Slashdot Mirror


Akamai Having Problems?

A reader writes:"It appears that sometime during the night, Akamai had some problems causing some connectivitly issues with many hosts thoughout the night. Akamai provides a DNS load balancing solution to many major internet companies/sites including (but notlimited to) Google, Yahoo, etc. Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs? " Not much details - but I can confirm having problems this morning. Thanks to alert readers for pointing that they were having "DoS related issues" and that service was restored as of 1400 GMT.

69 of 216 comments (clear)

  1. SBC? by boschmorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps this is related to the SBC strike?

    1. Re:SBC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did the bytes join in solidarity?

    2. Re:SBC? by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did the bytes join in solidarity?

      Word up!

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  2. Apple down, Microsoft up by G�tz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can confirm problems accessing the apple.com trailers, but microsoft.com has no problems. I thought they were using Akamai's services as well?

    1. Re:Apple down, Microsoft up by lazy_arabica · · Score: 4, Funny
      microsoft.com has no problems. I thought they were using Akamai's services as well?
      They are:
      www.microsoft.akadns.net CNAME www2.microsoft.akadns.net
      Oh my god, this must be another Microsoft conspiracy, you'll soon see them shutting google.com down ! :-P
    2. Re:Apple down, Microsoft up by the+frizz · · Score: 2, Informative
      See the Speedrank index for the affects this has had on 100 popular web sites.

      Disclaimer. I work for Speedera, an Akamai competitor.

  3. apple trailers by pinky99 · · Score: 2, Informative

    yes, i noted also it, when i wanted to watch new movie trailers at apple's qt site, which is appearantly and unfortunately hosted by akamai.

  4. I thought they do file hosting also by nev4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Akamai also hosts files (images, binaries) for many major websites. Seems like they have some pretty insane bandwidth too...

    1. Re:I thought they do file hosting also by r_cerq · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they don't need to. Akamai's model is to install a bunch of their own machines (a PoP) in each and every middle-to-large ISP. They then use source-based DNS to direct requests to the nearest PoP (with some luck, it'll be within your ISP's network). They basically work as a smart reverse-proxy. You make your request to their PoP, and the PoP serves the content from cache. If you happen to be the first person requesting said content, the PoP will fetch it from the originating server (Apple, MS, CNN, whatever) and cache it to serve following request.

    2. Re:I thought they do file hosting also by Misch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Like Livejournal. They use Akamai for hosting userpics. This morning my buddy list was having trouble loading the images. (as they note here.)

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    3. Re:I thought they do file hosting also by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of conent is also pre-pushed. For instance if Apple is going to have an ad campaign involving quicktime movies available from apple.com they will pre-push the content to Akami's servers several days ahead of time so that there is not a sudden rush of requests from Akami's cache engines crushing everything else.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  5. Having problems? by MarkGriz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Posting a link to their website on Slashdot should help them out.

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    1. Re:Having problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You think Slashdot can affect them? How quaint.

  6. erm... by REBloomfield · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So, you had a problem on the Inernet, no one else has reported this, on any or the mainstream news sites, and the whole Internet is coming to an end?

    And this is *news*???

    1. Re:erm... by geoffspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, my home DSL briefly went down during a severe thunderstorm the other day.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The other day, the whole Internet was down. The cause was traced to their cable being unplugged from my computer. I put it back and restored the Internet. I hope this didn't cause anyone problems.

    3. Re:erm... by Hobart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, you had a problem on the Inernet, no one else has reported this, on any or the mainstream news sites, and the whole Internet is coming to an end? And this is *news*???
      No, smart-aleck, EVERYONE had problems pulling down sites like Amazon / IMDB / others. I saw it too, heaviest problem at 1300GMT.
      --
      o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  7. Not a problem with having one company by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think it's a problem to go with one company. As long as that company has a distributed solution with many uplink providers. So, basically redundancy when something happens because no matter how good you are there will always be hickups.

  8. Internet Storm Centre has a little by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Akamai problems. Quiet, well kinda quiet, day on the Internet Update (Mon. May 24th 9 am EST, 13:00 UTC, 15:00 CEST)

    It appears that websites that use Akamai's distribution system are currently not reachable. Security related web sites effected are symantec.com and trendmicro.com. Virus updates may fail as a result. Further details are currently not available and updates will be posted here as they become available. Thanks to Vidar Wilkens for alerting us of this problem.

    According to a post to NANOG, the outage may be the result of a DDOS attack. At this point, Akamai has not ETA for a resolution.

    Update 09:45 EST: Looks like some of the Akamai hosted sites start to come back."

    You gotta love that "Quiet, well kinda quiet". ;)

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  9. Perhaps.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Perhaps it is because of karmatic pretending to be posting mirrors of various stories on Slashdot over the last 24 hours, but instead using Akamai as an open proxy to mirror the sites for him:Nice bit of bandwidth theft, there.
    1. Re:Perhaps.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember doing that a few years back ;-)

      I just went to akamai's site to see if they have any terms of use or anything but all I see is a blank page, so it must be ok.

  10. We do that already. by Underholdning · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs?
    We do that already. Remember when verisign introduced Sitefinder, thus effectively making various services (like spam filters etc) unusable because non-existing domains all of a sudden replied with a valid IP.

  11. NOC Says: by j0keralpha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Akamai's NOC says service restored approx 1400GMT. Earlier NOC quotes include: It is a system-wide problem that "looks like it may be a DOS attack".

    1. Re:NOC Says: by baudilus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder what kind of DOS attack could take down akamai? Their bandwidth is almost scary (I've downloaded stuff from them at well over 9 mbps from my home machine). I'd hate to think someone has enough bandwidth to attack them, unless it was some sort DDoS.

    2. Re:NOC Says: by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      While collectively Akamai is near impervious, there's probably a 'weak link' in there somewhere. I would guess that the servers which direct you to the local cache were the target - they deal only with requests and routing so they wouldn't need anything like the bandwidth that the actual media caching servers have, and if the media servers are up but the routing servers are down then the system is essentailly dead.

      Kinda like the time they DDoSed some of the DNS roots - if they'd got a few more of them it could've pretty much taken out the entire web without actually needing to attempt the near impossible task of offlining all of the millions(?) of normal site servers out there.

  12. Redundancy by some1somewhere · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their system is supposed to be distributed in such a way that any major outage in a section of the internet would not affect their overall ability to deliver the content, so presuambly any outage an ISP would not hit their too hard.

    BTW something interesting:
    http://a1.g.akamaitech.net/6/6/6/6/w ww.peacefire.o rg/bypass/Proxy/akamai.html

    --
    **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  13. What really happened... by Fulkkari · · Score: 4, Funny

    The cleaning lady needed electricity to her vacuum cleaner.

    Poor sysadmins.

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  14. Discussed on Nanog... by rf0 · · Score: 4, Informative
  15. Answer by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Informative
    Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs?

    Of course it is a bad idea.

    However, blame that on the other competing services who haven't become cheaper, faster or better at whatever it is that makes Akamai so popular.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  16. Ah, knee-jerk reactions. by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs?

    I love how the first reaction when something goes wrong is to replace it, or introduce competiton, or whatever. Yes, there are plenty of times when a service needs competition to encourage it to suck less. But go find me another company that is even remotely prepared to do DNS load-balancing. Verisign? Oh, that's a great idea. Going to start one yourself? Let us know when you have the infrastructure.

    The fact is, we have NO idea what caused this. There's no link to any story anywhere - just one reader report. It could be Akamai's fault. It could be their upstream providers. It could be failures elsewhere in the Internet. Could be someone uploaded a bad zone file. Or maybe some over-zealous backhoe operator slashed some fiber somewhere.

    It's probably best to reserve judgement until you have all the facts. (And if you're about to hit the reply button, yes, I'd say the exact same thing if MSFT lost their DNS service).

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    1. Re:Ah, knee-jerk reactions. by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Akami host their clusters all over the planet it is a fully redundant service it would of had to be a major fault to cause it to go down.

  17. Single Domino Theory Revisited by dalillama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People say that the Internet can't be knocked out. That may be true in the infra-structure sense, but if you're able to knock down Akamai or any other major solution provider, think of the sites that would go down (Google, Yahoo et al), and the repercution on the global economy. So yes, the domino theory doesn't apply to the Internet, but it becomes exponentially more dangerous when we rely on one domino for a significant share of of communications.

    1. Re:Single Domino Theory Revisited by dalillama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know-- But if a significant portion of their load-balancing is knocked out of service, the effects are still substantial. Imagine Google running at 10% capacity...

    2. Re:Single Domino Theory Revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes...oh dear God imagine if Google was down for a day what would the world do?

  18. 24/7 Application Uptime by Stalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess this throws a wrench in their claim of 24/7 uptime on their main page. Nice how their marketing team says 100% availability, when people get PhD's by adding more 9's to their 99.99..%'s

    1. Re:24/7 Application Uptime by djh101010 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been using Akamai for several years now at work, this is the first time we've had any interruption. The bandwith they serve for us for a couple grand a month offsets about 3 times as much cost if we had to bring it in ourselves, our customers get pages in half the time (better than that further away), and with the exception of this morning, _it just works_.

      Wish I could point to one of my servers here that hasn't been down unexpectedly in 2 years. I don't think I can. It's cheaper, it's faster, and it's more reliable than trying to serve that content from here; even with this downtime, it's still the appropriate solution.

      Now, if they go down _again_, without explaination, it could get messy.

  19. YIKES! by ZHaDoom · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope its not my fault. I knocked out 3 of akamai servers with a router problem =(

    --
    War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
  20. They just found the culprit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The outage was apparently related to a DDOS attack against project Gutenberg that started this morning.

  21. several possibly related outages over the weekend? by Servo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At work we lost connectivity to a handful of remote sites located in the Northeast, Midwest, and Southeast. Other sites in the same region but different cities were not affected. I was told it was a fiber cut on AT&T's backbone.. wonder if it has anything to do with this.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  22. Report from Akamai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Our Akamai rep tells us that it was an issue with a software version rollout. They flushed all their image caches, and effectively caused a DOS on themselves.

  23. Silly Akamai by avisdream · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've had so many problems with akamai as of late...it seemingly has a monopoly over just about any commercial website I'm interested in. I don't see images very often while I'm at work...they just idle. Maybe it's a sign that I should stop shopping when I'm supposed to be working :(

  24. Closer to home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs?

    Yeah. Duh. But, where else can I get a /. fix?

  25. eBay affected also by jelevy01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I couldn't get to eBay this morning either. It seems to be resolved now though.

  26. WORM_AGOBOT.GN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was unable to get to the sites for the major AV Vendors this morning. I chalk it up to Agobot as it
    DDOS's their sites. See the following link:

    http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/def au lt5.asp?VName=WORM_AGOBOT.GN&VSect=T

  27. Notice on Akamai Control site by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 4, Informative
    Akamai has posted a notice on the website customers use to get reporting and manage content.

    Due to a peering problem between ATT and UUNet, a subset of UUNet users may have experienced problems accessing Akamai delivered sites between 8-10pm EDT on Saturday May 22, 2004. The problem has been fully resolved.

    --
    I think I'll stop here.
    1. Re:Notice on Akamai Control site by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
      8-10pm EDT on Saturday May 22, 2004

      Well, unless you have a *really* bad latency problem, I don't think that's going to be an issue with a problem on May 24th...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  28. DNS flaky for the last 90 days by sphealey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a small company we have a limited view of the Internet, but it seems to us that there have been DNS and connectivity problems thoughout the Internet for the last 90 days or so. I was guessing that there was a DDoS attack against the root DNS servers that wasn't being reported. This would seem to be along the same lines.

    sPh

  29. Re:It's simple. by 87C751 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Terrorism.
    Funny you should say that. First thing this morning, I noticed my ThreatTray monitor was blank. I checked, and the Department of Homeland Security was not answering. And who do you suppose runs their webservers?
    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  30. What about Bittorrent? by KhalidBoussouara · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bittorrent reduces the load on the central server by having everyone who downloads content upload content to other users. Couldn't a similar system be designed for HTTP connections? Obviously it would be designed with much smaller files in mind and with less overhead.

    I realise no one give a shit about some large company's bandwith but for small community sites it could really make a difference. They wouldn't have to pay for a company to mirror their site and would save on bandwith costs.

    This wouldn't work for server side scripts (as the HTML output would be different for every user) but for static HTML and images it would be perfect.

    1. Re:What about Bittorrent? by ticktockticktock · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well with sha1 hashes that wouldn't be too much of a problem since the site could dish those out and the clients can use that to verify that the content indeed is the same as what the site says coming from untrusted parties.

      Imagine if a plugin for web browsers advertised their support for "protocol/torrent" when you visit www.site.com sort of like:
      GET / HTTP/1.1
      Host: www.site.com
      Accept: protocol/torrent,text/html,text/plain,image/png,im age/jpeg,image/gif
      Then the server, that wishes to have requests distributed would respond sort of like this:
      HTTP/1.1 302 FOUND
      Content-Type: protocol/torrent;text/html
      Location: torrent://www.site.com:6969/03cfd743661f07975fa2f1 220c5194cbaff48451
      Where the torrent:// URI would point the person's browser to the tracker to contact and what is after that is the sha1 hash of the content that the client can use to verify the integrity of what it downloaded from potentially untrusted third parties. As long as a user sits at a web page, the plugin could "seed" for others who wish to view the same page. When the user leaves the page, it would stop seeding that content immediately.
  31. from their support website by john_uy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Advisories

    Due to a peering problem between ATT and UUNet, a subset of UUNet users may have experienced problems accessing Akamai delivered sites between 8-10pm EDT on Saturday May 22, 2004. The problem has been fully resolved.

    Maybe the problem has recurred.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
    1. Re:from their support website by jea6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This was a different issue altogether. Saturday's issue only affected incoming traffic from any UUNet network. Today's issue was much more widespread.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  32. I don't think it was just Akami. by pedantic+bore · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was having all kinds of problems browsing the web last night: about half the sites I tried to visit (including slashdot and freebsd.org) simply failed to connect. The others were perfectly fine. I didn't see any pattern to it, but I wasn't looking very hard.

    Since I've had problems like this with my ISP, I figured it was something local. I guess not.

    OK, moderate me redundant because now I see a million other people saw the same thing...

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  33. I've noted a big problem... by Eggplant62 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. with akamai-hosted sites that has an odd effect in Mozilla Firefox 0.8 on Linux. A combination of Firefox doing an unnecessary reverse lookup on the IP that's being connected to (this is in addition to the regular forward lookup to get the IP, and waits until timeout, usually 30 seconds) and akamai's lack of any reverse zones configured for their boxes.

    A buddy of mine worked through further diagnosis to reveal this problem and registered a bug report with the MozDev team, however, after he contacted Google to inform them of the problem, they put in a blank in-addr.arpa zone file for their IP's, which resulted in an immediate negative result on that reverse zone lookup. If the rest of akamai would get on the stick and do the same, the problem would be history.

  34. michaelmoore.com by dario_moreno · · Score: 3, Funny

    seems also to be down. I was trying to access it after the Cannes result, and thought the US government had censored it...

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  35. Akamai says it's a bug in the software, not DDoS by tsu+doh+nimh · · Score: 5, Informative

    A guy I spoke with this morning at Akamai said this morning that the problem was NOT the result of any outside attack on the company's servers. Rather, he said, the problem stemmed from a bug within a tool that allows customers to purge old content and update their cache with new content. Akamai said the problem lasted about 90 minutes, and affected numerous Akamai customers. No response, though, as to why this bug suddenly reared its head.

    --
    ...because you never know who you're dealing with.
  36. Haha by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Akamai provides a DNS load balancing solution to many major internet companies/sites including (but notlimited to) Google, Yahoo, etc. Is it a bad idea to rely so heavily upon one service for our major internet needs?

    Don't you see the irony? How much of the internet populace depends on Google for their searching needs?

    I suspect the problem here, as there, is that there aren't many who can compete at a service level.

  37. Here's what's happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Currently akamai is configured as an open proxy. This is obviously bad (for them), since anyone can steal the service they're selling for big bucks.

    Try:
    http://a40.g.akamaitech.net/7/40/1601/1d/i mages.sl ashdot.org/topics/topiclinux.gif

    (it works with ANY URL)

    Obviously, they noticed it, and tried to fix it. Their fix turned out to block valid customers (like Apple, as has been mentioned), so now they have rolled it back to the free-for-all setup.

    They're probably working on a better fix right now.

  38. Akamais distributed DNS & content solutions by akaiONE · · Score: 5, Informative
    Akamai may have problems from time to time over in the US, while not in Europe. The fact that Akamai uses a distributed network of both DNS and content servers helps them deliver content to most users in other regions even if some servers are down in the US.

    This is nicely commented on in a recent story over at CFO where it says "Broadly speaking, Akamai needs servers near the consumers of content..[] Akamai, on the other hand, has servers pretty much everywhere."

    To trim the facts down a bit: Akamai has servers near by most users these days, and the distributed DNS gives you returning DNS to the closest contentserver. If I, who live in Norway, try to access fbi.gov from any computer from a ISP connected to the NIX (Norwegian Internet eXchange) I get a DNS response that leads me to Akamais servers in Oslo, Norway. I've tried this for some time, just to see what happens, with cnn.com, apple.com and fbi.gov. While on a trip to Sweden I tried this while connecting through a local DSL-provider and I got a response from a server located in Sweden, hence even the swedes have their own Akamai mirror these days.

    The problems with a DDOS from someone in Norway would, if directed towards a domain or webpage and not an IP-address lead to downtime on that specific local mirror, not Akamais entire network. We can from this conclude that only such events as a major blackout in Akamais core network or like this time, DOS'ing their own network would take out their service.

    --

    "-Who said sit down?!"
    -- S. Ballmer @ MSDC 2003.

  39. Nothing to see here...move along. by Hiawatha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Akamai just told me it was a 90-minute glitch (between 8 and 9:30 Eastern time) caused by a software bug. The company says everything's back to normal.

    --

    Hiawatha Bray

    Tech Reporter

    Boston Globe

    1. Re:Nothing to see here...move along. by jea6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Nothing to see here...move along

      Considering Akamai hosts the web sites for the like of the White House, FBI, and Dept of Homeland Security (among other gov't agencies), an Akamai outage is slightly more than "nothing to see here." Unless you are making a political statement, I guess.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  40. I'd say it's near a natural monopoly... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...for those that don't know, a market where it is unprofitable to be the 2nd company around (usually, you can sell cheap because the major company wants to reap profits). A small "Akamai" competitor is no competitor at all, really. You need to have a similar huge network in order to compete. They would undoubtably clash and one would come out as the winner.

    So well, if it hadn't been Akamai it'd probably be someone else. Of course, one company can still build a helluva redundant network, if they want to... it's just usually not cost-efficient.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  41. Akamai was down from 8:00am to 9:15am by dloyer · · Score: 3, Informative
    We are an Akamai customer. All of our content cached through Akamai was offline for a little over an hour as measured by keynote, a site testing tool.

    I spoke with Akamai support. They indicated that it was a far reaching problem, but I have not heard the reason yet.

    The customer login to the admin portal was down as well. It was almost like someone dump the customer account database.

    Akamai has a QOS commitment of 100% uptime based on the idea that not all of the 1,000's of servers could go down at the same time. But... There you go.

  42. latest advisory by john_uy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    from contol.akamai.com

    Akamai is aware of a service interuption earlier today affecting content delivery.

    We have identified the root cause and have implemented the fix. Issues retrieving content should be decreasing or resolved. Updates will continue to be posted on the Akamai Edge Control Management Center.

    so there is something wrong with their cdn. so much for 100% availability. my guess, all the edge servers were ok but there may be a problem with their noc or software.

    :)

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  43. Re:"Not much details?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you mean "grammatical mistakes"?

  44. Remember when Akamai DoS'd Microsoft? by freelunch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It took Microsoft down for DAYS.

    All due to a router config bug introduced by Microsoft.. So it was really Microsoft DoSing themselves via Akamai.

    And it would be unfair to blame the router config for more than a few hours of outage. The big problem was the complete and utter paralysis of management on the conference calls.

    I don't think the details of that outage have been leaked much. It was quite a hoot talking to those involved during the outage. And it wasn't hard, given the duration.

    It is my recollection that the problem related to Microsoft's filtering DNS requests from Akamai.

  45. Re:i've always wondered... by ps · · Score: 2, Informative

    ak a my

    Simple. Just like it looks.

  46. Explaination from Akamai by slashusrslashbin · · Score: 5, Informative

    An isolated issue occurred this morning (roughly during the period of 8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. ET), where multiple Akamai customers experienced intermittent performance and availability degradation.

    This degradation was the result of a bug within one of Akamai's backend content control management tools, which allows the expiration of content on the Akamai network. The degradation was not a result of any outside interference with Akamai's network (such as Denial of Service or hacking).

    Upon identification of the bug, Akamai quickly took corrective action which returned customers to normal service levels. Akamai is currently putting measures in place to return the content management tool to its normal working order and is adding safeguards such that the issue will not occur in the future. In the meantime, Akamai customers are able to serve their content through the Akamai Network normally.

    As part of Akamai's normal proactive customer communication policy, Akamai customers will be kept informed of the latest developments through the Akamai portal, the EdgeControl Management Center, https://control.akamai.com. Any further inquiries may be directed at Akamai Customer Care at 1-877-4-AKATEC.

  47. Scalability and bandwidth by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    No, Akamai as a whole really does have humongous amount of bandwidth, it's just distributed among 14000+ small machines. Their web site says they crank out "40 GPS", which is probably gigabits per second rather than gigabytes per second, so that's about 3 Mbps per machine, and that's probably aggregate peak delivered bandwidth, but most of their machines probably have a lot more capacity than that (10 Mbps would seem to be obvious for the smaller Ethernet-connected ones), because different machines will be busy at different times. It's not the kind of job that needs lots of CPU, but it does need lots of memory (at least by the standards of when the initial machines were deployed), because you don't want to wait 10ms for a disk drive to fetch your data when the reason the content provided chose you was to speed up their delivery and cut out latency (though you could get some performance wins by locking the first 10-20ms of each file in RAM and paging the rest.)

    Akamai's competitors have different scaling tradeoffs. The last time I knew numbers was a couple of years ago, and it may have changed, but Akamai had a very large number of mostly small servers located on many carriers networks, AT&T had a couple hundred very large servers (mostly at peering points, which takes advantage of being a carrier, though they also bought some transit for content distribution), and Speedera was somewhere in between. AT&T's directions included lots of streaming media, and Akamai was doing fancy database things.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks