Slashdot Mirror


Ever Smell T-Rex's Breath?

Jim Hawkins writes "Well, in case you never have the chance of getting up close and personal with a T.Rex, Dale Air, a company who 'nose' its smells, has recreated Tyrannosaurus Rex's breath for London's Natural History Museum. Seems people made a stink about the rotting flesh smell that would exist on T-Rex's breath - guess someone forgot to tell him to brush his teeth."

105 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. and this is useful because? by bunburyist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still waiting for that cure for cancer.

    1. Re:and this is useful because? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, (to take a bit of a tangent) I read somewhere that it may one day be possible to detect cancer by smelling someone's breath with an electronic nose.

      --
      Mod parent up!
    2. Re:and this is useful because? by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wasn't there a story about training dogs to do that?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:and this is useful because? by mratitude · · Score: 1

      I read about such research 15 years ago. Cancer was what generated the funding but the "practical" uses for the technology seemed to concentrate on general health issues. Early detection of certain bacteria and virus infections, for instance. Early warning for TB and blood related illnesses were specifically mentioned, if I recall.

      --


      Mod me troll, if you must, I can't help it.
    4. Re:and this is useful because? by blahlemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the first poster has a valid point. What the hell it the point of this story? It's neither interesting or important. So they made a smell that they *think* is the same as a T-Rex. They don't have any point of reference, for all we know the T-Rex's mouth could have smelt like a dozen roses, or it could have smelt like ass.

      --
      It take more faith to believe in evolution than it takes to believe in God
    5. Re:and this is useful because? by Lynxara · · Score: 1

      The point of this story is that dinosaurs are awesome.

    6. Re:and this is useful because? by flewp · · Score: 1

      I think you mean cool. And by cool, you inherently mean totally sweet.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    7. Re:and this is useful because? by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Still waiting for that cure for cancer.

      Who the h311 rated this funny? it should be insightful, the money could have been better used searching for a cure to cancer, or another life threatening illness.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  2. T-Rex breath by birdwax2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Supposedly it smells a lot like T-Rex ass.

    1. Re:T-Rex breath by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      I suppose this guy would know something about what that would be like.

    2. Re:T-Rex breath by arivanov · · Score: 2, Funny
      More likely like xenofobia:

      Notice the article URL: http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/27/britain .smells.reut/index.html

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:T-Rex breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think this dead guy found out even more.

    4. Re:T-Rex breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      spell worst then shit.

      Ya certainly do!

  3. This is not news! by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's been there since 2001.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:This is not news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I think it's been there since 200.000.000 BC. :p

    2. Re:This is not news! by Atrax · · Score: 2, Informative

      technically, T-Rex was around more like 65 million years ago.

      200 million would land you somewhere in the triassic. T-Rex was Cretaceous

      (yeah, I know, pedant)

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  4. Re:So... by Paleomacus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah but the chicken's heads they bit off were way bigger.

  5. "news for nerds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "stuff that matters"

    1. Re:"news for nerds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Format change today: "nose for nerds - sniff that matters"

    2. Re:"news for nerds" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      News for five-year-olds. Stuff that's gross.

  6. Nothing new is it? by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm sure this has been there for several years - in fact I saw it when I was in London and I've since emigrated! I heard that the smell they recreated was actually a lot tamer than the original would have done, since obviously they didn't want people keeling over or being sick - so the smell they have there is more like vaguely rotting cabbage than the stench of rancid meat. Certainly when I saw it it didn't smell all that bad.

    1. Re:Nothing new is it? by AllanLembo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this has been there for several years - in fact I saw it when I was in London and I've since emigrated!

      But you could have emigrated yesterday.

    2. Re:Nothing new is it? by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Certainly when I saw it [the simulated Tyrannosaurus Rex breath] didn't smell all that bad.

      Not to you, perhaps.

      But since you post of Slashdot, you've no doubt had many more opportunities to build up resistance to much more devastating scents:
      • unwashed geek with a beard full of Dorito crumbs,
      • Mountain Dew fermenting in a shag carpet laid down in 1976,
      • "magic-user" feet after a twelve-hour D&D marathon,
      • the reek of Mom's basement after that dot-com "opportunity" fell through and an impoverished and dispirited Perl hacker moved home too depressed to shower.
      And not to mention the full sensory assault of a GNU/noisome Richard Stallman.

      (I keed, I keed!)
  7. Geek's version by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article should take you back to the dot-com glory days. The opening paragraph:

    "After an uncomfortable pause, he looked straight into the eyes of the woman he'd loved for years. As he moved in for the kiss, he caught a whiff of her shoulder and immediately thought of his computer."

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Geek's version by upside · · Score: 1

      I guess someone would get turned on by the smell of their computer if they'd spent lots of time in front of it 'degaussing their coil', to borrow a phrase from UF.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  8. Movies by naubol · · Score: 1

    Wow, can't wait till the classic "Jurassic Park" is remade later on in this millenium when you get smells in the movie, too. Maybe, after I've lived for five centuries because of quantum biotechnology, I'll be able to forgive slashdot because I'll have realized that this news item was just ahead of its time, when I go to see the movie utilizing this hot new smelling technology.

    --
    Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    1. Re:Movies by operagost · · Score: 1
      If you ask me, Jurassic Park already stinks to high heaven. I mean, with lines like, "God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs... Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth..."

      Who needs the stink of rotting flesh when you have the stink of a Hollywood screenwriter?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. Obvious joke. by ideatrack · · Score: 5, Funny

    guess someone forgot to tell him to brush his teeth

    Well it is in England...

    And I'm English before anyone gets upset ;)

    1. Re:Obvious joke. by linuxelf · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that where the line "Why must you turn my office into a house of LIES??" came from?

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
    2. Re:Obvious joke. by jjjefff · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure the stereotype is "from nowhere." Take a look at what some Brits have to say on the subject:

      Until the NHS started up, and before the availability of fluoride in toothpaste (or water), our British teeth were spectacularly ugly. Look at any film footage of average Britons before about 1945, and weep. The standard of living of the contemporary American probably afforded them better dental care; and, I suspect, a certain cultural austerity would have meant that corrective procedures such as braces would be regarded by us Brits as extravagance and vanity.
      - Simon Gilman, London UK

      I think Simon Gilman has put it best. Having spent my first 20 years in America and 14 years since living in the UK, I find that the average Brit is satisfied with teeth that might be crooked, stained, even slightly rotten, if they aren't causing much discomfort to their owner. Average Americans have much higher standards of expectation in the state of their dental health -- regardless of whether they have to pay for dental treatment or not, they feel very strongly that good teeth are a wise investment in looks and health. Many visits to the dentist by average Brits happen only after something has gone horribly wrong with their teeth, whilst Americans take an actively preventative approach with semi-annual dental checkups and intervention before any problems become severe. As a result of the greater amount of attention that Americans pay to their teeth, they are far more likely to notice and comment on the state of other people's teeth.
      - Wendy James, London UK

      And this is just too funny not to include:

      I don't know about the States, but here in Mexico the common phrase to describle 'wonky' teeth is 'dientes ingles' (English teeth).
      - Iain Pearson, Mexico City Mexico

  10. Britain Smells? by upside · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look at the URL. Those wisecracks at CNN couldn't resist a jibe, could they?

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
  11. Ever Smell T-Rex's Breath? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No.

    And I prefer to keep it that way, ta.

    1. Re:Ever Smell T-Rex's Breath? by gregger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My friends on the Atkins diet have breath that smells just like what I would expect the T-Rex's to smell like...

      ewww...
      TTFN

  12. My T-Rex by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brushes and flosses regularly, then rinses with 5 gallons of Listerine. He say its worth it cos the ladies like good teeth. He does say he is struggling to find a decent scale moisturiser though. He's such a vain beast.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:My T-Rex by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > He's such a vain beast.

      Obviously he's a Mesozoicsexual.

  13. morning breath... by jcostantino · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd hate to have to wake up next to a female t-rex one morning.. don't they know that they should brush their tongues when they brush their teeth?

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    1. Re:morning breath... by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Funny
      Wow, you're really not fussy about who you sleep with are you?

      No, I take it back, you did specify "female."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. The smell of newbie in the morning by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Say you've got help desk staff who are getting tense and frustrated -- they can press a button to get an aroma to help calm them down," Knight said.

    And what aroma would that be? Luser eaten by a t-rex?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  15. Reptiles and poor dental hygiene by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    "-Rex's breath - guess someone forgot to tell him to brush his teeth."

    I used to catch beared dragons when I was a kid. They didn't have bad breath (that I can remember) but if they bit you the bacteria on their teeth could be nasty.

    1. Re:Reptiles and poor dental hygiene by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      they tend to eat locusts and the like, rotting insects smell rather different than rotting flesh, reptile or mammal

    2. Re:Reptiles and poor dental hygiene by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "The dinosaurs would have had open sores from fighting, and rotting meat stuck in the gaps between their teeth.

      "We needed all these features in the eventual odor," he said.
      ...
      Dale Air started life as an air-freshener firm. Then founder Fred Dale, who died earlier this year, found a lucrative sideline.

      What, they threw him into the T-Rex's mouth?

      <Aussie_accent>
      How's _that_ for authentic, ay mayt?
      </Aussie_accent>

  16. Smell o Vision by Osgyth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just waiting for the horrid day where you are able to smell the programs on TV. Or sure, sounds great for the cooking shows, but what the "secret doorway" in Desperado? (FYI, it was a bathroom stall with shit spread all over the walls)

    1. Re:Smell o Vision by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm just waiting for the horrid day where you are able to smell the programs on TV.
      I'll be leaving the room during the Kotex commercials.

      She'll be leaving the room during the locker room interviews.

      We'll both be leaving the room during the State of the Union address.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  17. Just to answer the pressing question by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, they do have the fart smell. It's listed as "Flatulence #9668" in their catalog.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Just to answer the pressing question by asr_man · · Score: 2, Funny

      And what about...

      Aromas of Football - Changing Room

      I'm not making this up, you know.

    2. Re:Just to answer the pressing question by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      It's a shame they can't just sell consumers vials of the aroma-concentrate... With such great hits as Dinosaur, Mummy, Man-o-war, Rope, Sweaty Feet, Wild Stag, Ships Cannon, Volcano, Victorian Leather (they sell a regular Leather, too), Old Man (= Old Smithy), and many others. I WANT! What do half of those things smell like?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  18. Sources, sources by denjin · · Score: 1

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/27/britain .smells.reut/index.html

    Had to come from somewhere...

  19. Opportunist Cleaners? by Mazem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if small opportunist creatures cleaned the T-Rex, like Egyptian Plovers clean crocodile teeth and various fish eat the parasites on sharks.

    1. Re:Opportunist Cleaners? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I remember a mighty hunter / time-traveller short story. The fool bags a big dinosaur, then gets munched by the "small" opportunist creatures that lived on it. Heh.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. Considering it's diet ... by dledeaux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recently saw a very interesting program on Discovery that hinted at T-Rex actually being a scavenger, not a hunter.

    They had several interesting theories to back this up. For example, T-Rex had a very bad center of gravity for one thing. This coupled with the fact that it's arms were so small meant that it would not pick itself back up if it fell. This meant that T-Rex probably didn't run because it didn't want to fall. It probably walked everywhere and in walking, the only food it would be able to catch would be already dead food.

    Other reasons that pointed out it's "scavengaristic" diet where things like it's olfactory senses. Porportionally it is the same size as a vulture.

    So, the theory that it ate already rotting flesh would greatly contribute to it's problems with halitosis!

    1. Re:Considering it's diet ... by thbigr · · Score: 1

      I agree I have seen another documentory stating the same thing, maybe the same one. But then I am sure if a T-Rex could get it in its mouth it was going to eat it. Dead or alive or an unfortunate rock with blood on it.

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    2. Re:Considering it's diet ... by bwy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is amazing that a species that can't pick itself up from a fall could survive past a single generation. But, I'm sure there are other species with this fault. It just sounds like a bad trait to have.

    3. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've read that theory too, and it's a bloody stupid idea on several counts.

      For starters it would mean that there were _no_ predators over a certain size. (They all look like they're made to walk, rather than run.) Now in and by itself, that would be unusual, but not necessarily impossible. There aren't any predators the size of an elephant nowadays.

      What it wouldn't exmplain though, is why did several of the herbivore evolve defenses. Why did the triceratops, for example, need those horns and a massive bone shield, if not for defense? Why did other species grow basically armour plates? What was the evolutionary advantage of that, in the absence of predators?

      Nature doesn't create useless stuff like that. If you want a reasonable approximation of the triceratops, take the boar. It can gore something in front with the tusks (whereas the triceratops had horns, but same idea). And while the boar doesn't have a bone shield, it rubs its shoulders to resin producing trees. The resulting hair and resin mixture is basically the same kind of material as your motherboard. It's a sort of armour. I.e., again, you have a smaller and faster equivalent of the triceratops.

      Why did it need to evolve that way? Well, for defense. The forward shield and tusks allow it to gore a wolf or two.

      The observation that "the T-Rex couldn't run, therefore it couldn't hunt" is also stupid because it only considers half the equation. Yes, the T-Rex couldn't run. Not just because of the small arms, but the bone sizes are all wrong for running. But here's the fun part: neither could its prey.

      You don't necessarily need to _run_ to be a predator. You just need to move (in whatever way) faster than your prey. Even if it's walking, or flying, or swimming, or rolling on wheels, or whatever else. What counts is whether you can catch a prey, not whether your kind of locomotion looks like what we'd call running.

      Basically the T-Rex only needed to walk faster than its intended prey. Bear in mind that we're talking a 40 ft beast. Assuming that a reasonable amount of its body mass was in leg muscles, it could likely pull up to 11 mph walking speed. As long as its big bulky victims (which again, couldn't run either) walked slower than that, the T-Rex could find a meal.

      To understand the tiny arms, you also have to understand the context of walking at that size. Body weight increases with the cube of the weight. Muscle strength increases only quadratically with their diameter. I.e., the bigger you grow, the more you have trouble moving fast.

      It's very likely that to maintain a quick stride, the T-Rex needed a _much_ higher percentage of its body mass to be concentrated in its leg muscles, than, say, a chicken would have. The body itself had to be as lightweight as possible, and the legs were massively muscular to move it. Any useless weight, such as the arms, was a _disadvantage_, so the evolutionary pressure was for them to grow smaller.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:Considering it's diet ... by gedhrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You ask:

      What it wouldn't explain though, is why did several of the herbivore evolve defences. Why did the triceratops, for example, need those horns and a massive bone shield, if not for defence? Why did other species grow basically armour plates? What was the evolutionary advantage of that, in the absence of predators?

      I'm not a behavioural paleobiologist, but the absence of predators doesn't seem to mean that there's the absence of reasons to fight. Maybe randy triceratops would fight over territory or a mate? Maybe girl triceratops were just turned on by massive head plates. Defence against predators isn't the only evolutionary advantage they might offer.

    5. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 3, Informative
      Maybe randy triceratops would fight over territory or a mate?

      A recent article in Palaeontologica Electronica (vol 7, issue 1) suggests so. A brief summary in the New Scientist news article

    6. Re:Considering it's diet ... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And you don't even have to be faster than your prey. Humans did well as cursorial hunters because they can outlast their prey. Of course humans (and other cursorials) have excellent mechanisms for getting rid of waste heat--we sweat, wolves pant. And a T-Rex, with its body mass, must have had a huge heat disposal problem. My nose itches just thinking about a sweaty T-Rex, euugh! :)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > It is amazing that a species that can't pick itself up from a fall could survive past a single generation.

      Oh, I don't know...we seem to have done all right.

    8. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite simple. T-Rex wasn't the only large predatory therapod, and its kin have noticeably stronger teeth and forelimbs.

      I will contest that it couldn't pick itself back up, though. One of the books I had as a child showed how its musculature could allow it to rise from the ground using its hind legs. Evolution doesn't favor such big gaps in survivability.

    9. Re:Considering it's diet ... by jongleur · · Score: 1
      Not being a girl of any species, I can only speculate.

      But from what I hear the behavioural biologists say, the reasons why the girls like the guys they do, links back to ability the guys have to survive and provide for, at least until the young are out of the way.

    10. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Thieron · · Score: 1

      Seeing these point, I wonder about its size. Why is it so large? If it is a scavenger, what advantage would size give it? As a predator I can more easily see the benfit of size.

      Also, don't many animals with tails use them to counter balance themselves when running? From skeletons we'd know the length of a T-Rex's tail, but the weight of the tail would be primarily in the muscle mass. Maybe they had thick tails and didn't fall over as easily.

    11. Re:Considering it's diet ... by Thieron · · Score: 1

      True, but then again look at a turtle or a tortise. They have a lot of trouble if they end up on their back. They are not likely to get that way (at least unless there is some little kid nearby to place them like that) but one could attempt to go down to a stream along too great a slope and fall.

      It is not likely, but maybe the T-Rex was not likely to fall. It might still run and take that chance, but eventually poor runners would get selected out of the population too.

    12. Re:Considering it's diet ... by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Once on a trip to Florida a manatee decided to demonstrate the use of its blowhole right in my face. That was gnarly enough -- and they're vegans.

      Oh the humanatee!

      [Somehow I think I should have checked Post Anonymously. Oh well.]

    13. Re:Considering it's diet ... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Why is it so large? If it is a scavenger, what advantage would size give it?

      To keep what it finds.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  21. Aroma dispenser by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That "smell" device mentioned in the article that's supposed to hook up to a computer has been done. I recall hearing about devices like it more than once over the past few years. Here is one example and here is another. It's a lame idea.

    1. Re:Aroma dispenser by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Yes they were....but didn't you smell the vapor?:)

      --

      Gorkman

  22. And the even more pressing question by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe they also have the porno-themed aroma.

    It's listed as "Fish Market A123511"

  23. Lifespan of developers at Dales? by farnerup · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Item 12235 in the catalouge is mustard gas.

    The chemical warfare connoisseur will be pleased to know they also offer phosgene gas aroma.

  24. How do they know? by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    His breath would be affected by the diet of the animals he ate, as well - how do they know the exact content of a herbiverous dinosaur's diet?

  25. Calming down by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The firm is testing an aroma dispenser which plugs into a computer and is controlled from the keyboard.

    "Say you've got help desk staff who are getting tense and frustrated -- they can press a button to get an aroma to help calm them down," Knight said.

    A case mod with a built-in bong would work much better.

    1. Re:Calming down by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A case mod with a built-in bong would work much better

      Heh, shows what I know. I thought the water was for cooling the cpu, not cooling the user.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  26. So T Rex was a Linux programmer? by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds like it from the description of his breath. Maybe they should rename him Stallmanosaurus

  27. T-Rex meets Jack by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    T-Rex breath...

    I guess people need a reference point so you can find out if your T-Rex has been out all night drinking.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  28. Re:Coming soon! by Enlarge+Your+Penis · · Score: 1

    Catalog number 12270-Urine

  29. Accurate? Isn't that a stretch? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article:

    T-Rex breath turned out so accurate and so revolting, the curators instead opted for a milder swamp smell to evoke the creature's natural habitat.

    Revolting is beleivable, but accurate? Do we really know enough about T-Rex's to say that the synthetic breath that was created was accurate? What bacteria lived in the mouth? Did the saliva have antibodies to protect open wounds around the mouth from bacteria and infection? What was the pH of the saliva? These all affect breath . . .

    There are lots of unknowns that make me think that the journalist's use of the word accurate is more than a little presumptuous. . .

    1. Re:Accurate? Isn't that a stretch? by jongleur · · Score: 1
      I don't know how 'revolting' the smell would be. Our sense of smell is linked in part to the threat level associated with the smell. Decomposing lizard is not great, fish is bad, decomposing cow is worse, but the worst is decomposing human.

      And that's because we 'recognize' that the decomposing human presents the greatest threat in terms of exposure to infection.

      Since T-Rex's diet would have been almost entirely other reptiles, with maybe the occasional fish thrown in, it's breath would not have been too bad. There would have been some mammals, but they probably weren't high on the menu list, especially since they would have been smaller and faster than T-Rex. It's breath would be more like decomposing reptile than decomposing mammal

      This all might be balanced out by something else however. We currently don't enjoy any serious predation, but if a walk to the local park carried significant risk of being lunch for a 30 foot lizard, we'd probably be pretty sensitive to any clues, including olfactory ones, of their presence.

  30. Diabetes analysis is done now... by cholland · · Score: 3, Informative
    Researchers at Mississippi State University recently discovered a way to detect diabetes by using the breath of the subject. I'm sure that similar efforts are being directed at cancer.

    According to the article, it utilizes Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS) to detect concentration levels of acetone in a person's breath gas.

    1. Re:Diabetes analysis is done now... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      Not sur eif the two are comparable. Diabetics don't properly process sugars which can lead to detectable scents in both the breath and urine (just ketosis and other conditions can) Cancer, per se, does not produce anything similar. So I don't think a comparable test for generic "cancers" would work.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
    2. Re:Diabetes analysis is done now... by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Hey, I go to school there and I didn't even know about that. Learn something new every day, eh?

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    3. Re:Diabetes analysis is done now... by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      isn't that what school is for?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    4. Re:Diabetes analysis is done now... by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      How is correcting ym own typos a "troll"? Did the moderator not bother to see who wrote the parent and grandparent?

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  31. Considering T-Rex was a scavenger by earthforce_1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I would be particularly interested.

    If you are really curious, leave a kilo of raw hamburger sitting on the kitchen counter for a couple of weeks, while you go on vacation. Your house will be filled with the lovely aroma of T-Rex breath upon your return.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Considering T-Rex was a scavenger by Thieron · · Score: 1

      Or try living in a city, then having a rat die under a deck and not seeing it for a few days.

      Ugh....

  32. Science grabs for public interest by cerebis · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I am all for scientists attracting public interest to their research but, does it strike anyone that some attempts appear to do more to trivialise the pursuit of knowledge than it does to promote its' worth?

    The degree of conjecture necessary to claim an odor represents the breath scent of a Tyrannosaurus Rex is enormous. To the point that, when all the approximations and educated guesses are accounted for, it is likely you're wrong.

    At least demonstrate the scientific process with subject matter that will stand up to modest scrutiny.

  33. Outrunning... by mariox19 · · Score: 1
    You don't necessarily need to run to be a predator. You just need to move (in whatever way) faster than your prey.

    You also don't need to be faster than a predator to avoid becoming its next meal, which reminds me of a joke about two people being chased by a bear: "The trick isn't being able to outrun the bear; the trick is being able to outrun the other guy!"

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  34. Ever smell T-Rex breath by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nope! But, to be fair, the T-Rex has never smelled my breath either!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  35. So... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    .. the best part of being eaten by a T-Rex is stop smelling its breath?

  36. ". . . forgot to tell him to brush his teeth." by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not exactly. His parents reminded him every morning, but with those short arms...

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
  37. reason for smell by thomasa · · Score: 1


    here is a better picture of T-REX

    1. Re:reason for smell by thomasa · · Score: 2, Funny

      failure of a slashdoter. Below is the link:

      here

  38. Never mind TV... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Has anybody figured out a way to download smells?

  39. Joey, ever smell T-Rex's breath? by niktesla · · Score: 1
    Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?
    Joey, you ever seen a grown man naked?

    ~ Captain Oveur, Airplane ~

    Sorry, the title just reminded me too much of these lines from Airplane. Anyhow, I'd really hate to smell a real T-Rex's breath, because you'd be the appetizer he's smelling! But I guess the smell of my burning karma might cover the stench...

    --
    I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
  40. Eh...there were other predators! by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    There were other predators in the LONG history of the dinosaurs. Velociraptors being the more famous. So the other preds would bring down the kill and the T-rex would show up and drive the preds away and eat the dead flesh. Sounds reasonable to me!

    Fritz

    ___________

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Eh...there were other predators! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      The dinosaurs from Jurassic Park that were called Velociraptors were actually closer to the Deinonychus. Maybe the author thought Velociraptor sounded cooler or was easier to pronounce or something.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  41. T-Rex diet by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

    The T-Rex's breath might not smell like rotting meat. A closer observation of the teeth of the T-rex reveals that the teeth are not rooted very deeply in the skull and jaw. This means that either the T-rex was not a carnivore, or it only ate small animals it could fit in it's mouth, similar to the way a snake eats. To catch and kill a large animal would mean ripping it's own teeth out.

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

    1. Re:T-Rex diet by great+om · · Score: 1

      Couldn't it also mean that T-rex's teeth fell out and regrew themselves regularly (like a nurse shark)?

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    2. Re:T-Rex diet by 56ksucks · · Score: 1

      possibly, but don't we see the new teeth behind the existing teeth in the jaw of a shark? Even though it is possible.

      --

      ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  42. You Better You Bet by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    I'm not familiar with the smell, but I do know the sound of old T-Rex.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  43. How can they say that by Neo's+Nemesis · · Score: 1

    Isn't your breath supposed to be based on what all you've eaten recently? And there's no way to 100% verify that the breath really simulates a T-Rex. Only calculations of anatomy, and diet constituens. Please give me a list of all those really interested in it. All receive free shelter in 3*3 cell.

  44. oh no... by (1)down · · Score: 2, Funny

    guess someone forgot to tell him to brush his teeth."
    This is the kind of humor that made us social outcasts in the first place....

    really though, on a thousand levels this just isn't funny..

    --
    my other sig is a commando
  45. icon by tr0p · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't the t-rex icon be on this story instead of the story above it?

    --

    My only regret... is that I have... bonitis..

  46. I'm still waiting for a Quake-Smell-O-Rama product by cmdrwhitewolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I don't have just imagine the smell of fresh napalm in the morning, but actually slap on the old MicroSmell game scent enhancer!

    --
    [Now, I'm off to lift my le... Um, visit... at another place.]
  47. Yes, but more importantly... by bchernicoff · · Score: 1

    ...how does Mr. T's breath smell?

  48. It's an opportunity for jokes? by ReKleSS · · Score: 1

    Well, I can't think of a better reason... and apparently, you people are having a hard time coming up with jokes as well. bah.
    -ReK

    --
    md5sum -c reality.md5
    reality: FAILED
    md5sum: WARNING: 1 of 1 computed checksum did NOT match
  49. The Lion strategy, huh? by HiThere · · Score: 1

    It's worth remembering that lions do hunt, as well as just scavenge. Likewise I'm relatively sure that T. Rex did both.

    So perhaps what's being argued about is:
    1) how long could the meat have been dead and still be appetizing, and
    2) how much of the time did it hunt, as opposed to scavenging.
    N.B.: Scavenging would be an opportunistic activity, while hunting could be planned. So perhaps the question should be how much of the time was it intending to hunt? (Or did it even adopt different techniques when searching for game vs. leftovers. It might just have gone into "hungry" mode.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  50. i think this is already being prototyped by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    at AMD

    or at least the heat source is

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad