Smart Glass Blocks Infrared - But Only When It's Hot
klevin writes "New Scientist has an article about a new way of making sheets of glass so they block infrared energy at temperatures above 29C (84.2F). Just so long as it doesn't have to get that hot on both sides of the glass. My AC comes on way before 84F. I suppose that with double or triple paned glass, you'd only treat the exterior pane."
How's that yellow tint going to look where indoor light is already greenish from fluorescent lighting? Will we walk outside and everything will look pink or purple? Fun!
Hopefully in three years they'll give some answers to these questions and more. I've got a couple windows, but we've got no air conditioning and the heat reflects off an earthen bank, most of the heat comes through the walls.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
This will severely hamper my illicit recordings of my neighbors having sex using my hidden wireless camera.
Sounds very similar to Ceramic window tinting film that is found on cars
[n8.r0n] http://petesweb.spymac.net/
If this technology comes out, a good application is to use it in cars (especially in hot areas).
How's that yellow tint going to look
Oh, that's easy, the opposite of yellow is blue, just use blue glass!
(sidenote: I guess there's a new geek test out on how to actually post to this story... the Read More link being wrong and everything...)
84 degrees actually is pretty comfortable for people in the south, especially if it's going to be a dry 84 degrees, which air conditioning can help with. This can be useful, if it's not as expensive as gold, and if it really works as advertised, for people living in dry climates (read: desert southwest) who don't want to run A/C bills through the roof.
That said, I recall that while a significant percentage of heat comes from solar energy through windows... when the house is sitting in a 110 degree plain, it may not be quite as good as first thought.
-Rob
Marriage doesn't have to suck!
Cool!
The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
I don't see how you *add* dye to get the coating to let in the light that the coating is currently blocking...
Linux IT Consulting and Domino Development in Michigan
Next step is glass that turns transparent to visible light when it's hot, for example, a bathroom window what turns transparent when a hot woman (or a hot man) gets on the other side...
The yellow tint issue would have to be definitively solved before this stuff could be used on vehicles, due to some states not allowing certain colors of window tinting (red and yellow, probably reasoning that that would lower the visibility of emergency vehicles and caution lights).
How about some electronics grounding that vanadium dioxide? If set up right, when the VO2 transitions to "metallic" above 29C, the panel's photoelectric effect could harness the solar power now more highly available. That in turn could power other devices, like awnings, vent covers, or even fans, to mitigate the heat, using the sun's power against itself.
--
make install -not war
three panes of glass, separated by a short distance each. pump warm air into the two gaps. The middle glass is this infrared blocker dealy.
Or, if only one side needed to be warmed, use two panes instead of three with a small gap. The exterior pane is the infrared blocker. When it's cool outside or the window is shaded, pump warm air into the gap between panes.
IANACE
The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
An interesting combination would be to incorporate it into a photosentive dye (photogrey?) like sunglasses. When it gets brighter, it gets darker. It would be useful in keeping rooms or cars from getting too bright.
Fight Spammers!
Yellow tint, ew, but as for the Vanadium, if you have a double paned window, treat the inner side of the outer pane. No leakage or exposure to Vanadium, unless you break the glass. And no exposure to H2S rain.
If you've got heat coming through the walls, just get some old-fashioned IR reflectors -- Aluminum Foil! Put it up to reflect heat away from your walls, and maybe an old fan to blow the heat off of it. Oh, and ripple it. Your very own House Heat Sink. Overclock your house!
Moo.
While the lowering of heat-causing agents is noble, the better scientific path (IMO) is to grab this energy and use it to power the home (solar).
Spend time and effort developing more efficient, resilient, and less-expensive tech on solar energy and every new house could be roofed with 100% solar tiles. These homes could even GENERATE enough exess energy to sell back to the grid, which would help every income level.
'Zero' dependence on energy businesses could be a very real thing for homes (oh the humanity)...
This is wonderful, and a step in the right direction to be sure. I was actually just pondering if this kind of thing was possible the other day. Unfortunatly, buildings are still made like huge heat syncs. This is because a flat surface has a very poor surface area to volume ratio, other sky scraper shapes, such as cylinders, are even worse. R. Buckminster Fuller explains this in his Critical Path. What really elucidates this is he says if we theoretically covered all the buildings from 20th to 80th St, I think it was, in Manhatten with one large dome we would decrease the surface area exposed to the elements by a factor of 84. Consequently, it would take 1/84th of the energy to heat and cool the environment.
~Anztac
Most of the heat that comes into your house will do so by conduction from the air by the window to the glass to the air by the window, then get carried around by convection. It won't get in by radiation, so IR-proof glass will have only a small effect. If you have double glazing then you have a hefty heat buffer between your house and your environment anyway, and the buffering effect is large enough to render any conduction heat exchange negligible. What it *might* do, however, is stop your neighbours from changing the channel on your TV.
Sweet, now I won't feel so bad when I leave Grandma in the car on a hot day with the windows rolled up.
I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!
Usually it's that heavy stuff that can withstand the direct impact of a pigeon (no sparrow jokes, please.)
Good firewall against IP by carrier pigeon.
Won't this interfere with the thermal imaging cameras fire departments use to find people in fires?
Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
It seems to me that it would make more sense to come up with a roofing material that blocked infrared above a certain temperature. For example, I'm sure that my house gains far more heat from having the dark roof sitting out in the hot sun all day than it does from the windows. It would be *really* cool if someone set something up that would absorb IR in the winter (like a dark roof) but not in the summer (light roof). Still, I guess windows are better than nothing.
As a side benefit you won't have to wear your tin foil hat inside anymore!
May the source be with you!
Imagine living in Nevada, where you get sun for more than 300 days a year, and most of those days are high quality 90F or higher sun.
A solar home can only use so much.
A trombe wall can only absorb so much.
Even the new 10% transparent solar collectors can only do so much.
What do you do with the excess heat?
You run evaporative coolers and AC.
The only other way to shed the excess heat is to absorb it (ala these panes or burying the house underground) or redirect it, with things like geothermal heat pumps.
GPL Deconstructed
... for the old ways of construction. 3 foot thick earth-type walls, low deep overhangs for shade. Maybe those old original settlers in the southwest weren't as backwards as we think, just because they didn't have cheap electricity.......
What happens to all that infrared energy that isn't being absorbed by the interior of the building anymore? Is it absorbed by the glass/film iteself and then dissapated by conduction or convection with other nearby materials like air, glass and steel or is it reflected back outside to make other buildings and surfaces and stuff even hotter?
"Lawyers are for sucks."
- Doug McKenzie
Visible light comes through the window and is absorbed by materials which start radiating that energy as IR. Auto glass is better at transmission of visible light than IR, so inside of car gets hotter. If true, it would help to have better IR transmission than to limit IR transmission.
Ask me about my vow of silence!
And since you're thinking it, that means they already got you. You're compromised. We can't have you at the meetings anymore. Er, I mean, what meetings?
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
One of the reasons rooms get so hot is that ordinary glass is already blocking a lot of infrared--from getting out. Non-infrared (ordinary visible) light comes through easily and strikes whatever is inside. In doing so, it heats it, so a portion of the visible light is converted to infrared. But, since the glass isn't very permeable to infrared, it can't get out, so the inside space heats up.
This innovation will make it even harder for infrared to get out, but it also reduces the infrared that gets in. So the question is whether the inside heats up more with visible light converted to infrared that can't get out at all, or visible plus some infrared converted to even more infrared that can get out a little bit.
I suppose they've done the experiment, but it's not obvious to me which one would be superior or by how much.
"Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
If I am right about this, then cars would be exactly where you don't want this stuff.
Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
I've worked in the glass industry for over three years, acutally for one of the direct competitors of the people (Pilkington) who came up with this. Coating glass almost always (90% of the time) requires an insulated (two lites of glass) unit. The coating goes on the inner surface because it is easy to scratch the coating off, and since its a near vaccum inside insulated units they don't have to worry about what ambient conditions will do to the coating. Now the yellow tint will be a non-issue come production time. It realy will be either applying it to glass that is already tinted to cancel out the yellow or they'll modify the formula to get it to appear clear. And the fact that it eventually wears out will either be adjusted for in the R&D process (not likely, too expensive), or offering some kind of warranty on it. It is cheaper to re-produce because of the scale of glass plants, than it would be for the R&D to get another year or two of useful life. The process of coating itself is very very interesting. They pretty much ionize particles to bond at a molecular level to the glass. It's a niche field, but one that is very lucrative because there are not that many people in it. And as far as costs are concerned, it should be rather cheap. Glass itself costs around 1-5 cents (US) per squarefoot. A float glass plant produces around 650 tons of glass a day. The process is really really efficient.
In Tokyo, law requires large buildings to have roof gardens to prevent the roofs from getting so hot. Plants will use that energy to grow, instead of letting that energy hit concrete, metal, etc and become heat. Its estimated that tokyo would be 10 degrees hotter on average without the roof gardens.
The article just says "blocks" If the glass blocks by absorbing IR then this would be a problem in double pane windows. The outer pane (or is it lite?) would become dramatically hotter and would expand more than inner one. This could break the seal between the two sheets and release any enclosed gas (argon fill is commonly used to reduce convective currents that transfer heat) as well as allow moisture in causing fogging. This was apparently a problem with some do it some do-it-yourself window tints. I don't know much chemistry but they say it's metal-like above transition temp so maybe that means it reflects. BTW I have now idea why Argon would reduce convective currents. Anyone know? I just know that lower convection is a property of heavy gasses
Of course, red tinting limits little, if any, red. It could make it harder to distinguish red from white. BLUE light is attenuated; green might look kinda dull yellowish.
OTOH, A sharp blue tint could make red and yellow (emergency) lights difficult to see... up to invisible if one got legalistic about the wording I saw on a Kansas website. If I were to ban any color for safety reasons, it'd surely be blue.
Perhaps Kansas's lawmakers reasoned that we'd evolve our way around their apparent stupidity. =^>
"Inquiring Minds Want to Know!"
Good for your neighbourhood grow house. Police Choppers with infared cameras fly overhead in search of heat blooms from grow houses. If it blocks it coming in, should block it going out too.
No sig... For shame.
Vanadium is a common alloying element in steel. The two MSDS pages I found indicate that the powdered oxide isn't very good to breathe or eat, but the amount released by breaking a window is probably so small that you wouldn't notice. The biggest hazard would be to people working in the manufacture of such windows.
Sustainability and energy independence essay
"Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
Sustainability and energy independence essay
It's even more lopsided than that, because the IR coming in and going out are so wildly different in wavelength. The IR coming into the car from the Sun is around 7000-14000 angstroms, where glass is reasonably clear; in the wavelengths radiated by objects around 300-400 Kelvin, glass is opaque. (If you wear glasses with glass lenses, look at your image in a thermal camera sometime. They will look cold while your face looks warm; the thermal IR from your skin and eyes does not go through them.)
Sustainability and energy independence essay
First off light will still get through, but, onto the the main problem of the parent's post (not really a problem, it was modded funny): anyone who has ever played with the keychain ring of tinted plastic in kindergarden knows that with the parent's solution, you get green. The appropriate color to achieve a colorless tint would be purple, as it, not blue, is the "opposite" color of yellow.
--
WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?