Slashdot Mirror


Language Tempest At Orkut

Quirk writes "Reuters is carrying an article outlining an ongoing headbutting session between English-speaking users of Goggle's orkut and the Portuguese-speaking users of Brazil. The orkut site has more than 769,000 members; 41.2% are Brazilians and 23.5% are Americans. The sites are now mostly in Portuguese, and English-speaking users are complaining that the service is intended to be in English. Orkut is a service meant to develop by way of invitation, and the Brazilians claim since they are inviting their Brazilian friends it doesn't make sense to communicate in English. Brazilian internet users averaged an estimated 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans."

140 of 948 comments (clear)

  1. Article text posted here for your convience by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 3, Informative

    SAO PAULO, Brazil (Reuters) - Brazil has butted heads with the United States this year on issues ranging from cotton subsidies to the war in Iraq .

    But perhaps none of the battles has been so personal as the one being fought on the Internet.

    Thousands of Brazilians have become devotees of Orkut (http://www.orkut.com), a popular new social-networking site from Web search leader Google Inc.

    Orkut allows members to organize themselves into online communities of friends, and friends of friends, to discuss everything from chess to sandwiches.

    But the rush of Brazilians to join Orkut and rival social networking sites has upset some online users, who complain of a proliferation of messages posted in Portuguese, Brazil's native tongue.

    Some users have even started communities specifically for people to air their gripes on this issue.

    The United States has at least 153 million Internet users, compared with Brazil's 20 million. Still, Orkut said Brazilians dominated its membership roster in June, outnumbering Americans for the first time.

    The site says it has more than 769,000 members, making it one of the largest and most popular of its type on the Internet. About 23.5 percent of the users are from the United States, while another 41.2 percent are Brazilians.

    Iranians are a distant third place at about 6 percent.

    SELECTIVE MEMBERSHIP

    Orkut, named after Google software engineer Orkut Buyukkokten, made its debut in January and is still in the testing stages. Part of its allure is its exclusivity -- one can only join at the invitation of another member.

    "Orkut maps one's social prestige, and Brazilians are by nature gregarious," said Beth Saad, a professor at the University of Sao Paulo's School of Communications and Arts.

    Although more than one-fourth of Brazilians live in poverty, those who can afford Internet access have become avid Web surfers.

    In terms of time spent on the Internet, Brazilians edged out the United States in May for the second month in a row, according to Ibope/NetRatings. The market researcher estimates that Internet use for Brazilians averaged 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans.

    The number of Brazilian visitors to community sites and online diaries rose 14.6 percent to 3.5 million in May from January, Ibope/NetRatings said.

    Tammy Soldaat, a Canadian, got a sample of Brazilian wrath recently when she posted a message asking whether her community site on body piercing should be exclusive to people who speak English.

    Brazilian Orkut users quickly labeled her a "nazi" and "xenophobe."

    "After that I understood why everyone is complaining about these people, why they're being called the 'plague of Orkut,"' she said in a site called "Crazy Brazilian Invasion."

    John Gibbs of Mountain View, California, has founded a community called "So many Brazilians on Orkut."

    "When the average Orkut user goes to look at community listings to see what's out there, he'll see a list populated with pretty much all Portuguese communities," Gibbs said. "This is highly frustrating since Orkut is not a Brazilian service."

    But Mateus Reis, a publicist who lives in Sao Paulo, said users should be free to write what they want, in the language of their choosing.

    "Since we can invite anyone we want at Orkut, and my friends are Brazilians, it doesn't make sense talking to them in English," Reis said in Portuguese. "I use the language I know."

    His compatriot Pablo Miyazawa has a more moderate view.

    "Brazilians have the right to create anything they want in any language they want," Miyazawa said. "The problem is to invade forums with specific languages and write in Portuguese. Brazilians are still learning how to behave in the Net."

    AN INTERNET FORCE

    The Brazilians' ardor for the Internet extends to other community-based sites, and Web ent

  2. Language barrier by Monty845 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How have other major international sites dealt with the language barrier?

    1. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Set up a localized site, e.g. www.orkut.br where everything's in Portuguese

    2. Re:Language barrier by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny
      How have other major international sites dealt with the language barrier?

      Você americanos sujos pensa de que você possui tudo, e Slashdot, mas é justo não assim.

      Fure seu hegemony internacional e seu McDonalds e seu Hollywood onde o sol não brilha.

      Pela maneira, eu sou amor o Mac Grande e esse Julia Roberts!

      [Google "translation" of above: "You American dirty think of that you possess everything, and Slashdot, but is just not thus. Hegemony pierces international its and its McDonalds and its Hollywood where the sun does not shine. For the way, I am love Mac Great e this Julia Roberts!"]

      [Original English source for the "Portuguese" response produced by Google "translation": "You dirty Americans think that you own everything, including Slashdot, but it's just not so. Stick your international hegemony and your McDonalds and your Hollywood where the sun doesn't shine. By the way, I'm loving it the Big Mac and that Julia Roberts!"]
    3. Re:Language barrier by 0racle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might have had a point if English wasn't the accepted norm for international communications and just something the States imposed on everyone. However English is the accepted language, so it makes sense that sites that are targeted at an international audience use English or keep everyone apart and just have localized versions. Not that I really care, I'm never invited to anything.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you're assuming that everyone who uses the net is using it for international communications. Many people could care less about people in other countries, and use the net for a plethora of non-international reasons. There's no reason for a Brazilian to use a non-native language which is the norm for international communications to talk with another Brazilian across town.

    5. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck, considering all the times I've corrected other people on that, here I go making the same damn mistake myself. Next thing I know I'll be saying "same difference". Sorry. I knew better; I just slipped.

    6. Re:Language barrier by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5
      Many people could care less

      Couldn't care less.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you. The problem is that, from the article, people are being harassed by Brazilians for being, or thinking about going, English only.

      This whole issue will go away as soon as Orkut opens to the public and the Brazilians become minority users.

    8. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why should english be primary language for international sites?

      Only relatively small group of people use English as native language.

    9. Re:Language barrier by PatientZero · · Score: 2, Interesting
      China or India could possibly submarine this argument, but I do believe that both of those countries have quite a few regional dialects to keep it valid in that neither has one language that the whole population speaks. I have nothing with which to back this up, however.

      Given that caveat, I would say that more people on Earth speak English than any other language. If the goal of the site is to create the largest international audience possible and help them to converse with each other, then English is the best choice.

      And before you start claiming this is American imperialism (of which there is plenty already), you can thank the good ol' English from England for it. :)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    10. Re:Language barrier by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Uhh... there are alternate language versions of Slashdot. The English one just happens to be the original and the largest.

      See www.slashdot.jp and so on.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    11. Re:Language barrier by kyknos.org · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it is probably not wise in this case. it shall be an internet community site and making barriers based on country borders in internet is imho futile. may be it wont take long before portuguese (or chinese, european or anything) will be majoriry language in internet in general. prepare for that. the only thing you can do now is to try fight back and invite english speaking friends. waht about me? well, its not my native language, but the native one - czech, is so small tah it cannot be dangerous in the next 500 years. And I would appreciate orkut invite.

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    12. Re:Language barrier by Oligonicella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No. Care had an older meaning in English. The phrase "I don't care to" currently means that one does not want to do it, but originally meant that one did not care (have a concern about) about doing it.

      "Would you bring ice cream to the picnic?"
      "I don't care to." - (I don't mind)

      It's still used that way in parts of the midwest US.

    13. Re:Language barrier by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > And you're assuming that everyone who uses the net is using it for international communications.

      When you are usign an international site like for example Orkut, or to quite some extent, Slashdot, yes definitely.

      > Many people could care less about people in other countries, and use the net for a plethora of non-international reasons.

      Why should i use English in an interntational forum or social networking site when talking to a fellow DUtchie?

      When the conversation is private, there is no problem in that. When it is on a public forum, we should be using English, or we shoudl setup our own forum.

      Why? because it is the only way in which things will ever work at all.

    14. Re:Language barrier by Nailer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or better yet, orkut.us, where the minority USA folk can go. :^)

    15. Re:Language barrier by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should english be primary language for international sites?

      Only relatively small group of people use English as native language.

      While it is true that there are only around 400 million native speakers of english in the world, there are also between 0.5 and 1.0 billion people who have been schooled in english as a second language.[1] There is probably an equal number of people who know english well enough for commerce and technical communications.

      A very interesting thing is that there are at least twice as many people who are fluent in english as a second language as there are native speakers of english. I think that is very rare for a living language; I'm not sure it has ever happened before.

      The way english is evolving is now more influenced by people who use it as a second language than it is by native speakers. The rate at which new words and expressions are coming into the language has never been higher; there is also a rapid acceptance of new alternate syntaxes, grammars, and spelling that I think is very unusual.

      I for one welcome the new expressions our Brazilian internet users could bring to english (if they choose to mingle with the rest of the world).

      [1]Start with Wikipedia's article and work your way through the links...

    16. Re:Language barrier by e_AltF4 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the whole point is that Orkut.com seems to be in English, and considering that .com is supposed to be American, I think that it would makes sense that the common language be English.
      Nice try, but wrong.

      USA is supposed to be in .US

      Commercial entities are supposed to be in .COM

      There is no .AM for "American" - .AM is Armenia
      Call me pedantic, but .com is not .us :-) Fore more details see Wikipedia.

    17. Re:Language barrier by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Set up a localized site, e.g. www.orkut.br where everything's in Portuguese

      If I go to "www.Google.cm", becasue I'm in Hong Kong I'm immediately bounced to "www.google.com.hk", which is in Chinese by default. You may gather that I'm not Chinese, speak little and read less. Even if I go to the English version of this site, I rarely want to find Hong Kong sites at the top of the list (and when I do, I know how to do that). Another site that used to guess my language preferences from my IP was Distrowatch that also gave me a Chinese version of their site, with no way to change to English (Language selection reverted after selection)-- this bug has apparently been fixed, just checked it while getting the URL and saw English there for the first time.

    18. Re:Language barrier by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually prefer the data from the CIA Factbook: (Especially, since that page gives the impression it is from 1997)

      Chinese, Mandarin 14.37%
      Hindi 6.02%
      English 5.61%
      Spanish 5.59%
      Bengali 3.4%
      Portuguese 2.63%
      Russian 2.75%
      Japanese 2.06%
      German, Standard 1.64%
      Korean 1.28%
      French 1.27%

      note: percents are for "first language" speakers only

      These numbers I assume also take into account people who are living out side the "typcial area" for their language (for instance, why would you (apparently) not count the spanish speakers living in the USA?)

  3. Why Fight? by Cavio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are communicating with others in your circle of friends, you should speak the same language.

    If I'm in a restaurant, and the people at the table next to me are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect the conversation at my table in the slightest.

    I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    1. Re:Why Fight? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the people at the table next to you are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect you. If your table is speaking English, that doesn't affect the other tables. But if the waiter only speaks Korean, it does affect you.

      Not knowing anything about Orkut, and not reading the article (surprised?) I would suggest that they handle this like they handle their existing site - offer it in as many languages as they can/want and let the users live with the choices.

      There's no reason to offer a site like this in just English or any other language.

    2. Re:Why Fight? by MrFlannel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the article. It mentions the fact that its more like the persons sitting next to you at the table, begin to try and speak to you in korean, and then expect you to be able to bend over backwards to communicate with them.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    3. Re:Why Fight? by John+Meacham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As universal languages go, lojban is much more interesting conceptually.

      http://www.lojban.org/

      or, if you are more visual, you might want to check out bliss-symbols.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    4. Re:Why Fight? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny
      If the people at the table next to you are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect you.
      Though when people nearby are speaking a language you don't understand, and looking in your direction, and laughing and pointing, well it's hard to not imagine things.
    5. Re:Why Fight? by driptray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its more like the persons sitting next to you at the table, begin to try and speak to you in korean, and then expect you to be able to bend over backwards to communicate with them.

      No, it's like the people at the table next to you start speaking to you in Korean, and because you don't know Korean you make a complaint to the management of the restaurant. There is no expectation on the English-speakers to bend over backwards, or do anything at all.

      But even that analogy isn't quite correct. I think the English speakers are upset because they are creating forums in the hope of developing communities of people they can be a part of, and their forums end up being overtaken by Portugese speakers. And so they are excluded from their very own creation.

    6. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, I find it really arrogant that people are complaining about how others communicate between themselves. It's not like every American tourist that visits a foreign country starts speaking that nation's native tongue even when just talking to their travelling companions, is it?

      As an Orkut member I do find the behaviour of some of its users annoying (Orkut-wide and community-wide spamming by a very small handful of people, people who ignore the rules of the communities that they join, etc) but I find that it's not that inconvenient compared to what I've got out of my Orkut experience. I've made at least a dozen real-world friends that I regularly go out with, and several more that are online only at this stage, and that's only after three months' membership.

      Yes there are plenty of Brazilians on the site, and yes, they do have a tendency to join every community that even half interests them (it's like some people play a game of "let's see how many communities I can join", and they seem to do the same with collecting friends too) but that's not just a trait exclusive to them: users of other nationalities can be just as bad.

      I'll also point out that Portuguese isn't the only non-English language used on Orkut. I've seen several, including ones that you wouldn't immediately think of, such as Arabic.

      Live and let live is what I say. On Orkut and elsewhere.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Why Fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak XML, my friend, only XML. After all, conversation is data and XML is a language for data exchange. Think of all the advanced transformations you could do with that data.

    8. Re:Why Fight? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.

      If we're talking about computer geeks, then Klingon or Elvish will be more common.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:Why Fight? by duffahtolla · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yeah! everyone knows english is the only language all people should be expected to know!

      I know that your trying to be sarcastic, but I did find this to be true. I did an 11 country tour of Europe a while back and I never had any problems communicating in English. If one person couldn't understand me, a passerby would eventually over hear and graciously translate.

      I doubt this would be the case if I spoke chinese, japanese, hindi, or in orkuts case, portugese.

      Of South America, I've only traveled to Chile and Venezuala, but my experiences their were even more english friendly. People would insist on speaking English so as to brush up their skills. I speak far more Spanish here in Miami than I ever did in South America.

      I'm not saying English 'should' be the most universaly accepted language, but it does seem to fit the role pretty good.

    10. Re:Why Fight? by polveroj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As universal languages go, lojban is much more interesting conceptually.

      Conceptually, yes, but Esperanto would be better in this case. Learning lojban requires you to really think about the grammar and memorize the roots. Esperanto, on the other hand, is Indo-European enough for speakers of English and Portuguese to learn quickly, and they don't need to learn the theory behind its sentence structure. As Linux has shown, people want to be able to use things without knowing exactly how they work, and this applies to languages too.

    11. Re:Why Fight? by doormat · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yea but thats not whats happening. Its more like...
      • Start conversation with a bunch of people from around the world, speaking english, on some particular topic (ie Simpsons, Slashdot, etc)
      • Large number of Brazilians come in and hijack the group, flooding it with messages in Portuguese
      • Group becomes unusable for english speakers all around the world (not just us Americans)

      If the Brazilians were nice enough to fork and create groups that discussed topics in Portuguese, it wouldnt be a big deal. Orkut should have an upgrade right now, providing an "official group language" field for groups, so one can tell if they're joining the "Simpsons - English" or "Simpsons - Portuguese" groups. But many of the Brazilians walk in, act like they own the place, and hijack Orkut. I dont use it anymore for this reason.
      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    12. Re:Why Fight? by bman08 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's funny, most of the people I meet on the internet seem to speak asshole fluently.

    13. Re:Why Fight? by wmspringer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Iranians also; they seem to have hundreds of people on their friend lists and I keep getting mails sent to "friends of friends" that I can't read :-p

      For the most part, though, they speak English.

    14. Re:Why Fight? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      All of your analogies are wrong. Really, it's like a balloon and...something bad happens.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    15. Re:Why Fight? by coaxial · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I find it really arrogant that people are complaining about how others communicate between themselves. It's not like every American tourist that visits a foreign country starts speaking that nation's native tongue even when just talking to their travelling companions, is it?

      Well I'm an Orkut member and I'll tell you what the problem is. The problem is that your inboxes are constantly filled with Portugese spam that is sent to "foo community." Every community has its share of Portugese spam. Whether it's US specific or not. It's really annoying. An easy fix would be language specific communities, but everyone is too lazy to join thoses...

    16. Re:Why Fight? by hennar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      let me guess, you went to Barcelona, Paris, London, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen and the like (eg, the capitals of western Europe). As a European citizen, I'll paint you another picture: south of France, countryside in Spain, Italy (you don't have to go to the countryside there), countryside in Denmark, Switserland. when you leave Western and Southern Europe behind, and head to Eastern Europe, the knowledge of English is even less! (I only have experciences of Romania, Hungary and Czech Republic) I've been to all of these countries, and in each I've had problems using English, in some I've even had problems using anything but their own language.

    17. Re:Why Fight? by igrp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Orkut should have an upgrade right now, providing an "official group language" field for groups, so one can tell if they're joining the "Simpsons - English" or "Simpsons - Portuguese" groups.

      It already does in a way. When you create a new group you can select the interface language. This does, however, not show up when you're not the community's creator.

      If you join a community that has a Spanish interface, chances are communications there will be in Spanish.

      I agree though that this doesn't really help with the problem at hand which is people taking over English-speaking communities and flooding them with foreign-language content (which is probably one of the rudest thing you can do on Orkut, as far as I am concerned - it's not that hard to start your own community).

      Google's Orkut dev team should probably have a look at this when they redesign the community section (and they should really really implement sub-categories while they're at it).

    18. Re:Why Fight? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, sounds just like Americans in a non-English language usenet group - without the bitching about the stupid language people keep using.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    19. Re:Why Fight? by prockcore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's like the people at the table next to you start speaking to you in Korean, and because you don't know Korean you make a complaint to the management of the restaurant.

      Nonsense. Brazillians are entering established communities and spamming them. It'd be much different if they set up their own communities.

      So it's like the people at the table next to you sat down at your table and started yelling at you in Korean. No shit you're going to complain.

    20. Re:Why Fight? by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Funny
      [I]t's a selfish idiot problem.

      That's pretty much the root of every human-related problem I've ever encountered.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    21. Re:Why Fight? by steffl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not a problem: people using different languages when talking in private/closed group.

      problem: if there is a forum (community) and most of the people are from all over the world and the language used is english it doesn't make much sense to jump in using a different language (which is what I see on orkut).

      It's kinda like if I replied to you in my native language - what sense would it make? Chances are you wouldn't understand it and most of the slashdotters wouldn't understand it either...

      On the other hand: some people have their profiles in languages I don't understand and I don't think that's a problem, I assume that if I don't understand their profile it wasn't written for me.

      erik

      --
      ...all excited, don't know why...
    22. Re:Why Fight? by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a friend who would slip into French trying to bug me. I simply dropped into German. It ended quickly.

    23. Re:Why Fight? by bodrell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nonsense. Brazillians are entering established communities and spamming them. It'd be much different if they set up their own communities.
      Nonsense. Posts/threads in a non-English language are NOT spam. You just feel excluded since they can communicate multi-lingually, and you can't be bothered to try to learn another language.
      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  4. Microcosm by toasted_calamari · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's interesting, Orkut seems to be mimicing "real world" human society. This fight over languages looks a lot like the conflits over immigration that happen in every country. If anything, I would take this latest conflict as proof that internet forums can function as true communities, analogous to those in the physical world. In that sense, I consider this development to be an accomplishment for Orkut.

    1. Re:Microcosm by toasted_calamari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was thinking of American history. In the early 20th century, there was a tremendous amount of immigration into the United States. Many people were sharply critical of this, arguing that america was by and for only Americans. The immigrants argued that it was as much their country as the native citizens.

      Fast forward to 2004, Orkut, a community that was originally primarily english speaking recieves huge influx of brazilian "immagrents" The english speakers argue that their community was by and for English speakers. The brazillians argue that they were invited and that the community is now also theirs.

      Notice a parallel?

    2. Re:Microcosm by jdwest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anecdotally, from an Asian graduate professor I had years ago, the difference in the previous emigration cultures of then (Germany, Italy, Poland ...) to the predominant ones today (Asian, Mexican) is that it was "forbidden" to speak their native tongue around children. The unspoken mandate was, for assimilation in this country, one had to lose the language and the accent. Economic survival was paramount to early immigrants, as they had no one else to lean on.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  5. maybe Im missing something by Derg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but due to the friend based invite model that this site employs, maybe the english speaking memebers of the site should start inviting more english speaking people, to equal if not overtake the brazillian tally.

    Just a thought

    --
    I'm a little tea pot.
    1. Re:maybe Im missing something by jrockway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the non-English speakers are irritating. One private messages me in broken "english" for a gmail account (why me? what an ass... anyway).

      I reply to him and tell him I don't know what he said. The reply?

      "That's not my problem if you don't understand, I don't know how to speak english very well, I think so...=x bye ihihihihihihh see ya"

      Not your problem if I don't understand? You're asking for me to give you a present and then you flame me for not understanding your poor attempt to speak my native language? That IS your problem!

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:maybe Im missing something by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Americans are irritating. One decides that he wants to invade Iraq on a whim and creates the mother of all shit storms. The next thing you know the whole world's a potential warzone. But that's OK, because him and his oil buddies will do alright out of it in the long run.

      See how stupid it is to generalise about a group of people based upon the actions of one individual? Just because one Portuguese-speaking idiot spammed you asking for a Gmail account that doesn't make all Portuguese-speakers idiots or spammers, does it? And, if your experience is anything like mine, you've received plenty of spams from Gmail account beggers that are from Americans too, it's just that they've not had a problem communicating their stupidity to you.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:maybe Im missing something by Anomalous+Communard · · Score: 2, Informative

      More likely, given his self-confessed and clearly evident lack of mastery of English, that he was trying to say that it's OK that you're unable to grant his request ("not my problem" == "I'm OK with that").

      Never attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity.

  6. Didn't our mothers teach us.. by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to share and get along with others?

    Don't like the foreign users? Ignore them or move on.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  7. our just desserts by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like we haven't done it to everybody else.

    oh, and it's not Goggle...

    1. Re:our just desserts by UncleOzzy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's also not dessert. You know what they say about glass houses...

    2. Re:our just desserts by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen the beautiful Brazilian women? That's the only language I really care about. I say MORE Brazilians on Orkut.

  8. Texto do artigo para seu convience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    O SAO PAULO, Brasil (Reuters) - Brasil butted as cabeças com os estados unidos este ano nas edições que variam dos subsídios do algodão à guerra em Iraq. Mas talvez nenhuma das batalhas foi assim que pessoal como essa que está sendo lutado no Internet. Os milhares dos brasileiros têm os devotoes tornados de Orkut (http://www.orkut.com), um local novo popular do social-social-networking do líder Google Inc da busca da correia fotorreceptora. Orkut permite que os membros organizem-se em comunidades em linha dos amigos, e dos amigos dos amigos, para discutir tudo do chess aos sanduíches. Mas as arremetidas dos brasileiros para juntar Orkut e locais sociais do networking do rival viraram alguns usuários em linha, que se queixam de um proliferation das mensagens afixadas no português, lingüeta nativa de Brazil's. Alguns usuários começaram mesmo comunidades especificamente para que os povos arejem seus gripes nesta edição. Os estados unidos têm ao menos 153 milhão usuários do Internet, comparados com o Brazil's 20 milhões. Ainda, os brasileiros ditos Orkut dominaram seu roster da sociedade em junho, outnumbering americanos para a primeira vez. O local diz que tem mais de 769.000 membros, fazendo lhe um do maior e mais popular de seu tipo no Internet. Aproximadamente 23.5 por cento dos usuários são dos estados unidos, quando outros 41.2 por cento forem brasileiros. Iranians são um terceiro lugar distante em aproximadamente 6 por cento.

    SOCIEDADE SELETIVA Orkut, nomeado após a Software Engineer Orkut de Google Buyukkokten, feito seu debut em janeiro e está ainda nos estágios testando. A parte de seu fascínio é seu exclusivity -- um pode somente juntar no invitation de um outro membro. o "Orkut traça o prestige social de one's, e os brasileiros são pela natureza gregarious, " Beth dito Saad, um professor na universidade da escola do sao Paulo's das comunicações e de artes. Embora mais de um quarto dos brasileiros vivam na pobreza, aqueles que podem ter recursos para o acesso do Internet têm surfers de correia fotorreceptora avid tornados. Nos termos do tempo gastados no Internet, os brasileiros afiaram para fora dos estados unidos em maio para o segundo mês em uma fileira, de acordo com Ibope/NetRatings. O investigador de mercado estima que o uso do Internet para brasileiros calculou a média de 13 horas e de 51 minutos em maio, oito minutos mais do que para americanos. O número de visitantes brazilian aos locais da comunidade e aos diários em linha levantou-se 14.6 por cento a 3.5 milhões em maio de janeiro, Ibope/NetRatings dito. Tammy Soldaat, um canadense, começou uma amostra do wrath brazilian recentemente quando afixou uma mensagem que pergunta se seu local da comunidade na perfuração do corpo deve ser exclusivo povoar quem falam o inglês. Os usuários brazilian de Orkut etiquetaram-na rapidamente um "nazi" e "xenophobe." "After que eu compreendi porque todos se está queixando sobre estes povos, porque they're que está sendo chamado o 'plague de Orkut, "' disse em um local chamado o brasileiro "Crazy Invasion." John Gibbs do Mountain View, Califórnia, fundou uma comunidade chamada o "So muitos brasileiros em Orkut." "When o usuário de Orkut da média vai olhar listas da comunidade para ver para fora what's lá, he'll vêem uma lista povoada com muito bonito todas as comunidades portuguese, " Gibbs dito. os "This estão frustrando altamente desde que Orkut não é um service." brazilian; Mas Mateus Reis, um publicist que viva no sao Paulo, os usuários ditos deve estar livre escrever o que querem, na língua de seu escolher. "Since nós podemos convidar qualquer um que nós queremos em Orkut, e meus amigos são brasileiros, ele doesn't fazem o sentido falando a eles em inglês, " Reis d

  9. But what about... by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Finnish?

    1. Re:But what about... by E_elven · · Score: 4, Funny

      For those not in the know: 'orkut', in Finnish, is a vulgar expression for 'orgasm'.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    2. Re:But what about... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And in dutch, phonetically, it means 'ear-cunt' :
      Properly spelled it would have to be 'oorkut' though.

    3. Re:But what about... by michajoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, "Finish" is a synonym for "Orgasm"

    4. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, orkut is the plural form "orgasms". An orgasm would be orkku.

  10. solved by jjshoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I solved the problem by changing the communities i run to English only. While this does not enforce people to speak in english it at least informs everyone the language they should be talking in if they dont expect their post to be deleted. I guess i'm missing the breaking news behind this.

    I think what would be more intresting is the rate at which amercians populated orkut vs brazilians

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  11. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is it with google and these services were you have to "know somebody".

    Half the reason I like forums on the internet is I don't know anyone there and I don't have to.

    I can pop in, post some shit, read some responses and then go back or not.

    I don't want to go on the internet with people I already know from real life. I go on the internet to get away from that. Just show up, discuss something and then leave. Like a bar or something.

    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason, I would guess, that Google is interested in social network based systems is because they are looking at the Semantic Web idea (or at least some of the technologies).

      FOAF is an effort by Dan Brickley/Libby Miller/Many others to create an open way to describe people - the world wide FOAF as opposed to the WWW. It shows the power of RDF in a practical (and fun!) way.

      Now, Lets say I'm Google. I spend millions on maintaining my marketshare with R and D; I'm going to realise sooner or later that gossip is a powerful communication tool. Friends talk to friends. If your friend gives you something, you are far more likely to accept it. If you make it so you can only get it from your friends, its a commodity.
      How do I leverage cutting edge ideas and attract users?
      and *bam* there we have it.

  12. Two separate sites? by 56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't they just give their users the ability to filter by language? If you don't want to see the brazilian posts, you should be able to filter them out.

  13. More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language. I'm a firm believer of "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" and when I visit abroad I try to speak as much of that nation's language as possible and keep a dictionary handy. I wonder if this is just another show of our much detested arrogance...

    1. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language."

      I'm sick of hearing this stereotype because all one has to do is look at a globe and it becomes obvious why we're not so fluent in other languages. It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country. That's no small chore. I've been to Brazil twice, and each time it cost me $1,200 just for the ticket AND 24 hours transit time.
      All it takes is a little understanding, yeesh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:More American Arrogance? by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya well I'm sick of hearing Americans whine about stereotypes and attempting to act hurt because 'nobody likes me.' Truth is Americans that show up somewhere, act like they're god and expect everyone to do things their way is the *norm*. If you actually make any sort of effort to learn something about the locals, you are in the minority. As such, it is to be expected that they are not going to want to have anything to do with you. Its a reputation your country earned so live with it. Your so proud to be an American, thats what you associate your self with by proclaiming it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:More American Arrogance? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed the point entirely. The point is that the typical American has to travel a lot further to get somewhere where his native tounge is not the most common lanaguage than a lot of other people do. I'd be fluent in other langauges too if there was more of a need. For most others, learning a second language isn't just an elective thing - it's a necessary thing.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:More American Arrogance? by Attaturk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sick of hearing this stereotype because all one has to do is look at a globe and it becomes obvious why we're not so fluent in other languages. It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country. That's no small chore. I've been to Brazil twice, and each time it cost me $1,200 just for the ticket AND 24 hours transit time.

      Sorry but geography is a pretty poor excuse. You could always have tried harder at school. =P

      Seriously though, from my experience it is more a matter of education than geography.
      Being English, English is surprisingly my first language. But I picked up much more French and German at school than I ever did in my adult life despite latterly travelling to both countries and indeed working and living in both for a time. And with a half-decent background in Latin I find most languages with their roots in Europe to be pretty easy - and that applies for countries I've never been to such as Brazil, for example. Learning something is never a handicap - not learning something is.

      Personally I think it's a cultural problem faced by the U.S. as a whole. As an observer it seems to me that American schools revere sports much more than they do anything else. You need to worship jocks less and geeks more IMHO, but surely that's de rigueur here at /. ;-)

    5. Re:More American Arrogance? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rest of the world doesn't care if the average American can speak their language as well as English. What they care about is that the average American tourist visiting their country can't speak anything but English, is reluctant to even learn even two words of Mexican/French/Spanish/German/Italian/whatever, yet expects everyone else to be able to understand what they're saying to them.

      You know, I didn't detect that sort of attitude from NanoGator. All he did was offer an explanation why things are the way they are - I can drive for an entire week and remain within English speaking areas - except for isolated pockets in cities, I would have to drive over 1000 miles to reach a non-English speaking area (Mexico). No wonder most people don't pick up a second/third language. I also don't know that your stereotype is accurate - it may be that you remember the obnoxious tourists, but the nice ones may have been German or something. I haven't been to europe, but when I go, I'll happily butcher 3 or 4 romance languages, then speak some passable German.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:More American Arrogance? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please point out what FEDGOV agency is doing this promoting? In the USA, it's mainly the corps doing the promoting and isn't most of the promotion in English?

      And besides, if we are as bad as you think we are why does your country keep allowing us to enter to visit those tourist sites?

    7. Re:More American Arrogance? by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (Sorry, I couldn't find a link in a quick search and it's 1 am. Sue me...)

      Realizing that wasn't going to satisfy you cynical bastards, I kept looking and:

      Courtesy of the BBC -- "British 'world's worst tourists'"

      As I'd recollected: Germans the favorite, followed by American, Japanese and Italians.

    8. Re:More American Arrogance? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's funny. I'm in NY and all I have to do is walk 2 blocks to hear people speaking in Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Indian, Afghani, Korean, Hebrew, Arabic...

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  14. It's not intended to be an *English* service... by bc90021 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...it's just intended to be a service.

    The English-speaking peoples of the world need to understand that outside the internet (and soon to be inside) they are a minority in the world. 1/6 of the world speaks Chinese, about the same proportion speaks Hindi, and just under that speak Spanish. While it is common to speak English, it is not the be-all-and-end-all, and people need to start accepting that.

    1. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by character_assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The English-speaking peoples of the world need to understand that outside the internet (and soon to be inside) they are a minority in the world.

      Cool! When can we start demanding our affirmative action and set-aside contracts?

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most Portuguese-speaking people can understand basic Spanish, although most Spanish-speaking people can't understand basic Portuguese. This has something to do with both langages' evolution... Portuguese has more vowel sounds, but vowel to consonant ration is lower than in Spanish. This means Spanish has more redundant information (by Portuguese standards), and Portuguese has more variations (which makes it harder to decode). Their grammars are very similar, although Portuguese is a bit easier.

      That said, there's a transition language, called Portuñol, spoken in Brazilian borders, which can usually be understood by both Spanish and Portuguese speakers. And because of recent Mercosur expansion (and related economic opportunities), Spanish is being seriously considered as a second language by a lot of people in Brazil.

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  15. wanh by eekygeeky · · Score: 5, Funny

    "OK, I onlee kno teh english lang and i wanto no wh4t teh 0thre d00ds r saying!!!!! they sux00r! b1gt1meeee! WTF? OMG? cant tey keep thos guyzz 0ff teh inetrn3t? OMG. OMG." bleh. carl

    1. Re:wanh by FatalTourist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now even Slashdot's going all Portuguese.

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  16. Noticed this else where too by hrieke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I play a few online games and on one server the admin was yelling / kicking those who did not communicate in English.

    It's silly. The internet is global - the first W in WWW stands for World, and the last time I checked English was not the offical language of this planet.

    Those who are complaining should either mellow out or learn Portuguese.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Game server != world. If the admin wants people to speak one language, he's perfectly within his rights to do so... and there are some obvious practical reasons for that policy. What's so hard to understad about that?

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:Noticed this else where too by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      If the admin wants everyone to speak the same language then the server should not be up for the world to use and see.


      Just because the server is available, doesn't mean you have a right to use it. You're a guest. Abide by the owner's requests or go find somewhere else that's more accommodating. Or, better yet, set up your own server run by the rules you find ideal.


      If you think that they're going to cheat by talking in their native language )give out key info / advantage), then of course there are easier ways than by global comms which everyone can see.


      Many years ago, I was playing in a paintball tournament in Germany. It was hosted by the US Army and open to all. A mix of teams from various nationalities ended up attending.

      During one game, my team happened to be going up against a German team. I had found myself managing to sneak in to the middle of the field and had a couple of the German team flanked. As I shot at them, they didn't realize the impacts weren't coming from my teammates in front of them. I took one out. He called himself out as he looked down the line at me in surprise. And as he walked off the field, he said something to his friend who turned to look at him then down to where I was. Too late. I took the 2nd guy out.

      The interesting thing was the referee who was standing further up from all of us. He was a US Army guy and part of the group that were hosting the tournament. He called out in German to the first player I had eliminated. I later found out he was informing the guy that he had earned his team a harsh penalty for talking after being hit.

      The point? People will be rather brazen about their cheating if they think you don't know their language. And, perhaps, especially because you don't know their language.

      As a side note, this wasn't the only time I experienced this theme. My German sucks. But our crew had some very fluent German speakers in our midst. We'd often picked up comments made openly (usually concerning strategy for the next game) simply because they didn't expect us to understand them. Thankfully, few cheated.
    3. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Today Warcraft III, tomorrow, the world! [Teacher in 2098] "Okay, class. Today we're going to discuss the English-Only Holocaust of 2031. It all began with this game server administrator in the 2000's who started to disconnect players for disobeying his English-only rule. Eventually, this hate-filled, power-mad psychopath would put down his Mountain Dew and take up the mantle of a brutal world dictatorship that marched non-English speakers into the gas chambers by the millions. If only someone had stood up to him back in 2004, countless lives could have been saved. But you know what they say: the frog gets boiled because he doesn't realize the water is slowly getting hotter." Just thought I'd flesh out your preposterous hyperbole.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  17. And now for something completely different: by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have only had one experience with Brazilian people online. It seems many .br kids who like to sit in net cafes think it's funny to destroy online communities. Take, for example, the MMORPG Tibia.
    These kids would walk around in-game and, upon seeing someone else, would say "br?". If you answered in English (or anything other than Portugese), they would promptly attack/gang-attack you.
    Somehow, I think something similar is happening here.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  18. Forget Portoguese... Indian is the future(?) by Animaether · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With regards to languages in general, that is.
    ---
    Let me just paste from what I dropped into IRC a while back :
    This is translated from a Dutch 'popular science' magazine (Kijk, for the Dutch viewers) :

    There are many languages in the world. Scientists estimate the number to be around 6,000.
    A few languages are doing very well. Chinese is the biggest language (in terms of numbers of speakers), and will remain so for some time to come. Tamil, Bengal and Malaysian are quickly gaining ground, as is Arabic.
    In contrast are languages (among which many regional African ones) of which on average one 'disappears' every day.
    A surprising find is that English isn't doing very well either. it is expected that by 2050, only 5.5% of the world's population will speak the language at all.

    Speakers in % of the world's population per language:
    1950
    English : 9%
    Spanish : 5%
    Hindi/Urdu : 4.5%
    Arabic : 2.25%

    2050
    English : 5.5%
    Spanish : 5.3%
    Hindy/Urdu : 6%
    Arabic : 5.2%

    Young speakers (age 15-24) in 2050 (x 1,000,000):
    Mandarin-Chinese : 166.0
    Hindi/Urdu : 73.7
    Arabic : 72.2
    English : 65.0
    Spanish : 62.8
    Portuguese : 32.5
    Bengal : 31.6
    Russian : 14.8
    Japanese : 11.3
    Malaysian : 10.5
    ---
    With regards to Orkut : As already stated.. don't bother visiting the Brazilian pages if you can't read them anyway.
    Vice-versa, if the Brazilian would want English readers to read it, write in English.
    ---
    With regards to the French : None of the doctors/nurses who helped a friend who was in a car wreck in France knew English. 'nuff said.
    ---
    With regards to the web as whole : English rules and will rule for a long, long time to come.

  19. Stupid by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ok, I see an article about Orkut. Go to Orkut web site to see what it is about. They tell me GO AWAY. What a nice place!!! In other words, you can't make friends on Orcut unless you already have friends on Orcut...

    This Orcut thingy, therefore, may be good or bad, but since they are a closed (secret) society I see no way to judge it. I just walk away, not to be back any time soon.

    1. Re:Stupid by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I usually don't ask for an invitation into something I didn't check out beforehand. What if the ritual of joining includes a human sacrifice, for example :-)

      Generally, though, Orkut's model presumes that "you are nothing, we are everything". I don't like that. If I can't join (or leave) on my free will, I don't want it. I want to be in control of my life.

      Granted, there are many cases when people must cooperate (and ask each other) to do something. If I want to check in some change on sf.net I'd better ask for write access to the project's CVS. That is understood, because there is a real need to state my cause, and if I am wrong with my changes other people will be inconvenienced.

      But why would anyone be denied an access to a glorified bulletin board? That I can not understand. And I see no reason to restrict access for non-members. For example, hide names & emails of everyone; make it read-only; make sessions short... But as it stands, I see none of it and therefore I see no reason why it may benefit me (or anyone else, to that matter). So why should I bother someone who I don't know asking him|her|it to vouch for myself? That was discussed to death on K5 recently.

    2. Re:Stupid by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now I know that Orkut has its own email :-) Secret society indeed, if such information can be obtained only when an insider talks too much :-)

      Myself, I definitely stopped playing in secret societies at the age of 7 at the latest.

  20. Arguing? by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    May I ask- how do they even know there's an arguement going on? And in what language is the arguement taking place?

  21. Knee-jerk reactions by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We had our fair share of knee-jerk reactions from a lot of people. Some Americans felt (really!) threatened by the fact a non-English speaking country dominated Orkut's stats overnight, and voiced out their frustration in a very vocal manner. Some Brazilians felt outraged and started an equally stupid reaction, flooding English-speaking communities with messages in Portuguese. Perhaps it has happened otherwise, I'm not sure.

    This could be discussed in a more civilized, intelligent way, but (as often happens also in Slashdot) well-thought and valuable opinions are just lost in the noise. Nobody respects anybody, that's what we can get from all this.

    I think it's a shame that a service like this, which can be used to connect people from every corner of the planet, isn't better used. Personally, I'll still try to do the best use I can. Orkut already helped me to find some (long lost) old friends and I'm happy I could find them. ^^

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  22. The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by jefferson · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Maybe the Brazilians are dominating Orkut because lots of Americans, like me, have declined all their Orkut invitations. Friendster swept through my circle of friends a while back. Lots of people joined, and then we discovered that there's not actually anything to do there. Once the novelty wore off, we stopped logging in. Then several people (from a different circle of friends) invited me to Orkut, and I thought "why bother?" and declined the invitations.

    Once the Brazilians figure out how lame and useless these social networking things are, their numbers will drop.

    1. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by escoz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Probably it's lame for americans, who don't see in social networking a big thing. For us brazillians, friendship is by far the most important thing you can have.. and it's not only orkut, but blogs and photoblogs.

  23. Orkut is not public chat by Zeromous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People on orkut should be able to speak their mind, in whatever language they choose. Orkut is not just a private forum, but its also a social experiment. To be honest, I find it fascinating that a demographic war is shaping up. Who will win? ;)

    I would also like to point out that orkut is unlike IRC, where perhaps it would be rude to speak a language in a channel that is prodominently another.
    Flooding a channel with text that is gibberish to the majority of its recipients prevents the free flow of information, defeating communication. It is clear this is not the case with orkut.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  24. Re:sounds like people need to learn some net etiqu by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's also wrong to disrespect other cultures by not even bothering to check how the names of their languages are spelt: would it really have been that hard for you to look at the spelling of Portuguese in the story summary (or even Dictionary.com) before typing your post?

    This isn't a flame, it's just a heads-up that it's small things like this that make others regard Americans as arrogant.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  25. Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by kbahey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unless you have a majority of the visitors / participants that are multilingual capable, you have to separate the content of a web site by language.

    I say this from experience on several newsgroups, then forums over the years.

    It starts out simple: people who are early adopters often speak English, and can read English (e.g. programmers, ...etc. who know English anyway). Then as technology spreads among the less techno-elite, people who do not know English well want to express themselves in their native language.

    In languages that use a non Latin character set, there is a phase where internet communication uses Latin characters to represent their own language. I have seen at least Hindi and Arabic written in Latin alphabet, with some modifiers. (Even some Euro languages lost some characters, like Scandinavian and Germanic languages, where the "O" in Torvalds lacks the stroke in the middle, and the "A" with the small circle, ..etc.)

    There are various "dialects" used in these Latinized alphabets, and people learn one version or the other depending on where they learn it first.

    This becomes a transitionary phase on these forums, where people will express themselves using this Latin based alphabet to represent their own language.

    Then later, as their own language becomes more wide spread and accepted, more people get to use computers and the internet, and they perhaps do not know any language other than their own. This leads to them demanding that only their native language be used in forums that are about their country/society/language/...etc.

    Anyone who speaks a "foreign" language in those forums is reminded that the primary language is such and such, and not to confuse others. Some take this as a matter of national pride, some take it as mere courtsey, others take it as common sense, and yet others take it as a mere form of communication. Depends on who you are, your outlook, and your biases.

    That is what I have seen in several newsgroups/forums over the years.

    So, this is the phase that Orkut is at right now.

    Eventually, they may have to separate the content by language. Although there are barriers here, because Orkut is about "networking", and not just "discussions".

    It would be interesting to see how this turf war gets resolved eventually, at least for those who are like me who like to observe the new frontiers that the internet have defined/merged/melted/setup.

    P.S. In Canada for example, where there are two large groups speaking two languages, a majority of web sites give the option on what language to use at the very beginning. Forums are separated into two languages on many sites. There is a minority who are bilingual and can (and do) participate in the two camps. I imagine Hispanics in the USA, and Spanish speaking Anglos do the same on some forums.

  26. Read that wrong by cosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I first scanned that as "13 hours and 51 minutes a day" and I was like "nah, I don't think I use it for much more than 12 hours."
    Gotta take my eyes away from the screen for a bit...

  27. Wow, Orkut really is popular in Brazil by BigDish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading this article about Orkut being so popular in Brazil, I decided to take a chance on finding a friend I had known for a couple years, but lost contact with after he moved to Brazil. I plugged in his name and *BAM* I see his profile and his picture.
    I sent him a message - hopefully he remembers me and responds. I just thought it was sort of cool to re-find him that way :-)

  28. They havn't. by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I know, wikipedia's articles are completly seperate for diffrent languages. Most sites are single-language only.

    But that could be a solution for Orkut. Just have users select a language when they sign in, and shield them from everything not in that language -- if they choose. They could also set things up so users can let the system know what languages they can speak, and if they would be interested in receiving machine translated communications.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:They havn't. by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      machine translated communications.

      I just had a thought. Lets assume that over the next couple of years machine translation becomes routine in all areas of the internet, and that the internet continues to expand across the globe and into homes and schools. No matter what language you speak, most people speak a different language. Machine translated language could quickly become a substantial fraction of all text anyone reads. In effect machine translation could become the single biggest "language" on the internet, or even in the world. What other sorts of influence could it have?

      Wouldn't it tend to affect and influence those millions of people? What sort of feedback effect could it have on the evolution of spoken languages? Would machinetranslation-isms and machine style begin begin to infect spoken language? Would languages tend evolve to be more easily machine translatable?

      The effect would become particularly pronounced as internet access spreads into primary schools and children are exposed to substantial amounts of machine translation while their language skills are still in the formative stages.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  29. If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then post here. Either I, or someone else, will be likely to come along and drop you one.

    (I'm not implying you want to join, of course ;-))

  30. Well, the English speakers have a point by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    English is the international language. It is, by far, the most spoken second language. It is the international language of finance, bussiness, diplomacy, flight and more.

    The problem is that there are just too many languages for a person to speak them all. Most people have trouble with more than 3 or 4, even if taught from birth (it gets more difficult later) and 15-20 is pretyt much the limit for even exceptional people.

    Thus there is no reaonable way you can expect everyone to know Portuagese, or any other language. However you can have a reasonable expectation that most people will have at least a functional proficency in English. Thus, if you wish to communicate with a worldwide audience, English is the language you should choose.

    I'm not saying people should always have to use English on the Internet, but it IS rather annoying to have people expect you should know their primary language when they want to communicate. I've had this problem in MMORPGs. People want to speak to you in French or Japanese or Korean or Spanish and so on. Problem is it is just unreasonable to ask a person to try and learn every one of the hundreds of languages on this Earth, much less the reality that most people DON'T know more than 1 or 2 languages.

    However, it's a fair bet most people have at least a basic English proficiency, and thus should be the prefered choice for online discourse if you intend to reach a worldwide audience.

    1. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by driptray · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to assume that when somebody speaks to you in a non-English language that they are either (a) expecting you to know their language, or (b) demanding that you learn their language.

      I don't think either of these assumptions is true. They're just trying to communicate the best way they know. If you can't speak their language you could politely say so ("sorry, I don't speak Portugese/French/etc."), or just say nothing.

    2. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UN has 6 official ass, one of them happens to be French. The others are English, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, and Arabic.

      If you're going to correct someone, you should get your facts straight.

    3. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by gujo-odori · · Score: 5, Informative

      Excuse me, but as a the holder of a degree in Linguistics, I can tell you that those are the numbers for *native* speakers.

      However, it is correct that Mandarin Chinese is the most widely spoken native language on earth. However, it's also worth noting that nearly all of those native speakers live in one country, and most of the rest live in countries are adjacent or very nearby.

      Native English speakers, on the other hand, live in many countries all over the world. The largest geographically contiguous block are in the United States and Canada, but they are also in many other countries.

      The numbers on native speakers of English and Spanish are also accurate if outdated; they are roughly equal.

      However, it's when you bring in all of the non-native speakers that English shows its international dominance. English is by far the most widely spoken second language in the world. Nearly all speakers of Spanish, Mandarin, and Hindi are natives, but there are more non-native than native English speakers in the world.

      With regard to the language of Diplomacy, you're wrong there, too. French *was* the language of diplomacy for many years, but is so no longer and has not been for decades. It was replaced by English. If French is in fact the official language of the UN (you don't cite a source, but I'll take your word for it; I'm too lazy to cite sources tonight myself), that's the only place left in diplomacy where that is still true. Go to any embassy or consulate in the world and you can probably find someone on the staff who speaks English; you'd be hard put to find someone on the staff who speaks French, unless:

      A) It's located in a Francophone country;
      or

      B) It's a French embassy or consulate.

      I know a number of people who speak Japanese as a second language, a few who speak Mandarin and/or Cantonese as a second language, a couple who speak German as a second language and a few who speak Spanish as a second language, but the only French speakers I know are all natives. French just is not a terribly important international language anymore. That's not a criticism, just an observation; French is only important in Francophone countries.

    4. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Ciel · · Score: 2, Informative

      straight up, no. french is the most spoken second language. and did you ever notice that the english translation comes second at the olympics?

      This is grossly factually inaccurate and it's hard to imagine where you ever came up with such an idea.

    5. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Clueless_Medic · · Score: 3, Informative

      The population of India is near enough a billion really & you will find that Hindi is a federal imposition, it might be the national language but I guess only around 25% of the population speak it. And in some states it is enough to get you blacklisted if you insist on using Hindi!

    6. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, English is slowly on the way out. This is nothing new, it has occupied a place taken by Greek, Latin, classical Arabic, French in different areas of the world and times of history. Simply, on a global scale.

      The choice of international language is mostly due to social dynamics, and the rise of China as an economic power is going to have consequences. Either they learn English, or we learn Chinese (besides I've been told that some parts of Chinese are quite easy - not the writing of course...). Spanish is becoming more and more widespread in the US; who knows, in a few generations there won't be any USofA, there will be EUdeA (Estados Unidos de América).

      As one living in a country different from my native one, I can say that most people in large countries don't really speak English - they merely improvise. They can order a coffee, but cannot withstand a real conversation, not with ease. It might be enough to survive, but not to say that "you speak the language".

      Me, I still wait for the day someone finally realises that languages are tools as hammers and printers, and takes a rational perspective at it. Esperanto is indeed better fit as an international language than any ethnic language, not because of any superior mind behind it, just because it's engineered to be easy. However, given the current situation, it's easier for each one to learn English than convincing the world to use Esperanto.

      But again, as G.B. Shaw put it,

      Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world; unreasonable people try to adapt the world to themselves; thus, all progress is due unreasonable people.
      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  31. Well by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With gmail, I think it was

    1) an attempt to prevent the service from growing to fast. Most websites grow slowly, and that can help them fix problems. But with Gmail, everyone was going to get an account as soon as possible. So the invite system helped them moderate growth. Somewhat.

    2) It made a gmail account something precious. And made people want it. It was good marketing.

    I actualy got invited to orkut (intrestingly by my autopr0n.com usernmae, rather then my real name). It was pretty annoying, and I gave up on it quickly.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  32. The world needs to understand by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That whatever their primary language is, it is not the primary language of most of the world. Whatever your native language is, even Chinese, there are more people in the world who that is NOT their native language.

    So, this leads to a problem, how to communicate with the world. We all have different native languages. Well there has been, and is, a solution. English, while not even close to the largest primary language is by FAR the largest second language. Nearly every industralized nation, and many third world nations, teach English as well as their native tounge.

    Thus English is the international language. All air traffic control is done in English (so no matter where a plane comes form or goes to the crews can communicate), Likewise bussiness is conducted in English when there is a language disparity. If a Japanese bussiness does bussiness with China, English is usually the language of exchange since Chinese is very rare in Japan, and Japanese is very rare in China.

    So when one wishes to speak to an international audience, on the Internet for example, English is the best choice. Demanding that people learn your native tounge is unreasonable, as there are so very many (hundreds, if not thousands) languages out there. It is beyond the capability of any one person to learn them all. Even the most talented translators usually don't know more than 20, and they are extreme cases.

  33. Re:Surely Google can address this technologically by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course they could come to an agreement with Alta-Vista, or some other company, and perhaps provide a link on every posting to view the posting in some other language, via BabbleFish.

    Not being an Orkut user, it doesn't really matter to me however. I think it would be great if google would post a confirmation request as part of the user submitting the posting in Portugese, or Big5, that states in 'English' something along the lines of:

    Your posting appears to be in Launguage Below the preview of your posting, is a BabbleFish translation of your posting in English. As the creator of the group you are posting to has indicated that English is the prefered language for the group, the BabbleFish translation is what will appear. If you wrote this in a language other than Language please select the correct language for your source post, so we can show you what may be a more accurate translation of your posting. The Moderator has indicated that if someone posts to this group in a language other than english, or includes profanity in the post, that post is subject to being deleated.

    Likewise for other languages as identified relavent to the group being posted to, and it's language preferences.

    For groups where 'any' language may be appropriate, a request to identify what language the user is posting in (defaulting to the language preference of the user) and a warning that the translation to other languages may not be completely accurate, would probably suffice.

    Then again, if I just stir up the coals a little bit more, perhaps I will get more people fighting. Ah well, crazy talk.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  34. Take slashdot for an example by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's one way of thinking about it. It seems the article is talking about users complaining that in a forum that started out as English, Portugese comments get posted and the language shifts to Portugese. I tried to imagine this happening on slashdot (for example, on this thread). At first I thought it wouldn't be any big deal. But then I thought, what if I was following a thread on slashdot, and suddenly it switched to Portugese. It'd be kinda like threadjacking. It's annoying to read an English thread, then someone posts a response in Portugese, because then I can no longer follow the thread. I'd like to read what that person said, but I can't. And any Portugese speaking people who were commenting would probably switch to Portugese if they posted any more comments too. Maybe I'll post something in English, and the response will be in Portugese. It really comes down to netiquette. Sure they have a right to comment however they want, it's just not polite to switch languages mid-stream. If you reverse roles (e.g. suppose I can read Portugese) and I post English comments in a thread that's all Portugese, then people start switching to posting in English, that would leave out all the Portugese-only people. Although creating a separate area may help somewhat, a better solution to the problem is just informing users how to behave better. If it was common knowledge, the community would police itself and frown upon that kind of behavior. I know polite internet conversation seems like an oxymoron to many, but for all the trolls and BS that gets posted on slashdot, it's pretty readable, and well-thought out arguments still happen.

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  35. Orkut has a much more annoying language problem by dirtsurfer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Orkut doesn't support international character encoding, so if you and your friends speak a language that doesnt use the Roman alphabet (Japanese or Chinese, for example), then you're just screwed.

    It's crazy seeing all these Japanese Orkut users (there are quite a few) posting to each other in romaji and broken English.

  36. Re:Typical Slashdot anti-American bias... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why did they list *just* Americans? Why not the British and the English speaking part of Canada and others? Why turn it into America vs Brazil when it doesn't need to be?

  37. That seems fine by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like a valid solution to me.
    And of course, it also seems perfectly valid for others to set up Portuguese-only, French-only, or whatever-only communities.
    I belong to some English-only communities, and to some Portuguese-only communities.
    Those are the only two languages in which I am capable of contributing. I guess I could probably follow discussions in Spanish or French, and I could probably get the gist of what was being said in Italian, but I am not capable of responding in any of these languages, so I only look at communities in English and Portuguese.
    It doesn't bother me if there are communities that speak any of the multitude of languages I don't speak. I don't get why some people from the country where I was born (USA) think everyone should speak their language in every community and discussion on Orkut.
    I'd like to point out that even if Brazilians were forced to have all their discussions in English, many of them would still be "Greek" to most Americans. For example, I belong to a community called "São Paulo odeia Paulo Maluf" ("São Paulo hates Paulo Maluf"). It's a place to talk about one of the politicians running for Mayor of São Paulo, and there are some pretty entertaining discussions going on there now. While most Brazilians know who Maluf is, and everyone in São Paulo has an opinion about him, most Americans haven't got the faintest idea of who he is (and I suspect they don't care, except that he's of Middle Eastern descent). So why on Earth should discussions in that community be in any language other than Portuguese?!

    --Mark

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  38. Tendência muito natural by pandemonia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Acredito que se trata de uma tendência absolutamente natural na evolção de qualquer rede social. O fato dos brasileiros terem tomado o lugar dos alemães ou indianos, foi parte por timing, parte por coincidência. Como um outro comentário mencionou, muitos norte-americanos acabaram ignorando convites para o Orkut por causa da febre do Friendster que já tinha passado por eles, enquanto essa febre jamais chegou aqui no Brasil.

    (espero que tenha bastante brasileiro por aí com pontos para moderar. abraço.)

    --
    -mz
    1. Re:Tendência muito natural by e.colli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oi! Achei muito interessante a tua tese. A minha idéia era que nós brasileiros poderíamos ser por natureza muito mais sociáveis que outros povos. Aposto que isso vai gerar muito assunto para pesquisa. E infelizmente não tenho pontos para moderação. ;)

  39. Happens everywhere, not only in Orkut by efbrasil · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm a brazilian, who lives in Brazil, in Rio de Janeiro, a city where lots of tourists like to spend their vacations. Many of these tourists happen to be americans, of course.

    The great majority of the americans tourists come to Brazil without knowing a single word in Portuguese, which happens to be Brazil's official and only language. (this also apply to tourists from other countries as well)

    And i've never seen any brazilian complaining when a american tourist go, let's say, to a restaurant and try to speak in English with the waiter, although he's not talking brazilian official language. (and this happens a lot)

    I think it's the same situation.

    Oh, i also think that orkut-based spam in Portuguese sucks. But it sucks because it is spam, and not because it's not in English.

  40. Our usenet 10 years ago by KaSkA101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems they just got the internet and are acting like we did 10years ago when we first got it here, they just don't know the mannerisms of the net yet.

  41. I have and Orkut account! by coopaq · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend invited me to Orkut. I signed up. It was fun. I logged on to message boards. Jimmy has a cat. It was fun like this post. People have pictures. It is neat. I like socks. Will you be my friend?

  42. This should be a business decision by TVeil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this talk about which language to use seems to me to miss the point. If 40+% of a business's customer base speaks a certain language, it makes sense to me to not alienate that market segment and instead appeal to them. Imagine if McDonald's said "we are an American company and insist that everyone who comes to our restaurants speak English no matter where they are." The Internet is obviously a global market place. A company that makes their product difficult to use for their customers is missing an opportunity which another business will eventually take advantage of. Maybe even a foreign business...

  43. Do you have Korean inlaws? by Skim123 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Because you just described what basically all non-Koreans go through when meeting the Korean extended family for the first time. Sitting there, having Mr. Kim and Aunt Park having an animated discussion in Korean that ends in laughter and a finger pointed squarely at you.

    I speak from experience. :-)

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  44. Linguistic Descrimination by LuYu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This statement is incredible:

    English-speaking users are complaining that the service is intended to be in English.
    Intended by whom? Since when are discussion forums "intended" or "required" to be exclusively in English. Is enabling communication not the point of the Internet?

    If these were French Canadians talking about "language preservation" in Canada, most English speakers would think they were absurd. Now, when the situation is reversed, English speakers think they have the right to behave in the same absurd way.

    These English speaking Orkut users are really being unfair. The fact that they cannot read Portugese is a result of the English speakers' ignorance and not the fault of the Portugese speakers. The Portugese speakers should be able to post in any language they like. If the English speakers do not like it, they can learn Portugese or use translation software to get an idea of what was said.

    These English speakers had better get a clue. Online, you are exposed to the whole world, not just your boondock neighborhood. People speak lots of languages. If they choose to remain ignorant, they should not blame others for that chosen ignorance.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:Linguistic Descrimination by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, when the situation is reversed, English speakers think they have the right to behave in the same absurd way.

      That's the problem with people in general: They want things cushy for themselves, even if it means a great inconvenience for a lot of other people. I've seen it in whites, latin-americans, blacks, americans, europeans, south-americans, asians, homosexuals, heterosexuals, religious people, athiests, rich, poor, educated, uneducated, skinny, fat, tall, short, and everyone in between. In fact, the person who can say "This sure is inconveniencing to me, but to change it would bother a lot of people even more" seem to be an extreme rarity these days.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  45. Non-issue with simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a total non-issue and anybody who gets worked about it is - quite frankly - a complete idiot. If these people want to lock themselves out of communicating with the rest of the world, who is to say that they are not allowed to do so?

    And the solution is totally simple. Orkut just needs to add a data field to users profile called "language". Every user is expected to set this field to the language his profile is written in. Also, every user gets a field to select what languages he speaks.

    Then, on a search, you can choose to either get "all matches", "matches in languages I speak", or "matches in specific language X".

    Problem solved, everybody will be happy.

  46. Time should fix it. by zxflash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems the Brazilians have a little racket for the time being but isn't it likely that things should adjust themselves as the Orkut population becomes more diverse?

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
  47. Hey! Lots of brazilians don't speak English! by felmasper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that many of you are forgetting the fact that many Brazilians (probably most of them) don't master the English language well enough to write using it.

    In fact many of them can hardly read/understand English. In fact, really, some can hardly write in Portuguese!

    That's why I believe that this is not being done on purpose or by pride. It's just that brazilians don't feel confortable writing in English.

    Of course there are some lammers thinking this issue is kind of a game to be won. But they are few (at least I hope :-).

    Besides, topics in orkut tend to be informal, and when you need to say something informal, with slang, etc. it's much easier and better to use your first language.

    Anyway, language is for us to understand each one better, not the opposite.

  48. Nope that is bad manners by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The first thing anyone with at least some social skills should learn is how to ask in the local language if that person speaks another language.

    Just starting to babble in your own language to someone who may or may not speak it is the hight of impoliteness. You always ask in the local language wether someone else speaks your language or another mutual language. How am I supposed to know that your speaking god knows what or even asking me a question? You might be warning me that I am about to step into some dog shit or a nutcase.

    The only exception perhaps is english in holland. You can pretty much take it for granted that nobody in the world speaks dutch and english is pretty much a second language to us. We also don't really mind, we are a small nation in a big world and either we speak english or become like the french. Easy choice eh?

    Anyway this is all about speaking in the real world. Personally I think it would greatly help if people tried to speak in english on the net. Why? Esperanto or whatever is deader then dead dodo on the day of the dead. Bury it already. The net is about exchanging information easily and accross the world. Bit hard if we are going to keep up the existing language barriers. Imagine if everyone on /. posted in their local language. It would die an instant death. Most amazing are the anti-socials who go to an english forum then post a question in their own language and wonder why no-one responds.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  49. Re:what the fuck are you talking about. by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Funny
    perlchild: I speak two and a half [languages] myself. [Proceeds to misunderstand and argue against autopr0n's original post]
    autopr0n: Are you illiterate?

    Looks like English is that "half" language. ;)

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  50. Re:solved? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And never the twain shall meet, or get to know each other...

    I strongly believe that a great many problems (especially wars, terrorism, etc) could be solved by people just getting to know each other better. Seeing that while yes, there are differences between them (some irreconcilable, perhaps), there are also a great many similarities; we're all human, after all.

    If you can get the general population to realise that actually, there's nothing to hate or fear of people just because they're different, you'd find that the leaders have a much harder time of causing trouble. Not forgetting that tomorrow's leaders are today's Joe Bloggs - get them understanding other cultures now, you'll have less trouble if they end up in positions of power. (That works both ways, of course - each culture should understand the others)

    But no, you're right - you just continue to foster your separatist attitude and separatist communities, and let other people do the hard work of trying to get people from different cultures interacting.

  51. Ashamed to be a brazilian by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    from FYI's Blog [ fyiblog.blogspot.com ], translation by me:

    -----------

    "The Brazilians in Orkut"

    For some reason I still do not grasp entirely, Orkut became a craze in Brazil. Nothing against the site, I also am a member, but suddenly everyone is talking about it. It became so pop, even Veja [Brazil's most important magazine] published an article about it.

    Thus far, that's ok. However, most of these people have not joined it to know people, or to take part in the discussion groups. They are only going to make a ruckus out of it.

    Dont ask me how this nonsense began exactelly, but all of a sudden I started getting emails inviting me to "join the brazilian movement in Orkut". It seems the idea was that we should invite other brazilians to enter in the site, to make the number of brazilians bigger than that of Americans.

    For what, you ask? Ah! It seems that someone named Gary, supposedly an american, somehow insulted the brazilians there. He said that we were a bunch of dicks who start speaking portuguese in american groups, something like that.

    And to prove that we are not ignorant indians, but educated and intelligent people, which better reply of the one than... to beat the USA in sheer statistics?

    The Saga continues, and it seems that Gary person was banished. However, "Gary's followers" started showing up.

    One of the countless messages I received came from one of these followers. I found interesting as the such individual had a nazi-styled photo, and had poor english. Tracking his messages, I found he spoke portuguese! It seems he had studied in Brazil (huh?), therefore things were like that.

    But that was just the beginning! Now, whenever I log in, I receive dozens of messages telling me I should change my photo to a flag of Brazil in the september 7th [brazilian independence day], or that I should change my photo to a flag of Iraq (?), or change my photo to a pic of the twin towers in the 4th of july!

    Seriously, why is our concentration of stupidity so high? I check the profiles of the senders of those childish messages expecting to find 15-year-old brats, and find 30-year-olds.

    Why can people from Iran, Japan, Slovenia, India, etc, keep civil, while we get in this nonsense? Ah, this bloated ego of ours... or, more precisely, our inferiority complex.

    And again, the joke is on us.

    -----------

  52. Oh yikes I hope you said this wrong by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Filter people based on their nationality. Yikes. The human race already has far to much liking to filter the world according to groups. Do we really need to make this even easier?

    Oh I don't like french, filter french people. I don't like americans, filter americans.

    Humans are talkers and we need to talk, there is just one hurdle remaining and that is a common language (love is but aids is killing that one plus gf tends to be rather unsupporting of me going talking to that blonde with the intrestting tits^H^H^H^H^Hdialect).

    English is of course acceptable to everyone who speaks it but to those who don't it is a difficult one to pick up, and human beings being the selfish assholes they are, and they would prefer the english speakers to learn their language.

    The truly insane want everyone to learn esperanto. A language nobody finds easy and no established base.

    Personally I am dutch so english is the natural choice for me. (dutch is far far to difficult for the foreigners to learn without very good training, it can be done but you need an expensive course)

    What I am wondering is if brazillians learn english as a second language like we do in holland and are just either poor students or incredible assholes (speaking english to an american isn't kow-towing, it is showing you are a smarter, a truly cultured person doesn't limit himself to one language). Oh well people being anti-social on the net, what a suprise eh?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  53. WTF are you guys thinking? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A quick search for females on Orkut yielded the following results.

    female, 20, single
    Brazil

    female, 18, single
    Brazil

    female, 22, single
    Brazil

    female, 25, single
    Brazil

    female, 28, single
    Brazil

    female, 22, single
    Brazil

    And most of the pictures are rather... nice. I dunno about you guys, but I'm going to go learn some Brazilian now!

  54. Re:Surely Google can address this technologically by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google can do it by themselves already.

  55. Iran? ! by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most interesing line in the entire article " Iranians are a distant third place at about 6 percent", and no one even seems to notice?

    Iran number 3 on Orkut! Hello! THAT is the story I wanna read!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  56. Not an Issue to Me by bedouin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I maintain a couple groups on Orkut, and at one point two Brazilians were speaking and commented, "I'm not sure how to express this in English." I quickly chimed in and basically said, "Then say it in Portuguese; if the content is juicy enough, the English-only speakers can paste it into Babelfish." I don't know Portuguese by the way.

    There's no reason multiple languages can't coexist in one forum. I suppose others are annoyed when they're the linguistic minority for a change though. Seriously, get over it; maybe you'll actually learn something new, even if it is only a word.

  57. Proposal: Language and language-filter settings by Blackheart2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am on Orkut, and I don't care if members there speak Portuguese, English, Korean or Swahili. I speak several languages, and I don't believe everyone in the world needs to speak English.

    What I do care about is the fact that every day my Orkut mailbox is filled with mass-mailed messages addressed to "Communities" and "Friends of friends" which are written in Portuguese, and therefore of no interest to me. More than half the messages in my box fit this description now. I find it extremely irritating; it's a step away from spam.

    What Orkut needs is:

    1. a language ID attached to each message/mail,
    2. a "default language" setting for each user which gets attached to each message they post, and
    3. a user setting which allows to filter out messages and mail posted in languages which a user cannot understand.

    This would solve the problem, and, I imagine, greatly reduce bandwidth (or, rather, increase useful bandwidth) since it can be done server-side.

    --

    BH
    Fools! They laughed at me at the Sorbonne...!

  58. Latin Difference by Via_Patrino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "In the early 20th century, there was a tremendous amount of immigration into the United States"

    The difference of that immigration from latin immigration is that latin people keep their culture (language) toward generations.

    About Orkut, I think it's indeed a "nazi" attitude to force someone to talk a language they don't know or segregate them in guetos (create a new group).

    It may look easy to "talk in english" but for a non speaker it takes about 4 years to learn and anyone that speak a foreign language knows that's much easier to understand (listen/read) than to talk (speak/write), as is much harder to express yourself when you know (manage to remember) a small vocabulary.

    So is not a surprise that a brazilian, when having problems expressing himself, starts talking in portuguese because he has a good chance of being understood and also can express his ideas better/faster.

    Since portuguese seens to be the dominant language, even if that isn't the official one, in pratical it becames the standard one. Like native languages in many african countries and english in the internet/business/scientific.

    That difficult in learning a "foreign" language is the same (or worse) for any other language except for Esperanto where you need just one year to reach the same level of understanting, because its gramatic/vocabulary were made to be easy to learn.

    But the "english speakers overlords" (including those which didn't know it before but learned) don't want to abdict their status and learn another language.

  59. An easy solution! by hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The easiest solution I see, is for Google to create an universal translator system, tied into their Google translation engine, to automagically translate the non-native posts into your own native language, when you log into Orkut.

    Problem solved.

    They're always looking to find new services to extend their Google Portfolio, and this would be a worthwhile one.

    For posts in English, to Brazilian readers, it would simply translate that way as well..

  60. Correction by Pac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be "chuta os gringos de merda".

    I don't know how many languages you can curse in, but from my experience Americans, French, Polish and Mexican (and mostly every other nationalyty) online players are just as annoying. I am yet to see a group of tennagers that can not be described as "Rude, arrogant, xenophobic, obnoxious", Americans most of all. I left the "racist" out because I believe it is out of place, specially for Brazilians (unless you believe "American" is a separate race - "gringo" means mostly "American" but can also be used for "foreigner").

  61. Which continent is Brazil in ? by DVega · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "41.2% are Brazilians and 23.5% are Americans"


    Sorry, I missed the episode when Brazil was evicted from America

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!