Slashdot Mirror


China's New Craze: E-bikes

lawrencekhoo writes "I was in Shanghai recently, and found to my surprise that bicycle crazy China is now electric bicycle crazy. Electric bikes were everywhere, and outnumbered normal bikes on the road. You could even buy them in the department stores. Basic models sell for about 1200 Yuan (about US$150), and more elaborate scooter-like models for up to 5000 Yuan. Apparently, this craze has been building up for a few years. Something like it is even happening in parts of the US. According to one user, electric bikes are popular because they're cheap, and can take you all around town on one charge. Who would have guessed that China would lead the way in green transportation?"

80 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. Hybrid models by beeplet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those look really good, especially for older people with reduced mobility (which seems to be one of their major target demographics). But what I would love to be able to buy would be some kind of hybrid model. The motor would reduce the exertion required, while being able to pedal would extend the distance you could go on a single charge.

    I didn't see anything in the posted links that said whether they were electric-only bikes or hybrid, but it does look like you can already get electric hybrid bikes: Electric Bikes Northwest. I would happily buy something like that over a car, assuming I could afford either, which isn't the case anyway...

    1. Re:Hybrid models by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 3, Informative

      Electric assist bikes or add-on's aren't uncommon.

      Google for more if you're interested . . .

    2. Re:Hybrid models by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can get such a bike in your town.

      If you have an independant dealer of "Giant" Bicycles - they can special order it and hand it to you assembled.

      If you live within 10 miles of work - you can get your excerisize and arrive at work less wasted than a standard bicycle. - I do.

      Highly recommended.

      AIK

    3. Re:Hybrid models by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a dynamo on a bicycle headlight, and let me tell you, it's a real drag when it's engaged (no pun intended.) They'll definitely have to improve the technology somewhat before that's viable.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  2. Who woulda thunk it? by BorkBorkBork6000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course China is paving the way for green transportation. Having enormous populations in congested cities with low average incomes is a great motivation to produce cheap transportation.

    1. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by Whyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure the bike doesn't produce much in the way of pollutants, but how about the electricity source used to charge the bike's batteries? This type of "green" transportation is nothing more than passing the buck due to most power stations burning fossil fuels.

      Unless you tell me they are ALL using portable solar power generators to do it.

      --
      -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
    2. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by glenalec · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Point one - China is also the world leader in solar energy. (As an Australian, I hang my head in shame).

      Point two - point one notwithstanding, China gets most of its eletrical power ATM off brown-coal (very high sulfur content) which is why in Beijing you really can feel the air burning the the inside of your nostrils on a bad day.

      On the local (ie Chinese) news last night, big stories on several chanels about China's eletrical power shortage, with factories having to only run night shifts, cancel big orders and subsequently lay off workers because they don't have the power to operate their machinery. I don't have exact figures at hand, but I believe well over half the population is yet to be connected to the grid.

      Chinese diet is becoming westernised and obesity is starting to become common in the population.

      A human-powered bicycle starts to look better again. But mainland Chinese are very physical-effort adverse as breaking a sweat is considered 'workerish'. Really! (This is, of course, a gross generalisation and all of my own Chinese friends here are exceptions).

      And all that hard breathing of Beijing (or Shanghai, or any city, really) air probably does more health damage than two packs a day. I doubt it is coincidence that major respitary illnesses come out of this part of the world mostly, what with the pollution, the dense population and everyone spitting like lamas everywhere!

      My unit leader was saying the other day that when he was a boy there was spring and autumn (fall) in this region but there isn't anymore. And if you can see Venus on a 'clear' night, you are going well!

      A bit ecclectic above, sorry, I'm in a rush to catch the university bus into the city for weekend grocery shopping.

      --
      The man with no surname and a silly hat

      On the universe: It's bunk.
    3. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Informative
      But this is irrelevant. These e-bike are simply not "green" devices when compared to what they replaced.... biologically (read: human) powered bicycles.

      I don't think that you can make that claim without further analysis. A typical human riding a bike produces ~0.3 HP (~250 W). An electrically powered bike going the same speed would use a similar amount of energy. (Compare this to a car that might use 20 HP to sustain highway speeds; the bike would be more than 60X more efficient.)

      At any rate, the electric bike indirectly uses coal, which is bad, but at only a tiny fraction of the rate that a car uses petroleum. On the other hand, the human demands extremely high-grade fuel: food. The environmental impact of creating a given amount of energy in the form of edible food can be significantly higher than mining that same energy in fossil fuels. In fact, depending on the type of food (especially if it's meat), producing food with one joule of chemical energy can consume many joules of fossil fuels (for fertilizer, transportation, processing, etc.). Deforestation, soil erosion, and pesticide pollution are other issues to consider.

      Although riding bicycles is clearly more "green" than driving a car, human powered vs. electric may be more of a complex tradeoff than it would seem at first glance.

    4. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Green", of course, is best achieved when humans live is as much poverty as you think you can smuggle past your audience, labeled as noble sacrifice if need be

      Bullshit. Poverty is bad for the environment, since it is a strong inducement to make choices that are cheap in the short-term but expensive in the long run.

      No, conspicuous consumption is not green. But being against the waste of resources, especially in pursuit of empty promises of happiness by owning more stuff, doesn't make one in favor of poverty and suffering - any more than being against overeating makes one in favor of starvation.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by dlakelan · · Score: 3, Informative

      You have to consider the MARGINAL food requirements of a human, since the basal metabolic rate will be burned regardless of whether you're on a bike.

      Since the BMR for an adult male is approximately 2000 Kcal and riding a bike around at a comfortable pace for 2 hours a day on flat ground costs maybe 250 Kcal according to the data quoted above, what we're talking about is a 13% increase in food consumption. Since healthier people are generally lighter weight and happier, and therefore do not overeat as much, it's possible that a person who bikes for transportation eats less total food than a person who doesn't depending on the rate of overweight people in the relevent populations.

      --
      ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
    6. Re:Who woulda thunk it? by gujo-odori · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is nothing insightful about that post, it's just ignorant.

      I lived in SE Asia, and I can tell you that the first thing that happens when people start going from poverty to prosperity is they start buying cars and scooters and things. The streets of Ho Chi Minh City are so choked with scooter traffic that if I had been riding a bicycle instead of a scooter myself, I probably would have been overcome by the exhaust fumes and collapsed (and no, I am not kidding).

      China, as you may have noticed, is becoming fairly prosperous. Now, people are going to buy faster, more comfortable modes of transportation than bicycles. Which would you rather have them buy? Electric-assist bicycles, which are still pretty green and whose batteries can be recycled (and I'm sure they are; a lot of stuff from the G-7 gets sent to China for recycling, so they have a big recycling industry already in place), or would you rather have them buy a car or scooter and get around with an internal combustion engine driving a vehicle with a lot more parts in it?

      You sound like a typical radical environmentalist: calling a good thing for the environment worthless because it's not perfect. By the way, do you use a vehicle with an internal combustion engine yourself? If you do, then you're also a hypocrite for criticizing China for not being perfectly green while they are still greener than you are.

      You and the people who modded you insightful both need to get a tighter grasp on your clue before it all slips away.

  3. Green Transportation? by AssProphet · · Score: 4, Funny

    in China it's RED transportation.

    1. Re:Green Transportation? by Suburbanpride · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People have already mentioned the urban planning of the China. Most chinese cities are already set up for bikes, not cars. If electric bike can help extend the distance that the average person can get on their bikes, then it will be a good thing. In america, bikes will never replace cars untill cities are built for bike traffic.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    2. Re:Green Transportation? by moreati · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Green transportation? These things definitly aren't designed to replace cars. Look at the min/max speeds! And the comparison was made with bikes, not cars.
      No they're not designed to replace cars as general pupose transporation, they're intended to be the only option other than walking, or as a supplement to a car (in a case the person can afford a car). The min/max speed is not comparable to a car on open road, but it beats the pants off anything that's sitting a traffic jam, something cars are very adept at creating, this is for urban use remember.
      What's greener, a bike powered by human-power, or a bike powered by electricity (which has to come from somewhere....fossil fuels, anyone)? I vote human-powered bikes.
      One human powered bike is greener than an electric one, but both are greener than a car, particularly in urban, stop-start traffic. If someone would choose a electric bike over a car, but a car over a normal bike, then the electric bike is greener than the car. As with most many environmental issues it is a balance between impact, hassle & motivation. Also remember the motor supplements the pedalling, it doesn't replace it. I vote electric bikes, for wide spread adoption. Alex
    3. Re:Green Transportation? by sploxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ahh, I was sure that this "Green transportation" thing would spawn quite a few comments. But as astounding as it sounds, electricity-powered vehicles *can* be 'greener' than directly fossil-fuel powered.
      Why?

      If you consider nuclear power as a 'green' energy source, it's easy. Some do, I'm personally not sure... :)

      If you don't:
      1. A certain amount of electricity is from renewable fuels already.
      2. The energy conversion efficiency is greater in power plants (about 42%) than in combustion engines (about 25%) and the conversion efficiency of an electro motor is good (about 90%).
      3. Waste heat from power plants can be used (for efficiencies up to 60%)

      Of course, one has to throw the building energy costs for the power plant, the motor cycle etc. into the equations. And there is bio diesel...
      Oh yeah and you have to take into account the fuel logistics. And, and, ... :) Obviously, a difficult question to decide.

    4. Re:Green Transportation? by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's greener, a bike powered by human-power, or a bike powered by electricity (which has to come from somewhere....fossil fuels, anyone)? I vote human-powered bikes.

      This would depend on where you get your engery from. Humans require engery in the form of food. Food must come from somewhere. Food requires land, soil, nutrients, in many cases livestock. Methane production of a cow for example is pretty signigent. Not to speak of the waste product of humans, which nothing to sneeze at as we are talking about a country with billions of people.

      I'm not saying you are wrong, all I'm saying it's not a clear cut equation to balance the effect on the ecosystem between the use of human power and the use of electrical power.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Green Transportation? by justin_le · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's greener, a bike powered by human-power, or a bike powered by electricity (which has to come from somewhere....fossil fuels, anyone)? I vote human-powered bikes.

      I crunched some numbers and the answer for a typical north american diet is... electric-powered.

      In summary, it consumes about 10 calories of energy to produce, process, transport, and cook one typical calorie of food. The human body can then convert this into muscle energy with a maximum efficiency of about 25%, so the total ratio is 40 units of primary energy for 1 unit energy seen by the bicycle.

      Batteries similarly take energy to manufacture, transport, and recharge. The electric motor is usually about 75% efficient at converting the battery energy into mechanical output. Overall it works out to a total energy ratio of 4:1 - 15:1 depending on the battery chemistry, so up to 10 times more efficient than a human-powered bike (40:1).

      The details are spelt out here:

      http://www.ebikes.ca/Ebike_Energy.pdf

    6. Re:Green Transportation? by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trading in pedal bikes for motor bikes, regardless of power source is not as green as a regular pedal bike

      Well, it is more green if it causes you to bike to more places, rather than buying a car or taking a taxi. Or if it becomes popular with middle-aged/senior people.

  4. Not green. by Meor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Generating electricity is not green. Once again this is a demonstration of euphoric environmentalists not knowing how things work.

    1. Re:Not green. by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not but it doesn't have any emissions so in that respect it is 'green'.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    2. Re:Not green. by Teckla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Generating electricity is not green. Once again this is a demonstration of euphoric environmentalists not knowing how things work.

      You're right, riding 30 pounds of bicycle isn't any more "green" than driving around 2000 pounds of car.

      We'll try to keep such crazy thoughts out of our head from now on.

      -Teckla

  5. Green Transportation? by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who would have guessed that China would lead the way in green transportation?"

    Trading in pedal bikes for motor bikes, regardless of power source is not as green as a regular pedal bike. Also, since this is "green" I guess, I would imagine countries like China would adopt them first as there isn't any room for American style SUV's, right?

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  6. It's not that hard to assume... by CoconutFoobar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unlike most places in the US, many Chinese cities do not have streets made for large amounts of vehicular traffic, so bicycles have become important to them. Then, when you consider the cost of gasoline compared to the average Chinese person's salary, what's so bad about electric bikes? Besides, in a country of a billion people, if only 10% of people use this technology, that's more electric bikes sold than all the cars sold in the US. (Plus no required age to use one).

    1. Re:It's not that hard to assume... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Plus no required age to use one

      Well, I can give you a few reasons why this will never work over here in the Netherlands.

      • There will be a minimum age of 16.
      • Helmet would be required.
      • Bikes would cost 250 euro due to massive taxes.
      • Special permit required ( 150 euro ), takes 3 months, one theoretical exam ( 150 euro ) and one practical exam. ( 250 euro )
      • It would get stolen withing a day.

      Here's to the goverment overregulating crap. Cheers.

  7. Green Transportation? by jonman_d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Green transportation? These things definitly aren't designed to replace cars. Look at the min/max speeds! And the comparison was made with bikes, not cars.

    What's greener, a bike powered by human-power, or a bike powered by electricity (which has to come from somewhere....fossil fuels, anyone)? I vote human-powered bikes.

  8. Stigma by mphase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I first came across this technology years ago I wondered why it didn't seem to very popular. I soon realized that here in America nobody would ride one of these because of the social implications. Your either such a lazy fat bastard that you need a motor on your bike or your too weak and pathetic to just ride a normal bike or your a broke looser who can't afford a motorcycle or car. Who is gonna ride even a good electric bike (which even now there are few of) with these sort of implications attached.

    1. Re:Stigma by bmonreal · · Score: 2, Informative
      I used to commute on an electric-assisted bike. I'd use the motor for a burst of acceleration out of stoplights, or up short hills. My legs did most of the work overall, but with the quick acceleration I could keep up with city traffic. I could take up a lane and behave more or less like a car.


      It was great.

    2. Re:Stigma by CoconutFoobar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your either such a lazy fat bastard that you need a motor on your bike or your too weak and pathetic to just ride a normal bike or your a broke looser who can't afford a motorcycle or car.

      It's not just that, but most of the US is very bike-unfriendly. With the exception of California, you either have to fight with pedestrians on the sidewalk, or try your luck in traffic (also depending on local laws).

      It's amazing how many drivers almost hit me when I'm riding around on my bicycle. It's not that they're trying to hit me, it's a question of riding in the middle of the street, slowing traffic, or ride along the side and be close to being run off the road/clipped.

    3. Re:Stigma by Jonathan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's amazing how many drivers almost hit me when I'm riding around on my bicycle

      On the other hand, as a pedestrian (when I'm not taking public transit), it's amazing how many bicyclists on sidewalks act rather similar to us as you describe cars acting to you...

    4. Re:Stigma by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wondered why it didn't seem to very popular. I soon realized that here in America nobody would ride one of these because of the social implications.

      While I'm not about to discount the social implications of riding an electric bike... but let's not discount the safety implications of riding a bike in general in the USA. Frankly in most of the areas i've lived, it's not exactly safe. You *could* ride on the sidewalk, but the rules of the road state that bikes belong on the street. Streets are often not geared tward bicycle traffic, let alone pedestrian traffic. Downtown areas you must play the game of dodging the parked cars and prevent from being hit by rear-comming cars crussing at speeds 25mph+. Major arterials are also not exactly safe either. Nicer ones have sholders or provisions for pedestrian traffic, others have no sholder what so ever. Users in cars get most angry when they can't pass you.

      Some cities are smart enough to actually retrofit bike lanes, and put in sidewalks. Perhaps they finally noticed that people under the age of 16 need to get from point A to point B without getting hit by cars. From what I've observed, this is rather an exception to the rule. America thinks in terms of cars and not people.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  9. That's not necessarily GREEN transportation by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless most of the electricity comes from non-polluting sources, recharging electric bikes is going to produce more pollution than exhaling some carbon dioxide and using muscle power.

  10. Green Transportation by Jameth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, finally China is making strides towards more pollutive transportation.

    After many long years of primarily using bikes, they are now charging these bikes with power from coal power plants. Once a billion or so people have these, our green goals will finally be completed and mother nature will be thoroughly defeated.

    1. Re:Green Transportation by Poeir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, Mother Nature needs a favor? Well, maybe she should have thought of that when she was besetting us with droughts and floods and poison monkeys! Nature started the fight for survival and now she wants to quit because she's losing? Well, I say hard cheese!

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    2. Re:Green Transportation by THotze · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're right about a lot of your points... all of it, in fact, but the question is always, not where does it begin, but, where does it end?

      I used to live in Beijing, eons ago by Beijing's standards, in the late 80's and early 90's. Beijing's growth might have very well outpaced the Internet's. But when I was there, we had a lot of white furnature, and a housekeeper to keep it clean... one day she was sick following her weekend... the white furnature was BLACK with soot. I honestly don't know if things have gotten better or worse, but I'd suspect that they've gotten worse. China's economy is still coal powered.

      The interesting question is who's buying these bikes, why, and what cultural impact they'll have. As pointed out before, its probalby people that are jsut starting to see wage growth, meaning that they're getting e-bikes to replace the human-powered variety, and that these require more electricity, which requires more coal, etc.

      But bikes had long been part of Chinese culture. More than just being a mode of cheap, fast transportation, they were handy. They're easy to secure, they can fit in small places to store. it means that building planners didn't need to accommodate big garages and parking spaces, useful when you've got such density as there is along the coastal regions of China and inland to Beijing, where most economic growth is taking place (and therefore, where people are more likely to have money for e-bikes).

      in this context, the shift from bikes to e-bikes is a small one, as they meet all of the conveniences of bikes without any major new hastles. (Most consumers, anywhere, have yet to make the 'big picture' association of energy usage == pollution == hastle for everyone, including me.) Now, this means that it postpones the growth of large numbers of cars for a while as people get these instead, perhaps delaying any shift to (as many) big garages, parking lots, etc.

      That way, it could be a good thing. RIGHT NOW, its true that it looks like these e-bikes are just a stepping stone to bigger cars... but what if the 'e-bike' phase lasts 20-30 years, as it very well might? By this time, perhaps cars won't seem as desirable, or at the very least, will be less polluting. Additionally, coal plants can be MUCH less polluting with proper design/retrofitting than you'd expect. There was SOME evidence, of which there has been a partial refutation, that its possible to reduce CO2 emissions to almost nothing with a highly efficient deisgn and a method (using some sort of ceramic device??? can anyone inform?). In this way, perhaps China could be one of the first nations to benefit from economic growth without all of the eventual environmenal hastle. If China were to pollute at say, North America's levels, the planet'd get baked like a garage band on a lazy Saturday night, and that'd hurt the Chinese economy both directly and indirectly. I'd say that within the next 10-15 years, China will start retrofitting existing plants to pollute less. This is especially true as they start to get a skilled labour force that hates pollution and is costly to replace when they die young from inhaling half a kilo of coal dust every day. Not that the massive growth of Chinese cigarette sales is helping that any.

      This *might* turn out to be an indicental step that prevents it, by postponing the onset of cars and keeping the 'bicycle culture', even if its currently powered by polluting coal plants.

      Sometimes, we get lucky, unintended breaks. This could be one.

  11. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who would have guessed that China would lead the way in green transportation?

    Not surprising. Now I would have definitely been surprised if the United States were the one leading the way in green transportation.

  12. leading green transportation? hardly.. by Scott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As electric bicycles aren't exactly what China needs at the moment, seeing as they need, you know, electricity. Most of China's electrical power is generated from coal in factories which have pollution controls making the U.S. coal factories look impeccably clean. Along with this the Chinese are becoming just as car crazy as us wacky Americans only once again to fuel their 8% annual economic increase they have instituted almost zero pollution control laws. Those shiny cars they drive may look modern but most are 20+ years behind when it comes to emissions; just take a look at the haze over Shanghai, it's like Los Angeles circa 1990. At their current rate China will overtake the U.S. as the World's leading emitter of greenhouse gases in a relatively short amount of time.

    So like I said, not exactly leading the green revolution.

  13. Hardly new, but interesting. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny to see how this craze is taking off in China only now... since these things have existed for ages. Also interesting to think about why these bikes haven't become popular in the Netherlands, another bike-loving country.Sparta has been selling powered bikes for years, with either an electric motor or a small gasoline-powered one.

    Then again, I can understand why they aren't popular here. Firstly, there's the price tag of EUR 1750 (Look on the site under "Collectie / Electrische fiets"). Secondly... crime statistics teach us that every bike owner has his bike stolen, on average, once a year in this country. And this bike would make a particularly juicy target for thieves.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  14. Electric bikes != green transportation by caseih · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Electric vehicles are all fine and good, except that until we have a good clean source of electricity, a proliferation of electric-powered vehicles will actually increase air polution. For example, in Alberta Canada, a study was done to determine the effects on the environment of government-mandated electric cars. The study found the air pollution would increase dramatically as all of Alberta's power plants (well most of them) are coal-fire plants.

    This is not to say it's not a good thing but it's certainly not a panacea at this point. Something else to remember is that internal combustion does not necessarily equal bad since practically all energy generation involves combustion in some form or another. For example, burning natural oils (vegatable oil) is environmentally neutral, since there is no net-increase of carbon in the atmosphere (which means no green-house effects).

    The problem is that most alternative fuels such as hydrogen and methane come from burning fossil fuels. Although they burn clean in our engines, they've already caused pollution before we even get them in our cars! This fact combined with the fact that alternative fuels simply don't have as many joules of energy per unit as conventional fuels makes alternative fuels less attractive.

    If we can get a cleans supply of electricity (from the sun, for example), then all of my points become moot.

    1. Re:Electric bikes != green transportation by Jardine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hydroelectric is somewhat more reliable than solar energy.

      Yes it is, in places that have nice rivers, fast streams, waterfalls, and other good things you can dam up. Ontario has quite a few hydro-electric plants, but we still depend on other methods of generating electricity.

      I don't think Arizona or Nevada will be likely to use hydro as their main source of power in the near future.

  15. I don't think.... by psychokid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i don't think the electric bike is driven by a desire for green transportation, but it just happens that the particular form of transportation is desireable compared to a standard bicycle, and considerably cheaper than alternative forms of "private" transportation in that country. The average motor vehicle is still considerably expensive for the average chinese urbanite. (let's not even consider the rural economy here). Besides, as a person pointed out in an earlier post, the electric bikes are only as effective as the power plants that produce the electricity. In china, a large portion of air pollution is still sourced from coal burning used for power production. china needs to improve the efficency and conditions of it's plants before the use of electricity is considered green.

  16. Gas Powered Scooters EVERYWHERE by erth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else seen a hug increase in gas powered scooters around their neighborhood? They seem to be getting more popular than skateboards for kids now.

    I'm a little worried about kids without licenses driving motorized vehicles around on sidewalks, though they could be safer than those segways that would just tip over if the battery ran out going up a hill :)

    A friend of mine who works for a city transportation planning organization and I were discussing tha they are scrambling to draw up some regulation on these things.

  17. I was thinking about something else... by OrthodonticJake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I saw the article link I was just imagining something like a portable battery charger; I am actually a little underwhelmed at what it turned out to be. I ride my bike to get places, but the exercise aspect of it is important to me; it would be cool if I could plug my iPod into the bike while i'm riding, though. What other devices would be useful on a bike with a renewable power supply?

    --
    I regularly report MSN spam to the Hotmail admins.
  18. Per-capita rate of electric bike by News+for+nerds · · Score: 3, Interesting

    is ranked in 2003:

    1. Japan
    2. China
    3. Europe

    Gross rank is:

    1. China (incl. Taiwan?) (500,000)
    2. Japan (200,000)
    3. Europe (10,000 and over)

    according to this US dealer.

  19. Electric vehicles not green. by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That electricity has to come from someplace... in China, that means mostly oil and coal powerplants with none of the pollution controls found in the west, or hydroelectric dams, like Three Gorges, that displace and literally enslave hundreds of thousands of people while destroying archaeological and historical sites. The most lethal dam disaster in history was a Chinese hydoelectric project gone wrong.

    Electric vehicles by themselves are not enviornmentally friendly. In conjunction with strict pollution controls and smart energy infrastructures, they can be. That's not the case in China. They'd be better off with a reliable fleet of diesel busses and subways.

    SoupIsGood Food

    1. Re:Electric vehicles not green. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      or hydroelectric dams, like Three Gorges, that displace and literally enslave hundreds of thousands of people while destroying archaeological and historical sites

      People in China are under tight authority, but they are not "enslaved." As a fellow Chinese (thought from Taiwan) I deeply resent your biased comment, even it only shows how simple-minded you are. While the cost and benefits of the dam is still unclear, it is very irreponsible for a westerner to talk about how bad it is without even knowing all the detail analysis and the society's big picture. It is well awared that there are going huge chages. In fact this is one of the few issues the members in "the people's congress" have very significant difference in opionions. I'm not commenting on whether the decision is right or wrong. I am saying we need to look deeper before we open our mouth and make a fool of ourself.

    2. Re:Electric vehicles not green. by ultramk · · Score: 2, Informative

      literally enslave hundreds of thousands of people

      Back this statement up, please. Links?

      The 2 main reason 3 Gorges is being built are thus:
      1. It will generate vast quantities of electricity, and pull millions of people out of poverty/3rd world conditions.
      2. It will control the annual flood/drought cycles that are responsible for the worst natural disasters in china, every year.

      I'm not saying it's the ideal solution, but at least i make an effort to understand the problems.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  20. How cheap are they to operate? by John+Seminal · · Score: 2
    I am looking for a cheaper way to get around town and to work. I am mad that gas costs so much, and might get even more expensive (I am spending over $35 a week on gas for my trip to work). But I dunno if those bikes are the anwser.

    When I run my window AC unit in the summer, my electricity bill goes up 3 times what I pay in the winter. If that electric bike has to be charged 6 or 8 hours for a 25 mile trip, what kind of cost per mile are we getting? Granted, gas just hit $2.25 a gallon where I live, but my car gets 25 miles to the gallon. Plus, I can drive my car in the rain.

    What we need are better cheaper cars, perhaps cars that have solar panels to add energy so a car is not 100% gas driven. And maybe a cheaper source of power, as it seems those who control oil production can put us over the barrel.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  21. Green- WHAT? by HexRei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to one user, electric bikes are popular because they're cheap, and can take you all around town on one charge. Who would have guessed that China would lead the way in green transportation?"

    Power from the outlet requires a generator or plant of some kind, as well. If theym like the US, generate much of their electricity from fossil fuels, all they've done is move their pollution problem to a different sector.

  22. Re:Language at the site by txviking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China was leading the green revolution for a long time .... With a lot of traditional bycicles....

  23. It's hardly green by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's hardly green transportation, not when the source of the electricity is coal and gas burning plants. All you've done is relocate the pollution out to wherever the power plant is.

    It seems as if many self-styled environmentalists (who wear their badge in the form of an all-electric vehicle) are the personification of shortsighted NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard). They either don't understand that electricity comes from SOMEWHERE, or they don't care about the pollution, only that it doesn't happen where they live.

    1. Re:It's hardly green by adamfranco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please see my previous post.

      Its not NIMBY, so much as an engineering problem. Power plants are few, and easily regulated/upgraded in comparison to cars. Additionally, they are vastly more efficent than car engines that are constrained by the need for mobility. Yeah, it would be great if we could power our grid via wind, solar, tidal power, etc, but getting rid of the little, inefficient, gasoline engines is the first step.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  24. Re:E-bikes? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Informative

    The e-bike has pedals so the rider can add power. Scooters do not have pedals, be they for children with roller blade wheels, or electric/gas models. The definition of moped: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=moped
    sa ys it has pedals and is powered by a gas engine.

    So they're either electric bikes or electric mopeds. I think the design and appearance would be the deciding factor of what to call them.

  25. Here ya go by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Giant LaFree. Does exactly what you want.

    I test rode one, and personally, I don't like them, except if you really need it.
    They're heavy (80lbs), slow, expensive.

    I can go farther, faster on a regular bike.

    1. Re:Here ya go by adamfranco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As an avid cyclist, I couldn't agree more. Me on a 17lb road bike can cruise at 17mph for long distances or 25mph for short distances/passing cars (really fun in my congested little town). Plus, I get good exersize while commuting.

      That said, for those not young, not in good physical shape, or just lazy, the electric bike would be great. It would also be good for those who don't work for bike-friendly employers since you can arrive at work without being all sweaty and needing to change.

      On another bicycle note, I recently came accross this great short essay entitled, "In Praise of the Bicycle".

      Excerpts:
      ...Man on his feet is thermodynamically more efficient than any motorized vehicle and most animals. For his weight, he performs more work in locomotion than rats or oxen, less than horses or sturgeon.

      ...The bicycle is the perfect transducer to match man's metabolic energy to the impedance of locomotion. Equipped with this tool, man outstrips the efficiency of not only all machines but all other animals as well.

      Its a nice read if you like cycling, commuting via bike, or are stuffed in your car in rush-hour traffic.

      I then looked up the stats for the 2003 Tour and Lance Armstrong's winning finish of the 2129.4 mile race in 83h41'12" gives him an incredible average speed of 25.45miles/hour.

      While a thoroughbred can run a mile averaging 40mph, a long distance speed record for the Karbarda breed or horses (the only one I could find data on) is 50km at 18.5 mph. Its pretty safe to say that attempting to ride a horse or just entering any animal in the Tour would kill it in a
      matter of days if not less.

      Go bicycles!

      In my opinion, anything that gets people out of their SUVs is a good thing for the world and these things are much better than nothing.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    2. Re:Here ya go by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...less than horses or sturgeon.

      I'm a sturgeon
      hooked for the very first time...

      You have my humblest apologies. I just couldn't help it. I don't know what came over me.

      What were we talking about? Oh yeah, bicycles and China. On the subject of China leading the way, we might find that they will be on the vanguard of many things to come. Without IP to hamper their innovation, they could easily surpass the U.S. and Europe. Their politics not withstanding.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Here ya go by adamfranco · · Score: 3, Informative

      In this later post I worked out the efficiency numbers for cars, to compare them with bikes, the results:

      Car: 66 Calories/km (45mpg)
      Walking: 0.75 Calories/km => 88x more effiecent than a car (at 45mpg)
      Biking: 0.15 Calories/km => 440x more effiecent than a car (at 45mpg)

      (note, the above assume that the numbers in the linked article for people, are in nutritional "C"alaries = kilocalories, instead of SI calories. If they are SI, then the bike is 440,000x more efficient than the car.)

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    4. Re:Here ya go by GFW · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I then looked up the stats for the 2003 Tour and Lance Armstrong's winning finish of the 2129.4 mile race in 83h41'12" gives him an incredible average speed of 25.45miles/hour.
      Note that that includes a significant number of mountain stages, with some serious climbs. On the flat, the peloton often rolls along at 55 mph.
    5. Re:Here ya go by Pyrrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm told that the top bicyclists (no doubt including lance)
      have a power output of 1/2 hp (for once, that's actually a somewhat
      relevant figure), so he's not that far behind.
      And before anyone flames me, .5HP = 378 W

  26. Even worse by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Shanghai is (as of Dec 2003) restricting bikes on its major streets.

    "Bicycles have gone from carrying more than 70 percent of travelers in Shanghai as recently as 1990 to from 15 to 17 percent now, according to the Shanghai Urban Planning Bureau."

    Upward mobility indeed.

  27. Viva Thinkmobility & Giant LaFree by turtleshadow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got a Thinkmobility several years ago. With Gas hitting near $2/gallon in my area its looking to be a decent investment.

    However thinkmobility has tanked their bike lines after Ford went back to regular electic vehicles.

    Me, I think they took the incentive money for low emmission vehicles and ran.

    Lee Iococca also started an entire new company for his bikes.

    I think the biggest hold backs to Western adoption of such vehicles
    1) Former use of SLA batteries; NextGen LION has just arrived
    2) Lack of adequate storage -- dont get a folder buy/rent a shed! Typical bike sheds (home & work) are needed as electric bikes are too big an investment to have someone huck it in the back of the F350 truck. They are much lighter than vespas but still heavy enough to deter most thieves given most come with a key ignition
    3) Lack of common components; Battery sets and chargers need to somehow standardize

    I can get to work, in an hour, 15mi, with a fully loaded briefcase and work clothes at a mild peddle speed without breaking a sweat. My spandex wearing 21 speeder co-workers have no such luggage ability and must undergo daily scrotum scrunch.

    I have to stay off highway and take a bit longer course as my top burst speed is 18mph which kills the battery. I live in a very hilly area and use them to my advantage as I can use the peddle assist on the light hills and use big hills and gravity elsewhere.

    The best part is the company is unknowninly paying to charge my battery as it charges under my desk!
    Who needs cubical lights?

  28. Car-Motorcycle Hybrid by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is slightly off-topic, but maybe someone will be able to point be in the right direction... I am envisioning a vehicle that is roughly 6-7ft long, 4ft wide, and about 4.5ft tall. It is shaped like a 'pod', i.e. very aerodynamic and egg like. It's got 3 or 4 wheels small, low rolling resistance tires, and is powered with a smallish motorcycle engine. The body is plastic with a minimal aluminum frame underneath. There is one seat, with basic controls. No A/C, heat could be added, utilizing 'wasted' heat energy from the the engine, of course. Gear it for maximum fuel efficiency, and a peak speed (in terms of good gas milage) of about 70mph

    Don't these little motorcycles we have now get 60+mpg? And they are tuned for speed/acceleration, not fuel economy. So we should be able to get even more than that if tuned properly. The extra weight would drop it down some, but the addition of better aerodynamics and lower resistance tires will up it some as well.

    I can't see how this would be anymore dangerous to the driver than a motorcycle is, and those are allowed everywhere. Plus you could drive it in the rain, and feasibly have some storage space inside.

    I've been envisioning this for about a year now, and would buy one if it were under $6000, went at least 65mph getting 55-60mpg, were legal on the highway, and had a 7-9 gallon tank (400-550 miles per tank).

    My question is if there is anything like this out there, of if I should go ahead and start building one?

    This is kinda on the topic, so please don't mod me down to hard!

    1. Re:Car-Motorcycle Hybrid by garyok · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out this concept car for a euro-interpretation of your vision. They're hoping for fuel consumption rate of 188 miles per gallon. They are also calling it the C.L.E.V.E.R. car (to cash in on the Smart car's advertising budget I assume). A nice idea but a dumb name.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    2. Re:Car-Motorcycle Hybrid by IceFoot · · Score: 2, Informative

      After World War II, the German aircraft company Messerschmidt toyed with this very idea! They developed and marketed a tiny car, more like an enclosed motorcycle with 3 wheels. Pictures here

  29. Stationary generators greener than portable by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That electricity has to come from someplace... in China, that means mostly oil and coal powerplants with none of the pollution controls found in the west

    Stationary power plants produce more energy and less pollution than a sea of small movable engines consuming the same amount of fuel. Chinese power plants may pollute more than American power plants, but they both pollute less than mini power plants (automobile/motorcycle engines) designed for size and weight instead of efficiency.

    You can eliminate more pollution with $1,000,000 worth of pollution control equipment on one power plant, then you can with a $100 worth of pollution control equipment on each of ten thousand automobiles.

  30. Too late, they already are by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BANISHED BICYCLES

    "It as a milestone of sorts when Shanghai, China's biggest city, banned bicycles on its largest avenues last month, but also a belated acknowledgment of a change that has already transformed many large cities in China."

    "Automobile sales in China, which reached two million last year, are growing at an annual rate of more than 50 percent. The growth of private car ownership has brought with it a car culture that increasingly resembles the American one, but with even worse traffic jams, especially in Beijing. Downtown parking spaces have become precious."

    How did YOU get to work yesterday, my little AC troll?

  31. Re:Language at the site by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, the view I had was that the bicycle had an almost Mao-ist appeal for at least most of the old guard there. An e-bike, therefore, is probably just the sort of post-modernist identity symbol that a contemporary Chinese would be interested in.

  32. funny slashbots by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    does anyone else find it hillarious that everyone is chiming in, "oh, green transportation! no surprise it's not the US doing it!"? what bullshit.

    Hello! These a) are electric bikes, b) are replacing non-powered bikes, and c) would not even be viable in an industrialized country where the infrastructure is dependent on massive transportation systems.

    So please just stop. This isn't even "green", when you compare it to the human-powered bikes that they're replacing, ffs. There's no need to be so zealotrously anti-American; you're simply illustrating your ignorance.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  33. Bashing the Green by Gleapsite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All of you are proclaiming that this isn't leading the green movement. Well lets just take a scanario out into time and see what you think then.

    Now.
    we have Oil.
    America makes gas using cars, and gas using moped.
    China makes electric bikes. that run off of coal power plants.

    years into the future.

    We no longer have Oil.
    millions of useless chunks of metal, formerly known as SUV's appear in junk yards in America. We have a transportation crisis because gas prices are insanely high.

    China, running on its electric bikes, and possibly vehicles, loses its coal power plants. However these are replaced by hydro- and solar-electric ones.

    So, ultimately having electric vehicles [bikes cars] eases the passage into utilizing sources of power that are green.

    And China is leading.

    --
    face the world with eyes of fire.
  34. Re:Language at the site by HyperCash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That meme, that these bikes aren't green because they aren't as good for the environment as regular bikes, is really screwed up coming from this crowd. The Athlon or P4 you're writing these comments on probably use as much electricity as these e-bikes do. Not to mention that being mostly westerners we almost all drive cars. But everyone complains that these e-bikes are a bad developement because they aren't as green as regular bikes! What should the chinese do? Never advance? Live in the dark because any electricity they use has to come from somewhere? Why are we slamming them for their comparitivly small energy use instead of slamming ourselves for writting these comments on energy guzzling computers?

    --HC

    --
    So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
  35. "green transportation" by Lu+Xun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't assume that these electric bikes are gaining ground because of environmental or even traffic concerns. They're cheap, and the vast majority of Chinese people cannot afford a car. I'd bet that once they can afford them, they will happily trade in their e-bike for a big, emissions-producing vehicle. The growing middle class is already doing this, contributing to the world-wide upsurge in oil demand and price hikes at the pumps.

    --
    That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
  36. Yeah, but is it really green? by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who would have guessed that China would lead the way in green transportation?

    Greener != green

    What about the lead-acid or nickel-cadmium batteries commonly used in these? How many one-armed, 3-eyed Chinese babies will be born as a result of pollution of these terribly toxic metals?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  37. Better than a car by lgbarker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While an electric bike may not be as green as a pedal bike it's sure better than a car.
    In light of reports that China is the fastest growing automobile market in the world, electric bikes look pretty good.

  38. Re:Language at the site by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I drive an e-bike to work.

    I'm quite happy with it.

    I find it to be a marked improvement on the pedal only model - appropriate for my less energetic mid-life self.

    Proper paths in which biking were safe combined with access to mass transportation would i think may transportation a community event (think train station as the quientessential town hall of the industrial revolution)

    Details - Good bike in the States will set you back $1100. Giant Lite is (a) leader stateside.

    There are two modes (Throttle and Pedal assist)

    Throttled is less appropriate for kids and pedestrian places.

    Pedal Assist is impossibly easy to control since it only amplifies the pedal movements.

    Mine is the latter.

    Here's wishing for a little more speed allowance - not for me - butto reduce the impatience of the cars behind me on narrow roads.

    At this gas crunch time - we should encourage our local law to embrace this option by:

    1. Granting higher speeds (-30 MPH perhaps) -

    2. special rights of way -

    3. efforts to keep the roadside clear of glass, potholes, manhole covers, and gravel from gravel drives.

    I suggest we name them Vbikes as a means of resisting the influence of the middle east crowd.

    AIK

  39. How is this technology Green? by nucrash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By charging the bike up at home,you are only transfering the location of which the poluting chemical reaction takes place.

    Now, if the bike was charged up like a hybrid car, charging the battery as the bike was being pedalled, or such, this technology would be wonderous. But there is the matter of having to create the bike itself, or atleast the battery, which isn't so good for the environment.

    --
    Place something witty here
  40. It will fail in US by tftp · · Score: 4, Funny
    I looked through all the comments so far, and seems like nobody noticed one deficiency of these bikes that will completely ruin their sales in the USA.

    These bikes can carry a rider weighing up to 75-100 kg (about 200 lbs.) Thus, majority of potential users here will be excluded. They would simply break the bike :-)

  41. electric is not "green"! by snarkasaurus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When are you people at Slashdot going to realize that electric vehicles do not stop air pollution, they only move the place it gets made?

    You have to charge up the battery. That takes electricity from the wall. Which comes from a power plant. Which BURNS something, usually coal in China. Really gawdawful brown coal too, not the nice hard stuff we get in the USA and Canada.

    Smokestack or exhaust pipe, take your pick. You want to be green, you better pedal it yourself. True, you will be burning sugar and making CO2 while you pedal, but unless you plan on going "back to the land" by stopping breathing on a permanent basis, you'll be doing that anyway.

  42. Small wheels because of how the engine works by GoClick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their easier to make with smaller wheels, both cheaper and lighter, plus the small engines tend to produce their horse power with RPM not torque so the smaller wheels are easier to gear for since the engine is already reving rather fast with little force. Smaller wheels can also easier to drive because there's less gyroscopic effect to overcome when turning. This is the same reason Japanese cars have little wheels.

  43. Re:Language at the site by subtropolis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No one said China should 'never advance'. The point being made is that these electric bikes are decidedly not 'greener' than the mechanical ones the country is known for.

    This isn't just a swipe at the editors. China has, what? 4 times the population of the US? The large increase in oil imports to that country is partly responsible for the current ~$40/Barrel oil prices (because reserves are tight). Like the US, they also burn *a lot* of coal. Unlike the US, the Chinese economy is raging right now. It is, to a large degree, propping up the economies of many others.

    There are about 30 golf courses built, or planned for, in and around Beijing alone. This is the boom many economists and traders have been talking about for years. The rest of Asia, including India, will follow. It'll be interesting, to say the least, how the Chinese deal with all that comes with a bustling commerce. Think of the shear waste that the 'first world nations' have already generated. Hopefully, the popularity of electric bikes is a sign that the path they take won't be so littered. One can hope.

    btw, I don't drive, i cycle. And i'm not typing this on a P4, either.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  44. E-Bikes pollute more than what they're replacing by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're replacing regular bicycles. And regular bicycles run on a good meal, and there's no avoiding the pollution that causes, whether or not you have the bicycle. China needs to get better electric production before trying to replace everybody's legs.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  45. Tried one by jeti · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was able to ride a Swiss Flyer on a fair for special bikes.
    And personally, I liked it a lot. You just turn on the power
    assistance and ride it. There are no other controls.

    When you accelerate or climb a slope, the drive kicks in.
    You're hardly aware of it. Instead it feels like you're uber-
    fit. And when you're up to speed, it just behaves like a
    normal bike.

    The model I rode was a city bike. I could imagine to buy
    one for my mother when she doesn't feel fit enough to ride
    a normal one anymore.

    A more sportsy version would be attractive to me.
    (I'm normally riding a good racing bike.)

    Here's the link (swiss/german text only.)