Slashdot Mirror


Off Grid Via Slow Moving River?

einstein writes "I live out in the middle of nowhere, and I lose power at the drop of a hat. My house is right next to the Susquehanna river, and all the kinetic energy going past my house makes just want to go off grid. Most homebuilt hydro power is lower volume/high speed. What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water? I'm between two large hydro dams, so the water level is fairly constant, but does tend to fluctuate 4-6ft in the winter due to ice floes and melting snow. I think maybe a miniature version of one of the recent submerged tidal generators might work... Does anyone have some suggestions on how I might go about this project?" More than a few people have done this before.

72 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. The Romans by panxerox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    did something similar, they had a line of floating grain mills across the Tiber (no ice there though) in the late empire period. Find a good high current area and build a paddlewheel boat basically with the drive attached to a generator and use anchors in the riverbed. It might not generate a steady high elec current so you might want to put in a bank of batteries and converter for peak demand. Since the paddlewheel is in the back the boat draft would break up at least thin ice. With underwater turbines your talking alot of cost both in construction and maintainance. Hers another option http://www.hydrogenappliances.com/hydromauro.html

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:The Romans by mikewas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably easier to build a dock, floating or fixed. A dock is something that the local officials will understand so any permits or approvals should be easy. Then attach the paddlewheels.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:The Romans by snerdy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Joe Sacco's excellent comic documentary "Safe Area Gorazde: The War in Eastern Bosnia 1992-1995" he talks about how the residents of Gorazde built floating water-powered generators in order to run lights and electric applicances like TVs and VCRs during the siege of their town. The generators were called something like "mini-turines?" (I borrowed the book from a friend and have since returned it.)

  2. Stay on-grid while generating power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you manage to generate your own power (wind, water, solar, whatever), stay on the grid because YOU can feed the grid, and the power company (usually) has to credit you. Yes, keep some of your own power stored up in batteries, but sell the excess and pay off the costs of setting this up.

    1. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by gleekmonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine makes over $600 a month by staying on the grid and setting up a few wind towers.

    2. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by MrChuck · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm in the process of Solarizing an odd grid house...

      Battery system will add a bit to the cost (but still might be worthwhile for keeping "absolutely needed" systems up (refrigerator)). But unlike solar, rivers run always. You can start without it and power your house, sending extra to the grid and making money on it.

      But note that a Rolls 375AH battery will cost you $600-$700 and you'll want a few of those. Plus charging systems for them. And replacing them every 5-8 years. (tho fuel cell systems are expected to work for this use within 3-5 years).

      HomePower Magazine is online and in libraries and just had something (Feb? March?) on home hydro. It's often used with creeks. You can also buy their entire archives on CD.

      If you need pressure, but don't think your river has it, note that running water into a large pipe and getting smaller makes pressure enough to turn things.

      The easiest way to handle it is with a, er, hill. Divert some of the water off through pipes, let it drop, let it hit your generator and route it back to the river. Filters and cats at the top keep fish out.

    3. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In theory, yes, the local power company often has to buy your surplus. In practice, though, it's often less simple.

    4. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Absolutely: DO stay on the grid. For 2 obvious reasons: 1) what if, you never know, your installation breaks down beyond repair ? 2) it's profitable I am in a monastery in the Netherlands. We are going to generate our own electric power, with windmills ( we are very close to the North Sea shore, have 200+ days of wind per year ). Not only for the monastery-house itself, but also for the candle factory with which we earn our money: heating paraffine eats kilowatts. But even under these favorable circumstances we would be mad to go off the grid.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    5. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by rpeterman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "running water into a large pipe and getting smaller makes pressure enough to turn things."
      This is incorrect. I regularly teach irrigation-related hydraulics classes to professionals in many fields, and this is one of the most common misconceptions about hydraulics. Decreasing pipe size increases velocity, not pressure. Increased velocity in pipes is usually associated with friction loss, or loss of water pressure. Water pressure is only created by the weight of water (with minimal additions from atmospheric pressure) or by mechanical means (pumps).
      Increasing the velocity may be beneficial in certain situations, but in this case I would convert the low pressure, low velocity energy from the river to electricity by using gears, pulleys and other mechanical aids. The river has plenty of mass to drive a large water wheel which would, with a high reduction ratio, turn a small shaft on a generator at the speeds needed to generate electricty.

    6. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Venner · · Score: 3, Informative

      I could be way off base, but if I remember correctly, all navigable waterways in the united states fall under the dominion/juristicion of the Army Corps of Engineers and it is technically illegal to do anything that alters the river without their approval and permission.
      Ownership isn't the issue. Kinda like it is criminal to drain wetlands, even if you own the property.

      --
      A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    7. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by MrChuck · · Score: 3, Informative
      And you're not going to get much clearance to put a "large water wheel" onto a widely used river.

      You would have an easier time drawing off the water with a couple 3" pipes.

      If I can take a couple gallons/second and drop it out a 4 inch pipe, it might not be able to turn a small turbine/generator. Coming out of a 1" pipe, FASTER, it will be easier. When I hosed down my brother by putting my thumb over the hose end, he didn't care if the water had more pressure or was faster. It was 45PSI either way, I suppose.

      I friend of my Mom's restored and old mill and, since he owned the property on both sides of the creek, and since it was a mill before, the town gov't people were actually pretty delighted for him to restore the "large water wheel" that had been there. It provides a fair amount of both mechanical and electrical power for his work - it turns lathes and he demonstrated grinding wheat (though how much wheat we need to grind in Western Ma is sort of in question, but he was playing with the "wiring" - mainly leather straps and gears.

      In the microHydro world, you can make power from a small creek. Using a large river and not doing environmental impact reports and living in bureaucracy would suggest water driving a turbine to make power come out.

      The ORIGINAL poster didn't say anything about where s/he lives on his river - if they get 2' of ice or just a gentle glazing on top. He's take different actions in winter based on that.

      But there are pro's and resources s/he can can use to negotiate the mazes that are unfamiliar to most of us.

    8. Re:Stay on-grid while generating power by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember checking out a solar-powered house about 5 years ago on a multi-house tour of energy-saving homes here in Austin. The solar system itself is expensive and so are the batteries. The average payback for solar is about 10 years. But that depends on how many solar plates you have generating electricity. The batteries are expensive and do require replacement every so often (forget the # of years) but only take up about 2ft x 6ft area, not really a lot of space (this house had them outside in a specially built protected 'shed' right next to the house).

      Depending on where you live, you can use several different (passive) methods for keeping your house warm or cool.

      Methods
      --------
      trees - get them big enough to shade your house, you'd be surprised at the temperature difference.
      if you can't get trees, have ivy grow on the walls, this will drop the temperature also by preventing sunlight from hitting the walls.

      windows - use transom windows to create an airflow thru the house near the ceiling. in hot months, this gets rid of hot air by the ceiling. it also helps evaporate moisture off your skin which creates a cooling effect.

      walls - _HEAVILY_ insulate your walls. I've ssen some houses with walls 2-3 ft thick, made out of either straw bales, poured concrete inside cinder blocks, or rammed earth. the insulation is so good, you'll barely touch your heating OR cooling equipment.

      roof - if you put solar panels on the roof and mount them at least 4-6" off the roof shingles, you not only generate electricity, you prevent the sunlight from hitting the roof and thereby warming up the attic. also, put one of those cutouts along the roof peak to help draw off hot air. this place (http://www.scienceonline.co.uk/science_now/green_ roofs.html) even recommends planting grass on the roof if you can do it on your house. here's an excellent link to another website describing this stuff.
      you can also try a metal roof as this will actually reflect a lot of the solar gain rather than letting it soak in. an added bonus is that it will last at least 50 years compared to 25 yr shingles (less replacement cost).

      all these methods will help you in saving electricity, not generating it.

      for generating power, look to wind, water, and sun. you will have to evaluate where you live to see what is best.

      I looked into wind power a few years ago and they have some _very_ efficient systems for generating power, and they are relatively inexpensive (less than $2000).

      with water systems you will need some kind of current to move those waterwheels constantly. however, you will have to find a way to step up/down the speed of the current generating axles to match the needed speed for generating electricity and storing it in the batteries.

      solar power has always been expensive. until they find a way to cut the manufacturing costs for the solar panels, it's too pricy for me compared to the other methods.

      btw, no matter what system you choose, you WILL have to have batteries to store power. that is one cost you will not be able to avoid.

      Good luck!

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
  3. Check out Home Power magazine by no_such_user · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a big fan of Home Power magazine. They focus more on solar solutions, but you'll catch an occasional article on hydro. Best part is you can download the current issue for free (after registration).

  4. Motivational Speaker? by niko9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You woudn't happen to wear a 50's era bifocals and live in a van down by the river?

  5. Township Approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    What would be a good, unobtrusive way to generate electricity from a high volume/low speed body of water?

    You'll need township approval before even thinking of constructing something that could possibly damn or slow down the flow of water.

    1. Re:Township Approval by virtual_mps · · Score: 4, Informative
      What if he doesn't live in a township and owns the river himself?

      Heh. The susquehanna is the 16th largest river in the united states, not some backyard trickle. It's a navigable river and a major feeder for the chesapeake bay, which falls under federal authority as well as state and regional environmental regulations. Sticking a dam on it is something I'd probably ask a lawyer about first thing.
    2. Re:Township Approval by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'll need township approval before even thinking of constructing something that could possibly damn or slow down the flow of water.

      Crap. Better rethink my plans to build a Church of Satan on the bank of the Animas River (in my backyard). The people of Durango might not be too happy that their river has been condemned to eternal damnation, especially since "animas" is Spanish for "soul".

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    3. Re:Township Approval by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are watershead and pollution issues involved as well.

      The state environmental regulatory groups (EPA EPD DEP, whatever) monitor this crap because whenever you take energy from a river system you cause an increase in things like sedimentation--in addition to whatever kind of pollution your system leaks into the water.

      Big power companies get away with it because, well, because they're big power companies, but it's very possible that you'll have to pay some liscensing fees and/or get some kind of water permit/pollution fees.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  6. Dear Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've noticed while wearing socks and walking on carpet, I often generate static electricity. Is there any way to harness this electricity to power my home, rather than shock me when I touch metal objects? In a related question, could I somehow generate power by rubbing balloons against my hair?

  7. High torque by 680x0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bet you could build a low-speed, high-torque paddle wheel (it would need to have a lot of surface area being pushed on by the river). Then, using gear ratios, you can convert that to high-speed, low-torque that may be needed by your generator. Not being a mechanical engineer, I'll leave it at that. :-)

    1. Re:High torque by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Submerged wheels are less efficient than wheels powered by falling water, which is something to look into if you live on a rough sort of incline. You could run a sluice to a smaller wheel for the same amount of power if you have a small decline on your water frontage. (Or you could dam the river, ha ha).

      A big wheel could run afoul of your winter time ice floes...A nice sized chunk of ice could wreck your system.

      A full underwater system (i.e turbines) would look better, and would probably be safe from ice. Turbines are much more expensive though.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:High torque by sakusha · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's freaking brilliant. I'm sure the massive gear and belt-driven factories that were the peak technology of the Industrial Revolution were designed by engineers that constantly thought to themselves, "what a disaster, I'm wasting 20% of this FREE ENERGY."

      Sheesh.

  8. Wind Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The basic idea behind hydro power is that you take the potential energy of water falling a vertical distance, and convert it to electrical energy. You will have trouble with that in your area. The fact that the river is slow movign tells me that the gradient in the area is very gradual, so it will be difficult to rig up a system where the water is able to travel a vertical distance. Basically you would have to build a dam to block the flow of water so it rises on one side.

    I don't think tidal power would work unless the river level fluctuates daily (tidal generators produce power only during a level change).

    My suggestion: forget hydro power, and build a windmill!

  9. does this remove energy from the current? by polished+look+2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ok, say this person puts in a paddle-boat or what-not which drives a generator. Does this remove energy from the river? will the downstream hydro-electric plant have less energy?

    1. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by RallyNick · · Score: 5, Informative

      yes, but just momentarily. once past your paddle, the water will be accelerated again by earth's gravitational pull, so the downstream power plant won't ever notice.

      p.s. it wouldn't notice anyway since they just store the water in the dam and let it free fall on their turbine from there. so your plant will make the water take longer to reach downstream but it'll have just as much energy once there.

    2. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nobody is taking free energy from anywhere.

      The Sun's energy was used to evaporate the water, which carried it up into the atmosphere, and then it rained down over high altitude. Water at altitude has potential energy, equal to g times the height times the mass - this is the energy that is used for hydroelectric power.

      The dam uses the potential energy difference between the water at the top of the dam, and the water at a bottom of the dam. Nothing more. When water is released at the top, this potential energy turns into kinetic energy, which is used to run generators.

      Where there is NOT a dam, this potential energy is used to accelerate the water (which is why rapids move fast, while dammed rivers don't!)

      So as long as the guy's private energy generation doesn't sink the water level behind the large dam (pretty unlikely) he isn't taking any of the energy that the hydroelectric plant uses. He is simply slowing the flow of water in his section of the river marginally.

      Finally "Where does gravity get its power?" Power is energy per second, and since gravity doesn't have any energy as such, nor does it have power. Gravity is simply a force, and by counteracting this force we can store potential energy, but that is exactly the same energy that comes back. Remember that current theory is that all matter started at the same point, so any energy that is created by objects in the universe falling towards one another is really just the return of the energy once used to pull them apart. If you are asking where the gravity get its force, well, that is a deeper question for which we would have to leave 7th grade physics.

    3. Re:does this remove energy from the current? by FrankDrebin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      yes, but just momentarily

      Huh? Let's not forget the law of conservation of energy. Of course a waterwheel/generator takes energy from the river as it puts out electrical energy. There is nothing "momentary" about it.

      But this energy is otherwise "lost" to heat as the water flows downstream anyway. IIRC it was Joule (whose energy scale we use today) that originally did the science on waterfalls, showing the water temerature at the bottom of the falls is higher than at the top. As water flows downhill, it pummels into itself, and the gravitation potenital energy is converted to heat.

      A waterwheel simply takes some of this energy and converts it to rotation instead of heat. With a waterwheel in place, the temperature of the water will be ever-so-slightly cooler downstream.

      The downstream reservoir has a level, and it is the difference between this elevation and the tailrace (water exit) elevation that determines the amount of energy the hydro plant can extract. The difference is called "head" (I kid you not).

      So the energy of the water used by a waterwheel is not "stolen" from the downstream plant... because it would have already been "lost" to heat as it reached the reservoir anyway.

      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  10. hydroelectric power by gordona · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'll probably have to divert some water through a small sluice, but you'll have to find out if you legally can do this. You can emphasize that it will be 100% conservative, ie., no water will be consumed. A turbine in the sluice can be geared to drive an generator at higher speed. Will no doubt have to play with the size of the sluice and the gearing etc, since you will have essentially no head to play with.

    --
    "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!" -- Dr. Strangelove
  11. Wind Power by Denix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not an expert on this but I believe you would also get wind off the river. So you could combine water turbines and windmills.

    --
    "Simple words such as 'better' or 'faster' are best used by simpletons. Life [...] is more complicated." - TMC
  12. Why not just.... by gleekmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not just use humans? Just make a computer based reality world to keep them happy, and harness the energy.

    1. Re:Why not just.... by ActiveSX · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no. Didn't you listen? You make a computer based reality to keep them miserable, not happy. Otherwise they won't believe it's real.

  13. Do Some Homework by klausner · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a huge amount of material from the 19th century on mill design, and how to get the most out of river power. Try doing some research in a major library.

  14. John Ashcroft by EventHorizon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We need government approval to think? Damn. That's worse than 198

    [MESSAGE CENSORED FOR YOUR PROTECTION]

  15. Permits? by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While it does sound like an interesting idea I suspect that the county and/or commonwealth will want you to pull somekind of permit. After they stall you for a year or two just to come up with the regulations they most likely want engineering data concerning possible damage to the riverbed and the generator's effect on river currents. Of course this really makes no sense but local politics never did.

    Years ago my family spent a few years trying to get a 30' fix pier (that others on our street could use for free) built by our property. Between the hassles of the town, state and MEPA we gave up. Strangely a few years later a neighbor (and state senator) who opposed to our project build his own from our prints 100' away. I guess we didn't grease the right gears.

    My advice, make it small, discrete, quite and easily removable. Be forward that running your own generator over a long period is probable cause for the DEA to search your house as a suspected grow-op. It sounds crazy but again it's all about politics.

    Bonne Chance.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  16. I forget the name of it now.... by zogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... but there exists a tow-behind your sailboat generator I have seen. Looks like a dinky torpedo that is trailed behind, the little props spin, you get juice. It would do what you are looking for, easy to install, some power. Legalities of tying it directly to some point out in the stream-no idea, plus the safety factor of someone smacking into it.

    found it

    http://www.salt-systems.com/marine-wind.htm

    with that said, unless a stream goes entirely through your property, ie you can control both sides of the bank and build a proper dam etc, which is a ton of hassle and permits and whatnot usually, I would recommend doing the normal tried and true approach of wind/solar/fuel genny hybrid as an adjunct to your grid power. Re arrange where you put your money into first which of the first two works better for your locale. You usually want all four for true backup solution in most places. that is a generalization, but mostly true. It's really a variable, it has to be customized to your location and needs. Site survey maps exist on the web that will show mean average sun shiney hours and mean average winds for your area that will help you make a determination of which method gets priority. the reason why the "hybrid" approach is so good is that usually most places in the US get a lot of wind in the winter, but less wind but more sun in the summer. but that just depends, some places it's so windy all the time wind alone with the fuel genny backup is good, other places solar is better,etc--just depends..

    me = grid, some solar, backup aero-marine wind genny, two fuel gennys

    good luck! Once you get your rig up and working, you'll ask yourself "why the heck didn't I do this years ago?" It's really comforting knowing you always have SOME power no matter what, and even better to OWN it.

  17. submerible generator by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative

    Real Goods catalog sells a generator that looks like a boat trolling motor or a minisub thruster, only with a bigger propeller. You anchor it in the river, and it uses the large volume of water flowing past it. I believe the river still needs to be moving at several feet per second, and has to be at least 2 feet deep- we're not talking mountain stream here. Needs to be a -river-.

    The other way is to lay pipe along the river for quite some distance, to as low a point as possible. You need quite a bit of "head"(vertical delta) or a lot of waterflow; Real Goods' other generator system uses a turbine, with a customizable configuration of nozzles.

    As for selling electricity back to the grid (aka intertie systems)- you can't always do that(ie, "sell" the electricity back), and even if you can, there are often limits on how much electricity can be generated. The power companies also get pretty pissy about people powering the grid, because if there's an outage, and a lineman goes to work on the lines he thinks are dead...well...fried lineman. Most inverters these days designed for intertie(which is what we're talking about) have safety features to prevent it from powering a grid by itself, but power companies still like to make excuses and may demand one of their engineers check out the system(at your cost of course).

  18. Getting energy from the river. Some ideas by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sneak out and clamp 12 to 120 volt convertors on passing motorboats, with wires going back to your house. The wires had better be long

    Stand on the shore with a big shotgun, and demand that passersby pay you a toll in killowatt hours in order to pass.

    Provide all the catfish with treadmills connected to generators.

    Per Max Screck of Batman 2, set up your own power plant and connect to the nearby hydro plants. Provide a lot of paperwork that no one reads, that includes the part that says that your power plant actually drains power from the grid instead of adding to it.

    Power hot air turbines from meetings of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

    If all else fails, I'm sure that the orgone writings of Reich, the magic energy fields of Tesla, or the spoonbending force of Uri Gellar will give you an answer.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  19. Is there an elevation change involved? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 3, Informative
    If your relying strictly on the flow of the water (no gravitational potential energy due to elecation changes) you can measure the speed of the river flow get some idea how much head pressure the river can deliver. If it's a slow moving river (as you said in the header of the post) there may not be a lot of pressure head to deal with (which would imply a large volume of water to generate significant current).

  20. Start with conservation by danharan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, almost any solution will cost more than conservation. Not only can you have a smaller generator, but you won't need as many batteries to store energy for peak periods.

    Check out real goods and other suppliers. Good lighting, gas-powered hot water heaters, fridges and cooking... there are lots of nice appliances that can reduce your reliance on electricity.

    As for generation- keep your options open. It may not be legal for you to install a micro-hydro generator, and solar or wind might be cheaper.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  21. Re:No, of course not by Dasaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    pfft, a mere toy! I use one of these

    --
    XP is basicly 98 with a lot more extra features to hunt down and disable. --Dram
  22. My father had a book on this stuff by panurge · · Score: 5, Informative
    It was obviously written for settlers in the early 20th century and had all kinds of stuff on the different types of paddlewheels for different applications. By the sound of it you would need an undershot wheel with large buckets, unfortunately far from unobtrusive. Noise could be a major problem unless you used sucessive belt step-up drives rather than gearing, but the basic setup would need to resemble an automotive alternator system, which can produce a fairly constant output power despite fluctuations in rpm.

    However, there would be many potential problems, especially the difficulty and cost of fixing a large overhung wheel with an asymmetric load over a river with fluctuating height (the wheel axis is going to need to rise and fall) and the regulatory problems: I guess you would need a license and it might be hard to obtain.

    Another solution might be a hydraulic ram. There is the remains of one near where I live, that could raise water nearly 200ft. without an external power source, and was very simple and reliable. I guess some sort of license would be needed, but they are unobtrusive- there is nothing to see above water level but the exit pipe and the compression tank. Once the water is in a storage tank at high level, it can power a conventional turbine or an overshot wheel (more efficient than undershot), and the output can be adjusted to give fairly constant generator rpm regardless of load. Hydraulic rams can be noisy.

    However, I wouldn't recommend going down either of these routes unless you are a qualified mechanical or civil (structural) engineer or both, and have good contacts in other disciplines.

    The smallest hydro generator I have seen working, by the way, is at the end of the River Lyn in England. It's way bigger than you are likely to want ( I think I recall it's about 100KW) but when I was there in the early 90s it was still working. It attracts a lot of visitors from the US, and the whole place (including the water powered gravity railway) is a wonderful example of English quaintness.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  23. Re:Legal ? by gleekmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How is it more 'irresponable' to use water as a source of energy rather than wind or sunlight? I wasn't under the impression that waterwheels were perticularly damaging to the environment.

    On the positive side, if everyone by a river did build one of these things, there would be less need for coal powerplants - THOSE are destructive to the environment.

  24. here is the link by polished+look+2 · · Score: 4, Informative
  25. check your regs first... by waytoomuchcoffee · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have Federal, State, and local regs you need to check out.

    First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits. You need this to discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States - fill material includes structures as well. You might be exempt (usually if you affect under 1/10 acre you will be), but you need to make sure. If you are going to affect any Federal Endangered/Threatened species (are any in/near the river?) you will need clearance through the US Fish and Wildlife Department and or National Marine Fisheries Service. This is usually coordinated through the Section 7 process of your 404 permit, but if you DON'T qualify for a 404 permit and there are endangered species, you have to do your own Habitat Conservation Plan and prepare a document under the National Environmental Quality Act (NEPA).

    Second, State. The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission regulates fish movements. "No dams, ponds, or other devices which prevent free migration of fish shall be erected or placed by a person licensed to propagate and sell fish in a stream flowing over the person's property".
    I am sure you also have some type of dam safety office as well, if you go that route. Also, I don't know how water rights work in your state, but you need to check into that as well. You also might have a state version of NEPA (many states do).

    Third, local. Check your local Planning department for applicable rules and regs.

    1. Re:check your regs first... by Bryan_W · · Score: 3, Funny
      First, Federal. The Corps of Engineers handles 404 permits.
      Wouldn't it suck if he went there to get them but they couldn't be found?
  26. Off Grid Living by Fortress · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would suggest that hydro power is not the best way to go for an off grid home power system. You really need high volume/high head water source to harvest any appreciable energy; from what you've described, there is no appreciable head (vertical drop) to the river near you. As well, as others have pointed out, building anything in the water entails a lot of bureaucratic red tape.

    I would say that solar or wind power is more feasible for most people. Solar is cheap in maintenance costs but expensive to set up, and you really need a lot of panel area to hope to supply your needs. Wind power is cheaper up front, but more maintenance is required because of moving parts, and noise from the rotors can be annoying.

    Either solution will require a battery bank to store power to use when the plant is not producing, plus a good inverter to supply consistent 120v 60Hz power. If all you are looking for is protection from outages, the battery bank with a generator may be ideal from a cost/benefit perspective. The payback time of most alternative energy projects is in excess of 50 years, so think carefully before you invest.

  27. storage by zogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a lot of experience maintaining a large bank of rolls/surrettes and some trojans ( and others). One, they'll last a lot longer than 5-6 years, especially is you install a desulphator on the battery bank. They *work* as advertised, I highly recommend them. I've actually rejuvenated some marginally rank batts with them. neat stuff, the gov and some industries use them a lot to, to keep starter batteries "fresh" for long unused storage conditions with vehicles that only get occassional use.

    On the batts, the rolls are definetly good, and definetly expensive, along with the crowns. I have found cost comparing, it might be useful to check out local forklift companies and get a battery bank from them. These are deep cycle "traction" batteries in steel boxes. Whoppers, and with batts, it's the lead, the size, bigger is better more or less. You can get a 12 volt bank for around 6-800$ that will hold twice (roughly) as many amp hours as the equivalent-in-money rolls batts. Plus, if you are near any big city with the foirklift dealer, you can go get the thing yourself,(heavy, be prepared for some egyptian engineering to get them in place with levers and ramps and dollies and whatnot) usually rolls batts need to be shipped in,too, kinda spensive...

    the forklift batts come 12/24/ 36 / 48 volt so you can pick your voltage requirements. Most home systems are 24 or 12 volt at the storage, depends on how far away your panels are, and how much thick expensive copper wire you want to run. You can (if you really want to) CAREFULLY cut the welded busbars on the top of the forklift batts and do your own custom series/parallel wiring as well,to get whatever voltage you want (say knocking down the 48 to a 24) but I'd recommend just sizing for your needs and purchasing appropriately.

    Good luck!

  28. "minicentrale" or floating zero-head generator by caffeineboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you can get access to both sides of the river, you could try rigging up a floating power generator. They seem easier to home-brew than a turbine, and are probably accordingly less efficient.

    There is a company in britaing that specializes in this kind of generator - one application that it lends itself to is water pumping from bodies that have a deep draft and a large amount of excess flow.

    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/throptone nergy/

    I know that these are available from other places as well, and I'd be surprised if you couldn't make something like this yourself if you have a little motivation...

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
  29. DEP Regulations by spenceM7 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Assuming you mean the Susquehana River in Pennsylvania, you have to deal with DEP permits. A quick glance at the regs indicated you'd need

    a) Dam Permit - application fee of $1500-$3000
    b) Environmental Assessment Approval - free
    c) Limited Power Permit for Hydroelectric - $5 application fee and $10-10000 annual fee (depending on capacity)

    Not to mention any local or federal regulations (did you check the EPA yet?) or the permits you'll need for construction, etc.

    There's also a 30-day public comment period before the DEP rules, and they estimate it will take 220 days or so to complete the paperwork.

    Reference is from the massive PDF found at Department of Enviromental Protection

    In short, you probably don't want to build a dam.

  30. Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The party line in all the history books I've read is that the Romans had water mill tech, but it only accounted for a tiny portion of their flour production. The Roman economy was based on plentiful slave labor, so finding way to do things with fewer people (in this case, hand-powered versus water-powered mills) was not a big priority.

    If you know of references that rebut the standard historical theory (wouldn't be the first time), please post links or titles. I'd want to read them

    Anyway, it's my understanding that water mills began serious development during the "Middle Ages". Modern Western culture is descended from the great cultural renaissance of the 15th century, and we've inherited their prejudice against the "Middle Ages", that 1000-year period after the fall of Rome where Western progress supposedly ground to a halt. But this period was when people started playing with technology seriously, and thinking about ways to use it to make life easier -- and to get rich. In short, it was the period that gave birth to the techno-geek!

    1. Re:Stupid Romans by hcetSJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      So clearly the solution is to invade some neighboring town, taking the people as slaves to turn a giant generator for you.

      Those Romans were smart people...

      --

      This side up.
    2. Re:Stupid Romans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're pretty lazy...I wouldn't try it.

    3. Re:Stupid Romans by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...convince me about the middle ages were a time when tech was taken seriously.
      When you put it like that, it's impossible to view the middle ages as anything but a regression in human progress. But when you do put it like that, you're reducing 1,000 years to a simplistic idea. That's a lot of history. Consider how much change the Western world has gone through in just the last couple of centuries, and how many different attitudes there were towards these changes.

      The right way to think about the middle ages is as a long period of history shared by a many diverse peoples. Their scientific and technological accomplishments may seem puny by our standards, but they were crucial to human progress. Improved crop rotation, use of wind and water power, the beginnings of chemistry... it's a long list.

      You want sources? Well, I'm reading Western Europe in the Middle Ages, by Joseph Strayer. This book argues a lot of the things I just said, but it's not primarily about science or technology. I think you'll find the arguments I just made in any history of the middle ages written in the last 20 years. I mean serious history, not the watered-down nonsense they put in standard secondary-school textbooks.

  31. Gorillas by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    But what happens when the cats over-eat, get fat and die?

    Then you get dogs to eat the cats. If these become a problem, you get gorillas to eat the dogs. The gorillas won't be a problem, because, come winter, they will freeze to death.

    I don't think the cats will be a problem, however. Garfield has been over-eating and very fat for 30 or so years now, and I still see his sarcastic face in the funny papers every morning.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  32. The cats by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    do cats know to keep the fish out? And do they work in shifts or what??

    Some work in shifts. A few work in loincloths, but most wear the catsuits they were born with.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  33. Re:yes, but investigate 'net metering' by pla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    do they sell at the same rate they buy from? depends on the state..

    I'd worry about that, too...

    Looking at my own electric bill, it divides almost perfectly in half, with 50% going to electric "supply", and 50% going to "distribution". So, even if they paid me the same rate they charge me, it would seem that, no matter how much I produce, I could at best break even (since presumeably I would make the money on supply, but still have to pay almost the same rate for distribution).

    I dunno. But personally, I'd stay on the grid (unless something major happened, in which case, I'd make damn sure I had an overly-dramatic Very Big Switch I could throw to disconnect me) just for the convenience factor in case something goes wrong with my own production system (generator breaks, stream dries up, whatever).


    As an aside, though, I still consider wind the way to go (though would certainly not suggest we completely skip solar, but I would consider solar more of a backup system than a primary one). With hydroelectric, you need year-round running water with a decent head. With solar, you need a fairly high-capacity storage system for the 60-80% of the day when you can't generate enough to match usage. With any sort of combustion, you need fuel. But with wind? It doesn't even really matter where you live - an 80' tower will produce a few kW just about anywhere. Aside from the "ugly" factor, including a wind turbine into the cost of every new house would reduce our current electric grid from a critical utility, to little more than a backup system. When I finally "settle down", I consider that a major point in my decision of where to buy property - If I can't have a wind turbine due to local BS laws and zoning regs, I won't live there.

  34. Re:Don't forget your 60Hz and the phase! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's Really Easy, you just buy an inverter!

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  35. Easy Method by Long-EZ · · Score: 3, Informative
    I saw some similar /. concepts to the design that popped into my head. Also some total /. crap.

    Build a floating dock. Very common for people living on the river. Make it as wide as you can manage without drawing attention. Eight feet would be good. If you have a lot of river frontage, you could even build two or three docks. The velocity is low, so you need to capture a lot of mass. This is kinetic energy, proportional to the mass and the square of the velocity.

    Put a paddlewheel across the downstream width of the dock, maybe five feet in diameter, with two feet submerged. Nothing high tech is required. This doesn't need the optimal vane shape of a high pressure hydroelectric turbine. I'd use a shape that sheds debris to minimize maintenance.

    Use a large belt around the outer diameter of the paddlewheel to drive an automotive alternator (very large gear ratio) with an external voltage regulator. This will cost about $20 at a scrap yard. Adjust the voltage regulator to produce 14V at the batteries to null the loss in the long wires, which should be at least 10 AWG. Use a circuit breaker at the batteries and the alternator. A charge controller will prevent overcharging if the regulator fails.

    Charge a parallel bank of 12 V deep cycle discharge batteries, as used in golf carts, small boats or RVs. These are available for a decent price locally. Sealed batteries are good. Low maintenance, and no worry about explosive hydrogen offgassing. Keep the batteries warm, but vented to the outside air.

    Use a power inverter to create 120 VAC. You can buy one that syncs to the power grid if you you want to sell power back to the utility, but I wouldn't bother. I'd cut the cord completely. You can buy inverters on eBay. Trace makes good inverters.

    An alarm should monitor battery voltage and possibly charge rate. If river debris jammed the paddlewheel, you'd want to know sooner rather than later. A true geek would have it email if there was a problem.

    I'd build a big cover over the paddlewheel assembly and maybe make it look like a barbeque grill or storage locker. I wouldn't go out of my way to inquire with the authorities. Better to beg forgiveness than ask permission. "Gee, I didn't know I couldn't generate my own power."

    You'll be surprised by how much energy you get from a small & slow moving paddlewheel. Unlike sun or wind, water power is 24/7, so your battery bank can be a lot smaller with a hydro power system. For about $500 initially and battery replacements and alternator brushes every few years, you can be off the grid. Most of us don't have a river and need to use solar.

    --
    >> My ultraviolent Linux switch video.
  36. That sounds like a good idea to me by pimpbott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In fact, I have seen people rig up homebrewed windmills fairly easily with bicycle parts to transfer the energy and to experiment with different gear ratios. Bike parts are tough, cheap, plentiful and easy to work on. It seems to me that you could build a paddlewheel boat fairly easily and link the paddlewheel to a generator with some old beater bike sprockets. Go with steel, aluminum wears to fast for constant use. Instead of lubing the chain with oil, use grease. A nickel plated chain will resist corrosion as well.

  37. Verdant Power Turbines by igzebier · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's something that sounds just like what you're looking for:
    In the east channel of the East River, next to Roosevelt Island and in the shadow of the largest power plant in NY State, Verdant Power has been deploying a small farm of low speed turbines to tap the force of the tidal stream that flows back and forth in the channel.

    In the scale you're interested in, a ten foot turbine can power 25 homes.

    There is an article about it at the Roosevelt Island Wire website.

  38. Hydro Radio by AikenDrumGotWired · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since the poster did not state which branch of the Susquehanna he lives near I am not sure of he is close enough to the location of
    • http://www.wjffradio.org/
    for them to be able to render him any assistance or inspiration. WJFF is a public radio station that is run entirely off a hydro generator(water conditions permitting). It makes a nice little case study for those who say it can't be done, or for those who do not live in a state that has net metering laws, or one with intolerably cumbersome restrictions.
  39. The paddelwheel method is the way to go by rspress · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The paddelwheel method is the way to go but actually putting it in the river would not be.

    More than likely this would be an illegal to do and dangerous as well. A better way to go would be a diversion channel that diverts a small amount of water from the river. At the top of the project or head would be a simple weir or gate to control the flow of water during the changing levels of the river. Depending on the amount of drop between the head and the wheel might give you higher speeds than the river itself could create. After the wheel you simply channel the water back to the river. The channeling back may be the hardest part of the project. As changing river levels might be harder to control and water may back up into the system. It depends on your situation. You may be able to gain a little elevation by using a shallower slope than the river has. Water needs at least a .15 of inch drop every 100 feet to move..and that is slow moving water.

    In any case, you would need to survey the job and use an optical level or a laser level to determine the drop between where you pull the water out and where you put it back in. This could be a costly project depending of the generating needs and your state laws, county laws..etc. But the way stated above is probably the only way to do it legally.

  40. Jackrabbit submersable generator. by Charcharodon · · Score: 4, Informative
    Take a look at www.realgoods.com

    http://www.realgoods.com/renew/shop/product.cfm?dp =1200&sd=1201&ts=1017104

    They sell a product called the Jackrabbit. Orginally it was used for oil survey sleds that were towed. This way you could mount them without having to build anything elaborate to change the water flow. This should work nicely for what you are wanting.

  41. It probably isn't legal. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 3, Informative
    LOL. Of course its legal.

    LOL, it might help if you had some idea what you were talking about. The Sesquehanna is a navigable waterway, and 33 USC 403 seems to be of the opinion that you need the permission of the federal government to construct anything, such as the poster's waterwheel, which would obstruct that waterway.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  42. Don't miss work done in India on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you google for "micro hydel iit" you'll find
    interesting hits on this topic. NOTE: Hydel is
    the Indian-English term for Hydro power.
    When I was working at IIT Delhi I interviewed
    a young woman who had just completed a research
    assistantship during which she and her professor
    developed a generating unit that would fit your
    requirements. They used a type of rotary pump
    that is mass-produced cheaply in India (used it in
    reverse of course), and they got good results.
    Unfortunately I wasn't able to hire the young
    woman, and I don't have any references for you.

  43. Look to Marine Technologies by RubberJohnny · · Score: 5, Informative


    I don't know what the average flow of the Susquehanna is but I doubt it's really a slow river. I do know the Mississippi is typically moving about 4 knots and it is considered by boatmen to be an absolute bear to travel upstream. Recreational boating in the main Mississippi channel is near zero because the current's just too strong. I'm betting your river is faster.

    A sailboat (monohull recreational boat big enough to have a galley) is making fair time if he averages six knots. Six knots is enough to generate a helluva lot of electricity using a water generator (they call them "spinners" and some of them will convert to wind generators if you get the urge). These things are not even that expensive.

    Contrary to some of the alarmist nonsense being posted here, as long as you are not messing around in a wetland (swampy, boggy marshy place) and you don't propose to do any dredging, the Corps of Engineers presumes that all docks and piers for small boats will be approved for riparian use on ALL navigable waterways as long as you don't interfere with navigation. Possibly you have stronger local regulations, but get your COE permit and I think everything else will fall into place pretty easily. Sink a couple pilings, hang the spinners deep enough to keep from freezing and I expect you're in business.

  44. Re: High volume, low speed by pr0cess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some people build what's known as "microcentrals", which are esentially rotary water pumps working backwards. They make water flow into the pump so it turns the turbine and makes the engine act as a generator. I guess some modification is required to stabilize and clean the resulting current, but it shouldn't be too difficult to do. But no matter what system you're going to use, if you want a steady, reliable electric production you're going to need a water and some supplementary infrastructure (pipeline, energy dissipators, etc). That's where the city and environmental agency folks come in, and that's where it gets bumpy.

  45. Re:User/pass for Home Power's site (no!) by barc0001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do not use that username/password.

    Home Power is a very small grassroot-ish site. I've been dowloading their current issue for a couple of years now. A few months back they stopped just having a link to the issue on the front page and went to registration. The reason they need the registration is to prove how many unique visitors download and read the mag for their advertising rates on ads inside the magazine. If they can't prove their readership size, their ad rates fall. And they're not some big megacorp, they're already on a shoe-string budget. If you want to read it, sign up. They've never abused my info, and the magazine is awesome for the depth of info provided.

  46. Old Fashion Rule breaking = Jail Time by purduephotog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    True story:

    My neighbor wanted to take down his tree. It was 150 feet tall. The city only allows licensed tree cutters, which wanted in excess of 500$ to do so.

    So... we took it down. Six guys and a 1987 GM pickup truck.

    Mind you it took 5 hours, and had I not removed the gutters from my roof to work on the soffits, the top of the tree would have removed them for me (and probably much faster with less trepidation).

    So the city makes a drive by midweek... and he gets a phone call and a citation for a whopping fine for not having used a licensed tree removal service. Convincing them that 6 guys and a pickup truck actually did the work took some time, but eventually he won.

    He was then cited for not having replanted a tree within 10 feet of the road within 1 week (another ordinance) and fined 150$.

    Face it- the government can and will spank you if someone gets their panties in a big of enough twist.

  47. Legalities of the Susquehanna by plnrtrvlr · · Score: 3, Informative

    OK.. I grew up along the Susquehanna and have lived near it all my life. The stupidest things you can think of can be illegal for reasons you never thought of before, so it isn't as easy as saying "of course its legal." It sounds to me from his description that he's located somewhere below Rock Bottom Dam, after the Chenango River joins it. The river can have some wild fluctuations in level, has a tremendous high volume of water (second only to the Hudson) for NY, and anything you build is going to have to deal with the hazards that come along with that: ie your "power station" being flooded over or completely washed away, entire trees washing down river and turning wooden structures to floatsam, etc. You want to anchor a dock in the river, better be prepared to lose your water wheel. You want to make a dock/mill wheel that floats and is on firm footings in the river so it doesn't get lost? Better talk to the DEC and the Fish and Wildlife comission: they have a LOT to say about anything more than a few wooden pilings put into the river. The posters best bet would be a simple water wheel put on a wooden dock that was floated on plastic drums. Two concrete dead-men on the bank to anchor it into place and skip the batteries just in case he lost the whole contraption to the river. A better suggestion still would be to get out of this god-awful high tax, high energy cost, high pain in the gluteus maximus place (I worked rebuilding a bridge over that river once where the project was delayed two months just in case we might have disturbed the walleye from spawning) and get somewhere that he doesn't mind paying his electric bill. 10.55 a kilowatt here baby, we all love NYSEG.

  48. You're not in the middle of nowhere... by John+Murdoch · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're in either Pennsylvania or New York. And you're on a river that has been actively dammed and controlled for over two hundred years. Which means that your property either has deeded mill rights, or it doesn't. And if it doesn't, you have no legal right to divert the water in the river to power a generator. Which is to say, attempting to divert river flow to generate electricity could get you in a world of trouble.

    What about in-river systems?
    Good question--and I'm sure that your state environmental agency will tell you. And I'd bet money their first answer will be "no." Bureaucrats are bureaucrats--and anything that is likely to cause them additional work is almost certain to be turned down.

    This doesn't mean you're dead
    What you can do to help grease the skids with your state authorities is to contact your local state legislator. If you're in Pennsylvania you'll find that a lot of legislators are extremely interested in "constituent service." Call the legislator's district office, and explain where you live (make sure you live in that legislator's district) and what you're trying to do. You want to know if the state has any information on the subject, and how you can go about finding out. You will be talking to an intern--a breathless, endlessly enthusiastic young person who is just itching to find answers. You may find it astonishing how quickly you will get answers--and since the question came from Rep. Stuffedshirt's office, the answer is far more likely to be "yes."

    Visit the county courthouse
    If your property at the river's edge shows any kind of swale or evidence of an old channel, go to your county courthouse and ask for the Recorder of Deeds office. Ask for help in searching for mill rights--and whether or not your property ever had mill rights assigned, or was subdivided from property that had mill rights. If the answer is yes, you should ask your county bar association for a referral to an attorney with experience in real estate law--what you're looking to do is assert that you want to take advantage of mill rights that were deeded with the property years ago.

    On the off chance that mill rights were awarded to your property years ago, you may be able to do this. In the more likely event that you do not already have mill rights, you'll have to do some design work, get a registered professional civil engineer, and go through a planning process that will include the state environment regulators, the utility company that owns the hydro dam downstream (most likely PP&L), and probably the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. And unless you have a very long stretch of shoreline, you'll have to get permission from your neighbors to dig a mill race upstream, and a tail race downstream. (This, of course, means that you'll be providing them with free electricity too.)

    But what about a floating generator in midstream?
    If you're in Pennsylvania, good luck. The Susquehanna is full of boaters and fishermen, and the state is going to regulate you to death with concerns about who might hit it, how you'll secure it during the winter, and whether you have adequate insurance coverage for any possible liability.

    In short--I think you'll find that the licensing, permitting, and assorted legal folderol will make the project economically infeasible.

  49. Personal hydroelectric power by Ricdude · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://www.realgoods.com/renew/shop/product.cfm?dp =1200&sd=1201&ts=1017104

    Jack Rabbit Submersible Hydro Generator

    No Pipes or Dams! Power from any Fast-Running Stream or Tidal Flow!

    The Jack Rabbit is a special low-speed alternator mounted in a heavy-duty, oil-filled, cast aluminum housing with triple shaft seals. Orginally designed for towing behind seismic sleds for oil exploration, this marine-duty unit is ideal for home power generation near a reasonably fast-moving stream. In a 9 mph stream (slow jog) the Jack Rabbit produces about 2,400 watt-hours daily. Ina 6 mph stream (brisk walk) it produces over 1,500 watt-hours. The 12.5" propeller requires 13" of water depth. A rock or timber venturi can often be constructed to increase stream speed and power output.

    --
    How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL