Slashdot Mirror


TiVo-Like Service Coming To Australia

rosy writes with good news for Australian television watchers: "CNET.com.au is reporting that a TiVo-like service will be available in November this year. Dubbed ICE ("Intelligent Content Engine") and developed by Peter Vogel, the technology will be built into set top boxes and personal video recorders to skip ads or lower the volume, view electronic program guides, etc. The article states that the service will cost $2-3 per week with the service launching initially in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong."

121 comments

  1. Oz Tivo by mongrol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps, Australia being upside down, Tivo make work the opposite and actually put decent programming onto the TV rather than take it off.

    1. Re:Oz Tivo by weighn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not a chance - Murdoch or Packer will buy it before its wings dry. Then its just another outlet for Fox or 9.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  2. Hmm... by incog8723 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dubbed ICE ("Intelligent Content Engine") and developed by Peter Vogel, the technology will be built into set top boxes and personal video recorders to skip ads or lower the volume, view electronic program guides, etc.

    When did pr0n start having ads in the middle of the show, and why would you want to lower the volume?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Artega+VH · · Score: 3, Funny

      When did pr0n start having ads in the middle of the show, and why would you want to lower the volume?

      Let me translate for you..
      It means you can skip the dialogue and plot, and allows you to instantly switch "channels" much like the good ole "boss key".

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    2. Re:Hmm... by weighn · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'd hate to see one of those "ICE Nannies"

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  3. Ads and Spams by usefool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Vogel didn't reveal much of the technical detail behind how the ICE system works, he did state that it was backed up by live monitoring -- so presumably he'll be looking to hire people to watch solitary TV stations 24/7 -- to enable the system to react automatically to ad changes, or late running TV programs.

    If spams are anything like ads, maybe it's time someone looks into doing something similar (live monitoring) for spams.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Ads and Spams by Rosonowski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the trick is that there's a breif pause between the show and the ads in which there is a black screen. It detects this black screen (and probably some other stuff imbedded in the signal) and knows to mark it as the start of the commercial, and then waits for the other black screen signal to mark it as the end of the commercial.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    2. Re:Ads and Spams by SurgeonGeneral · · Score: 2, Funny

      If spams are anything like ads, maybe it's time someone looks into doing something similar (live monitoring) for spams.

      Yeah, we really need live monitering stations were people sit and watch/read every email.

      Oh wait we already have that. They just call it Echelon.

      --
      -- "Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains." Jean Jacques Rousseau
    3. Re:Ads and Spams by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      If spams are anything like ads, maybe it's time someone looks into doing something similar (live monitoring) for spams.

      news.admin.net-abuse.sightings

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  4. TV by khazan · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's almost enough to make me wish that I watched TV.

    almost.

  5. Cyberpunk by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will the boxes be black?

  6. That's not like TiVo... it's like ReplayTV by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The addition of volume-leveling and ad-skipping features seems to imply that this service is going to be closer to the original ReplayTV units rather than TiVo units... ReplayTV of course at one point in time was a sister company of the Rio brand of MP3 players and always has had a reputation of being the "screw the system" DVR as opposed to TiVo who co-operates with advertisers and broadcasters.

  7. About time -- but will it be legal? by siliconbunny · · Score: 1
    It's about time something like this came to Oz.

    Only problem is that the very narrow 'fair dealing' defence in the copyright act might not even allow the sort of home copying allowed in the US under Betamax.

    If that's the case, this thing could have an unfortunately short life... :(

    1. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by halowolf · · Score: 0
      Well from what I recall living in Australia, its perfectly legal to record a show to watch later as long as you don't go around distributing the copy.

      Now getting rid of those ads, would be a nice feature most of the time but sometimes there are ads that I wan't to watch that tell me if a show has moved or something, or perhaps a new show I am interested in.

      However I don't watch enough television to warrent such a service so I think I might skip it for now. I do have a digital television receiver (because good ones have been coming out at cheap prices) so that I can have DVD picture and sound quality but thats about as far as it goes. Free to air digital television isn't actually doing anything particularly constructive in Australia at the moment. I get an basic episode guide (when the stations can be bothered filling it in), time, and lots of stations which all show the same thing because each free to air station is only maintaining a single broadcast channel (except for ABC and SBS which have radio channels that they broadcast). There isn't anything else thats really worth noting.

    2. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by skribe · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well from what I recall living in Australia, its perfectly legal to record a show to watch later as long as you don't go around distributing the copy.

      Actually, that is not correct. According to this pdf document you need permission from all the copyright holders to legally copy a television show in Australia. There are exceptions (such as educational purposes) but they don't include for personal use only. This still hasn't stopped millions of VCRs (note the R for recorder) from being sold in this country. I doubt it will stop the Aussie version of the Tivo.

      For more information of Australian copyright I suggest The Australian Copyright Council.

      skribe

      --
      Blog
    3. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by weighn · · Score: 1

      I don't think its the copying of shows that is the issue in oz.
      The tv market in Australia relies really heavy on advertisers.

      What are the chances of this becoming an election issue?
      Under its current policies, including an opposition to a 5th commercial free-to-air station, This department would not be in favour.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    4. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and us Australian's have been ignoring it and recording TV-shows for, well heck, 20 years probably.

      Whilst some of us will put on a tinfoil hat, most of Australia will choose the technology which allows them to record TV shows and replay later

    5. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The day somebody is actually charged for recording a TV show is the day that the law will be changed.

    6. Re:About time -- but will it be legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is legal to copy for your own use. There is an exemption to the copyright act. Copyright Act 1968 Section 111 Filming or recording for private use - to be specific.

  8. who wouldn't pay for no ads by BoFiS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd pay that just to have advertisements taken out of my daily TV...infact it's one of the main reasons I like the ReplayTV 4000-series, you can just have it skip the ads all-together.

    And for those of you who enjoy commercial breaks so you can run and get more chips or ice cream...remember, you can always just pause it!

    1. Re:who wouldn't pay for no ads by erinacht · · Score: 1

      >And for those of you who enjoy commercial breaks so you can run and get more chips...

      You'd need to live really close to the chip shop for that!

    2. Re:who wouldn't pay for no ads by red+floyd · · Score: 1
      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  9. Lowering the volume on ads by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I'd love a feature to automatically lower the volume on ads, to save me doing it manually.

    I have noticed a disturbing trend on British cable TV channels where adverts are considerably louder than the main programmes, presumably to try and grab your attention. In reality, it's just annoying.

    I normally channel surf or watch five minutes of a rolling news channel anyway, although now a lot of channels seem to have syncronised their ad breaks to try and stop you doing that. I expect such a feature would come under a lot of fire here (and probably in Aus too) from the very people who make it necessary.

    One question though: how does it detect adverts?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by ubrkl · · Score: 1

      I RTFA'd :)

      They say it'll have live monitoring, that they'll hire people to watch a channel 24/7.

      I'd love this, I hate that TV channels are pumping up the volume during ads (or turn it down during shows, I'm not sure). I'd sign up $10-12/month easy.

    2. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Mr+Tall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they do that on the terrestrial channels too. Bit of a stupid thing to do really - previously we'd tolerate the ads, but now they're so DAMN LOUD ALL THE TIME we hit the mute button.

    3. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Informative

      One question though: how does it detect adverts?

      There are two methods that I know of. The first is to measure the sound volume - breaks for advertising often will have a pause in audio, then the actual advertising audio level will usually be higher than the programming audio. There was actually such a project (muting audio from commercials automatically) featured in an electronics magazine a number of years back - try looking up back issues of Popular Electronics.

      The second way is to measure the video signal in much the same way as you would audio. There used to be a blanking interval as the advertisments were cut into the program feed. ReplayTV relies on this, along with the MPEG scene-detection algorithms to determine when a scene starts and stops, and whether that scene is likely to be an advertisement.

      Of course, TV stations are wise to this these days. ReplayTV units often have problems detecting commercials because of the stupid station ID logo burned into the screen - this prevents the screen from going totally black, which usually signals a commercial (not always - I've had my ReplayTV mistakenly cut out a chunk of the program because there was a lightning effect). Also, TV stations have begun putting in sidebars and strips at the top and bottom for advertising and junk messages, which also spoils the commercial detection algorithm, and cross-dissolve to commercials, which eliminates a pause in either the video or audio.

      Checking the sound level seems to be the best bet, and if you can couple that with scene detection, and some sort of intelligent algorithm that figures out that the next 5 scenes are a collection of 30 sec and 1 min spots, and are likely to be commercials, that, I think is the way to go. Of course, if you want to do that, you'd probably have to buffer the programming, which then precludes you from channel surfing.

    4. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Horizon_99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the ads aren't louder but they do have more impact. This is mostly due to sound compression, where the softer parts of the ads are raised a few decibels in order to reduce the dynamic range of the sound.

    5. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Funny


      Actually the ads aren't louder but they do have more impact. This is mostly due to sound compression, where the softer parts of the ads are raised a few decibels in order to reduce the dynamic range of the sound.

      This is true; the commercials effectively turn the volume of your television up to 11.

    6. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by sotonboy · · Score: 1

      Ive never read such tosh. Do you really believe it's beyone the wit of man to create a means of upping the broadcast volume of old shows ?

      The ads are louder to wake you up from the deep sleep you have been pushed into by the slumber inducing crap that fills the airwaves these days.

    7. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by chewy_2000 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Personally, I'd love a feature to automatically lower the volume on ads, to save me doing it manually.

      RTFA.

      Vogel showed off the majority of the ICE service's functionality at an event in Sydney this morning, including the ability to control the volume level of advertisements (dubbed "ICE Hush") automatically..

    8. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Personally, I'd love a feature to automatically lower the volume on ads, to save me doing it manually."

      Wouldn't it be better to skip this brain-rotting crap completely?

    9. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The volume of advertisements has even been the subject of a private members bill in the parliament here in oz. Think it got defeated on party lines but the response from the TV stations was that the volume was not increased but the sound was COMPRESSED to take out the quieter sounds which actually appeared to make it louder. Trust me however they do it - some ads are very loud and really annoying! TV here is crap anyway with too much American content and probably even more when the Free Trade Agreement with the US gets ratified so I've just about given up watching it apart from news and the odd show i still enjoy on the ad-free ABC. (Australian Broadcasting Commission). Of course you could subscribe to pay TV and have 57 channels with nothing on if you prefer that, or just hire a DVD movie or rip one down from the net in DIVX and play on your new fandangled DVD/DIVX combo player!

    10. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by sien · · Score: 1

      Don't point what you're describing at MTV, it'd think all it was was a giant commercial. Hang on....

    11. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading something about this a few months ago. If i remember correctly, the set top box will not actually do the ad detection. I think that ICE uses a private digital radio band to send out the start/stop signals and other data, so presumably they will have a single powerful ad detection system rather than expensive set top boxes.

    12. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this trend to here in Denmark. When the ads comes on, I go somewhere else and do something, cleaning up or what ever. But now with the loud ads, I mute the TV before getting up and then often forgets that I was watching tv.
      So the result at my place is less tv viewing. :)

    13. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      The audio and video quality of adverts is probably better than that of the program that you are really watching.

      Maybe someone can with come up with an addition to a PVR along the lines of "Dragon Dictate PVR Add Detection", that decodes the speech in the audio track to both add subtitles as well as looking for words like: sale; cheap; buy now; exdended; last days, and just drop those recordings sessions.

    14. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new technique is to look for the station logos that are plastered over the picture during TV shows, but disappear during ads (on some TV stations). I think this is a great technique, as it finally finds a use for the annoying logos.

    15. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by daffmeister · · Score: 1

      Another method that would work on broadcast channels in Australia a few years ago was to detect a special signal sent in the vertical blank whenever the ads were on so that regional stations could put in their own ads.

      I don't know if it's still there but I imagine it is.

    16. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. When I watched TV "normally", the extra-loud volume just made me jump for the mute button (especially on Channel 4).

      Now I watch all my TV through my MythTV box, which has inbuilt ad-detection and skipping, although it isn't highly reliable outside of the US AFAICT. I wish they'd introduce another detection method to incorporate volume increase (at the moment, it can detect scene changes, blank frames and channel logos).

      Much like pop-ups, trying hard to make crappy garish adverts intrude upon us will eventually just make people go that extra length to circumvent them.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    17. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by afidel · · Score: 1

      Another common method was to look for mono audio tracks. Most programming was in stereo whereas the ads were in mono. Advertisers caught onto this one when a couple VCR manufacturers came out with VCR's that used this trick to mark ads, so now almost all national ads are in stereo, even if it's really just a doubling of the mono signal.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Lowering the volume on ads by iantri · · Score: 1
      Others have mentioned ways of detection; I have a slightly OT question.

      On the CBC, at the start of commercial breaks in MOST programs, depending on the overscan of your TV you can clearly see a small white square appear in the upper-right corner of the TV screen for a half a second.

      Any idea what this is for? Some sort of cue?

  10. Smarter than a TiVo... by LostCluster · · Score: 0

    The article implies that the ICE system will somehow be getting either real-time or post-broadcast metadata that current DVRs do not... basically allowing the units to compensate for things like sports runovers and news preemptions that cause a network to not follow its pre-broadcast schedule, and therefore getting the accurate start time and end time of the shows, not accidently recording program A under program B's heading, in addition to knowing which timecodes to jump past to avoid the commericals...

    Of course, Austrailia has many fewer total over the air TV stations than the USA does thanks in part to its smaller geographic size, so this service is much more practical there than it is here.

    1. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by rjch · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Of course, Austrailia has many fewer total over the air TV stations than the USA does thanks in part to its smaller geographic size, so this service is much more practical there than it is here.
      Spoken like someone who has no idea where Australia is or has the slightest idea how big it is.

      Australia is geographically the same size as the United States, even though it has 1/10th of the population. The fewer number of television stations (3 commercial, 2 government-owned and in some places 1 community) is driven in part by govenment regulation and in part by economics. A country of ~20 million people cannot support the same number of commercial stations as a country of ~200 million.

      Pay TV only arrived in Australia 7 years ago and has only been accessible to most for the past 3-4 years. The ratings for Pay TV are pretty poor, since the commercial free-to-air stations have first pick at a lot of things - sport in particular - to protect people from "having" to pay for TV.

    2. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by sholden · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Australia is geographically the same size as the United States

      Most people know that: 7617930 != 9161923

      and hence they aren't "the same size". Over 80% of the size, yes. Almost the same size, yes. But not just "the same size".

      A country of ~20 million people cannot support the same number of commercial stations as a country of ~200 million

      That's true, it remains true even though the US population is ~300 million (290 million+ makes ~200 million a bit off).

      [we now return to your less pedantic programming]

    3. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much the same size as the forty-eight states, excluding Hawaii and Alaska.

    4. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant the mainland united states that hides under the rock of canada eh! (he was excluding alaska). thats commonly what people measure - they forget about alaska and hawaii and...

      the main continuous states are about 7.8 million square kilometers. australia is about 7.5. his point stands. its not a size thing - and the original post showed a large lack of clue of geography at all. its a matter of population, not size. there just isnt a commercial viability to support so many stations due to smaller population (20mil vs 300mil - rounding) and due to a much less tv engrossed population.

    5. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by solferino · · Score: 1

      >
      Of course, Austrailia has many fewer total over the air TV stations than the USA does thanks in part to its smaller geographic size, so this service is much more practical there than it is here.

      >>
      Spoken like someone who has no idea where Australia is or has the slightest idea how big it is.

      Australia is geographically the same size as the United States, even though it has 1/10th of the population. The fewer number of television stations (3 commercial, 2 government-owned and in some places 1 community)is driven in part by govenment regulation and in part by economics. A country of ~20 million people cannot support the same number of commercial stations as a country of ~200 million.

      ~ ~ ~

      If you are going to correct someone, make sure you get your facts completely straight. The original poster said Australia is smaller than the U.S.A. They are correct: Australia is slightly smaller than the 48 contiguous states, with Alaska, their largest state, adding significantly to the margin.

      U.S.A. : 9,631,418 sq km
      Australia : 7,686,850 sq km

      More glaringly, your estimation of the United States of America's population is out by nearly 50%. Their population is currently 293 million rather than the ~200 million you give.

      I'm an Australian too by the way, and I find that most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia (it's pretty evident by looking at a globe) but are surprised by it's low population.

      My source for population and nation size : CIA World Fact Book, 2004.

      Otherwise, I found your argument against the original comment insightful.

    6. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hey, I'd be happy if the TV stations transmitted a real program guide in their digital streams - not just shitty "NOW / NEXT" data, or sometimes an even shittier separate "Program Guide" video channel.

      Hell, I'd be happy enough if the NOW / NEXT info was accurate. Though the info from the ABC, at least here in Brisbane, is within a second or two - when it's working, that is...

      Note for Americans : Australia, in the capital cities, has 5 FTA stations:
      • the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) - government-owned, considered to be left-leaning regardless of whoever is in power, but probably more central than left. Programming consists of everything from mainly British shows to innovative local productions - which usually never achieve popularity until they are head-hunted / ripped off and mangled by one of the 3 commercial stations. Ad-less (well, internal ads only, between programs)
      • SBS (Special Broadcasting Service) - known as "Sex Before Sleep" by people who think the word "knickers" is rude and funny. Nominally a "multicultural" station (in the best sense of the word), plays everything from PBS news and documentaries, through comedy (South Park, Daily Show, etc), anime, non-mainstream sport (soccer, Tour de France, etc), to "European" movies ;-) Semi-commercial - government sponsored, but with commercial advertising between programs.
      • 7, 9, & 10 - the 3 commercial channels. One's tied up with AOL, another's tied up with Microsoft / MSN, and the other one has no money so runs "The Simpsons" on a mobius loop interspersed with "Big Brother", "Australian Idol", and even less-successful local reality TV. All run as many programs as they can fit in between the ads...

      Thankfully, we don't really have a Fox, though Ch9 comes close - without the soaring eagle and giant phallic missile graphics...
      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    7. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by martinX · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm an Australian too by the way, and I find that most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia (it's pretty evident by looking at a globe) but are surprised by it's low population.

      I find that most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia, but a lot of Septics overestimate the size of the USA.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by rev063 · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... most foreigners don't underestimate the size of Australia (it's pretty evident by looking at a globe) ...
      Unfortunately, most people don't learn about other contries by looking at a globe (when was the last time you looked at one?) -- they look at a map. World maps in 2-D can be pretty misleading. Many people see the Mercator projection, which does make the US look bigger than Australia (especially if country borders are not included). Compare the difference in an equal-area projection map.
    9. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by pauldl63 · · Score: 1

      actully pay tv was first introduced to australia in 1995.galaxy was the compant name

      --
      I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees.
    10. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      9 Network is a division of News Corp... so in terms of corperate relationships, they are your Fox.

    11. Re:Smarter than a TiVo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. 9 is Kerry Packer's (part of PBL), News Corp's interests are in paytv only (in any real sense), having 25% of Foxtel (PBL have another 25%, which is where you might be getting confused).
      With 10 showing so much Simpsons it might be a closer match.

  11. For the masses, maybe. by rjch · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...for those of us who read Slashdot, the question becomes "why?" I've had a PVR at home for the past four or five months, ever since I built my MythTV system with KnoppMyth.

    With some old leftover hardware and a $150 TV card, it was ridiculously easy to set up, even though a little Linux experience did help. Sure, the commercial detection is "programmed" and prone to miss commercials or (on occasion) think that the program itself is the commercial, but when it's free and includes most, if not all of what these PVR boxes will, having that "up-to-the-second" information isn't really all that vital.

    1. Re:For the masses, maybe. by nathanh · · Score: 1
      ...for those of us who read Slashdot, the question becomes "why?" I've had a PVR at home for the past four or five months, ever since I built my MythTV [mythtv.org] system with KnoppMyth [mysettopbox.tv].

      I'd pay for the service if it had accurate EPG data. I built a DVB-MythTV box of my own. It's usually great but recently I've had problems with "reality shows" that go overtime. I don't watch reality shows but because they play 15-30 minutes too long it ruins anything I'm recording on that channel after 8pm. Effectively Capital (the worst offender) has been inaccessible to me for weeks. Can't wait until that shite called Big Brother is off the air and programming returns to normal.

    2. Re:For the masses, maybe. by droleary · · Score: 1

      ...for those of us who read Slashdot, the question becomes "why?"

      For this particular person that reads Slashdot, the full question is "Why don't you shut the hell up until you can actually market a turnkey MythTV box that competes with the likes of TiVo?" I tinker enough with technology all day long and I will gladly pay good money so I don't have to tinker some more just to replace a VCR.

      With some old leftover hardware and a $150 TV card, it was ridiculously easy to set up, even though a little Linux experience did help. Sure, the commercial detection is "programmed" and prone to miss commercials or (on occasion) think that the program itself is the commercial . . .

      No exactly a ringing endorsement there. I paid $199 for my TiVo four years ago (running sans guide for the last 3), and when I wear it out I'll gladly get another one, or whatever else might be on the market that's better. So you've got maybe a good couple years to put out a sub-$300 package that I can plunk down on the couch and just watch. If you think that's so easy to do, welcome to your new millionaire lifestyle. If not, get used to your parent's basement and your "free" PVR that thinks programs are commercials.

    3. Re:For the masses, maybe. by B747SP · · Score: 2, Informative
      "up-to-the-second" information isn't really all that vital.

      With respect, I disagree. I too have been playing with a PVR for a few months, but I did the sums in my head (2 x PCI DVB-T tuners, big HDD, fast Pentium 4, motherboard, ram, case, tv-out card, remote control) and went for a commercial product. The Topfield (Toppy) TF5000PVRt cost me just AUD$900, and I couldn't come close to buying the abovementioned hardware for that, even before I got to thinking about the weeks/months of screwing about with an OS and software to make it all work (and probably never, ever get it working just so).

      The commercial product was a pretty easy decision for me. A quick explanation along the lines of "2 x PCI DVB-T tuners at AUD$200 each..." got the spending approval from She Who Must Be Obeyed pretty quickly too!

      Now, I love the Toppy, it works really really well. The standard 80Gb disk is just enough to keep a lot of content while still being small enough to force you to clean up once a week and not letting you accumulate gigs of content you'll never get around to watching (OK, so I'm waiting for the warranty to expire then I'm putting a 300+Gb ATA drive in there!!!). Two digital tuners on board means that you can cat two streams to disk, and watch another pre-recorded stream all at the same time.

      The real problem lies in catching content. The Toppy can synch time to the broadcast time signal from the TV stations, or it can run on your own 'manual' time setting. 'Manual' means that if you have a power failure, you don't recover too well, (until you come home and reset the clock). 'Automatic' puts you very much at the mercy of the TV stations. Toppy owners Australia wide recently suffered when one of the TV stations (allegedly ch10) put the time signal forward three weeks for a little while, then reverted to their version of 'normal'. All the Toppy boxes in the land marked the next three weeks worth or cron jobs as 'done', and didn't record anything for three weeks!

      If you set the time manually, you still get the TV stations starting content 5-10 minutes before or after the published time, so they still manage to make you miss the beginning or the end of your program (and that really sucks with something like Laura Norder or NCSI! (yup, we get all the same programming you Americans do!)). So you set the machine to record +/- 5 minutes of everything. Waste disk space, but you can ffwd through ads, etc of course, don't start watching until 20 mins after the content started, and time shift - all those wonderful things.

      Anyhoo, long story short, I'm with the ICE man (pun!). I think that the two most important things in PVR land *are* knowing when to start and stop cat'ing content to disk, and (less important, but nice) when to pause for advertisements.

      We're starting to get a lot of pay content in various forms here in Australia (presumably the stuff you Seppos have had for years, only ours can't be bypassed with two capacitors and an inductor using these nifty plans for only $9.95!). Most of it just isn't worth the ridiculous prices they're charging for it. This one though, if he's really going to sell it for $10-$12/month, is good - I'm there. If he comes up with a module that runs on my existing Toppy box (this machine does have a bit of third party freeware floating around, upload/install with usb, etc, etc), then I'm there with bells on. Best of luck to 'im!

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    4. Re:For the masses, maybe. by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      I paid $199 for my TiVo four years ago (running sans guide for the last 3), and when I wear it out I'll gladly get another one

      Sadly, it won't be a TiVo. You must have one of the very original TiVos. Only the first run of the Series One TiVos can be used without a subscription. The rest of them simply go into "boat anchor mode" and won't do anything beyond play what's already there and maybe buffer live TV.

  12. its a service? by POds · · Score: 1

    I thought tivo was just a box that recorded stuff so you could re-watch it later?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:its a service? by carnivore302 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's much more. You can record and watch the beginning of a movie while the movie is still on. It will learn your viewing habits and automatically record all the shows you tend to watch, for up to 140 hours. It's sort of a search engine for your TV really. Plus you can view your photo's and listen to your music on the TV via the tivo. You'll want one :-)


      Click on the Mystery Futures Link!

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
  13. Europe by derphilipp · · Score: 1

    I ask myself if TiVO will ever come to Europe - The german tool Fernsehfee http://www.telecontrol.de/produkte/fernsehfee.html (TV Ferry) is of questionable legality - and everything it does is blank out the commercials... (The last court said TV Ferry was legal - see http://www.nzz.ch/2004/07/02/em/page-article9P8G4. html )

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
    1. Re:Europe by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 2, Informative

      TiVo has been to Europe, It was in the UK for sale for a couple of years but has since retracted it due to terrible sales, those that actually have still have a limited service i beleive. Then of course there is Sky+ which is a satellite box with 2 decoders, one for viewing and one for recording that works exacly the same way as TiVo but is offered by the BskyB corp.

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    2. Re:Europe by misterbleepy · · Score: 1

      The full service is still active in the UK - not limited at all. The UK units still sell at £200+ on eBay, and there is a strong UK community modifying and improving the hardware and software.

      There is also an Australian 'Underground' TiVo scene, using modified UK and US units and 'home-grown' Australian TV listings.

      Find out more at: http://www.tivocommunity.com/

      --
      -- bleep - bleep - bleep
    3. Re:Europe by splateagle · · Score: 1

      I made the mistake myself of equating Sky+ and TiVo until I looked into it and discovered there are significant differences which (imho) make TiVo a far better platform.

      Shame that the marketing might of the Murdoch media empire squashed competition in this country yet again on this one. Happily we got hold of a TiVo before they became too scarce and still enjoy the (full) service.

  14. Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by xxx_Birdman_xxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm in Australia, and to be honest, we dont really have that much free to air television. We have 5 main stations. One of them is the ABC (government funded), SBS a more multicultural tv station (partly gov funded I think) and three fully commercial stations. The ads we have are mostly on the commercial stations.
    I dont think Australians are real heavy tv watchers, as pay-tv here is no where as popular as it is in other parts of the world. And if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services. I wouldn't pay a few dollars a week to record/filter ads from free to air tv. I mainly just turn it off.
    So even thought I could see that this would have a market, I don't think it will be as big as Tivo in the American market.

    --
    Live in your skin. Keep changing the scenery.
    1. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by fpga_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services. I wouldn't pay a few dollars a week to record/filter ads from free to air tv. I mainly just turn it off.

      I'm not so sure about that - pay tv services here suffer the same extortion racket that they seem to in the US - bundling.

      Until I can order Pay TV a la carte there's no way I'd cough up AUD50+ / month to get collection of crap plus one or two channels of interest.

      But in lieu of that, $2 or 3 per week for ad blocking, plus PVR services? Yes please.

    2. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 22 minutes worth of adverts every hour on FTA, it's got to be worth a try.

    3. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      if people dont want ads, they buy pay-tv services.

      Could that be anymore clueless? 1> You still get ads on the free-to-air channels regardless of whether or not you have cable. 2> All Foxtel channels have commercials.

      Will Tivo in Australia work? I doubt it. But pay-tv is certainly NOT an alternative to get rid of commercials.

    4. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by dalesmatrix · · Score: 1

      I'm about to move back to Aus from the US and was pretty depressed about not having access to TiVO anymore. Hope this takes off and becomes a success. Also it's not JUST for skipping ads, IMHO it's more for making shows available on YOUR schedule, not when the broadcasters decide to air the show. It's very liberating and even in Aus with only 5 channels there's still a lot of content, so I think it'tt be a big hit. Once people understand what it can do, might take a little product education.

    5. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by imroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I may be wrong, but my understanding of cable TV here in Australia has been that our population is simply too sparse to support wide-spread roll outs. Foxtel and a few other operators have cable around the big three cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane... what about Perth and Adelaide?) but everywhere else requires satellite. And satellite is an extra hassle, and I'm guessing is more expensive for the operator.

      But I think you're also right about us not being "real heavy tv watchers". I used to get Foxtel when I lived in Sydney and while it had some good things from time to time, it never really engrossed me to a great deal. With the internet, computer games, Triple J radio, a good collection of DVD's, and several gigs of ripped MP3/Vorbis music, the five FTA channels are entertaining enough for me. I never find myself thinking "geez I'm bored and what I'd really like to do right now is flick through 500 channels of crap and vegetate".

      Besides, there's always the D1 Home Media Centre as well as DIY MythTV and Freevo boxen.

    6. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The limit for FTA networks is an average of 10 minutes per hour. However, this sometimes stretches to 15 minutes, with only 5 minutes per hour late at night.

    7. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very liberating and even in Aus with only 5 channels there's still a lot of content, so I think it'tt be a big hit.

      I agree, there is rarely a night on Australian TV when there is "nothing to watch", even with only 5 TV stations. It is certainly no worse than other countries with 100 times the number of stations.

      Free To Air TV is densely packed with decent quality TV (although the "reality TV revolution" is trying to ruin this). However, no matter how bad the commercial networks get, there is always the ABC.

      I think the quality of the Free To Air networks is one reason why "pay-tv" never took off in Australia.

    8. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite TV is available almost everywhere, and it is basically the same as cable, at a similar price-point. It is funny driving through the Outback seeing old shacks with Austar pay-tv dishes on their roofs.

    9. Re:Im not sure if it will be a hit here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you watched pay tv recenty!!! Its chocka with adds. Fox is boasting that it's taken 100 million in advertising from the free to air networks. And, they want more. Pay will be just as bad as free to air soon. If pay was so good why do they only have 20% of the market, despite spending a zillion on advertising?

  15. Tivo is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's anything like the US Tivo then it's crap.

    Why do I HAVE TO buy Tivo service to be able to record shows? I can do this with VCR without paying for any special services. That's probably one of the reasons US Tivo is likely to be out of business soon.

    1. Re:Tivo is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to pay so you get the fancy EPG. This is what DRIVES the TiVo, bork!

      On a TiVo, you can just say 'Record all the Simpsons, no I don't care when it's on, just do it' and that's what will happen.

      You must be from the United Mistakes of America to be so dumb...

    2. Re:Tivo is crap by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      You do not have to buy the service. There are TiVo models which come with a minimal version of the TiVo feature set which allows you to treat it basically like a digital VCR. It's nowhere near as featureful and nice as a "real" TiVo but it will allow you to record shows by picking them out of a three-day-guide or setting up repeating timeslot recordings, manually.

      Anyone who doesn't buy the TiVo service has completely missed the point, however, and through stubbornness and miserlyness is missing out on the whole point of the best DVR there is.

      BTW, I work for TiVo. Just so you know.

  16. It's both. by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    It's the name for the box - the TiVo DVR (digital video recorder) - as well as the service that goes along with it. The advantage of the service is that it is automatically able to do things like keep track of the shows you want to record even if the day/time slots change, or automatically record shows with your favorite actors/actresses, for example.

    You CAN use the TiVo box without the service, but you will lose all of the "automatic" functionality.

  17. Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour) by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While it would be nice to think that a similar service might be implemented here in New Zealand, the chances are virtually zero for one reason:

    Copyright.

    The TV broadcasters consider their program listings to be their intellectual property and that they're protected by copyright.

    Similar copyright cases (both here and in Australia) have been won by the companies which publish other collections of data such as telephone directories (example)

    Anyone who attempts to publish TV program schedules without the permission of the broadcaster (and they charge like wounded bulls for giving such permission) will be set upon by multiple teams of corporate lawyers.

    Of course someone intent on providing a scheduling service for a Tivo-like system could always try and buy the rights to publish those listings but I bet you any money you like that those rights would come with the caveat that ad-blocking was forbidden. After all, advertising revenues are the lifeblood of a free-to-air broadcaster so they're not about to allow someone to provide a service that cuts ads are they?

    Personally I think someone should fight the broadcasters over their copyright claims -- after all, copyright is supposed to protect the presentation, wording and format of data, not the facts on which that data is based.

    If I create listings from scratch and simply include the program title, genre, start and finish times then that information should not be covered by any form of copyright.

    But, fighting the corporate sharks costs lots of money so I doubt we'll see a test-case here in NZ anytime soon.

  18. (nothing to see here.. move along) by slittle · · Score: 3, Funny
    launching initially in Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong.
    Woohoo! Suck it, Melbourne!

    regards,
    Sydney.
    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    1. Re:(nothing to see here.. move along) by anty · · Score: 2, Funny

      don't think many ppl round here r gonna get that joke.

      least we don't have the mardi gras :P

    2. Re:(nothing to see here.. move along) by cranos · · Score: 1

      You don have the AFL Cup either. Lions all the way!!!

    3. Re:(nothing to see here.. move along) by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Why not in Adelaide? There's over a million of us watching TV here!!!

    4. Re:(nothing to see here.. move along) by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      Over a million, you say? Golly.

      :P

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  19. Re:Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour by csteinle · · Score: 1

    I believe the same issue exists here in the UK, and it didn't stop TiVo here. (What eventually stopped TiVo here was partnering with Sky, who screwed them over by releasing their own PVR. I still get my listings downloaded every night, though.)

  20. Wake me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when there's actually something worth recording with this thing being screened.

  21. Open-Source Tivo-style recommendations? by rune-bare-rune · · Score: 1

    I have been thinking about creating a web service that could be used by PVR software to create an open-source version of TIVO-style recommendations.

    The idea would be to collect viewing habits anonymously, and then automatically create "viewers who recorded this also recorded..." listings.

    A PVR project could then use this data to automatically record shows, or just mark them as recommendations in the Guide. It would not be tied to a specific PVR project, it could be added as modules to GB-PVR (which I use), MythTV, or any other project.

    Some of the challenges include how to identify films and TV series correctly, handle international show titles, and how to make the users contribute to the database hassle-free.

    If anyone has heard of a project like this before, please let me know :-)

    1. Re:Open-Source Tivo-style recommendations? by lewko · · Score: 1

      I understand that some of the Aussie homebrew PVR projects had issues with programme information of that type.

      Not sure who, but someone apparently owned copyright over it and TV guides licenced it from them. PVR websites which screen-scraped were hunted down and apparently its now an arms-race.

      Hopefully someone knows more than me.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  22. Community- and net-based live monitoring by Mandrel · · Score: 1

    Start and end times of both programs and ad breaks could be sent over the Internet -- from live monitors (pressing buttons on remotes or keyboards) to those watching or recording programs.

    You could actually build a free community-based live monitoring system using (1), aggregation of signals from many monitors (based on their history of accuracy), and (2), a system whereby credits are accrued by sending accurate signals that can be used to receive signals at other times. Would work best with broadband connections.

    Could this sort of thing be added to Linux-based PVRs like MythTV?

  23. Tivo is already there!!! :) by ajpalm · · Score: 1

    Why wait? TiVo is already in Australia!! :) http://minnie.tuhs.org/TiVo

  24. Re:Current Slashdot Status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's the problem. I can remember when Slashdot used to have interesting articles now and again. People blowing shit up and making dangerous chemicals in their back yard. Cool hacks that actually involved hacking stuff, not some kiddie stuffing a mini-ITX board into a stuffed penguin. All we have now are endless dupes of SCO stories, rewarmed news to Wired and NYT articles and crap like this. Honestly, who the fuck cares about TiVo services being sold in .au? If you're an Ozzie I'm sure it's great, but it doesn't mean we need a front page article about it. Bah.

  25. thats swell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A TiVo that records crocodile hunter.. excellent.

  26. Cutting out Ads? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the best part of TV???

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  27. Re:Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour by yem · · Score: 1

    Yep, its DIY in NZ for at least a few years more.

    The current issue of FFWD magazine has a writeup by someone who imported a TiVo and what the options are. I just this minute finished messing around with a PVR-250 in Linux. I'll wrap a SFF system around it and program it with cron.

    Sky NZ have been promising to do a PVR for a while. The FFWD article notes that Sky think they'll have one available in 2005. They also note that in 2002, Sky said they'd have one in 2003...

    --
    No, I did not read the f***ing article!
  28. The same guy who did the Fairlight. Cool! by adam872 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Peter Vogel built this awesome instrument (with his business partner Kim Ryrie) called the Fairlight. It was to the best of my knowledge, the first sampler and can be heard on dozens of albums, particularly from the eighties. Even with the advances of audio technology in the last 10-15 years, I still drool over the Series III.

    http://www.ghservices.com/gregh/fairligh/

    In any case (and back on topic), I hope he has better luck business wise this time. As was typical with great engineers with good ideas at that time (think Clive Sinclair) they never had the acumen to cash in on their great technology. Those MBA graduates do sometimes come in handy :)

  29. how about the bugs? by thogard · · Score: 1

    Can it remove the bugs that now appear to be on all the channels?

    The Aussie TV stations tend to use the cheapest gear they can lay their hands on and that means NTSC/60Hz and that results in some odd issues when you take a video of a cricket ball moving over a field that was recorded at 50Hz/PAL and then converted to 60Hz/NTSC mpeg encoded, moved 1/2 around the world via sat and converted back to 50Hz/PAL. Add in a bug and watching the jitter and it makes me feel like I'm car sick. The result is I don't watch as much TV and I don't watch any thing that is high action thats been converted on any of the channels anymore.

    1. Re:how about the bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Top Bugs in Australian TV
      1. Squashed picture. Australia is gradually phasing in digital free-to-air TV, but they haven't quite got the hang of the aspect ratios yet, so they keep f*cking it up for anybody who is using the same 4:3 TV that's been the standard here for the last 30 years. Unless this is a cunning plot to make us "upgrade" to 16:9 widescreen.
      2. Obvious conversions from low-bitrate digital recordings. I don't mean up-to-the-minute live news feeds from a warzone here, but when I'm watching a movie on a commercial netwrok, I don't expect to see blocks like it was ripped from a VCD.
      3. Networks who want to squeeze in an extra 30sec of ads each half-hour. Especially bad are those bastards at Ten, who are forever fading out the last 5sec of The Simpsons, in order to put up their stupid logo and run some more ads. I'm sick of a choice quip from Chief Wiggum being faded out so the network can say "coming up after this show we've butchered with our shit editing: Big Brother!"
      4. Anything involving reality shows or rich couples renovating their expensive apartments.

  30. Tivo here in Oz ready or not by wadiwood · · Score: 1

    Some enterprising people have already set up sites to modify imported machines, and supply the data.
    tivo site for making australian Tivo
    Tivo Weeknees

    --

    -- it must be true, it's on the internet.
  31. Scheduled vs Actual Program Times by MattXonn · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a trend in Australia lately that some local programs will overrun their scheduled spot. What is scheduled to finish so another show can start at 8:30pm, for example, may actually go on for several more minutes. This makes it difficult to set the VCR timer to record. You end up with some of the show before the one you want to record and miss the end of it. I experienced this on Sunday. Bloody Big Brother!

    I have also noticed the commercial networks may occasionally skip ads between programs. One program will flow into another. This may also make it difficult to set the timer.

    What will be interesting to see with these PVRs is how good is the program guide they use. Will it be up-to-date? As said before, even the networks can't get their NOW/NEXT on-screen display accurate. How will a third-party do it? I can just imagine them having people watching each channel, pressing buttons which send signals to all the PVRs.

  32. Maybe not - read the law by indaba · · Score: 1

    The law is a bit contradictory to this fact sheet, as this clause indicates.. it is legal to make copies of tv broadcasts for private or domestic use..
    COPYRIGHT ACT 1968 , SECT 111
    Filming or recording broadcasts for private and domestic use
    (1) The copyright in a television broadcast in so far as it consists of visual images is not infringed by the making of a cinematograph film of the broadcast, or a copy of such a film, for the private and domestic use of the person by whom it is made.

    So, maybe it's only OK to copy a tv show without sound ?

    1. Re:Maybe not - read the law by skribe · · Score: 1
      I wrote to the copyright council to get a clarification. Their reponse follows:

      Unfortunately, the section of the Copyright Act to which Mr Kruse refers (section 111) has been read out of context.

      As you are aware from our information sheet 'TV programs: home taping', a TV broadcast can contain a number of different copyrights. For example:

      - copyright in the broadcast signal from the television station;

      - copyright in music and recordings on the soundtrack;

      - copyright in scripts;

      - copyright in the film footage being broadcast; and

      - copyright in artistic works (including logos, paintings, sets and so on).

      The section of the Copyright Act to which Mr Kruse refers, however, only applies to the first of these copyrights: the copyright in the broadcast
      signal itself.

      Section 111 could be described as a 'Clayton's exception', as it's hard to think of when, in practice, it could be relied on at all: just about every broadcast will include at least one other copyright element other than the broadcast signal. (Note that we make a brief reference to this problem in the second paragraph on page 2 of the information sheet.)

      As noted in our information sheet, in some countries 'blank tape' levy schemes exist, under which people are allowed to make private recordings, but which also provide payment back to copyright owners. Unfortunately, there is no such scheme in Australia.

      Hope this clarifies the confusion.

      Yours sincerely,

      Ian McDonald
      Senior Legal Officer
      --
      Blog
  33. Re:Current Slashdot Status by Marlor · · Score: 1

    I think it's great. This is big news for me (I live in Newcastle, one of the rollout areas). If you don't like it, don't click on "Read More". I like it being on the front page, since I wouldn't see it if it was elsewhere.

    However, maybe Slashdot needs checkboxes for geographical locations (similar to the current topic ones), so that we can choose not to see stories from other areas if we want to. That way, you can choose not to see Australian stories, and we don't have to read your whining.

  34. Syney, Newcastle and Wollongong? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Why don't they have it in Ayers Rock, Broome and Melbourne too?

    Motherfuckers :(

    *(for reference that's like having it in NYC, Florida and that shitty place they bagged in futurama with the coke bottling factory and the air port and that's it)

    *at least to my approximate geographical knowledge

  35. The feature I specifically want that Tivo has .... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I want that "hunt down other things you might like" feature.

    I'm FAR from being a TV junkie - I (seriously) watch less than 2 hours a week and this is only due to my g/f having the tube on.

    HOWEVER When I do get behind the remote at her place I spot
    fantastic things on ABC and SBS (non commercial stations)

    I normally feel that using the computer is more rewarding than the TV as it's interactive - I spose the PC is the 1970's TV equivelant for kids (but anyhow I'm getting off track)

    What I would like is those great documentaries on SBS and ABC as well as catching Rally highlights (the only motor sport, if not only sport I appreciate) - also anything like the simpsons, southpark, seinfeld and futurama - oh it would be bliss

    Of course it would chew up all my time and kill me but damn it would be good.

    Without that feature I'm distinctively not interested.

  36. Re:Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it would be the same in all of Australia's provinces...why is NZ any different?

    HAHA :)

  37. Would be nice if Canada had TiVo or TiVo-like by jbr439 · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all. Cable analog viewers in Canada have no TiVo or TiVo-like service that they can buy.

    1. Re:Would be nice if Canada had TiVo or TiVo-like by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      Not true. The RCA Scenium PVRs (or DMRs as RCA calls them) work just fine with analog cable in Canada. It uses the Guide Plus+ system for scheduling.

      If you are a roll-your-own type, SageTV, Snapstream BeyondTV, and MythTV all support Canadian listings. These use the Zap2It service.

      Of these, SageTV is probably the most TiVO-like, as it will suggest new shows that you might like. The others don't do this.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  38. mod perent up! by eshefer · · Score: 1

    yup, and the Cnet article doesn't do it justice calling it the "fairlight music synthesizer"

    it was the first digital sampler. and CMI ment computer music instrument. in 1979 - mind you..

    and the reprecutions of this invention can be heard to day on almost every music production today. the idea of using a digital representation of sound and playing it back in varing speeds relative to seminotes was totaly revelutionary and had much more of a cultural effect then that video box will ever have..

    it's nice to see the guy still comming up with new stuff.. ;-)

  39. its a start by watsondk · · Score: 1

    now we just need something worth recording with this

  40. Compatible with Pay TV set top boxes? by AWWinter · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if I can use this thing with Pay TV set top boxes - ie Foxtel or Austar? Seems pretty lame if it will only work with the 5 free to air tv stations we have here in Aus...

  41. Re:Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour by batzo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sad but true...

    at least tv_grab_nz works great over here!

  42. I have a 5 yr old - I want one of these, by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Daaaaaad, can you get me one of those? could become a thing of the past.

    Wooot!

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  43. Re:Won't happen in New Zealand (Aussie's neighbour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pity you cannot get someone out of the country to publish that data.

    Preferably someone who can afford to scoff at NZ law.

    Hell, even the US with its copyright insanity doesn't allow crap like a phone book or TV listings to be copyrighted.