Slashdot Mirror


UIUC Unveils the Worlds Most Advanced Building

Eagle5596 writes "The University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, one of the top Computer Science programs in the world has just officially opened their new $80 million Siebel Center. The department head describes the building as a single computing entity, meant to be programmed and to interact with those in the building via RFID tags in their ID cards. This is probably one of the biggest and most expensive projects in ubiquitous computing ever launched, touching on all the important issues in this field, from privacy to the ultimate question about the usefulness of such a system. Several papers are covering this including the Chicago Sun Times, and the Chicago Business"

319 comments

  1. Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you in. Your GPA is too low this semester.

    --
    "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

    - Seneca
    1. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by YoJ · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is doubly funny because in the movie 2001, HAL is actually designed at UIUC...

    2. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow! Really?

      Wait, I think I heard that before... yes, I did... IN THE DAMN ARTICLE.

      Oh wait, this is Slashdot, nobody reads anything before making stupid comments and debating about "important issues" that are completely irrelevant to anyone who took the time to read the article.

    3. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by stoney27 · · Score: 1

      No kidding we had a party for him when he was supposedly built.

      -S

      --

      It is said that a child learns wisdom from the parent,
      but the truly wise parent learns joy from the child
    4. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by YoJ · · Score: 1

      So a comment about a joke superficially related to the story is not relevant to you? I guess your rant about a comment on a joke superficially related to the story is much more relevant to readers.

    5. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by nico60513 · · Score: 1

      Actually, while the film does say that HAL was built in Urbana, Illinois, it does not mention the University.

      From the script:
      "I am HAL 9000 computer. I became operational at the HAL plant in Urbana, Illinois, on January 12th, 1991."

    6. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think it was actually built at Uni High.

    7. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to live in Urbana. The only things worth a crap in Urbana-Champaign are the university and Wolfram Research. The story goes that Stephen Wolfram didn't want to find a new apartment so he started the company there.

      -B

    8. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 1

      Haha. Though I think the conversation would be more like this in a way. =/

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    9. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by rvega · · Score: 1

      The only things worth a crap in Urbana-Champaign are the university...

      Given that the cities are so utterly dominated by the size and population of the University, that's not really saying much. Almost (but not quite) like saying that the only thing worth a crap on Manhattan island is New York City.

      And, anyway, during the years I lived there, '90-'96, I found plenty of off-campus things to appreciate: The Blind Pig; the Courier Cafe; Espresso Royale on Oregon; several great local bands including Poster Children, The Moon Seven Times and The Suede Chain; Bikeworks bicycle shop; the New Art Theatre; WEFT community radio, and many others.

      I'll give you that it's not the most exciting place on earth by a long shot, but there's a lot to do if you have any immagination at all, and compared to the other rail-side corn depots on the line to Chicago, it's a real oasis.

    10. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      You are making the assumption that New York City is worth a crap. Personally, I think the indians had a pretty good fortune teller in the tribe, saw what would happen and got the better of the deal. ;-)

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    11. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by ZhouAn · · Score: 1

      I think I may be able to do you one better. We (the Illiac IV OS crew) were in Paoli PA to work on the machine one week. One night we couldn't get to the machine so we decided to go see 2001(again). When the Urbana bit came along we of course cheered. On the way out of the theater, we came across a group of 5 or 6 freaks stoned out of their minds. (Not an unusual state for seeing the movie in those days.) So we stopped to talk to them. They asked where we were from. We said, Illinois. They said O, you were the ones that applauded. What are you doing out here? Building on the world's largest computer, we said. Like HAL! they said, Well sort of. I always wondered if the next day they were ever sure whether that incident had really happened or had just been part of their trip! Take care, John

    12. Re:Damnit HAL, LET ME IN!!! by rodrigo_braz · · Score: 1

      "HAL plant" seems to suggest the existence of a company called HAL (maybe a University spin-off?).

  2. In interaction means... by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Funny

    keeping the soda machines near me full of Dew, it's a good thing.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:In interaction means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no pepsi@uiuc!

    2. Re:In interaction means... by Dejitaru+Neko · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can attest to this, being a student at UIUC. They have a big contract with Coca-Cola, and Pepsi products are the devil here. Interestingly enough, I had a computer science professor (Jason Zych; CS majors here would know that name, probably) who seemed addicted to the Dew.

      --
      Nyo nyo, the Neko Boy has spoken.
    3. Re:In interaction means... by epanastasi · · Score: 1

      Actually... here in the ACM office that dream may become a reality...

      Caffeine is our own little magcard swipe internet enabled (crappy) soda machine...

      It is out of Dew right now, however

    4. Re:In interaction means... by mattbelcher · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, the campus is owned by Coke, so we have to hit up one of the street vendors for the nectar.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    5. Re:In interaction means... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      you're asking for a slashdot effect, aren't you!

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  3. I'm not sure by odano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure if I like the idea that anything between me and these 4 walls is now between me and some sort of ubiquitous building-computer.

    1. Re:I'm not sure by kfg · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, nothing can go wrong. . .go wrong. . .go wrong.

      But if you think you see Yul Brenner, it might be wise to run anyway, just in case.

      KFG

    2. Re:I'm not sure by cyril3 · · Score: 1

      If you have done nothing wrong you shouldn't be concerned.. At least now it is not necessary to speak into the flower.

  4. Siebel Center? by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that mean the building is wildly overpriced and requires expensive consultants in suits to do anything right?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Siebel Center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, yes. With all of that technology inside, they couldn't spend much on contruction or architecture, and frankly, it's a bit small. I mean, it looks great on the inside, but here's an outside view of the front entrance: click here.

  5. Building is a single computing entity... by dickiedoodles · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Imagine a beowulf cluster of those

    Sorry

    --
    In Soviet Russia Slashdot cliches use you
    1. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Obligatory]?
      Yeah, but does it run Linux?
      [/Obligatory]

    2. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by Carnildo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once they finish rebuilding the campus with this sort of building, they'll have one.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by Kelz · · Score: 1

      I think you should mod YOURSELF down for that.

    4. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by Bobdoer · · Score: 1

      Having a bunch of buildings hooked together, smart or not, is nothing new. Are people supposed to be impressed that there are small passages between some buildings?

    5. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      I can imagine one. It's named Deep Thought.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    6. Re:Building is a single computing entity... by reCURSE · · Score: 1

      The only computers I've used so far run LynxOS. Of course, they haven't moved everything in yet...

      --
      ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
  6. "Modern" buildings tend to not age well by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The old TWA terminal at JFK (round, swoopy curvy thing) and terminal 1 at CDG (aka the habitrail) both looked incredibly modern and futuristic when first opened.

    The UIUC bldg sounds extremely cool, but in 5 yrs folks will be smiling politely at the "hokey-ness" of the place.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by MoTec · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to disagree... I just visited Bartlesville, OK on business and saw an amazing looking building, a true work of art. Frank Lloyd Wright's only "skyscraper" Price Tower.

      It was built in the late 50's and looks good today. Of course, Frank Lloyd Wright is considered by many to be one of the great architects of all time and the Siebel Center isn't really of the same class.

    2. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      You should come to San Francisco, and check out Sony's "Metreon" destination mall.

      Everytime I'm there, I'm impressed. "Woah. It's like a time capsule to 1998!"

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by epanastasi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I being a current inhabitant of this "amazing" building... have yet to see this wonderful technology. Sure, I didn't really read what's been said in the papers about it, cus I know what's actually happening here. It's really stupid, the whole building. When I first walked in, my inital reaction was that the 70's threw up on it. They still haven't finished building the damn thing. And it's got way too many bugs (just like a CS building should....) like the pretty light fixtures that hang in the conference rooms cast a lovely shadow onto the projector screen. Plus, the screen in my conference room doesn't have a switch to lower it. But it's nice to know that a screen should exist. They've just installed all this RFID stuff and touch screen kiosks today... so it doesn't look like crap for the Grand Opening.

      I wouldn't believe all the hype if I were you. Just like everything else, including the project I'm supposed to present at this Siebel Center Open House, it's a lot of buzzwords and catch phrases...it doesn't really do what I say it does... But a man can dream can't he?

      But on another note, the elevator shafts provided a lovely rappelling trip... to bad they had to install elevators in them. (Which I mananged to crash and get stuck on the 3rd floor...like software-wise not bloody death crash)

      But I'm stuck here until I graduate... what fun it will be to break the rest of it. It is however nicer than our old building... Thank you Mr. Siebel for giving us a lot of money before your company started to fail, and thanks for not asking for it back.

    4. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by kfg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a fan of the FIAT 124 Spider. When it was first introduced Road & Track called it's syling "Classic, but slightly dated."

      20 years later when they featured it as used classic they called its styling "Classic, but slightly dated."

      Today I would, myself, call its styling "Classic, but slightly dated," and rather imagine that's the way my grandchildren will describe in in another 50 years.

      On the other hand when my first gen Capri was only 5 years old it looked old. Old and stupid.

      My brother's 64 1/2 Mustang looks, well, classic, but slightly dated. I think the new Mustang is going to start looking old and stupid in about, ohhhhh, next week.

      His '63 split window 'Vette looks kick ass! Yes, at the time of introduction people thought it looked too dated.

      Are we sensing the trend here?

      Most of the people here would think my desktop theme looks "old fashioned" (i.e. what we had a few years ago). It's flat. Lacks transparency. The widgets have corners and shit. The colors are muted earth tones and lack shading.

      Of course, it's also in a mode that has been considered conservatively attractive for some thousands of years.

      I think I'll keep it.

      KFG

    5. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      O/T but I own a Fiat Spider, by the way. It's a great little car.

      On a more on topic note, I believe that designs tend to go in cycles. Today, modern tends to be the "in-thing" while tommorrow what was cool 30 years ago might be cool again. It's a never ending cycle. It's the reason people buy old cars, old houses, futuristic cars, houses, etc. One moment it's in, the next it's not.

    6. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by cfoster611 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'll have class in there every day next fall, and, honestly, I find the place spectacular. I find the architecture is modern yet not gaudy. Most of the architectural metal is muted, and the exterior blends well with the older buildings, even if it dominates the small high school across the street.

      The place still has the most excellent smells of new computer/networking gear, and you can go around and sometimes see the MDF's still under construction.

      Its a fun place.

      --
      --- Kicking the Cheat since late 2002
    7. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Dejitaru+Neko · · Score: 1

      "Modern" buildings tend to not age well

      From another article:

      The role of the building as a lab for the future, especially in a rapidly changing field like computer science, made its design a challenge.

      "Any technology you deploy will soon be obsolete," Reed said. "Some things you think will happen turn out not to happen."

      Accordingly, the Siebel Center was built to be flexible, Kubitz said. Many rooms are designed to be reconfigured with movable partitions, flooring and fixtures

      --
      Nyo nyo, the Neko Boy has spoken.
    8. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, but are the fixtures, etc.. built to withstand the test of time. One of my company's buildings has "modular partitions" (not cubes, these are floor-to-ceiling) that are about 10 years old. Not only do they now mostly fall apart when you attempt to reconfigure them, they look dated as well.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Many rooms are designed to be reconfigured with movable partitions, flooring and fixtures

      Isn't this how most modern office buildings are built already? Hell, even most modern shopping malls can be reconfigured easily.

    10. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come to Kenya, we've got lions.

      And also Masai. The lions don't impress me as being terribly crazy about that arrangement. There's just no pleasing some people.

      Coincidentally I happen to be dressed as a Masai right now, right down to the traditional trapazoidal sandals (but when I track down a good bad tire I'll do up a pair of Ho Chi Maas). Very simple, but elegant mode of dress. One might well describe it as "Classic, but slightly dated." In fact, it's basically Classical Greek. I don't know why most northern writers refer to it as "Roman." Classical Greek dress doesn't look anything like Roman and is the very antithesis of the toga, which now just looks old. Old and stupid.

      I'm not at all sure how a Masai would react to a white American dressed like a Masai, but it seems that here in upstate NY people either look at you funny or pretend they're not looking at all. In NYC, of course, nobody looks at anything anymore.

      I'll match my walking ability with any man, anywhere, including Masai, but admit I can't jump for shit.

      KFG

    11. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by phurley · · Score: 1

      Not to mention schools tend be treated a little rougher than your average office building, so I wonder what the building will look like in five or ten years.

      --
      Home Automation & Linux -- now I know I'm a geek
    13. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      But on another note, the elevator shafts provided a lovely rappelling trip... to bad they had to install elevators in them. (Which I mananged to crash and get stuck on the 3rd floor...like software-wise not bloody death crash)

      How do you manage to do that. First of all, since elevator controls are a pure hardware implementation (at least the one in my building), it would be impossible to have a software error. Second, an elevator uses perhaps a dozen flip-flops and a few hundred transistors, diodes, and capacitors, so it's small enough to exhaustively test. There is no excuse for a bug in such a simple design that has been in use for so many decades. Intel manages to make CPUs with hundreds of millions of transistors and only a handful of bugs, and the CPU design didn't exist a few years ago.

      Of course, perhaps they decided to dump the old and proven technology. I can't see why you would need a CPU + software to control an elevator, but if they put computers in the rest of the building, perhaps they figured an extra one couldn't hurt.

    14. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      That's not the only problem I see. The lights are pointing upwards, of all directions. Aim the lights downwards and you'll save plenty of light and energy. Flourescents are diffuse enough to be okay without light shades, so aim the light directly towards where it will be used. Aiming light upwards, both outside and indoors, seems to be a new trend. What's the big benefit of doing so? Will planes crash into buildings if they're not lit up by 20 floodlights which spill most of their light into the sky? Will students not learn right if the ceiling isn't flooded with light? Is it a way of being a snob by showing off how much energy you can waste?

    15. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of another building that I have the misfortune of being acquanted with:
      http://weatherhead.cwru.edu/wsom/virtualtou r/aroun dTheBuilding.htm

      Over budget, ugly inside, and don't forget about the glaring bug: the huge chunks of ice that form on the roof in the wintertime, falling onto the sidewalk below...

    16. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by reCURSE · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as, well, all the other buildings looked after 5-10 years. In any case, who cares about the architecture? It wasn't meant to be a work of art. It looks fine on its own, and I'm sure the College of Engineering will do their best to maintain it, just like they do with the rest of their campus. By the way, most of the file cabinets, desks, etc. were brought over from the Digital Computer Laboratory right across the street, and most of those looked like they were in the building during "HAL's" time.

      --
      ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
    17. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG what the f*ck is that? Architectural rubbish for the sole purpose of being different. Reminds me of a satirical ad - "if you can't look good then at least look strange". Bring back the classics and start educating architectural students properly!

    18. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You sound like a real tool. A pretentious tool, at that.

    19. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I've seen a number of eleveator refits lately that involve software to run the elevators. Its supposed to make the elevators more efficent.

      I think they should install fat-person sensors. Anytime a fat person gets on, it should refuse to move and tell them where to find the stairs.

    20. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Actually most modern elevator installations, especially those in tall buildings are almost totally software controlled. In one of my 3rd year software engineering classes we spent the entire year programming, each module a seperate assignment, a software control system for a bank of 4 elevators in a 20 story building. The idea was to optimise utilization to minimize wait time for every floor. So when somebody pushed the button on the 20th floor, there should be an elevator less than 30 seconds away. As each elevator moved according to passenger requests the others would automatically adjust thier "wait" locations to minimize delay.

      Through the whole class we joked about real people personalities, and switching majors to psych so we could counsel depressed elevators...

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    21. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I read about all this tech in a building and I think , "What would the BOFH do here?"

    22. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      After a little digging, found the name is the Peter B. Lewis Building. For those who would like to look at photes, go here.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    23. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by thecap · · Score: 1
      I agree that this building and its "Grand Opening" has been (over) hyped. I would like to know who choose things like the big blue screen on the construction site fance facing SC and flowers at something this morning for suits. Who gave them such a large budget they can splurge on such silly cosmetic things when the university can't pay to maintain all their buildings?

      Sorry your demo is hyped up with buzzwords. I'm quite happy with ours in 2109. We never felt any pressure to change anything with our project. But it is an application of wireless sensor networks so I guess it cames with buzzwords for free.

    24. Re:"Modern" buildings tend to not age well by claar · · Score: 1
      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous...
  7. I go here by garbletext · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The building looks like it was designed by a bunch of computer scientists. Ugly as hell, shiny things everywhere.

    1. Re:I go here by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      How can you tell?

      80 million dollars couldn't afford a photo gallery, just an .asx link.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:I go here by crispy1083 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm going to have to disagree. Although there are parts that look odd and half finished, like the metal beams jutting out over the entrances, walking around the back and seeing the gigantic wall of glass is kind of cool. And it's purdy on the inside. Reminds me of DCL, actually.

    3. Re:I go here by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > How can you tell [what it looks like]?
      >
      > 80 million dollars couldn't afford a photo gallery, just an .asx link.

      The insurance policy on $80M buildings that are "single computing units" probably doesn't cover the Slashdot effect. They fear us, and with good reason.

    4. Re:I go here by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Shame VLC won't play the mms link embedded in the .asx.

      I don't know what I'm saying. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:I go here by garbletext · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those odd, half-finished parts are what I was calling ugly. And it doesn't remind me at all of DCL. I have a few classes there next semester, so i'm going to have to learn to like it.

  8. Microsoft "Buildy" by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    I guess they had to go and install "Microsoft Office... that is, REAL Office".

    Now, when you go down the hall, the "Buildy" mascot asks things like. "You appear to be walking to the bathroom. Would you like some help?"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Microsoft "Buildy" by antic · · Score: 1

      That'd be fantastic. What about a MS Exercise Drone?

      "You appear to be walking like an obese person."

      And before you can say "I am an ob..." it starts shooting at your feet, "Would you like some help? Run fat boy, run!".

      Yeh, I'm all for this. It'd be hilarious.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    2. Re:Microsoft "Buildy" by mt+v2.7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh GOD.. Imagaine Bonzai Buddy.. all the purple, and fur, and.. little gnomes running through the building carrying out your credit card bills..

    3. Re:Microsoft "Buildy" by Czernobog · · Score: 1

      I prefer "Buildy" to Real Office.

      Imagine if you had to go through the "I'm sorry Sir. The toilets are busy and you must queue."
      "In the mean time, feel free to be "Buffering... Buffering... Buffering..."

      --
      /. Where the truth
  9. Some of us already have advanced buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clap on. Clap off. What else is there?

  10. security issues? by eisenbud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently RFID tags (and anything that doesn't have its own power source) don't have enough power to do real crypto. So this will be great until someone builds a device to read people's tags as they walk down the hall, and then impersonate any of them to the building. At least with keys or magnetic striped cards you have to get physical access to them before you can copy them.

    1. Re:security issues? by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The doors are locked with traditional magnetic striped cards, it's only inside the rooms that RFID tags are used help configure the room. It's amazingly secure, so secure that I cannot enter the rooms I need to do my project in, and if I step out for some fresh air on the fourth floor balcony I will not be able to get back in.

    2. Re:security issues? by thecap · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think that passively powered devices may eventually power "real crypto". See Integrating passive RF technology with cryptographic communications protocols.

      Your claim of needed physical access is not true. I work in Siebel. Like most people there I use my i-card for access to locked doors. This card contains a magnetic strip just like a credit card. We have been provided with necklaces for holding our i-card so it is easy to swipe. The entire number encoded on the magnetic strip needed by the building is printed in clear text on the front of the card (I watched them type the number into the door security system). All one needs is a very high resolution picture of someone who is wearing their card front-away-from-body and you could make a copy of their card.

    3. Re:security issues? by reCURSE · · Score: 1

      The housing administration can administer new cards, for those students that lose them. Until these cards are completed, students are given replacement cards to use for meals at the dining halls. Are you sure that is the only thing encoded?

      --
      ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
    4. Re:security issues? by thecap · · Score: 1

      I would hope that parts of the university that use the i-cards for cash use more fields on the card. I have not swiped an i-card (a regular credit card reader should suffice). But SC uses only the number printed in the card. I was not added in their first import of people with access. While in the TSG office someone looked at my card and typed in the 16 digit number and my name into a computer and then granted me access to certain rooms. I suspect SC does not get updates when someone is issued a new card.

  11. Regression by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 5, Funny

    This proves the point that all things human go in cycles. First computers were the size of buildings, then they shrunk down to fit in the palm, now they are becoming the size of buildings again.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Regression by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      And the logical next step in the cycle is for the buildings to shrink until they fit in the palm of your hand?

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  12. Dangerous? by glpierce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw the nearly-completed building a few months ago when visiting the campus. My immediate reaction: this can't be healthy. With that many wires and that many radio signals (RFID, wireless network, etc), I can't help but think that it will increase your risk of developing cancer. Normal offices are bad enough, but this place has significantly more in the air.

    --
    G
    1. Re:Dangerous? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Considering that the only scientifically-verified consequence of overexposure to radio waves is radio burns -- and that only happens at very high energy densities -- I wouldn't worry about cancer.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Dangerous? by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      Which prospective weekend did you attend, JOOC?

    3. Re:Dangerous? by cj171 · · Score: 1

      Damn, that musta been on the Engineering tour..I accidentally got in the regular and had some frat jock who just gawked when i said computer science, wireless, and segway

    4. Re:Dangerous? by glpierce · · Score: 1

      It was in March; I was checking out the grad psyc program.

      --
      G
    5. Re:Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, and I'm a student right next door...

    6. Re:Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, just add another layer of tin foil to your hat and you'll be fine. ;)

    7. Re:Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When were cigarettes "scientifically-verified" to be bad for you? Or how about benzene? Or lots of other things that were originally "safe".... Just because we have no evidence of damage from large amounts of radio waves doesn't mean there is none, although it does tend to reduce the worry one should have.

    8. Re:Dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was checking out the grad psyc program

      Ah, Psyc major. That would explain the following idiotic FUD statement:

      My immediate reaction: this can't be healthy. With that many wires and that many radio signals (RFID, wireless network, etc), I can't help but think that it will increase your risk of developing cancer.

      Being an EE, I have found that the media hype over such RF "poisioning" of the environment is entirely alarmist and mostly fabricated. As someone else has already stated, the only known problem with overexposure to RF are burns caused by close proximity to high-intensity levels. Everything else is "chicken little" syndrome.

      But I wouldn't expect a psyc major to differentiate between the two.

    9. Re:Dangerous? by rozz · · Score: 0
      Considering that the only scientifically-verified consequence of overexposure to radio waves is radio burns -- and that only happens at very high energy densities -- I wouldn't worry about cancer.

      so, over-exposure is surely dangerous ... and from that, you concluded that light-exposure is safe .. that's some very interesting logic you are using

      for me it sounds the same as saying : yeah sure, a flamethrower would kill you, but a small cigarette lighter is totally safe!

      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
    10. Re:Dangerous? by Axeling · · Score: 1

      Well, to tell you the truth, I think Uni High students are deranged enough without any need for harmful rays.

    11. Re:Dangerous? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      so, over-exposure is surely dangerous ... and from that, you concluded that light-exposure is safe .. that's some very interesting logic you are using

      for me it sounds the same as saying : yeah sure, a flamethrower would kill you, but a small cigarette lighter is totally safe!


      No, it's more along the lines of "days in a sauna will kill you, but fifteen minutes is safe".

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  13. Clap off? If only it was that easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Clap on. Clap off. What else is there?"

    If only it worked that way. No matter how I try "Clap Off" that case of gonorhhea I caught in Tijuana back around '96 stays with me.

  14. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    .. who expects that the brutal hacks done to Gaia are going to be much better 'learning experiences' for everyone than the official software itself?

    Gotta wonder what kind of security they've got on her. If I had my face scanned everytime I entered a room, and had some stupid voice asking me questions when I just wanted to finish my assignment back when I was in school, the system would have been modified drastically during finals week.....

    Not that I would condone such now, of course. Probably get you labeled a terrorist and thrown under the jail.

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, this is Hercules. I'm currently tracking you down, and will make you pay for saying bad things about my bitch.

  15. The Real Privacy Question by Eagle5596 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The real issue with privacy of course is turning off the location function when you don't want something embarressing happening. I present the following situation as evidence:

    Johnny wanted to find Professor X to ask a question about his research paper, approaching the wall he intoned, "Computer, please locate Professor X."

    In a booming voice the wall responded, "Professor X is currently in Stall 5 of the Bathroom on the second floor, logging in."

    1. Re:The Real Privacy Question by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      This, of course, leads to the question of what he's doing in the ladies' bathroom.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:The Real Privacy Question by zuhl · · Score: 2, Funny


      And the the booming voice will continue, "And Professor X has used more than his (her) allotment of toilet paper this week. Initiating emergency protocols."

      And then they guys with shotguns come bursting in on poor Professor X.

    3. Re:The Real Privacy Question by synaptik · · Score: 1
      This, of course, leads to the question of what he's doing in the ladies' bathroom.
      It's like the GP said... "logging in". :)=
      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    4. Re:The Real Privacy Question by tricops · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ahh, you don't need this kind of technology for oddities like that. On a few different occasions I've had a professor with a wireless mic make a trip down the hall like that while neglecting to turn it off. Fun (horrifying?) stuff.

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    5. Re:The Real Privacy Question by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that reminds me of a story about an old physics prof of ours back when I was in University. Rather strict old guy but very good. He lectured in a huge auditorium, so he wore a microphone and his voice boomed out over the auditorium sound system. One day he took a break to go take a leak, and forgot to turn off the mike .. :)

    6. Re:The Real Privacy Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then he could just use his mind powers to stop them!

      Go Patrick Stewart, you're my hero!

    7. Re:The Real Privacy Question by Tiro · · Score: 1
      . . . logging in . . .
      I think you meant, core dumping.
    8. Re:The Real Privacy Question by nosphalot · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to see a buffer overflow...

    9. Re:The Real Privacy Question by arothmanmusic · · Score: 1

      Heh... reminds me of my office, where we often knock on the bathroom door and ask if the occupant is "downloading or streaming". :)

    10. Re:The Real Privacy Question by thecap · · Score: 1

      They better not have toilet paper allotments. One of the first things I noticed when I moved into this fancy expensive building is that they picked the cheapest toilet paper available. The toilet paper does vary from building to building (according to a friend who used to work in the Facilities and Services? dept) around UIUC but SC is all the way at the low end.

    11. Re:The Real Privacy Question by Liora · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you want good TP, you've gotta go to the Union, or Wohler's (formerly Com West). They keep the good stuff (2 ply, rolls out without breaking) on hand in case nature happens to call a visiting dignitary.

      --
      Liora
  16. It's an idea by MacBorg · · Score: 0

    but do I want my boss knowing every time I take a shit? also, do you think there's 802.11 in the bathroom?

    1. Re:It's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but do I want my boss knowing every time I take a shit?"

      Not sure, but when I have to goto the bathroom I ask permission just like in elementary school: "Boss, I have to take a shit, can i goto the bathroom?"

  17. Blue hair by antic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where is a link to pictures? If there aren't pictures of gadgets, no one cares.

    Nice to know that the welcoming avatar has blue hair. Because that's the future, apparently.

    I bet they'd fire the receptionist of he/she dyed their hair blue, or they'd refuse to hire the same, but as soon as you need to represent the future, it has blue hair.

    Just like Strong Bad has a Japanese cartoon character: http://homestarrunner.com/sbemail57.html

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  18. Re:Cards by RadioFreeSource · · Score: 1

    I assume the would, I mean, why not eh? =) VUINCED!

  19. Microsoft Slashy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Anonymous Coward - "That isn't the least bit funny"

    "You seem to be posting a -1 Troll. Would you like assistance with that?"

  20. And the best part is... by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 2, Informative
    Salaryman is playing at the grand opening tomorrow afternoon.

    Oh... and sure, the building's nice, too.

    --
    "It's better to have an attention span and not need it, than to need whatever it is we were just talking about."
    - Mayor {Powerpuff Girls}

  21. Interface by tarpoon · · Score: 1

    All the hardware exist today to make advanced computer controlled buildings. But who wants to stand beside a lightswitch, fiddling with the remote in the dark to find the correct button to push? The problem is the interface. You have to be able to talk to the system to operate it. It's not good enough walking around with a microphone, or stand beside that lightswitch talking into a microphone. Beside, it should alos recognize you when you tell it show your email on the screen in the kitchen, either by voice or by face recognition.

    1. Re:Interface by gilrain · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah. I think that's why their building has, well, voice and face recognition. I guess you just assumed it used a clumsy remote? And that they were going to issue, uh, remotes to their faculty and staff?

  22. MacMuslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Converter of the infidels to the one true faith... Macintosh"

    That's a perfect attitude. It tells it all. Especially when you consider that compared to the rest of the computer world, Mac users are like rag-swathed flea-covered savages sitting in caves.

  23. go see salaryman!! by mattrowe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    geek rock Friday, April 30th, Siebel Center Open House, University of Illinois, Urbana IL. Salaryman, PosterChildren's electronic alter-ego will be playing at the grand opening of the new Computer Science Center at the U of I. It will be a lunchtime performance, 11:30am - 1:30pm.

    1. Re:go see salaryman!! by puppithead · · Score: 1

      Never heard any salaryman stuff, but Poster Children are definately worth checking out. I'm definately there. morning drinking...class...free show...edward 40 hands...tomorrow's gonna be a great day

  24. Sup with the site? by Unnngh! · · Score: 1

    No webcams, not even any pics...seems like there would be some level of interaction over the 'net for such a "wired" building. Maybe these things are yet to come?

    1. Re:Sup with the site? by Zelxyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surprisingly, this is basically the same thing you get when you walk up to an information display on the wall (except the website doesn't have the information specific to the room you're standing in front of).

      Everything actually looks really awesome right now. Too bad most of it isn't staying in the building after the weekend.

      Anyway, to provide you with some other cool associated things:
      web cam, VRML model of building. Enjoy.

      PS Though I have complaints, I'm leaving those to the other trolls.

  25. Apostrophize much? by stevejsmith · · Score: 0, Troll

    It should be "UIUC Unveils the World's Most Advanced Buildin," maybe?

    1. Re:Apostrophize much? by Zcipher · · Score: 1
      It should be "UIUC Unveils the World's Most Advanced Buildin," maybe?

      Utilize the letter "G" much? ^_~

  26. What are you smoking? by Eagle5596 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    UIUC still has some of the greatest minds in computer science, including Michael Heath, probably one of the most brilliant computer scientists of our time. They continue to attract some of the highest calibre students in the world, both nationally and internationally, and have a staff with more citations and awards than most schools can even dream of. They are the site of one NCSA facility, soon to be another one, and one of the DoE's advanced research centers. Most recently they have discovered new fabrication processes for IC's, light emitting transistors, and they continue to push the bounds of excellence in computer science.

    This building isn't an effort to revive a program (currently ranked #3 in Engineering, #3 in ECE, and #5 in CS), it's a natural step taking to increase the facilities available to accomidate recent advances by the University, and a continuously growing program which time and time again excells in all areas.

    1. Re:What are you smoking? by _defiant_ · · Score: 1
      UIUC still has some of the greatest minds in computer science, including Michael Heath, probably one of the most brilliant computer scientists of our time.


      I agree with the comment about Heath, and want to add that he is also an excellent teacher. His advanced numerical methods course was one of the more enjoyable classes I took (hey, I love math okay).

    2. Re:What are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the greatest CS minds? Michael Heath?

      Damn... Should have paid more attention 3 years ago.

  27. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but you get some nice parting gifts.

    Tina, tell this fat smelly loser what he's won.

  28. Irony, indeed by geekychic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe on the eve of the night when my school's unveiling the most technologically advanced building in the world, the campus mail is down >=( Prioritize, much?

    1. Re:Irony, indeed by ambienceman · · Score: 0

      No. they're just eliminating use of normal PCs. They're going to have to infuse you all with nanobots. You'll not need to use a satellite computer desktop anymore for you'll be one with the living building...who can transmit e-mails to you like how the Borg speak to each other.

    2. Re:Irony, indeed by garbletext · · Score: 1

      Geez, you're right. someone has to do something about this "Express" email crap. I don't like it.

    3. Re:Irony, indeed by cfoster611 · · Score: 1

      UIUC's new motto: Why mange multiple, redundant systems when you can do a botch'd up job with one for twice the price!

      --
      --- Kicking the Cheat since late 2002
    4. Re:Irony, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real irony is that you attend there!

    5. Re:Irony, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we to blame the current administration or the past one headed by Jim Bottum?

    6. Re:Irony, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or that you couldn't get in

    7. Re:Irony, indeed by reCURSE · · Score: 1

      I'm graduating, so I don't have to switch over. Suckers..ha!

      --
      ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
  29. but... by ambienceman · · Score: 0

    is it more advanced than Bill Gates' mansion?

  30. I wonder... by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    How much their next upgrade is gonna cost??

    --
    once more into the breach
    1. Re:I wonder... by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      BAsicly i work with Siebel Systems closly and am siebel cert and im amazingly surprised they got Siebel anything for 32 mill the money grabbing gits

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  31. BFG Competition? by uujjj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The web site for the opening lists one of the events as a BFG Competition. Apparently, they will be broadcasting the thing around the world. Also, they will record the competition for future viewings. Hmmm . . . only in computer science could they be proud.

    1. Re:BFG Competition? by ambienceman · · Score: 0

      BFG? I used to LOVEE that gun in DOOM!!!!

    2. Re:BFG Competition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The F stands for friendly.

    3. Re:BFG Competition? by Benley · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Don!

  32. 1000 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone able to find a neat photo gallery on the site? I looked, but could only find some movies of the grand opening. The itty bitty pictures make the place look nice, but I'd love to see more details. Wonder what their sever room(s) look like...

  33. Novel Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear they also planned for intelligent waste management. All waste is funneled down via chutes to a fully automated trash compactor level.

    (-1, lame reference. sorry, couldn't think of any way to make this sad joke funny)

  34. in a side note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    2 hours later the building was declared obsolete by new technologies...

  35. Re:What are you smoking? Probably not much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm going to have to agree with the first AC on this one. I know some folks who applied to the top 20 grad programs and a few backup schools and got into only UIUC and their backups. Either UIUC is finding diamonds in the rough on a regular basis or it has lowered its standards.

    And I don't know about this Michael Heath guy, but I think most places that claim to be top departments have a few Turing award winners running around their halls.

  36. Sounds like Tron... by xtermin8 · · Score: 0

    Do they have any lighcycles in there?

  37. Cheap bastards by DinZy · · Score: 0, Troll

    They can float the bill for this but they cannot give us grad students decent health care.

  38. This will be fun to watch... by Black+Art · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am waiting for the first time they blow the breakers on the circuit that handles their security computer.

    What happens? Does the system fail to "everything is locked"?

    This sounds like a RISKS article waiting to happen.

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:This will be fun to watch... by epanastasi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, there has already been a power outtage here... everything turns off except a few mood lights? were on... makes everything look really creepy. The door locks still worked... but it was a pain to find my server in the dark

    2. Re:This will be fun to watch... by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Informative

      All electronic locks I have ever seen default to unlocked when the power goes off. This is the way they are built, not wired. So if the power goes out, they WILL unlock (and they did unlock too, when the power went out). This is probably required by the fire code so that people are not trapped in a burning building.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:This will be fun to watch... by phallstrom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought I read that during NY's blackout awhile back hotels that had electronic locks (card swipes) were locked... and guests couldn't get in... which wouldn't be a problem unless your 2 year old was inside I guess...

    4. Re:This will be fun to watch... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      All electronic locks I have ever seen default to unlocked when the power goes off.

      Someone will undoubtedly call me on terminology, but this is "fail-safe" design. I.E., instrument air/pneumatics/electricity failure defaults the device to a "safe" condition. The trick is in evaluating *the whole system* as an entity in itself. The law of unintended consequences applies here, and with more design being automated, there is often a disconnect between the designers of different systems (worst case is inexperienced, low-paid people running great big machines overseen by clueless, profit-oriented managers).

      You never want to fuck around when it means lives can be lost.

      To Engineer is Human

    5. Re:This will be fun to watch... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even big safes full of bonds and stuff do that, as I learned watching "Die Hard."

    6. Re:This will be fun to watch... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      it makes sense to not be able to get in (imagine the theft possibilities..just cut the power and have a ball..) but being able to get out. Most door locks on public buildings work that way, electronic or not.

      --

      -

    7. Re:This will be fun to watch... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      Even big safes full of bonds and stuff do that, as I learned watching "Die Hard."
      Weird, I learned the same thing watching "Diebold."
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    8. Re:This will be fun to watch... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      This is probably required by the fire code so that people are not trapped in a burning building.

      Ah yes, yet another example of how high tech inventions are modeled after comfortable and familiar low tech versions.

      We interface with our computers using comprehensible "desktop" metaphors. We implement our electronic locks to behave like steel locks - that is, in case of a fire, they default to unlocked status to prevent people from dying in fires. Um, wait a minute. Nevermind, that's merely totally farking crazy.

    9. Re:This will be fun to watch... by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Bah! Humor foiled by the infinitely complicated nature of the italics tag yet again! This "markup language" is just fad; it's a solution looking for a problem and needlessly complex!

    10. Re:This will be fun to watch... by pHDNgell · · Score: 1

      All electronic locks I have ever seen default to unlocked when the power goes off.

      Smarthome sells deadbolts in either fail-safe or fail-secure. I would guess they probably sell more fail-safe ones.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
    11. Re:This will be fun to watch... by webmaestro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Usually when you purchase an electronic lock you can choose between a Fail-Safe and Fail-Secure variant. With Fail-Safe the lock unlocks when electricity is remove, and you can get what Fail-Secure does.

    12. Re:This will be fun to watch... by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      worst case is inexperienced, low-paid people running great big machines overseen by clueless, profit-oriented managers).

      Why bring the American Business Management System into this discussion on the use of advanced technology.

  39. Re:If interaction means... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    Sheesh... I just lost all kinds of respect for the place... everyone knows that computers run on AC, DC and VitaminC(affeine), damnit.

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  40. No, wrong area. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "In a booming voice the wall responded:

    "Professor X is currently fighting Magneto at the Statue of Liberty."

  41. Tom Siebel is Evil by linzeal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    but the real question is will I be able to leap over it in a single bound?

    As an aside I heard that Tom Siebel drives a bullet proof custom mercedes of some sort, anyone know what kind?

    1. Re:Tom Siebel is Evil by justMichael · · Score: 1
      As an aside I heard that Tom Siebel drives a bullet proof custom mercedes of some sort, anyone know what kind?
      If he does in fact have an armoured Mercedes Benz, it' most likely one of these, well something along those lines. I think the only one that would be able to get out of it's own way with all the weight is the S 600.
  42. As long as it isn't running Windows by potuncle · · Score: 2, Funny

    When it crashes does it become the BBOD (Blue Building of Death)?

    1. Re:As long as it isn't running Windows by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course, if it's running UNIX then it would
      crash with "Segmentation fault: floor dumped".

      --
      >;k
    2. Re:As long as it isn't running Windows by reCURSE · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to be inside and hear Gaia (is that "her" official name?) start babbling about sending error reports to Microsoft..

      --
      ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
  43. Even cooler than their last building? by Monthenor · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for next year's Mechmania. The building they had before was larger than anything at NDSU (with a lot more wasted space). Now I have all-new nooks and hallways to explore!

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    1. Re:Even cooler than their last building? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for next year's Mech Mania either.

      -The Cheat

    2. Re:Even cooler than their last building? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may as well get to work on it...

      Just kidding, it's been in production for a couple months already, and it'll be kicked into high gear once the devs get off of school.

  44. Finally, a chance to get back... by sklib · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all you need to get back at a professor you don't like is hack into the building's computer, and turn off the air conditioning in whatever room he goes into.

    Sweet revenge!

    --
    -S
    1. Re:Finally, a chance to get back... by TheCyko1 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but if he finds out he will just trace your IP and turn off your electricity. Then fail you.

      --
      This message was brought to you by the death of 30 brain cells.
    2. Re:Finally, a chance to get back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! The builders thought of that and cleverly disabled the thermostats!

  45. Re:BFD Competition? by xtermin8 · · Score: 0

    Big Freakin Deal. I think these guys watch too much reality television. Its sounds like an exercise in self-absorption.

  46. Salary by GrEp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    $80000000/$100000=800. Hmm...
    800 faculty years of almost anyone in the world, or one building. Good going UIUC.

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
    1. Re:Salary by uujjj · · Score: 1

      There are about 60 faculty, to that's 13.3 combined faculty years.

    2. Re:Salary by tsangc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      800 faculty years of almost anyone in the world, or one building. Good going UIUC


      I can't see how this comment was modded interesting.


      First, faculty and students need buildings to work and learn in. You can hire all the people in the world, but if they don't have a place to run their labs, teach classes etc in, what's the point?


      Second, having the best facilities in the world is a draw for leading researchers and students. You can't expect to attract the best with some beat up old building from 1970, can you? This is an investment in the staff and students as much as hiring more TA's or buying new lab equipment.

      Third, do you know much UIUC spends overall on their budget for professors salaries? We don't know if this is a fraction of their budget or half of it.


      Finally, $80 million is not a lot of money for a university building. It's about average.

    3. Re:Salary by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

      800 faculty years of almost anyone in the world, or one building. Good going UIUC.

      That's not quite an accurate assessment I gather. A university does need a decent-sized networked building and good computer equipment. You have to subtract what an average configuration would run from the cost of the building, THEN divide that by $100,000. You might also want to account for the value of the publicity the building generates. The more good students that are attracted by something advanced and flashy, the more successful the school is.

    4. Re:Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Somebody (hint, his last name is "Siebel") gave them money to build a building. Should they say, "no, we don't want that money for a building, we'd rather get money for faculty."?

    5. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You've never seen UIUC's engineering campus's main building, have you? It's about a million years old and the front doors weigh about a half-ton each, so if you manage to make your way up the wavy, deeply worn out stone stairs out front, you'll probably collapse just trying to enter the building. Then, when you're inside, it's 1963 decorations all around. Or, that's how it was when I was there 5 years ago. Supposedly it was due for a remodel, but that money probably went to finance some fruitcake group who loudly proclaims that they're offended on the behalf of the remaining Iliniwek (who, BTW, approve of the Chief).

      Yet, they managed to attract the some of the top CS faculty in the world. Dean Kamen may be a dick, but the other staff's pretty well qualified.

    6. Re:Salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engineering Hall? It was relatively spiffy the last time I was in there (last week). I'm pretty sure that they did remodel the whole place a few years back (as part of the Super Engineering Quad rebuild). Also - Dean Kamen? The Segway guy? He's not on the faculty here. Are you thinking of Sam Kamin?

    7. Re:Salary by ianaverage · · Score: 1

      when you pay for a building, you do not pay for it out of the same "account" that you pay profs. you get a bunch of alumni to chip in, and one guy to chip in a ton and get his name on the building. it is not like they could have done whatever they wanted with the money.

      with that said, the building does seem a bit wasteful to me and i am not a fan of some of the architectural decisions that they made. much too much orange on the inside (although i guess that is one of our school colors).

    8. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      As the sibling poster said, Engineering Hall is in very good shape now. They finished remodeling it four years ago (just before I started my freshman year).

      Secondly, Prof. Kamin is not a dean, he's the head of the undergraduate part of the Department of Computer Science. And in my experience Prof. Kamin is a very nice man. I have had to interact with him on a number of occasions and never had any problems.

    9. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I called him a Dean, I meant Professor - he *is* a dick, though. Clearly he's a decent politician, as he managed to work his way though the beurocracy of a major university, but he's still a dick. Ask anyone who took CS125 when it was still taught using Scheme - there're probably still a few grad students hanging around who remember that (I got an A, so that's not why I dislike him). *Friedman* was a nice guy, too bad he stepped down.

      I've gotta be over there for a graduation next weekend, perhaps I'll swing by Eng. Hall. I knew it was supposed to be remodeled someday. I'd like to see if they finally got the Engineering Quad fixed up, too...

    10. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      Eh, I never had him as a professor. Zych teaches CS125 and CS225 now, in Java and C++, respectively. And definitely do stop by the engineering quad, it looks fantastic. They did a ton of relandscaping and whatnot, and I think it looks quite good.

      Good enough that I love to make fun of my Poly Sci friends, since Greg and Lincoln halls are falling apart.

    11. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Is CS225 a real class now, rather than one that meets for 2 hours twice a week, requires 20+ hours outside of class, yet only results in 1 credit hour? When I was there, I took Java as that one course where different sections are things like Fortran, COBOL, Java, etc. Then again, the boneyard was about the best landscaping feature of the engineering quad, which definitely isn't saying much.

      If you're in the engineering school, you could make fun of the Poly Sci people even if they had nice buildings, IMHO. ;) That's where a few of my friends who started in CS went - Poly Sci. Funny how starting a CS program with some horrible language like Scheme (or Lisp, or Haskell, or any functional language) will do that. :)

    12. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      You get 3 hours of credit for 225, but I couldn't tell you how often it actually met, because I never went. All the lectures are online, so most people either just watch those or read the notes. Some of the MPs were moderately difficult, but I got an A without too much trouble.

      They still have the language course, but CS majors aren't allowed to take it for credit, because we're expected to be able to pick up a new language without much difficulty. Eh, they don't give us enough free credit hours to take it anyway.

    13. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I was a Comp Eng major (BTW kids, if you wanna program, don't do CompE with a software specialty - unless you're really into Electrical Engineering or you really want to end up as a grumpy sysadmin ;)), and the course just counted as a free elective. It would've been a stretch to get all the coursework in within 4 years anyway, so I had some free time in that extra semester... There has to be at least one "fun/easy" course per semester, anyway, or you get burned out. ;) Java was my "fun" course, a decompiler combined with the example MPs took care of the "easy" part... Hooray for easily decompiled bytecode and lazy TA's!

    14. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      Well done. My brother is going to be starting a CompE major here next year, so maybe he will be able to take one (or more?) of those courses.

      I hear you on the not-in-4-years thing--I'm on the 4.5 year plan right now, and that might slip to the 5 year plan if I'm not careful over the next 3 semesters.

    15. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I know one guy who did it in 3 or 3.5 years (I forget which). He was a darned smart guy, but one of those who wouldn't make a big deal out of it. Everyone else I knew was there for at least 4.5 years. Stupid Gen-ed requirements... :)

    16. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, testing out of the gen-eds is the best way to do it on time (or early). One of my frat brothers is a ME major and he'll be graduating in 3 years because he started with 40 hours of credit. Yay for AP tests, eh? Too bad my high school only offered Calculus.

      But then, who wants to go to the real world anyway? I'm having a pretty good time right now, I was able to study abroad, and while classes can be stressful, let's face it, they don't call college the best years of your life for nothing.

      Of course, the only experience I've had with the "real world" is my internship with John Deere, so maybe I'm way off. <shrugs>

    17. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      My school only offered "math IV", which was just barely pre-calc. I had to take calculus at the local community college just to be at a reasonable math level when I started school. :( I think Early Graduationguy did have some AP credits, though my school also didn't offer those (crappy small-town high schools). I tested out of Rhet 105, but that was it.

      My real-world experience has been good. As a sysadmin first for Parkland and now for "a company", I've had far less stress in the workplace than I had in school (though Parkland's beaurocracy was just as bad for employees as for students, as far as I can tell). Then, I only get called outside of work hours when there's a genuine emergency, so I may have it better than others in similar positions. Large companies generally result in larger checks, but you get larger stress because of it. I'll stick with the smaller places, personally - the minor pay cut is well worth the major life benefits.

    18. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1
      My school only offered "math IV", which was just barely pre-calc. I had to take calculus at the local community college just to be at a reasonable math level when I started school. :( I think Early Graduationguy did have some AP credits, though my school also didn't offer those (crappy small-town high schools). I tested out of Rhet 105, but that was it.


      I'm curious about how big your high school was. Mine only had 150 kids (36 in my graduating class) but was probably as good as a small-town school can get. Our athletics were crappy, but the important thing isn't really winning as much as just being on a team and learning what that's all about, so it was ok with me. I definitely would not have been good enough to play sports at a giant suburban school.

      I managed to get a high enough ACT score that I didn't even have to test out of Rhet 105. So that worked out well enough for me. LOL

      May I ask when you graduated from UIUC?
    19. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I didn't. I went for 3 years (starting in '95), then decided to get a job as a sysadmin so I could pay for stuff, and ended up finishing up a CS degree through Franklin University's online program (which fit around my work schedule better, being asynchronous and all). I've been considering doing UIUC's IMCS program, but just haven't been able to convince my employer (or wife ;)) to fork over the cash for those classes. The online thing worked out well, as I now work for an online course developer. :)

      The rhet105 prof thing based on ACT must be a new one - I got a 34 on my ACT (somehow I got a 36 on the math component despite my crummy background) and still had to take a written math and "writin'" placement test before enrolling at UIUC.

      There were 47 people in my graduating class - small-town central IL at its finest. Our athletics were adequate (I played until I got hurt my Junior year), but our acedemics sucked. Makes me wish I'd been in your small-town school instead. :)

    20. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      Not bad. Sounds like things worked out for you. LOL

      I think that 34 and up on the English part of the test qualifies you for getting out of Rhet 105. I'm not entirely sure though, because I had a 36. Eh.

      My home is in northwest Illinois. About 30 miles south of the Quad Cities, in Woodhull, IL. Good ol' AlWood High.

    21. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was probably a good decision to get a job *before* the dot-com thing went all to heck. :)

      I think I "only" got a 33 on the english part, so perhaps that's why I still had to take a test there. Huh. Judging based on how my peers performed on the ACT, I'd think that anything over 25 or so should be adequate. Then again, looking at the quality of people's written communication in general, perhaps the bar is appropriately located at 34. ;)

      Winchester is located pretty much where a line west from Springfield and north from St. Louis would intersect. I've been through Woodhull, but I don't remember why (or when). That's probably similar to how most people remember Winchester - "there's a sign on the interstate that says Winchester's that way, though I've never been there"...

    22. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the kind of crap that passes for good writing around here is pretty amazing. I took a journalism class during my freshman year and it's incredible that some of those people passed 8th grade, never-mind high school.

      Woodhull is the exit between the city of Galesburg and the Quad Cities on I74, so it's not surprising that you've driven through if you've ever been in that area of the state.

      I think I had to drive through (or near) Winchester when I was going to meet an MIT alumnus for an admissions interview. I don't really remember specifically, though, because that was 3.5 years ago.

    23. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Seems odd that you'd have any reason to go to (or through) Winchester - though there are a couple of colleges in nearby Jacksonville, and Winchester could potentially be near a decent route to Alton/St. Louis from up there.

      Hooray for drifting way offtopic... Stop by and say hi if you happen to participate in the Hot Rod Power Tour this year - it's not going too far from Chambana on its path through IL. :)

    24. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      It seems like it was on the route we used to cut down there, but like I said I don't entirely remember. I could be thinking of something completely different. Who knows? LOL

      I probably won't be down there, but thanks for the invite anyway. If you're ever in Woodhull look me up.

    25. Re:Salary by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I could almost take you up on that. ;) The power tour (home page here) is going St. Louis to Davenport on June 9. The most logical route, IMHO, would be to come up I55, then cut across 155 to I74. That'd take us through your back yard, it seems. My wife and I will be touring in what's very likely the only flat black '71 Chevelle with flat white doors. If you're into cars at all, you might wanna take a lawn chair out to the nearest interstate overpass (or head over to the cruise night in Davenport) - there should be a couple thousand muscle cars and newer hotrod-type cars driving by - we'll probably be in the area sometime early in the afternoon, given that the tour normally departs sometime around 8AM... Even if you don't see us, it might be fun to watch the pretty and/or old cars. ;)

    26. Re:Salary by holt · · Score: 1

      I put it on my calendar... Sounds pretty neat. I know exactly where I'll go to watch. Thanks for the tip!

      Uhg. I need to get back to studying, since today is the first day of finals. Slashdot is not going to help my GPA...

  47. As a CS student in the siebel center right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't look all THAT special. No really.

    It's pretty. But it's not this "magical wonderworld" or some shit, and the keycard readers are fucked up too.

  48. can't...resist..potty..humor by switcha · · Score: 1
    "Professor X is currently in Stall 5 of the Bathroom on the second floor, logging in."

    Shouldn't that be 'logging out'?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    1. Re:can't...resist..potty..humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be "logging on".

  49. Don't forget Towlet XP by Professor+Cool+Linux · · Score: 1

    Error: Chilly & cheeze don't mix.
    Want rectum reformated? [OK] [Cancel]

  50. The perfect excuse by Uninen · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...when caught from a bar near by:
    "Nooo. Can't go to school, they're running critical updates on our building today!"

  51. +2 Informative???? by fbform · · Score: 1


    Moderators! The link in the parent goes to a pic of an outhouse. Who the hell (two people actually) modded parent Informative?

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    1. Re:+2 Informative???? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's when you want to mod the moderators, +1, Irony. :-)

  52. Re:No referendum for Venezuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    s/Venezuela/USA
    s/Chavez/Bush

    ;-)

  53. The One by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

    There will be war between computers and all of humanity until Keanu Reeves shows up in the building to negotiate terms!

  54. Mods, try "Funny" by shigelojoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I bet you were aching to use that picture for *something*. : )

    I know that people usually don't RTFA, but if you are modding comments, please at least CTFL (Click The Fscking Link).

  55. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God gets angry, tosses lighting bolts, and causes all the people inside to speak diffrent languages. Film at 11.

  56. now what to do with DCL... by puppithead · · Score: 1

    I always thought it would make a great Quake level, so I'm kinda pushing for them to turn it into a paintball arena...think any of the administration would go for this?

  57. UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

    "The University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, one of the top Computer Science programs in the world "

    Who? Can't say that I've ever heard of them. Where do they appear on the list of other top western universities like MIT, Stanford, Cambridge, Oxford, etc? Is this some kind of in-place advertizing thing?

    1. Re:UIUC by seringen · · Score: 1

      For most US students the top three are MIT, UC Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon. However UIUC is also an excellent school, and shouldn't be mocked at all

    2. Re:UIUC by hackman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you haven't heard of UIUC for computing you probably haven't been around computing or academic circles very long. They have a very strong reputation in the field.

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    3. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll let you know before you read the rest of my post that I'm a current student at UIUC.

      I got into the PhD programs at Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, Carnegie-Mellon, and UIUC--and UIUC compares very well with the rest of these schools. The only thing UIUC lacks is the publicity to go with the quality of research that happens here. On the other hand, this is a good thing since the students here can concentrate more on research instead of just working very hard at appearing smart like some other schools promote.

      At UIUC, the professors are generally fairly young, which I view as a good thing. At the 'bigger' name schools you end up with a bunch of dinosaurs who may have contributed to the field in the past but are simply living off the legacy insteading doing new research. If you actually care about this, check out the UIUC research page at: http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/research/areas.html

      I have personally found the AI, Databases, and Theory groups to be very impressive and have had experience working with them.

      If you want an interesting comparison, check out MIT's new building.http://web.mit.edu/buildings/statacenter/ I took a tour of it, and the impression it gave me was, "Look at us, we're MIT! This building looks so crazy, we must be geniuses to work here!"

      UIUC has a much more honest and less flashy style, which I find rather refreshing.
      I do agree that most of the ubiquitous computing features of the building seem a little silly, but why not make your new computer science building a functional experiment in computer science itself?

    4. Re:UIUC by SnoopyZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you need to do is observe your surroundings a little more. To teach you a little more about UIUC, go ahead and follow the steps below in Internet Explorer. Click on Help --> About Internet Explorer Then read the textbox that comes up. "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign." The original web browser started there.

    5. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy totally goes to Berkeley.

    6. Re:UIUC by mrjah · · Score: 1

      As a two-time MIT grad student, I can assure you that the vast majority of computer types here at the Institute are rather accustomed to working in stuffy, concrete-faced buildings that date from before the moon shot.

      Among my circle of friends and colleagues, the Stata Center is eyed with curious suspicion and occasional annoyance.

    7. Re:UIUC by Kyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      HAL 9000 is from hereabouts. Perhaps you've heard of him. Granted, he did kill a few people, but no one is perfect...

    8. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think UIUC's real strength is in low-level stuff (EE and EE-oriented CS), rather than core CS areas. They had good people back in the past, but lately I've thought their ranking was a little overrated. Granted, it's not a bad school, but in terms of publications (both quality and quantity) in core CS areas (theory, systems, ai), they don't really match up to Berkeley or MIT.

      Note: I'm not a student at Berkeley, MIT, or UIUC.

    9. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of /.er are you?

      Anyway, I think you give them too much credit.

    10. Re:UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

      You're right, I haven't been around academia for a while. I graduated with a BSc. (Hons) Computer Science just after Mosaic came along. I always thought it was shit and considered the web no more usable than Gopher until Netscape exploded on to the scene with its pulsing N. Mosaic was nothing more really than a logical evolution of earlier work from other places.

      I think somebody else in the thread got it right when they said: "For most US students"...

    11. Re:UIUC by shadowmatter · · Score: 1

      "The Stata Center... is composed of The William H. Gates Building and the Alexander W. Dreyfoos Building."

      Looking at the GIF slideshow here, it appears that Bill's building has already crashed.

      Suprised? No. Amused? Yes.

      - sm

    12. Re:UIUC by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I forget, where did the creators of Netscape go to school?

    13. Re:UIUC by allanc · · Score: 1

      If you're using Mozilla or Firefox or running an Apache HTTP server (and you are, 'cause Slashdot's running Apache), you're using technologies that originated with UIUC. Mozilla evolved from Netscape which evolved from Mosaic which was developed at NCSA. Apache evolved from NCSA HTTPD.

      Their CS program has done some pretty important things.

      --AC

    14. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, "For most US students" and "For most students" is effectively the same thing. Foreign schools can't compare with US schools in Computer Science, they don't have the resources and they don't do the same calibre of work. There is a reason why the best and the brightest of the world come to the American Top 10 in CS. Because they are the best.

      Internationally, you only have a few schools which regularly turn out top quality work, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, University of Manchester, and occasionally Beijing. This isn't to say other foreign Universities don't turn out high quality people and research, they just don't do it regularly.

      The top 10 in CS have consistantly been (according to the Computing Research Association, and USNews): Stanford, Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, UIUC, MIT, Cornell, Princeton, UT-Austin, Washington, and Wisconsin. Occasionally CalTech also makes the list. The fact of the matter is, these schools are not just the best in the US, but also the best in the world.

    15. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      I'd disagree with that, the top three I'd put as Stanford, Berkeley, and Carnegie Mellon. MIT is a good school, but it isn't Stanford, Berkeley or Carnegie Mellon. In more recent years their level of work has declined a lot. I think it's due too much to "resting on their laurels" as for a while they were the premier institution in all science and engineering.

      With luck things will pick up there, and they'll move back into the top. But for right now I'd only rank them as top five, along Stanford, Berkeley, CMU, and UIUC.

    16. Re:UIUC by hethatishere · · Score: 1

      ...Okay, that was over ten years ago what are they doing now? We can all compile nice big lists of the recent contributions that the big three Technical Colleges in the country have been up to...where is UIUC? FYI, I've never even heard of this place and considering I work at a Science Museum I get my fill of urudite scientific papers crossing my desk and I haven't seen one by or referencing anything by UIUC in a long time.

      --
      Something intelligent here.
    17. Re:UIUC by seringen · · Score: 1

      well, if you're going to get even more nitpicky, it all depends on what the program is. I'd agree that MIT is definitely overrated, it's the harvard of the sciences for sure (in being obviously overrated and laurel-resting)

    18. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      I'm talking mainly about MIT's EECS department.

    19. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well UIUC did ONLY have 3 Nobel Prize winners this year so I'm not surprised you haven't heard of it.

    20. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we got on the NCSA Mosiac kick...

      To start here is a list of projects we are up to at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA) http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Projects/ongoing.html

      A quick look at the Top 500 supercomputers list will also yeild NCSA fame. http://www.top500.org/list/2003/11/

      Last let me boast about Terragrid, of which we are a part.
      http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Projects/TeraGrid/

      Granted these are NCSA accomplishments, we are housed and originated as part of UIUC. In CS we might not be the top, but our Electrical/Computer Engineering College is amazing. Some recent contributions to note, Prof Feng's World's fastest Transistors, Prof Feng and Prof Holonynak's Light Emitting Transistor. Not to mention the LED was developed in our labs oh so many years ago. We are not MIT, but we are still respected members of the research community. Do some research, I think you'd be suprised. Don't mock my school, thats personal.
      http://www.ece.uiuc.edu/

    21. Re:UIUC by cyril3 · · Score: 1

      The general rule "There is more than you know" is particularly true in your case.

    22. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, actually I live in Europe, as I computer scientist I should point out that UIUC appears much more frequently than Cambridge and Oxford... So it sounds quite funny to me that someone doing CS has never heard of it. Even two of the professors I had during my studies had been there for a while.

    23. Re:UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHA. Don't make me laugh. Talk about American arrogance and self-centred short-sightedness. When you you live in the US, all you hear about is American stuff - partly because of the size of the country, partly due to historic in-bred isolationalism, and partly because of jingoistic chest beating. Tell me why there is such an unusually high percentage of foreign born and educated people making Silicon Valley work if the US education system is so much better?

      When I lived in the US I had friends doing Masters in Computer Science... they were just getting on to stuff in their third or final years that I learnt during the first year of my undergraduate degree in the UK - and I didn't even go to one of the top-notch places in the UK either.

    24. Re:UIUC by Geekwad · · Score: 1

      He is not being arrogant when he says American schools are always the ones ranked highest in CS .. it's absolutely true and you can look it up. Regardless of what you may or may not have learned in your first years, I highly doubt that your entire CS education had been as utterly brutal (and, in turn, preparatory) as mine has been here at UIUC.

      --

      - http://pakman.sytes.net/
    25. Re:UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

      Who's doing the ranking?

      My experience of N. American education is that it's based on volume of vocational work. Intellectually simple, but brutally hard. When I did my exchange year, multi-week open-ended projects were unusual - instead it seemed that every course had simple one-week assignments every week. This stretches you in your ability to manage your time, but doesn't stretch you in your academic ability.

      Furthermore, exams were trivial and a complete joke: that's just a matter of regurgitating (sp?) anything covered in the lectures. Easy compared with what I was accustomed to: questions on topics not covered during term time, or application of previously taught concepts to new ideas, coupled with a low pass mark to allow the top students who read around the subject to really excel and show off their abilities.

      Also, brutally hard are places like Cambridge that traditionally has finals: exams at the end of your degree that cover everything from year 1. Exams in previous years don't really count towards your final degree - they ensure you can come back the next year. Modular degrees are so much easier to pass as you can keep working at it and retaking bits.

    26. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very correct, intellectually simple, brutally hard (in terms of time consumption). In my experience, I prefer my graduate students to be hard workers rather than smart thinkers. The hard workers tend to get more done. What I'd really like is to get both a hard worker and a smart thinker, but (to me) they seem to be a rare commodity both in Europe and the U.S.

    27. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      You can keep laughing, but in the end you're still wrong, and quite pathetic for not seeing it. In the research field you will find little "american arrogance", as most researchers over here are not american. My advisor was an italian, my co-advisor was greek. I have a friend who worked under an indian, and I worked very closely with a large number of chinese students. There is a reason all of the best minds come to the system here, because it is the best.

      We do pay a lot of attention to the international community though, in fact most conferences I've been involved with have been hosted overseas by a foreign University... yet most of the presenters are from American Universities. The research community is hardly isolated. We track papers written in all major languages, and I've had to translate several for the people I work with as we keep abrest with many foreign projects that are doing some amazing work. However the bulk of truly revolutionary work comes from American institutions. Face it, it is a fact.

      For your information, most of Silicon valley is foreign born and American educated. Even if that were a point, which it isn't, Silicon Valley is not a place where good research is occuring, it's a great spot for commercial adaptation of work which has already been done, but other than the influence of Stanford, Berkeleky and occasionally UCSF, the Valley produces very little original work.

      P.S. If you knew anything about science or math (which speaks to your poor education), you'd realize that your friend with a Masters degree is not a good sample of the US population. Yes, anyone who gets a masters in CS from any old crappy school is going to be piss poor. America has plenty of piss poor Universities, but it also has all of the best.

    28. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      You've already state you go to a mediocre at best University, and you expect us to believe your exchange was with a program worthy of comparison? The courses I took consisted of some simple one week assignments every week, yes, but they were in addition to long term research projects. We had to submit a project proposal within the first few weeks of class, detailing what our research would cover, along with background info and citations to show it was original work, and to provide back up for our methods. During the semester, in addition to balancing our weekly projects, we had to produce real results on our research, and submit our data and work frequently for discussion. By the end, we had not only a long and difficult exam, but also a presentation, and a full write up of our results, typically 50 - 100 pages or more with appendices. If your project passed muster and was considered publishable research, you'd get an A, if it wasn't quite ready for publication, but close, you'd get a B, anything less was unacceptable.

      Furthermore, during a PhD, you have several comprehensive exams you must pass, covering any and all material in the field, whether you have had classes in it or not.

      It's no wonder the program you exchanged with was poor, you stated yourself in a previous post you don't go to a top notch program in the UK, and the good Universities here are not going to take you seriously enough for admission. The good Universities here have acceptance rates well under 5%, and a massive lot of international and resident applicants. The programs are the most competitive in the world, and the best.

    29. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, I prefer my graduate students to be hard workers rather than smart thinkers.

      This must be a systems prof.

    30. Re:UIUC by J.+Chrysostom · · Score: 1

      UIUC is generally agreed to be the number 5 ranked CS school in the country after MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Stanford and U Cal @ Berkeley.

    31. Re:UIUC by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      My experience of N. American education

      Disclaimer: I did CS at UIUC as an undergrad and can't in complete fairness speak to how the grad programs work. It's also been a number of years, so it's possible some things have changed.

      Simply: From what you're saying you've seen, going through the computer science program at a school like UIUC is utterly unlike anything you've experienced.

      It's a grueling academic endurance trial unlike anything you're probably capable of accurately imagining. I don't mean to be condescending in saying that; it's just the truth as I see it.

      Imagine taking classes, as an undergrad, that are over half composed of grad students. Imagine, also, competing with some students who are very experienced or even published in the field, who are really only after a prestigous diploma. Imagine competing with them on a curve where only 40% of the class can get As or Bs -- and anything less puts you in danger of probation or explusion. Imagine sleeping less than 20 hours a week, every week, for a semester at a time, because there simply isn't time to get all of your requisite project work done any other way. Imagine exam prep sessions where your TA in all seriousness tells you, "Guys, I've just read the exam the professor wrote, and honestly -- I absoutely couldn't pass this thing if you gave me a week to work on it. Good luck."

      These are a small sample of everyday experiences from my undergrad education. If you'd like, I can also tell horror stories, such as the time dozens of students in a one-hour class I took (not including myself, thankfully) were failed and denied graduation and thus already-accepted jobs. It's not like they were all blowing off the class in senior slump mode either -- most of them were genuinely trying their best to pass it.

    32. Re:UIUC by shnarez · · Score: 2, Informative
    33. Re:UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

      I didn't say I went to a mediocre university. As it happens, I still have the offer letter I got from Cambridge. I turned them down though as I wanted to go somewhere with a decent foreign exchange programme. I don't consider CU Boulder a bad university, but I would say my undergraduate degree is easily equivalent of their masters programme... in fact I learnt more than my friends who got MCSs from there. It's sounds like the research project I had to do in the final year of my undergraduate degree was more involved than yours. Also, what's all this crap about PhDs? I chose not to do one - unnecessary waste of time unless you want to do academic research for the rest of your life. Certainly no benefit to me on existing education.

    34. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the American way. Work enough hours and you'll get the results you want. Get enough monkeys working for long enough and you'll get the works of Shakespeare. Personally I prefer living in other countries where they work smarter and so can enjoy life more. I don't want to have regrets when I die from spending too much time at the office.

    35. Re:UIUC by Malc · · Score: 1

      You're quite thin-skinned, aren't you? Definitely overly sensitive. You speak a lot about your own personal qualities when you yourself stoop down and join in with the belittling and ad hominems. You certainly sound quite sheltered and with little practical experience outside your own country. Oh well, I'm bored with prodding you in to predictable responses...

    36. Re:UIUC by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      You mistake me, the projects I was indicating were not a final year project, they were per course. Our senior year of undergraduate we had to submit a thesis, similar to that required for a masters. You were expected to start your research summer before your senior year, then work through the year, having a prelim in Decemeber, and a final defense in May of your thesis. Very involved.

      No Colorado at Boulder isn't bad, but it also isn't good. It's ranked between 35th and 39th depending on who you ask. Anything below the top 20 really isn't considered high enough calibre for serious graduate work, and anything under the top 10 isn't going to be as rigorous or competitive, but it still isn't "bad" per se. Its the sort of school one might go to if one were more interested in technical work, or a vocational education as opposed to a research or science based one.

      As for PhD's, they're required in America for any type of serious research, or engineering work as you are competeing with people who have them. It's seen as a needed apprenticeship to prove that other groups should invest time and money in you to produce good quality work. Otherwise you may not be research quality, and be better served as a code monkey. Elsewhere they may not be needed but in the American research community it is required to be competitive, both in Academia, Gov't research labs, or in industrial research labs.

    37. Re:UIUC by SnoopyZ · · Score: 1

      It's Mosaic, seperate from Windows.

    38. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Undergrad education should not be that grueling. I see one of two explanations:

      1. You were not talented enough
      2. You were thrashing and should have spent more time sleeping. I knew a few students like this who worked constantly but were not that productive.

      I graduated from UIUC CS with a 3.9 GPA and I can honestly say that I had more sleep and free-time than I had in high school.

    39. Re:UIUC by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Your mileage may vary. That doesn't agree with what even one person I knew as an undergrad was saying, though.

      Actually, I don't think I know anyone studying CS there at the same time I was who spent less time on their education than I did.

    40. Re:UIUC by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. Inculcating hard work at the expense of smart innovation frequently results in inefficient work. Smart people find short cuts to get the same amount of work done with less effort/time.

      --
      Beetle B.
    41. Re:UIUC by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Why a PhD? Well, at least here in the US, it's practically necessary (although not sufficient) if you want to do research in industry. If you don't want that, or abhor becoming an academic, don't bother.

      Yes, people with Masters once in a while get to do research in a company, but they have to demonstrate exceptional research oriented skills to get that position, and frequently the company infrastructure does not permit such a display.

      --
      Beetle B.
    42. Re:UIUC by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Funny - I count only 2.

      --
      Beetle B.
    43. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I graduated from UIUC CS with a 3.9 GPA and I can honestly say that I had more sleep and free-time than I had in high school.

      When you weren't working on classwork, what were you doing? I bet it was either sleeping or jerking off. If you were, in fact, more well-rounded than that, you're smarter than the average student. However, I think you are probably just a dick and you have to attack people on Slashdot to make up for your (ahem) shortcomings.

    44. Re:UIUC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess you won't regret *anything* after you are dead. Or do anything at all, for that matter.

  58. Re:If interaction means... by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though the university itself can only carry coca cola products, at the ACM office in Siebel they've got a "robotic" soda machine called Caffeine that will give you Mountain Dew or whatever else it is currently stocked with, and just bill a few cents to your account. There is even a website I think where you can view soda statistics (yes, mountain dew wins).

  59. What the f**** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beat this http://www.duffield.cornell.edu
    Biggest cleanroom with most verstile range of nanotechnology equipments any university dreamt so far.
    Cost : 65 million dollars for the entire thing
    Class 10 clean room with TWO state of the art E-beam machines.

  60. Hack Gaia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stop at the professor? The hacker could have a building full of hostages.
    Plus, all the "computers and PDAs, closed-circuit TV cameras, telephones and infrastructure (heating/cooling/lighting/door locks)" would be under the control of that person...

    Just lock all the doors and crank up the heating to start a nice Korean BBQ. Mmmmm

  61. Ugh. Microsoft Goatsy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n.t.

  62. No spell-checker if that $80 mill? by Missionary+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nice building.

    Shame they didn't get a spell-checker with it. I believe the reference to "Accomodations" on the main page of their website should read "Accommodations".

    Ho hum. Am I being too picky?

    1. Re:No spell-checker if that $80 mill? by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Uhm.

      No spell-checker if that $80 mill? (Score:1)
      :-)
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:No spell-checker if that $80 mill? by Missionary+Man · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that?

      "If" is spelled correctly.

      It's just the wrong word, that's all.

  63. Only mountain dew on this campus... by Benley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah... except for THIS soda machine (which just so happens to be in the seibel center) The link points at the web server running inside the pop machine itself. The only photo I can find of the thing is here, with one of the guys who worked on it sitting in front of it. And a BeBox perched on top.

    1. Re:Only mountain dew on this campus... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      but it looks like all they've got right now is sprite...

    2. Re:Only mountain dew on this campus... by nosphalot · · Score: 1
      Oh thats scary. I know that machine.

      While the machine may be in the Seibel building now, it used to be in the ACM chapter office in the old CS building, which is where the picture was taken. That machine dates back to my undergradute days in 96 or so, although I'm sure it was around longer than that. I even remember when Be came to campus and gave the ACM chapter those BeBoxes.

  64. Of course not... by poptones · · Score: 1

    It can't do anything right. It only appears to be doing something between hourly reboots.

  65. Scratches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn this story makes my Luddite skin itch.

  66. Hey, that's the old UIUC Woodshop! by mookoz · · Score: 1

    15 years ago I had to work on my CS225 labs on the second floor of the old Woodshop. 1st floor, planing sanders! 2nd floor, AT&T 3b2s!

    Amazing what a few bubbles can do to the campus.

  67. Not likely by _defiant_ · · Score: 1

    CITES (runs the majority of computing services for the campus) has already started its takeover of DCL.

  68. Espresso bar! by jcuervo · · Score: 2, Funny

    They failed to mention whether caffeine was gratis or not.

    If it's free, I'm going to college.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    1. Re:Espresso bar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it isnt. 3 bucks for a mocha, expensive stuff.

    2. Re:Espresso bar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The espresso bar isn't free. (And sorry, Jason; Dew isn't free, either.) On the other thand, there are at least five coffee machines on every floor, dispensing free (as in beer) coffee 24/7. Soon they will be hooked up the RFID tags implanted in our br-- implanted in ou-- impla-- Soon they'll read our minds.

  69. Tina... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where the fuck are you? Give this man his prizes.

  70. Re:Way cool! by FelixCat · · Score: 1
    In all fairness you have been living in the building before it was officially "open".

    In fact, if I recall, the contractors are still working on the building right now. If you look at the progress that has been made just in the past few days, I'm sure they will eventually achieve a large number of the goals they have set for this project.

    Just give them some time to "debug" the building.

  71. As a Computer Science student at UIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its always amusing to type in CS and UIC into google and have it ask me if I mean UIUC.

  72. Hey, I used to live there! by bob_shoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now I know why they bought and knocked down my old apartment building!

    1. Re:Hey, I used to live there! by slamden · · Score: 1

      shit, i used to live there on stoughton, too...

  73. kewl by wviperw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Surprisingly enough, I just happened to visit this building this past Monday. I was taking a visit to UIUC (thinking about transferring there) for the first time, and was referred to this building, since I'm a CS major.

    When I was in there Monday, all kinds of work was being done on the building--I would have never thought it'd be done so soon. I absolutely loved the architecture though, very very cool. And I can't count how many "50 inch plasma screens on wheels" I saw in the various rooms.

    And just think, all that above deeply impressed me, and I didn't even have a clue that the building was going to be a giant computer/the first of its kind.

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
  74. who cares about computers? by diablobsb · · Score: 1

    who cares about computers?
    will we have Milla Jovovich fighting zombies on this one?

    --
    I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
  75. Siebel Systems Sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. CEO makes a lot of money building a business at the right time, not a bad business, not a particularly great business.

    2. CEO gives away a lot of money to get press.

    3. Econony tanks along with company because they grew too fast, too soon. Did I mention that they bought an auction company for $500 million in stock?

    4. During company meeting in 2003, says that no jobs will be offshored.

    5. 3 months later, 400-500 QA engineers (most of whom worked about 60-70 hours a week to get the Siebel 7.0 release out the door) from the USA are laid off - I was one of those engineers that was laid off.

    6. Raises and bonuses are given to Directors and above 1 month later.

    7. early 2004, Engineers in the USA start to leave due to shit management and shit projects and shit product managers that like buzzwords such as ERM and ISS.

    8. 2004 ... Siebel opens an engineering office in India - but the engineers in the US office know nothing. Senior management types that I keep in touch with have informed me that since engineers were leaving anyways it doesn't matter anymore.

    8. Be happy that the $$$ given to UIUC didn't go into his bank account - lying bastard. Tom Siebel - Larry Ellison Wannabee. RIP bastard

  76. Make it so. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Pop, Mountain Dew, Cold.

    1. Re:Make it so. by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Damnit.

      I want to resist but can't.

      I know I'll sound like some damn AOL fool, but...

      "Gawd, that'd be cool!"

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  77. Not true... by raehl · · Score: 1

    I've found that using my cell phone to receive calls from my girlfriend has severe consequences on my mental health.

  78. "Most advanced???" by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    So just how does "lots of computer-related toys" translate to "most advanced?"

    Seriously, where's the discussion about environmental controls? HVAC improvements? Energy efficiency? Chemical and electronic emissions?

    Don't get me wrong--this isn't a bad idea, nor is it a bad building. It's cool but relatively straightforward to create a building with endless technological integration, on the level they're talking.

    But HVAC is a very big, expensive, INCREDIBLY important, and not yet solved problem, which probably has more long-term relevance than anything they spent $80M on in this project.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  79. Bad math. by raehl · · Score: 1

    Faculty members, on salary and benefits alone, cost a lot more than $100,000 per year. Now, don't forget to add a place for them to work, money for them to do research, tuition assistence for their research assistants, people to take out the professors' garbage, electricity for the professors' lamp, etc.

    Or look at it another way - it's only 10,000 undergratuate tuition years (assuming UIUC tuition is still $8k.)

  80. photos of siebel center at night. by bigtrick · · Score: 2, Informative

    i took some; they're .

    1. Re:photos of siebel center at night. by bigtrick · · Score: 1

      repost - bad link. i took some; they're here.

  81. Until recently... (like, last week) by raehl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    UIUC had the #1 paintball team in the country.

    Damned Boilermakers.

  82. Re:Analyst Credentials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow... This is an entirely different article!

  83. we call it Meta Moderation by Derf+the · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    But how often do *you* actually do your bit!

    --
    No. You can't look at my Sig; it's mine, and I'm not showing you.
  84. Sign of Impending Failure by wwi · · Score: 1

    My personal experience has been that
    when an organization builds a fantastic,
    expensive new building, the organization
    itself is on the verge of failure, and you
    can expect it to be out of business in
    a very short time.

  85. Indeed... by raehl · · Score: 1

    UIUC always ranked better in EE and CompE than in CS.

  86. Been there - building is awesome, network sucks by Paco103 · · Score: 1

    We were there for the Microsoft Imagine Cup contest a couple weeks ago. The building is totally sweet, and looks amazing. The bathroom has solid chrome hand-dryers. (I know that's not THAT much - but considering at MY school the paper towel dispensers don't always work. . . ) The only complaint I have is their network connection. You connect, it asks you to logon. I choose guest authentication, enter my info/purpose (We are there for legitimate CS business) - and it lets me on. Sometimes it lasts for an hour, sometimes it asks you to log on when you click a link from the authentication success screen. I checked cookies, so that wasn't it, and we were ALL having that problem. Seems like the worlds most advanced building needs an upgrade already :P It still makes me happy and I want to go there. . . too bad I'm not rich :(

  87. RFID Tags and privacy... by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

    I can feel my knee jerking already!

  88. Stanford's building problems by Animats · · Score: 1
    Stanford has been doing badly with new science buildings.

    First came the building for the IC designers. This has its very own wafer fab. Unfortunately, it's a 1980s wafer fab. Wafer fabs are too expensive to keep up to date unless they're heavily used. So it's obsolete. If you want something fabbed, you send it out.

    Then came the Gates Computer Science building. This is where AI went to die. Visit the second floor "Knowledge Systems Lab", and see all the empty cubicles with obsolete computers. The layout is wierd; the basement and first floor are difficult to get to from each other, and are connected only via a seminar room. The corridors are devoted to a museum of old computer equipment, of mixed historical importance. ("Wow, an '80s DEC Ethernet hub! There's a Gandalf port selector box!")

    Then there was the Lane Medical Library. Built with built-in stacks just as medical data was going online, it's used as office space. The immovable stacks remain, dividing up the space into long narrow office aisles.

    Then came the New Engineering Quad. Finished at the height of the dot-com boom, it looks great. But it has all the wrong built-in stuff, like in-wall VCRs. More museum area. ("Wow, an original HP audio oscillator!") Good expresso bar, though.

    The latest building is the Clarke Center for Biotech Engineering Stuff. Jim Clarke put up the money just before Netscape tanked. SGI contributed an obsolete supercomputer. Nobody seems quite sure what's going on there. The building has the overdesigned look of the free-spending dot-com era. There's steel and glass and balconies and atriums.

  89. UIUC indeed. by Geekwad · · Score: 1

    I actually have the pleasure of having a class at Siebel next semester (my Compilers class) as well as having used it for my video editing needs this semester. -- It's a beautiful building. Balconies, courtyards, art-deco frosted glass tables, windowed offices .. it's gorgeous. Not to mention all of its RFID capabilities, certainly .. it's definitively the nicest building on campus.

    --

    - http://pakman.sytes.net/
  90. Re:As a CS student in the siebel center right now. by reCURSE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I watched Prof. Jeff Erickson swipe three times before the reader finally recognized him. The elevators fried for a few hours the other night too. It'll all be nice and pretty in a few months.

    --
    ~LD "My destiny was to be a karma whore. Then, I forgot my user name."
  91. Obligatory Die Hard reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well DUH -- anyone who's seen Die Hard knows that :-)

  92. software architecture by ragnar · · Score: 1

    After years of hearing all those poor analogies about how software development should be more like building an edifice, we get to see it in practice. Let's just hope they don't need to do too many patches. ;)

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  93. C'mon lets leave some history behind by Neo's+Nemesis · · Score: 0

    We really have to setup structures to match the colloseum, tajmahal, etc.

    Let us leave something for the humans 1000yrs later, when they visit back the planet for research see that we had really grown.

    No matter whatever you want to put in the buildings, if it looks confusing and mystical, put it! Scientists would be making really really strange assumptions later...

  94. Every CS department is the best in the WORLD!!! by atlacatl · · Score: 1

    :)

    "one of the top Computer Science programs in the world" - I've heard this claim from almost every University with a CS department. I thought the University of Waterloo was "one" of the bes...blah, blah...

    --
    Esta es una firma en Espanol.
    1. Re:Every CS department is the best in the WORLD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds about right. Heck, even my school, the University of Cape Town, claims that its CS department is "world class". Of course that's a rather ill-defined term, but it implies that we could complete with the best. Other than our ACM ICPC performances (13th and 15th in 2003 and 2004), there's absolutely nothing world class about our department.

      It's such an overused term nowadays that my brain's been trained to just skip over any paragraph that mentions the words now.

  95. Am I the only person by krgallagher · · Score: 1

    When I saw the headline "Worlds Most Advanced Building", the first thing I thought of was the old Tom and Jerry cartoons where Tom chases Jerry into the "House of the Future."

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  96. Maybe someone should've told them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe someone should've told UIUC that neither the U.S. Gov nor U.S. Corporations really care about remaining at the forefront of technological innovation. They just spent 80mil on training the next generation of white-collar unemployed.

    They would've done better to build larger facilities for the study of 'human manipulation', 'bullshit', or 'creative profit reporting'.

    Sorry, my extreme cynisism coming through but what is this here? The AC button!

  97. Re:As a CS student in the siebel center right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched Prof. Jeff Erickson swipe three times before the reader finally recognized him.

    The card reader thought I was Pedro. --Jeff

  98. Re:As a CS student in the siebel center right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least it's not just me, then. :-)

  99. Gremlins 2 by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    The fools. Haven't they watched Gremlins 2?

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  100. Re:What are you smoking? Probably not much. by Beetle+B. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, I'm in the ECE department, and I'll tend to agree with you with regards to their grad admission - not as hard as their peers to get in. But they have a good filtration system when it comes to the qualifying exams for the PhD.

    --
    Beetle B.
  101. Can be either/or by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Electronic locks can be either "fail-safe" or "fail-secure". Fail-safe means they unlock when the power fails and, you guessed it, fail-secure means they lock when losing power and won't unlock until power is restored.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent