Slashdot Mirror


Third Space Tourist is Set

Sgt York writes "Space Adventures announced yesterday that Gregory Olsen will be their next private space tourism client. He paid $20M to hop on a Soyuz, sometime by 2005, and go spend some time on the ISS. The cool thing is, he's not just playing tourist. He's the CEO of Sensors Unlimited, has a MS in physics, and a PhD in materials science. He's planning on using the trip to 'help inspire today's youth to dream big' and conduct a few experiments, including testing out some of his company's equipment. SA is billing him as his own 'private space program.'" There's also a space.com story.

170 comments

  1. Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a few billion dollars, you can buy anything you want. Film at 11? No. Nothing new here, move along.

    1. Re:Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With a few billion dollars, you can buy anything you want.

      Just think how far away we could blast Gates and Balmer on their expense accounts! Hell, let's fit Darl in between them for comic relief!

      Oh wait... It wouldn't work because THEY are the ones with the billions... not me. :-(

  2. Well, at least he's not... by jdray · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least he's not part of a boy band.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
    1. Re:Well, at least he's not... by bitchell · · Score: 1

      Thank god that the boy band never made it into space.

      At least someone a Pepsi had an ounce of decency and spared the rest of us from this, the biggest marketing gimmick of all.

    2. Re:Well, at least he's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      With the dangers inherent in space travel, I would think slashdotters would have wanted him to go up. Perhaps on this flight.

      Ducks.

    3. Re:Well, at least he's not... by mike_mgo · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Oh, I thought sending a 77 year old into space was the biggest marketing gimmick for space.

      What was the reason for using my money to send him into space again-to study the effects of weightlessness and the elderly? That seems like a useful study at this point in our space program.

      Really, what's the difference between sending up a wannabe musician or a rich CEO (who would both pay for their trip) or sending up an elderly former astronaut/senator (at tax payers expense). Sending Glenn back into space was just as much a marketing gimmick for NASA as anything anyone else has done.

    4. Re:Well, at least he's not... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, it had marketing benefits. It also had scientific benefits, and not just those of studying the effects of weightlessness on the elderly.

      The more attention NASA can get, the more funding it's likely to retain. These days, anything that doesn't help put a polititian(and not just John Glenn) in positive light isn't safe from being axed in favor of pork barrel spending.

      And personally, I'm in favor of NASA retaining its funding.

    5. Re:Well, at least he's not... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The more attention NASA can get, the more funding it's likely to retain.

      How about take $20 Million endowments from rich people who want to tag along for the ride, and spare ourselves the humiliation of putting on dog-and-pony shows to keep up interest for the sake of public funding? Get enough clients like this, and NASA could actually operate in the black with no taxpayer funding at all!

      Government spending on space exploration was one thing, when Sputnik was beeping along overhead and scaring the bejeezus out of Americans, but now that the space program is no longer part of an arms race, it's much more difficult to justify the expense to taxpayers, especially in tough times like the recession we just went through. Instead of putting Ohio Senators in space, let's collect cash from as many of Sam Walton's heirs as we can in exchange for letting them ride the roman candle for a few days each... and let's do it before we completely run out of current-generation space shuttles.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Well, at least he's not... by Tree131 · · Score: 1
      What was the reason for using my money to send him into space again-to study the effects of weightlessness and the elderly?

      They proved that old farts don't just dissipate into space.

      Seriously, It might be useful someday, when humans decide to venture to places futher than Mars and when trips will take longer than 10 years each way.

      Then again, they might improve cryo-tech or come up with some other stasis technology by then.

    7. Re:Well, at least he's not... by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What was the reason for using my money to send him into space again-to study the effects of weightlessness and the elderly? That seems like a useful study at this point in our space program.
      Shoving John Glenn into orbit wasn't the only reason for that flight. They did a lot of studies on microgravity, you can see it in the press kit for that mission. You can bitch and moan about it, but it wasn't a bad mission. It worked on many levels, good science, good press, and a second flight for NASA's first man in Space. As for sending up the rich, well, more power to them. If I had $200 million, I'd buy a ticket for 10% of it. Hell, there are apartments which cost more than that.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  3. I can just hear it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    "I don't want to be like Mike, I want to be like Gregory Olsen!"

  4. Tax Deduction by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    conduct a few experiments, including testing out some of his company's equipment

    In other words, it'll be a tax deduction because it's a "business expense".

    1. Re:Tax Deduction by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I bet he'll frame that page of his income tax return!

      I'd love to see the look on the face of the IRS clerk when s/he looks at that line.

    2. Re:Tax Deduction by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm sure you're right. Here's a recent blurb about them in the news. It looks like they do a fair bit of business with the Air Force, so NASA's practically sending one of their own.
      Sensors Unlimited, Inc. (Princeton, NJ), provider of short wave IR imaging products based on indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) technology, has received a follow-on, Phase 1b contract from the U.S. Air Force, for a twelve month, $2 million program to develop the industry's first high frame rate camera for combined imaging and ranging, using an in-pixel digitized, monolithic PIN/APD focal plane array. The Department of Defense Missile Defense Agency is providing the funding under a contract managed by the Air Force. Sensors Unlimited was the only vendor to address both imaging and ranging within a single focal plane array and camera. The company says that it will "significantly advance the state-of-the-art in infrared imaging."
    3. Re:Tax Deduction by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Redundant
      In other words, it'll be a tax deduction because it's a "business expense".

      Will Space Adventures and Sensors Unlimited/a> be able to claim the bandwidth bill after the slashdotting as a business expense? Hell, will he still be able to afford to go after the slashdotting?

      I'm really surprised that noone else made this joke yet ;) What's the world coming to?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Tax Deduction by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Redundant
      In other words, it'll be a tax deduction because it's a "business expense".

      Will Space Adventures and Sensors Unlimited be able to claim the bandwidth bill after the slashdotting as a business expense? Hell, will he still be able to afford to go after the slashdotting?

      I'm really surprised that noone else made this joke yet ;) What's the world coming to?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:Tax Deduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting the same lame crap twice after screwing it up, logged in, too boot! That's class!

    6. Re:Tax Deduction by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      Posting the same lame crap twice after screwing it up, logged in, too boot! That's class!

      Yeah I screwed up. So sue me! Hopefully the broken post will be blissfully modded out of sight. Perhaps even the correct one if people don't think it's funny. Time will tell and I have better things to do then worry about comments I can't take back.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:Tax Deduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In other words, it'll be a tax deduction because it's a "business expense".
      Wowwww.... Just think of the business mileage he's gonna deduct !!
    8. Re:Tax Deduction by re-Verse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd love to see the look on the face of the IRS clerk when s/he looks at that line.

      By my guess is that it will be competely bank. From my dealings with tax people, I've decided they aren't human... or at least humans capable of emotion.

  5. Is this news? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hate to sound like a troll, but is this news? He's the third guy. The first was newsworthy, the second really wasn't, and this even less. The only noteworthy thing is the guy went from rags to riches, and now into space. He'll train, get on a rocket, go to the space station, stay the hell out of the way, return, write a book, make money on said book. The End.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Is this news? by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The more the merrier though. In a theoretical capital market, if there are enough buyers, the producers will make more, enabling more people to buy, and maximizing profit. It's newsworthy in that it's another step closer to non-government sponsored space flight. Personal space travel will come eventually, but maybe market forces can accelerate the process.

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    2. Re:Is this news? by Urkki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh come on. It could also happen so that he'll train, get on a rocket, and get blown into fine red mist... Without this article, it wouldn't be possible to link back to this on the article telling about the accident. It may seem pointless now, but so do most precautionary things...

    3. Re:Is this news? by Blue+Master · · Score: 3, Funny


      1: Start from rags
      2: ???
      3: Go to riches
      4: Go to space
      5: Write book
      6: Profit!

    4. Re:Is this news? by nate1138 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is also noteworth because he will be the first to carry his own significant research up with him. He's not going to just "stay the hell out of the way". This guy isn't some boy-band wannabe. He's a real scientist with real experiments he want to carry out.

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    5. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I find this post morbidly disturbing. Where can I sign up for your service?

    6. Re:Is this news? by Otter · · Score: 4, Funny
      Without this article, it wouldn't be possible to link back to this on the article telling about the accident. It may seem pointless now, but so do most precautionary things...

      Once again, the journalistic thoroughness of the editors shines through. The question is whether they'll link to this story or the dupe Taco will post tomorrow.

    7. Re:Is this news? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      This isn't news. The only Olson news anyone is really intested in is this

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    8. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a KDE maintainence release is news, this is news. I don't remember the last time that KDE sent someone into outerspace. Those lazy, dirty communists...

    9. Re:Is this news? by schwaang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not really, but it provides a way for news.google.com to pay Slashdot back for the three google-related articles on Slashdot yesterday.

    10. Re:Is this news? by bwy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The third time we went to the moon was boring too, eh? Seems like today once something has been done once it isn't worth paying attention to after. For some reason people watched how many years of Friends episodes though? 30 minutes of peoples lives, gone, every week for years.

      I, for one, live north of the Cape and watch every shuttle launch I possibly can. Most people don't any more. I guess it depends on your interests.

    11. Re:Is this news? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably the biggest reason it's newsworthy is that the number of people who've done this is still in the single digits, and it has to do with science/technology.

      Now, maybe it shouldn't have been on the front page...

    12. Re:Is this news? by GTRacer · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I was going to upmod you post, but I think I should reply instead. I agree COMPLETELY that space travel and the expansion of same should be newsworthy. But there's a difference between "Third Space Tourist" and the countdown to the final Friends ep:

      Interest in space travel (or in most scientific discovery) is dependent on the initial "Wow" factor or in thinking about how some advance is superior.

      That "wow" is generally finite, like a first impression. It may have been great a first, but the 30th time you meet $CELEBRITY, the reaction is different if it's not a personal contact. I've met many girls that were very attractive, exciting, etc., but since all but one are friends or acquaintances now, that "wow" isn't there any more. With my wife, there's much more to our relationship than the swoony feelings of a first date or kiss.

      Humor however, is not so dependent on this "wow". A given joke, yes, but consistently well-written funny is much longer-lasting. Ditto for other brain-candy entertainments.

      GTRacer
      - Would go up in a heartbeat!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    13. Re:Is this news? by nate1138 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm very interested in your experiments on zero-g rectal methane ignition technologies. I would be willing to fund such a venture assuming that all resultant Intellectual Property would be transferred to my new startup, AssTech, LLC.

      Oh, wait, the 90's are over and I don't just give a pile of cash to anyone shooting ideas out of his ass anymore ;-)

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    14. Re:Is this news? by andrewm_za · · Score: 1

      The first was newsworthy, the second really wasn't Depends where you live. In South Africa, the second tourist (Mark Shuttleworth) was the front page news headlines for many months. I dare say he's still more famous locally than our president.

    15. Re:Is this news? by Rico_za · · Score: 1

      he will be the first to carry his own significant research up with him
      No he's not! Mark Shuttleworth used his trip to do various experiments, including one on the effect micro-gravity has on stem cells, as well as one on proteines used in the fight against AIDS. He funded all of this out of his own pocket. After his space flight, he went on a huge educational tour of South Africa, getting kids interested in science and maths.

    16. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the movie spinoff. ;)

  6. risky by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's still too risky. think about it, someone going up that's not an astro flowing around accidentally kicking some switch on a panel breaking something. I know it's prob not *that* unsecure, but still, the point is the ISS is supposed to be this great nation-free project, but the Russian's are trying to milk it for some rubles by gambling that this "tourist" won't break anything.

    call me pariod it you wish, but the stakes are too high for this.

    CVb

    1. Re:risky by Mistlefoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This guys a scientist. Pretty good chance he's not going to be going around hitting switches or being any more careless than any astronaut.

      This guys also running his own successful business.

      Consider that every $20 million injection into space flight will help insure that there will be a 'next' space flight.

    2. Re:risky by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simply put, Russia cannot afford to keep sending Soyuz up there time after time again. They don't have the riches the US apparently does. So they fund their flights anyway they can.

      Looking at the alternatives (neglecting ISS and letting it fall apart because we won't go up there with our crappy Space Shuttle anymore) I certainly have no problem with some jet-set millionaire travelling up there.

      Plus, I think 6 months of training will make sure they don't accidentally kick any switches marked "Self Destruct".

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    3. Re:risky by chef_raekwon · · Score: 0

      i think you are absolutely right. we should leave the ISS empty (3 'nauts instead of 5) on account of the US Government curtailing spending on it, and forcing other nations (like Japan) to be cut from sending up their 'nauts.

      Also, now that all of the Shuttles keep on blowing up, there really is no point to being in space.

      sounds very reasonable.

      I say: Russians, push the Americans until they can be pushed no more. Then maybe the Americans will spend more money on developing the ISS and new space programs, and less on attacking poor nations, and raping them for their oil.

      no flame war intended.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    4. Re:risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Chuck Bucket wrote:
      call me pariod it you wish, but the stakes are too high for this.

      Why would I want to call you pariod? Chuck Bucket is just fine.

      SCNR
    5. Re:risky by mantera · · Score: 1


      "I think it's still too risky. think about it, someone going up that's not an astro flowing around accidentally kicking some switch on a panel breaking something"...

      i don't know why my mental picture of that featured Homer Simpson...

    6. Re:risky by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      He's going to do more actual research up there than NASA does. With the budget cuts, they are down to just enough crew to keep the lights on and don't really have time for much else. I'm not sure how lame (or not) his experiment is, but it's probably a better use of the station than is going on right now. Even the president has said the ISS will be abandoned after the US "obligations" to the international community that built it have been met. Why not let a rich guy bang around up there, maybe it will crash and our obligation will be over sooner than expected ;-)

    7. Re:risky by ttsalo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Simply put, Russia cannot afford to keep sending Soyuz up there time after time again.

      I don't think that's a problem now that the shuttle is grounded and they have the only vehicle in the world capable of flying to ISS at all.

      And by the way, some have claimed that the whole ISS is just a way of keeping the russian rocket scientists working on peaceful projects in Russia, not on ICBMs in "rogue nations"...

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
  7. pfff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    Another "rock and roll" CEO. It's bad enough we have Richard Branson ballooning about as if he's a 20 year old.

    1. Re:pfff... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, when I was 20 I used to balloon my ASS off!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  8. Smart guy... by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's planning on using the trip to 'help inspire today's youth to dream big' and conduct a few experiments, including testing out some of his company's equipment.

    Business trip, be sure to keep the receipts. Oh, and he'll be entertaining a client for dinner when he gets to the space station, so his meal will be a write-off, too.

    Hmmm... how many cents per mile is it for a space commute?

    1. Re:Smart guy... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...so his meal will be a write-off, too.

      Does that include the three martinis?

      --
      What?
  9. He's not a space tourist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's a space salesman.

    Not a problem, but not a whole lot nobler than the average millionaire or boy band member.

  10. This is the best chat-up line ever! by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Guy: hey, baby, what's up?

    Hot chick: get lost, loser, unless you got something interesting to say!

    Guy: I'm going into space next month, gonna cost me $20 mil. I might not come back alive. Look, here's the clipping from the New York Times with my photo. So, want to come for a ride in my Porsche? I got a little time left and a lot of money to burn... ....

    I reckon it'd be worth 2-3 months of one-nighters with exceedingly pretty but easily charmed women. In purely genetic terms, that $20m could be a pretty good investment.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet that could get him two chicks at the same time.

    2. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by grub · · Score: 1


      exceedingly pretty but easily charmed women. In purely genetic terms, that $20m could be a pretty good investment.

      I don't know about that if they fall for that line. I mean.. they may be beautiful women but something about drool on the chin turns me off.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it cheaper to use photoshop.

    4. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by tjmsquared · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think a guy with $20 million to spend (waste?) on a venture like this would have little trouble picking up "exceedingly pretty but easily charmed women" whether he is going into space or not.

    5. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20,000,000 for chicks is crap.

      A $1000 hooker is better looking than most women, and you could buy 20,000 for that price. That would mean you could have sex with three $1000 hookers every day for the next 18 years.

    6. Re:This is the best chat-up line ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      New life's goal: earn $20 million.

  11. Sensorsinc Making money from what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sensorsinc's title page says: 'How can a bottle manufacturer prevent glass shards in its drinking containers?' - This guy has a PHD and a company to use plastic bottles. Geees.

  12. One thing he should remember to pack: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, this /. story makes it painfully obvious that you should always carry extra in case your luggage gets lost.

  13. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had that kind of dough to throw around I'd sponsor a probe to Pluto or one of Jupiter's moons

  14. For 20 million dollars by ForestGrump · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He could buy 8-12 acres of land in PRIME Silicon Valley...and be a billionare in 50 years.

    Heak, hes old so whats that investment gonna do for him?

    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:For 20 million dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicon Valley? Why? It'll be in the ocean within 50 years.

  15. Space Tourism by Dizzutch · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm really not sure what I feel about this whole Space Tourism thing. I guess the space agencies are doing it as a source for some extra cash, but how much does profit do they actually make on these trips? I think for now space technology should be kept for scientific research only. There is still a lot that can go wrong, and even more that we don't know about.

    1. Re:Space Tourism by TigerNut · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Getting in the news equals free airtime, which equals funding dollars from the government. The profit angle is bunk, because it would take several thousand tourists to recoup the billions of dollars pumped into the space program as a whole.

      At $20million a pop, the current crop (is three a crop?) of space tourists would have made a much bigger impact on the space industry by putting their money into John Carmack's, Rutan's, or one of the other X-prize ventures.

      --

      Less is more.

  16. Sure it's a big adventure.. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What could be more exciting than to go to the ISS, which has as many faults as the average Disney Theme Park. Space exploration really is becoming a farce. Too bad private industry can't seem to come up with the loot necessary to run a full-scale space program itself.

    Rockets by SpaceX and others are all well and good, but not even Bill Gates has the cash to fully fund a competent space program. Assume private enterprise could and did, would it be any better than what's happening these days?

    "Did you remember to close the door?" "Didn't need to, it fell off and drifted away."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Sure it's a big adventure.. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Roton design (of the now sadly ex Rotary Rocket company), should have come in cheap enough that Gates could have easily afforded it. Still, that program was fairly high risk. I think they were predicting about $200 million to complete the program.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Sure it's a big adventure.. by ctishman · · Score: 1

      Well, it would be as frustrating as any other dealing with big business. Their main concern is always their bottom line, and if all that "cool stuff" we all want to do in space didn't directly benefit the sponsoring company's pocketbook, it simply would not get done. Worse yet, I suspect any space program the Bush Administration has up its sleeve is based upon privatizing spaceflight and disbanding NASA entirely or making it irrelevant.

    3. Re:Sure it's a big adventure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should send Bill Gates into space. He could enlighten us all on how great it feels to be flying on a spaceship running Windows(TM) and predict that with the advent of zero-cost hardware, we can soon all fly to the moon as long as our magic carpet runs Windows(TM).

  17. Space tourism PLEASE! by filekutter · · Score: 1

    I want to go to space before I DIE! I'll even work for McDonald's as long as its NOT on Earth. The dream of so many, and available for a small few. Is this what you get from Bush's last tax cuts?

    --
    I call computer-illiteracy job security
  18. Third Tourist Background Story by bcolflesh · · Score: 3, Informative

    He sounds like an interesting guy - not your typical privileged millionaire.

    1. Re:Third Tourist Background Story by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Better story. Pretty well not your typical scientist.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  19. That's just sad. by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the $20 mil isn't getting him any action, I doubt the expensive vacation is going to help.

    Guy: My penis has been in outer space. Wanna touch it?

    Hot chick (while spraying mace): Eww! I thought this place had a lot of rich guys.

  20. Profit? by somethinghollow · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder how much it ACTUALLY costs to send one person into space? From what I understand, the tourists are just tag alongs. In other words, the ship is going anyway. How much extra can that one person cost? $20 Mil for another 150-250 lbs? Chipping in for gas has never been this expensive. Or maybe the people that make up the prices for movie theatre food make up the prices for in flight meals on a space ship.

    1. Re:Profit? by captain_craptacular · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First of all, there is no such thing as extra space in a space launch. Every ounce of payload is examined and scrutinized in order to determine if it's worth the cost of launching it.
      Furthermore, we're talking about going to space here , not Fresno. I bet his support equipment alone weighs more than "150-250 lbs". He has to bring every single item he'll need to survive for a week. The water alone is probably more than 50 lbs, then there's food, oxygen, extra underwear, etc....

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    2. Re:Profit? by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      $10,000/lb or more for the shuttle, Soyuz is about half that, that's launch costs, not retail.

      The pity is that DC-X was looking to be sub-$1000/lb, possibly as low as $100/lb, which is around airline pricing.

      Then NASA cancelled it.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    3. Re:Profit? by glpierce · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the food, water, and oxygen he'll consume, and the CO2 and waste he'll generate. Oh, and the equipment, training, etc.

      --
      G
    4. Re:Profit? by JewFish · · Score: 1

      So if by around airline pricing you mean off by two orders of magnitude, then ya sure $100/lb.

    5. Re:Profit? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The Soyuz costs about $15-25 million to launch. Of course they charge a lot more than that- 60 million for the whole rocket IRC.

      So the tourists are paying most of the unit costs of the rocket- and the Russians get to send along 2 more astronauts (cosmonauts) as well.

      Yes, the Soyuz rocket really is that cost effective (the Russians use this amazingly hi-tech special technology called a 'production line' and the rocket is designed from the ground-up to be cheap/rugged- unlike in the West where it is designed to be 'high performance'.) It's a very different mindset.

      I remember one of the American astronauts was asking one of the technicians wearing an ordinary white coat, standing next to the rocket he was about to launch on about whether the nozzles can swivel. "Oh yes up to 30 degrees! Watch"- *wrench* (bonk- hit's the stops), *wrench* (bonk- hit the other stops). Astronaut starts sweating. (Apparently in the west they tend to go with a clean-room attitude to their rockets and treat everything gently like it is made of glass- the Russians are more pragmatic about something about to see the brutality of a launch environment.)

      And of course, on the day it worked perfectly.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:Profit? by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Actually, airline costs for similar distances would be around $100/lb for payload.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    7. Re:Profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we use a Corvette, and they use a Yugo, right?

    8. Re:Profit? by bwy · · Score: 1

      Rumor is that 20 mil covers the cost of the rocket, but you still have a good amount of other expenses. Like the cost of operating a taxi in Manhattan- the cost of a taxi is big but it isn't the only expense. Same thing here. Also I'm not sure if the 20 mil covers the Soyuz capsule or just the launch vehicle.

      FYI Soyuz rockets are some of the most cost effective and reliable launch vehicles in the world today. They aren't fancy, like the latest Atlas or Delta, but they do the trick.

    9. Re:Profit? by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More like the comparison of a Ferrari to a Ford F-150. Which do you think hauls more for cheaper?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    10. Re:Profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats really interesting.
      A canadian company had originally planned on using a russian made rocket for launch (because it was less expensive) yet they ran into all these regulatory problems with the states. After they switched to American made rocket for launch the regulatory problems disappered . (from my understanding the regulatory problems were in regards to encryption not the actual launch vehicle its self)..

    11. Re:Profit? by chrismg2003 · · Score: 1

      Water is a by-product of the engines on the shuttle so they dont pay for the extra weight, i dont know if this is the same for the systems the russians and the ISS use or not.

      --

      Red Hat is for people who hate Windows, FreeBSD is for people who love Unix.

      www.putertech.net

    12. Re:Profit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well,... we all know it's the other way around in Soviet Russia...

    13. Re:Profit? by igny · · Score: 3, Funny
      I read a story about how they played a joke on Americans. There was this hangar, full of old rockets, used booster stages, and such... Everything was going to be scrapped. There were a few technicians, drinking vodka, when they heard some people coming... (It appeared to be some visitors from West, accompanied by some russian guides.) Technicians immediately started 'working' using tools like sledgehammers, hitting and cutting some rocket.

      Some visitor asked (noticing vodka bottles), wtf are those guys doing to this expensive equipment? A guide seriously said that these workers prepare the rocket for launch.

      I am not sure if the tourists bought the explanation.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    14. Re:Profit? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so it's well worth asking the question about why NASA built a Ferrari when they obviously need a Ford F-150.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  21. An Interesting Flight by ChuckDivine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This looks very interesting. He's the head of a real company that's still fairly small. Small companies, being much less bureaucratic, are friendlier environments for creative work and pioneering investigations.

    Olsen looks like a remarkably intelligent man with a good background in the kinds of science he will be exploring up on ISS. He's also led the development of products that the real world wants and needs.

    The space business needs more Olsens. Today there are entirely too many bureaucrats with no vision and no ability to connect with the larger world.

    --
    "Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy." -- B. Franklin
    1. Re:An Interesting Flight by Thanatopsis · · Score: 3, Informative

      He also made a ton of money selling his previous company (he cashed out to the tune of several hundred million). So his current company is small because he is in start up mode again.

  22. Will they be kicking themselves later? by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a Tivo fanatic, and I've got a Hidef "ready" TV, so, in my blood, I'm itching to get the new HiDef DirecTV Tivo when it comes out in the next few weeks. Trouble is, it's MSRP is going to be $999. It's just too rich for my blood. Under $500, I could manage, but $999 is just crazy. I expect this price to fall like a rock-- perhaps faster than any other Tivo unit has so far. DirecTV is getting ready to go on a major HD push, even launching a new satellite. This device has got to be part of it.

    I wonder if "Space Tourists" will look back to when the going price was $20 million and shudder. I hope so. I hope that visiting space will be an attainable expense within my lifetime.

    Surely, the first few are so rich that it doesn't really matter, and the "honor" of being one of the first will be worth the price.. but it's numbers 10-100 that I wonder about. Is it really going to seem worth that price, after the fact?

    1. Re:Will they be kicking themselves later? by justins98 · · Score: 1

      I think $20M is a small price to pay for that cool of a place in history, whatever the eventual "market price" for a spaceflight turns out to be. Being the 3rd civilian in space is a bit more of an achievement than owning the 3rd Tivo. The whole concept of value changes when you're worth $100M. Would you rather:

      a) Have $100M in the bank to spend on houses, cars, etc., or,
      b) Go into space for a couple days and then have $80M to spend on houses, cars, etc.

      To me that would be a pretty easy call, but that's just me.

  23. Cool.... by bitchell · · Score: 1

    ...Lets Slashdot his company website out of existence.

    On another note does he realise that the ISS is falling apart?

  24. Newsworthy by Thanatopsis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is a newsworthy story as the this guy is going to be one of the first to use ISS to test crystal growth (which should have a clear advantage in a ISS's microgravity setting), his company's infrared cameras. It really is a business expense for him. As opposed to the first space tourists which were just that tourists. He's testing ISS as the prototype for a space based manufacturing facility.

    1. Re:Newsworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine that. Someone finally using the ISS for what it was originally designed for!

    2. Re:Newsworthy by SB9876 · · Score: 1

      I find it ironic that one of the first actual instances of real science being done on the ISS is from a tourist. I've been checking in on the ISS science page and it's just depressing. According to the ISS folks, astronauts taking pictures out the windows and some Jr High kids firing a remotely operated camera pointed at the Earth is 'science'. To be fair, they've done a little bit of zero-G crystal growth but the state of science on that bucket of bolts is pathetic.

    3. Re:Newsworthy by charboy1 · · Score: 1

      This is a newsworthy story as the this guy is going to be one of the first to use ISS to test crystal growth . . .

      Okay, I'll be nice since you said "one of the first". I just want to point out that ESA has already flown a crystal growth experiment to ISS three times. The experiment is called PromISS from the Universite Libre de Bruxelles. The PromISS experiment box and samples were sent to ISS via Russian Progress and Soyuz modules. PromISS operates inside the ESA built Microgravity Science Glovebox within NASA's Destiny Laboratory.

      PromISS first flew on the Odissea Mission, also known as the Belgian Taxi Flight, in 2002. PromISS-2 flew again in 2003 on the Cervantes Mission (Spanish Soyuz Mission) and the third set of experiments is currently being performed on ISS as part of the Delta Mission (Dutch Soyuz Mission).

      - charboy

  25. Good Link by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    That is interesting. I love when people are told they will never amount to anything and they ignore that and overcome.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Good Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stoolpidgeon --
      You will never amount to anything.

  26. Jealously or reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I read a great article after the first guy went into space where the writer summed up the "sour grapes" reaction from so many who were disturbed that a rich guy could buy a trip to space - it was jealously.

    People were envious that one person could actually buy his way into space. Surely, space should be left to scientists, intellectuals, dreamers, etc. rather than a memeber of the "wealthy elite".

    The reality is when ship,car,train and airplane travel debuted, the passenger list comprised government-sanctioned types or the very wealthy.

    After a time, all forms of travel become accessible to more people from other walks of life and eventually become commonplace.

    I say good for this guy. May space become even more accessible to those willing to buy a ticket.

    1. Re:Jealously or reality by evilviper · · Score: 1
      People were envious that one person could actually buy his way into space. Surely, space should be left to scientists, intellectuals, dreamers, etc. rather than a memeber of the "wealthy elite".

      No, not at all... People are pissed that our tax dollars are subsidizing millionaires' space vacations. The millions spent are only a fraction of the costs of sending an individual, and even if they were paying a billion dollars, don't think that Russia is going to divide it equally among the countries that have contributed to the ISS.

      How would you feel if hundreds of billions in tax dollars were spent to build an advanced aircraft, then the result was not used by the government at all, but sold to Boeing for 40 million? Sure would piss a lot of people off, and Boeing would say "it's just sour grapes".
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  27. So ... the whole thing is tax deductible... by popo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The headline shouln't be that he's the "third space tourist", it should be that he's "the first space tourist to travel tax-free".

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  28. Nietzsche on loftiness by agslashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ken Thompson, one of the inventors of Unix, forked out $12,000 to fly on a Mig29

    Oracle playboy Larry Ellison is "multi-talented, not only is he an acute business but he is also a jet pilot, marketing genius, sports enthusiast and world champion yacht racer"

    Nietzsche once said people who aspire to lofty ideas ( like "help inspire today's youth to dream big" ) often have very simple, direct, greedy drives that propel them. A scientist might say he's out to prove the hardest theorem, but perhaps all he wants is fame ( eg. Dr. Watson says in his book on decoding DNA that he simply wanted to beat the competitors & become famous ). A philosopher might set out to "find the truth", but perhaps all he wants is tenure at some ivy league institution. Looks to me like Dr. Gregory Olsen simply wants good PR for his firm with this stunt...claiming to inspire American youth seems outlandish.

    1. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by fliptout · · Score: 1

      Is it so bad to be altruistic, even if making contributions is a side effect?

      That said, I think there is some truth in what you suggest.

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    2. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA:

      "He built a building down at the University of Virginia. He didn't put his name on it. He put his teacher's name on it. There's another addition to the library in Ridgefield Park. He put his mother's name on it. You'll never see [a building] with his name on it," Capalbo said. "People all over the place are saying, 'Who is this Greg Olsen guy?' I can tell you. I know who he is and it's been one of the delights of my life to know him."

      This guy sounds legit. More evidence in the full article, of course =)

      --
      True story.
    3. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I said "full article," I guess I meant this one that doesn't appear to be linked from the main story. So pay no mind about "RTFA."

    4. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by guacamole · · Score: 1

      That thing on the picture is not a Mig-29. Google for it if you want to see how it looks like.

    5. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by Noehre · · Score: 1

      A previous poster mentioned an article that stated that he has has donated money to build a university building and a library. In naming the buildings, one was named after one of his teachers and the other after his mother.

      If his drive was for PR or personal fame, I doubt he would have neglected to place his name on those buildings.

      Then again, Nietzsche was still probably right. I just don't think that his motivation is what you think.

    6. Re:Nietzsche on loftiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy sounds legit. More evidence in the full article, of course =)

      He does sound like a great guy. I guess that means the SEC will be investigating him any moment.

      We all want everything, and yet we hate anyone who has more than us, all the while we aspire to take their place. The more good someone does, the more suspicious we are of them; the more successful someone is, the more we delight to see them fall. Only in America.

  29. Kick in the teeth. by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty sad when the Russian folks are able to send average Joe for a joy ride in space with a return journey...and we (here in the US) don't even have the ability to launch and return the pro's with the whole state of NASA these days. And we are looking to go back to the moon and Mars??

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:Kick in the teeth. by evilviper · · Score: 0, Troll

      The russians are hemmoraging money to send these average joes, and the fatality rate is much higher. These average joes are taking a big risk with their lives, and they aren't always going to win.

      Who ever said the US doesn't have the ability to launch and return people? In the US, when there is a fatality, the space program stops pending inquiry. In Russia, it's about as common as a fatal car accident, so they just brush it away and move on, like a non-issue. Their rockets aren't reusable, so they have to build a new one everytime anyhow.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  30. US Reaction more laid back... by larsoncc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you notice that this time, the US reaction is more laid back? Perhaps the US will begin to take up tourists of their own (eventually).

    Frankly, it surprises me that the Russians are the first to realize the profit potential.

    So, here's a question... If the US and Russia started to compete for space travellers (and you had the money), which agency would you trust? Why?

    It seems one is gathering experience catering their programs to the rich folks, yet the other would have some "whiz bang" technology. Tough call, really.

    1. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think I would go with Russia. If I'm not mistaken, they have a better record for safety than the US (I could be wrong).

      But more than anything, their equipments and technologies have often proved to be far more resilient and robust than the American counterparts.

      American would be more cooler and comfortable, am sure. But the Russian one would be robust and interesting ;-)

    2. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by clearmake · · Score: 3, Informative

      You gotta go with the Russians on this - they havn't lost anyone in space for awhile. I think it's like 14 to 0 in last 20 years.

    3. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The records show that Soyuz is as safe as the Shuttle- about a 1.7% fatality rate per launched person. In fact, the latest manned version of the Soyuz has had NO fatalities whatsoever- they've had some injuries though. Even if you include the whole of the Soyuz program, then less astronauts have died per launched astronaut; but there's nothing much in it (it's not statistically significantly better than the Shuttle.)

      Ironically though, Soyuz has had more missions that failed (the early Soyuz's were known to be a bit iffy so they launched less astronauts on them; they've hopefully got the bugs out now- and so they launch an extra person.) One mission had a launch pad fire that meant that the cosmonauts had to use an escape system- note that the Shuttle doesn't have an escape system.

      So bizarrely, Soyuz is about as safe (or safer), but less reliable.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Why would NASA bother taking tourists into space? They're not russians. $20M buys only peanuts for NASA (literally).

    5. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      Yeah lets fly with NASA... only cost you $800 million dollars and there is a 2% chance you die.

    6. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Frankly, it surprises me that the Russians are the first to realize the profit potential.

      There is no profit... it's just money being moved around.

      For the millions a person pays to go to ISS, several times as much tax-payer money has been spent on them. That's why this is a problem... We all spent the money in good faith that it would be used for scientific research, not to give some millionaire a place to go on vacation.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by evilviper · · Score: 1, Funny
      Please MOD PARENT DOWN. IDIOT AT WORK

      I think I would go with Russia. If I'm not mistaken, they have a better record for safety than the US (I could be wrong).

      You are mistaken.... Greatly and gravely mistaken. The US blunders are greatly publicized, debated, and investigated... The Russian deaths are quietly noted, swept off the pavement, and the next rocket is launched.

      But more than anything, their equipments and technologies have often proved to be far more resilient and robust than the American counterparts.

      I have no idea where you get that... Obviously the death toll disagrees with you there. Secondly, anyone that has paid any attention knows that the Russian equipment is a mess.

      Russia doesn't even have any type of space shuttle... They are still shot into space on the tip of an ICBM, that is disposed of after every trip.

      But the Russian one would be robust and interesting ;-)

      Robust no... Interesting, yes, but in the same way that a car accident is "interesting".
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:US Reaction more laid back... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      But the Russian one would be robust and interesting

      But only for certain values of interesting...

  31. I agree, reasearch is what ISS was built to do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that he is a scientist and that he is going to work with his companies equipment is the ultimate having the company "rep" do a visit to the company and see how the equipment is working out...the bonus is that he's also a scientist...we must remember that the ISS was built for material science research in space, so this is an exact fit. Usually, it's training people to be scientists, here, you have a real scientist complete with his own equipment. It's also interesting to note that most of our culture is more tuned into the tourist/boy band wannaby aspect of this story because they are so ignorant of the reason for and importance of basic science research.

  32. Hardly a Tourist by randall_burns · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This company sounds like they have highly legitimate business reasons to have a guy in space. The CEO might not be the ideal person for that job-but he signs the checks. Shuttleworth and Tito may have been essentially tourists-but this marks the first time legitimate private business has sent an individual in space. I wonder if this trip will be seen as a corporate junket or as having good Return On Investment?

  33. I was wondering why I got rejected by Walkiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously someone beat me to the punch (the submit button punching that is). Anyway, I wonder if this could be an acceptable new trend, to ship scientists up that are not professional astronauts to conduct research (since, sadly, no one person, not even an astronaut, can be a top-noch scientinst in everything). As a non-astronaut scientist, my head is saying "hell yes!".

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    1. Re:I was wondering why I got rejected by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      As a non-astronaut scientist, my head is saying "hell yes!".

      I hope there is something space-worthy computer scientists can do... :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:I was wondering why I got rejected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they're called payload astronauts.

  34. CEO in space by obsid1an · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He's a CEO? I wonder who's really paying for this mission.

  35. The third space tourist? by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

    "The third space tourist - In search of the second" (Spaceballs anyone?)

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
  36. Let's send Linus!!! by Marble68 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's all pitch in and send Linus.

    Suggested experiments:

    Installation of XP on one box, and Linux on another. Which OS os "lighter"?

    Evaluation of the safety ramifications of space travel while carrying either a stuffed penguin or a window made of stained glass. Does a towel help?

    Installation of dual OS's on all mission critical ISS servers.

    Upgrade of Hubble OS to Linux so it'll run on just one Gyro!

    Human sciences experiment where the subject must debug an OS kernel in weightlessness while under the influence of various hallucinogenics.

    If we can afford it, send strippers, a pole, and a DJ to study and facilitate the development of weightless lap dances.

    --
    /me sips his coffee and ponders a new sig...
    1. Re:Let's send Linus!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A weightless lap dance? now that could definitely benefit society!

    2. Re:Let's send Linus!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Installation of XP on one box, and Linux on another. Which OS os "lighter"?

      I know it's a joke, but there's no weight in a zero-g environment, so you wouldn't be able to tell which object is "lighter" than another.

    3. Re:Let's send Linus!!! by Marble68 · · Score: 1

      That's the point... |:-p

      --
      /me sips his coffee and ponders a new sig...
    4. Re:Let's send Linus!!! by clearmake · · Score: 1

      Thanks for making my day, I havn't laughed that hard all week (ok - it's only Tuesday) - If I hadn't already commented on this article I would have modded you up.

  37. Thirdspace? by IPFreely · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who saw that and thought Thirdspace. It sounds a little dangerous to me.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  38. Thats great by thebra · · Score: 3, Funny

    but where is my flying car!

    1. Re:Thats great by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

      Why, right here, of course.

      --

      Place sig here.
  39. expensive way to work for free by JonnyRo88 · · Score: 1

    Think of it this way, he just payed 20 million to work for free in space. I think the russians really had the right idea when they started doing space tourism.

    "Cosmonauts are too expensive, how can we cut out their already small pay? Answer: Get americans to pay us to work for us. Call it a work for us tax."

    --
    The Ro Factor - Jeep/Linux Weblog
  40. Re:OMFG LOGOL LINUX ESS TEH COOL! by Marble68 · · Score: 1

    tsk tsk tsk..

    Aren't WE a little pissy?

    OK, replace Linus / Linux / XP with whoever / Whatever you want... The satire is in anarchistic and unfettered commercial space based research gone bad.

    I hate it when I have to explain humor... If you don't get it, STFU...

    --
    /me sips his coffee and ponders a new sig...
  41. let's see... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He wants to inspire kids to become astronauts. How nice.

    With his $20 Million USD, he could fund approximately 20,000 $1000 one-time scholarships.

    Let's say he uses the $20 Million USD to establish a trust, which uses earnings on the principal to fund science scholarship programs. Let's say this trust only earns 5% annually. That would be $1 Million USD annually, which could fund 1,000 $1,000 science scholarships annually.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:let's see... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Or 20,000 slashdotters could spend the money they currently spend on internet access, cable TV, DVD's, plasma screen TV's and other frivolous activities and fund the same number of scholorships.

      Why do you get toys but he cant? He works long, hard and smart, takes risks, and makes a profit. Instead of blowing $20 million on a fancy yacht he spends it on a holiday, but as a bonus he decides to do a little to help other people.

      How does you buying a dvd each week help little Tommy? 50 dvd's is a $1,000 scholarship each year. Put your money where your mouth is.

    2. Re:let's see... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      And you could be feeding a starving third-word kid with just forty-two cents a day. Are you? If you are, couldn't you afford another one?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  42. Hate to say it, but.... by Phenris+Wolfe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our space touring, PhD-owning corporate overlords. 1. Get Rich 2. Fly to space to do experiments 3. ??? 4. Profit etc.

  43. Re:Hate to say it, but....Dumb comment reloaded by Phenris+Wolfe · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our space touring, PhD-owning corporate overlords.

    1. Get Rich
    2. Fly to space to do experiments
    3. ???
    4. Profit

    etc.

  44. Re:Sensorsinc Making money from what! by Bagels · · Score: 1

    There are some companies out there that still want to use glass bottles, for the nostalgic look if nothing else - of the top of my head, I can think of Snapple, Nantucket Nectars, and Coca-Cola products in some parts of the world (I remember get a glass-bottle Sprite in Austria). Their business isn't actually a bad little niche at all...

    --
    --- Bwah?
  45. Wrong. by Richard+Stallionman · · Score: 1

    Shuttleworth and Tito may have been essentially tourists

    This is incorrect. I'm not sure about Tito, but Shuttleworth was definitely not just a tourist, he performed experiments on the ISS.

    1. Re:Wrong. by randall_burns · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is: Shuttleworth wasn't selected because he was the "right" person to do those experiments-we was selected because he had the checkbook to buy that job. In this case, the pretense really does sound different-the company needed someone to go up and do some experiments-and the CEO decided he wanted to do that job himself-and is properly qualified.

  46. He should give kids (and crackpots) a lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Crackpots have so many inventions about zero point gravity and using 'left over' forces in zero gravity calculations. He should show kids what zero gravity is about and prove the crackpots wrong as a happy side effect:

    Have a remote controlled car (8 wheels; 4 normal at the bottom and 4 at the top for traction) in a plastic shoe box, hang it still in the station. And ride and ram the car into the walls. Notice how the box doesn't move at all, no matter how hard you bang it into the plastic walls. Ha, you didn't expect that now, did you kids.

    Dennis SCP

  47. astronomical hotel rates by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much is he paying me in ISS room rates, for my share of the project as a US taxpayer? We'd better at least stick it to him on the room service - I hope he's a big tipper.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  48. $40 mil for zero-gee p0rn? by peter303 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then a couple could publicly answer to what has long been rumored to have been secretly tested: what is a zero-gee sex like? What is a zero-gee orgasm like? Can you "do it" without pushing each other apart? Does cumming have a enough force to push a man backwards? Does zero-gee make it bigger? faster? more explosive? Do the hooters stop sagging and always point outwards? Does the Book of Tantra need several more chapters for zero-gee techniques?
    It boggles the mind! You could probably raise the $40 mil from curious subscribers alone.

    1. Re:$40 mil for zero-gee p0rn? by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      becuase we're dealing with NASA and everthing is a bit more expensive, I thik we can change the old duct tape/WD-40 addage to velcro and KY jelly...

  49. He's the sixth, not the third! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1: Senator Jake Garn
    2: Congressman Bill Nelson
    3: Senator John Glenn
    4: Dennis Tito
    5: Mark Shuttleworth

    There is no scientific or operational need for members of congress to fly in space, thus they should be remembered as the first space tourists. Tito and Shuttleworth were the first "non-government-employee" space tourists.

    1. Re:He's the sixth, not the third! by r00tdenied · · Score: 2, Informative

      No Tito and Shuttleworth were the first 'paying' space tourist. There is a major distinction. Congressional and Senate memebers obviously were non-paying.

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
  50. He already does all that by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might have missed this link, since it was in one of the comments. Quote of choice:

    He also gave $15 million to his alma mater, the University of Virginia and runs a family foundation with his daughter Krista. (For the last ten years, Olsen has also personally mentored a Trenton, N.J., student through the Big Brothers-Big Sisters program.)

    And besides, I see absolutely no reason why you have to crack on him like that about how he should be using that money in a "better way" according to you. Perhaps you don't think the way he is spending that money is the right one, but it seems like he disagrees.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  51. This is a superb program that should be continued by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

    This funding is crucial to the stumbling NASA. Also, it might give Russia a kickstart for their 6 man Soyuz upgrade.

  52. That's Nice, But... by reallocate · · Score: 1

    ..I'd rather see them earn their $60 million by flying 300,000 passengers at $200 than 3 passengers at $20 million each.

    There's nothing in the current ISS infrastructure that will allow you or me to fly to orbit.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  53. The third? No, the fourth. by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    He's not the third, he's the fourth. They're forgetting this guy:

    http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/al-saud.html

    "Payload specialist", my ass. Just a coincidence that he was a Saudi prince, I guess. Everyone working at NASA at the time knew he bought himself a ticket.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  54. List of the experiments Shuttleworth did:

    Soluble Protein crystallisation experiment One of the processes that helps scientist learn about diseases like HIV, is called Soluble Protein Crystallisation (SPC). This process gives scientists a way to understand the immune system and learn how to make it more effective.

    Embryo and Stem Cell Development (ESCD) Project Understanding stem cells holds the key to healing serious injuries and disease. This is because where the cells in one part of the body have been damaged, stem cells may one day be used to repair the injury.

    Studying the heart, muscles and energy in space Space places a very different set of strains on the human body to those we encounter on earth. Much of the science conducted in orbit has been aimed at understanding how we function when under conditions of "micro-gravity".

    UCT monitors Shuttleworth Not just anybody is suitably qualified to work out a training programme for astronauts living between heaven and Earth.

    Forgive me, but a lot of those sound more worthwhile than "materials" research and product testing...

  55. The fourth? No, the fifth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's this Japanese TV reporter dude who went up in a Soyouz in 1990.

    http://www.astronautix.com/flights/mirorter.htm

  56. You can't win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "let's collect cash from as many of Sam Walton's heirs as we can in exchange for letting them ride the roman candle for a few days each... and let's do it before we completely run out of current-generation space shuttles"

    You won't win, you know. If you have government funding, you are "wasting money in space when children are starving here on Earth". If we do what you want, the same people will turn around and whine "you've seen to it that the New Frontier will only be a playground for the idle rich and corporate overlords".

    1. Re:You can't win by Golias · · Score: 1
      You won't win, you know. If you have government funding, you are "wasting money in space when children are starving here on Earth". If we do what you want, the same people will turn around and whine "you've seen to it that the New Frontier will only be a playground for the idle rich and corporate overlords".

      The idle rich are going to have expensive playgrounds no matter what. That's the whole point of being idle and rich. Might as well let it be in high orbit, and use the money they spend on it fund advancements in space travel. Early (rich) adopters of any new technology or trend are the only way to make anything affordable. Let that sort of thing go on for a few decades, and a trip to the moon in 2034 might become nearly as cheap as a trip to Antarctica is today.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.