Slashdot Mirror
U.S. Home Internet Access up to 75%
waytoomuchcoffee writes "Over 200 million U.S. residents now have access to the internet at home, or 3/4 of the U.S. population. This is quite a jump, as only 51% of U.S. homes had access to the internet in August of 2000. Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."
So all those email solicitations I've been getting lately from lonely housewives were real?
Phoenix
Surprising to male /.ers perhaps, but not us girls...I spend eight hours a day on a T-3 at work and five nights a week on my cable connection at home. Typical home activities include updating my Web page, trolling forums, email/messaging friends, playing competitive leagues Counter-Strike, and shopping. At work, when I'm not /.ing, I'm a communications coordinator (writer & designer). I use the 'Net for research, purchasing, and communication with my colleagues.
You guys keep being surprised, but women make up half the work force where we spend a lot of time on computers. We buy more than half of all electronic devices and more than half of all computer games (and no they are not all for our spouses/children).
Wake up boys. This is no more news than females voting and driving!
That said, I've noticed the net is slowing down at home and at work. Do we have the infrastructure for all of America to be online (and with blazing connections)?
Can I bum a sig?
I didn't know computer ownership was that high
"internet access is highest among females 35-54" So thats why there are 3 girls registered on the OSDN Personals instead of the one that had her pic put in the banner. That would account for the huge jump =)
Stranded.org
In December 2003 only 126 million Americans were online. Also, interesting to note that 66 mln use the Internet on a daily basis.
Going by all the trolls on ./, I think the distribution must be close to the 2-year old end.
Indefinitely Detained US Citizen
No, Internet access is actually highest among middle aged men who call themselves "Debra".
Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
It's probably single woman trying to find a single man...
Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
There's hope for the male geeks yet! (Assuming you don't still live in your parents' basement. You don't, do you?)
I ceased to take this seriously as soon as I realized that whoever wrote this POS didn't seem to understand that "internet" != "web".
Why am I still getting these freakin AOL disks?
I've recently dropped my phone line at home therefore dropping my home Internet access as well. Our household has 2 cell phones, I get plenty of Internet at work/college, and I can't quite afford broadband. I wonder how many others are in similar situations?
01000001 01011001 01000010 01000001 01000010 01010100 01010101
So it's 25% from the "great tech bubble", I wonder if that means that now would be a good time to start buying YHOO shares again? Although the tech bubble burst, it could almost be considered underrated, the issue was all the money thrown into the internet at one time caused the over-value, now it may be near corrected or even undervalued, so as the internet grows, so will tech stock.
Mod +5 Drunk
3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what bandwidth is.
I'm wondering about this "easy to use" business. It's true that it will get us more users in the short run...but if the system was such that you would be forced to acquire at least some understanding of what you were doing, eventually you would get similar number of users, only they would be a little bit more aware of what is going on.
It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.
ever been to shoes.com?
boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
Since I'm from Romania here we see this like:
... you do the math.
... the best
go to US plug your cable in the wall and the broadbad flows.
Now this is something I envy you for. Low rate decent speed access. Since here a 64/128 kbit goes around $100-$150 and the minimum wage is around $75 monthly
But at least we cand get some online clients from US. The more
Hmm, posting about wanting online soap operas, on Slashdot. You're being ironic, aren't you?
God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
How can we not be "connected"? Its become narly manditory (if not already so) for secondary schools to teach internet skills. It's only a natural thing to have the students ask their parents for an internet connection: "We need to do our projects" is often the case. Granted, teens do use it for many other things, but that's not the point. How many state websites have money saving online forms for Car Registration, etc? If you do it via hardcopy, you often have to pay X number of dollars to process it. But it's less online more than not. Want more information about a product or service? Check out the company's website! Want to play the latest game or get a new pc part? You better have the internet, since the company may not have bothered to send the correct drivers with the product, check their online driver download section! You might be lucky if they have an option for you to buy the update CD and pay for shipping for a 6-8 week later delivery. It's becoming more and more difficult to use the "I don't have internet" excuse. It's not a merely sending email and for up and coming companies to use the web. It's invaded our everyday lives. For better or worse, we need to conform or perish.
"Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."
And you thought mom was busy balancing the checkbook online....
Now all you teenagers now get to face the fact that 'HotChick69' you've been eagerly getting busy with in the chat rooms may in fact be just down the hall.
The horror... the horror...
#1) This is a press release. It is in the interest of the Nielsen group to exaggerate these figures. The more people who they show as on the internet, the more advertisers who will buy their data.
#2) The data was collected using random-digit dialing. Obviously, the people who don't have phones are more likely to not have internet access too. I wouldn't discount this factor.
#3) It's very vague what question they actually asked people. Does it include "is there a library within 50 miles of you that has internet access?" Given their natural bias towards inflating the numbers, you can't discount them incorporating those results into their totals.
It's great if more people are online, but these figures and percentages need to be taken with a grain of salt.
Their method of counting internet access is flawed. Their method would count me four times, and my wife three.
And then you count my mother-in-law and while she has "access", she has never been online. Her access is just to get e-mail.
So there you have it. 6 accounts out of 8 counted that are not valid. How many more of them are not valid as well?
Your mom is so fat she takes up the largest age/gender group of internet users in the United States!
Perhaps the real story isn't that the percentage of Americans online at home has grown about 25% in the last 4 years. I think the fact that we've gone from almost nobody being online in the early nineties to having 3/4 of the population on the net in only a decade is the really impressive figure.
You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
Good idea. What button on AOL connects me to that then?
From what I've seen through my work, it's exactly that 35-54 group that are keeping me in business. I have seen more junk running on these older ladies computers than I even knew was out there. A cat the falls down the screen, walks out a little cat door has been the highest offender. But other things such as "cute" screensavers (likely spyware), comet cursor's "cute" pointers and the like are just as popular.
It's strange that only 70% of homes in the USA have an Internet capable computer, yet 75% of homes have the Internet?
Maybe WebTV is an explanation, but it could be something more sinister. Perhaps these figures are wrong?
I'd bet the figures are wrong, as I've just made up the "70%" stat. Sorry if I had alarmed you there for a moment...
Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
Wasn't there a story here a couple weeks ago, that stated the largest group playing MMORPG was that same group.
This signiture copied from somewhere.
There's a fundamental difference between computers and these things. Computers are interacted with on a low level. I've used locks my whole life and will never have to open one up. A computer is so complex that even the simplest tasks can cause problems. For instance, few people have a decent grasp of the directory structure. Yes, the simple directory structure. This is a constant problem when they want to open a file with something other than the program that saved it and that program has a different default open folder.
Your examples would make sense if say, the ring voltage on your phone had to be randomly calibrated to fluctuating levels manually (silly isn't it?), but it doesn't. The problem isn't with users , but with computers themselves. Computers NEED to be learned or need to be simpler.
Photos.
Better analogies:
How many digits are in a phone number?
How much gas does your tank hold?
What's your car's top speed?
How many minutes are on your cell phones calling plan?
How much milk comes in a typical jug?
Does your lack of knowledge about the number of tumblers in your door lock make it easier for a thief to crack? No. Will I ever, EVER need to know how many tumblers or even that there are tumblers in order for me to use a lock? No. The exact same questions can be asked about your other stupid analogies.
In the past couple weeks I've had to act as phone support for friends trying to configure their IP address to use their network. To even USE a computer for what it is designed you need training. I can't tell you how many times my friends who use computers everyday have tried to email me an mp3 and have only sent their winamp playlists... or told me all of their files were deleted when Word or Excel couldn't find a file that was in the recent docs list.
These are basic tasks that can't be performed without knowledge of how the computer works. BASIC tasks. Do you need a manual to use your phone, TV, or remote? No. Do you need a manual to program phone numbers in memory, add new devices to a remote, hook up 20 cables for a home theatre system? Yes (for non-geeks). Advanced tasks are the only times when you need training. Basic tasks for a computer require training. If you don't know the modulation scheme for your TV or the ring voltage of your phone, can a hacker come in and destroy it? No. Just using a computer opens it up for malicious activity.
Even worse is the analogy people use with car engines. Sure, I don't know what the tension is supposed to be on my old cable clutch, or how much pressure is in the hydraulic clutch... but does that hinder my ability to use it how it was designed? No. Can you just put a 12 year old in the driver seat and expect that kid to a) know how to operate the vehicle, and b) not kill people when they do? No. You have to be trained to use a car for its basic function to be usable. Same with a computer. Its basic function is complex and requires knowledge to use correctly and responsibly.
IANAL, but I play one on
I remember that many prior surveys said men use Internet than women do. Women are more "computer anxious" than men. But this survey has a different results. Why?
I work for a cable ISP in a town populated with mostly older people (retirement age and up). And I swear, they ALL buy/sell stuff on eBay. They all bought digital cameras to take pictures of the stuff they are selling on eBay. They all upgraded from dial-up so they could bid faster on eBay. In fact, retired people dig eBay so much, I'd bet that many of them would trade their Social Security and Medicare for high buyer/seller ratings. We could cut the federal deficit by billions! So, that's my platform. Vote realmolo in 2004. Contributions accepted via PayPal.
and not just browsing for pr0n.
it's called PARTICIPATION man. There's only so much portforwarding you can do.
Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
What they reveal are suggestive.
What they hide are critical.
There are 4 people living in my house. I definitely have access to the internet, my wife doesn't care about computers and my kids are too young to understand it. So in our house it is 1 out of 4 people, and I know people who do not have any kind of Internet access in their home because they don't even own a computer.
So I'm a bit skeptical about these numbers. I'm guessing there is probably about 200 million actually capable of using the internet in this country (of the whole population, some are too young, some too old, some are unable for other reasons - ill (mentally or otherwise), in jail, etc.).
This should be expected since this is precisely the age group that is willing to go out with the average 20-year old slashdot geek.