Slashdot Mirror


Linux for Non-Geeks

norburym writes "This is not an intro Linux book for your mom. Well, actually it's an intro Linux book for the author's mom! Linux for Non-Geeks came about by virtue of Rickford Grant's desire to create an easy to follow guidebook to installing, configuring and using Linux for his mom who, at 72, was on a fixed income. Her erstwhile son suggested giving her an old box of his with Linux installed. Willing to go along, she asked for book suggestions to learn about Linux. Stumped by the meager offerings, Grant decided to write up a set of instructions on his own. Egged on by relatives and friends to subsequently publish his manuscript, Penguinistas the world over can now rejoice! A far cry from dumbed down editions of how-to comic book style manuals from other publishers, No Starch Press has adopted a smart series of books for the capable, no nonsense audience; those folks who are not afraid to try new things and who want a clear and (more importantly) practical approach to enhancing their skill set. This book is a stand out in that series." Read on for the rest of norburym's review. Linux For Non-Geeks, A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook author Rickford Grant pages 336 publisher No Starch Press rating 8 reviewer Mary Norbury-Glaser ISBN 1593270348 summary A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook

The title explains exactly how Grant's book is laid out. It's for Windows users, Mac users, and new or inexperienced Linux users who are non-geeks (or wannabe-geeks) and who are itching to take the plunge into Linux without having to wade through a multitude of books aimed at power users, online HOWTOs, weblogs and IRC channels. This is one volume with enough worthy information to credit the cost of the $34.95 investment.

The content is based on Redhat's Fedora Core and includes CDs for installation. As such, the author has chosen to go with the default Fedora desktop, GNOME. Choices have to be made: Fedora Core vs. Mandrake vs. SUSE vs. Xandros etc., and GNOME vs. KDE vs. Enlightenment, etc. Grant has chosen stability and ease of use, and he has chosen well. Fedora would have been Redhat 10, had Redhat gone that route. They didn't and we can all lament the changes the company has launched toward focusing on corporate gains or we can move on. Moving on, we can see immediately that Fedora Core is excellent and if Red Hat's idea in Fedora's community focus is to go the Debian route and have lots of experienced eyes taking care of this project, then it will continue to be excellent. Once you get into this book and get your fancy tickled by Fedora and GNOME, go wild. 'Nuff said.

The first two chapters of the book cover the 'penguinista' mindset (why you're even looking at a book on Linux), hardware compatibility and the install process. Easy enough, and Grant does a great job of leading the reader through this process. It's the scary part, after all! Once the deed is done, the reader is introduced to Chapter 3, 'A New Place to Call Home'. Gnome is the desktop of choice and the author goes into detail, easing the reader through a wealth of GUI options. Lots of screenshots and photos give the reader a clear sense of what to expect when they are navigating through the choices. Lots of time is spent on customizing and some may find this trivial but there is nothing more frustrating to the beginner than being told to "click click click" when they aren't comfortable finding the correct windows, buttons and choices. After spending some time on this chapter, the reader will be able to progress through the book with confidence.

Connecting to the Internet is the next chapter, with information presented on hardware, connection options, using the browser, email and IM. The Internet is a must-have so this chapter is well placed. Get 'em going and they'll keep plugging along!

Once the reader is up and running, a side road is taken for those who want to get more familiar with the GUI and who like to tweak everything to look as individual (and tacky) and they can.

After getting on the Web, printing is probably next on the list in importance. Grant dedicates Chapter 6 to explaining how the reader can achieve good printing karma with printer support, printing to PDF, changing settings and handling queues.

Part one of external media is covered next, with an introduction in to floppies (whaaaa?), data and music CD reading/playing/burning, and ISOs (an absolutely necessary part of life for Linux users, especially since we all tend to experiment with different distros when they become available!).

With Chapter 8, we get into the core of every OS user's skill set, no matter how newbie the newbie is, one thing everyone wants to know how to do on their platform of choice: how to install applications (did I say "games"?). Grant gives the reader a very well written chapter on package management, walking the reader gently through four examples, including Skoosh and -- woo-hoo!! -- Frozen Bubble (well, we all need Frozen Bubble!). He even gives the reader a taste of "dependency hell" (don't panic! It's a controlled environment!). There will be a few folks who complain that RPM is Redhat-centric thinking and they'd be right. We are working with Fedora Core after all. Remember the "'Nuff said" above'?. Grant later presents chapters on APT and Synaptic and also on compiling a program from source so the reader has ample chance to get geeky.

A (too short) chapter on the terminal and the command line is wedged in between with practice projects on pyWings and pyChing that brings it all home. Part two of data management comes next, covering USB storage devices and the Windows partition, if there is one. Chapters 13 and 14 deal in depth with music (audio formats, mp3 support, apps like Grip, Rhythmbox and XMMS) and 'getting arty with the GIMP' (including how to scan and use your digital camera).

Then, it's back to business, with several chapters dedicated to workplace productivity and what options are available to Linux users in a 'dark side' dominated world. Grant looks at several office suites including OpenOffice.org (the clear winner) as well as KOffice and some stand-alone apps like AbiWord, Dia, Gcalctool and GPdf. There is also quite a bit of excellent coverage on fonts (a must read!) and finally, language support within Linux.

Now, if everything is working well so far and you can connect to the Internet, print, get your work done and play games. So what's left? Doing it all from your living room, bedroom, even bathroom! In short, going wireless. Grant succinctly explains what it means, what you need and how to do it.

The last few chapters of the book deal with bits and pieces of necessary information that are essential to the reader for further Linux exploration: system settings and system updates, KDE, 'odds and ends' and the requisite troubleshooting section for "uh oh, now what do I do now?" moments. Lots of help and resources round out the book.

A few things could have been expanded on or included: a bit more on firewalls and internet security (we are not entirely immune, after all), handling email attachments is missing (the author promises an update to this on his web site), something on yum and device installation; the slim description of installing a CD-RW drive in the book merely refers the reader to his web site where one can download PDF instructions ...hmmm, that seems a bit skimpy. Installing drives and cards (especially sound cards) would have been a nice chapter on its own, especially since this would most likely require re-compiling the kernel. The reference to this on Grant's web site results in a 'broken' pdf link and no obvious way to alert the author to the damaged file.

At this writing, there are only a few errata but it would be wise to take a peek at Grant's site before delving too deeply into the book.

Overall, I like how Grant chose to lay out his chapters; he's anticipated the needs and expectations of the level of reader he's targeting and placed well-constructed topics in a logical series of chapters. Nicely balanced information for a new Linux user, an on again/off again Linux user or for the switcher (is that trademarked?!). Other distros will be a short leap after reading this one volume. So yes, I lied: Linux for Non-Geeks is for your mom -- and for you, too, come to think of it. (And are those references to Vonnegut scattered about? Erudite crowd, Linux folk, yes?)

You can purchase Linux For Non-Geeks, A Hands-On, Project-Based, Take-It-Slow Guidebook from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

70 of 260 comments (clear)

  1. "Erstwhile"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...desire to create an easy to follow guidebook to installing, configuring and using Linux for his mom who, at 72, was on a fixed income. Her erstwhile son suggested giving her an old box of his with Linux installed....


    I do not think it means what you think it means.

    See here.
    1. Re:"Erstwhile"? by HelbaSluice · · Score: 5, Funny

      Simple. She got so confused trying to install and run Linux using his book that she disowned him.

    2. Re:"Erstwhile"? by Random_Goblin · · Score: 2, Funny

      esrt while son

      surely he just means to erst as long as the condition son is true?

      ah... i'll get me coat....

  2. Dude, she's a MILF!!! by weeboo0104 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mom Installing Linux Fervently

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  3. But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can think of one major reason. Security. Actually, given how bad windows security has been lately, I'd recommend that most users not use windows unless their geeks and know how to keep it clean, and free of Spyware. I already install mozilla whenever I come across a Spyware infected machine. There is some Spyware that infects mozilla on win32. (The user gets a warning about installing XPI, but it's not even as menacing as IE ActiveX warnings. On the other hand, many Spyware programs install themselves via security holes in IE)

    Running as non-root on a Linux machine is much safer for the naiveté surfer then running windows.

    We'll have to see how XP SP2 fares as far as protecting users from all the people who want to rape them.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by mandalayx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      reason #2: free as in beer.
      reason #3: geek friend is evangelizing :)

    2. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strange argument, the ones that cant keep windows secure, not an immensly difficult task these days with the tools available, are the ones least likely to be able to run linux, or are you suggesting they install something friendly like linspire or whatever its called today which runs as root by default I believe?

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless one of those tools is a hardware firewall/router, it is an impossible task, especially for the non-geek.

      My father is set up with Linux, and doesn't know squat about computers. He has no problems with it whatsoever (well, over and above the same PEBKAC ones that existed with Windows as well). Of course, he doesn't *maintain* that system, I do. He doesn't know what root is or even that it exists.

      A HW firewall would have been a more expensive and difficult proposition in his case - dialup. How common are dialup routers (no, I don't mean "do they exist", I mean walk into Best Buy or Comp-USA and get one).

      The average time between connection to the ISP and a Blaster hit was 8 seconds. Nimda was 2 and a half minutes. (Times are from a little less than a year ago) How is a non-geek going to protect a Windows system from that?

    4. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny

      reason #4: babe magnet.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    5. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is a non-geek going to protect a Windows system from that?

      By patching on time? A visit to Windows Update every two weeks or so should work.

    6. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Alranor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Granted, I could possibly be wrong about this, but I thought the XP firewall started after the network interface, thus giving all those lovely worms out on the net a nice window of opportunity to infect the PC while it's booting.

      Can someone confirm this?

    7. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by sfe_software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, given how bad windows security has been lately, I'd recommend that most users not use windows unless [they're] geeks and know how to keep it clean, and free of Spyware.

      I agree somewhat, but I do believe things are getting better.

      On the one hand, I do know many people with (relatively) new XP-based machines that, upon a "system restore" cannot connect to the 'Net long enough to get the necessary updates. Of course I end up walking them through enabling the firewall, or (as was the case today with my cousin) aborting the shutdown that one of the XP/RPC-based worms causes...

      ...but, SP2 does promise to at least enable the firewall by default. Granted, a properly configured machine shouldn't require a firewall, but I wouldn't run a Windows box without one (and preferrably either a hardware-based firewall, or an external *nix box). But it's a great start.

      Had XP (or 2000) had an enabled firewall by default, we'd have been much better off, all the way back to Code Red/Nimda up to the latest ones (I stopped keeping up any more, but there was an RPC based one, and one that hit LSASS.EXE, etc)... so like I said, it's a great start.

      Also don't forget the Honeypot project a couple of (few?) years back. IIRC (which I probably don't) they connected a RedHat 6.something box to the 'Net, and it wasn't 30 minutes before it was rooted via an automated worm (or whatever)...

      The point is this: Microsoft is *finally* getting some things right. They may be sacrificing some ancient backward-compatibility in favor of security, but they're finally doing some things right. Granted, every other OS in the world is far ahead in most of these areas, but it still is nice that MS is getting there...

      It will be nice to not cringe whenever I hear a relative say "I'm finally getting a computer!"...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    8. Re:But why would non-geeks want to run Linux? by Alranor · · Score: 2, Informative
      And of course you can cite the fact that i'm talking bollocks?

      The reason I asked it here is because I recalled something along these lines having been mentioned previously on Slashdot and thought I might get a quick reply.

      Since you asked, i've checked, and while I may have been incorrect, I certainly wasn't talking bollocks, as you so eloquently put it.

      From Technet's page on changes in SP2

      In earlier versions of Windows, there is a window of time between when the network stack was running and when Windows Firewall provides protection. This results in the ability for a packet to be received and delivered to a service without Windows Firewall filtering and potentially exposes the computer to vulnerabilities.


      While I was mistaken as to exactly why this was, the fact remains that, prior to SP2, even if you had the XP firewall installed there was a window of time at boot when the PC was unprotected, quite potentially for long enough to become infected.
  4. In other words... by lboxman · · Score: 5, Funny

    This IS TFM

    --
    Regexes are like cocaine. The first hit is pretty good, but afterwards you try to use them to solve all your problems.
    1. Re:In other words... by Carnildo · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other words...

      This IS TFM


      I thought that was the Kama Sutra.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Considering that the story involves a 72 year old woman, that's not the sort of image I like to get while I'm eating.

    3. Re:In other words... by eoyount · · Score: 2, Informative
      I thought that was the Kama Sutra.


      No, TFM for Slashdot is called the Karma Sutra

      Thank you, I'll be here all week.
      --
      To understand recursion,
      you must first understand recursion.
  5. Normal People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wouldn't it be nice if it actually got more normal people to start using Linux?

    1. Re:Normal People by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      it would definitely make me take a look at it. At least it doesn't seem to have the condescending tone that too many Linux sites/tutorials have.

  6. More! More! More! by Metteyya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux community definitely needs more books like that and users like that. Only increase of Linux desktop boxes can push software developers/companies to writing their for-now-Windows-only software for penguin system.
    Additionaly, this is the only way to surpass the chicken-egg problem, as software companies aren't willing to (as we can see today) port their software to non-Windows.
    So, kudos to author!

    1. Re:More! More! More! by penguinland · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, this is wonderful. As a person who considers themself a geek, but does not know very much about Linux, I think this book could be marvelous for me. I've been wanting to switch for a while now (sadly, I'm still on XP Home). The thing that's kept me back is that I don't know how to use Linux well, and don't know what questions to ask to get better at it. I have a box running RedHat 7-or-so, but I screwed it up by changing something I apparently shouldn't have (I can't find my programs as root anymore :-P). This lack of Linux know-how has been my main reason for sticking to windows, and now hopefully, I'll be able to change that. If more people could write books like this, the world would be a pretty great place.

      --
      "Flying is the art of throwing yourself at the ground and missing." - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:More! More! More! by eille-la · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows dosent need a book to use it in a simple way.
      Computers are now seen as powerfull tools that saves you time!
      When you are not a computer geek, reading a book to learn how to use the computer is WASTED time.
      What could be nice is a really simplest-default-configured and already installed KDE without too much features visible at first, as it is scary and obligate to learn why there is that much apps installed if they are for the same use.
      Simplicity dosent need a book.

      The book is maybe a good thing for people with much of free time and willing to really learn someting.

      But my point in this post is that I think it could be better to concentrate this kind of energy (wanting to see F/OSS more used by public) in developing and organising a really easy way to use a desktop computer. KDE seems the best at this time but there are still too much things to understand and learn to make it as main stream as it could be.

    3. Re:More! More! More! by eille-la · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looking at computers users now, in western coutries, I wonder if the people not using desktop computers (ms windows) will ever do. These ones are probaly relatively old compared to the younger who have been raised in a much more computer supported society.

      Brand new average young users have no problem at all to explore enough the desktop computer and software in order to do what he wants. I think the culture now make this easy.

      Young users can already figure out how to get things done if you present them an installed and ready to use KDE screen. But there is some lacks (which would be a long offtopic post) that show, compared to windows, that usability isnt good enough yet.

      There is a market for the light-geeks who buy the "for dummies" books about everything (how to burn CDs, etc). But to get the majority on a diferant (free) OS you have to make it usable as easily as windows is now. After you can think selling these useless books to everyone who will want to buy them.

      And for the ones who will cry about "linux should not try to copy windows!":
      Windows is a model of usability that the world currently know and use everyday.
      You must integrate many similar aspect of usability if you want people to switch to free os one day.
      And of course there is many good things in windows, thats not all bad. But being a closed source os simply make it as evolutive as a very little and simple blue painted plastic piece lost in a desert (a big desert).

    4. Re:More! More! More! by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      since its not the early 90s anymore, almost everybody is used to windows.

      you cant make a system thats so intuative that people used to the windows way will beable to use it straight away.

      there is no way of installing any operating system on a bare box without knowing how to change the boot order and understanding partitions (or logical drives). (my grandpairents wouldn't beable to install windows xp or any linux distro as theyve never owned a computer)

      there's no way of making it obvious how to use something different, without making it the same.

      KDE is simple enough for anybody to use, without being patronising (hiding files from people)

  7. Speaking of red hats... by jejones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ever hear of the Red Hat Society? It's a society inspired by that "When I am old I shall wear purple..." poem. I think Red Hat is missing a neat tie-in by not giving Red Hat Society members Fedora Core discs, or maybe this book. Hordes of older women using Linux would pretty well put a stake in the heart of the "Linux is too hard to use" BS.

  8. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by TheAdventurer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I buy them if I need to learn about something they cover. I am confident enough in my intelligence not to be put off by a silly book name. ;)

  9. Hello Granma. by xenostar · · Score: 5, Funny

    - Oh, Hello Grandma, what'd you get me for Christmas this year? - Well, me and grandpa thought about it and decided to give you... our .bash_profiles. Hope you like them.

  10. Business Plan by DaveKAO · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.) Have sad story about good'ol Mom.
    2.) Write Geekish book and get free PR on slashdot.
    3.) ???
    4.) Profit!!!

  11. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't buy those on principle even if they may contain pertinent information on a subject I'd like to learn about.

    Agreed. I won't buy any Dummies books, for the same reasons I wouldn't buy the popular Calculus for Fuckwit Retards or Programming for Crackhead Asshats.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  12. Non-Geek Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Surely the first chapters must be devoted to the great Linux jihads!

    Chap 1: Gentoo is t3h 1 4 u
    Chap 2: KDE was here first
    Chap 3: Becoming a man of vi
    Chap 4: What of Redmond? (Onward Linux Soldiers)

    Hell if they're going to be linux users, the least we can do is teach them the basics, eh?

    Then the appendices --

    Appendix A: How Are You Gentlemen? (Blending in)
    Appendix B: Attacking Your Leaders (They're blowhards, hackers, they're blowhards!)
    Appendix C: Forums of Attack (Slashdot, Installfests, LUG meetings, etc.)

  13. What if by iMaple · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This is not an intro Linux book for your mom. Well, actually it's an intro Linux book for the author's mom!

    What if the author has a sibling(from the same Mom). If he/she reads the article he is going to be confused no matter how well written the book is.

  14. non-geeks ? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I only have very limited experience with non-geeks using linux, but my experience has shown that they don't read, and don't think they should have to read to use linux. My non-geeks don't even pretend to solve or diagnose the problems, they just call for help immediately. I think the non-geeks this book would help most, are those already solving their problems using google.

    1. Re:non-geeks ? by mandalayx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ever played a video game without reading the manual?

      yeah, I think it's like that.

      crack open your car manual one day, too. there's some useful stuff in there. like how you're supposed to check your tire pressure regularly.

    2. Re:non-geeks ? by Tongo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a linux thing, it's a non-geek using a computer thing. For many months after introducing my Mom to a computer I had to constantly remind her to read the messages that popup, and call me if she didn't understand what it was saying/asking. For some reason new computer users (windows/linux/otherwise) always just click away at whatever button is the closest to their mouse. It comes down to them not understanding, not caring, and just wanting the damn popup to go away.

    3. Re:non-geeks ? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I only have very limited experience with non-geeks using linux, but my experience has shown that they don't read


      You just summed up one of the major impediments to desktop Linux and to the tightening up of security in general.

      You have a choice between the insecure POS, which they know, and the very secure OS which they don't. They don't want to learn anything new. At all.

      Today I tried to set my mother up with Trillian, so she could use MSN Messenger and be able to click links (we-read I-have Sygate set up to not allow connections from IE, which MSN is hard coded to use. If any MSN developers are out there, I hate you forever) and go auto away and countless other things she could use.

      She refused to use it because she wouldn't change one of the ways she does things, namely changing her online status (normally it's in a menu at the top, in Trillian it's in a submenu in a menu at the bottom). She could have enjoyed her-brr-online experience much more if she'd stuck at it, but after thirty seconds of not trying-"I don't like this. It isn't the same.".

      Damn newbies :)
      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:non-geeks ? by Egekrusher2K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The bad thing about using a search engine to try and look for helpful guides is that most of the guides on the internet for linux installs/usage are complete technical rubbish. Plus, the information is so scatterred and contradictory that it makes it virtually impossible to do a google on "linux guide" and come up with anything that makes sense to the average person.

      Having a centralized, easy to use guide for Linux is fucking priceless. I have tried to install Linux more than once, and have run into contradictory information within the first couple of pages of their own manuals! It's quite absurd. "Little" things like partitions and file system choices can make or break an OS install.. and they've always broken mine.

      --
      Listen to my experimental-industrial-techno!
  15. Fedora Core by sp00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The review talks about using Fedora, but doesn't mention whether it's version 1 or 2. This would be nice to know, especially since there are some major differences between the two.

  16. Mothers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhat sick and tired of sorting out my mother's PC from virii, trojans, spyware ad infinitum. I wiped her box and installed RH (should have used Debian in retrospect).

    Interestingly, once she knew which icons were for email, word processing and browsing, she was off. Her only problem was when her ISP changed dial-up telephone numbers, and the moron on support only had windows experience (or script). He claimed that the service she'd been using fine over the last year didn't actually work with Linux. A quick ssh and change of telephone numbers had her online again(*).

    She even found out how to add a new printer on her own, something she never managed to do with windows.

    (*): The telephone number changed meant that the previous low rate number became a standard cost per minute, and massively increased her cost of being online. The ISP didn't bother to notify her, and it wasn't until she got a phone bill that was 5x higher than normal that we knew something was afoot.

    1. Re:Mothers by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Funny
      She even found out how to add a new printer on her own ...

      Something ESR has trouble with. Well done, mum!

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  17. Seems like a good book to support by grunt107 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am setting up a Linux (JDS) system for my grandparents, who keep saying they'll never learn. To this end I have been creating a screen-captured document of the common tasks (login, read email, reply to email, delete email, fwd email, create/open documents in OOo, play CD). This book may shortcut some of this. The easier something is to understand the more often it gets used.

  18. Rickford Grant's Mom comments on the article by iMaple · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am a geek, You insensitive clod !!!
    Rickford Grant's Mom

  19. I hope his book isn't like his webpage.. by x.Draino.x · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a look at this write-up on why GNOME is better than KDE. I am a GNOME fanboy, and I still dis-like his article. He doesn't provide any really good reasons why one is better than the other. Just lousy opinions with no backing. I really hope he put more thought into his book.

  20. teach the CLI by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My parents can't move to Linux because they need specialized Windows apps not to be found this side of the divide. Nope, nor Gracenote nor LillyPond make for even decent musical typesetting packages in a professional environment.

    Yet they keep messing up their files dragging-and-dropping to wrong places or generally fucking up with the GUI.

    So I got them Cygwin and Bash, and taught them to manage their files that way. It works.

  21. Read the website more careully Re:I hope by iMaple · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rickford's writeup is not on why GNOME is better than KDE. He writes on Why I like Gnome better
    He doesnt really make any claims just says why he likes somethings. Infact he says Just to be fair, however, I should state that KDE is no dog. In fact, the first Linux desktop environment I used was KDE, and it was sufficiently impressive to reel me into the Linux world for good. and concludes the article with Enjoy finding out which environment is best for you by playing around - that's half the fun, after all. Which to me doesnt seem like KDE bashing at all.

  22. My statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, I have come to a conclusion. I have silently read Slashdot for several years and have seen COUNTLESS references to this on-going project of having "mom use Linux".

    Today, I came to a realization. Each and every poster on Slashdot has a mom-fetish. That is the ONLY explanation. Every mention of mom is either posted or moderated up. Mom mom mom.

    Christ, quit with this horrid maternal obsession, please.

    1. Re:My statement by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      lets watch your post get modded down for mom bang^H^Hshing.

  23. Linux for Non-Geeks? by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blasphemy! Burn the heretic and his unholy scribblings at the stake! Oh, ye cursed, ye fool! You'll have worse things to worry about than dependency hell. May Saint Ignucius have mercy on yer wicked soul.

    Alexis de Torquemada

    Chief Inquisitor

  24. A trend? by mratitude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One can only hope. When I first admitted that I was interested in C programming (remember Power C's $20 compiler and libs?) I was scrounging for books that would definitively explain C programming from the point of view of a novice, NOT a programmer!. In the early 90's, that nearly didn't exist. The technical priesthood still held sway and they did demand their tithe.

    The early Linux efforts at documentation carried through with the priesthood mentality - Every person writing the documentation just assumed you already knew what he or she knew and what they wrote offered only what he or she thought you needed to know. Not all mind you, but most.

    Which is the worst assumption any writer can ever make, IMHO.

    --


    Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
    1. Re:A trend? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Every person writing the documentation just assumed you already knew
      Excellent point. I am frequently critized for assuming that everything I know is common knowledge, and giving presentations that don't present enough background to the audience.

      I can imagine this is a downfall with geeks writing documentation in general. Everything we know is now obvious [to us], so we only document the non-obvious parts.
      The new reader tries to use the docs, but finds themselves frustrated because the docs start out at too high of a level, and the additional resources they refer to are also at too high of a level for the beginner.

  25. For an audience of 3 by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With all due respect to the author, who I'm sure wrote a fine book, no one sits down and reads whole manuals. Some people will grab a manual to find a solution to a problem. The rest will ask someone, do a workaround, or do without. 330 pages? That's about the thickness of a John Grisham book. (Though I'm sure this one has more pictures.) IOW, huge.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:For an audience of 3 by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With all due respect: I LOVE reading manuals!! I enjoy the format as some like the cliff-hanger aproach of novels. The first "manual" on Linux I read (and this was so that I could install RedHat 4.0 on an old 486 EISA based swerver) turned out to not be a manual at all. The author had grabbed every HOWTO and Mini-HOWTO he could find, then interspersed that with Usenet posts and spell checked IRC replies. In spite of this eclectic editorship and the fact that Linux of that vintage on a purpose built Netware box just can't be done, I done it. Why? because I read novels the way other folks watch TV..
      You start on PC Mag, migrate to (the old) Byte, before you know it you are drooling over the fold-outs in Dr Dobbs... The reading of tech lit is in itself a joyous exercise.
      a non-geek book on Linux is exactly what the world needs.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  26. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since I'm intelligent enough not to believe in sympathetic magic I feel no particular aversion.

    YMMV

    KFG

  27. Good timing by bludstone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed my first linux (mandrake 10) this weekend.

    Of course, im a geek. Not a linux geek, mind you, but still a geek.

    Im having fun discovering a whole NEW slew of prolems to deal with. Of course, these are slight more managable then the ones i used to deal with :-)

    google, slashdot, and random linux gurus online have been wonderful. thanks folks! :D

    I should pick this up.

    --

    no .sig
  28. Linux in easy steps book by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 2, Informative
    I came across Linux In Easy Steps whilst browsing a bookstore today, and it's a great great book.
    I sticks to the Mandrake install, covers all the usual stuff (playing music, editing files, browsing blah blah) , and then finishes off with a bit of bash scripting.
    A superb intro for the newbie Linux people - i heartily reccomend it.

    No , i'm not connected with the book or the publisher in any way - i was just impressed with the layout and the usage of screenshots and the step by step explanations within , in purely non-geek terminology.

  29. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's only insecure nerds that have a problem with the "Dummy" label -- when you lack any social skills, you have to comfort yourself by telling yourself you are "smarter than everyone else" (even when you don't know jack shit, see most /. posts).

    The average intelligent person has no problem saying "I'm a dumb about Auto Repair/Home Buying/Whatever, I don't know anything about it.", and buying a book.

  30. Re:Fedora vs Mandrakelinux by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah, of course! It would be impossible to have a discussion about Linux for "Moms" without someone bringing up "but distribution X does Y SO MUCH BETTER than the one you chose!"

    Yada yada, shut the hell up. There are hundreds of distributions, and a dozen that are actually usable. This book is about Fedora. If you don't like Fedora, that's fine, it's your choice. But don't sit here and tell the author of the book that he *should* have chosen a different distribution. Maybe he's never used Mandrake. Maybe he didn't know the new version was coming out. Maybe he doesn't have a USB key. For whatever reason, he wrote about Fedora, so just cope with it, ok?

    I'm sick of all this "my distribution is better than yours" penis-measuring. Get over it, people.

  31. car driver analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cars can be described in three ways:
    The dummy's point of view: "Oh look, pretty red color"
    The driver's point of view: "Turn the steering wheel to the right to turn right"
    The engineer's point of view: "The newton force required to make a 90 degree turn depends on the distance from the center of the steering column that the force is applied ..."
    This book will help only if it written for a car driver style point of view. Not dumbed down, not full of technical information that the computer user will never use.

    Car manuals and driver's ed books do not show you how your engine works. If you need to know that, you need to get a different book or have someone else fix it for you.
    Computer books for users should be the same. Just the info on how to use what you will use, very basic maintenance, and nothing else. If more info is needed to fix something, time for a more indepth book or a call to your local computer geek.

    Unfortunately I have yet to find such a book for computer users. They either go too dumb or to full of information useless to the end user (great for the geek and semi-geek though).

    At 337 pages, I am thinking this one may be just another failed attempt with too much info for the end user.

  32. Some more good reasons. by twitter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Security is nice but the big deal for me is all the beautiful, first class software that comes with any Linux distribution. This essentially boils down to KDE/Gnome, but the list goes on and on.
    1. Uptime. Nothing sucks so much as having to open everything I WAS working on every other day or so.
    2. Window managers with multiple desktops. One is not enough to organize work and play.
    3. Modern Browsers, Konqueror, Mozilla, even Galleon. Where would I be without tabs, pop-up blocking, and everything else modern browsers offer?
    4. Modern mail clients. Kontact, Kmail, Evolution, Balsa even. Kontact rocks for syncs to my handheld computer. What do you get with Windoze, a mail client that lacks a spell checker?
    5. GIMP and friends.
    6. K3B and Eroaster for burning CDs.
    7. No DRM to mess with my music. It is very nice to know that ogg won't go away and neither will any of my legitimately gotten music.
    8. APT, for getting all of the above without much trouble.
    9. The ease of install. Mepis goes on in 30 minutes or less and gives you everything the average user could want. One CD that runs live so you know it all works.

    That's a short list. I could think of more.

    Free software is more than stable and hard to break, it's excellent in every way these days. Fedora is very good too and addressing all of the reasons I moved to Debian based distributions two years ago but doing it with the same Red Hat ease of use I sometimes miss. The new interfaces are beautiful and functional.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Some more good reasons. by James+McP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like linux, but it has its problems. Where Windows is a fluffy, nerf environment with no locks, Linux is a hard and lockable place with lots of sharp edges.

      Here's my windows survival tips

      1. Uptime.
      Other than obsolete applications my company uses that the vendor won't even consider providing support on, I don't have crashes. My Win2k box stays on all week, only being shut down on the weekends.
      Run windows update and just pull out the silly crap that will try to DRM your machine. No Media player 9!

      2. Window managers with multiple desktops.
      I agree. Do a web search for IMPVWM.exe. I've been using it since Win95 and it's worked on every Windows variant I've tried. It occassionally fights with an application that will *not* let go of the processor, but otherwise nice. If need be email me and I'll send you a copy.

      3. Modern Browsers, Konqueror, Mozilla, even Galleon.

      Agreed, which is why I run Mozilla/Firefox on Win2k.

      4. Modern mail clients.
      Can't speak on this one; I've got a webmail server set up. Corporate uses Outlook2k3, which does have a spellchecker. But gawds, the Exchange server is slooooooow!

      5. GIMP and friends.
      Agreed. I run Gimp on Win2k

      6. K3B and Eroaster for burning CDs.
      Never used 'em. I have a few freeware burners I use.

      7. No DRM to mess with my music. It is very nice to know that ogg won't go away and neither will any of my legitimately gotten music.

      Agreed. I don't use Windows Media player and convert my own audio to MP3 or Ogg. (Yay Winamp!)

      --
      I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  33. FYI About Mozilla Spyware by Anthracks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't believe that vulnerability exists anymore in Firefox 0.9 / Mozilla 1.7. See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238684 if you're interested in the details, but basically that patch made unrequested attempts to install an XPI illegal, sort of like how the pop-up blocker works. You have to click a link or something along those lines for the request to be valid.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  34. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sympathetic magic is the belief that like effects like. Stick a pin in the likeness of someone and he'll feel pain, break a stick to protect against snakes, etc.

    Ultimately this was applied to words as well. The practice of "spelling" comes out of the belief that a word for something "is" that something, in the same manner that a voodoo doll "is" the person it represents. There is an innate "sympathy" between the noun and the thing it represents. A modern psuedo scientist might call them an "entangle pair" on his website trying to sell you secret mystical books of power (a grammar).

    So the idea that I'm trying to convey is that I am not influenced by the book being assigned to "dummies" or that it has the spelling "dummies" on its cover. It has no hold on or power over me. I may purchase it, borrow it from the library, read it, absorb its contents, but that does not in any way make me, or imply that I am, a "dummy" because that is just an arbitrary sound/collection of letters arbitrarily assigned by some marketing geek (in the pejoritive sense of the word) who believes in sympathetic magic.

    Plus I have this magic crystal that some gypsy women sold me to protect me from "dummies" books.

    I don't suffer the editions that treat me like a dummy gladly, however. Some of their authors apparently don't have a magic crystal.

    KFG

  35. Re:At least it's not a "For Dummies" book by PushyB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the good old days, if a contraption didn't work as advertised, the problem was either bad design or bad instructions. Since the dawn of high tech, people have accepted the silly idea that if they can't make it work, they must be dummies.

    At least this book acknowledges the idea that there are intelligent people out there who don't want to roll their own or even use a command line.

    My own forays into Linux have been plagued with all sorts of problems. I usually bug my SO (who is a linux evangelist) and frequently there is no easy answer.

    I am glad of any attempt to ferret out the most likely questions and concerns and address them as though dealing with an adult.

    --
    Denise
    Will manage Novell network for money.
  36. Set yourself Linux tasks by Brandon+Glass · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only way to really learn Linux is to get something into your head that you want to do, and then start taking a step by step approach to accomplishing it. For example, set yourself the goal of setting up a mail server, for example, and then start researching what steps need to be taken. Break the task down into sub-sections: Installing the operating system, securing the distribution of your choice, installing the neccessary packages, etc.

    I think that learning Linux seems a huge task to you at the moment not because it's beyond you, but because you have no direction in terms of what you want to do with Linux. I believe that almost everyone has the capability of running Linux successfully, but I don't think that it's suitable for all purposes, yet.

    I agree that books like this will help bring some people to Linux, but unless they actually have something in mind that they want to use Linux for, they won't get past the "installed Linux and messed around with KDE/Gnome a bit" stage.

  37. Re:A polished turd still smells by iamplupp · · Score: 2, Informative

    actually, you can change the screen resolution from the desktoop in linux too. at least if you have gnome installed. (applications->desktop preferences->screen resolution)

  38. Re:A polished turd still smells by sktea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An Anonymous Coward wrote:
    I don't think you can make a complex-often-broken-thing fit into the mainstream by writing a book about the complex-often-broken-thing targeted to the mainstream.... I am the most tech savy person that I know.

    The word is "savvy." ("Damn that spell-checker! Why didn't it do its job?!")

    Out of curiosity, coward, what distros of Linux did you use? All of my dual-boot experiences with Windows (XP, 2K, ME) and Linux (Mandrake, Redhat, Fedora -- core 1 not core 2) have been good thus far.

    You seem to imply that Linux is more complex than Windows; I would not say so. Different, more involved, sure. Windows is complex too, only Microsoft made it look simple... flash and ease of use sell, or Windows wouldn't rule the commercial PC market. But sometimes too simple, IMHO. I call it the law of conservation of intelligence: broadly, the more intelligence you build into the tool, the less intelligence the tool user is willing to expend to figure out how to make it work.

    Regarding polished turds... I have a bias toward function, myself: I care comparatively little about the design or form if the underlying function is sufficient. Case in point: I maintain a few Linux servers whose interface consists of a command line. I have done little or nothing to make the administrative interface(s) user-friendly, which is of little matter if they work. In a pinch, I can direct a technician simply to reboot a server if it fouls up, but none have, since frankly they're too simple for much to go wrong. Polished, no. But it works.

    Then you've got Windows, which looks great, but occasionally -- okay, frequently -- has problems. I tend to focus on security, as that's my field, and Windows is not terribly secure. Polished, yes.

    Now which one, of Windows or Linux, would I call a polished turd?

    Of course there's a big difference between servers and workstations, although Microsoft successfully blurred that distinction years ago... sure, I run Windows XP, though I've hacked it a bit so not EVERY process runs in the system context, and installed so many third party add-on security products (antivirus, antispyware, antietc.) that it's noticeably slower than the hour of the initial install.

    I also run KDE, Gnome and Fluxbox. FWIW I tend to prefer Fluxbox; in fact I downloaded Blackbox for Windows and plan to give it a try.

    Anyway, what do you want out of your PC? If you want simple setup and operation, or compatibility with specific third-party apps, go with Windows. (But backup your data often.) If you want something generally more reliable, less demanding on your hardware and easier to control, give Linux or BSD a try. And maybe buy a book like this next time.

    (Last minute relevancy to topic -- yes!)

    --
    Sometimes I have to say to hell with it and just eat my jellybeans.
  39. Open Content by Michael+JasonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only the book was published under an open licence then I could modify it to suit my Fedora Core 2/GNOME using mum, and others could modify it to suit there Mandrake 10/KDE using moms. The author would get the benefits of others keeping the content up to date, and off the shelf sales (assuming the source was released under a non-commercial licence). The rest of the community would benefit from a book that would better suit our needs.

  40. if it's new... by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. then the vendor should do it as a courtesy before it leaves the store. In fact, they should be updating those machines as they sit around waiting to be sold.

    Patches should be treated like a "recall", in fact, IMO, people would take them more seriously if they WERE recalls. People understand a "recall".

    Of course, ignore all that, most people won't do quat until after it's hosed... what was I thinking...

    1. Re:if it's new... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a mac classic guy for years and years from that reason exactly. I bought a machine, it all worked, it was easy to use, never got hosed or owned or anything. If I got a peripheral, I plugged it in and it worked.

      I remember sitting around with my roomate back in the day trying to upgrade his modem on a 486 running 3.11. Nightmare, something as simple as that. You would think unscrewing one card and screwing in another and applying the driver from a disk would "just work". Nope. Both of us struggled for days on it off and on, we took it to the local neighborhood ubergeek, HE couldn't do it. A normal big bucks for the time off the shelf at the computar store card modem. Around the same time I got a new one for my mac, plugged it in, selected it from the list of modems, it worked.

      Anyway, I switched from macs when apple stopped development on classic and went to a unixy thing that wouldn't run on my hardware, and the combination of the two just got even more expensive, I got priced right out of macs. I had JUST bought a semi new PB1400 and OSX wouldn't run on it, couldn't upgrade past 64 megs RAM and the dang thing USED was expensive. Nuts. I'm screwed then. I'm looking around, had heard of "linux". So I just got some old pc junkers, fixed them up, then got linux discs. It wasn't that hard, I got it up and running and on the intarweb. Seems to work OK, albeit not even close to as easy as classic always was to my way of thinking. It's still not, but "easy enough" now for most normal things I use a computer for. AFTER that initial foray into linux I understood the whole FOSS idea, which I now agree with and support. Windows has never held any sort of fascination for me, I went way too long with no virus du juor or having to set IRQs or needing a firewall or sacraficing chickens or anything to be content with putting up with that kludgy and insecure mess I saw all my friends always struggling with. Irony was they would call my mac a "toy" because it just sat there and worked, as they always were trying to barely keep their machines on the net or keep them from crashing. I thought it was hilarious, but hey, people root for their home team even if they haven't made it to the finals in 50 years or something,mmust be human nature. I think a lot of the "sticking with windows" that has occurred in our society is that humans won't admit they made a mistake when it comes to buying something, especially when the product they buy has no warranty or recall provisions to it. They got stuck with a lemon, and rather than admitting it was a lemon, and entirre lemon fixit it industry grew up around the concept of lemon="good". And this REALLY applies to giant businesses where some powerful VP in charge of buying the expensive stuff gets hosed with 10,000 lemons. he gets to skate on that decision because his buds at the country club, the other VPs, bought the same lemons, so a long time ago they decided to ignore the fact they bought lemons so all of them wouldn't get fired. Well, that and I can't prove it but I bet there's been billions of dollars in kickbacks over the years too that went to the VPs in charge of buying stuff. It exists in every other business, so I doubt it doesn't exist in the expensive paid for software industry.

  41. Re:A polished turd still smells by pan_sapiens · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yet another way to change screen resolution ....

    using a fairly standard Mandrake 10.0 install:

    Press
    and
    to toggle

    (obviously depends on whats in your XF86Config-4, but it should probably be okay by default anyway)

  42. the biggest problem is the EULA by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EULAs are the debble. Here you got fabulously successful companies who by common sense observation SELL software but in legalese they uh loan it to you or something in exchange for you paying for the box it comes in or something. It's nuts. They insist on every possible legal protection and every possible penny in profit, yet NO LAWS apply to the actual product. No warranty, no recourse, no nuthin. It's nuts. I still fail to see why there hasdn't been a massive joe user backlash with a BIG class action suit. forget bundling and browser inclusions and all that jazz, a class action suit over useability for purpose, a warranty. If someone sells a product call it selling, this "license to use but not own" stuff is the ripoff scam going on.

    with free software, I got no beefs, I know up front what the cost is-free-and that I might need to tweak, or get hosed with some aspect of it. I don't expect a warranty of any kind, and am pleasantly surprised that the developers keep working and fixing it. To me it's "so what" on any warranty with free software so I don't mind a EULA there. It's worth "free" to me or minimal cost on a data transfer medium. But to charge what entities like MS charge, SERIOUS folding money, get entire companies sucked in, millions of home users, then they have no warranty at all? Nuts. Software been around decades now, time to take the training wheels off and have our legal systen and society treat it like any other product if they insist on treating it like a product when it comes to money.