Slashdot Mirror


Apple Tests Well in Education

wongaboo writes "Business Week has some interesting insights into Apples in schools. I remember when I was in K-6 an Apple was about the only computer you could find. Then in high school there were some PC's around but it was still mostly Apple. In college is was just the reverse: all PC's and no Apples. Now they are giving kids in high school a laptop when they show up; will it be an Apple? Either way, it makes me want to be a kid again."

93 comments

  1. Good. by nepheles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This must be a good thing. At least they're getting started on a UNIX OS, and not contributing to the Windows hegemony.

    --
    ((lambda x ((x))) (lambda x ((x))))
    1. Re:Good. by ctr2sprt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From an average user's perspective, MacOS X has as much in common with UNIX as Windows XP does (absolutely nothing). It's extremely disingenuous to claim that casual familiary with MacOS X results in casual familiarity with UNIX. The similarities between the two are almost exclusively beneath the hood, so to speak, and far beyond the reach of all but the most advanced users.

    2. Re:Good. by MrTangent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's not entirely true. With Unix under the hood, the casual user still has access to Unix attributes; namely, Apache. With one click in the System Preferences, even the most naive user can set up an Apache-driven website right from their Macintosh. There's not a lot of other Unixes that make it so easy to set up Apache.

    3. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From an average user's perspective, MacOS X has as much in common with UNIX as Windows XP does (absolutely nothing). It's extremely disingenuous to claim that casual familiary with MacOS X results in casual familiarity with UNIX.


      You are correct that for the average user this is true, but it does open up a whole new world for the curious or power user. It is easy to get to a command prompt and almost all open-source software of any quality has been ported and is easily installed. lots of free X-window software (most all apps you find on linux)


      I am a happy convert. I got a mac last year for the first time and I could be happier with it. I am a software engineer in a Unix world. The great thing about the mac is that I have all of my programming tools that I am used to in Unix, some open-source productivity applications, and access to great commercial applications.


      </end_surmon-like_rant>

    4. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those underhood similarities are entirely useful though - and i'd argue that this is even more a selling point for apple in education, as it suitable for those that might care about such things (or would be interested to learn more) and those who just want to use powerpoint or excel. or shake. :)

    5. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the average user may know not why.
      but Mac os X introduces them to basic ideas of users, admin and other features that improve security and reduce virus attack

    6. Re:Good. by jc42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Remember that we're talking about schools here. Schools are supposed to educate.

      Granted, 90% of the students aren't going to look past the surface cosmetics, any more than they'll ever learn much in their math or history classes.

      But for the minority that wants to learn, OSX is open to them in a way that isn't remotely possible with MS Windows. They can dig as deep into the system as they like, and except for a few proprietary apps, the underlying system is accessible.

      Maybe in your office, the sysadmin corwd wants to keep you ignorant and at their mercy. But in a halfway decent school, closed system should be avoided for a very good reason: It's their job to help their students become educated. They need computers that can be opened up and studied.

      Of course, a really good school will have a variety of computers. Even a few Windows boxes, so that the students can compare their design and construction with the others that are available. But OSX, linux and *BSD should probably be the workhorses, since those are the ones that are accessible to the students.

      (And note that I haven't even mentioned quality. In an educational setting, bad examples are just as useful as good examples. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:Good. by Gsus411 · · Score: 1

      Apache isn't exactly a "Unix attribute." I know people who run it on Windows natively.

    8. Re:Good. by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point is that this doesn't give the user any practical familiarity with unix. They may not even learn the name "Apache" from this experience. The opportunity is there, but I don't see any students (except those with a predisposition to hacking) learning anything particularly unixy from using Macs.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    9. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many people run websites from their home computers? I'm sure it is a little higher than the zero that I know, but not much higher.

    10. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      UNIX as in "using a trademark name as a marketing tool without permission".

      The fine folks at Apple are nothing but a bunch of scumbags.

    11. Re:Good. by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      but then again this is an article about computing in education and most modern campuses have ethernet to the dorm so not realy "home computers". Let's not forget that modern wired university campuses gave rise to the popularity of mp3 files.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    12. Re:Good. by tobycat · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, there was little that could be done to keep me from tinkering under the hood whenever I was given access to a computer. My natural curiosity led me to the "advanced" features right away. Something about not liking the idea that the "grown ups" had hidden away features and functionality rubbed me the wrong way. I suspect a lot of kids are like that. In this reaspect, then, the fact that UNIX is under the hood in Mac OS X is a good thing. Open up the terminal window and your're right there. If I was a kid now, I'd probably discover the terminal within a day or two. Something to keep in mind: kids like exploring. Even more important to keep in mind: kids generally lilke to push boundaries. If there's a part of a computer OS that's off limits, they are gonna try to go there and tinker with it. Guaranteed.

  2. Around here.. by hookedup · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The public school board offers a curriculum which involves all students to have a laptop, specifically an iBook. Apparently the kids take rather well to them too. When I was speaking to one of their techs, he told me they recieve less calls for help since they've made the mac 'switch'.

    I would have assumed it'd be the other way around, since the kids were already used to windows.

    1. Re:Around here.. by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Virii and spyware kill Windows machines stone dead.

      Apple will have to increase their market share by 400% or more before it proves truly worthwhile to make a Mac virus designed to spread virulently, or to write Mac spyware programs.

      There is so much spyware under Windows that even the anti-spyware applications aren't keeping pace. And of course multiple spyware applications on the same PC do their best to stomp on each other, creating an environment more like a war zone than anything else.

      Because Safari is not "an integral part of the operating system", it can't be used to install software and therefore you cannot manipulate it to install things automatically without the system asking for a root password. This is a huge advantage of the Mac over Windows security-wise, so even if the Mac were to gain ground over Windows it would still be a lot harder to plant unwanted software in a machine.

      Microsoft was downright stupid to make their software update mechanism rely on using their browser instead of a standalone update application, as is done on the Mac. Being able to update software through the web means that, well, anyone can do it.

      All of this makes Macintosh support a walk in the park compared to Windows' walk in the ghetto.

      D

    2. Re:Around here.. by pvt_medic · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember in high school all the student computers were Macs, all the administrative computers were PCs. A couple of the students who complained about the enequalness of this were allowed to help out the computer dept with keeping computers running. The arguments ended quite quickly when they saw how easier it was to maintain the macs despite the heavy abuse they took from students.

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    3. Re:Around here.. by johkir · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would have assumed it'd be the other way around, since the kids were already used to windows. ...so they were very adept at ctrl-alt-del X2

      --
      These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Around here.. by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      I was in charge of upkeep in the Mac Computer Lab at my high school (1986-1988) We had a bunch of II+ and IIgs and some others. The only problems I had were with the goddamn AppleWriter printers. Of course everybody used the hell out of them with BroderBund PrintShop making dumb-ass banners. Ah, the memories...

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    5. Re:Around here.. by obeythefist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's an amazing argument you got there.
      Allow me to paraphrase.

      "Macs are great, because nobody uses them, so nobody bothers to write viruses for them. Ergo, Mac PCs are more secure than Windows PCs."

      And your supporting argument is:

      "Windows has spyware."

      The only reason Windows has a lot of spyware is, firstly, as you rightly pointed out, people (plural of the small handful of persons that are Mac users) actually use Windows, making it a target. The spyware isn't bundled with the O/S, it's installed there by incapable users (the ones who are still on Windows and haven't Switched so they can be incompetent but don't need to worry about rightclicking anymore)

      Couple this with the lack of an SOE or the rampant use of IE instead of a decent multiplatform browser like Mozilla or Opera, and of course you're going to have problems, problems that are very easily fixed by revoking admin access and using virus checkers and spyware scanners.

      Microsoft is actively removing the very last of the serious issues with Windows. Windows XPSP2 is including a firewall, and they're obscuring the elements of MSIE that allow one-click spyware installs, and enabling CPU buffer overflow checking for AMD64 processors. They're replacing most of the old VB code with bufferchecked .NET code.

      But if you really, really want security, why would you even contemplate a closed source OS? Linux is open source. Linux is secure because the OS community continually works to make it so. Microsoft, even Microsoft is admitting that security through obscurity does not work, so they're bundling firewalls and A/V software in Windows now. But Apple seems to believe that security through obscurity is the way to go.

      Who would you trust?

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    6. Re:Around here.. by wfisher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hold on. I thought Apple does not believe in security through obscurity, that's the whole point of having an open source kernel. Windows does not release any of there code while Apple's Darwin is completely open source. Of course the GUI and applications can't be open source because they'd have a hard time selling it then. What else of Apple's do you expect to be open source? All the security, correct me if I'm wrong, is based in the kernel if not in the open source utilities the kernel employs like the firewall (ipchains?) etc. Or maybe you just wrote it backwards.

      -Will

    7. Re:Around here.. by NSash · · Score: 1
      I remember in high school all the student computers were Macs, all the administrative computers were PCs.

      Why were all the administrative computers PCs?

    8. Re:Around here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the iniquities?

      the inegality?

    9. Re:Around here.. by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, much of OS X is open-source (it's called Darwin)... especially the most security-vulnerable parts: those exposed to the network.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:Around here.. by javax · · Score: 1
      Windows has Spyware"

      because on Windows - in contrast to Linux, BSD and MacOS - you have to install lots of applications to make the system useful.
      Windows just has no good software included: You need
      • Firewall
      • Browser
      • Movie-Player (divx..) or at least codec pac
      • Music Player (everyone I know uses winamp, not Windows Media Player)
      • PDF Viewer
      • ...
      Heck, you even need an Editor because Notepad is really crap.
      Thats why there is succesful spyware on Windows, and because you have to install all this crap with your Administrator rights!
      Linux Distributions do have their rpm/dpkg vaults and BSD/MacOS do have ports collections that solve this problem of small (or larger) helper apps.
    11. Re:Around here.. by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      true but the people running Darwin w/out Aqua are few and far between.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    12. Re:Around here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Few, yes. Far between, probably not.

      I think the two of them are in the same room.

    13. Re:Around here.. by byolinux · · Score: 1

      That's true to a degree, but does that really matter?

      I mean, if the sources are available, people can check them, without having to actually be running the software all the time, right? An install would be useful, but not crucial.

      I'm sure not all the people who exploit Windows run it.

  3. My old high school by Kethinov · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My old high school dropped all their PCs for OSX Macs the year after I graduated. On one hand I was pleased, but on the other hand I was kind of pissed. It's as if they were waiting for me to leave!

    Sarcasm and conspiracy aside, I'm glad that so many schools are realizing the benefits of upgrading their pre osx Macs and/or replacing their PCs. The world needs more *nix and less wintel.

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  4. NYC public schools and Microsoft by andy666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In district 26 in Queens, the school board refused to let schools buy Apples, even when the entire school was in favor of it.

    1. Re:NYC public schools and Microsoft by physicsnerd · · Score: 1
      Do you (or anyone else of course) have any more info about this? I'd like to read up on it.

      Thanks,

      Physicsnerd

    2. Re:NYC public schools and Microsoft by kommakazi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the people in your district need to vote those bastards off the school board come elections?

    3. Re:NYC public schools and Microsoft by irokitt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you know, they do cost more. What you need to do is convince the board that they will save money in the long run. Or, like the above poster suggested, fire them come elections.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    4. Re:NYC public schools and Microsoft by zenwaves · · Score: 2, Informative

      When did this occur? I did have to convince people, but I managed to have my school's lab upgraded to Macs last February. http://schools.nycenet.edu/region3/ps133/pages/com puterlab.html Now if HP would just release RIP software for my Designjet . . . Jon

  5. Waste. by Daleks · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Giving kids in school a laptop is a waste. Studies have been done that show using Word with spell/grammar check is a detriment. Also, the students will most likely browse the web or IM each other during class. Computers in the classroom are more of a distraction than anything else.

    1. Re:Waste. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Studies have been done that show using Word with spell/grammar check is a detriment.

      What methodology was used? can you cite sources?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Waste. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 3, Funny

      --Studies have been done that show using Word with spell/grammar check is a detriment.

      --What methodology was used? can you cite sources

      He's extrapolating upon the 'Calculators are a detriment to slide rule skills' research conducted back in the 70's.

      Which, if you'll recall, dates all the way back to the 'Pointy sticks are a detriment to bludgeoning-with-rocks skills' study of 20,000 BCE.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    3. Re:Waste. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Studies have been done that show using Word with spell/grammar check is a detriment.

      What methodology was used? can you cite sources?

      Slashdot... The methodology, the source, and the documented results!

    4. Re:Waste. by Daleks · · Score: 1

      Here is an article on a study done by the University of Pittsburg.

    5. Re:Waste. by irokitt · · Score: 1

      "Dammit, when I went to school we had to use a slide rule!

      Sorry, couldn't resist, you almost sound like my Dad there...

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    6. Re:Waste. by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That was a study done with 33 participants proofreading a single page letter loaded with errors that Word could not catch. I'm talking about what the parent was implying; that it causes a reliance upon those tools and a long term inability to write without those tool and/or lesser ability to write in general.

      This study does show that people are willing to trust the software over their own abilities, but that's a different issue.

      And I'm not taking a position for or against spellcheckers helping or harming students. I have seen it cited as a 'well known fact' too often, and I wonder if there is any real legitimacy. I also ask about the methodology because you can find a limited or just plain bad study to prove just about anything.

      --
      Evan "Grad students! They produce every fact you'll ever need to cite!"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:Waste. by alikat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you think that the only thing that students are using their laptops for is to type up reports in Word? There is a LOT more that goes on in schools with Student Laptop Programs than just composition, though increasing writing is an important part of improving student achievement.
      A number of recent studies have shown that 1:1 laptop ratios can have a very positive effect on student achievement rates (as well as increasing student engagement, reducing drop-out rates and school truancy...)

      If you implement right (plan it fully, have professional development ready for teachers, fully communicate to students AND parents what appropriate use is for the machine - e.g. no games, no IM, etc. - and enforce it), laptops can positively impact schools.

      Sources:
      Detroit Free Press
      New York Times
      Montana Associated Technology Roundtables
      Public Policy Institute: Laptop for Every Student?

    8. Re:Waste. by misterpies · · Score: 1

      The difference between using a calculator and a spell/grammar check is that if you use it correctly, a calculator will give you the correct answer. MS Word, on the other hand, will take a perfectly well-written sentence and destroy it. I use many words that aren't covered by the spellcheck; I use many constructions that Word considers ungrammatical. Fortunately I know enough to know when I'm right and Word is wrong, but most kids will be scared by those wiggly green lines. They will end up being stylistic pygmies, scared to ever use a passive or write a sentence containing more than three clauses. Microsoft-approved style may be fine for helping semiliterate employees write reports, but it's woefully inadequate for students learning to write creatively.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  6. K-6? by aduzik · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's been a few years since I've been in the K-6 category, but can anyone else remember doing anything truly educational with computers in grade school? They tried to teach us typing -- "tried" being the operative word -- throwing out a couple of dozen decent typewriters in favor of Apples with typing software.

    Don't get me wrong: I'm a Mac lover through and through, but looking back on it, I've always felt that the money could have been better spent elsewhere -- like fixing the dilapidated building we called a school. I went to a Catholic school where the textbooks were in terrible condition, the desks literally fell apart from time to time, and the "heater" keep the rooms at a balmy 55-60 degrees. But we had a bright, modern computer lab with lots o' Macs that we used for, well, nothing much, really.

    By the time I made it to eighth grade -- yes, grades K-8 were all in one building... sigh -- the computers were so woefully out of date that they couldn't use them for anything more than teaching typing.

    I've read a couple of studies recently that demonstrate that tech education for grade/middle-schoolers really doesn't benefit them much in the long run, given what they try to teach the kids, particularly when one considers the expense such education naturally engenders. Just about any educational software marketed to schools can be easily replicated by much cheaper (gasp) low-tech tools.

    I think the highschoolers on up can benefit a lot more from technology, and computers are so ubiquitous in the home these days that it's not like they'll get to high school and have never seen one of these glowing boxes before. I have friends with kids who are in fourth grade or higher and who read well below grade-level, but they have plenty of access to technology at school. All this technology won't do them any good if they don't have the education to use it. Computers are just a tool -- bicycles for the brain, as Steve Jobs once said -- but you've got to know how to ride first, and where you want to go.

    Although, none of us will deny that Number Munchers was hella fun :-)

    --
    If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    1. Re:K-6? by mdarksbane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't the idea of teaching computing at an early age, it's that of all the teachers in the school, maybe one understands more than how to check their email.

      My mother teachers at a k-6 school in a low-income neighborhood. Their text books are ancient, but thanks to a state grant, every room has five top of the line computers (for 20 elementary students). I look at that and say, WONDERFUL. I would have LOVED to have that technology in class.

      Then I look at how thick the dust is on them. The kids only use them during play time, or indoor recess to play educational games. The teachers use it for email.. maybe, half the time not even that. To many of them, the concept of double-clicking is as confusing as calculus would be to their students. The teachers don't use the computers to teach anything, especially not computing, and therefore they are a waste.

      If schools want to invest money in computers, they should invest something into teacher training and make technology PART OF THE CURRICULUM. Teachers don't know computers because they don't care, and so they don't, won't, and can't teach them. They don't see technology, or in elementary, often even science, as important. And so.. the kids get $1500 game systems that they can use twice a day, and they learn how to click a mouse. Woohoo.

    2. Re:K-6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read a couple of studies recently that demonstrate that tech education for grade/middle-schoolers really doesn't benefit them much in the long run, given what they try to teach the kids, particularly when one considers the expense such education naturally engenders.

      Where can I find those studies? Are you a teacher or are your kids starting school soon? I'm interested in that kind of info, because I see gradeschoolers first-hand that benefit from having computers available.

    3. Re:K-6? by amsr · · Score: 1

      Dude, I can recite every stop on the Oregon trail. I can't say that for much else I did in elementary school. (Except maybe reading). Now thats what I call learning.

    4. Re:K-6? by superflippy · · Score: 1

      You make some good points. I recently helped work on some software for a teacher technology training program here in SC. At the time, I wondered about the usefulness of the program, since it didn't seem to be teaching the teachers much beyond the basics and seemed to me to be just another administrative burden on already overworked teachers. But it hadn't occurred to me that a lot of the teachers might need this training in order to use the equipment in their classrooms and bring them up to speed with their students.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    5. Re:K-6? by zenwaves · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm teaching 5th graders to make their own sites with Adobe GoLive, my 4th graders are using Photoshop, and all of the students from 3rd grade up are checking their test scores online.

      See our work:
      http://www.ps133q.org

      But there are teachers like the one described by the previous poster. Most "computer teachers" come equipped only with an education in Education! They must learn all of their tech skills on the job. Now picture an older person with a family (not my case) thrust into that position, and you will sometimes get the situation described above.

      It's partially a generational experience - the younger teachers coming in are more familiar (though not necessarily knowledgeable) with computers. Technology coursework needs to be a mandated requirement in all MS Ed programs.

      Jon

    6. Re:K-6? by robert.short · · Score: 1

      We do a great deal with our iBooks including data analysis via spreadsheets, lab interfaces with chemical experiments, lab interfaces with biological elements such as EKG, basic programming in PHP, mySQL, RealBasic and Applescript. We also teach students basics in common file formats so they don't fall into the Office Suite expense/upgrade trap. The computers are also used of course for extensive multimedia use with photography and movies as well as presentations. We do quite a lot with photoshop as well. Additionally, the techniques we teach concerning how to "mine data" from the internet are quite valuable and MUST be taught for our children to stay competitive. Understanding how to get good information back from a google or Yahoo search is critical and involves some great lessons in knowledge evaluation such as analyzing the source, analyzing your own internal bias and analyzing the article for internal logic consistency! We do all of this and couldn't do it without the computers. Also, we have had a significant cost savings in text books because so much of the info we need for our lesson plans is on line. Years ago we worried about buying many copies of encylopedia CD's now we flit about the internet grabbing high quality diagrams and bits of useful info. It is a really exciting time to be a teacher.

  7. Take the red pill by awtbfb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They run hardly any software, and once you get into the real world, your Mac skills are worthless because Macs are few and far between out there.

    The world is not just first person computer games.

    1. Re:Take the red pill by cosmo7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please inform the Mac developers who are reading of the Windows applications that are not available (or have equivalents) for Macintosh. You can be specific or describe categories.

      Seriously, it would be very useful. I've been researching this for the last two weeks and have still yet to find a good market niche. If on the other hand you are simply trolling, please excuse my reply.

    2. Re:Take the red pill by astrodawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming you are not just out of high school... how similar is what you do with computers now to what you did in school?

      For me, any skills I learned beyond typing and using a mouse were completely useless in the real world. The computing world changes very quickly.

      COMP101 is not MS101 nor should it be.

    3. Re:Take the red pill by xtal · · Score: 1

      Please inform the Mac developers who are reading of the Windows applications that are not available (or have equivalents) for Macintosh. You can be specific or describe categories.

      I own many computers including an Al powerbook, I'm a big supporter, I love OSX, but please:

      There is no professional CAD software for Mac. Think Unigraphics, Solidworks, AutoCAD. There are some cad programs, but these have more in common with the Gimp than Photoshop.

      There is no professional EDA software for Mac. Think OrCAD, not Electronics Workbench.

      There is no support for lab equipment for Mac.

      There is no support for almost any motor or industrial control. You can do stuff in C though, close enough.

      Matlab is a big win, but those are some very big misses for Apple. It is in industry where apple needs to make inroads. The home market is about on par. The platform is capable; the vendors are weary.

      --
      ..don't panic
    4. Re:Take the red pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no professional CAD software for Mac. Think Unigraphics, Solidworks, AutoCAD. There are some cad programs, but these have more in common with the Gimp than Photoshop.



      Check out VectorWorks

    5. Re:Take the red pill by xtal · · Score: 1

      Vectorworks is not Solidworks. Not even CLOSE.

      --
      ..don't panic
    6. Re:Take the red pill by amsr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They run hardly any software, and once you get into the real world, your Mac skills are worthless because Macs are few and far between out there.

      Yeah and my computer skills I learned on an Apple IIe and commodore 64 when I was a kid are holding me back. Face it, by the time kids in first grade today get into the working world, computers as we know it will be radically different. Its not the actual programs that you learn that is valuable, its the general skills that can be transfered to any "computer".

  8. Open Source K-6 Texts by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Schools could make better use of their investment in computers by using open-source textbooks or a wiki-like curriculum content system. Seems like a bunch of teachers could put together a great set of tools (like these college calculus texts) and eliminate the cost of paper textbooks.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  9. Nod... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know of any company that standardizes cross platform office applications such as Microsoft Office or Open Office. Why at coke they use Coca a Cola Word, which runs only on WIndows Machines that are operated by coke drinking users.

  10. My experience in an Apple laptop high school prog by HongPong · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I graduated from high school in 2001. My senior year, my private K-12 prep school in St. Paul MN, Mounds park academy, started an apple iBook program (only grades 9-12) that continues today. Despite my fervent support of Macs, i was dead set against the program because i thought it was an expensive distraction. (we also started horrible block scheduling the year before, which drove me nuts). We got the Clamshell models, but these have now been replaced by the white iBooks. (software licensing was WAY expensive)

    Overall it was useless much of the time, but it also taught everyone in our class the fundamentals of TCP/IP, an important skill in the Modern Age. As we were seniors, the administration didn't pick on us too much, but they tried very hard to crack down on the younger kids, particularly boys. They didn't want people installing games, of course, but they also decided to ban the use of the CD-ROM drives, a bizarrely unenforceable rule given that we took the computers home every day (these rules are No More). Since the Techs would often erase a computer as a first resort when fixing it (spotting warez along the way), I had to step in and deal with things all the time.

    There was a real problem with understanding how the "private space" of an object owned by the school actually worked. I recall being commanded not to tell people that the MacOS had a handy "Encrypt..." command in the File menu.

    The unfortunate irony of the program was that the kids who were formerly the most obedient in school--ie the geek types--were placed in a position of violating rules left and right if they wanted to set up their computers in a comfortable sort of way with the usual warez etc. So the good kids got in trouble, and some otherwise harmless guys basically got caught in enforcement feedback loops that disheartened or chased them right out of the school.

    Also it was interesting to run AirPort packet sniffing and watch AIM conversations and unencrypted email passwords. Since then, instant messengers have been blocked. There were a lot of technical snags that year--infuriating and time wasting. As I tend to be easily distracted sometimes, the magic boxes were all too tempting.

    One of the best moments was when I made a comment on Slashdot about AirPort packet sniffing at the very beginning of Statistics class, and by the end of class it reached the vaunted 5, joy of joys.

    The older iBooks had kind of crummy CD trays, where the outer plastic shell would break off too easily, not to mention all the cracked screens. Generally students have to pay for all replacements and repairs, which are very expensive. Power cords get lost frequently, and laptops have been stolen from time to time.

    We had a rather moody senior class, and it was disheartening to come into our senior lounge to see everyone silent inside the screens, oftentimes communicating by AIM across the room to make furtive conspiracies. Did we trade off natural interaction for this cold mode of operation?

    Fortunately, the subsequent classes of kids adjusted to the laptops more socially, and they have not "run amok" in that sense. However, where the old geek population that was there when i was a freshman was more rebellious and linux oriented, these new geeks are very obedient, obnoxious condescending bitches, according to my younger brother and sister who are now sophomores at the school.

    The whole program was driven by an urge to keep MPA at the cutting edge of innovation bla bla bla. I was really impressed by teachers who came up with innovative ideas but i really wished we didn't have to be the damn guinea pigs. I started my website in those days, and it was fun to have everyone reading it all the time, but then when i got uncontrollably angry i said hasty things and got in big trouble. Hazards of the new territory.

  11. Lick My Blue Balls by MarcQuadra · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People like you piss me off. Macs run the core software needed in the education and office environments.

    I work in a school, our Macs run almost all the same software that the PCs do, they last 40% longer 'in the field' than the PCs, and we haven't had a SINGLE virus-infected Mac since 1999. Macs run the GNU tools, which are unarguably the BEST tools for those of us who can be productive on the command line.

    I do hardware repairs too, but in the last four months I've only had to do one hardware repair out of 230 Macs in operation. The PC guy is SWIMMING in broken PCs, he does three or four each day, on 600 PCs in operation.

    As for skills, your Windows skills aren't going to be worth jack-shit either, Microsoft wants to totally alter the face and philosophy of computing from what we know today. Most training in the office is with custom apps and databases anyway, and no amount of time using a Windows box will help you with "Bob From Accounting's Really Cool Purchasing Database".

    Computer skills are totally transferable. I watch kids everyday walk in between Windows and Mac labs, doing what they do. Maybe someone in their 30s or 40s would have trouble switching after 20 years of use, but kids these days, this upcoming generation, they can use anything with buttons.

    As for Mac skills being worthless, no skill is worthless. I set up a computer for a friend last year with Linux and KDE on it, she never had a computer before, she's 25. She just got a job with Windows/Office this week and the only thing she called me about was to verify that cutting and pasting were 'different on windows'. She can lay out a table or make a chart just as easily as the next guy who's been using Office for three years.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by aduzik · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I *used* to own a PC. When I was an undergrad CS major, I became, as many nerdy college boys do, enthralled with Linux. But one of my profs had a spiffy (then-new) WallStreet PowerBook. When he opened up a shell and did all the things I was doing with Linux, then popped over to Mozilla (these were the pre-Safari days, remember) to show us something else, I fell in love. It had the glitz and glamour I loved, with a very powerful engine inside.

      Long story short, I dumped my PC, got me a PowerBook, and haven't looked back since. I can run gcc, vim, and all those great *NIX tools we all can't live without, and I have access to all those allegedly vitally important Windows applications because they have Mac equivalents. It's the best of both worlds! Best of all, I've never had to have it fixed. Every PC I've ever had has had to either go back to the manufacturer so they can "repair" something I could easily do myself if they'd give me the parts, or I've had to replace some ridiculous card or something myself.

      Seriously, though, anything you'd really want to do on a PC -- word processing, spreadsheet stuff, presentations, programming, RDBMS, etc., you can do just as well -- usually better -- on a Mac.

      Oh my God, I sound like one of those friggin' "Switch" ads. Maybe mine could go, "My name is Alex, and I post on slashdot." And yes, I still can use Linux (w00t) -- I installed YellowDog so I can switch it up every now and then -- and (shudder) Windows with equal facility.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    2. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got beat up a lot, didn't you?

    3. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by aduzik · · Score: 1
      Did you always have this feeling in the back of your mind that you were a homosexual, or did you wake up one day and realize that this was the way you are?

      Um, I think the feeling was always there, but how does my computer preference have anything to do with my sexual preference? I guess the "gay jokes" don't really work on a gay guy, now do they?

      I'm not knocking PC's -- or PC users, for that matter -- I just think that Macs are a better investment: they hold up better and run the most kick-ass OS I've ever seen. I'm also not a gamer, so that's not a concern for me. To each his own, I guess.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    4. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sexual preference has nothing to do with your computer preference. It does show in your post however. While I am not really into social interaction, I do observe people. I could have made a cheap gay joke anywhere, but I had a theory and wanted to see if I was correct. It was probably in bad taste, but it was the first time I've done such things and probably won't be the last. Anyway, I'll go away now.

    5. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I've been punched in the face a few times, but nothing serious.

    6. Re:Lick My Blue Balls by aduzik · · Score: 1
      Well, alas, you got modded down because you came off as a homophobe, even though your comment had some decent content. If I worried about what every person on the Internet thought of me, I'd yank the cable out of the wall and never go near it again. Congratulations on the good gaydar, though.

      Ironically, my boyfriend won't use my Mac. When he wants to check his email at my place, he fires up the ancient PC to use (snicker) Internet Explorer... He hates when I ask him why he can't just use Safari or Internet Explorer on the Mac. I think it's just the devil he knows. I'm convinced that's why lots of people stick with PC's.

      P.S. -- Are even my posts gay-sounding? Christ! The one place I think I sound butch from time to time! Also, you should try the social interaction thing sometime. It's great!

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
  12. Interesting... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Worth $68 million over four years, it calls for HP to provide laptops to as many as 132,000 middle-school students in the Wolverine State.

    I really do wonder how Michigan schools tech support are going to keep their heads on their bodies after this.

    Personal experience tells me; How many students will install Mozilla? Will these computers be running XP? Will they be up to date? Patched? How many of them will click "yes" whenever something comes up as they're surfing the Internet? How much of that software will break the computer? When viruses invade (you know... ones that come in through Outlook that the virus companies haven't quite caught yet) how many computers will break? Spam other computers? How many 6th graders know not to open the attachment? How many would do it anyway?

    To each company I will give their own (read: Macs have problems too), but... for as long as I've had a Mac, I haven't had to deal with the above. And for as long as I've given over Windows systems to my parents, I sure as hell have.

    1. Re:Interesting... by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

      Running windows gurentees that they'll catch most of the smut surfers by the adware they'll accumulate.

  13. Ease of programming by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    Are any of Apple's APIs popular in the schools? The AppKit is easy to use, but, having graduated from high school after the whole graphing calculator craze, I must confess I don't know much about the pedagogical effects of teaching simulation building to students.

  14. Re:Kiss My Red Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would say I have sufficient computer skills. Since I know the difference between the command and control keys, I would do just fine. You, on the other hand, are one of those slimy assholes that just likes to pick a fight. You really should just fuck off. If by design houses you meant Genentech or NASA's JPL or thousands of other non-design businesses and universities, then you are just retarded. Sad but true.

  15. Re:Bio-IT World Conference features Apple Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DG World Expo's Bio-IT World Conference + Expo returns to Boston, Mass. later this month. The event will feature key players in the Life Sciences and IT markets including Apple, who will be featured in several presentations.

    The event features an exhibit floor where dozens of vendors will show off their latest wares to IT professionals, researchers and scientists who work in the life sciences market. The exhibit floor features a "Technology Demonstration Theater" open to all show attendees where several vendors will provide demonstrations and details about their solutions. Participants in the area include IBM, EMC Corp., Hewlett-Packard and others, including Apple and Apple-related vendors.

    On Thursday, April 1 at 11:30, Liz Kerr, Ph.D., will offer a presentation called "Apple Solutions for Life Science: Power, Innovation and Value." Kerr is Apple's Director, SciTech Markets. And following Kerr's presentation is "Apple Workgroup Cluster for Bioinformatics," presented by Apple Xserve product marketing manger Doug Brooks and William Van Etten, Ph.D., founding partner and principal investigator at The BioTeam.

    Bio-IT World Conference + Expo happens March 30 - April 1, 2004 at Boston's Hynes Convention Center.

  16. Re:My experience in an Apple laptop high school pr by dema · · Score: 2

    The unfortunate irony of the program was that the kids who were formerly the most obedient in school--ie the geek types--were placed in a position of violating rules left and right if they wanted to set up their computers in a comfortable sort of way with the usual warez etc.

    Am I reading this wrong, or are you saying that people who pirate are "good" people?

  17. Apple need to make more effort than this though... by GrahamCox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here in Australia, Apple appear to be doing next to nothing to sell computers to schools, colleges and universities.

    The other day I went to a poorly advertised "iMall" at our local university. I wasn't sure what to expect, but it wasn't this: a few rickety tables, with one iBook and one iMac, both running GarageBand. A lot of leaflets, iPod badges and a free draw to win an iPod. All the signs were scrawled in marker pen on bits of photocopy paper and sellotaped to the desk. A couple of geeky students were there to "sell" the systems, but instead hogged the two machines making music loops. Anyone wandering past would a) think it was a jumble sale and b) would be put off because there wasn't an actual machine to try out. I couldn't see the point of it, and doubt very much if it led to even one sale. I left very disappointed and pretty miffed at Apple for their lack of effort.

    This same uni has about a 40% Mac usage among its staff overall. There is a strong Mac following here, but it's totally thanks to staff who are able to specify their own PCs.

    The other day I met a lecturer at our local TAFE (further ed college). He teaches film and cinematography. Thanks to his own efforts, he has got two labs installed with Macs, an iMac lab for general still and basic work, and a G5 lab for Final Cut Pro. Where was Apple? Nowhere, he did all of this off his own bat. The rest of the college has PCs for all the courses they run, including desktop publishing and graphics arts courses, where they use Photoshop, Illustrator, et al - all traditional programs that are strong on the Mac. Apple Australia should be convincing TAFEs to use Macs for these courses - it's what many of these students will find in industry after all (well maybe, eventually those students will say, Oh, I used a PC for this at college, let's buy a PC). Get Macs into schools and TAFEs now, and industrial sales will pick up later. I just don't see Apple doing it here.

    Another lecturer I know at a university in Sydney recently told me that after a recent policy change, there are now no Macs at all left for general student use in the uni. The only ones remaining are those that particular staff have clung on to because they refuse to have a PC. Even he, a long-time Mac fan, has had to buy a Dell laptop so he can use the same software that his students are using, and he says it's a backward step because he now has far more issues with stuff failing to work, and many projects such as creating QuickTime panoramas and so on has become a lot more long-winded and difficult. Has Apple lifted a finger to slow or reverse this trend? Not according to him, and the evidence speaks for itself.

    It seems to me that Apple succeeds in its small way despite itself. It's enthusiastic users who make Apple sales in education, not Apple. At least not in Australia. I'm starting to think that the Apple Australia sales office doesn't exist - or maybe it's like a spidery old dusty corner in a building that no-one has bothered to enter in years. For fuck's sake, it's about time you made an effort guys!

  18. Re:My experience in an Apple laptop high school pr by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    I recall being commanded not to tell people that the MacOS had a handy "Encrypt..." command in the File menu.

    Wait...what? Is this still around on Panther, or was it completely replaced by filevault?

  19. Re:Apple need to make more effort than this though by hatter10_6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree with the above post. Apple in Australia is not doing much, despite many opportunities to act.

    I am currently working on some bioinformatic projects at a university in Sydney. With the need to use commercial software (e.g. Word and EndNote) and open source bioinformatic tools, I can't imagine doing this without OS X. Sometimes, I come into contact with other people doing similar things, with similar opinions about OS X.

    Open Source is making quite an impression here on campus, with many students installing dual boot systems to learn about UNIX. However, these students often have problems getting onto the network and getting cross-compatibility between the two platforms installed on their computers. It really frustrates me to see other people getting frustrated when there are much easier solutions out there.

    The Apple store here on campus seems to enjoy itself too much. Recently they coated their store front with frosted glass. With all the Mac boxes inside, it now looks more like a warehouse than a shop. The two times that I visited the store weren't very good experiences, as the people behind the counter acted as if you have to beg them for responses. Apple really needs to do more.

  20. Re:Waste ... sort of by borkus · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Using a word processor just for spelling and grammar checking is the least of its advantages. The other advantage is using it to edit and rewrite. If you know how to use a word processor, you can go from "note cards" to finished paper in one document. You can also improve sentence structure, clarify your ideas and remove redundant words, clauses and phrases. Admittedly, you can do the same thing without a word processor. However, the software lets you avoid a lot of recopying or retyping.

    Unfortunately, many teachers don't know how to write that way with a word processor. Not to single out teachers, most business people don't know how to write period - word processor or not. Too often, people only use the word processor for the spell checker and for adding egregious quantities of bullets, fonts and tables.

  21. Re:Kiss My Red Ring by MarcQuadra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'd really have to be dumb to say 'Mac Skills' if you interviewed for ANY job. 'Computer Kills' are cross-platform, and using a Mac will get you quite far in Windows or Linux these days. The 'desktop' paradigm is cross-platform, file management and applications are the same on all platforms.

    You wouldn't say that you only know the British dialect of English if you applied, would you? Would that make your language skills useless in America?

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  22. Apple vs. Dell by nic+barajas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's funny how the article mentions Dell as the arch-nemesis of Apple in the education market, because at my district Dell took over for Apple. In my elementary days, you couldn't go around school without seeing an Apple in every classroom. But around the 5th grade, they switched to Dells. [tear]

    It made sense at the time, seeing as how the Apple computers were around a decade old; archaic next to a computer with Windows 95. (GUI -- wow!) But looking at the school situation now, it's terrible. The schools have been overloaded with Dells -- there must be three thousand machines in my high school alone (a school of about 1,600 students) with several thousand more in the remainder of the district.

    What's worse is that these machines are outdated for the most part. The district goes out every year and buys a new set of fifty to one hundred machines per school - the last was for a significant speed bump in the high school. Unfortunately, until this school year (my senior year) they had used Windows NT, meaning they had to go out and buy thousands of licenses for XP - a complete and utter waste of funds.

    I work as an editor for the school newspaper, and it's the opinion of the editorial staff that the time to move back to Apple is now. It's been proven that the longevity of Macs outweighs any PC, and they are more reliable than a PC in terms of security. I won't even delve into the amount of time/money spent on Internet blocking, virus problems, networking issues, etc. But you know how tech people in school districts can be -- ignorant fools who don't know enough about what they're in charge of.

  23. Re:My experience in an Apple laptop high school pr by Graymalkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    AFAIK Panther doesn't have single file encryption like OS9 did. You can however make an encrypted disk image with Disk Utility and stick sensitive files inside of that. File Vault is nice and all but it encrypts your entire home directory. I much prefer the encrypted directories on Windows 2000/XP. Simulating that feature on Panther isn't too difficult.

    Make an encrypted disk image of whatever size you'd like and keep it in your home directory. Set the permissions to 700. Mount the image and make an alias to it. From here you've two two options with different levels of security. The first is to make the disk image a login item. If you do this whenever you log in the image will be mounted and you can put files on it until you're blue in the face or it runs out of space. When you mount it you'll be prompted for your password, you can store the password in the keychain so it doesn't prompt you but that isn't very secure. The second option is to not make the disk image a start up item. Whenever you go to save something you the alias you created in your home directory and the image isn't mounted it will mount and prompt you for your password. Voila encrypted directory. For further coolness replace your Documents folder with alias to the image. encrypted Documents folder.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  24. well, then it's up to the schools and teachers by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    in school the students will be required to do what the teachers call for. if some teachers want to have students play with the command line then the students will learn it even exists. If a teacher wants to teach some basic Unix commands they can do that easily with existing hardware. Even if it's just a day here and there, the students will learn it is in there and may go home to play with it and if that gets a few more kids into learning... that's great. Even 10 years ago the college i went to still required you telnet into a unix machine to check your email. EVERY university student had to do it, so everyone learned some basic unix things. unfortunately those days are gone.

    as for Apache, Apple promotes the fact that Apache is in every copy of OS X. They don't hide Apache with a blue button called iServe or something. We are talking about schools with large networks and with OS X creating webpages is as easy as dropping your webpage files into a folder and turning on an option in prefs. in colleges with dorm networks that's even more common since the computers are more likely to be static.

    1. Re:well, then it's up to the schools and teachers by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      with OS X creating webpages is as easy as dropping your webpage files into a folder and turning on an option in prefs.

      And how, exactly, does doing this promote familiarity with Unix?

      I'm not saying that this is a Bad Thing. Setting up your computer to act as a web server should be this easy, and the typical user shouldn't need to know or care whether the daemon is Apache or thttpd or Sambar or WebStar, and a nice big hand to Apple for doing it. It's great that there's a command shell available for those few who will actually seek it out. But there's nothing about using a Mac that requires or actively promotes use of the shell. So putting students in front of a Mac doesn't automatically make them Unix-literate any more than putting them behind the wheel of a car teaches them anything about internal combustion engines.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:well, then it's up to the schools and teachers by log0n · · Score: 1

      If the schools had their way they wouldn't allow students to access the command line.

      Disclaimer: I work for a public school system.

    3. Re:well, then it's up to the schools and teachers by technomagesteve · · Score: 1

      My school did have their way, and disabled the terminal after I used it to SSH my way onto IRC to pass the free time I tend to have in their tech classes. Boy were they pissed when I found a way to enable it again...
      Anywho, they've been swiching most of the computers with newer eMacs, and upgrading a few from 9 to X. They keep most/all of the UNIX stuff off limits out of fear of some cureious or destructive student, It's awful...

    4. Re:well, then it's up to the schools and teachers by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Do they use passwords on OpenFirmware? I'm just thinking about what would prevent a student from resetting a password on the machine, ie. root?

  25. A clarification by HongPong · · Score: 1

    After thinking about the experience some more, I have to add a few more things. Firstly my bro and sis never refer to the tech kids today as "bitches" as such (i shouldnt have put that), but they have been treated very rudely and it upset them. It makes me angry since I have to deal with the public in a computer lab, and I always try to be very polite, it upsets me when these kids deem their knowledge and their positions to somehow elevate them from common courtesy and all that.

    Also I would say that the adults on staff have mostly tried to be basically good people, trying to make the program work. What they were principally concerned about was *legal liability* arising from what kids might do with the laptops. The school program was supposed to be an example, but what if the RIAA came in trying to make an example by finding thousands of illegal Mp3s etc on the computers? The school feared it, which is a great deal of what drove them to control things.

    As i sit here and try to recall what we actually legitimately did in class on the computers, it seems rather dim now. It meant we didn't have to truck down to the overcrowded computer labs every time that we wanted to look up information. Also it meant we were obligated to check our email once a day. Oftentimes it really devolved into a lot of Powerpoint presentations, and I just don't like that program very much.

    On the plus side, it makes it a lot easier for my siblings to write papers and that kind of thing now, because they don't have to fight over the family computer. There are, for example, Spanish and French teaching programs on the computers as well.

    It was good in the sense that it gave everyone some level of technical proficiency, but it was profoundly irritating and unpleasant for the kids who didn't like computers that much or hated Macs in general. There were not a ton of Mac converts from the class, in particular because of the hardware failures.

    Perhaps this is the future of education, I really don't know. It was a very stressful adjustment, but since that year the administration has allowed the kids more space--and blocked instant messenger, which is probably a good idea in the long run. (see "furtive conspiracies" above)

    Would it help public school kids get ahead, especially considering how their families may not have the technical resources like mine did? That's a pretty good question. I feel sorry for all those kids with the new Dells, though. Dells are sooo unreliable, hahahaha Michael Dell you have such an inferiority complex against Steve Jobs, and there's nothing you can do to overcome it.

  26. Re:My experience in an Apple laptop high school pr by HongPong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm pointing out that the ones with the real computer skills were generally the least problematic in school before the program started, but they also used whatever software they could find at home. With the program in place, these kids would still bring the software into the school, to the alarm of an adminstration fearing the BSA. So the program put them in that position... The same kids who were copying things were the ones who tended to help out when the computers got messed up, so yes I would still call them "good" people.

    It was an ethical quandary I really didn't want my senior year. let me put it that way.

  27. ALWAYS ask google first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > There is no support for lab equipment for Mac.

    Radmind.org / see also MacosXlabs.org

    FS Maintence over the network. Minimum badwidth is used, only files that have changed are transferred.

    Supports Client/Server MacOSX, Linux, Sun, etc. Originally a Solaris project that turned heavily into a Mac centric product. All OS support is interchangable (a Linux server could host mac transcripts and a mac could host linux transcripts).

  28. -were- strong on the Mac. by solios · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Personally, Adobe has completely dropped the ball with the OS X versions of their software. Photoshop and Illustrator CS are a hell of a lot snappier on our 2ghz duron under win2k than they are on our dual 2ghz G5s.

    I can, in fact, launch Classic and Photoshop 5.0.2 in roughly the same time it takes to launch Photoshop CS. And 5.0.2 is a hell of a lot more responsive. :|