Slashdot Mirror


Listen to the Sky

disposable60 writes "Sky Ear will be a one-night event in which a glowing "cloud" of mobile phones and helium balloons is released into the air so that people can dial into the cloud and listen to the sounds of the sky."

188 comments

  1. But the question is... by josh+glaser · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...who will answer?

    1. Re:But the question is... by GiveMeLinux · · Score: 0, Funny

      You're feeble human mind could not possibly handle the answer. Next question.

    2. Re:But the question is... by John+Courtland · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only on slashdot would a post like this contain grammatical errors.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    3. Re:But the question is... by That_Guy_Again · · Score: 2, Funny
      ... can you hear me now?

      --
      One of life's lessons: Its always easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.
    4. Re:But the question is... by narkotix · · Score: 3, Informative

      most mobiles have autoanswer for handsfree

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    5. Re:But the question is... by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      They're only going to 60 meters. That's not very far. If you want to hear what the sky sounds like at 60 meters, you could always stand on the roof of a small skyscraper, or go skydiving.

    6. Re:But the question is... by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      The One above it all. The Glory One.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    7. Re:But the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The Non-existent One?

    8. Re:But the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The One above it all. The Glory One.

      John Carmack will personally be answering my phone call? I feel unworthy.

  2. So where do all these phones land? by Alex+Reynolds · · Score: 0, Troll

    So much for laws against littering. Helium balloons don't stay aloft forever.

    1. Re:So where do all these phones land? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      read the article...

      The whole thing is tied to the ground.

    2. Re:So where do all these phones land? by MikeJ9919 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right, but if you'd read the site, you would realize that the whole structure is enclosed in a net which, presumably, they plan on hauling back to earth when finished.

      -Mike-

    3. Re:So where do all these phones land? by blowdart · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The balloons will be enclosed in a carbon fibre and net structure 25m in diameter tethered to the ground by 6 cables and held aloft at a height of 60m where it will remain for several hours."

      They are not free floating balloons, so presumably they will rise in the net and come down in the net

    4. Re:So where do all these phones land? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article you would know it is tethered so littering is not an issue at all.

    5. Re:So where do all these phones land? by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 1

      Expecting people to read the article? You must be new here.

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
  3. Why? What is the point? by palfreman · · Score: 1, Insightful
    What is the point of this? Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows past the microphones?

    Just out of interest, who is putting up the money for this? They sound like they are spending other people's money with no comeback

  4. Neat by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally like calling stupid people to hear the echo of my voice in their empty head.

    --
    Setec Astronomy
    1. Re:Neat by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you use single weave or braided string with your can? :)

    2. Re:Neat by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I personally like calling stupid people to hear the echo of my voice in their empty head."

      I personally like calling stupid people to hear the echo of my voice in their empty head.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been spending a lot of time alone too.

    4. Re:Neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you put a cell phone up your ass you can make your own booty calls...

    5. Re:Neat by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      A lot of the comments attached to this story are quite negative - What's the point, waste of money and so on. This is more art than a scientific experiment, pretty obvious when you RTFA and see that pretty coloured lights are being used. This would actually be quite an impressive sight, mobile phones or not. Now the whole 'sounds of the sky' thing is a bit silly, you're not going to be hearing anything really amazing, but the article doesn't mention if the phones will have their speakers disabled. If they made it a two way 'experiment' where you could 'talk to the sky' and interact with the other callers, that would be interesting to say the least.

      This reminds me about the uproar over Tracey Emin's Unmade Bed modern art piece. I've been to the Tate Modern gallery in London and some pieces are breathtaking and some are, naturally, headscratchers. Of course, I'm no art expert. What pisses me off more than artists who think a single brick is art is those who kneejerk as soon as they hear the words 'Modern Art' and there are quite a lot of people like that. Now I don't know the details about Tracey Emin's bed (I know there are dirty clothes and condoms littered around, not sure if there is food and a remote control) but could it be that she is using a boring, inanimate object to represent all areas of her life - work, sleep, sex, food, entertainment etc.? Again, I'm just speculating here, I don't know exactly what the bed is like and at this point in time I can't be bothered to check (maybe a fellow Slashdotter can fill me in).

      If this thing was going on near me I'd check it out to see it and might even contemplate giving it a ring. Does this make me an idiot? (pretty risky posing such a question on this place) All of us do things that appear to have no purpose or value for one reason or another. Look, I know we're all geeks, but logic and art don't have to be mutually exclusive.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  5. Sound of ringtones by solid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hope they turn off the ringtones / vibrators.

    *imagines the sound of mission impossible theme over an earpiece*

    1. Re:Sound of ringtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, funny how the sky sounds like mommy's battery torch with no light.

    2. Re:Sound of ringtones by Poison_kitty · · Score: 1
      *imagines the sound of mission impossible theme over an earpiece*

      All it needs is for someone to call one of those cell phones and start playing loud music on thir side, which would basicly broadcast it over the other phones, presuming the phones would be relatively close to each other. No matter how loud the music is when it reaches an innocent listener, it will cause annoyance and confusion.

  6. That's incredible by mindless4210 · · Score: 1

    But almost scary at the same time. Anyone plan on watching this?

    --
    Wireless News www.DailyWireless
    1. Re:That's incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why are you scary?

      Everytime these is a slightly offbeat stroy on slashdot someone always comments of the scary factor.

      I supposed you have also never seen the daystar ... Run for the hills.

    2. Re:That's incredible by mindless4210 · · Score: 1

      I guess it's kinda wierd to think that something I spend a good deal of time of each day (I only use cellular phones anymore) is capable of changing colors in the atmosphere through some crazy phenomenon which I can't even understand.

      --
      Wireless News www.DailyWireless
    3. Re:That's incredible by fejikso · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What's so fscking incredible or scary about listening to some wind blowing in the microphone of a mobile phone?

      I think this is one of the most stupid experiments I've ever heard...

      People sometimes fail to have a little bit of common sense and a bit of scientific knowledge to be able to predict the outcome of certain kinds of experiments without actually performing them.

    4. Re:That's incredible by snot.dotted · · Score: 1, Troll

      The guy thats doing this is a failed architec, he teaches now.check out http://www.haque.co.uk/ for the most pretentious arty twaddle you've ever seen in you life. Well if its a windy night, it would be fun to see it all braking its guy rope and seeing it drift into the flight path over Heathrow airport. A quick quote from his website "To chart this unexplored territory, shortly before dusk in Spring 2004 the Sky Ear structure will be released from its ground moorings and slowly float up into the sky sampling the electromagnetic spectrum as it rises, rather like a vertical radar sweep." The rf spectrum is hardly unexplored, over used a crowded maybe. The various government agencies constanly monitor all parts of the RF spectrum.

    5. Re:That's incredible by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I guess it's kinda wierd to think that something I spend a good deal of time of each day > (I only use cellular phones anymore) is capable of changing colors in the atmosphere
      through some crazy phenomenon which I can't even understand.

      In that case, the next time you're allowed outside you should head straight for a set of traffic lights!

  7. what if there's a storm? by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    would we get to see cell phones zapped by lightning?

    1. Re:what if there's a storm? by TSR+Wedge · · Score: 1

      Only if they're camera phones.

      --
      What if the hokey-pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:what if there's a storm? by loyalsonofrutgers · · Score: 1

      Lightning travels from the ground up, where the free electrons are. The cell phones, presumably, have no ground so they're not susceptible to being hit by lightning. This is the same reason the space shuttle can't fly in inclement weather: the exhaust creates a ground column that the lightning surge can travel up, and bam: there goes the shuttle.

  8. Roaming by subzerorz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would that be considered roaming?
    It would be interesting to listen to during a storm or tornado.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
    1. Re:Roaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever put your head out of a car window???? now you know...

  9. 25M? 60M? miles? meters? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do they mean 1000 balloons will be enclosed in a 25 mile net at a height of 60 miles?

    Or a 25 meter net at a height of 60 meters?

    The first seems ridiculous; the second is not very high.

    1. Re:25M? 60M? miles? meters? by Nerd+With+Nalgene · · Score: 2, Informative

      They definitely mean meters; they are planning to keep the balloons tethered to the ground.

      It does seem like they aren't really in the sky at 60 meters.

      --


      "as if nothing were solid...and that would be the end of the world, not fire and brimstone, but goo."--Rand
    2. Re:25M? 60M? miles? meters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Lower case m means metres you pagan imperialist. :)

    3. Re:25M? 60M? miles? meters? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      No, only 99 Luftbaloons. Dunno about the rest tho.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:25M? 60M? miles? meters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I could hold my phone outside on the balcony if anyone wants to hear what it sounds like even higher off the ground than that.

  10. Re:Why? What is the point? by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Easy way to do it, climb a high mountain. No cell phones involved and you hear and see the clouds in person.

    --
    Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
  11. This is almost as stupid as flash mobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And twice as stupid as that stupid "cat" bar code scanner for magazine ads.

  12. Free phone, no contract required by Hamstaus · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, I could really use a new phone. I think I've got some darts and a net around here somewhere...

    --
    I moderate "-1, Fool"
    1. Re:Free phone, no contract required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but do you want a million idiots calling you, thinking they are talking to god?

    2. Re:Free phone, no contract required by Hamstaus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but do you want a million idiots calling you, thinking they are talking to god?

      Wouldn't be much more than I get now doing tech support. And for all intents and purposes, to them I am.

      --
      I moderate "-1, Fool"
    3. Re:Free phone, no contract required by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the LORD spake "Doth thou hear ME now?" And it was Good.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. ELF by dysprosia · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even better, muck around with VLF/ELF radio. You can hear much more interesting stuff than just the sky, like whistlers from thunderstorms for starters...

    Check out vlf.it for some interesting stuff on VLF/ELF radio.

    1. Re:ELF by nick0909 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can do some cool stuff with low-frequency listening. I have heard radio skip that was transmitted on the east coast, bounced of a meteor storm, and came back down to my little antenna in California. I also like the pings and zooms from various atmospheric disturbances. You don't even need a storm to do it, but that just adds to the randomness.

    2. Re:ELF by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      About how low are you speaking? Usually meteors do not affect HF, MW or LW. Their effect is more distinct on VHF and UHF.

      If you are talking about FM broadcast radio, that is VHF.

      I like listening to aurora reflections on VHF whenever I have the chance. Listen around 144.3 MHz SSB.

    3. Re:ELF by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      I remember reading that there was a frequency you could tune to and listen to 'all the lightning all over the world'. Anyone know what the frequency is?

  14. Re:Why? What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spending people money with no comeback? But it's not even a .com site!

  15. I'm confused by Aurelfell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is April Fools Day the tenth of April in the UK?

    1. Re:I'm confused by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 0

      heh, maybe who ever posted this is dyslexic...

      10...01...

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    2. Re:I'm confused by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      In the UK, every day is April Fool's Day.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  16. Using mobile phones at altitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought using mobile phones at high altitudes put a strain on the system, because the phone sees so many towers. Or is that an urban legend?

    1. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by dysprosia · · Score: 1

      The balloon thing I think will be stationary, and it won't be so high so it causes problems for the towers...

    2. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, now that I have RTFA-ed, I see that the phones will actually be at a ridiculously small height (< 85m).

      I assumed they'd be much higher. What does one expect to hear at from a phone at 85m ? It really sounds completely unappealing.

      I think it'd be much more interesting to bury the phones under a foot of dirt. That way you could have a nice chat with worms.

    3. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I have RTFA-ed again, and the people doing it promise all kinds of interesting sounds. Please mod me down to punish me for being so dumb.

    4. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by nick0909 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have been on the top of a pretty high mountain (Bald Mt, Butte County, CA) during Field Day 2003. The cell had full strength signals but we couldn't make a call. When my friend got his roaming bill it turns out he was hitting a tower about 150 miles away. The better gain antennas on the cell tower could hit us, but out little .3w phone couldn't get back to it.

    5. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      I thought using mobile phones at high altitudes put a strain on the system, because the phone sees so many towers. Or is that an urban legend?

      No, that's a true reason why the FCC prohibits the use of cell phones while in an airplane.

      Within each providers allocated slot of bandwidth, they subdivide that space into a number of channels, and assign each tower on their network a channel. If you're using your phone while in motion, when the signal from the tower you're actively talking falls below the acceptable line, it moves you over to the channel on which you are getting the strongest signal, because that's most likely coming from the tower you've moved closer too. Of course, for this to work, at no place should you be able to get two towers on the same channel... that'd be real confusing, and could lead to calls being assigned to the wrong tower. In practice, that's no big deal, that signal will just weaken quickly and you'll pick again until you get it right.

      However, somebody in a high-altitude plane is in just that ugly situation.... they can see far too many towers from that height with no hills in the way. As proven on 9/11/01, such a call works if done in small numbers... the call will end up bouncing around from tower to tower a lot of times, but since those handoffs are invisible to the user, nothing really bad happens to the call. However, if everybody did that... there'd be far too many transfers for the system to keep up with, and the whole system would bog down. That's one reason why they tell you not to do that.

      The FAA also prohibits the use of cell phones due to a possible risk of interference to the airplane navigation systems. However, this is distinct from the FCC's ban. Even if the FAA were to lighten up on this one, the FCC's ban would be unaffected.

    6. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was never proven

    7. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by transient · · Score: 1

      I don't think the FAA prohibits cell phones; I thought they had just expressed support for the FCC reg. But whatever. I know the plural of anecdote is not data, but I'm a pilot, and my cell phone causes problems with my radios.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    8. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My General Aviation Ground Instructor told us the reason we're not sposed to make calles from a plane is they can't bill us properly when the call switches to a bunch of towers. Course lots of jokes are passed around in flight school. But according to him go ahead and make a call from a cessna. Which i have done no problem. I have turned my phone on at 30,000ft in a 757 and not gotten a signal with my GSM phone.
      My old nextel phone caused interferance on FM radios 88-108mhz within about a 3ft range. havent tried on any other radios.

      Wasn't there a /. article on the some study that shows cell phones cause interference with navigational equipment only at 100watts at a distance of 3inches or some unreasonalbe number

    9. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by M1FCJ · · Score: 4, Informative
      To be frank, people doing it are talking rubbish. You have to go much much higher unless it is a miserable London day with clouds hovering around your head. Cloud cover is usually higher than hundred meters. At the moment Cambridgeshire is quite cloudy (~100km away from London) and they are pretty low but they are definitely not at 60-100 meter mark.

      It's one of these conceptual art bollocks and just an idiot at the helm.

      One think I wondered about is how did they get these baloons which change colour according to the magnetic radiation. The gas is filled with helium so that's inert. I haven't heard of any material which changes colour with radiation.

    10. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by baka_vic · · Score: 1

      They're using LEDs. Look here.

    11. Re:Using mobile phones at altitude? by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Arrgh.. My imagination ran aground... What's the point of this then, there isn't anything interesting in this stunt. On the other hand, all Britain were quite interested with a guy locked in a glass box suspended off meters the ground... I think we are experiencing sensory deprevation, at least in the interesting stuff department. :)

  17. Re:Why? What is the point? by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And why wait?? Listen now, live. (not all at once now!!) If that site goes down, and I presume it will within seconds of posting this, this site has pre-recorded sounds of Earth's natural EM radiation.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  18. I for one... by iswm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Want to be there when they land; free cell phones for life!

    --
    Buckethead
    1. Re:I for one... by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1
      NO NO NO!!!

      As was demonstrated in a previous post you CANNOT say "I for one" without mentioning the infamous Kent Brockman newscast!

      To quote the aforementioned post:

      Here, I'll give you some examples:
      • I, for one, welcome our new knocking alien overlords.
      • I, for one, welcome our new colliding space debris overlords.
      • I, for one, welcome our repetitive slashdot joke overlords.
      There, now hopefully you will not make the same mistake. I have seen the light, I hope you have too.
      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
  19. HAHA you are STUPID you didn't read the ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps you should read the latest slashdot poll

  20. Are the real logisitics of this being considered? by soren42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why cellphones? I mean, really, what's the value of having people call in to hear wind whistling around, balloons rustling (latex/plastic rubbing together), and cellphones ringing.

    Why not use higher-fidelity equipment, and make a recording available for download afterwards? I think the quality and value of that model would be much more attractive.

    Additionally, there will be issues with either 1) there being too few cellphones to meet the demand, and no one being able to get on them and listen, or 2) there will be too many cellphones, necessary to meed the demand, that will occupy all the access points/lines at the cell tower sites, and interfere with each other due to ambient RF from the phones being packed so close.

    I hope these folks are bright enough to have considered and addressed these issues.

    --

    "Adventure? Excitement? A Jedi craves not these things."
  21. Dude... by ctr2sprt · · Score: 4, Funny
    My hands are huge. They can touch anything but themselves... oh, wait.

    (Seriously, how high were the people behind this event when they thought of the idea?)

    1. Re:Dude... by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      (Seriously, how high were the people behind this event when they thought of the idea?)

      RTFA, it says 60 meters up. Wow, the colours...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
  22. I want to call the phone... by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that gets sucked into a jet engine...

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  23. The answer is... by ProKras · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, the cell phone answers YOU!

  24. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by solid · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but with the recent /.-ing of this event, the interest in this project is bound to surpass the predicted turnout and might result in a complete flop for the majority of the people trying to connect to a very limited number of phones.

  25. It talks to me by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sky talks to me all the time.

    It tells me to burn things.

  26. ET by RavidgeMole · · Score: 0

    Well this sure beats out any other attempt to contact distant life forms. Looks like ET left behind a few ideas.

    --
    "It is better to keep your mouth closed and have people think you a fool than to open it and prove them right." M. Twain
    1. Re:ET by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I think that involved floating record players, or something.

  27. This is art...not science... by Frennzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just enjoy it for what it is. Don't you have an inner child that loves balloons? Add that inner child to your outer geek...and this should be good stuff. Come on, not everything has to be bad.

    (begin flame...NOW!)
    (no, I'm not a hippie...but I HAVE been to Burning Man, and am going back this year as well){

    1. Re:This is art...not science... by solid · · Score: 1

      My inner child holds very dark thoughts of *popping* balloons, rather than sending them up in the air with phones tethered to them.

      No, wait, better yet, send them up in the air so my inner-child can shoot them down and watch the phone shrapnel scatter onto the onlookers.

    2. Re:This is art...not science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      just enjoy it for what it is. Don't you have an inner child that loves balloons? Add that inner child to your outer geek...and this should be good stuff. Come on, not everything has to be bad.

      (begin flame...NOW!)
      (no, I'm not a hippie...but I HAVE been to Burning Man, and am going back this year as well){


      Listening to distant traffic and a bunch of jostling latex balloons, huh? I've carried a bunch of balloons (child's party), and they're noisy enough to make me doubt this is going to be much fun...

      Inner child? Good stuff? Hardly. I bet it'll sound like a thigh mike at a bump and grind show. There's probably a reason nobody cares what THAT sounds like...
  28. Ummmm... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    ....I think you missed the April 1st submission deadline :-p

    -psy

  29. Stupid question by needacoolnickname · · Score: 1

    But - it's slashdot so I should get a few made up answers.

    How do they answer the phones?

    And yes I started to read the article but was t/o/oo/wo lazy t/o/oo/wo click the More Details link.

    1. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of phones have auto-answer, for reasons of accessibility or laziness.

      Sorry I couldn't think of a snappier made-up answer, but it's late.

  30. But personally... by josh+glaser · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait to see how many people mistake this for a UFO. ;-)

    1. Re:But personally... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It wasn't ball lighting or Venus, sir, that was a massive bunch of flying cellphones and balloons..."

      Yeah, right. Let the conspiracy theories abound!

      --
      My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    2. Re:But personally... by lone_marauder · · Score: 1

      Man, no doubt. A mass of glowing ballooons arranged in a hexagonal pattern, emitting a disturbing cacophany of cellphone ringtones? I started laughing uncontrollably right after clicking the link.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    3. Re:But personally... by Spunk · · Score: 1
      No! The joke is on you! Balloons, radio communications, patterns in the sky? How easily people are fooled by this so-called "art project." Wake up!
      • ...Sky Ear will launch at 7.00pm on May 4th, 2004 to coincide with the lunar eclipse...

      They're here, they're phoning home, and everyone thinks it's a bunch of silly Brits!
  31. Re:Why? What is the point? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is the point of this?

    Answer here

    Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows past the microphones?

    I found a pretty good explanation here.

    Just out of interest, who is putting up the money for this?

    I think if you dig around, you might find out here.

    They sound like they are spending other people's money with no comeback

    Science had known to occasionally be funded by someone for one reason or another. I would recommend reading this page to learn about the experiment.

    Or you could just RTFA.

  32. amazing by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Well, there's an amazing waste of time and money. But hey, it's their money, not mine.

    I'm tempted to call for a minute or two, even if it's an international call. It'll break the monotony of office conversation.

    "Ya last night I called a cell phone in England, hanging from a balloon. What did you do?"

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got laid.

    2. Re:amazing by JWSmythe · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Congratulations. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save it. He wasn't that good.

    4. Re:amazing by oiscotthey · · Score: 1

      How do you know it's -not- going to be amazingly cool looking & sounding, as intended? If not, then at least they tried. That's how you learn. By trying. Besides, the whole notion is terribly romantic. Listening to the sounds of the Earth & Sky and all that stuff. Regardless of how spectacular it is, these hippies are going to be getting laid while you're spending exhorbant amounts to dial across the Atlantic to talk to nobody on the other line of a phone hanging from a balloon.

    5. Re:amazing by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the man working the camera. :)

      Reminds me of an old movie I saw last night. 1979's "Hardcore". God that had to be one of the worst movies I've ever seen. I watched the whole thing out of morbid curiousity. :)

      Maybe I have a slightly skewed perspective, working so long in it, but through most of it I was like "what the fuck?"

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:amazing by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Well, it may look cool, but I can drive 10 minutes from home, sit a trivial distance from the Hollywood sign, and talk on the cell phone for the same effect. They're implying there'll be fantastic radio noise 180' up over a city. Well, I dare say Los Angeles has a bit of radio noise. :) Even my tone&tester picks up radio stations by touching the phone lines here. It was rather distracting when I was tracing phone lines.

      I'd like to see the balloons though. Well, assuming it works the way they expect. I'm going to ask a friend who lives near by to take pictures for me.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  33. spoiler by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Oh! The sky sounds just like a busy signal.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  34. Uh little problem... by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Who will push the button on the cell phone to answer it?

    I know that we could use a midget, but if you're going to send up a midget, you may as well just send a weather balloon with a microphone. You never think your midget friends are useful until you actually need them :)

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Uh little problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most cell phones have an auto ansewr option, which can problably be set to answer on the first which is probly befor the phone rings. and i would think they would mute the speakers. I would hate to be the one to sit there and set up all those phones

  35. Northern Lights. by qualico · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to hear the northern lights.

    If I whistle through the receiver we should get one hell of a show! :->

    1. Re:Northern Lights. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this is a bit off topic - and maybe I try should for a separate article - but it is *really old* news - but it does relate to the region from *25 to 500 miles above sea level* and the parent to this mentioned the aurora which it studies - so here a link to HAARP.

    2. Re:Northern Lights. by qualico · · Score: 1

      Interesting and informative article.

      Sounds like the ionosphere is alive.

      ionosphere ( ane sfir)
      n.
      the outer part of the earth's atmosphere, beginning at an altitude of c. 55 km (c. 34 mi.) and extending to the highest parts of the atmosphere: it contains several regions that consist of a series of constantly changing layers characterized by an appreciable electron and ion content: see D region, E region, F region
      ionospheric
      adj.

      Etymology
      [ ion + -o- + sphere]

  36. Hey, what's your number? by higuy48 · · Score: 1

    This is all well and good, but I would REALLY like to get a number... NOW (eh, I'm impatient).

    I for one welcome our new inevitable bad pickup line overlords.

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.

    Okay... I'm geeked out. End transmission.

    --
    And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    1. Re:Hey, what's your number? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      This is all well and good, but I would REALLY like to get a number... NOW (eh, I'm impatient).

      867-5309

    2. Re:Hey, what's your number? by higuy48 · · Score: 1

      Stewie Griffin: Hello, operator. Hello... Oh God, that's right. You have to punch in the numbers nowadays. Uhhh... I should know this. Oh yes... eight-six-seven-five-three-oh-nine, yes that's it. Wait, that's not it. Damn you Tommy Tutone! Only one thing to do. One-one-one-one-one-one-one. Lois? DAMN! One-one-one-one-one-one-TWO! Lois? DAMN! One-one-one-one-one-one-THREE...

      --
      And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
  37. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Cell phones are also optimized to only capture and playback sounds in the human vocal range. They weren't designed to carry any sound outside of that range... and may just discard it as noise.

  38. Lame project by sysbot · · Score: 1

    There's better use for this money than spending it on something that's so...useless. Not even news worthy too.

  39. Hmmm by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    Think I'll set up a 900 number. For a buck, people can call me to hear me blow air into the microphone.

    I wonder if you'll be able to hear people shouting into the other phones. If some phones are close enough, it could turn into an impromptu conference call.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Hmmm by VivianC · · Score: 1

      I think I'll do the same thing but hang my phone near a hot shower. Should sound about the same.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
  40. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by hydrofilic · · Score: 0

    Why not use higher-fidelity equipment, and make a recording available for download afterwards?

    No, it would be much easier to make a shitload of money using mobile phones. All you need to do is charge a high per minute rate.

  41. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Speaking of RF, they don't make clear *how* users are expected to hear these VLF phenomena, considering the GSM handsets popular in the UK are 1. digital (any interesting 'noise' becomes a bit error likely to be discarded from the stream), and 2. UHF/'microwave.'

    There's something absurdist and poetic about 'calling the sky,' but I do hope that a) there'll be a VLF radio onboard patched into said phones (erm, and the phones' own RF will indeed play hob with it, to the point it'd be unlikely to hear natural phenomena over the noise), and b) they'll webcast the audio so more than just a select few can 'participate.' (Art can be about exclusivity, but in this case, it adds little to what seems intended as a populist piece.)

    ---

    They've got a lot of pretty sketches and prototypes as apply to hanging the balloons, but no detail on the wireless end at all.

  42. No phones in the ballons.... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    If you RTFA... the only discussion about phones is that people on the ground watching the ballon structure can use their mobile phones to hear what the ballon is hearing... since the whole structure will be teathered to the ground anyway, they could just be using a wired microphone with a really long extention cord to feed the phone system that everybody's going to be dialing into.

    Uhm... speakers on the ground might have been a cheaper idea to use...

    1. Re:No phones in the ballons.... by r1ch · · Score: 1

      Umm, no. If you RTFA yourself, it says:

      This non-rigid "cloud", made up of several hundred glowing helium balloons will be embedded with mobile phones.

  43. Drugs are bad by razathorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mkay...

    At least that was MY first thought when I saw this story.

  44. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you're dissecting it this much, you're sort of missing the entire point of this.

  45. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by hydrofilic · · Score: 0

    If you're dissecting it this much, you're sort of missing the entire point of this.

    What is the point then? (Apart from being a cynical money making exercise.)

  46. All I can say is... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Riiiiiiggggghhhhhhtttt.......

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  47. Re:Why? What is the point? by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 1

    I would say that this is an interesting example of environmental art. A large, temporary display available for anyone to observe. And in this case interactive which is quite interesting. And yet even more interesting is that the observer can become part of the piece as they dial in, causing color changes.?

  48. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to make art, may as well make good art.

  49. Cool, but... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    when will I be able to get a Smelloscope? I hope I don't have to wait until the year 3000!

  50. And in other news.... by TribeDoktor · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Greenwich, London had reported pellet gun sales going through the roof.

    1. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll shoot your eye out, kid.

  51. Northern Lights? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    I think that's what inspired this event.

    (The kind you smoke.)

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  52. dumbest by mikeg22 · · Score: 1

    dumbest thing done in the history of mankind PERIOD

  53. Michael Savage, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you finally get kicked off of radio too?

  54. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my God. Look at how stupid you are! I can't believe you typed that.

  55. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Nyh · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, what's the value of having people call in to hear wind whistling around, balloons rustling (latex/plastic rubbing together), and cellphones ringing.

    Maybe you should read the article first before commenting. It is not just the wind they are interested in. They also 'listen' to radio frequencies.

    From the article: Using mobile phones people will be able to listen to the actual sounds up high, the electromagnetic sounds of the sky as well as streams of "whistlers" and "spherics" (atmospheric electromagnetic phenomena that are the audible equivalent of the Northern Lights).Of course, the action of calling the cloud changes the electromagnetic environment inside and causes the balloons to vary in brightness, colour and intensity.

    Why doing it the hard way? (You don't have to go 60 m up in the air to get all that.) Well, I suppose that is what Art is all about.

    Nyh

  56. Re:Why? What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll hear the other cell phones ringing... ;)

  57. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no cell phones are cheaper...

    Hasn't anyone seen that deal on amazon.com where you make $50 to $200 for getting a phone with service plan. I guess after ordering 1000 phones some geek had to figure out what to do with all those phones, and where to waste the $50,000

  58. Re:Why? What is the point? by hugzz · · Score: 1
    ...so that people can dial into the cloud and listen to the sounds of the sky.

    Weird, all I can hear is 50 ringing phones

  59. Is it JUST ME?!? by chowdmouse · · Score: 1

    Or is this the most dumbass thing I have *ever* read about on /.?!?! And to think of some of my submissions that have been rejected. Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezus.

  60. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

    Not only that, compression algorithm will get rid of most of the scientifically useful information. Human brain is a wonder, you can't believe how much information you can get out of a DSP'ed audio stream. I do this regularly, with a signal bandwidth of a couple of kiloHerts, you can still understand the conversation. Radio amateurs (like I) do this regularly.

  61. If I wanted to hear latex rubbing together... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just rent a video.

  62. Re:Why? What is the point? by Doug+Neal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, with an outlook like that, your life must really suck :P

  63. Re:Why? What is the point? by FreemanPatrickHenry · · Score: 1

    Actually, they'll probably be hearing the sound of many, many phones ringing...

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous .sig which, unfortunately, this space is too small to contain.
  64. Listen to the Sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Afterwards there will be a love-in.
    Participants are encouraged to purchase from a selection of 'thai dyed shirts',
    'tea cosies', 'smoking accessories', and other commemorative paraphenalia.

  65. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FAA also prohibits the use of cell phones due to a possible risk of interference to the airplane navigation systems

    This is - and always has - been an absolute crock of bullshit. Their technical objection is to preserve the Airfone monopoly (the credit card phone systems on the back of some seats) - nothing more.

    Would you trust your life by flying on a plane who's systems could jammed by a $50 cell phone no bigger than a pack of cards? I think you wouldn't - and I'm sure aerospace electronics engineers would be capable of solving that problem effectively. Let's see - passengers are inside a large metal can - and there's unlimited mounting space for antennas on the outside.. hmmm..

    1. Re:Bullshit. by RallyNick · · Score: 1
      ...I'm sure aerospace electronics engineers would be capable of solving that problem effectively. Let's see - passengers are inside a large metal can - and there's unlimited mounting space for antennas on the outside.. hmmm..

      Let's see... you seem to think that an airplane is a Faraday cage. But you also seem fairly pissed that they won't allow you to place a call from the plane. Hmm...

  66. RRRRiiiiiing RRRRiiiing by Salica · · Score: 1
    What is the point of this? Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows past the microphones?


    No, you will hear the ringtones of the other cellphones ;-)
  67. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by instarx · · Score: 0

    Do you have no imagination whatsoever? Its ART for cryin' out loud. Its not a scientific experiment.

  68. Why would anyone do this? by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 1

    this is a terrible idea. it's a waste of electronics, money, and pollution to boot.

  69. Re:Why? What is the point? by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 1

    Very cool. Thanks.

  70. Schumann resonance-lightning from around the world by dtmos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're probably referring to the Schumann resonance, the resonance of the earth-ionosphere resonant cavity. Energy from lightning around the world excites this resonance, which then rings--much as hitting a bell with a hammer causes the bell to ring.

    Also like an acoustic bell, there is a fundamental frequency of resonance and many overtones that grow fainter as you go up in frequency. The fundamental Schumann resonance is approximately 7.8 Hz; the first few overtones are usually given as 13.8, 19.7, 25.7, and 31.7 Hz. There is a slight variation in the frequencies involved over long periods of time, as the ionosphere changes in response to solar activity.

  71. You all don't get it by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    When was the last time they talked about "helium filled (weather-) balloons"?

    So this time they're telling us this in advance, so we're prepared when we see a colorfull "thing" flying around you can dail into;
    when actually you have an UFO with aliens who're testing their wireless telephone system or something..

    Be afraid.. */me searches for his tinfoil hat*

    ET phone home...

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  72. I hope they're not GSM phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...because if they are, the GSM circuitry will detect zero noise and therefore send zero signal to the receiving handset. The receiving handset will auto-generate a random noise which is perceived by our ears as silence.

    Thus, if you phone up these balloons, the sound you hear has been generated by the phone you are holding next to your ear!

  73. Re:Schumann resonance-lightning from around the wo by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's a really low frequency. Is it a concidence that it's wavelength is the almost the same as the circumference of the Earth? Or is that the whole reason it works?

    Thanks for the information and links!

  74. obvious : in the cloud... by gomel · · Score: 1


    in the cloud ... no one can hear your scream!
    (unless somebody else calls a nearby phone and listens)

    OR

    I have no cell phone and I must call!

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  75. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Angostura · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh come on, read the article. This whole thing is being done as a bit of *fun* combining some interesting science and a big art component. It's meant to appeal to people's sense of wonder and interest them, not to be the most technically adept way of providing a multi-channel audio feed from 60M up. If you had bothered to read the piece you would have seen that, apart from anything else the act of contacting one of the suspended phones is meant to change the RF field in the balloon cloud enough to change the colour of the surrounding balloons change the colour of the light they emit. I live near Greenwich, and I suspect I'll be there, together with a lot of families with picnics having a laugh. And for those people asking about the funding - these people are coughing up: "The Daniel Langlois Foundation'spurpose is to further artistic and scientific knowledge by fostering the meeting of art and science in the field of technologies. " The foundation unfortunately has a terrible liking for bad Flash.

  76. But by Azathoth!EDC · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you just be listening to the sounds of everyone elses phones ringing??

  77. The atmosphere is only 12M by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since the atmosphere is only 12 miles high, it is obvious that they must mean a 25 mile net at the depth of 60 meters. The weight of the cellphones needed to fill it probably can't make a bigger crater than that. If it makes a sphere, it has a volume of 3.3E13 m3. Each m3 can probably contain about 5000 cell phones, each weighing in at ~200g. This comes to 1.7E17 cell phones at a total weight of 3.3E16 kg.

    1. Re:The atmosphere is only 12M by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Informative

      The TROPOSPHERE is only 12 miles thick. The atmosphere goes quite a bit beyond that.

      Although you're right in the sense that it's the troposphere where the "weather" happens, so to speak.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  78. Ringing? by Hinkey · · Score: 1

    I hope they have them all on vibrate, otherwise all you'll hear is ringing :)

    --
    -=Hinkey=-
  79. Can you hear me now? by isny · · Score: 0

    Then get me down!!

  80. If this was an asteroid impact... by Chemisor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects, such a net of cell phones will create an impact of 1.16E9 megatons of TNT and create a crater 108 miles in diameter. It also notes that simliar sized nets of cell phones hit the earth about once every billion years.

  81. Re:Why? What is the point? by smchris · · Score: 1

    What is the point of this? Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows past the microphones?

    Indeed. Conceptual art either wows you -- or is stupid. Maybe I'm wowed by the stupidity of this one.

  82. Then the balloon popped by koan · · Score: 1

    and there is finally a link between cell phones and head related injuries.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  83. Ce n'est pas la science. by AllenChristopher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Science had known to occasionally be funded by someone for one reason or another. "

    This is clearly not science, it is art. There are no untested hypotheses, there is no rigorous data being collected that may tell us more about EM in a deductive way...

    It is no more science than a painting of a cat is a cat. Ceci n'est pas une pipe, right?

    This is a moving demonstration of how complex the sky's environment is, and how much we can't see. Since people still have no clue about radiation, it will be a little educational... but mainly it will create an emotional response to an ordinarily invisible phenomenon.

    Oh, and the funding is provided by the Daniel Langlois Foundation for Art, Science, and Technology, which ends the discussion about whether it's worth the money. Daniel Langlois thinks art about science is important, and it's his money.

  84. Sponsored by... by Merovign · · Score: 1

    This CELLPHONE event sponsored by AT&T, Sprint, Cingular, etc... (Skytel? Orange in UK?)

    Am I cynical, or does this just seem to be a way to get people to burn airtime? I mean, horrible sound
    quality (compared to dedicated microphones), fighting for a connection, it seems like this is
    even less useful than a bicycle with square wheels (in the real world, anyway).

    I imagine in addition to ringtones you'll hear a lot of tinny voices yelling "Hello!? Hello?!"

  85. What do they hope to learn... by IDigUNIX · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...everyone knows that the wind cries Mary...

  86. Sing Along... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    The sky is alive with the sound of ringtones
    With tones they have rung through a thousand movies
    The cloud fills my sky with the sound of ringtones
    My heart wants to blog every tone it hears

  87. Justification by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    It's Art! Art, I tell you!

  88. Re:Why? What is the point? by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows past the microphones?

    If you're listening to a microphone aboard a balloon and you hear wind noises, you can conclude that the balloon has burst.

    rj

  89. Not again.... by jemenake · · Score: 1

    Oh no... "carbon fiber net structure"... "coloured blue, red and yellow lights"... can we please not have this one come back down to earth in Roswell?

  90. yes, but.... by TheBoostedBrain · · Score: 1

    Who the heck is gonna press the "send" key to answer the phone in the sky?

    --
    -- When did Ignorance Become a Point of View?
  91. Re:Are the real logisitics of this being considere by Seby123456 · · Score: 1

    (Apart from being a cynical money making exercise.)

    And the event would be making money how? Its free for the public to attend, and is funded by The Daniel Langlois Foundation for Art, Science and Technology.

    Surely the point is something is much more simple... its something which will look nice and intrigue people by being unusual.

  92. omg by Himring · · Score: 1

    I've seen many people make these types of posts since I've been reading /. over the years, but this is my first time saying such a thing, so here it goes:

    oh shit that's sad....

    I'm bracing for the mod-impact....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  93. Re:Why? What is the point? by Sh4d0wP4wn · · Score: 1

    The obvious solution to this would be to make the rings silent.

    --
    Interactive Poetry & Prose - http://www.magickalkingdom.com
  94. Re:Why? What is the point? by LizzyDragon · · Score: 1

    Nah. I think they might hear "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" or "Over the Rainbow".

  95. What will the slashdot effect do to this? by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    What will the slashdot effect do to this?

    We (members of the slashdot community) send servers into screaming oblivion on a daily basis. We have even inundated a spammer with snail mail. Now we have the chance to slashdot a pinata! Rise up my brethren and embrace this challenge!

    By the way, can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these?

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  96. Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is liable when these things fall back to Earth?

  97. Re:Schumann resonance by dtmos · · Score: 1

    That's the whole reason it works--the frequency of resonance is a function of the physical size (and shape) of the resonantor, just like in acoustics, where the larger bell has a lower pitch. The frequency of resonance of the earth-ionosphere cavity is largely (but not completely) determined by the circumference of the Earth.

  98. Re:Why? What is the point? by Threni · · Score: 1

    > What is the point of this? Presumably they will just hear a few wind noises as it blows
    > past the microphones?
    >
    >Just out of interest, who is putting up the money for this? They sound like they are
    >spending other people's money with no comeback

    I take it you're not familiar with a concept known as `art`? You could start by checking out Hymnen by Karlheinz Stockhausen.