Slashdot Mirror


Nextel and FCC Swap Bandwidth

evilninja writes "Techweb is reporting on the sale of 10MHz worth of bandwidth to Nextel by the FCC. One term of the agreement will solve a problem that has been frustrating the FCC for some time. Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain, since it has been interfering with local emergency channels in some areas."

124 comments

  1. the fcc by Fuzzy_Nuts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the FCC couldn't just force Nextel to stop useing the bandwidth that was used for emergeny channels?

    --
    ReachInternet.com Wireless, Campus Area Networks, Office Networking.
    1. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I used an emergency channel they'd send a group of jackbooted thugs to kick down my door and smash my head in with a baseball bat.

      If you've got $$$ you're above the law.

    2. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nextel did not use emergency channels, they were using cellphone channels. Emergency frequencies happens to be next beside cellphone frequencies. Guess what happens when you cram a ludicrous amount of soccer moms screeming sensless in their phone while driving? That's right, it overlaps in neighboors frequencies.

    3. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      They weren't using emergency channels, numbnuts, they were using channels that interfered with them. Big difference.

    4. Re:the fcc by silas_moeckel · · Score: 3, Informative

      More importantly they were using the channels that the FCC gave them to use for cell phones right ext to emergency channels.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    5. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ffc had given them the the bandwitdh in the first place and nextel is not allowed to pick their own just for the heck of it. They need permission to use bandwidth legally, and this is what has happened. It took too long and shouldnt have happened in the first place. Its scary to think the fcc doesnt know what bandwidth emergency services use but they regulate the piss out of corps.

    6. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So the FCC couldn't just force Nextel to stop useing the bandwidth that was used for emergeny channels?

      That's what I was wondering. If my car blocks a fire hydrant, they tow it. If my house blocks the path for a new highway, they tear it down. Apparently, eminent domain only applies to the little guy.

    7. Re:the fcc by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      except if your house blocks the highway, they pay you fair market value for it.. its the same thing here.

    8. Re:the fcc by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Thing is, it would be fair market value for the worth of the property if the buyer knew they were about to run an interstellar super galatic highway thru what is currently the dining room. Which is to say about 1/4 of what it really is.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    9. Re:the fcc by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      if your house blocks the highway, they pay you fair market value for it.

      And what's fairer than an equal-size slice of RF bandwidth?

    10. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon complaining about it, of course.

  2. This story is so boring... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it hertz.

    1. Re:This story is so boring... by cytoman · · Score: 2, Funny

      you mean... *mega* hertz :-D

    2. Re:This story is so boring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The editing is so bad it hurts.

      Technically, they sold a 10Mhz wide band of spectrum. Bandwidth is a measure of throughput.

    3. Re:This story is so boring... by nomel · · Score: 1

      not always. bandwidth can also be a measure of the width of a band. in this case, a band of frequencies. so, 10MHz bandwidth would be from f to f2, where f2 is 10MHz greater than f.

      see dictionary.com deff.

    4. Re:This story is so boring... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      That's MHz, not Mhz... Mr. Editor.

      Mr. Hertz appreciates you capitalizing his surname.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  3. Re:Beep Beep! by dealsites · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nextels aren't too bad of cell phones. In fact many of them are pretty cheap to be had. Ex: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals+index-mode-sear ch-query-nextel.html. I don't own one, but I do get annoyed with that walkie talkie crap. I do know people that get better service with Nextel vs competing carriers though.

    --
    Deal updates all the time.

  4. It's about time! by NaCh0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Finally the FCC does The Right Thing(TM).

    1. Re:It's about time! by vk2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Don't you think you are too old for this kind of lame attempt for first posts ?

      --
      No Sig for you.!
  5. Hopefully... by Count+of+Montecristo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Although the article does not mention a lot of detail, I do hope that this will fix some of the reception problems i've been having in the LA Metropolitan area with Nextel.

    It used to be pretty reliable almost anywhere, although lately there were some 'lossy' spots to say the least.

    On the other hand, since i'm no iDEN expert.. will this require an upgrade to the handset's codeplug?

    --
    *shower*
    1. Re:Hopefully... by BigFire · · Score: 1

      Don't bet on it. I'm almost convinced that Nextel's reception problem in Los Angeles is in their code, rather than interferance.

    2. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't count on it. Chances are, it'll get worse because their towers are spaced for 800MHz and since 1900MHz doesn't have as big of a signal radius, Nextel will now have huge gaps in their network.

    3. Re:Hopefully... by Tmack · · Score: 2, Informative
      Most of the field techs I work with have nextel phones. The reception sucks for all of them in the 4 market areas across the US I work in. Texas, Georigia, Denver, they all have crappy reception. Trying to call a tech thats got a Nextel normally requires 2 calls, the first either goes into their voicemail or gives some Nextel error message, the second usually goes through if they have a signal. And when porting (LNP) phone numbers for our customers (I work for a CLEC), the techs cant test the porting with their cellphones normally, because Nextel is one of the slowest carriers to update their translations, thus the test calls from their phones usually route to the old provider's phone block rather than the one we installed and just ported the numbers to.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    4. Re:Hopefully... by halo1982 · · Score: 1

      It'll require all new handsets. Nextel's current phones only support 800MHz iDEN, and with the network changing to 1900MHz (or possibly 2100MHz..I've heard both) it will require handsets that support 1900MHz iDEN. I'm sure they'll start selling dual mode iDEN phones, and eventually when the new network goes online most people won't even notice the change (except all of the new holes brough by the 1900MHz's smaller transmission area and lack of building penetration...but thats another story).

    5. Re:Hopefully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Er. I read the article a little a little differently I guess.

      Frequencies are being shifted around. All public safety frequencies are being bunched together at the lower end of the 800MHz spectrum, so they bump up against the high-700Mhz public safety frequencies.

      Commercial uses, like Nextel, will be relocated to the high-800MHz range.

      In general, public safety would be at the bottom of the 800 MHz band (near other public safety licensees in the 700 MHz band), private wireless users in the middle and commercial wireless operators at the high end. Each would be separated by a buffer.


      Now, given that they're not relocating out of the 800MHz band, is it possible for the existing radios to be attuned to the slightly higher frequency range?

      BTW, in reading Verizon's complaints in the article, I can't help but think of my employer. We sell products to distributors who in turn sell them people who in turn puts them into businesses. Large restaurant chains want our products, but had to buy from distributors, who wouldn't give them the time of day because they like their traditional customers (IMHO because they can gouge them mercilessly). We get in touch with large chains, find out what's been going on, find out what they want, setup a deal, and as soon as it's announced the distributors want to get in the middle so they can get a piece of the pie for, essentially, doing no work whatsoever, and if anything, pissing these people off for years on end.

      If you don't do the legwork, if you don't take the initiative, if you're not in the trenches trying to help, don't expect to benefit. It sounds to me like Nextel was being proactive, looking at the problem, offering a technical solution that would solve the problem, offering to PAY for them to implement the solution, and Mr. Johnny-come-lately cries foul because they're been sitting on their duff and want something free too.
    6. Re:Hopefully... by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      So Nextel is going to 1900MHz while the GSM providers (pardon me, I meant the two providers that actually have licenses for it) go to 850MHz. Somewhat ironic, I think, and an interesting reversal. Currently where I live Nextel has a slight advantage in coverage because their network is 800MHz and can go farther from a single tower, while AT&T is still converting TDMA 850 towers to GSM. I'll be interested to see if this changes when Nextel moves to 1900MHz on towers spaced for 800, etc.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    7. Re:Hopefully... by halo1982 · · Score: 1
      So Nextel is going to 1900MHz while the GSM providers (pardon me, I meant the two providers that actually have licenses for it) go to 850MHz. Somewhat ironic, I think, and an interesting reversal. Currently where I live Nextel has a slight advantage in coverage because their network is 800MHz and can go farther from a single tower, while AT&T is still converting TDMA 850 towers to GSM. I'll be interested to see if this changes when Nextel moves to 1900MHz on towers spaced for 800, etc.

      I believe AT&T converted a lot of their TDMA 850 to GSM 1900 and had tons of coverage problems cause of this. Also T-Mobile is using 1900MHz GSM with no plans to go 850, so its not all going to 850...

    8. Re:Hopefully... by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      I think AT&T figured out that going from TDMA 850 to GSM 1900 was a mistake and is now changing over to GSM 850 because I've noticed improved coverage in a couple spots over the last few months. And I know T-Mobile doesn't use 850.. I used to have a T-Mobile account and the reception was crap. Dunno if that's because they use 1900 and have some of the towers spaced wrong or if it's because of the funky situation in the NY market, but I was surprised by the difference when I went to AWE from T-Mobile.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
  6. This is what the FCC is for by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The spectrum is a public trust and if the FCC can eliminate the interference without killing off the company that they issued the origional spectrum to they should. Verizon is stupid for demanding that the spectrum be auctioned to the highest bidder because Nextel and the FCC are doing what is in the publics best interest.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Surt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seems like revoking the interfering license and auctioning the new spectrum would be the public best interest.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:This is what the FCC is for by afidel · · Score: 1

      How does destroying a competitor through fiat help the public? It was the FCC's fault for granting the infringing license in the first place, now Nextel is willing to play nice and swap spectrum with them.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Nextel got bad spectrum in the past, and basically swapped it for good spectrum with the people that hand out the spectrum.

    4. Re:This is what the FCC is for by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that having a government body suddenly grab someone's possessions without compensation is a very bad idea. Not that it doesn't happen all too often.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    5. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless Nextel *resisted* efforts to move their bandwidth.

    6. Re:This is what the FCC is for by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then again, Verizon got most of its cell-phone bandwidth simply for being the Baby Bell company of record... not at an auction.

      It's hard to claim the "free lunch" argument when you're munching on one as well...

    7. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except that in most cases it isn't Nextel's fault. There are many public safety radio systems that are not designed to reliably operate in a hostile RF environment. More transmitter sites and higher quality radio equipment costs money. Doing it on the cheap saves money at the cost of coverage and reliability.

      The general rule is that if the interfering transmitter is operating within FCC rules and sound technical practices, it isn't responsible for solving interference problems that are the result of deficiencies in the equipment that is suffering the interference.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    8. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Bruha · · Score: 2, Informative

      Verizon is a landline company.. Verizon Wireless is a cellular company and bought all their bandwidth. They are entirely seperate companies with Vodaphone PLC owning the majority of the company not Verizon.

      Either way verizon wireless arguement is valid. Just giving Nextel a 10mhz peice of spectrum for free is a slap in the face to all the other companies that have paid billions for their specturm. Nextel cannot tell me they were not aware that there could be problems with them moving in on the 800mhz area or they dont know what a spectrum engineer is for.

    9. Re:This is what the FCC is for by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a true statement about the state of Verizon Wireless today, but neglects the history of where the bulk of their bandwidth licenses come from...

      Verizon Wireless has heritage in the fact that FCC handed out the original cellular licenses in pairs in each area.. one went to the Baby Bell company of the area, and another went to a competor company. (Celluar being an unproven business at the time, the competitor slot went to the first company to stand up and be willing to invest in the technology... and there was sometimes a wait to find that newcomer.) As a result, Bell Atlantic, NYNEX and GTE (the Baby Bells who'd eventually merge into Verizon) all got into the wireless business that way. Those licenses are now in the hands of Verizon...

      As a result, much of Verizon's bandwidth wasn't won at auction either.

    10. Re:This is what the FCC is for by apederso · · Score: 1

      And to further complicate matters... the company that is today Verizon Wireless (majority owned by Verizon PLC) also has the cellular licenses that were brought into it by Airtouch, an American cellular company bought by Vodaphone which was a spinnoff of Pacific Bell, yet another RBOC (Regional Bell Operating Company aka Baby Bell).

      So really, the bulk of Verizon Wireless was built from these initial grants by the federal government.

      Don't take this the wrong way, without those grants cell phone bandwidth licenses wouldn't be as valuable as they are today. We just need to understand thier current value and price them accourdingly, that is all.

    11. Re:This is what the FCC is for by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "They are entirely seperate companies with Vodaphone PLC owning the majority of the company not Verizon."

      Actually, Verizon owns 55% of Verizon Wireless, and Vodafone owns 45%.

    12. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Surt · · Score: 1

      Problem is they paid bad spectrum prices for bad spectrum, abused it, then said, ok we'll swap for good spectrum if you'd like us to stop abusing.

      They need to pay up the difference in value for this to be fair to the public.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:This is what the FCC is for by dirbinhas · · Score: 0

      Verizon is stupid for demanding that the spectrum be auctioned to the highest bidder because Nextel and the FCC are doing what is in the publics best interest.

      not according to the Citizens Against Government Waste porker of the month

    14. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nextel didn't move into the 800Mhz band. They've been there all along. From Day 1. That's where iDEN lives. Nextel has always been using iDEN. That's their schtick.

      As municipalities try to do more and more and more with their reserved frequencies, the FCC's idiotic organization of that frequency band, with some things here, some things there, has turned around and bit public safety officials in the ass.

      I look at it this way. There's a problem. Nextel is doing nothing wrong, the organization of that band is just completely asinine without adequate guard bands to prevent this problem when everyone's utiilizing the full spectrum (which municipalities want to do).

      Nextel listens to complaints, looks at the problem, proposes a way to fix the problem that makes far, far more sense than the current frequency arrangement, offers to pay municipalities to switch around, help municipalities switch around, works with the FCC and all affected parties so everyone understands the situation and hammers out the best possible plan, and as a result of all this legwork, the FCC awards them a 10Mhz spectrum, conditional on implementation of their plan.

      Now, at the tail end of this, Verizon cries foul. Let's face it - they don't necessarily want Nextel to not get 10Mhz. Verizon wants 10Mhz for themselves. That's why they want an auction.

      In fratboy terms - latecomer barges into a party, screams "where are all da white women at?" and then proceeds to cause a ruckus because the women are all... occupied.

      If Verizon wanted 10Mhz, they should have done something instead of sitting on their ass. TANSTAAL - There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

  7. Re:Beep Beep! by Izago909 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sure that walkie feature is nice for some conditions, but I swear I'm going to slap the next person in the elevator who feels like using it to gossip about who slept with whom.

  8. Re:Beep Beep! by DevilJeff · · Score: 1

    I have a Nextel myself and I can't STAND the people that don't have the courtesy to turn their private speaker on when they want to gossip. I only ever use the "Walkie-Talkie" type speaker when I'm in my car, or at home, otherwise, I like to keep my conversations private.

  9. Bah by Billobob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who needs emergency cha- wait, where the hell did that tornado come from...

    --
    If you have to ask, you'll never know.
    1. Re:Bah by cmoressi · · Score: 1

      I really don't know how Nextel's direct talk works, but I am sure its uses a repeater type mechanism. Trust me if that tornado were in area Nextel's direct talk service will be fubar.

  10. Public domain? by hugesmile · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain

    1. Re:Public domain? by Lurk3r · · Score: 0

      fcc.gov?

    2. Re:Public Domain? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 0
      Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain

      I don't think this part of the spectrum is in the "public domain" as if anyone can use it. More accurately, it's been returned to the highly regulated, unaassigned pool of the spectrum.

      Heh. Yeah, it's "public" in the sense of "we're hoarding it and selling it off to the highest bidder, but we're doing it FOR YOUR OWN GOOD!"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Public domain? by IWantMyNickBack · · Score: 0

      Public domain is a term for anything unregulated, i.e. public domain works, public domain spectrum...

  11. Public Domain? by hugesmile · · Score: 4, Informative
    Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain

    I don't think this part of the spectrum is in the "public domain" as if anyone can use it. More accurately, it's been returned to the highly regulated, unaassigned pool of the spectrum.

  12. Re:Beep Beep! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    Indeed, I had a roommate(s) with those phones and they would use them where they are talking out loud. Anoying as all hell and could be heard through the whole apartment. And worse was the damn beep they made, and he would leave the phone there and it would beep for hours shoving it under a pile of clothes and shutting his room door didn't help much.

    The phones seam to work good, but they are anoying as hell. He had it mainly for work (in construction) and it seams like a good idea for that, but god damn is it anoying.

  13. Re:I'm so lonely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn, and I just used my last mod point :(

    Don't worry though, there is still hope of a -1: Offtopic

  14. Effects on service, etc. by Harpua22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this will have much effect on Nextel's service? Previous to this, Nextel had some of the best coverage around. I am obviously no expert (as someone here is bound to point out) but is it possible that a change in the spectrum Nextel will be using will result in a change in their service? Then we have the whining. It sounds to me like some rivals (verizon) are fuming because they see their company's fortunes as being more important than the greater good of society (i.e. the ability to use emergency channels without interference) Won't Nextel incur significant costs to facilitate this switch anyway, partially offsetting what other companies see as a "giveaway"?

    1. Re:Effects on service, etc. by b1scuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Won't Nextel incur significant costs to facilitate this switch anyway, partially offsetting what other companies see as a "giveaway"? Yes, actually. The FCC is making Nextel acquire a 2.5 Billion Dollar letter of credit, to facilitate switching all the existing sytems. $2.5B liquid dollars isn't anything to laugh about. Also, per RCRNews.com: "If the relocation costs, including Nextel's own costs plus the value of the spectrum it relinquishes, is less than $4.8 billion, Nextel will pay an anti-windfall payment to the U.S. Treasury." Basically, it's going to cost Nextel close to 5 Billion dollars to do this whole thing, one way or another. And the kicker is that they just had to shell out to do this very thing not a year ago, when they started moving people around in the 800MHZ band. We had to retune about 22 repeaters(at Nextel's expense, but it was still a pain). I have no sympathy for Nextel in this matter. They still interfere with some of our channels and it's a bitch to track down. That whole system has been nothing but a pain in our ass. 2 out of 3 of the interference problems we have are usually nextel related, and those phones make damn near everything in my office flicker or go tick tick tick tick... I'm done, I promise. :)

  15. Re:Beep Beep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does blatant site advertisement with almost zero actual content get modded "Interesting"?

  16. What about customers? by bstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happens to Nextel customers with phones that operate on the frequencies that they just sold back to the feds? Do the customers now "get to" buy a new phone from Nextel (with a new two year service contract, I assume)? If so, it sounds like a windfall for Nextel.

  17. Re:Need.. Coffee.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    browsing thru the gnaa website again? :)

  18. hehe public domain by XMichael · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Yes, they've returned it to the extremely regulated, overly monitors, beaucratic to the max, over enforced, over regulated, over monitors public domain.

    Sweet!

  19. Dumb Question by thesupermikey · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This may be a dumb question; does this mean the Nextel cell phones will have to be reprogrammed to work with the new frequency?

    --
    Mikey
    I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    1. Re:Dumb Question by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it just means the Nextel cell phones will have to be replaced with ones that work on the new frequency. Unless Motorola has been very forward thinking...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Dumb Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the 800mhz band was used for the two service...

    3. Re:Dumb Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The answer to your question is in the very first paragraph of the linked to article:
      As expected the FCC Thursday approved a plan that will give Nextel Communications a 10 megahertz chunk of spectrum in the 1.9 GHz band. Also, as expected, the 5-0 vote touched off a protest by a public safety group that is expected to be followed up by complaints from additional protesting parties.
  20. Questions from the Article by Lifix · · Score: 4, Informative

    The issue here is simple: if the current allocation of frequencies is cutting into emergency services, then that needs to be fixed.

    The FCC was debating letting Nextel reorganize the 800MHz band in return for their slice. This no doubt pissed off all their competitors who had to pay millions for their GHz freqs.

    Usefull links:
    Slashdot: FCC to Reorganize 800 band.
    FCC Options and Alternatives for 800 band

    --
    In nature, there are neither rewards or punishments, there are only consequences.
    1. Re:Questions from the Article by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Right, because Nextel didn't pay anything for their frequencies...

      Of course Nextel deserves compensation for a frequency they licensed that they're being forced out of. How the hell can you argue against that?

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  21. Mainly to broadcast Janet Jackson warnings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10Mhz is just about enough bandwidth to broadcast out the Janet Jacksone / Justin whatshisname MPEG. Then the FCC can levy fines against whomever receives it.
    4) Profit!

    This will pay for itself in about a week.

  22. I see a problem with the FCC "selling" RF spectrum by Polarism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't make much sense to me, if they are supposed to be regulating the RF spectrum, then why are they allowed to sell any of it? That's about the worst thing for the "public" you can let them do.

    If what this article is saying (it does not specifically say anything directly related to a "sale", but pretty much draws the inference on. That would mean Nextel now "owns" that part of the spectrum from the FCC?

    Just sounds fishy, hope i'm interpreting that incorrectly.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  23. Honest question: by shrewmy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sure its been covered before but I must've missed it, but what is the difference between a normal phone call and a walkie talkie phone call aside from the fact we have to hear twice as much of a conversation we don't want to be hearing in the first place? I was at a wake tonight and sure enough BEEPBEEP loud walkie talkie talking BEEPBEEP.

    1. Re:Honest question: by Twench · · Score: 1

      The difference is bandwidth. On the Nextel system, direct connect uses half of the bandwidth of a interconnect call. So, Nextel charges a much lower rate and bills direct connect usage to the nearest second. Several of their plans offer "Unlimited Direct Connect" for a very reasonable price (if you consider any of Nextel's rates reasonable). As for the person at the wake, I find the beepbeep much less annoying and disturbing than a ring tone (particularly the default ones ... ugh).

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't
    2. Re:Honest question: by hugesmile · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have a Nextel... the main attraction to the walkie-talkie feature is that I don't need to dial (or as a recipient, I don't need to answer).

      We rapidly established a protocol at the office where I work, in that you don't start talking without doing a silent Alert first. So if I want to walkie-talkie someone, I Alert them, they answer (if they are in a position to), and then we talk.

      This avoids the random voice blurting out in a meeting, except for MORONS who randomly Direct Connect the WRONG NUMBER (who ARE These morons??)

      Since their Direct Connect Number appears on my phone, I have added them to my phone directory (Moron1, Moron2, etc), so I can see if there are repeat offenders. When I am ready to turn in my phone for good, I am going to spend the prior week calling all these MORONS back in the middle of the night, and blurt out idiotic stuff like they did. Especially Moron3 - He has made the same mistake about 10 times!

    3. Re:Honest question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At work we have a batch of phones that are literally sequential in terms of phone #s and DCD #s. One afternoon a lot of us happened to be together and this gang banger was, literally, walking DCDs, incrementing by 1 each time, trying to find some other gang banger. After the fourth phone chirped by this guy we'd had enough and started screwing with him. "Your mother", "I know where you live", "come down to (such & such) street and I'll pound you", at which point he apparently stopped and went down there. Maybe he started some crap with some random gang member and got killed in a turf incident, I dunno, but we never heard from him again.

    4. Re:Honest question: by fldvm · · Score: 1
      Nextel... the main attraction to the walkie-talkie feature is that ...(you) don't need to answer...We ... established a protocol ...where ...I Alert them, they answer (if they are in a position to), and then we talk.

      Wow your protocal is so much beter than vibrate and voice mail on my cell phone ...

    5. Re:Honest question: by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      How do you connect without dialing? Just curious. Really my biggest question is why a walkie talkie? Why not just make it work like a normal phone?

  24. Nextel gets a steal by fishbert42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, Nextel a mere $1.6 billion for bandwidth rights which should've cost somewhere between $3 billion or $5 billion.
    "Oh, the poor emergency responders! Of course we'll trade bandwidth with you... it's for the good of the nation."
    Give me a break!

    Verizon must be pissed.

    1. Re:Nextel gets a steal by Durrik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Verizon is probably just pissed because they don't like competition. As for the 1.6 vs 3 billion, I'm not sure its that big of a steal. The 800 MHz mobile band is much more valuable then the 1.8 GHz PCS band, from the providors point of view.

      One of the rules of RF cost/design is that as frequency goes up the electronics to increase the power and quality of the signal goes up, while the cost/size of the antennia goes down. The problem is, that the cost goes up faster for the electronics then the cost goes down for the antennia.

      So they gave up an 800 MHz block that would probably be worth at least 1.5 to 3 billion to them, and bought another block. The money almost works out the same. What would have really sucked for Nextel and probably what Verizon wanted was for them to give up the 800 MHz block. And then lose the auction for the new block, cutting Nextel out of the market and reducing competition.

      Also the higher the frequency the worse it is for distance. I can't remember the exact figures but I think for PCS you need 3 - 4 times the number of base stations as you need for the 800 MHz band.

      As for upgrading the customer's phones, it won't be much if they already support the new band as many newer phones do. If they don't the customers are going to have to get new phones. In BC when Telus upgraded their PCS base stations to 3G the old 2G phones wouldn't work. They gave out their cheep phones to the old customers and didn't make them get a new contract. Nextel can do the same thing.

      For the phones that already support the new frequency. The new frequency plan can be downloaded over the air during off hours, or even when the customer is talking on the phone.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    2. Re:Nextel gets a steal by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I'm quite sure, if they ask the FCC nicely, the FCC will happily remove Verizon's 850MHz allocation (you know, the bands they received by default because they, for the most part, are made up of various old Bell companies who all got nice "B" frequency allocations) and give them some crummy 1900MHz spectrum instead.

      Verizon doesn't have a leg to stand on.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Nextel gets a steal by b1scuit · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nextel isn't really getting that great a deal. But it's not a bad deal, either.

      They're spending close to $5B in spectrum and cash for a solid 10MHz block in the 1.9GHz band. The spectrum that they're trading in (non-contiguous chunks in the 600-700MHz bands) is woth about 1.6Billion, sure. But the cost of retuning all those other license holders is gonna run close to $3.2B. And if Nextel doesn't spend that much while doing this switch, then they have to pay the diff. to the treasury in an anti-windfall payment.

      Did Nextel (and the FCC) way undervalue a solid 10MHz block in the 1.9GHz band? Yes. But Nextel isn't walking away with this spectrum, either. It's gonna cost them $4.8B to do this, any way you look at it. That's not chump change.

    4. Re:Nextel gets a steal by cdogg4ya · · Score: 1

      Nextel is not getting a trade for trade deal out of this. The FCC valued Nextel's spectrum around $1.8B and the new block around $5B (which is funny since that is the amount that Verizon suggested they would open the BIDDING at). Nextel has to put up the cash for the difference.

      Verizon Wireless doesn't like this because they want to buy the spectrum but they have no chance because the FCC is only giving Nextel the option to buy it. Nextel IS getting the better end of the stick here in the fact that they don't have to pay MARKET value for the spectrum, but they are giving up PRIME spectrum for it.

      I don't work for either, I work for another competitor.

  25. Story Title by modest+apricot · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one who saw the story title and thought, "hm, bandwidth swap?...swingers....kinky..."?

    1. Re:Story Title by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yes. PLEASE seek some professional help!

      --
      My other car is first.
  26. Re:Beep Beep! by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

    If he leaves it somewhere and it's beeping incessantly, you've showed great restraint in not smashing it to pieces. Me, I just turn it off if somebody leaves one and it won't shut up.

  27. Well you see by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be against the Constitution, you know, that pesky little document that is the supreme law of the land. In Ammendment 5 it declares "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." This is why you are paid if a city emmenent domains your house to build a highway. They'd much rather just force you out and not have to pay. That would be better for the public good, since it wouldn't require using taxpayer dollars to pay for your house. Rather unfair to you, hence why Ammendment 5 is in there.

    Well, same basic protections apply to corperations. When they buy something, be it land, or slices of RF, they expect that it then belongs to them. Now they can face emmenent domain too, but just like individuals, they need to be compensated. If you get down to it, it's just basic kindergarden level concepts of fairness. You don't take something from someone without giving them something in return.

    And trust me, you don't want a government that can just take shit for "the public good" because that WILL get abused.

  28. Re:I see a problem with the FCC "selling" RF spect by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    This has been the FCC's way of dealing with spectrum allocations since the Clinton administration...

    They're trusting the free market economy to decide who needs the bandwidth the most... an auction shows who is willing to pay the most for the right to use it, and assures the government gets the most money possible out of the transaction.

  29. Re:I'm so lonely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSD, is that you? I thought you were already dead.

  30. Nextel Plans by SolidCore · · Score: 4, Informative

    Federal regulators said that they would vote next week on a proposal aimed at resolving problems with cellphone interference in police and fire communications systems. According to an agenda released, the FCC vote will come at the agency's monthly meeting. Nextel Communications is largely blamed for causing the interference. Radios used by police, firefighters and other first responders broadcast on the same 800 Mhz spectrum as Nextel phones. So, if a radio dispatch is made at 850 Mhz near a cell tower broadcasting at 851 Mhz, the radio signal can be drowned out. The commission is expected to approve a Nextel backed plan in which the company would abandon some of its airwaves in exchange for more lucrative spectrum in a band that won't disrupt the radio communications of emergency officials. Nextel would be relocated to more valuable spectrum in the 1.9 Ghz frequency range, where most other cellular companies operate. Nextel's competitors, Verizon and Cingular Wireless, have staunchly opposed the move.

  31. Uh oh... by stienman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nextel and FCC Swap Bandwidth

    FCC has reportedly denied having mono, and sources claim that HIV test results should be available soon.

    -Adam

  32. Somewhere in Denver... by Talisman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, we've got a head-on collision on I-70. Multiple casualties. Can you respond?"

    Unit 9: "Roger that, dispa...zzzzzfffzzzkkkkkrkrkk...so I'm all like WHATEVER! he wasn't even cute enoug... Dispatch? Did you copy?"

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, negative. There appears to be interfe... and then he CALLED me and asked me out aga OH hold on, got another call *click* Hello? Hey babe! Yes, I watched American Idol last night. Can you BELIVE that bitch won?!?"

    Unit 9: "Dispatch come back. Got chatter on the frequency."

    Dispatcher: "Roger that, Unit 9. Hold on a sec. (alters voice) This is Nextel customer service. Sorry to interrupt your call, but we are investigating cloned numbers and we think you may be a victim. Can you please verify your billing address for us?"

    Female teen voice: "OMIGOD where did that come from hahahaha! OMIGOD OK it's 5233 South Downing Lane."

    Dispatcher: "That will be fine, ma'am. We'll be with you shortly. Unit 9, standby. SWAT, we've got what looks like a drug deal gone bad at 5233 South Downing Lane. Advise that you have permission to use deadly force and should go in locked, cocked and ready to rock."

    SWAT: "Roger that, dispatch." (sounds of guns loading)

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, we've got a head-on collision on I-70. Multiple casualties. Can you respond?"

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
    1. Re:Somewhere in Denver... by groovestone · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would someone moderate a rendition of emergency services and cell phone cross talk "offtopic" Don't drink and moderate!

    2. Re:Somewhere in Denver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give you a 10 !!! And you know whoever the moderator is it is probably that girl and she is pissed. Can you get out of your contract with nextel if it is terroristic ? Well for her it is too late.

  33. FCC to blame by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe that in this case the FCC is entirely to blame. Isn't it their chartered duty to make sure that crap like this doesn't happen.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  34. Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by usurper_ii · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny thing about the whole deal. I work for a 2-way radio company that has a table in a back room full of 800 Mhz radios. The radios came from companies that were using them. When Nextel purchased the 800 Mhz spectrum, we (back before I started) had to sell all of these companies new radios in a different spectrum. Well, Nextel has yet to build out in my area and it has been several years since all of this took place.

    I overheard some of our current customers complaining that they thought the whole deal was phony and created to sell them new radios. And I could see where they are coming from since Nextel didn't build out and it has been years, it does make us look a little bad (each one of the radios on that back table is hundreds of dollars, so this was a *huge* amount of money spread across a lot of companies).

    It would be almost a kind of irony if Nextel's customers had to buy new phones. First it makes companies have to spend a lot of money, then it turns around and makes consumers spend a lot of money.

    Maybe Nextel's catch phrase should be: Nextel, we make a lot of money change hands.

    (And if anyone was wondering, the 800 Mhz radios can be used for non-profit emergency-type stuff (VFD, first responders, sheriff, etc.), so my company has just started building out an 800 Mhz system and has started installing all of the radios and is eating all of the installation cost!)

    Usurper_ii

    1. Re:Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nextel do not use CDMA or GSM, they are the only company to use a TDMA network which runs at 800Mhz.

      TDMA has no real path to 3G and beyond hence the company was stuffed for the future. They have been after a freq change for years away from 800Mhz.

      So, the bottom line is, yeap, everyone will have to change handsets not just because of the freq change but also a change in the air interface.

    2. Re:Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      First off, you know GSM (original, not the 3G versions) is a type of TDMA standard, right? And that the 3GSM standard is generelly implemented as a CDMA?

      Verizon/Sprint CDMA is actually called IS-95.

      The TDMA you're thinking of (AT&T's) is actually IS-136, previously IS-54.

      Nextel uses a modified standard (based on TDMA methods, but not compatible with IS-136/IS-54, which also run in the 800-900 MHz band). TDMA isn't getting shafted because it runs higher in the 800 MHz band (closer to 850), further away from emergency frequencies.

      Nextel's plans, last I heard, involved overlaying a 3G network onto their existing spectrum. This will obviously be easier to do now that they've got new spectrum to work with. I would bet that it'll be like the AT&T TDMA-GSM transition - a long period of overlap, followed by a slow phaseout of the last few TDMA customers as their phones die.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb asses, Nextel is setting itself up to be purchased. 10MHz nationwide of spectrum is worth $$$$. Remember, Verizon said they would be willing to pay ~$7B for the deal Nextel got... Nextel will be purchased by someone and my bet is T-Mobile...

    4. Re:Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Nextel would be an expensive acquisition in an industry that's already in the middle of a cutthroat price war.

      Remember, Nextel has (by many measures) the *best* customer base of any of the providers - they have the highest revenue per subscriber of any carrier, and tend towards more business customers (generally more stable than consumers). They might prove to be more expensive a company to acquire than the revenue warrants, though.

      That said - were someone to purchase them, the only difference to the Nextel customers, at least at first, would be the name on the bill. My comment re: transition plans would go ahead in exactly the same manner if they get bought.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  35. Re:I'm so lonely by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    I do wonder if this is genuine or not. If so, whoever you are, we need more than an AC post signed "JD in NYC"...

  36. Re:Beep Beep! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    Belive me, I would have loved to. If it was someone i didn't like/would never see again it would have been tempting.

    I didn't dare mess with buttons, like i know what the heck they do.

    I'm in general a nice guy. I would bury it,and leave a note on his computer about it.

  37. Re:Please, I need your help! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
    Heh heh.... ooookay. I guess that means you don't make comments like this one over on technocrat? ;-)

    I've disabled ACs over there. So, we don't have to snuff the pesky things :-)

    Bruce

  38. Push-to-talk bandwidth by saikou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So in worst case scenario Nextel PTT service would be hit. More grief to local construction crews, some joy for people eating out at local chinese buffet [Prr-BEEP] JOHN GET YOUR $%^$ HERE, MIKE JUST SCREWED UP THE LINING ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
    But seriously -- this plan is quite old.
    See this article (Motorola drops 800 MHz bomb)

  39. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't laughed so hard in a long time!

  40. Re:Beep Beep! by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

    The symbol on a power button is pretty universal.

  41. Nextel is Paying $2.5 Billion for the Switch by IsaacW · · Score: 1

    The /. article title is misleading. Nextel is going to pay for the new spectrum. According to the linked article, the FCC valued the spectrum Nextel would receive at $4.8 billion and valued the spectrum Nextel would give up at $1.6 billion. Nextel pays the difference, probably discounted a bit because of the cost of upgrading their network equipment to the new allocation.

    So guess what? Nextel is paying an upcharge for the "good spectrum" based on the value of the "bad spectrum" that they had already licensed.

  42. Re:Beep Beep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a side note, the picture of a penis on men restroom doors would be much more universal than some matchstick men.

  43. Re:Beep Beep! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't dare mess with the buttons? What kind of geek are you?

    Mr. Ballmer, is that you?

  44. Hey Bruce, by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ever since I saw you in the hit independent movie Revolution:OS, I've wanted to rape you against your will. How does that appeal to you?

    --