Slashdot Mirror


Delorean Time Machine Replica Up For Auction

PunkerTFC writes "I'm sure most of you remember the movie Back To The Future. Well, now you have a chance to own your very own 1982 Delorean, fully equipped for time travel. It has a "Flux Capacitor", "Time Circuits" and "exterior Flux Dispersion Banding". This thing is clearly a chick magnet, and if you can't get them on the first pass, you can always crank it up to 88 mph and go back in time to try it again! Seriously though, this car is amazing, definitely worth a look to see the details. Nothing has been missed, and my hat goes off to the builder."

107 of 431 comments (clear)

  1. Mr. Fusion? by grahamlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    This baby lacks a Mr. Fusion. I take it that the car also doesn't fly for use in 2015... :-(. Oh well, whoever buys it has much happy modding ahead of them!

    1. Re:Mr. Fusion? by Lussarn · · Score: 5, Funny

      This baby lacks a Mr. Fusion.
      Time to call the libyans. I'm going to send them a bomb full of pinball parts.

    2. Re:Mr. Fusion? by Catiline · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, no, no!!! The obvious lack of a Mr. Fusion is a good thing!

      It means you can beg off giving rides through time because Homeland Security has made it impossible to obtain enough Plutonium!

      With a Mr. Fusion you'd just have to give some lamer, cheap excuse....
    3. Re:Mr. Fusion? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      With a Mr. Fusion you'd just have to give some lamer, cheap excuse....

      Like "I never thought ahead to convert my flying time machine to run on an electric engine instead of this antiquated internal combustion engine"? What kind of scientist was Doc Brown anyway.. he couldn't think of that? I imagine electric engines would be VERY common in a time when you can buy a little conversion kit called Mr. Fusion to supply gigawatts of electric power to a car. Even still, you'd think he could've built an electric engine when he was trapped back in the old west and just used batteries to store power generated by Mr. Fusion if he wants to use the excuse that he needs every bit of power from Mr. Fusion at the time of time travel to power the flux capacitor. I guess I'm too much of a dork to be analyzing that lame ass third movie this much, but for the record, my time machine coupled with a fusion reactor that runs on garbage will most definitely be a GM EV1.

    4. Re:Mr. Fusion? by portwojc · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well that would be an upgrade accesory kit along with the hover conversion. I'm sure if you ask nicely you can find out what year you need to visit for the update.

    5. Re:Mr. Fusion? by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just to be even more lame than you :-)

      My vechile is the soon to be out Ford Escape Hybrid. That way I can use Mr Fusion to bypass the gas engine when ever I want. Also the off-road is needed when travelling back to 1885.

      An EV1 as no ground clearance for those old west dirt paths

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:Mr. Fusion? by LightningTH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here is the fun part, if you watch the first movie, you'll notice the tail pipes are missing. It also has an odd sound when it starts up, as if something electrical turned on. It was suppose to have a nuclear engine in it.

      They then did the 3rd movie, and needed a way to have the car break down, so the combustion engine came back.

    7. Re:Mr. Fusion? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Faulty electronics? OS malfunction? Your computer probably doesn't have a gas engine, but I bet it behaves oddly from time to time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. 99% certainty the buyer is ... by Hekatchu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow I've got a feeling Steve Ballmer is going to buy that thing too.

    1. Re:99% certainty the buyer is ... by chamenos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Assuming the shocks don't punch through the frame under his weight and the underpowered engine somehow moves with him in it, you can look forward to him cruising past your neighbourhood with "Developers! Developers! Developers!" blasting on the stereo.

      Aren't you trembling with excitement already? Doesn't matter if you're not. I know I am.

      *sniffle*

    2. Re:99% certainty the buyer is ... by chamenos · · Score: 3, Funny

      in case anyone needs a visual/audio experience use this link:
      http://achurch.org/media/ballmer.avi

    3. Re:99% certainty the buyer is ... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... That and "Back in Time".

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  3. good job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    way to fuck up a perfectly nice and rare car.

    1. Re:good job. by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least it isnt a ricer.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    2. Re:good job. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least it isnt a ricer.

      Are you kidding? with that amount of neon, this is the ORIGINAL ricer!. All others are fakes!

    3. Re:good job. by mollyhackit · · Score: 2, Funny

      With all that time travel gear it has the ability to become the original ricer.

    4. Re:good job. by ValourX · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not that rare. You can buy a brand new DeLorean from the DMC. Only runs about 30 grand -- not too bad for a "Rare" car, eh?

      -Jem
    5. Re:good job. by ValourX · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do I have to do everything for you? Click on the "Sales" tab.

      "All refurbished cars are "built to order" using only quality, rust-free (while the stainless bodies will never rust, the frames are prone to it, particularly in the Northeastern states) cars, using our years of expertise and our vast supply of original and correct DeLorean parts. By doing it the right way, we can offer a six month, six thousand mile limited warranty on our refurbished cars. It's as close as you can get to a brand new DeLorean, and for about the same price as you'd have paid for one when it was new!"

      -Jem
    6. Re:good job. by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Informative
      R'ing TFA, I was pleased to see "All of the interior and exterior Time Machine components were made to last, but at the same time not damage the integrity of the original vehicle."

      Otherwise I'd quickly agree with you. On the other hand, I think doing something like this would be the main idea behind me ever buying a Delorian anyway.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
  4. Try again? by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny
    This thing is clearly a chick magnet, and if you can't get them on the first pass, you can always crank it up to 88 mph and go back in time to try it again!
    Sorry, but if your cup of poison is building a replica of nerd car from a movie from the 80's, then its going to take more than a few trips back in time to score with a chick...
    1. Re:Try again? by luminea · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking as a chick...if you've got the ability to travel back through time, let me tell you: you are hot. Dead sexy, even. Alas, replicas just don't do it for me. But it's still pretty cute...

    2. Re:Try again? by nmoog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless of course you go back in time to your childhood, put a pair of headphones on yourself from the past, played yourself Korn until you scared your shelf shitless and convinced yourself to smash your C64 and kick your little eating-peanut-butter-from-the-jar habbit.

      Ofcourse, if you could do that you most likely wouldnt be reading this. Best not to mess with the space time continueum I guess.

    3. Re:Try again? by MacroRex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget that you'll have to fight one more of your previous instances every time you try again. However, they are YOU so it'll be easy to exploit their weak spots. Oh, wait...

    4. Re:Try again? by builderbob_nz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well at least he has all the time in the world...

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    5. Re:Try again? by D-Cypell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I have the ability to travel forward in time...

      Your place or mine? ;o)

    6. Re:Try again? by luminea · · Score: 3, Funny

      Funny, I would have thought you'd already know the answer to that if you could do as you claim. Hmph. (I think we know the answer here)

    7. Re:Try again? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      But when he travels back in time surely be his old self will still be asking out the girl (with rejection inevitable)? So he's gonna be competing for the love of a woman with himself?

      Unless, he travels back in time to 5 minutes after the initial rejection. No wait, that would mean the girl would say 'But you just asked me out 5 minutes ago, can't you take no for an answer?'

      So I guess he'd have to travel back to a point in time before the previous attempt to ask out the girl. The only trouble with that plan is, he'd have a finite number of attempts before she becomes a 'lolita'.

      Maybe I just read into jokes too much...

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    8. Re:Try again? by LC+Gundo · · Score: 2, Funny
      All I know is, if I ever wake up in the morining to find a time machine sitting in my driveway, I wouldn't waste any time.

      I'd amass a fortune in the usual time-travel-exploit manner, go forward into the future to a time when you can buy a time machine, buy one and deliver it to my driveway in the 21st century.

      You couldn't do it with the DeLorean, though.

      I worked for a machine shop/ fab shop that built and modded parts of two of the original cars (the first car, and the car with the railroad wheels), and I know first hand, they couldn't really travel any way through time other than forward at a rate of about 1/24th of a day per hour.

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    9. Re:Try again? by darkpixel2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow.
      You just admitted you're a chick to the Slashdot crowd.

      I'm betting your 'fans' list just grew by several hundred thousand entries.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    10. Re:Try again? by Resident+Netizen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, sorry. Too much nickel in most stainless steels to be magnetic. Don't know what series the DeLorean was made from but it was probably not 400 (ferrous). Does knowing that make me a chick magnet? Please?

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche!
  5. It has to be said,,, by ZaMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great Scott!

    There. Now I've gotten that out of my system.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    1. Re:It has to be said,,, by Ralp · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is heavy.

    2. Re:It has to be said,,, by AgentUSA · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's that word again; "heavy". Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the earth's gravitational pull?

  6. Corrections by SimianOverlord · · Score: 5, Funny

    This thing is clearly a chick magnet, and if you can't get them on the first pass, you can always crank it up to 88 mph and go back in time to try it again!

    Please use phrases in the story outline the average slashdotter can understand. All this talk of "chicks" and making a "pass" is incomprehensible gobbledegook to the average Slashdot nerd. Though "you can always crank it" is perfectly OK.

    P.S. The birds won't be impressed by a replica DeLorean, just like they were probably unimpressed with a glow in the dark TRON costume. Except that hacker goth chick Raven.

    --
    Meine Schwester ist sehr, sehr reizvoll - Nietzsche
  7. The good technology always dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a pity Deloreans never came into the full success they deserved.

    Stainless steel body that couldn't rust. Light, efficient and well designed midmount engine. Gullwing doors. Brilliant weighting and suspension that were 10 years ahead of what was in anything but supercars...

    The fact that so many great ideas start off in this country and are killed before they can get the success they deserve is what's driving america down the drain

    1. Re:The good technology always dies by hkroger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I heard that it didn't sell so well because it had relatively underpowered engine for the market.

    2. Re:The good technology always dies by Anonytroll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the end, things die because they are ahead of their time. It's human nature, I think. We as a whole are not made for revolutionary steps, just small evolutionary ones.
      I would say "Welcome to the post-modern time", but it is supposed to be over.

    3. Re:The good technology always dies by Alioth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Driving *America* down the drain? The Delorean was designed and manufactured in Northern Ireland!

    4. Re:The good technology always dies by jobbegea · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget that stainless steel won't rust, but stains very easily just by touching it. Also, the doors of the DeLorean did leak, which is particulary bad if you have gullwing doors.

      --

      Net sa best, mar it koe minder
    5. Re:The good technology always dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Stainless steel doesn't rust, but it will still corrode. It is susceptible to its own special form of decay: crevice corrosion, also known as oxygen starvation. Stainless steel contains significant amounts of chromium, which when exposed to air oxidizes slightly and a thin film of chromium oxide forms, which stops any further oxidation. If exposed to ONLY water, salt or fresh, without the presence of air, this film will not form and stainless steel will corrode, and badly. Salt water is even worse.

      Oxygen starvation happens anytime stainless steel is covered, so anywhere it's in constant contact with other materials the chromium oxide can wear off (admittedly it's tougher than rust there) and corrode. Grommet holes, contact points for suspension and plastic resin extras are all places that the deloreans that have until today are corroded.

    6. Re:The good technology always dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Stainless steel body that couldn't rust.

      Stainless steel corrodes instead of rusting.

      > Light, efficient and well designed midmount engine.

      Underpowered unreliable engine

      > Gullwing doors.

      Doors incompatible with 75% of parking spaces

      > Brilliant weighting and suspension that were 10 years ahead of
      > what was in anything but supercars...

      Go drive one. They wallow like a boat.

      I think you're a bit too influenced by the image of the car rather than the reality.

    7. Re:The good technology always dies by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't forget that stainless steel won't rust, but stains very easily just by touching it.

      Like many things made for marketing I think. The name is a lot better than the reality. Titanium is COOL when it's on a blackbird (ok actually the stuff gets really hot) and the correct alloy is used for its purpose as an extreme exotic material. Use it on a Powerbook though and it's really just another metal, which dents easily and needs to be painted otherwise it too marks just by touch. But it still sounds cool.

      Like the delorean. Stainless Steel is just COOL marketing wise, but it's a pain in the ass on a car.

    8. Re:The good technology always dies by caluml · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't let misplaced chest-beating, flag-waving American "patiotism" get in the way of facts. You must be incorrect.

    9. Re:The good technology always dies by Julius+X · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do hope that's a joke. The stock V6 PRV engine was designed by Peugot, Renault, & Volvo (hence its name, PRV) with an original output of 130bhp. Hardly powerful, and definitely not Chevy-built.

      From Delorean Motors UK:
      It's a Peugeot Renault Volvo V6 (PRV-6) 2849cc Bosch K-Jet fuel injected SOHC 90 degree V6. It's a US emission-controlled amalgum of the Renault 30 and Volvo B28 engines. It's often mistaken for a Renault engine due to the belts, pulleys, alternator and water pump using the Renault configuration, but the internals are common to the Volvo engine. The transmission is a slightly modified version of the R30's (both 3-speed auto and 5-speed manual). The gears are taller and the transaxle is rotated through 180 degrees for rear-mounting. The PRV-6 has been a popular choice among kit-car enthusiasts for years due to its flexibility and availability. The 3-litre 24 valve version of the PRV-6 was in new production cars up until only a few short years ago, for example in the Citroen Xantia V6 and Renault Espace V6.


      Delorean Motors offers upgrades for this engine.

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    10. Re:The good technology always dies by mccalli · · Score: 5, Informative
      I also am fairly sure Delorean designed it in the states.

      The DeLorean was a predominately British design, by Lotus and Colin Chapman, though there were other inputs too. The idea was American - DeLorean and Bill Collins, but the details and implementation were British.

      More here.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    11. Re:The good technology always dies by LightningTH · · Score: 4, Informative

      I sure hope you are not an owner, I am though so...

      > Stainless steel corrodes instead of rusting.

      Only with certain chemicals

      > Doors incompatible with 75% of parking spaces

      You try opening up a normal car door with only 11 inches of space on the side of the car. Yes, 11 inches of space.

      > Go drive one. They wallow like a boat.

      You must have been in one with a poor suspension, mine is nice. Take some turns at high speed that other cars have to slowdown for due to how low it sits.

    12. Re:The good technology always dies by zsazsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      All cars manufactured for sale in the United States during that time, regardless of performance, were legally required to have speedometers that only reach 85MPH and also highlight the speed of 55, which was the national maximum speed limit.

    13. Re:The good technology always dies by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not on topic at all, but I had to jump in here and point out that a guy named "Amiga Lover" is posting to a thread named "The good technology always dies."

      Just kinda struck me funny.

      Weaselmancer

      PS: I'm an Amiga fan too... I still have a working 500, and a 2000 with a working GVP 120 mb hard drive/8 mg mem card.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    14. Re:The good technology always dies by ryanwright · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doors incompatible with 75% of parking spaces

      LOL... Another wannabe who doesn't know a damn thing about DeLoreans. A typical car door requires something like 40 inches of space to fully open. The DeLorean's gullwing doors, hinged near the center of the car, only swing out 11 inches.

      Next time try some basic research before opening your mouth.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    15. Re:The good technology always dies by Aggrazel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, don't laugh at the delorean's doors.

      Open wide

      (Taken from a delorean thread on newbeetle.org)

  8. Yep by OriginalChops · · Score: 5, Funny

    Car is amazing... But I think I'll stick to my flying train...

  9. Replacement parts? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone know the availability of replacement parts in this time-line? Willing to travel up to 15 years. Cash waiting.

  10. Yeah.... by HiQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine that: stepping out of that car in your brand spanking new spandex Tron suite. The girls would be over you like bees on honey...!

  11. VMax by troon · · Score: 4, Informative

    you can always crank it up to 88 mph

    ...if you can get it to 88mph. Those things were heavy (1200kg/2700lb) and underpowered (130bhp), and the build quality was pretty poor. And yes, I have seen one in the flesh.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:VMax by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those things were heavy (1200kg/2700lb) and underpowered (130bhp), and the build quality was pretty poor.

      There were problems with some of the original 1981 run that caused them to need extensive work. The kinks got very quickly worked out, however. While you are correct that the vehicle, from a sports car point of view, were overpowered, don't think for a second that the car is on the level of say, Toyota Tercel. The vehicle has a V6 built by Renault-Volvo, and my old Saturn weighed just shy of 2700 lbs. The Saturn also had equal horsepower. It could do 120mph without a problem (so I hear.... cough cough), and Saturns don't have gull wing doors, or a flux capacitor.

    2. Re:VMax by builderbob_nz · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yes, I have seen one in the flesh.

      If there is anyone in NZ wanting to see one, there was one in the auto-museam north of Wellington (well there was one last time I looked anyway)

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    3. Re:VMax by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Having driven one, I can tell you they'll hit 88 without much effort, but they are quite a bit slower than their exotic image would make you think.

      I'm not sure how many people really get it, especially on /. where everyone is pretty young, but the 88mph wasn't a randomly chosen speed. Back when the Deloreans were made and around when the movie was made, US law make all cars have to have an 85mph speedometer. Porsche's, Ferrari's, they all had 85mph speedometers.

      So of course it was (dripping with sarcasm) a big deal for a car to get to 88!

    4. Re:VMax by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

      Those things were heavy

      Weight has nothing to do with it!

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:VMax by raynet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humm.. My Volvo 360 weights about 1110kg/2447lb and has only 100bhp but still goes up to 110mph so i'm guessing that this much nicer looking car must go atleast as fast as my bulky car :)

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    6. Re:VMax by bjb · · Score: 2, Informative
      Probably also worth mentioning that in the movie, the car had a whine sort-of like a turbo charger, which the car did not have. Also, the ripping, gutteral roar of the engine was sampled from another engine, because this V6 sounded (obviously) more like a family car's six (in other words, not a very impressive sound).

      I've driven two different DeLoreans in the past, and no, they're not speed demons. However, they DO look cool as heck.

      You can find a LOT of information on the car at http://delorean.com. Good hour of reading or so.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    7. Re:VMax by ThosLives · · Score: 2, Informative

      130 HP in a 2700 lb car might not scream off the line, but top speed is only a function of power, aerodynamics, rolling resistance, driveline losses, and gearing. Many vehicles in the mid 100 HP range can hit well over 100 MPH (I've had my 170 HP car up to 135 on a track). Weight only factors into top-speed by a small mutliple in rolling resistance. Typically there's a tradeoff between acceleration and top speed due to mechanical limitations of fixed gear ratio transmissions and tire grip characteristics.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    8. Re:VMax by RESPAWN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so much a problem of the top speed attainable. It's a problem of how long it takes to get there. 130hp isn't going to move that car up to 120 very quickly. Certainly not quick enough to be considered a very good sports car. I'd also like to mention that 2700lb is less than ideal for a sports car, but these days most of the "sport cars" produced weigh even more than that, so the weight really isn't that bad by comparison. Still, that's not exactly an ideal power to weight ratio.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    9. Re:VMax by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      You know, doing a quick google search would've kept you from looking stupid.

      In 1980 the US government restricted speedometers to 85mph. That lasted until 1985/1986. The majority of cars sold in the US went from 0-85mph on the speedometers. In some cases the manufacturer skirted the law in creative ways, for example Ford I believe had speedometers on their Thunderbirds or maybe it was the Mustang that went to 120mph, but the numbers stopped at 85mph, to stay within the letter of the law.

      Thats why early 80's 911's originally had 85mph speedometers even though my 1968 goes up to 250kph, although most had them replaced by their owners at some point after the law was removed.

    10. Re:VMax by coso · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I understood they choose 88 because it looks a lot like BB. BB=Buckaroo Banzi, the first movie they made. BTTF had a lot of Banzi references, including the Flux Capicator standing in for BB's Oscolation Overthruster and Christopher Lloyd.

  12. Re:I love that car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    He was neither Irish, nor a junkie. He was an American of French decent, and was charged with conspiracy to traffic cocaine, and aquitted due to the cop's obvious attempt to entrap him.

  13. Re:I love that car... by thinmac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shame the designer was a junkie ;[

    Actually, he wasn't a junkie, he was accused of dealing cocain but was aquitted on all charges because he was entrapped.

    IMHO, the real shame is that such a great designer didn't pair up with a great business manager who could make his ideas successful rather than a footnote in automotive history.

  14. old or new? by dragonfly28 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this the old one or the new one?
    To put it in different words do I have to feed it plutonium or bananas?

    If it's plutonium then it has too be overpriced, really difficult to get at your local gas station.

    But seriously, nice job man!

  15. The 80's .. by sporty · · Score: 2, Funny

    The 80's are calling. It wants its fanboy back. Good thing you have that delorian there McFly. :)

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:The 80's .. by Ralp · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 80's are calling. It wants its fanboy back.

      I couldn't help but notice your sig:
      "Wait till they get a load of me!" - Joker, Batman the Movie (1989)

  16. My goodness by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This guy obviously banged his head in the toilet.

  17. Chick Magnet by Bricklets · · Score: 4, Funny

    This thing is clearly a chick magnet

    Maybe if you filled the cup holders full of chicken feed.

    --
    Little Bricklets
  18. Re:Must have for a geek my age by Anonytroll · · Score: 2, Funny

    You sure you mean "pothole" and not "plothole"?

  19. Why can't this crap stay in the past? by asbestos_tophat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Why can't this crap stay in the past? =o)



    That's the trouble with time travel, the probable development of a predestination paradox to irritate with outdated hype. ;o)

  20. Bah! I'll be impressed when a replica of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Interceptor of Mad Max is on Ebay! Ford big block, supercharged, the baddest of bad ass movie cars by a long, long way.

    Sheer

    Brutal

    Horsepower

  21. Re:I love that car... by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, he wasn't a junkie, he was accused of dealing cocain but was aquitted on all charges because he was entrapped.

    This guy is right. John DeLorean got teamed up with someone who he thought was going to fuse a large amount of cash into his company in order to save it (after his original loans by the royal family were spontaneously and unfairly called.) He had no idea that this guys plan was for him to sell coke in order to get the money.
    DeLorean attempted to back out, but the man threatened his daughters life. With this in mind, he agreed to go through with the deal. Only at this point did the true facts come out. This gentlman was ACTUALLY a very over zealous cop who did all of this deliberately.
    Entrapment.
    DeLorean was (very appropriately) acquited of all charges.

  22. Low Bidding? by objekt404 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks Slashdot, now everry nerd will be watching this. There goes my chances of snipering it on the cheap....

    --
    "Good, bad, I'm the guy with the gun."
  23. Re:I love that car... by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, according to the link you provided, it wasn't John Delorean (the CEO) that swindled the money out of the UK, it was Arthur Andersen, the U.S. accounting giant that handled DeLorean accounts.

    The Delorean had so many problems with tariffs and shipping and just a mess that many of the 9,000 cars they made sat in parking lots waiting to come to America.

    To call John Delorean a thieving bastard is to not understand everything that happened. John DeLorean has stayed out of the limelight. He's been entangled in about 40 legal cases stemming from his company's bankruptcy. He personally declared bankruptcy in September 1999. He was evicted from his house in 2000.

    So much for the "thieving bastard".

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  24. WARNING: not for drag racing by weiyuent · · Score: 4, Funny


    At inopportune moments, the engine might not start. Especially at around 10:04pm on dark stormy nights.

  25. BTTF trivia by ColonBlow · · Score: 5, Informative

    from IMDB, trivia about the Delorean Time Machine:

    # The time machine has been through several variations. In the first draft of the screenplay the time machine was a laser device that was housed in a room. At the end of the first draft the device was attached to a refrigerator and taken to an atomic bomb test. In the third draft of the film the time machine was a DeLorean, but in order to send Marty back to the future the vehicle had to drive the DeLorean into an atomic bomb test.

    # The device originally considered for use as the time travel machine was a refrigerator. Director Robert Zemeckis said in an interview that the idea was scrapped because he and Steven Spielberg did not want children to start climbing into refrigerators and getting trapped inside.

    # The "Mr. Fusion Home Energy Converter", which is sitting on the DeLorean when Doc returns from the future, is made from (among other things) a Krups coffee grinder.

    # The script never called for Marty to repeatedly bang his head on the gull-wing door of the DeLorean; this was improvised during filming as the door mechanism became faulty.

    The DeLorean time machine is a licensed, registered vehicle in the state of California. While the vanity license plate used in the film says "OUTATIME", the DeLorean's actual license plate reads 3CZV657

    When Marty is trying to re-start the DeLorean in 1955 as he prepares to return to 1985, the car's headlights flash the Morse Code for "SOS".

    # The DeLorean used in the trilogy is 1981 model with 6-cylinder PRV engine, and the base for the nuclear reactor was made with hubcap from a Dodge Polaris. It is incorrectly quoted as being a 4 cylinder on the 2002 special edition DVD.

    --
    free online diet tracking.
    1. Re:BTTF trivia by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The DeLorean time machine is a licensed, registered vehicle in the state of California. While the vanity license plate used in the film says "OUTATIME", the DeLorean's actual license plate reads 3CZV657
      I wonder about this. The California license plate sequence wasn't anywhere near 3CZV657 back in 1985. We still had the 2 series in 1990, so either the plate listed is wrong, or the DeLorean wasn't registered until much later (1993 or so), or was reregistered and got new plates. (Nitpick mode off!)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  26. watching BTTF by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Im going to have to watch back to the future again as I don't remember the car being that ... sucky.

  27. The other car in Back to the Future... by slipgun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What car is it that Biff is driving in 1955? I seem to remember being told it was a Ford '48 Ragtop, but can't remember...

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    1. Re:The other car in Back to the Future... by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a 1948 Ford Custom convertible.

  28. Chick magnet? by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

    Theres no back seat! :P

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  29. Re:Hahahahah by Carrion+Creeper · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw a DeLorean with Back to the Future trimmings on the road a few months ago. It was in Boston on Mass Ave headed north. In that direction lies MIT, where a DeLorean may indeed be considered a babe magnet.

    So in some contexts, and dependig on what babes you are looking for...

  30. Forget that, I want a Buckaroo's Jet Car! by trims · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it's a modified F-350 with a GE jet turbine.

    More information

    As cool as the DMC-based Time Machine is (and I have to admit, the original B-T-T-F movie is a good memory of my teenage years), the whole BB stuff just rocked. Soooo much more wacked, and so much more fun.

    Now, if I can just get Kaneda's Bike from Akira...

    -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
  31. Re:I love that car... by Bertie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was an utter pile of shit, by all accounts. Basically, they built a show car with no regard for how to make it suitable for production, and got Lotus in to make a proper car out of it. Colin Chapman took one look at it and said "right, we'll basically have to start all over again", and it was a total rush job with nowhere near enough money spent on it. It was never meant to be made out of stainless steel, so it's slower and therefore heavier than it was meant to be. The perfect illustration of what a balls-up it was is the windows on the gullwing doors - it didn't occur to anybody until very late on that the windows couldn't actually be opened because of the door design, so they had to cut out those little windows-within-windows you can see if you look at the photos on the auction page.

  32. Not *quite* a replica... by Stopmotioncleaverman · · Score: 3, Informative

    It says it's automatic transmission, but I distinctly remember in BTTF, Marty changes gears on the run up to the lightning wire.

    1. Re:Not *quite* a replica... by nxg125 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, you're right... I remember Marty flooring the gas and dumping the clutch and thinking, wow, good thing he didn't stall :)

      Check out the pictures on eBay, though, it's clearly a manual transmission.

      --Nick

    2. Re:Not *quite* a replica... by LightningTH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, it does state automatic, however, in the pictures you can see it is a manual, and looking at the production info on dmcnews.com, that vin number is marked as a manual.

      However, that car lacks the grooved hood (need a 1981 model for that), and the metal plate where the window switches are is improper for the car (suppose to be 5 switches across, 2 are dummies, with the cigarette lighter located elsewhere).

      Buttons on the steering wheel is also improper.

      I'll stop glancing at photos and nit-picking. i know I could find more.

  33. Some factual information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The builder (an architectural designer) of this replica time machine actually only sold it at a public auction for $22,000. Less than the price of a new refurbished DMC-12. The seller is now trying to sell this car for $35,000.
    The frame is badly rusted, and little mechanical work was done to it to ensure its reliability as a driver's car. Not to mention, the electronics were in a large part fabricated by someone without an electronics degree (stainless steel incinerator, anyone?).
    As far as movie accuracy, it's very close, but far from perfect. Many details were left out since this car was built to generate income rather than be accurate to the films.
    There's actually some legal dispute going on right now between the seller and the builder, being that the seller is using the builder's own photos to promote the item, i.e., copyright infringement.
    Most of the comments I've seen so far here about the DeLorean as a car have been pretty misinformed. Stainless does corrode, but only in an environment that lacks oxygen. The chromium forms a protective oxide that protects the carbon steel component from rusting away. Gull-wing doors on it only take about 1 foot of clearance. The engine is heavily based on the Volvo B27 and B28F and was used for many years by them. It has a reliable track record seeing as there are real timing chains, not timing belts, that are used on it, as well as a very accurate, albeit, primitive, mechanical fuel injection.
    While the car itself is not necessarily practical, the concepts behind it are. Can you imagine the reduction in paint fumes released into the environment if every car built was stainless steel? Not to mention, when some jerk comes and keys your car, not only will he destroy his key, but with some sandpaper, you yourself can remove the scratch. I'll admit the car has its flaws, but nothing that can't be corrected by someone knowledgeable about DeLoreans.

  34. no way by in4mation · · Score: 5, Funny
    This thing is clearly a chick magnet

    Seriously though, everyone knows that magnets have two poles...and this one is definitely on the repelling side. Chicks will run away so fast that not even a time machine can catch up with them.

  35. Next Best Thing, a VW by FutureShoks · · Score: 2, Informative
    The guy who designed the DeLorean also designed the VW Scirocco.org.

    If you look at the pics the design similarities are quite obvious.

    --
    ___FutureShoks___
  36. Delorean factoid by scharkalvin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funny thing about the DeLorean. You can't keep them in lane, they want to drive inbetween lanes (to suck up the white line.....)

  37. Re:I love that car... by grahamlee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, they are what are referred to as "receivers". The .gov.uk had to sue them to get their JZDeLorean money back. Which they didn't manage to do.

  38. Guigiaro... by GrahamCox · · Score: 3, Informative

    He also designed nearly everything that we drove in the 70s and 80s in Europe. VW Golf, Polo and Scirocco, Fiat Uno, Citroen BX, Fiat Panda, Lotus Esprit, Lancia Delta, SAAB 9000, Audi 80, Alfasud. He practically invented the "folded paper" school of auto design, those that weren't his were copying his.

  39. Re:just last night... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry but it's GIGANTIC compared to the mint 1988 fiero GT I have in my garage. and even a 300lb man can sit comfortably in a fiero... I know, my uncle who is QUITE large drove it off the assembly line for me in 1988 and handed me the keys. It is one of the last 100 made.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  40. Re:Deloreans for sale by DownTownMT · · Score: 2, Funny

    If any of you do live in Buffalo......Im sorry

    --
    "Insert Sig Here"
  41. 1982, not 1981 by Rhett · · Score: 2, Funny

    The car from the movie was a 1981 delorean, i believe, and this one is a 1982. Pretty major detail for someone who claims he researched everything for 5 years.

  42. Time travel to the futuristic time of 2015 by brocktune · · Score: 4, Funny

    So far, other than big screen flat panel TVs, Robert Zemeckis' vision of the future is not panning out. No flying cars. No Jaws 17. No hovering skateboards.

    Then again, Buck Rogers was supposed to leave on the last of NASA's deep space probes in 1987, the moon was to hurtle out of Earth's orbit in 1999, and the exploration of Jupiter's moons began in 2001.

    Of course, we still have 11 years left. But even if we get Mr. Fusion, who will control the world's supply of banana peels and Old Milwaukee cans that supply its fuel? I say to you now: No Blood for Banana Peels.

    1. Re:Time travel to the futuristic time of 2015 by Trespass · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe we're just on the timeline where Biff found the book.

  43. But what they'll be wearing... by Chemisor · · Score: 3, Funny

    > stepping out of that car in your brand spanking
    > new spandex Tron suite. The girls would be over
    > you like bees on honey...!

    Unfortunately, if you look closely, you'll see that the girls are all dressed in white and are carrying syringes. You probably won't have much time to conteplate it.

  44. John Z DeLorean, Ireland, Flux Capacitors by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He was neither Irish, nor a junkie. He was an American of French decent, and was charged with conspiracy to traffic cocaine, and aquitted due to the cop's obvious attempt to entrap him.

    That's right. I used to have a DeLorean (rare, 1983 model, note the fuel fill door on the hood) and still have a driver's side gull wing door kicking around my garage. Lemme tell you, they're already a pain in the ass to work on - the engine is in the back and there are the little "sail windows" which give it the rough profile of a hatchback when it isn't. I can't imagine how it is to try to get at the motor with all the BTTF props on it!

    Anyway, I read a lot about DeLorean. Here's the problem. DeLorean was a former Pontiac executive, and one of the creators of the Pontiac GTO.

    Angered with GM, he wrote a scathing book, "On A Clear Day You Can See General Motors" in which he detailed how the first Chevy Vega tore itself in half after only 8 miles on the test track.

    (The Vega and its twin the Pontiac (dis)Astre, was the predecessor to the Chevette, produced from 1971-1977, and is probably the single worst car ever made by Detroit - still not so bad compared to lots of early Japanese and Eastern European cars, though... Renault Beep-Beep Dauphine!)

    DeLorean decided to make his own personal luxury car, the ethical luxury car. Stainless steel body that would never rust, best of the best materials (yeah, as a former DeLorean owner, tell me how to fix dents in the stainless steel!). By the time he'd arranged for the production (factory in Ireland for the tax breaks), it was 1981.

    When the Guigaro (same styling house that did most VW, Hyundai, Audi) styled the DeLorean, it was the mid-1970s. Such a simple rectangular, clean car was unheard of.

    In 1978 Ford introduced the Ford Fairmont and Mercury Zephyr, also the restyled "Fox-body" Mustang. GM introduced the super-square Impala about this time - all of these are things that we associate with 1980s cars, versus the rounded and skirted shapes of 1970s cars. All of a sudden, the DeLorean's simple clean angular body wasn't so cutting-edge.

    In 1981, inflation was rampant, and the economy was doing poorly. Chrysler was on the verge of bankruptcy. When you factor in inflation, gasoline was more expensive then than it is now. People were not in the mood to buy luxury cars; people were buying Chevettes and Ford Escorts and Plymouth Reliants. DeLorean's nascent car company launched at the wrong time.

    By 1983, he was running out of money. The cars were already looking dated as the simple early 1980s angular shape was giving way to the "Aerobird" shapes of the new 1984 Thunderbird, Cougar and Tempo, all premiering in the 1983 car show circuit. There was no money to restyle and retool, and DeLorean started to look for other ways of keeping the company afloat, at least for a little while.

    The car had been produced with massive subsidies from the (North/South - can't remember which) Irish government. When the company finally folded (with a little over 2,000 DeLorean DMC-12 sports cars produced), the government destroyed all the stamping dies and tooling to ensure that no more DeLoreans would ever be made.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  45. Re:I love that car... by taernim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    John Delorean did have his scrapes with the law.

    He went to school at Lawrence Tech, where my ex just happened to have gone and shared with me stories that have been passed down about the man.

    One such story is that he typed up letters claiming to be from the power company, saying that the company had underpaid by $5 and to remit payment to a PO Box.

    He sent these letters to a number of companies -- the PO box being his own personal box.

    He was tried for it and levied a fine... ironically the fine was LESS than the money he made from the whole scam.

    So I'm not saying the man was guilty of everything accused, but he definitely was not a total angel.

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
  46. The description says yes. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Informative

    The pictures make it very clear. There are 3 pedals in the car, and the shifter knob is manual.

    Unless those pictures are of the "real" one from the movie, then the one up for auction is a manual 5-speed, and someone goofed up the auction listing.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  47. Re:Umm, it's a DeLorean you're talking about? by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Informative

    At some point, he must have realized that what was being discussed were illegal actions and an upstanding person would have backed off then.

    This proves exactly how much you don't know about what happened. John did back off. Once he found out drugs were involved, he told the guys - who were undercover FBI agents - "No deal."

    Do you know how they responded? They told JZD that if he didn't follow through, they would murder his wife and his children. He didn't know they were FBI agents. He thought they were gangsters, so he cooperated. He even sent letters to his attorney before going to meet with them explaining everything, "in case they kill me." Then he meets them and lo and behold, they're FBI agents.

    All of this came out in court. There were statements made by several reputable people that one of the agents in question had bragged about "bringing down someone big... someone like John DeLorean" long before any contact was initially made with him. So our own FBI screws up this guy's life - forever - because someone wants a cheap thrill. And people like you have the gall to come on a public forum 20 years later and spout off about how immoral and awful DeLorean was, without doing any research whatsoever.

    He's an innocent man. Always has been.

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  48. On the origin of the car being sold by j1ggl3x · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any prospective buyers who might be interested on the history of the car being sold:
    Should check out the discussion on the car by the original creator

    And the creator and his timeline on building the car

    In short, its a re-sell and the original creator is getting no credit. In fact the person re-selling the car is using copyrighted images on ebay (which is why the auction was previously pulled).