Slashdot Mirror


OD2 Launches Penny-Per-Song Streaming Jukebox

securitas writes "BBC Technology's Darren Waters reports that UK digital music service OD2 launched its 350,000-song SonicSelector streaming 'digital jukebox' for a penny per song a day ahead of the iTunes Europe debut. The service (co-founded by Peter Gabriel) is available only in 'UK, France, Germany and Italy and will only work with users of Windows Media Player' 9. NewsFactor and The Register have descriptions of the pay-per-use / a la carte service. More at the Financial Times and Reuters via ZDNet UK. You can also read the previous OD2 Slashdot discussion."

163 comments

  1. Just Pains Me... by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To see Brian Eno on the side of the borg. What is the world coming to?

    1. Re:Just Pains Me... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Err... he's been on the side of the borg since he did the "Microsoft sound" for Win98.

    2. Re:Just Pains Me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just Pains Me... To see Brian Eno on the side of the borg.

      What do you mean by this?

  2. A voice of sanity... by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just think on this - Peter Gabriel is now a voice of sanity in the music biz.
    And you listen to the stuff these people put out. They could be sneaking _anything_ into your subconscious in their music...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:A voice of sanity... by jbrw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iTunes Music Store Europe has launched. Cheaper than I thought. Less tracks than they would have liked. Some nice exclusives though.

      But oD2 and the others are going to be running scared for a while. There should be some good offers on for European legal downloaders over the coming few weeks/months.

    2. Re:A voice of sanity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less tracks than they would have liked.

      Fewer tracks, please. Someone of your UID shouldn't be making grammatical errors like that..

      --
      Grammar Nazi

  3. Price isn't bad, but... by chewy_2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    sod using WMP9. No way I could live with that. I'm not even asking for non-DRM'd files (although that would be ideal), but something a bit more cross platform is a pre-req for me. I should be able to play it on what software on whichever OS I choose.

    1. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sod using WMP9. No way I could live with that. I'm not even asking for non-DRM'd files (although that would be ideal), but something a bit more cross platform is a pre-req for me. I should be able to play it on what software on whichever OS I choose.

      Okay, so go and start up your own company and offer cross-platform music streaming for a cent per song. OMG... my library only offers me paper books in English. I should be able to read the books anywhere... PDA, computer, cell phone... and in any language I want! Sheeyit... kids these days.

    2. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard windows media player was not an operating system.

    3. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by dmayle · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree with this one. I develop multi-platform software, which means that, as of right now, I vary between working with three different OS's (OSX, Solaris, and various flavors of Linux) on four different architectures (ppc, x86, x86-64 and sparc), which isn't to brag, but to say that my current desktop at any time is more likely than not to be unable to play windows media.

      Also, I think DRM is a bit silly, because it's a penny a song, and the people who are going to rip you off to save sixty cents weren't going to pay for it anyway. They'd just find someone online who has ripped it from a CD and copy that.

    4. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cross platform eh?

      Well lets see:
      What other platforms would you use?
      BSD? - ...sure, but you'd hafta take it off life support to get it to do any work
      MACOS? - all pretty like, but can't run anything...COMMUNISTs!
      Linux? - hmm, well apparently a small bit of code can cause an FPU exception that crashes the entire system
      Dreamcast? - gamer? more like FLAMER!

      Operating system monocultures are good...and great.

      *ducks*

    5. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should be able to play it on what software on whichever OS I choose.

      Yeah man... I want to play this with The Gimp running under Debian! As if I'm gonna let them pwnz0r me with their l33t WiMP9 DRM hooliganism! LiNuX is teh r0x0r!

    6. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you telling me there's something Emacs can't do?

      I refuse to believe it!

    7. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Dagny+Taggert · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...I agree with your sentiment. WMP is crappy, IMHO. I would love to see something based on Winamp, for example. However, as another poster said, we have the opportunity to start our own company and run it using anything we wish. No I have to go make a sacrifice to Redmond so I don't get eaten.

      --
      Don't be a looter...and yes, I know that it's spelled with an "A" instead of an "E".
    8. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by straybullets · · Score: 1

      DRM is a bit silly, because it's a penny a song

      it's a penny a song for streaming only ... there's no drm for streaming, you know ? it streams then it's gone ... Or may you didn't read the fuc ... uh, oh wait, sorry.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    9. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't worth the money to port it, sadly enough.

    10. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Dutch_Cap · · Score: 5, Funny

      "there's no drm for streaming, you know ? it streams then it's gone ..."

      Yes, because streamed bits are a very special kind of bit. Unlike normal bits they can't be stored to the harddisk.

    11. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by spiny · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah, and in VI it would be so easy :

      CTRL-SHIFT-NUMLOCK-~-#-`--[CTRL027], [return] :)

      --

      Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
      Leela: No he didn't.
    12. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by straybullets · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unlike normal bits they can't be stored to the harddisk.

      Wow ... Do they use some kind of stream water marking ?

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    13. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You missed out the "Esc" at the beginning, followed by :

    14. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by sydb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would love to see something based on Winamp, for example.

      Wake up! Let's not have it based on a piece of software, let's have it based on a fucking standard for christ's sake!

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    15. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by abertoll · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the reason for this is so that you won't copy the music. The idea is that if they can control the software you use to get the music, they can make it harder for you to rip it. I say harder because... even though you may not get WMP9 to cooperate during the ripping process... you can still export that signal from your soundcard to another machine if you wanted to.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    16. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you could always use your soundcard's mixer to record the audio with the same bitrate. There would be a little loss of quality, but not much.

    17. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by aldoman · · Score: 1

      What, like the WMP9 Video Codec? It is now technically a standard...

    18. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by gotem · · Score: 1

      a fucking standard? I would really like to see the RFC's

    19. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by sydb · · Score: 1
      An implementation MUST define two partners who SHOULD be consenting. The partners SHOULD be of the opposite sex but in special cases MAY be of the same sex. Unless the partners are certified STD-free protection SHOULD be worn UNLESS the would-be-parent flag is set.


      And so on.
      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    20. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by sydb · · Score: 1

      By the way, that was going to be ...MUST be consenting but the Microsoft representative on the working group insisted he wanted to shaft anyone he liked, whether they agreed or not.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    21. Re:Price isn't bad, but... by chewy_2000 · · Score: 1
      OK, just to clarify. I don't really consider myself to be an anti MS zealot - in fact, XP is one of my main OSs that I use on a daily basis. I think it's unfair to lock people into a specific program to play the music - I don't see why I should have to change from WinAmp for the privilege of purchasing their music, why Linux users should have to move from XMMS or Mac users from iTunes.

      Oh well, a simple solution - don't use the service. Maybe they'll get the message, but I think I'm in the general minority in not being willing to use WMP9.

  4. Nice deal by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A penny per song is a nice deal, and the 350.000-track database should contain something for most people's taste - but why only UK, France, Germany and Italy? What about us in the rest of Europe?

    The article states that OD2 is "Europe's leading music download firm", and I've never heard of the company - which might explain why the service will not be available in my country...

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Nice deal by Tuvai · · Score: 1

      And the iTunes service will only be available to the UK, France, and Germany. Obviously Apple's and OD2's definition of "Europe" is very lax.
      But in the end, they have to go where the money and population is, and build it up from there. Remember, some members of the EU are more equal than others.

    2. Re:Nice deal by julesh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      why only UK, France, Germany and Italy? What about us in the rest of Europe?

      Interesting question. Did you know that offering a product with restrictions based on residence in a particular country in Europe is illegal under EU regulations? The EU Ombudsman may be interested in this case.

      The article states that OD2 is "Europe's leading music download firm", and I've never heard of the company - which might explain why the service will not be available in my country...

      It seems from the Register's story that they've been operating a service that's co-branded with Coca Cola (I think I remember seeing something about it somewhere before, never paid much attention), so they've probably not used their own name to market it before.

    3. Re:Nice deal by NickeB · · Score: 1

      The rest of Europe has Windows versions without Windows Media Player 9.

    4. Re:Nice deal by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It sounds like they're setting up restrictions on importing across EU borders though, and that sounds likely to be in violation of EU law. It'll be interesting to see whether or not anyone sues.

    5. Re:Nice deal by instanto · · Score: 1

      You're not a part of Germany, France, Italy or the UK, sorry mate, you dont live in Europe. :-)

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    6. Re:Nice deal by martinX · · Score: 1

      Nearly right.

      LONDON--June 15, 2004--Apple® today launched its revolutionary iTunes® Music Store in the UK, France and Germany ... (blah blah PR) ... Apple also today announced that it will launch a European Union version of the iTunes Music Store in October of this year.

      If the EU is so unified, how come Apple et al can't provide an EU-wide service? Obviously Apple wants to, but maybe something in these other countries is blocking them?

      Perhaps it's not that Apple's definition of "Europe" is lax, but the EU's definition of Union is.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    7. Re:Nice deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a part of Germany, France, Italy or the UK, sorry mate, you dont live in Europe. :-)

      ah, the UK are part of Europe ? I though they were a state of the union, now, thanks to the UKIP bastards ...

    8. Re:Nice deal by Njovich · · Score: 1

      OD2 has sites in more countries. For instance you could already get this cheap streaming preview thing for months on the OD2 site of Planet Internet (in the Netherlands). I would give a link but I can't even enter the site now.

      Belgium, Austria and Italy have OD2 sites too, and I'm sure there are others.

    9. Re:Nice deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UKIP, putting the smiling happy face to racism and xeniphobia!

      It's 10:30pm. Do you know where your Brown Shirt is?

    10. Re:Nice deal by Renesis · · Score: 1

      The rights deals for the music are different in every country. They probably haven't managed to negotiate the rights for the penny-a-stream in the other countries yet.

      UK, France, Germany and Italy are the biggest markets in Europe and obviously the countries to tick off first. Give them a chance! The record labels move very slowly - OD2 were the first digital download provider to get all the labels across Europe, but it took them several years of negotiations to pull it off. This is also why it took Napster, iTunes et al so long.

    11. Re:Nice deal by tepples · · Score: 1

      Did you know that offering a product with restrictions based on residence in a particular country in Europe is illegal under EU regulations?

      To put what Renesis said another way: Tell that to the labels.

  5. Sign of things to come? by WordODD · · Score: 4, Informative

    With the massive proliferation of online music distribution services popping up all over the internet could this finally make the RIAA take notice that the old channels of distribution are finally dead and they need to reinvent themselves to stay alive? It will only be a matter of time before non-RIAA artists starting getting exposure through these new channels and the RIAA loses their shakey grip on the industry. Maybe they will never actually admit to being dinosaurs but that won't stop them from becoming extinct.

    --
    Please do not let scientific accuracy interfere with the intended humourous/interesting/insightful value of this comment
    1. Re:Sign of things to come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because I seriously doubt the Recording Industry Association of America could give two shits about what's being announced in Europe.

  6. Sounds like a great idea to me... by iapetus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...right up to the point where he says 'will only work with users of Windows Media Player', and there my interest tails right off.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    1. Re:Sounds like a great idea to me... by jokach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree .. even despite the fact that the author "guesses" that there will be gateways written between the 2 DRM systems.

      Do you really see microsoft playing nice in the DRM market? I just can't see them voluntarily building a gateway from their software so that users can use anything but Windows to listen ... they work so hard putting patents on everything they develop, I can't see how that fits into the plan (especially with Apple).

  7. ITMS europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Who want a subscription service anyway?? Not me. I've just purchased a song from the UK iTunes store and it's now mine, all mine! Don't even think about whining about DRM. Oh Puhleeese.

    1. Re:ITMS europe by Renesis · · Score: 1

      OD2's services are not subscription services.

      They are pay-to-play. 1 cent/1 penny per play. Nothing more, nothing less.

  8. Surprises by Bricklets · · Score: 3, Informative

    iTunes surprised a lot of people when they hinted one week ago that they would launch iTunes in Europe today. Well, it's not exactly Europe (just UK, Germany, France), but everyone is running scared right now trying to prevent Apple from doing in Europe what they have done in the US.

    Competition is good for everyone, especially for the consumers. Let the music war begin.

    --
    Little Bricklets
    1. Re:Surprises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Excuse me?

      What Apple has done in the US is to prevent/delay Microsoft from extending its monopoly into audio. Apple's success can only help competition by promoting another format to WMA, which is shoved down the throat of the unwashed masses by M$ through its illegally-gained tight-fisted control of the desktop.

      It pains me each time I hear that there is "competition" when some oblivious sod points to, say, 30 different WMA players, players who'se format is controlled by a convicted monopolist hell-bent on using any means possible to destroy competition and limit choice. People just don't realize that PROPRIETARY FILE FORMATS ARE A TOOL, A WEAPON that can be used to CONTROL AND LIMIT what people can hear, where and how. Think: how many open-source WM{A|V} file players have you seen recently? How many times have you seen sites that say ~"you can only play this with a MS/Media Player running on this version of MS/Window or better"?

      AAC, MP3, FLAC, OGG Vorbis et al are all open *standards* which can usually be played on anything you can think of. It's only the DRM that complicates file portability, and I hope we all know who imposed DRM. Don't blame Apple or the Fraunhofer institute, look more at the RIAA and Microsoft!

    2. Re:Surprises by reptilicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ---everyone is running scared right now trying to prevent Apple from doing in Europe what they have done in the US---

      What exactly has Apple done in the US, other than offering the most compelling service that customers seem to prefer over the competitors?

    3. Re:Surprises by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      What exactly has Apple done in the US, other than offering the most compelling service that customers seem to prefer over the competitors?

      Exactly. Competitors in Europe had hoped to build up a userbase before Apple arrived. I'm certain Napster had expected more than a two week head start. Well, now that Apple has arrived, the competition starts to heat up. As I stated, it's good for all consumers involved no matter what service they use.

      You seem to have gotten the impression that I was commenting against Apple. Just the other way around. Apple is forcing these competitors to compete through better products and services.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    4. Re:Surprises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (quote)
      Apple is forcing these competitors to compete through better products and services.
      (/quote)

      If "the competition" was using open standard file formats, I'd agree with this statement. But ultimately, what these guys are doing is propagating a proprietary file format (even before DRM!) that is controlled by Microsoft. The minute M$ enters any equation you have a problem of limitation of choices and the unavoidable monopoly abuses by The Redmond Gang.

      What do you think will happen if WMA ends up with, say, 65%+ of music downloads and internet radio streams? Can you imagine what control this gives M$ over what could be distributed, HOW it is distributed and WHO can listen on WHAT OS?

      Magnatunes is competition, because they use open standards. FauxNapster is not, because they are in all intent and purposes a front for M$'s effort to control yet another market.

      THINK, people, THINK!

    5. Re:Surprises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please post as a non-AC (even if you have to create a dummy name) and I will always respond. Thanks.

  9. BBC Technology? Surely not.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Err.. he doesn't work for BBC Technology, he works for BBC News Online. BBC Technology is a very different entity.

  10. From od2.com by StripedCow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Infrastructure

    OD2 offers a complete end to end solution for the digital sale, promotion and distribution of Music.

    The OD2 infrastructure is designed to serve all channels, devices, platforms and formats. This means that the consumer will be able to purchase digital product to their PC, Mobile phone, TV or portable devices - like MP3 players. OD2 provides all the tools required for labels to sell and promote their music digitally and, as the market evolves, OD2 will ensure that the label's music is sold in every viable media.

    Performance

    * Systems capable of delivering over 1,000,000 streams and downloads per day.
    * New European clusters will extend this to over 2,000,000 in Q1 2000.

    Reliability

    * Full Application and System Monitoring 24x7x365.
    * Automated test downloads every 120 seconds.
    * Hardware and software redundancy throughout OD2 systems architecture.
    * Rigorous development, test and deployment processes. (OD2 is an accredited Microsoft Solutions Provider).

    Security

    * Digital Rights Management (DRM) based on Microsoft Version 7 Rights Manager.
    * Enables a range of distribution and playback controls to be defined.
    * Media protected internally and externally using latest security and encryption techniques.

    Multi-platform

    * Architecture enables new DRM's to be inserted for support of new platforms e.g. Cable TV, ADSL, 3rd Generation Mobile.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:From od2.com by julesh · · Score: 1

      OD2 is an accredited Microsoft Solutions Provider

      Well, I'm impressed. What does this mean, that they've got a few MCSEs working for them?

    2. Re:From od2.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A million streams a day? Is that 3 minute songs at 64k? That would take a 155mb link.

  11. Re:you do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    gak

  12. MPlayer anyone? by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, does anyone have experience with trying to use MPlayer on the site with the windows codecs installed?

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    1. Re:MPlayer anyone? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Seriously, does anyone have experience with trying to use MPlayer on the site with the windows codecs installed?

      I'm not certain, I use a very old version of mplayer myself, but I don't believe it implements the DRM aspects of the more recent versions of media player, so probably not.

    2. Re:MPlayer anyone? by mrjb · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought, but I just hear the previous poster mention 'DRM, so possibly not possible'. When it's stream ripping that you want, many soundcards nowadays allow you to capture the digital playback stream before it is D/A converted, just save that stream instead of the network stream and you should be fine too. As usual with streamed audio, don't expect premium sound quality.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    3. Re:MPlayer anyone? by Fooby · · Score: 1

      I've got mplayer on gentoo, it works pretty well most of the time apart from the occasional crash. Doesn't do DRM yet though.

  13. Finally, a price worth paying by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's pretty tough to argue with a legal listen for 1-2 cents (exchange rate varies). I bet that 50-100 times is about as many as I could listen to a song before I'm bored of it anyways, and for 99 cents I can get either that, or I can own the song. Plus, unscrupulous listeners could always record the stream!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Except you have to be sat at your PC to use it.

      I dont know anyone else with lounge systems, and I do my listening on the move, so the service is useless to everyone I know.

      This site may be of use for previewing tracks, buts thats about it.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    2. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's pretty tough to argue with a legal listen for 1-2 cents (exchange rate varies). I bet that 50-100 times is about as many as I could listen to a song before I'm bored of it anyways, and for 99 cents I can get either that, or I can own the song. Plus, unscrupulous listeners could always record the stream!

      It was also pretty tough to argue w/99 cents when iTunes came out unless you were the RIAA "trying to protect your artists'".

      How long do you seriously believe that the money-grubbing music cartels are going to let these low prices go before they jack it up to something far more attractive to their wallets?

      The only price worth paying is free. Free monitarily, free codecs, and free distribution.

    3. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      If only artists still had sinecures, so that they could be compensated by the very wealthy to simply produce works. It's at least time-consuming, if not expensive, to make great recordings... I would like to see a way for artists to at least earn a living wage so they can produce the music.

      --
      stuff |
    4. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want artists to receive a living wage you will find yourself lonely on this board. Actually, most people here seem to want artists to get paid, just by somebody else. But not too much money. Just the right amount. An amount presumably determined by the collective wisdom of the Slashdot audience. And they should only earn it by touring. And only if they produce music that is deemed truly artistic. Because music is not really important--even though it's played at every single important event (weddings, funerals, religious ceremonies, etc.) in virtually every society on earth. And people seem to want to download and listen to plenty of it. Er, maybe you're right. Maybe we need a patronage system.

    5. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, they should only profit from touring. I don't see how X days of work in a studio to cut 10-15 tracks should net them millions.

      Tour for 250 of 365 days and make the millions. Then you earned it.

    6. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about non-touring songwriters? Or, by extension, inventors? Should all royalty payments for intellectual property be done away with, in your opinion?

    7. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      allofmp3.com. $0.01/MB (which you get to keep). That is a price worth paying.

    8. Re:Finally, a price worth paying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it unscrupulous to record the stream. Isn't it legal to record from the radio? Is there an implied immorality in that action?

  14. Linux support by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and will only work with users of Windows Media Player' 9.

    Any idea whether this'll work with the MPlayer Win32 codecs? :)

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  15. Interesting by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been doing a lot of work related research into UK/European online music services, and from what I've seen so far, OD2's basic package that they give to people (like MyCokeMusic) is a horrible restrictive service.

    This new service package sounds interesting, but honestly, all it seems like to me is an extended preview that you pay for.

    Granted its only 1P, but their ultimate goal is to get people to buy the whole song...and this sounds like kind of a scummy way to do it.

    Unfortunately, this may be the only way they are ABLE to do it because I'm sure they have to pay the labels for the streaming rights to the song, so they couldn't just offer up a whole preview for free.

    I'm curious though, can anybody spot any difference between the sites that use OD2's main product other than the brand name/images/colorscheme slapped onto the webpages?

    As far as I know they all use the same catalogue, same terms, and same price, so I can't see how they are differentiated at all other than by Brand.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Lord_Dweomer :"I've been doing a lot of work related research into UK/European online music services, and from what I've seen so far, OD2's basic package that they give to people (like MyCokeMusic) is a horrible restrictive service "

      Hey, how much is CRAPPLE paying you to spread mindless FUD about their rivals who have beaten them to the European market?

      OD2 is FAR LESS restrictive than CRAPPLE'S tunes. By far. So why don't you scurry back to the hole you crawled out from buddy?

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      hence they have been in buisness a couple of years and nobody gives a shit, all they have is a WMP SDK, a shopping cart and bandwidth and in todays markets, you need to deliver a lot more than that to the customer or he/she will just download it for free elsewhere (which the customer base is doing)

      OD2 is just another bandwagon company who just doesn't "get it"

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      calling OD2 a rival to Apple is a bit like saying a teaspoon is a threat to a JCB

    4. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, how much is CRAPPLE paying you to spread mindless FUD about their rivals who have beaten them to the European market?

      OD2 is FAR LESS restrictive than CRAPPLE'S tunes. By far. So why don't you scurry back to the hole you crawled out from buddy?

      And you must have a financial stake in OD2. I'm sure you get worked up when someone threatens your livelihood, but calm down man. Try decaf, if that doesn't work then try thorazine. Really. I'm worried for you.

    5. Re:Interesting by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I am in no way associated with Apple, and I don't really care whether you believe me or not.

      I'm not spreading FUD, I'm making an observation on the current state of the industry.

      So now, since you seem to think OD2 is far less restrictive than Apple's service...I shall give you a point by point break down of why it is indeed more restrictive. OD2's policy on burning:
      "CD burning refers to the process of creating an audio CD from the downloaded media file on your PC. Most of the music can be 'burned' to a CD. CD 'Burn' allowances for each track are determined by the Rights Holders (Record Labels). The media player uses the license associated with each track to check that a particular track can be 'burned' to a CD. "

      Funny, I seem to remember that with Apple you can have unlimited burns.

      Next on the list is the fact that with OD2's package, the license holder has the chance to limit the number of listens per song, and while they say it is typically done with free songs, it is still more restrictive than Apple who has no such thing. Here's a quote from their terms:

      "For some downloads, the Rights Holder (Record Label) may have set up some restrictions. Usually these are only set for free downloads. Our product details page will tell you how many plays you are allowed. "

      Next of course is the fact that you can only listen to them in WMA. Now, to be fair, Apple DL's are in AAC format, but you can convert those, and to be honest, I don't know if the WMP9 DRM prevents you from converting or not, but I would assume it does.

      And you are also required to listen to them in WMP9, but this is not LESS restrictive than Apple, as Apple requires you to listen to AAC in iTunes, so I'd say its just as restrictive.

      Oh...almost forgot, in their terms regarding why they don't support Macs?

      "Currently the Windows Media Player for the MAC does not support Microsoft DRM Version 7. DRM version 7 is the minimum security setting required by the majority of our Record Labels."

      Last I checked, iTunes was available for Windows as well.

      Now, I did not do this point by point analysis to because I work for Apple or anything else imagined by you, oh great anonymous one, I merely did it to show exactly why you were completely wrong in your statement.

      Crawl back to your hole.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:Interesting by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Actually...while I agree they don't get it in terms of the quality of their package they sell...I will say that they "get it" in terms of business model.

      You see, they don't really have to worry so much about competing head to head with the best in the industry in terms of quality of service simply because they are aiming for companies who just want to jump on the bandwagon, and are willing to pay a lot of money for it.

      I'm sure this is infinitely more profitable for them than if their business model involved using their own music service to sell music.

      Remember, the people who got rich during the goldrush were the people selling shovels.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now, to be fair, Apple DL's are in AAC format, but you can convert those

      Now, to be fair, iTunes downloads are DRM protected AAC files. So you get to play and burn those files, but not to convert.

    8. Re:Interesting by Renesis · · Score: 1

      I would definitely not say that OD2's service is horribly restrictive. Your research must be pretty poor. From what I believe they offer unlimited CD burns and device transfers. I understand Apple only allow 7 transfers/burns of the same playlist.

      You could use their 1c/play service forever and not ever have to buy any songs. What makes you think they are trying to make you buy the songs?

      They do have to pay the labels for the rights to stream the entire song, yes. They don't have to pay for 30 second clips generally.

      Sites that use OD2's system can either use their off-the-shelf system and brand it themselves, or they can build their own site and just integrate with OD2's back-end systems. It's usually the site owners that are being lazy in this respect. British Telecom produced a really nice fully integrated site of their own, under the DotMusic brand I think, but they closed it down.

      Sites that use the system are free to choose what catalogue they want, but most are going to choose the whole kit n caboodle, and they'd probably be stupid not to. They are also free to set their own prices as they wish, as with any retailer they just buy at a certain price, but most are selling at the RRP.

      The sites are also free to do their own editorial as much as they want. Most probably can't be bothered. I believe the MyCokeMusic.com and Msn.co.uk sites make a particularly special effort to update their editorial content.

  16. Link to BBC Coverage of iTunes Europe launch by CdBee · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  17. Business Model by IrresponsibleUseOfFr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know. I mean, a penny-a-song is pretty cheap. But, something about me wants to pay once and be able to play a song as much as I want.

    If I kinda of only liked the song and wanted to hear it only once in a while. I'd probably wait for them to play it on the radio. If I really liked a song, I'd pay a buck so I could listen to it when ever I wanted and be done with it.

    The only time I see this as useful is if you are playing a song that you don't like that much, but somebody else would. For example, hosting a party or you have a date at your house and you figure Wierd Al isn't going to set the mood you want.

    I just don't see those situations of use setting up a sustainable business model for the costs they are going to endure. Of course, if it becomes _the_ method for DJ'ing. You might get the volume you need, but I still doubt it.

    Of course, this is just my opinion and I could be wrong (and frequently am).

    --
    Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. I mean, a penny-a-song is pretty cheap. But, something about me wants to pay once and be able to play a song as much as I want.

      This works fine for me, eval version available (no, I'm not affiliated, etc.).

    2. Re:Business Model by Mr+Smidge · · Score: 1

      Of course, if it becomes _the_ method for DJ'ing.

      I don't know about you, but real DJing often involves a bit of listening to your songs to work out the ideal cue points and rough song structure..

      Unless you mean those hired monkeys that play nothing but cheese and get paid to press 'next' on their CD players and, every so often, change to another CD... But I doubt that would be legal, considering the 'broadcast' factor of playing the music to a public crowd.

  18. Meanwhile... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1, Troll

    iTunes launches in the UK.

    Great! Where can I sign-up?!

    But the only portable device it supports is the iPod.

    Oh well, I guess I'll stick to burning CDs.

    Seems that the only way I can play music from iTunes on my MuVo is to burn a CD and then rip the CD, which is a bit more hassle than I'm willing to go to. So I'll pay a few pounds more, get the CD with the nice packaging, track listing, lyrics, etc, the eeeevil record companies will have more of my money and Apple will have none.

    Apple wants to limit my use of their service so I'll limit it myself -- to zero.

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Technician · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I guess I'll stick to burning CDs.

      The labels don't want the content online where it can be copied and shared. If they sign up to provide content and price it and criple it so nobody uses it, but buy's the CD from the conventional retailer instead, then they won.

      If they wanted it to work, all they had to do was provide high quality un-encumbered MP3's and other formats for a nominal charge. Subscribing to a newspaper isn't a budget buster, so there isn't much 2nd hand market for pass me along newspapers. Anybody that wants one, just buys one. Music isn't priced that way. Getting a few new albums a week is a serious budget decision for many people. There is competition for the entertainment dollar. I haven't been buying music CD's simply because the money is much better spent elsewhere. I'm into Geocaching. (www.geocaching.com) I just bought a 17 CD topo map set by National Geographic which supports my GPS. (Back Roads Explorer) The cost is under $50. For me, it's much an alternative entertainment purchace. That entertainment money is not going to buy music CD's. I'm also buying several Linux Distrobutions to try. This is also money better spent. Music CD's are simply not priced for a casual purchase such as buying a newspaper. Online music offerings are crippled to the point I can't take them with me without extra expense and trouble. To play these tracks in my car, it would be the equivilant of having to photocopy any part of a newspaper you wanted to read at any location other than your computer. The newspaper example would be $10 per copy or $1 per page. The extra cost of materials and the time penalty to do the transfer make the online offerings less of a value. For me, the price and the restrictions equate to no sale.

      Remember (betamax) VHS was going to kill cable TV? Everybody was going to leach by recording the shows and giving them to their non-cable friends? That fear was back in the day when blank tapes were over $10 each. If cable was $500/month, then it might be worth the hastle of taping shows for friends and family.

      RIAA, get a clue. Price a quality unrestricted product for mass market consumption, not just the high disposable income demographic and produce good music, not just the shock jock rap and girl band star's and watch the sales pick up.

      In a nutshell, open the archives for in-expensive downloading. Watch the low priced hard to find stuff get high volume (like old Napster). There has to be a way to make money on high volume instead of low volume high price.

      I know they won't do that, because the sales of the old stuff will kill the sales of the new stuff, then they can't get artists to sign up with the labels anymore.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  19. You haven't heard of them because ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    they've never had a site of their own. From the BBC article:

    Instead it provides the technology to retailers such as HMV, Virgin, MTV, MSN and Tiscali.

    I still haven't figured out how Peter Gabriel ended up as the EU force of Evil.

    1. Re:You haven't heard of them because ... by Renesis · · Score: 1

      They've always had a site of their own:
      http://www.od2.com/

  20. I'll stick to BUYING CDs, not burning them, duh. by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    [nothing]

  21. Or if you are a Mac user... by Anim8me2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You could always just capture the penny streams with AudioHiJack (I am sure there is a PC equivalent as well).

    1. Re:Or if you are a Mac user... by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      I had to do this recently - my girlfriend bought the latest Ash single online from their site and was very confused when she received a WMA she couldn't do anything with rather than an mp3 or ogg (we have a houseful of Debian/FreeBSD boxes).

      I ended up playing it with Windows Media Player inside VMWare and using Sox to capture the stream and re-encode it to an MP3.

      It stinks that I have to do this for something that I have legitimately paid for. And no, they took the money before letting you know what you were getting.

    2. Re:Or if you are a Mac user... by Cygnus+v1 · · Score: 1
      --
      ---- Politics: Kissing ass and pointing blames.
  22. Maybe the thinking is by Rogerborg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If you won't pay for an OS, why would you pay for music?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Maybe the thinking is by dbarclay10 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you won't pay for an OS, why would you pay for music?

      There's a difference between won't and don't. Some of us, though you may find it hard to believe, don't care much about the sticker price of a working environment, so long as it gets the job done in a manner that's acceptable. It just happens to be that one of the best environments available today can be downloaded for free off the 'net (or paid for from a vendor like Red Hat).

      I, for one, would be perfectly happy to pay for an iTunes-like service (their restrictions are acceptable to me, though I'd prefer either MP3- or Ogg Vorbis-formatted files; the former is extremely portable, the latter is very nice and reasonably portable), just like I'd be happy to pay for an operating system which suited me. It's a pity that since my operating system *happens* to be free, I can't pay anybody to let me access their service :)

      --

      Barclay family motto:
      Aut agere aut mori.
      (Either action or death.)
    2. Re:Maybe the thinking is by Fooby · · Score: 1

      I don't have to pay $150+ for my OS, I have some money left over to spend on music.

    3. Re:Maybe the thinking is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of logic is that? I can legally get something that is nearly a commodity for free. That is, my OS. It would be stupid to deduce that I would then only want to illegaly get artistic works for free. Just because I'm cheap doesn't mean I'm not willing to pay what something is worth.

    4. Re:Maybe the thinking is by turgid · · Score: 1
      If you won't pay for an OS, why would you pay for music?

      Troll, flamebait, ignorant moron. Why pay for an over-priced, under-powered, flakey and largely useless OS when you can get a proper one that works legitimately for free and Free.

      Some of us have principles despite the cynicism, ignorance and self-serving attitudes that prevail in this world.

      Believe it or not, I have a Free operating system for personal use and a commercial UNIX for business use. I also like to support good hardware manufacturers by buying slightly more expensive, higher quality components. I also buy CDs of my favourite bands from independent record shops, I don't "file share" illegitimate copies of their music and I pay good money to go to their concerts. If I have spare money after filling myself to the ears with beer, I sometimes buy a T shirt from them.

      Now, please buzz right off back to Redmond, Washington where you belong.

      Oh, and I have been known to write small, but interesting, pieces of software that I distribute for Free as well.

    5. Re:Maybe the thinking is by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I said: "Maybe the thinking is...". If you have trouble with the concept of seeing things from other people's point of view, I'm sure that RMS or ESR could tell you what to think about it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  23. Complement not competition by Alkonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This looks like an excellent way of "browsing" for music which is not played on the radio. I mean, it's not really competing with the $.99 "own the song"-price of iTunes, but rather it seems like a neat way to preview a lot of songs once (at a penny each) then buy the ones you like on cd or from iTunes.

  24. More information by MooKore+2004 · · Score: 0

    On EuroItunes

  25. what format? oh my! by truffle · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, "the various formats need to be compatible," Averdieck says. "This will take a while to get sorted out, but it will happen. Meanwhile, Windows Media Player has a head start over all the other formats in Europe. And in the UK, there are 8.9 million PCs with Windows Media Player 9."

    If only they'd heard of the MP3 format...

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
    1. Re:what format? oh my! by makapuf · · Score: 1

      Simple : no DRM -> no songs from music providers

    2. Re:what format? oh my! by glenstar · · Score: 1

      While mostly true, that is oversimplifying things a bit. There are many labels and distributors out there that do not require DRM. Eventually, even the majors will allow for non-DRMed tracks to be sold... although more than likely only for back catalog material.

  26. New Headline Suggestion by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 1, Funny

    OD2 Launches Penny-Per-Song Streaming Jukebox in Countries that don't use Pennies.

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    1. Re:New Headline Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be funnier if the UK *didn't* use pennies.

    2. Re:New Headline Suggestion by pldms · · Score: 1

      We still use pennies in the UK.

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    3. Re:New Headline Suggestion by Aluminum+Tuesday · · Score: 1

      But they don't call them "pennies" in Europe, which I'd imagine was the point of his post.

  27. 1 Penny by simpl3x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that the cost of music needs to approach this cost, and as soon as that happens, I'll likely ditch the cds permanently. It's too bad that the music industry has this perspective that we need to own the music. Like every other commodity, costs decline as distribution increases. That said, I'm not holding my breath for wide distribution of songs via this method. iTunes really has a great model, although I wish that albums could be downloaded multiple times. I want to own the license not the data.

  28. Great by Stevyn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Something for the ogg and drm zealots to bitch about today.

    A penny a song isn't bad, but it could get annoying. I leave my computer with music playing. When I come back, knowing I wasted 10 cents would get annoying. If anything, I think that little annoyance would hinder people from playing music freely. It's still cheaper than $20 for the shrink wrapped cd or 99 cents for the song from apple. This service is probably better for teenagers who like to listen to the pop hits rather than actually invest and support and artist they like.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I come back, knowing I wasted 10 cents would get annoying

      It would have been your own fault for not turning it off, you cheap bastard. You dont seem to have a problem leaving your PC turned on while you are not at it, wasting electricity.

    2. Re:Great by Fooby · · Score: 1

      How hard is it to press pause? As others have pointed out it will only be a matter of time before people figure out how use stream-rippers with this service so you can get more than your money's worth.

  29. IE Lock in by GoogleGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good idea, but its only accessable with Microsoft Internet Explorer. WTF? I use Firefox and am not going to switch back ;-)

    1. Re:IE Lock in by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1

      How the heck did you get modded funny? It's a valid point.

      So I guess nothing's changed since the last time I tried to look at OD2. If you ain't running IE, they ain't interested in ya.
      Well that's just annoying. I might still be a Windows user, but I went Mozilla-based well voer a year ago. Apart from a few selected uses (Windows Update and OWA), I do not use and will not use Internet Explorer.

      Once again they try and make a legal "solution" to the downloaded-music issue, and exclude many of the people who actually want a legal alternative.

      Tiggs
      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  30. Good business model by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This model of paying a negligible fee to hear music online is exactly the kind of thing the record industry needs to profit. It taps the impulse market that had previously been dominated by piracy. Good for them.

    Of course, ripping songs from this service could eventually become rampant.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Good business model by straybullets · · Score: 1

      what quality is ripped from stream ? i don't like it that much ...

      OTOH they claim that their service gives security, as in "no need to open 245 port for peer to peer" ... That's worth a penny.

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
  31. Um.. by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not ahead of the iTunes Europe debut... I live in the UK, I have a UK credit card, and I have downloaded music in my iTunes folder - the iTunes UK, France and Germany stores are open.

  32. Peter Gabriel? Wow, this could be... by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... big, big, big, big, big, big, big, big, big...

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  33. Price isnt the issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They really need to offer something better then the legally grey apps before I'll consider them.

    Maybe a massive site with full archival downloads. I'd pay for that, even per download, simply for the convenience of knowing where to get it, and the gaurentee behind the quality and speed of download.

    Otherwise, they are just being woefully hopefull, or dismissive of online distribution. "see, see, we charged 5 cents a download for a crappy file that most people cant play where they want. thats PROOF that online sales dont work."

    Give me a break.

    1. Re:Price isnt the issue here by karmatic · · Score: 1

      http://www.allofmusic.com

      Legality: They are licensed (and pay royalties to) ROMS, which under russian laws has the authority to license non-member music as well.

      As for the U.S., importing of music not licensed here is allowed, provided it's for personal use (limited # of copies). The question is: "does this count as import". Well, ultimatly, it's up to the courts, but I would imagine it is, given that giving software (sequences of bits) to people outside the country still counts as export (and is subject to export controls).

  34. For those in US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the US and tried to sign up. It didnt boot me till I typed in my credit card. I guess its tied to the country. Anyone have any ideas on how to sign up from the US? How would you go about getting a UK issued credit card?
    Thanks for the help...

    1. Re:For those in US? by julesh · · Score: 1

      You can't get a UK credit card without a UK address, and probably an entry on the UK electoral register.

      Anti-money laundering regulations.

    2. Re:For those in US? by julesh · · Score: 0

      I wrote: Anti-money laundering regulations.

      Actually, that should be anti-money-laundering regulations. I've never even considered laundering anti-money before now. Although that does coincide quite nicely with credit cards, as originally discussed.

      I'm rambling. I'll stop now.

  35. I'll Explain... by Black-Man · · Score: 1

    1. When he and Gabriel touted this service initially - they made it sound like an alternative to any other on-line service. Most certainly not one that would be WMP only!!

    2. His music and Gabriel's only availability will be via this service (and subsequently WMP only). Forget about iTunes.

    3. He was always about "alternative" to pop music... atleast he was during the 70's. Now... he's just another pop superstar awash in cash.

    1. Re:I'll Explain... by tkokesh · · Score: 1
      My copy of iTunes must be broken, then, since it offers eight complete Peter Gabriel albums. (Up, Plays Live, Secret World Live, Us, Shaking the Tree, Passion, So, and Security.)

      --

      A pride of lions.
      A gaggle of geese.
      A murder of crows.
      A vista of bugs.
  36. Re:Peter Gabriel? Wow, this could be... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

    ... big, big, big, big, big, big, big, big, big...

    I dunno, WMP makes me want to take a sledgehammer to my computer sometimes.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  37. Use a pocket PC by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Why not use a pocket PC? If you could get a fast enough connection, it would be like having an iPod with a pseudo-infinite song library, only the songs cost a few cents. That would be pretty awesome.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Use a pocket PC by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Surely that would assume a blanket cover of WiFi whereever he went though? Personally, I Think it's a lot easier to buy yourself an itunes song for 79p.

  38. $1.60 per day by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see... the average song is 3 minutes, one penny per 3 minutes, let's unrealistically assume I work 8 hours a day. That's $1.60 per day to have this playing all day. That's about $400 per working year.

    I think I could buy a lot of music on iTunes for $400 and listen to it for more than a year.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:$1.60 per day by Renesis · · Score: 1

      With your $400 you could have listened to 40,000 songs with OD2's system.

      Or own 400+ songs from iTunes, half of which you'll never listen to more than once.. ;)

  39. Er um, sorry for the rant... by turgid · · Score: 1

    I was too quick to rant there as usual. You were postulating that might be their line of thinking. It wasn't your personal opinion. I quite agree with you that that's what they might be thinking. PHBs and rationality or clues rarely mix.

    1. Re:Er um, sorry for the rant... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      And please consider my equally ranty reply retracted. I should have read on a bit before kneejerking. Sorry.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  40. But how... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How and why would they limit this to some countries only?

    Physical location is just about meaningless within the internet.

    This is whats gving governments like China headaches because they can't control the propaganda anymore. Why should the record comapnies think they can control it?

  41. Just let the damn music play by SalsaDot · · Score: 1

    Yet more energy being poured into "it'll only play on this system for that amount of time if your blood group matches X and your eyes are blue" schemes. All we want is a way to buy and download music we like at realistic prices (not the CD gouge) which we can then play where we want, when we want. Worried about pirates? WELL ITS GOING TO HAPPEN WHATEVER YOU DO until you directly pump the stream into friggin DRM cochlea implants. Fact is not all of us wanna give away what we buy. So many of us CRAVE the convenience of an OPEN pay-then-download system but they JUST DONT GET IT ... instead they want the ka-ching every time you even think of THEIR chord progressions. Damn that, heres a business model for you: 1. Try keep 20th century business model in a new age of media connectivity 2. Piss off users with half arsed schemes that irritate and frustrate users who just want freedom with their music 3. Users turn to new forms of entertainment including music generation/production systems that put more power into a laptop than you found in an average studio 10 years back 4. Regrowth of interest in local/open talent rather than the slops the "industry" chucks at us 5. PROFIT - no maybe not, but maybe fame at least for developers of music software/ instruments/tuition enabling individuals to capture and share their creativity. We're nowhere as close to step 5 as we could be. EG: music software can still be a PITA to setup and use - but over the years we've had small revolutions like Band In A Box, ACID, Hammerhead which have made making music, noise or just stopming out a basic beat more ACCESSIBLE. More development is needed in this area to help bring the music we like OUT of us (or our friends) rather than having it dished up. Want another example? How many of you use a scribe to get your blog articles written? What about a typing pool? Sure we dont all write masterpieces but we can all have our voice (as soft as it can be amongst all the noise) but thats where systems like google come in. Now lets just do the same thing for music.

  42. Funky Gibbon by turgid · · Score: 1
    A penny per song is a nice deal, and the 350.000-track database should contain something for most people's taste

    I bet they don't have the Funky Gibbon by the Goodies.

    1. Re:Funky Gibbon by Johnny5_uk · · Score: 1

      Maybe not but they do have "The Wurzels" best of. And as it's almost a pound a track, to buy the album costs around 22 gbp! That's a bargain if ever I saw one.

    2. Re:Funky Gibbon by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      "I bet they don't have the Funky Gibbon by the Goodies."

      I said "most people", not "weird people". ;-P

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    3. Re:Funky Gibbon by turgid · · Score: 1

      Oh, what I wouldn't give to hear "I've Got a Brand New Combine Harvester" one more time...

  43. 350k Tracks, eh? by cthrall · · Score: 1

    That's the number of albums I can listen to on Listen.com...

  44. Just proves what I've always said by Alsee · · Score: 1

    They are selling downloads for a penny each and (presumably) making money.

    Just goes to prove that there's absolutely no reason they couldn't just sell MP3 downloads for 5 to 10 cents each and make money just fine. Hell, they would save a lot of their bandwidth and server expenses by not needing to stream the same data repeatedly.

    Any download service that offered a $19.95 subscription for 250 MP3 downloads would absolutely sweep the market. It's not even work the hassle of mucking around with P2P at that point.

    I'm really getting sick of the recording industry's DRM crap and inflated pricing mentality. I hope the whole recording industry just fucking IMPLODES.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  45. my $0.02 (2 songs!) by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    While I do not pay for much content online, especially not music, this is what, to me, makes sense. I would not feel ripped off after the purchase, even if it's DRMed to death. It's affordable enough that I can just pay for a 20 song playlist whenever I want to listen to it. Of course, I would like to be able to make a backup of what I pay for, but my point is that this is thinking in the right direction. It's not the 80s/90s anymore, and to think I'm gonna pay $1/song is absurd.

    P.S. This is not to say there is something wrong with paying $1 for a song. If that's how you choose to spend your money, go right ahead. By all means, go buy a $13-20 CD that costs $1 to make. "It's your money - you paid for it."

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  46. It's to cheap by koan · · Score: 1

    One penny? come on that's too cheap and the fact that it only uses windows media player? who started this the people from Real? (laff)

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  47. You miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the quote is *wrong*. WM9 has to *catch up* to mp3 in compatability. Every single machine able to play WM9 can play MP3. Many millions of CD/DVD players (portable and static) play MP3 but NOT WM9. Millions of portable devices (creative rio, for example) will play MP3.

    So their quote is incorrect.

    I think I'll be taking this one to trading standards.

  48. Splitting hairs by hellfire · · Score: 2, Informative

    The definition of what Apple is doing is confusing on its face and the poster of this article made it worse.

    The iTunes Europe debut is for the rest of Europe, while Germany, France, and the UK already have iTunes. Yes it doesn't make perfect sense, but calling the debut iTunes "rest of Europe" wasn't as catchy.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  49. It's vile! by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OD2 has actually had this feature for a while (streaming a song for 1p) and I think it's hideous. Forget the WMP stuff, and forget that it demands Internet Explorer... the tracks only play at 32kbps! I thought it was some sort of big joke (or malfunction) until I searched the Net and found out that, indeed, 32kbps was the order of the day. 32kbps? I'm willing to bet my almost-deaf grandmother could tell how poor the quality is at 32kbps in WMP compared to even a 128kbps MP3. Steer clear!

  50. What some people have been asking for... by zokrath · · Score: 1

    This seems to fill a niche where people had been asking for a wide selection of limited use, low quality songs that can be legitmately downloaded for next to nothing, in order to hear new artists or screen songs before spending more money on a high quality version that they get to keep.

    You don't need cd quality sound to determine whtether a song is worth your dollar, and most songs you can pass judgement after a play or two.

    Of course, 350,000 songs is not exactly an extensive library, especially since one can assume a fair portion is top forty fare, but they are no doubt planning on expanding their selections.

  51. Our iTunes-like overlords.. by Sunnan · · Score: 1
    I, for one, would be perfectly happy to pay for an iTunes-like service

    Aren't we getting tired of that obligatory Simpsons joke by now? ;)

    Personally, I don't like restrictions. I chose a free OS primarily for the freedom. I think Audio Lunchbox is fine but slow - it has non-DRM:ed oggs, with some records that are quite hard to find in physical record storse (notably early April March stuff).

    I guess it only goes to show that /. is a heterogenous community.
  52. Scummy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly how is it scummy to practically give away a free listen in hopes you might just PAY for something? It's like... "how scummy, they aren't just handing out CDs." Whatever.

  53. Secure Audio Path by tepples · · Score: 1

    When it's stream ripping that you want, many soundcards nowadays allow you to capture the digital playback stream before it is D/A converted, just save that stream instead of the network stream and you should be fine too.

    WHQL signed audio drivers don't mix DRM protected audio into the captured digital playback stream. If you don't have any WHQL signed audio drivers, Windows Media Player will just beep at you. See also the Secure Audio Path.

    You'll have to use line-out to line-in, which really doesn't add that much noise compared to the ogg or mp3 encoding that typically follows it.

  54. Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya! by Moqawama · · Score: 1

    Tahya al-Moqawama al-Iraqiya!

    Soon a dozen American cities will burn as their World Trade centers did on 11 September! Soon the Americans will know what it is like to have their cities ablaze and their wives and children burn to death! 11 September will be almost a pleasant memory compared to what we will soon release on their cities!

    Long live the Resistance in Iraq! Death to the Americans and their puppets and dogs in our lands!