Slashdot Mirror


Dr Who, Daleks Kiss And Make Up

Dynamoo writes "The BBC is reporting that the creators of the new series of Doctor Who due next year have reached an agreement with the estate of the late Terry Nation to include the Daleks in the new series. This means that I'll definitely be watching.. although whether from behind the sofa or not remains to be seen." We previously reported on the apparent exterminate-ion of the lovable pepperpots from this new version.

221 comments

  1. I could never get into it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

    Some of the story lines were pretty interesting, but overall I could never get into the show. Hopefully that will change with the new one.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I could never get into it by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are now banned from /.

      Please turn in your UID and report for reeducation.

    2. Re:I could never get into it by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Some of the story lines were pretty interesting, but overall I could never get into the show. Hopefully that will change with the new one.

      I love Doctor Who, but I can understand where you are comming from. The format is that of a vintage 50s cliff hanger. It's something that I didn't understand watching it in the states as PBS typicaly showed an entire story at a time. If you don't like old classic science fiction then Doctor Who is difficult to get into.

      The only way I could get no fans even to watch it is by showing them the credits with names like "Douglas Adams" or "Terry Nation".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:I could never get into it by Bill_Royle · · Score: 1

      Just a tip - a man with dyslexia could have trouble with your orders, as men don't generally carry an IUD.

    4. Re:I could never get into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had to've been there you know. Dr Who is one of those shows that in all truth is pretty B-grade, but for those of us who grew up watching every Sunday and hiding under the couch cushions from Daleks it's a big deal. It's a similar sort of thing with Blake's 7 (another UK production). I'm sure kids in the US had the same sort of thing with Buck Rogers or Battlestar Galactica, when we in the UK thought those shows quite silly compared to our Daleks.

    5. Re:I could never get into it by whovian · · Score: 1

      You are now banned from /.

      Or, in the spirit of the topic, this translates as
      YOU WILL BE EXCOMMUNICATED!!!

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    6. Re:I could never get into it by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      "I'm sure kids in the US had the same sort of thing with Buck Rogers or Battlestar Galactica..."

      Battlestar Ponderosa was just BAD...

      Dr. Who reminds me of some of the Inspector Morse series, in that about halfway through it starts not making any sense. I suppose it has something to do with subtle language differences or perhaps just the peculiar way Brits think... ;-)

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    7. Re:I could never get into it by hb253 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dr. Who free association....

      Pure, unadulterated schlock, boring, badly acted, cheap sets, bad costumes, did I say boring?, incomprehensible, drivel, dreck...

      I feel better now...

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    8. Re:I could never get into it by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Battlestar Ponderosa

      We used to call it Cattlecar Bonanza. And have you noticed that SciFi Channel will be doing a new version next year? Frightful thought....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    9. Re:I could never get into it by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Except for the last 15 minutes, I thought the SciFi BG pilot/miniseries was decent -- not great, but still better than Enterprise. I have high hopes for the new series. At least they've got some decent talent -- Edward James Olmos and Mary McDonnell are good performers.

      Even more exciting is the fact that SciFi is bringing back Farscape!!! That just ROCKS. That might even make up for Stargate: The Explotative Spin-off.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  2. Terry Nation probably thought.... by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Terry Nation probably thought: "Hmm... I just get this garbage can here turn it upside down, cut ping-pong balls in half and stick them all over the outside, thrust a whisk or a plunger on the front, and I'll be scaring kids for generations!"

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Dr Seuss was more scary than a Dalek ever was...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was sarcasm, you should know that I can consider the Daleks and Dr. Seuss to be leagues more frightening than any movie monster.

    3. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by permaculture · · Score: 3, Informative

      Terry was trying to make an alien that didn't look like a man in a rubber suit. The Daleks were a sack of protaplasm with an arm, who had to live in robot bodies after they'd devastated their home planet.

      Unlike the alien from the film 'Alien', they actually _couldn't_ be played by a man in a rubber suit.

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    4. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by TomV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Terry Nation wrote the scripts and created the Dalek characters. The design was by BBC employee Raymond Cusick, and this lies at the root of the rights problems / confusion now resolved - the Nation Estate could licence the name Dalek and characteristic speech patterns such as "Resistance is Uselesss" and, of course, "Exterminate", but not the likeness. The BBC could licence, and use, the likeness, but not the name or behaviour.

      Tim Hancock, Terry Nation's former Agent and boss of "The Nation Estate" for licensing purposes, tried to bump up the price above the agreed UKP250,000 for using the Daleks in the new series at the last moment, and the BBC called his bluff. The Estate wasn't going to make much money if the new series didn't use the Daleks at all.

    5. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cybermen were where it's at. the daleks just looked silly.

    6. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by Talthane · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except Terry Nation didn't design the Daleks and the only thing he thought about was the lack of legs, based on a viewing of the Georgian State Ballet where the dancers appeared to glide due to their floor-length dresses. Raymond Cusick designed the rest, and he was the one inspired by a pepperpot.

      --
      "This is why men never share their feelings; because women always remember." -Just Shoot Me.
    7. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except, being British, he'd have thought "rubbish bin" not "garbage can". :-)

      A friend of mine had a theory that the whole upside down rubbish bin/garbage can thing was crucial to the popularity(?!) of the daleks. Any kid could put a bin on their head and *be* a dalek.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    8. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they now have Daleks accessible ramps so that the y can function better (ie invade) in this society?

    9. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by njj · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe Nation's original description of the Daleks (in his original 1963 script) was pretty vague. The job of turning his brief notes into reality was given to Raymond Cusick, of the BBC design department. I think I read somewhere that he was paid a flat fee of forty pounds for designing the Daleks - Terry Nation, however, owned the copyright and did very nicely out of it.

    10. Re:Terry Nation probably thought.... by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Actually as a child I had a dalek, created for a stage production of Doctor Who. They were piloted from the inside, and I could fit and move the thing fairly easily. Of course, that's before I reached 6'4". Nor did I wear a rubber suit, but that goes without saying :-)

      What I find amusing is the part about Billie Piper being the sidekick.

  3. Yeah but... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm still going to miss Tom Baker... Best scarves on T.V... ;)

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Yeah but... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      And the jellybabies... still remember the funny looks I got when I asked for those in a candy story.

    2. Re:Yeah but... by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      I saw "The Five Doctors" the other day and was very dissappointed that Tom Baker only got a few minutes of time in the movie, and that just looked like stock footage.

      I never really got into the TV series, being never shown on TV much here in Australia (at least where I was living at the time) but I did exhaust all the libraries I had available of the books. I'd read a whole book in a day or two.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    3. Re:Yeah but... by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      (OK, real Whovians will probably point out all my errors, but here goes..)

      When the BBC were making "The Five Doctors", Tom Baker was unavailable due to other acting committments. Since that would have ruined the main plot device, they rummaged round and used a few scenes from "Shada", which was made but never broadcast at the time due to a strike.

      So yes, Baker wasn't really in it, and yes, it was stock footage (albeit footage that hadn't been broadcast before)

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  4. Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by PipianJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    During the hiatus, the Daleks did a little-known movie called "Mr. Dalek Goes to Washington."

    Here is a still from the movie.

    "Expatiate!"

    1. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mustache makes the picture. Excellent

    2. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Here's another Dalek tribute, featuring a con artist named Sam Starfall (normally wearing an animatronic environment suit).

    3. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by lewko · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    4. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > During the hiatus, the Daleks did a little-known > movie called "Mr. Dalek Goes to Washington."

      Great photo. There's also a picture of how Mr Dalek looks like without his tin can:
      Mr Dalek doing an impression of CP3O .
      (Truth is scarier than fiction.)

    5. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by leoxx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whomever created that image is in a lot of trouble, because SCO owns the copyright to the Daleks and isn't afraid to use it!

    6. Re:Where Did the Daleks Go In the Meantime? by Goozbach · · Score: 1
      --

      I used to but then I quit.

  5. YAY by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Dr. Who fan, I get frustrated with intellectual property over the damned Darleks(tm). While I appricated the Terry Nation's vision, I can not see how even the BBC could ruin the commercial value of any spin off project that future non Doctro Who Darleks might have for they are nothing more then a B movie stereotypical evil villain.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:YAY by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a Dr. Who fan, I get frustrated with intellectual property over the damned Darleks(tm).

      I saw Darl and intellectual property in the same sentence. Thought I wandered into the wrong section in Slashdot.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    2. Re:YAY by dorward · · Score: 2, Informative

      B-Movie? Sterotype? No! Dalek Empire is now in its third series. The first was excellent - I just need to sort out my budget to get the rest.

    3. Re:YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a very big Dr. Whoi fan if you can't even spell "dalek" correctly.

    4. Re:YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, "Dr. Who".

      It was a typo. ... No, it was a joke! Yeah, that's it, a joke, because he didn't spell "dalek" correctly, and I made a joke about it. Yeah, a joke.

    5. Re:YAY by jazman · · Score: 1

      Is that the Darleks from Doctor Sco and the Darl-eks?

    6. Re:YAY by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Not a very big Dr. Whoi fan if you can't even spell "dalek" correctly.

      Well, not a big *dalek* fan, and too lazy to break out a video tape and see how Terry Nation spelt it in the 50s. Besides, Darl-eks & intellectual property? "Exterminate the Penquin!"

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:YAY by nanojath · · Score: 1

      Well honestly too, what the hell are Daleks worth without Dr. Who? Since the only people who could possibly be even nominally interested in a Daleks spinoff would be Dr. Who fans, and what are you going to do - tell the Sci Fi channel you want to do a special, oh and by the way, that all the people who are likely to watch hate you for refusing to play ball with the BBC, and plus you can't most of the recognizable features of the alternate universe in question? Sound business strategye. I'm quite sure this simple fact was the basis of the "reconcilliation" - and that the "breakdown" was merely a stunt to squeeze a bit more money out of the property, and that the announcements that Dr. Who would soldier on without the Daleks was the counter - the BBC playing a little hardball ("we can make it without you") to force them to be reasonable. Price of doing business, I suppose.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    8. Re:YAY by Colazar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not a very big Dr. Whoi fan if you can't even spell "dalek" correctly.

      Classic hyper-correction. What do you want to bet that the poster speaks a dialect that drops the R's after vowels. Such speakers tend to stick random "silent R's" in words, because they can't figure out the rhyme or reason behind which words have R's in them and which words don't.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    9. Re:YAY by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Classic hyper-correction. What do you want to bet that the poster speaks a dialect that drops the R's after vowels. Such speakers tend to stick random "silent R's" in words, because they can't figure out the rhyme or reason behind which words have R's in them and which words don't.

      Or perhaps the poster, ME, tends to see both spellings.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  6. So really, why do we need, *need* them? by gordgekko · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I loved the good Doctor as much as any other geek but do we absolutely have to have Daleks in the next series? Some of the best episodes ever -- like Pyramids of Mars -- had no Daleks.

    Rather than take the series in an interesting and new direction, we're essentially getting the same series but with better F/X. Why not just have The Master and the Daleks in every episode?

    Don't get me wrong, I love the Daleks but it was the occasionally very superb writing that got me, not any specific villians.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    1. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      Did the Master AND the daleks ever appear together??

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    2. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They exterminated him at the beginning of the Dr Who movie, if that counts.

    3. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by urbaer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Some of the best episodes ever -- like Pyramids of Mars -- had no Daleks.

      They tried to be in it, but after several attempts decided that the pyramids were to steep to go up.

      Let's hope the Daleks have some cool rocket jets in the next series.

    4. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Yeah. In the Pertwee episode "Frontier in Space", the Master instigates a war between the Human and Draconian Empires, so that the Daleks might take advantage of the chaos.

      There's also the Five Doctors, which featured a mishmash of historical adversaries, including the Master, a cyberman, a dalek, a yeti...

    5. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Well, as for technology, few people know that the real reason Daleks always lost in the end was that they used Windows. All the Doctor had to do was induce the Blue Screen of Dalek Death. K9, of course, ran on Gallifreyian Linux.

    6. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by doctorwhofan · · Score: 1

      Doctor Who doesn't *need* the Daleks. However, having them in will attract casual viewers and, assuming that the story is half-decent (and given the people involved it'll almost certainly be fairly good or better) then it'll get those viewers watching the rest of the series. So they are a ratings boost and a hook for casual viewers rather than a necessity.

    7. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "Why not just have The Master and the Daleks in every episode?" My favorite season was the season where the Master was in every story, but that was Delgado. If Eric Roberts or the recently-departed Anthoiny Ainley were in every episode, I would tune out rather quickly.

    8. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Rethcir · · Score: 1
      Frontier - Best episode ever. For that 4 hours or so, Doctor Who was turned into a DS9-like political space war drama.

      I honestly think the Ppertwee episodes were just as good as a lot of the Tom Baker episodes. Unfortunately, PBS up here (NHPTV) tends to only show Tom Baker, although for a good 3-4 years they started with hartnell and showed every episode in order, up until the Colin Baker episodes where they went out of order and ended up going back to the Tom Baker series.

      They need to come out with a 24-7 Doctor Who webcast or cable channel! (hell, FX showed MASH almost incessantly for two years and it did fine) I'm gonna have to dig up my old tape of Spearhead from Space and give it a watch sometime soon!

    9. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Rethcir · · Score: 1

      Actually any true "whovian" will know that the best way to disable a Dalek was when he would put his hat on the Dalek's eye stalk, blinding it. And, that hat was a Fedora... hmmm...

    10. Re:So really, why do we need, *need* them? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      My pbs station (maryland public television) showed "Frontier in Space" last week, albeit in that coveted 12mid-3am timeslot.

  7. Wait a second... by cosmod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't that be Doctor Whom?

    1. Re:Wait a second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be Doctor Whom?
      And is he really on first? And what's that at short stop, a dalek?

      --
      This post is inspired partly by John Dvorak.

    2. Re:Wait a second... by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if the good Doctor is the object of the transitive verb "exterminate."

    3. Re:Wait a second... by mewphobia · · Score: 1

      that's value added for ya.

  8. I hear the breakthrough was reached... by Timbotronic · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when the BBC agreed not to put any stairs in the new episodes.

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:I hear the breakthrough was reached... by TheTXLibra · · Score: 1

      On the BBC's budget, all they could afford was a threshold.

      --
      -The Libra
      "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
    2. Re:I hear the breakthrough was reached... by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      ...when the BBC agreed not to put any stairs in the new episodes.

      Your standard model slag pit comes without stairs, thank you.

    3. Re:I hear the breakthrough was reached... by albanac · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember the day a Dalek learned to fly? It made the Nine O'Clock News in the UK.

      ~cHris

    4. Re:I hear the breakthrough was reached... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely it must have been not the Nine O'Clock News.

    5. Re:I hear the breakthrough was reached... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Post Ever.

  9. Calum T. Dalek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calum T. Dalek rejoices in hearing about the appearance of his brethren. The Computer Science Club, of which he is president, also adds their congradulations.

    ** This post is not offically endorsed by the Computer Science Club of the University of Waterloo, or Calum T. Dalek.

  10. Thank God by ishmalius · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could never even consider watching Dr Who, or endure a single episode, without those beloved evil vacuum cleaners.

  11. News ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means that I'll definitely be watching.. although whether from behind the sofa or not remains to be seen.

    Is this news that matters or just stuff by/for nerds ?

    1. Re:News ? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering the amount of money/publicity the BBC is dumping into this project? It's potentially one of the biggest things BBC TV has done in years, and I would argue it matters as much as any entertainment news does to a site like Slashdot.

      Although, to be fair, it certainly is also "stuff by/for nerds"....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    2. Re:News ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's potentially one of the biggest things BBC TV has done in years

      Which is why it's going to sink like a rock. Any show that has money poured into it is also going to bear the scars of interference by TV executives. (Imagine if "The Simpsons" were revived twenty years after it went off the air, by TV executives.) It's going to be a disaster.

    3. Re:News ? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      Well, the situation is a bit different. I trust the BBC to interfere more than I would trust any American TV network, if only because their jobs are different. Fox reviving "The Simpsons" twenty years down the line would suck because, like any commercial network, they'd almost certainly have as much of an eye on making money off of the thing as they would in producing a good series. Since BBC TV isn't run on a for-profit basis, they have a better chance on actually focusing on making a great series. Which, of course, doesn't mean they'll know how to do that....

      But, then again, I trust the writers and producers. They are long-time fans of the show, and all of them have done work for the franchise at some point, either as part of the range of novels, the audio dramas, or the TV special "Curse of Fatal Death." So, with some luck, they'll be able to turn out something that will work.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  12. This is a bad thing... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Instead of taking the franchise new places, we'll be seeing re-hashed bad guys. Great.

    First it was half assed covers of songs I used to love (thanks a lot Jessica Simpson), then Doom 3, now this. I'm starting to think that trying to keep nostalgia alive isn't worth the risk of stunting the growth of such a promising franchise.

    1. Re:This is a bad thing... by martinX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:This is a bad thing... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

      Too right. Nothing's as cool as I remember it.

      Next thing I know Journey won't be cool anymore and George Michael will be openly gay.

    3. Re:This is a bad thing... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Well, either way people will bitch and moan. Take CatWoman for example, sure it was a completely horrible movie for more reasons than I can count, but one of the things critics found fault with was that it wasn't based off the original Cat Woman story in the least bit.

      So either way, you're going to have people pissed off. At least this way you get to see old time favorites recreated with a new vision.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  13. in fact, by grepistan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best wardrobe, generally! Entire scenes of stories like 'The Aztecs' appear to have been casted, set and shot in the seedier kind of drag queen establishment, complete with makeup. The fact that any of the actors could keep a straight face just shows how talented they were!

    DOn't get me wrong though, I love Doctor Who. It's still on tv every weeknight here (yes, we ARE that backward Down Here)...

    --
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
  14. It Must Be Late by Witchblade · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not a Dr. Who fan at all, but I read the headline as "Dr Who, Daleks, Kiss and Makeup". That imagined comma made me think for a minute that KISS were getting involved. I've been wondering why they never made another move ...

    1. Re:It Must Be Late by TheShadowHawk · · Score: 1

      I was reading the trivia for that KISS movie on IMDB and noticed this absolutely CLASSIC piece of trivia:

      Ace Frehley's stunt man was African American, so in the fight scenes you can see Ace go from being white to black and vice-versa.

      LOL!! That would have been hilarious to see!

      --
      Friends don't let Friends use Internet Explorer.
    2. Re:It Must Be Late by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Rather than the original headline's implications, I prefer the images of Dr. Who, Daleks, KISS, and whomever is getting the Makeup.

    3. Re:It Must Be Late by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      Just after "Empire Strikes Back" came out - and it was all the rage - i saw some teen magazine (or maybe one of those science fiction movie rags) which gushed about how KISS was set to play a 4-headed alien in Star Wars VII (or maybe it was VIII). I loved the idea of them (it) breaking into Dr. Love in that Tatooine (sp?) bar.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  15. Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rather than take the series in an interesting and new direction, we're essentially getting the same series but with better F/X.

    But wouldn't that ruin it? I'm not a True Fan, but I thought "camp" was an integral part of the show.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better effects would be good up to a point. Perhaps improve the effects to the level of the original Star Trek series or even Battlestar Galactica. Effects would still have a primitive feel, but not be totally backwards which would kill a large part of the potential new fanbase that *didn't* fall in love with the old show.

      As long as they don't bring them to the level of the later Star Trek series or Stargate SG-1... I'll be happy with it.

    2. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By and large, the original series was not especially lacking in the FX department. It was generally on par with any science fiction show during its time, really. The show only managed to gain a reputation for being done "on the cheap" because of two basic reasons. First of which was that what was probably the single most famous season of the show (season 17, the season where Douglas Adams served as script editor) did have the tendency of being cheaper-looking than was probably healthy. This is also just about the only season that qualifies as being truly campy (thanks, in part, to the Adams connection). There were other moments, here and there, but, even at its worst, it's not "Rocky Horror," and by and large the camp value is overstated.

      The other reason is that there was a bit of a delayed reaction at work in the way the show was recieved in North America. The earliest years of the show, from the early-to-mid 1960s, didn't reach the United States until the late 1970s at the earliest. Taken in the correct context, it's not bad. Certainly, it wouldn't be winning awards, but it's more than passable. By the standards of the late 1970s? Yes, it looks weak. But the show itself had long since moved beyond that, anyway.

      Don't get me wrong: it's not overwhelming, and the strength of the series really never has lied with the special effects. But it's not the sub-"Plan 9 from Outer Space" mess that its reputation would lead one to believe. It holds its own fairly admirably with its contemporaries, keeping in mind that the series was ending just about the time when "Star Trek: the Next Generation" was beginning. And the first two seasons or so of that show look rather cheap, too.

      The other thing is, it's was a very long-lived program, which had many different show-runners at various points in its history. Different producers/editors brought very different sensibilities into play. Depending on what time period and what producer you look at, you could easily come away believing the show was predominantly campy space opera, spy thriller, hard-edged military sci-fi, magical realist period drama, or hard science fiction, straight up. Which is, after all, part of the charm of the premise, and part of the reason why the show lasted twenty six seasons to begin with. Not to mention why it, as much, if not more, than Star Trek did, managed to persevere so long after its cancellation....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    3. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by AGMW · · Score: 1
      better F/X

      Back in those days you didn't need special effects because kids still had imaginations. Now, if the film doesn't actually show the 'plot' in detailed brain-dead-o-color(tm) then the kids don't get it!

      It was the writing and acting that set the scenes and it simply didn't matter if the scenes wobbled when the cast walked past! Unfortunately, expectations have been raised and it will likely be ruined by too many expensive F/X and the cost of cheap plots and actors.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    4. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I think they had better see the best of Stargate sg-1 such as the writing, etc. It is a great model for the new Doctor Who IMHO...

    5. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      >By and large, the original series was not especially
      >lacking in the FX department. It was generally on par
      >with any science fiction show during its time, really.

      I'm a huge fan of Doctor Who, but the truth is that most of the time the show's sets and effects were severely lacking, compared to its sci-fi contemporaries (they did better when it came to costumes, usually). If you compare the effects from late '60s outings of Who to those of the original Star Trek there's no comparison - Trek blows 'em away. Likewise in the mid-'70s if you compare the sets and effects on Who to those on Space:1999, the good Doctor's show also comes off looking like a joke.

      Who's producers did what they could I suppose on too-tight a budget, but the results - while almost always inventive - were seldom impressive (or even particularly convincing). Here's hoping modern computer animation helps to even the odds a little bit in that department.

    6. Re:Better F/X? But wouldn't that ... by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure, myself. On average, I don't think Doctor Who ever lagged more than two or three years behind the standard for television sci-fi in the United States, and, even then, tended to do so only for brief periods. The earliest seasons were pretty much on par for what you would expect in the early 1960s. By the late 1960s, Star Trek had raised the bar a little, but the show caught easily up by 1970, when it made the jump to color. Similarly, Graham Williams' run in the late 1970s was probably the most notoriously cheap in the history of the series, but Philip Hinchcliffe's before him, and John Nathan-Turner's after him, were just about on the same level. And the final two seasons or so were, IMO, actually better looking than the first two seasons of Star Trek: The Next Generation on almost every level.

      The problem was inherently one of scope. Graham Williams and Douglas Adams, for instance, favored big space operas which were generally too expensive to do except on the cheap, whereas Philip Hinchcliffe tended to favor contemporary and/or period pieces, which the BBC could do very well indeed. Plus, especially towards the tail end of the series, after the episode counts of the seasons had been slashed, and there was more money to distribute to each individual episode, on the average the show did a fine job, IMO. Not spectacular, and not going to win any awards, but not the crapfest that most make it out to be.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  16. Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by sunspot42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There hasn't been a good Dalek story since the mid-'60s. Pertwee's encounters with the Daleks were hardly the highlight of his career as the Doctor in the late '60s and early '70s. During his 7-season run as the Doctor Tom Baker had one mediocre, overlong Dalek serial (1975's "Genesis of the Daleks", redeemed only by Michael Wisher's fantastic performance as the Dalek's crazed creator, Davros), and one truly awful Dalek 4-parter, "Destiny of the Daleks" in 1979. Peter Davison's Doctor encountered the portly pepperpots half a decade later in 1984's lamentable "Resurrection of the Daleks". Colin Baker's Doctor runs into the Daleks the next year in the silly "Revelation of the Daleks". I've never seen Sylvester McCoy's Doctor's 1988 Dalek serial "Remembrance of the Daleks", but the general consensus seems to regard it as no better than "Genesis of the Daleks" at best.

    The Daleks were an idea that ran out of gas after the initial Dalek craze of the early '60s ran its course in the UK. Since then, a Dalek serial has been a guaranteed bad time. They're more a curse to Doctor Who than a blessing, and the real challenge for any new Who series would be trying to reinvent them into something truly chilling and remotely plausible to a contemporary audience. It's possible I suppose, but Who's past producers tried and failed for almost 20 years to produce a Dalek serial as engaging to modern audiences as original Dalek adventures like "Dalek Invasion Earth" were to audiences in the early '60s. I think they'd be better off ignoring the Daleks - and particularly the Davros character, who has been unnecessarily and ludicrously dredged into every Dalek adventure since 1975's "Genesis" - and concentrating on creating compelling new enemies for the Doctor to fight.

    And if they must revisit the past, they'd be far better off reimaging more plausible Who adversaries, like the Sontarans (reptilian clone warriors) and the Cybermen (televised sci-fi's original Borg).

    1. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by jebiester · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess an Arch-Villian who would be totally defeated by a set of stairs makes it hard writing a decent script.

    2. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by kamawell · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Genesis of the Daleks" is a classic and infinitely better than "Remembrance..." but I guess it's just a matter of taste. I'd have to disagree that the Sontarans or the Cybermen are more plausable enemies - the first a race devoted to war but unable to do anything about that little vent on the back of the neck and the second vulnerable to any opponent that can rustle up some gold and a cheesegrater.

    3. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Genesis" and "Remembrance" both are generally considered to be the best of the post-1960s Dalek stories. The former more than the latter, though. But that's only eight stories out of a twenty year period, mind.

      The Daleks tend to be only as good as the people writing for them. They're at their best when used as part of some sort of metaphorical purpose: Terry Nation's "Genesis of the Daleks" likened them to the Nazis, and drew heavy parallels between their creation and the rise of the Third Reich. Ben Aaronvitch's "Remembrance of the Daleks" did a similar trick against the backdrop of the civil rights movement of the 1960s to make a point about racism.

      A similar problem faces a lot of Doctor Who monsters, though: the Cybermen suffered through almost all their post-1960s appearances as writers generally tended to disregard the whole risks-of-technology idea that was at their core of their creation. The Cybermen, in particular, rapidly degenerated into joke status through their supposed allergy to gold, a far cry from the humanity-once-removed creepiness of their first appearances.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    4. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by sunspot42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      >I'd have to disagree that the Sontarans or the Cybermen
      >are more plausable enemies - the first a race devoted to
      >war but unable to do anything about that little vent on
      >the back of the neck and the second vulnerable to any
      >opponent that can rustle up some gold and a cheesegrater.

      Oh, I agree - they both need work as well. Those Achilles heels the writers built into the races were silly 20 years ago.

      I just think there's more there to work with than there is with the Daleks. The original concept behind the Cybermen was truly creepy, for the '60s. I think that would be easy to recapture for a modern audience. Likewise the Sontarans are physically an impressive enemy, though clearly someone needs to teach them the concept behind the "gas cap".

      The Daleks could probably be reimaged as well into a truly credible threat - say as little biomechanical tanks that fly around and blow stuff up - but you'd probably have to change so much of their behavior and their backstory you might as well spend your time coming up with new, better enemies.

      One of the other problems late-era Doctor Who had back in the late '80s was needlessly dredging up old enemies - Omega, the Daleks & Davros, the Sea Monsters - just to have a nostalgia fest. Invariably the results were mixed at best. Even back in Tom Baker's day, the outstanding episodes - "The Ark In Space", "Terror of the Zygons" (if you can overlook the bad effects for a certain monster), "The Pyramids of Mars", "The Face of Evil", "The Robots of Death", "The Talons of Weng Chiang" - all of them introduced new adversaries for the Doctor to combat. Offhand the only episode I can think of that brought back an old adversary and sorta kinda worked was "Earthshock", which re-introduced the Cybermen after nearly a decade's absence. It wasn't perfect either, but at least it had its moments and wasn't terribly dull or silly.

    5. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by noewun · · Score: 1

      Damn. That was geeky even for Slashdot.

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
    6. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      >"Genesis" and "Remembrance" both are generally considered
      >to be the best of the post-1960s Dalek stories.

      Yeah, and that says a lot about how awful the other post-'60s Dalek serials were. While it sports a creepy atmosphere in the first episode, "Genesis" grows boring as hell and dismally oppressive in spots - like most Who 6-part serials the middle is hopelessly padded - and many of the guest performances are wretched. It becomes less enjoyable than endurable. Tom Baker doesn't have a good handle on the character of the Doctor yet either, which leaves poor Elisabeth Sladen as Sarah Jane to carry much of the story for the good guys (she does what she can, although her character is somewhat wimped out and dumbed down by the writers during this season).

      Fortunately "Genesis" has the late Michael Wisher's spectacular, over-the-top performance as Davros. Unfortunately he was so good the writers kept bringing Davros back over and over again for the next decade, with diminishing results (largely because they recast the role - the other actors couldn't deliver performances up to the level of Wisher's).

      >A similar problem faces a lot of Doctor Who monsters, though:
      >the Cybermen suffered through almost all their post-1960s
      >appearances as writers generally tended to disregard the whole
      >risks-of-technology idea that was at their core of their creation.

      Bang. Nail. Head.

      That's what worries me about this latest return of the Daleks. Will they be used as a statement against fascism, which was at least to some degree their intended purpose when originally concocted by Nation back in the '60s, or will they just be trotted out the way they were pretty much from 1979 on, as a, "Oh look, here are the Daleks being nasty" kind of irrelevant nostalgia trip? Because if the story doesn't address what makes them a unique menace, you might as well use the Cybermen or the Borg or Darth Vader or whatever. Here's hoping the new writers and producers understand that better than their predecessors did during the end days of the program.

    7. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by AGMW · · Score: 1
      Michael Wisher's fantastic performance as the Dalek's crazed creator, Davros

      And not forgetting Harry Enfield playing Davros' brother, Stavros ... Alright matey peeps - O B E Y.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    8. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Mind you, WHO doesn't reimage. It goes on and regenerates!

    9. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can levitate. There's at least one episode where they did this (Dr. Who screamed "Run up the stairs", did do then turned around to see the levitating dalek following them).

    10. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      The last time they came back they could go up and down stairs, however. So they won't be limited by stairs!

    11. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      "And if they must revisit the past"

      I though that that was the whole point of time travel

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    12. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Like I mentioned. I think that was Remembrance with the 7th Doc. Sylvester McCoy... great.

    13. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      Now when I was a very young kid the Daleks were frightening.

      As I grew up I came to realise that the Daleks were a pretty sad and lame enemy. All the Doctor had to do to run away from them was climb a flight of stairs. Or just run, since they were so slow.

      Of course eventually Daleks could climb stairs, along with a cheesy special glowy effect. Pah! It was too late by then, and the childishness of the late Dr. Who was ruining things anyway. No, I don't see them being able to come up with anything decent with Daleks.

      As for bringing back the Cybermen, yes, I'd much prefer that. For me that's the real story here, since the Cybermen are also a Terry Nation creation and I believe that this announcement clears their use in the series too. However I'd like to see them toughed up a bit - they always seemed a bit slow and the silly "rub gold on their grill and they die" thing wasn't great.

      But why bother resurrecting any of these old villans? There's a whole big universe of time and space out there, and whilst The Doctor may be fascinated with Earth (and might be half human) there's little reason to stick with the old stuff.

    14. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by tuffy · · Score: 1
      As for bringing back the Cybermen, yes, I'd much prefer that. For me that's the real story here, since the Cybermen are also a Terry Nation creation and I believe that this announcement clears their use in the series too. However I'd like to see them toughed up a bit - they always seemed a bit slow and the silly "rub gold on their grill and they die" thing wasn't great.

      I'm pretty sure the Cybermen were Kit Peddler's creation (co-created by Gerry Davis). The weakness to gold was a late addition, first appearing in "Revenge of the Cybermen", IIRC. Since the Cybermen are an ever-evolving adversary, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to write out that particular weakness and return to the characters' roots. The theme of dehumanizing medicine is surely as relevent today as it was back in the 60s when they were created. Though keeping them tall yet somewhat slow (yet virtually unstoppable) is part of their trademark.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    15. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1

      I'm hopeful that the Daleks will be handled well. Many (most) of the writers of the new series have experience writing for Doctor Who in some capacity, either for the novel range, or the series of audio dramas. And, in particular, Robert Shearman's audio play "Jubilee" is hands down my favorite handling of the Daleks ever. So I believe these guys can use the Daleks effectively. Whether or not they will, though, remains to be seen....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    16. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by jandrese · · Score: 1
      Even back in Tom Baker's day, the outstanding episodes - "The Ark In Space", "Terror of the Zygons" (if you can overlook the bad effects for a certain monster)
      Wow, I've never seen that episode, but when someone says it has bad F/X for Dr. Who, well, now I'm just intrigued. What is it? A cardboard box shot through a shotglass or something?
      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    17. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      It was an incredibly cheesy cybernetic Loch Ness Monster. It looks abysmal when it is stop-motion animated, and it manages to look even worse when it is a CSO background sock puppet.

      Good story, though. Lots of atmosphere, good old "over the top" villian in John Woodnutt, and the thrill of Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart in a kilt. It's a fun episode. Pretty typical of the "good" Baker episodes.

    18. Re:Why would you WANT to bring the Daleks back? by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the Zygon costumes themselves are great I think, at least for the time. Their ship model looked pretty good too, IIRC. Again, for Dr. Who.

      But that monster . . . yech!

  17. Call me sceptical, but... by TintinX · · Score: 1

    ... am I the only one who thinks this was a publicity stunt? That's the first thing that came into my head when I read this.

  18. Nitpicking for the Brits... by red+floyd · · Score: 1, Troll

    The story should read "The BBC are..."

    No, I am not British, but I figured SOMEBODY had to defend them :)

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    1. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story should read "The BBC are..."

      It depends on whether you consider the BBC one organization or many people.

    2. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by Tom+Veil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The story should read "The BBC are..."

      BBC = British Broadcasting Corporation

      "The British Broadcasting Corporation are"?

      I'm pretty sure the original wording were correct. ;-)

      --

      There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

    3. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by uberdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BBC website always uses the singular, and they should know.

    4. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by iapetus · · Score: 1

      Defending the Brits by trying to force American grammar on them? Well, we appreciate the thought, I suppose.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    5. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by Polkyb · · Score: 1
      No, I am not British...

      Shouldn't that be No, we are not British ???

      That's how Queen Victoria would have said it and you can't get any more British than the Queen

      --
      I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
    6. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by IngramJames · · Score: 1

      That's how Queen Victoria would have said it and you can't get any more British than the Queen

      This is the same Queen Victoria whose immediate ancestors were German and who married a German?

      Only asking.

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    7. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by b4rtm4n · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      Those Sax-Cobergs were hardly pure blood English.

      Come to that its been many a year since the English Monarch was actually English.

      --
      "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
    8. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by vidarh · · Score: 1
      In British English groups that are treated as a single entity can be treated both as plural and singular, though you should stick to one of them in the same sentence. It is also more common to use singular than plural when treating the group as an impersonal unit, and more common to use plural than singular when talking about something that would be done by individual members of the group.

      "Practical English Usage, New Edition, Oxford University Press, 1997" specifically lists the BBC as an example of a group that can be referred to with both plural and singular.

      "The BBC are reporting" would possibly indicate a more personal approach - this is something that is reported by the individuals making up the BBC - while "the BBC is reporting" is more official: The BBC as a unit is issuing a press release or a news story.

      To me "the BBC is reporting" sounds more natural in this case.

    9. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Darling: I'm as British as Queen Victoria!

      Captain Blackadder: So your father's German, you're half German, and you married a German!

    10. Re:Nitpicking for the Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wit, I fear, was lost on the masses of slashdot.

      Read it again, moderators, and _think_ about whether
      that should have been a +1 funny.

  19. Who would have thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have thought that one of the most terrifying forces in the universe would end up being a bunch of robots that lack the ability to climb a set of stairs.

  20. With the power vested in me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I crown you King Dork.

    1. Re:With the power vested in me, by sunspot42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why, thank you, Dork Pope!

  21. Daleks are cool !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More Daleks..more..yeah !!!!!!!!!

    The Daleks and the Cybermen scared me sh*tless when I was a kid....bring back the Daleks and Tom Baker I say!!!!

    Dr Who is f*cking cool on so many different levels although we shouldn't really expect the yanks to understand, look at the goddamn mess Hitchikers Guide is going to be (Those asshole cops were American in the TV series for a reason you know) .. :((((

    1. Re:Daleks are cool !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those asshole cops were American in the TV series for a reason you know

      Hey! It's isn't easy being a Yank!

  22. Re:No but can I call you a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    b-r-i-t-i-s-h s-p-e-l-l-i-n-g y-o-u d-u-m-b f-u-c-k

  23. The Daleks scared me sh*tless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny



    The Daleks (...) scared me sh*tless when I was a kid...

    No doubt, I didn't use salt for a week after for fear the shaker might exterminate me!

    1. Re:The Daleks scared me sh*tless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know that dream you have where you can't run away? Like, the Bad Thing is coming and your legs are stuck or your feet slip or something...well, the Daleks were usually the Bad Thing...they were scary.

  24. Note the login. by Daleks · · Score: 4, Funny

    I haven't been kissing any doctors.

    1. Re:Note the login. by Rethcir · · Score: 1

      Maybe your standards are too high?

  25. Totally offtopic factoid: by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before the civil war, whenever US foreign policy was discussed in newspapers, they always read "The United States of America are..." rather than "is..." The clear shift in power to the 'federal' (damned interstate highway funds) government afterward caused the change in grammar.

    1. Re:Totally offtopic factoid: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You watch too much PBS.

  26. The amazing thing was... by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that the author had any say in the first place. Here in the good 'ole us of a, there never would have been an issue, since the author would've signed away his rights ages ago. Not defending our system, just saying I'm amazed this happened at all.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The amazing thing was... by albanac · · Score: 1

      Given that the creator of the Daleks (Terry Nation) has been dead for quite some time, it's not so much him as his estate that has a say in the Dalek brand.

      ~cHris

  27. Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by TheTXLibra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was reading "Don't Panic" (sort of a biography on Douglas Adams during the period when he wrote H2G2) and apparently he used to be one of the writers, and later a script editor for them. And it was during the Tom Baker years too... ahh, the good years...

    ...anyone know what happened to good old Tom?

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
    1. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      He got progressively more insane as his hair grew greyer. Last sighted in "Fort Boyard", a "Crystal Maze" rip off.

    2. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, he started a rumor that Eddie Izzard would be the next Doctor.

    3. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tom Baker is still around, but not doing anything much of note, really, other than playing the part of a slightly crazy semi-recluse rather well. He had a brief part in the abysmally awful (yet oddly compelling, in an Ed Wood sort of way) "Dungeons and Dragons" a few years back as an elf.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    4. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by aedan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tom Baker does the voice overs in Little Britain

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/tv/littlebritain/a bo ut_the_show.shtml

      aedan

    5. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by castor_acer · · Score: 3, Informative

      In addition to the other sightings mentioned, Tom Baker appeared on a regular basis in a cultish British TV series called 'Randall And Hopkirk Deceased', a modern re-make of a 60s TV series of the same name.

      --
      And they that rule in England, In stately conclave met, Alas, alas for England They have no graves as yet.
    6. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Baker did some voices on the FireWarrior game that was recently released. It was exactly the same as HALO, but not as lame.

    7. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by miniRMS · · Score: 1

      as an ex-monk, I think this is a part tailor-made for him R

    8. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      He does the voice over for the superb "Little Britain" series too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by g_attrill · · Score: 1

      Fort Boyard isn't a rip-off as such, it was created by Jacques Antoine who also created The Crystal Maze at around the same time (1990). The same chap also devised Treasure Hunt, Interceptor and a few other excellent shows.

      Gareth

    10. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      some years ago he wrote an excellent autobiography, Who on Earth Is Tom Baker?

      recommended not only for Doctor freaks, it's very funny and shows him to be a perceptive man.

    11. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by brianerst · · Score: 1
      He's been in a number of British TV shows since then (the longest running of which was Medics, a sort of Brit ER) and has recently joined the cast of "Monarch of the Glen", which is a fairly popular show set in Scotland (I think it's currently in its sixth season).

      He's also does the voiceover work for Little Britain (hilarious), has written a number of books (The Boy Who Kicked Pigs), done theater work and been in some truly awful movies (Dungeons and Dragons).

      You could always check out his official website.

    12. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Baker did the voiceovers for a truly mediocre game, _Hostile Waters_, five or six years ago. Bit strange to hear his disembodied voice booming from my PC speakers.

    13. Re:Douglass Adams wrote for Dr. Who by Jbrecken · · Score: 1

      In addition to the other sightings mentioned, Tom Baker appeared on a regular basis in a cultish British TV series called 'Randall And Hopkirk Deceased', a modern re-make of a 60s TV series of the same name.

      BBC America has been running that lately as part of their "Mystery Monday" block.

  28. Re:No but can I call you a... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    If there's anything more pathetic than somebody that bothers to post to correct another posters spelling, it's someone who tries but is incorrect.

  29. Re:No but can I call you a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE CAN BE NOTHING OUTSIDE OF AMERICA.

    WE ARE U-S.

    SPELING IS FUTILE.

    --
    ClJlYXNvbjogRG9uJ3QgdXNlIHNvIG1hbnkgY2Fwcy4g SXQncy BsaWtlIFlBTExBLVlBTExB
    LgpSZWFzb246IERvbid0IHVzZS BzbyBtYW55IGNhcHMuIEl0J3 MgbGlrZSBZQUxMQS1ZQUxM
    QS4KUmVhc29uOiBEb24ndCB1c2 Ugc28gbWFueSBjYXBzLiBJdC dzIGxpa2UgWUFMTEEtWUFM
    TEEuCg==

  30. Dalek = Nazi ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh, in case anyone was wondering...the Daleks were modelled after the Nazis, kinda like Godzilla was the personification of nuclear danger for the post-nagasaki japanese.

    Anyway, as memories of WW2 were still "fresh" with the poms the daleks really struck a chord in 1960'2 viewers I expect. Anyway, for the terminally stupid, here goes:

    Daleks are the master race
    Inferior races must be subjugated or EX-TER-MINAT-ED....
    They have the out-thrust right arm (think Nazi salute)
    It's a funny ol' world huh ?

  31. sheesh by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    http://webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Diction ary&va=skeptical&x=15&y=9 So I wouldn't say I'm incorrect and this is Slashdot and meant to be a jovial harrassment that might pass for humour around geeks. Now one cares about spleling here and you might have noticed by mis-spleling of "spelling" in my post? Whats realy pathetic is that in criticise his spelling I used terrible incoherent grammar: " No but can I call you a you a bad spleler? ". Now it might not have been great but here we accept and mod up inane posts. Would you really have preferred a "In Soviet Russia imagine a cluster of skeptics." Kudos to the fellow/fellowette who pointed out "sceptical" is valid in British spelling.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    1. Re:sheesh by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      Drop it. You were incorrect in saying it was the wrong spelling. I didn't say you spelt(spelled) it incorrectly. You were just wrong in saying that someone else had. Yes, the spelling with a C is the correct *English* spelling... and this being a thread about a quintessentially British sci-fi series it's more even more appropriate than ever to spell it that way.

      Suggest you also avoid getting your knickers in a twist about words that look like they should have a "z" in them, but actually have an "s".

    2. Re:sheesh by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      avoid getting your knickers in a twist"
      That's "cniccers" to you Brits.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  32. Scary? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    This means that I'll definitely be watching.. although whether from behind the sofa or not remains to be seen.
    I always thought that the main appeal of the Daleks was their campiness, not their scariness. I mean jeez, if you need to escape them, you just have to look for a non-flat surface!
    1. Re:Scary? by Scrab · · Score: 1

      Not true - the Daleks did evolve to go on non-flat surfaces, including being able to hover up a flight of stairs....

      Now...nowhere is safe......

      ARGH!

      --
      RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  33. Slashdot being consistent as usual by BigBadBus · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Would someone mind telling me why, when I posted this yesterday afternoon (Wednesday, about 4.00pm GMT) it was rejected, but now here it is, after someone else posted the story hours after I did so?

    Perhaps its just favouritism, preferring stories from preferred sources?

    1. Re:Slashdot being consistent as usual by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Because the hate you personally, you and your stupid bus.

      or Maybe they get lots, and lots of submissions, so may in fact, it basically is a random drawing of whose gets picked.

      naw, they must hate you.

      It's not like you get anything. Of course I have had 1/2 dozen of my submission selected.
      Isn't that cool? no, actualy it's not. should you care? no.

      Maybe I should put that on my resume?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Slashdot being consistent as usual by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

      yeah, that's how slashdot works, unless your a fanboy your subs get rejected, mysteriously to appear scant hours later with someone else's name attached to them.

      slashdot is becoming ever more irellevant as time passes, it's gone from being my "first coffee and cigarette while reading slashdot" morning wake up to "ok, 30 minutes to kill, been to ebay, trawled usenet, lets see what stories slashdot is repeating today."

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  34. Maybe the new series will address.... by solios · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... how the Daleks became such a threat when they CAN'T WALK UP STAIRS OR LADDERS.

    That always boggled the heck out of me.

    1. Re:Maybe the new series will address.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware! Daleks can levitate.

      Watch "Remembrance of the Daleks"

    2. Re:Maybe the new series will address.... by keefey · · Score: 1

      The new ones have been designed by Segway*

      *note - not actually true

    3. Re:Maybe the new series will address.... by zennor · · Score: 2, Informative

      As all Who devotees should know the last series with the Daleks, "Remembrance of the Daleks" finally showed them moving up stairs to get out of a cellar. They used a hover/rocket-type mechanism from my hazy memory. This htus totally wrecked my favourite cartoon from "Punch" magazine. This had the daleks at the bottom of a set of stairs. The head Dalek said: "Well.. that certainly bu**ers our plans for universal conquest!"

    4. Re:Maybe the new series will address.... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      On Skaro, all buildings are Handicapped Accessible.

    5. Re:Maybe the new series will address.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Buggers" is obscene now? Too bad you brits will never be able to read Ender's Game.

  35. Star Wars Syndrome by tezza · · Score: 1
    The Terry Nation estate was worried about diluting the Daleks' brand. It is my fear that the BBC writers may Lucas them into laughable infamy. I'm sure the BBC solved this problem with £££ and not editorial guarantees.

    White coloured 'good Dalek' converts from Evil to save the day at the last minute, sacrificing itself at the same time. [Shudder]

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    1. Re:Star Wars Syndrome by cfuse · · Score: 1
      The Terry Nation estate was worried about diluting the Daleks' brand. It is my fear that the BBC writers may Lucas them into laughable infamy.

      Mee'sah wanna exterminate.

  36. Gay Dalek cartoon?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say this story in the Guardian:
    [Guardian.co.uk]

    "Last month Tim Hancock, agent for the Terry Nation estate, alleged that the BBC had tried to commission a cartoon series about gay Daleks for BBC Three. "We want to protect the integrity of the brand," he said."

    Oh exterrrrrrr-minate darrrr-lings! What the hell would they be, limp plunger-ed?

    1. Re:Gay Dalek cartoon?!? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      The Gay Daleks have already appeared in the Channel 4 series TV Offal, and it's creator, Victor Lewis-Smith wanted to bring them back, but failed to get the rights to use the Daleks (how he got them the first time is a mystery).

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    2. Re:Gay Dalek cartoon?!? by evilandi · · Score: 1
      failed to get the rights to use the Daleks (how he got them the first time is a mystery)

      He didn't get them first time, which pissed off Terry Nation's estate no end, hence why the new negotiations took so long. Sure, they're control freaks, but they've learned that if they don't take control, they end up with shoddy parodies, and it's a short walk from there to panto.

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  37. Hopefully... by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Billie Piper will be the first to get exterminated ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Hopefully... by keefey · · Score: 1

      Hopefully she'll explode as she bursts into a manic frenzy of "cos we want to! cos we want to!"

  38. Who are the Daleks? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    For those of us who don't have any clue what Doctor Who is except for a vague idea, could someone please give a little bit of backstory on the Daleks, what they are, some links to pictures perhaps, etc? Thanks.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Who are the Daleks? by doctorwhofan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the best guide to who the Daleks are, is probably the Dalek entry on this page: http://www.lofficier.com/dwudd.html There are loads of Doctor Who sites with pictures of Daleks, but this is the Dalek gallery on the official Doctor Who site: http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/doctorwho/gallery/dalek/

    2. Re:Who are the Daleks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try www.bbc.co.uk under Cult TV. The Daleks are a species of monocular, slim like aliens which travel around in metallic machines equipped with life support, weapons, computers, etc. Their "travel machines" look like giant salt and pepper shakers. The Daleks evolved from a race of humanoids called Kaleds ("Genesis of the Daleks")from the planet Skaro. Due to the use of biological and radiological weapons in a 1000 war against another race of humandoids, the Thals,the Kaleds mutated into the Dalek form. The Kaleds were overtly represented as psuedo Nazis, and the Thals as more democratic, hence the irony of Nazis motivated by race pride degenerating into nasty slimy blobs.

  39. Good Old Tom by garethwi · · Score: 1

    Was also the narrator for the pretty damned funny BBC comedy series Little Britain.

    1. Re:Good Old Tom by keefey · · Score: 1

      And that show is just the funnier (and the more brilliant) for having him in it. His voice is possibly one of the most distinctive on modern TV. "Yeah, I know"

    2. Re:Good Old Tom by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      He's also been on the Radio 4 programme, Dead Ringers. He was phoned up by their Doctor Who impersonator - and he reacted brilliantly.

      You can listen to it here.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  40. omg! dalek pron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Today only... :P~~~~~~

    1. Re:omg! dalek pron! by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      That dalek doesn't look to be too unhappy about the way the girl on the right is "grasping" him.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:omg! dalek pron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eeeejaculaaate, eejaculaaaate!!!!

  41. If only there were by geekoid · · Score: 1

    some device..that was connected to a bunch of other similiar devices.. and one of those devices, could search the others for 'content'... based on a 'searching criteria'.
    I should patent that! naaa it would never catch on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. Thatcherism across time and space by evilandi · · Score: 5, Funny


    The BBC has broken the strike over terms and conditions for the Daleks. Apparently the Cybermen began crossing the picket lines in unmarked coaches, while the Daleks pelted them with rotten fruit, shouting "SCABS ... WE ... KNOW ... WHERE ... YOU ... LIVE".

    As part of the deal, thirty-seven gravel pits will close.

    An Equity union representative, speaking of behalf of the Daleks, said "This is a sad time for the Daleks, but at the end of the day, they have bills to pay, and the electricity for the genetic embryo chambers doesn't come cheap."

    The strike-busting Cybermen are understood to have had their contracts terminated early in favour of the new hovering Dalek Battletank design, previously only seen in paperback. The Cyberman leader said "THE DALEKS MAY HAVE WON THIS BATTLE BUT OUR EMPIRE WILL CONTINUE TO EXPAND."

    Meanwhile a dispute is believed to have broken out inside the Dalek camp, with the Supreme Dalek unhappy at the terms negotiated by Davros. In a news conference earlier, Davros said "This marks the next generation of the Kaled race. We have evolved beyond rails, beyond wheels, beyond low-budget bluescreen CGI hovering awkwardly up stairs. Although I'm sorry to see Ace go, she was rather fit, wasn't she, and she still looks hot in those childrens' programmes she presents."

    The Supreme Dalek was unavailable for comment, although he was earlier overheard saying "I ... HOPE ... DAVROS ... LIKES ... HOSPITAL ... FOOD."

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Thatcherism across time and space by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      The BBC has broken the strike over terms and conditions for the Daleks....

      And in late breaking news, the CBC has decided to franchise Dr. Who from the BBC. Their first episode, "The Dalek Invasion of Detroit".

      Watch Daleks swarm the Ambassador Bridge, zapping toll keepers on the way.

      Watch Daleks ride the elevator to the top of the Ren Cen!

      Watch Daleks runing amok through a vast urban wasteland.

      (True to movie tradition it will actually be shot in Dallas.)

    2. Re:Thatcherism across time and space by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      (True to movie tradition it will actually be shot in Dallas.)

      Actually, some of the new series is being shot with Cardiff standing in for London (the series is being produced by BBC Wales). Although they are doing some London shooting, probably due to Cardiff's lack of London landmarks.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:Thatcherism across time and space by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Watch the Daleks wake up the next morning to find themselves stripped and up on blocks.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  43. Animated Dr. Who series by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone checked out the animated Dr. Who series on the web? The Master ends up being revived as a new robot assistant for the Doctor, kind of like a new K-9. I haven't followed all of Dr. Who, but I presume this meant the Master was killed off at some point. It's an interesting twist and I wonder if they will carry this kind of thing into the new series for some kind of continuity.

    1. Re:Animated Dr. Who series by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I checked it out.

      And that animation isn't going to be canon as it's going to be a different 9th doctor completely. I didn't like that animation/story anyway.

    2. Re:Animated Dr. Who series by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      But did they kill off the Master for good? I presumed that was the reason they had him as a robot.

    3. Re:Animated Dr. Who series by wolverine1999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Master took a new body in the tv movie (Doctor Who: The Movie) with McGann as the 8th Doctor Who. At the end of the movie, the Master is sucked into the Eye of Harmony (the TARDIS' power source). We don't know if he is still alive, or dead, so that's the state of the Master. Of course, the Master appeared very much alive in the BBC Novels with the 8th Doctor, but I don't whether the new tv show producers will take the books as canon. I'd rather they wouldn't, since Gallifrey was destroyed by the Doctor himself in the books (and he doesn't remember it to make it worse!).

  44. Daleks? Who needs the Daleks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Bring back the Zarbi, Menoptra and the venom Grub. Now they did scare me!

    My dads hair brush became a Venom Grub and my 'Action Man' got it in the neck for days afterwards!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/doctorwho/gallery/monste rs1/webplanet2.shtml

    Ok, I was only 4 years old......;-)

  45. Re:I could never get into it (If I wanted to) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the BBC... NEVER shows Dr.Who anymore! (Think no repeats since series finshed)

    Except on special charity occasions etc...

    Apart from those [Few] shows, I've actually seen more Dr.Who on "Channel 4", I.e. the FILMS!!!

    .

    (PS I'm English, which adds to the strangeness as I don't know which BBC you guys have been watching :) )

  46. Please learn how to make links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Please learn how to make links.
    <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/tv/littlebrita in/about_the_show.shtml">Little Britain</a>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: Little Britain

    If that's too much typing for you,
    <URL:http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/tv/littlebritai n/about_the_show.shtml>
    (without any spaces put there by Slashdot) yields: http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/tv/littlebritain/abo ut_the_show.shtml
  47. It never was. by wiredog · · Score: 1

    lashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

    It's been 16 seconds since you hit 'reply'.

    Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

  48. Re:No but can I call you a... by isorox · · Score: 1

    No but can I call you a you a bad spleler?

    Those that live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.

  49. Is it just me? by DikSeaCup · · Score: 2, Funny
    .. although whether from behind the sofa or not remains to be seen.

    I think it's common geek issue that they can see all the threads of thought so quickly that, to non-geeks, often their comments seem as non-sequitrs, until the comment is explained.

    That being said, is it just me or did anyone else suddenly get the image of the article poster running around with a baseball bat, smashing aluminum trash cans and anything else that looked remotely like a Dalek?

  50. Re:No but can I call you a... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    shouldn't...

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  51. Re:I could never get into it (If I wanted to) by IceFreak2000 · · Score: 1

    Well, the BBC do show Dr. Who regularly - every Saturday and Sunday morning on UK Gold (which as part of the UK TV network is jointly owned by the BBC and Flextech Television).

    I've been happily re-enjoying the Tom Baker years for the past few months, although we're now into the Peter Davison tenure so things are starting to go downhill. I'll stop watching again as soon as Bonnie 'Annoying Twat' Langford makes her appearance (much as I did the first time around).

    --
    Life is like a sewer; what you get out of it depends on what you put into it...
  52. I can't be the only Python fanatic here by noims · · Score: 3, Funny

    We previously reported on the apparent exterminate-ion of the lovable pepperpots from this new version.

    Am I the only one here who first thought of Monty Python pepperpots when I saw this? You know, the 'middle aged, middle class women' who first demonstrated that you can't tell the difference between Wizzo butter and a dead crab.

    The most disturbing thing for me was trying to figure out where these pepperpots might have appeared. I mean, on one hand they'd certainly make a powerful adversary for the poor doctor, but on the other hand can't you just see a couple of them following him around as sidekicks?

    - Look, Mrs Conclusion! The Cybermen and Daleks have united againstus!
    - Oooh! Well I never. And they used to be such nice people. I mean, society today. Young people. Ooooh. Tut tut tut.

    Noims

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
    1. Re:I can't be the only Python fanatic here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr Who is showing on Australian TV currently.

      Those 'companions' always seem to me to be the person the Doctor goes to be with at night.

  53. Re:Dalek = Nazi ! MOD this UP by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    MOD this up. It's true. The orginal Klingons looked an acted like WW2 Jap's as well. The original Star Wars had WW2 written on it as well.

  54. Next Years Movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alien vs Predator vs Daleks?

  55. Me too by Joe+'Nova' · · Score: 1

    Dr. "derringdo" Who made me the geek I am today. The driving force behind Tom Baker was Doug Adams, no really, read the credits.(the scarf was the work of someone who didn't know the yarn ball could be cut at the end!)
    I liked Tom Baker as the wise cracking doctor with bravado in the face of sticky situations, "Adrik, I'll allow you to scream bloody chaos in a situation like this, but if I do, where would we be?"
    'Scared Doctor?'
    "Petrified..."

    "Ramana, you put a hole in my tardis controls..."

    He saw things logically and whimsically at the same time. I fear the plot factory writers will ruin a childhood memory by trying to use formulas for success. It was his unorthadox approaches that make me a much better programmer(I turn maticies row-column because I self taught), and taught me not to apply standard approaches. He had pinache! Show me a SciFi character that has wit and intellect.
    Yeah, I'll miss him too.

    --
    This mind intentionally left blank.
    The KKK a bunch of sheetheads? You decide!
  56. Tom Baker by kabz · · Score: 1

    Tom Baker also did a hilarious appearance as the Sea Captain in Blackadder.

    "You have a woman's hands, mi'lord !!"

    Man, I laughed til I cried, that was so over the top. Well worth tracking down. I think the episode is called Potato.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  57. Let's hope they keep the music scarey... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember cowering behind the couch everytime Dr. Who came on when I was a kid. The Daleks belong in Who, this is good news indeed. Now if only they go back to the scarey Dr. Who music we'll be set.

  58. What Dr Who really needs... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    ... is a Jar Jar Binks character.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  59. Welcome by DrWho520 · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our new Dalek overlords.

    C'mon, with this user name, you knew I was going to comment sometime.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
  60. Golden Voyage of Sinbad too by bobalu · · Score: 1

    I just happened to drag out my laserdisc of that last night, forgot completely that Tom Baker played the bad guy sorcerer. Add in great Ray Harryhousen effects and the fabulous Caroline Monroe, and you can't go wrong.

    My favorite line: "Abdul, for someone who likes the hashish so much you should be more at peace with yourself."

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  61. Re:I could never get into it (If I wanted to) by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    PS I'm English, which adds to the strangeness as I don't know which BBC you guys have been watching

    It used to air on some independant stations back when I was a kid (early to mid 80s), I think it was WWOR out of New York. I'm in Pennsylvania, but that was a staple in our cable programming back in the days when there were only 36 cable stations.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  62. Daleks have lips? by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

    Who knew

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  63. Dahleks were Borg, not cyberman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cyberman? Come now, they are a joke! The daleks look a bit silly, I admit, but not nearly as silly as the cybermen!

    Maybe the daleks can get a new look - sticking true to their origin as basically mobility suits for the gooey creatures inside. The plunger was a bit silly - they could make it work if they design the dahlek vehicles to accept that "plug", but that makes you ask, "why not go wireless?". An slightly more useful arm or set of arms are in order for manipulating the world outside of their cities/ships. Many arms like FX-7 from Empire Strikes back is an idea (that medical robot who worked on Luke).

    Eyes on stalks are fine, I suppose, but not with an 80 percent blind spot at all times! They need two eyes placed on the top of the dome, instead of those silly lights/bumpy things, so they can see in all directions at once. The basic dome shame should not change, however. Wheels are efficient. The idea of using slave labor to get into areas without paved roads is also cool and adds spice to the stories. I do think they should have a "leg module" which they can ride onto - something like those walking hologram generators in SW Episode 1 perhaps.

    The dahleks were the original Borg. Without political ambitions and so forth - just out to conquer everything in sight - the cyberman hardly qualify.

    With very slight tweaks to nullify the "wtf" factor, daleks can be modernized and made a very cool villain, remaining true to their basic shape/design.

    1. Re:Dahleks were Borg, not cyberman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?

      Poster call the daleks the original borg, in a post mentioning cybermen???

      I'm sorry, you're just nuts.

      Plot refresher: Cybermen kidnapped humans, implanted them with machinery, and enslaved them into the collective consciousness of the cybermen.

      The borg basically were cybermen for the 90s, without the absurdly silly teapot-head costumes.

  64. Kissy, kissy, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they'll pose some of the Doctor's lithe young 'assistant's naked on a Dalek for publicity shots?

  65. I missed that ep by fm6 · · Score: 1

    That makes no sense. If they could do that, then they'd have to be shown doing it -- and where is the BBC going to find that budget for something like that?

  66. Your wish is my command... by Scrab · · Score: 1

    http://www.fact-index.com/d/da/dalek.html

    Check out the second paragraph - it's got the title of the episode in it.... :)

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
    1. Re:Your wish is my command... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed that the Beeb actually found the budget for a levitating Dalek. But I don't find the fact interesting enough to actually watch the episode!