Slashdot Mirror


BSA Asks Kids to Name Copyright Weasel

theodp writes "According to CNET News, this fall, 4th-graders will not only be treated to comic books and lesson plans from the Business Software Alliance and Weekly Reader, but also invited to name the BSA's mascot, a copyright-crusading ferret who teaches tech-savvy kids about the importance of protecting and respecting copyrighted works such as software, music, games and movies. More details in the BSA press release."

157 of 828 comments (clear)

  1. Lemmiwinks! by SteroidMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because that ferret is destined to go on a long dark journey!

    1. Re:Lemmiwinks! by crimethinker · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner. The contest is now closed. Thanks for playing.

      Seriously, though, I'm not sure where the joke ends and the reality begins. They're going to have an animal mascot to teach kids about their (the BSA's) view of copyright? It works for breakfast cereal ("They're gRRRRRRReat!") so I guess it will work for getting kids to rat out their friends for mod-chipping an x-box.

      However, they seem to be forgetting something from their school years - NOBODY likes a snitch. Most of the kids who have x-boxes or similar consoles at home are keenly aware of how the price of a game compares to their weekly allowance, and their reaction to seeing a chipped console would most likely be "cool, where can I get one, too?"

      -paul

      --
      Pistol caliber is like religion: everyone has their favourite, and theirs is the only right choice.
    2. Re:Lemmiwinks! by nkh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's get a Photoshop expert to draw a lot of pictures featuring this thing in different situations like: the ferret modding his PS2, the ferret giving the finger or the ferret writing C code. (and I'm really serious about this)

    3. Re:Lemmiwinks! by nkh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate to answer my own posts but you MUST download this and this!

    4. Re:Lemmiwinks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! Slashdot the BSA! Let's not set up a torrent for this one, they should have plenty of bandwidth.

    5. Re:Lemmiwinks! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about a picture of the weasel getting the shit beat out of him because snitches are bitches and deserve to get stitches.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Lemmiwinks! by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ummm.... why does the BSA have a file named "young_girl.mpg"?

      Yea... Kazaa scared the shit out of me some time ago... I'm not clicking that one.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    7. Re:Lemmiwinks! by marco0009 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I guess it will work for getting kids to rat out their friends for mod-chipping an x-box.
      Fortunately, chipping in of itself is not illegal, it's the use of most of the modded BIOS's which are made from hijacked XDK code. There are a few legitimate BIOS files available (Cromwell for instance) that use of does not violate any law or copyright issue. It's been a while since I've been in the X-box modding scene so things might have changed, but I doubt it.
      --
      Physics makes the world go 'round.
    8. Re:Lemmiwinks! by xQx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How long until we get some new slogans from the BSA... I've got some really effective ones lined up:

      - Pirating music causes lung cancer
      - Copying videos will harm your unborn child
      - Stealing music harms others

      Stopped everyone from smoking didn't it?

    9. Re:Lemmiwinks! by empaler · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of my friends work in a 7-11.
      One day, when a customer asked for a pack of smokes, she was asked to get the other (nearly identical) pack, that was behind the one she'd gotten initially.
      Why? It said "Smoking damages fertility" and she didn't want any more children. My friend was so taken aback by this that he didn't really say anything to her, he just sold her the pack.

    10. Re:Lemmiwinks! by paganizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If we lived in a society of Just, Sensible, Minimal laws it would probably be pretty nice.
      I don't see that happening anytime soon.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    11. Re:Lemmiwinks! by glyph42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the end of the video it draws the letters "BSA" on the screen, one at a time. Quite fittingly, my connection failed just as it finished drawing "BS".

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  2. Abraham Lincoln said... by quizwedge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    something to the effect of The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation is the philosophy of the government in the next. This seems a good way for organizations to get laws changed in their favor.

    --
    I have no .sig
    1. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But did he mean about what children are taught, or the emotions of those kids?

      Is the war on drugs being won? Or is it just the case that the politicians know it's a waste of time but fear a backlash right now? Give it 30 years, the War on Drugs will be thought of as a really bad idea like prohibition.

    2. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by allism · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, the DARE program worked really well as an example...

      Seems to me that teaching this in the schools gives the kids something to rebel against later.

    3. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      ehm, aren't the laws already in their favor?(copyright extensions & etc which really only help big organizations who own big amounts of _old_ materia that was actually fucking cheap to produce back in the day with actors working on monthly wage and so on..)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by IronMagnus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... the current administration is geared towards bringing government down to record low levels (military excluded). They're using a 'starve the beast' tactict where, by making taxes sound bad, the public want less taxes. Unfortunately what happens is the taxes get reduced on the rich and what burden is left is shifted towards the poor. As revenue goes down, so must government programs, eventually reducing the size of the government. Paul Krugman talks about it quite well: http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml?displayValue= day&todayDate=09/10/2003

    5. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give it 30 years, the War on Drugs will be thought of as a really bad idea like prohibition.

      Except that if you say it outloud, you'll be arrested for being a terrorist.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by BigAl_nz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drugs Are Really Excellent.

      N.B. a cop told me that one :)

      --
      --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
    7. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... the current administration is geared towards bringing government down to record low levels (military excluded).

      Are you fucking kidding me? As a Libertarian, I find this hilarious. "Starve the beast"? Where exactly is the beast starving? Bush has yet to veto a single spending bill. The Republicans in Congress, along with the Democrats, have only spent more and more.

      Unfortunately what happens is the taxes get reduced on the rich and what burden is left is shifted towards the poor.

      Yeah. Which poor, the ones that don't pay any taxes, or the ones that are getting tax "credits"?

      The upper tier pay almost all the taxes, and receive very few social program benefits. The reason why tax breaks help the rich the most is because THEY PAY THE MOST IN TAXES.

      http://freshair.npr.org/day_fa.jhtml?displayValue= day&todayDate=09/10/2003

      Ahh yes, a Fresh Air link from NPR, a real bastion of central thinking. How's about I post some far right links and we can waste even more time?

      Reduce taxes. Reduce spending. Return the government to its intended role of upholding the Constitution.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    8. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by pgnas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I will teach my childen morality, thank you.

      The last thing I want is my child's views to be formed based on someones money motivated opinion. What is next? Are my children going to be "Treated" to school bags with the drug company logos on them? I beleive that it is not far off, if it is not happening already.

      I do not encourage pirating software or infringing on copyrights, however, I do encourage schools to do what they are meant to do--Teach! This teaching involves basic things like math, english, history, science and so on, save the copyright law for college when he/she can make the choice.

      I think they should take their ridiculous capaign and keep it the hell away from my kids! Please, leave the morality issues to me. It's one thing that I constantly receive propaganda from this sanctimonious orginization, please, stay away from my children.

    9. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well if you use drugs you are funding terrorist organizations, that much is for sure.

      People have been getting high for much longer than there have been terrorists.

      One of the wisest things Bush ever said was "The day you stop doing drugs, is the day you join the War against Terror."

      They day we legalize marijuana is the day that all of the illicit profit disappears.

      To favor drug prohibition is to support terrorism.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Homegrown herb funds terrorism? How?
      Stop swallowing the sound bites.
      The ban on marijuana is ridiculous when you can go to the store and buy kegsof beer, which are arguably much worse for you. It is also at least as difficult to enforce without violating civil liberties as sodomy laws, which pretty much everyone agrees are a joke.

      Before you respond, yes, driving while intoxicated should be a crime regardless of the drug, but the time is approaching when you will have no say at all regarding what an individual other than yourself or your child does with their body. Since both the parent and the grandparent made predictions, I will go out on a limb and say that in thirty years, there will be full frontal nudity (read pr0n) on prime time network television every night.

    11. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You completely missed the point of my statement. I was talking about the erosion of free speech rights. 30 years ago one of our current presidential candidates was an anti-war protestor. Today protestors are restricted to "free speech" zones. Following that trend, it's not unreasonable to think that in another 30 years the goverment could arrest people for publicly disagreeing with public policy.

      The fact that the mods didn't need me to explain this all to them is why my previous comment was modded Insightful.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    12. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by mblumber · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, Drugs Are Really Expensive.

      Saw it on a t-shirt this summer.

      --
      Anyone who posts about bad moderation are themselves off-topic and should be moderated accordingly.
    13. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We will have to agree to disagree. You feel it is appropriate to take property from someone and give it to someone else. I disagree.

      If someone works hard, they deserve to have more money that those who do not

      I don't buy this argument, either. What does it matter if they worked hard? As long as they did not illegally gain the money, it is theirs to do with what they wish. Just as you probably feel it is not right to take another man's life, it is not right to take another man's property, for any reason. Rather, encourage him to give it willingly, if you wish.

      but even the very laziest and lowly do not deserve starvation

      I do not know what "lowly" means, but please explain why the laziest do not deserve starvation? It seems to me that lazy people are the very people that deserve to starve. You reap what you sow.

      With current technology, the only way to ensure this would be to put an upper cap on how much wealth any one person is allowed to have

      Socialism.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    14. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Bush+Pig · · Score: 5, Funny

      > One of the wisest things Bush ever said was "The day you stop doing drugs, is the day you join the War against Terror."

      Was that when Bush joined the war against terror? When he stopped hoovering coke, I mean.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    15. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IF the government exists to provide a safe environment with a free market AND it is determined that the best way it can do that is through moderate taxation (50-70% Europe being heavy), then it is well within reason that it do so.

      I have no problem with some sort of taxation to support the government's duty to protect it's citizens from those that would take their lives or their property, however, that is not what we are talking about here. We are talking about arbitrarily wasting money.

      Who's to say where the appropriate middle ground is aside from an educated majority?

      The appropriate middle ground is, you have the right to swing your fist until another man's nose, and the government is there to ensure that idea is upheld. Nothing more or less.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    16. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Informative

      They totally shut down Afganistan's heroine business, and Bush rewarded them with $43,000,000.

      I guess no one can say that there isn't one upside to Islamic fundamentalism.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:Abraham Lincoln said... by Mant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well if you use drugs you are funding terrorist organizations, that much is for sure.

      Just becuase some terrorist organisations use organsised crime for funding does not mean all crimanal organisations are terrorists. Some terrorist organisations avoid drugs, many drug selling organisations are not terroristss (until all crime is classified as terrorism). Of course, not all drugs come from organisations anyway.

      One of the wisest things Bush ever said was "The day you stop doing drugs, is the day you join the War against Terror."

      The phrase "Damning with faint praise" springs to mind.

      What's more kids nowadays understand this.

      Yep, kids these days don't do drugs, no sir.

      In 30 years time, far from thinking that the War on Drugs was a bad idea, the self indulgent baby boomers will be dead, and their drug taking funding of terrorist organizations will be a thing of the past.

      Yep, it isn't like drug taking is part of human history for as long as we have had human history, and even prehistory. It isn't like the baby boomers succesors, generation X, haven't taken drugs, or whatever we call the generation after them.

      Taking drugs will be seen as a really bad (not to mention un-patriotic) idea, just like trepanation or blood-letting.

      As opposed to good ol' traditional booze and cigarettes that fund the War on Terror with taxes?

      I this is really your view of reality, sounds like you need to stop the drugs, or start, whatever.

  3. Brainwashing! by agent+dero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not just for your parents anymore! :P

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  4. Darl by romper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's name him Darl!

    --
    Right is wrong when left is right.
    1. Re:Darl by Pentagram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes! Someone must propose this. Justify it as some sort of weak acronym that seems so popular these days, such as:

      Defending All Righteous Licenses ...or some such crap. Who on /. has a kid in the right age range they don't mind using as a political tool?

  5. Ferret Face! by yroJJory · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gosh, it sure reminds me of good ol' Frank Burns from M*A*S*H! Take THAT, Ferret Face!

    --
    Jory
    1. Re:Ferret Face! by Tongo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Repeat after me: "Frank Burns eats worms"

      So it's OT, sue me.

  6. I got the perfect name by VonGuard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fucktard, the copyright weasel.

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
  7. At least... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BSA Asks Kids to Name Copyright Weasel

    At least they choose the right animal. Has anyone heard when SCO will be letting us name their skunk mascot?

    1. Re:At least... by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny
      Has anyone heard when SCO will be letting us name their skunk mascot?

      I thought SCO's mascot was Stinky the Dung Beetle?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:At least... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Funny


      At least they choose the right animal. Has anyone heard when SCO will be letting us name their skunk mascot?


      I guess their work on Lenny the Lamprey fell through?
  8. odd choice by randyest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As the article says:

    The ferret, by the way, does seem to be an odd mascot choice for an organization devoted to strict legal adherence, given that the weasel-like mammals are outlawed in California and several other states.

    Anyway, were I in 4th grade, I'd submit "nibbler."

    You know. In honor of the old copy/backup programs often called "nibblers" frmo the C64/Apple2 days. Since they nibbled the disk bit-by-bit to make exact copies. And like ferrets.

    Get it? ;)

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:odd choice by Erik+Fish · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Not to mention, keeping wildlife...an amphibious rodent...for domestic purposes...inside the city limits. That ain't legal either"

    2. Re:odd choice by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, most nibbler copiers of the Apple2/Commodore days worked by duplicating the low-level GCR format of the disk, not a byte/nybble/bit copy (although there were disk copiers that worked like that too)

    3. Re:odd choice by DataCannibal · · Score: 2, Funny

      weasel-like mammals are outlawed in California and several other states

      You what ??!??!?!

      I know that Californians are sliding off into the Pacific but how one earth do you outlaw animals ?

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    4. Re:odd choice by adam613 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are you, a fucking park ranger now?

  9. BSA? by zaax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BSA - I thought they make Motorcycles

  10. OK, I'll ask the question by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    teaches tech-savvy kids about the importance of protecting and respecting copyrighted works such as software, music, games and movies.

    This is bad because... ?

    1. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> This is bad because... ?

      You're assuming the "education" provided will not be one-sided and will include fair use.

    2. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by AgentAce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because this has no place in the classroom, that's why.

    3. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because there are a lot more important things that kids should be spending time on in school.

      Like food fights.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fair use according to whom? The law or the Slashbot collective? People around here have a very peculiar concept of what constitutes "fair use". That's probably why the article submission was dismissive of this thing.

    5. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by offpath3 · · Score: 5, Funny
      what's bad is that the BSD mostly acts as a terroristic organisation

      You know it's only a small step from writing a network stack to putting bombs on busses!

    6. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by stagl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      more seriously though, what about things like financial education? i know maybe not for 4th graders, but at least in our junior and high schools. home economics taught me how to so a pillow, but not how to balance a checkbook or use a credit card responsibly (not that i have problems, the only debt i have is mortgage). so many young adults are thrown into financial problems without a clue on how to manage their money

      it's a shame we don't spend the money in public education on something like this.

      --

      R.I.P.
    7. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by LGagnon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because they won't give a complete and fair review of copyright laws. Corporation interests will be put before the truth, and this will be nothing more than de-education. Not to mention they are teaching a very complex subject to an age group that doesn't understand legal issues well enough to understand the subject correctly.

    8. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by stagl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      apparently, i was never taught how to spell "sew"! :)

      note to self: USE PREVIEW BUTTON!

      --

      R.I.P.
    9. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by dameron · · Score: 2, Funny
      The idea of respecting copyright isn't bad; what's bad is that the BSD mostly acts as a terroristic organisation


      That's ok, didn't you hear? It's dying...


      -dameron

    10. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by lothar97 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This is bad because... ?

      The BSA's favorite method is sending out threat letters to small-mid sized businesses, and warning about the dire consequences of having pirated software. The place I work got one, and the boss freaked out- especially since 1 Office 2000 CD had been used for all 6 computers in the office. The letter basically said we had 1 month to take care of any abuses, and if they caught us after that with illegal stuff, there would be hell to pay (since we were on notice).

      I got some nice OEM copies to make us legit, but they never showed up. I heard a bunch of people throughout our area got these letters (San Diego), and I didn't really hear about anyone getting busted.

      Also, do you like the idea of your kids being trained to rat out their peers? Always be a snitch? How far does it go... Should we also have them snitch on Mommy & Daddy?

      --

    11. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by istewart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because this is a private business alliance attempting to use the public education system to maintain their influence in the market. Besides, how is this different from issues of "legislating morality?" Are the students given a one-sided view? Is the fact that the copyright (at least in a number of cases pertaining to movies and music) is not held by the original creator but by one of the cartels funding the BSA discussed at all? Are the students given a lesson on the original "limited monopoly" intention of copyright and patent, or is this just intended to perpetuate the current status quo? Also, how does this really advance the state of America's already poor-quality primary education institutions? There are any number of reasons to be suspicious of this.

    12. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by DugzDC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, for fuck sake. Every day this just keeps getting worse. I've had a few beers, and normally resist posting in this condition, but I've obviously had one too may tonight.
      Why are these fucktards allowed anywhere near schools? Why these particular fucktards? Where do you draw the line?
      I guess we're lobbying the kids now. This planet is going down the fucking sink. S'what you get when our governments are run by people of below-average intelligence. The people who seek power are the very fuckers who should never be allowed to taste it. Why does everyone have a short term 'I want a ferrari' mindset these days?
      Fuck. And I had a bad day too.

    13. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Fair use according to whom? The law or the Slashbot collective? People around here have a very peculiar concept of what constitutes \"fair use\"."

      Exactly. Neither of these groups have the right people to teach children about copyright. The lobbyists are likely to teach them that the GPL is immoral, and the typical user here would make them memorize the collected works of Richard Stallman in English class.

      Personally I believe that items of zero marginal cost must be distributed for free to guarantee economic efficiency (incentives to produce can and should be created in other ways). Society should, however, tell children about all sides of issues, but that's not what we're going to get, is it? So schools and corporations should shut up and go back to teaching children how to think, not what to think.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    14. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because if people started saving their money instead of living above their means via easy credit, the economy would collapse. If you want to be one of those financally responsible subversives anyway, point your kids to www.fool.com and they'll probably turn out OK.

    15. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by gilroy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:

      I'm now waiting for your semantic argument that argues that copyright infringement is not the same as stealing, and therefore allows you to rationalize that ripping people off is OK.

      Intellectual property is not the same as physical property (for example, it [theoretically] expires) but let's not descend into the usual word games. Can you recognize, however, that -- though this does not justify infringement -- the copyright system is in fact malfunctioning, especially due to the unreasonably long time that passes before a work enters the public domain? And can we agree that the corporate stakeholders have persuaded the government to abandon the historic "copyright bargain" interpretation? And that late additions such as the Digital Millenium Copyright Act have tilted the playing field away from balanced -- in part by creating "access control rights" that have no grounding in the Constitution and, menacingly, no expiration date?

      You don't have to be a eyepatch-wearing download junkie to see that things have gone awry.
    16. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Izago909 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Piracy is not theft, it is copyright infringement. Piracy is a civil crime, theft if criminal. Anyone who says piracy is theft is unwittingly making themselves a tool of the media giants by mindlessly repeating their corporate spin. I'm not justifying piracy, but people who are tools of the media giants need to be shown exactly how they are tools in order for them to take the first step towards thinking for themselves. Please remember you are spouting corporate cliché for people who are buying politicians left and right so that they can strip personal rights and give more to corporations.

    17. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Izago909 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Copyright law is a subject the brightest lawyers spend years, even decades, learning without even knowing it all. Copyright should be presented in school, except not from biased sources and not to an age group that accepts the words of adults on blind faith. They should also be told how large corporations spent billions buying politicians to twist copyright 180 degrees from what the founders envisioned.

    18. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by cgreuter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is bad because... ?

      I'm all for respecting copyrights but I don't trust the organization that's saying it.

      The BSA is, for all practical purposes, a vigilante group. They can behave like one (without actually meeting the legal definition of one, probably) because it's generally cheaper to let them have their way than it is to fight them in court, even if you're innocent. As such, they get to play Secret Police on whoever they feel like.

      I'm all for respecting rule of law but I don't think they're in any position to tell me about it.

      (Disclaimer: this is my opinion only, based on what I've read about the organization's activities.)

    19. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by xScruffx · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So I guess we shouldn't teach our kids that stealing is wrong. Right? Wrong.
      We, the parents, most certainly should be teaching our kids not to be idiots.

      I know to a certainty that I'd rather not have to drag my ass out of bed at three-in-da-morn to bail my kids out of the local lockup.

      I also know that I want it to be me, not Fucker the Ferret, reminding them of why they ought not to be doing nefarious crap that would end up cauing me to have to drag ass out of bed at three-in-da-morn.

      xScruffx
    20. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by hazem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is that we (as a public) pay people to develop curriculum and establish benchmarks and goals for our students to learn from and achieve. This is basically allowing a political group to come in and teach their own program, interrupting what the teachers may need to be teaching.

      Maybe learning about copyright law is a good thing, but it should be a part of the developed curriculum and part of what students are held accountable for. What other groups are you willing to let force their way into a school with a cute cartoon character? The republican party? The democrats? Christian Scientists? Skinheads? The North Carolina Quilting Association?

      This kind of thing simply does not belong in the classroom because outside parties should not be pushing their agendas in the classroom. If they want their lessons taught, they should present them to the bodies involved in developing curriculumm, which through school boards, represent the people.

    21. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not a matter of open source, it's a matter of a corporation using the public education system to indoctrinate people. I have similar beefs with Subway, Coca Cola, etc. - all of whom have encroached on my old High School in the name of hooking kids on their brand early. There's a particular marketing term for the practice of impressing a brand on people before they're old enough to make decisions (so they later decide on that brand), but I don't recall it at the moment.

      The BSA has a specific agenda that they most certainly will benefit from financially if they can impress it on kids early on and make it stick. If they were only teaching the facts about copyright laws or providing those materials that do so, that's fine. However, this reaks of marketing and promotion, not education. That doesn't belong in a public school. If they think that copyright laws need to receive more focus, they can go to school board meetings like everyone else.

      As far as emacs - emacs is the one true editor!!! .... oops... sorry, wrong discussion ;)

      I don't think learning about the GNU - if it was relevant to the class - would be bad, but RMS is not the best person to be teaching it. The nice thing is, since it's OSS, you could always take that out. I'm not a particularly big fan of RMS, and I only use the GPL when I have no intention of using the code I write commercially...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    22. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by hazem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So I guess we shouldn't teach our kids that stealing is wrong. Right? Wrong.

      No, we SHOULD teach our children in schools that stealing is wrong. But it should be a part of the approved curriculum and school guidelines. It should NOT be through some political group coming in and spewing their own agenda. If you let the BSA in, who else might you have to let in?

      School districts and state boards of eduction pay highly trained people to develop curriculum by which the children are taught. Let them do their jobs. If you don't think copyright is being covered, take it up with your school board.

      If you don't trust the board and curriculum developers, then you have bigger problems. But letting private political organizations into schools to push their agenda is not the solution.

    23. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No place in the classroom???

      One of the important purposes of a public education is training children in civics -- things like how government works, how government is changed, and what happens to you if you disobey the government. Not as a scare tactic, but as an informative one. You can't prepare a child to do well in the world without giving him or her the rules of the land, especially ones he or she will directly encounter in their life.

      The schools are doing pretty well when it comes to explaining to students what happens if they steal, or menace, or hurt people. It doesn't do a good job of explaining what happens if they infringe on other people's copyrights. In fact, in my public school days it never came up once. I was sort of shocked to find out that the tapes I'd been trading since grade school were more or less illegal but existed in a grey area where the scale of infringement wasn't worth prosecution.

      This is important. Because copyright protection is one of the luxuries of living in America. We treat intellectual property in many of the same ways we treat physical property, and as a result, we have had some really great authors, musicians, directors, software companies, inventors, etc. Knock the BSA/MPAA/RIAA for being dicks about it if you want, but all they're doing is what you're supposed to do when somebody infringes on your copyright: find them, and demand restitution.

      Does that mean a curriculum designed by the BSA is a great idea? Well, it's no worse than the oral hygiene curriculum designed by Crest I had in elementary school, a program to which I credit my fantastic smile. 'Course, I use Toms of Maine nowadays...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    24. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So I guess we shouldn't teach our kids that stealing is wrong. Right? Wrong.
      Speaking of which, do you think the RIAA's curriculum will give equal time to price fixing?
    25. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Izago909 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think most people are upset because it is a biased corporate entity teaching impressionable children who are too young to form their own opinions. Copyright does have a place in education, but not at that age and not from that source. Would you allow your child to be taught health by Phillip Morris, business ethics by Microsoft, or foods by McDonalds?

    26. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Grym · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is important. Because copyright protection is one of the luxuries of living in America. We treat intellectual property in many of the same ways we treat physical property, and as a result, we have had some really great authors, musicians, directors, software companies, inventors, etc. Knock the BSA/MPAA/RIAA for being dicks about it if you want, but all they're doing is what you're supposed to do when somebody infringes on your copyright: find them, and demand restitution.

      Care to provide any proof that authors/inventors/musicians are the DIRECT result of increased copyright protections? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't copyrights a rather new idea with respect to MUSIC, BOOKS, and INVENTIONS?

      I disagree with your statement. In fact, I would change it to the following:

      We treat intellectual property in many of the same ways we treat physical property, and as a result, we have unclear laws that fail to recognize that intangible really means just that, a confused populace who often (understandably) can't define what a copyright, trademark, or patent are or even mean, and an organized bourgeois who feel the need to "reeducate" our children on the righteous path of blind consumerism.

      Does that mean a curriculum designed by the BSA is a great idea? Well, it's no worse than the oral hygiene curriculum designed by Crest I had in elementary school, a program to which I credit my fantastic smile. 'Course, I use Toms of Maine nowadays...

      You're missing the point. NOBODY is in dispute on the issue of ORAL HYGIENE. Comparing it with an issue so complex and debatable as the oxymoron of "intellectual property" is ridiculous.

      -Grym

    27. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by tekunokurato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't we already?

      I'm sure to get 'insightful' for that one!!

    28. Re:OK, I'll ask the question by Zareste · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm now waiting for your semantic argument that argues that copyright infringement is not the same as stealing

      I figured you would. If I equated data transfer with some random bad word like, say, murder or lying, I'd also anticipate a correction. So glad you saw it coming in spite of the fact that you never corrected yourself.

      I guess there's a funny little group out and about that actually believes what these people say. How can you spot them? Simple: They can only back up their claims using utterly undefined and arbitrary words ('sending data is wrong! Obeying me is right! Dualism is right! Disobeying corporations is wrong!'), equating propaganda with morality ('you haven't paid for that tile so you have no right to stand on it!'), and of course, trying with every last breath to turn listening to music into 'ripping off' the artist who, even if the outlandishly abstract concept of artists 'losing' money to data transfer were true, isn't getting the 8 cents he would have gotten had you bent over and bought the CD.

      The claims pretty much debunk themselves, not only with the total lack of reason but the obvious fact that nobody ever manages to justify them without turning the dictionary inside-out. You'd think these people would do a better job of convincing you now that the anti-data-exchange movement has been around for some time, but the throw-offs cop-outs are actually getting worse.

      A ferret? Wow I'm convinced. I'm so inspired I think I'll sell my soul to the recording industry and sue some random kid right now!

      A small fine for stealing a CD, a large lawsuit for downloading one. Let's arrest those kids outside of the bank and ignore the guy robbing it.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  11. Snitchy by xoboots · · Score: 4, Funny

    First of all, he looks like a rip-off of everyone else's favourite corporate cartoon character: Poochy. So "Snitchy" feels right.

  12. Who's copyright? by TommydCat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Kids, make sure to copyright your entries!

    --
    This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  13. Lets hope it backfires by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I will teach my child what *I* believe is right and wrong, we can hope that the children of parents that are not quite as diligent see thru this garbage.

    Perhaps with a bit of luck this attempt at brainwashing will totally backfire.

    Home schooling becomes more appealing each day.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Lets hope it backfires by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Learning about how US Law works is *not* brainwashing. If you want to change the law, work to change it... but while that law exists, it should be taught just like any other.

      If every person who illegally downloaded an MP3, movie, or piece of software instead wrote a letter to their congressman on their beliefs about copyright, then I could guarantee that the law would be changed. But breaking a law is not an acceptable way of changing a law.

      I like how the Slashdot summary says "weasel" while the actual article says "ferret." That's quite a stretch on the submitter's part to make their mascot look bad.

    2. Re:Lets hope it backfires by Joe5678 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that big of a stretch, they are in the same Family. I believe it was intended to be a joke.

    3. Re:Lets hope it backfires by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You'll teach your kids that it's okay to break the law, steal music and rip-off the work of others?

      Oooookay.

      Personally, I teach my kids to respect other people's property, and respect their wishes. No one says you have to listen to copyrighted music or watch copyrighted movies. If you don't like the copyright that's on it, then don't listen to it.

      Yeah, yeah, I know. Morality is so last century. It's the age of "I should be able to do what I want even if it hurts others, especially when I can do it and no one will catch me."

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:Lets hope it backfires by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dating yourself? By admitting that you were, at one time, on fourth grade? ... you realize that probably 95% or more of the US population can "date themselves" by revealing that little tidbit of information, right?

    5. Re:Lets hope it backfires by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Civil disobedience of the form you describe is an outdated tactic; governments have responded by hiking the penalties sky-high so no one can publicly violate the law, take their medicine, and get on with their life. It also never works if the violation isn't in the public eye to begin with. Instead, what happens if you try civil disobedience, is that you're quietly arrested, tried, and found guilty. You go to jail for a long time, get AIDS via forcible sodomy, and assuming you do get out, when you get out you're a felon, unable to make any political waves and unable to even work in any decent-paying capacity. Civil disobedience is self-neutralization under these conditions.

      Breaking the law remains willful disobedience even if you don't go that route. And breaking a law which is wrong can still be right even if you endeavor to avoid the penalties.

    6. Re:Lets hope it backfires by cybersk4nk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't think sending millions of letters to your elected representative(s) will make any change at all. Since when was the last time a petition on any issue seriouly made a large impact? I'm being pessimistic here, but you know what I mean. Even 10,000 signatures would be laughable in most ridings. What do you think has more influence: large money campaign financing by large corporations and lobby groups like the BSA, or an individual citizen who dosen't create or buy this software in large volumes?

      I strongly dissagree with you view that "breaking the law is not an acceptable way of changing law". It is completely acceptable. Usually what happens is you break the law, and then you defend yourself in court. You may be found guilty, but if you're found not guilty you set a precedent or overturn prior rulings and laws that can change the law itself or its interpretation in the future. This is how our court system works in Canada, and I'm sure that's how it works in the US. And weasels and ferrets are all part of the same family of mammals: the rodent family. So I think the BSA has really shot themselves in the foot. Weasels and ferrets are both mammals considered to have very sly and shady demeanors. They live in holes in the ground and are both quite vicious little creatures. Ferrets are very vicious, and don't let go when they bite. I would say this idea won't be lost on most kids. Remember Wind in the Willows? All the crooks and bad guys in the show were Weasels. Ferrets - Weasels - whatever. They look very similar anyway.

      And the worst part about this whole thing is that the BSA is the weasel. I really don't think they're interested in teaching kids the letter of the law -- it's too complex for kids understand anyway. I really think their aim is to brainwash kids into *their* interpretation of the law. I think the biggest problem is brainwashing kids on the myth that copying is equivalent to stealing. It really isn't. Slashdotters should be savvy enough to know this by now. What is really happening is the BSA is practically advertising software to kids at a very young age. Their imprinting teenagers that will most likely grow up surrounded by computers and softare, and these imprints they leave will last much longer than those made on adults. This reminds me a lot of the cigarette industry before it was regulated or found out. Since BSA is bankrolled by major software developpers, including Microsoft, I wouldn't be suprised if this is done on purpose to discourage kids from buying alternative products or downloading illegal software off p2p networks to 'try them out'. I wouldn't even be suprised if the BSA pushes a program designed to teach kids about IP and tell them that open source and free software programs are evil because they contain, in the BSAs opinion, tons of 'stolen' IP. This would discourage many kids from getting free, world class software and programming tools.

      To counter this I say the FSF and the open source movement should have a mascot to teach kids about the evils of large corporations and intellectual property abuse (like patent and trademark mis-filings and controversies). We could call the mascot something like Peter the gluttonous pig.

    7. Re:Lets hope it backfires by incom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Morality is so last century eh? So your the one practicing traditional values? I don't know what your roots are, but my ancestors certainly didn't pay any mind to ownership of ideas.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    8. Re:Lets hope it backfires by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The question in this situation is not whether downloading music is moral or not, but whether or not children should be taught about it in schools by industry designed programs.

      Call me cynical, but I am a lot more concerned about indoctrinization in schools than I am about downloading music.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    9. Re:Lets hope it backfires by jdavidb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a pretty developed sense of morality. (Some would say overdeveloped ... I'm a fundamentalist Christian.) But I do not feel that the law defines for us what is moral. There are many laws which I believe just should not exist.

      I will teach my children to respect other people's property. I will also teach them to obey the law ... even laws they feel are unjust ... unless a law compels them to violate their religion. I will also teach them that even though the law tries to give the impression that ideas are property, that that does not make it so. I do not believe an idea can be property, and I do not believe the "originator" of an idea (if we could even determine who that really is) should be granted an exclusive right to its use.

      The Constitution states that the purpose of granting these exclusive rights is to promote the progress of science and the useful arts. I believe the progress of science and the useful arts would actually be promoted better by eliminating these exclusive rights.

  14. WTF? by wmute · · Score: 5, Funny

    May I be one of hopefully many in saying WTF?? How is the BSA allowed to even infiltrate our PUBLIC school system, I mean what goes on at these meetings

    BSA REP: "We will give you enough money to buy 10 more computers if you let us brainwash the kids"

    Director of school: "I'm not sure thats a good idea, have you ever read 1984?"

    BSA REP: "Of course I have, I'll make it 11 computers and I won't let RIAA charge you for illegal music downloads"

    Director of school: "But i havn't downloaded any illegal music"

    BSA REP: "Thats what they all say!"

  15. Nice animal to pick! by bburrill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey kids be a weasel and turn in your friends for downloading music!

  16. Attack the Young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I'm all for respecting copyrights and all that intellectual property stuff, I find it strangely difficult to accept moral lessons from the BSA.

    I suppose they'll be joining the ranks of MTV, musicians, and video games in the world of raising YOUR children.

    Parents -- please take responsibility for your children. Please?

  17. Quisling by Trespass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Too easy.

  18. name of Weasel Ferret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    John Ashcroft

  19. How about "Captain Copyright" by CharonX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about Captain Copyright?
    See how the dauntless Captain Copyright sells out its friend to the BSA for talking about copying software.
    Laught when Captain Copyright battles with the fearsom Product Pirates (and see how they get locked up for 30 years for running an illegal copy of Windows XP).
    Be fascinated how Captian Copyright bribes and lobbies the Congress to introduce capital punishment for product theft.

    --
    +++ MELON MELON MELON +++ Out of Cheese Error +++ redo from start +++
  20. Whoa by offpath3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a second, when I read the title, I thought it meant the BSA was asking children to rat on their friends... Glad to hear it's just brainwashing!

  21. Just say no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this program has any success like the Just Say No program did in the 1980s, then we should be seeing an entire generation of copyright violators in, oh, 20-30 years.

    Raw raw brainwashing backfires.

  22. Copyright Weasel Names by White+Roses · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't think of a better name than Hilary.

    --
    Do not touch -Willie
  23. How long until they turn in parents? by freelunch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So how long until the kids are 'taught' to turn in their parents "to help them"?

    Gotta love my tax dollars supporting this tripe.

  24. before this gets carried away by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    let's remember that there's nothing wrong with protecting the copyright.
    the problem lies in the fact that copyrights seem to be indefinite. we need to cut them down, not cut them out.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  25. Something tells me they don't know much about kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The campaign also includes an online game in which the ferret races to destroy pirated copies of software while collecting valid licensing agreements.

    ...hurray?

  26. A weasel, indeed by the+pickle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah yes. That's just too appropriate. Weasels are the snakes of the mammal family. (Yeah, it's not proper taxonomic jargon. So sue me.) Always sneaking around behind other animals' backs, and fighting like holy hell whenever they get cornered. Oh, and weasels particularly like to eat young things.

    Heck, just the fact that they've picked a weasel is funny enough for me. Could they possibly have picked a WORSE animal mascot? Maybe the cockroach...

    p

  27. May I Make a Suggestion, Please? by superdan2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    Howabout "Orrin the Ass-Burrowing Money Weasel"? It's got a nice ring to it. You gotta admit.

    --
    blog |
  28. How fitting by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Funny

    A rodent that tends to smell like shit and is uncannily prone to getting rabies. Things like this are why I don't believe in coincidences anymore....

  29. It's kinda symbolic by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linux: Chubby, randy penguin. A rather inoffensive critter.

    BSA: A maniacally-grinning weasel.

    I wanna see all the logos that will be sure to come up involving Python and everybody's least-favorite weasel.

  30. Could it be.... by Eneff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Satan?

    1. Re:Could it be.... by Eneff · · Score: 2, Funny

      [/churchlady]

      Sorry, forgot to close the UBB tag.

  31. I hope some smartass kid suggests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Juares. Spelt W A R E Z.

    Rock on!

  32. Write in Sterling Ball by azav · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the article, it notes that we can write in "Sterling Ball" the guy who jettisoned all MS products after getting raided by the BSA.

    Anyone know where the url is so we can vote?

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  33. Transcript of meeting at BSA... by One+Louder · · Score: 4, Funny
    BSA guy #1: We at the BSA want a weasel with attitude. He's edgy, he's "in your face." You've heard the expression "let's get busy"? Well, this is a weasel who gets "biz-zay!" Consistently and thoroughly.

    BSA guy #2: So he's proactive, huh?

    BSA guy #1: Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.

    BSA guy #3: Excuse me, but "proactive" and "paradigm"? Aren't these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I'm accusing you of anything like that. [pause] I'm fired, aren't I?

    BSA guy #4: Oh, yes.

    Apologies to The Simpsons...

    1. Re:Transcript of meeting at BSA... by ESqVIP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apologies!? You've just violated copyrights! Be proud, you'll be one of the first to meet the weasel.

  34. GNU Wildebeest by scorp1us · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is the GNU mascot supposed to compete with the aptly selected weasel? A weasel is much more fun to play with.

    I guess we have to lauch a counter movement, and tellthem to share and share alike. We'll then see which culture benefits better and improves faster.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  35. Re:Too much South Park by tekiegreg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good I'm not the only insane one on Slashdot then...first thing that came to mind when I heard of the copyright weasel was the Sexual Harassment Panda....uggggh....

    --
    ...in bed
  36. Anyone remember the anti-piracy rap video? by British · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many moons ago there was a small video with some unknown rapper talking about the effects of piracy to 2 kids.

    Someone's got it on the web somewhere. Quite possibly the funniest thing you have ever seen for propaganda.

  37. Ferret != Weasel by Kgreene · · Score: 2, Informative

    A ferret is not the same as a weasel any more than I am the same as a chimpazee.

    Although, you will have to take my word that I am not in fact a specially trained super chimp named Lullu typing this from my cage.

    Ferrets and Weasels are of the same family which is Mustela. As a category this family also includes Weasels, Marters and Polecats.

    So they are similiar to weasels but that is not to say that weasel should be used as another term for ferrets.

    Also ferrets are domesticated creatures. There are no wild ferret populations compared to weasels who are wild, widespread through britian, and eat small rodents.

  38. Re:Rat Bastard by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey! Leave me out of this!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  39. Brainwashing by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is not that they are teaching legality, they are twisting the law to their own view.

    Such as trying to convince children that its a criminal act to download ANY music file.

    Problem is that its a CIVIL issue, ( at least for now, unless Hollings gets his way.. then it will be criminal ) and 2ndly its not illegal to download *copyrighted*material. Its illegal to download material that isn't permitted for distribution in that manner..

    Its also legally debatable that its even illegal to download restricted data.. Remember fair use, libraries, copying excerpts.. etc.

    Its also NOT the job of some industry to come and teach students. Even if I were to accept the concept of what they were trying to portray, its the SCHOOLS job to teach facts, not some company. ( and its parents job to teach morality ).

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Brainwashing by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The slipperly slope about that seemingly intentional confusion between "copyrighted" and "authorized for free distribution" is very dangerous.

      Simplfying the matter that much overlooks the fact that the concept called "public domain" is not only for content that was copyrighted at one time but is no more, but also for content in which there still legally exists a copyright but the owner has publically declared that they will not enforce their copyright, since a binding promise not to use ones rights renders those same rights moot, they still exist but they don't matter.

      Additionally, there's works that have been released on public licenses that are not complete public domain waivers, but do waive certain rights in exchange for an agreement to use the software in certain ways. This ranges from the open source licenses, to trial-ware downloads that are free to use for a limited time before the decision whether or not to pay becomes due.

  40. Nothing else suits this thing better... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Than Lemmiwinks.

    After all, god knows the BSA's going to try to jam it up our asses anyways.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  41. I can't wait for all the spoofed web comics by JumperCable · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scene: 4th grade Sally singing happy birthday in a public place. Copyright weasel jumps out. CWeasel: You owe me $19.95 for that! Cough it up. Sally: But I was just singing... CWeasel procedes to mull little Sally's face, turn her upside down & shake money out of her dress pockets. CWeasel: "And don't let me catch you doing it again."

  42. I give it a month before a Chinese factory... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    pumps out thousands of "Copywrite Krusader" stuffed counterfeits. Look for them on a street corner near you.

    Now THAT would be hilarious.

    And on a more important note, a Ferret, what the hell? A friend of mine has two of these fuzzy things and one thing the BSA and Ferrets have in common is both want to get into your pants.

  43. How appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The name "ferret" comes from the Latin word "furritus" which means "little fur thief". It refers to the ferrets habit of stealing things, toys, food, socks etc. and dragging them away to hide them in it's lair.

  44. Digging deeper, we find... by jasomill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Cyber-Ethics Champion Code with items such as

    I look for the copyright symbol (©) whenever I add a new program or game to my computer.

    Why? First of all, use of the mark is now optional, at least in the U.S. Second, the mark itself doesn't explain to the child (or anyone else) whether or not a program may be copied (e.g., GPL'd software is copyrighted). The license does. Which leads us to...

    I know that the copyright owner gets to decide how many times a software program can be copied. That means I can't copy the software that is running on my home computer unless the license for that program says I can.

    So the assumption is that a child young enough to be attracted to the weasel-ferret-whatever mascot will read and understand the license agreements included with his or her software? Perhaps the BSA wants to donate to some sort of fund for early legal education?

    I guess the problem I have with all this is, there's currently a lot of controversy surrounding free software, copyright, patents, and other "intellectual property" issues, and if we're not prepared to educate our children about the issues, we shouldn't allow the "voice of the world's commercial software industry" to do it for us, any more than we allow McDonald's to educate our children about nutrition. Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Digging deeper, we find... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Funny

      So the assumption is that a child young enough to be attracted to the weasel-ferret-whatever mascot will read and understand the license agreements included with his or her software? Perhaps the BSA wants to donate to some sort of fund for early legal education?

      Looks like you uncovered the secret strategy behind all this...they want to raise an entire generation of lawyers!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  45. All too easy by paiute · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To reinforce to the kids about how copyright works in the real world, the weasel's name should be...
    Mickey Mouse.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  46. OK, I'll answer the question by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Because we don't want or need advocacy groups pushing their positions on our kids in the public schools WE fund with our tax dollars.

    Because pushing an issue on school children, trying to form their opinions at a young age, on behalf of CORPORATIONS, smacks of manipulation and self-rightousness.

    Because the BSA is a blackmailing, self-interested money hungry group of lawyers which strongarms small businesses into "compliance", trying to bluff business owners into thinking they are guilty until proven innocent.

    Because controversial issues that are not directly related to education or universally accepted understandings of right and wrong have no place in the public education system.

    I wouldn't have the BSA forcefeeding my kids their garbage anymore than I'd invite PETA in the classroom. Either way, God willing that we can afford it, I'm not sending my kids anywhere near a public classroom if and when the day comes.

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    1. Re:OK, I'll answer the question by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well you make some good points but I'm not saying that it's controversial that exclusive copyright MEANS the exclusive right to copy, but that the structure and scope of current copyright law is increasingly controversial in today's digital society.

      As I'm sure you are aware, both sides are growing more vitriolic and entrenched in their respective positions, from the corporate powers pushing the DMCA/CBDTPA/We Own Your Toaster Legislation to the "information should be free, especially if it is 186 gigs of MP3's and ROMs I don't feel like paying for" crowd who argues that ownership of digital content is immoral. I don't hold either of these two positions, but the increasing determination of each group definitely causes the issue to fall under the scope 'controversial', and to me, subjective enough that I don't want it taught with my tax dollars to eight year old children by the representatives of one side.

      --

      ---

      WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    2. Re:OK, I'll answer the question by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Here's the nail on the head time. There should not be anything controversial at all about the idea that exclusive copyright MEANS the exclusive right to copy.

      Except that a copyright isn't a totally exclusive right to copy. There are several exceptions, and the rules on where to draw the line are fuzzy and open to interpretation. It's certainly beyond a 4th grade level topic, and subject to controversy, but will undoubtedly be presented to the 4th graders in your oversimplified black-and-white terms anyway.

  47. 154 comments and still no... by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...mandatory Simpsons reference?

    "Weaseling out of things is important to learn! It's what separates us from the animals! 'Cept the weasel." --Homer

  48. I got one of those letters by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just laughed. ALL my production software is open source.

    That being said, this threat is serious to most businesses, and I have to help many customers get into compliance. All the more reason to use open source.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  49. So glad I'm a beta! by promethean_spark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alpha children wear grey They work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever. I'm really awfuly glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. I know it's true because the weasel told me so!

  50. Berman The Ermine by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Name this beast after the Congresscritter most thoroughly owned and operated by the RIAA and MPAA! I'm sure he's also owned and operated by the BSA as well, or at least sympathetic to their cause.

    The species change would not only make it a better rhyming name, but one would have to do it because ferrets are still illegal in California. (and Hawaii, and the 5 boroughs of New York City, NY)

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  51. Play The Game! by Rubberpants.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have to check out this game they cooked up to go along with this drivel. Notice that the CDs are "bad" along with the skull and cross bones. And, don't forget to grab to licenses or else your current business model might fail! "No thanks mom, I don't really want Doom 3 anymore now that I can play Pirate Deep Freeze!"

  52. Don't Copy That Floppy by empaler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reminds me of the ~15 yr old campaign "Don't Copy That Floppy", with a rap song and dance and everything. It was way cooler than this half-arsed shite... ^_^

    16 mb "Don't Copy That Floppy"

    1. Re:Don't Copy That Floppy by mnbjhguyt · · Score: 2, Funny

      of course you realize you shouldn't be linking to that pirated video, since the original is still available for sale

  53. Re:Kids are too good at logic for this. by sqrt(2) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call me a hopeless optimist... But, unless both the parents and those schools are doing absolutely nothing outside of brain washing those kids...

    Remember the "Red Menace" of the 50's-80's? We've all seen the films they used to show kids in schools, and the information from parents, wasn't far from brainwashing the kids to hate anyone who didn't live under a Democratic Government.

    Need a more current example? Just replace communist with "Terrorist"

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  54. My Problem Here by Bruha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dont mind the power company coming in with Larry the Lightning Bolt teaching kids to leave power lines and other nasty power stuff alone. But for a business such as this which tends to threaten businesses without a shred of proof then sue them if they refuse guilty or not should not be allowed into our schools to pitch their views on copyright.

    It's the responsibility of eduacators to bring this topic up in the classroom. Explain what a copyright is and explain some of the history of it. It's up to the kids to decide if it's the right thing not some corporate sponsored entity telling our kids that copyrights are fine. All it does is breed a group of kids that will not challenge the system and sit around all day thinking certain laws are okay when in fact they may not be so perfect.

  55. Remember Rosa Parks? by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 5, Insightful
    On December 1, 1955, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on the bus to a white man, despite the law.

    This set in wheels in motion to have those segragation laws declared unconstitutional in the USA.

    It is your moral duty to refuse to obey laws that you know are simply wrong and immoral. It's called "civil disobedience" and has has a pretty decent track history of causing positive change without too much bloodshed.

    PS: Note that I'm not specifically saying that this mp3 downloading ruckus falls in that category. I'm just saying that your affirmation that all laws need to be obeyed is just not right.

  56. God Bless America *insert sarcasm here* by jinxidoru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You've gotta love living in a country where teaching 4th graders morality will put you in front of a judge, but where it's apparently OK to indocrinate children with the corrupt money-mongering copyrighting system. Breach of copyright, now there's a sin we need to teach our children to avoid. But don't you dare teach them about chastity or good moral living.

    Sorry, I just get upset with the priorities of this country sometimes.

  57. Animal Associations... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An interesting sidebar to this whole story is that the way that both sides want to call the similar looking animal:

    The RIAA wants to say "ferret" because that word is also defined as a verb that means to search for something in a group of others.

    The anti-RIAA forces wants to say "weasel" because that word when used as an adjective means a person that is dishonest and/or greedy.

    That's a sign of a bad PR person somewhere at the RIAA. No matter how cute the positive association is, you shouldn't put out a PR campaign with a mascot that easy to mock.

  58. Oh please by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you own a Tivo or a VCR? Ever fastforward through commercials? Thief! You're depriving those poor advertisers of their hard-earned dollars!

    Just because something is illegal (or unlawful, as is the case in CIVIL matters like these) does not make it wrong, and while there is definitely good reason to ensure that musicians continue to receive compensation, this issue is NOT as cut and dry as the Morality Police would have us belief. Taken to the extreme, beliefs like yours would outlaw all libraries because they take away money from authors and publishers.

  59. Weasel must DIE! by jatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the purpose of a school mascott, aimed at kids, to teach them important values? Loyalty, Devotion, Friendship, Thinking for themselves. Nah, kids these days will trade in all of those for some monopolist propoganda, uh I mean "comic", of some weasel telling them to rat out their friends for inovating so they can get next weeks exciting issue on how infringing copyrights can send you to hell. At least they chose an appropriate mascott. Looks like its time to get out the D-Con. --Copyrighted monopolys stiffle inovation. th!nk differently

    1. Re:Weasel must DIE! by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      hey, why not? After all, a cartoon character camel/human cross-breed in a leather jacket and jeans got them to smoke, right.

      Oh, wait...

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  60. Propaganda Everywhere! by Bloodmoon1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Attached to the article is a lovely little game called Deep Freeze, and Christ almighty is it hard.

    The point of the game is that you're supposed to use Rat Bastard (As I'm now referring to the Weasel) to kick a ball to destroy Pirates (Represented by a Skull and Crossbones) and Software (Represented by a CD. Note that I said software, not illegal software, just plain software. Interesting...) all while collecting Licenses to protect your city.

    Ah, yes, you're asking the same question I was, "Protect it from what?" Quickly, you will learn the answer, to protect your fair city from being "frozen" by software piracy. The game is ridiculouslyhard and as far as I played it, is impossible to win. I can only assume that this is by design to show kids how hard it is to "defend" against the deluge of pirated software.

    Man, does anyone else feel like they're in some kind of really weird, fucked up movie with a bad plot everytime they read this absolutly insane software piracy shit? Seriously, it seems like I'm inside of some horrible plot hole whenever I read the BSA is working in conjunction with Weekly Reader (Which I remember from back when I was in school) in order to indoctrinate 4th graders to believe software piracy is some sort of scourge of the Universe. Back when I read Weekly Reader, it had stuff about all kinds of exotic animals, something about space, or just anything else kids thought was really cool. Now it teaches them about Copyright laws?

    What the fuck? This country really needs to get its shit back together. I love America, but I fear for our future when corporations can have the power to set ciriculum, especially for such young, impressionable kids like this.

    --

    Request: ECM unit, 1000 km fullerene cable, 1 tactical nuclear weapon. Reason: Birthday party for foreign dignitary.
  61. Re: sig by Lehk228 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mod me down. I think you deserve to be sued if you rip off music.

    I agree entirely, let's start with suing P. Diddy for ripping off everyone else's music.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  62. That is not a ferret (it's a black-footed ferret) by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the common parlance, "ferret" refers to the domestic ferret, mustela furo. The cartoon mascot is clearly a black-footed ferret, mustela nigripes which despite the similar name is only obliquely related, sort of like a dog being related to a coyote.

    The telltale signs are the cream-colored body and black-tipped extremities. Domestic ferrets in the most common sable pattern are colored somewhat more like a siamese cat: the legs and tail are solid black, and the hair is darker overall.

    What's the difference? The domestic ferret is a fun-loving domestic species native to Europe and a popular family pet. The black-footed ferret is a fierce North American weasel that savagely devours cute, cuddly prairie dogs and takes over their homes. So they got the image right, but the name is wrong.

  63. BSA? by portnux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't they "pirate" that acronym from the Boy Scouts of America?

  64. Weasel Words by femto · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's my entry.

  65. Susan by Bralkein · · Score: 2, Funny

    It can be a female, right? Well I propose the name Susan. Or just Sue, for short. ;)

  66. Fair Use by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sure hope that weasel/stoat/whatever doesn't forget to remind kids that they have Fair Use rights too, guaranteed by law!

    p.s. As for a name, I'm torn between "Frank Burns" and "Ratfink".

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  67. Here it is (Don't copy that floppy!) by Gregoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the url:

    http://www.mattkruse.com/humor/DontCopyThatFlopp y. wmv

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

  68. Quisling! by isomeme · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quisling is the only possible name for this weasel.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  69. Send letters to weeklyreader... by stienman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't cut n paste, please, but here's a copy of my email to pr@weeklyreader.com:

    Subject: BAS Alliance?
    I recently read how Weekly Reader was going to help educate children and teens about copyright law from CNET, at http://news.com.com/Ferreting+out+copyright+scoffl aws/2100-1012_3-5303966.html .

    I remember enjoying Weekly Reader when I was young, going over your website today has made me realize how much has changed over the years.

    While I understand this is primarily a business decision, I want to urge you to reconsider distributing their supplement.

    As a IT professional I am very familiar with the tactics the BSA and similar 'non-profit' organizations use to intimidate and deceive. While the company I work for is in compliance with current copyright laws, we must spend an inordinate amount of time and resources making certian that we can also prove we are in compliance.

    I heartily encourage you to educate your readers on copyright laws, where they came from, what purpose they are meant to serve, and how they have changed and adapted over the decades to meet new challenges. I would strongly urge you against allowing the BSA to perform this education as I can assure you they are interested in how copyright protects copyright owners, and not how copyright also protects individuals and users of copyrighted works.

    Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter!

    -Adam

  70. I've got a name for him by Wordsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got a name for him ...

    But I can't say it in front of kids.

  71. Posts like this. by eniu!uine · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I hate to answer my own posts but you MUST download this and this!"

    I think we all know what kind of effect that posts like this have on people's bandwidth issues. If you have any compassion or empathy for your fellow man, and the target of your post is the MPAA, RIAA, SCO, or the BSA PLEASE try to get these things to the front page. When the BSA servers start a fire that burns down their empire... and a daycare next door, but don't sweat the small stuff... you will know you made a difference. Don't you owe it to yourself?

  72. Seconded. And a war story. by leonbrooks · · Score: 4, Funny

    I also helped a customer past a BSAA audit threat (got the notice mid-afternoon, got inspected mid the following morning) by counting their holo stickers and hastily Linuxifying some of their generic workstations to make up the difference, and slapping the OpenOffice.org suite (and Mozilla for good measure) on all of the machines.

    Highlights of the visit were the BSAA dudes (local agents, I think, rather than BSAA proper) trying hard not to ask why nobody was using MS-Office (they eventually broke down and asked, I told them it was because it helped to avoid licence hassles like this one - IRL everyone was ostentatiously using OOo and Mozilla not MSO and MSIE because they'd been told to for that day :-) and the allegedly technical dude shoving a diagnostic CD into the reception machine, which was at the time running Mandrake Linux (I think 9.2) and XPDE and - after a few minutes - asking where "My Computer" was so he could run the nice diagnostics.

    IIRC, we'd renamed the XPDE equivalent "Not Bill's Computer". Said dude's look of disbelief upon being appraised of the truth was worth framing; it took the Mandrake Control Centre to half-convince him. I don't think he was ever quite sure.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  73. Ferret defense by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're mustelids, not rodents. They aren't any more prone to rabies than other mammals - skunks (which are, admittedly, cousins), coyotes, foxes, and bats are the most common carriers of rabies in the U.S. So two out of the four are related to dogs, not ferrets... (I don't honestly know the figures for outside of the U.S.)

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  74. Three words for you.... by fallen1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Class Action Lawsuit.

    Wait. I am not one who enjoys frivolous lawsuits or believes in them (in fact, I think we should have the same system as in several Eurpoean countries: the loser pays the winners lawyer fees and court costs) BUT I firmly believe that if my child was in a public school where they were going to let in the BSA to "teach" my children morality on copyright issues I would approach the school board with simple facts:

    1) I pay taxes for my children to go to school to be taught HOW to think, not WHAT to think
    2) Corporations blatantly "teaching" a one-sided version of "morality" for crass consumerism have no place in public schools (and I'm almost sure there is a bylaw or code that keeps corporations from doing just that)
    3) It is MY responsibility as a parent (and yours, and his, and hers, etc) to teach children morality based on MY (and yours, and his, and hers, etc) belief system - not based on the BSA's.

    With all these things in mind, I would simply tell the school board where my child was in class that I would be finding the MANY other parents who believed along the same lines as I did and we would be pulling our children out of school and forming a class action lawsuit against the school board (as a whole), each individual member of the school board, the principal of the school where the BSA was to "teach", and - if necessary - the STATE school board as well. I'm sure having 20% or more of the parents from one county (or parish) starting a class action lawsuit against the state and local school board would get a) severe media attention and b) the elected officals attention.

    What better way to nip this in the bud than to use the legal system against the "rat bastard" BSA... and I'd be teaching my child the meaning of Irony at the same time :)

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  75. Re:DARE prorgram - Dare to keep kids off p2p by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, No, NO!

    The guy was hopped up on P2P! It's way worse than PCP!

    It's like any addiction. First it's only ROMS. Then a DV rip here or there. Then suddenly you find yourself one night in front of the computer with a box of tissues and a bottle of jerkens downloading "VixenBrittenyGoats.ex.mpg". Before long the street starts to notice as soon as your car pulls into the driveway, their internet connection come to a grinding halt as you consume a whole 57% of the regions available bandwidth. As you walk down the street you hear them cluth their ugly blue pleather purses just a bit tighter as they glace at you with those little beedy old lady eyes and whisper "I hear he's on that P-2-P stuff".

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  76. Terrific... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 3, Funny

    now, my Firefox downloads list shows "young_girl.mpg" *delete*