Slashdot Mirror


Language Tempest At Orkut

Quirk writes "Reuters is carrying an article outlining an ongoing headbutting session between English-speaking users of Goggle's orkut and the Portuguese-speaking users of Brazil. The orkut site has more than 769,000 members; 41.2% are Brazilians and 23.5% are Americans. The sites are now mostly in Portuguese, and English-speaking users are complaining that the service is intended to be in English. Orkut is a service meant to develop by way of invitation, and the Brazilians claim since they are inviting their Brazilian friends it doesn't make sense to communicate in English. Brazilian internet users averaged an estimated 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans."

656 of 948 comments (clear)

  1. Article text posted here for your convience by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 3, Informative

    SAO PAULO, Brazil (Reuters) - Brazil has butted heads with the United States this year on issues ranging from cotton subsidies to the war in Iraq .

    But perhaps none of the battles has been so personal as the one being fought on the Internet.

    Thousands of Brazilians have become devotees of Orkut (http://www.orkut.com), a popular new social-networking site from Web search leader Google Inc.

    Orkut allows members to organize themselves into online communities of friends, and friends of friends, to discuss everything from chess to sandwiches.

    But the rush of Brazilians to join Orkut and rival social networking sites has upset some online users, who complain of a proliferation of messages posted in Portuguese, Brazil's native tongue.

    Some users have even started communities specifically for people to air their gripes on this issue.

    The United States has at least 153 million Internet users, compared with Brazil's 20 million. Still, Orkut said Brazilians dominated its membership roster in June, outnumbering Americans for the first time.

    The site says it has more than 769,000 members, making it one of the largest and most popular of its type on the Internet. About 23.5 percent of the users are from the United States, while another 41.2 percent are Brazilians.

    Iranians are a distant third place at about 6 percent.

    SELECTIVE MEMBERSHIP

    Orkut, named after Google software engineer Orkut Buyukkokten, made its debut in January and is still in the testing stages. Part of its allure is its exclusivity -- one can only join at the invitation of another member.

    "Orkut maps one's social prestige, and Brazilians are by nature gregarious," said Beth Saad, a professor at the University of Sao Paulo's School of Communications and Arts.

    Although more than one-fourth of Brazilians live in poverty, those who can afford Internet access have become avid Web surfers.

    In terms of time spent on the Internet, Brazilians edged out the United States in May for the second month in a row, according to Ibope/NetRatings. The market researcher estimates that Internet use for Brazilians averaged 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans.

    The number of Brazilian visitors to community sites and online diaries rose 14.6 percent to 3.5 million in May from January, Ibope/NetRatings said.

    Tammy Soldaat, a Canadian, got a sample of Brazilian wrath recently when she posted a message asking whether her community site on body piercing should be exclusive to people who speak English.

    Brazilian Orkut users quickly labeled her a "nazi" and "xenophobe."

    "After that I understood why everyone is complaining about these people, why they're being called the 'plague of Orkut,"' she said in a site called "Crazy Brazilian Invasion."

    John Gibbs of Mountain View, California, has founded a community called "So many Brazilians on Orkut."

    "When the average Orkut user goes to look at community listings to see what's out there, he'll see a list populated with pretty much all Portuguese communities," Gibbs said. "This is highly frustrating since Orkut is not a Brazilian service."

    But Mateus Reis, a publicist who lives in Sao Paulo, said users should be free to write what they want, in the language of their choosing.

    "Since we can invite anyone we want at Orkut, and my friends are Brazilians, it doesn't make sense talking to them in English," Reis said in Portuguese. "I use the language I know."

    His compatriot Pablo Miyazawa has a more moderate view.

    "Brazilians have the right to create anything they want in any language they want," Miyazawa said. "The problem is to invade forums with specific languages and write in Portuguese. Brazilians are still learning how to behave in the Net."

    AN INTERNET FORCE

    The Brazilians' ardor for the Internet extends to other community-based sites, and Web ent

    1. Re:Article text posted here for your convience by thaWhat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know I'm going to be flamed for this but hey, this is, as I understand it, the INTERnet, inter, as I understand it, standing more for international nowadays. Hello, xenophobic americans, there are a lot of people out there who don't - or choose not to - speak english. Get over it. I'm an english speaking Australian and I have, so what's your problem, don't you have enough international friends to get an invite??? There are deeper issues here... I am not a troll, I am simply expressing my freedom to speak (I believe you have an amendment to your constituition that covers this.)

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
    2. Re:Article text posted here for your convience by wjsteiner · · Score: 1

      Hi thaWhat, correct approach. US citizens should speed up to study Spanish anyway, before it is too late. As native German and European I am used to the multi-language thing. BTW: Need an invitation for orkut. Drop me an email at wjsteiner@hotmail.com!

  2. Language barrier by Monty845 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How have other major international sites dealt with the language barrier?

    1. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Set up a localized site, e.g. www.orkut.br where everything's in Portuguese

    2. Re:Language barrier by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny
      How have other major international sites dealt with the language barrier?

      Você americanos sujos pensa de que você possui tudo, e Slashdot, mas é justo não assim.

      Fure seu hegemony internacional e seu McDonalds e seu Hollywood onde o sol não brilha.

      Pela maneira, eu sou amor o Mac Grande e esse Julia Roberts!

      [Google "translation" of above: "You American dirty think of that you possess everything, and Slashdot, but is just not thus. Hegemony pierces international its and its McDonalds and its Hollywood where the sun does not shine. For the way, I am love Mac Great e this Julia Roberts!"]

      [Original English source for the "Portuguese" response produced by Google "translation": "You dirty Americans think that you own everything, including Slashdot, but it's just not so. Stick your international hegemony and your McDonalds and your Hollywood where the sun doesn't shine. By the way, I'm loving it the Big Mac and that Julia Roberts!"]
    3. Re:Language barrier by 0racle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You might have had a point if English wasn't the accepted norm for international communications and just something the States imposed on everyone. However English is the accepted language, so it makes sense that sites that are targeted at an international audience use English or keep everyone apart and just have localized versions. Not that I really care, I'm never invited to anything.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Language barrier by Isauq · · Score: 1

      Usually, you see sites with different language versions, like in Google, where you choose your language in the Preferences. Not sure if this would work with Orkut though...

      --
      RTFM
    5. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you're assuming that everyone who uses the net is using it for international communications. Many people could care less about people in other countries, and use the net for a plethora of non-international reasons. There's no reason for a Brazilian to use a non-native language which is the norm for international communications to talk with another Brazilian across town.

    6. Re:Language barrier by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      And the back and forth French (thanks to Google):

      You them American dirty think that you have all, including Slashdot, but it is just not too. Stick your international hegemony and your McDonalds and your Hollywood where the sun is not shining. Moreover, I am affectionate it it large imper and this Julia Roberts!

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    7. Re:Language barrier by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Not quite, I am assuming that Orkut itself is an international site, and considering Google has localized sites for its browser, it seems to be a good assumption. It wasn't created for Brazillians to meet other Brazillians, but for anyone anywhere to meet and interact with people.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    8. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck, considering all the times I've corrected other people on that, here I go making the same damn mistake myself. Next thing I know I'll be saying "same difference". Sorry. I knew better; I just slipped.

    9. Re:Language barrier by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5
      Many people could care less

      Couldn't care less.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    10. Re:Language barrier by satmech · · Score: 1

      Soy americano (Spanish, I know.). If brazillians dominate... let it ride!

    11. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you. The problem is that, from the article, people are being harassed by Brazilians for being, or thinking about going, English only.

      This whole issue will go away as soon as Orkut opens to the public and the Brazilians become minority users.

    12. Re:Language barrier by eyeye · · Score: 1

      "I could care less", it means you don't even care enough to bother caring less

      No, it means that you can't repeat a simple phrase without getting it wrong and then trying to make up a reason why its valid.
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    13. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I'll stop while I'm a head. ;-)

    14. Re:Language barrier by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I can see the dialogue as going like this:

      A: So I typed 10 8 - and 6 4 - into my calculator. Guess what it said?
      You: "Same difference"?

      Okay, that wasn't funny at all. I think I'll click submit anyway, though.

      --
      My other car is first.
    15. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why should english be primary language for international sites?

      Only relatively small group of people use English as native language.

    16. Re:Language barrier by PatientZero · · Score: 2, Interesting
      China or India could possibly submarine this argument, but I do believe that both of those countries have quite a few regional dialects to keep it valid in that neither has one language that the whole population speaks. I have nothing with which to back this up, however.

      Given that caveat, I would say that more people on Earth speak English than any other language. If the goal of the site is to create the largest international audience possible and help them to converse with each other, then English is the best choice.

      And before you start claiming this is American imperialism (of which there is plenty already), you can thank the good ol' English from England for it. :)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    17. Re:Language barrier by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Uhh... there are alternate language versions of Slashdot. The English one just happens to be the original and the largest.

      See www.slashdot.jp and so on.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    18. Re:Language barrier by Dejitaru+Neko · · Score: 1

      Saying that one could care less is influenced by Yiddish, in which there is sarcasm abound. Of course it doesn't make sense in the literal interpretation, but the use of human language assumes a human notion of deviating beyond that which is literal and employing such linguistic constructs as figures of speech, sarcasm, irony, wit in general, et cetera.

      --
      Nyo nyo, the Neko Boy has spoken.
    19. Re:Language barrier by kyknos.org · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it is probably not wise in this case. it shall be an internet community site and making barriers based on country borders in internet is imho futile. may be it wont take long before portuguese (or chinese, european or anything) will be majoriry language in internet in general. prepare for that. the only thing you can do now is to try fight back and invite english speaking friends. waht about me? well, its not my native language, but the native one - czech, is so small tah it cannot be dangerous in the next 500 years. And I would appreciate orkut invite.

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    20. Re:Language barrier by Oligonicella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No. Care had an older meaning in English. The phrase "I don't care to" currently means that one does not want to do it, but originally meant that one did not care (have a concern about) about doing it.

      "Would you bring ice cream to the picnic?"
      "I don't care to." - (I don't mind)

      It's still used that way in parts of the midwest US.

    21. Re:Language barrier by Czernobog · · Score: 1

      You might have had a point if in the context of Orkut Brazilian Portuguese wasn't the standard of communication. It works both ways you know.
      And lets not forget English is not the first language to become the de facto medium of communication, either in geographical terms or in terms of a specific practice associated with a specific language.
      One could argue that French never lost its hegemony in diplomacy. And then there's Greek, the first true global (global meaning the known world from a western point of view) language, surviving in areas of different customs, civilisation and language. And there's Chinese. Mandarin or whatever you want to call it with the thousand dialects.
      So English is not the first language to gain global exposure and it certainly won't be the last to lose it. Not when half the population on the planet speaks some dialect of Chinese or Hindi...

      --
      /. Where the truth
    22. Re:Language barrier by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > And you're assuming that everyone who uses the net is using it for international communications.

      When you are usign an international site like for example Orkut, or to quite some extent, Slashdot, yes definitely.

      > Many people could care less about people in other countries, and use the net for a plethora of non-international reasons.

      Why should i use English in an interntational forum or social networking site when talking to a fellow DUtchie?

      When the conversation is private, there is no problem in that. When it is on a public forum, we should be using English, or we shoudl setup our own forum.

      Why? because it is the only way in which things will ever work at all.

    23. Re:Language barrier by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oh, irony. We don't get much call for that around here.

      KFG

    24. Re:Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Set up a localized site, e.g. www.orkut.us where everything's in English

    25. Re:Language barrier by rafelbev · · Score: 1

      Some facts for you:

      1st: Mandarin with 885 million spoken in China, Malaysia, Taiwan
      2nd: Spanish with 332 million spoken in South America, Central America, Spain
      3rd: English with 322 million spoken in USA, UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand
      4th: Arabic with 235 million spoken in Middle East, Arabia, North Africa
      5th: Bengali with 189 million spoken in Bangladesh, Eastern India

      For a whole list a quick google gives http://www.krysstal.com/spoken.html. You will find Portuguese at 7th very close to 5th position.

      It would be interesting to observe on behalf of the orkut engineers the relations between the English speaking and the Portuguese communites to see the people who act as bridges between the communities because they are bi-lingual. Such people have an important role in society and the website just shows one of the current realities in life - communication

      --
      Dodge this !! --Trinity, The Matrix
    26. Re:Language barrier by deragon · · Score: 1

      I recall having read that over a billion people can communicate in english around the world (as 1st or 2nd language). Thus, english can be spoken by the largest amount of people compared to any other language. Moreover, I am pretty sure that these english capable people are probably part of the billion richest of the world, thus most likely to be connected and communicate internationally.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    27. Re:Language barrier by rowdent · · Score: 1

      Are those the number of native speakers? I'm pretty sure that because business the world over is conducted in English, many more people than what is listed actually speak English (albeit as a second language). I think the "universal language" idea springs from the fact that English is used as the language of commerce now, and is an accepted norm in both the business world and much of academia.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    28. Re:Language barrier by thaWhat · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'm waiting for the mandarin version of 'and for something completely different' where we laugh at the ignorant for speaking LOUDLY and CLEARLY in cantonese... you know we deserve it.

      and i agree about the truth being trolled... people should do their homework..

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
    29. Re:Language barrier by rafelbev · · Score: 1

      Those are native speakers. But even so, the fact that you can speak both native and english just makes the orkut experiment more relevant. I am a Maltese http://www.visitmalta.com/ native and we speak both English and Maltese in day to day conversations. A language is chosen dependent on what you feel comfortable with or depending on your social background.

      Its very rude to exclude people based upon not understanding a language, but there again its also very rude to impose a language restriction on a conversation which is between a close group of people. If you don't understand... just ask; or else even better: learn a new language :-)

      --
      Dodge this !! --Trinity, The Matrix
    30. Re:Language barrier by rowdent · · Score: 1

      I've learned bits and pieces of several languages, and I know French very well.

      I think the whole point is that Orkut.com seems to be in English, and considering that .com is supposed to be American, I think that it would makes sense that the common language be English. Right now, I receive dozens of Orkut messages that I just have to delete because they're not in any language I understand; However, likely other non-english speaking patrons of Orkut are probably experiencing the same thing with the English messages. It probably rests with Google to fix Orkut in one of the ways that are mentioned in other parts of this thread. Still, it cannot be denied that English is the language of commerce and, when people in other parts of the world want their children to be successful (whatever that means) they send them to learn English at school.

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    31. Re:Language barrier by Secret+Agent+X23 · · Score: 1
      If the goal of the site is to create the largest international audience possible and help them to converse with each other, then English is the best choice.

      Why do they need a "choice?" What's wrong with just trying to get English speakers to issue more invitations?

    32. Re:Language barrier by viniciuscb · · Score: 1

      This language is very bad organized. Seems that you wrote this in english and used google to translate it to portuguese.

    33. Re:Language barrier by Nailer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or better yet, orkut.us, where the minority USA folk can go. :^)

    34. Re:Language barrier by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      China or India could possibly submarine this argument, but I do believe that both of those countries have quite a few regional dialects to keep it valid in that neither has one language that the whole population speaks. I have nothing with which to back this up, however.

      True, but if a person is your friend then obviously you two managed to communicate well enough to become friends. If someone is your friend then you likely speak a common language. That's my take on it at least. I think they simply need to use localization on their website to curb the problem.

    35. Re:Language barrier by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why should english be primary language for international sites?

      Only relatively small group of people use English as native language.

      While it is true that there are only around 400 million native speakers of english in the world, there are also between 0.5 and 1.0 billion people who have been schooled in english as a second language.[1] There is probably an equal number of people who know english well enough for commerce and technical communications.

      A very interesting thing is that there are at least twice as many people who are fluent in english as a second language as there are native speakers of english. I think that is very rare for a living language; I'm not sure it has ever happened before.

      The way english is evolving is now more influenced by people who use it as a second language than it is by native speakers. The rate at which new words and expressions are coming into the language has never been higher; there is also a rapid acceptance of new alternate syntaxes, grammars, and spelling that I think is very unusual.

      I for one welcome the new expressions our Brazilian internet users could bring to english (if they choose to mingle with the rest of the world).

      [1]Start with Wikipedia's article and work your way through the links...

    36. Re:Language barrier by e_AltF4 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the whole point is that Orkut.com seems to be in English, and considering that .com is supposed to be American, I think that it would makes sense that the common language be English.
      Nice try, but wrong.

      USA is supposed to be in .US

      Commercial entities are supposed to be in .COM

      There is no .AM for "American" - .AM is Armenia
      Call me pedantic, but .com is not .us :-) Fore more details see Wikipedia.

    37. Re:Language barrier by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and people used to have "a gay old time."

      How about it, want to go puff on a fag, mate?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    38. Re:Language barrier by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      But if you could care less, then you care somewhat.

      "So you're telling me there's a chance!"

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    39. Re:Language barrier by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      you can thank the good ol' English from England for it. :)

      I don't think you'll persuade the English to take responsibility for it until the Americans can learn to spell 'colour' correctly. (^_^)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    40. Re:Language barrier by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      You might have had a point if English wasn't the accepted norm for international communications and just something the States imposed on everyone.

      Engels als internationaale taal is eigenlijk *wel* een geimposeerde taal. Alleen door het Britse koningrijk, niet America. Een grotere deel van het wereld zat, op een punt in tijd of 'n ander, onder het bestuur van Engeland. Engels was het taal van de overheid en van het handel, en daarom ook nu 'swerelds grootse bijtaal. Dat een van haar voormalig kolonies gegroeid is tot werelds meest machtig staat heeft engels wel geholpen maar heeft niks te maken met reden waarom engels nu zo ruim gesproken is.

      (excuses als mijn nederlands vraai slecht is, woon al lang in buitenland).

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    41. Re:Language barrier by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      I'm from the midwest, and I've never heard such a thing. Odd.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    42. Re:Language barrier by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      The issue is not the word "care", but the word "could".

      "could" means a possibility. So, "I could care less" means that while I may not care the most, I don't care the least -- there is still some care left.

      "couldn't" means no possibility. So, "I couldn't care less" means the care is either all gone, or at least at a static point -- there is not more care to give.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    43. Re:Language barrier by nasor · · Score: 1

      Uh...even if you use care in the way you described, parent was still right about his correction. Think about it.

    44. Re:Language barrier by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Set up a localized site, e.g. www.orkut.br where everything's in Portuguese

      If I go to "www.Google.cm", becasue I'm in Hong Kong I'm immediately bounced to "www.google.com.hk", which is in Chinese by default. You may gather that I'm not Chinese, speak little and read less. Even if I go to the English version of this site, I rarely want to find Hong Kong sites at the top of the list (and when I do, I know how to do that). Another site that used to guess my language preferences from my IP was Distrowatch that also gave me a Chinese version of their site, with no way to change to English (Language selection reverted after selection)-- this bug has apparently been fixed, just checked it while getting the URL and saw English there for the first time.

    45. Re:Language barrier by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      No crap. How about having a drop down toolbar so you can choose your language. I'm sure someone can translate the site navigation to different languages. When it comes down to a 1-on-1 with an orkut user, if you can't understand them due to the language barrier, then your probably wouldn't hang out with them in real life anyway.

      --
      3 Gmail invitations availiable

    46. Re:Language barrier by gacp · · Score: 1

      Pues fíjate que muchos de nosotros NO lo aceptamos ni lo aceptaremos nunca.

      Por supuesto, el que no estemos de acuerdo nunca ha tenido importancia.

      [Para eso están las campañas de bombardeo, me imagino...]

      Well, many of us DO NOT accept it, and never have, never will.

      Or course, that we do not agree never mattered...

      [That's what bombing campaigns are for, I guess.]

      --
      ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    47. Re:Language barrier by smacktits · · Score: 1

      I also hate when people say "I could care less". They should stop and think about what they say.

    48. Re:Language barrier by sirmob · · Score: 1

      This is the model that the college website thefacebook.com has used - each college is set up as a separate entity (I connect to princeton.thefacebook.com, Emory students to emory.thefacebook.com) and while it is easy to search and form friendships linking colleges, the design assumption is that most of your links are going to be within your own college. I don't know how Orkut works, so I hope this comment doesn't sound horribly stupid, but it seems like it might be a reasonable assumption to assume that people mostly desire interaction within their country - or at least within their language... That's clearly not xenophobic - if I speak only/primarily Russian then I am going to be vastly more likely to have friends and social interactions with... you know... Russian speakers. The same goes for English.

    49. Re:Language barrier by Igmuth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually prefer the data from the CIA Factbook: (Especially, since that page gives the impression it is from 1997)

      Chinese, Mandarin 14.37%
      Hindi 6.02%
      English 5.61%
      Spanish 5.59%
      Bengali 3.4%
      Portuguese 2.63%
      Russian 2.75%
      Japanese 2.06%
      German, Standard 1.64%
      Korean 1.28%
      French 1.27%

      note: percents are for "first language" speakers only

      These numbers I assume also take into account people who are living out side the "typcial area" for their language (for instance, why would you (apparently) not count the spanish speakers living in the USA?)

    50. Re:Language barrier by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Portuguese becoming the majority language on the Internet in general? I wanted to mod you down, but there's no "dumbass" option, so I'll just reply instead.

      -1 Not living in reality

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    51. Re:Language barrier by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Why should .com be American? The .us (and all the other country-code TLDs) were created for a reason. I would say .com, if it exists at all, should be aimed towards more international things.

    52. Re:Language barrier by 0racle · · Score: 1

      No he's right it was a typo.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    53. Re:Language barrier by rekrutacja · · Score: 1

      > more people on Earth speak English than any other language

      No, you are wrong. According to Wikipedia english is world's third popular language, however you count. This data is not up to date, and shows only estimated numbers, but i don't know better data source. Take a look:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_ total_speakers

      --
      This Is Not a Sig
    54. Re:Language barrier by bugbread · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. Hence the winking emoticon.

    55. Re:Language barrier by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, ik ben niet met je eens.. ok, in nederland kan bijna iedereen die daar is opgegroeid engels spreken, maar nederland is een van de weinige landen waar TV programmas subtitled zijn in plaats van dubbed. Dus van een jonge leeftijd zit je bijna elke dag voor de kast een uurtje of meer engels te leren ;). Mijn ervaring van niveau van engels in de rest van europa is dat het veel lager zit dan in nederland.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    56. Re:Language barrier by PatientZero · · Score: 1
      I can only assume that the numbers you give are, as one of this post's siblings shows, for native speakers -- not number of people that actually speak the language. I assume that because there are 290+ million people in the United States, yet most of Europe and Canada and a lot of people in Latin America and Asia can also speak English. 322 million seems awefully low.

      While a useful statistic, it's not as applicable to choosing which language should be the universal language of international communications as is the number of people that can speak the language at all.

      Interestingly, at least to me :), I see this as somewhat related to instant runoff voting. If only 14% of the voting people would choose person A (and that's too close for them to win), but 75% would choose A over everyone else except their preferred candidate, then A should win.

      Similarly, while only roughly 5% speak English as their first language, someone else posted that 16% can speak English it. I actually find that figure low, but there are a lot of rural communities that have no need to learn English so I'll accept it at face value. If that's significatnly higher than the next language, then it makes sense to choose it.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    57. Re:Language barrier by rafelbev · · Score: 1

      Ok... another quick fact:

      China's population estimate for Jul '04: 1,298,847,624

      USA's population estimate for Jul '04:
      293,027,571

      That is quoted from the CIA factbook.

      Even taking all the other English speaking nations (I am from one of them) it doesn't get close to China, let alone all the other languages in the world put together. Having said that, English is the language used in western commerce. This still does not imply that for social reasons people use English when communicating to foreigners. People use the language that is most appropriate for a conversation and to their culture.

      This thread is not about the relevance of English in commerce nowadays but on a lanuages used for social interaction which is what orkut is all about afterall.

      --
      Dodge this !! --Trinity, The Matrix
    58. Re:Language barrier by PatientZero · · Score: 1
      I just spoke with a Chinese friend of mine, and while not scientific, his perception is that the majority of the Chinese population, which speaking a regional dialect as their native tongue, would like speak the national language, Mandarin.

      So it would seem that Chinese would be the language spoken by the most people. However, I would put forth that it is definitely not the language spoken by most people online -- not yet at least.

      Looks like I've got another language to learn! :)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    59. Re:Language barrier by jwr · · Score: 1

      It's not the sites that have to deal with it, it's Americans. Seriously. Some of us have grown up knowing we'd have to know _at least one_ foreign language in order to communicate with pretty much anyone and in order to do anything significant. Others (most Americans, I'd guess) still believe they can get around knowing ZERO foreign languages.

      Which, most of the time, they actually can. But at times like these when sudden realization strikes them -- the world is not unilingual, you know, and
      it's only on Star Trek that they all speak English -- major whining erupts.

    60. Re:Language barrier by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia is perhaps not the best reference for this, since it implies that RFC 920 specified .com for all commercial entities, but .gov and .mil for US government and military entities.

      It in fact specified .gov and .mil with the same language as .com. They're intended by the RFC to be used for all government and military entities.

      Yet it also specified country domains, so technically, only governments of entire planets would be allowed to use .gov. Mercenary units could probably use .mil, though.

      Of course, if we're supposed to just assume it meant US government and military, then we have to assume it meant use commercial as well.

  3. Why Fight? by Cavio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are communicating with others in your circle of friends, you should speak the same language.

    If I'm in a restaurant, and the people at the table next to me are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect the conversation at my table in the slightest.

    I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    1. Re:Why Fight? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the people at the table next to you are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect you. If your table is speaking English, that doesn't affect the other tables. But if the waiter only speaks Korean, it does affect you.

      Not knowing anything about Orkut, and not reading the article (surprised?) I would suggest that they handle this like they handle their existing site - offer it in as many languages as they can/want and let the users live with the choices.

      There's no reason to offer a site like this in just English or any other language.

    2. Re:Why Fight? by MrFlannel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the article. It mentions the fact that its more like the persons sitting next to you at the table, begin to try and speak to you in korean, and then expect you to be able to bend over backwards to communicate with them.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    3. Re:Why Fight? by John+Meacham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As universal languages go, lojban is much more interesting conceptually.

      http://www.lojban.org/

      or, if you are more visual, you might want to check out bliss-symbols.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    4. Re:Why Fight? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny
      If the people at the table next to you are speaking Korean, it doesn't affect you.
      Though when people nearby are speaking a language you don't understand, and looking in your direction, and laughing and pointing, well it's hard to not imagine things.
    5. Re:Why Fight? by zors · · Score: 1

      Yeah! everyone knows english is the only language all people should be expected to know!

    6. Re:Why Fight? by driptray · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its more like the persons sitting next to you at the table, begin to try and speak to you in korean, and then expect you to be able to bend over backwards to communicate with them.

      No, it's like the people at the table next to you start speaking to you in Korean, and because you don't know Korean you make a complaint to the management of the restaurant. There is no expectation on the English-speakers to bend over backwards, or do anything at all.

      But even that analogy isn't quite correct. I think the English speakers are upset because they are creating forums in the hope of developing communities of people they can be a part of, and their forums end up being overtaken by Portugese speakers. And so they are excluded from their very own creation.

    7. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, I find it really arrogant that people are complaining about how others communicate between themselves. It's not like every American tourist that visits a foreign country starts speaking that nation's native tongue even when just talking to their travelling companions, is it?

      As an Orkut member I do find the behaviour of some of its users annoying (Orkut-wide and community-wide spamming by a very small handful of people, people who ignore the rules of the communities that they join, etc) but I find that it's not that inconvenient compared to what I've got out of my Orkut experience. I've made at least a dozen real-world friends that I regularly go out with, and several more that are online only at this stage, and that's only after three months' membership.

      Yes there are plenty of Brazilians on the site, and yes, they do have a tendency to join every community that even half interests them (it's like some people play a game of "let's see how many communities I can join", and they seem to do the same with collecting friends too) but that's not just a trait exclusive to them: users of other nationalities can be just as bad.

      I'll also point out that Portuguese isn't the only non-English language used on Orkut. I've seen several, including ones that you wouldn't immediately think of, such as Arabic.

      Live and let live is what I say. On Orkut and elsewhere.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:Why Fight? by Cavio · · Score: 1

      Rather than beg for an invite, I'll just ask if you've used Livejournal, and how Orkut compares to it.

      Oh, and invite me.

      --

      Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    9. Re:Why Fight? by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with that? By expecting them to speak English, or excluding them from "English-only" communities, you'd be doing exactly the same thing.

    10. Re:Why Fight? by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 1

      I find your use of my religion in your simile highly amusing.

    11. Re:Why Fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak XML, my friend, only XML. After all, conversation is data and XML is a language for data exchange. Think of all the advanced transformations you could do with that data.

    12. Re:Why Fight? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is a dumb "tempest".

      I sent Cavio an invite.

    13. Re:Why Fight? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.

      If we're talking about computer geeks, then Klingon or Elvish will be more common.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    14. Re:Why Fight? by duffahtolla · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yeah! everyone knows english is the only language all people should be expected to know!

      I know that your trying to be sarcastic, but I did find this to be true. I did an 11 country tour of Europe a while back and I never had any problems communicating in English. If one person couldn't understand me, a passerby would eventually over hear and graciously translate.

      I doubt this would be the case if I spoke chinese, japanese, hindi, or in orkuts case, portugese.

      Of South America, I've only traveled to Chile and Venezuala, but my experiences their were even more english friendly. People would insist on speaking English so as to brush up their skills. I speak far more Spanish here in Miami than I ever did in South America.

      I'm not saying English 'should' be the most universaly accepted language, but it does seem to fit the role pretty good.

    15. Re:Why Fight? by polveroj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As universal languages go, lojban is much more interesting conceptually.

      Conceptually, yes, but Esperanto would be better in this case. Learning lojban requires you to really think about the grammar and memorize the roots. Esperanto, on the other hand, is Indo-European enough for speakers of English and Portuguese to learn quickly, and they don't need to learn the theory behind its sentence structure. As Linux has shown, people want to be able to use things without knowing exactly how they work, and this applies to languages too.

    16. Re:Why Fight? by doormat · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yea but thats not whats happening. Its more like...
      • Start conversation with a bunch of people from around the world, speaking english, on some particular topic (ie Simpsons, Slashdot, etc)
      • Large number of Brazilians come in and hijack the group, flooding it with messages in Portuguese
      • Group becomes unusable for english speakers all around the world (not just us Americans)

      If the Brazilians were nice enough to fork and create groups that discussed topics in Portuguese, it wouldnt be a big deal. Orkut should have an upgrade right now, providing an "official group language" field for groups, so one can tell if they're joining the "Simpsons - English" or "Simpsons - Portuguese" groups. But many of the Brazilians walk in, act like they own the place, and hijack Orkut. I dont use it anymore for this reason.
      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    17. Re:Why Fight? by bman08 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's funny, most of the people I meet on the internet seem to speak asshole fluently.

    18. Re:Why Fight? by wmspringer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Iranians also; they seem to have hundreds of people on their friend lists and I keep getting mails sent to "friends of friends" that I can't read :-p

      For the most part, though, they speak English.

    19. Re:Why Fight? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I've made at least a dozen real-world friends that I regularly go out with, and several more that are online only at this stage, and that's only after three months' membership.

      Really? You know, while I have people I already know attached to me in Orkut, I really find it hard to see how you can sensibly make friends on that system. What are you doing? Talking to people in communities who are local to you.. or just blind messing people with shared interests?

    20. Re:Why Fight? by pbaumgar · · Score: 1

      Orkut sucks. I used it for about a week and found nothing useful about it. I terminated my account. The forums were worthless. I don't need to make new friends, or find a date... so someone tell me, why would I use the site? Is is "cool" and better just because Google runs it?

    21. Re:Why Fight? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure plenty of people sent him an invite. I'm orkut nokilli com on orkut.

    22. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      I live in a major city and it has its own community. Several members of that community get together regularly for drinks, dinner, etc. I've made some casual friends but also a few that I can see myself becoming really close to too.

      I'm in a committed relationship, so I'm not talking about romantic/horizontal developments but there's an element of potential matchmaking for one or two members of my new circle of friends.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    23. Re:Why Fight? by discogravy · · Score: 1

      I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.
      Sadly, you can probably find more people that speak fluent Klingon than people who can speak fluent Esperanto. Which is a shame, because it's easy to learn and use.

    24. Re:Why Fight? by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

      It's irritating to have a thread that's originally in English and then have it taken over by non-english speakers. I can choose to not read posts that are not in English but when the title is english and someone responds in a different language, causing the rest of the thread to be in a different language, I don't know before starting to read it.

    25. Re:Why Fight? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      All of your analogies are wrong. Really, it's like a balloon and...something bad happens.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    26. Re:Why Fight? by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      Um... Lojban isn't supposed to be a universal language, it's supposed to be a logical language. I'm a Lojbanist, and I think that going around shouting "Everyone should speak Lojban!" (u'i ei ro prenu cu tavla fo la lojban) just damages its reputation, because that's not even one of its goals.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    27. Re:Why Fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they provided a way to filter out languages you don't know, would this still be a problem? Sure there's a whole other conversation going on in Portugese that you don't know about, but you should still be able to continue your conversations in English.

    28. Re:Why Fight? by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      If we all agree to speak Elvish, those wanting to speaking Quenya and those wanting to speak Sindarin will duke it out. And of course some people will speak Telerin just to be hip and be all, "nobody speaks my language even though its more like proto-Elvish than Quenya."

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    29. Re:Why Fight? by coaxial · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I find it really arrogant that people are complaining about how others communicate between themselves. It's not like every American tourist that visits a foreign country starts speaking that nation's native tongue even when just talking to their travelling companions, is it?

      Well I'm an Orkut member and I'll tell you what the problem is. The problem is that your inboxes are constantly filled with Portugese spam that is sent to "foo community." Every community has its share of Portugese spam. Whether it's US specific or not. It's really annoying. An easy fix would be language specific communities, but everyone is too lazy to join thoses...

    30. Re:Why Fight? by khuber · · Score: 1

      Google sucks. I used it for about a week and found nothing useful about it. I terminated my Internet access. The forms were worthless. I don't need to find websites or images or news ... so someone tell me, why would I use the site? Is is "cool" and better just because Google runs it?

    31. Re:Why Fight? by butt_monkey · · Score: 1

      Esperanto? that'd be silly - nobody speak Esperanto. I'd make more sense to speak Klingon since there 3 times as many fluent Klingon speakers.

    32. Re:Why Fight? by xRizen · · Score: 1

      Except that's not what's happening. It's more like having a conversation amoung your friends at that table, and it's all in english, then a couple of Brazilians who happen to be in that group of friends start talking in Portuguese. It's still the same conversation, but you can no longer understand it.

      What's even worse is that orkut implemented a primary language setting for communities, but this is largely ignored.

    33. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Ever thought that the non-English-speaking world (or non-Americans in general for that matter) get annoyed by the hundreds of English language, US-targetted spams they receive every day?

      And it's not as if the only Orkut message spams you get are in Portuguese. I get just as many, if not more, in English.

      This isn't an Orkut problem, or a language problem, it's a selfish idiot problem.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    34. Re:Why Fight? by hennar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      let me guess, you went to Barcelona, Paris, London, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen and the like (eg, the capitals of western Europe). As a European citizen, I'll paint you another picture: south of France, countryside in Spain, Italy (you don't have to go to the countryside there), countryside in Denmark, Switserland. when you leave Western and Southern Europe behind, and head to Eastern Europe, the knowledge of English is even less! (I only have experciences of Romania, Hungary and Czech Republic) I've been to all of these countries, and in each I've had problems using English, in some I've even had problems using anything but their own language.

    35. Re:Why Fight? by igrp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Orkut should have an upgrade right now, providing an "official group language" field for groups, so one can tell if they're joining the "Simpsons - English" or "Simpsons - Portuguese" groups.

      It already does in a way. When you create a new group you can select the interface language. This does, however, not show up when you're not the community's creator.

      If you join a community that has a Spanish interface, chances are communications there will be in Spanish.

      I agree though that this doesn't really help with the problem at hand which is people taking over English-speaking communities and flooding them with foreign-language content (which is probably one of the rudest thing you can do on Orkut, as far as I am concerned - it's not that hard to start your own community).

      Google's Orkut dev team should probably have a look at this when they redesign the community section (and they should really really implement sub-categories while they're at it).

    36. Re:Why Fight? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, sounds just like Americans in a non-English language usenet group - without the bitching about the stupid language people keep using.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    37. Re:Why Fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      duffahtolla (535056) wrote: "I'm not saying
      English 'should' be the most universaly accepted
      language, but it does seem to fit the role
      pretty good."

      And pretty "well" too. Seriously, food tastes
      good, things are done well. See, English isn't
      so hard after all. ;^)

    38. Re:Why Fight? by prockcore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's like the people at the table next to you start speaking to you in Korean, and because you don't know Korean you make a complaint to the management of the restaurant.

      Nonsense. Brazillians are entering established communities and spamming them. It'd be much different if they set up their own communities.

      So it's like the people at the table next to you sat down at your table and started yelling at you in Korean. No shit you're going to complain.

    39. Re:Why Fight? by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      I've made at least a dozen real-world friends that I regularly go out with, and several more that are online only at this stage, and that's only after three months' membership.

      Interesting. A lot better than my experience with Friendster, Myspace, and Thefacebook. I'd love to hear more from you on this point.

    40. Re:Why Fight? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      Interesting URL (I spent about fifteen minutes reading about lojban, but next time please make a link.

    41. Re:Why Fight? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      This does bother me. When you're in America, speak in English. If you don't know English, then don't come to America. Okay? Thanks.

      I also got pissed off in Japan when morons kept walking around speaking English to everyone and taunting them for not knowing English. Then again most people I knew in Japan (European people, I mean) wanted to get drunk and have sex "with a different girl every night". I'm sure that worked out real well for them...

      When in Rome, do as the Romans.

      --
      My other car is first.
    42. Re:Why Fight? by andersa · · Score: 1

      Is there no moderation on orkut? Can't the group creator enforce a language?

    43. Re:Why Fight? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Really? You know, while I have people I already know attached to me in Orkut, I really find it hard to see how you can sensibly make friends on that system.

      Yet for many, the opposite has occured. I started out 'friending' and being 'friended' by all former collegues. People I havent seen for years now. Yet I've made great friendships with people local to me where I have gone to dinners and parties. My old co workers? I never get the time of day from them anymore. What's so hard to believe?

    44. Re:Why Fight? by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Funny
      [I]t's a selfish idiot problem.

      That's pretty much the root of every human-related problem I've ever encountered.

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
    45. Re:Why Fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try Spain or Portugal: they can't.
      Try France: they won't.

    46. Re:Why Fight? by TomV · · Score: 1

      So it's like the people at the table next to you sat down at your table and started yelling at you in Korean. No shit you're going to complain.

      Ah, but, as things stand at Orkut, and you might not realise it when you enter the putative Restaurant, what the analogy doesn't mention is that even though it started out as a Burger-and-Fries place, over the years it turned out that most of the diners were Korean and it's now, de-facto, a Korean restaurant with mostly Korean diners.

      Still, population statistics notwithstanding the people at the next table shouldn't be yelling at you, in any language. That's a fair complaint. Unless of course you've been going out of your way to complain about all these bl*&dy Koreans in the restaurant, in which case it's probably frair enough.

    47. Re:Why Fight? by IIEFreeMan · · Score: 1

      If you give me a invitation I can start sending some French spam on Orkut ;) (just kidding)

      orkut.10.freeman@spamgourmet.com

      thanks !

    48. Re:Why Fight? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      I'm not the grandparent poster, but I too have found orkut to be useful for meeting real-world friends.

      Here are my experiences

    49. Re:Why Fight? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Damn, reading this discussions has been really depressing. Too many people have the attitude that "Well, everyone else should speak English, just like me". The whole point of Orkut is supposedly to allow networking of friends - what's the point, if it's going to force you not to speak your native toungue?

      To me, it seems like bad design to begin with. Why can't you filter out posts based on language, if they don't want people to be bothered by other languages? It's something I think they should have thought of when they were designing a "social network" - Google handles multi-language search pretty well, so it's not like they'd never dealt with the issue before.

      The fact is, most of the world doesn't speak English, at least among themselves. Why should they use a second or third language to talk to their friends on a "social networking" site? It's perfectly understandable that you should speak English in a thread started in English, but why should you stop people from speaking their native language in their own threads?

      Yes, English is the "lingua franca" of the internet, it's very useful when communicating between two people who don't speak the same native language. That doesn't mean you should be forced to speak it with your friends when you'd rather speak another language.

    50. Re:Why Fight? by talaphid · · Score: 1

      Reading the article, that's exactly how everyone responds, and while everyone can hmm and haw about it, this is simply a more popularized manifestation of the same phenomenon as you might find on Blizzard's Battle.net, amoung other places. It used to be that if you were 'speaking in gibberish' you were a Korean, and 'you should go back to your server', and ... well, the epithets fly. "Speak in English or shut up" - regardless of the channel. It's you are in the presence of Americans, bow down and speak our language.

      Now that there's a significant Brazillian community (or so it would seem) on Bnet, you can just s/Brazillian/Korean (or is that backwards?). It isn't as bad presently, I think, mainly because there's not a lot to communicate in Warcraft, and the map ping function achieves 95% of what's to be said ever in a universal language way, anyway (and the more communication-required Diablo 2 has run most of its course)

      Moving on... English is a fairly well accepted language for the exact same reasons Latin was once a fairly well accepted language. Economic dominance that has historic ties to imperialism. If we're going to pick one, I nominate Italian, because it's just plain got fewer letters, and its simplicity is such that the detection rate of dyslexia in adult males is significantly lower than other modern European languages (and we can pretend we're the new Romans while we're at it). Also, I get the impression it's much more difficult to be Jeff K in Italian. SOU E STUPEDO11!!!

      Okay, scratch the last one.

    51. Re:Why Fight? by caranha · · Score: 1

      I would add the same for less cosmopolite [sp?] parts of south america. Try going to non-major/non-touristic cities around here and you'll be hard pressed to find english speakers.

      One time I've been to Tokyo, and the lack of english skills among the populace (not counting hotel folks and clerks at big store chains) took me by surprise, since I've always been told that you could make your way in english pretty easily around there. (good thing I was there to learn japanese)

      I guess (by experience) that people will change to whatever language they feel confortable with, as soon as possible, unless they're on an effort to learn a new language at the time.

    52. Re:Why Fight? by steffl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not a problem: people using different languages when talking in private/closed group.

      problem: if there is a forum (community) and most of the people are from all over the world and the language used is english it doesn't make much sense to jump in using a different language (which is what I see on orkut).

      It's kinda like if I replied to you in my native language - what sense would it make? Chances are you wouldn't understand it and most of the slashdotters wouldn't understand it either...

      On the other hand: some people have their profiles in languages I don't understand and I don't think that's a problem, I assume that if I don't understand their profile it wasn't written for me.

      erik

      --
      ...all excited, don't know why...
    53. Re:Why Fight? by Oligonicella · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a friend who would slip into French trying to bug me. I simply dropped into German. It ended quickly.

    54. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Ironically, this is one of the real-world friends that I'm talking about.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    55. Re:Why Fight? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      I think the original poster's point was that pretty much no matter where you go in the world you're more likely to be understood by speaking English than any other language.

    56. Re:Why Fight? by antic · · Score: 1


      Altavista's Babelfish assures me that the correct response* to this is to say:

      "Vá-se foder. Você não me é nada. Fale minha língua ou, eu , para err, para não poder compreender."

      (In English: "Fuck off. You are nothing to me. Speak my language or, I will, err, not be able to understand.")

      *To anyone taking this seriously, don't; Be reasonable and polite!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    57. Re:Why Fight? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      And you are...? :)

    58. Re:Why Fight? by Splunge · · Score: 1

      let me guess, you went to Barcelona, Paris, London, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen and the like (eg, the capitals of western Europe). Actually, I heard he even went outside of London and found a number of English speakers.

      --
      "Brown University? We have one of those in Providence!" -- Outside Providence
    59. Re:Why Fight? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > It's you are in the presence of Americans, bow down and speak our language.

      You happen to be aware that that language is called English and that it is in fact named after another country? Just thought i should point it out ;P

    60. Re:Why Fight? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      You still have my DVD, right?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    61. Re:Why Fight? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So it's like the people at the table next to you sat down at your table and started yelling at you in Korean. No shit you're going to complain.

      Amen to that. This is why I get my international interaction in on irc, in channels in which I am an operator. I like to describe irc by a 'cafe' model - irc channels are [vaguely] like a series of coffeehouses. Some of them are peopled almost entirely by cliques, and the operators are the management. (Of course, some channels are all management, I'm on one like that with over 40 members.)

      Moral of the story is that when someone comes into the channel and won't use English, we just boot them with an amusing kick message that they probably won't understand, but we can all laugh at. It's what we want for our channel, and we have the power to enforce it.

      I have an orkut account, but I don't use it for anything other than being linked to a few friends who I already know from the really real world. It's just there to make it easier for people I know to find me, and one friend has already done so (though more have found me on livejournal than on orkut.) I don't like situations I have no control over and that includes orkut.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    62. Re:Why Fight? by Seft · · Score: 1

      'I'll paint you another picture: south of France'

      They barely speak French in the South of France :p

      But English wasn't a problem. Equally, Italy has always been fine for me. Generally what I've found is that the locals are much more likely to be co-operative in english if you open the conversation in the native language.

    63. Re:Why Fight? by Doh! · · Score: 1

      It's more like the Koreans arrive one at a time and sit down at your table and join your discussion, speaking English. Then when enough of them have joined the group, they all start speaking Korean, and the non-Korean speakers get left out of the conversation.

      At this point, one group should move to a new table, but which group?

      If the non-Korean speakers start a new table, and the whole thing happens all over again, what next?

    64. Re:Why Fight? by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      Large number of Brazilians come in and hijack the group, flooding it with messages in Portuguese

      solution: make group moderated, and non-anonymous.

      if someone tries to join and you don't like their ethnic background, then it's up to you to be hitler and stop them from joining/posting.

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    65. Re:Why Fight? by ryen · · Score: 1

      > begin to try and speak to you in korean, and then expect you to be able to bend over backwards to communicate with them.

      sounds like the TA for my lab.

    66. Re:Why Fight? by Blueboard · · Score: 1

      I agree. I am Brazilian and I still find it very annoying. Even more so because people who switch languages are generally doing it for the sake of trolling. It comes as no surprise, as you shouldn't expect much from lads with no sense of [n]etiquette.
      If you don't know the language, go somewhere else. Unfortunately, we don't seem to form the most polite ethnic group in the world.

    67. Re:Why Fight? by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      Grow up. The whole world does not speak english. The juvenile english speakers should just start their own thread and get over it. The english speakers (and I bet most of the whiners are USA'ians) are just getting a SMALL taste of what the USA has forced on the rest of the world: shipping, flight control, and most business speach is in english due to the Americans unwillingness to learn other languages - backed up by their economic might.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    68. Re:Why Fight? by bodrell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nonsense. Brazillians are entering established communities and spamming them. It'd be much different if they set up their own communities.
      Nonsense. Posts/threads in a non-English language are NOT spam. You just feel excluded since they can communicate multi-lingually, and you can't be bothered to try to learn another language.
      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    69. Re:Why Fight? by davebarz · · Score: 1


      The parent was unfairly modded. I wish I could meta-moderate all "Troll" and "Flamebait" mods.

      I tend to agree with what he was saying. The language of conversation is defined by the participants in the conversation. If the participants are Brazilian, they have every right to speak in their native language.

      I agree with many other comments saying Google should provide a language field so that users can self-segregate if they choose to, but until that happens, we Americans have no right to coerce them into adopting our language.

    70. Re:Why Fight? by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      Invite, please?

      haloman at fastmail dot fm

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    71. Re:Why Fight? by elhedran · · Score: 1

      Sounds more to me like you want a language filter on your inbox.

      e.g.
      I understand (check the following boxes)
      l33t
      English (US)
      English (UK)

      so that when someone 'spams' you, you won't be presented with the email unless you turn your langauge filter off.

      I don't see any reason to simply block people from the community or separate communities simply because you can't press 'next'.

    72. Re:Why Fight? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Posts/threads in a non-English language are NOT spam.

      Messages unrellated to the subject of a community sent to all members of that community are spam.

      I got tons of these until I disabled recieving messages sent to communities.

      you can't be bothered to try to learn another language.

      Why should I be bothered into learning brazilian portugese just because I joined the Simpson's community? A community who's description is in english and that is about a show that is in english.
      There is a portugese Simpson's community, that is a place to discuss the portugese version of the Simpsons. Its really annoying when you just keep recieving unsollicited messages in a language you do not understand because you joined a community to discuss something you enjoy with others.

      The whole point of joining the community was to join a discussion, I can't discuss it if its in a language I don't speak, and I joined a community that was established in a language I understood. Its very annoying!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    73. Re:Why Fight? by NaturePhotog · · Score: 1

      I think the "capitals" post probably hits on a big part of it. I just returned from a trip to Europe, and have been to Europe numerous times before (my sister lives just outside Munich (or München, if you prefer, and /. doesn't swallow the u+umlat). In general, more people speak English in the larger cities, and fewer in the smaller towns and countryside.

      East of Marseille, for example, we had world's nicest taxi driver (this guy is on the fast-track for sainthood -- super helpful in resolving a problem with a hotel at what ended up being the middle of the night.) But he didn't speak of bit of English.

      I've found this elsewhere in the world, too (South America, Africa, Asia). There's usually some English-speakers about, but they're fewer and farther between the further you get from a big city.

      And regardless of where you are, it always helps to at least know a couple of words in the native language: hello, please, thank you. If language capacity is limited (like mine, if you're not counting programming languages :-), learning just hello** goes a long ways. Even if people speak English where you go, it's a *lot* more polite, and a lot more likely to get a helpful response if you start with a word or two in the correct language.

      (** If you're lucky, 'hello' in the language will be something like in Swedish: 'hej', which is pronounced more or less like 'hey' in English, so just going up to someone and saying 'hey!' works :-) And depending on your needs, you may wish to add 'one beer, please' to the list of words to know :-)

      But back to the point: Orkut is a site for networking. As long as people aren't hijacking existing threads into one language or another, they should use whatever language they want to network with others. If that's Portuguese, more power to them. I think it's a cool-sounding language. Oddly enough, the guy who invited me to Orkut is...Brazilian.

    74. Re:Why Fight? by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Colin, I e-mailed you about your entry a few months ago. I'm not sure you took my response well. E-mailed you again, which should refresh your memory.

    75. Re:Why Fight? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I guess a few people are still reading this. There were problems with a couple invites bouncing back. If you asked for an invite and didn't get one, let me know.

  4. Microcosm by toasted_calamari · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's interesting, Orkut seems to be mimicing "real world" human society. This fight over languages looks a lot like the conflits over immigration that happen in every country. If anything, I would take this latest conflict as proof that internet forums can function as true communities, analogous to those in the physical world. In that sense, I consider this development to be an accomplishment for Orkut.

    1. Re:Microcosm by toasted_calamari · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was thinking of American history. In the early 20th century, there was a tremendous amount of immigration into the United States. Many people were sharply critical of this, arguing that america was by and for only Americans. The immigrants argued that it was as much their country as the native citizens.

      Fast forward to 2004, Orkut, a community that was originally primarily english speaking recieves huge influx of brazilian "immagrents" The english speakers argue that their community was by and for English speakers. The brazillians argue that they were invited and that the community is now also theirs.

      Notice a parallel?

    2. Re:Microcosm by jdwest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anecdotally, from an Asian graduate professor I had years ago, the difference in the previous emigration cultures of then (Germany, Italy, Poland ...) to the predominant ones today (Asian, Mexican) is that it was "forbidden" to speak their native tongue around children. The unspoken mandate was, for assimilation in this country, one had to lose the language and the accent. Economic survival was paramount to early immigrants, as they had no one else to lean on.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    3. Re:Microcosm by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      In the early 20th century, there was a tremendous amount of immigration into the United States. Many people were sharply critical of this, arguing that america was by and for only Americans.

      You meant "21st century", right?

  5. maybe Im missing something by Derg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but due to the friend based invite model that this site employs, maybe the english speaking memebers of the site should start inviting more english speaking people, to equal if not overtake the brazillian tally.

    Just a thought

    --
    I'm a little tea pot.
    1. Re:maybe Im missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      yes, an apostrophe.

    2. Re:maybe Im missing something by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they should just remember that there's no shortage of English-language sites already. Really, what's the problem? I don't know how orkut is organized, but is it really so hard to find areas where English is spoken? Why can't different linguistic groups all find their own niches there, and not worry about what other people are doing?

    3. Re:maybe Im missing something by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that will happen eventually.

      It's interesting how long it's taking though. I wonder what is causing one group to leapfrog another. Is the English speaking community too loose-knit? Or is it that they have so many choices they don't see Orkut as an important site.

      Granted, I don't have an account. And I'm guessing no one on Slashdot has one or they would have developed some automated signup system by now. (Which, strangely enough, would bring about another language war, Perl or PHP?)

      Either way, in the end the Orkut system will become native multilanguage capable and this argument will become a thing of the past.

    4. Re:maybe Im missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many of the complaints are that, instead of staying in the portugese speaking areas, the brazilians are purposly flooding the english areas with portuguese posts, and complaining if people make there areas "english only". /not a member of orkut, no idea how true such complaints are.

    5. Re:maybe Im missing something by jrockway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the non-English speakers are irritating. One private messages me in broken "english" for a gmail account (why me? what an ass... anyway).

      I reply to him and tell him I don't know what he said. The reply?

      "That's not my problem if you don't understand, I don't know how to speak english very well, I think so...=x bye ihihihihihihh see ya"

      Not your problem if I don't understand? You're asking for me to give you a present and then you flame me for not understanding your poor attempt to speak my native language? That IS your problem!

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:maybe Im missing something by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Americans are irritating. One decides that he wants to invade Iraq on a whim and creates the mother of all shit storms. The next thing you know the whole world's a potential warzone. But that's OK, because him and his oil buddies will do alright out of it in the long run.

      See how stupid it is to generalise about a group of people based upon the actions of one individual? Just because one Portuguese-speaking idiot spammed you asking for a Gmail account that doesn't make all Portuguese-speakers idiots or spammers, does it? And, if your experience is anything like mine, you've received plenty of spams from Gmail account beggers that are from Americans too, it's just that they've not had a problem communicating their stupidity to you.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:maybe Im missing something by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I didn't intend to generalize, but I guess I did. Anyway, I just wanted to share that mail with everyone, since I was just shocked that someone that wanted something from me was so impolite. I'll go now :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    8. Re:maybe Im missing something by Anomalous+Communard · · Score: 2, Informative

      More likely, given his self-confessed and clearly evident lack of mastery of English, that he was trying to say that it's OK that you're unable to grant his request ("not my problem" == "I'm OK with that").

      Never attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity.

    9. Re:maybe Im missing something by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Nice of the person who moderated this as flamebait to miss the entire fucking point of the post.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  6. Didn't our mothers teach us.. by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...to share and get along with others?

    Don't like the foreign users? Ignore them or move on.

    --
    "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
  7. our just desserts by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like we haven't done it to everybody else.

    oh, and it's not Goggle...

    1. Re:our just desserts by UncleOzzy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's also not dessert. You know what they say about glass houses...

    2. Re:our just desserts by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you seen the beautiful Brazilian women? That's the only language I really care about. I say MORE Brazilians on Orkut.

    3. Re:our just desserts by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      I was looking for confirmation on that pseudophrase just before I posted.

      Maybe I should have snopes.com bookmarked from now on.

    4. Re:our just desserts by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Why? The phrase works either way. Complaining about it smacks of 'whiny grammar bitch'.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    5. Re:our just desserts by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

      http://www.goggle.com/ is a website for Spy Bouncer

      --
      My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  8. Texto do artigo para seu convience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    O SAO PAULO, Brasil (Reuters) - Brasil butted as cabeças com os estados unidos este ano nas edições que variam dos subsídios do algodão à guerra em Iraq. Mas talvez nenhuma das batalhas foi assim que pessoal como essa que está sendo lutado no Internet. Os milhares dos brasileiros têm os devotoes tornados de Orkut (http://www.orkut.com), um local novo popular do social-social-networking do líder Google Inc da busca da correia fotorreceptora. Orkut permite que os membros organizem-se em comunidades em linha dos amigos, e dos amigos dos amigos, para discutir tudo do chess aos sanduíches. Mas as arremetidas dos brasileiros para juntar Orkut e locais sociais do networking do rival viraram alguns usuários em linha, que se queixam de um proliferation das mensagens afixadas no português, lingüeta nativa de Brazil's. Alguns usuários começaram mesmo comunidades especificamente para que os povos arejem seus gripes nesta edição. Os estados unidos têm ao menos 153 milhão usuários do Internet, comparados com o Brazil's 20 milhões. Ainda, os brasileiros ditos Orkut dominaram seu roster da sociedade em junho, outnumbering americanos para a primeira vez. O local diz que tem mais de 769.000 membros, fazendo lhe um do maior e mais popular de seu tipo no Internet. Aproximadamente 23.5 por cento dos usuários são dos estados unidos, quando outros 41.2 por cento forem brasileiros. Iranians são um terceiro lugar distante em aproximadamente 6 por cento.

    SOCIEDADE SELETIVA Orkut, nomeado após a Software Engineer Orkut de Google Buyukkokten, feito seu debut em janeiro e está ainda nos estágios testando. A parte de seu fascínio é seu exclusivity -- um pode somente juntar no invitation de um outro membro. o "Orkut traça o prestige social de one's, e os brasileiros são pela natureza gregarious, " Beth dito Saad, um professor na universidade da escola do sao Paulo's das comunicações e de artes. Embora mais de um quarto dos brasileiros vivam na pobreza, aqueles que podem ter recursos para o acesso do Internet têm surfers de correia fotorreceptora avid tornados. Nos termos do tempo gastados no Internet, os brasileiros afiaram para fora dos estados unidos em maio para o segundo mês em uma fileira, de acordo com Ibope/NetRatings. O investigador de mercado estima que o uso do Internet para brasileiros calculou a média de 13 horas e de 51 minutos em maio, oito minutos mais do que para americanos. O número de visitantes brazilian aos locais da comunidade e aos diários em linha levantou-se 14.6 por cento a 3.5 milhões em maio de janeiro, Ibope/NetRatings dito. Tammy Soldaat, um canadense, começou uma amostra do wrath brazilian recentemente quando afixou uma mensagem que pergunta se seu local da comunidade na perfuração do corpo deve ser exclusivo povoar quem falam o inglês. Os usuários brazilian de Orkut etiquetaram-na rapidamente um "nazi" e "xenophobe." "After que eu compreendi porque todos se está queixando sobre estes povos, porque they're que está sendo chamado o 'plague de Orkut, "' disse em um local chamado o brasileiro "Crazy Invasion." John Gibbs do Mountain View, Califórnia, fundou uma comunidade chamada o "So muitos brasileiros em Orkut." "When o usuário de Orkut da média vai olhar listas da comunidade para ver para fora what's lá, he'll vêem uma lista povoada com muito bonito todas as comunidades portuguese, " Gibbs dito. os "This estão frustrando altamente desde que Orkut não é um service." brazilian; Mas Mateus Reis, um publicist que viva no sao Paulo, os usuários ditos deve estar livre escrever o que querem, na língua de seu escolher. "Since nós podemos convidar qualquer um que nós queremos em Orkut, e meus amigos são brasileiros, ele doesn't fazem o sentido falando a eles em inglês, " Reis d

    1. Re:Texto do artigo para seu convience by ispeters · · Score: 1

      How'd you put the accented characters in your post? I've tried before, but /. strips out the &...; entities.

  9. Can't anybody spell? by mr_rangr · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fer fsck's sake, I wish the Slashdot editors would do something about the atrocious spelling of some of their contributors. What the heck is "Goggle"?

    1. Re:Can't anybody spell? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      What the heck is "Goggle"?

      Why don't you google it ? :D

    2. Re:Can't anybody spell? by tepples · · Score: 1

      It's easier to get a synonym for "chkdsk" past the censors than a vulgar slang word for coitus. Is government-enforced media prudishness as strong in Brazil as it is in the United States, where there are six words that the FCC says you can't say (starting with s, p, f, c, cs, ah)?

    3. Re:Can't anybody spell? by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 1

      Portuguese?

  10. Ok then by RTPMatt · · Score: 1

    Sounds like it would be a good idea to open it publicly then, it would be a shame to see it fade into obscurity just because most of the world cant understand most of the communications....Naw, that could never happen, i mean its google right?

  11. But what about... by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Finnish?

    1. Re:But what about... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Vittu huora is what I have to say to that...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:But what about... by E_elven · · Score: 4, Funny

      For those not in the know: 'orkut', in Finnish, is a vulgar expression for 'orgasm'.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    3. Re:But what about... by Keruo · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for every finn, but I don't know anyone who actually uses that site

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    4. Re:But what about... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And in dutch, phonetically, it means 'ear-cunt' :
      Properly spelled it would have to be 'oorkut' though.

    5. Re:But what about... by michajoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, "Finish" is a synonym for "Orgasm"

    6. Re:But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, orkut is the plural form "orgasms". An orgasm would be orkku.

  12. solved by jjshoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I solved the problem by changing the communities i run to English only. While this does not enforce people to speak in english it at least informs everyone the language they should be talking in if they dont expect their post to be deleted. I guess i'm missing the breaking news behind this.

    I think what would be more intresting is the rate at which amercians populated orkut vs brazilians

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    1. Re:solved by NerdForChrist · · Score: 1

      It appears that English speakers are populating Orkut at a slower pace. Maybe, if the English speakers want to dominiate Orkut they should invite more people.

  13. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is it with google and these services were you have to "know somebody".

    Half the reason I like forums on the internet is I don't know anyone there and I don't have to.

    I can pop in, post some shit, read some responses and then go back or not.

    I don't want to go on the internet with people I already know from real life. I go on the internet to get away from that. Just show up, discuss something and then leave. Like a bar or something.

    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason, I would guess, that Google is interested in social network based systems is because they are looking at the Semantic Web idea (or at least some of the technologies).

      FOAF is an effort by Dan Brickley/Libby Miller/Many others to create an open way to describe people - the world wide FOAF as opposed to the WWW. It shows the power of RDF in a practical (and fun!) way.

      Now, Lets say I'm Google. I spend millions on maintaining my marketshare with R and D; I'm going to realise sooner or later that gossip is a powerful communication tool. Friends talk to friends. If your friend gives you something, you are far more likely to accept it. If you make it so you can only get it from your friends, its a commodity.
      How do I leverage cutting edge ideas and attract users?
      and *bam* there we have it.

    2. Re:heh by Evro · · Score: 1

      So don't use those sites?

      --
      rooooar
    3. Re:heh by appleprophet · · Score: 1

      I wonder who didn't get an invitation...

    4. Re:heh by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      How else will they know what to set the From: address to in their advertising? ;)

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  14. Typical Slashdot anti-American bias... by character_assassin · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Brazilian internet users averaged an estimated 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans.

    Nice. A completely irrelevant little fact quoted at the end of the submission... equally irrelevant is this fact, actually found earlier in the article:

    The United States has at least 153 million Internet users, compared with Brazil's 20 million.

    But somehow, timothy decided that wasn't as significant, when in fact neither are. Typical.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:Typical Slashdot anti-American bias... by maggern · · Score: 1

      none of the numbers are actually irrelevant.
      the small difference in user-time is irrelevant, however the information about the usage-time is not irrelevant. It could've been vastly different, and stating that it's almost the same has value.

      The difference in internet uses goes to POTENTIAL. If you change those numbers to customers, you would surely see the difference. Market potential would surely be much smaller if portugisee were to be the language of choice!

    2. Re:Typical Slashdot anti-American bias... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why did they list *just* Americans? Why not the British and the English speaking part of Canada and others? Why turn it into America vs Brazil when it doesn't need to be?

  15. Two separate sites? by 56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't they just give their users the ability to filter by language? If you don't want to see the brazilian posts, you should be able to filter them out.

    1. Re:Two separate sites? by NoYes19 · · Score: 1

      I belive he was suggesting the language the post was written in. There is a lot of interesting work looking at the character distribution of a composition to determine the language....it is actually very good for longer works. So It wouldn't be all that hard to just analyze the character frequencies to filiter out post that are cleary not a certain language.

    2. Re:Two separate sites? by 56 · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify: if you were a person from Brazil, you would sign up at the brazilian incarnation of the site or tick off 'brazilian' in your user profile or something. Regardless of how it happens, differentiate between the brazilians and the americans and enable the users to, if they so desire, only see posts that are by brazilian or american posters.

    3. Re:Two separate sites? by tzanger · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that any latin language would have very similar character distributions?

    4. Re:Two separate sites? by Annoying · · Score: 1

      I think English and German (as well as Asian languages) are not latin derived. English if I recall is derived significantly from German with some French (a romance (latin derived) language) thrown in.

      If the user sets in a profile which languages they speak then it might be possible to analyze it down to the language family. Then picking from the options the users profile claims to speak as a best guess might often be sufficient. A bi-lingual portugese/english speaker's posts might be automatically catagorizable as either a latin or germanic rooted language. Although distinguishing between a spanish/italian speaker's posts might not be feasible though since they would both be in the same language family.

    5. Re:Two separate sites? by NoYes19 · · Score: 1

      Nope, obviosuly the closer related two languages are the lower your confidence of the diffrence can be. However, for any language the frequency of the same characters are enough diffrent that given a large enough sample you can catagorize them with some confidence. I wish I could find the link that has a lot of the info on this, but I can't seem to :(. I will keep looking and post it if I find it.

    6. Re:Two separate sites? by NoYes19 · · Score: 1

      bah I give up. Some exampels though:
      In English the six most common letters are E T A O I N.
      In Spanish they are E A O S R N.
      In German they are something like E N I R S A.

      But rly the bigger diffrences is at the lower frequency letters, but I don't know those off hand.
      Also looking at frequencies of certain sequences of letters is helpful.

  16. More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language. I'm a firm believer of "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" and when I visit abroad I try to speak as much of that nation's language as possible and keep a dictionary handy. I wonder if this is just another show of our much detested arrogance...

    1. Re:More American Arrogance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      id say your the ignorant one, you do something (awsome) so you expect the rest of your country does the same (ouch, hit the tard line)

    2. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language."

      I'm sick of hearing this stereotype because all one has to do is look at a globe and it becomes obvious why we're not so fluent in other languages. It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country. That's no small chore. I've been to Brazil twice, and each time it cost me $1,200 just for the ticket AND 24 hours transit time.
      All it takes is a little understanding, yeesh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of hearing this sterotype as well, because 1) I don't fall under it and 2) I get a bad rap as an American because of other Americans who travel abroad and act like they're king of the mountain. The argument you give is such a cop-out, I don't care how much it costs for a ticket or how far you have to travel, as if us Americans are the only ones that have to travel far or pay for our trip. Pocket dictionaries or even electronic translators are cheap, ESPECIALLY if you're an American who paid $1,200 for a ticket to Brazil TWICE.

    4. Re:More American Arrogance? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wow. You are exactly the kind of person that we're talking about here, aren't you?

      If you've travelled half way around the world (or whatever distance) to another country then don't you at least owe it to yourself to absorb as much of their culture as possible? Otherwise, what's the point of having gone there if all you do is spend your time in your hotel with its English-speaking staff and cheesy tourist-oriented restaurants because you couldn't be bothered to even try to use a phrase book?

      When I travel I make it a point of having a pocket dictionary and phrase book with me. For one thing, it's polite to be able to thank someone properly in their own language. For another, it's nice to be able to ask directions if you're trying to get somewhere. And, for yet another, it's nice to be able to do more than shout English at someone very slowly if you're caught up in an emergency of some sort.

      I speak English and four other languages (two very well, two pretty well) yet I'm constantly amazed by fellow tourists overseas who can't even say "hello", "please" or "thank you" even after two weeks. You're a guest in someone else's country, is it so damned hard to actually learn a word or two of their language when you expect everyone else to be fluent in yours?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The argument you give is such a cop-out, I don't care how much it costs for a ticket or how far you have to travel, as if us Americans are the only ones that have to travel far or pay for our trip."

      How can one possibly learn a language if there isn't much use for it? I have some background in Spanish, but it's pretty much useless. Pretty pathetic considering I'm living in a town with lots of spanish speakers, isn't it? There just isn't a need for it. As such, there's little chance to show it off.

      " Pocket dictionaries or even electronic translators are cheap, ESPECIALLY if you're an American who paid $1,200 for a ticket to Brazil TWICE."

      Where in my post did I say I didn't have translation tools? If that's all it took to make the difference, do you really really really think the bitching would end? Please.

      I'd like it on record, while I'm on the topic, that Brazil was VERY friendly towards me despite my low knowledge of portuguese. Very nice friendly place to visit. They pride themselves on their hospitality, and as far as I'm concerned, they get an A+ for it. I'd love to retire there.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "If you've travelled half way around the world (or whatever distance) to another country then don't you at least owe it to yourself to absorb as much of their culture as possible?"

      Don't you think you're trying a little too hard to punch a hole in my point? I never said anything that said or suggested that I didn't do what I could to be as adaptive as possible. I'd respond to the rest of your post, but it was written on a faulty assumption.

      I have NFI why people think that bringing a translation device along completely obliterates this stereotype.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:More American Arrogance? by goon+america · · Score: 1

      English, by the way, has been estimated to have 350-1000 million speakers as a second language. If you're travelling anywhere in the western world, probabilistically it would be safest to bet that any given person spoke English.

    8. Re:More American Arrogance? by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya well I'm sick of hearing Americans whine about stereotypes and attempting to act hurt because 'nobody likes me.' Truth is Americans that show up somewhere, act like they're god and expect everyone to do things their way is the *norm*. If you actually make any sort of effort to learn something about the locals, you are in the minority. As such, it is to be expected that they are not going to want to have anything to do with you. Its a reputation your country earned so live with it. Your so proud to be an American, thats what you associate your self with by proclaiming it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    9. Re:More American Arrogance? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed the point entirely. The point is that the typical American has to travel a lot further to get somewhere where his native tounge is not the most common lanaguage than a lot of other people do. I'd be fluent in other langauges too if there was more of a need. For most others, learning a second language isn't just an elective thing - it's a necessary thing.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    10. Re:More American Arrogance? by ParnBR · · Score: 1

      This is very interesting. I'm Brazilian, and always heard about how Frenchmen were impolite, especially with tourists. Then I had the chance to visit France. Surprise, Frenchmen were actually very nice to me. Probably because I tried my best to speak French to them. ^^

      Later, I was told that a lot of French people can speak English, but hate when you approach them speaking English. They can easily "forgive" you, though, if you just say "pardonnez-moi, mais je ne parle pas français... peux-je parlez anglais?" (forgive me, but I can't speak French... may I speak English?) =)

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    11. Re:More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

      Where in my post did I say I didn't have translation tools? If that's all it took to make the difference, do you really really really think the bitching would end? Please. Yup, the bitching would end. If someone knocked on your door, speaks a foreign language that you don't understand at all, then yells at you and makes gestures indicating that you're an idiot and stupid for not understanding their language, I'm pretty sure you'd bitch about it, especially since they knocked on *your* door! The problem isn't that Americans don't learn foreign languages that they have no use for, the problem is that us Americans in general are rude by expecting others to know our language when we're in their country. Most don't even freaking try, and some are even downright assholes by calling these people stupid idiots and marching off in a huff to someone else who happens to understand a little bit of English. What do foreigners do when they get here? They try their darndest to speak the few words of English that they know. What do we do when we go abroad? We give those who speak English an A+ while we shit on everyone else. Crack open a dictionary, learn a word or two that will come in handy while you're there. But I tell you what... if you insist on speaking English, then go to Maracana stadium in Rio de Janeiro during a Flamengo game and ask the Flamengo "torcida" (fans) to take a picture of you (in English). I would love for you to post a vivid description on slashdot of what happens next to you, your pretty English speaking mouth, and your camera. Btw, I'm half Brazilian.

    12. Re:More American Arrogance? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, have missed the point entirely.

      The rest of the world doesn't care if the average American can speak their language as well as English. What they care about is that the average American tourist visiting their country can't speak anything but English, is reluctant to even learn even two words of Mexican/French/Spanish/German/Italian/whatever, yet expects everyone else to be able to understand what they're saying to them.

      Don't travel to Mexico City/Paris/Madrid/Berlin/Rome/wherever and expect everyone to know your mother tongue. Not only is it practically unrealistic, it's arrogant beyond belief.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    13. Re:More American Arrogance? by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      This is such BS. Everyone in the world whose job it is to service tourists, anywhere in the world, speaks some English. American travelers know and expect this because it's the case. Why get offended when Americans speak English to someone they know speaks English? Isn't it more rude to actually know English but get all huffy when you're expected to use it?

    14. Re:More American Arrogance? by Attaturk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sick of hearing this stereotype because all one has to do is look at a globe and it becomes obvious why we're not so fluent in other languages. It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country. That's no small chore. I've been to Brazil twice, and each time it cost me $1,200 just for the ticket AND 24 hours transit time.

      Sorry but geography is a pretty poor excuse. You could always have tried harder at school. =P

      Seriously though, from my experience it is more a matter of education than geography.
      Being English, English is surprisingly my first language. But I picked up much more French and German at school than I ever did in my adult life despite latterly travelling to both countries and indeed working and living in both for a time. And with a half-decent background in Latin I find most languages with their roots in Europe to be pretty easy - and that applies for countries I've never been to such as Brazil, for example. Learning something is never a handicap - not learning something is.

      Personally I think it's a cultural problem faced by the U.S. as a whole. As an observer it seems to me that American schools revere sports much more than they do anything else. You need to worship jocks less and geeks more IMHO, but surely that's de rigueur here at /. ;-)

    15. Re:More American Arrogance? by ParnBR · · Score: 1

      You mean if you're traveling randomly in the western world, because most of the Panamerican people really don't speak English. =) Just to be nitpicky. ;)

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    16. Re:More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

      lol, what an idiot... What kind of lemming are you that you have to follow the majority because it's expected? It's true, people who want to learn about the locals are the minority, just like people who are cultured are in the minority and people who are ignorant are the majority (which you seem to be siding with.) So you're saying that these people would rather speak to ignorant people (majority) rather than cultured people that are interested in them (minority)? LOL! I need not say more. On a side note, the only reason why I stated I'm an American is as a disclaimer so people would know that I'm not some foreigner trying to bash Americans. Also, I don't think that we have much to be proud of in light of relatively recent events, but that's a different subject.

    17. Re:More American Arrogance? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      People don't get offended at Americans talking English to hotel clerks. They get offended by Americans talking English to the little old lady selling newspapers, and shouting in English at them as if they're stupid for not understanding. They get offended at Americans not even bothering to learn to say "Thank you" in the country they're visiting.

      More than anything, they're annoyed that Americans just assume that everyone speaks English.

    18. Re:More American Arrogance? by Cryp2Nite · · Score: 1

      They can easily "forgive" you, though, if you just say "pardonnez-moi, mais je ne parle pas français... peux-je parlez anglais?" (forgive me, but I can't speak French... may I speak English?) =)
      And that's the point right there. If you have the decency to make an effort, and acknowledge the fact that you're inconveniencing them by not being able to speak their language. In stead of making the -somewhat arrogant- assumption that they will have to adapt to you.

      It's a matter of common courtesy and makes all the difference in the world in their attitude towards you.

    19. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " I'm pretty sure you'd bitch about it, especially since they knocked on *your* door! "

      No, I wouldn't. I know this for a fact because I've had several jobs where I had to communicate with non-english speaking people. I did not get impatient, nor did any of my coworkers. Though I'm sure incidents have occured, I've never witnessed them despite having plenty of opportunity. The frustration I have had with non-english speaking people is when they are at the counter in a customer service job. The job requires the ability to commmunicate with the customer, but they can't do it effectively. That's annoying, and it'd be annoying anywhere else in the world.

      I understand your point a little more clearly, though. I think you are speaking more generally than I was. I was thinking about visitors coming to the USA and then taking up jobs. Didn't broaden my scope enough. I need to think about this a little more. I haven't witnessed this behaviour first hand. What I have dealt with was being put down because I wasn't bi-lingual.

      Sorry if I frustrated ya. Shoulda done more reading and less writing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:More American Arrogance? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The rest of the world doesn't care if the average American can speak their language as well as English. What they care about is that the average American tourist visiting their country can't speak anything but English, is reluctant to even learn even two words of Mexican/French/Spanish/German/Italian/whatever, yet expects everyone else to be able to understand what they're saying to them.

      You know, I didn't detect that sort of attitude from NanoGator. All he did was offer an explanation why things are the way they are - I can drive for an entire week and remain within English speaking areas - except for isolated pockets in cities, I would have to drive over 1000 miles to reach a non-English speaking area (Mexico). No wonder most people don't pick up a second/third language. I also don't know that your stereotype is accurate - it may be that you remember the obnoxious tourists, but the nice ones may have been German or something. I haven't been to europe, but when I go, I'll happily butcher 3 or 4 romance languages, then speak some passable German.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    21. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The rest of the world doesn't care if the average American can speak their language as well as English."

      You're right. I did miss the point, I misread the post I was replying to. I was thinking about people coming to the USA and being expected to speak English, not the other way around.

      Sorry if I frustrated ya. That's what I get for trying to speed-write a post before fully comprehending what the discussion was about. :/

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:More American Arrogance? by jorlando · · Score: 1

      My French teacher used to say... if you are a foreigner, speak to a Frenchman with the worst possible French and he will do his best to help you, speak to him in English and the answer (in English) will be "if you took the time to lear English, why didn't you learnt also French?" and there goes your help...

    23. Re:More American Arrogance? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      If I go to a foreign country, to a site that is promoted by the tourism boards of that country in the USA, then I damn well expect them to be able to understand basic english. If that pisses you off, please have your goverments stop advertizing/promoting your country in English, in the USA. But you like the money us BAD Americans bring in so you will just keep bitching.

    24. Re:More American Arrogance? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      The US promotes itself as a tourist destination all over the world. I don't see the US reacting in the way that you suggest by making sure that all of its citizens can speak French/Spanish/German/Italian/Japanese/whatever, do you?

      As I've said elsewhere in other posts related to this story, if you're a guest in someone else's country, is it so damned hard to actually learn a word or two of their language when you expect everyone else to be fluent in yours? Not only is expecting all of them to be able to speak your native tongue practically unrealistic, it's also arrogant beyond belief.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    25. Re:More American Arrogance? by 0racle · · Score: 1

      So you don't expect a Canadian to like hockey or ski? A Brit to have bad teeth? An Irishman or a Scotsman to be a drunk or at least prone to have a little too much? A European to be unshaven? Everyone does it all the time, previous experience with a fair number of one group gives you a basis with what to expect with other members of the same group. This isn't the same question 'if someone jumped off of a bridge would you,' its 'When you meet an american what do you expect.' I never said or implied that because you are an american you have to be a drooling, ignorant redneck, I said stop whining that thats what people have come to expect from an american thanks to your fellow americans.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    26. Re:More American Arrogance? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please point out what FEDGOV agency is doing this promoting? In the USA, it's mainly the corps doing the promoting and isn't most of the promotion in English?

      And besides, if we are as bad as you think we are why does your country keep allowing us to enter to visit those tourist sites?

    27. Re:More American Arrogance? by kidgenius · · Score: 1
      learn even two words of Mexican/French/Spanish/German/Italian/whatever,

      Last time I checked, Mexican was not a language dipshit.

    28. Re:More American Arrogance? by Otter · · Score: 1
      I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language.

      This is one of those things that "everyone knows" but the only real study I've ever seen of people in the tourist industry around the world placed Americans as the #2 most popular tourists, behind Germans. It was the British who came in last, driven by a complete unwillingness to attempt foreign languages or to try unfamiliar foods.

      (Sorry, I couldn't find a link in a quick search and it's 1 am. Sue me...)

      I realize that a certain type of American loves to hear about "our much detested arrogance" but it just ain't so.

    29. Re:More American Arrogance? by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (Sorry, I couldn't find a link in a quick search and it's 1 am. Sue me...)

      Realizing that wasn't going to satisfy you cynical bastards, I kept looking and:

      Courtesy of the BBC -- "British 'world's worst tourists'"

      As I'd recollected: Germans the favorite, followed by American, Japanese and Italians.

    30. Re:More American Arrogance? by lordlod · · Score: 1

      I have seen an American order a continental breakfast in a small thai roadside cafe, then rant and refuse to pay because the eggs weren't done right.

      I have seen older american tourists walking around markets refusing to deal in 'funny money' and insisting on paying for everything in US dollars.

      True the Brits and every other country have their bad tourists too, but there seems to be an attitude with many Americans that things should be the same as they are back home.

    31. Re:More American Arrogance? by jgardn · · Score: 1

      Gee, I'm an American too, and I took the time to learn Korean so that when I go to Korea, we can communicate.

      In fact, most of the American ex-patriots that I see speak enough Korean to get around.

      I'm kinda wondering where these arrogant Americans who refuse to "do as the Romans do" really are, you know? You yourself have busted the prototype - so why perpetuate it?

      And if you're going to complain about Americans who go to foreign countries but won't learn the language, why don't you complain about the foreigners who come here and won't learn English? Xenophobia works both ways.

      In fact, I daresay that Americans are far more tolerant of those from different cultures than those cultures are of us! The Koreans are incredibly tolerant, but they don't go nearly as far as Americans do! (How many Americans have applied for and received Korean citizenship that weren't of Korean descent? And the inverse?)

      --
      The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    32. Re:More American Arrogance? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that's funny. I'm in NY and all I have to do is walk 2 blocks to hear people speaking in Spanish, Russian, Chinese, Indian, Afghani, Korean, Hebrew, Arabic...

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    33. Re:More American Arrogance? by AnthonyPaulO · · Score: 1

      Are you obtuse? Who's talking about learning an entire language? We're talking about the arrogance of expecting others to know your language when you're travelling abroad, and here you are talking about learning entire languages??? Please, go infect some other herd...
      *Someone please do us all a favor and mod the parent outta here.*

    34. Re:More American Arrogance? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Did you learn any portuguese or not?

      I thought it is mere common sense to try and learn some of the language of a country you are visiting. It is irrelevant how far away it is, only that you are going to it.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    35. Re:More American Arrogance? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      *cough* Quebec *cough* ;)

    36. Re:More American Arrogance? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Did you learn any portuguese or not?"

      Yes, I did. I also had lengthy chats with my friend down there to help me understand the customs.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    37. Re:More American Arrogance? by 12357bd · · Score: 1

      I would have to drive over 1000 miles to reach a non-English speaking area (Mexico). No wonder most people don't pick up a second/third language.

      How true!

      But remember that's an 'anormal' situation. As species, humans show a high degree of language variation, even small placement changes (ie: differenet valleys) affects language. That's happenning all over the world on hundreds of languages.

      English or maybe future Mandarin 'standarization' or aglomeration, is not the norm, is the exception. We are already losing an invaluable source of knowledge with the actual rate of language destruction. Let's not pretend that's a 'natural' state!.

      --
      What's in a sig?
    38. Re:More American Arrogance? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an experiance I had whilst traveling in France.

      Just to set the scene, I'm Australian, I had an Australian flag sewn to my backpack and I was standing on a corner reading a map.

      All of a sudden I see this overbearing man heading towards me, he stops a bit to close for comfort in front of me and begins to YELL at me asking where the Eiffel Tower is. He was making huge gestures with his hands to accuratly convey that it was, in fact, the tower he was looking for. Now I was a little confused, aside from the fact that he had COMPLETELY missed the huge hulking radio tower that was blatently obvious in the background he was yelling at me and making gestures. What could I do? I said "Over their mate" and put my thumb over my sholder....

      You know what that ignorant fool said to his wife?

      "Oh look honey... an English speaking Oz-tralian" with more shock in his voice then was entirely comfortable.

      I shuddered thinking this person was able to get a passport... let alone a vote.

    39. Re:More American Arrogance? by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      Most people in Europe learn English without ever visiting an English-speaking country. I spoke it before I even went abroad for the very first time. I also learnt Russian without frequenting there and French with chances next to none to ever get to France. (Though I finally did get to hitchhike there.)

      Now, Hungarian and Spanish are in the queue and I've never been to Spain or any other Spanish-speaking country.

      And the next time an American Krishnaite comes up to me in my hometown and assumes I have to speak to him in his native tongue while he has the luxury of knowing not a word of the language of those people whose guest he's been for years, I am going to kick his arse. Really.

    40. Re:More American Arrogance? by anothy · · Score: 1

      1) if you have to fly somewhere to hear a different language, you don't live on either coast, in a city, in any state along our southern border or much of our northern one, nor within driving distance of same.

      2) if it costs you >$700 to get somewhere on a plane where they speak a different language, you need a new airline. i've taken trips to central/south american and western european countries with lower round-trip cost than that. recently.

      3) same with transit time. unless you're flying by hot air balloon, getting from any major US airport to brazil is well under 24 hours. getting to japan doesn't take that long.

      4) why do you believe you need to go where the language you'd like to learn to speak is the "national language" (when such a thing exists) to learn it? growing up, my parents had a housekeeper. she and her family were portuguese. were i interested (and less lazy), i could have learned all the portuguese i needed from them. i have friends who were fluent in spanish before ever going to a spanish-speaking country. we have this thing called "school". check it out, it's neat.

      5) even assuming you justify not speaking another language (and you needn't actually try very hard - "i don't care" or "i can't be bothered" is actually fine justification if you live in a primarily mono-lingual community), the original post was about the expectation that people in other countries speak english. first time i was in a spanish-speaking community for a few days, i quickly learned how to say "i'm sorry, i don't speak spanish" and "do you speak english?".

      6) you don't "land" if you're driving.

      as an aside, we went on vacation with the above-mentioned portuguese family once, to their family home in portugal. amazing trip. they stayed longer than us, and after we left went to a resort on the coast. when i was talking to the kid roughly my age upon his return, he recounted a story about being unable to speak portuguese to the wait staff because they only spoke english. sigh.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    41. Re:More American Arrogance? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      "I'm an American who's tired of hearing from foreigners that one reason why Americans are not liked is because we travel abroad to other countries and EXPECT them to speak english, as if they're expected to know our language."

      I'm sick of hearing this stereotype because all one has to do is look at a globe and it becomes obvious why we're not so fluent in other languages. It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country.


      The only countries in Europe with English as the official language are the UK and Ireland. They're frigging Islands, so it's not like we drive over all the time. Mainland Europe is a non-English zone.

      So when we go somewhere we don't speak the lingo.. We buy a frigging phrasebook. Is that so hard?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    42. Re:More American Arrogance? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Nice to see that moderators are so fair and even-handed. Someone calls me a dipshit without any provocation and they don't get modded. I use the same language in a sarcastic manner in a factual reply and I get modded as flamebait.

      But I guess that this is the moderation system that we get stuck with when anyone who's been on the site for a while and posts regularly is banned from moderating.

      To the person who modded my post flamebait whilst leaving the post that it was in reply to unmoderated: open your fucking eyes. Your bias is so obvious it's beyond a joke.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    43. Re:More American Arrogance? by bungo · · Score: 1

      I can drive for an entire week and remain within English speaking areas

      Yeah, I had a car like that once too!

      Maybe you should consider getting a Toyota?

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    44. Re:More American Arrogance? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      No. The word is dialect.

    45. Re:More American Arrogance? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I've seen [fill in the tourist] behave in exactly the same manner here in the U.S. Assholes abound in the world.

      Another note. I've personally stepped up and berated said English-speaking assholes for behaving that way. I've never seen other than sniggering fron non-English speakers when the tables were turned.

      Do I think that *all* non-English speakers snigger? NO. I'm bright enough to spot an asshole.

    46. Re:More American Arrogance? by ParnBR · · Score: 1

      Of course, Brazilians can be equally arrogant. I've seen (and felt ashamed by) loud and noisy Brazilians who thought everybody else should see how "fun", "friendly" and "entertaining" people they were. This happened to me in a ferry-boat, and I was glad I were not with them. =)

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    47. Re:More American Arrogance? by ParnBR · · Score: 1

      Just as a side comment, not every country is like this. I've never been in Japan, but some friends of mine told me some stories. It seems some Japanese people can be very scared if a foreigner approaches them speaking Japanese. This happened at a McDonald's.

      Clerk: Hello, welcome! (with Japanese accent)
      Friend: Konnichiwa!
      Clerk: ...

      The clerk was completely shocked, and couldn't speak for a while, eyes wide open. Luckily, the manager was around and took her station, while she recovered. I would assume she'd had a heart attack if my friend tried some advanced sentences (he's majoring in Japanese language). I can imagine a lot of reasons for that, but I don't know what's the truth. ^^

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    48. Re:More American Arrogance? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a car like that once too!
      Maybe you should consider getting a Toyota?

      Heh. The joke's on you - I already have a Toyota!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    49. Re:More American Arrogance? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, but companies can take out all the ads they want with out getting prior approval from the Goverment (doesn't apply to brokers and medical ads).

      Perhaps you are the one who is trying to force your values/way of life on us because you appear to not know what the hell you are talking about.

      Perhaps you don't like those BAD tourists from the USA because they remind you too much of your self.

    50. Re:More American Arrogance? by jorlando · · Score: 1

      I think that they assume that only japanese or descendants speak the language, so the surprise. another thing that can surprise them is when someone (japanese) can speak but can't read, since the illeteracy rate in japan is near zero.

    51. Re:More American Arrogance? by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      Dunno if that's true. I live in Australia, we are a LOOOONG way from any other sovereign nation and pretty much no one here knows another language because the language education system is frankly quite embarrassing. I am sure you are taught better Spanish in American schools than we are taught any of the 20 or so languages they try to teach us here without being able to choose one to teach for more than a year.

      Despite that, Australian tourists seem to be quite liked overseas. I am told there is a town in Germany that doesn't like Australians any more because a bunch of rowdy Aussies ruined their beer festival, and a bunch of Australians were targeted and blown by some extremist nutcases in Bali because of that Afghanistan business (not really the fault of Australian tourists, we have Mr Howard to thank for that). But apart from that, most people I know have been liked for their nationality. My Grandparents regularly go to France, and they say the French are nice to them, and if the French don't get snooty at someone it must mean that the nationality is liked. The same applies to the Kiwis, Canadians and pretty much every other insular, isolated, english speaking country I can think of.

      I don't want to speculate too much about why Americans have a bad reputation abroad. Maybe Americans turn into arseholes when they leave their own shores (I dunno if that is true but Americans seem a lot nicer on the internet than they do when they are over here).

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    52. Re:More American Arrogance? by mangu · · Score: 1
      It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language.


      The same holds true for Brazil. That's why they prefer to use Portuguese in Orkut, entende?

    53. Re:More American Arrogance? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You've also probably seen dozens if not hundreds of American tourists getting along just fine with the people in the country they're visiting, because they aren't acting like "American tourists".

      So how about you give the stereotype a break? There are assholes in every country. Sometimes they travel. Let's move along.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    54. Re:More American Arrogance? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      And we Americans get offended when you assume that we are all like those assholes that shout at old ladies.

      How many courteous American tourists have you seen? Probably not many, since they actually blend into the background pretty well.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    55. Re:More American Arrogance? by KamuZ · · Score: 1

      But all people speak english! or you don't see movies? :)

    56. Re:More American Arrogance? by anothy · · Score: 1

      1) i'd have accepted your first assertion if you'd said "most" instead of "almost all". take a walk through some of the country's larger chinatowns, for starters. beyond that, you're forgetting the original post's argument: that geography somehow inhibits americans' learning another language. your point doesn't impact my issue with that argument.

      2 + 3) just for kicks, i went to expidia and asked for a flight from Kansas (you didn't say where you lived, and Kansas was the first thing that came to mind for "the middle of nowhere") to Quito, for about 10 days. Continental does if for $599, 8hr on the dot (7hr 27min return). this was my first shhot. to be fair, now that i'm writing this it occurs to me that things are probably worse from, say, South Dakota, but the rationale in the grandparent is pretty thin, especially as an excuse for americans as a whole.

      4) Total agreement. but school-fluent gets you real-world conversational, at least, in all the languages i know real-world fluent non-english speakers in (that's quite a few).

      6) can i assume this is unrelated to my #6? if not, i'm now quite confused.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    57. Re:More American Arrogance? by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

      You missed the point entirely. The point is that the typical American has to travel a lot further to get somewhere where his native tounge is not the most common lanaguage than a lot of other people do. I'd be fluent in other langauges too if there was more of a need. For most others, learning a second language isn't just an elective thing - it's a necessary thing.


      If that were true, how would you explain the fact that I can speak english fluently?

      I'm Argentinian and if it were a matter of distance, I'd either have to cross the Atlantic or travel a very large part of america (the continent), to get to an english-speaking country (the Falkland islands don't count, they were only recently opened to Argentinians a few years ago).

      The problem with you Americans is that you simply don't care about your education. I leaned english in an Irish school since kindergarten, and could speak english decently, before travelling to an english-speaking country.

      You should get rid of that "it is not really useful, I'll never go to a xxxxx-speaking country" and start learning from elementary school. You never know what is going to happen later, and then it might be too late to learn.
    58. Re:More American Arrogance? by infolib · · Score: 1

      It's also about films, music etc. 90+% of the popular music heard here in Denmark is in english. (A lot of it made by danes in Denmark). Perhaps 75% of tv is in english, and the market is too small to warrant doing anything but subtitling the films. So, it's much easier for a dane to pick up english, than for an american to pick up, say, french or spanish.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    59. Re:More American Arrogance? by Swami · · Score: 1

      I grew up not too far from the Navajo Nation in Arizona, and about 25% of the student body at my High School was Navajo. But I only learned three words in Navajo: "Diné" (Navajo for "Navajo" or "the people"), "Ya`aa`tee" ("greetings"), and a word that's not appropriate in polite company, which sounds a lot like the English word for a mighty tree grown from an acorn. And yet I am fluent in Portuguese (or at least was; I'm a little out of practice). So geographical proximity doesn't explain everything.

    60. Re:More American Arrogance? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It's not most of the USA can drive in a day and land in a country with a different national language. With the exception of Mexico (which gets so much tourism from us that English is relatively well understood) we have to hop on a plane at >$700 a ticket to visit a non-english speaking country.

      Sais-tu, t'es dans mes "amis" de slashdot, mais avec une attitude comme celle-là, c'est assé tentant de t'enlever de cette liste.

      And you apparently are unaware of the existance of Canada. Sad.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    61. Re:More American Arrogance? by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Uh...I'm an American too. And damn courteous.

    62. Re:More American Arrogance? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      The problem with you Americans is that you simply don't care about your education.

      I stopped reading at this point. I don't tolerate lying. You will not get a polite response until you learn to make a polite statement.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    63. Re:More American Arrogance? by j-beda · · Score: 1
      I would have to drive over 1000 miles to reach a non-English speaking area (Mexico)

      Where are you located? Perhaps Québec is closer?

  17. yeah, too bad orkut stinks... by mekkab · · Score: 1

    If the Brazilians find it useful, then by all means, use the site in Brazilian.

    The AIX group was lame, the vi group had 1 conversation a millenia ago, and by the time I finished typing a long winded discourse on my favorite drummer Orkut logged me out. For all its warts, I'm sticking to Slashdot. Everyone else can have orkut.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:yeah, too bad orkut stinks... by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Danny Carey every time. If you havent heard it check out his drum solo in 46&2

      :)

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  18. It's not intended to be an *English* service... by bc90021 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...it's just intended to be a service.

    The English-speaking peoples of the world need to understand that outside the internet (and soon to be inside) they are a minority in the world. 1/6 of the world speaks Chinese, about the same proportion speaks Hindi, and just under that speak Spanish. While it is common to speak English, it is not the be-all-and-end-all, and people need to start accepting that.

    1. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by character_assassin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The English-speaking peoples of the world need to understand that outside the internet (and soon to be inside) they are a minority in the world.

      Cool! When can we start demanding our affirmative action and set-aside contracts?

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by Xiph · · Score: 1

      Chinese isn't one language, the ONE language which is most peoples native language is AFAIR spanish. most of the really big nations don't have one language, but a lot of smaller nations speak spanish, including most of south america (brazil excluded, curiously enough ;))
      also hindi isn't the native language of so many (AAFAIR) but is the or a language which is taught in public schools.
      That being said the huge population explosion in india might've changed this since i last bothered checking, but it was originally the reason i learned spanish.

      --
      Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
    3. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by zhenlin · · Score: 1

      I believe that is a measure of their first language. I suspect a lot more than 1/6 of the world speak English as a first or second language.

    4. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by jmkaza · · Score: 1

      You're right about Mandarin. It tops the list with a billion+ speakers, but English comes in second with 508 million. Hindi places third at 497 mil. Spanish takes a distant fourth with 392, and Russian rounds out the top five with 277.

    5. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by idlemind · · Score: 1

      However, business drives the economy. I wonder what percentage of business is conducted in English. If English becomes the mainstream in business dealings than I could forsee English becoming a world 'standard', even if it may be the minority language in the non-business realm.

    6. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by stubear · · Score: 1

      Actually here's a little tidbit of trivia for you. Why do the Olympics use French and English for everything? These are the two most common first or second languages for people around the globe. Also Mandarin is the most common language in the world followed by English second. One of these two languages will dominate the world in 50 years and it'll all depend on whether China becomes an open and democratic society. I'm going to start learning Mandarin.

    7. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by taniwha · · Score: 1
      I think that's only true if you count Hindi and Bengali as the same language .... if you count them as different languages Spanish comes in at #3 and Russian comes in at #6 (pretty much a tie with Portugeuse).

      (however there are so many different lists that give the number of people speaking which language and their numbers are so varying that I suspect the only thing you can safely say is "Mandarin is #1")

    8. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most Portuguese-speaking people can understand basic Spanish, although most Spanish-speaking people can't understand basic Portuguese. This has something to do with both langages' evolution... Portuguese has more vowel sounds, but vowel to consonant ration is lower than in Spanish. This means Spanish has more redundant information (by Portuguese standards), and Portuguese has more variations (which makes it harder to decode). Their grammars are very similar, although Portuguese is a bit easier.

      That said, there's a transition language, called Portuñol, spoken in Brazilian borders, which can usually be understood by both Spanish and Portuguese speakers. And because of recent Mercosur expansion (and related economic opportunities), Spanish is being seriously considered as a second language by a lot of people in Brazil.

      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    9. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by coupland · · Score: 1

      Two comments: 1. Chinese is not a language. Did you mean Mandarin? 2. While a lot of languages score higher than English as a *first* language, it is still by far the greatest "common denominator" language in the the world. When you go to Hong Kong you see tonnes of Asians speaking English to each other because it's the only language they have in common. I agree that people should feel free to speak the language they want, I just disagree with your insinuation that English plays such a minor role. In China road signs are all in Chinese (yes, Chinese is a written language, there is simply no spoken language named "Chinese") and English, and a huge number of those Hindi speakers you make reference to also speak English.

    10. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      So what? Most of the people on the net today can read at least some English. I fail to see what language 400,000,000 chinese farmers with out net access speak in has any bearing on this.

    11. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by geek · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, there are more english speakers in China than the US =) That's bound to happen when you have nearly 4 times the population.

    12. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about second and third languages is that they have a rather lower chance of being passed on to the next generation unless there is a real need for it.

      Therefore, if Spanish becomes more widely used than English on the Internet, more people may choose to learn Spanish rather than English as a second language.

    13. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      ok but I'm sure the Chinese and indian are also fed up with the Portuguese

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    14. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by lintux · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about second and third languages is that they have a rather lower chance of being passed on to the next generation unless there is a real need for it.

      Not as long as the kids go to a sane school with good English education. Which is quite a usual situation over here, at least.

    15. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      While it is common to speak English, it is not the be-all-and-end-all, and people need to start accepting that.

      I'd recommend you read the role that English played in the development of India over the last 200 years. Even today the country has about 20 major languages (most of them *official* - you can have a Government document in any of them) and about 1600 dialects of those languages, not all of which can be understood unambiguously by speakers of other dialects of the same language. In other words, it's a subcontinental Tower of Babel. It is also an interesting linguistic minicosm (it's hardly "micro") of the world. There are only two languages that play the role of national link - English (favored in the southern half, certainly in large cities) and Hindi (favored in the northern half, even in large cities).

      The average urban 20-year old Indian today speaks only English when with peers, and a combination of English and a local language with parents. I use terms like "mother tongue" and "primary tongue" with extreme caution - how can, say, Marathi be considered someone's mother tongue if he cannot speak more than two sentences in it? Is it just because his ancestors spoke the language? What if he thinks in English and translates to the language of his ancestors on the fly for the benefit of less-educated people who don't speak English? What would his "mother tongue" be then? This is the stuff that the statistics don't capture.

      You'd have to add 1/3 the population of India, the people who think in English, who were taught in English starting at age 2, who started learning a local language (if ever) only at age 12. We are closer to native speakers of English than you could possibly fathom. (Leave the accent aside, just judge us by what we *write*). When you add 300 million people to the number of English speakers worldwide...it certainly isn't a small minority even if it IS a minority.

      And what is the social status of English in India? It's the most favored language, period. Most parents these days spend more to send their kids to a school that teaches in English than a school that teaches in, say, Kannada - even if they themselves did not speak English until they were 12. They realize that it is for the best of their kids, so that the kids can be upwardly mobile even when the parents could not be.

      Those people in small Indian towns have understood something that the parent poster doesn't seem to have grasped. Stop maligning English. Start accepting the fact that it's the only viable global link language we have. It's much more valuable than you think.

    16. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      A "sane" school will have good education in multiple languages; not just English.

      Currently, English is highly rated for international communication but this could change.

      My point is that if this does change, for example if Spanish becomes a requisite for some specialized Web sites, the most popular second language could shift rather quickly whereas the primary language would not.

      My mother tongue is French and I have English as my second language. My children, currently, only speak French. Eventually, they will probably learn English or some other second language but the language they choose will be influenced by the then current World situation.

    17. Re:It's not intended to be an *English* service... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      One of these two languages will dominate the world in 50 years and it'll all depend on whether China becomes an open and democratic society. I'm going to start learning Mandarin.

      The fact that a significant number of Chinese mandarin speakers are already learning/using english suggests that you likely won't need that mandarin. Besides, as far as choosing a "lingua franca", nobody, not even the Chinese, would suggest that the world learn mandarin.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  19. wanh by eekygeeky · · Score: 5, Funny

    "OK, I onlee kno teh english lang and i wanto no wh4t teh 0thre d00ds r saying!!!!! they sux00r! b1gt1meeee! WTF? OMG? cant tey keep thos guyzz 0ff teh inetrn3t? OMG. OMG." bleh. carl

    1. Re:wanh by FatalTourist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now even Slashdot's going all Portuguese.

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  20. Times by Tragek · · Score: 1

    13 hours and 51 minutes per.... day, week, month year? We need units here people!

    1. Re:Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You mean like where it says, two words later, "in May"? Or are you just unaware that May is a month?

    2. Re:Times by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Yes but is that per metric May, or English May?

  21. Noticed this else where too by hrieke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I play a few online games and on one server the admin was yelling / kicking those who did not communicate in English.

    It's silly. The internet is global - the first W in WWW stands for World, and the last time I checked English was not the offical language of this planet.

    Those who are complaining should either mellow out or learn Portuguese.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Game server != world. If the admin wants people to speak one language, he's perfectly within his rights to do so... and there are some obvious practical reasons for that policy. What's so hard to understad about that?

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:Noticed this else where too by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      I've seen this too, in games as well as on message boards and chatrooms. Some people have a weird allergy to other languages. I don't get it.

      --
      Visit the
    3. Re:Noticed this else where too by hrieke · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      If the admin wants everyone to speak the same language then the server should not be up for the world to use and see.

      If you think that they're going to cheat by talking in their native language )give out key info / advantage), then of course there are easier ways than by global comms which everyone can see.

      Games are supose to be fun. Part of that fun is playing with people from around the world.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    4. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with cheating. It has to do with trying to maintain a community and a shared experience, rather than letting language automatically balkanize the game. The game is better when everyone understands each other.

      If the admin wants everyone to speak the same language then the server should not be up for the world to use and see.

      Umm... yeah, he runs the server and probably pays for the bandwidth, but who the hell does he think he is, laying down and enforcing rules of conduct?

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    5. Re:Noticed this else where too by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Interesting


      If the admin wants everyone to speak the same language then the server should not be up for the world to use and see.


      Just because the server is available, doesn't mean you have a right to use it. You're a guest. Abide by the owner's requests or go find somewhere else that's more accommodating. Or, better yet, set up your own server run by the rules you find ideal.


      If you think that they're going to cheat by talking in their native language )give out key info / advantage), then of course there are easier ways than by global comms which everyone can see.


      Many years ago, I was playing in a paintball tournament in Germany. It was hosted by the US Army and open to all. A mix of teams from various nationalities ended up attending.

      During one game, my team happened to be going up against a German team. I had found myself managing to sneak in to the middle of the field and had a couple of the German team flanked. As I shot at them, they didn't realize the impacts weren't coming from my teammates in front of them. I took one out. He called himself out as he looked down the line at me in surprise. And as he walked off the field, he said something to his friend who turned to look at him then down to where I was. Too late. I took the 2nd guy out.

      The interesting thing was the referee who was standing further up from all of us. He was a US Army guy and part of the group that were hosting the tournament. He called out in German to the first player I had eliminated. I later found out he was informing the guy that he had earned his team a harsh penalty for talking after being hit.

      The point? People will be rather brazen about their cheating if they think you don't know their language. And, perhaps, especially because you don't know their language.

      As a side note, this wasn't the only time I experienced this theme. My German sucks. But our crew had some very fluent German speakers in our midst. We'd often picked up comments made openly (usually concerning strategy for the next game) simply because they didn't expect us to understand them. Thankfully, few cheated.
    6. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      You're equating the enforcement of an single-language rule on a game server to the Holocaust? How stupid are you? I hereby invoke Godwin's Law upon you. And with any luck, Darwin's Law will impose itself upon you, too.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    7. Re:Noticed this else where too by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      "equating"? perhaps I am.
      The point still stands.
      The post is basically saying that the way to promote "understanding" is to drop the folks you don't understand.

      To continue the reasoning, I can state that I understand everybody in the world, as long as I ignore everyone who doesn't speak English and Spanish.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    8. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      So you are equating the two? You actually admit that? You think that marching people into gas chambers because of their religion is equivalent to disconnecting people from a game server because they won't obey your English-only rule? You're an idiot with absolutely no perspective, and I'm disconnecting myself from this thread.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    9. Re:Noticed this else where too by MrFlannel · · Score: 1

      At least around here, resteraunts, and other places had a "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone", Why then, when someone does this on the internet, does it become a crime against humanity? "Games are supposed to be fun", how is trying to play with someone who doesnt speak your (and the rest of your groups) language, and insists on not trying to work around that (babelfish?) considered fun? You cant interact with people if you have no way of communicating.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    10. Re:Noticed this else where too by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      These things are *NOT* equal but, they are equivalent. If you don't draw your line early, you are susceptible to the "Boiling Frog Syndrome".

      You can stay in the pot because the water is just getting warm. I prefer not to wait for it to boil.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    11. Re:Noticed this else where too by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      No, they are not. It's just a privately owned game server. Get over it.

    12. Re:Noticed this else where too by character_assassin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Today Warcraft III, tomorrow, the world! [Teacher in 2098] "Okay, class. Today we're going to discuss the English-Only Holocaust of 2031. It all began with this game server administrator in the 2000's who started to disconnect players for disobeying his English-only rule. Eventually, this hate-filled, power-mad psychopath would put down his Mountain Dew and take up the mantle of a brutal world dictatorship that marched non-English speakers into the gas chambers by the millions. If only someone had stood up to him back in 2004, countless lives could have been saved. But you know what they say: the frog gets boiled because he doesn't realize the water is slowly getting hotter." Just thought I'd flesh out your preposterous hyperbole.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    13. Re:Noticed this else where too by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Its about what you are willing to tolerate as acceptable behavior.

      Yes, a simple game server is trivial. But, once you find such behavior acceptible, you've reduced the threshold of what is acceptable behavior.

      I'll take the "extreme" of being inclusive, rather than letting myself be exclusive by degree.
      Now, if he brought up behavioral issues of the non-english speakers, as I mentioned in a different
      post http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=114846&cid=972 8620http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=114846&cid =9728620/

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    14. Re:Noticed this else where too by Stalky · · Score: 1
      If you don't draw your line early, you are susceptible to the "Boiling Frog Syndrome".

      Even though frogs are not.

      --
      Jeff
    15. Re:Noticed this else where too by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      Ok, I concede, lets keep em out of our servers but don't gas them. Can we at least make them use different bathrooms?

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    16. Re:Noticed this else where too by lintux · · Score: 1

      Dus als ik jouw post in het Nederlands beantwoord vind jij dat niet erg?

      (Translation: So if I reply to your post in Dutch, you don't mind?)

      Also, those numbers mentioned in the article don't make any sense at all. (41.2% Brazilians vs. 23.5% Americans) They would make sense if the 23.5% Americans were the only people who don't understand Brazilian, and they clearly aren't.

      If you measure the number of people on Orkut who can read English and the number of people who can read Portugese, you'll get something like 99% vs. 50%. Then I wonder why some people don't understand that it's obvious to speak in English in communities not specific to one language or country.

    17. Re:Noticed this else where too by lintux · · Score: 1

      Games are supose to be fun. Part of that fun is playing with people from around the world.

      And part of playing/communicating with people from around the world is speaking a language which they're most likely to understand. And, surprise surprise, but that's English.

    18. Re:Noticed this else where too by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree, we should focus our efforts on more pressing matters. For example we need to track down the guy who decided to use the abreviation www to shorten world wide web when you said it, they replaced a three sylible saying with a nine sylible acronym for gods sake!

    19. Re:Noticed this else where too by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      (Translation: So if I reply to your post in Dutch, you don't mind?)

      I don't mind if people follow up on my posts in Dutch or Tagalog or Catalan or whatever. I won't understand them, but I don't understand half the English posts, either. Frankly, I seldom understand my own. This one included.

    20. Re:Noticed this else where too by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      What's so hard to understand?

      That a lot of the time people feel the need to be rude in the process. I've seen admins that get a sadistic kick out of booting non-English speakers when they're not disrupting anything.

      There's a difference between wanting a common language and being violently xenophobic.

      --
      Visit the
  22. Mod Parent Upxxx0rXZ! by mekkab · · Score: 1

    I think this guy has the point: we don't speak english anyway.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  23. Surely Google can address this technologically by ewg · · Score: 1

    Surely Google can address issue with technology. Their search interfaces have options to restrict results by language and nationality; can't orkut do the same?

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    1. Re:Surely Google can address this technologically by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course they could come to an agreement with Alta-Vista, or some other company, and perhaps provide a link on every posting to view the posting in some other language, via BabbleFish.

      Not being an Orkut user, it doesn't really matter to me however. I think it would be great if google would post a confirmation request as part of the user submitting the posting in Portugese, or Big5, that states in 'English' something along the lines of:

      Your posting appears to be in Launguage Below the preview of your posting, is a BabbleFish translation of your posting in English. As the creator of the group you are posting to has indicated that English is the prefered language for the group, the BabbleFish translation is what will appear. If you wrote this in a language other than Language please select the correct language for your source post, so we can show you what may be a more accurate translation of your posting. The Moderator has indicated that if someone posts to this group in a language other than english, or includes profanity in the post, that post is subject to being deleated.

      Likewise for other languages as identified relavent to the group being posted to, and it's language preferences.

      For groups where 'any' language may be appropriate, a request to identify what language the user is posting in (defaulting to the language preference of the user) and a warning that the translation to other languages may not be completely accurate, would probably suffice.

      Then again, if I just stir up the coals a little bit more, perhaps I will get more people fighting. Ah well, crazy talk.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Surely Google can address this technologically by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 1

      Certamente Google pode dirigir-se à edição com tecnologia. Suas relações da busca têm as opções para restringir resultados pela língua e pela nacionalidade; não pode o orkut fazer o mesmo?

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    3. Re:Surely Google can address this technologically by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google can do it by themselves already.

  24. Orkut Invitations. by Cavio · · Score: 1

    Ok, I've got a gmail account, but I've yet to meet anyone with an Orkut account at all.

    Are these things real? I think you are all playing some kind of huge joke on me. Prove me wrong. Invite me. cavio@hotmail.com

    --

    Please bid on this Karmann Ghia! Please pleas

    1. Re:Orkut Invitations. by shokk · · Score: 1

      Me too. Gmail, but no Orkut.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  25. And now for something completely different: by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have only had one experience with Brazilian people online. It seems many .br kids who like to sit in net cafes think it's funny to destroy online communities. Take, for example, the MMORPG Tibia.
    These kids would walk around in-game and, upon seeing someone else, would say "br?". If you answered in English (or anything other than Portugese), they would promptly attack/gang-attack you.
    Somehow, I think something similar is happening here.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  26. Not surprising by NeedleSurfer · · Score: 1

    If there are more people speaking one language in some place it's just normal that it become the de facto language. Most speak portuguese then portuguese it is, second to most is english then english should be considered the second language of choice. Democracy, majority rules, isn't that what americans promote?

    1. Re:Not surprising by Annoying · · Score: 1

      I think you mean democratic republics as what Americans promote. As in majority elects a leader, everyone is bound to that representatives decisions. Such as joining a community with a leader and being bound by that persons decisions. Decisions which can include the language of the group, obscenity rules or even the whims of the leader.

      The orkut model of having a community leader who has such control actually fits the Real US model better than this crap ideal of pure democracy (mob rule). It lacks checks and balances so it is more of tyranny but if anyone doesn't like it there aren't orkut community militaries to bind anyone to a community leaders decisions outside that community.

  27. Re:may I ask,,, by eekygeeky · · Score: 1

    >"Who gives a shit?"

    >The english speaking people trying to use the >site? RTFA.

    um, that's who we're talking about- who gives a shit? they can't read the language, they should learn it, ask for help, use another circle-jerk service or stop complaining.

    they need a hobby, a life, or a brasilian girlfriend. Or Something.
    carl

  28. Forget Portoguese... Indian is the future(?) by Animaether · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With regards to languages in general, that is.
    ---
    Let me just paste from what I dropped into IRC a while back :
    This is translated from a Dutch 'popular science' magazine (Kijk, for the Dutch viewers) :

    There are many languages in the world. Scientists estimate the number to be around 6,000.
    A few languages are doing very well. Chinese is the biggest language (in terms of numbers of speakers), and will remain so for some time to come. Tamil, Bengal and Malaysian are quickly gaining ground, as is Arabic.
    In contrast are languages (among which many regional African ones) of which on average one 'disappears' every day.
    A surprising find is that English isn't doing very well either. it is expected that by 2050, only 5.5% of the world's population will speak the language at all.

    Speakers in % of the world's population per language:
    1950
    English : 9%
    Spanish : 5%
    Hindi/Urdu : 4.5%
    Arabic : 2.25%

    2050
    English : 5.5%
    Spanish : 5.3%
    Hindy/Urdu : 6%
    Arabic : 5.2%

    Young speakers (age 15-24) in 2050 (x 1,000,000):
    Mandarin-Chinese : 166.0
    Hindi/Urdu : 73.7
    Arabic : 72.2
    English : 65.0
    Spanish : 62.8
    Portuguese : 32.5
    Bengal : 31.6
    Russian : 14.8
    Japanese : 11.3
    Malaysian : 10.5
    ---
    With regards to Orkut : As already stated.. don't bother visiting the Brazilian pages if you can't read them anyway.
    Vice-versa, if the Brazilian would want English readers to read it, write in English.
    ---
    With regards to the French : None of the doctors/nurses who helped a friend who was in a car wreck in France knew English. 'nuff said.
    ---
    With regards to the web as whole : English rules and will rule for a long, long time to come.

  29. Everybody samba!! by Torgo+X · · Score: 1

    Uhoh, here comes the neighborhood!

  30. sounds like people need to learn some net etiquett by Nyder · · Score: 1

    It's wrong to invade a conversation by using another language, or noise type posts. But the internet is about everyone, so other then being rude, just have seperate forums for "English" "Portulgiese"(sp?), etc. I think there's enough room for everyone on the net.

    I also think people have the right to have "english only" sections, "Spanish only" web sites, so on. Mainly on orkut, after all, it's about inviting friends...

    --
    Be seeing you...
  31. Stupid by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Ok, I see an article about Orkut. Go to Orkut web site to see what it is about. They tell me GO AWAY. What a nice place!!! In other words, you can't make friends on Orcut unless you already have friends on Orcut...

    This Orcut thingy, therefore, may be good or bad, but since they are a closed (secret) society I see no way to judge it. I just walk away, not to be back any time soon.

    1. Re:Stupid by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

      or you could ask for an invite.... Orkut members do read slashdot.

    2. Re:Stupid by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I usually don't ask for an invitation into something I didn't check out beforehand. What if the ritual of joining includes a human sacrifice, for example :-)

      Generally, though, Orkut's model presumes that "you are nothing, we are everything". I don't like that. If I can't join (or leave) on my free will, I don't want it. I want to be in control of my life.

      Granted, there are many cases when people must cooperate (and ask each other) to do something. If I want to check in some change on sf.net I'd better ask for write access to the project's CVS. That is understood, because there is a real need to state my cause, and if I am wrong with my changes other people will be inconvenienced.

      But why would anyone be denied an access to a glorified bulletin board? That I can not understand. And I see no reason to restrict access for non-members. For example, hide names & emails of everyone; make it read-only; make sessions short... But as it stands, I see none of it and therefore I see no reason why it may benefit me (or anyone else, to that matter). So why should I bother someone who I don't know asking him|her|it to vouch for myself? That was discussed to death on K5 recently.

    3. Re:Stupid by zo219 · · Score: 1

      Would you like an invite? Had only 54 pieces of Brazilian spam in my Orkut mailbox today.

    4. Re:Stupid by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now I know that Orkut has its own email :-) Secret society indeed, if such information can be obtained only when an insider talks too much :-)

      Myself, I definitely stopped playing in secret societies at the age of 7 at the latest.

    5. Re:Stupid by zo219 · · Score: 1

      Did I say email? Darn it, next thing you know I'll be giving away the secret handsha-- oops!

  32. Re:Repeat after me by character_assassin · · Score: 1

    Diversity is the opposite of excellence.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  33. Re:Repeat after me by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
    America is not the centre of the world. Diversity is ok. Multi-culturalism is ok

    Multi-culturalism is okay? Even here in the USA? Guess it was a little hard to tell what with all of the blacks, hispanics, asians, arabs, and other nationalities running around. We have no problem with multi-culturalism. But that isn't even what this issue is about...

    The Americans aren't demanding that everyone speak *American English*. They are simply wanting people to speak *English* The language wasn't invented by nor is it owned by the Americans. Is their demand wrong? I don't think so being that a good amount of the entire *worlds* communication happens in English every day AND seeing that the company that owns Orkut is an *American* company.

    Need a great Linux laption? Email me for details!

    --
    Anthony Papillion
    Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
    "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
  34. Brazillians? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    Check out my own network, brazillian friendly!

  35. It's about give and take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You speak English and I'll get one of those waxings your people are famous for.

  36. both! you idiots! by maggern · · Score: 1

    The site should use it's memeber mass to make articles in both languages! How hard could it be? It's surely profitable!

  37. Goggles by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    ...between English-speaking users of Goggle's orkut and the Portuguese-speaking users of Brazil...

    Would it be offtopic to say I just bought a nice pair of novelty Beer Googles from the novelty shop yesterday?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  38. Arguing? by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    May I ask- how do they even know there's an arguement going on? And in what language is the arguement taking place?

  39. How about a compromise... by Ankle · · Score: 1, Troll

    Klingon? mubelmoH Holraj *rgh* wab.

  40. Knee-jerk reactions by ParnBR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We had our fair share of knee-jerk reactions from a lot of people. Some Americans felt (really!) threatened by the fact a non-English speaking country dominated Orkut's stats overnight, and voiced out their frustration in a very vocal manner. Some Brazilians felt outraged and started an equally stupid reaction, flooding English-speaking communities with messages in Portuguese. Perhaps it has happened otherwise, I'm not sure.

    This could be discussed in a more civilized, intelligent way, but (as often happens also in Slashdot) well-thought and valuable opinions are just lost in the noise. Nobody respects anybody, that's what we can get from all this.

    I think it's a shame that a service like this, which can be used to connect people from every corner of the planet, isn't better used. Personally, I'll still try to do the best use I can. Orkut already helped me to find some (long lost) old friends and I'm happy I could find them. ^^

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  41. The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by jefferson · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Maybe the Brazilians are dominating Orkut because lots of Americans, like me, have declined all their Orkut invitations. Friendster swept through my circle of friends a while back. Lots of people joined, and then we discovered that there's not actually anything to do there. Once the novelty wore off, we stopped logging in. Then several people (from a different circle of friends) invited me to Orkut, and I thought "why bother?" and declined the invitations.

    Once the Brazilians figure out how lame and useless these social networking things are, their numbers will drop.

    1. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by escoz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Probably it's lame for americans, who don't see in social networking a big thing. For us brazillians, friendship is by far the most important thing you can have.. and it's not only orkut, but blogs and photoblogs.

    2. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 1

      Once the Brazilians figure out how lame and useless these social networking things are, their numbers will drop. You think so? Have a look at fotolog.net, for some reason Brazilians really took to it and in so doing almost destroyed it. Nothing to do with language, a large percentage of them (and there were some very notable exceptions) were teenagers using it for "social networking" and killing it with volume, very few were using it for the site's original intended purpose, to make photo blogs, they were just using the photo comment fields to message each other and a lot of them were cheating to get around the limits on the free accounts. I don't half wonder if the issue at orkut is similar, it's not the language so much as the sheer volume of no content teenage blather....

    3. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by escoz · · Score: 1

      I live in chicago.. I've been living here for 2+ years now.. I know a lot more about americans than you might think... :) And I'm far, far from being a racist...

    4. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      You just negatively characterized an entire people. And don't tell me you were making an objective, non-normative statement - you weren't. So, yes, you're a racist. Either embrace your racism (bad) or change it (good).

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    5. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by escoz · · Score: 1

      I was not doing that. I don't need to prove you anything. I talk from what I know, and that's what I know. How many brazilians do you know?

    6. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Jesus christ, man, how do you get racism out of:

      americans...don't see in social networking a big thing.

      Wow. If my enemies list wasn't full of assholes already, you'd be on there. Please add me to your enemies so I can ignore your moronic posts :)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      How many brazilians do you know?
      I'm not characterizing all Brazilians the way you are to Americans, so it's irrelevant how many Brazilians I know. You're changing the subject, as you're clearly uncomfortable with your own racism. And that's a healthy discomfort... it can lead to true change, and eventual escape from your racism, if you transform your shame into understanding and tolerance. You have a long road ahead of you, and I wish you well.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    8. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Legendre · · Score: 1

      irrelevant how many Brazilians I know. character_assassin, you simply don't know what you're talking about because I highly doubt that you personally know any brazillians. I've lived in Brazil and in the US for over a decade (each), and yet, I'm not a native of either country. I can tell you objectively that, on average, there is a much higher probability of a random brazillian national being friendly to you off the streets of Sao Paulo (the "wall-street" financial center of Brazil), than of a random american being friendly to you in New York City. For instance, a Kitty Genovese type of incident would be completely out of character for Sao Paulo . In NYC, such apathy is almost expected. So yes, brazillians ARE more gregarious than americans. More friendly not only towards each other, but also towards strangers.

    9. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      So? You've entirely mischaracterized this discussion and his original point. He claimed that social networking was not important to Americans. The degree to which you value your social network really doesn't have much to do with whether you're nice to a stranger on the street. Or do you have a lot of homeless people who asked you for change whom you've welcomed into your social network? Let's take another city I've spent time in: Japan. Let's say that, on average, Japanese people are cooler towards strangers than people in some other city, be it Sao Paulo or wherever. Does that imply that Japanese people don't value their social networking as much? Wrong. Japanese value it as much as any people. Maybe you should have hit "Preview" instead of "Submit" before you posted what you did...

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    10. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Or that, in America (and in my experience most countires) social networking isn't done on the Internet. Most bussiness transactions could happen anonymously over the Internet, but don't. Why? Well, to a great many people, nothing replaces going and meeting someone, having some drinks, and comming to an agreement with a handshake. There is something to that that IM, e-mail and so on just can't replicate.

      I know many people on the Internet, but none are as close to me as those that I know in person, even is just for a little while. There is something about human contact that the Internet is not yet able to replace.

    11. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to "Americans are a bunch of introverts that think other people are icky! Laugh at their stupidity!" :O

    12. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

      It is possible to meet people from the internet in real life. Many organizations are set up to facilitate. I use things like Orkut to find people geographically near me; I consider this to be its main feature, not the friends of friends thing.

    13. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Legendre · · Score: 1
      character_assassin, you seem like a reasonable guy. But do tell me, how many brazillians do you know?

      Americans need the word "social networking" to describe the concept of .... being friendly? What's wrong with "hanging out", "socialize", "become friends"? You go "network" at a business conference, since "socialize" is a no-no during work hours, right? (No need to reply, purely rhetorical).

      You know what? Brazillians don't make such distinction. Portuguese doesn't even have a word for our concept of "social networking", as far as I know. I think someone needs to go do some traveling...

      And one last thing, are you telling me that at no point in your life were your friends actually strangers to you? If you're never nice to strangers, how the heck did you ever make friends in a new setting? (rhetorical)

    14. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by character_assassin · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that, because it was the Brazilian who started this argument who introduced the term "social networking" to this thread. I don't use that term outside of this discussion, primarily because I have the same objections to it you do. But apparently, our Brazilian friend does.

      Guess you didn't read back that far. In the future, I recommend reading the entire discussion so as not to look like an idiot.

      --

      If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    15. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Legendre · · Score: 1
      I guess I was wrong: Character_assasin is not reasonable after all.

      But back to your point. Our Brazillian friend has been in the USA for 2+ years now, and hence is using the term "social networking" so he can get the point across to the english-speaking audience.

      Guess you didn't realize he was writing in english in a vain attempt to communicate a message to you. In the future, I recommend a friendlier demeanor in slashdot discussions. Shouldn't be too hard for an aggressive "social networker" like yourself, right?

    16. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Legendre · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to realize the delicious irony of the situation yet. :)

    17. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

      He probably meant "prejudiced", but that doesn't sound as negative as "racist".

    18. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Lorean · · Score: 1

      I think he decided to stop feeding the troll.

    19. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      The friendliness of Americans never ceases to amaze me...

    20. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by dmir · · Score: 1

      Not any time soon. If you go to Search on Orkut, it shows most recently joined members. Typically 8 out of 10 are from Brazil...

    21. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by Lorean · · Score: 1

      I'm not American.

    22. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I was actually referring to character_assassin. ;)

    23. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by neves · · Score: 1

      Social networking always has been the killer application of internet in Brazil. Probably no other country use chat, irc, and IM as Brazil. A lot of people live by it. This is probably the most interesting lesson of this quarrel: to see how a country that has a lot less internet users become predominant in a social networking service. This is a consequence of brazilians culture, which puts a lot of value in social relations.

    24. Re:The Brazilians just aren't jaded yet. by klui · · Score: 1

      I agree that friends are important. But to me, the most important thing that I have is my family. I don't have a lot of friends, but those whom I consider my friends I would trust them with my life. I am so busy that I don't have the time to constantly keep tabs with even email or even a phone call. I do know that even if we lose track for even a year our friendship will not diminsh. That's the reason why I don't value online communities as much as my real network of friends.

  42. Re:Repeat after me by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    Apparently you completely missed the point.

    The fact that Americans "are simply wanting [sic] people to speak *English*" is the problem. Having a bunch of different cultures "running around" in one country isn't multiculturalism; having a diverse set of cultures co-existing in a climate of mutual respect and operating under the assumption that it's OK to speak different languages, have different religions, or eat different foods, on the other hand, is.

    To use your own argument against you, a good amount of the world's communication may happen in English... but a greater amount is happening in Portugese, or this wouldn't even be an issue. Orkut may be an American company, but I don't see anywhere on their site that you are required, or even encouraged, to write in English.

    The world-wide-web is global. Get used to it.

  43. Re:solved? by pseudochaotic · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is a solution, except for your communities. After all, if the Brazilians all do this, then you've got the exact same problem.

    --
    And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
  44. Re:Repeat after me by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    Wow, I didn't realise that members of the KKK were smart enough to figure out this intarweb thing.

  45. Re:may I ask,,, by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

    I see this modded troll for the tone.

    However, I agree. The whole argument over the languages is just dumb. If you only speak/read/type one language then, just read/write post in it and ignore the others.
    It doesn't matter what language "the service" is in if people can add content. If you can't read their content then, it obviously wasn't meant for you; regardless of your language.

    On the other hand, this is the same 'ol Brazil bashing (not completely undeserved) that we've seen before.

    Developers/Programmers/Hackers, how many times have you seen:
    "I'm from Brazil, I don't want to learn to program but, how can I ..."

    "... be a hacker ?"
    "... make this javascript I copied from ... work on my site ?"
    "... make a program that does ... ?"
    .
    .
    .

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  46. Orkut is not public chat by Zeromous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People on orkut should be able to speak their mind, in whatever language they choose. Orkut is not just a private forum, but its also a social experiment. To be honest, I find it fascinating that a demographic war is shaping up. Who will win? ;)

    I would also like to point out that orkut is unlike IRC, where perhaps it would be rude to speak a language in a channel that is prodominently another.
    Flooding a channel with text that is gibberish to the majority of its recipients prevents the free flow of information, defeating communication. It is clear this is not the case with orkut.

    --
    ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  47. Re:Repeat after me by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

    Repeat after me....

    "I am an Individual"

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  48. Re:sounds like people need to learn some net etiqu by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's also wrong to disrespect other cultures by not even bothering to check how the names of their languages are spelt: would it really have been that hard for you to look at the spelling of Portuguese in the story summary (or even Dictionary.com) before typing your post?

    This isn't a flame, it's just a heads-up that it's small things like this that make others regard Americans as arrogant.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  49. Re:The damn place is called Orkut! by escoz · · Score: 1

    What the heck does orkut means? Is it an english word? Why the heck is it clear that we have to speak english on it?

  50. I HAVE THE SOLUTION by DarkMantle · · Score: 1


    Let's all speak Elvish

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  51. Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by kbahey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unless you have a majority of the visitors / participants that are multilingual capable, you have to separate the content of a web site by language.

    I say this from experience on several newsgroups, then forums over the years.

    It starts out simple: people who are early adopters often speak English, and can read English (e.g. programmers, ...etc. who know English anyway). Then as technology spreads among the less techno-elite, people who do not know English well want to express themselves in their native language.

    In languages that use a non Latin character set, there is a phase where internet communication uses Latin characters to represent their own language. I have seen at least Hindi and Arabic written in Latin alphabet, with some modifiers. (Even some Euro languages lost some characters, like Scandinavian and Germanic languages, where the "O" in Torvalds lacks the stroke in the middle, and the "A" with the small circle, ..etc.)

    There are various "dialects" used in these Latinized alphabets, and people learn one version or the other depending on where they learn it first.

    This becomes a transitionary phase on these forums, where people will express themselves using this Latin based alphabet to represent their own language.

    Then later, as their own language becomes more wide spread and accepted, more people get to use computers and the internet, and they perhaps do not know any language other than their own. This leads to them demanding that only their native language be used in forums that are about their country/society/language/...etc.

    Anyone who speaks a "foreign" language in those forums is reminded that the primary language is such and such, and not to confuse others. Some take this as a matter of national pride, some take it as mere courtsey, others take it as common sense, and yet others take it as a mere form of communication. Depends on who you are, your outlook, and your biases.

    That is what I have seen in several newsgroups/forums over the years.

    So, this is the phase that Orkut is at right now.

    Eventually, they may have to separate the content by language. Although there are barriers here, because Orkut is about "networking", and not just "discussions".

    It would be interesting to see how this turf war gets resolved eventually, at least for those who are like me who like to observe the new frontiers that the internet have defined/merged/melted/setup.

    P.S. In Canada for example, where there are two large groups speaking two languages, a majority of web sites give the option on what language to use at the very beginning. Forums are separated into two languages on many sites. There is a minority who are bilingual and can (and do) participate in the two camps. I imagine Hispanics in the USA, and Spanish speaking Anglos do the same on some forums.

    1. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by faaaz · · Score: 1

      I have to make one small comment. Where you said the "O" in Torvalds lacks the stroke in the middle. Torvalds is spelled correctly. There is no "O" with a stroke in the middle. You mean his name is really Törvålds? No.

      What you seem to mean is that the letter o and the letter ö, or the letter a and ä, are the same. They are not. They are as different as e and y.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
    2. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by RJack-45 · · Score: 1

      I think he meant the ø letter. Tørvalds

    3. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by Erik+Corry · · Score: 1

      Yeah, only Tørvalds is not his name. Torvalds is correct.

    4. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by Krach42 · · Score: 1
      I imagine Hispanics in the USA, and Spanish speaking Anglos do the same on some forums.


      A very small percentage of the hispanics in the USA speak Spanish with enough fluency to be communicable. (Don't tell me I'm wrong, I live in New Mexico, where over half the population is Hispanic.)

      Most of the reason for this is because the schools actually PUNISHED students for speaking in Spanish. (Similar to what was done to some Sign Languages, and deaf children.) Thus, the majority of students stopped speaking English, and eventually developped a habit to not speak it.

      There's another group that still exists today. Their parents speak Spanish, and spoke Spanish enough that they learned Spanish, and can understand it, but they are incapable of speaking it. This is primarily due to a psychological block because Spanish was viewed as "inferior", and that using it would diminish your English speaking skills, which you needed in order to survive in the world.

      Honestly, New Mexico has treated its second official language entirely unfairly, and unjustly. (Yes, here in New Mexico, both English, and Spanish are official languages... but Spanish is mostly an afterthought)
      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    5. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by crazyhorse44 · · Score: 1

      Here in Los Angeles... everyone speaks Spanish. However... when I was in the military... I found that Latinos from Texas and New Mexico did not. Wierd phenomenon.

      --
      . SLASHDOT: Home of the vicious nerd.
    6. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by jeorgen · · Score: 1
      (Even some Euro languages lost some characters, like Scandinavian and Germanic languages, where the "O" in Torvalds lacks the stroke in the middle, and the "A" with the small circle, ..etc.)

      Troll! There are no strokes or small circles in Torvalds. There are perfectly good uses for plain "a"s and "o"s in Scandinavian languages, without any dots, circles or strokes. And the name Torvalds happends to be one of these cases.

    7. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      You are right about Finland not being Scandinavian. The Finnish language belong to the Finno-Ugric group, which is more Asian than European.

      But you are wrong about Linus Torvalds, because IS ethnically and linguistically Scandinavian.

      That is because he is ethnically and linguistically a Swede, who form a considerable minority in Finland, from the heyday of when the Swedes were the dominant Empire in the area.

    8. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction.

      So I am wrong in Linus' case. And by the way, I was not trolling, like the guy from Sweden a few posts down was saying.

      However, I have seen corporations impose English only names in email addresses. So if someone does have a letter that does not exist in English, they approximate it to an English character. Whether it is an accented French letter, or double A for Dutch/Nodric, ..etc. e.g. Jorgensen would have that stroke, but not in his email address.

      Exactly the same thing happened in the early days of the net, where non English language letters are approximated to an English letter. Even in languages that do not use the Latin alphabet at all, like Hindi and Arabic.

      But as technology gets to the masses, and native support for it is more widespread, we get less use of that, and things evolve to what I said.

      That was my main point.

    9. Re:Unless you have a majority multilingual ... by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it has primarily to do with how long they've been in the US. Here in Texas and New Mexico the Hispanics have been here almost 400 years.

      They were literally FORCED to not speak Spanish. So now most of them don't. In Los Angeles, I imagine that the Hispanic culture is much fresher from immigrants. Thus, almost all speak Spanish. :)

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
  52. Re: not insightfull! hehe by maggern · · Score: 1

    hehe, rated insightfull

  53. They are right to complain by Nibelungo · · Score: 1

    American Orkut users definitely have a right to complain about the brazilians, not because of portuguese replacing english, but because of the behavior of most brazilians. When asked politely to speak in a language in wich more people would understand them, most of them answer with stuff like: "fuck J00 you american imperialsit pig!" "fuck J00 , Fuck Bush" That's simply moronic, but unfortunately seems to be the way most of my people think(I'm brazilian).

    1. Re:They are right to complain by escoz · · Score: 1

      I agree with you.. most of the brazilians on the internet are teenagers... that explains what you said.. On the other side, the americans complaining are usually the ones that enter groups with half english/half portuguese people, and ask everybody to speak english.. If you don't like other languages, don't join multi language groups.. It's that simple.. Find your friends, and make your english group..

    2. Re:They are right to complain by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      The one time I remember playing with a Brazilian person online was on a FPS (specifically, "America's Army"), and the guy was a TKer. He didn't go out of his way to kill team members, but if you were between him and his target, he would just shoot through you.

      Suprisingly, he managed to avoid getting votekicked.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  54. Re:Repeat after me by character_assassin · · Score: 1

    I'm Korean-American. I doubt I'd be welcome at a Klan rally. And your arguing style - tar your opponent with invective and name-calling rather than address his ideas - is much more the Klan's style than mine. How's that feel?

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  55. Re:Repeat after me by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I find it a bit funny that you prefaced that statement "Multi-culturalism is ok" with "Repeat after me." It seems that a lot of people have convinced themselves of the validty of this statement without giving it much thought. Repeat after me: "We are all individuals."

    Do you believe standards are bad? Do you think a million different "standards" should exist merely for the sake of diversity? For humanity to be productive, we have to standardize on a language we all understand, be it English, Portugese, or Esperanto. Besides, the idea that language is tied to culture is nothing more than moronic. Yes, fractured languages "preserve" cultures in the sense that they prevent people of different cultures from sharing aspects of their cultures and integrating aspects of other cultures more easily into their own. In other words, fractured languages create artificial barriers among people preventing the natural mixing of cultures that would normally occur. Personally, English is my third language, and I am more than happy to speak and write it (I also had to learn French as my fourth in order to appease those bloody Quebecers).

    Now that that is out of the way, we come the the subject of culture itself. Multiculturalism shouldn't be about artificially creating a thousand small cultures; it should be about merging the best elements of cultures.

    Finally, I'd like to address the often mentioned concept that "all cultures are equal." The moment you accept that "Nazis are evil" you accept that all cultures are in fact not equal. I'm certainly not saying that American culture is the ueber-Culture which should assimilate all others (I'm not even an American), not am I implying that American culture is the best culture by any means. I merely wish that we would put all this politically correct garbage behind us and examine the situation instead of ignoring everything around us and repeating to ourselves that "Multi-culturalism is ok."

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  56. Not sure about the Hindi.... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

    about the same proportion speaks Hindi

    If your talking about India, then I think your wrong about Hindi. From the CIA factbook:

    English enjoys associate status but is the most important language for national, political, and commercial communication; Hindi is the national language and primary tongue of 30% of the people; there are 14 other official languages: Bengali, Telugu, Marathi, Tamil, Urdu, Gujarati, Malayalam, Kannada, Oriya, Punjabi, Assamese, Kashmiri, Sindhi, and Sanskrit; Hindustani is a popular variant of Hindi/Urdu spoken widely throughout northern India but is not an official language

    30% of a billion is ~300 million or less than the population of the US. Nothing to sneeze at but not 1/6.

    In talking with an Indian coworkers, one of the things that struck me was how little of their native languages they knew or remembered. In particular, one guy brought out his passport. It had two languages, an Indian one and English. He could only understand one of them---Engish. He laughed about it, but I felt very "culturally imperialist" when he pointed it out. :)

    IMHO, one of the reasons that India has been so successful in outsoucing is that so many people know English. There is much less of a language barrier in communicating designs or requirements.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:Not sure about the Hindi.... by sdr · · Score: 1
      Are you sure it is a case of remembering the other native language? In India, official documents like passport are written in two languages, Hindi and English. A non-Hindi speaker (like me) may only understand the English version. I understand spoken Hindi but can barely speak it and can not read it at all.

      Going back to the languages spoken in India, according to the 2001 census, the number of speakers of Hindi is about 414 million and the number of Bengali speakers in India is about 85 million. Given that Bangladesh had about 211 million people in 2002 and almost all of them sopke Bengali, there are at least 296 million people whose first language is Bengali.

  57. Read that wrong by cosyne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I first scanned that as "13 hours and 51 minutes a day" and I was like "nah, I don't think I use it for much more than 12 hours."
    Gotta take my eyes away from the screen for a bit...

  58. A frequent orkuter's opinion... by MsMel · · Score: 1

    I've been very frustrated with a large and obnoxious group of people who refuse to be polite regarding language choice. 90% of the spam I get on Orkut is in Portuguese, usually having nothing to do with the designated English community they are spamming. Many people refuse to follow the designated language of communities and get angry when asked to translate. Replies like this are more than common; this was directed to me July 12th: "please babe, don't bother... As you can see you're the only gringa here... So keep quiet. We're still speaking in portuguese here! Not happy?! go learn it, as I learnt English" It's not a matter of being able to ignore non-English speakers, it's about people being rude to one another.

    --
    A good way to threaten somebody is to light a stick of dynamite. Then you call the guy and hold the burning fuse up to t
  59. Re:may I ask,,, by Zibblsnrt · · Score: 1
    "Oh, cry me a goddamn river" is more what comes to mind to me.

    -PS

    --
    "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
  60. Welcome to the Internet, America! by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
    We Americans assume that because we can invade any country we want based on religious -oops, I mean economic -oops, I mean ideological -oops, I mean anti-terrorist reasons, yeah, that's it, "Anti Terrorist Reasons", we can dictate how the Internet operates. To be more specific, how the Web operates; most citizens and politicians don't really know or care what the Internet really is ("email? well, that's on my *computer*, not the Internet...and what do you mean people email in other languages? All email that I have ever received is in English!"). Or maybe we've been this way for a while now...We are arrogant but everyone puts up with us in the political and economic worlds. This "world of everyday people", the inter-network, is turning out to be...different. We claim to be "democratic", as in "A Democracy", but let's face it, when we are confronted with being the minority we don't really like all that much anymore the old idealistic values that our forefathers put forth and held to be true.

    How many bills have appeared in the United States that have attempted to control Internet content outside of existing laws? How many have passed into law? How many have quietly dissolved due to impracticality? ("What do you mean we can't shut down foreign websites if we don't like their views -this is America!") We, as a people, are acting a bit like a bully that has met someone that...isn't afraid of us and won't simply bend to our will. We're not sure what to do, but like any spoiled brat, the first thing we'll do is get angry. After that, we'll try something less noticeable, like ignoring it. Someday, maybe, we just might learn to get along, be part of a larger community and enjoy life.

    Short term solution? Filters should be made available so that the end user can choose to ignore any information that is deemed "noise". It won't help our attitude, but it will make the service more useful to everyone.

  61. Wow, Orkut really is popular in Brazil by BigDish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading this article about Orkut being so popular in Brazil, I decided to take a chance on finding a friend I had known for a couple years, but lost contact with after he moved to Brazil. I plugged in his name and *BAM* I see his profile and his picture.
    I sent him a message - hopefully he remembers me and responds. I just thought it was sort of cool to re-find him that way :-)

    1. Re:Wow, Orkut really is popular in Brazil by 12357bd · · Score: 1

      if you find-it strange, get ready (in 10 years) for the chinese wave! :)

      Amazing how people call other languages strange!!!

      --
      What's in a sig?
  62. Ok! :-) by mfh · · Score: 1

    56 (527333) writes: > Why don't they just give their users the ability to filter by language? If you don't want to see the brazilian posts, you should be able to filter them out.

    This would work great, and they might add it. They should also think about separating Orkut into two distinct regions; Brazil, and everwhere else. Clearly Brazil has earned their own version of Orkut.

    Furthermore, I think it's cool your name is my UID. :-)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  63. Re:Repeat after me by malfunct · · Score: 1

    I don't see any reason why they should expect people to speak English on the site in general. I guess I could see why they would complain if they created a community and then everyone spoke a different language in it. I guess I'd expect that if I went into a community founded by someone English speaking that the communication there would be in english and if I went into one founded by a Brazilian then the language would be Portuguese (unless the Brazilian liked some other language). Anyways I guess my point is if you created the community to be a circle of English speaking friends then you have some right to be upset if a bunch of people come in and speak a different language and leave your out of your own community but if you are complaining because there are other communities that speak other languages then you need to go sit on your thumb.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  64. Translations? by imemyself · · Score: 1

    While, granted, it may not work very well for slang/etc, why not have like some sort of translation. Like each person chooses there language, and when you view a thread/message/whatever the hell Orkut has, it translates it looks to see if the posters language is different than yours, and if so, translates it to your language. Google does innovative things, just look at Gmail, why not do something like this(AFAIK I haven't seen anything that does this automatically).

    --
    Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
  65. Re:Repeat after me by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    t without giving it much thought.

    I have given it much thought. I've lived and worked in enough countries: Canada, The United States, Mexico, Japan. I've travelled to more than 20 countries. I speak English and French fluently, Spanish and Japanese converstationally, enough Slovak and Ukrainian to get by and even the Yucatec dialect of Maya.

    I believe that diversity in language and culture is a good thing. First of all, travelling to other countries and learning other languages exposes to ideas that might contradict conventional wisdom in our own culture. Language and culture are often intimitely tied together, such that even learning a languages challeges some of our preconceived ways of thinking.

    I am not a "bloody Quebecker" (I'm from BC) but I've visited Quebec quite a few times, and loved it every time I was there. Are there cultural differences? Yes. Are there linguistic differences? Yes. Are there cultural differences in the legal system? Yes. Are there political differences? Ben oui! And vive la différence man! Plus Quebecoise girls are intrinsically hot.

    Actually I do believe that all cultures are equal in the sense that it makes no sense to rank cultures. When you say culture A is "better" than culture B, what metric are you applying? The Nazis were a political group, though you might make the (sketchy) argument that followers of a particular brand of politics constitute a culture. They happened to be a political party that used its military machinery to quash other groups. In doing so, they pissed off a lot of other cultures who stomped them out. To make an analogy, if someone were to try to murder me, I'd fight back. It doesn't mean they're less of a person than I am, but my guess is more people are likely to side against a murderer than with them. So it goes.

    Political correctness is one thing. Tolerance and cultural sensitivity is another. I stand by my statement: Multi-culturalism is ok.

  66. They havn't. by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I know, wikipedia's articles are completly seperate for diffrent languages. Most sites are single-language only.

    But that could be a solution for Orkut. Just have users select a language when they sign in, and shield them from everything not in that language -- if they choose. They could also set things up so users can let the system know what languages they can speak, and if they would be interested in receiving machine translated communications.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:They havn't. by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      machine translated communications.

      I just had a thought. Lets assume that over the next couple of years machine translation becomes routine in all areas of the internet, and that the internet continues to expand across the globe and into homes and schools. No matter what language you speak, most people speak a different language. Machine translated language could quickly become a substantial fraction of all text anyone reads. In effect machine translation could become the single biggest "language" on the internet, or even in the world. What other sorts of influence could it have?

      Wouldn't it tend to affect and influence those millions of people? What sort of feedback effect could it have on the evolution of spoken languages? Would machinetranslation-isms and machine style begin begin to infect spoken language? Would languages tend evolve to be more easily machine translatable?

      The effect would become particularly pronounced as internet access spreads into primary schools and children are exposed to substantial amounts of machine translation while their language skills are still in the formative stages.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  67. If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then post here. Either I, or someone else, will be likely to come along and drop you one.

    (I'm not implying you want to join, of course ;-))

    1. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by geek · · Score: 1

      I'd take an invite. I'm a little curious what the hype is about, I did the livejournal thing when it was invite only and it never caught my fancy, but Okut seems interesting.

      You can email me at iamblue at gmail dot com.

      -todd

    2. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by bzImage8 · · Score: 1

      I would like one invitation.. demon (at) demon (dot) com (dot) mx Thanks..

      --
      Unix its simple, but sometimes it takes a geniuos to understand the simplicity -- Dennis Ritchie
    3. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      /me has been curious about Orkut for a while now

      elsonliu at gmail dot com

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by DoubleReed · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of curious to see what its like, if you wouldn't mind dropping an invite. doublereedkurt at aol.com

    5. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      If someone has an Orkut invite, I'd like one.

      I have a few Gmails left :)

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    6. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Dylbert · · Score: 1

      I think Groucho Marx said it best when referring to exclusive, anti-semitic "clubs" in the US:

      "I wouldn't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member."
      ~ Groucho Marx

      It was a reference to the exclusivity of the club being in direct correlation to the perceived value of being a member. The less exclusive it is, the less "elite" the members feel, and the less effort a person will go to in order to become a member.

      --
      I swear, if I see another Slashdot comment with "It will be interesting to see"...
    7. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by EMNDev · · Score: 1

      I'd love an invite... ;)

    8. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      I would like one too ...
      ganhawk@rediffmail.com

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    9. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      There are a TON of Adriana Limas on there (by my search). Anyway, I need your first and last name to do the invite, you can drop these as an anonymous comment on my /. journal if you like or something.

    10. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

      I've wanted one. I live in Arizona btw. bma3.dana@ucc@nau@edu. (tr/@./.@/g)

    11. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Synocco · · Score: 1

      Anyone still giving out invites? jeff (dot) kang (at) gmail (dot) com

    12. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Raw+Ostrich · · Score: 1
      I would appreciate an invitation, just to check the thing out.

      Should you be feeling generous, please send an invite to s3uss at hotmail com.

      Thanks

    13. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by sphughes · · Score: 1

      God, if only it is half as exciting as fiendster.

      I'll bite sphughes@@@bayaccess...com

    14. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      invited

    15. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      invited.

    16. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by nr · · Score: 1

      Sure, would like to be invited. :)

      nr (at) c64.org

      Thanks.

    17. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by seizer · · Score: 1

      Invited.

    18. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by seizer · · Score: 1

      Invited...

    19. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Would be cool =)
      if someone still invitates:

      nutshell (at) web (dot) de

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    20. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      gna, I really should learn to use the preview button.

      That's what you get when you have the habit of rearranging your sentences while being in the middle of writing them...

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    21. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by shokk · · Score: 1

      Me, please.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    22. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      send me your email if you haven't gotten an invite yet

    23. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      I would really like to check the site out. Please invite buffner@tkpups.com

    24. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      send your email and I'll invite you if no one has already

    25. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by spineboy · · Score: 1

      I'd like an invite to see what all the hype is about, so
      spineboy at sbcglobal (dot) net

      --
      ..........FULL STOP.
    26. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by NerdForChrist · · Score: 1

      I'd wouldn't mind an invite..

      ryansking AT mac DOT com

    27. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by Cee · · Score: 1

      <aol>me too!</aol>

      orkut@sundae.se

    28. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by philntc · · Score: 1

      Hi, I would be interested in seeing what Orkut is about. Please invite me if you don't mind :-)

      (it probably wouldn't hurt me to learn some portuguese either!)

      thanks!

    29. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      invited..

    30. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by yarbo · · Score: 1

      invited...

    31. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by philntc · · Score: 1

      doh! i'm sure an email would help...

      please use: philntc @@@@ hotmail

      thanks!

    32. Re:If you (or anyone) want an invite.. by CheeseyDJ · · Score: 1

      Yes please! paul cheeseman lycos co uk

  68. Context Free by theguywhosaid · · Score: 1

    idunno if elvish is, but if we are going to adopt a new language, lets make sure its context free.

  69. receptivity of (non) intended audience by jorlando · · Score: 1

    orkut is a big hit among brazilians as any other app that enables some kind of messaging, be it email, IRC, msn, icq or email.

    if the brazilians are majority is simply due they accept/invite more their friends than americans. why? just a question of taste... brazilians liked more orkut's format than americans

    maybe it will lead to an improvement in orkut, like selecting communities by language.

    the only problem that I see is that some brazilians create communities with an english title and use only portuguese to comunicate, it upset some english speaking people. if you create a community and someone posts with an undesirable language, ignore or delete the posts...

    the "wrath" that some people are experiencig when they criticize brazilians is just lack of sense of humor... people shouldn't take what happens on internet so serious...

    1. Re:receptivity of (non) intended audience by faedle · · Score: 1

      the only problem that I see is that some brazilians create communities with an english title and use only portuguese to comunicate, it upset some english speaking people. if you create a community and someone posts with an undesirable language, ignore or delete the posts...

      The even bigger issue is when they take a formerly low-traffic topic that WAS primarily in English and start posting only in Portuguese. This has essentially happened to the Orkut "Bloggers" community. Almost 80% of the traffic there is in Portuguese.

    2. Re:receptivity of (non) intended audience by jorlando · · Score: 1

      I have an orkut account, but I don't know it's workings very well, but the owner from that community can't block undesirable posts? I see my sister-in-law doing this in the communities that she made.

      It's an extra overload, but avoid people becoming upset...

  70. Well, the English speakers have a point by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    English is the international language. It is, by far, the most spoken second language. It is the international language of finance, bussiness, diplomacy, flight and more.

    The problem is that there are just too many languages for a person to speak them all. Most people have trouble with more than 3 or 4, even if taught from birth (it gets more difficult later) and 15-20 is pretyt much the limit for even exceptional people.

    Thus there is no reaonable way you can expect everyone to know Portuagese, or any other language. However you can have a reasonable expectation that most people will have at least a functional proficency in English. Thus, if you wish to communicate with a worldwide audience, English is the language you should choose.

    I'm not saying people should always have to use English on the Internet, but it IS rather annoying to have people expect you should know their primary language when they want to communicate. I've had this problem in MMORPGs. People want to speak to you in French or Japanese or Korean or Spanish and so on. Problem is it is just unreasonable to ask a person to try and learn every one of the hundreds of languages on this Earth, much less the reality that most people DON'T know more than 1 or 2 languages.

    However, it's a fair bet most people have at least a basic English proficiency, and thus should be the prefered choice for online discourse if you intend to reach a worldwide audience.

    1. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by driptray · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to assume that when somebody speaks to you in a non-English language that they are either (a) expecting you to know their language, or (b) demanding that you learn their language.

      I don't think either of these assumptions is true. They're just trying to communicate the best way they know. If you can't speak their language you could politely say so ("sorry, I don't speak Portugese/French/etc."), or just say nothing.

    2. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where did you get those numbers? Google zeitgeist shows that about 55% of the "Languages Used to Access Google" are English.
      http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.ht ml

      And how did you get such a low number for English? The population of India is about 500 million and most Indians know Hindi and English.

      Methinks that you are pulling those numbers out of your ass.

    3. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The UN has 6 official ass, one of them happens to be French. The others are English, Russian, Chinese, Spanish, and Arabic.

      If you're going to correct someone, you should get your facts straight.

    4. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by gujo-odori · · Score: 5, Informative

      Excuse me, but as a the holder of a degree in Linguistics, I can tell you that those are the numbers for *native* speakers.

      However, it is correct that Mandarin Chinese is the most widely spoken native language on earth. However, it's also worth noting that nearly all of those native speakers live in one country, and most of the rest live in countries are adjacent or very nearby.

      Native English speakers, on the other hand, live in many countries all over the world. The largest geographically contiguous block are in the United States and Canada, but they are also in many other countries.

      The numbers on native speakers of English and Spanish are also accurate if outdated; they are roughly equal.

      However, it's when you bring in all of the non-native speakers that English shows its international dominance. English is by far the most widely spoken second language in the world. Nearly all speakers of Spanish, Mandarin, and Hindi are natives, but there are more non-native than native English speakers in the world.

      With regard to the language of Diplomacy, you're wrong there, too. French *was* the language of diplomacy for many years, but is so no longer and has not been for decades. It was replaced by English. If French is in fact the official language of the UN (you don't cite a source, but I'll take your word for it; I'm too lazy to cite sources tonight myself), that's the only place left in diplomacy where that is still true. Go to any embassy or consulate in the world and you can probably find someone on the staff who speaks English; you'd be hard put to find someone on the staff who speaks French, unless:

      A) It's located in a Francophone country;
      or

      B) It's a French embassy or consulate.

      I know a number of people who speak Japanese as a second language, a few who speak Mandarin and/or Cantonese as a second language, a couple who speak German as a second language and a few who speak Spanish as a second language, but the only French speakers I know are all natives. French just is not a terribly important international language anymore. That's not a criticism, just an observation; French is only important in Francophone countries.

    5. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by admiralfrijole · · Score: 1

      straight up, no. french is the most spoken second language. and did you ever notice that the english translation comes second at the olympics?

      --
      e to the pi i plus one equals zero
    6. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So since I speak English and French, I'm cooler than other humans?

      Whatever. Penis measuring contests are never interesting.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by LuYu · · Score: 1

      In this particular case, however, your problem is simplified by the fact that you probably already studied at least one Latin language in school. If one can speak Spanish, one can learn to understand written Portugese (even the Brazilian flavor) in a relatively short period of time. The grammar and most of the vocabulary is the same with some pronunciation and spelling differences. In fact, something like 60% of English vocabulary is Latin. Really, Latin is only one language.

      If Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese were still written exclusively with Kanji, this problem would be solved in a different but similarly useful way.

      In that case, if you learned English, Latin, and Kanji, you could pretty much talk to at least 80-90% of the people on the Net in one language or the other. You could not write poetry, but you could communicate.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    8. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      No sorry, I know that many Frech speakers believe this, but it simply isn't so. If you do a little research you discover that English is the foriegn language that is taught across the globe, not French. Go to Germany, Japan, Mexico, India, etc and have look in the schools. You'll discover that they are taught in theri native tounge, as ou'd expect, but also taught English. You'll also discover they are not taught French, except as an elective.

      This isn't to disparage French or claim that English is a better language, it is a simple fact. In a large part due to British imperalism, and also in a large part due to the American media, English has become the de facto international language. In many cases, such as air traffic control, it is also the de jure language (look it up, all air traffic control is done in English).

    9. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      French is not the official language of the UN.

      It is though one of a set of WORKING language. A working language is the languages, which must be used when making a speech or something like that. The reason being that the UN cannot afford to hire translators for every combination of X and Y.

      Thus, the working set is: English, French, and German.

      Everything else is generally translated from these 3 languages into the respective operating languages. (of which, there is one for every language that a delegate speaks)

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    10. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Again, we are not speaking of the world as it could be, we are speaking the world as it is. As it is, the majority of the world either is taught English as an additonal language in school, or (a minority) learns it as their first language. It IS the language that is most often used for discourse between two groups that do not share a common native language.

      Thus it lends itself to use on the Internet. If you wish to communicate with a diverse array of people, quite possibly from other countries, English is your best single choice to reach the most of them.

      While it's nice to think that people would have the background to understand any language, that simply isn't the case. Learning a Latin based language isn't sufficient to speak other romance languages. Where I live, we have a large contigent of spanish speakers, and they tell me that while Portugese is similar, they still have a lots of trouble with it. Those that speak Italian or French (also romance, or Latin based if you like, languages) have even more trouble with it. Those that speak German, Norwegian, Finnish, etc are totally lost, nevermind oriental languages.

      My argument isn't that English is the One True Language(tm) or better than any other. My argument is that English is the one langiage that more people have at least a functional proficiency in than any other. Thus when trying to communicate with a wide audience that doesn't necessiarly speak your language, English is the best choice.

    11. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Ciel · · Score: 2, Informative

      straight up, no. french is the most spoken second language. and did you ever notice that the english translation comes second at the olympics?

      This is grossly factually inaccurate and it's hard to imagine where you ever came up with such an idea.

    12. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Clueless_Medic · · Score: 3, Informative

      The population of India is near enough a billion really & you will find that Hindi is a federal imposition, it might be the national language but I guess only around 25% of the population speak it. And in some states it is enough to get you blacklisted if you insist on using Hindi!

    13. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Thus there is no reaonable way you can expect everyone to know Portuagese, or any other language. However you can have a reasonable expectation that most people will have at least a functional proficency in English.

      Those two statements are mutually exclusive. Either you cannot reasonably expect everyone to know any given language, or you can reasonably expect everyone to know English.

    14. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by romiz · · Score: 1

      The subject in the grandparent post is the United Nations, not the European Union.

      In the United Nations, there are 6 official laguages, which are English, French, Spanish, (Mandarin) Chinese, Russian and Arabic. Among those 6 languages, English and French are priviledged. All documents are written at least in those two languages, and every administrative employee hired by the UN needs to be able to speak them.

    15. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      > all air traffic control is
      > done in English

      I recall reading somewhere that they refused to do it in France... until the lack of understanding between tower and pilor caused a crash that killed dozens. o.O

    16. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by idril · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on whom the Portuguese-speaking posters are expecting to communicate to.

      If their objective is to talk to each other (which is true in at least some cases, based on how I understood the article), what's wrong with having some of the posts or responses being in Portuguese?

      Say someone started a new thread on Ask Slashdot asking about Linux usage in Brazil, and wrote it in Brazilian Portuguese. Wouldn't that help the article get to more of the author's intended audience? Even if it had the side effect of maybe excluding a lot of non-Portuguese-speaking readers?

      Perhaps some of those people who would post Portuguese replies are more fluent in Portuguese than English and would not be able to respond as well if they had to post in English.

      I don't speak Portuguese myself, but I don't feel it harms me if other people are having a conversation in Portuguese among themselves.

      Just a thought.

    17. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by IIEFreeMan · · Score: 1

      I think the reason for this is that Pierre De Coubertin, the founder of the modern olympic games was french ...

    18. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Let's consider the languages taught at school in Germany:
      - German. Mandatory. Gosh.
      - English. Mandatory, usually from the 5th to the Nth* grade, although I do believe that it's going to be from 4 to N soon.
      - Latin. Teritary language**. The most-picked teritary language, because you need it for certain jobs.
      - French. Teritary language**. Second to Latin in the populartiy ratings. Linugists etc. need this.
      - The rest - Spanish, Greek, Russian.

      *N equals the grade after which you leave the public school - either 10, 11 or 13 (soon 12).
      **On some schools it's necessary to learn a teritary language, but you can usually choose between two or more languages, usually Latin and Franch, sometimes also Spanish and Greek.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    19. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by orzetto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, English is slowly on the way out. This is nothing new, it has occupied a place taken by Greek, Latin, classical Arabic, French in different areas of the world and times of history. Simply, on a global scale.

      The choice of international language is mostly due to social dynamics, and the rise of China as an economic power is going to have consequences. Either they learn English, or we learn Chinese (besides I've been told that some parts of Chinese are quite easy - not the writing of course...). Spanish is becoming more and more widespread in the US; who knows, in a few generations there won't be any USofA, there will be EUdeA (Estados Unidos de América).

      As one living in a country different from my native one, I can say that most people in large countries don't really speak English - they merely improvise. They can order a coffee, but cannot withstand a real conversation, not with ease. It might be enough to survive, but not to say that "you speak the language".

      Me, I still wait for the day someone finally realises that languages are tools as hammers and printers, and takes a rational perspective at it. Esperanto is indeed better fit as an international language than any ethnic language, not because of any superior mind behind it, just because it's engineered to be easy. However, given the current situation, it's easier for each one to learn English than convincing the world to use Esperanto.

      But again, as G.B. Shaw put it,

      Reasonable people adapt themselves to the world; unreasonable people try to adapt the world to themselves; thus, all progress is due unreasonable people.
      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    20. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is rather annoying when people expect you to know THEIR primary language when they want to communicate... like, say, English.

      I'll remain skeptical about your bet that most people have a basic level of English proficiency until I see the native US citizenship meeting that criteria in written communications.

      English is the lingua franca of business, which made it by extension that of diplomacy and research. But while the US inherited this cultural dominance from the UK, it preserved a very provincial cultural scope.

      It could be insulting, if it were not so naive, this assumption that just because most people can do business on a second-language they will always stick to it in informal interactions, in deference to others they are not communicating with directly.

      Most people do not switch back-and-forth between languages without effort: they are "functional" on their second-language, which is very far from "relaxed" and "fluent" which is how they want to communicate with their friends and communities.

      Although having a lingua franca, be that English or any other, is a great advantage in business, research, and other "practical" forms of communication that permeate all social interaction, it is deceptive to expect more spontaneous social groups to follow that rule.

      It's also deceptive to think that international communities are cleanly partitioned by language; it's a decent approximation, but n-lingual conversations, and by extension communities, are not rare by any means.

      Perhaps this is a sign that our online social-network systems break easily under the assumption of "language indifference".

      Perhaps we should be filtering our threads of communication by locale/language metatags that match what we can understand, effectively ignoring pieces of the conversation we cannot parse (although we can be made aware of their existence). This is what we do in real life.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    21. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by LuYu · · Score: 1

      You are both correct and incorrect. Let me go through your message blow by blow:

      About half of English vocabulary comes from French, not "Latin" which you call it - the term you are looking for is "Romance" languages (French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese)

      While you are technically correct that the term Latin is supposed to apply only to the dead language formerly spoken by the Romans, I deliberately chose to call those languages "Latin" languages because I see nothing but natural evolution and regional accents separating them from their ancestor. I see Latin as a living language embodied in regional accents colored by contact with other languages. French is the German flavor of Latin, Spanish is the Arabic flavor of Latin, and Italian is the Greek flavor of Latin (more or less). They are only "Romance Languages" if Latin truly did die. However, these languages are the result of uninterrupted speech since the Roman Empire, so I see no reason to call Latin "dead".

      Yes, you are correct that French is the "language" that English absorbed the majority of its borrowed vocabulary from. However, I chose to say "Latin" because I was (again) considering these Latin or Romance "languages" to be one language. So, with French taken as a dialect, English got those words from Latin.

      and while they are closely related they are not significantly more so than many of the Germanic languages (English, various Scandinavian/Nordic languages, Dutch, Afrikaans, German, Yiddish etc.) are related to each other.

      I would like to see some statistical analysis of this. All I have to offer is anecdotal experience, but thats better than a naked, unsupported statement.

      I have spoken English my entire life and am fluent in several dialects. I have never been able to make the slightest sense of German. However, upon becoming conversant in Spanish, I was able to communicate with Italian and Portugese speakers with a little extra effort and concentration. When I was in Spain I frequently observed French and Italian speakers who could not speak a word of Spanish manage to conduct whatever business they wanted to conduct. From what I have seen, there are bigger differences between Brazilian Portugese and Portugese Portugese than between Spanish and Portugese Portugese. The only one that was significantly difficult was French.

      As a Norwegian speaker who also knows German reasonably well I can relatively easily read Dutch, for instance. And of course Swedish, Danish and Norwegian is so closely related most speakers of any of them can understand all three.

      This backs up the point of my original post that many languages exist in groups where knowledge of one is sufficient for a basic understanding of the others. However, this point you made is more interesting because English makes a rather absurd distinction here that I have never quite understood: The distinction between German and Dutch.

      Germans call themselves "Deutch", so what is the real difference between "Dutch" people and "Deutch" people? This is a slight accent difference at best. So, to claim you speak Dutch and Deutch is like claiming you speak English and English. Yes, I know there are some differences between the two. There are differences between the speech in Hamburg and Berlin, as well.

      These all really demonstrate one thing about Europe. People seem to think that language and nationality are the same thing. Languages cover larger areas than most tiny European countries, so there are actually less languages in Europe than currently claimed.

      Oh, and Vietnamese was never written using Kanji, at least not by any large part of the population.

      The Vietnamese script used Ch~'u N^om (apologies to any Vietnamese speakers if I got the accents wrong and said something rude :-) ) until missionaries introduced a latin based script (tho

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    22. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

      While it is true that there are six official languages in the UN Secretariat, I can tell you that German has a de facto status, due to the presence of the third-largest duty station in Vienna, Austria -- and as a result, many UN staffers work in German, especially when dealing with local infrastructure. I used to work for the UN in Vienna, and can confirm that official documents are translated usually from English into the other five official languages, but 99% of all interactions in New York and Vienna occur in English, with French being dominant in Geneva.

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
    23. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by bodrell · · Score: 1
      Quite ironic, I think that English has become the lingua franca and the de jure language. Take that, France!

      Hey, more people speak Portuguese natively than speak French, and Brazil is the "country of the future," so maybe the next lingua franca could turn out to be Portuguese.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    24. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by bodrell · · Score: 1
      While it's nice to think that people would have the background to understand any language, that simply isn't the case. Learning a Latin based language isn't sufficient to speak other romance languages. Where I live, we have a large contigent of spanish speakers, and they tell me that while Portugese is similar, they still have a lots of trouble with it. Those that speak Italian or French (also romance, or Latin based if you like, languages) have even more trouble with it. Those that speak German, Norwegian, Finnish, etc are totally lost, nevermind oriental languages.
      Sorry, but as someone who speaks both Spanish and Portuguese non-natively, I can tell you that someone who speaks Spanish should have little trouble reading Portuguese. There are definitely grammatical differences, but the pronunciation is where Spanish-speakers get thrown off. Many aspects of Poruguese are closer to Italian than to Spanish. For example,


      English: son
      Spanish: hijo
      Portuguese: filho
      Italian: figlio

      The Portuguese and Italian are pronounced approximately the same (the -lh- and -gl- are the same sound).

      But wait! We can include English too.

      English: filial = of, relating to, or befitting a son or daughter

      Regarding German, Norwegian, Finnish, and oriental languages, well, since none of those are Romance/Latin-based languages, I fail to see your point. Even English, a Germanic language, has enough Latin words that an English speaker with a decent vocabulary could figure out "filho."

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    25. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      the rise of China as an economic power is going to have consequences. Either they learn English, or we learn Chinese (besides I've been told that some parts of Chinese are quite easy - not the writing of course...)

      That's what they said about Japanese in the 80s. And it's not going to happen -- CJK (Chinese/Japanese/Korean) requires you to learn a minimum of 2000 characters -- which is really, really hard work even for Chinese children. It's much worse once you're an adult. I speak as someone who's tried -- I learnt written Thai in a month (64 or so letters, pretty phonetic), but after 12 years in Taiwan and Hong Kong remain illiterate. The rest of the world is not going to learn Chinese (aside from some basic spken pidgin, perhaps) --- in fact literacy in China is pretty low.

    26. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Trejus · · Score: 1

      I think that there are more English speakers in India than Hindi speakers. The use of Hindi drops dramatically the farther south you go. Some of the local langauges like Gugarati are quite similar, but things like Tamil are completely different. That's why people from different parts of India use English to communicate.

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
    27. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by aulendil · · Score: 1

      ... Korean, and Vietnamese were still written exclusively with Kanji ...

      FYI Korean is written in Han-gul, which is a phonetic alphapet blended with pictographs describing soundformation. It's a bloody brilliant system... And very far from Kanji.

    28. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Krach42 · · Score: 1
      English, French, Spanish, (Mandarin) Chinese, Russian and Arabic


      Very well, they've updated from when I last recieved my statistics... thanks for the information. :)
      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    29. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Wirr · · Score: 1
      Germans call themselves "Deutch", so what is the real difference between "Dutch" people and "Deutch" people? This is a slight accent difference at best. So, to claim you speak Dutch and Deutch is like claiming you speak English and English. Yes, I know there are some differences between the two. There are differences between the speech in Hamburg and Berlin, as well.

      First it's "Deutsch" not "Deutch".
      Secondly, Dutch is a true language not a simple dialect of German. To quote the wikipedia entry on dialect: " Although standard Dutch and German are not mutually intelligible, a chain of dialects connects them, with no break in intelligibility between any geographically adjacent dialects along the continuum."

      Dutch and German are strongly connected but they're far from beeing just an accent.
      As for your Hamburg/Berlin example, believe me they will understand each other, but neither will be able to understand Dutch.

    30. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by kwoff · · Score: 1

      I'm learning French, mostly because I work in Geneva, and it is fascinating to learn where a lot of words in English come from, many of which I hadn't even realized were French. I hope to learn German some day to get the other half, though that's more grammar than vocabulary.

    31. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Isn't saying "English is the lingua franca of ..." sort of like saying "Mercedes-Benz is the Cadillac of cars"?

    32. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Almost.

      Saying "English is the lingua franca of business" is more like saying "Zeibatsu Monstrosity is the Cadillac of SUVs".

      The fact that it became, by extension, a universal language in other areas has a nice parallel in the Soccer Mom using said Monstrosity to drive up to the supermarket, fully convinced that its superiority in the frozen tundra also make it the perfect vehicle for the suburban landscape.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    33. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by LuYu · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia's history of the Hangul script (scroll down to "History"):

      Hangul was promulgated by the fourth king of the Joseon Dynasty, Sejong the Great, after being developed under his guidance by a team of researchers. ... The system was completed in 1443 or January 1444, and published in 1446 in a document, Hunmin Jeongeum, after which the alphabet was named. The publication date of Hunmin jeongeum, October 9, is Hangul Day in South Korea (Its North Korean equivalent is on January 15).

      ...

      King Sejong intended Hangul to be a suplement to Hanja, to be used primarily to educate people who did not know Hanja (hence the name Hunmin Jeongeum, which means "Correct Sounds for the Education of the People" in Sino-Korean). At that time, only male members of the aristocracy (Yangban) learned to read and write Hanja; since all written material was only available in Hanja, most Koreans were effectively illiterate. Hangul faced heavy opposition by the literate elite, who believed Hanja to be the only legitimate writing system.
      So, basically, until 1443 or 1444, the Koreans did write with Chinese characters which are otherwise known as Hanja (Korean), Kanji (Japanese), or HanZi (Chinese). The statements about literacy need to be taken with a grain of salt because most Western scholars tend to compare Asian literacy incorrectly with their own alphabetic concepts of literacy.

      Hangul was not developed as a replacement for Hanja. Rather, it was developed as a way to teach the proper reading of Hanja in school. So, yes, HanZi, or Kanji, or Hanja, or whatever you want to call them (they all represent the same two Chinese characters) were the proper writing system in Korea, and yes, if Koreans were more literate in Chinese characters today, one could learn written communication in four national languages at once (not to mention all the various "dialects" of China, which are actually distinct languages).

      Comparable scripts to Hangul are Hiragana, Katakana, Nü Shu, ZhuYin (BoPoMoFo), and the Vietnamese Chu Nom. PinYin romanization is also used in mainland China in the teaching of the pronunciation of Chinese characters in the same way as Hangul was originally intended to be used.

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    34. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      "Let's consider the languages taught at school in Germany:
      - German. Mandatory. Gosh."

      Tell that to the locals where I live. I speak reasonably good german, but I have the hardest time understaning my next door neighbor's Badisch.

    35. Re:Well, the English speakers have a point by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Heh. I guess I'm lucky to live in a region where everyone speaks standard German...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  71. Re:Repeat after me by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    How's that feel?

    It feels so so fine; I was posting a sarcastic (troll) reply to a comment that quite possibly deserved it. When you make a blanket generalization, back it up with a reason. Or were you being ironic? Perhaps I'm the one who's been trolled here.

    So go for it. Back up your statement that diversity is the opposite of excellence, because as it stands, it does sound very KKK-ish. Would America be a better place if it were 100% 30-year-old white males? It'd certainly be less diverse... would that make it more "excellent"? Would the world be more "excellent" if it consisted only of black 50-something-year olds? I doubt it... but I do want to hear you argue it.

    And yes I realize that my original post did make several blanket statements without explicit justification -- I will state here, for the record, that the implicit justification is that tolerance of other cultures is good. :)

  72. Well by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With gmail, I think it was

    1) an attempt to prevent the service from growing to fast. Most websites grow slowly, and that can help them fix problems. But with Gmail, everyone was going to get an account as soon as possible. So the invite system helped them moderate growth. Somewhat.

    2) It made a gmail account something precious. And made people want it. It was good marketing.

    I actualy got invited to orkut (intrestingly by my autopr0n.com usernmae, rather then my real name). It was pretty annoying, and I gave up on it quickly.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  73. an insult to Unitarian Universalism by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    I guess we could all switch to Esperanto, the Unitarian Univeralist of languages.

    The Unitarian Universalist religion is nothing like esperanto, and I consider that comparison an insult to my religion.

    Like the ethnic background of the United States(commonly called the Cultural Melting Pot), UUism draws all the good bits from many of the world's religions. Esperanto was developed by one nutjob who took some bits of latin and mixed it with the world's languages.

    The similarities end there. The UUA is governed mostly by democracy, whereas Esperanto has been mostly the vision of one man. Unitarian Universalism is practiced by millions; Esperanto is spoken by maybe a couple thousand people. Unitarian Universalism embraces other religions (save the parts which interfere with the UU principles and purposes- mainly, stuff like "all non-believers are heathens" and such). Esperanto is based around the assumption that your language isn't good enough, you need to be speaking Esperanto. Lastly, UU's don't go around preaching about their religion very much, which is why most people don't know of it, or don't understand it; there are no UU advocates, much less missionaries; the UUA rarely even takes positions, it's so unimposing. Esperanto advocates, meanwhile, just can't shut up about how good Esperanto is, and are constantly trying to force it on people.

    1. Re:an insult to Unitarian Universalism by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone had a nerve poked. Lighten the fuck up, dude. It was a lameass analogy that didn't deserve as much time as you gave it.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:an insult to Unitarian Universalism by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The Unitarian Universalist religion is nothing like esperanto, and I consider that comparison an insult to my religion.

      If rather easy comparisons to your religion (both Esperanto and UUism try and be the one-for-all, though they have different methedologies) insult you, then you really should pick an affirmative religion rather than one built from compromise.

      Feel free to be insulted if you wish, but if your religion doesn't share its teachings, doesn't take positions, lets democracy rather than reason and relevation determine dogma, and generally doesn't say much more than "we should all get along", then it's not a frigging religion.

      UUism is a group of different religions that share one house, very much in a common-ground way that's a great and wonderous civil example to the broader mass of religions. However, it, in and of itself, is no more a religion than "paganism" is.

      And I find it an insult to MY religion that you would take what is essentially a "we're all right" stance and purport to put it in the same class as a religion that has the cohones to say "this is right, that is wrong." (Even though Christianity can and has been dead wrong on a few things.)

    3. Re:an insult to Unitarian Universalism by The+Ephialtist · · Score: 1

      Heh, whereas I viewed the comparison as a compliment to Esperanto...

      --
      The things people do for money are amazing, but not half as shocking as what they do for free.
  74. The world needs to understand by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That whatever their primary language is, it is not the primary language of most of the world. Whatever your native language is, even Chinese, there are more people in the world who that is NOT their native language.

    So, this leads to a problem, how to communicate with the world. We all have different native languages. Well there has been, and is, a solution. English, while not even close to the largest primary language is by FAR the largest second language. Nearly every industralized nation, and many third world nations, teach English as well as their native tounge.

    Thus English is the international language. All air traffic control is done in English (so no matter where a plane comes form or goes to the crews can communicate), Likewise bussiness is conducted in English when there is a language disparity. If a Japanese bussiness does bussiness with China, English is usually the language of exchange since Chinese is very rare in Japan, and Japanese is very rare in China.

    So when one wishes to speak to an international audience, on the Internet for example, English is the best choice. Demanding that people learn your native tounge is unreasonable, as there are so very many (hundreds, if not thousands) languages out there. It is beyond the capability of any one person to learn them all. Even the most talented translators usually don't know more than 20, and they are extreme cases.

    1. Re:The world needs to understand by anothy · · Score: 1
      So, this leads to a problem, how to communicate with the world. We all have different native languages. Well there has been, and is, a solution.
      this is false. the problem as stated - how to communicate with the world - is not solved by the speaker using English, nor any other given language. it is, most likely, an intractable problem. it likely gives you the best approximation currently available, but that's a very different statement.

      being able to do business in the local language is a huge advantage. i work for a company with customers in a few dozen countries, and six continents (no mobile phone providers based in Antarctica, as far as we know). language skills are a - if not the - primary hiring criteria. we've had a number of customers tell us that they stay with us even when we mess up because our competition doesn't have staff that speaks their language well. if you go in assuming you can do business in english, just because everyone involved understands it, you're gonna get eaten. every large company understands the value of local knowledge, language being the most important point.

      also, on your "english is the international second language" point. i recently got to travel to Prague, in the Czech Republic. it was really interesting being in a place where the most common second language wasn't english, but german. english and french (thanks to the russians) showed up with pretty much equal frequency after that.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  75. argh! by applegoddess · · Score: 1

    you have to know english to sign up for orkut, seeing as how the default invitation and all the questions and boxes to fill in are all in english, as well as the terms of service or whatever else you have to read before signing up. so clearly orkut is a place where everyone can speak english to be understood by most if not all of the members. Orkut, the whole interface, all the features, even the help pages are all 100% english.

    most brazilian people i've encountered on orkut are plenty friendly but a noticeable few are downright inane and rude (see posts in community titled "WTF A CRAZY BRAZILIAN INVASION", et cetera), posting in their native tongue in an English-only community, bashing everyone else based on unfounded stereotypes, spamming people with Portuguese messages in a community as diverse as (for example) the Simpsons community with 13000 members and growing - jeez!

    The non-English posts outnumber the "plz gimme gmail invite kthx" messages. Crazyness.

  76. Good Lord by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    As all Americans know, the world revolves around us! Not.

    Good lord people, is this going to end up another ethnocentric American racial thing?

    What? You don't speak-a da language? Good lord, how I wish I had been born in Europe.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Good Lord by geek · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to move there. It's a free country, you aren't beng stopped by anyone.

      Do you honestly think this doesn't happen in other countries? France has an entire department in their government devoted to keeping the french language "pure". Every country does it, every race, every culture.

      So you go run to europe where the grass is greener and shit doesn't stink. I'll stay here and laugh at you for being such an ignorant fool.

    2. Re:Good Lord by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Good lord, how I wish I had been born in Europe.

      Why, aren't they allowing anybody in who isn't born there? Or are you saying that it's too late for you to change some beliefs you grew up with in America? Or is it too late for you to learn another language? What, exactly, is there that you just can't change now in your life?

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  77. Thanks. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I'd like an invitation.

  78. Re:Repeat after me by ObitMan · · Score: 1

    Or as I like to say: Inclusion to the point of mediocrity.

    There has to be a line drawn in the sand somewhere.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  79. And again by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Why some push so much for English in things like Orkut. The number of lanugages in the world is just staggering. Even when you just take languages form "major" players (major in this case meaning likely to have a number of people on the Internet) you still have more than most people can learn, even if they did nothing else. Your case is an excellent example, in that you would have extreme difficult communicating with a Hindi speaker in Hindi, but it is highly likely both of you could converse in English.

    I never claim that English was the best choice for an International language, I mean it was really chosen, more forces by imperalism and circumstance. However it IS the international language, and thus by far the largest secondary language. So it really is the best choice if you want to reach a diverse group, which the Internet is.

  80. Take slashdot for an example by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's one way of thinking about it. It seems the article is talking about users complaining that in a forum that started out as English, Portugese comments get posted and the language shifts to Portugese. I tried to imagine this happening on slashdot (for example, on this thread). At first I thought it wouldn't be any big deal. But then I thought, what if I was following a thread on slashdot, and suddenly it switched to Portugese. It'd be kinda like threadjacking. It's annoying to read an English thread, then someone posts a response in Portugese, because then I can no longer follow the thread. I'd like to read what that person said, but I can't. And any Portugese speaking people who were commenting would probably switch to Portugese if they posted any more comments too. Maybe I'll post something in English, and the response will be in Portugese. It really comes down to netiquette. Sure they have a right to comment however they want, it's just not polite to switch languages mid-stream. If you reverse roles (e.g. suppose I can read Portugese) and I post English comments in a thread that's all Portugese, then people start switching to posting in English, that would leave out all the Portugese-only people. Although creating a separate area may help somewhat, a better solution to the problem is just informing users how to behave better. If it was common knowledge, the community would police itself and frown upon that kind of behavior. I know polite internet conversation seems like an oxymoron to many, but for all the trolls and BS that gets posted on slashdot, it's pretty readable, and well-thought out arguments still happen.

    --
    "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    1. Re:Take slashdot for an example by citog · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point, one that has been largely absent from what I've previously read.

      Reading the article there is a quote from someone who objects to seeing Portuguese communities listed as it's not a Brazilian site. I would think that it's easy enough in that case to ignore them and carry on? I see Portuguese threads in some of the communities I'm in and just ignore them. So far I've never seen threads with languages mixed, unless the community is language related i.e. people are doing translations or whatnot.

      If people mix languages inappropriately in threads then it's a matter of etiquette, the community owner should be able to handle this. I don't know if they can or not.

    2. Re:Take slashdot for an example by TomV · · Score: 1

      Reading the article there is a quote from someone who objects to seeing Portuguese communities listed as it's not a Brazilian site.

      What struck me reading this bit of the article was that it was talking about "when the average user looks at Orkut", while entirely missing the point that, at present, for most useful meanings of "average", the "average user" of Orkut is Brazilian, in which case Portuguese language is the obvious language of choice.

    3. Re:Take slashdot for an example by The+13th+Duke · · Score: 1

      But what if the thread started in Portuguese?

    4. Re:Take slashdot for an example by bluFox · · Score: 1

      ?the "average user" of Orkut is Brazilian,"
      No, The last time i looked the brazilians were only 43% of the total users. The average users are *international* not brazilians.

      --
      ~561
    5. Re:Take slashdot for an example by marcelo.mosca · · Score: 1

      I am from Brazil and don't agree with what is happening at orkut.

      The problem is exactly that brazilians can't keep the portuguese betwen themselves. :(
      I am part of many comunities founded by non brazilians and it is becoming more and more common to see portuguese posts in them (many like: "Olá, meu nome é José!" (or "Hello, my name is José!")).

    6. Re:Take slashdot for an example by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      It's annoying to read an English thread, then someone posts a response in Portugese, because then I can no longer follow the thread.
      Then perhaps, in the same way the Portuguese speakers have learned English, you should learn Portuguese if you want to communicate with them?
      You are not obliged to understand or even read their posts, in the same way that they are not obliged to read or understand your English posts - but they have chosen to educate themselves in order to communicate with English speakers - perhaps this merely reflects a lack of education and considering among the primarily English-speaking population?
    7. Re:Take slashdot for an example by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      I never realized how similar Portuguese to Spanish. I used to know Spanish. Maybe I'll pickup both someday. Thanks!

    8. Re:Take slashdot for an example by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      If it starts in Portugese, it should remain in Portugese, and English comments shouldn't be posted in that thread. It's the polite thing to do.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    9. Re:Take slashdot for an example by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      No one is obliged, it's just not a nice thing to do. It's threadjacking via language. Remember that not all Portugese readers can read English -- I think they would be irritated if a thread that started out Portugese switched to English mid-stream, and they were left out.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    10. Re:Take slashdot for an example by klui · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Okrut is similar to the early days of Usenet where there was a netiquette newsgroup for this sort of thing. I have experienced the reverse on German boards and the thread started in German, but someone found the topic interesting and he would ask (in German and English) if the folks would mind switching to English. They were nice enough to say "OK, we'll switch to English." There will invariably be some who cannot communicate in English as well, but there are others who would do a translation.

      English is one of the unique languages where a lot of people know enough to communicate.

      I think the parent hit the issue on the head. Yes, one can post in any language one wants, but there are limits to that type of freedom, as long as you don't restrict someone else's. Personally, I feel these types of people have a lot to learn about being good net citizens. If they don't like the fact that a community is in English only, rather than bitch and label someone a Nazi, maybe ask nicely to get it changed or start their own community. I've been to Brazilian websites and forums where there are two sites: one for English, the other in Portuguese; but the forums are in English. That was decided by the owner, in Brazil.

  81. Where is the problem ? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
    I sometimes encounter a same sort of 'problem' within online games : People on your team start talking a language, that im not able to understand :
    While I can't force them to use english (im dutch myself) , i can always point them to -why- they could talk english (if they speak it) : eg. It is way better for your whole team to know what you are saying, so you can all work together.

    If they don't want to speak/can't speak english, and they are adding noise to my other communication with my other teammates, i will mute/ignore them : The same should be applied here, as i think it's ridicilous when one of the few communities on the Web, purely by natural 'forces' (invites only) has turned out to become very popular amongst Portugese people , it's a bit dumb to whine afterwards.

    Hell, what is so hard to filter (or just *drumroll* dont -read-) the stuff you don;t want ?

    Btw, i got invited a few months ago to join Orkut, and i found it to be nothing amazing, and fairly quickly 'polluted' as the Net got more polluted with asshats over the years too.

  82. SF Tracker vs. Orkut by tepples · · Score: 1

    I usually don't ask for an invitation into something I didn't check out beforehand.

    Agreed one hundred percent, which is why I discount such clique sites outright, trying to convince myself that they don't exist. The biggest problem occurs when I get hits to my public web site with a Referer inside a clique site.

    Granted, there are many cases when people must cooperate (and ask each other) to do something. If I want to check in some change on sf.net I'd better ask for write access to the project's CVS.

    That or post a diff with comments. But anyway:

    That is understood, because there is a real need to state my cause, and if I am wrong with my changes other people will be inconvenienced.

    Well at least each SourceForge.net project provides both 1. an easy way to "check [it] out beforehand," namely public CVS checkouts and 2. an obvious mechanism for an outsider to contact an appropriate insider, namely the project's Tracker. Orkut offers no such straightforward way in, not even to determine who is a valid "each other".

  83. Orkut has a much more annoying language problem by dirtsurfer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Orkut doesn't support international character encoding, so if you and your friends speak a language that doesnt use the Roman alphabet (Japanese or Chinese, for example), then you're just screwed.

    It's crazy seeing all these Japanese Orkut users (there are quite a few) posting to each other in romaji and broken English.

  84. A different way to look at this... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps instead of looking at it as a "language" problem, perhaps the 'English' speakers should look at it as a challenge to get more 'English' speakers involved in Orkut.

    Since the service is by invitation only, and I suspect was primarily english speaking early on, it tells me that more Brazilian's, and Portuguese speakers have invited more other Brazilian and Portuguese speakers to Orkut than English speakers have.

    If you don't like the way that others are treating you at Orkut, then you have three options, Be a Quiter, Be a Whiner, or be a Builder, and get More english speakers invited.

    Then again it makes no difference to me. I am not a member of Orkut.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
    1. Re:A different way to look at this... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      As a native speaker of English, it should be well known that I don't really care what an Anonymous Coward thinks of my writing abilities.

      To any Brazilians who felt offended, I doubt an empty oppology is necessary.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  85. That seems fine by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like a valid solution to me.
    And of course, it also seems perfectly valid for others to set up Portuguese-only, French-only, or whatever-only communities.
    I belong to some English-only communities, and to some Portuguese-only communities.
    Those are the only two languages in which I am capable of contributing. I guess I could probably follow discussions in Spanish or French, and I could probably get the gist of what was being said in Italian, but I am not capable of responding in any of these languages, so I only look at communities in English and Portuguese.
    It doesn't bother me if there are communities that speak any of the multitude of languages I don't speak. I don't get why some people from the country where I was born (USA) think everyone should speak their language in every community and discussion on Orkut.
    I'd like to point out that even if Brazilians were forced to have all their discussions in English, many of them would still be "Greek" to most Americans. For example, I belong to a community called "São Paulo odeia Paulo Maluf" ("São Paulo hates Paulo Maluf"). It's a place to talk about one of the politicians running for Mayor of São Paulo, and there are some pretty entertaining discussions going on there now. While most Brazilians know who Maluf is, and everyone in São Paulo has an opinion about him, most Americans haven't got the faintest idea of who he is (and I suspect they don't care, except that he's of Middle Eastern descent). So why on Earth should discussions in that community be in any language other than Portuguese?!

    --Mark

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
  86. Tendência muito natural by pandemonia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Acredito que se trata de uma tendência absolutamente natural na evolção de qualquer rede social. O fato dos brasileiros terem tomado o lugar dos alemães ou indianos, foi parte por timing, parte por coincidência. Como um outro comentário mencionou, muitos norte-americanos acabaram ignorando convites para o Orkut por causa da febre do Friendster que já tinha passado por eles, enquanto essa febre jamais chegou aqui no Brasil.

    (espero que tenha bastante brasileiro por aí com pontos para moderar. abraço.)

    --
    -mz
    1. Re:Tendência muito natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Translation from Sherlock (not great but better than nothing):

      I believe that one is about an absolutely natural trend in the evolção [evolution?] of any social network. The fact of the Brazilians to have taken the place of the Germans or Indians, was part for timing, part for coincidence. As one another commentary mentioned, many North Americans had finished ignoring invitations for the Orkut because of the fever it Friendster that already had passed for them, while this fever never arrived here in Brazil.

      (I wait that he has sufficiently Brazilian for with points moderating there I hug.)

    2. Re:Tendência muito natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      não tenho ponto de modereação mas vou correr o risco de parecer um babaca completo e...

      sugerir que a gente comece a fazer em outros sites (tipo slashdot) a mesma coisa que fiaemos no orkut. tomar conta.

      pra evitar represalias, postamos como covardes anonimos, e outros brasucas com mod points moderam as mensagens pra cima (desde que as mensagens sejam razoavelmente civilizadas). ai os americanos vão ser forçados a reconhecer que não estão sozinhos no mundo e que não podem sair por ai impondo o que eles pensam.

      claro... usuários de outros poises estão convidados a fazer o mesmo.

    3. Re:Tendência muito natural by e.colli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oi! Achei muito interessante a tua tese. A minha idéia era que nós brasileiros poderíamos ser por natureza muito mais sociáveis que outros povos. Aposto que isso vai gerar muito assunto para pesquisa. E infelizmente não tenho pontos para moderação. ;)

    4. Re:Tendência muito natural by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

      Pois é.

      Acho que o slashdot é um excelente veículo de informação e adminro muito o lance deles de liberdade de expressão.

      Acredito que ninguém por aqui irá se sentir incomodado se CRIARMOS comentários em português, responder um comentário em inglês em português seria com certeza uma atitude de troll.

    5. Re:Tendência muito natural by hagnat · · Score: 1


      honestamente isso seria a pior coisa q vc poderia fazer...
      apenas estaria provando o ponto deles, alem de bancar o troll estupido...

      a ultima coisa que precisamos eh de mais gente demonstrando sinais de 'sabedoria' e tentando tomar comunidades jah estabelecidas...

      'como vc se sentiria se estivesse falando em portugues com um amigo seu numa mesa de bar, e de repente alguem começasse a falar em ingles na mesa ao lado ?'
      'o problema não é esse, mas sim quando vc esta falando em portugues com seu amigo, e de repente um bando de estranhos se senta na tua mesa e começa a berrar contigo em ingles'

      --
      "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    6. Re:Tendência muito natural by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

      Bom, pelo menos vivemos em um país livre :)

      Nosso país não espalha medo e terror no mundo, não produz armas atômicas, nunca atacou ninguém com Napalm, não jogamos bomba atômica nos Japoneses.

      Devemos ter bastante orgulhos de não fazermos coisas como essas, se tivesse nascido em um país que já fez as atrocidades que os americanos fizeram teria vergonha toda vez que lembrasse de coisas como essas.

      Brasileiro é um povo bom, muito brasileiro dá uma de troll na net porque não conhece a netiqueta e está tentando aparecer, chamar a atenção pra ele, isso não é de todo mal, é difícil ver um brasileiro recriminando alguém por ser de outro país ou etnia, muitas vezes é extremamente o contrário.

      Por outro lado já vi muitos comentários na net de americanos dizendo coisas como "então muda para um país decente" coisa que nunca vi da parte de brasileiro. :)

  87. Re:solved? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

    How is it not a solution? I have communities where i can talk and they have theirs!

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  88. Happens everywhere, not only in Orkut by efbrasil · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm a brazilian, who lives in Brazil, in Rio de Janeiro, a city where lots of tourists like to spend their vacations. Many of these tourists happen to be americans, of course.

    The great majority of the americans tourists come to Brazil without knowing a single word in Portuguese, which happens to be Brazil's official and only language. (this also apply to tourists from other countries as well)

    And i've never seen any brazilian complaining when a american tourist go, let's say, to a restaurant and try to speak in English with the waiter, although he's not talking brazilian official language. (and this happens a lot)

    I think it's the same situation.

    Oh, i also think that orkut-based spam in Portuguese sucks. But it sucks because it is spam, and not because it's not in English.

    1. Re:Happens everywhere, not only in Orkut by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

      Eu também sou brasileiro mas como você escreveu em inglês... There is spamers everywhere, but the kind of spam brazilians do in orkut is because WHE LIVE IN A FREEDOM COUNTRY, WE SAY WHAT WE WHANT, AMERICANS READ IF THEY LIKE. It's kind strange people here in slashdot complain about the orkut problem, being slashdot a place you can say what you want. MICROSOFT SUCKS AND IT'S FROM USA, US CITIZENS HAVE FAULT ON THE MONOPOLY BECAUSE THEY DON'T DO NOTHING BECAUSE MICROSOFT MAKES MONEY FOR USA.

  89. Our usenet 10 years ago by KaSkA101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems they just got the internet and are acting like we did 10years ago when we first got it here, they just don't know the mannerisms of the net yet.

    1. Re:Our usenet 10 years ago by syrinje · · Score: 1
      Netiquette, like profit, depends on how much the market will withstand. It is entirely possible that the same medium will tolerate a completely different "Protocol for interacting via the Internet using both real-time and store and forward technologies" (remember you saw this posited as an RFC here first!). This "RFC" would have large sections that were extremely "locale-specific" (read culture specific) - what is taboo in the Internet of the here and the now may be completely legitimate in another time and place.

      Those of you who've driven in Mexico city (or in New Delhi or Djakarta) will remember the keening claustrophbia that engulfs the American driver as cars hedge them in on all sides with literal inches to spare - and in moving traffic - not just at traffic intersections!

      The Internet(TM) is evolving to more closely mirror the real world each day. Newer modes of interaction are being deployed all th etime - the common factor between them all being that they are designed to render the intervening network as inconspicious and invisilbe as possible.

      The downside is that even virus propagation in the Internet is starting to resemble its real-world analogue. A decade ago a virus infection was like a sexually transmitted disease - it needed the user to perform an act (of inserting the infected floppy) that would infect his computer. Till recently Internet borne viruses would still need a user action (click a link, open an atatchment, execute a file etc) to spread. Now, its like riding a bus and catching a cold - keeping a computer on and connected causes infection for those without the immune systems to resist. The Sasser plague is a case in point.

      As the number and character of the diverse peoples inhabiting the Internet grows, the Internet itself will continue to morph to better mirror the realities of its inhabitants. And so will the acceptable conventions of behaviour aka Netiquette.

      --
      See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
    2. Re:Our usenet 10 years ago by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

      We brazilians have our own usenet.

      That's why you don't see too much brazilians in the worldwide usenet.

  90. I have and Orkut account! by coopaq · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend invited me to Orkut. I signed up. It was fun. I logged on to message boards. Jimmy has a cat. It was fun like this post. People have pictures. It is neat. I like socks. Will you be my friend?

  91. Re:Repeat after me by ericspinder · · Score: 1
    Repeat after me...
    America is not the centre of the world. Diversity is ok. Multi-culturalism is ok.
    America is not the centre of the world. Diversity is ok. Multi-culturalism is ok.

    There are you happy now? The one thing that most people don't *get* is that America is the most multicultural country in the world. More than any other county in the world, America has been built on immigration from every other country on this planet. Sure we are well more than half "white" but that represents Germans, Italians, Irish, English, Spanish, French, Russian, Polish, etc. America was filled by people who looked around their particular 'old country' and said "Fuck this Shit, I can't get ahead" and left.

    Our culture is truely a melting pot of ideas, and values from all over the world, primarily northern European but not exclusively. For example most every school child in American knows what a Pinata is, and some even know how to use chop sticks. Perhaps that's why our culture is so 'exportable', because there are parts of it that are familiar to every part of the world. Even in most minor cities you can find what ever religion you follow. We speak English, not because there is any law saying you have to, but because most other people here do, immigrants learn that 'to get ahead' it's best to communicate in the 'local' language. However, unlike some courtries which will remain nameless there are no laws saying that you have to (excepting for a couple of closed-minded municipalities), large sections of our country speak Spanish, in fact all major cable companies have multiple Spanish language TV stations. You don't have to look hard in any big city to see business signs in any one of a dozen different languages.

    America is not the center (or centre if you like) of the world, but we do currently have the market cornered and English (in particular American English) is 'the lowest common denominator' for the Internet, this I believe will remain. If Brazilian's want to communicate in Portuguese fine, but I believe that this will seperate them from the largest part of the Internet communitity.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  92. Then again, by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1

    your imaginations might be right.

  93. At the same time by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    ... the US accounts for roughly 30% of the worlds economic output. It's no wonder that English is the most spoken second language, the lingua franca of these times.

    BTW, I'm not American, English is my 2nd language.

    --

    The Raven

  94. Re:Repeat after me by agbinfo · · Score: 1

    > Besides, the idea that language is tied to culture is nothing more than moronic.

    You are a moron if you don't see how language can be tied to culture. Please look up culture in a dictionary.

    > [blah blah blah]
    > I also had to learn French as my fourth in order to appease those bloody Quebecers

    Interesting that you had to learn French in a French community. I guess that if I go to the US, I should expect the entire country to start speeking French just so I should not be bothered to use the native language.

  95. This should be a business decision by TVeil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All this talk about which language to use seems to me to miss the point. If 40+% of a business's customer base speaks a certain language, it makes sense to me to not alienate that market segment and instead appeal to them. Imagine if McDonald's said "we are an American company and insist that everyone who comes to our restaurants speak English no matter where they are." The Internet is obviously a global market place. A company that makes their product difficult to use for their customers is missing an opportunity which another business will eventually take advantage of. Maybe even a foreign business...

  96. Re:Huh? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    Concur with other response to this inane post. Have you ever been to NYC? It's the most worldly city I've ever been in - I was out in Central Park the other day and heard a grandfather speaking to his two grandchildren in Finnish (while they spoke to each other in English), a bunch of people speaking Spanish to each other, a lady smoking a cigarette after running while on her cell phone speaking in a loud voice in Spanish, two mothers of young babies pushing strollers and speaking to each other in French, and a couple of German and Japanese tourists, all within about 5 minutes of each other around the Great Lawn (around 80th St. in the middle of the Park). I literally heard more non-English speakers than English-speakers.


    And that's not so unusual around here. You clearly visited the wrong places if you think Americans are culturally inept - sure, there are plenty of very backwards places in every country. Hell, I went to France and met some of the most racist, backwards-assed people I've ever encountered (a bunch of Koreans in my high school group on the trip were attacked in Lyons purely because they were Asian).


    I've lived for many years in Boston too, with many foreign friends and roommates there. Also a very worldly town, plenty of European-style clubs, Eastern European parties (nobody parties like Bulgarians), rich Arab kids living in opulent apartments, Indians and Russians everywhere holding up the technology industry, and so on.


    In short your experiences are not everybody's. And how on earth you could say something as atrocious as saying thousands of innocent people deserved to die for our current President's foreign policy is beyond the pale. You are a sick, sick man and I won't justify such an accusation with any further discussion. I frankly think anyone who says such a thing likely deserves a bullet themselves.

  97. Re:Stop being ethnocentric by khuber · · Score: 1

    Portugese is way down on the list of languages I wish to learn, somewhere after Klingon, Elvish, and Catalan.

  98. OT: Surely Google can address this technologically by agbinfo · · Score: 1

    Quick, patent this idea now before we need to do a search for prior art when SomeCie patents it in a month or two.

  99. Re:Huh? by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    The US deserved September 11th.

    Regardless of anyone's opinion of the current administration, or of US foreign-policy in general, the thousands who died in the attacks on the World Trade Centre did not deserve the events of September 11th. I realize you are arguing that the nation deserved it, not the people in the buildings, but I disagree there too. The foreign policy of a nation is unfortunately far too often at odds with the will of its people. The US is in a unique position of being the world's only real economic, military, and political superpower, without another nation (or truly united collection of nations) to keep it in check.

    It's practically a lose-lose situation. Because of its position, people expect a lot of (often contradictory) things from the US. Refuse to interfere militarily (eg. last year in Liberia for a bit) you lose, interfere militarily (Vietnam) you lose. I agree that US foreign policy needs work -- but nobody deserves an event like September 11th. I'll add that the Iraqis did not deserve the war in Iraq while I'm at it, though the Iraqis didn't deserve to have Saddam Hussein inflicted on the either.

  100. Hmm, I wonder how much affiliation google has .... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    .... in this. I mean a search of "orkut site:google.com" (no quotes) on google brings up one result with a dead link. I mean, maybe it is just some employees from google who started this, and put google's name on it? I don't see google putting much into this service though, for all we know, someone could be running it secretly from their workstation, a server, etc at google. I am questioning how legitimate this place really is, and if it has much affiliation with google or not. I'd see this problem as fixed a while back if google was afiliated.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  101. Do you have Korean inlaws? by Skim123 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Because you just described what basically all non-Koreans go through when meeting the Korean extended family for the first time. Sitting there, having Mr. Kim and Aunt Park having an animated discussion in Korean that ends in laughter and a finger pointed squarely at you.

    I speak from experience. :-)

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:Do you have Korean inlaws? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought I was reading about my Filipino in-laws when thye first met me. :)

    2. Re:Do you have Korean inlaws? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      An interesting thing I've observed in the Koreans who are relatives or friends of the family that I've met is that they all start with the saying, "You look very X," where X can be any number of things. Usually, for me, X is "young," but I've heard "smart" and "handsome", too. Perhaps this is what the relatives where laughing about when I first met them, how young I look.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    3. Re:Do you have Korean inlaws? by PatientZero · · Score: 1

      Or they're laughing because you swallowed the "smart" and "handsome" bit. :P

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  102. Re:OT: Surely Google can address this technologica by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

    Publication of an idea, especially such that is timestamped, trumps patent application. This is why Heinlein is famous relative to the waterbed. He published a description of a waterbed in the early to mid 60's, which exceeded the specifications of what was later developed as a waterbed. When whatever company first started marketing waterbeds attempted to enforce a patent, the 'infringing' company presented the description Heinlein had previously poblished, and the pattent was vacated.

    (It was either that, or the original manufacturers started making them fully aware that it was not patentable, and when a follow on company attempted to patent, and claim infringement the earlier company pointed to the published description, and effectively said, sorry, too late.)

    Then again, with the way the patent office and others have been operating over the past few years, who knows.

    Besides I don't have 'Word' on any computer I own. As preparing the patent application in 'Word' is the current requirement, I can't do it. I also can't afford the patent search required.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  103. what the fuck are you talking about. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Are you illiterate? Read my post again. Pay close attention to the second paragraph.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:what the fuck are you talking about. by PatientZero · · Score: 3, Funny
      perlchild: I speak two and a half [languages] myself. [Proceeds to misunderstand and argue against autopr0n's original post]
      autopr0n: Are you illiterate?

      Looks like English is that "half" language. ;)

      --
      Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
      I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  104. Linguistic Descrimination by LuYu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This statement is incredible:

    English-speaking users are complaining that the service is intended to be in English.
    Intended by whom? Since when are discussion forums "intended" or "required" to be exclusively in English. Is enabling communication not the point of the Internet?

    If these were French Canadians talking about "language preservation" in Canada, most English speakers would think they were absurd. Now, when the situation is reversed, English speakers think they have the right to behave in the same absurd way.

    These English speaking Orkut users are really being unfair. The fact that they cannot read Portugese is a result of the English speakers' ignorance and not the fault of the Portugese speakers. The Portugese speakers should be able to post in any language they like. If the English speakers do not like it, they can learn Portugese or use translation software to get an idea of what was said.

    These English speakers had better get a clue. Online, you are exposed to the whole world, not just your boondock neighborhood. People speak lots of languages. If they choose to remain ignorant, they should not blame others for that chosen ignorance.

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    1. Re:Linguistic Descrimination by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, when the situation is reversed, English speakers think they have the right to behave in the same absurd way.

      That's the problem with people in general: They want things cushy for themselves, even if it means a great inconvenience for a lot of other people. I've seen it in whites, latin-americans, blacks, americans, europeans, south-americans, asians, homosexuals, heterosexuals, religious people, athiests, rich, poor, educated, uneducated, skinny, fat, tall, short, and everyone in between. In fact, the person who can say "This sure is inconveniencing to me, but to change it would bother a lot of people even more" seem to be an extreme rarity these days.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Linguistic Descrimination by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

      The fact that they cannot read Portugese is a result of the English speakers' ignorance and not the fault of the Portugese speakers.

      Ohhhh!

      Yeah, you are right, i will love if americans start studing portuguese to speak with me in portuguese at Orkut.

      Also portuguese is a very nice language, hard to learn but is nice :)

      I will add you as your fan, i only need to learn, i will read the faq, in orkut is more much easier :)

    3. Re:Linguistic Descrimination by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      "If these were French Canadians talking about "language preservation" in Canada, most English speakers would think they were absurd. Now, when the situation is reversed, English speakers think they have the right to behave in the same absurd way."

      That's only b/c we hate French Canadians in general ;)

      "We want to leave, we want to leave"
      Ice Storm
      "We need your help"
      Oh shut up.

      *above blatantly stolen from Sean Collins comedy hour*

  105. language identification and filtering by dekeji · · Score: 1

    If seeing Portugese or English bothers people, there is a simple technical solution: apply language identification and just don't show content that's in the wrong language. Orkut can and should do this at the message and forum level. It could even offer automated translations "the wrong language" as a third option.

  106. Oblig. by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    A man who speaks three languages is trilingual.
    A man who speaks two languages is bilingual.
    A man who speaks one language is American.

  107. Here's how I see it.... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    When people come to the USA, where the vastly predominant language is English, and they don't bother to learn English, then they're just lazy, and deserve whatever consequences befall them.

    (When I moved to a foreign country for a couple of years, I learned quite a bit of the language before I even went - and the entire time I was there, I worked on my language skills and accent.)

    Of course, that means that in the Orkut case, where it's predominantly Portugese, I think that the Americans can either (a) learn Portugese, or (b) deal with it. It's what I expect of others, it's what I expect of myself, it's what I expect of my fellow countrymen.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  108. Re:Hmm, I wonder how much affiliation google has . by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

    I believe Google bought it. There was a /. story on it way back when... maybe you'll find the info on here.

  109. Re:OT: Surely Google can address this technologica by agbinfo · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I was aware that once a trade secret is published, it no longer is a trade secret and cannot be patented. However, for someone to claim that, one must have access to the publication. I won't tell if you don't :-)

    > Then again, with the way the patent office and others have been operating over the past few years, who knows.

    That's mostly what I was refering to. The one-click, two-click, hypertext, etc.

  110. Non-issue with simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a total non-issue and anybody who gets worked about it is - quite frankly - a complete idiot. If these people want to lock themselves out of communicating with the rest of the world, who is to say that they are not allowed to do so?

    And the solution is totally simple. Orkut just needs to add a data field to users profile called "language". Every user is expected to set this field to the language his profile is written in. Also, every user gets a field to select what languages he speaks.

    Then, on a search, you can choose to either get "all matches", "matches in languages I speak", or "matches in specific language X".

    Problem solved, everybody will be happy.

    1. Re:Non-issue with simple solution by klui · · Score: 1

      And while reading messages (I don't have an Orkut account), the system would automatically translate other languages to one's native language.

  111. Re:Stop being ethnocentric by NerveGas · · Score: 1


    The rest of the world? You mean, like, Texas? :)

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  112. Re:Stop being ethnocentric by jdhawke · · Score: 1

    Is it ethnocentric to have a "community" that has been communicating in english suddenly get invaded and spammed in a foreign language? Then I get painted as the "bad guy" because I try to keep things on topic and in english? Why do they not just establish their own communities ( very easy to do in Orkut ) to have their conversations. But no, just because I am a citizen of the United States I am automatically the bad guy.
    Wake up people, the objectivity around the world when it comes to the US is just a bit skewed at times.
    And yes, before anyone comments, I have visited or lived in about 15 nations, and speak some french and italian, and have always learned the basic pleasentries (hello, thank you, please) in the local language no matter how brief my stay in any nation.

  113. What's the problem? by mikew03 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this has been posted before but I want to add my vote. If the site attracts speakers of a particular language, who cares. More power to them. Surely the english speakers will find plenty of sites open to them, way more sites than for people speaking other languages. Sounds to me like if you want to stay with Orkut and speak english you should invite a few more of your english speaking friends. I hear its a pretty common language so shouldn't be much trouble.

  114. Time should fix it. by zxflash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems the Brazilians have a little racket for the time being but isn't it likely that things should adjust themselves as the Orkut population becomes more diverse?

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
    1. Re:Time should fix it. by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      When the Stanfordites figure obscurity != security, and they remove that feature is when Orkut should be taken seriously.

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  115. Immigration is a bitch by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why, aren't [EU member states' immigration agencies] allowing anybody in who isn't born there?

    Immigration is expensive, and the red tape is an absolute female dog.

    1. Re:Immigration is a bitch by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      So, you're telling me that the expense of moving and that dealing with the red tape would be a greater burden to you than staying here?

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Immigration is a bitch by tepples · · Score: 1

      Yes, especially when I'm long past that pre-puberty "critical period" when language acquisition comes naturally.

      Yes, especially when Americanosis spreads to each country in turn through the sheeple's wholesale adoption of American corporate pop culture and the USA government's deceptively-named "free trade" agreements.

    3. Re:Immigration is a bitch by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      Language acquisition doesn't come naturally later on? I moved to another country for a few years, and became fluent in the language while there. And since I've been back, I've been picking up quite a bit of a few other languages just by reading a little bit here and there. I don't think that I'm in any way "gifted", I just have happened to pay some attention to it.

      Perhaps you should give it a try, see if it's what you really want to do.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  116. ignorance by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    UUism is a group of different religions that share one house

    No, it's not. It is a religion built upon a recognition for the need for spiritualism and that faith is a deeply personal affair. Technically is it the merging of the Unitarian and Universalist churches, which both have their roots in very early medieval europe. Unitarians are actually one of the oldest derivatives of Christianity. Universalism followed a few hundred years later.

    However, it, in and of itself, is no more a religion than "paganism" is.

    Funny, because my minister graduated from Harvard Divinity School (which recognizes Unitarian Universalism, and just happens to be one of the oldest and most respected theological school in the country), and UU ministers are recognized across the world and in every single state.

    The view that Unitarian Universalism is not a "true" religion is rather old- it has long since been accepted as a religion by the majority of theologians.

    Feel free to be insulted if you wish, but if your religion doesn't share its teachings

    UUs certainly share their teachings- but they do not force it upon others because they have neither the desire for global domination that other religions do, nor do they chase away their base- mainly because they celebrate spirituality, instead of instilling fear and guilt like most other religions.

    doesn't take positions, lets democracy rather than reason and relevation determine dogma

    Substantial reason goes into UUA policymaking, which is usually administrative only. At no time during General Assembly (the yearly convention) is dogma discussed, and the UUA does not consider it appropriate to tell others what is right and wrong. Each church is free to practice their form of UUism how they see fit.

    and generally doesn't say much more than "we should all get along", then it's not a frigging religion.

    Characterizing the Principles and Purposes of the UUA as "we should all ge along" is akin to characterizing pagans as a bunch of goat-slaughtering freaks, or Catholics as a bunch of child-molesting, subservient, permanently-guilt-tripped, mindless idiots.

    Incidentally, the religious freedom you enjoy today if you're in America is due almost entirely in part to the beliefs of Unitarians such as Ben Franklin; Unitarians made history in the 16th century by convinc

  117. what is it with brazil? by rebelcool · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't get me wrong - I have nothing against brazil or its people (the women are especially beautiful), but besides Orkut, theres many other community-esque websites which brazilians tends to invade, in a sense, and attempt to assimilate into their own.

    Fotolog.net comes to mind. Originally a website by a handful of new yorkers to be a photo-blog type site, it has exploded with brazilians, mainly teenagers. Its not so much a blog to them, as the vast majority of pictures are crude webcam type self portraits or risque photos they upload, as opposed to the original amateur photographer type envisioned when it was started.

    Most words posted on fotolog are written in portuguese. Its a common point of tension among these users and the administrators. Fotolog is hosted in america and its administrators are mostly americans. Therefore, the membership plans which pay for the site and its bandwidth are in american dollars ($5 atm). $5 is alot of money for the average brazilian, and since stolen credit card numbers and fraud is utterly rampant in Brazil, it is very difficult for the brazilian users to become legitimate paying members, and enjoy the benefits thereof.

    But what is it about brazil that they tend to 'invade' sites that are clearly not meant to cater to their individual needs, involving language and culture? Why are they not starting their own Orkut, or their own Fotolog, instead choosing to invade an existing site and demanding its administrators cater to them? How can this be remedied?

    --

    -

  118. Hey! Lots of brazilians don't speak English! by felmasper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that many of you are forgetting the fact that many Brazilians (probably most of them) don't master the English language well enough to write using it.

    In fact many of them can hardly read/understand English. In fact, really, some can hardly write in Portuguese!

    That's why I believe that this is not being done on purpose or by pride. It's just that brazilians don't feel confortable writing in English.

    Of course there are some lammers thinking this issue is kind of a game to be won. But they are few (at least I hope :-).

    Besides, topics in orkut tend to be informal, and when you need to say something informal, with slang, etc. it's much easier and better to use your first language.

    Anyway, language is for us to understand each one better, not the opposite.

  119. Some translation is one-way by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Orkut user interface is English too, so you can't tell me the Brazilians talk Portugese because they don't know English.

    Ability to translate the UI and others' comments from English into mental Portuguese does not necessarily imply ability to translate one's own comments from mental Portuguese into English.

  120. utter nonsense by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    Do you realize how much it costs to run a website? Especially when the content is chiefly pictures? $5 is token change.

    And what do you do when 75% of your users are essentially leeches, who have no intention of donating or paying, slowing it down for those who do? And who don't even use the site for its intended purpose?

    And then when the administrators make changes to correct this imbalance, these users flood group fotologs and webforums with garbage, obscene pictures and indecipherable ranting.

    And you you go so far as to call the people who complain about this behavior as 'racist', or 'xenophobes'.

    Maybe its this gregarious, ridiculous attitude of wanting everything for free, and that everyone ELSE cowtow to your desires is what makes you unpopular. Or as some would say, compared to a plague of locusts.

    --

    -

    1. Re:utter nonsense by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      When locusts swarm and devour everything in their path, uncaring about how this affects whose crops they're eating... I think at times, the analogy is apt.

      I don't think this has to do with brazilians as a whole (I know many fine people of Brazil), but rather hormone fed teenagers who've acquired too much new technology in too little time, and don't realize their actions behind a keyboard impact people more than they know. And perhaps don't realize that dealing with it - in both money and time - isn't cheap.

      As for fotolog not charging $1 - the reason is fraud makes payment hard, if not impossible for most. Paypal for example requires a credit card, and for brazilians it has to be one of major issuers like visa, mastercard etc. These are very difficult to come by there. Generally only the wealthy have them - certainly not all these 15 and 16 year old kids. Its clear also, that the ratio of people who would actually pay (not many) do not justify lowering the cost. The cost for the site is in substantial american dollars, all paying users should be treated the same.

      Of the credit cards that do get used from brazil, the admins have noted a HUGE number of fraudulent ones with stolen numbers get used. Its rampant. Dealing with credit card fraud is hugely time consuming, taking time away from site issues and service.

      Which brings us to the new program they launched this week, which was partnering with a major brazilian internet provider to bring better service to brazilians - native language, easier methods of payment, more catered to their cultural needs. Part of the deal of this was non-paying south american users would see a smallish banner at the top of the page. How was this taken? By having hundreds of teenagers 'protest' by posting obscene pictures to group logs and spamming people with offensive gibberish.

      --

      -

  121. Unsurprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If the Brazilians were nice enough to fork and create groups that discussed topics in Portuguese, it wouldnt be a big deal. Orkut should have an upgrade right now, providing an "official group language" field for groups, so one can tell if they're joining the "Simpsons - English" or "Simpsons - Portuguese" groups. But many of the Brazilians walk in, act like they own the place, and hijack Orkut. I dont use it anymore for this reason.
    Not just Orkut. They're like this everywhere they go online. Rude, arrogant, racist, xenophobic, obnoxious, they have to be seen to be believed. I'm sorry to say they are simply the worst nationality of people I have ever come across. I actually laughed when I saw this Slashdot article, as it exactly mirrors mine and others' experiences with Brazilians in online gaming. You quickly learn what "chuta os gringos merda" means...
  122. Nope that is bad manners by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The first thing anyone with at least some social skills should learn is how to ask in the local language if that person speaks another language.

    Just starting to babble in your own language to someone who may or may not speak it is the hight of impoliteness. You always ask in the local language wether someone else speaks your language or another mutual language. How am I supposed to know that your speaking god knows what or even asking me a question? You might be warning me that I am about to step into some dog shit or a nutcase.

    The only exception perhaps is english in holland. You can pretty much take it for granted that nobody in the world speaks dutch and english is pretty much a second language to us. We also don't really mind, we are a small nation in a big world and either we speak english or become like the french. Easy choice eh?

    Anyway this is all about speaking in the real world. Personally I think it would greatly help if people tried to speak in english on the net. Why? Esperanto or whatever is deader then dead dodo on the day of the dead. Bury it already. The net is about exchanging information easily and accross the world. Bit hard if we are going to keep up the existing language barriers. Imagine if everyone on /. posted in their local language. It would die an instant death. Most amazing are the anti-socials who go to an english forum then post a question in their own language and wonder why no-one responds.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Nope that is bad manners by infolib · · Score: 1

      The net is about exchanging information easily and accross the world.

      No. That's how YOU use it. I know lots of people who basically only use the net in danish. (And it's not like danish is a world language). I personally get a lot more out of the net when using english, since I'm involved in different cross-border communities/activities, and you may feel the same way, but that's how OUR calculation falls out.

      I think my main point here is that the net is not "about" anything. It merely exists, being used for billions of different purposes by billions of different humans.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  123. You miss the point by beakburke · · Score: 1
    Sure the US could put more cultural emphasis on learning multiple languages (which is considered highly trendy to do now days for those with the bucks). There are low reasons for an english speaker not to learn another language. I'll label them the "international effect" and the "regional effect". While both the US and UK would suffer from the international effect, the US would suffer much more from the regional effect than the UK.

    1. Since English is widely taught (internationally) as a second language, those who learn it as their "first language" can expect others to understand them without learning another language. This reduces the demand for english speakers to learn another language. This would apply to all english speaking countries. I'll call this the "international effect"

    2. The "regional effect" is that you have less of a reason to learn other languages if everyone in the region (defined by a variable distance x) speaks your language. Eg. someone from the US travels xkm, and someone from the UK does as well. Which is more likely to end up somewhere where English is not the primary language? Basically, being multilingual is just much more of a requirement for living anywhere in the EU than in the US. It's just more important as a practical skill, because average Europeans are much more likely to use that skill than average USians.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  124. here's whats happening by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    and why it annoys people. i'll use a simple analogy.

    imagine you have a group meeting about some kind of topic. It all goes well. Then all of a sudden, dozens of others join in, talking in a separate language, often gregariously and completely off topic, and using enough slang that things like babelfish can't even hope to translate it.

    Now imagine that all your original on-topic posts to your original members get drowned out by this. And then when you ask the new members to stay on topic, or try to translate their writings, they call you a racist xenophobe, or flood the group with pornography in 'protest'.

    Thats whats happening. It happened on fotolog and its happening on orkut.

    --

    -

  125. Re:solved? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And never the twain shall meet, or get to know each other...

    I strongly believe that a great many problems (especially wars, terrorism, etc) could be solved by people just getting to know each other better. Seeing that while yes, there are differences between them (some irreconcilable, perhaps), there are also a great many similarities; we're all human, after all.

    If you can get the general population to realise that actually, there's nothing to hate or fear of people just because they're different, you'd find that the leaders have a much harder time of causing trouble. Not forgetting that tomorrow's leaders are today's Joe Bloggs - get them understanding other cultures now, you'll have less trouble if they end up in positions of power. (That works both ways, of course - each culture should understand the others)

    But no, you're right - you just continue to foster your separatist attitude and separatist communities, and let other people do the hard work of trying to get people from different cultures interacting.

  126. wow. by mushroom+blue · · Score: 1

    well, if brazil is given an orkut.br, that sorta defeats the purpose. however, this would mean that I wouldn't have to see the brazillian neo-nazi skinheads that are slowly infecting many communities.

    give and take, I suppose.

  127. Half truth by 12357bd · · Score: 1

    Half truths.

    All air traffic is controlled in english, true. but all bussiness are dealed in english?... Common, not even remotely, world is far bigger than you suppouse.

    Even if english is the largest second language, the truth is that:
    1) there are very broadly used second languages in the world ie: spanish.
    2) the distribution of these second languages is very sensible to geografic location.
    So if you are speaking to an international audience, you better select the most used second language in the place you are, because in a lot of places english is not a sensible option.

    --
    What's in a sig?
    1. Re:Half truth by 12357bd · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I replied saying that the percentage of non-english speakers deals done in english is nothing compared to the number of deals done in non-english.

      There are a lot of second languages in the world, in vast areas of the world english means nothing to common people, so the total number of deals done at a given moment in the world between people of different native language english is just a small part.

      English can be the most used languahe between big bussines true, but do you believe that these are the most common ones in the world?.

      --
      What's in a sig?
  128. Ashamed to be a brazilian by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    from FYI's Blog [ fyiblog.blogspot.com ], translation by me:

    -----------

    "The Brazilians in Orkut"

    For some reason I still do not grasp entirely, Orkut became a craze in Brazil. Nothing against the site, I also am a member, but suddenly everyone is talking about it. It became so pop, even Veja [Brazil's most important magazine] published an article about it.

    Thus far, that's ok. However, most of these people have not joined it to know people, or to take part in the discussion groups. They are only going to make a ruckus out of it.

    Dont ask me how this nonsense began exactelly, but all of a sudden I started getting emails inviting me to "join the brazilian movement in Orkut". It seems the idea was that we should invite other brazilians to enter in the site, to make the number of brazilians bigger than that of Americans.

    For what, you ask? Ah! It seems that someone named Gary, supposedly an american, somehow insulted the brazilians there. He said that we were a bunch of dicks who start speaking portuguese in american groups, something like that.

    And to prove that we are not ignorant indians, but educated and intelligent people, which better reply of the one than... to beat the USA in sheer statistics?

    The Saga continues, and it seems that Gary person was banished. However, "Gary's followers" started showing up.

    One of the countless messages I received came from one of these followers. I found interesting as the such individual had a nazi-styled photo, and had poor english. Tracking his messages, I found he spoke portuguese! It seems he had studied in Brazil (huh?), therefore things were like that.

    But that was just the beginning! Now, whenever I log in, I receive dozens of messages telling me I should change my photo to a flag of Brazil in the september 7th [brazilian independence day], or that I should change my photo to a flag of Iraq (?), or change my photo to a pic of the twin towers in the 4th of july!

    Seriously, why is our concentration of stupidity so high? I check the profiles of the senders of those childish messages expecting to find 15-year-old brats, and find 30-year-olds.

    Why can people from Iran, Japan, Slovenia, India, etc, keep civil, while we get in this nonsense? Ah, this bloated ego of ours... or, more precisely, our inferiority complex.

    And again, the joke is on us.

    -----------

  129. What's knew about this? by solios · · Score: 1

    Orkut's a circle jerk. Slashdot's a circle jerk. It just so happens that here, Windows is sneezed at and joked about, whereas on Orkut, the "I'm BETTER THAN J00!!!" has turned out to be language-based, as opposed to more personal preferences. Since it's hard to argue just how much the other guy sucks when you can't speak his language, some people are getting peeved.

    And babelfish goes unmentioned.

    I gave orkut a shot. Frankly, looking at the Pittsburgh dating scene through search filters scared the crap outta me.

  130. Oh yikes I hope you said this wrong by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Filter people based on their nationality. Yikes. The human race already has far to much liking to filter the world according to groups. Do we really need to make this even easier?

    Oh I don't like french, filter french people. I don't like americans, filter americans.

    Humans are talkers and we need to talk, there is just one hurdle remaining and that is a common language (love is but aids is killing that one plus gf tends to be rather unsupporting of me going talking to that blonde with the intrestting tits^H^H^H^H^Hdialect).

    English is of course acceptable to everyone who speaks it but to those who don't it is a difficult one to pick up, and human beings being the selfish assholes they are, and they would prefer the english speakers to learn their language.

    The truly insane want everyone to learn esperanto. A language nobody finds easy and no established base.

    Personally I am dutch so english is the natural choice for me. (dutch is far far to difficult for the foreigners to learn without very good training, it can be done but you need an expensive course)

    What I am wondering is if brazillians learn english as a second language like we do in holland and are just either poor students or incredible assholes (speaking english to an american isn't kow-towing, it is showing you are a smarter, a truly cultured person doesn't limit himself to one language). Oh well people being anti-social on the net, what a suprise eh?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh yikes I hope you said this wrong by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, I wish I could filter french people. Just think of what it'll be like when we have reality overlay and you can replace a french person with a mobile chalk outline with a little french flag in the head area. Bliss.

      Seriously though, Google has language tools, why not integrate them into Orkut so that they can be used to detect the language used in a post, and then you can filter out the ones you don't want to read - or maybe translate them?

      This is why I'm really not very excited about all these google services (though I am using them all) - they don't integrate. This misses the best thing about the web, the fact that sites can and do interoperate, and yet this is one company with several sites that don't do so.

      I guess google has loads of talent but no vision and has to be directed by external forces?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Oh yikes I hope you said this wrong by bandy · · Score: 1

      Au contraire, mon frere. Esperanto is a language that everyone finds to be easy. Please feel free to take a no-cost online course: here

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  131. Learn "sorry spreekt U engels" for holland by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Is that so hard to understand? Any tourist guide book can teach you that line and the repsonses. "Yeah sure" "Nee sorry" "Want to buy some good weed?" etc etc

    Sure holland may be an exception, plenty of foreigners say this, as the fast majority of us speak and understand english fairly well. Not fluent but less face it your a yank, raping the english language for centuries and your proud of it.

    So it is bit of give and take, we can't expect americans to learn a second language because america doesn't have any communities inside that speak another language (that is a bullshit excuse, they do). The valid excuse, if americans travel a bit they have to learn an awfull lot of languages just for a trip to europe. Dutch, german, french, danish, swedish, italian, portugese and if they visit england hardest of all, english.

    BUT it isn't impossible for them to learn at least the opening lines. It is not like you even need to be fluent in them. Just make a tiny little effort.

    Although I must admit that personally I find it rude to speak dutch when their is an english speaker present. Fluent english is a valuable skill to have for any dutch working person and excluding a co-worker at the cost of brushing up your language skills just doesn't make sense.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Learn "sorry spreekt U engels" for holland by caluml · · Score: 1

      Ik wil een ham en kaas brodje, aub. Oh, en een blikje cola, ook. Dank U wel. :)

    2. Re:Learn "sorry spreekt U engels" for holland by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not fluent but less face it your a yank, raping the english language for centuries and your proud of it.

      Oh right, that's why it's the british who can't spell Aluminum. They and we have both been doing our best to pervert the language since its inception. However, english cannot be perverted, because it is inherently perverted - it's like trying to queer up the shows on bravo, it's not possible. English seems to be about half old english which itself is a language of germanic descent, and half words from any other language which was in use at the time. It seems a lot of the non-english-derived words are french, which must amuse them to no end given our attitude about their language.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  132. Re:Linguistic Discrimination by idril · · Score: 1
    Is enabling communication not the point of the Internet?

    Somebody mod the parent up please, I thought this was pretty insightful.

  133. Nice way to make friends by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    So you think the best way to make friends is to speak a language they don't understand? To spam an english community with portugese?

    Of couse you don't.

    Neither do I think do those who do this kinda thing, they are like the gnaa and "ME TOO" aolers. God knows what motivates them but I don't think it is making friends.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  134. dotnode by millette · · Score: 1

    .node is multilingual (french and english for now) and we certainly appreciate the subtleties of your language. Buzz me if you want to have a good peek inside. Subscribing to .node gets a blog, a foaf file, forums, calendars and a bunch of communities. Oh, and I heard people hung out there too :)

  135. Big Jesus On A Hill Commands You by Qrlx · · Score: 1

    if i had an invite i would learn the language
    this is any different in the business world?

  136. choosing content by languages! by toleransi · · Score: 1

    The answer to the question posed by this development at Orkut: multilingual sites that allow users to choose to view content by languages (plural). ISSHO is one such experiment.

  137. orkut... by timerider · · Score: 1

    ... is a moot point.

  138. Orkut's manifold annoyances. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know what, the Portuguese/English language battle is just a symptom of a larger problem with Orkut. Even if you only allow friends to invite friends, some of those people are still going to be assholes who care nothing about community standards, primary languages, or the fact that nobody wants their stupid new community or look-at-my-site spam.

    I am active in the big PHP community (because I love giving advice and support to PHP programmers), but this particular one is supposed to be for English speakers (there are 5 PHP-Brazil communities, and one PHP in Portuguese community as well). There are a few people who unthinkingly speak Portuguese in threads (and one "Who's from Brazil?" thread that has since gone dormant), but the one thing that eventually made my blood boil was someone who came along and double-posted spam in two new threads in Portuguese, taking up 40% of the topic real estate on the community front page. So we had a little local Brazil/English-speaking-country war over there after I railed at the bastard.

    I'm subscribed to plenty of language-agnostic communities which have some threads in P-guese, but when it says on the front "Language: English" and you spout your crap in any other language, you can expect nothing but vitriol from me. I'm pretty sure I'm making enemies in Brazil as we speak. They can go to hell.

    Speaking of which, even though you know the name and account number of anyone who sends you useless spam in your message box or in your communities, there's pretty much only two ways to deal with it. One is to put repeat offenders on your ignore list. The other is to make sure said person sees the following quote from the Japanese Food/Sushi Lovers community:

    "Why are you doing this spam? Are you stupid or just a bad person?" --Aya Tanimura

    Or just to drive the point home, here it is babelfished into Portuguese.

    "Por que você está fazendo este Spam? São você stupid ou apenas uma pessoa má?"

    The one extra thing you can do is identify spammers on Orkut who live near you (their names and faces are there if they're too stupid to fake them), and give them a general beatdown if you see them on the street. Maybe a tracker site would be in order: "The Hunt for Orkut Spammer"

  139. Can a linguist be wrong? Maybe just a francophobe. by hethatishere · · Score: 1

    For a linguist you seem to have some of your facts out of whack in regards to the French language.

    -French is the most widely taught second language in the world, after English. French is the third most taught language in the United States (For most of our history it was the second until whites finally recognized the higher prevelance of Spanish) Personal quips should never be used in place of facts. French is still somewhat considered the language of diplomacy (Both English and French reign here) and is also considered to be one of the essential languages for International business (Among, not surprisingly English, German, Japanese, and Mandarin). France is also the second-largest international investor behind the US.

    French and English are the two working languages The United Nations, UNESCO, The International Monetary Fund, The International Labour Bureau, The International Olympic Committee, The 31-member Council of Europe, and The European Community.

    French is the dominant working language at The European Court of Justice, The European Tribunal of First Instance, The European Court of Auditors in Luxembourg, The Press Room at the European Commission in Brussels, and the International Red Cross (Where it is also the Official Language).

    You might also have forgotten that French-speaking Africa has an immense population and a geographical area larger than the United States. And behind English is the most taught second language in the United States If you were looking for a job with the State Department you'd find overwhelmingly they look for people with proficiency in French as a second language. The closest second language had a third as many jobs and was looking for Spanish speakers. So I'd say it's plenty useful for working for the US Government and in diplomacy.

    French is a very useful language to know, as is English and I agree with you on your statements on English. I'm just sick of people and their whole Anti-French attitude, it's just bigotry wearing a clown nose - especially from my fellow Americans who for being so rich and educated certainly hold a strong anti-foreigner mentality more than I've seen in almost any other non-homogenized society.

    The source I used is here [intstudy.com], and those facts are also mirrored on other pages about the French language on study programs and Higher Education institutions around the world.

    --
    Something intelligent here.
  140. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  141. As an orkut user by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'd agree with this sentiment. I've entered an english community. The title is in english, the description in english etc etc. However, I have been getting a lot of non-english (Brazilian?) mails in my orkut inbox from some of those forums.

    If I'd entered a form with a Brazilian descriptor I might expect that, but if a Brazilian enters an english channel (and can read english to understand the channel description), he/she should probably use english as per the rest of the channel users' understanding.

  142. Didn't parse link correctly. by hethatishere · · Score: 1
    --
    Something intelligent here.
  143. It goes deeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's funny. The people that complain the hardest seem to be Americans. Is this because they are frustrated that they don't speak a second language? The argument 'we don't need to speak a second language since our country is so big' is a rogue one. Ever been to Miami? It's easier to speak spanish there than english. Why is it, here in the Netherlands most people get at least english, and most likely a few years french and german education, yet in the USA they don't even bother to give spanish (Which would make sense) in schools as a second language (although slowly that seems to change). Because Americans have to admit they are not the best in something (languages), they try to solve it by banning it, instead of fighting the problem at the core: their own lacking. Demanding the whole world to speak english is plain ignorant.

    1. Re:It goes deeper by jdhawke · · Score: 1

      At least here in New York, the public school systems are required to teach a second language. When I was in High School I had three years of french (made much more sense than spanish being so close to Quebec) and they had started to teach spanish in the Elementary schools.

      So your accusation of not being taught a second language in schools is at least in part groundless.

      Please learn the facts before making a statement that just shows your ignorance about the American School system.

      Furthermore your statement of the "large nation excuse being a rogue one" is also a fallacy. If I learn a language in school, but then have little or no chance to use it over the next 15 years because I would have to travel to locations hundreds or even thousands of miles away to encounter an area where its use would be required then my knowledge and proficiency will degrade to the point of being useless.

    2. Re:It goes deeper by Emmeau · · Score: 1

      Okay, assuming that a second language like Spanish is being taugh ALL OVER the USA in the public schools (feel free to prove that that is the case), then what is the problem? If you can read and write spanish, considering the fact that portugese is quite close to spanish, it should be not hard to understand things is it? That is, if one would bother to put effort in it... The fact that you seem to insist on that there is no use for any foreign language since you won't be using it, doesn't hold ground. You are on the internet, many languages are being used there. The time that where you would only get in contact with foreign languages if you would actually go there, is beyond us. Not to mention the fact that the world is a bigger place than just an english speaking world. This whole ignorance for foreign languages is exactly the problem with english speaking people visiting a country like France, Germany or The Netherlands. When someone from France goes to the USA, they expect the French people to speak english. When an American goes to France, they expect the French to speak English. What is wrong in that picture? How hard is it to buy at least a little book with elementary phrases, so you can order the basic? Even if you would have to resort to just pointing out phrases, it would make sense. You're in a foreign culture. (something americans lack seriously, culture, how many building they have over say 300 years old?) Why bother so much over the fact that people speak portugese among eachother? If you don't like it, leave. It's free to leave. Instead of complaining, try to understand the foreign cultures. The world is bigger than just the American piece of soil and the english language. My experience is, that people get annoyed when other people speak a foreign language. They get annoyed with themselves, for not being able to understand it. And instead of trying to understand the foreign language, Americans seem to go the easy way, trying to ban the foreign language. Let's just look at the economic principle of offer and demand. If this concept of Orkut is really so great, what's keeping people from starting a similar service, english only? It's a free internet to do whatever you feel like when it comes to that. But I guess it's easier to whine and complain about things one doesn't understand than to start up their own service. Ignorance is bliss. Sadly that counts for a lot of people, especially those who refuse their open their eyes and minds for foreign cultures.

  144. WTF are you guys thinking? by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A quick search for females on Orkut yielded the following results.

    female, 20, single
    Brazil

    female, 18, single
    Brazil

    female, 22, single
    Brazil

    female, 25, single
    Brazil

    female, 28, single
    Brazil

    female, 22, single
    Brazil

    And most of the pictures are rather... nice. I dunno about you guys, but I'm going to go learn some Brazilian now!

    1. Re:WTF are you guys thinking? by DanBrusca · · Score: 1

      They're probably all lady-boys...

  145. Still not there by jm.one · · Score: 1

    Ayways: I do not have gotten any invitation yet and all people I know don`t have gotten one, too. (Were in Germany an willing and able to speak English ;) )

  146. Iran? ! by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The most interesing line in the entire article " Iranians are a distant third place at about 6 percent", and no one even seems to notice?

    Iran number 3 on Orkut! Hello! THAT is the story I wanna read!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Iran? ! by cancerward · · Score: 1

      I commented about Iran being number 3 on orkut a month ago today. My comment still stands - I wouldn't classify it as a "very repressive police-state", I think you have to visit yourself to see, and being French it is easy for you to visit. And even without being an orkut member you can see that those 6.05% are all IN Iran (of 929,894 right now).

  147. Not an Issue to Me by bedouin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I maintain a couple groups on Orkut, and at one point two Brazilians were speaking and commented, "I'm not sure how to express this in English." I quickly chimed in and basically said, "Then say it in Portuguese; if the content is juicy enough, the English-only speakers can paste it into Babelfish." I don't know Portuguese by the way.

    There's no reason multiple languages can't coexist in one forum. I suppose others are annoyed when they're the linguistic minority for a change though. Seriously, get over it; maybe you'll actually learn something new, even if it is only a word.

    1. Re:Not an Issue to Me by bandy · · Score: 1

      bumbum

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  148. Re:Can a linguist be wrong? Maybe just a francopho by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    "French-speaking Africa has an immense population and a geographical area larger than the United States"

    Not relevant. Antarctica is pretty large as well. It's the population stats that count. Why throw in land area (containing a large number of different countries, I might add)? Fine, add up U.S., Canada and Mexico.

  149. Simple solution! by lokedhs · · Score: 1
    Since the US has started with even more weird travel restrictions, and a bazillion weird questions that has to be answered when entering their country, why doesn't other countries do the same?

    I propse a new quiz to be taken by all US citizens entering another country:

    1. Say the word "Hello" in our language
    2. Say the word "thank you" in our language
    3. Show us the proper to greet somebody
    Seriously. Even withou this quiz, learning these takes a few minutes, and it opens up a complete new world.

    I cannot stress this enough: Learn these things. Just imagine what would happen if someone came to you, gave you a headbutt and yelled "Hey! Bitch!" to you. Seriously, what is considered a friendly greeting in one country, might not be in a different one.

    Disclaimer: I'm not suggesting any country or culture uses the expression "Hey! Bitch!" as a greeting.

  150. Proposal: Language and language-filter settings by Blackheart2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am on Orkut, and I don't care if members there speak Portuguese, English, Korean or Swahili. I speak several languages, and I don't believe everyone in the world needs to speak English.

    What I do care about is the fact that every day my Orkut mailbox is filled with mass-mailed messages addressed to "Communities" and "Friends of friends" which are written in Portuguese, and therefore of no interest to me. More than half the messages in my box fit this description now. I find it extremely irritating; it's a step away from spam.

    What Orkut needs is:

    1. a language ID attached to each message/mail,
    2. a "default language" setting for each user which gets attached to each message they post, and
    3. a user setting which allows to filter out messages and mail posted in languages which a user cannot understand.

    This would solve the problem, and, I imagine, greatly reduce bandwidth (or, rather, increase useful bandwidth) since it can be done server-side.

    --

    BH
    Fools! They laughed at me at the Sorbonne...!

    1. Re:Proposal: Language and language-filter settings by Badaro · · Score: 1

      My opinion is different, that messages from "communities" and "friends of friends" shouldn't be enabled by default.

      I never got a single useful message from those groups, only SPAM, even before Orkut became a craze in Brazil.

      []s Badaro

      --
      My sig became obsolete, and I lack the imagination to create a new one. :(
  151. Anyone want an invite? by pilot1 · · Score: 1

    I have them for Orkut.. reply with name and email address if you want one.

    1. Re:Anyone want an invite? by nchase · · Score: 1

      Name: Noah
      Email: nchase@gmail.com

      Thanks, this would really be appreciated.

    2. Re:Anyone want an invite? by tigris · · Score: 1

      Erica

      luxarific@gmail.com

      thanks!

  152. Simple...invite more english speaking users... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    feel free to send one my way...
    haplo-dated-1091020078.dba2ed@majere.epith na.com

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  153. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  154. Re:solved? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

    ROTFLMAO

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  155. Orkut by gumpish · · Score: 1


    What the heck does orkut means? Is it an english word?

    It's the name of the engineer, Orkut Buyukkokten (who's heritage is clearly that of a non-English speaking nation), who wrote it for one company and then illegally reused the same code for Google.

  156. Latin Difference by Via_Patrino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "In the early 20th century, there was a tremendous amount of immigration into the United States"

    The difference of that immigration from latin immigration is that latin people keep their culture (language) toward generations.

    About Orkut, I think it's indeed a "nazi" attitude to force someone to talk a language they don't know or segregate them in guetos (create a new group).

    It may look easy to "talk in english" but for a non speaker it takes about 4 years to learn and anyone that speak a foreign language knows that's much easier to understand (listen/read) than to talk (speak/write), as is much harder to express yourself when you know (manage to remember) a small vocabulary.

    So is not a surprise that a brazilian, when having problems expressing himself, starts talking in portuguese because he has a good chance of being understood and also can express his ideas better/faster.

    Since portuguese seens to be the dominant language, even if that isn't the official one, in pratical it becames the standard one. Like native languages in many african countries and english in the internet/business/scientific.

    That difficult in learning a "foreign" language is the same (or worse) for any other language except for Esperanto where you need just one year to reach the same level of understanting, because its gramatic/vocabulary were made to be easy to learn.

    But the "english speakers overlords" (including those which didn't know it before but learned) don't want to abdict their status and learn another language.

  157. Language Tagging by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that the best solution would be to just tag everything with a language specification and give users an (overridable) default language option so that they don't have to choose every time.

    Once this is done, then allow users options to only "see" stuff in certain languages. Sure, it means that some people will see things that other people don't, but that's close to the current situation where people can't read the non-English messages. The only difference here is they don't get the opportunity to feed it into Babelfish, but then they can just not have the option turned on if that bothers them.

    The final part of the solution would be to display "languages spoken" on the profile pages, perhaps along with a skill level, so that people know to whom they should be speaking Spanish and to whom English, and so forth.

    Optional extras include also allowing users to pick text directionality so that people can write in RTL scripts, and tagging in the HTML with lang and dir attributes so that, in the future, "clever" browsers can give the option to automagically translate portions of a document. (Could happen if more sites start specifying their languages.)

  158. Language predominance changes over time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The first "universal" language was LATIN, used by scholars among the catholic churc in the Medieval Ages. Reading the old classics of Plato, Homer, Archimedes, Herodoto and others...

    Then french rose as the prefered language. France was the great continnental potence until the end of the 18th century.

    When England started the Industrial Revolution, english slowly began to predominate...

    As you can see... It's a normal thing, I'm not sayng that portuguese will become the official language of the internet... but it may well become the predominate language of Orkut, and that's not a bad thing.

    THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS AN OFFICIAL INTERNET LANGUAGE

    There are people in Brasil, and in other countries, that can't afford english classes... bu t somehow they've managed to get access to the internet. These people don't have the right to use internet in their own language!?!

    See... if the English-speaking users want to speak in english, then do so! Let the french speak french, and the brazilians speak portuguese, and the spannish speak spannish!

    This Orkut thing is a good chance to show how opressive the USA can be, tryng to force their culture to other people. Nobody is obligated to learn english!

    Internet is a wonderfull example of democracy... lets try to keep things this way.

    (by the way, sorry my english... see, I'm another internet-crazed-brazilian)

  159. Not to mention by JamesP · · Score: 1

    that brazilians are being encouraged to change ther "Country" field to Irak...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    1. Re:Not to mention by bandy · · Score: 1

      What's the story with that? Protest against our ops there or what?

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    2. Re:Not to mention by base3 · · Score: 1

      At which time they should be kicked off for providing patently false information. Their accounts can be turned back on upon receipt of a notarized copy of their Iraqi passport.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  160. An easy solution! by hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The easiest solution I see, is for Google to create an universal translator system, tied into their Google translation engine, to automagically translate the non-native posts into your own native language, when you log into Orkut.

    Problem solved.

    They're always looking to find new services to extend their Google Portfolio, and this would be a worthwhile one.

    For posts in English, to Brazilian readers, it would simply translate that way as well..

  161. Opportu(guese)nity by davekebab · · Score: 1
    No wonder so many Brazilian users are switching their Orkut country setting to Iraq.

    You miserable pentelhos, melhor que voces fica queto and learn a bit of portuguese ate voces podem entender tudo que occora nosso mundo.

    I thought the USA was becoming bilingual hablando espanol tambien ann so easily understanding gente que fala uma idioma vizinha.

    Brazilians can teach you quite a bit about football and guncrime. Tambem suas meninhas sao bem feias, sem bunda, sem graca.

    Tchao! DK

  162. Re:Who doesn't speak english? by Matheus+Villela · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is more much powerfull tham Linus Tolvards.

    Bill Gates breaked monopoly laws and IS an asshole.

    Linus Tolvards is GOD.

    You are an asshole!

    US isn't a Freedom country.

    The world doesn't respect US, the world fear US.

    Brazil is the more powerfull country in the world because brazil have more people in orkut!

    Iraqians like brazilians because brazilians are the betest soccer players.

    Iraqians hate US because US invaded their country and killed their people.

    Serious: China _IS_ the more powerfull country in the world, not US

  163. Re:Repeat after me by agbinfo · · Score: 1

    > First, I'd like to mention that your argumentum ad hominem really displays your level of tolerance.

    Interesting that you should refer to people who live in Quebec as 'those bloody Quebecers' but then don't expect any reply. Should I understand that in addition to being a racist, you are also incapable of being coherent.

    >> Interesting that you had to learn French in a French community.
    > No, I learned French in an English community. I live in English-Canada (the vast majority of Canada)
    > where almost all the people speak nothing but English.

    There are French Canadians in all parts of Canada. New Brunswick is officially bilingual, Ottawa has a large French community, there are a lot of people all accross the country who come from non English speaking countries and speak their native tongue very well.

    But I guess that just as with 'culture', you have your own 'selective' definition of "almost all" that everyone should guess.

    > > > I also had to learn French as my fourth in order to appease those bloody Quebecers

    In case you can't follow your own threads let me assure you that these 'bloody Quebecers' don't really care if you don't speak French if you don't live in Quebec. Are you trying to imply that Quebecers would like everyone in Canada to speak French? If you are, you are sadly mistaken.

  164. Re:Repeat after me by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 1

    What you're espousing is the American way, not the Canadian system.

    I never meant to create the impression that I was espousing the Canadian system (in fact, I'm not sure where you got that idea from); however, it should be noted that I am not exactly espousing the American system either for the simple reason that the American system has failed. As long as people refer to themselves as Latino-Americans, African-Americans, or whatever-Americans, (and yes, I realize that those are supposedly "ethnicities", however, cultures form around these fictitious divisions) a (successful) cultural melting pot does not exist.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  165. Lets just compensate, inviting each other! by urbieta · · Score: 1

    I think we are enough american slashdot users to compensate, so lets invite each other until we beat those brazillians!!! :D

    Give me a gmail invitation while you are at it heh, for now you can reach me on urbieta at yahoo dot com

    thanks :)

  166. Obligatory Megatokyo quote by acariquara · · Score: 1

    4ny0n3 sp33k l337?

    d4 pa1n!

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  167. On a related note by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

    Those who would like to view this (or any other site) in Portuguese, can use the fish

    Problem solved.

  168. You and everybody else... by Pac · · Score: 1

    I memory serves me well, I believe we won the last World Cup...

  169. Americans? by Ocrad · · Score: 1
    Brazilian internet users averaged an estimated 13 hours and 51 minutes in May, eight minutes more than for Americans.
    Aren't Brazilian Americans? Or America _is_ the USA and the rest of the continent is another thing?

    The lack of a collective name for the inhabitants of the USA doesn't give them the right to steal the term "American".

    Hey, they even seem to lack a name for "collective name for the inhabitants of somewhere". (Gentilicio in Spanish).

  170. Correction by Pac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be "chuta os gringos de merda".

    I don't know how many languages you can curse in, but from my experience Americans, French, Polish and Mexican (and mostly every other nationalyty) online players are just as annoying. I am yet to see a group of tennagers that can not be described as "Rude, arrogant, xenophobic, obnoxious", Americans most of all. I left the "racist" out because I believe it is out of place, specially for Brazilians (unless you believe "American" is a separate race - "gringo" means mostly "American" but can also be used for "foreigner").

  171. "Americans" a separate race now? by Pac · · Score: 1

    His comment was probably wrong in trying to attribute one trait to a whole people, but this is quite different from racism.

    Nevertheless, there are definite differences of average behaviour among people from different countries and racism has nothing to do with it.

  172. But I though Orkut was open to public already by Pac · · Score: 1

    What really happened, IMHO, is that at this particular moment Brazilians were ready to jump into it - they liked the invitation and networking mechanism more than other people and answered by inviting everybody they knew, creating something the world hasn't yet saw, an international Internet application where the Americans are not the majority.

  173. What about UTF-8 japanese? by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    I quit visiting my orkut "japanese language", "sushi", etc. I can't fucking use UTF-8 japanese at all! The whole idea is to use the language the group as as the "perferered language". They have many english/korean/etc groups for the same subject. I don't have a problem with it. I would just like a better text storage on orkut to use UTF-8. They're as archic as slashdot! Then agian slashdot still has yet to discover CSS, so I'm not surprized.

  174. Translating: A very natural tendency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I believe it is a very natural tendency in the development of any social network. The fact that the Brazilians have taken the place of Germans or Indianas was in part a matter of timing, in part a coincidence. As another comment mentioned, many North Americans eventually ignored invitations to Orkut because of the Friendster fever that had already passed by them, while this fever had never reached Brazil.

    I hope there are enough Brazilians around with points to mod me up. Hugs.

    --
    My 2c: at least you Americans are enjoying the opportunity to get a (rather traumatic, but even though interesting) contact with our language. It's only sad that most people posting in Portuguese use a very lame style and a very low language level. :-(

  175. I just created a community! by Pac · · Score: 1

    A community to discuss socks and post cat pictures. Would you like join?

  176. I'm sick of it. by smacktits · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of that fucking site. I was one of the first 1,000 users, and back then (that makes it sound so long ago) it was actually fun to use.

    Now every time I log on, I have >40 messages from Brazilians and God knows who else, spamming the fuck out of groups with shit like "I waNT hax0r server 2oo3" or "I WANT GMAIL INVITE PLZ OKE :::)))"

    I thought it would remain an interesting online community. How wrong I was.

  177. Arrogance by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    No, it's not. It is a religion built upon a recognition for the need for spiritualism and that faith is a deeply personal affair. Technically is it the merging of the Unitarian and Universalist churches, which both have their roots in very early medieval europe. Unitarians are actually one of the oldest derivatives of Christianity. Universalism followed a few hundred years later.

    Do you have a scholarly study by someone unaffiliated with the Unitarians to back up that claim? If not, then the 1960s religion is a modern invention with as much historical lineage as modern wicca.

    Funny, because my minister graduated from Harvard Divinity School, and UU ministers are recognized across the world and in every single state.

    Scholarly acceptance or lack thereof doesn't mean that you are or are not a "religion." Neither does governmental recognition of individual ministers make UUism a religion.

    A better term than religion would be "interfaith collaborative." If you don't have substantial core dogma then you aren't a religion. Every last single major religion DOES have substantial core dogma--something that answers the question "what do you believe" with a spiritual rather than political answer.

    Characterizing the Principles and Purposes of the UUA as "we should all ge along" is akin to characterizing pagans as a bunch of goat-slaughtering freaks, or Catholics as a bunch of child-molesting, subservient, permanently-guilt-tripped, mindless idiots.

    I'll thank you not to insult wiccans, druids, and individual "magickers" with a patently untrue slander, or the whole of the Catholic congregations with the actions of their priesthood.

    As for the matter at hand, UUA's statement of principles (http://www.uua.org/aboutuua/principles.html)
    see ms to be quite close to "we should all get along." And they don't set themselves up as a religion, but rather a house where religion can be learned and discussed in a, as I said origianlly, very good and non-confrontational way.

    Incidentally, the religious freedom you enjoy today if you're in America is due almost entirely in part to the beliefs of Unitarians such as Ben Franklin;

    Oh, for crying out loud.

    I think I've heard everyone from agnostics to atheists to humanists to pagans claim the Founding Fathers as a member of their minority. If what you espouse is true and right and good, then you don't need an appeal to fame to justify yourself.

    I respect UUism for what it is, and I think it's a good movement even if it's inherently flawed (but only by being TOO 'good'.) I do not consider it a religion, but that doesn't mean that I think that you're insulting and demeaning it with your half-thought arguments and weak allegations of historical authority.

  178. I don't think so by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Are you saying in 2050 only 65 million people will speak english?
    only 166 millio will speak mqandarin?

    YOur number don't even add up to a billion, what are the other 9 billion people going to speak in 2050?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  179. Re:Brazilian Portuguese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Get real - esperanto's been indubitably dead since the '50s.

  180. agreed--not like the Portuguese posts are spam by bodrell · · Score: 1
    (quote of a quote)
    It's annoying to read an English thread, then someone posts a response in Portugese, because then I can no longer follow the thread.
    This sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't think the original poster has any desire to learn a language besides English. Americans (and I am one of them) are big fans of instant gratification. That's why I've never learned to play a musical instrument: too much practice is required before it starts to pay off.

    Then perhaps, in the same way the Portuguese speakers have learned English, you should learn Portuguese if you want to communicate with them? You are not obliged to understand or even read their posts, in the same way that they are not obliged to read or understand your English posts - but they have chosen to educate themselves in order to communicate with English speakers - perhaps this merely reflects a lack of education and considering among the primarily English-speaking population?
    I don't think this is totally acccurate. The Brazilians with internet are the more privileged portion of the population (even if they aren't rich, they can read and write and most likely don't live in shacks) whereas in the US, plenty of uneducated folks have high-speed internet. Most likely, the Brazilians on Orkut have had expensive educations are English was required at their schools. And even if it weren't required, they'd have to know how to speak enough English to communicate with Americans on ski trips to Aspen.

    So I think you're both right and wrong. Americans live such insulated lives (the US is a huge country, and some people rarely encounter individuals that don't speak English) that there is less evident need for them to learn foreign languages. But even in places like Texas, where over a third of the population is Latino (and many speak no English at all), few Texans bother to learn Spanish. There is an urgency for Brazilians to learn English, but no urgency for Americans to learn Portuguese. People learn English partly because they want to communicate with English-only speakers, and partly because of the opportunities available in the extremely wealthy US, where poor people may eat Velveeta and white bread, but they don't starve (unless they're kids with negligent parents).

    Things are really going to get interesting when the US Latino population gets big enough and rich enough so their presence can't be ignored, both on the web and in real life. What are all you monolinguals going to do when that happens, huh?

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  181. Hindi is not the national language by bodrell · · Score: 1
    Last I heard, there were 16 official Indian languages, and scores of other languages spoken by smaller segments of the population.

    But Hindi is NOT the official language, and there were massive outcries when the government attempted to make it the official language. Whereas English is a second language for all Indians (possibly learned simultaneously for a few people), Hindi is the native language for only part of the population. The southern Indian states were not at all happy with the prospect of being forced to speak Hindi, which is why English is the official language in India. However, if you want to understand a politicians speech, and he/she is speaking in Hindi, knowing English won't do any good in that situation

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  182. Re:Repeat after me by MochaMan · · Score: 1

    Then why are you so quick to want to sacrifice Canadian culture (yes, they used to have one before all this multiculturalism stuff got started) and American culture for the noble goal of multiculturalism.

    Because, at least in the Canada I grew up in, the fact that so many immigrant groups make up Canadian society is an integral part of our culture. Some of the biggest cultural events of the year here in Victoria are co-sponsored by Heritage Canada and the Inter-Cultural Association: FolkFest, Luminara, Summer at Centennial Square, etc. I would argue that if growing up and living in the midst of a society where a huge majority bring their languages and cultures with them, I would have far less interest in travel, global and local politics, and cuisine, than if I hadn't.

    I never said we should encourage division based on what one's ancestors did. But you cannot argue that people are all different, and that many people share common traits -- that's reality. Events like FolkFest are positive manifestations of showing off and sharing that with everyone else for a few days. It's not a "we're better than you" thing, it's a "hey check out these cool things we do/food we make/language we speak" thing. Having different cultural groups within a country that maintain some of their old-country culture is great so long as one understands that when you come here you may have to sacrifice a few things if your culture starts treading on others.

    When you say that Canada had a culture before all this multi-culturalism stuff got started, which culture are you referring to? The wide assortment of amerindian nations before Europeans arrived? The British? The French? The Spanish? They were all here in various capacities. The Ukrainians and other Eastern Europeans who arrived en mass in the 1800s to farm? The Chinese who were brought in the 1800s for the railway? Which unified culture are you talking about here, because I can't think of a single point in our history where we've had one unified culture. If we have, I'd like to know about it, 'cause it doesn't appear to be in any of those Pierre Burton history texts sitting on my shelf.

    The moment you accept that "The beliefs of majority of Germans circa 1940 were evil by the standards that we would use today" you accept that all cultures are in fact not equal

    First of all, I don't accept that. I accept that a relatively small number of Germans formed a socialist, but very nationalist party, which was brought to power by a German population that was possibly reacting to what they saw as oppressive restrictions imposed on their country by the Versailles Treaty of 1919. The leader of this party was incredibly charismatic, which obviously worked in his favour. The guy also happened to be, a sociopath/psychopath. He and many of the high-ranking officers around him were ready to do anything for power, including the extermination of large chunks of the population that they considered a hindrance to them. And you're right, we would call them evil today. But I won't say most Germans were; a huge proportion of the ones in power, and a few who weren't certainly were though. And one might argue that to murder is a crucial part of any culture during a war. I can't think of many cultures that espoused murder during non-war times. The Aztecs, Olmecs, and Toltecs come to mind as cultures that were very violent even during peacetime, particularly the Toltecs, and all practiced human sacrifice to a certain degree, so I suppose that would be considered a crucial part of their culture.

    The Nazis under Hitler were certainly expansionist, just like the British were, just like the French were, just like the Spaniards and the Portugese were. Territorial expansionism means war. War means murder. And yeah, expansionist cultures are trouble. In the end they start pissing people off and either learn their lesson or get stomped out. That's balance.

    Wouldn't fighting back be intolerant

  183. This is stupid. by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    I side with the Brazilians here. Let everybody post in whatever language they like. The internet is all about connecting the world, most of whose inhabitants do not speak english. So if you can't read it, learn to read it.

  184. Re:Brazilian Portuguese? by McDutchie · · Score: 1
    esperanto's been indubitably dead since the '50s.

    These folks might disagree.

    (No, I'm not an Esperantist.)

  185. The future now by nwerneck · · Score: 1

    I cant understand why this is a problem. Every science fiction reader should be waiting for this kind of thing to happen sooner or later. When I created my account at Slashdot, I wrote everything in english, because afterall the site is all in english. I created my account in Orkut in english too, but now I dont see why, because I interact much more with brazillian friend and friends of friends then with international people... I naturally started to use more portuguese than english, because I just found brazillan friends everywhere. I tought I would interact a lot with international people, like it happened in my old IRC times, but today I cant stand anymore the big wold-wide communities (like "programming", "free software", "atheists")... I simply cant have a fruitfull conversation on these international groups. Its just flame wars... Now if a non-brazillian wants to take part of a group created by brazillian why cant this person just try to send an english message, and see if anybody wants to talk in english (or other language, perhaps)?... Why cant this person create a parallel community? this already happened in the good old ICQ and usenet times. I think if someone has a genuine interest in a community subject, the love for it will break all language barriers!... :) To finish: this is a non-problem. Ive seen people talking about "fight back and do blablabla". What *fight* my friends?!?! if brazillians are using the site more than north-americans this is just an epiphenomenon emergin from subtle characteristic on how brazillians relato to their friends... Lets just keep living admiring the peculiarities of each human being... If anybody wants to read messages in portuguese about any subject hes interested, I volunteer myself as a translator.

    --
    Nicolau Werneck - NIC1138
    "The secret of genius is to carry the spirit of childhood into maturity" -- Thomas Huxley
  186. Invites arrogance by mangu · · Score: 1

    Well, what would you expect of a society based on a "we are the chosen few" meme? They are almost pre-selecting their members for arrogance. No wonder they have communication problems.

  187. Who cares? by bXTr · · Score: 1

    Orkut is by invitation only and, therefore, private. Since I've never been invited, it doesn't matter to me.

    I don't care what language you speak normally. I only speak English; it is *my* native language. Would you want me to speak to you if you don't understand me? No? Likewise.

    American arrogance? Hello kettle, this is pot; you're black. I heard the French smell bad, English food is disgusting and that you shouldn't drink the water in Mexico. I don't know for sure; I've never been to those countries. It's just what I've heard. That being said, I don't believe Americans have a monopoly on arrogant nationalism. Ours just gets more media coverage. :)

    --
    It's a very dark ride.
  188. ME AM BRASIL! by ZifRocks · · Score: 1

    Ah, the old days . . .

  189. Which continent is Brazil in ? by DVega · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "41.2% are Brazilians and 23.5% are Americans"


    Sorry, I missed the episode when Brazil was evicted from America

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
    1. Re:Which continent is Brazil in ? by Jim+Starx · · Score: 1

      Because Brazil is a country, would it be so much of a stretch for you to assume that when he says America he's talking about the country??

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
  190. Re:I don't think so - try reading by Animaether · · Score: 1

    1. "This is translated from a Dutch 'popular science' magazine" - i.e. they are not my numbers.

    2. "Young speakers (age 15-24)" - i.e. a rather small subset of the entire world's population

  191. Re:Repeat after me by agbinfo · · Score: 1
    It was a bit tongue-in-cheek; I'm sorry it wasn't conveyed properly.

    Apologies accepted.

    By the way, are you so quick to call other people racists when they refer to other cultures, such as Americans, in a demeaning and offensive manner? If so, we really need more people like you; nowadays, in Canada, it's common to hear things that would be considered racist if said about any culture other than the Americans, yet no one says anything to those people.

    I feel that to a certain extent, we are all a bit racist. When I find that I have a racist attitude, I try to correct it. Although I generally try to avoid the term; Yes, if someone has a racist attitute I point it out.

    W.r.t. Americans, I work for an American company and I have daily contacts with Americans. The people I work with are very nice and very bright.

    Also, most comments I hear about Americans are not directed at the people but at the government they elected. Thinking that Bush is an idiot is not being racist.

    Thinking that the Americans are idiots for placing such a mad man in office is only racist if you think that other races/countries are more intelligent. :-)

    There are also Hungarian Canadians in all parts of Canada; however, that doesn't make those parts Hungarian Canada.

    Where did I claim any such thing?

    Yes, and the majority of those people also have a decent grasp of English; certainly more than have a decent grasp of French.

    Agreed. Your original comment was that in English-Canada,... almost all the people speak nothing but English.. I still disagree on that point unless almost all has taken on a new meaning.

    Whether they care or not doesn't change the fact that if it wasn't for their adherence to the French language I would not have had to learn French.

    Again, unless you come to "live" in Quebec, Quebecers don't really care if you learn French so I don't see how you would have been forced to learn French. In any case, I would rather prefer not to be called a "bloody Quebecer."

  192. WTF by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    TROLL?!

    I AM dutch so I should know what I'm talking about :)

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  193. Ok, eu vou tratar... by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1
    Vocês americanos sujos pensam de que vocês possuem tudo, e Slashdot, mas justo não é assim.

    Furem sua hegemonia internacional eu seu McDonalds e seu Hollywood onde o sol não brilha.

    Pela maneira, amo muito todo isso[1] do Big Mac e essa Julia Roberts!

    [1]Esto é a mesma frase que McDonalds usa nas suas copas por I'm Lovin' It.

    A melhor parte dos seus errores foram por não saber as formas plurales, especialmente os verbos que terminam com M.

    E não, não falo português, falo espanhol com palavras portuguesas.

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  194. to get started on your research of Portuguese by kwoff · · Score: 1

    From http://www.instituto-camoes.pt/bases/lingua/portug ueselanguage.htm

    Portuguese is actually the sixth most widely spoken mother tongue on a global level, it is an official language in seven countries on three continents - and, within the short term, of eight countries in four continents - it is the working language of twelve international organisations, and is used daily by about 200 million human beings.

    I've also heard (at the UN organization where I work) that it is the most spoken in the southern hemisphere. Portuguese speakers are called (a bit unfortunately...) lusophones.

  195. why not just filter threads by language. by amiable1 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be simpler for the system to approximately assign a language to any commment.
    Then allow readers to filter threads by language, similar to search engines.
    The poster could also help out if necessary. This shouldn't cost much computationally.

  196. They aren't the average brazilian by neves · · Score: 1

    Yes, a lot of them aren't nice, but at least remember that they aren't the "average brazilian". Reuters article is deceptive when say that brazilians spend more time than americans. This is a very small percentage of brazil population. While now half the USA has broadband, in Brazil just the upper classes have internet access. This bad behaviour isn't representative of the brazilian people.

  197. Turkish by juan2074 · · Score: 1

    Everybody knows Orkut is supposed to be in Turkish, tesekkur ederim.

  198. Obligatory post... eh... by Stoik · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new portuguese speakers Overlords!

    Oh wait, I am brazillian!.... This Time I AM THE OVERLORD!

    Knee before me, Slashdot!

  199. from a member by Jedikahuna · · Score: 1

    As a member of ORKUT and a friend of Breigh's I can tell you that it has gotten bad I have had to kick a few people for not adhering to my no Portuguese rule. If I had joined a Brazilian web service I would try to use there language Why the f@#K can't these people do the same?

    --
    Peace, Love, And Oreo cookies
  200. Re:Dutch / German / French arrogance... by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Kijk, jij snapt me tenminste :)

    "omelet du fromage, omelet du fromage!!"

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  201. Re: (Even further OT) Moderating... by Grrr · · Score: 1

    But I guess that this is the moderation system that we get stuck with when anyone who's been on the site for a while and posts regularly is banned from moderating.

    Thank you, in all seriousness. I've been trying and trying to figure out what the hell I did wrong...

    Last month my karma rolled over to 'Excellent,' I always metamod - and I haven't seen a mod point in months. Yet the relevant FAQ seems to say that no one with sufficiently positive karma is banned from moderating. Even asking about it approximates whining about it, but I'm mostly trying to understand the lay of the land, here - really.

    "At least I'm not the only one," etc. etc.

    <grrr>

  202. Resposta aos americanos! by flipeexpl · · Score: 1


    é tipo daquele jeito... vivemos em um mundo cercado po palavras em inglês e quem ñ sabe falar inglês acaba se fudeno... mas ñ é bem assim... eu so brasileiro, falo em português, e ñ pago pau pa americano ñ(se quiserem entender o q falo e minhas girias escritas e faladas aprendam português porra)...

    mesmo com tudo q o q nós que ñ falamos inglês ñ temos aprendemos po exemplo d linux(programa, administra, estuda, trabalha ou somente brinca)... conseguimos ser melhores q os puta dos americanos, o q diriam se tivessemos essa enxurrada d doc's e afins em nossa lingua...

    quem é brasileiro q fale português, quem é americano q fale em inglês... o q ñ vo faze é baba ovo d um puta americano q se acha o tal por ser americano... e q acha q tenho q fala inglês pq fala em português é errado... tipo... so do time em q valoriza minha cultura é o mais importate(já q temos uma, pois a cultura americana é mcdonald's, hollywood, casa branca, dinheiro e guerra... essa é a cultura americana, o q posso tirar disso... NADA!!!!!)

    o q os brasileiros tem a faze é o q os americanos fazem a muito tempo somos maioria, somo + poderosos, temos + soldados, então nós ditamos as regas... no caso do orkut, ouvi fala q somos cerca d 40% d tudo.. entaum nós mandamos porra!!!! se somos maioria temos q impô nossas regras.... entaum eles q falem pt_BR... e ñ nós en.........

    UMA SIMPLES OBSERVAÇÃO É QUE NESTE TEXTO USEI UMA LINGUAGEM AMPLAMENTE USADA EM BATE-PAPOS NO BRASIL!!!!

    QUALQUER DÚVIDA PEÇA UMA PESSOA Q FALE PORTUGUÊS FLUENTEMENTE QUE ELE IRÁ TRADUZIR TUDO DO JEITO CORRETO.

    AS TRADUÇÕES DO GOOGLE OU FREETRANSLATION(POR EXEMPLO) NÃO IRÁO TRADUZIR O TEXTO CORRETAMENTE.

    MUITO OBRIGADO! E FELICIDADES A TODOS O BRASILEIROS QUE IRÃO LER ESTE TEXTO SEM NENHUM PROBLEMA.... E O RESTO....DIGO....

    I AI MANU... O BAGUI É O SIGUINTI CERTU CUPADI!!! BRASILERU AQ NUM PAGA D LOQUI E NEM D COMÉDIA CERTU.. ENTAUM SE CRUZA O MEU CAMIN VAI TOMBA LIGERO CERTU MANU!!!

    AI... UM SALVE PUS GUERRERO.. ZÉ POVIN EU LAMENTO!!!!

    --
    o homem que matou o mau era mau também.. - lado shell da força, quem tem o dedo de gesso tromba este é