Slashdot Mirror


Pigeons' Bandwidth Advantage Quantified

An anonymous reader submits "A well documented test took place in the north of Israel, in presence of several dozen Internet geeks and experts. During the test, 3 homing pigeons carried 4 GB (gigabytes) for 100 km distance, achieving, what apparently looks as pigeons' world record in data transfer to a given distance. Bandwidth achieved by the pigeons was 2.27 Mbps...Transferring a similar volume of information through a common uplink of ADSL line would have taken no less than 96 hours..."

82 of 462 comments (clear)

  1. Ha! by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So essentially, we should unplug all the cables and just get a bunch of shithawks?

    1. Re:Ha! by Trejkaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Absolutely, I've been using avian carriers for my connection for years, and never had a #%!@#70824645[CARRIER LOST]

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:Ha! by stephenisu · · Score: 4, Funny

      What is the air speed velocity... um... I mean Data Transfer rate of a homing pigeon...

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    3. Re:Ha! by daveashcroft · · Score: 3, Funny

      April 1st anyone? (regarding: http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html)

    4. Re:Ha! by daveashcroft · · Score: 5, Informative

      NOT by GMT...its now 00.51am on 1st April 2004! The world doesnt run on yankee time! ;-)

    5. Re:Ha! by schmink182 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The problem with pigeons is that they don't scale well over large distances. Not only does packet delivery take much longer for when distance is increased, but reliability goes way down, too.

      So while regular wired methods might not work nearly as quickly over short distances, they're much better to be used internationally.

      Oh wait, what's that foot mean next to the article...?

    6. Re:Ha! by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 5, Funny
      but reliability goes way down, too.

      The big problem to my mind is cat-in-the-middle attacks.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    7. Re:Ha! by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do you mean a TCP pigeon or a UDP pigeon? =)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Ha! by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah, but European TCP pigeons might have an advantage over African UDP pigeons....we need to finance another study! Come on, this is Important!

      This joke was probably already made already, but my slashdot pigeon hasn't made it here yet... might've got sucked into a jet engine... poor bastard.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  2. But... by michaelhood · · Score: 5, Funny

    the DSL doesn't shit on my car.

    1. Re:But... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently you don't have comcast.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    2. Re:But... by rjelks · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm picturing what a Denial of Service attack would be like.....Alfred Hitchcock's "The Birds" comes to mind.

      -

    3. Re:But... by John+Hurliman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually if the pigeons were the communication medium, a denial of service might be a shotgun.

    4. Re:But... by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Na...that would be a firewall. Wanna guess what ports I'm gonna close? ;)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:But... by Throtex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I hope for the security of your system, you close all the documented pigeonholes.

    6. Re:But... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I figure a Denial of Service for pigeon-net would be alot of other pigeons and birds flying into the destination birdcage.

      Squawk!

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    7. Re:But... by cluckshot · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have 25 fully grown hens at my house. Each is able to carry at least 1 hard drive containing 280 gig. When chased by the 3 cocks I have these hens have been known to fly at a forward speed of about 30 km/hr for a distance upwards to 100m. So these hens should be able to carry a message of 7,000 Gig over 100m in just 9 sec. This would be about 7 times faster than a 10/100 line at max. My chickens should be at least as good as a Cat5e 10/100 Connection. Providing my Cocks are feeling sexy.

      A substantial increase in efficiency for single transmissions can be achieved by throwing out some scratch mix. This performance boost is followed by a significant degrading of the transmission rate for several hours.

      If the freezer gets empty this transmission rate may suffer a substantial decline.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  3. Back of envalope by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    2.27 Mbps = 0.28375 MBps
    4 GB / 0.28375 MBps = 14097 secs
    14097 secs = 3h 54Mins
    100km / 3h 54Mins = 25.53 km/h
    25.53 km/h = 15.86 mph

    Not bad for laden little pigeons

    1. Re:Back of envalope by Anm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, from this link, the pigeons flew the 100km in 206, 136, and 233 minutes respectively. That makes 18.12, 27.49, and 16.02 miles per hour. Not sure what motivated pigeon #2.

      Anm

    2. Re:Back of envalope by RabidStoat · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was the one being chased by the SCO lawyer.

    3. Re:Back of envalope by shiftless · · Score: 5, Funny

      Okay, having done that, when are you going to work out the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?

      African or European?

    4. Re:Back of envalope by CyberKnet · · Score: 4, Funny

      AAAaaaaaaaaah!!!!!!!

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    5. Re:Back of envalope by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's done :

      ~11m/s

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  4. packet loss? by sporkboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    the response time for packet loss is prohibitive... may as well get satellite

    1. Re:packet loss? by oGMo · · Score: 5, Funny
      the response time for packet loss is prohibitive...

      But oh so tasty!

      ;-)

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    2. Re:packet loss? by MikeXpop · · Score: 3, Funny

      pong **** CARRIER LOST

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    3. Re:packet loss? by Anti_Climax · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Pigeons... Pigeons are good too. Sometimes, they come with notes attached. It's like a fortune cookie with wings!"

      If You don't know what I'm talking about, dust off your copy of GTA3 and tune into Chatterbox...

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    4. Re:packet loss? by nkh · · Score: 3, Funny
      Actually:
      • pigeon-based satellite technology will work by catapulting the pigeon to the sky and
      • ATM (asynchronous transfer mode) technology will work by chopping the pigeon into small rounds and throwing it in the air, hoping the wind will carry it to its destination.
  5. new firewall technology by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Funny

    12 gauge shotgun i'm applying for the patent right now

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:new firewall technology by GnuHaiku · · Score: 5, Funny
      12 gauge shotgun i'm applying for the patent right now

      Wow! That gives a new meaning to the error message "Carrier Lost"

  6. Mandatory joke by davebarz · · Score: 5, Funny

    There will be at least ten comments that say (even though it's a pigeon and not a swallow): "Was it African, or European?"

  7. let's get this joke out of the way early by stephenb · · Score: 4, Funny

    the relevant rfc

    1. Re:let's get this joke out of the way early by cbv · · Score: 4, Funny

      RFC1149 was updated by RFC2549 in 1999.

  8. Sure by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fill up a cargo jet with full up hard drives and I'd bet you get really good bandwidth.

  9. One of those things that shouldn't surprise but... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting


    It's a truism within the London-based Post-production industry (pretty much all located within a square mile of Soho, central London) that the bandwidth of a bunch of RAID arrays in a transit van is pretty much unbeatable, even with the fast networks that post-houses have between themselves... transferring physical media used to be called 'sneakernet' when walking across the room, it's just been scaled up slightly :-)

    I'm quite impressed that a pigeon can do 100km in 2.5 hours though, I had no idea they were *that* fast...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  10. Protocol stack by DRUNK_BEAR · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, I can start implementing my MORSE OVER IP OVER PIGEON CARRIER protocol stack!!

    --
    DrkBr
  11. Time to switch by unbiasedbystander · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it, I'm switching to PSL. (Pigeon Subscriber Line)

  12. Monty would be proud . . . by ygbsm · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What is the average velocity of a data-laden pigeon . . ."

  13. What about packet loss? by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'd lose both a huge amount of your data and your only connection should something happen to those pigeons. Still, it's more reliable than AOL.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  14. plop plop plop by frostyboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Insert obligatory joke here about "dropping packets"....


    --
    Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my disk????
  15. MD5 hash... by addie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel sorry for the pigeon who needs to be hashed on the other end to check if it's the same one... that's gotta hurt.

  16. What, no packet loss... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 4, Funny


    ...induced by hungry hawks?

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  17. at the risk of getting shat on: by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Try wiretapping that you FBI bitches

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  18. Pong by Fammy2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    3h 54Mins

    Ping time is twice that. Doh!

    --
    If I had something intelligent to say, I would have said it.
    1. Re:Pong by DeadPrez · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, even with client prediction, Quake is going to be a bit of a bitch!

  19. Fetch me porn by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if I can train my pets to fetch me playboys from local 7-11s, I am as good as without broadband.

  20. It begins... by stevenbdjr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it already April 1st somewhere?

    1. Re:It begins... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it already April 1st somewhere?

      In many senses, it's April 1st everyday at Slashdot.

    2. Re:It begins... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is on GMT and this was posted at 22:58 GMT and right now it's 23:22 GMT so we still have a few more minutes before official April 1st as far as Slashdot is concerned. However, it is already April 1st where the story originated (Israel).

    3. Re:It begins... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We might as well label April 1 as Pigeon Appreciation Day in the geek world. While networking by carrier pigeon is mostly a joke, there is some serious bandwidth potential in trained birds that we might as well remember exists just in case we ever really need it.

  21. Pigeon DNS by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's all fine and good if you know where you're sending your packets. But what if you have to do a DNS look up? Then you have to send several scout pigeons to the nearest aviary which will in turn send a pigeon back with a map of where to send your data pigeons.

    And there's a whole other issue with those bastard Verisign Pigeons, but I'm not going to get into that now.

    There's also a risk of packet sniffers who use various means to down your pigeons and read your data (no router protection).

    And if they do happen to down your pigeon, they can give it new data and send it on its way as if it came from your IP (iniating pigeon). WATCH OUT CREDIT CARDS!

    The solution of course is to use Pretty Good Pigeons to protect your data.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Pigeon DNS by DrWhizBang · · Score: 3, Funny

      You raise some good points. PGP can address some of these issues. Additionally, protecting your Wide Avian Network with a good firewall, and using a secure tunnel (Virtual Pigeon Network) when transporting pigeons outside the local network.

      As for latency issues, a clever engineer should be able to manipulate the protocol in such a way to reduce round-trips. I would keep all transfers over UDP, not TCP.

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  22. Fat Pipe Pigeons.. by kortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..but can they stream?

    --
    -- kortex "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts"
  23. Well, DUH! by purduephotog · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Worlds Record for Data Transfer in a Station Wagon"

    Basically, a station wagon of 35 gig tapes from SETI is driven to it's destination. Takes 16 hrs to fill 1 tape.

    Although it is very humorous to see pigeons used, they are still prone to packet failure (automatic weapons fire).

  24. Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yep, and I believe it was one of the guys from MS Research that said he could buy new servers with RAID arrays and send them cross country for less than the cost of a network link that could support the same kind of data transfer =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  25. latency v. bandwidth by Scott+Hussey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the distance involved matters not. Bandwidth is purely the time to put data on the line. Latency is the time it takes to get from A to B. So the bandwidth would be the same no matter how far they travelled or how fast they flew. A good simile is bandwidth is how many tapes you can load in your trunk per hour. Latency is how fast you can drive those tapes to your destination.

    --
    Scott, Keeper of the Crystal Flame
    1. Re:latency v. bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't be such a tool. Travel time does matter given a finite number of pigeons and/or car-trunks. Once the car goes on its way, you can't put any more information out until it comes back.

    2. Re:latency v. bandwidth by irokitt · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a debate that nobody will ever win. I was taught that bandwidth was the difference between lower/upper frequencies on a wire, i.e.
      "The numerical difference between the upper and lower frequencies of a band of electromagnetic radiation, especially an assigned range of radio frequencies." (thank you Google).
      And under that definition, these pigeons have no bandwidth (unless you're counting the frequency at which they flap their wings ;).

      The Jargon File says
      "Used by hackers (in a generalization of its technical meaning) as the volume of information per unit time that a computer, person, or transmission medium can handle. "Those are amazing graphics, but I missed some of the detail -- not enough bandwidth, I guess." Compare low-bandwidth. This generalized usage began to go mainstream after the Internet population explosion of 1993-1994. 2. Attention span. 3. On Usenet, a measure of network capacity that is often wasted by people complaining about how items posted by others are a waste of bandwidth."

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:latency v. bandwidth by Mnemia · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you just defined bandwidth by is exactly the same definition I used. Bandwidth is the amount of data that can be transmitted per unit time. The parent poster was only wrong about his statement that bandwidth would be halved if distance (and thus latency) were doubled. *That* is incorrect, because the rate you can transmit data at is not affected by the distance to the receiving station. He would be correct if he said that link utilization would be halved for the same amount of data. But bandwidth is constant.

      I was just saying that what is doubled in this case is the pipe capacity and latency; the bandwidth part stays the same.

    4. Re:latency v. bandwidth by EvanED · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you were sending the pigeons back and forth, and you had a finite number of them, then doubling the distance would halve the bandwidth. The pipe capacity would actually stay the same no matter what the distance; you have the same number of pigeons.

    5. Re:latency v. bandwidth by MemoryAid · · Score: 5, Funny
      these pigeons have no bandwidth

      That makes them carrier pigeons!

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  26. Re:Lets see what happens if... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets see how far those flying rats get with 4 GB of floppies attached to their frickin' heads.

    We can't attach them there.

    That's where the frickin' lasers go.

  27. Re:My car is better by DrWhizBang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can throw 10,000 DVDs in my trunk, and drive 100km in an hour

    How long does it take you to load 10,000 DVDs in your trunk? Not to suggest that you still wouldn't beat the pigeons, but I don't think your time would be as good as you are hoping.

    Would that be considered "great bandwidth"?

    Yes, but that latency would not be considered so great.

    Besides, if they can use 3 pigeons, why not compare it to 3 DSL lines?

    You could, or you could compare one pigeon with dial-up. Or you could compare with an 18-wheeler instead of the trunk of your car.
    Lighten up - this is a great hack! And better than another SCO story.

    --
    Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  28. April 1st? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pigeons carrying data? Web page has photos of baby birds as a way to replicate the system, photos of turtles for no good reason.

    I think the posts for April Fools Day have started to arrive. Damn, it's early this year.

    Better get mine in, then: LZip for DOS - Yes, lzip 2.0 has been ported to DOS! Lzip is an advanced file compression utility that generates smaller file sizes than either gzip or bzip2, and does so much faster. Lzip can achieve these goals because it it based on a so-called "lossy" compression scheme.

  29. The problem with pigeons... by eth1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    is all the 'packets' they drop

  30. Response Time, Thoughput, Reliability: Pick Two by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What this goes to show is that a cheap and somewhat reliable technology can sometimes put our high-tech stuff to shame when response time is not a factor.

    NetFlix is the most commonly cited example, how they can send a DVD over USPS faster than that information more often than not faster and cheaper than it could have been delivered over the Internet.

    Sometimes moving the data physically is better than moving the data by wire, and this should always be taken into account when designing an information system. The Internet's great, but it's not the solution to all data transfer needs.

  31. Re:But...But... by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can eat the pigeons (squab, actually) when they arrive.

    And yes, just like chiken, but better.

  32. The RIAA and MPAA... by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is trying to turn all of our isp's into Stool Pigeons anyways.

  33. Big deal! by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Funny

    I trrew my DVD collection across the room yesterday. That's 1 terabyte per second, right?

  34. but the pigeon carrier signal can be attacked by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The ancient sport of "The pigeon war, better known as kash al-hamam, involves having opponents keep their flocks up circling in the sky as they try to lure each other's pigeons into their flocks."

    So the pigeon carrier signal can be hijacked, and data can be stolen in a new kind of man-in-the-middle type attack specific to the pigeon protocol.

    Additionally, this type of attack is freighted with geopolitical intrigue: this pigeon war sport is practiced in Lebanon, which, being a place of conflict with Israel, renders yet another dimension of threat to the robustness and security of the pigeon carrier signal.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  35. No fair... by j-turkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    During the test, 3 homing pigeons carried 4 GB (gigabytes) for 100 km distance

    Not a fair comparison against DSL...they multiplexed the pigeons. This is just more anti-DSL FUD
    ;P

    --

    -Turkey

  36. Noteworthy incompatibility: by diesel66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The technology eliminated the need for cat 5..."

    In fact, I would recommend not using ANY kind of cat technologies with this protocol.

    --



    eleven plus two / twelve plus one
  37. Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    When a Clear Channel radio station changes formats and therefore needs a large volume of music on site quickly, they usually send a server that is pre-loaded with the new format worth of music on HDs, and the studio just plugs that into their network. This also gives them the capability to change the format overnight without anybody at the studio complex needing advanced notice, so that soon-to-be-unemployed DJs don't see it coming and therefore leave the station a few days early to ruin the transition... the UPS delivery of the new music comes in a non-descript cardboard box which can be scheduled to be on the site just hours before the changeover happens.

  38. Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, that's a working pace for a pigeon. They were working hard, but not really what you could call "trying." Birds are fast.

    Mind you a duck will overhaul a pigeon. That fat body is all wing flapping muscle. A duck is built to fly fast, high and for days at a time if needed. A duck in fear of its life can break 100 kph in level flight. An Eider just trying to get somewhere in a hurry for no particular reason has been clocked at 76 kph. That's the current officially confirmed record.

    Nevermind the falcon that eats the pigeon creating packet loss.

    I have no idea what the achievable bandwidth of a duck is though. They could deliver data intercontinetally. Having to wait through migratory periods would probably kill it pretty good.

    KFG

  39. Of course. FedEx is still the fastest transfer by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For large datafiles. You load them onto harddrives and overnight them to the destination. For large amounts of data it is -by far- the fastest.

  40. No Blackadder quotes yet? by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We didn't receive any messages, and Captain BlackAdder did not shoot this delicious, plump-breasted pigeon.

  41. A little more "Birdseed for Thought" by Dareth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was wondering if homing pigeons were extint.
    This FAQ answered that question and many others for me.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  42. but seriously by soricine · · Score: 4, Informative

    this actually works. here in nz, a caving tour company uses pigeons to ferry memory sticks back to base so the digital photos can be waiting when the tourists get back. http://www.waitomo.co.nz/pigeonpix.html

  43. Re:One of those things that shouldn't surprise but by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Duck homing is pretty precise. I have ducks and geese in my "backyard" (the Mohawk River) who manage to find the exact same favorite pool every year from whatever far flung warmer clime they spend it in (the bastards).

    The problem as I see it is that pigeons are dogs and ducks are cats. Tell a pigeon to carry something through antipigeon fire to save the regiment and the otherwise intelligent animal will say, "Oooooooo, Oooooooo, can I? Pleeeeeeeeeese!"

    Whereas you to try to tell a duck that and he'll say, "Yeah, right Sparky. Blow me. Why don't you just run along and carry it yourself? Or maybe ask that stupid pigeon. I'll bet he'll do it. A pigeon will do anything. Just ask that Skinner dude."

    Which is why no duck has ever won a Crouix de Guerre. On the other hand no duck is standing on his remaining leg stuffed in a museum either.

    The ducks like it that way.

    That isn't to say that a duck won't oblige by carrying a message, but it'll go when he wants, where he wants.

    If that happens to coincide with your needs, fine and dandy, if not, well, tough noogies.

    KFG

  44. Re:But...But... by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sometimes they come with notes attached.. it's like fortune cookies with wings!

  45. Re:The lag will be a problem, though... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I think there is work on extending the TCP/IP protocols for interplanetary missions, so timeouts etc might be OK?

    I'm pretty sure you'd get 100% packet loss trying to use avian carriers for interplanetary communication.

    I guess when the bird died, it would send an ICMP message back about the timeout by falling on your head.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  46. Re:One of those things (Advance Warning: Offtopic) by dreggory · · Score: 3, Funny

    "That fat body is all wing flapping muscle"

    I read this and instantly got a mental picture of some poor geek in a bar modifying it for use as a pick-up line.

    [matt]

    --
    "I paid my money, I refuse to be inconvenienced." -Karl Cocknozzle