Slashdot Mirror


US Government Upgrades RAM

Deep Throat writes "Techworld has the scoop on a new super-sized RAM disk that the US government has just bought for a few million dollars in order to speed up searching through huge databases. It's 2.5TB! The VP of the company that made it says it is for Washington DC and searching databases but won't say who. Techworld explains why it reckons it's the Department of Homeland Security searching in the NSA and Pentagon databases for terrorists. And apparently the government is 'very happy' with the purchase and thinking about getting more."

328 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. Google by sik0fewl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Still not as fast as if they'd make the info public domain and use google :)

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    1. Re:Google by ThisIsFred · · Score: 3, Funny

      Word has it that the gov't was disappointed with the results of comparative benchmarks against more mainstream pigeon-based searching technologies.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    2. Re:Google by DingoBueno · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      ascii art
  2. Very interesting because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Usually the US Government rams upgrades. Iraq, Haiti, next?

    1. Re:Very interesting because... by UdoKeir · · Score: 1, Informative

      -1 Offtopic

      The US destabilised the democratically elected government there through a campaign of disinformation, then supplied arms to a gang of murders and criminals based in the Dominican Republic and sent them on a killing spree across the border into Haiti, forced the elected (and popular) president onto a plane under threats of death to himself and his family, flew him to a backwater African nation out of reach from the media and orchestrated a bloody coup. They then sent in troops to protect the leaders of said coup from any kind of popular uprising against them.

      What was your point again?

    2. Re:Very interesting because... by Lordrashmi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can I get some sources to document this?

    3. Re:Very interesting because... by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      I think you're confused. About many things, but mostly Haiti. Hispaniola was purged of all it's natives by the Spanish in the 15th and 16th centuries. In the 17th century, France built a colony on the western end of the island called Hati, filling that end with all these French people, inducing Spain to give the western third of the island to France. France grew sugar there with large numbers of African slaves through around 1800, when the slaves quit taking that shit and killed all the French people. Then they took turns killing eachother until 1990, when they decided to try some democracy and elected Jean-Bertrand Aristide president. Then they tried to kill him, so he ran away until the UN told Clinton to sent some marines to give him his job back. He got elected again in 2000, but some old people voted for Buchanan and they tried to kill him again, so Bush told him to fuck the hell off before we bust a cap in your ass. Then the UN told Clin^H^H^H^HBush to send some marines to give him his job back.

      There's no island, really, the French haven't given a shit since 1804, and nothing's happened yet for anyone to look at, besides the traditional post-election coup and Bush being an asshole to Aristide.

    4. Re:Very interesting because... by jcr · · Score: 1

      Of course not! It's all part of the CONSPIRACY!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Very interesting because... by rueba · · Score: 1

      OK, this is funny (even if you don't agree with the politics).

      --
      The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
    6. Re:Very interesting because... by DingoBueno · · Score: 1

      Usually the US Government rams upgrades.

      I believe you're thinking of Soviet Russia

      --
      ascii art
    7. Re:Very interesting because... by nixman99 · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, because the US really wants to control Haiti for it's vast reserves of oil, gold, and minerals.

    8. Re:Very interesting because... by denissmith · · Score: 1

      Nobody thinks about Soviet Russia

      --
      I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
    9. Re:Very interesting because... by vivian · · Score: 1

      NASA denies that they didn't fake the moon landings.
      I knew it! There is just no way that they could possibly have developed the technology to land on the moon!

      Or was your use of a double negative inadvertant?

  3. Google? by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 5, Funny

    in order to speed up searching through huge database

    Have they consulted Google?

    1. Re:Google? by RickHunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The parent post isn't just funny, the poster has a very good point. Google does this on a regular basis and, from what I understand, does it very well. And without lots of really expensive and specialized hardware. They've got a lot of really, really good graph theorists and other such people working for them, too, so I'd expect that whatever they do can be generalized quite nicely.

    2. Re:Google? by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While a good point, perhaps, I'm sure the government has no interest in even considering that unless they have the necessary government classification clearances, which I'm guessing would be pretty high given the assumed use of a database of this magnitude.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    3. Re:Google? by RickHunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google wouldn't need the clearances to be asked to supply the technology. The government just goes and says "we need to search some data quickly, what can you sell us?" and Google gives them some algorithms and code and such. Which they then pore over to look for security holes and then isolate nicely from everything else on the planet.

      No classification req'd.

    4. Re:Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      they didn't just throw money at it, they also threw brainpower at it.

      The Government likes to waste money. This was their best solution.

    5. Re:Google? by powerpuffgirls · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, my point wasn't about using Google to search for them, but using Google's technology.

      I did a search for "a" on Google, and Results 1 - 10 of about 3,370,000,000. Search took 0.14 seconds . Does US have that many people?

    6. Re:Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually no, Google crawls a vast amount of information but a very small percentage of that information is useful (specifically the links and keywords). Google also remebers common queries and plays other tricks to speed up searches. When your looking at a 2.5 TB database it is very different. First of all history doesn't matter as much since it is unlikly that they will be running multiple searches on the same thing. Second the 2.5TB is all meta data, so its all relivant, so it all must be searched. Third a query is likly to be much more complex then a normal google query. Google has one index that can be clearly defined in an alphabetic way. The govenment has many data bases that are indexed multiple different ways. This makes searching for connections between databases very difficult. In short Google is highly optimised for a specific type of search and probably will not work in the much fuzzier realm of inteligence.

    7. Re:Google? by dj245 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Customs and Border protection (specifically, the old "Immigration" branch) could benifit from distributed computing for their database. They scan a car licsence plate and run a search while they ask the usual questions- where have you been, where are you going, got any meat? When the search completes they look at it and send them on their way. Quick searching could allow the CBP agent to notice that the car was stolen and that the drug dealer always carries a gun, so that they could wave them through and avoid conflict.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    8. Re:Google? by RickHunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but as I said... (Possibly in another post) Google has some very good people working for them. Like, a sizable number of the major contributions to graph theory research over the last ten years major. I'm betting the USG could also deliver a (deliberately fuzzy) list of requirements to them and get back something that'd do what they wanted.

    9. Re:Google? by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Google?! Are you serious? Anyways, they have nothing on really big search engines.. Think "American Express" think "Visanet [aka Vital]" think "Mastercard", now THEY have some quick lookups!! And they are _SLOW_ compared to what the Pentagon, the DOD have, etc.. Google is a toy.

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    10. Re:Google? by ssbljk · · Score: 1

      well, they'll need to do that anyway with software that will use such Disc-O-Matic

      --
      /ss
    11. Re:Google? by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      I definately don't doubt the ability of Google to index large amounts of data on the web. But agencies like the NSA are probably even better though. Unless you got the clearence, you'll never know.

    12. Re:Google? by micromoog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Putting the right indexes on a table with 100 million records to satisfy a very small set of well-documented expected queries is not exactly rocket science. And I think you underestimate what Google does.

    13. Re:Google? by diablobynight · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think your very wrong. Everything that goes into the government databases is designed by them, tables and queries, all designed by them, all the data is in the same form, and language. Now take google. searching sites made by everyone, with only meta tags as guides, which sometimes aren't there, and there is a constant influx of new data. Plus I would be willing to bet, with no doubt whatsoever, the internet is bigger than the government database.

      This is probably just a bunch of govs sitting around going, well, we got this new budget, how are we going to spend it. And one guy said, I bet it would be really cool to have a 2.5 TB RAM

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    14. Re:Google? by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing you've never worked with a large database. I would guess that there are less than 100 million different liscense plates in the US, though it could be a little more. 100 million records is peanuts when it comes to large databases (teradata in particular).

      The data is also really lumpy, and could be denormalized around the state. What I'm saying is that you in no way need some fancy distributed database to do what you're talking about, its actually fairly trivial. At the data warehouse I used to work at we had over 200 gigs of data and ran extremely complex queries (much, much more complex than SELECT FROM liscense_table WHERE liscense_table.no = **) on one pretty paltry box. It was running teradata as the software, though.

    15. Re:Google? by globalar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google sells a search appliance which also includes a (presumably) customized implementation of their searching algorithms. Basically any geeks dream - their own little Google. I read that base price is $28,000 (seems to be a hardware/software bundle).

      You can keep the tin foil hat on, because this has been sold to government intelligence services.

    16. Re:Google? by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Quick searching could allow the CBP agent to notice that the car was stolen and that the drug dealer always carries a gun, so that they could wave them through and avoid conflict.

      Exactly! With this fantastic and expensive technology, the new-and-improved BCIS could have sent the 9/11 pilots their approval to go to flight school before they blew up the WTC, rather than six months after the attack, thereby saving them much embarassment.

      By government standards, that means it's money well spent.

    17. Re:Google? by e-r00 · · Score: 1

      There are few important differences between google-like search and data analysis (like OLAP): * in google data is not structured, while gov's data is probably high-dimensional * the above is related to types of queries, while in google we have equal-text searches, in OLAP we usually query over many attributes with various, often complex, predicates * in google we are interested in very limited number of hits, while for data analysis we almost always process zillions of tuples. In other words, ask yourself, if google is able to count avarage salary of all plumbers from Washington that went to Florida last year in May and spent there money both for alcohol and renting surfing boards :) I'm not saying it's impossible for google people, yet it seems their facilities don't support such functionality.

    18. Re:Google? by bobkate_nz · · Score: 1
      • Google has some very good people working for them
      • I'm betting the USG could also deliver a (deliberately fuzzy) list of requirements to them and get back something that'd do what they wanted
      I'm betting that these 'very good people' will either:
      • See through the fuzz within n minutes of reading the brief, or:
      • Get pissed off and go do something else more interesting, because its frustrating to try and give something to someone who won't tell you what it is that they want.
      Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this post are the authors personal rantings only, and do not reflect the position of his employer, Google, or the USG
    19. Re:Google? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's that.

      But do we even want all those brains at Google helping the government spy on us better?

      --
      blog
    20. Re:Google? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      170 Million licensed drivers in the US according to the traffic school class I just took. I guess not all of them would have a car, but most probably would.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    21. Re:Google? by wscott · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but I but this ramdisk would be cheaper.

    22. Re:Google? by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 1
      And without lots of really expensive and specialized hardware.

      Hmm. Having seen their installation, I wouldn't say it's inexpensive and it certainly does use specialized hardware, in fact it is all specialized hardware AFAICT that only google uses.

    23. Re:Google? by blair1q · · Score: 1


      And with a terabyte of DRAM, it'd do it an order of magnitude faster yet.

    24. Re:Google? by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      ...that would be the process to acquire...a security clearance, n'est-ce pas, muet?

    25. Re:Google? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you wanted a good example of a very complex system with a fairly fast lookup, think of the AOL IM farms.

    26. Re:Google? by Narkov · · Score: 1

      Not really. Google is one dimensional. It searches for occurences.

      What the US Gov want seems to be relational. In other words they want to cross check results based on results.

      One Google search that returns 2.5M hits is fast but imagine cross-checking 2.5M results by each other then across ~10 (??) databases. How long would that take? Answer: An exponetially long time.

    27. Re:Google? by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think that you're view of how organized the government is is completely wrong. I will agree that the data is nowhere near as dynamic as that handled by google, but if you think that the data is in the same form, etc., you've never worked with any big organization.

      Basically, the government is probably lucky if any two databases have the same set of keys, much less the same data format. Every separate department of ever single governmental organization tends to store data in different formats, possibly on different types of databases entirely.

      All large organizations are like this. In the past, I did work for a major US automobile manufacturer. Not only didn't they have the same format across the boards, but the marketting databases used a completely different set of keys than the engineering/manufacturing departments when referring to the same vehicle package. So cars sold (handled by marketting) was very difficult to match up with cars produced (handled by engineering/manufacturing) because it was very hard to match the number of cars of a certain package between the different data formats. At least these were all in the same database (DB2), so you didn't have to make sure that your date formats matched from one field to another.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
    28. Re:Google? by diablobynight · · Score: 1
      I saw some guy flamed you because you said, you're instead of your. I get that a lot here, it seems tech guys that don't have anything intelligent to say, just post anonymously and bitch about grammar.

      that aside, the governments databases are all very much alike. You see, because a major automotive corporation, isn't really all that major. Grain is more responsible for our GDP than auto sales.

      The FBI database, is widely used by other Government organizations, and many of the other databases were modeled after the FBI database, which was modeled after the NSA database. Even if the keys aren't all exactly the same, I bet they are still a thousand times less dynamic then categorizing webpages.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    29. Re:Google? by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Actually, I think that you're view of how organized the government is is completely wrong. I will agree that the data is nowhere near as dynamic as that handled by google, but if you think that the data is in the same form, etc., you've never worked with any big organization

      I showed my mom (former Customs analyst) this post and the parent. She says "You are right. Even our own Customs database on shipping had different programmers. They would call the same field different names depending on who did the work."

  4. It's awesome and all... by Azadre · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How are they going to save the data if the power goes out? That's a lot of data to store on hard copies.

    1. Re:It's awesome and all... by thefatz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Solid State Storage, .... the data is already saved.

      --
      http://www.freebsd.org
    2. Re:It's awesome and all... by grub · · Score: 1

      SolidData sells solid state drives. Mountable by SCSI or FiberChannel (think SANs).

      Anyhow, their website has info on how the data is backed up.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:It's awesome and all... by Maskirovka · · Score: 5, Informative
      How are they going to save the data if the power goes out? That's a lot of data to store on hard copies.

      This is supposed to be a caching system, not a long term archive. They also undoubtedly have both Uninteruptable Power Supplies (think racks full of car batteries) and generators to protect from power failure. The databases that it caches are more than likely mirrored at multiple locations, and backed up daily, if not in realtime to an autmated tape library system.

    4. Re:It's awesome and all... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How are they going to save the data if the power goes out? That's a lot of data to store on hard copies.

      Of course, possible power outages were considered before the system was purchased. To prevent the loss of information, they hired 35,000 people to watch console screens and transcribe the data from the screen onto legal pads 24x7.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    5. Re:It's awesome and all... by kudos200 · · Score: 1

      What everyone else said in response is true, but additionally, when you consider how much more expensive RAM (whatever it is that they purchased) is than magnetic disks, and how much they've spent on the RAM, I'm sure they'd barely notice the expenditure on enough disk space to back all that up. But, if the information is actually some sort of flash or whatever (though I'm not certain that it is, since regular SDRAM is a "solid state" device), the point could be moot. (I'm of the opinion that it's not flash, but whatever).

    6. Re:It's awesome and all... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      There was a program on the Discovery channel. They had these jet-engine powered generators that could run for 2-3 days non-stop.

    7. Re:It's awesome and all... by superyooser · · Score: 1

      No, they have contestants from the World Memory Championship to memorize all the zeroes and ones.

    8. Re:It's awesome and all... by sacherjj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2.5 Tb of magnetic disk space is peanuts. I have almost that much attached to my machine at home for video editing purposes. You are talking less than $2000 for fast 7,200 RPM IDE disks. So perhaps $10-15k for 2.5 Tb of really fast disks.

    9. Re:It's awesome and all... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Gas turbine engines better be able to go more than 2-3 days. Most places that use em have fuel supplies of at least a week on-site with contracts to get refueled every couple days. Hell we ran for over 48 hours on our traditional diesel (and only used about 2/3'rds of its 500 gallon tank for a medium sized computer room in summer).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:It's awesome and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did you read the specs on the technology? This is a "disk drive" do the database not a "cache". Essentially, all you do is allocate your database tablespaces are on this device. It just appears as an order of magnitude faster disk drive. The DB may backup to another device, but that isn't material.

      From the specs.
      1. there are three hard disks in each node.
      2. they have software which backs up the solid
      state memory to the hard disks.

      so yes you'd need a UPS. but it would only need to run for as long as it took to "safe" onto the units internal back. (their marketing material says they can keep from 60-100% backed up likely depending upon acess and update parameters.). It shouldn't take that long to backup to a "safe" state and turn the power off.

      Frankly, you're in the same boat as you'd be in if you had a high end raid system that was doing any heavy duty caching: need UPS power until the disks can be safed.

    11. Re:It's awesome and all... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      My step-dad has a generator that will run for as long as you put gas in it, my friends dad has a tractor PTO generator that will run for as long as a tractor is hooked up to it. I'm not understanding what is so inherently great about a "jet-engine" powered generator, aside that the gas costs $5 a gallon or so.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:It's awesome and all... by El · · Score: 1

      35,000 people to watch console screens and transcribe the data from the screen onto legal pads 24x7. Wouldn't it be a lot more efficient to just use 35,000 printers? Using an LA-120 printer as a console was how we used to debug boot failures on the PDP 11/34...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    13. Re:It's awesome and all... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      The use of these jet-engines was to power an entire office-block. These were the type of thing you'd expect to see on a fighter aeroplane. It sure looked impressive, with this huge blue flame shooting out the back of the engine.

    14. Re:It's awesome and all... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Ah, well then in that case your generators would put out just a tad more juice than the ones I've delt with ;)

      Can't imagine how expensive they'd be to run though. Or the caps needed to store the power.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:It's awesome and all... by brysnot · · Score: 1

      yeah but all the people they hired got outsourced to India.

  5. Big Disk by DotNM · · Score: 1

    I'd even like HALF of the size of that disk!

    --
    There's no place like localhost
    1. Re:Big Disk by DotNM · · Score: 1

      I kinda meant... without paying the money.

      --
      There's no place like localhost
    2. Re:Big Disk by jamshid42 · · Score: 1

      It's only 2.5 TB. He only asked for that much space, but he did not ask for the same performance specifications. Considering that 250 GB harddrives are going for about $250 (at Circuit City - jacked up retail rates), you can get 2.5 TB of storage for your home network for $2,500. You would probably need to get an extra EIDE adapter for most systems to handle this space, but that should only cost about $35-40.

      Now, if he wanted better performance and reliability, he would need to spend a little more to get a good RAID5 controller card and probably 2 more hard drives to account for the parity data (depending upon how he organizes the system).

      --
      /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
    3. Re:Big Disk by jamshid42 · · Score: 1

      Revised math:
      If you go with pricewatch.com instead of a retailer, you can easily get a 2.5 TB solution for under $1,700 USD, to include the RAID5 controller cards.

      --
      /. - Proof that Sturgeon's Law is true...
    4. Re:Big Disk by evanothespanishbasta · · Score: 1

      next slashdot topic; how to build a 2.5 TB solution for you home netwrk for under $1,700 USD how much you wanna bet?

  6. Like google by robslimo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like they're taking heed of Google's success in attaining blazing search speeds by holding all the data in RAM.

    See here.

  7. Power Failure by Aurix · · Score: 1

    What happens when the power goes out? How long will it take to read all that data back into the RAM disk? Ouch.

    1. Re:Power Failure by SQLz · · Score: 1

      I think RAM disks, the kind you buy, are non volatile. If the power goes out your data is still there. The kind you make via software use your system's ram.

    2. Re:Power Failure by eric2hill · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA dude. "It also includes three independent internal UPS systems to ensure that no power loss or power supply failure will stop the RamSan from performing its internal backup procedures."

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    3. Re:Power Failure by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      What happens when the power goes out?

      Power doesn't go out in a decent data center. They have online UPS to take over short term and gas powered generators for longer outages.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    4. Re:Power Failure by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      If you had to reload from hard drives, then assuming your data transfer rate is 20 meg per second, then it would take about 62.5 hours to populate.

    5. Re:Power Failure by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      assuming your data transfer rate is 20 meg per second

      Linear reads? Striped volumes? Try 260 MB/second. For linear reads on a well laid out stripe set with a sufficient number of volumes, your bottleneck should be the interconnect. In this case that's 2Gbit Fibre Channel. Hard drives can be quick if you don't care about random access.

    6. Re:Power Failure by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Dude, if power goes out your ram goes to:

      00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
      00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
      (continued till end of space). :)

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    7. Re:Power Failure by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      Read the fine article, follow some of the links, google is your friend...

      Link

      Solid state disks solve the problem of physical constraints by replacing hard disk drives with high speed circuitry. Instead of a rotating disk, a solid state disk uses memory chips (typically SDRAM)

      So the data is volatile.

      The immediate concern voiced about solid state disks regards data persistence and volatility. Unlike magnetic disk drives, SDRAM-based disks require power to maintain their data. The solution to this is surprisingly simple: solid state disks includes backup batteries and backup hard disk drives so that any data written to the SDRAM can be mirrored to or backed-up onto these drives.

      Texas Memory Systems solid state disks have a 20 microsecond access time (250 times faster than hard disk drives).

      and 400 times slower than 50 nanosecond DRAM (2000 times slower than 10 nanosecond static ram!..)

      I wonder why the access time for the RamSan is so high - 50-150 nanoseconds access for SDRAM and 20,000 nanoseconds for the RamSan 340?

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    8. Re:Power Failure by dubious9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      errr... "dude", look up what non-volitile means. Volatile memory generally is implemented as a series of capacitors which can be queried if they have a charge or not (1 or 0). The capacitors in the RAM in your computer, however, lose their charge very quickly, and need to be "refreshed" every couple milliseconds or so.

      Non-volatile needs little or no refreshing. It's usually implemented by component that do something else than hold a charge. And thus, since it doesn't need freshing it keeps information when the power goes out. The reason all memory isn't like Non-volatile is that it is either much slower (magnetic storage) or much more expensive (ie flash and this RAM disk).

      --
      Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    9. Re:Power Failure by ultrasound · · Score: 1
      All it takes is a small battery and a couple of diodes and you can hold SRAM for weeks/years after power out, cos these chips only consume a few uA at standby. Whereas DRAM consumes mA so you need a an unfeasibly large battery for any reasonable length of time.

      'Non-Volatile' chips such as EEPROM or Flash have problems with limited writes (10^3 to 10^5) before they loose their ability to be non-volatile. See this guide to Non-Volatile Memory chips. And a nice diagram of all the families

      Also write speeds for flash are very slow, (order of 10s-100s of milliseconds rather than order of 10-100 nano seconds for SRAM, however reads are fast, so for a static RAM disc that is loaded once and then searched this may not be a problem. There is also FRAM which is non-volatile but has 200 nano-sec read and writes, but write time is not infinite (about 10^8 to 10^9).

      Also note that most electronically re-writable non-volatile techonologies are only guaranteed for 10 years. So it ain't forever.

  8. $4.7 million by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Funny

    The list price of the system, which is made up from 40 RamSan 320 units, reviewed here, is $4.7million

    Purchased from Dell's website that would have been....$12.5 million?

    1. Re:$4.7 million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >The list price of the system, which is made up from 40 RamSan 320 units, reviewed here, is $4.7million
      >Purchased from Dell's website that would have been....$12.5 million?

      No idea, but if it was sold by the RIAA, it'd cost about $470 millions.

    2. Re:$4.7 million by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait a year or two and it'll be so cheap that everyone and their dog will have one. I'm even cheaper so I'll wait 4-5 years before I get one.

      --
      --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
    3. Re:$4.7 million by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      So true. Just bought a gig from Crucial, Dell's price was 3X higher.

    4. Re:$4.7 million by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny
      Purchased from Dell's website that would have been....$12.5 million?

      Yeah, but they would have gotten a free scanner with it!

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    5. Re:$4.7 million by OxyFrog · · Score: 1

      That's quite a ripoff. I hear SCO was selling them for 699$

    6. Re:$4.7 million by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Yes but shipping would have cost $3 milions.

    7. Re:$4.7 million by addaon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the ink would run out almost immediately.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    8. Re:$4.7 million by gosand · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the ink would run out almost immediately.


      Almost? I have never seen a scanner able to hold any ink.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    9. Re:$4.7 million by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Yeah, but they would have gotten a free scanner with it!"

      For $12.5 million they better have gotten Michael Dell to deliver it himself.....oh wait......

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  9. RAM upgrading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're upgrading in time for Longhorns release you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:RAM upgrading by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      The above post was modded as funny, but it was actually rather "insightful" as well.

      Not really, I've just always wanted to say that.

  10. Use the correct post by Shipud · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just hope they rememebr to use the USB2.0 for their new keychain disk; access time might be horrible otherwise...

    --
    /sdrawkcab si gis siht
    1. Re:Use the correct post by smackjer · · Score: 1

      It would still take over 11.5 hours to fill it to capacity. They might want to wait for Firewire 800.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  11. Doom 3 by vinit79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My guess is that they want to play Doom3 with a fps higher than 5 fps.

    Is Unreal Doomed

    1. Re:Doom 3 by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Government Official: "No, its this damn Halo demo...."

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Doom 3 by Pike65 · · Score: 1

      Doom 3, eh? They may need more grunt.

      Seriously though - what kind of RAM do they actually use in these things? Are they standard DIMMs or something more esoteric?

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    3. Re:Doom 3 by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 2, Funny

      A little further than that actually... they will host a free Doom3 server, and then track down and convict anyone playing an excessive amount of hours on it with suspicion of terrorist activities.

    4. Re:Doom 3 by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      Likely they use standard parts, albeit ECC, likely.

      Where they get you, though, is in the service contracts - likely in order to increase space, or repair one (say one had a bad DIMM), their service contract states only authorized people may come out and do it, and only use authorized parts. Otherwise, any warantee is void.

      Oh, and the parts are the same as you can get elsewhere, they just jack the price up 10-100x more.

      IBM does it, Sun does it, they all do it - for items like these (ie, big expensive computer equipment), it is a niche market, and they charge what the market will bear, not a penny more or less.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    5. Re:Doom 3 by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      That's a helluva price to pay for service - I just worked out that 2.5TB of ECC RAM from the shop I work at would cost $319,479.82 without even using a bulk discount so you're paying $4.4million for the hardware linking it together (which can't cost more than a mill) leaving at least $3.5 million to have an engineer with a few spare parts on call. I'd take a job that pays like that any day.

    6. Re:Doom 3 by afidel · · Score: 1

      More like for the engineering of designing the system. Having an ultra niche product means that R&D costs have to be spread over a very small number of units.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  12. Doom 3 ? by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wonder if they got hold of an early copy of Doom 3.

    1. Re:Doom 3 ? by vinit79 · · Score: 1

      Think alike, dont we ??

    2. Re:Doom 3 ? by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, longhorn.

    3. Re:Doom 3 ? by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly ;)

  13. A trivial expense by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    However, not that many departments could possibly want to run such vast queries regularly. It would also be extremely difficult to justify a $4.7 million investment unless that work was seen as vital and speed was a main consideration in that work. It is also peculiar that such a large purchase could be approved at a time of tightening belts.

    Honestly, I wonder what the author was smoking?

    * However, not that many departments could possibly want to run such vast queries regularly.

    You don't think so? I think *every* DBA would like to have a few extra TB of RAM. Maybe the Department of Transportation just wants a more efficient way to keep track of US Highway routes?

    * It would also be extremely difficult to justify a $4.7 million investment...

    What country is this guy living in? If you're high up enough, it's trivially easy to justify $5 million. That's hardly enough to build one Interstate highway intersection.

    * It is also peculiar that such a large purchase could be approved at a time of tightening belts.

    Oh, now I know the problem. The author has been in a coma for the past 18 months. Wake up, dude, and smell the money!

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:A trivial expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In and of itself, $4.7 million is not that much money. It's when the government spends $4.7 million of taxpayer money frivilously on this and 10,000 other similar projects that it adds up.

    2. Re:A trivial expense by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      "A million dollars here and a million there, and pretty soon it adds up to some real money."

      I think this line was attributed to Reagan, but I could be wrong.

    3. Re:A trivial expense by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Do you have any idea what kind of hardware they've got at Los Alamos? Just because the gov't is buying a huge ramdisk doesn't mean they want to use it to invade your privacy.

      It's more likely that they just want to make bigger and better bombs.

      So relax. =]

    4. Re:A trivial expense by A+Bugg · · Score: 1

      Yeah except replace million with billion and it was some congressman not Reagan, but i think it was back in the 80's.

    5. Re:A trivial expense by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Everett Dirksen is the congressman.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    6. Re:A trivial expense by Threni · · Score: 1

      >"A million dollars here and a million there, and pretty soon it adds up to some
      >real money."
      >
      >I think this line was attributed to Reagan, but I could be wrong.

      It's right though, isn't it. Have you seen the sizes of the budgets the US government deals with. One million dollars is a fraction of a fraction of a percent of them.

  14. Not for the DHS by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was bought by the Internal Revenue Service in order to improve the auditing of tax returns. They say that the additional revenue brought in will easily pay for the device many times over.

    If it was for the DHS or NSA you would not have heard about the purchase.

    1. Re:Not for the DHS by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would feel less threatened if it was in the hands of the DHS rather than the IRS.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Not for the DHS by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More likely, the NSA's already got a dozen of these things and loves them...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:Not for the DHS by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hear that now it can process over nine tax returns per day.

    4. Re:Not for the DHS by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > This was bought by the Internal Revenue Service in order to improve the auditing of tax returns. They say that the additional revenue brought in will easily pay for the device many times over.
      >
      > If it was for the DHS or NSA you would not have heard about the purchase.

      You're both wrong. It's probably just some bureaucrat who happened to have $4.7M to spend before the end of the fiscal year. Half an hour ago he saw a Slashdot article titled "Can Software Kill?", and he said "Hey, I'm from the Government, and I'm here to find out!"

    5. Re:Not for the DHS by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Relative the NSA, DHS isn't too terribly secretive about their purchases, it's pretty well known that they have a huge Microsoft contract and the amount, there was a slashdot story on it last year..

    6. Re:Not for the DHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually this article sounds pretty factual to me. I am a civil servant in the Dept. of Homeland Security. We have a whole bunch of these grey plastic boxes that have rack mount computers in them lining the hallways of one of the floors in our headquarters that each have 2.5 TB of storage one them, according to the label. No one really knows what they do, or at least those who do know won't say anything, but rumor has it they have something to do with financial crimes. Ecivres Terces. ---

  15. Don't be paranoid by afra242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before many users start discussing the privacy laws and what not, it should be noted that the data being stored is probably not new. It's the medium on which it is stored on, which is.

    Even without this, the old database could have been searched for some terrorists. Nothing has really changed.

    1. Re:Don't be paranoid by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ohh, good I'm glad it's all old privacy violating data rather than something new. That sure clears my worries.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Don't be paranoid by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      Wrong . . . the speed at which searches can be carried out will increase dramatically, which means more searches can be run, and a lot faster. Getting timely answers to a query allows government officials to react to intelligence faster.

      So . . . this has the potential to change a lot.

    3. Re:Don't be paranoid by diablobynight · · Score: 1
      actually in 9-11 they had warnings about the terrorists nearly a month before hand. I don't think the search was the bottle neck there.

      Personally I think we need a little less security. A strip club just got raided for liquor license information recently in my town. Cops in swat uniforms busted in with loaded shotguns throwing everyone on the floor.

      I hate to say this, but I don't trust a police officer with a loaded weapon in his holster, let alone them wildly waving around shotguns in a club. Why the hell would you bring in shotgunS? so you can shot the guy your aiming at, and maim six innocenct bystanders?

      shooting unarmed retarded boy in head http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/2004/02/03/new s/local/7861057.htm

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    4. Re:Don't be paranoid by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      So the guy you shoot stops doing things that get people shot Right Fucking Now.
      Amazingly, shotguns don't spray a random fan of death.
      It's actually possible to learn the pattern and know what it will be at various useful distances.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    5. Re:Don't be paranoid by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      Despite what your playing Doom might convince you, even us Marines wouldn't do anything as gung ho stupid as expect to control a shotgun spread in an enclosed room, garanteed to have more innocents than hostiles.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  16. Could be a lot of things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Could be memory for pattern matching genomic alignments : Health and Human Services.

    Could be memory for modeling Nuclear Blasts : Department of Energy.

    Could be everybody's tax returns since the Truman administration : Internal Revenue Service.

    WTFK.

    1. Re:Could be a lot of things. by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      My vote goes to the IRS. The cost of that hardware could easily be recovered by better auditing systems catching tax cheaters.

  17. Longhorn Beta Tester by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny


    They really just needed it to beta test Longhorn.

  18. obligatory Gates quote by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    "2.5 TB ought to be enough for anybody."

    Heck, that might even be enough to boot Longhorn!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:obligatory Gates quote by gonffen · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Tech: "Time to boot up that beta disk we've been working on!"

  19. it's neat and all... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1, Troll

    but does it really matter? they'd have spent the money on something anyway because they seem to think that it is theirs to spend and that they are some how above the citizenry that they were elected by and from. They might as well have spent it on something "cool." as for searching for terrorists and stuff, big bloody whoop. As long as they only index and infringe on non-citizens, i really don't care. of course, they are going to do that and it doesn't matter who is president because both major parties are in on the international totalitarian conspiricy.

  20. More stats by Maskirovka · · Score: 5, Informative
    A RamSan 320 unit holds up to 64GB of RAM in a 3U rack unit. The US government order is housed in three full height rack units. There are over 320 2Gbit/s Fibre Channel ports and the aggregate I/O rate is 36Gbit/s.

    No comment needed.

    1. Re:More stats by vidnet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not even about beowulf clusters? What's the world coming to!

    2. Re:More stats by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny


      I'd like a beowulf cluster of this thing's fucking cooling fans.

    3. Re:More stats by X · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the article is likely getting it's facts right. Check out the specs of the system.

      Each Tera RamSan system can have up to 128 ports and 24 Gbit/s. It also can fill up to 2 full racks. Since the government system takes 3 full racks, I imagine it's a slightly different configuration, so reaching those numbers is not out of the question.

      Note that the "aggregate I/O rate" number they are talking about is not the same as the aggregate bandwidth of the Fibre Channel ports. It's probably limited more by the memory subsystems than anything else.

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
    4. Re:More stats by Ropati · · Score: 1

      Comments are needed:



      The spec for the RamSan 320 says it will do 3GB/sec random sustainable bandwidth. To achieve this they have 8 each 2Gbyte/sec FC ports per unit. Since they can max out at 250,000 IO /sec, this implies a block size of 12K.



      Most databases work in 4k blocks or smaller. The IO spec here is also full duplex. We can expect half that for writes. So the system can suck up data (100 percent random writes of 4k blocks) at 125000 IOs per unit with 40 units for a input bandwidth of 20GB/s per second.



      Assuming that the system can read from multiple databases at anywhere near this speed it would take 125 seconds to fill the entire 2.5TBs.



      Amazing.



      Specs can be found at:
      http://www.storageflex.com/download/Storagefl ex%20 RAMSAN%20320%20Spec%20Sheet.pdf



      --
      machinator omnis sine licentia
    5. Re:More stats by tunabomber · · Score: 1

      Why? Are you building a D.I.Y. hovercraft?

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    6. Re:More stats by killmeplease · · Score: 1

      Berfore you link a web page you might want to read it. The page says that this thing is a rack full of the ramsan-320s and not a new fangled device. Probably the order is for 2.5 racks of these connected by some connector, but it is made up of Ramsan-320s.

      http://www.superssd.com/products/ramsan-320/

      --
      - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
    7. Re:More stats by X · · Score: 1

      I did read the page quite thoroughly. Perhaps I did not express myself well.

      As noted in my post, normal configs for Tera RamSan's are only specked out to 2 full racks. All I was suggesting was that the config specced out for the government was a slight modification of what was already on that page.

      --
      sigs are a waste of space
  21. This is a nice change of pace by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 5, Funny

    After weeks of seeing overblown headlines on slashdot (IE, Bill Gates runs over a squirel on the way to work, headline reads "Bill Gates Murders Animals as part of his Job!!!"), it's good to see one that is, well, underblown. 2.5TB is a bit more than a 'RAM upgrade'

    1. Re:This is a nice change of pace by cgenman · · Score: 1

      This coming directly after the Fox special "When Software Attacks 2!"

      Come to think of it, the stories are probably linked more fundamentally than we would be comfortable admitting.

    2. Re:This is a nice change of pace by nlindstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean Bill Gates uses IE (Internet Explorer) to run over squirrels? Wow!

    3. Re:This is a nice change of pace by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Darn. I was going to submit Nazi raccoons conquer Europe but I haven't been able to figure out where the Gates connection is. Maybe if I had a fast way of searching large DBs...?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  22. Lets see by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that's about 8KB for every person in the US, including the 'terrorist' bit. You can put a lot of personal data in 8KB.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Lets see by bad_fx · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they also use the 'evil' bit.

    2. Re:Lets see by Ummagumma · · Score: 4, Funny

      the 'terrorist bit'? Thats the one right next to the evil bit, right?

      =)

      --
      "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Lets see by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's an issue with the Homeland Security Department.

    4. Re:Lets see by RoundSparrow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can put a lot of personal data in 8KB.

      You assume the government is efficent :)

    5. Re:Lets see by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's volatile storage, cacheing for multiple databases.

      I see a mainframe running a hundred thousand or so small queries simultaneosly, rather than one huge database running one query at a time.

      But, whatever. The government already has a hell of a lot more personal data than that. They're called tax returns, birth certificates, drivers licenses, marraige licenses, etc, etc..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Lets see by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > that's about 8KB for every person in the US, including the 'terrorist' bit. You can put a lot of personal data in 8KB.

      Especially if you're only caching the indexes to the key fields in RAM.

    7. Re:Lets see by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      It's volatile storage, cacheing for multiple databases.

      Exactly. All that ram is likely to just hold indexes into HD (or tape) based arrays.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    8. Re:Lets see by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correction: you can put a lot of textual data in 8KB. If you start putting other things like fingerprint scans, voiceprints, DNA profiles, mug shots, and other things that aren't character-based, 8KB immediately becomes ridiculously tiny.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    9. Re:Lets see by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Funny
      to save space, you can compress the evil bit and the terrorist bit since you don't need 4 full states.

      there are really only 3 states, evil, not evil, and ashcroft.

      (yeah, that was a stab. figure it out..)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Lets see by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if their cache is 2.5TB, I wonder how large the disk farm is? (And I was so happy about my new 120GB drive, poot!)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    11. Re:Lets see by Turmio · · Score: 1

      A lot of people visit the US without being citizens, you know. The airliners have to hand over passanger records of their customers flying to the country. Lots of info to analyze and store. 2.5TB ain't that much.

    12. Re:Lets see by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Ask the government.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    13. Re:Lets see by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fingerprints can be (and are) encoded as a couple of vectors, voiceprints are similar. DNA profiles only need to record the magnitude of around a dozen markers to accurate to the person, mugshots are the only thing on your list which would require a lot of storage, and you don't need those for the searching part of the DB, just have them stored in a blob with a key from the main record pointing to it. Don't bring up facial recognition, it doesn't work, false positives are through the roof and false negatives are too high to trust.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Lets see by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      No worries. Nothing vital is going on that drive, just all the caches, temp directories, and stuff that can be reinstalled from CDROM fairly quickly. I didn't need quite that much space, but I'm expecting two big development packages, they didn't have the 80 that I wanted, and the price-point for smaller drives was terrible. Once I get a better idea of the drive use, I'll get another drive for the AuxCon machine.

      Oddly enough, my 1.6GB drive was the worst I've had. I should use a low-level utility and see if I can reclaim some of the crater-field of bad sectors.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    15. Re:Lets see by penguinblotter · · Score: 1

      evil bit

      You know, I have one simple request and that is to have sharks with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads!

      --
      Mind the gap
    16. Re:Lets see by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      Don't bring up facial recognition, it doesn't work, false positives are through the roof and false negatives are too high to trust.

      This is, of course, assuming that The Powers That Be have nothing more advanced that what's available to the private sector...which is a big assumption.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  23. Re:What size is it? by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

    The article said 3 full-height racks, which means 19 inches wide by 42U high, by however deep they bought, times 3. It would fit in your cubicle. :)

  24. Don't even bother trying to figure out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...exactly what they're going to use this for. Believe me, the US government isn't doing anything sinister now that there's a department of homeland security and we have the "post 9-11" buzzword that is any worse than what they were doing before. You just hadn't heard about it yet back then.

    Let me tell you a little story.

    January 2001. There are still two very tall buildings at the southern end of Manhattan. A certain three letter agency paid a *large* sum of money for me to signifigantly alter the virtual memory subsystem of the linux kernel for alpha processors. The validation testing and application of the modifications inolved benchmarks that compared large quantities of text against a large word list. The modification changed the amount of data they could pump through their (very large) cluster of machines by about 15%. Why would their motive today be any different? If this has been going on all this time, how can you say for sure what they're going to use 2.5TB of fast storage for?

    1. Re:Don't even bother trying to figure out... by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 3, Funny

      A certain three letter agency

      NSA, CIA, or the Department of FUD?
      Did your compensation include Xena tapes and Hot Pockets?

  25. Re:What size is it? by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 1

    Actually it's three 19" racks.

    --

    This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

  26. Re:What size is it? by denisonbigred · · Score: 1

    Three Full 3U Rack Units.

    --

    "There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals."
  27. Facts?? by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

    Is Techworld a Drudge spinoff?

  28. this came... by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...right after their purchases of thousands of those little X10 spy cameras that you can mount just about anywhere! Oops, said too much, gotta go before-------------

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:this came... by contrasutra · · Score: 1

      who was the dumb assassin that pressed the "submit" button? There's the US government for you. :P

  29. Re:What size is it? by SunBug · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    "A RamSan 320 unit holds up to 64GB of RAM in a 3U rack unit. The US government order is housed in three full height rack units."

    So, about 7' tall, 10' wide.

  30. OMG my rights online by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have no idea what it's for. The list of known terrorists and their acquaitances is relatively short, I cant imagine more than a few gigabytes being needed.

    Perhaps it's to store tax returns so the government can mail you your refund check faster. (Job required, sorry).

    Maybe INS (or USCIS or whatever they're called) want to track the tidal wave of benifits being handed to Mexican illegals.

    I'm a little tired of all this Big Brother speculation. Get over it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:OMG my rights online by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (I have mod points, but think replying would be more apt)
      Perhaps it's to store tax returns so the government can mail you your refund check faster. (Job required, sorry).
      Maybe INS (or USCIS or whatever they're called) want to track the tidal wave of benifits being handed to Mexican illegals.
      Note that name of the buyer has been kept secret. None of the agencies you mentioned need their names to be kept secret... infact Tax Returns dept will scream all over that it can now serve the texpayers better!!

      So the issue is who was the buyer who needed this to make his HUGE database reasonably fast AND needs to keep the name secret.

      --
      - mritunjai
    2. Re:OMG my rights online by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Hell it could simply be used to store definitions of all the new words that Curious George jr makes up in his speeches.

  31. Re:What size is it? by shystershep · · Score: 1

    Just wait until AOL starts mailing these out.

    Hell, if AOL would send me one of these I'd actually be willing to use their service. Well, sign up for it anyway.

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
  32. Wow can they upgrade my machine to 512 mb ram? by Congress · · Score: 1

    maybe I should contact my elected officials and ask them to upgrade my ram!

  33. Bleeding Edge by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    'very happy' with the purchase

    I just hope they didn't get it at Fry's. God help them if they've got to return it.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Bleeding Edge by tenchima · · Score: 1
      No - they should have got it from McDonalds

      Then they would have got Frys with it....

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
    2. Re:Bleeding Edge by gonffen · · Score: 1

      Well duh they bought it at Fry's. Your talking about the U.S. government here. A bunch of not so techonological advanced politicians who sit around all day making orders for things that need to be built right. Who do they have build the order? The lowest bidder.
      Maybe they got lucky this time and heard of NewEgg.

  34. So What? by DrDebug · · Score: 1

    In 15 years (or less) people will have this much data on their Palm Pilot.

    1. Re:So What? by Fedallah · · Score: 2, Funny

      In 15 years (or less) people will have this much data on their Palm Pilot.

      And somehow, my wife will still be able to fill it up with MP3's.

  35. Re:for Pr0n!!! by billimad · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh man, and I thought I was the only one with a collection THAT big.

  36. Speaking of... Cheapest way to get 16GB on 64bit? by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

    Speaking of such a project.

    I'm searching for the cheapest way to get a 64-bit processor with 16GB of RAM.

    There are some Opteron motherboards but you have to purchase very expensive 2GB DIMM modules with only 8 slots...

    Anyone aware of a motherboard that has 16 slots and will take 1GB DIMM modules? Reliable?

    For 8GB, I found the Sun Blade 1000's are pretty cheap to get on eBay. I got a 8GB dual 750Mhz system for $4500 used. However, it is maxed out at 8GB...

    I figure someone in this thread would have something to share. Thanks.

  37. SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, it could be used for good. But you know and I know that it will eventually be used for evil.

    1. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      But you know and I know that it will eventually be used for evil.

      Wait till the RIAA hear that they're storing the world's largest MP3 and p0rn collections.

    2. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by dustmote · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your opinions have been noted, citizen. Please report to the nearest termination booth immediately. The Computer is your *friend*, citizen. -The Computer

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    3. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by gonffen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ya...
      They'll be renting it out to use for their EVIL MP3 sharer searches.
      /. Headline: "In compensation for NSA making 2.5TB of fast access database of MP3's RIAA has been given permission to use the terminal for their searches for 6hours a day free of charge for it's lifetime and $5 an hour after that..." click for details

    4. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by Nynaeve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is why the "good" reason of "tracking terrorists" had to be used. Like you need a 100+ TB database to track terrorists! The real reason would cause too much of a fuss.
      The sheer number of naive and/or apathetic citizens that can not or will not ponder the ramifications of the construction of such a large people-tracking infrastructure -- regardless of its purpose -- is depressing.

    5. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      How you fit a 100+TB database into a fucking 2.5 TB disk, I'll never know.

    6. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      You don't. The article indicates the databases themselves comprise 100 TB. The 2.5TB RAM drive is for temporary storage to speed up database queries.

    7. Re:SMASH THE GIANT COMPUTER!!! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Damn. You're right. I was kinda hoping for a kickass compression algorithm or something... :S

  38. Who's using it? by Xeger · · Score: 1, Troll

    Maybe NSA wants to build a searchable database of SHA1 preimages. Maybe FBI wants to crack domestic terrorists' GPG keys (because, thanks to export restrictions, *no* international terrorist could ever have access to strong encryption, right guys?) Maybe NTSB wants to sort everyone's mother's maiden names alphabetically and cross-index with blood type in order to make a pretty picture.

    There are a million uses for this kind of lightning-fast random access storage, so it's useless to speculate. Whichever government agency is using it, one thing's certain: they're not using it for our benefit.

  39. How Unfair! by Tremor+(APi) · · Score: 1

    I pay more than enough taxes, I think - where's my giant honking RAM disk?? Of course... didn't somebody build a supercomputer out of Xserves for $5 mil? Boy, five million dollars isn't what it used to be... why, I remember when you could make a payphone call for only 35 cents!

    --
    [Z?]
  40. Re:Required line by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, but the best I can imagine is a RAID of those things.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  41. the ram in my PC by kraemer · · Score: 1

    The article says thats "10,000 times the RAM in your PC". No, thats only 2,500 times the RAM in my PC....

  42. Watch out for Bad Electricity Days! by nutznboltz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This cautionary tale is a USENET fable:

    VAXen, My Children, Just Don't Belong In Some Places

    Usenet Apocrypha

    VAXen, my children, just don't belong some places. In my business, I am frequently called by small sites and startups having VAX problems. So when a friend of mine in an Extremely Large Financial Institution (ELFI) called me one day to ask for help, I was intrigued because this outfit is a really major VAX user--they have several large herds of VAXen--and plenty of sharp VAXherds to take care of them.

    So I went to see what sort of an ELFI mess they had gotten into. It seems they had shoved a small 750 with two RA60's running a single application, PC style, into a data center with two IBM 3090's and just about all the rest of the disk drives in the world. The computer room was so big it had three street addresses. The operators had only IBM experience and, to quote my friend, they were having ``a little trouble adjusting to the VAX,'' were a bit hostile towards it and probably needed some help with system management. Hmmm, Hostility.... Sigh.

    Well, I thought it was pretty ridiculous for an outfit with all that VAX muscle elsewhere to isolate a dinky old 750 in their Big Blue Country, and said so bluntly. But my friend patiently explained that although small, it was an ``extremely sensitive and confidential application.'' It seems that the 750 had originally been properly clustered with the rest of a herd and in the care of one of their best VAXherds. But the trouble started when the Chief User went to visit his computer and its VAXherd.

    He came away visibly disturbed and immediately complained to the ELFI's Director of Data Processing that, ``There are some very strange people in there with the computers.'' Now since this user person was the Comptroller of this Extremely Large Financial Institution, the 750 had been promptly hustled over to the IBM data center which the Comptroller said, ``was a more suitable place.'' The people there wore shirts and ties and didn't wear head bands or cowboy hats.

    So my friend introduced me to the Comptroller, who turned out to be five feet tall, 85 and a former gnome of Zurich. He had a young apprentice gnome who was about 65. The two gnomes interviewed me in whispers for about an hour before they decided my modes of dress and speech were suitable for managing their system and I got the assignment.

    There was some confusion, understandably, when I explained that I would immediately establish a procedure for nightly backups. The senior gnome seemed to think I was going to put the computer in reverse, but the apprentice's son had an IBM PC and he quickly whispered that ``backup'' meant making a copy of a program borrowed from a friend and why was I doing that? Sigh.

    I was shortly introduced to the manager of the IBM data center, who greeted me with joy and anything but hostility. And the operators really weren't hostile--it just seemed that way. It's like the driver of a Mack 18 wheeler, with a condo behind the cab, who was doing 75 when he ran over a moped doing it's best to get away at 45. He explained sadly, ``I really warn't mad at mopeds but to keep from runnin' over that'n, I'da had to slow down or change lanes!''

    Now the only operation they had figured out how to do on the 750 was reboot it. This was their universal cure for any and all problems. After all it works on a PC, why not a VAX? Was there a difference? Sigh.

    But I smiled and said, ``No sweat, I'll train you. The first command you learn is HELP'' and proceeded to type it in on the console terminal. So the data center manager, the shift supervisor and the eight day operators watched the LA100 buzz out the usual introductory text. When it finished they turned to me with expectant faces and I said in an avuncular manner, ``This is your most important command!''

    The shift supervisor stepped forward and studied the text for about a minute. He then turned with a very puzzled expression on his face and asked, ``What do you use it

    1. Re:Watch out for Bad Electricity Days! by buzzoff · · Score: 1

      This was such a long post, but worth reading it at the end. How funny! Thanks for sharing.

      --
      "Never tell me the odds"
    2. Re:Watch out for Bad Electricity Days! by aled · · Score: 1

      God, I have seen things like this happen but I though it was just us!
      I have been in a long blackout (more than a week), on a hot summer, working in the basements, the generator hadn't been fueled in a while, the UPS wheren't charged, I can't even turn on my PC because every watt is precious on the loaded generator.
      I needed to access a server on another floor that was on the emergency power line but can't connect, I go there and found that someone has taken the power cable to turn on the water cooler. That was the only water cooler on in the enterprise.
      Some other time all was right but there was some disagreement between the generator and the UPS then power goes down anyway.
      Don't trust city power, UPS nor generators, even if they are properly maintained.
      Isn't there some candle powered computers we can trust?

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    3. Re:Watch out for Bad Electricity Days! by quinkin · · Score: 2, Funny
      And that's why I always deposit then withdraw... the banks don't mind. Honest.

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
  43. This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And here everyone thought 64 bit would only be used ONLY in virtual!! Wow! I wonder if it's running on "Big Iron", since T-Rex might be the only monster that could handle the load. (z990 from IBM [ os = z/OS]). They also are using FICON which seems kinda dated for the technology I'd like to see more on the switching capability. I wonder how many CPU's she's running?

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by TheRealFoxFire · · Score: 1

      Actually, a 64bit processor could (assuming it also had a 64 bit address line) address 18 million terabytes. As it currently stands, mainstream 64 bit processors (including the AMD K8) have a 48 bit line which can 'only' address 281 terabytes.

    2. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by Ancient+Devices+King · · Score: 1

      Huh? 2.5TB=2.5*8*2^12 bits. 64 bits can adress nearly 2^44 times that much memory. This is irrelevant though, since they say it's spread out over many machines (45, I'm guessing, since a typical rack is 45 units+these are 3 unit machines and 45*64GB=2.8TB).

      --
      -"It seems like you're trying to exploit a security hole. Would you like help?"
    3. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You were correct, it's 16 exabytes. I was wrong it doesn't quite max it out.. :) Thanks for the correction.. I just thought 31 bit = 2 GB in my head so I took a stab... The PSW can address all 64 bits in z/OS so technically the max number is possible, if only in virtual...

      [For other /.ers who are curious on what addressing this kind of RAM would take] Here is some good information on the 64 bit mainframe and 64 bit addressability:

      http://www.bmc.com/technews/011/Freeway.html

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    4. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by Eivind · · Score: 1
      What makes you think so ? 2^64 is 18446744073709551616 or 16777216 terabytes.

      This ain't anywhere close. It's not even using a hundreth of a percent of the 64 bit adress-space

    5. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Most computer-architectures are not bitwise-adressable.

      For example, a 32 bit computer (that is, one which uses 32 bits for its memory-adresses) can typically adress up to 2^32 _bytes_ of memory (4GB), and not only, as you seem to think 2^32 _bits_ of memory.

      The latter would make 512MB the maximal amount of RAM in a 32-bit x-86 machine.

      In principle, a 32-bit machine could force aligned access, and thus only have one adress for every 4 bytes of memory, that would make it possible to adress 16GB with 32 bits. The reason this ain't done is probably mostly bacwards compatibility, I'm under the impression that most actual memory-access is 4-byte aligned anyway, for performance-reasons.

    6. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      You are correct, although I don't understand how you could have one address per full word of storage? Don't you need to address every byte? I'd like to read more information on this if you have any links available? Thanks!

      (On a mainframe it's actually on 2Gb addressability with 32 bit, because of 24 bit, the first bit is an "address mode" bit, so it's actually only capable of a max 31 bit addresses..). I have no idea if x86 would work the same way?

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    7. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by Ancient+Devices+King · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand your question. I don't really know much about memory systems. I was just working it out the way it made sense to me, without worrying about overhead and addressing systems. In any case, (if I understand correctly about the address bit) 63 bits would still mean that 2.5 TB is something like 2 millionths of the max addressible ram (even less if each memory address is more than one bit).

      --
      -"It seems like you're trying to exploit a security hole. Would you like help?"
    8. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Ok, so here's how that'd work. With a 32-bit architecture (data and adress-bus) not only are the adresses 32-bit, but you also, typically, get 32 bits of data back from a adress. So, if you set the adress "0000 0000", (yes, I know, that adress is magical and "forbidden" on some architectures, I'm simplifying here!) you get back 32 bits of data, stored from "0000 0000" to "0000 0003", 32 bits, 4 bytes.

      If you ask for the data at "0000 0001" you'll instead get the stuff from "0000 0001" to "0000 0004", notice the overlap with the last call.

      What this means is that there are 4 different ways of getting at every byte in memory. If you really want to read byte 17, you can do so by asking for adress 17, 16, 15 or 14, and discard those bytes you don't need. (this works because on 32-bit architectures, when you ask for "14", you really get 14-15-16-17, or atleast can at no extra delay. (because the bus doesn't go any faster with just 8 bit on it instead of 32 bits)

      An alternative would be for a architecture to only be word adressable. This would mean that if you asked for adress 0 you get the first word in memory, which is bytes 0-1-2-3. If you ask for adress 1 you get bytes 4-5-6-7, in general, if you ask for address X you get word number X, which is bytes number X*4, X*4+1, X*4+2, X*4+3.

      A "drawback" of this architecture would be that if you really wanted adress 17, you'd *have* to do it by asking for word 4, which would return you bytes 16-17-18-19, and then discard the unwanted stuff. Your CPU could have an opcode that did this for you though, and besides, we're pretty much doing this anyway, because frequently aligned (as in the adress I ask for is divisible by the number of bytes in a word) access is frequently faster than non-aligned.

      You're rigth that sometimes there's "address bits" that aren't really part of the adress, so the effective adress-space is smaller. For example, for a long time Linux used 1 bit to determine if the address was "user space" or "kernel space", which effectively limited a single user-space program from having a adress-space larger than 2^32.

    9. Re:This maxes out 64 bit technology!!! by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      I understand what your saying. Thanx for the detailed explanation, I really appreciate it!

      I guess the halfword instructions in this case would actually retrieve a full word of storage and then just cut off the last 2 bytes? (Which explains why half word instructions are typically slower then full word instructions?) It sounds cool, but wouldn't this cause some nightmere's for 64 bit? Would you _have_ to retrieve a double word now? Or would it be the same with maybe another addressing bit?

      Thanks again!!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  44. A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by AltoidsSuck · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you go to disk, just once, you need about 9ms just to get the disk heads in position. If you're reading a file system of complex database, you now have multiple disk seeks and reads. That adds up. Seeking in RAM is orders of magnitude faster. That's why all the good search engines keep *everything* in RAM all the time.

    That is why Google has multiple copies of the entire web in memory.

    -AS

    1. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by MMaestro · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's why all the good search engines keep *everything* in RAM all the time.

      Everything? Damn thats a lotta quick always available pr0n then.

    2. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by NSash · · Score: 4, Funny
      Google has multiple copies of the entire web in memory.

      HOLY SHIT!

    3. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      One thing I'm curious about is, rather than a huge RAM pretending to be a drive, why not just use lots of RAM as RAM? Granted, I suppose that getting a computer that can fit a sizable fraction of a terrabyte's worth of RAM sticks, I'd think it would be a preferable way to do it.

    4. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by Bamafan77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is why Google has multiple copies of the entire web in memory.

      Interesting link, though I wonder if everything it claims is true. Specifically I'm referring to the business about every page Google has indexed necessarily being in memory simultaneously. Possible, but I'd have to hear it from a Google programmer familiar with the area to start to believe it.

      And even if it were true, the statement that Google has "multiple copies of the entire web in memory" is certainly false because there are still many webpages that are not indexed by Google.

    5. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats a freaking BLOG!

      How can you possibly believe that? True disk accesses are slow, but it doesnt mean that they have to be completely avoided to still get good response time.

      Caching everything in RAM definitely helps, but is not feasable. There are many other concepts out there that Google must use as well (dedicated RAID disk subsystems, metafiles, heuristic-based searches, etc...)

    6. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1
      Specifically I'm referring to the business about every page Google has indexed necessarily being in memory simultaneously.

      Assuming this information is close to what Google is running today, your suspicions are warranted:

      Google's data structures are optimized so that a large document collection can be crawled, indexed, and searched with little cost. Although, CPUs and bulk input output rates have improved dramatically over the years, a disk seek still requires about 10 ms to complete. Google is designed to avoid disk seeks whenever possible, and this has had a considerable influence on the design of the data structures.

      ...
      This design decision was driven by the desire to have a reasonably compact data structure, and the ability to fetch a record in one disk seek during a search

      ...
      This batch mode of update is crucial because otherwise we must perform one seek for every link which assuming one disk would take more than a month for our 322 million link dataset.
    7. Re:A Single Disk Hit Kills Responsiveness by trisweb · · Score: 1

      From the UC Berkeley School of Information Management and Systems:
      "The World Wide Web contains about 170 terabytes of information on its surface; in volume this is seventeen times the size of the Library of Congress print collections."

      This 2.5 TB RAMdisk is a big thing? You'd need 68 of them (more if you actually expect the internet to grow, but I don't know...).

      That's also without the "deep web" -- database-driven sites (they estimate the size to be 400 to 450 times larger if they were included).

      --
      "!"
  45. Longhorn developers... by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is what's going through the mind of someone at redmond right now...

    "With that much ram, I won't have to worry about fixing the memory leaks!"

  46. Databases, my ass... by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're using it to store ripped DVDs! It's an outrage! They're stealing the bread from the mouths of Julia Roberts and Steven Seagal!

  47. Encryption? by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Could this be used with a large enough pre-computed table to crack encryption? Maybe the NSA is hoping to win RSA's next challenge. :)

    </tinfoil>

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Encryption? by gonffen · · Score: 1

      Maybe their just going to make a 2.5TB database of possible PGP keys to make decrypting code obsolete.
      Instead a user will just run it through a program that will calculate the public key and send it to the database which will instantly send back the key that matches.

    2. Re:Encryption? by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      Cracking RSA encryption keys is processor intensive, not memory intensive. I bet some of the machines they have for that are pretty amazing though.

  48. emacs, obviously. by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

    they just want to have more than 10 files open at once.

  49. RAM Upgrade by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    It's 2.5TB!

    Sweet. This is a sure sign that Doom 3 is almost here...

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  50. For those talking about restoring data on it... by Vthornheart · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... it sounds to me, based on the article, that the theoretical use for it would be more like a giant, freakin' enormous Cache system than an outright storage system. In otherwords, on the beginning of a query, all pertinent info is copied to the Solid State drive for analysis. There it is analyzed, and wanted data extracted at astoundingly fast speeds.

    Perhaps we should begin to consider the implications of this step in analytical ability. Every techie knows that the Government (in cooperation with major Corporations) has had the methods in place to track individuals... RFID tags, GPS locating (in automobiles as well as hand held units. You can tell your position, but the position is also transmitted back... Five Star anyone?), Cell Phone triangulating, and thanks to the Patriot Act, the Government now has legal access to the records of pretty much any transaction we make with bookstores, libraries, etc (and probably more places as well... and this isn't even taking into account information that they might be recieving in ways that we do not know of).

    The thing that (we shall assume) they didn't have before was the ability to instantaneously cross check this information. (I assume this because... well... why would they have bought the drive otherwise?) Now that they can check such information so quickly, will we be brought into an era of "Total Information Awareness" as the government spoke of not too long ago? Does this smell the same as the Thought Police to anyone else?

    To me, this presents at least the intent by the government to achieve total information awareness, if it doesn't actually achieve it. And the intent is bad enough. Perhaps they're not reading our minds, but the ability to monitor our actions in such vast varities of levels comes pretty close to doing so.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:For those talking about restoring data on it... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > The thing that (we shall assume) they didn't have before was the ability to
      > instantaneously cross check this information. (I assume this because... well...
      > why would they have bought the drive otherwise?) Now that they can check such
      > information so quickly, will we be brought into an era of "Total Information
      > Awareness" as the government spoke of not too long ago? Does this smell the
      > same as the Thought Police to anyone else?

      I can see why they'd need a lot of disk space for that sort of thing, but RAM? Why? You don't need to hold information on everyone all the time in RAM - there's no point.

  51. I have one of these. by Mordack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, I have one of these things too. It really speeds up my builds.

    --
    I don't need no stinkin' sig!
  52. NSA by BCW2 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I bet they are hooking it to one of their Cray's just to search their own DB.
    Can you imagine the amount of signals traffic they intercept in a day? Then try to sort into files of what is coded in cyphers we have broken and what needs work. Then translate the decoded messages and forward them to the agency that needs them.

    No wonder they have several Crays.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  53. Re:Sucker must take forever.... by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    You don't format RAM. Cut power and it's:

    00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000

    again... Your thinking of hard drives..

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  54. Imagine... by fm6 · · Score: 1

    No, I can't say it.

  55. Startup time by jhines · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now checking 2,748,779,069.440 bytes of memory, please wait.....

    1. Re:Startup time by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know how you have .440 of a byte... or is this some weird system that has 25 bits per byte?

  56. plug by mabu · · Score: 1

    How much you want to bet they have that ramdrive plugged into a big octopus with no UPS?

  57. Aaaaaagh! by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagg ggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!

    <flees with hands over his ears>

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Aaaaaagh! by tenchima · · Score: 1
      Oh come on now.
      It was supersized after all....

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
  58. Database accelerator by Devi0us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was seriously looking at this product as a solution for a really bad database performance issue for a major financial institution. Instead of redesigning the whole database (small, around 2-3TB), we were thinking about putting a couple of these in to replace the slow EMC 8830/DMX infrastructure. Unfortunately, the PCI busses of the DB server weren't fast enough to keep up with it (Unisys ES7000 420). When you look at the TCO, the man years required to redesign the DB and applications were much more expensive than dropping in another few million in hardware. The only downside that I saw to the terraramsan solution was that it eats power and generates way too much heat. This thing would be great for horizontally scaled databses, as long as your physical plant could support it. Brute force always wins over recoding. That is, until we got offshored by Indians billing at $30/hour.

    1. Re:Database accelerator by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Sorry, "horizontally scaled databases"? What's that? (Genuinely curious.)

  59. Imagine by Xiaotou · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things!

    There... someone had to say it.

    1. Re:Imagine by MooseByte · · Score: 1


      Now all we're missing is the obligatory Simpsons quote. :-)

    2. Re:Imagine by sushi_steve · · Score: 1

      They already function like a cluster. Each rack is connected by cable.

  60. dumb question by deviator · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the money be better spent on regular commodity DRAM in servers? I mean, you can buy a lot more DRAM for a lot less money--and just use it as cache or hold an entire 2.5TB database in memory in a cluster.... I dunno, just seems like a waste.

    But that's what government is good at - don't find a smarter way to run your database (so it's ultimately faster) - just throw it harder by applying more cash.

    1. Re:dumb question by Devi0us · · Score: 1

      Find a good way to virtualize ramdisks in commodity servers, then bind it together into addressable luns, and then you can market a replacement. Better yet, find an off the shelf server that can hold more than 3TB of ram, and just mount it as a ramdisk, and use the remaining 500G as memory for the system.

      The TMS solution is a drop in replacement for SAN based disk.

  61. Obligatory Star Wars quote and a sobering thought by Chalybeous · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look at the size of that thing!

    When I worked for the Inland Revenue in the UK, we hooked into a national database of personal details available to a wide variety of government departments. We used Telnet clients via an intranet, and although I forget the precise specs of the central server, it sure as hell didn't need a RAM disk that big.
    We never had any problem waiting for results, either. On a really bad day, you'd get maybe a 1s lag between hitting enter and a results screen coming up.

    So if the US.gov needs a RAM disk that big, it's one fricking huge database. I have to wonder what sort of info it carries (part of the size might be due to things like photos, fingerprints, criminal records - stuff our DB didn't use), and how many people are on there (100% of the population?).
    The scary thing: what if 2.5TB is a fraction of the database size - say, 25 to 50%? You'd still get reasonable performance, but the idea of a government holding 5-10TB of personal data seems positively Orwellian. "Big Bush is watching you"?

    Disclaimer: I am not a techie, a lawyer or a government analyst. And it's only 5 years since I junked my Amiga 500, which did perfectly well with a mere 1MB of RAM, so maybe I'm used to thinking on a different scale. If you feel I'm wrong in any way, please feel free to correct me - I actively appreciate it!

    --

    "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

  62. I hope they are using ECC memory by hazman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or else the Ministry of Information may just be looking for a Mr. Buttle rather than the Mr. Tuttle they really want to find.

  63. MOD PARENT DOWN by SlipJig · · Score: 1

    Why did this get modded as 'Insightful'? It should have been modded down as 'Troll'.

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      troll means hooking for bites, like fishing. yeah, so? just because it's a troll doesn't mean it isn't the truth, just that it's not fun for the fish. it's not like i used fake baite.

  64. Get a grip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The US installed Duvallier. Then they installed Aristide. Twice! Then when he asked for help again, they forcibly removed him and are now supporting the rebels.
    Here
    Here
    Here
    Here
    Here

    Get a clue. Read a newspaper. Turn on the television news. Pull your head out of your ass.

    1. Re:Get a grip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This is all bullshit. The US never did anything to Haiti and never should have. This is all the niggers in Haiti's fault and it should remain that way. 200 years ago Haiti was the richest countries in the Caribbean. They had fertile land and plenty of resources to support one of the highest qualities of life in Caribbean.

      Then the niggers decided in a fit of stupidity to mirror what was going on in France at the time. They raped, murdered, and kill all the white people on the island. They raped the white women before they killed them and the stuck the children of the white people there on stakes and paraded them around the island.

      Then the uneducated niggers without the support of the upper white class de-evolved into a tribal state like their homeland in Africa. They destroyed the infrastructure that the white land owners had built. They ravaged and raped the land by using the slash burn style of agriculture that is popular in their homeland. When one area was used up they would simply move on and burn another area. The result was one of the most fertile islands was reduced to wasteland and ash. It is now impossible to grow enough food there to support the population. But this didn't slow down the niggers there, they continue to breed like rats, sure they starve but that don't matter.

      I'm sure the liberal belly aching on Slashdot will start any second but all this is true. A simple google search will revile it to be so. Where ever you find the ape like nigger you will find savagery and superstition rule. There is no place where the nigger has been left of his own devise that has gone up, only down. Look to Africa for more proof.

      Every where in Africa the white man settled the quality of life went up. People lived longer and diseases and hunger vanished. When the white people where driven out or murdered by the nigger population civilization begin a spiral downwards back to the level it was before the white man came. South Africa is a modern example of this. The richest country on the continent under white rule up until a few years ago. It had the highest standard of living for both white and black anywhere in Africa.

      Then the white man was driven out and the country has been spiraling down ever sense. Crime is up to levels unheard of before the end of white rule. 1 out every 2 adults has AIDS and they refuse to accept responsibility for it. The common ideal to cure AIDS is to rape a child, an underage girl. Up until recently South Africa refused to recognize the cause of AIDS as being the HIV virus. The official government line was it was caused by evil spirits and sorcery. Superstition and violence are all the nigger knows.

      Yes Haiti, and Africa, should be left alone. This it not our doing. The niggers where given a paradise which in short order they destroyed. I say let them live in their cesspool. Their mistake, their problem, let them deal with it. If they can't deal with it, nature will deal with it for them. If they can't take care of the problems they caused famine and disease will do it for them.

      Of course they won't deal with it. They will do like the nigger has always done. Once and area becomes uninhabitable they will move on. They will build their boats and set sail for the United States like they always do. These boats should be turned back as soon as possible and sank if they can't be. Unless the Haitian nigger does to the US what he has done to his homeland.

      It is a simple fact, everywhere white man is things are going up. Everywhere the nigger is, and left to his own advice, things are going down. This is evident in Haiti, Africa and to an extent in American cities. When integration allowed the nigger to live where it wanted to they moved in to the center of American cities causing the white people to flee to the suburbs to escape the crime and violence the nigger brought with him. Now the cities are cesspools just like Africa and Haiti where gangs rule and violence and crime are a way of life for the urban nigger.

      That is just the way it is.

    2. Re:Get a grip. by gessel · · Score: 1

      Yikes.

      Gosh... 400 years of slavery had nothing to do with it, huh? I'm sure you see that as a "gift" we gave those poor people living in dirt and huts and they were too stupid to recognize how wonderful we were for providing them with wood floors and rape (mixing your "good" white blood with theirs) and chains (for their own good) and murder (death is escape from the horror of being born black) and taking them from their families (what a boon to them to get them away from their other ner-do-well relatives), then once they were freed, we gifted them with 100 years of regular lynching (the gift of knowing one's place), and once the ungrateful miscreants rejected that gift, we offered them economic marginalization, regular police beat downs, and social segregation (providing the opportunity to learn to be independent).

      Your absolutely astonishing cultural and historical ignorance would be hysterical if it weren't both tragic and horrifically common.

      I realize it's utterly pointless to argue with people like you. You are simply congenitally incapable of generalizing your own experience across whatever bounds your ignorance draws, and the concept of empathy for someone that doesn't look like you is utterly alien. It's like trying to get a 5 year old to engage in abstract reasoning: you look like a human being, and therefore one would assume you have equivalent capacity for thought, but your reasoning makes it clear that you simply do not.

      There should be a test for this sort of mental state that would prevent you and people like you from ever having a position of authority based on the same justification as keeping an avowed child molester from becoming a baby sitter. But don't despair, it might someday be curable.

  65. Ok, now imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    running memtest on this.

  66. But with the electricity infrastructure as it is.. by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    Let's just hope they have a really, really good UPS; saving that thing off to conventional media would take a few hours.

    Next on CNN: Terrorists who target the power infrastructure of command-and-control centres! Pictures at eleven!

    --
    - undoware.ca
  67. Reminds me... by reuben04 · · Score: 1

    It reminds me of Platypus Technologies Qikdrive. You use it as another hard drive on your system for either database storage or caching or transaction files. Access time is much quicker than normal either way.

  68. BUSH n PORN by llZENll · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nice, now half of Bush's porn collection will be instantly viewable. Next up you'll see a purchase for 1000 OLED displays to simulcast all his feeds on.

  69. command line by Nonac · · Score: 1

    rdev -r /dev/fd0 2684354560

  70. In other news... by fizban · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...1-800-MAGNETS reported a very large order from an undisclosed source for very high-powered magnets...

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    1. Re:In other news... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that magnets can't disrupt capacitor-based storage devices such as SRAM or DRAM. Magnetic-based core memory technology came and went decades ago...

    2. Re:In other news... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I wonder what we'd need in that case. Perhaps some kind of Electromagnetic Pulse Generator...

      Then again, that would take everything out as well as the giant RAMDrive itself... but no one said the solution had to be elegant. ;)

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
  71. A somewhat related question by Gherald · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where can I buy a *small* ramdisk, on the cheap?

    For example, I have about ten 128mb PC100 DIMMs lying around. I'd love to stick them on some kind of PCI card to make a ramdisk, but I have no idea where to go about getting such hardware... google's results are useless, they're all links to *SOFTWARE* ramdisks that use main memory =(

    1. Re:A somewhat related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you're looking for a RocketDrive.

      I believe it's a 33 MHz PCI beastie.

    2. Re:A somewhat related question by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Hmm, well thats at least $500 for 1GB... not very cost effective. My idea was to find a good use for old DIMMs...

      I'd be willing to try something like that RocketDrive, but my budget is only a few hundred dollars.

    3. Re:A somewhat related question by Nynaeve · · Score: 2, Informative

      RocketDrive retails for $1000 with 1GB to $3000 with 4GB. Not exactly "on the cheap" though. They used to sell it without memory, but apparently they don't anymore. Here's a review.

    4. Re:A somewhat related question by djaxl · · Score: 1

      It looks like their software does not require their hardware. You can create virtual drives on your RAM, without needing the Rocket Drive hardware.

    5. Re:A somewhat related question by djaxl · · Score: 1
    6. Re:A somewhat related question by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and there are about 3 billion softwares out there that will do exactly the same thing.

      The whole point is I do *not* want to use main RAM memory. I want a hardware solution, but not $1000 one.

      My fairly top-of-the-line motherboard cost me $120. A P4 2.8 was around $180, and two sticks of 512MB PC3200 ran for a little over 100 appiece.

      Thats almost a whole system for half the price of a measly PCI ramdrive!

      There has to be a cheaper way....

    7. Re:A somewhat related question by Gherald · · Score: 1

      no thanks

    8. Re:A somewhat related question by keith6689 · · Score: 1

      Seems that it is limited by the data rate of the PCI bus. It would be cool if they do a 64-bit version, and make it bootable.

  72. magnet by cheeseSource · · Score: 1

    The question is: How do we get someone close to it with a giant magnet?
    You know darn well this is going to be used to search for info on everyone in the U.S., let alone the world. Isn't it great when technology and information come together...

    --
    (Sponsored by cheeseSource for President 2012)
    1. Re:magnet by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      That's all we need: someone to spontaneously flip the 'conspiracy theorist' bit on hundreds of thousands of records, causing a huge leap in the number of heart attacks nationwide.

  73. Re:CREATE INDEX by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Well, actually it's their index which is already that large.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  74. Anything that big must be from Texas by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Texas Memory Systems specifically.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  75. Re:What size is it? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Ummm..... Do RAM chips have zero volume or something?

  76. Oh yeah? by reverendslappy · · Score: 1
    At 2.5TB, it is roughly 10,000 times the size of the RAM in your PC.


    Oh yeah? How do they know? Maybe I got 2.5TB of RAM in my PC too... Yeah.
  77. Silly question by mike260 · · Score: 1

    Why not put the RAM directly into the database servers, rather than having them access it through a filesystem? Presumably large db systems have all kinds of clever mechanisms in place to make good use of RAM.

    I'm not being funny, I'd genuinely like to know since it seems like a roundabout way of doing it.

    1. Re:Silly question by gordlea · · Score: 1

      I'm betting there aren't many processors that can address that much memory.

      --

      Choose yer poison: Prophets or Profits

  78. only searching or storeing? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    Maybe they need the database to store all the passenger flight records submitted by the airlines that fly to the US.

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  79. BTW, this is how oracle started by Serveert · · Score: 1

    It was supposedly used by the USDA at the time, Oracle people wondered why these farmers wanted such a huge DB ;)

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  80. tenchima shoots... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    ...and scores!

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  81. Re:Paid too much. by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Lets see.. 2500 GB of RAM at $150 a gig (retail).. that $375K ..

    Do you think they're buying it in DIMMs or something? Yeah, somewhere in the depths of the mainframe, there is a giant board with 2500 1G DIMMs plugged into it. </sarcasm>

    Not all memory is equivalent, you know. The price does seem a bit steep, though.

  82. Take off your tin foil hat and re-moderate parent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    None of those sources prove the grandparent's claim and most of them are local crackpot newspapers. The majority of articles claiming this only report that Aristide himself claims he was kidnapped, not that it actually happened. It's in his best interest to make up that silly story. A leader is ousted by rebellion and he cries bloody murder. Basic sociology here. You don't want to be ousted from your pedastal of leadership. When it happens, certain types of people will do anything they possibly can to scream unjustice in a desperate attempt to regain the throne. There's a certain reality distortion that takes place.

    I am uncertain why you suggest the parent read a newspaper or turn on the television news, considering your implication that it would prove you correct. Instead, it proves that your theory is a conspiracy denied countless times. The NY Times, Washington Post and other newspapers you're referring to have all consistently reported that this theory has been denied. Most cable news channels have had limited coverage altogether, reporting on the status of the Marines stationed in Haiti and noting only briefly Aristide's quaint claim that he was kidnapped, followed by a quotation of the Pentagon's denial and subsequent dismissal. I watch daily CNN, FNC and MSNBC, meaning those are the channels I refer to. Located here is an editorial which covers the majority of the material. For the record, both the Seattle Times and San Francisco Chronicle are respected in the industry, but the NY Times is included here as well.

    Here (eatme123/eatme123)
    Here
    Here
    Here

    There are occasions in which skepticism is warranted, in which the government is lying to you in order to further its agenda. There may even be times in which the White House spokesman can casually lie to you without showing an iota of remorse, although that would be remarkable. This is not one of those times, as is obvious to those of us who are paying attention. Pull your head out of your ass.

  83. Mis-posting by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Should have been posted under "Your Rights Online". I bet this RAM disk is being used for non-scientific purposes.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  84. Let the humorous SQL queries begin!!! by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    SELECT * FROM tblNSA WHERE usLivingIn = "true" AND ethnicity = "arab"

    SELECT * FROM tblCIA WHERE ss = "xxxxxxxxx" AND surname = "Kerry" AND dirt = "true"

    SELECT * FROM tblFBI WHERE student = "true" AND politicalID = "left" ORDER BY antiwar

    UPDATE tblTEXASAF SET duty_fulfilled = "true" WHERE ss = "xxxxxxxx" AND surname = "Bush"

  85. Who's More Paranoid? by ddelrio · · Score: 1

    I'm somewhat worried about government snooping--and am therefore labelled as paranoid by my friends who are supporters of big government. But I can't imagine that my concern can be labelled as paranoia--I'm not spending all my money to find out what the government's doing--I'm spending it on taxes.

  86. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote and a sobering thoug by SoLoatWork · · Score: 1

    In 1995 you have roughly 58 million citizens in the UK. In 1995 the US had roughly 263 million citizens. Even small amounts of information would take more space than a UK database. Rough math says a UK database of this type would be 250gigs. Doesn't seem that big to me.

  87. expensive? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    they could have just bought 6,250 Creative 4GB Muvo MP3 players @ $200 apiece, and removed the 4GB CFdisk. then it would have only cost them 1.25 million dollars.

    The Gubment needs to save our money!

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  88. Not only that by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Even though Google runs a lot of queries, the key difference is that Google has a web crawler running 24x7. It causes them to update their database constantly that requires very different data structures and application support.

    The government's project looks like a pure Data Warehousing to me. It means that their data set is pretty much static and serves for just retrieving data that will take shitload of time to load into this RAM (they should have some pretty heavy duty UPSs there ;-).

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Not only that by Tree131 · · Score: 1
      Google has at least 5,000 1U server throwaways, if not 10,000, and a bin full of failed hardware (drives, power supplies, etc...). They don't even bother with RMA's or cases for those things. It all runs on linux and is distributed processing with more than 30% of the queries cached - it's ready to display before you even type it.
      The queries in a database can't really be cached, especially if you are cross-referencing quite a few of them, so Google is not a very good solution.

      Also, this RAMDrive has no moving parts, so it is less likely to fail, which, in turn, might save the gov't some money by not having a server monkey always replace parts and image new systems.

    2. Re:Not only that by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      What's your source for this information? That's pretty interesting if it's true.

      --
      P226 .40cal
    3. Re:Not only that by Tree131 · · Score: 1

      I used to work for their competitor and at one point our machines were in the same datacenter as theirs. Couple of my coworkers told me about it.

  89. Freeway intersection by unicorn · · Score: 1

    Woefully underestimating the cost.

    Whe the replacement I880 stretch of freeway opened in Oakland California, to replace what collapsed during the '89 earthquake, the local news was reporting that it cost over $1000/inch to construct.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  90. It is only a fraction. by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Read the article- it refers to the 2.5 TB space being used as temporary query data storage for a 100TB+ databank.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  91. Other Uses... by Jack+Kolesar · · Score: 1

    You think we can get them to throw BitTorrent on it?

  92. My first thought by unicorn · · Score: 1

    Was the Government upgrading it's RAM is just gonna hurt, really.

    But with April 15 right around the corner, I'm almost used to getting rammed by them.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  93. [OT] Re:Watch out for Bad Electricity Days! by sl956 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even 15 years later it's still damn funny.

    Just to set the record straight, the original author of this post is Jack Harvey, and it was originally published under the title "The Immortal Murderer" on January 18th, 1989 on DECUServe, the DECUS member bulletin board.
    This bulletin board is still active under the name Encompasserve.org after mergers of Digital Equipment Corporation and Compaq with Hewlett Packard.
    The original publication can still be found on that bulletin board in the archived Soapbox conference, note number 168.

    It was Monday, 19-Oct-1987.
    For those of you who were not born, Monday 19-Oct-1987 was the day the stock market crashed.
  94. One Word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
  95. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote and a sobering thoug by mbruns · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but your scale is a bit off. 5-10TB isn't large these days. AT&T's Data warehouse is 95TB. Amazon's is 35TB. Heck, there's an 8TB database running on Windows. http://www.wintercorp.com/vldb/2003_TopTen_Survey/ All%20Winners.pdf

  96. In Beetles by identity0 · · Score: 1

    This database is huge - 2.5 TB is a LOT of memory. How big is it, you ask?

    Well, to put in terms the average Slashdotter can understand: If the database were measured with VW Beetles, it would weigh in at a whopping 128 VW Beetles, assuming each Beetle came with a 20 GB iPod.

  97. Has happened in the past by bobobobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at Chile for a past example. Venezuela today too, although hard to say for certain.

    1. Re:Has happened in the past by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      " Look at Chile for a past example. Venezuela today too, although hard to say for certain."

      Well considering the failed coup in Venezuela was US engineered/backed, and that nothing has come to light to suggest the US admin has changed its attitude and ways at all, it seems pretty easy to suggest that they're involved in trying to topple and undermine the democracy there now (and in the future).

      'Freedom and Democracy' my arse, as they say.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    2. Re:Has happened in the past by I'mJVC · · Score: 1

      As an actual Venezuelan (nationality AND residence) I'd have to admit being both surprised and offended that you refer to the actual administration as a democracy.

      No flamewars intended, just a word about how easy is to play devil's advocate from a few hudred miles away.

      The are my two cents. Which I'll have to owe you, since in my country the freedom to buy foreign currency is banned since february 5, 2003.

      --
      Will add sig later...
    3. Re:Has happened in the past by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      I'll take your point, but add that I live in the UK, and there's not much sign of "democracy" here either.

      I'm sure your country, like mine is far from perfect; that still doesn't excuse the US undermining "democracies" [however loosely the term is used] across the world - whilst telling the ignorant masses how they're championing freedom and democracy, all the while.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  98. exactly! by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I once applied for a job at Visa. Believe it or not, they're using flat files and some very extreme hardware to run sed and awk scripts. That was all! I couldn't believe it. I felt like I had been allowed in to see the heart of a very large beast and it was in fact a couple of double 'A' batteries.
    1. Re:exactly! by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Google works in a surprisingly similar fashion.

      I did some work for a company with a multi TB database, it was being stored in flat file on an old mainframe. We moved it to SQL Server 2000; it took two years of tuning (both by us and by Microsoft) to get the performance to be acceptable compared to the old flat file.

      Remember, in computing there are always tradeoffs. Database technology is often a trade of complexity management (in the form of metadata) for speed.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  99. terrorists? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

    if by terrorists they mean porn, than, yes, this purchase makes sense... it might be able to sift though [insert government official name here]'s porn collection!

    what? half of [insert above government official name here]'s porn collection is 3 TB? quick get a few more of these racks!

    --
    Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  100. Paranoia... by anubi · · Score: 1
    ( Putting on paranoia hat... )

    Ok, the ol' US of A isn't really cutting it in the world anymore after the profits generated rebuilding the world after WW2. We aren't the only show in town anymore, but most of us don't know it yet. Fat, dumb and happy, we are.

    Technology is what drives our rise to fame, yet not only do we export the technology freely, we also discourage ( by lack of the promise of any sort of meaningful employment ) our youth from technology fields, choosing to use what others make rather than learning how to innovate on what we made before.

    So, we now import damn near everything.

    Gone are those days when kids would tear a disposed TV apart and re-use its components to build all sorts of gadgets like I did.

    Note the latest wealth-building books all speak of "earned income" as the worst kind of income - taxed to the hilt. What they tout is "passive income", that is making money from appreciation of your investments. Most tout real estate for this. So the price of a home is rising much faster than the wages ( driven by outsource competition ).

    In order to "help" the buyers come up with more money, the government drops the federal funds rates. Sure, now the market is flooded with cheap dollars. Lots and lots of borrowed dollars are now competing with earned dollars in the market. Prices go up. Merchants rake in increased dollar sales. The wealthy snap up yet more and more properties. The new incoming generation finds themselves trapped between competing with third world countries labor rates and the price of a home.

    So, economic costs force them to delay having kids until they can at least hold down a place to live. Back to the "Rich-Dad, Poor-Dad" syndrome, these kids will soon find they can not work for any sort of corporation who not only will force them to compete internationally, they will also force them to render their SSN, so the corporation can gladly give any earnings info to the gov't so the gov't can tax it back.

    I think the writing is on the wall that the next generation - if they are gonna survive - is going to have to work for themselves. That is - find something there is a market for and do it themselves. Things like auto repair come to mind. Its something that one - armed with enough tools, could do at home without involving anyone else. A job paid for in cash. Cash unseen by the monitoring systems currently in place. This way, costs to the consumer can still be held to a low rate so the rich can have their toys maintained. But I think it will become standard knowledge that if you ask for anyone's SSN, you expect to pay about quadruple the rate so your servant can pay the tax on the money you are about to give him.

    Its kinda obvious things are heading for a tumble. I think the government knows it. I think they know they better get a system in place to control the people while the going is good. They wanna make sure that any revolt among the wage-slaves is controllable by knowing exactly who is involved, and economically ruining the dissident without taking out the rest of the wage-slaves, whose labor supports the lifestyles of the owning classes.

    To me, all this 9-11 stuff did was give our government all the justification it needed to install all sorts of snooping technology aimed at ourselves. I am sure all these fancy databases will be mostly used for taxation enforcement.

    I do not like what I see in the future. If we pee-ons don't get busy at the ballot box, and hold politicians accountable, we are gonna be in for a world of hurt.

    Example: When Congress is presented with the H1B Visa program showing how many jobs, they should simultaneously consider the equal amount of Americans who won't have jobs, look at their salary, how much taxes they would have paid, and at the same time as they sign the bill, they would be signing immediate budget cuts to reflect the lost tax revenues, and also support costs for the unemployed workforce resulting from their signature.

    So, right now, the government is putting the machinery in place for enforce compliance while the getting is good. Can't blame them for that.

    ( taking off paranoia hat... )

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  101. You forgot the part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Where Aristide rigged the last election, and suppressed dissidents, thus setting himself up like most of the leaders in Haiti's history. Bush was kind of engough to get Aristide rear end out of the country before it got shot off.

    Haiti should just be turned over the UN to see if they really can save some small country from itself.

  102. Frightening by OceanWave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rumor has it that Adolf of WW-II infamy managed a lot of his damage with records stored in shoe-boxes.

    It is scary even imagine what they could do with that. Do all the posts regarding privacy come to mind?

    Once, I had an argument with a buddy of mine that spoke his mind--to much--over Email. I gave him a little grep script to show how email monitoring could select "suspicious material" for further analysis.

    Now, all they have to do is tie it in to a profiling system, and there you go. Orwell's 1984^10 all over again:

    SELECT TOP 100

    Suspect.LastName, Suspect.FirstName
    FROM
    Suspect
    ORDER BY
    Suspect.Profile_Points DESC
  103. Its a good investment by zenst · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the new cap limits and surcharges alot of american broadband connections have impossed and increased average speed of connections. It would make only perfect sence to have the fastest spamming maching possible. Why - more spam's, more communications infrastructure utiliased the more money changing hands and...more tax's paid. There is the added bonus of not having to find out what people want and elling them. End result is a small database that fits on a PDA were FBA/NSA can instantly know if somebody is a terroist/pervert or simpsons fan. So for there faster database they generate more tax's, more comms infrastructure intilisation and a easier to manage personel details database. Lets not forget the growth in IT stocks thru the growing spam prevention markets. :>

    Either that or thats a heck of an MP3 player the presedent has there.

  104. What to search for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is to find the Iraqi WMD's, of course. And also, to find the traitor who outed Valerie Plame.

    On a different note, OJ has ordered one of these for himself, to help with the search for the real killers.

    Mr Shapiro

  105. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote and a sobering thoug by shadoelord · · Score: 1

    So let me get this streight... you used a telent client to access a goverment database? lol.

    --
    this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
  106. Usage instructions for the gov't by eamonman · · Score: 1

    1: Insert USB Keydrive into USB port
    2: Watch as the drive snaps cleanly in two as all the weight of the drive is centered upon the metal USB drive's neck.
    3: Buy a new 2.5 TB USB drive.
    4: Goto step 1!

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  107. 2.5TB list of terrorists? by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    That must be really a very large number of these terrorists out there. I hope your government will quicksort them soon.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:2.5TB list of terrorists? by Paddyish · · Score: 1
      Quicksort? No need! It's much easier to just assume that everyone is a terrorist. Spy on the citizens, because only terrorists could have any use for privacy.

      I'm outta here, and I'm taking my terrorist ass with me.

    2. Re:2.5TB list of terrorists? by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows the efficiency experts in the Gov. Agencies recommend using BubbleSort with random restarts... you know, for robustness.....

      --
      That's right. All your base.
  108. The gvmt hires some pretty sharp folks as well by nomadicGeek · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you remember there were a lot of folks in the industry that had very mixed feelings about Pointdexters total information awareness initiative. While they didn't like the big brother aspects of it, many people said that the types of software and systems that were proposed had as much potential to change the world of computing as the development of the internet.

    I'm pretty sure that they are drawing on the best minds that they can find and I wouldn't be surprised if some of those folks worked at Google.

    Even though Poindexter's TIA program was canned most of the projects have lived on under other names. I'm sure that it will be a while but it will be interesting to see what kinds of information technologies get spun off from this.

  109. Decide for yourself by trolman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A simple search shows the documentation on TMS' customers and the only thing this large that requires this size index is keyword searches of e-mail intercepts.

  110. Re:ECHELON by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    This is trolling?

    $100 bucks says the RAM was for ECHELON

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  111. I highly doubt it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The precomputation system you are talking about are called Rainbow Tables (http://lasecpc13.epfl.ch/ntcrack/faq.php). Let's you store password/hash combinations much more effectively than simply storing them in text. Well the thing is, this quickly grows to the point of impossible, both in storage used and time taken to compute.

    For example: Let's take Windows LM passwords. It is a shitty hash, which we can calculate very quickly. What's more, the password can never be over 7 characters long (LM uses 2 7 character hases for a max password length of 14 characters). Also, LM converts every alpha character to upper case.

    So suppose we want a table for just the alpha space. 26 possibilities per character, 1-7 characters. That'll need 610MB of disk space and take about 2.5 days on a 700mhz computer. That's perfectly feasable for a normal user.

    But what if we want alpha numerics? That's not 36 possibilities. Just doing that, we raise the amount of disk space you need to 3GB and the amount of time to 15 days.

    And then let's say we want to crack REAL passwords. Well cracking shitty LM hashes isn't going to cut it, most new OSes (Windows included) use something like MD5. MUCH slower to computer, and much more space to store (it's a longer hash). Of course these are also case sensetive, so we have a minimum of 62 characters just for alphanumberics. And many people (espically those we might be interested in) are getting wise and using puncutation. That's about 80 characters.

    And now for the REAL fun: Each additonal character in the password make the space to search grow geometricaly. New systems aren't a 7+7 system, they are just a straight hash on the password. So you have to search whatever length you think you might encounter.

    As you can see from the gain from going from alpha to alpha numeric with LM, it quickly gets to be an unsolvable (with current hardware) problem. You simply can't build an array big enough to hold it, and even if you could, you can't calculate it in the next 10,000 years.

    Oh, and that's not even to mention things like random salts that many UNIXes use.

    Maybe someday, but at this point, it's just not happening, even with redicilous amounts of hardware. You could build a table to crack weak passwords, but we've been able to do that in realtime for years.

  112. Re:Take off your tin foil hat and re-moderate pare by addaon · · Score: 1

    Get a recording of the congressional inquiries earlier this week. In particular, listen to Charlie Rangel's questions. They make the situation pretty clear.

    --

    I've had this sig for three days.
  113. Now for the obligatory... by alphorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Imagine a RAID5 of these!"

    1. Re:Now for the obligatory... by killmeplease · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Raid 0 of these things.

      --
      - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
  114. Oooooooooh well. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    This little disk would be really convenient for watching pr0n, er, I mean, for efficient statutory law research. Yeah, that's it.

  115. Google? Ahem, Matt Cutts! by MacDork · · Score: 1

    Have they consulted Google?

    Does having a former NSA employee with security clearance count? I'm surprised no one else mentioned it.

  116. Well, it's more of a speed thing... by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    To me, it seems to be more of a speed thing. They use that giant RAMDrive to basically store all of the information that they might possibly need for the cross check. The information is checked at blazing speed, and when the processing is complete the info can simply be wiped from the RAMDrive or overwritten by other cross-check(s). That's what I meant by them using the drive more like a Cache, and why they'd want to use RAM, as well as why the drive probably isn't for permanent storage as much as temporary usage.

    I just thought of another interesting point too... if it is being used as a cache instead of direct storage, there's a high potential for it being used for thousands to tens of thousands of cross checks at a time... just hold the individual cross-check data in different sections of the Solid State drive. That could be scary, as it could potentially mean the scanning of everyone in, say, an entire city, all at the same time. Perhaps even larger than a city-wide radius worth of people, it depends on how much data each individual cross-check would need. But imagine if that was possible - the Government could be scanning entire cities at a time, looking for people who show signs of... well... whatever they want to look for at the time, and in mere moments. If I may make another popular culture analogy, I'll point at the lidless, flame-wreathed Eye of Mordor.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
  117. How long.. by Quo_R · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long will it take until Dell starts shipping their standard PCs with that much RAM? Guesses?

  118. NSA Procurement by Detritus · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in such things, look for contract announcements from the "Maryland Procurement Agency", conveniently located at Fort Meade, Maryland.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  119. roughly 10,000 times the size by lixlpixel · · Score: 1

    "At 2.5TB, it is roughly 10,000 times the size of the RAM in your PC."

    not really ...
    for me that's more like 1000 times ... Thanks, steve jobs . honestly ...

  120. Re:Obligatory Star Wars quote and a sobering thoug by Chalybeous · · Score: 1

    Yep, via departmental intranet.
    AFAIK, said DB is not connected at all to the internet, so it's highly unlikely such a thing could be accessed, even if you were the world's best Black Hat. I'm not even close to being a "leet" hacker...
    Then again, what do I know about hacking? Last computer I tried to hack called me Dr. Falken and asked if I'd like to play a game ;-)

    --

    "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

  121. RAM disk cheaper??! by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

    I think $28,000 is cheaper than "a few million dollars" (source: story). In fact, even ten of them would be cheaper. In fact, even forty. Or probably even a hundred.

    1. Re:RAM disk cheaper??! by wscott · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Thanks for the links.

  122. Windows Users by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow 2.5TB of RAM, they must be running the new Beta of Windows Longhorn!

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
  123. Re:Required line by essreenim · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this is great. They'll find themselves in this database,..and in recor time!

  124. Re:Encryption Code cracker. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps the gov stored every possible key for various encryption codes and its just one big lookup table for fast code cracking.

  125. Re:Frightening- For all your non-core activities.. by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    Adolf didn't do it all by himself.

    In fact, to effect real change, he looked beyond traditional stategic elements. With novel approaches to value-creation and increasingly involved transformation of organizations' non-core activities that focus on strategic capabilities he turned to IBM Holocaust Division for all his ethnic data processing (EDP) needs.

  126. No dumbass by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1

    It's because Jeb Bush doesn't want to deal with the Haitian refugees that would appear on Florida's shores.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  127. Parent is completely false, not informative by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    Nope. The last election wasn't fixed.

    Here is a list of the "irregularities".

    * In the last election of the parliment, 8 legislators were allowed to take seats on a plurality, rather than having the required runoff.

    * When Aristide last ran, the opposition boycotted the election, largely because they knew that Aristide would get over 60% no matter who they ran.

    You have to remember that the Neocons HATE Aristide. They prefer the more palely complected elites.

    Add to that the fact that Aristide brought in Cuban doctors and nurses (our foreign aid never got a signature on the check), and he's the next Castro.

    In a lot of the country, there are more Cuban than Hatian doctors.

    You can figure that the first thing that will happen now that the marines are in is that the Cubans will be sent home, and the clinics closed.

    After all, who cares that the "riff raff" (Bob "I'm a traitor" Novak's term) die?

    The privilige of the pale elite of Haiti must be preserved.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"