Slashdot Mirror


Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow!

ph43thon writes "The New York Times Magazine has a neat story about the sci-fi nerd, Kerry Conran, behind 'Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.' It's an interesting look at his creative journey starting with a Macintosh IIci. It took him twelve hours just to render individual robot legs. Antisocial, shy people rejoice! Hide in your homes until you get discovered by a movie producer!!"

232 comments

  1. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
  2. Mr. Invisible and the Secret Mission to Hollywood by znode · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Mr. Invisible and the Secret Mission to Hollywood
    By JOHN HODGMAN

    Article Photo
    (c) Catherine Ledner, The New York Times

    Kerry Conran is not what you would call descript. He has very short, tan-colored hair, usually covered with a clean, logoless baseball cap. He is 37, somewhat baby-faced and often quiet, with a smile in the corner of his pale blue eyes that suggests he is observing you from a far-off world of his own. And while he can be genial and funny, his default setting seems to be self-deprecation to the point of self-erasure. The second thing of any note he ever said to me was ''I am basically an amorphous blob of nothing.'' The first thing was ''I'm shy.''

    This was on the set of his movie ''Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow.'' You might expect a little more brio from a writer-director who is making a summer blockbuster with almost unlimited creative control. Set in 1939, the movie stars Jude Law as the daring flying ace Sky Captain, who teams up with his former flame, the intrepid reporter Polly Perkins, played by Gwyneth Paltrow, as they track down a mysterious mad scientist named Totenkopf. It is in part a nostalgic homage to the movies of the 30's and 40's: the hammy fisticuffs and golly-inspiring proto-technology of sci-fi cliffhangers like ''Flash Gordon'' alongside the snappy patter (and even snappier clothes) of the era's noir thrillers.

    But like the old serials it emulates, ''Sky Captain'' is mainly preoccupied with the strange promises of the future. The astonishing things you will see in the world of tomorrow include: an immense, silvery zeppelin docking at the Empire State Building; an elephant that fits in the palm of your hand; a troop of giant robots marching down Sixth Avenue and the carpet at Radio City Music Hall. None of these things actually exist, though. Conran has not constructed a single set or miniature. Rather, they are computer images, built and animated in a virtual 3-D environment, or stitched together from photographs, which are then draped around the flesh-and-blood actors, who have been shot separately on an empty set in front of a blank ''blue-screen'' background, along with those few minimal props with which they actually interact (a ray gun, a robot blueprint, a bottle of milk of magnesia). The film, in other words, is one long special effect with Jude-Law-size holes in it.

    ''The goal was to make a live-action film, but to use conventions of traditional animation,'' Conran said. The reason? ''First and foremost, to do it cheaper.'' It's a model that would appeal to anyone who, like Conran, does not seem entirely comfortable spending other people's money; to anyone who might dream of shooting in Nepal or Paris (or in the 1930's) but doesn't have the means to get there; to anyone who is shy.

    For Conran, the question, as he put it, was ''Could you be ambitious and make a film of some scope without ever leaving your room?'' And so 10 years ago, Kerry Conran went into a room in his apartment to make a movie. In some ways, he is just now beginning to come out of it.

    At first, he was a mystery. Word of ''Sky Captain'' began to spread around the Internet only after Conran finished primary shooting in London last spring -- extraordinarily late for the Internet, which often seems invented specifically to track movies with giant robots in them. Even then, no one knew who Kerry Conran was. Google couldn't touch him. He was so undocumented in the world of Hollywood that I briefly wondered, when I began pursuing him, if perhaps he was just a front for his producer and partner and mentor Jon Avnet, who is well known for producing ''Risky Business'' and directing ''Fried Green Tomatoes'' but who is not so well known for retro-science-fiction summertime blockbusters, and who unlike Conran seems to have been photographed at least once in his life. I don't think Conran would mind that I doubted his existence. In fact, for a long time, that w

  3. Oh, the regrets by capz+loc · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's stories like these that make me regret taking apart my IIgs to use for wall decorations. Well, at least I still have my Equity II.

  4. huh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Antisocial, shy people rejoice! Hide in your homes until you get discovered by a movie producer!!

    uh no, getting "discovered" is exactly what us antisocial folk want to avoid. Just for that I'm going to dig an even deeper borrow!

    1. Re:huh ? by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 2, Funny

      uh no, getting "discovered" is exactly what us antisocial folk want to avoid.

      So now I know why many /. users post as AC's. ;)

    2. Re:huh ? by shadowbearer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm going to dig an even deeper borrow!

      Dude, getting yourself deeper in debt is NOT a way to stay unnoticed. Just trust me on this.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  5. Pizza producers? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hide in my home until a movie producer finds me? Dude, the only producer who will ever 'find' me is one who decided to deliver pizzas for a night... otherwise, no way in hell I'd be discovered...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Pizza producers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not even by the paramedics who have to take you in after all those pizzas?

    2. Re:Pizza producers? by invckb · · Score: 1

      I figure the postman will call the police when I don't empty the mailbox for a few weeks.

  6. The Trailer by AIX-Hood · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:The Trailer by NeepyNoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      A IIci, eh? Guess that dates him. Newbie.

    2. Re:The Trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone got a non-Quicktime trailer somewhere?

    3. Re:The Trailer by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool, but they really need their own music rather than stealing it from .. Wrath of Khan?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:The Trailer by fpp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope. Stargate.

      Using music from older movies is a common practice for trailers. Sometimes, the real music hasn't been recorded yet. Often, however, existing music is used because it gives audiences a vague sense of familiarity with the film, even when they haven't seen it yet.

    5. Re:The Trailer by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I placed it right after I posted. (D'OH!) Then I was trying to find a site that had a sample.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:The Trailer by Uncle+Dick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interestingly enough, the music from the trailer is the main theme for the Stargate SG-1 television show, not the movie.

      --
      END OF LINE
    7. Re:The Trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's not stealing. It's sharing.

    8. Re:The Trailer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often, however, existing music is used because it gives audiences a vague sense of familiarity with the film, even when they haven't seen it yet.

      Is that why they used the "Requiem for a Dream" theme song for the "Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" trailer?

    9. Re:The Trailer by delus10n0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, wrong. It's track #26 from the movie soundtrack "Battle at the Pyramid" -- the TV show theme is a tiny re-working of that track.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    10. Re:The Trailer by Red+Weasel · · Score: 1

      Not just for Trailers. Watch Zulu followed by Gladiator. Nothing like a hoard of Germatics chanting zulu war songs.

      It's not like they couldn't get the hundred or so extra's to chant something in german or anything.

      --
      ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    11. Re:The Trailer by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      The Last of the Mohicans theme has been used in at least half a dozen trailers I've seen...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  7. May by Kelz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    score for geeks and simpsons characters, but theres no way that movie will ever score with the public.

    When I saw the preview in the theater nearly everyone looked at each other in shock and amusement. Some things just don't make good movies.

    1. Re:May by Cylix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, true...

      For me, I saw the trailor a while ago linked from some strange place on the web. First thing I did was download this and save it to my usb flash drive.

      I was happy with it and I want to see the movie. I like the premise and I don't care if its cheesy. It made me want to dig out crimson skies and pretend to be an ace pilot for 20 minutes.

      However, I showed it to a few co-workers and my family. I didn't get quite the same reaction that I had experienced. Actually, it was a bit of a negative reaction. I think my mother asked if it was the sequel to Iron Giant....

      O well

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:May by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Besides, nobody wants to watch Jude Law, Gwyneth Paltrow, or Angelina Jolie.

    3. Re:May by kimota · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but they couldn't have done much better in terms of casting: Jude Law will bring in a lot of non-geek women (and, I'd guess, a number of gay men who wouldn't otherwise be caught dead at a geekfest movie like this), and Gwyneth Paltrow and Angelina Jolie stand to bring in a lot of non-geeks of both sexes.

      It could, of course, still end up a high profile, multi star flop. I'm thinking the stars will bring people in for a weekend or two; actual quality will determine the rest.

      I reacted to it with the sort of enthusiasm I haven't felt since the trailers for Raiders of the Lost Ark, but then I'm a sucker for the pulp era...

      --Kimota!

      --
      Who moderates the meta-moderators?
    4. Re:May by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what? The movie has been made, and if it appeals to me I'll buy a ticket. Why would I ever care if it "scored with the public"?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:May by certron · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking to go see it, but when I saw the trailer, I was with a bunch of other people to see Return Of The King. (Now that I think about it, why haven't there been more Elvis-themed parodies?) I think I was the only one in our group of 7 (ok, so 5 of them were women) who had any desire to see it.

      Something I noticed in the trailer were the flying robots. I distinctly remember them flying around, then robbing banks, then flying away. The only thing was that this was in a very early color Superman cartoon. 1950s? 1960s? I distinctly remember the shape of their arms, and they looked the same! Maybe I'm crazy.

      Just before that, I saw the trailer for Chronicles of Riddick, and while they both have a similar darkness in their style, Vin Diesel drew some interestin from the ladies. I still thought Sky Captain looked better. Then again, the trailer could be great and the movie could suck...

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    6. Re:May by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Funding for future movies... either sequels or other movies similar in subject.

    7. Re:May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elvis: http://www.bubbahotep.com/

      I just missed this in local theatres, but plan to watch it on dvd.

    8. Re:May by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Same thing for "I, Robot". A bunch of people started laughing after the trailer. Pfft.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  8. Must be tired... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will someone please take Michael out for a walk and change his water? i think they've chained him to the uber-secret slashdot console.

  9. Waitaminute by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny
    Since when do movie producers break into peoples' homes in hopes of finding the next big star hidden among racks of anime and video games?

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:Waitaminute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the gigantic amounts of porn on hard drives, VCDs, & VHS. ;-)

    2. Re:Waitaminute by sharkey · · Score: 1

      They were probably Hollywood stormtroopers looking for evidence "hidden among racks of anime and video games" that he had SMS'ed someone a message saying that %COOKIE_CUTTER_ACTION_FLICK stank and was not worth watching, and ended up seduced by the powers of his voice. People had the same troubles with Saruman, IIRC.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  10. Not just hide and wait by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the article, Conran wasn't really hiding, she did show it to her boss, Jon Avnet, who decided to fund the production until they can find some bigger investors. And they did find Jude Law, and later signed Gwyneth Paltrow and eventually Angelina Jolie.

    So the moral of the story is, if you really want to do something like that, make sure you don't just sit there and wait to be discovered, it will never happen until someone see your work.

    And as a side note, there are many similar productions with no initial sponsors and low budget, yet able to pull it through at a much faster pace than 10 years - like Blair Witch Project.

    1. Re:Not just hide and wait by Omerna · · Score: 2, Informative

      Conran is a "he". Not a "she".

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:Not just hide and wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Exactly, Conrad didn't show it to his boss:



      A friend of his brother's wife came to dinner, a woman named Marsha Oglesby, who happened to be a movie producer. She had been hearing about the short for some time and was eager to see it. Conran protested: he wasn't ready. But she insisted. Six minutes later, she didn't know what to say. ''Can I see that again?'' she asked. The next day she showed it to her boss, Jon Avnet, who was so impressed that he agreed to finance the movie himself until they could find a studio or investor.


      Please mod down the 'Not just hide and wait (Score:5, Insightful)'

    3. Re:Not just hide and wait by quantax · · Score: 1

      You're definitely right, half the time something like this comes out, its because someone had something small that had major potential to become big, and it was just a matter of showing people. This is why as an artist, you should be sure to publically display your work, and not just keep it for private viewing for you, family, and friends (or whatever). Remember, even though you might not think it, someone else might be interested, and in some cases, interested enough to fund further research/production/ideas.

      --
      "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
    4. Re:Not just hide and wait by ph43thon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must have read the article very fast. Mr. Conran is a man. His brother's friend's wife, Marsha Oglesby (a movie producer), came by. She had heard about his little piece and wanted to see it. Conran didn't want to show it because he thought it wasn't ready. She pressed him, and he finally showed it. He did not push it on her or self-promote (according to the story.) Marsha Oglesby showed it to Avnet. He was essentiall discovered against his will.

      p

    5. Re:Not just hide and wait by Jacer · · Score: 4, Funny

      So is John Romeo, but it's still easy to make the mistake.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    6. Re:Not just hide and wait by Clith · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: it's not *what* you know, it's *who* you know.
      .. especially if it's a movie producer!

      --
      [ReidNews]
    7. Re:Not just hide and wait by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Speaking of John... I was at the local Goodwill last night. Take one guess as to which software claimed the most shelf space there. I got a good laugh out of it.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  11. a couple of good interviews.. by fireduck · · Score: 4, Informative

    there's a couple of interviews with the principles behind this (producer, director, etc.) here and here. this definitely sounds like one very interesting film from a technical and artistic perspective.

  12. Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Xshare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, it's a World War 1/2 Fighter Pilot Flying around against super-advanced aliens, all the while with the soundtrack as the Stargate SG-1 theme. The writer is a genius.

    1. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Jonathan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The point is that it's supposed to be the future as depicted in 1930's pulp magazines.

    2. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

      You seriously need some pulp fiction in your education, kid.
      I'll bet you've never even heard of Doc Savage.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    3. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by buddydawgofdavis · · Score: 1

      No...just uninteresting. I saw the trailer yesterday at the theater. Looked like one of thoughs kooky cliff-hangers. I thought I'd check the comments here to see how other people viewed it. Impression while watching the trailer: It sort of reminded me of Myst or cover art from games of that era. I didn't care for the misty/soft/grainy/whatever camera effect used in the tailer either, hope it's not used too much in the final release. Trailers are a funny thing, they usually exaggerate the excitement of the feature film. I didn't feel too excited, not looking forward to the summer block-buster line-up.

    4. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by hiryuu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll bet you've never even heard of Doc Savage.

      My gawd - I'd nearly forgotten about chewing through the stacks of Doc Savage rags I'd found in family storage when I was a kid. Entertaining, until I burned out on them; that era's pulp fiction was incredibly formulaic, although in all fairness I doubt that's changed much over the years. Great mindless stuff, lots of melodrama and action, good guys were really good and bad guys were just awful.

      To attempt to get back on topic, I thought the same thing when I saw the "Sky Captain" trailer - revitalizing the old pulp fiction stories.

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    5. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I mean, it's a World War 1/2 Fighter Pilot Flying around against super-advanced aliens

      I don't think they're supposed to be aliens; according to IMDB, the villian is a "mad scientist bent on world domination."

      He must be pretty fargin' mad!

    6. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw the trailer and didn't see anything that reminded me of Doc Savage.

      Sky King maybe...Hop Harrigan for sure...but Doc Savage?!?!

      If it'll get Buckaroo Banzai and the World Crime League made then I'm all for it but dropping Doc Savage's name around will just serve to confuse people in a thread about a freedom fighting pilot.

    7. Re:Does noone else see this movie as HILARIOUS? by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, of course it's true that the movie has more of its roots in Sky King with a little of old Superman scientist villains tossed in, but Doc Savage and the Shadow are far, far better known pulp heroes.

      I don't begrude someone for not knowing Sky King. I begrudge them seriously for not knowing ANYTHING about pulp.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  13. Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    "...as they track down a mysterious mad scientist named Totenkopf..."

    Hmmm, I can see a lot of people out there might get a wee bit pissed off about the fact that his scientist is named after the infamous SS Totenkopf (Death's Head) Division that ran... concentration camps.

    Yes, I know it sounds cool, I know a lot of people might think I'm being picky and overtly PC, but Totenkopf isn't a German surname (Dr. Deaths Head!?), and I kinda wonder - given it's background - if the guy actually knows the history behind it.

    1. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sheesh, that's the friggin Point!

      The villian is an evil genius, and who in the 1930's were the most evil techno types? The Germans. And who do we now know were not just militarily aggressive, but truly, wholly, cut-you-open-to see-how-you-tick insanely evil? The Nazis.

    2. Re:Totenkopf? by Jonathan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I know it sounds cool, I know a lot of people might think I'm being picky and overtly PC, but Totenkopf isn't a German surname (Dr. Deaths Head!?),

      Why couldn't it be? I know people named Himmelreich (Heavenly kingdom) and Fleishman (Meat man). German surnames generally actually mean something and are derivable from German words.

    3. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, just another way for the Jewish power elite to get another dig in at the Germans. Of course, you'll never see mention of the millions of native Americans that were slaughtered over the years by European-Americans. No, the natives never had enough money and clout to worry about.

    4. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, you'll never see mention of the millions of native Americans that were slaughtered over the years by European-Americans.

      They weren't "slaughtered", they were displaced by natural evolutionary forces. It's not like they were using the land productively anyway.

    5. Re:Totenkopf? by quantaq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, I'm not sure if you noticed, but Totenkopf is THE BAD GUY. If you pull a name from history for a bad guy, it usually has negative conotations. I mean, what if the scientist was named "Dr. Rainbow." Not as convincing, is it? The kind of thing people would get pissed about would be having a hero named Himmler with blue eyes and blonde hair.

      According to your view, lots of people should be pissed about Rowling having an antagonist named Voldemort (Winged Death, I think is the translation) with a lot of simliarities to Hitler (trying to wipe out a whole segment of people). Oh, and since this guy spent so much time on his computer, I'm fairly certain he did his research on the name and chose it for exactly those reasons.

    6. Re:Totenkopf? by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I kinda wonder - given it's background - if the guy actually knows the history behind it.

      I'm sure that he does. Nazis were staple villains of 40s pulp fiction, which is the reason that they're recurring bad guys in the Indiana Jones movies, the Rocketeer, and the classic Doc Savage serials. Mad Nazi scientists, the Nazi quest for religious relics, and the Nazis invading Anarctica, the Hollow Earth, and other cryptogeographical locations are all staples of the pulp fiction era.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    7. Re:Totenkopf? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

      3.SS-Pz.Div. "Totenkopf" was a Waffen SS Division, they didn't run the camps.

      http://www.feldgrau.com/3ss.html

      They were a combat Armor division on the Western and Eastern front.

      "Although after a shaky start they gained a fearsome fighting reputation they will always be associated with the concentration camp system and the running of the camps. This is due to the fact that the origins for this division can be traced back to the Totenkopfverbande which consisted of five pre-war standarten (regiments) who along with a few members of the SS-VT were responsible for guarding the concentration camps in Germany such as Dachau. This situation still persisted when the war started with guards being interchanged from frontline to concentration camp guard duties, however this practice was stopped when the invasion of Russia took place and manpower was needed at the front. Then the practice of interchanging men was almost identical as with any other Waffen SS unit."

      At the time they were guarding the Camps, they were Concentration Camps in the role of, Concentration peoples togeather, the murder for which the camps will be famous for wasn't spelled out until 1942.

      I'm not defending the Waffen-SS or anyother SS, but the 3.SS-Panzer was a combat Panzer unit and not a bunch of thugs shooting or gasing folks in a camp. They were a bunch of thugs shooting folks and burning villiages with tanks.

    8. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of a "SS Totenkopf," and if I had, it'd be the last thing I'd think of when I heard the word.

      A "totenkopf" is simply a skull, as in these pirate skulls.

      If that somehow makes you think of Nazis, you've some serious problems.

    9. Re:Totenkopf? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I thought the main bad guy in the Rocketeer was Errol Flynn... ;)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Totenkopf? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Who was a secret Nazi agent. Now, the villain in The Shadow wasn't a Nazi, but at least he was still a foreigner, and that's just as bad as being a Nazi, or a member of Foreigner.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    11. Re:Totenkopf? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, "Voldemort" more closely translates to "thief of life".

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    12. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Totenkopf isn't a German surname (Dr. Deaths Head!?)

      I think in the original script, the villain was called "Doktor Leuteschrumpfer," but that was deemed too silly to be threatening. ;-)

    13. Re:Totenkopf? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Volo => to fly or move rapidly
      Mortis => death

      "Winged Death" seems to work. Though "thief of life" might be the transliteration.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    14. Re:Totenkopf? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if we assume it's Latin-based, it sound a bit like "flying death", but if we assume it's French-based, it sounds like an elision of "Voleur de Mort" - thief of death.

      Given that Rowling seems to have a penchant for giving her baddies French- or Norman-sounding names (Draco Malfoy, etc), the latter seems more likely to me.

      Although having said that, all the spells and stuff are in Latin, so she's obviously capable of either. But she does seem to have a thing about the French.

    15. Re:Totenkopf? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I like the evil Dr. Sunshine Lollipops. Talk about filling one with terror at the mention of his name!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They were a bunch of thugs shooting folks and burning villiages with tanks.

      They were hardly thugs. They were a professional fighting force that invented practically every modern combat technique used by armored divisions today. They constantly had limited manpower, limited fuel, and limited equipment but consistently were able to best the Russians despite their superior numbers.

      They ultimately died holding off the Russian advance allowing Lithuanian and Germans in East Prussia the opportunity to flee further west. They died because German fuel supplies finally ran out and they could do little more than hold the lines.

      Such loyalty in battle and strategic originality is a rarity today.

      The victor's attempt to demonize their opponents still fails, even today nearly 60 years after the German defeat.

    17. Re:Totenkopf? by quantaq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just taking a stab at this; I don't know Latin.

      I suspect that the French for "thief" is probably derivative of the Latin for "winged" or "flight." I mean, think about what a thief does. Perhaps the way they "sneak" about to steal could be similar to flying (hard to catch, maybe?), or consider the fact they "fly" as fast as possible once an item is stolen. That said, I'm fairly certain I heard/read her say that it means winged. Either translation has interesting conotations, though.

      One of us *could* pop over to one of the five billion fan sites to find out for sure; I'm personally far too lazy for that, though.

    18. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, that would also describe the Japanese in WW2. They did some nasty experiments and such that made the Nazis look like amateurs.

    19. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "Winged Death" seems to work. Though "thief of life" might be the transliteration.

      Transliteration? Please look that up in the dictionary before you return to your armchair etymology.

    20. Re:Totenkopf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on! Nobody got this joke?? Isn't there anybody over 30 here who understands German? :-/

  14. Nah! Re:May by StefanJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can picture someone saying this about The Lord of the Rings:

    "Magic rings? Little guys with hairy feet? Twisted little trolls with multiple personality disorder. Please! Nyahhhh, gimme a babe with guns and big tits, yeah, that's adventure, HAWWW!"

    If it's good, Sky Captain might be a moderately succussful popcorn movie. If not, it will be out of theaters in a week. But not because it's for geeks.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Nah! Re:May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lord of the Rings had a literary antecedent that people were bound to be interested in, and a preexisting fan following. This is basically coming out of nowhere.

      There have been plenty of other geek movies: Spiderman, Batman, Star Trek, but they all had a franchise. Only thing I can think of that came out of nowhere was Star Wars...

      It might make it, but I don't think the odds are that good. Too bad: it looks interesting.

    2. Re:Nah! Re:May by Jonathan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lord of the Rings had a literary antecedent that people were bound to be interested in, and a preexisting fan following. This is basically coming out of nowhere.

      There have been plenty of other geek movies: Spiderman, Batman, Star Trek, but they all had a franchise. Only thing I can think of that came out of nowhere was Star Wars...


      How about Indiana Jones -- that seems like it is the closest equivalent, considering that both Indy and Sky Captain are inspired from 1930's pulps and serials.

    3. Re:Nah! Re:May by JudgeFurious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indiana Jones didn't "come out of nowhere" though to the average movie going slob. It came out of Lucas/Spielberg which said average movie going slob was very familiar with so in essence it came with a "Trusted Brand Label" on it.

      If it showed up today with Lucas name on it I wonder how much "Hey that should be good" sentiment it could count on?

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    4. Re:Nah! Re:May by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about The Rocketeer? That seemed to fizzle.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Nah! Re:May by ikewillis · · Score: 2
      Only thing I can think of that came out of nowhere was Star Wars...

      How about... the Matrix?

      Unless you predicted a sci-fi powerhouse coming out of the creators of Assassins and Bound...

    6. Re:Nah! Re:May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literary antecedent? This movie is pretty much stolen straight from pulp fiction and movie/radio serial franchises that predate LOTR.

      LOTR had a lot of people who were waiting for it but there was also the extreme risk that it would bomb miserably--have you _seen_ any of Peter Jackson's previous works?!?!?

      With homages to the movie serials, which continue to generate a large amount of revenue for their owners, you never know what you might get...another Star Wars or Indiana Jones? If not then it will most likely enjoy the same following that the Rocketeer and Buckaroo Banzai have.

    7. Re:Nah! Re:May by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bound...

      mmm, lesbians.

    8. Re:Nah! Re:May by slaker · · Score: 1

      ... started as a comic before it became a movie. In the graphic novel I have, the Rocketeer's girlfriend is Betty Page, the 50s pinup icon who was at that time (mid to late 80s) thought dead.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    9. Re:Nah! Re:May by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Commando Cody, Sky Marshall of the Universe is definitely in its ancestry.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  15. NY Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why is it that even though /. has access to NY Times articles without registration that stories are posted with links that require registration first?

  16. Darn by screwballicus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I looked at this headline regarding the "world of tomorrow" and opened this story expecting specious futurism. Where is my specious futurism! There hasn't been a single story making dubious claims about technological revolutions right around the corner on slashdot all day.

    1. Re:Darn by kylearin · · Score: 1

      It's not exactly futurism, but the movie's not out yet... :)

  17. ah the Mac IIci... by dylan.ucd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my first computer wasn't a IIci, it was a 286. even so, the IIci was certainly my first love. i can remember those romantic hours that i would spend with my IIci, waiting for POVRAY to finish rendering...

    of course those days are over, but i don't think that I could ever remove the IIci from its place in the corner of my room.

  18. No use. by Bull999999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been hiding at home all this time and no one has yet to discover me for my one handed web surfing skills.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    1. Re:No use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because I can surf the web telepathically. Slashdot feed tommorow: geeks found to be cool to other geeks.

    2. Re:No use. by xtort17 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "poor guy must have lost his other hand in a war or something" until my boyfriend corrected me...

  19. Re:plug! by ph43thon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's not nice, my blog is a good blog. AND, I contributed a good news story that no one else seemed to register. My post was not a flame.

  20. But what about me? by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

    What about us non-anti-social people (also known as just, well, social people)? Will we never be in the movies?

  21. Two Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Angelina Jolie.

    (ergo, it will suck)

  22. Take the film in context by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, don't compare this to Stargate (I know the music doesn't help) or Independence Day. Compare this to the Shadow, Hudsucker Proxy, or the Rocketeer. Second, remember this is one step away from indie. Yeah, I question the mainstream appeal. However, the story behind the movie will probably make me go see it.

    I've seen bare stage interpretations of Shakespeare. This isn't that type of flick. However, seeing as how the last movie I've seen is the Segal-like Payback (sorry, Afflick's bravado reminds me of Under Siege), I don't know if this will be so bad. Yes, I know that we get caught up in CGI valhalla. However, this does speak a lot for effort.

    Plus, remember the goal is to make money. Not necessarily rake in $300 million at the US box office.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  23. Stolen Music? by General+Sherman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mod me down for being incorrect, but the music used in the trailer is EXACTLY the same music used for the opening of Stargate SG-1. Exactly.

    I even went to my TiVo to confirm this, and yes they're the same. I can't believe that they would rip it so shamelessly.

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Stolen Music? by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


      Somehow I doubt it's stolen--I suspect they've paid the applicable parties for the rights, unless for some reason you know differently.

    2. Re:Stolen Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Often, when movie trailers are released, the composer hasn't finished composing and recording the soundtrack, so the movie company uses "needle drops". They often use music that the director has envisioned the final soundtrack to sound like. A good example of this is the music to Waterworld as it is used on so many trailers that it is almost a standard. Many directors get their needle drops so engrained in their heads that they often chuck the whole score some poor sod has written in favor of the temp music.

    3. Re:Stolen Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie trailers buy the rights to music like this all the time. Anyone who followed last night's link to the i, Robot trailer would have heard some of the score to Matrix Revolutions.

      The Big Fish trailer had some stuff from Edward Sissorhands... etc etc etc

      A group called E.S. Posthumus does a lot of music you might recognize from trailers.

    4. Re:Stolen Music? by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't stolen. This happens a lot. How many times have we seen a preview for an (allegedly) quirky comedy scored to the music of Get Shorty? Could be someone in marketing decided that using the Stargate theme will help make the sci-fi connection better than the existing score, or that there wasn't any choice as the film's score is incomplete or being rewritten, even at this late date.

      I saw the preview before Spartan on Friday. The stylized production design looks good for a trailer. But 100 minutes of this? And saving the world from future beings in future technology with 1942 (US) fighter planes? Only today's earlier Lord of the Rings musical seems more dubious. But good luck to everyone.

    5. Re:Stolen Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, trailers do this all the time: First time I noticed: 1993, when the "Jurassic Park" trailer used the soundtrack from "Backdraft".

      It's fine, because the film promoters are trying to associate the feelings you had while watching one film with the movie trailer they're showing you. Or, if you haven't seen the other film, at least put you in the proper mood.

      It's all okay, as long as a movie doesn't use the SAME soundtrack as another. Example: "Batman and Robin" is scored by Elliot Goldenthal, who borrowed one the tracks he used for "Alien 3".

      Imagine how associating with one movie in the middle of another feels like!

      I'll admit, I never watched the end of that particular Batman, and I prefer Danny Elfman scores of the first two. Come to think of it, a lot of Elfman scores get re-used for trailers too...

    6. Re:Stolen Music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although they frequently "re-use" music in movie trailers, they really made a mistake using the SG-1 music. That music is SO recognizable, and it's on a show that's *still on every damn week* (every day in syndication). So the first thing I think of when I see the ad is "huh, stargate?" rather than "cool, a new movie"

    7. Re:Stolen Music? by metamatic · · Score: 1
      Many directors get their needle drops so engrained in their heads that they often chuck the whole score some poor sod has written in favor of the temp music.

      The definitive example, of course, being 2001.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    8. Re:Stolen Music? by FrenZon · · Score: 1
      the music used in the trailer is EXACTLY the same music used for the opening of Stargate SG-1. Exactly.
      And the trailer for LOTR:TT used the theme from Requiem for a Dream. It's just music, and it's often not exclusively licenced, so it's no big deal.

      Although anyone who's watched Requiem for a Dream will find its use in LOTR .. disturbing.
    9. Re:Stolen Music? by The+Fred · · Score: 1

      You'll find that a lot of different trailers use the music of E.S. Posthumus (http://www.esposthumus.com/).

      It becomes quite humerous after hearing all of his music how often his music used for trailers of all sorts.

    10. Re:Stolen Music? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I have the Requiem soundtrack and I was rather surprised to hear it in the trailer... definitely an... interesting tie between such unrelated movies.

    11. Re:Stolen Music? by unother · · Score: 1

      Link? Or are you talking on complete hearsay...

    12. Re:Stolen Music? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      There's one modern (orchestral) piece called "Tikal" (or something like that) which has been used in at least 12 trailers, including the one for Pirates of the Carribean. It sounds a lot like Orff's Carmina Burana, which has also been used many times (as well as ripped off by many film score "composers"). It's sort of generic epic thriller music, with loud choral accompaniment, but it doesn't sound very thrilling after about the third hearing.

      The problem with this reuse is that people will notice it after a while. "K-19" used the Gladiator soundtrack in trailers and other promotional material, and it was pretty obvious. I immediately noticed the Stargate music - although I couldn't remember where I'd heard it, it was very familiar.

      Of course, I'm a classical musician, so most movie soundtracks (for this type of movie, at least) already sound like they've been recycled from pieces by far better composers - Holst's "The Planets" being the most egregious example.

    13. Re:Stolen Music? by prozac79 · · Score: 1

      And how many times has a Hans Zimmer soundtrack been used in trailers? It seems like every new action or suspense movie trailer has "Crimson Tide" or "Gladiator" going through it. I actually get a kick out of identifying the score... it's a little geek trait of mine. But I will only use this power for good, never for evil.

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
    14. Re:Stolen Music? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, I thought that was one of those "*Every* Kubrick fan knows *that*" facts.

      You can even buy the Alex North soundtrack that was going to be used for "2001" on CD now, so it's not exactly obscure.

      Anyway, here is a link and here is another one.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  24. offtopic, sosumi. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I was with you until your sig.

    At my college, Sigma Pi was full of the elitist rich kids who partied right out of Animal House, giving the whole Greek system a bad name. (I think they finally lost their charter a couple years after I left.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  25. This seems to be common in movie trailers. by simdan · · Score: 0
    For example if you can find the trailer for October Sky the music is taken from Apollo 13, from the launch if I'm not mistaken.

    You see, movie soundtracks are recorded a mere month or two before the movie comes to theaters. But the trailers come out several months or even more than a year. So, in the absence of the final soundtrack, existing music is often used.

  26. Crimson Skies? by Moocowsia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks good and all, but I just can't help but think it looks like Crimson Skies with giant robots :s

    --
    Moo!
    1. Re:Crimson Skies? by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Crimson Skies is one of the few video game-to movies I'd go see. I've always been in love with the same period of history as this director, and I can relate to his passion for the period, and the wild optimism and imagination that flourished. In so many ways, we've gone either backwards, or just settled for less. The depression and WWII came, and smashed those dreams for good. And I think we've suffered the consequences in spirit ever since.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    2. Re:Crimson Skies? by slim · · Score: 1

      I just can't help but think it looks like Crimson Skies with giant robots

      Crimson Skies with giant robots is... Crimson Skies: High Road to Revenge.

      [Minor Spoiler] A couple of times in the game you take on a giant 8-legged robot: once among the canyons of Atrixo, and once in stormy Chicago.

  27. Payback? Mel Gibson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, seeing as how the last movie I've seen is the Segal-like Payback (sorry, Afflick's bravado reminds me of Under Siege)

    Uhm, I think you mean PAY*CHECK*.

    Fuckwit.

    1. Re:Payback? Mel Gibson? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 2, Funny

      Disgruntled and pendantic!

      You work at Blockbuster don't you.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    2. Re:Payback? Mel Gibson? by Rubyflame · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll bite. What do pendants have to do with anything?

      --

      All it takes is nukes and nerves.
  28. A Film Made for Howard Waldrop by Nova+Express · · Score: 1, Interesting
    As soon as I saw the trailer for this last year during Return of the King, I immediately called up Howard Waldrop and told him "Howard, they finally made a film just for you!" It's got that 1940s, retro-futurist vibe to it that Howard has in a lot of his stories (like "30 Minutes Over Broadway!"). If it's half as good as Howard's work, I'll be impressed.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:A Film Made for Howard Waldrop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, How long were you waiting to drop that name?

    2. Re:A Film Made for Howard Waldrop by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, my thoughts exactly. For a brief moment, I thought a movie version of Wild Cards had slipped under my own personal geek radar.

      Alas, not so. But I'll be cheering for Jetboy all the same :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  29. Oh joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for somebody to say "well, I've got assburger's syndrome too, blah blah blah". Cripes. Just say I'm an anti-social nerd. Don't try to make is a syndrome or disease. Its like calling alcoholism a disease. Anything to make the person at fault feel like he has an excuse.

    "I'd love to talk to you, but I've got assburger's...".

  30. Metal Slug 2 lives! by realdddave · · Score: 1

    Hey, Neo Geo/SNK fans take what we can get nowadays.

  31. No, the real moral is: by Pyromage · · Score: 1

    No, the moral is:

    if you promote your project enough, you may be able to work with a chick like Angolina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow 8-}

  32. just to be exact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    its my geek obligation to say this:

    antisocial doesn't mean what everyone mean shy or withdrawn. antisocial is, say, if you went out and decided to throw molotov cocktails at your local high school band as they practice marching. if someone is shy they are withdrawn, antisocial is exactly what it means, against society. ie burning looting raping and maiming, anything to disrupt society.

    1. Re:just to be exact by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      antisocial is exactly what it means, against society. ie burning looting raping and maiming, anything to disrupt society.

      Isn't that what everyone does in their spare time?

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    2. Re:just to be exact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and just because I'm a prick.

      Webster says

      Main Entry: antisocial
      Pronunciation: "an-ti-'sO-sh&l, "an-"tI-
      Function: adjective
      1 : averse to the society of others : UNSOCIABLE
      2 : hostile or harmful to organized society; especially : being or marked by behavior deviating sharply from the social norm

      Who would have thought a word would have more than one definition. (plus mine's the first one)

    3. Re:just to be exact by freeweed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's my pedantic obligation to say this:

      antisocial P Pronunciation Key (nt-sshl, nt-)
      adj.

      1. Shunning the society of others; not sociable.

      2. Hostile to or disruptive of the established social order; marked by or engaging in behavior that violates accepted mores: gangs engaging in vandalism and other antisocial behavior.

      3. Antagonistic toward or disrespectful of others; rude.


      Word often have different meanings.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  33. $70 Million for and Indie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The budget for this film is apparently $70M. I looked at the trailer - it looked like a cheesy rough sketch of Metropolis. Compare this budget to the $50M for Iron Giant or $15M for Spirited Away. I'm scratching my head wondering how this approach is either viable for independent productions or a demonstration of any new ground breaking CGI techniques.

    1. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Simple: Gwynith, Jude, and Angelina each got $22M for their parts, leaving $4M for everything else.

    2. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by Hanno · · Score: 1

      In the trailer, the CGI looked very fine indeed, but the acting looked horrible. The whole trailer just cried "bad acting!". Actors in fron of blue screens, obviously.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    3. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by bbkingadrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lol, modded informative? it is obviously a joke. show me i am wrong and i will eat my hat.

    4. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this wasn't part of the plan... "bad acting" such as that seen in movies of the era this is supposed to emulate. The CGI is quite impressive, IMHO, and I think as a whole, the movie will probably do pretty well. Even if not financially, it's sure to have a respectable following of geeks who enjoy the genre of movie that this falls into. Being indie gives it points up front for a lot of people anyhow.

      Personally, I think it'll be a lot like I imagine... a faux early 20th-century sci-fi, without the Ed Woodian strings attached to the spacecraft. .o)

      Xepherys

    5. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by unother · · Score: 1

      Shades of Star Wars, eh?

    6. Re:$70 Million for and Indie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the trailer, the CGI looked very fine indeed, but the acting looked horrible. The whole trailer just cried "bad acting!". Actors in fron of blue screens, obviously.

      My sentiments exactly! This looks more like the intro and backing story for a computer game than a feature film. Game studios have been known to use big-name actors too. Not surprising, when video games are a bigger industry than Hollywood.

  34. the short by tono · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be very interested in seeing the short that he first made. My best friend from high school would spend days rendering movies in Infini-D on his LCIII that were very entertaining and choreographed space battles. Anybody got a link to it?

    --
    cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
  35. MODS: Not Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is ontopic becuase the editors keep on saying "Registration Required" in the article summary.

    There is no reason why they cannot include the Google Partners link

  36. semantics! horse man ticks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are funny.. I want to read your blog! Anyhow, if you could read, you'd know I'm not very conservative or republican. You're too busy conjuring fun words.

  37. 3D on a Mac IIci... by ktakki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, that had to be an excruciatingly tedious experience. The IIci had a 25Mhz 68030 and maxed out at 128MB RAM (though all that RAM would have cost nearly as much as the IIci back then, and the standard IIci was 1 or 4 MB out of the box). They used something like 320K of system RAM for video, though 3rd party NuBus video cards were readily available (still, with only something like 2MB or 4MB of VRAM).

    There's no mention of which software he used, but I recall that in '94 the big Mac 3D package was ElectricImage, with Strata 3D and Infini-D at the low end of the scale (~$500 or so). Photoshop was at around version 2 or 2.5; it wasn't until 3.0 when layers were implemented.

    I remember trying to model and animate on an Amiga 500 with Turbo Silver back in 1989: anything with reflection or refraction would take about 24 hours per frame. Five years later, I was using Autodesk 3D Studio (R3 for DOS) on a 486 and had a room full of PCs for doing network rendering. Watching that red "Rendering" bar creep across the screen became a thing of the past (well, except for previews and such). Those five years were an interesting time, seeing the price point for a computer powerful enough for doing productive animation work (and digital video and audio) fall to where an independent artist could afford one.

    Gotta hand it to Kerry Conran: if he had the patience to model and animate on a IIci, he surely paid his dues.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:3D on a Mac IIci... by andy55 · · Score: 1

      There's no mention of which software he used,

      He made it. Why do you think they were able to make it so cheap--it's all his own IP... all they needed for the rendering studio were a bunch of stacked machines and the data to crunch on.

      ...had to be an excruciatingly tedious experience.

      Ahh, the Apple IIci. He probably had the math co-processor version, making a world of difference for his software (that could target it). It was a little disheartening that they called didn't mention Apple anywhere in the article (just "Macintosh").

    2. Re:3D on a Mac IIci... by dylan.ucd · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wasn't always that bad. Even though the IIci had an '030 it did have a 6882 math co-processor for floating point work. With a little extra RAM, an Apple 32k cache card, and an accelerated video card (like the Apple 8.24GC or better yet the Radius Thunder IV GX with 16Mb or RAM wow!!)... it wasn't a bad little machine.

      as i mentioned upstream, POVRAY was a little unbearable- there were a host of smaller, wire-frame based packages out there. i remember working with some very large dxfs in turboCAD (?)

      ... however, the lack of a sound-in port was a little annoying...

    3. Re:3D on a Mac IIci... by funwithstuff · · Score: 1

      Wow, that had to be an excruciatingly tedious experience.

      Oh yeah. I did some POVRAY command-line 3D on a Mac LC with a math coprocessor card, and it was a dog. The tiny animation I set up (stupidly complex - a transparent bubble rising in front of two mirrors that reflected into one another) was about 200px square and took about 10 minutes to render a frame. I remember one Friday horror film where I used to head back upstairs in each ad break, comment back the last line of code, uncomment the next line, start it going...

      And since then, this guy has his own movie, and I'm working in a room without windows. He wins.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
    4. Re:3D on a Mac IIci... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they'll put the 6 minutes of IIci produced work on the DVD so we can all see it.

  38. SS Nazis did 1 thing good...Killed Commies!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helluva good job at it and no small achievment
    Some units were Latvian,Lithuanian,Finn etc and had damn good reason to cap Commies.
    Not that this absolves them from being Nazi though.Nazi Commie killers were a lot less evil then Nazi Jew/Gypsy/Pole etc killers and should be crediteed as such.

  39. NICE RACK!! BayBeeeeee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woooooooooooo! as the Nature Boy would say
    Good luck on your implants padded bras/falsies look as/more dramatic and offer a less invasive kink/fetish factor....jus a thought...

  40. Re:NICE RACK!! BayBeeeeee! by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

    But padded bras don't jiggle! :-(

  41. Countdown... by KewlPC · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...to all the Slashbots rambling about how we should do all movies as CG with nothing but CG sets and (eventually) nothing but CG actors.

    Of course, the fact that they're wrong won't stop them from posting.

    1. Re:Countdown... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Hell whats next shipping all our jobs to India.

    2. Re:Countdown... by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      The trailer has a nice style to it - sort of a Dick Tracey meets Laputa: Castle in the Sky feel. However, I wonder if the acting in the movie will pan out - we've already experienced the unfocused performances of actors who are acting without any environmental references in movies like Attack of the Clones. Although they're avoiding the problems with all-CG actors (ie, Final Fantasy), I'm wondering if they're going to run into problems marrying real actors with very stylized background plates that are more animation than special effects - to me, the style that I'm seeing is begging for animated characters, not live action...

    3. Re:Countdown... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right?

      If anything, the "Slashbot" (by which I assume you're trying to imply majority opinion here) would be bemoaning CG in movies. Lucas killed Star Wars by making it all CG, after all! Go back to how movies were done with model kits and silly putty, damnit!

      Read any story here about a movie other than Jackson's LOTR, and more often than not the comments will overwelmingly be critical about CG.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:Countdown... by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      Like Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within?

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  42. Bravo by elmos_dog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All I can say is bravo for the dude. If the movie does well hurray if not atleast he got to fulfill his dream. Im sure we are all a little envious. I'm goin to see it just to support a guy who pushed hard for the perfection of his dream. Also nay-sayers remember Blade Runner wasn't that much a success either when it first came out but its one of the pivotial points in Sci-Fi movies. I think this will be of similar importance.

  43. Fizzled yes... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    But still a great movie. Not entirley original, had the obvious old pulp stories inspiration. Not that i cared at the time, i was just a little kid, even went as the Rocketeer for halloween. Spray painted 2 litre bottles and all...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  44. At the risk of being slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously slashdot is slow to pick up on the truly cool things, since I knew about this movie months ago and only NOW is it on slashdot. At the risk of having my site slashdotted: rocketmen vs robots

  45. Rip off of Laupta?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it just me or has no one noticed that this movie is a rip off of the Japanese Anime movie "Laputa" (by Miyazaki Hayao)...? Maybe the story is original, but the world and technology it is set in doesn't seem to be.

    1. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by tloh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is it just me or has no one noticed that this movie is a rip off of the Japanese Anime movie "Laputa" (by Miyazaki Hayao)...? Maybe the story is original, but the world and technology it is set in doesn't seem to be.

      All the works of Miyazaki have a much more European feel to them. At nausicaa.net there is an oft-cited FAQ that directly addresses the question of when and where Laputa takes place: "It is believed to have taken place at the end of the 19th Century or the beginning of the 20th Century, in an alternate universe where flying technology was more advanced (a la Verne). According to Miyazaki, he wrote "Laputa" as a "science fiction novel which was written in the end of the 19th century". The events of Laputa takes place "In an imaginary country. The Slug Ravine, where Pazu lived was modeled after a mining town in Wales. Miyazaki went to Wales for location hunting, and learned that the town had had a huge labor dispute the year before. This story and the scenery of the depressed mining town (he being a former chairman of a union) affected him, and made him put the scene of the townfolk fighting with the pirates in the movie. You can also see a socialist-looking poster in the house of Pazu's boss." It seems thus Laputa has more of a Jules Verne/Johnathan Swift 18th/19th century flavor to it. In contrast, "Sky Captain", from the looks of the trailer, takes it visual cues more from mid 20th century WWII era cultural icons. I'd go so far as to say "Sky Captain" also feels more American than anything Miyazaki has done.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    2. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by KH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not just you. I noticed a bunch of Miyazaki elements: robots from Laputa or Nausicaa, the premise of a lone flying hero whose face is invisible on a retro plane from Rosso (or even Nausikaa). The scenes filled with all-wing flying machines may look like from Conan (if anyone knows this TV series, not to be confused with Arnold movie).

      Still, even with all those elements, I wouldn't call the movie a rip off of Miyazaki. Certainly the creators were inspired by Miyazaki's works, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Miyazaki, too, was influenced by many other creators himself--Nausikaa was a Dune rip-off. etc.

    3. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Not really. A lot of this look dates back to SF artwork from the pre-1960 era. There's also a lot of Art Deco and Streamline influence.

      Heck, if you want to claim rip-off, then everyone has ripped off Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" back in, what, 1929?

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    4. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      We all stand on the shoulders of those who came before.

      The idea is not merely to copy, but to expand the scope - to look at old ideas from new perspectives. This is invention at its best.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by acehunter · · Score: 1

      The creators may not have been influenced by Miyazaki at all. Miyazaki's works are recent. The director has clearly stated the Fleischer Brothers' "Mechanical Monsters" (1941) as the source material for the robots - this animation was the original inspiration for the robots in Miyazaki's "Laputa" and "Lupin III: Castle Castigliostro". The lone aviation hero with the masked face is a staple of 1930's pulp films (as are invading robots, for that matter).

      Japanese animation borrowed heavily from US 1930's and 1940's culture (not surprising considering our domination of their culture at the end of WWII). Don't confuse the source (1930's-1940's pulp) with the derivative work (anime).

      The entire entertainment world does not revolve around anime.

      --
      -Mod how you like, we'll make more
    6. Re:Rip off of Laupta?? by bitrott · · Score: 1

      How many times do we need to suffer posts ike this one?!?! Laputa ripped off Jules Verne. The steampunk, pulp noir genres have been around for eons. Go get an education in cinema. Start with Fritz Lang's Metropolis. Miyazaki owes him more than you'd care to admit I'm guessing. Besides that it's been done better than Miyazaki. Laputa was pretty, but that's about it.

  46. Re:For those who dont like soul-sucking registrati by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Funny

    The film, in other words, is one long special effect with Jude-Law-size holes in it.

    Well, that's better than a lot of movies which have big enough holes in the plot that you could drive a truck through them.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  47. Retro adventures. . . Fail hard or Big Success. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Indiana Jones and Star Wars. Both blew the roof off.

    But the failures to quite ring the bell can be listed endlessly. . .

    Many, many have tried, but somehow. . . Even those black & white episodes of 'Voyager' were kinda dull despite all the clever and hard work put into them.

    If "Sky Captain" can make the grade, it'll be interesting to see how.

    I think it has something to do with replicating an old, albeit loved idea, versus taking a timeless formula and doing something with it which makes it vital to contemporary culture. Luke, Leia, Han and Indiana Jones and their worlds were all honest, first generation approaches to old and tired carbon copy ideas.

    The difference will be if "Sky Captain's" director is a fan or a visionary.

    Fans are stuck in idolizing yesterday. Visionaries are into the creation of the moment. Their beginnings may be the same, but their directions on the path of life are diametrically opposed.

    Never work backwards. It's the same as falling asleep.


    -FL

  48. Not the sharpest crayon in the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of everything else stolen to make this movie, from the premise to the characters, you notice the music?

  49. Re:plug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My post was not a flame.

    No, it was flamebait, which is something quite different, and was correctly modded that way.
    Why was it flamebait?
    Because it was SPAM, an advertisement for a website with a political agenda.
    Because, as another respondent noted in a different fashion, the content of the advertised site appears to contain vast quantities of bovine excrement.

    Your post was also off-topic, pointing to a blog that had nothing whatsoever to do with the Sky Captain movie, or with movies at all, so your post was correctly modded that way, too.

  50. Setting by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So what exactly is this type of genre/setting called? I'm always fascinated by it, but never know where to look for more information. Its kind of an alternate history too....Fascinating stuff, right up there with Crimson Skies, Talespin, and Porco Rosso

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Setting by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Well, considering steam engine type Sci-Fi is called "Steamerpunk", and this is based more on the 1920s-40sish retro theme, there isn't apparently an official label.

      I guess the most appropriate genre/setting would be either "Vacuumpunk", "Electrodepunk", "Cathodepunk", "Streampunk" (eg; the streamline trend of the 20's-40's), or as the tendacy with retrotech was heavy use of neon (almost 50 years before Miami Vice even), how about "Neonpunk"?

      Heh, or one could combine all of the above and call it "Frankenpunk".

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:Setting by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's called steampunk, neo-pulp and retro-futuristm.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
    3. Re:Setting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1920's, maybe early 30's would be the time of modernism... I think that's what the futurist techno-believer ideas of the time were called. Of course, by now we're well into post-post-modernism so anything modernist created at present would not be real modernist, but retro-modernist at best. And considering the many rehashings of retro-modernism in popular culture, isn't it about the time for post-retro-modernism?

    4. Re:Setting by acehunter · · Score: 1


      Technically, Steampunk refers to the era from about 1850 to 1910 or 1920. It was popularized by the William Gibson / Bruce Sterling novel "The Difference Engine" and basically ends with the widespread use of the internal combustion engine.

      1930's-era pulp is typically referred to as "pulp", though the other terms referred to in the parent post certainly apply.

      --
      -Mod how you like, we'll make more
  51. What is the implication? by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    I can't understand why it is necessary to mention that he used to use an Apple in the ./ posting. I mean, is the implication that only Apple users are creative? That this somehow demonstrates how awesome Apple is? Surely there were other bits of information more relevant to the story that could have been placed in the summary.

    The Apple conspiracy continues...

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:What is the implication? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Of course that is the implication. It's all part of the Apple marketing culture. Creative design work is done with an Apple. People know that and expect it: after all, what kind of a 3d Animator/Designer doesn't use a Mac? Anyone who does that must not be a professional.

      And after all, this is Slashdot. You should expect to be modded down for questioning the Apple Gods, just as I expect to be modded down for explaining these obvious facts. There are many an Apple zealot lurking with mod points, and rarely will you be able to survive their wrath.

      If you want to go even deeper, there's something to be said about any company that paints itself as "the underdog" in American culture. There is a patent romanticization of being the 'little guy' in American myth. This is why there is such a general contempt for the rich and the successful, why corporations are so frequently maligned, and why the protagonist is almost always the underdog struggling for success against impossible odds. It's a culture-wide obsession, and this Apple bias is just one symptom of that.

    2. Re:What is the implication? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      can't understand why it is necessary to mention that he used to use an Apple in the ./ posting

      Could it be that it is mentioned because the IIci is a really old, slow relic and that mentioning it's use underlines the fact that this guy was A) ahead of his time and B) doing amazing things with limited resources. I had always understood those two things to be almost the definition of Geekiness and part of the whole point of site devoted to "news for nerds".

      Come on, don't you think it is cool, or at least interesting that this guy was successfully making the movie with the awesome computing power of a 25MHz CPU and 128 MB of RAM (assuming he maxed it out - out of the box it had 1MB of RAM). If you don't find that interesting and his achievements with such old hardware impressive are you sure you are reading the right site?

    3. Re:What is the implication? by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1
      Wow. Knee-jerk!

      The point was that he used a machine introduced in 1989. A machine that (as a poster points out below) runs at 25MHz using '030 processor. An old, old, old machine. Reading the article, I didn't see any mention of the new machines he is using.

      But congrats on extrapolating a line in an article to an entire cultural rant.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    4. Re:What is the implication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What an asshole you are. Of course we Apple users are more creative.

      But seriously, I imagine it was a reference point used to show how antiquated his technology was. A IIci would be the equivalent of a 25MHz 386DX.

  52. Re:Retro adventures. . . Fail hard or Big Success. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a huge fan of pulps and welcome pulp-related movies, but say what you will about him now (Calista Flockhart? eww), the one thing Star Wars and Indiana Jones had going for them was Harrison Ford.

    I actually like Jude Law a lot, but he wasn't able to put AI over the top (and Eric Roberts was the Rocketeer...)

    Anybody remember the Last Starfighter?

  53. Re:Blade Runner by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, ditto Tron. The 20th anniversary DVD of that was simply amazing in scope. It also serves to remind you that sometimes a movie can be ahead of it's time.

    For instance, can you believe that Tron did not win any special effects academy awards because their 'overuse' of computer generated effects disqualified them??!

    If you get a copy of this, check out how painstakingly the movie was done and then realize how badly the Tron artists were ripped off!

    Considering how many special effects there are in even non-science fiction movies nowadays, I don't think this will be too much of a stretch for people who get the concept of this kind of pulp fiction.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  54. Re:Obligatory Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a clue. First of all, I have an account, but it would be modded into oblivion. Secondly, Slashdot lets me make the choice to post anonymously or to post without ever registering. The NYTimes offfers no such mechanism because they want you to register in exchange for the article.

  55. Re:Obligatory Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that they shouldn't be asking for it, then tell them that, and don't read their pages until they explain themselves. But you can't justify the google loophole by saying that you don't know why they want you to register. They have their reasons, even if they don't spell them out publically (and there's no reason that they have to do so).

    Either you agree to their terms and get access, or you do not agree and you do not get access. Agreements do not get any simpler than this. So why do so many people have trouble with the concept?

  56. Re:Mr. Invisible and the Secret Mission to Hollywo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it wouldn't fit, and you're not strong enough to cut it off anyway.

  57. Re:Blade Runner by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

    For instance, can you believe that Tron did not win any special effects academy awards because their 'overuse' of computer generated effects disqualified them??!

    Uh, yes. That movie was horrible, special effects or no.

  58. What goes around... (Re:Blade Runner) by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
    For instance, can you believe that Tron did not win any special effects academy awards because their 'overuse' of computer generated effects disqualified them??!

    Arrgh, that stinks. Fortunately, at least one animator who worked on Tron (Chris Wedge) went on to win an Academy Award for his computer animation work (Best Animated Short for "Bunny") :)

  59. Thank you by tiltowait · · Score: 1

    I've noticed this as well -- nice to hear someone else has too.

    Conan the Barbarian theme used for the The Scorpion King trailer.

    Miller's Crossing theme used in ??? (something fairly recent).

    Terminator 2 theme used in the Universal Soldier trailer.

    1. Re:Thank you by eudas · · Score: 1

      man, i hate that. that's annoying as all hell.
      if you make a new movie, make some new music. damn!

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    2. Re:Thank you by Doug-W · · Score: 1

      X-Men 2 trailer, used Holst, but then again almost everyone uses Holst...

    3. Re:Thank you by Luyseyal · · Score: 1
      Or frickin' Carmina Burana...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  60. Re:HE/SHE IS LYING. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So lying is a new form of trolling is it?

    Sheeiiit newbie...

  61. Re:Retro adventures. . . Fail hard or Big Success. by Xepherys2 · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm, I agree...

    He would appear, from the article, to be just the visionary mentioned, though. Or at least that's my hope. He seems to really be striving for something to call his own. That's something that most geeks can really appreciate! ;o)

  62. Slow learners in Hollywood by mblase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The film, in other words, is one long special effect with Jude-Law-size holes in it.

    Kinda like Attack of the Clones or (don't blame me, I didn't ask to watch this) Spy Kids 3-D were? Yeah, I remember those monuments to modern filmmaking -- bluescreens and greenscreens! Practically no sets! Let your actors imagine everything they're supposed to be interacting with and they'll be much more compelling that way!

    Didn't anybody listen when we complained that the acting in the new Star Wars films was painfully wooden, and the actors complained that it was because they were working on virtual sets and couldn't place themselves in the roles?

    Look, would-be blockbuster-makers: this isn't the way to make a compelling movie. It may be pretty, but it doesn't work well. Go watch the behind-the-scenes stuff for The Lord of the Rings and look at how much trouble they went through to build sets and miniatures whenever possible, and then count the Oscar nominations and wins they got for their trouble. Spend the money on at least some kind of physical set and your actors will thank you for it.

    1. Re:Slow learners in Hollywood by Moekandu · · Score: 1
      Didn't anybody listen when we complained that the acting in the new Star Wars films was painfully wooden, and the actors complained that it was because they were working on virtual sets and couldn't place themselves in the roles?
      Well, no. See, it wasn't the virtual sets that made the actors' performances wooden. It was the virtual director. Lucas has always struggled with dialogue and drama.
      --
      Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself; but talent instantly recognizes genius. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
  63. See the trailer yet? by cherokee158 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like good fun, although I believe the effectiveness of a few fifty caliber machine guns against alien giant robot spaceship alloys may have been wildly overrated in the movie...

  64. Doc Savage by chiph · · Score: 1

    I think I must be one of the few here (even on /.) who saw "Doc Savage: Man of Bronze" in the theater.

    But I was more of a "Grey Avenger" fan, in any case.

    Chip H.

  65. Re:Retro adventures. . . Fail hard or Big Success. by acehunter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Black and white episodes of Voyager? You mean that show where the guy and that annoying kid travel through time, setting things right? Man, that show died out in the 80's, dude! ;-)

    --
    -Mod how you like, we'll make more
  66. Just like the "Midnight Run" soundtrack by himself · · Score: 1

    The music from "Midnight Run" is used on about a quarter of the trailers I've ever seen. The music is very catchy, some twangy guitars and harmonica: you wouldn't listen to a whole CD of it at once, but it works great over the kind of bits and pieces that comprise a trailer.
    The original film was fantastic. And when my college roommate turned out to own the album, I was delighted. :7)
    In fact, I hear the music a lot more now than I ever hear the movie itself mentioned, which is too bad: DeNiro and Charles Grodin, with Dennis Farina as an awseome mobster, and Joe Pantoliano before he started showing up under every Hollywood rock you turned over, plus Yaphet Kotto as Angent Foster Grant.
    *sigh*
    Man, I love that movie.

  67. Re:Obligatory Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey idiot,

    Google and the New York Times have a partnership wherein Google is permitted to link directly to NYT content, and Google's users, therefore, are permitted to bypass the registration process at NYT when accessing NYT content through Google.

    If that agreement is satisfactory to NYT, why do you have such a problem with it? You just like policing other people's business?

  68. Grateful Dead Reference, Dammit! by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


    TotenKopf can just as easily be translated as "Deadhead". So get in the spirit and smoke a bowl just before watching the movie; you'll be happy you did!

  69. Voyager. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Right. . !

    Man, I forgot about that show. I really enjoyed that one, actually. Too bad it ended prematurely. The main actor died on set in an accident, apparently. I bet it could have gone on to become a big cultural phenomenon if things had been different.


    -FL

    1. Re:Voyager. . . by acehunter · · Score: 1

      Possibly - the show was a lot of fun, and predates the more recent world / time / reality hopping shows like Sliders, Stargate, etc.

      Interesting that my original post (which was intended to be funny - hence the winking smiley) got modded as "Flamebait" - some people apparently have no sense of humor. ;-)

      Or maybe I just don't understand /.ers

      --
      -Mod how you like, we'll make more
  70. Shut the fuck up, troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Made you look.