Slashdot Mirror


Metal Velcro

RotJ writes "British scientists have developed technology that can grow structures up to 2 millimetres high and 0.2 millimetres in diameter on metal surfaces. Dubbed Surfi-Sculpt, it 'will act like ultra-strong Velcro to form much tougher joints between metals and lightweight composite materials'."

192 comments

  1. Fast to create as well by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whenever I read one of these articles about a process requiring X, Y and Z to all do novel things A,B and C under strict conditions, I always think 'how are you going to commercialise that?! Chip fabrication was a case in point - I guess where there's a multi-billion dollar will, there's a way...

    This process requires lasers to melt the metal and tease the structures into being and yet it can do 100 cm^2 in 10 seconds... That's just not intuitive [grin]. Kudos to the researchers - us Brits have always been jealous of the Yanks for inventing the zip anyway :-)

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Fast to create as well by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Informative
      us Brits have always been jealous of the Yanks for inventing the zip anyway/i>

      Really? Strange, since the modern zipper was invented by Canadian Gideon Sundback.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Fast to create as well by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the word 'modern' in that sentence implies an 'earlier' version...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    3. Re:Fast to create as well by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's not a laser at all, but an electron beam. And as for the speed at which an electron beam can be scanned over a square surface, chances are you're staring at a demonstration of this as you read this.

      This is the same technology that is used in CRT's, but scaled up a few orders of magnitude in power. And a computer just draws shapes with it, like an old vector graphics screen. Not just commercializable, it's easy to do.

    4. Re:Fast to create as well by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Check the link I gave for a picture of an earlier version, Whitcomb Judson's clasp locker. Now I ask you, would you wear one of those on the crotch of your pants? Didn't think so!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Fast to create as well by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not around my crotch [grin] but they were all originally designed for boots, and I'd probably (carefully, mind) use it to do up my boots...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    6. Re:Fast to create as well by nih · · Score: 2, Funny

      MY EYES!

      --
      I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    7. Re:Fast to create as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The goggles do nothing!!!!" - Simpsons

    8. Re:Fast to create as well by fire5ign · · Score: 1
      Brits have always been jealous of the Yanks for inventing the zip anyway

      Actually, the modern zipper was designed by Gideon Sundback, a colonial from Canada. American Whitcomb Judson is credited for the invention, but his device worked poorly and bears little resemblance to the fasteners we now use. It was Sundback's fastener that was marketed by B.F. Goodrich as the "zipper".

    9. Re:Fast to create as well by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My brother (Who's in the Navy) showed me one of his uniforms when we used the adopt-a-sailor program to see him this past Christmas. (He was still in basic training.)

      It had 13 buttons that had to be undone before you could use the bathroom. You can't tell me they don't learn how to plan ahead in the Navy. ;)

    10. Re:Fast to create as well by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess where there's a multi-billion dollar will, there's a way...

      ...and a beneficiary.

    11. Re:Fast to create as well by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      So with a minor modification to my CRT, I could have a velco face? Cool! Who'd say no to that!! :)

    12. Re:Fast to create as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the brits had something to do with that too?

    13. Re:Fast to create as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loads of people! It's not that much fun, just ask any Greek woman.

    14. Re:Fast to create as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do all zippers have YKK stamped in the little pull thingy?

    15. Re:Fast to create as well by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. Velcro is pretty Metal by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In fact I saw Tom Araya wearing velcro hi-tops the last time Slayer toured.

    1. Re:Velcro is pretty Metal by freakyfreak · · Score: 1

      Sweet, Slayer Rocks. I'm so pissed that OzzFest decided to cut out their Somerset Wi stop. I was hoping to see Slayer get down and dirty in my home area.

  3. Velcro by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well we can now that everything in society is being held together only by Velcro :P

    --
    Join the TWIT army now!
  4. Name? by deutschemonte · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dubbed Surfi-Sculpt

    This is why British stuff doesn't do well in America. The name sounds too much like "Stiffy-Sculpt".

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brits can speak properly...

    2. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The brits can speak properly...

      Only in their own little world. Any language that refuses to evolve with time and/or incorporate better aspects from various other languages is on its way to become a dead language.

    3. Re:Name? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But it has evolved with time. Most current British accents are even further from speech of a few hundred years ago than many American accents.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Name? by Ckwop · · Score: 1

      lol.. I have a question for Americans and other nationalities in general.. Do your accents change every 3 or 4 miles..

      For instance.. Our accent in this end of town is different from the one down the road.. No kidding..

      Liverpool is only 11 miles away and that has a different accent again. Warrington does to. Runcorn has a different again..

      Is it just Britain that has this property?

      Simon.

    5. Re:Name? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Do your accents change every 3 or 4 miles..

      No, the accents intermix.

      For instance, people in Massachusetts can have either no accent (regular American accent), or a New England accent (pahk the cah in Hahvahd yahd), all within the same area.

      Then, of course, there are dialects like Ebonics.

      Also, since we are a country entirely made up of immigrants, you hear English spoken with many accents. Most large cities have large Spanish, Italian, or Chinese sections ("Little Italy", "Chinatown") within them that still speak their native language most of the time. Along the coast in Massachusetts, there is a large population of Portugese families that have been here for generations, yet still speak mostly Portugese.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    6. Re:Name? by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
      I suspect a lot of countries in the 'old-world' have this property, as until recently, there has been very little migration and people tended to stay in their communities. Countries like Germany and Italy only became countries in the last 150 or so years, and before then, there probably wasn't any attempts at large scale language standardisations. In these two countries, the spoken dialects are radically different from eachother. In fact, 'Low-German' (or Nedersachsisch' (sp?) ) which is what they speak in Northern Germany (and also parts of Eastern Netherlands) is actually considered a separate language. Southern Germany and Switzerland and Austria speak 'High German' which is a distinct sounding dialect (not sure if that is also considered to be another language).

      The inhabitants of the 'new world' came from all over the place in the country in the old world that colonised the area. Once there, the different populations assimilated, and differences in the accenst were ironed out. Also because of the vast ammounts of land available, people spread out very quickly without giving their dialects a chance to evolve.

      Within the USA, apart from the South-East which has a radically different dialect, most of the USA and Anglophone-Canada is more or less the same. But there are subtle differences in the accents, but as Americans are generally much more spread out, you have to travel far to notice an accent-change.

      One thing I'm still curious about is which old-world languages and dialects evolved into the various American-English dialects, and how come the south-east has such a radically different dialect.

    7. Re:Name? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      I think there are different mechanisms at work in British/American accents.

      British accents depend on those nearby e.g. Liverpool, being the major port to Ireland, has an accent which is a mixture of Irish and Yorkshire.

      in America accents can be based on where people emigrated from e.g. North Dakota (in Fargo) where everyone sounds Swedish because that's where the founders came from.

      in Britain accents change in a continuous way whereas in America state boundaries often involve miles of empty space where accents can become cut off from other states.

    8. Re:Name? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      most of the USA and Anglophone-Canada is more or less the same.

      Tell dat to a Newfinlander, eh?

      Bay, da East Coost as a deffern't accint den deh rest uh Canadah.

      It's good that you narrowed it to anglophone Canada; we have a very large segment we like to call "Quebec" that has a radically different accent. As a result, however, there are a lot of people in and around la Belle Province that speak English ("Hanglish") with a distinct French accent ("Montreal accent", as my friend from dere puts it).

      The difference becomes really apparent when you phone customer service and are greeted with "Allo, mynameees .... Ow may eye elp yoooo?"

      I've also noticed that some people from the left coast (west coast - British Columbia) tend to have more laid back speech; almost a drawl. Nowhere near as defined as Texas, but more subtle. (We Canucks don't like to be obtuse, eh)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    9. Re:Name? by Feniscowles · · Score: 1

      As Liverpool was part of Lancashire prior to the county boundary changes of 1972, I think its accent is more likely to be a mixture of Irish and Lancashire, not Yorkshire. Of course, those changes in 1972 were to administrative counties and, strictly speaking. the old county still exists. From the Mersey to the lakes and from the Irish Sea to the Pennines! All 7 million if us! P.S. Death to Yorkshire.

    10. Re:Name? by rokzy · · Score: 1

      yes Lancashire! you can't mix the counties! ;-)

    11. Re:Name? by Venner · · Score: 1
      I've heard that some Germans get a big kick out of hearing the Amish here in Ohio/Pennsylvania speak. Being a closed, somewhat isolated community, the language has basically stagnated for the last few hundred years.
      (The other groups of "Pennsylvania Deutsch" speakers have mostly died out or adopted English.)

      An example I found,
      Excert from Lord's Prayer, Amish dialect:

      Unser Fadder im Himmel,
      dei Naame loss heilich sei,
      Dei Reich loss kumme,
      Dei Wille loss gedu sei,
      uff die Erd wie im Himmel

      Contrast with modern German

      Vater unser im Himmel,
      geheiligt werde dein Name.
      dein Reich komme,
      dein Wille geschehe
      wie im Himmel, so auf Erden.
      --
      A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    12. Re:Name? by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Actually, they don't mix as much as you may think. There are still linguists (like my Spanish professor three semesters ago) who can place somebody by county based on their speech.

    13. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some places, we have the same thing. Once you get away from the east coast you're pretty safe if you only learn a new accent every few hundred miles. I dunno how the west coast is, I haven't had much experience over there.

    14. Re:Name? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      There are still linguists (like my Spanish professor three semesters ago) who can place somebody by county based on their speech.

      Really? What are the differences in accents between Bristol, Norfolk, Suffolk, Middlesex, and Essex counties? I ask, because, it would really freak people out if I could tell what part of 128 they live near.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    15. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Countries like Germany and Italy only became countries in the last 150 or so years

      Correction: Countries like Germany and Italy, which were always countries, only became centralised states during the past 150 years.

    16. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wild differences between all of those. Go and find some English people, ask them where they're from, ask if they speak with RP or not. if they don't, they'll probably be pretty regional so just listen and learn. Where I'm from in rural Herefordshire, one end of my village sounds very different from the other, a matter of about 3 miles. The next town four miles away is completely different and the one over the hill (admittedly in another county) is not of this earth. I don't think it's something you can learn too easily but something your ear grows accustomed to as you grow up. However, if you can't hear the difference between someone from Newcastle and someone from York, you're deaf!

    17. Re:Name? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Where I'm from in rural Herefordshire, one end of my village sounds very different from the other, a matter of about 3 miles.

      Uh, I bet it does. However, I was asking specifically about counties in Massachusetts, USA and the differences in accents between them in response to the poster of my previous post. AFAIK, there is no Herefordshire in MA.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  5. Let me be the first to say... by Scorpion_1169 · · Score: 4, Funny

    OUCH!!! I really wouldnt want to accidentally sit on that stuff. Think cactus spines that refuse to come out.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah, it wouldn't have that effect. Ever laid on a bed of nails? Since there are so many, it supports you without much discomfort.

      I'm sure they're too small to pierece the skin, anyway. The most they'd probably do is get suck on you and itch like crazy.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd hate to see if they ever made toilet seats or even toilet paper out of that stuff! OUCH!!!!

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "OUCH!!! I really wouldnt want to accidentally sit on that stuff. Think cactus spines that refuse to come out."

      Could I be the first to patent the use of this stuff in walls and security-fences covered with microsocopic little spikes?

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe one could cover it with some sort of pigment before getting seated: instant tatoo!

      --
      Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by metlin · · Score: 3, Funny

      The most they'd probably do is get suck on you and itch like crazy.

      And that is not bad how? ;-)

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by bob65 · · Score: 1
      Ever laid on a bed of nails? Since there are so many, it supports you without much discomfort.

      But what about sitting on a bed of nails?

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Dros68 · · Score: 1

      Gee... how come no one has patented a security fence covered in Velcro before? Could it be the object is NOT to provide a simple means to climb up the security fence?

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CowBovNeal · · Score: 1

      Why the heck will they make toilet seats out of such a material? or toilet paper for that matter?
      The parent mentioned "accidentally". You do not sit on a toilet seat "accidentally" or use toilet paper "accidentally".
      What will your next suggestion be? "This stuff would be really uncomfortable to sleep on instead of my regular bed?"
      I hope you are the first and last person to suggest such stupid uses.
      Use your brain, damnit.

      --
      Bush is on fire and its not good for my lungs.
  6. Rods huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anybody else notice a striking resemblence between those 'rods' and some other 'rods' that ~50% on the planet's population have? *cough*

    1. Re:Rods huh? by alstor · · Score: 1
      Yea...especially with the headline
      Surface eruption
      in the article...
    2. Re:Rods huh? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      ~50% on the planet's population have?

      Actually, it's about 40%.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    3. Re:Rods huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40% ?

      Hell, that's the best news I've heard all day !

      That means 60% is female, and that means more females
      for me :-)

    4. Re:Rods huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when I was a kid I always wondered why they were called male/female connectors. Can't blame for watching pr0n if the whole society is based on such "constructs".

  7. Sounds familiar by INeededALogin · · Score: 1, Funny

    To make a projection, researchers focus a beam of electrons in a vacuum chamber at the point on a metal surface where they want it to grow. The metal melts at the centre of the beam. When the beam is moved sideways, surface tension pulls the molten metal into a droplet.

    Sounds like me with a soldering iron

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 1

      Beam of electrons? Vaccum chamber? Yeah that sounds like a soldering iron all right.

  8. i smell gay... by bearik · · Score: 1

    they are using small penises to fasten metal together? back in the pile!

    1. Re:i smell gay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i smell gay...

      Try a douche.

  9. Awesome by thedillybar · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This looks like a great idea, I just hope it holds up well to age and fatigue.

    It will be interesting to see whether or not this actually makes it into production anytime in the near future (or even in our lifetime). I hope so.

    1. Re:Awesome by deutschemonte · · Score: 0

      This looks like a great idea, I just hope it holds up well to age and fatigue.

      That's the same thing they said about Cher, and just look what happened with that.

      --
      The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    2. Re:Awesome by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      >whether or not this actually makes it into production

      The article said couple of years.

  10. Mi5? (Re:Fast to create as well) by otisg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q is alive! Q is alive!

    Regards,
    Moneypenny

    --
    Simpy
    1. Re:Mi5? (Re:Fast to create as well) by otisg · · Score: 1

      Something like CIA and CIB in the U.S.? ;)

      --
      Simpy
    2. Re:Mi5? (Re:Fast to create as well) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought MI-5's main purpose was to investigate itself for traitors?

    3. Re:Mi5? (Re:Fast to create as well) by Emperor+Igor · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's MI6? How many MI's are there?

      I am confused.

    4. Re:Mi5? (Re:Fast to create as well) by bobba22 · · Score: 1

      MI (Military Intelligence) had agencies numbered up to 19, but not all at the same time. Most were folded into MI5, MI6 or GCHQ after the war. : MI1 (Codebreaking), MI2 (Russia and Scandinavia), MI3 (Eastern Europe), MI4 (Aerial Reconnaisance), MI8 (Military Communication Interception), MI9 (Undercover operations), MI10 (Weapons analysis) MI14 and MI15 (German specialists), MI19 (PoW debriefing), MI17 (Military Intelligence "Head Office").

  11. Other applications? by beeplet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's pretty impressive, even if it's not the hook-and-eye structure that the word "velcro" first brought to mind.

    I'm sure there must be other applications besides bonding that would benefit from increased surface area. Heatsinks, maybe?

    1. Re:Other applications? by xmda · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you read the article:

      The projections could be used to encourage bone to grow onto artificial hips. They could also be used in electronics to produce heat sinks of just about any shape.

    2. Re:Other applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well probably not a heat sink.

      Yes surface area is grat for heatsinks, but u also want the air to move as fast as possible acros the surface.

      i would say that a textured surface like that (creating a lot of turbulance) would reduce air flow very close to the surface and hence reduce the heat transfered.

      IIRC cactus use this idea, there spikes reduce the airmovement acros there surface and hence reduce evaporation of water
    3. Re:Other applications? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The sibling to this comment put aside for a moment (or longer), this technology will probably not make heat sinks all that much more efficient, but it may provide improvements in the methods of manufacturing them. There is a certain minimum clearance between fins of a heat sink beyond which airflow will suffer significantly. This will vary based on pressure, in that the smaller the hole is, the more pressure you need to get a decent flow rate through it.

      To me, the primary benefit appears to be the improved speed of manufacturing, not the precision - though that is certainly a positive factor. In fact, since I mention radiators, building complicated structures like that could more easily be done by a machine. It would be really slick if you could have an enclosed robotic system that would build radiators from stocks of tubing and varying sizes of aluminum ribbon and sheet. Aluminum racing radiators, 1-n cores, while-u-wait - and they could be sold for the price of an ordinary radiator because they would be completed very rapidly. Just run out a length of the stuff, crimp to shape, zap it with the electron beam, and push it together.

      One has to wonder if you could somehow employ this technique on a larger scale to get penetration, so you could do fusion welding without having to bring an arc near. Then you really could build just about anything. All you need is a plasma cutter, a small-scale electron welder, and a large-scale one. Metal parts can be cut to shape and welded, and parts made of other materials can be supplied to the system pre-formed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Other applications? by Resident+Netizen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt that a 'metallic velcro' interface would seal well enough to be useful in a radiator. As for electron beam welding, it is currently in wide use but typically requires joint-mating-surface-contact to be extremely good; not a feature typically found in plasma cutting. Another topic: Why make the metallic velcro act as the heat fins? Just grow it on the surface you want to cool and shove your standard aluminum extrusion (with corresponding metallic velcro patch) onto it. The patches might allow for good heat transfer between each other- better than one patch alone to the air. Who knows, after a while (and some heat) the two patches may diffusion bond together and become permanent.

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche!
    5. Re:Other applications? by jafuser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was thinking if they could fuse these structures between layers of foil, it could make a lightweight metal sponge of sorts, that would probably be quite strong for it's density.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    6. Re:Other applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, turbulance is exactly what you want in a good heat sink. Google "laminar flow heatsink" and poke around a bit. Turbulance exposes more water to the heatsink to transfer heat directly via conduction. Even though this slows down the water it is a good thing.

      Of course there is a really good reason this won't be used for metal/water heat transfer. Unless the system is *very* carefully balanced you will either get corrosion (which will destroy those fine structures right quick) or you will have cruft deposited on those fine structures, which will seriously reduce the amount of heat transfer by clogging the areas between them.

    7. Re:Other applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC cactus use this idea, there spikes reduce the airmovement acros there surface and hence reduce evaporation of water

      Not how I recall my high school class.

      Spines on a cactus are what leaves would be on another plant. However, on other plants, those leaves have larger surface areas which lose water.

      Spikes have nothing to do with air-flow (unless you can google me a reference).

    8. Re:Other applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chlorophyl is green and so is the rest of the cactus...

  12. Playtime by PixelScuba · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The kids on the playground are going to be sooo jealous of my new metal velcroe shoes. Just like they were with my pumps!

    1. Re:Playtime by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Just like they were with my pumps!

      Damn, even kids are wearing high heels these days. What a world we live in! :P ;)

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
  13. Isn't the point of velcro by ProudClod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That you can pull it apart?

    If the bond on this stuff is so very very strong, then what advantages does it lend over, say, epoxy?

    --
    Gamers Europe - Gaming News. Reviews.
    1. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by beeplet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they would use it for applications in which you don't want to ever pull it apart. The mention of artificial joints in the article is a good example of that. I wonder if this is safer and/or more reliable than adhesives for use in medicine...

      There are probably other industry applications where you want to join metals and composites also. I imagine that having a permanent strong bond is often more desirable than the ability to take it apart again.

    2. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I imagine repairing/replacing a space shuttle tile becomes a whole lot more realistic.

    3. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was quite excited to hear about this since I deal with the construction of devices which are exposed to thermal extremes. Unfortunately I can not elaborate much further. I can however say that when the contact surfaces of a construction are of the same material, thermally induced expansion and contraction are synchronized. It becomes a problem when you stick materials together which expand or contract with temperature at different rates. The stress causes fatigue which can lead to cracks. Think thermal protection tiles on re-usable spacecraft as one example. Another is the attachment of heat sinks, of the integrated circuit variety or otherwise.

    4. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by FFFish · · Score: 2, Funny

      No drying/curing time, for starters. No mess, no poisonous chemicals. No mis-calculating the ratios of the base and catalyst. No jigging.

      Imagine the amount of work that must go into gluing a Boeing 747 together.

      Then imagine how much easier it would be to just velcro it all together.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by xmda · · Score: 1

      Well, yes it is. But the article did not say that it *was* Velcro, it just said is was turbo charged Velcro/Velcro on amfetamine :), probably to be used in totally different places though.

      Btw, in Sweden we call this "kardborreband" (kardborre is a flower, look here: http://www.lysator.liu.se/runeberg/nordflor/pics/4 .jpg, and "band" means, hmm, eh, band. A quite logical name for it.). Don't know what that flower is called in english but I guess most of you have got one of those stuck in your clothes or on your dog... :)

    6. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by GregChant · · Score: 1

      I believe the colloquial name is "sticker bush".

    7. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by TheClam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Space Shuttle heat tiles are ceramic, not metal. Metal would tend to conduct heat, not insulate from it.

    8. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then imagine how much easier it would be to just velcro it all together.

      Then imagine how quickly the average two-year-old could disassemble it.

      In flight.

      -Adam

    9. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But the wing chassis is metal, is it not? Doesn't the article say that the technique can be used to bond metal with other compounds?

    10. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Btw, in Sweden we call this "kardborreband" (kardborre is a flower, look here: http://www.lysator.liu.se/runeberg/nordflor/pics/4 .jpg, and "band" means, hmm, eh, band. A quite logical name for it.). Don't know what that flower is called in english but I guess most of you have got one of those stuck in your clothes or on your dog... :)

      Here in the Great White North, they're generally referred to as "burs", as from the burdock plant.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    11. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from a few select components (control surfaces, some empennage structure) a 747 is riveted, not glued.

    12. Re:Isn't the point of velcro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the bond on this stuff is so very very strong, then what advantages does it lend over, say, epoxy?

      1. No welding or tubes of epoxy or crazy glue needed. Just press the parts together and you're done. Manufacturing costs plummet.

      2. Sick and tired of little Timmy's backtalk? Put his parka on him backwards, close the velcro and put the hallway coat release prybar up where he can't reach it. Problem solved!

  14. Very Clever. by tbjw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since I don't enjoy looking stupid, I'll wait for metal shoelaces, thank you very much.

    1. Re:Very Clever. by Demanche · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finnaly..
      ...something that will truely keep me stuck to my computer desk...

      Then again that might hurt a little.

      --
      Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
    2. Re: Very Clever. by duffel · · Score: 1

      What, you wanna buy some wires?

  15. How Many Pumps? by deutschemonte · · Score: 0

    I used 4-5 pumps for mine.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
  16. Perhaps that's intentional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you look at the pictures?

  17. Where is the weakest link, btw? by toesate · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can have a strong bonded metal velcro, but there could still has a weaker link somewhere along the chain of materials, the ones that are not bonded as tightly as the metal velcro.

    To illustrate, imagine a piece of melted cheese is the velcro for 2 pieces of pastry in a burger, then the weakest link is between the pastry and the bread.

    --
    Hey, that's my password you are typing
    1. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To illustrate, imagine a piece of melted cheese is the velcro for 2 pieces of pastry in a burger, then the weakest link is between the pastry and the bread.

      Were you perhaps referring to the beef patties? I can't speak for everyone, but I know I certainly wouldn't want to go anywhere near a pastry hamburger :)

    2. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by monkeymonster · · Score: 1

      mmm.... burger....

      (munch munch)

      Pastry??? What the hell kind of burger is this?

      (Homer throws pastry burger on floor)

      mmm... floor pastry....

      (couldn't resist. but seriously, pastry in a burger? and 2 pieces no less? must be a european thing ;)

    3. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between bread and pastry?

    4. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wha tthe fuck is a burger pastry you FUCING EROTIC ASS NIGGER

    5. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by Resident+Netizen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (ignoring the pastry/patty/bread arguments)... Your model seems to conceptualize this process like that of glue or some kind of adhesive bonding. It is not- the 'hairs' are grown from the parent material; they are therefore 'attached' to the parent via the same metallic-lattice bonds that hold the parent together. It's nothing like a slab of melted cheese between a beef (or tofu) patty and a slice of bread. It's more like, um, well, *velcro*! That said, the 'metallic hairs' might tend to fail with some amount of cold work applied... ever bent a paperclip back and forth until it breaks? I'd be worried about fatigue life of this kind of 'bond'. It all depends on the material properties of the parent, though.

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche!
    6. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
      Hmm... /me ponders a traditional English trifle - with Beef!
      What's not to like? Custard? Good. Jam? Good. Meat? Gooooood.

      Pastry hamburger:
      What's not to like? Bread? Good. Ketchup? Good. Fluffy pastry? Good. Meat? Gooooood.

    7. Re:Where is the weakest link, btw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pehraps it was the buns that were being referanced.

  18. Heatsinks by Mifflesticks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Up to 10x the surface area of the sheet of metal? Sounds like it could make for a great low-profile heatsink. Of course, development costs could be prohibitive, but still...

    1. Re:Heatsinks by rpozz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could possibly make the inside of a water-cooling block more efficent as well. IANAP (I am not a physicist), but wouldn't the increased overall surface area between the coolant and the cooling block lead to a better transfer of heat?

    2. Re:Heatsinks by Raynach · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Did anyone RTFA?

      They could also be used in electronics to produce heat sinks of just about any shape.

      This _would_ make a wicked heat sink. And mentioning that it can be make in any form could really turn heatsinks from structures that jut far out from the chip to something that is conservative on space.

      --
      - A
    3. Re:Heatsinks by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 3, Informative
      Assuming the added turbulence of all the protrusions doesn't end up blocking the flow of the coolant entirely (by creating vaccum pockets between them via Bernouli's Principle, or similar effects), then yes, it would make a heat-sink much more efficient.

      The gains would be much more noticable in a system where the bulk of the coolant action comes from a high specific heat with low fluid motion, as in a liquid cooled system. It would increase the efficiency of still air, but could end up decreasing the efficiency of forced air.

    4. Re:Heatsinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      IANAP (I am not a physicist)

      WDYJTWYMD (Why don't you just type what you mean dumbass?)

    5. Re:Heatsinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, yes, Bernouli.... Didn't they make a disk a long time ago?

  19. Sounds like wielding or soldering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This process requires lasers to melt the metal and tease the structures into being... Sounds like wielding or soldering, isn't it?

  20. The advantage is... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that the attachment of e.g. fibers in a composite to the metal protrusions does not depend on the bonding mechanism of a glue. The glue may age and fail, but the mechanical entanglement will not.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:The advantage is... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      I see no mention of rust in the article, wouldn't that make this fail regardless of how entangled it is?

    2. Re:The advantage is... by Phanatic1a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's in the middle of a very tight join between a block of metal and a composite surface; if air and moisture could get to it, then maybe it will rust, if it's a metal susceptible to it.

      You'd probably take care to design the joint so that air and moisture can't get to it.

    3. Re:The advantage is... by scottwimer · · Score: 1

      Use stainless steel, or some other rust-proof and/or corrosion proof metal.

      --
      -- Intrusion prevention for Linux servers. www.cylant.com
  21. Well so much for.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    airport metal detectors...

    1. Re:Well so much for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Huh? I don't understand? Airport metal detectors? Metal velcro? Airport metal detectors..... metal... velcro....

      nope. I still don't get it.

  22. Re:And I hate to point this out... by f13nd · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's not like dragging your finger through clay though

    when you use the beam, then drag it, the metal will accumulate near the start point, not where the beam is

    in all, it's a pretty cool application of physics, really, and deserves this patent

    at least they're not trying to patent electrons

    --
    www.necroticobsession.com
  23. Ok... Which Alien race came up ..... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... with this product.... or is it a stupid human effort to increase teh use of rustolem?

    1. Re:Ok... Which Alien race came up ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay. I cought your Enterprise reference. :(

  24. It sounds like it would be permanent by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

    Well, it *has* to be permanent. If it was easy to pull apart, it would easily fall apart. And the article does say that it goes together like velcro.. not that it pull apart like velcro.

    Useless joing metal to metal however - we already have many faster and cheaper ways of welding for that, which would be much stronger than this technology.

    I imagine with this technology, the cost of car repairs (if it was applied to cars) would increase, since you wouldn't be able to do it at home. And of course, the manufacturer would say "you cannot just glue or rivet the two parts together, it wont be as strong and we will not warranty the vehicle"

    1. Re:It sounds like it would be permanent by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Is the warranty is actually worth more than the savings in repairing it?

      Here in the UK, taking a car back under warranty wastes a mass of time, and often costs so much in time off work, and general agro, you often have to wonder if its worth it. Also, there are all the exclusions "You used it on a public road? That means you shared the road with another user - clearly invalidating your warranty!" On top of that, there is all this high tech stuff that even the main dealer can't understand. The manufacturer's strategy is to raise the complexity of the minimum replaceable module No longer do you replace a light bulb, now you have to replace the entire cluster. Soon, you will also have to replace the headlamp cluster's dual processor motherboard and RAID assembly.

      The way things are going, I can see us buying imported copies of 1970s cars made in india, simly because they are repairable! (Yes, I do drive an old, mechanically injected, diesel)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    2. Re:It sounds like it would be permanent by Resident+Netizen · · Score: 1

      Joining similar parent metals is common and easy today, yes, but... imagine easily joining dissimilar metals- an aluminum part to stainless steel, 'frinstance. (neglecting anodic corrosion issues)

      --
      My other sig is a Porsche!
    3. Re:It sounds like it would be permanent by Jason_Knx · · Score: 1

      I can think of an application that as far as joining metal to metal together that it may be useful for.

      That is as in typical strucutral steel applications where you have two structural members held together by a bolted plate. (Think of two beams bolted together as is used in most buildings.) If the surface of the plate and the member had this applied to it then conceivably if the bolts were to be sheared or they failed the members would still stay together.

      Or used in any application where welding is not an option. Basically any thing has to be bolted the members can have this coating on them. Good luck getting them apart though if the need ever arises.

    4. Re:It sounds like it would be permanent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could actually be stronger than welding, under the right circumstances. Welding tends to break down the crystalline structure of the metals involved; just because it's mechanical doesn't mean it's weak; at the scales involved, electromagnetic forces between the individual metal atoms get involved in the bonding process (whee, friction). It'd also be quicker (after the surfaces had been prepared, perhaps prefabbed in a factory), although fixing a misaligned joint would be a pain.

  25. RTFA by GothChip · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Dance says his early tests show that these joints will last far longer than current composite-metal joints, which are held together by adhesives."

  26. Re:And I hate to point this out... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    >That's all this is, is using an electron-beam welder to slide a little metal around, instead of a finger to move a little clay around.

    Exactly, that's all there is to it, which means there's nothing to prevent others from using some other sculpting technology, such as finger movement, to create the same effect.
    Or, if they want to save development time and money, they can use the same technology but compensate the inventor via patent royalties.

    Seems quite reasonable to me.

  27. Low-gravity? by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They say that they can get structures up to 2mm high and .2mm across, but that's under the influence of gravity. I wonder if this process would work in zero-G, and perhaps work better to create longer structures or different shapes for even stronger bonds?

    This is very good news for composite fiber development. While composite has been exceptionally strong and light, it's difficult to find reliable ways to attach things to it. You basically have to build the fittings into the composite material. "Sticky-metal" fittings might make composites less expensive to use.

    --
    ...
  28. Sweet tech! by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I RTFA, and this is really sweet and promising technology that'll be in use in only a few years. However, not even babelfish could tell me what "gobsmacked" meant.

    1. Re:Sweet tech! by Mad+Alchemist · · Score: 1

      A friend from New Zealand recently had to explain it to me. "Gob" is a slang term for mouth. If someone smacks you across the mouth hard enough, you'll be stunned and speechless.

    2. Re:Sweet tech! by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Astounded.

    3. Re:Sweet tech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ wordnet gobsmacked -over

      Overview of adj gobsmacked

      The adj gobsmacked has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts)

      1. gobsmacked -- (utterly astounded)

  29. No. by gr3y · · Score: 2, Informative

    It doesn't "use lasers to melt the metal and tease the structures into being".

    The process uses a beam of electrons; a laser is beam of photons. The process relies on surface tension to form the structures; they form on their own and are not "teased" at all.

    You are neither interesting nor informative. I was going to mod you down, but because this process has tremendous commercial potential, I decided that it was more important to point out the facts are not in agreement with your summary. You're welcome.

    --
    Slashdot is my Mercer Box.
  30. Spiderman, Spiderman.... by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does whatever a spider can,
    Bonds to lightweight
    Composites
    Or other metal
    Surfaces

    Watch out!
    Here comes the Spidermaaaaaan!

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
    1. Re:Spiderman, Spiderman.... by frankmu · · Score: 1

      i'd like to see this show up on the David Letterman Show, but i guess he'd have a hard time peeling off his guests from the wall of velcro

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    2. Re:Spiderman, Spiderman.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Hell no! David Letterman sucks. And he wouldnt have enough strength to stick them to the wall in the first place.

  31. pulling velcro apart by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Isn't the point of Velcro that you can pull it apart?

    Literally pulling two Velcro blocks apart can be next to impossible. Usually it's a matter of peeling Velcro apart... which should work here too if one of the bondees (the "composite", presumably) is flexible.

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  32. But how do they get the other side to stick? by bobbabemagnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love velcro and its ability to stick two things together, but my problem is usually in getting the velcro to stick to the material on the other side. How will this fabulous metal stuff be stuck to whatever surface it will be on?

    1. Re:But how do they get the other side to stick? by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      The spikes are grown directly on the surface of the metal.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  33. size matters by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Did anybody else notice a striking resemblence between those 'rods' and some other 'rods' that ~50% on the planet's population have?

    2mm by .25mm? I hope not, because we're all in serious trouble as a species if that's the case.

    1. Re:size matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh... Don't tell this to the spammers. My spam-filter cannae take any more!!!!

  34. Manners Maketh Man by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    With regard to the electrons rather than photons, someone else had already previously pointed that out anyway. Fair cop.

    The 'teasing' I think is a fair description, since the article itself uses the word to describe the process:

    "Electromagnetic fields controlled by software choreograph the electron beam's movements around the metal, teasing out many projections at once."


    So, in your opinion I may not be either interesting or informative, but I am 50% correct. As were you. You're welcome too.

    Simon.
    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  35. Elliminates soldering? by schwatoo · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the article (oops) but wouldn't a perfect use for this process be to create electronic components that just stick together without the need for any welding or any other kind of bonding?

    --
    I have trouble with passwords among other things.
  36. Gobsmacking? by stienman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "When we first realised we could do this we were absolutely gobsmacked," Dance says.

    Brilliant! Those boffins have really done it now. Just a quick electron scan and Bob's your uncle!

    gobsmacked adj. Nothing to do with punching people in the face (although I'm sure that's where it derives from originally), to describe someone as being gobsmacked means they're very surprised or taken aback.
    From here.

    Although I didn't realize that boffin was somewhat of an insult. That would have been embarrassing, interviewing for a position and referring to your interviewer as a boffin...

    -Adam

    1. Re:Gobsmacking? by panurge · · Score: 1
      Completely off-topic I know, but I was actually once referred to as a boffin by a British soldier (in the context of a field test of a military computer system at Larkhill, England.) From the context, it was simply used as a rank, meaning civilian scientist or engineer, as distinct from a military scientist or engineer who would have been in the RE.

      Even then, 20 years ago, the presence of US forces in the next field was making the Brits very nervous. Plus ca change...

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    2. Re:Gobsmacking? by RotJ · · Score: 1
      The title I submitted for this post was originally "Gobsmacked by Metal Velcro". I think it's Michael's fault it was changed. Smack him in the gob I shall.

      By the way, 'gobsmacked' does have to do with punching people in the face.

      gobsmacked adj
      1. colloq Astonished; dumbfounded.
      Etymology: From the action of clapping a hand to one's mouth in surprise.

      Your mouth is your gob, see?
    3. Re:Gobsmacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although I didn't realize that boffin was somewhat of an insult.

      I'm not British, but I'd imagine it would have the same sorts of connotations as being called a "geek" or a "nerd".

  37. it'll help, but the small crannys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't lead to great airflow.

    The important characteristic of a heatsink is the surface area across which air flows. These crannies are small enough that they won't lead to great airflow.

    It still should be better than a regular smooth surface on a heatsink.

    1. Re:it'll help, but the small crannys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were refearing heat sink properties at a much lower area. The transfer of the metal and silicon to ceramic or casing.

  38. Corrosion? by rockgorilla · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What about corrosion? If you increase the surface area so much it'll be very quick to corrode (rust) and then all the hooks will fall apart.

    Normally you would galvanise or paint it in with something water proof, but surly painting it would cover all the hooks up? I know this isn't an issue for stainless steel but there are plenty of other metals.

    1. Re:Corrosion? by Murphy(c) · · Score: 1
      What about corrosion? If you increase the surface area so much it'll be very quick to corrode (rust) and then all the hooks will fall apart

      That's an excellent point, but I would like to point out this little quote from the article :
      • "Surfi-Sculpt has so far been successfully tested on stainless steel, aluminium and titanium"
      So given that stainless steel doesn't corrode too much and that aluminium and titanium don't rust, I think that the rust problem for the 1st batch of applications might not be a problem.

      Murphy(c)
  39. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have the modpoints, but this is damn funny.

  40. This is old news... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about this in a science journal back in the 1980's. The root word of "news" is "new", which means "not old". I fail to see how this qualifies.

    1. Re:This is old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, the root of the word NEWS is: North East West South

    2. Re:This is old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow that was clever

      its news to me. news to other people i bet. go away

    3. Re:This is old news... by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      Actually, the root of the word NEWS is: North East West South.

      No, actualy the root word of news is new, what you have my friend is a folk entymology. From the first link:

      news - 1382, plural of new (n.) "new thing," from new (adj.), q.v.; after Fr. nouvelles, used in Bible translations to render M.L. nova (neut. pl.) "news," lit. "new things." Sometimes still regarded as plural, 17c.-19c. Meaning "tidings" is 1423; newspaper is first attested 1670, though the thing itself is much older. Newsreel was first recorded 1916; newscast is from 1930. Newsletter is attested from 1674, but fell from use until it was revived 20c. Newsworthy first attested 1932.
      Ignoring the etymology of news, the article did seem to make it appear that they got gobsmacked recently.
      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  41. pets by Fullmetal+Edward · · Score: 1

    This is all fine and dandy untill someone gets a metal dog near it.

    Velco + dog hair = no more working velco unless majorly cleaned.

    Not to mention what happens if someone comes along with a magnet? London bridge may very well fall down!

    --
    --- [Insert intresting Sig here]
  42. Imagine by Auntie+Virus · · Score: 1

    Imagine trying to dis-assemble a Beowulf Cluster made with this process... :)

    --
    Why yes, I *AM* new here. Why?
  43. FINALLY something worth patenting by eagl · · Score: 1

    Finally, a company comes out with an idea and technology worth patenting. It's a process that makes something physical, they put a lot of work into making it, it's not something everyone has been doing for years, and it solves a problem in a way that doesn't have a ton of nearly identical alternatives.

    I bet the USPTO sits on the patent application. They wouldn't know innovation if it velcroed itself to their butt.

    Can SOMEONE PLEASE patent the idea of patents, so we can put the USPTO out of business? Call it "A specific process to uniquely identify the orignator of materials and processes in order to facilitate distribution of rights associated with production, sale, and use of such materials and processes."

    I bet it would be approved if dressed up right with some technical mumbo jumbo.

    1. Re:FINALLY something worth patenting by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      That would just get thrown out due to so much prior art. You should patent the process of throwing out a patent based on prior art first. Then their hands would really be tied.

  44. Right out of Ariadne by Thagg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The New Scientist magazine, back when I was in school in the early 80's, had a column on the last page of each issue, descibing the exploits of the mythical engineer/scientist Daedalus (actually David E H Jones.)

    He had proposed doing exactly this, but with glass, back in one of these columns. It was exactly the same method and result.

    It's not the first time that Daedalus's speculative inventions have turned into reality. A couple of books have been published collecting the best of Daedalus.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  45. So, anybody here think... by cr0sh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...this stuff will be stronger than JB-Weld?

    JB-Weld, for those of you who don't know, is probably number one in the list of tools for rednecks and others (right next to duct tape, baling wire, and bubblegum) who need to make a repair fairly quickly, and want it to remain in place.

    JB-Weld is strong - very strong. It is a two-part epoxy (comes in slow and quick setting versions) which I have yet to find an equal to.

    My brother-in-law repaired the cracked housing of a blower off the diesel engine on his 10-wheel dump truck (it was alluminum, and he didn't have the equipment to properly weld it) - that repair lasted 5 years before he "retired" the truck (actually, the engine block cracked), probably would have lasted even longer...

    I use it all the time - if it is something that I can't weld but I need to have it stay together (under heat, pressure, vibration, or other high stress especially) - JB Weld is my first choice. I have seen it hold shit together where you would swear it would have to be welded (more or less, it is - just an epoxy "weld") to stay together.

    Now, I know this "metal velcro" is supposed to be an "industrial process" - meaning it will likely never be available for home use in the near future. I also know there are industrial epoxies. I wonder if any of them would beat the pants off of JB-Weld - though I wonder if JB is already an industrial epoxy packaged for "small project" use - I wish I could buy that stuff in larger quantities...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:So, anybody here think... by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      Now, I know this "metal velcro" is supposed to be an "industrial process" - meaning it will likely never be available for home use in the near future

      Wow, I just had a vision of pointing my electron gun at two difference pieces of metal and then fusing them together. Now we just need to figure out a way to create the vacuum adnd still keep up the Buck Rogers looking electron gun.

      In the article it did say that it lasts longer than using adhesives:

      Dance says his early tests show that these joints will last far longer than current composite-metal joints, which are held together by adhesives.
      The article does not mention if it will work to bond two pieces of metal together we all seem to be speculating about; it seems to be tailered for only the 'hook' end of velcro and the composite fibers make up all the 'loops'.
      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  46. The composite material would form the seal, right? by LairBob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think you've got a point if you're just going to leave the surface exposed to normal air once it's been sculpted, but assuming that you weren't careless in storing it till it's used, then once the composite's been bonded to it, that should take care of any rusting problem, right?

    This isn't meant for surfaces that are meant to stay exposed--it's a method to prepare them for some kind of further use, like composite bonding.

  47. in my area it was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "pricker bush"

  48. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, "Ever lain on a bed of nails?" You lie/lay/have lain in a bed you lay/laid/have laid nails onto. (Bad example sentence, I know)

    1. Re:Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! I wasn't aware of the distinction, atleast I learnt something new today!

      Cheers,
      ~metlin

    2. Re:Grammar police by chaoaretasty · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he meant "Ever [b]been[/b] laid on a bed of nails?"

  49. Clod! by bprime · · Score: 1

    Many boffins died to get you that interview!

  50. Sinclair Micro-Penis by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 0

    Look at those pictures at the NS web site. If they aren't the fabled Sinclair Micro-Penis I don't know what is.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  51. Seriously, folks... by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

    It's not how *big* they are, it's how you use them that counts.

  52. You are not by gr3y · · Score: 3, Insightful

    even half right, and we're not competing here.

    You paraphrased the article inaccurately, attributing the commercial potential you're talking about to a technology that isn't described. Your defense is that someone else previously pointed it out so that it's a "fair cop", and that Mick Hamer used the word "teasing" to describe the process to his intended audience in the article he wrote.

    The "fast to create" that you speak of is a direct result of the technology you misrepresented. Your path does not lead to the "why", and that's unfortunate, because the why explains why the process may lead to incredible gains in:

    1. Heat sink efficiency
    2. Catalytic converter (and other smog-scrubbing technology) efficiency
    3. Bone adhesion to artificial joint replacements or other medical prosthetics, like artificial teeth
    4. Strength of metal-to-adhesive bonds
    5. Strength of composite materials. A way to reduce or eliminate failure at the interface, which is the most common failure mode for composite materials

    When you figure out how to do it with a laser, let us know (with a rotating crystal perhaps), and if it is a commercially viable technology discussed on slashdot, I'll bitch and whine when the first poster misses the point entirely. This isn't personal. I just couldn't pass on the need to set you straight because almost everyone will read the first post.

    --
    Slashdot is my Mercer Box.
    1. Re:You are not by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      You paraphrased the article inaccurately, attributing the commercial potential you're talking about to a technology that isn't described. Your defense is that someone else previously pointed it out so that it's a "fair cop", and that Mick Hamer used the word "teasing" to describe the process to his intended audience in the article he wrote.


      [the latter part of the post remains unquoted since it deals with consequences, not statements or postulates]

      [sigh]. Indeed. In the first instance I was wrong, it was a slip twixt mind and hand after I'd read the article, get over it - unless of course you've never written one thing while thinking another... In the second I used the same attribution as in the article. That's a 50% score as far as I'm concerned. By the way, "fair cop" is UK slang for "yes you're right" in this context. Perhaps it's different where you hail from.

      You called me to task on 2 things - the former I believe you were right with (note that I haven't tried to defend the position at all), the latter I believe you are wrong on. That's also a 50% score as far as I'm concerned.

      The reason for my reply (since it seems to have been missed) was really to point out that you weren't particularly forgiving in your rebuttal, and that you were only as right as I was. Pot, kettle, black. The fact that the general readership seems to have (as I write) elevated the post where all I point out is this fact to +4 would seem to lend some popular weight to my argument.

      Enough, reply if you wish, as far as I'm concerned this argument over - it has gone on far too long already.

      Simon
      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  53. Re:Low-gravity? do it upside down! by BierGuzzl · · Score: 1

    There is, of course, a cheap way of testing what effect, if any, gravity has on the process. Just repeat the whole process upside down. My guess, however, is that the G-force will have no noticeable effect.

  54. Velcro Metals by subzerorz · · Score: 1

    If its velcro, then it is detachable. Hmm, how safe can that be?

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  55. Mushrooms vs. hooks by tgibson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting quality about velcro. If you replace the hooks with mushrooms, the loops grab under the head of the mushrooms and the fastening becomes permanent (i.e. you can't separate the two pieces).

    I'm sure this version velcro is used in many areas. I became aware of it via a friend working in pest control. The nets he was using on buildings to prevent access by pigeons were fastened using this version of velcro.

  56. Re:SHIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit is st000pid,... why j000 dt00pid.,.. all p3ople use shit is st00dit=

  57. Metallic velco for ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    a great new design of medieval armor.
    These guys are obviously big time D&D players.

    Can't wait till this stuff goes commercial.

  58. More accurate history of the zipper by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

    The first patent was taken in 1851 by the american Elias Howe, a well known sewing machine constructor. Important improvements were done by the american Whitcomb Judson (1893) and by the swedish-americans Peter A. Aronsson (1906) and Gideon Sundbäck (1913). In the first zippers, the hooks were sewn to the cloth, one at a time. Sundbäck's idea was to punch out the hooks and squeeze them into two textile tapes/ribbons, which could then be sewn to the clothes with a sewing machine.

  59. Mom from Louisiana, Dad from North Dakota by chadjg · · Score: 1

    That's about as different as things get. My father's family are a bunch of Germans that left a little town close to the Black Sea. When they are talking without thinking about it you can barely tell that they have any accent at all. It's more of a difference in pacing and volume. They sometimes tend to clip the ends of their words a bit.

    Up there you pretty much have all the different immigrant groups living in separate towns. The Germans, Russians, Swedes and others get along well enough but they tend to live apart. The Germans tell dumb Swede Jokes and I assume the Swedes have dumb Kraut jokes. From what I've heard they're pretty much the same jokes though.

    My mom's family has been living in Louisiana so long that everyone has forgotten who is what and what groups have been breeding with who. My mom grew up with a faily thick southern accent but she's pretty much lost it by now. It only pops up when she talks to family or when she's under stress. I've seen her get out of a traffic ticket because the cop thought her accent was cute.

    In general, people are prejudiced against those with thick southern accents. It's considered "uneducated" or "low." To a northerner, they sound like they're talking really slow, dragging out their words and that they never finish pronouncing anything.

    There are, of course, micro-regional accents, but most of the deep south is lumped into one group. I have no idea how the 'southern" accent came to be, but it's definitely different from the rest of the country.

    My dad said that the reasons southerns talk so slow is that it's too hot down there to do anything fast, and that the reason North Dakotans talk fast and clip words is that if they left their mouths open long enough to talk like southerners their tongues would freeze. That caught him a good day and a half worth of hell from my mother.

    Non-americans, especially non-english speakers may not pick up on the nuances that we can, of course, and once they do start learning they'd probably be puzzled at why most TV & radio people sound like they're from the mid-west. The trick is to get them hammered and then see what they sound like. Many educated people work on it, and they can turn their non-standard accents on and off, at will.

    Y'all pick this up right quickly, you hear?

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.