Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Bluetooth Hearing Aid

CloudShape writes "I've been trying to find a way to make a mobile phone work with my hearing aids for some years now, and I finally managed it a few days ago. Although the procedure itself is pretty simple, the surrounding issues are good for quite a bit of discussion."

161 comments

  1. The hooligans will have fun with this one by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine the possilbities for bluejacking!

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:The hooligans will have fun with this one by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1, Funny


      Hooligans? I suppose your car also gets 40 rods to the hogshead...

  2. Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bluetooth is an important add-on to cellular technology because as hearing aid users clearly realized right from the start, there's a lot of RF coming out of that little thing! We hear about all of these questionable health risks... why are we even taking the chances?

    1. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by Earplugs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder how the RF from this would interfere with the existing technology in hearing aids to "sense" the magnetic field from a telephone reciever as opposed to listen to the actual audio waves. (Know as a T-P switch on most hearing aids I believe). Also, wouldn't your hearing aid technically not be allowed on commercial planes. How many people have been yelled at for using 802.11 and bluetooth devices already.

    2. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by rohan_leader · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am a hearing aid user so I can comment on this. Being severely/profoundly deaf will get you exceptions in the rule.

      I'm certainly allowed to use my hearing aid on planes. Furthermore, I also own an FM system, basically a sort of wireless microphone that can speak directly to my hearing aid. Same 3 pin connector that the author refers to connect to a DAI shoe, btw. It is certainly handy on planes, and there are provisions in the rules that airlines have for disabled people.

      Personally, I've seen, as I've travelled with other deaf people, others use text pagers in the air to communicate. Definately, the rule is a little blurry when it comes to what technologies are allowed, but airlines do bend over backwards to accomodate us.

      And a word on the bluetooth issue. I heard from my audiologist that Widex www.widex.com is coming out with hearing aids with built in bluetooth. This was a while ago, so perhaps, they are out now. Not only can bluetooth be used to stream audio, but also to configure the hearing aid on the fly. Some hard of hearing people suffer from fluctuating hearing losses and used to have to visit an audiologist to get their hearing aid reprogrammed each time they wanted it changed. Now, we can use our bluetooth enabled devices such as PDA's and laptops to do this.

    3. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by rohan_leader · · Score: 5, Informative

      edit:

      Seems as if Phonak has their own deal called SmartLink. No sign of a Widex version like I said earlier, but again, it's planned but may not exist.

      I'm going to be looking into this since I have a Phonak Claro hearing aid that I bought a year ago. Finally can use those cellphones now!

      For those of you who are wondering, hearing aid users experience an extremely loud crackling sound when using the cell phone normally. If we use the telephone switch which make use of built in telecoils in some cell phones, a loud buzzing sound overpowers the voice coming out of the phone. It's very annoying indeed. Some phones, amazingly, do not have these problems. I once tried my friends phone made by Samsung, and it was amazingly clear! Just a bit of advice, in case, anyone was wondering :)

    4. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by gr8fulnded · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use a Kyocera 2035 without any problems. I'm profoundly deaf (HA model escapes me at the moment).

      The phone itself is a "brick" according to my friends that have new ones smaller then my thumb, but I'm hesitant to upgrade because it simply WORKS. I've used friends' fancy new Nokias and they just don't do the job. Crappy telecoils or something? I don't know, but my 3.5 yr old Kyocera keeps working for me...

      --Dave

    5. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by throbber · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is an important add-on to cellular technology because as hearing aid users clearly realized right from the start, there's a lot of RF coming out of that little thing! We hear about all of these questionable health risks... why are we even taking the chances?

      Hmm what's better... having 900Mhz or 2.4Ghz RF near your ear? I know several people who refuse to use
      bluetooth headsets because it makes their ear hot with extended use.

    6. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by Buran · · Score: 1

      Have you ever found a GSM phone that works with your aid? I have a Phonak AudioZoom. I want a GSM bluetooth phone, since Sprint and Verizon (who use CDMA phones, which I can use) are dragging their feet when it comes to Bluetooth.

    7. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [begin rant]
      What I'd really like to see is a divorce of phone provider and cell phone seller. It's a pain to have to get a new phone when you switch networks.

      Haven't these guys ever heard of standardization? It'd be nice if you could go pick your phone as the best for your needs, then tack on a provider, instead of having to choose from their models-de-jur!
      [end rant]

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    8. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by Tito · · Score: 1

      I have hearing aids. I use a GSM Sony Ericsson T610. I've never found RFI to be a problem; rather, I've had acoustic feedback issues due to the microphone in the hearing aids and the shape of the earpiece.

    9. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by another_henry · · Score: 1
      There isn't an awful lot of RF coming out of a cellphone - 1W at the very most. That isn't enough to cause significant heating effects, and is not a health risk as numerous studies have shown.

      The reason it interferes with a hearing aid is the same reason it interferes with some speakers: The amplifier in the hearing aid picks up a small amount of noise and amplifies it by 80dB or so!

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    10. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by BShive · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth aids sounds very cool, but I'm confused as to the original problem. I've got severe/profound loss and have never experienced the problem described. I've used nextel, cingular, and sprint gear. I'm wondering if it's only between certain phones and aids. Of course, in my better ear I can usually get away with not switching to T-Coil.

    11. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by allism · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the tech support nightmare the customers would have to go through every time they had a problem with their phone/service? Having the service provider dictate the phones which may be used with their service at least means that I can call one number whether the problem is with the phone or with the service (especially if I am not sure which it is).

      I know the problems we have had with our DSL (Qwest provides the line in, a local ISP provides the bandwidth) have been handed off between the two providers ad nauseum, I don't want that kind of problem with my cell phone.

    12. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by XO · · Score: 1

      Technically, if the phone model speaks the same communication protocol and same frequency as the carrier you want to use it with, it doesn't matter who branded the phone initially. You CAN activate a Sprint phone on a Verizon network, if you know the program code for the phone. (It's a little more difficult going the other way around, since Sprint has a pre-approved ESN list, if they don't have the serial #, it can be virtually impossible to get it to activate) You can get phones for the GSM carriers, as long as they speak the right frequencies, that can be switched among the GSM carriers, as long as you get them carrier unlocked.

      At least in the case of Verizon, though, highly recommended to use only a Verizon approved handset. I've seen a few people use Sprint PCS phones on Verizon's network, and the performance is awful - Sprint's phones aren't nearly as high quality as the ones that Verizon approves. (This is also why Verizon takes freakin forever to get new phones to market, because they go through at least a 3 month long QC process)

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    13. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by XO · · Score: 1

      All handheld cell phones are 300 mW, except for Nextels, which I've heard they managed to pay off the FCC enough to allow them to bend the rules and make 1W handheld transmitters, or perhaps even more.. (you ever hold a Nextel a few inches away from an incandescent light bulb, and key the mic? scary)

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    14. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Next to an incandescent lightbulb? wow... I can see you getting something from a fluorescent bulb, but I'd be surprised at lighting a normal filament lamp.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    15. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by XO · · Score: 1

      It's freaky. Virtually anything that lights up, will light with a Nextel keyed near it. Had a friend with a Nextel that would demonstrate this by going near a place in a mall that sold the flashing antennas.. and when he'd get near the display, and key the mic, every one of the antennas would go crazy.. like a foot away.

      at least the older ones...

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    16. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno...

      The situation Grandparent decides is exactly how it works in Europe.

      Phone model is unbundled from the network provider. You're free to get the phone from the network provider, of course, but you don't have to.

      The manufacturers seem to work closely with the networks. On Orange UK, I'm able to call Orange and they provide excellent support for the phone.

      It seems the US cellphone system seems to be something of a closed 'black box'. European GSM seems much more free.

    17. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      The problem is very dependent upon the combination of hearing aid and telephone models. My hearing aids unfortunately seem to be at the sensitive end of the spectrum, hence my need for the Bluetooth solution. If you have something that works for you, stick with it!

      Should you ever have to change, make absolutely certain that you comprehensively test your planned new setup before you part with any money. One good thing to try whilst testing is to find a location with poor mobile signal strength, so that the phone has to transmit at full power, giving you the highest chance of detecting any RFI problems.

    18. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      The Bluetooth headset radiates about 1mW at radio frequencies - even if the entire milliwatt were converted to heating your ear with 100% efficiency, you wouldn't feel it. Naturally, most of the RF radiates into space, otherwise Bluetooth wouldn't work. What you can feel is the heat generated by the headset circuitry - the audio transducer alone will account for tens of milliwatts.

      Also, a mobile handset in an area with excellent signal strength will radiate about 50mW of RF, rising to about 500mW in areas with a poor signal. If I remember correctly, some of the first generation analogue cellphones could radiate a full watt. All of these are much stronger than Bluetooth.

    19. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by laymil · · Score: 1

      of course ... its not because they're using phones that don't have verizon specific firmware..
      while they do use the same tech, there ARE differences in the implementations and specifics. so yeah, you can use a sprint phone on verizon for voice, but you can't use the rest of the features. sprint also frequently releases firmware upgrades, and verizon's phone have always been, in my experience, pieces...

    20. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by Buran · · Score: 1

      They do this in Europe already. Last I checked, their customer support seems to work just fine, judging from how many people seem to use cellphones over there.

    21. Re:Cell phone RF bad... Bluetooth good. by BradNike · · Score: 1

      This concept is amazing. You guys have all talked about the benefits of such a product, I am just wondering about the realities of such a device. Would the hearing aid still be somewhat hidden? Or would it adapt into more of an earpiece, around the size of a wireless headset.

  3. Obnoxious Friday reply, please disregard by TheDarkener · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I hear you now? Wait, did I load the kernel module? Hello? DAMN IT!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  4. And the CIA can *really* radio voices to you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll actually need that tinfoil hat.

  5. Great by goatstuffer · · Score: 1

    Now some punk kid can bluejack your ear.

    The potential for fun is boundless...

  6. You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't read this article, I'm blind!

    1. Re:You insensitive clod! by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. I wrote that page with no frames, no divs, no tables, in short, no fancy-format crap. To the best of my knowledge, it should be fine with a screen reader or Braille line - even the images at least have a little ALT text.

      Why? Some causes of deafness take your eyesight down too...

  7. Great Work! by Mad+Martigan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a neat project. I've been thinking about the same problem for a while because my Great-uncle is going deaf. He takes out his hearing aids when he talks on a conventional phone (remember back in the day when you used to be able to get those big bowl-looking things that fit over the ear-piece to help make up for the abscence of the hearing aid?), but using a mobile phone is impossible becaues of the RFI.

    He is pretty old, so we would feel a lot more comfortable if he could have a phone with him at all times. I can't wait to try to build one of your devices for him.

  8. Where's a standard where we need it? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Effectively, this solution is working because bluetooth uses a much lower power RF signal so the wire is not interfered with... he's just built himself a custom connection so that a hearing aid can be connected to the bluetooth tranciever.

    So really, all that really needs to be on the market for this to be a mainstream solution are A: Bluetooth adapters that connect to the phone and have a standard 2.5 mm output, and then B: an adaptor to convert that to a hearing aid-friendly conector. It'd have the side effect of letting all of us also connect our favorite handsfree piece to the phone by Bluetooth

    1. Re:Where's a standard where we need it? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      Your last thought goes further than the commentary on my web page, though - it suggests an appeal to at least part of the normal-hearing market, which might just tip the balance for a manufacturer.

      Interesting!

  9. the new fad in the U.K by phaetonic · · Score: 3, Funny

    toothing with your ear piece! ouch.

  10. Re:what? by squidgyhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Actually, I RTFA, and the first 10 lines of the article are written in ALL-CAPS.

    I found it quite humorous, really, clicking on a page about hearing aides and getting visually yelled at.

  11. Re:what? by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't hear those instructions, either, because they're freaking words!

  12. Maybe I've got it wrong ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It looks like the cell phone communicates with a Bluetooth transceiver which is in turn connected to the hearing aid with a cord. Why not just hook the cell phone to the hearing aid by a cord and skip the Bluetooth part? Alternately, how about a headset hooked to the cell phone coupled acoustically to the hearing aid.

    Of course, the goal would be to have a Bluetooth enabled hearing aid. I haven't found a cheap way to develop for Bluetooth. The development kits are very expensive. Any suggestions?

    1. Re:Maybe I've got it wrong ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you haven't RTFAed. The article notes that a hard connection between the handset and the hearing aid picks up a lot of the RF along the cable, even with filters. That's because celphones do put out a LOT of RF. The bluetooth step helps by allowing a 2' gap sans-wires, which gets the user far enough from the transciever that the excess RF isn't picked up by the sensative electronics in the hearing aid.

      I'd be curious if something akin to the technique used with XLR pro audio could be used here as well -- XLR cables eliminate most RF by splitting the signal into two channels, then inverting the waveform of one. At the other end, the waveform is inverted again so they're back in phase, then electronically combined. Since the EM radiation distorts the two signals in opposite "directions," when the second channel is inverted a 2nd time and recombined, the two sets of EM distortion are out of phase, and cancel eachother out. (Sorry for the horrible description; if anyone who does more work with the electronics in an XLR setup wants to clarify and correct me, I'd appreciate it) ... Anyway, the point is, that might work if the RF is being picked up by the cable (ie: if the cable is acting like an antenna) .. if the RF is actually in the circuit to begin with for whatever reason, then you're just fux0r3d.

    2. Re:Maybe I've got it wrong ... by Tito · · Score: 1

      +5 Insightful

  13. Maybe It's Asking Too Much ... by SteveM · · Score: 4, Informative

    That you RTFA. This is /. after all. But if you did you would have seen:

    No amount of extension cable will make a wired hands-free usable - the wire always conducts enough RFI to cause trouble, regardless of any filters that might be in place.

    So connecting the phone directly to the hearing aid via a wire isn't an option.

    SteveM

    1. Re:Maybe It's Asking Too Much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about an opto-isolator? A simple LED setup with some Toslink cable (hell, have it use the S/PDIF protocol, too, just for kicks) would be way more than enough, could run with cellphone/external power, etc. And it would use tons less power than Bluetooth, but it wouldn't have the obviously nice benefit of being wireless.

      I'm sure most of the parts needed to drive this are available cheaply, and they've got to be small enough to be portable. My iRiver 120 has Toslink ability, and it works marvelously (damn small to boot). I suppose it could be good for hearing impared people to listen to music as well. Mmm.

    2. Re:Maybe It's Asking Too Much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To filter RF from wires use a ferrite bead, different beads give different results

      As with all coils, increasing the number of turns increases the
      inductance and ESR by the square of the increase. For example, if one
      turn gives 1 uH and 10 ohms, two turns will give 4 uH and 40 ohms,
      three turns would give 9 uH and 90 ohms and so on.

    3. Re:Maybe It's Asking Too Much ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The optocoupler is quite likely to just pass all the picked up interference, using a optical fibre to connect the mess would be an option, if it wasn't for the fact that that requires the hearing aid end to be active...

    4. Re:Maybe It's Asking Too Much ... by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      I considered optocoupling, but I liked the idea of wirelessness - having wired stuff attached to your hearing aids can be a problem. If you drop the device your headphones are plugged into, you'll probably get away with it, even if the device doesn't. Either the headphones unplug, or fall off, or the jerk is distributed enough not to hurt.

      Do that with a hard connection to a hearing aid, and trust me, it'll hurt, because the hearing aid is set right into your ear. (The innermost end isn't more than a few millimetres from your eardrum.) I'm speaking from personal experience, unfortunately...

      The previous poster also raises good points with respect to optocoupling.

      On a sidenote, hearing aid wearers learn to protect their ears very early on - it's an extra place to take a hit in sport, or a dirty blow in a fight.

  14. Filtering the wrong end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If he's trying to filter at the phone end of the wire, well of course there's going to be RFI fed into the hearing aid. The doggone wire is going to act like an antenna that just happens to be sitting right next to an RF transmitter!

    The RFI filter needs to be on the hearing aid end.

    1. Re:Filtering the wrong end? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      However... that's not even practical because the signal to noise ratio is so high there'd be nothing left after the RFI filter did its work.

      The solution is to use the Bluetooth hop between to create some meaningful distance between the wire and the cell phone transmitter. Being right next to a Bluetooth reciever is not an issue because Bluetooth uses a much weaker signal (since it's designed to only go for a few feet, not miles) and therefore an RFI filter has a chance to do its thing and the result is a useful signal.

    2. Re:Filtering the wrong end? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      I tried filtering at both ends, in various forms and combinations. LostCluster is right.

      Mind you, the extra weight of an RFI filter hanging off the hearing aid would be something to avoid, even if it did work. Since it has to be as close as possible, you can't just park it on your shoulder, or somesuch.

  15. Remote by gunnmjk · · Score: 0

    But does it double as a remote control for Videolan?

    http://homepage.mac.com/jonassalling/Shareware/C li cker/

  16. Something else is probably going on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I did read the fine article.

    1 - The frequency the cell phone operates on (minimum 800 MHz) is far too high to propagate along an earphone cord. In any event, filtering it would be EASY.

    2 - If the rf coupled to the cord near the hearing aid, then the cord attached to the Bluetooth device would couple just as badly as one connected to the cell phone itself.

    If something is coupling from the cell phone via the cord, it is almost certainly happening at a lower frequency. Maybe there is an inverter that supplies a high voltage for the display. (just conjecture but something like that would do it.)

    I currently spend a major amount of time designing micro-strip and have been doing RF in general for forty years. That said, you can always assemble a set of circumstances that causes strange things to happen. In this case, I wouldn't bet money on the problem being RFI per se. Getting GHz rf down a random piece of wire just isn't likely.

    1. Re:Something else is probably going on. by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      The root cause is definitely the RF transmission, or a system directly related to it, although I don't have the entire lab's worth of resources I'd need to determine the exact mechanism.

      There's no interference if the phone is quietly switched on and not sending to the network, even if you're playing games or something on it. It only appears during radio transmission, either during a voice call or during the few seconds it takes for an SMS to transfer. I generally know an SMS is coming in before the phone does - the sound is quite distinctive.

      The web page I wrote was intended for an intelligent layperson, so I deliberately omitted abstruse discussions of the various RFI-related mechanisms that might be at work.

      You're probably right about the GHz frequencies as such, but the bursty nature of the transmission is another thing entirely. I suspect that it embodies the audible frequencies I hear as interference in what one might call unintended modulation.

      A hi-fi enthusiast once told me that he can hear SMS arriving on the hi-fi downstairs with the phone upstairs, almost certainly for the same reason. This Motorola link has sound samples, for anyone who wants to know what these things sound like.

  17. RFI sorted by Network Type by Mondak · · Score: 1

    When my AT&T TDMA Cell phone rings or I am on a call in my house, all the speakers in my house including those on my computer, TV and Surround Sound system get a large amount of interference. There is even a "blip" of interference when I send a SMS message. Because I also have a Verizon CDMA phone and my wife has a AT&T GSM phone, I know that these phones do not cause the same interference. I wonder if the TDMA protocol puts out signifigantly more RF Interference than others or if that interference produced is simply on a wavelength that is more noticeable since it interferes with most speakers. Anyone?

    1. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Informative

      I once worked for a cell phone company in Phoenix. I'm not a cellular engineer, so the theory and such is a bit over my head, but I was offered a simplified explaination on how the CDMA system worked, and how it differed from other forms of cellular access. This was several years ago, so hopefully I remembered it correctly.

      Analog cellular works much like standard radio. A signal is broadcast on a particular channel and your phone negotiates with the cell towers to broadcast on a that channel; each user has a distinct access path. Analog signals also have to broadcast above the noise floor in order to be heard by the tower. I think the FCC limits the maximum power of analog to 4 watts.

      Each analog call has to use a single analog phone line. This is somewhat limiting for the cell companies as they need a single POTS voice channel for each cellular connection. This gets very expensive as the number of calls go up.

      TDMA is a multiplex scheme. It stands for Time Division Multiple Access. Each phone under TDMA is given a specific "slice" of a channel to communicate on. This allows multiple phones to operate on the same channel at the same time, allowing the carrier to expand the capacities of the cell towers without adding extra land-lines.

      CDMA stands for Code Division Multiple Access. Under the CDMA system, each phone communicates with the cell tower and agrees upon a particular part of the spectrum to use, a particular channel in the spectrum, and a compression method. Depending on the compression used, you can squish more calls per channel. CDMA also operates below the noise floor, so a typical CDMA broadcast is in the milliwatt (or lower) range. The power is adjusted several times per second to keep multiple phone signals on the channel from stepping all over each other.

      I've probably got some of the particulars wrong, as about 25% of what the engineer said to me was over my head.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    2. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Both GSM (World) and TDMA (USA) are TDMA systems. That means that access to the channel is time sliced among the various users. Each channel is divided into 8 time slots, which are used in a round-robin fashion. That is the source of the annoying buzz in hearing aids and other devices that are sensitive to RFI. CDMA has the advantage of using lower peak power and a pseudorandom spreading code, which makes the signal look like continuous white noise. GSM/TDMA look more like radar systems, sending out periodic bursts of RF.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have the same problem, but with my GSM phone.

      There's nothing like setting your phone down on top of your desk and having your PC speakers or your keyboard synth start shouting in the middle of the night.

      DEET-DE-DEET DEET-DE-DEET DEET-DE-DEET. BZZZZZT.

      Oddly, my TDMA/CDMA phone never did anything like this.

    4. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by xtord · · Score: 1

      Actually GSM is a hybrid (don't know anything about the american systems) it uses both CDMA and TDMA.

    5. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what my hearing aids do when an SMS arrives.

    6. Re:RFI sorted by Network Type by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      As annoying as it is to me, I'm sure it must be infuriating for you.

      Nonetheless, I can't help but be fascinated at the regular patterns of interference created when a phone uses SMS, as opposed to the irregular patterns during other times. (Is 'irregular pattern' a contradiction in terms?)

  18. I also wear a hearing aid... by antdude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't wear those standard/common ones that go on the ears. Mine is the bone conduction type with a headband since I do not have ear canals. I wonder how difficult it is to do this for this type of hearing aid.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by zogger · · Score: 1

      Those are interesting, I hadn't seen them before. Email the guy and ask him, bet he would like to help. Good luck!

    2. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a bone-conduction aid, although I've heard about them. I'd need a lot more information before I could say much that was useful, though. For example, when you use a fixed-line phone, a portable CD player, or an FM lecture theater microphone, how do you get the audio into your aid?

    3. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I missed the image link the first time round... Some of those aids look like they would accept DAI shoe connections - if so, then my style of Bluetooth conversion should work, in theory. Unfortunately, the only way to find out is to try, and a serious mistake could fry your hearing aid. That's why I wouldn't make one for someone else, because I don't want to assume that kind of risk.

    4. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by antdude · · Score: 1

      CloudShape:

      1. Crank up the volume and hope the mic picks it up.
      2. Use speaker phones.
      3. Sit close to the speakers or audio source.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    5. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Also, my brand is from Oticon. I was only curious if it was possible. I guess I *could* try the OLD models that I still keep as backups in case the newest/current one needs a repair.

      And yes this one gets RFC interference from cellular phones, radio stations at a close distance, and many other unknown sources like at work, classrooms, etc.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:I also wear a hearing aid... by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      OK, so you're not using DAI (Direct Audio Input) stuff at the moment. It might be a good plan to ask your audiologist about using DAI with your aids first, then. If you get a positive answer, try plugging the DAI into a CD player or somesuch as a proof of concept. Hopefully, that will give you more of an idea whether a Bluetooth module is practical for you.

  19. Great idea... by Critical_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was wondering if this guy has considered selling/giving his idea to the manufacturer of the bluetooth headset. This could always lead to a nice job offer later.

    On another note, does anyone know where to get that faceplate for the T68i in the following picture?

    http://www.gfern.com/btha/btha-complete.jpg

    1. Re:Great idea... by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Yes; I deliberately wanted to spread the information so that as many people as possible would know. Slashdot is a key site for that, incidentally. I'm hoping that people will start thinking about the basic idea and making the devices commercially. Someone might even come up with related ideas or extensions I didn't think of, which could be a big win for me and deaf people like me.

      That's a 2-year old T68, by the way, I don't think you can get that style anymore. I'm not even sure if the faceplate can be changed, actually. Try EBay?

  20. woes of hearing aids by zanzibuz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a moderate hearing loss, and have found that using cellular phones with my hearing aides is nearly impossible. I look forward to this technology and hope that it will eventually lead towards my being able to use my hearing aids and cell phone simultaneously. There are a few things that I have found work moderately well to compensate for the interference. I have a clamshell cell phone, a Samsung x-427. The clamshell design helps keep the antenna another couple of inches away from the hearing aide, and its enough to make a conversation tolerable. My old phone was a non-clamshell Nokia, and its interference was horribly bad. My hearing aids also have a background noise canceling feature that, when I turn it on, takes out quite a bit of interference. Unfortunately it also makes understanding conversations harder. I am left with having to take out my aids completely to talk on the phone. its quite annoying. For those of you who wonder exactly what the interference sounds like, check out http://commerce.motorola.com/consumer/QWhtml/acces sibility/hearingAid.html there are a few .wav files on this page which sound very familiar to me. Imagine those sounds blaring over every conversation on your phone. It gets to be where you just cant tolerate it anylonger. To my knowledge, only Nokia has an attachment for their phones to allow for use of the Telecoil. Information is at http://www.nokiaaccessibility.com/loopset.html. If anybody out there has used one of these, i'd love to hear your testimonial on how they work... Garth

  21. tinfoil hat time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The headset could be beaming signals to Mars somewhere above 8kHz, and I would never know... "

    crap, this guy is trying to get us all to build this to improve communications back to his home planet

  22. Re:what? by mboverload · · Score: 0

    That is a disclaimer skilly. They are ALWAYS WRITTEN IN ALL CAPS. I don't know why, I guess thats what lawyers tell people to do, plus, thats the way I have always done it.

  23. Reading impaired by mboverload · · Score: 1

    And for those you you who are reading impaired and only like pictures: http://www.gfern.com/btha/

    1. Re:Reading impaired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little offtopic, but I find the term hearing impaired really insulting. When you think about it, the term 'deaf' doesn't focus on a person's disability; the term "impaired" however seems to categorize deaf people by their inabilities in a way that seems downright pejorative.

      Despite what hearing people seem to think, being deaf is not a disability that deserves such a negative categorization. Deaf culture is rich and very different from hearing culture, largely but not uniquely due to the use of sign language, a mode of expression fundamentally different from spoken languages (and ASL at least is grammatically more similar to Chinese than to English, for those of you that mistakenly think we sign English words using English grammar.)

      Ironically the term 'hearing impaired' was popularized as a PC replacement for 'deaf', even though deaf has been the way deaf people refer to themselves for generations. It would be like refering to gay people as heterosexually impaired -- it focuses needlessly on differences and implies that the people who are impaired are at a disadvantage. While it's clear that in a predominantly hearing world deaf people do have some interface problems, think of it as running Linux in a Windows world -- an experience with which you are no doubt familiar. We do not consider ourselves inferior to the majority simply because we speak (sign) a different language.

      I know Slashdot readers don't relish being PC, but for those of you that like to be culturally aware, don't use the term hearing impaired. We're not impaired. Thanks.

  24. What's going on here? by 1000101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    34 posts and not one response on how he was originally designing this for 50 pounds for patentable hardware?!?!? This is /. isn't it?

    1. Re:What's going on here? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      In the UK prices work a bit differently. Kids spend 1125/year to go to college and even that sets them back for a few years afterwards. The problem is that costs are rising so they plan(ned) to raise tuitions to 1900 with the possibility of making it 3000.

      Anyways, 50/4450 comes out to 1.12% of his 4 year tuition. That might seem like chump change to an American, but I bet that went a long way in the UK. FYI those are all in pounds. /. doesn't seem to like the symbol.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:What's going on here? by LuxFX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not just that he designed it for 50 pounds -- but that Ericsson had a program that asked employees to come up with new patentable ideas, and only rewarded them with a 50 pound bonus. I'm sure this kind of 'bonus program' wasn't part of the daily schedule, but something the employees were asked to do on their own time.

      The irony is that they were asking this of R&D geeks that were supposed to be intelligent. This does not speak highly of the quality of Ericsson's HR staff. I wonder if their hiring instructions read something like, "Look for smart but extremely naive and gullible people. Sheep, people, find smart sheep."

      Wow that makes me mad.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    3. Re:What's going on here? by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      GBP50 (Roughly US$90) is quite a bit for a patentable idea that isn't good enough to actually get developed. Remember, what's shown on this site isn't the actual patent concept... the idea of hooking wires together to convert one interface format to another is not good enough to get a patent. He had to have come up with some unknown enhancement beyond that for that program... and I doubt it was terribly useful seeing that this unpatentable idea that his new invention depends on hasn't been rolled out by anybody on the market yet.

    4. Re:What's going on here? by hashwolf · · Score: 1

      Well, there might be multiple reasons for developing patentable ideas for 50 pounds.

      First of all you get 50 pounds for an idea that you would not have made any money out of anyways. Or better still, get 50 pounds for something you have worked on during the weekends AT A LOSS and is now sitting idly on a shelf in your garage/workshop. Another reason might be for getting more recognition from the boss/company. This might help later on if your department is going to be downsized.

      And finally, what are the chances for those R&D developers to patent the idea and make a good profit out of it? (If there was any chance they wouldn't have disclosed the idea to their company wouldn't they?)
      -------
      Thinking about it, a good idea might be for open source and open hardware communities to give ~50 pounds (out of donations etc.) and full credit to those that develop 'patentable' ideas. This serves the dual purpose of rendering the idea unpatentable and giving due credit to the inventor.

      --
      - "They misunderestimated me."
    5. Re:What's going on here? by ctid · · Score: 1

      I think the article says the bluetooth hearing aid proposal wasn't patentable?

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    6. Re:What's going on here? by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      At first when I read the article I figured that this guy was really kind of taking it to Ericson. There is definately a hint of anger at Ericson for not developing the idea further. I really thought this guy was trying to do something noble.

      As I think about it though, he basically helped a company with no interest in developing the product, obtain some IP that could prevent other companies from selling an apparently much needed product. I wonder if the lack of BT equipped hearing aids is a result of these patents.

      I will give him the benefit of the doubt that he thought he would help bring a product to market sooner since he felt he had a "in" at a manufacturer, but in the end did he sell out other hearing impared persons for 50GBP?

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    7. Re:What's going on here? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Oops - I should have said that the closer such an idea got to actual patents and real production, the larger the bonuses were. I probably shouldn't give any more detail, but Ericsson certainly weren't penny-pinching.

      Mind you, I am curious to know what their current policy is - any Ericsson people about who can comment?

    8. Re:What's going on here? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Thank you; naturally, my thoughts on the usefulness of my ideas differ from yours :-)

    9. Re:What's going on here? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      That last paragraph is an excellent thought. I'd lean towards variable amounts, though, decided by voting among the site users/members. One pound from your donation goes to each person you cast a vote for, perhaps?

    10. Re:What's going on here? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      Paragraph 1 - thank you.
      Paragraph 2 - it's not.
      Paragraph 3 - that was a part of my decision to write it up for Ericsson. No sell-out, though.

      Unfortunately, I can't properly defend my assertions without disclosing things I'm not allowed to. Sorry.

    11. Re:What's going on here? by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps some $ goes to the developer of the idea, and some $ goes to an open-source styled team to do preliminary patent research. Because really, I or any of my peers could do a better job researching tech patents than the USPTO does...

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    12. Re:What's going on here? by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      It's pretty obvious your intentions were genuine originally, but it does raise questions about peoples resopnsibilities in general. I'm sure had you known that they would shelve the idea you wouldn't have empowered them with the patents. But I really do wonder how often this happens and we don't know about it.

      I bet there are tons of examples where someones exuberance or naivety has impared developments.

      Good luck to you.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    13. Re:What's going on here? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      My intentions have always been genuine, not just "originally".

      That said, the point you raise about naivety impairing development is a good one. As a young graduate fresh out of university, I had no idea how hard it is to get from an idea to a product. Now I'm wondering how often such things happen, too...

  25. ultimate hands free... by mr.+snrub · · Score: 0

    one of these babies, plus a microphone inserted behind one of your front teeth. throw in some voice activation and you'll never have to take the phone out of your pocket.

  26. Minimum Possible Size? by Geiger581 · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool, but what is really the minimum possible size for a Bluetooth device? Could one really fit into a earplug sized device. In high school I had to do a lot of memorized poetry recitation for English classes and fantacized about such a thing. :)

    1. Re:Minimum Possible Size? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't really one.
      With high-frequency devices, smaller is better.
      (The resistance in the conductors of the circuit rises very high in high frequency devices.)

  27. Can you hear me now...? by Marthisdil · · Score: 0

    No! I'm deaf!

    1. Re:Can you hear me now...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope you really are deaf. If so, this will mean something:

      HAAA HAAAAA!!!

  28. Hey, Almost as funny as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That lame story about Bush's guard records being "inadvertently" destroyed!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    What kind of dumbass BOZO's are going to believe that one?

    Un-FUCKING-believable!

    What the hell is in those records? What did Wumpass really do that it has to stay hidden no matter how many stupid stories have to be concocted to cover-up their cover-up?

    Was Bush caught sucking his own dick behind the aircraft hanger? ....

    1. Re:Hey, Almost as funny as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Was Bush caught sucking his own dick behind the aircraft hanger? ....


      well, that would imply that he had some marketable skill besides being his father's son, so i'd say it's unlikely.
  29. 2 Metres by operagost · · Score: 1
    The converted headset has worked perfectly for me so far. As long as my handset is at least two metres away, I cannot hear any RFI whatsoever.
    Whoa - this guy has really long arms!
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:2 Metres by Kredal · · Score: 1

      No, he just has bluetooth installed...

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    2. Re:2 Metres by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Doens't matter what magic wireless technique he is using... 2 meters is still an incredibly long distance to have a phone from your ear. Unless you are say, in your car, or at your home...

      The best bet, would be to strap it to your ankle. Assuming the phone doesn't get smashed too quickly,, It should cut down on nearly all of the interference...

    3. Re:2 Metres by XO · · Score: 1

      This guy's phone or hearing aid is really fukt up. I deal in cell phones, every day, and most days involving at least one or two people with hearing aids. No one has ever complained to me about the phone causing interference, or even having to take their aids out to use their cell phone.

      Nokia makes a device that will connect to any of their phones, and interface it directly to any LoopSet compatible hearing aid.

      You could easily use an earpiece that doesn't go "in the ear", with almost any hearing aid, as well.

      It's a cool device he's built, but his problem isn't what he thinks it is.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:2 Metres by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      I usually just put the phone on a table and wander about the room. Theoretical maximum range is ten metres, although I'm not usually beyond five. I've also discovered that having the phone in my backpack works, provided that all the wires are kept in front of me. Human flesh obviously absorbs microwave RFI... :-) although the Bluetooth link coped, somehow. Interesting.

    5. Re:2 Metres by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ.

  30. Re:what? by rasz · · Score: 1

    I found it quite humorous, really, clicking on a page about hearing aides and getting visually yelled at.

    Maybe it's his revenge.

  31. After the shit goes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to jam a tinfoil hat so far up your ass it will be nearly as deep as your head is right now.

  32. I usually just use the speaker phone on my treo600 by zorkmid · · Score: 1

    I wear two Resound Canta 7's HA's and the speaker phone on my treo 600 is usually good enough. Kind of sucks if you're in public and want to keep some measure of privacy though.

    This looks neat too.
    The world's first Bluetooth for hearing instruments:

    http://www.gn.com/gn_magazine/2002/november/the_ wo rlds_first_bluetooth_for_hearing_instruments

    Bluetooth in the HA's themselves would be pretty neat. I could zot MP3's straight into my head.
    Might be asking a bit much given the space restrictions though.

  33. More fun idea for a bluetooth hack.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'd really get a kick out of it if this guy had hacked a vibrator to bluetooth!

  34. Verizon with Bluetooth by craig2787 · · Score: 0

    "Can you hear me now?"
    "Good!"

  35. I wonder if there are bluetooth headphones... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    It would be a cool idea. No more getting the headphone cord tangled or accidently yanked. Especially for portable music players etc. Anyone know if such a thing is available anywhere? And ironically using them at loud volumes may eventually lead to the bluetooth hearing aid.

    1. Re:I wonder if there are bluetooth headphones... by ff3j · · Score: 1
  36. Perfect Timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife has lost most of her hearing in her left ear and is now losing that of her right ear as well. Her hearing loss fluctuates (often changing drastically within an hour). She now has two digital hearing aids, which help tremendously, but she is having difficulty with both her cell & land line phone. This article couldn't have come at a more opportune time, as we were investigating various telephone solutions earlier this evening. Losing your hearing is frightening and you can't imagine what a morale booster it is for her to see articles like this one, just to know that someone is working on the very problem you have.
    I think an entire Slashdot section could be devoted to "assistive" devices, such as hearing aids/cochlear implants. For those who are interested, there is an excellent article about cochlear implants by Philipos C. Loizou in the Sept. 1998 issue of IEEE Signal Processing Magazine - the title is "Mimicking the Human Ear".
    Thanks.

  37. Induction Loop? (much cheaper) by truefluke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You didn't mention whether you were aware of an existing technology, but there's something known as an "induction loop".

    Being hearing-impaired myself, I obtained an induction loop that jacks into the cell phone. The signal is clear as day. Of course, you have to deal with batteries, but an advantage is, hands-free mode. There's a microphone portion where the cord forks into a 'Y'. :D

    I imagine the local Bell cell-phone store would carry it (that's where I got mine).

    Good luck.

    --
    spam, spam, spam, spam, e-mail, news and spam.
    1. Re:Induction Loop? (much cheaper) by teneighty · · Score: 1

      He mentions in the article that induction loops don't work well because of EM interference, lack of clarity, etc. I can attest to this myself - try using your induction coil while sitting in front of a large monitor and you'll see what I mean.

    2. Re:Induction Loop? (much cheaper) by truefluke · · Score: 1

      Aha I glossed over that, however un-intentionally. I know what you mean though, anything that kicks off enough RF could be annoying, but the loop can help in other situations, I imagine, just not stationary in the office (often I use induction loop in my car. Try THAT with a laptop and WiFi ... welcome to constant wardialing much?)

      I just proffered as an option. Not saying mine is the bonafide end-all solution.

      --
      spam, spam, spam, spam, e-mail, news and spam.
  38. Re: ferrite choke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can U use a ferrite rf choke to filter the RF??
    a ferrite torus that you put the cable through twice wrapping the wire round the choke. I used this to eliminate the phone using my hands free headphone as an ariel to broadcast the microwaves into my skull (as the headphone is in the ear).
    Hands free kits reassured many that they were less harmful to use as the phone was further away from the head thus avoiding cooking your brain (radiation falls off with square of distance). However WHICH magazine in the UK repoted that some (not all )hands free kits were acting as arials bring the microwaves closer to the brain via the ear piece, i.e. making them worse for you than the original phone next to your ear. Using a regular radio tuned for maximum interference as a microwave detector I found a ferrite choke ( 1.50 from Maplins etc ) eliminated any broadcast down the wire thus saving me from micro waves brain cookage.
    So a ferrite choke could be used to stop the RF interfernce down the wire to the hearing aid. Thus allowing a cheaper wired solution (and no bluejack risk). N.B. ferrite chokes are seen on many computer cables to stop RF broadcast from them.
    Is this a solution or am I a bozo? You decide.

  39. Re: ferrite choke -- govt advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can a small ring of metal cut radiation from hands-free kits[www.mindfully.org] here is a link to microwave propagation along hands free kits (originally from news scientists) - mod the parent up -- informative.

  40. Umm... by AVryhof · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It was a hot summer night, her and I were parked up in the mountains where we could see the town and beautiful lake below. After a wonderful night out on the town, what more could I expect? It was our fourth date, and she had already hinted towards a number of sexual innuendos. As I sit there letting my mind wander, I can feel her breath upon my ear getting warmer and warmer, but she is not going any further.

    After 5 minutes of feeling her breath on my eat and anticipating the expected tongue, I realize that she is trying to say something to me. Perhaps she is trying to arouse me with sweet talk, or informing me to take my clothes off.

    I decide to turn my hearing aid up to find out that she thinks I'm a fucking prick and she wants to go home because I don't listen to her.

  41. Re: ferrite choke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USING a hands-free earpiece with a mobile phone may channel more microwave radiation into your head than holding the phone up to your ear, according to tests announced last week by Britain's Consumers' Association. But the tests also found there might be a cheap and simple solution.

    The CA's tests found, however, that fitting a small ring of an iron-based compound called ferrite to the headset wire eradicated the extra radiation. "The ferrite choke acts as a high impedance to the wave and reflects it back down the cable," says Les Barclay, a member of the government's Independent Expert Group on Mobile Phones.

  42. Possible Answer: Frequency by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    F*ing A. my phone does that too. i usually fall asleep with the stereo playing a short playlist off my computer. It's a very rude awakening when i get an early phone call. I can also usually know when i have a call because the stereo buzzes for a second before the phone actually rings.

    Some of the brighter /.'ers can check out the wireless communication specs. Some carriers are slowly switching over to the 800/850 band, but not my carrier. They're mostly at 1900MHz. Here's another article that's a bit more informative.

    Yea, so: I think it's possible that your phone is on the higher frequencies while the other two aren't. I know for a fact my cell is @ 1900MHz and that i really hate it when people call before 9.

    As a bonus, I discovered yesterday that the cordless phones in our house drown out my wifi cable modem. What a trip. Isn't it wonderful how they're both at 2.4GHz.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Possible Answer: Frequency by XO · · Score: 1

      If your phone does this sort of thing, it's time to get a new phone. You've probably got some serious problems. I've never seen a cell phone ,except for Nextels, which are at higher RF output power, cause interference like this, when tuned properly.

      However, I did have a phone that anytime it would ring if it was near my bathroom, the electrical circuit wired to the bathroom would overload, causing the breaker that provides power for that area of my house to trip. After that happened twice, I took the phone in to a service center, and it turned out that not only did the software need a very important upgrade, but also the RF transmitter was WAY out of spec.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    2. Re:Possible Answer: Frequency by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      It also doesn't seem to matter what the volume is set at. Could it just be that my (very old) stereo just has poor shielding? Same story with some old computer speakers I had around. It only happens when the phone is in relatively close proximity.

      I tested this poor shielding theory on a much higher class Stereo/Reciever and a diff stereo of a slightly more recent vintage, but with a much more compact design. Both barely gave off a hum.

      Update: I really do think it involves poor shielding. I just waved it around my speakers and it's loudest in front of the 'sub' port hole and even on the sides where the plastic is thinner. All that said, you still think my phone is pumping out too much energy?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Possible Answer: Frequency by XO · · Score: 1

      ya know, i suppose that could be an answer too.. but you might want to have your phone checked to see if it is in spec.. i've never had any buzzing on anything i've ever owned, though, and i don't have any really expensive stereo hardware or anything.. (except with my phone that i mentioned elsewhere that would blow the circuits in my bathroom)

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  43. Re: frequency blocking in wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, in December, the government changed its mind, following a report from the Consumers' Association that said mobiles with hands-free kits beamed 3.5 times more radiation into a user's head than mobiles on their own. ... Simon Best, editor of Electromagnetic Hazard and Therapy, a specialist news service, agrees. "A choke would considerably help stop radiation from going into the head. It is not rocket science. A ferrite choke is a terribly simple little thing." [www.rfsafe.com] N.B. The official position of the Federation of the Electronics Industry on ferrite chokes is that they "work at some frequencies but not at others".

  44. Am I missing something? by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can someone clarify one thing for me - why bother with Bluetooth for this application? I'd think it'd be easier just to use a cell phone that has a standard 2.5mm jack.

    Take any "hands-free" kit with a microphone in the cable and a 2.5mm connector. Snip off the earpiece, leaving the microphone behind, and replace the earpiece leads with a 3.5mm mono jack. Use the 3.5mm to hearing aid adapter as shown in this story, and you're done.

    If you're going to have something clipped to your belt and a big cable, may as well carry the cell phone on your belt and have the wire going directly to the phone instead of a wire to a wireless link.

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by DaLiNKz · · Score: 1

      No doubt you haven't read the article. The RF problems run up the line aswell, still causing disruptive static..

      --
      I've left to find myself. If you happen to see me, please, keep me there until I return.
    2. Re:Am I missing something? by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

      maybe he wants to hear when he's not using the phone? That's probably why he did it, as a switch,also, bluetooth has less human audible interference than the straight normal cellphone transmission carries, the wire propogates and interferes with the hearing aid circuitry and operation.

      It's in the article, unless I am reading this wrong.

    3. Re:Am I missing something? by J2000_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      RTFA - "No amount of extension cable will make a wired hands-free usable - the wire always conducts enough RFI to cause trouble, regardless of any filters that might be in place." Wires really transmit. I used some spare wire to wrap around my wireless to boast the signal.

    4. Re:Am I missing something? by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      RTFA - "No amount of extension cable will make a wired hands-free usable - the wire always conducts enough RFI to cause trouble, regardless of any filters that might be in place." Wires really transmit. I used some spare wire to wrap around my wireless to boast the signal.

      How about terminating the the cable from the cell phone to the hearing aid DAI with an opto-isolator?

    5. Re:Am I missing something? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      The audio output from a cellphone is already electrically isolated from the RF circuits. The problem is that _inductively_ isolating it from high frequency RF energy is very hard and I doubt an optoisolator would help. Another possible solution is to use fibre optic cable instead of copper cable to connect the phone and the earpiece together - separating the devices by a metre of fibre optics would probably do the trick.

      Having said all that, I must congratulate this guy on a good idea. With circuits getting smaller and smaller aalong with batteries, maybe it won't be long before all hearing aids come with built-in bluetooth.

    6. Re:Am I missing something? by Peter+McC · · Score: 1

      Using wire to boost your wireless. Oh, the irony.

      --
      You know what I hate? Wait, what do you like? I hate that!
  45. What cell phones *really* need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a very rude awakening when i get an early phone call

    What I really wish they'd put on cell phones is an off switch. Oh, wait...

  46. Anal fixation anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HHHhhhhmmmmmmm??? ...Mr. Poopy-pants?

    George W. Bush: A flaming Tutti-Frutti?
    the definitive answer is here

  47. -1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to let you know I hate you because I can't quit playing this stupid quiz game thing in your sig.

  48. pun by 7*6 · · Score: 1
    "the surrounding issues are good for quite a bit of discussion."

    ...pardon the pun

    1. Re:pun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What pun?

      Oh, I think I get you. Because, y'know... deaf people can't communicate? Ha. Smart.

      ???

  49. Anybody up to the challenge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the patents he says he can't talk about:

    >Naturally, the patentable ideas I wrote up for
    >Ericsson are not disclosed, as they remain Ericsson
    >property.

  50. ReSound Canta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not affiliated with them, but use their hearing aids. They are pricey ($2200/ear) but I have no problem with cell phones. The $$$ pays for a tunable dsp that has four programs. I found that I never use the telecoil.

  51. that's not RF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just the BT headset heating up and communicating the heat to your ear. It isn't some unexplainable heating action from the BT.

    Electronic devices convert nearly 100% of the energy in the battery into heat. That's all you're feeling.

  52. Some issues with Cells and Aides aren't as severe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I require aides myself and have been utterly frustrated with the noise that comes out of cell phones... for those who are wondering what it's like...

    "Normal" phones can be listened to via a "T" mode on most hearing aides... it's usually in reference to "Telephone" or "Teleconductor". Phones with actual speakers/coil membranes in the headset can be picked up by hearing aides. Headphones can, too. We switch the mode to "T" from "M"icrophone and hear only what is being sent through the coils. Very handy and allows us to hear only what we want to hear. (Caveat: While music is much more clear in "T" mode, it's pretty much just the upper midrange to high end frequencies that we hear. No bass. Period. Ugh.)

    As the article mentions... "T" mode also picks up other kinds of interference. The most common is electrical. Just a low buzzing sound. For poorly shielded equipment or poorly grounded houses... switching to "T" mode can make this noise about as loud as anything else you try to pick up through coil/conductor. Going past a power sub station is deafening (literally!) to anyone with an aide in pickup mode. Subways are extremely noisy too, since they run on electrical power (with that live third rail, too)... Better (worse?) yet, an aide in pickup mode can also pick up engine noises from cars. The revs, the click-click-click of the signals... engines change pitch depending on how fast you go. I used to freak out my friends by being able to tell them when the signals are flashing without even looking at the lights.

    Cellphones use a different kind of speaker for the earpiece (usually) and they are NOT hearing aide compatible. I switch mine to "T" mode and try to listen to a cellphone? I hear NOTHING that comes out of the speaker. I pick up plenty of the interference from the cellphone, however... Whether it's in T or M mode.

    On most phones I've used, probably because of the way my personal aide model picks up the interference... It sounds like a humming whine that whirrs and pulses and varies in intensity a lot. Think of it this way, I can hear the packets being sent and the intensity of the signal. It's maddening to try to hear over this noise when I simply use my aide's microphone to listen to the cellphone.

    Fortunately, Samsung makes their phones well enough to where the interference doesn't carry through a hands-free wire. I've owned two Samsung phones through T-Mobile (R225 and the E105, both excellent, though the R225 has issues with a propriety hands-free connector that often shorts out) and as long as I keep the phone at least one feet away from my ear... I can listen to the convo just fine. The biggest drawback to this method that I've noticed is that the majority of the cellphones I've tried out DO NOT echo local/microphone noise back through the earpiece. It's understandable because the person shouldn't need to hear themselves speak through the phone... but in my case, I cannot hear myself speak at all! Anyone can imagine how frustrating it is when you're trying to talk and can't hear how loud you are or whether or not you are speaking clearly enough. Imagine playing in a band at a concert without any monitor speakers. If you can't hear yourself, you don't feel quite as confident with how you sound.

    Fortunately, the Samsung E105 has a *slight* local echo through the earpiece... so most of the time I can just barely hear my own voice over the hands free. Most do not have any local echo (cancellation?) at all.

    This guy made a pretty neat hack to use his phone for his hearing situation... if you notice, he has his phone adaptor set up in stereo (mono source, two clips for each ear). Most people just listen to phones with one ear, so I suspect this is mainly why he went the bluetooth route. Pretty smart idea, if you ask me. I only use an aide in one ear, so a hands-free piece is enough for me.

    FYI: They sell inductor coil loops (one is just a loop that hangs around your neck like a necklace, another is called a Silouette... it looks like a 1/16th of an inch th

  53. Bluetooth hearing aids ~ Wave of the Future by Lifix · · Score: 1

    Hearing aids have become an exercise in digression. The newer hearing aids are getting smaller and smaller, becoming less and less obtrusive. Combine this with the fact that cell phone companies are striving to reduce the size of their phones (limited only by our fat fingers) and facilitate communications between bluetooth enabled devices. How long will it be until we see bluetooth wireless headsets shaped like hearing aids? (Practically) invisible wireless headsets that connect our ears to our phones.

    Bluetooth has certainly made my life easier (my phone connects to my headset connects to my pda which syncs wirelessly to my PC which uses a wireless keyboard n' mouse) and if a hearing aid shaped bluetooth headset comes out then by all means sign me up... After all, as far as I'm concerned it's just a few short years before we begin implanting ourselves with wireless communications "wetware."

    Toodles...

    --
    In nature, there are neither rewards or punishments, there are only consequences.
  54. so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you want the public to make life easy for you? Sheesh, talk about nieve, Welcome to The Nation of Me.

  55. if I send you an SMS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do I have to do it in ALL CAPS?

  56. What about taking this idea a step further? by teneighty · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering lately if one could have a hearing aid that uses bluetooth to allow the battery, DSP, etc all to be in a device separate from the what one wears in the ear (or on the ear in the case of the more powerful behind the ear aids).

    There's a few reason this would be useful. A key reason is that the unit in the ear could be made cheaply enough that it is virtually disposable. This is important when you realise that the device is exposed to sweat, rain, etc - all very bad things when your aid is worth $3000+ (that's what they cost - sometimes more!). The other reason is that larger batteries and more complex signal processing would be possible in the external unit - and as a bonus, it would be easier to connect external devices such as cell phones, two-way radios, iPods, etc.

    Then again, maybe the latency introduced by the bluetooth link would be too great?

    Of course, my REAL dream is a PDA-sized real-time speech-to-text device, but that is a long, long, loooong way off yet.

  57. Re:not seen on slowdot.org yet by Tito · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mandrake? More like GAYdrake! But seriously... linux is NOT the way of the future.

  58. So what if.. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    you just build in some terabytes ram (Hey, dont look funny, it will happen soon enough!), an mp3 player, hook up the thing directly to my hearing nerves.
    Voila! Instant audio memory and playback!

    I am actually loosing my vibrating inner ear hairs, that translate soundwaves into nerve signals, as I dont have an eardrum on one side. When they are all gone ill be effectively deaf with that ear.

    When I get there, I want above mentioned gadget, and STILL be able to visit concerts..

    I wonder what that will mean to audio copyrights... imagine one of those implanted into your retina, for visuals..

    "/Dread"

  59. Standard Zero Wing Reference by Xerp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What you say?

  60. try this! it works! by EaterOfDog · · Score: 1, Informative

    For the hearing who wonder what exactly we are talking about, telecoil is a magnetic link with the speaker of the item you are listening to. The microphone is shut off. Most cell phones crank out a lot of magnetic noise. I have this problem with my $2,000 (each!) digital Interra AV MM's and my Nokia phone. I simply use the included headset that comes with the phone and loop the small speaker behind my ear close to the hearing aid, then switch to telecoil. The sound I get is so good, I prefer to use my cell phone over any other phone.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
  61. Experiences with Nokia induction loop? by dannybackx · · Score: 1

    My mother in law has a hearing problem too. I've been thinking about buying her a Nokia GSM phone and the induction loop device that'll talk to the T option of her hearing aid.
    Does anyone have experience with that? Her hearing disability is very high.
    Thanks.

    1. Re:Experiences with Nokia induction loop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't have any personal experiance with this as a CSR for Nokia I have talked with customers who use it. They are quite happy. Also the device was developed by Nokia Design Engineer Mikko Haho, who has been hard of hearing since birth. http://press.nokia.com/PR/199809/778511_5.html

    2. Re:Experiences with Nokia induction loop? by CloudShape · · Score: 1

      My immediate thoughts:
      - I'm not surprised it took a deaf engineer to do it.
      - Damn, I should have gone to work for Nokia, not Ericsson.

      These devices don't work for me, unfortunately, or I'd've had one years ago :-)

  62. OK, that's kinda neat. by AlterEd · · Score: 1

    But this is really cool.

    --

    Ed Chauvin IV
  63. Re:what? by CloudShape · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, the thought had never even crossed my mind... thank you for that, it made me laugh!

    As mboverload says, I wrote the disclaimer in capitals because everyone seems to do it that way. I'm not sure why, although I suspect it might be so that people can't claim that a disclaimer was "hidden in the surrounding text" or somesuch. If someone could claim that the disclaimer was hidden so they wouldn't notice it, they might just be able to sidestep it on the basis that it hadn't been made clear, and demand damages anyway.

    The reason my page doesn't have a clickable contents list with in-page link targets is so that people are forced to start at the top where the disclaimer will be presented to them up front. Mind you, I can't help feeling that it's a shame we live in a day and age where this kind of legal paranoia is necessary...

  64. Complex. Unnecessary. by panurge · · Score: 1

    I use a simple phone adaptor which has a neck microphone and a small inductive loop. Sound quality is excellent (there is a very small rattle in my car which has the VW Pump Duese engine, but it is hardly noticeable when someone is speaking) and I have had no interference problems. What is more, the battery life is about 3 months, the additional drain on the phone battery is unnoticeable, and I can use the same loop with both hearing aids (I have a Widex for sports and outdoors and a larger Siemens with better sound quality for home and office.)
    Unlike with Bluetooth, there is no additional weight on the ear. Both my colleagues who use bluetooth headsets complain of short battery life and of the weight on the ear. The only downside is the people who look at you as if you are mad as you make a phone call with no visible phone equipment at all.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  65. what if you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    greenteeth

  66. Wireless Telephone to Hearing Aid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite a few Hearing Aids now offer an FM link capability.
    Mine (Phonak) have an FM Microphone/Transmitter to communicate with the receivers in the aids.
    After reading this discussion, I will look for a way to cable the Wireless Phone to the "HandiMic transmitter.
    Anyone worked this up, yet?

  67. Gennum Corporation has already created this device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a company in Canada that has this technology and is bringing it to market imminently.

    The URL for HearPhone Technology/the Zen headset is at:

    http://www.gennum.com/zen/index.html