Slashdot Mirror


Emergency Alert System Insecure

glebe writes "The U.S. Emergency Alert System used to issue disaster warnings and other alerts over T.V. and radio is vulnerable to spoofing and denial-of-service attacks, SecurityFocus is reporting. Apparently, 'the EAS was built without basic authentication mechanisms, and is activated locally by unencrypted low-speed modem transmissions over public airwaves.' The FCC acknowledged the security issues yesterday in a public notice seeking comment on the future of the system."

210 comments

  1. Dear FCC by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear FCC,
    Since you asked, I thought I would weigh in with my comments about The U.S. Emergency Alert System (EAS). I think it's appalling that anyone with a 14.4 could tap into this system and alter it for their own aims. The whole system could be crashed by terrorists during an attack, compounding the devastation of any terrorist attack by cutting off access to the system, or providing false and possibly deadly information. For example, during the 9/11 attacks the EAS could have directed people to return to their desks in the WTC, magnifying the losses suffered that day.

    I suggest you rebuild the EAS and take it offline until such a time that it can be secure.

    >... the EAS is designed to allow the President to interrupt television and radio programming and speak directly to the American people in the event of an impending nuclear war, or a similarly extreme national emergency.

    With the audio capabilities available today, it would be quite possible to dupe the public into thinking they were listening to George Bush, when in fact they were listening to the words of Osama bin Laden. And with the stuff Bush has been saying lately, the public might actually believe it was Bush no matter how insane the babble was!

    Somehow you would want to have a method for ensuring the audio was legit, encrypted and unaltered. I'm sure there are many ways to do this today, so I'm not really sure why you're asking me! Throw up a bunch of secure pipes and give the president access to them. Come up with a way to keep his message secure. Yeah, it's going to be expensive, but not as costly as 80,000 employees of the WTC returning to their offices because the EAS said it was "just a test".

    Kind Regards,
    Scott

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Dear FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing you forgot is the building security told everyone to stay at their desks. Sometimes common sense overrides stupidity.

    2. Re:Dear FCC by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I suggest you rebuild the EAS and take it offline until such a time that it can be secure.

      That's not a good idea. The system is currently used for many events less catastrophic than World War III, like severe weather warnings.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Dear FCC by JonLatane · · Score: 0
      And with the stuff Bush has been saying lately, the public might actually believe it was Bush no matter how insane the babble was!
      You mean he's gotten even less coherent lately?
    4. Re:Dear FCC by Egonis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common knowledge in replacing a server is that you build a new one, and switch to it when ready -- thus, not interrupting a critical service.

    5. Re:Dear FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you HONSETLY believe that anyone would have returned to their desks in the WTC?

    6. Re:Dear FCC by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the EAS is designed to allow the President to interrupt television and radio programming and speak directly to the American people in the event of an impending nuclear war, or a similarly extreme national emergency.
      I doubt that the President would tell anybody about an impeding nuclear war. That would just create panic and hysteria.
    7. Re:Dear FCC by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      "That would just create panic and hysteria."

      What threat level color are you at today?

    8. Re:Dear FCC by MasterSLATE · · Score: 3, Informative

      In regards to your mention of Sept. 11....

      As a NYC area citizen who was affected by that tragedy, I would like to point out that at no time during the day did the EAS even get used, at least in my view. I never saw it go off on any of the many channels we were flipping through.

      --

      [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    9. Re:Dear FCC by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      I think everyone had figured it out when the only thing on every news^H^H^H^Htelevision station was the crashing planes and collapsing towers

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    10. Re:Dear FCC by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Yeah. No shit. It's not like people can do anything about a major attack. All it does is alert that terrorists that the government knows that something is afoot.

  2. tornado sirens too? by jrockway · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've always thought things like this were insecure. When I was in
    high school, I wanted to make a device to activate the tornado siren.
    I figured I could just implement a simple replay attack. I never got
    around to researching what frequency the signal was broadcast on, and
    I didn't know how to record the signal once I knew where to get it
    from. But it seems simple:
    record when they do the monthly test, replay whenever. Panic everyone. Good
    fun.

    Apparently if you modify various bits you can make them play different
    sounds and even broadcast voice. Plenty of fun to be had there.

    If anyone has done anything like this, I'd be interested in knowing,
    just so I don't have to get myself hauled off to jail trying to do it
    myself :)

    fp?

    --
    My other car is first.
    1. Re:tornado sirens too? by JAD+lifter · · Score: 5, Funny



      Somewhat maybe related... In high school we had those fire alarms that have the handle that you pull down to trigger the alarm. Well, as one of my unlucky (and stupid) friends found out; when you pulled the alarm a big blast of marking dye shot out covering your hand, arm, torso, face and everything else with a blue/black stain that was almost impossible to wash off. Needless to say he was found and busted within minutes of pulling the alarm.

    2. Re:tornado sirens too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, he didn't, and you didn't. FOAF stories are dull, this is Slashdot, don't repeat stories someone told you that someone else told them.

      SNOPES

    3. Re:tornado sirens too? by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      Tornado sirens, sounds interesting. If you figure it out, let me know, so I can activate the alert sirens for our local nuke plant. Now THAT would scare people.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    4. Re:tornado sirens too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:tornado sirens too? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Panic everyone. Good fun.

      You certainly have a strange definition of fun...

    6. Re:tornado sirens too? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a blessing. Maybe it's just super-staining fire retardant.
      Or.. as it is more likely.. a super-staining mark of a retard.

    7. Re:tornado sirens too? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just build a big brightly lit sign with "Core explosion. Repent sins" -- that should make everyone nervous.

    8. Re:tornado sirens too? by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      This is why you use a 3 foot stick at a low angle (IE, stand by the alarm, about 3 feet to the side) and when someone you don't like comes walking past, pull and enjoy.

    9. Re:tornado sirens too? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Or a piece of paper over the trigger.

    10. Re:tornado sirens too? by wass · · Score: 1
      did happen in my school, you can even see the dye on the handle. Well, it's more like thick ink than dye, and it doesn't shoot out, it's just covering the inside of the handle. My friend gently put the tip of the cuff of his jacket in there and the red ink there.

      Also, we had 2 or 3 fake fire alarm pulls within a month. For the last one, they had a fireman at every door as we were walking in checking our hands for the ink.

      Needless to say they didn't find the perpetrator. But it was rumored to us anyway (before my friend dipped his cuff into the handle) that there was ink there. So anyone that would have pulled the alarm could just use a spare shirt or rag under their hand to avoid the ink trap.

      But anyway, yeah, ink is definitely there, I saw it with my own eyes.

      --

      make world, not war

    11. Re:tornado sirens too? by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

      If they were smart, they'd link Doppler radar with the siren system. The moment rotation would be detected within a thunderstorm, the system would activate the sirens.

    12. Re:tornado sirens too? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I learned that in elementary school from the My Teacher Is An Alien books by Bruce Coville.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:tornado sirens too? by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      At my University, it was an invisible substance that shot out -- only visible under a black light. That way the jerk that made the fire alarms go off at 3AM would not even think to scrub their hands and arms.

    14. Re:tornado sirens too? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      That's why you get a screwdriver and pry/pop the trigger off the wall. There's a simple switch behind it to trigger the alarm, no dye.

      I learned this this summer while seeing them test the fire alarm at my old HS.

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    15. Re:tornado sirens too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all alarm units have the ink trap. I pulled one in high school...no ink.

      No, it was not a prank. I started a fire first. The fire was not a prank either.

    16. Re:tornado sirens too? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I thought that was an urban legend?

    17. Re:tornado sirens too? by mhaisley · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really work that well, rotation is detected many times when there is no tornado, but we call it a mesoscale discussion.

    18. Re:tornado sirens too? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Wrong. This is a mesoscale discussion. A mesocyclone is the rotating part of the cloud base. And IIRC, they usually issue tornado warnings whenever something is rotating, just to be safe... (even if there isn't a tornado there's going to be hail and high winds...)

      --
      My other car is first.
  3. Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    10 bucks for whoever can get all of Nevada to evacuate due to imminent flooding.

    1. Re:Okay... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Does it have to be all? I don't even think that's possible. At least a few people won't hear (it is desert rat country, after all), and some will be physically incapable.

      90% sounds like a more possible number. Will you settle for that?

      KFG

    2. Re:Okay... by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      That's the best you can do? FLOODING? You know, there ARE other EAS that are far more interesting. For example:

      NUW : Nuclear Plant Warning

      RHW : Radiological Hazard Warning

      CEM : Civil Emergency Message

      A truly unscrupulous person might consider sending out a CEM message warning of a nuclear 'incident' in New York City and a cloud of radioactive debris spewing forth therefrom. Other unscrupulous persons might send an RHW message in nearby areas. Still other unscrupulous persons would set off large explosives in NYC. Lastly, the most unscrupulous people of all would kick back and wait for the story to get picked up by Reuters or the Associated Press and then watch news media world-wide go into a panic.

      This is all purely hypothetical, of course. IANAT.

    3. Re:Okay... by afidel · · Score: 1

      And if they were smart and unscrupulous they would make a fortune shorting the financial markets =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Okay... by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1
      And if they were smart and unscrupulous they would make a fortune shorting the financial markets =)

      Terrorist.

    5. Re:Okay... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      That's the best you can do? FLOODING?

      Obviously, you've never spent any time in Nevada.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    6. Re:Okay... by MntlChaos · · Score: 1

      What about sending Nevada a message stating "All your base are belong to us. You have no chance to survive. Make your time." to them?

    7. Re:Okay... by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      FYI, a lot of Nevada is desert.

      Tsunami warning in Kansas would be a lot better.

  4. US Officials realized this... by bdigit · · Score: 5, Funny

    after a mysterious color purple alert was issued. Officials believe it was the work of slashdot user outraged at the horrible color schemes on the popular news for nerds website.

    1. Re:US Officials realized this... by dmayle · · Score: 1

      mysterious color purple alert

      No, silly, it's a Taupe alert this week. The alert scale goes from Taupe, to off-white, then to Vanilla, and bone. You've got to learn to tell these colors apart!

      BTW - shamelessly cribbed from SNL

    2. Re:US Officials realized this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purple? Bah!

      I'm more worried about that "radioactive beige" ...

    3. Re:US Officials realized this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still holding out for Condition Paisley

    4. Re:US Officials realized this... by Exatron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meh. Anyone can do purple alerts. I'm planning on spoofing a plaid allert.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    5. Re:US Officials realized this... by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      That's ludicrous!

  5. The Solution has but Three Letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    XML

    1. Re:The Solution has but Three Letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra Medium Large ???
      One size fits all strechable T shirt ?

    2. Re:The Solution has but Three Letters by Cranx · · Score: 1

      +5 Ironic

  6. We interupt this program . . . by homeobocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    to give you this emergency message: ``Are your mortgage rates skyrocketing? Are your sexual organs too small? Do you have more money than brains? You can solve all of these problems by purchasing SUPER-VIAGRA! . . . and something about a tornado.''

    --
    MOUNT TAPE U1439 ON B3, NO RING
  7. I can see it now by Billobob · · Score: 2, Funny

    Conan + EAS + Bush picture + manlips = endless possibilities...

    --
    If you have to ask, you'll never know.
  8. So... by sockonafish · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...how long until primetime television is interrupted so that we may be informed that 'all your base are belong to us'?

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might actually watch TV if there were breif random interludes of "MAKE YOUR TIME"

    2. Re:So... by mlcolosimo · · Score: 0

      Well Im glad Im not the only one who instantly thought of that.

    3. Re:So... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      ...how long until primetime television is interrupted so that we may be informed that 'all your base are belong to us'?

      20 to Life... That's how long.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:So... by w9wi · · Score: 2, Informative

      - The data rate and modem tones used are non-standard. (though public knowledge) One could build one's own encoder, but you won't do it easily with off-the-shelf parts.

      - Stations are only required to forward EAN ("we're about to be nuked"), EAT ("OK, I guess we *aren't* going to get nuked"), and RMT. (monthly test) Many stations don't relay any other alert. (then again, many do)

      - Stations are not required to automatically forward *anything*. They may hold even EAN/EAT/RMT for a few minutes, long enough to not relay if it's an obvious hoax. (then again, many stations *do* automatically forward everything)

      - The larger the station, the less likely it will forward an alert without reviewing it for validity.

      - Stations are required to monitor at least two sources of EAS data. To spoof a manned station, you'd need at least two transmitters.

    5. Re:So... by M-G · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stations are required to monitor at least two sources of EAS data. To spoof a manned station, you'd need at least two transmitters.

      Good info up until that statement. The reason you're required to monitor at least two stations is for redundancy, not confirmation.

      With EBS, you only monitored one upstream station, creating a weak link. EAS requires multiple sources to prevent this problem, but doesn't cross-check the other sources.

      Think of a weather warning, where the local NWS office issues an EAS alert. All stations monitoring NOAA weather radio in the area will receive it. Some will relay it. A small station will likely get the alert direct from NOAA and from another station they monitor. So even if a station did verify with two sources, a single spoofed alert could give them two identical alerts.

    6. Re:So... by Deekoo · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the second "All your base..."
      announcement is probably due two days before
      election day, and will be followed by a Kerry/Bush
      joint appearance announcing that Bush has
      appointed Kerry vice president and that they've
      come to an agreement that the election will be
      suspended until after they've wiped out all
      terrorism everywhere.

      --
      #include printf("[Yeemp: deekoo~tentacle.net]\n");
  9. Go ahead and fuck with the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One idiot sentenced to 20 years in jail for broadcasting illegal emergency alerts ought to make people think twice about doing something so stupid.

    1. Re:Go ahead and fuck with the system by Spad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that the people you need to be concerned about gaining access to the system are really going to care about prison sentences.

  10. A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by Flexagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is yet another example why keeping infrastructure details secret is a bad idea. It's security through obscurity in the real world, and removes any incentive to actually fix these things. Now that there is a public report about it, there's at least a chance that pressure can be brought to bear, and get it fixed.

    1. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Pressure? Anyone who so much as twitches reading some of these comments is going to get charged with terrorism.

      Oh. Damn.

    2. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by RadioTV · · Score: 3, Informative

      This system is not now and never was a secret. You can go to any TV or radio station and talk to any broadcast engineer, announcer, master control operator or station manager. They all can explain the basics of how the system works.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    3. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      This 'security through obscurity' refrain is getting almost as tired as the beuwolf cluster thing. ALL encryption is security through obscurity...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only that, but you can find the format for EAS messages on Wikipedia, along with an overview of SAME headers and messages.

      EAS has never been a secret. Neither was EBS, nor CONELRAD. HAND.

    5. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by afidel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Dude you are a moron. Seriously. Security through obscurity refers to obscuring or failing to reveal the method of security, not to obscuring the data path (which is what encryption does). A good security system is one which has been published and picked apart by all interested parties and agreed to be secure, if you obscure a weak security system then all it takes is a single individual revealing your security mechanism for it to be broken.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by HermanAB · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      D00d, you d0n't get, 0r d0n't w@nt to get wh@t I'm s@ying: ALL encryption is security through obscurity.

      Whitfield Diffie once said that encryption is 90% muddle and 10% mathematics. I actually understand what he means.

      So, if you want to denegrate the security of a bad system, then you should use a different term, not 'security through obscurity', since that is all we got.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    7. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by 0racle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Encryption does not hide the fact that a message exists, it just alters what the text appears to be. Also, a principle in cryptology for some time has been, "The general system must not be a secret." Today that can be restated, "The algorithm must not be a secret." So not only is the fact that there is a message, but the way the message was altered is also known. With these knowns, encryption is not 'security through obscurity' since that term relates to hiding the fact that there are problems, something you can not do with encryption.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    8. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by jrockway · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's security through obscurity:

      Frgw ocpw ap. a egmxugjt!

      You don't know what I said, but as soon as you figure out my algorithm you will. And you'll know what anyone else using that algorithm said. That's security through obscurity.

      On the other side of the coin, is SSH2 Key-based authentication. I can tell you exactly how that works, but that knowledge won't let you log into my computer. You need the key. That's real security.

      --
      My other car is first.
    9. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is just a higher level of obscurity.

    10. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      No, it's a fundamentally different kind of obscurity. When people talk about security through obscurity they're talking about the algorithm, not the key.

    11. Re:A good reason *not* to keep these things secret by thogard · · Score: 1

      Only if you can prove the algorithm and I don't think you can. It turns out that they way RSA (and many of its friends) work, there is the assumption that the ratio of public to private keys are 1:1 but because of wrong assumptions based on the Euclidian algorithm mean that there may be many pubic keys that work with your private key. Also anyone else notice that the 1st 15 bits of every ssh-2 protocol packet are always encrypted nulls?

  11. Yup by mfh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well the above letter was kind of a joke. I mean, there were flames shooting out of the buildings!

    But the seriousness of the insecure EAS could have been much more deadly. Like if a nuke was detonated and people were told that some city was safe to return to, even when in reality a bunch of nuclear fallout was starting to cling to everything within miles of the blast.

    I'm not sure how effective hacking the EAS would be, but I am damn sure I wouldn't want to find out. I say, take it offline until they can secure it (and I don't mean by getting Diebold involved).

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Yup by d474 · · Score: 1
      Like if a nuke was detonated and people were told that some city was safe to return to, even when in reality a bunch of nuclear fallout was starting to cling to everything within miles of the blast.
      If a nuclear war has already happened, this "EAS" spoof is going to be the absolute least of anyone's worries. Likewise, if a nuclear war is starting, knowing about it in advanced isn't going to do you, I, or anyone any good, except governement officials that have bunker VIP passes. As for me, I'd rather be listening to my favorite music on headphones in my last 15 minutes rather than some dork announcing the end-of-the-world-is-coming-so-you-better-hide- under-your-desk-Johny!
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    2. Re:Yup by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      umm.. i think someone already screwed around with it thanks to the report release, as we in san diego just recieved a flashflood warning for san diego county until this evening.. and there isnt a cloud anywhere near by. no chance of rain, either.

      pm

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    3. Re:Yup by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it is likely that some percentage of the population would survive a war. Sure, nobody within a mile of a detonation is likely to be alive, but further out if you have cover and a supply of iodine, safe food, and water, you'll have a chance to make it.

      In any population there will be those who are more tolerant of radiation that others. A nuclear war will simply select for humans who can tolerate these conditions. Sure, mankind will probably live in the stone ages for a thousand years or more, but eventually things will clean themselves up enough for civilization to re-emerge.

      I wonder what such a society would be like? It would have some knowledge from the high-tech past, but little means of employing most of it...

    4. Re:Yup by libolt · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like Roland Deschains' world in The Dark Tower series by Steven King.

    5. Re:Yup by niew · · Score: 1
      I wonder what such a society would be like? It would have some knowledge from the high-tech past, but little means of employing most of it...

      Ask the damn dirty apes...

    6. Re:Yup by JVert · · Score: 1

      Steven needs to hurry is ass into paperback so my cheapass can get some read on!

    7. Re:Yup by Alioth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The BBC TV film "Threads" (made in 1983) had a go at describing it. The film was made at the height of public 'nuclear paranoia', and apparently makes "The Day After" look like a soap opera by comparison (I've not seen "The Day After" so I can't really comment on it).

      "Threads" is the most depressing film I've ever seen. When I originally saw it (aged 12) I had to turn off the TV right after the nuclear attack happened and couldn't sleep for weeks because it made me realise what nuclear war was about - I hadn't even barely understood until then. I recently got it in DivX form off a friend and watched it all the way through. It is not a film that comes under the heading "entertainment".

      There is a good synopsis here: http://www.ibp-intl.demon.co.uk/nuke/threads.html

      The leaflets the UK Government were publishing at the time (when we all thought nuclear war was basically inevitable - it was when not if - and we had no control over it; it was largely an American or Russian decision whether the world should be scorched): http://www.cybertrn.demon.co.uk/atomic/

      If you google around a bit, there are some quite good descriptions of the UK's (long-dismantled) emergency warning systems - it was multiplexed on the same phone lines as the Speaking Clock and could basically start and stop the sirens centrally. The UKWMO (also now defunct, described in the 'Protect and Survive' URL above) controlled the 'all clear' etc. signals.

    8. Re:Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comedy gold! Thanks for the laugh...

    9. Re:Yup by scifiber_phil · · Score: 1

      Actually, the way my life has been going recently, I would like to spend my last 15 minutes racing toward ground zero.

    10. Re:Yup by nick0909 · · Score: 1

      I second that, Threads was probably one of the most powerful movies I have ever seen. My father has a video-taped copy of it, Fox aired it unedited many many years ago. If you can find it, give it a watch. Just don't plan to sleep for a few nights.

    11. Re:Yup by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Try reading "A Canticle for Leibowitz"
      by Walter M. Miller Jr.

      IMHO, the most profound post-apocalyptic novel I've read.

      By the way, it's just 19 Days & Counting, according to Daniel Joseph Min
      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8 &edition=us&q=Daniel+Joseph+Min+
      http://tinyurl.com/4cjx5[google.com]

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  12. good fun by Frostalicious · · Score: 2, Funny


    Use this to replay a nation wide brown note. Also good fun. Buy stock in American Standard.

  13. Not a big deal... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Funny
    I mean it's not like anybody would actually.....

    Oh my god! The russians are attacking!!!!!

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  14. Very interesting site about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://generisite.net/

    1. Re:Very interesting site about this.. by emurphy42 · · Score: 1
      http://generisite.net/
      I checked this out (expecting a LastMeasure-type troll and prepared to warn folks about it), but it appears to just be a hit counter. Huh? (Tested with IE 6, Firefox 0.9, Opera 7.11)
    2. Re:Very interesting site about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tested with IE 6

      pwnd

    3. Re:Very interesting site about this.. by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

      very, very strange indeed mr. murphy.

      keep up the good work, chum!

  15. That thing is for real ? by Ralconte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    During the 9-11 attacks, did that beep come on the TV and radio? Some commedians have joked that it didn't so I don't know. I got my news from the web -- bbc.co.uk was fairly, and the local radio announcers gave the info as they saw it. Did the gov't even try to use the Emergency Alert System? Seriously, I thought the alert was just for a nuclear attack by the USSR, never ment to be anything more than that -- a useless anachronism since the 1970's. Sounds like another group of buearucrats who want some of the Patriot Act resources to pad a sagging budget.

    1. Re:That thing is for real ? by tabacco · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe it's also used for more localized alerts like "Tornadoes are coming" and "Whoops, the chemical plant up the street just started leaking toxic gas."

    2. Re:That thing is for real ? by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. It was not activated. Check the 9/11 commission report. It isn't just for a nuclear attack by the soviets anymove. Check it out here.

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    3. Re:That thing is for real ? by Ralconte · · Score: 1

      Ok, tornados don't hit my part of the US often, so I've never seen those. But a chemical plant nearby once released toxic fumes from a fire, and it wasn't on TV, the police came by to tell us to evacuate. So really, I spent a childhood listening to the *Beeeeeeeeep* in the middle of commercials. Nowadays, no beep, just silence. But I've never seen it used at all.

    4. Re:That thing is for real ? by KDLynch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It did not go off at our radio stations during 9/11 .. but then we are nowhere near any of the places that were attacked. However, it is used. We have had it go off for weather emergencies, and for Amber Alerts to find potentially kidnapped children. (In both cases locally, the children were found within an hour of the alert being broadcast.) So, not quite useless... but could be used better than it is. Oh, and we had to pay for all the equipment, and the changeover in equip from the EBS to the EAS. So no fed moneys come to us to pay for it. On another note, we do not monitor every possible frequency out there for carrying forward EAS alerts... someone wanting to "hack into the system" would have to also know the exact frequencies we do monitor, and override those freqs... not that that's too hard to figure out, but it's another wrench in the way. KDLynch

    5. Re:That thing is for real ? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      They're used for ALL instances of severe weather, and they're supposed to be used for national alerts. Amber Alert (child abduction alert system) is implemented in most states via EAS, according to Wikipedia.

      Try a radio. I've found that TV stations will simply overlay the broadcast with more useful info than EAS (audio only) can possibly provide, and they don't even broadcast the monthly EAS tests anymore. Radio stations, though, broadcast just about every EAS alert that affects their listening area.

    6. Re:That thing is for real ? by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's also used for severe weather alerts. And if some terrorist cell does plant a "dirty bomb" or other nastiness (unlikely, but possible) it can be used as an evacuation alert.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    7. Re:That thing is for real ? by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard that in one of the Dakotas they had a chemical disaster and the police tried for an hour to get an annoucement over the air. Turns out that all the local broadcast stations were remotely managed from 1000 miles away and nobody could get ahold of anyone who could put an annoucement on the air. Gotta love radio station consolidation...

    8. Re:That thing is for real ? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      No, the alert wasn't just for nuclear attack. I've heard the alert go off several times whilst I lived in Houston - mainly for tornado alerts, severe weather and flash floods. You can tell when it's coming because you hear bursts of "modem noise" on the radio just before the emergency alert message starts playing.

    9. Re:That thing is for real ? by regen · · Score: 1

      I live not to far from the Pentagon (about 3mi as the crow flies), and I was at home on 9/11. the emergency alert system wasn't actived here. Of course every media outlet was covering it, so I don't know what good it would have done.

    10. Re:That thing is for real ? by mhaisley · · Score: 1

      What wrench in the way, your state EAS plan has to specify the PEP stations...

  16. Old news... by ktakki · · Score: 4, Informative

    Almost two years old, in fact:

    http://www.securityfocus.com/news/613

    I'm sure one could find even earlier discussions of this vulnerability.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Old news... by Repton · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA? We know it's old news --- the article mentions this itself, providing the same link you give.

      The news here is that, on Thursday,

      ...the FCC responded by opening a formal review of the EAS, beginning a public comment period on how the network might be improved. One of the issues the FCC is probing is the security of the system.
      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  17. Old news. by dj245 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was reported two years ago. We'll probably hear about it in 2006 too, unless someone takes advantage of it.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  18. not only unencrypted but a public spec by js7a · · Score: 4, Informative
    the EAS digital signal is the same signal that the National Weather Service (NWS) uses on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Weather Radio (NWR).
    -- www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/eas.html

    NWR Specific Area Message Encoding (SAME)

    Full spec (pdf)

  19. No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EAS isn't a system that is actually used. Its just a porkbarrel project that Americans simply ignore. In fact, on 9/11 EAS wasn't even used. People simply watched cable.

    1. Re:No big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a holdover of the old EBS system of the Cold War days, you know, before cable TV...

    2. Re:No big deal by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      What kind of warning should have been broadcasted?

      Go to your local atomic shelter because two big houses thousands of miles away collapsed?

      This system is meant to transmit information how to protect yourself from something that is to come.

      If they had, say a 15 minutes warning, they might have used it to transmit an evacuation order, but after the planes crashed, it was too late anyways.

      --
      bickerdyke
  20. Look on the bright side... by mabu · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure it's nothing Halliburton or Diebold can't fix for $400 Million via a no-bid contract.

    If they went public with this, I'd bet good money it's a precursor to an already set up proposal from a well-connected contractor who wants to ride the wave of public fear all the way to ten times the cost of fixing it.

    1. Re:Look on the bright side... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      I think you nailed it. For the record, I'm not an American, but doesn't the fact that glaring, fundamental security flaws such as these exist at all after spending billions of dollars on security make you wonder what their real priorities are?

    2. Re:Look on the bright side... by mosch · · Score: 1

      But only if the contract is cost-plus. After all, this needs to be fixed, no matter what it takes, right?

    3. Re:Look on the bright side... by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Nah. Halliburton's physical infrastructure; Diebold is voting machines.

      This one will go to one of the Beltway Bandits: SAIC, IBM, Booz-Allen, CSC, that sort of thing. There may actually even be a good idea by the lead architect, but implementation will turn into a 70-member team (lead architect, physical infrastructure architect, networking team, authenitcation team, 8 member database team, 5-member testing team, 20 member rollout team, QA, CM, security, managers). There will be at least four subcontractors. Everybody will have a clearance, making them twice as expensive. It will all be conducted in a secure building, which costs ten times as much.

      I wish I were joking. I've seen this literally hundreds of times. The sort of thing that one smart guy could bang out in a few weeks becomes a five-year-long, hundred-million-dollar event which produces worse results. The contractors want to use "ordinary" developers rather than one super-smart guy. The contracting officer knows that one super-smart guy operating on his own doesn't have all the pieces, but he's not going to force the big contractors to use his smarter design.

      The worst part is that many of these projects simply fail. The software gets written and it never gets used. Either it doesn't work well enough, or it turns out to be a bad idea. And often, the government just recompetes the contract, and often the original contractor wins the contract again, since they're the expert now! Its disgusting.

  21. If it ain't broke... by Cranx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...don't fix it.

    Seriously. We don't have to coat everything in 50 feet of kevlar, spaced 100 feet apart and communicating with 1GB encryption keys.

    Unencrypted broadcasting modem: scales well and very cost-effective.

    1. Re:If it ain't broke... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      After all the slashdot publicity it'll be broke

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    2. Re:If it ain't broke... by Cranx · · Score: 1

      You would think, eh? Yet, not a damn thing will happen. Watch.

  22. Well, Yeah. by c0dedude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When it was made, that wouldn't have been a problem. It was put in to repeat a message sent in the event of soviet nuclear attack. Each node would relay to all the other nodes. Of course, modem technology was rather scarce at the time, so security wasn't the top concern. This thing was never designed for security.

    This is one of the few times where I can see hacking as terrorism. If you hack this, you are, in my eyes and in those of the law, a terrorist. Leave this one be.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    1. Re:Well, Yeah. by mnewton32 · · Score: 1

      When it was made, that wouldn't have been a problem...modem technology was rather scarce at the time...

      Actually the current system was put in place in 1997, replacing the old system from the 1970's

    2. Re:Well, Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was 1997 before or after Al Gore invented the internet?

  23. oh goddamn it by veritron · · Score: 1

    I had this idea. I so had this idea. It was going to be great. I was going America my naked ass on national TV live at 7:00 PM next month. I'd already worked out my monologue and everything.

    Bastards.

    1. Re:oh goddamn it by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, nice try at humor, but EAS is text (which is converted to audio) and audio only.

      Yeah, you can send out a civil emergency EAS from Bush saying "I broke into the Emergency Alert System, and I'm BUTT NAKED!", but they won't see your naked ass, and, with the way most TV stations (at least in my area) are, EAS messages aren't broadcast - they read it, and then have their meterologist set up an alert (rarely are there non-weather EAS messages in my area, and Amber Alerts they just put a ticker on with their own text). However, radio stations almost always broadcast EAS.

      BTW, leave out the cities with the lowest technology densities - you can only broadcast to 32 states (if you're broadcasting nationally), and if you're broadcasting in one state, it's 32 counties max.

  24. In search of the perfect dam by syrinje · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First of all, a small clarification - I agree that critical, life-saving infrastructure must be secure. That unauthorized access to these systems must be prevented. That public confidence in the sources of information is key to saving lives in the event of a disaster - and hence must be guaranteed to be genuine. A 100% of the time.

    That said - don't y'all sprain yer hamstrings to jump up and point fingers at the "government" or twist this into an open-source vs. closed source issue.

    Every system is designed in relation to its operating environment. The EBS was originally designed for a far more benign environment than exists today. I bet the primary goal of the designers was to come up with a system that was simple and effective and would work even if large parts of the power grid and the telephone network collapsed. It is inconceivable that they did not ask themselves if they needed bullet-proof authentication mechanisms - it is equally probable that they discarded that requirement as being potentially failure-prone. Given the fairly benign security environment that they designed for, and given the technology available and the overarching goal of simplicity - they cam up with what is really quite functional.

    And then the world changed (surprise, surprise). the environment that surrounded the EMS changed, rapidly and unpredictably. Where previously it was safe to assume that natural disasters would bring people in the community together to work in co-operation to face the threat, we now wonder which sleeper cells activate in these situations. The comfortable security blanket of yore that RipVanVinkle aka RVV dozed is suddenly yanked off - exposing us to the elements.

    Its like waking up one day in the shadow of a dam and suddenly seeing a thousand leaks in it. The small leaks have always been there - all dams leak and sweat a little. But now we know that there are people out there that seek to widen the cracks and stuff them with C4 and stick some fulminate in them (amazing how much chemistry you can pick up from the newspapers isnt it?). So RVV franctically tries to seal the leaks in the dam. Paranoia? Perhaps.

    The real tragedy is that the time that should be spent tending to his crops, playing with his children, making hot, sweaty love to his wife and dreaming big dreams in his afternoon nap is now spent in searching and classifying and closing the leaks in the dam.

    Will RipVanVinkle make his dam perfect? Can any dam be made perfectly leak free? Go figure.

    --
    See that long UID - that's what you get for lurking too long
    1. Re: In search of the perfect dam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The EBS was originally designed for a far more benign environment than exists today.

      Bull! The EBS was designed to tell people that the Russians had decided it was time to rain firey radioactive death on the capitalist menace, and that our time to live could be counted in minutes! There hasn't ever really been a "more benign era". I think we get so far into this "OMG! TERRORISM!!!" mindset that we lose sight of that sometimes.

    2. Re: In search of the perfect dam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the flaw in your reasoning is equivocation. He meant benign in the network-security sense; you don't.

    3. Re: In search of the perfect dam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the one thing the Russians wouldn't do was try to fool the US into thinking it was under nuclear attack.

  25. Emergency Broadcast System problems by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative
    The previous system, the Emergency Broadcast System, was based on two components - teletype messages to broadcast stations, and secondary broadcast stations monitoring "primary" broadcast stations for an alert tone.

    On February 21, 1971, an alert message announcing a nuclear war was sent over the teletype network by accident. Somebody at NORAD loaded the wrong paper tape. Almost no stations broadcast the message. One station in Florida actually did. After that, NORAD lost their authority to send emergency action messages on their own.

    The current system has more input sources than the old one did. There are weather alerts, and now even child abduction alerts. If there's ever a phony message, it will probably come from some "authorized" input source.

    A detailed history is here.

    1. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by Jayfar · · Score: 1

      Right. And the primary stations had a sealed envelope (I believe sent out monthly) with authenticator words for each date to validate the TTY messages. My recollection on specifics is fuzzy beyond that. I remember later when I worked at a secondary station our EBS box had a hair trigger - sometimes kicking on and putting Pittsburgh Pirates baseball broadcasts from KDKA, a primary in our area, onto our airwaves (until we quickly reset it).

    2. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by RadioTV · · Score: 2, Informative

      This brings up a good point. At the two stations (one FM and one TV) that I support the only alert that get automatically inserted are tornado warnings for our county - incase the operators had to run for cover. Everything else is interpreted by a live operator and the appropriate information is included in our broadcast.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    3. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't the stations broadcast the message? If the message was authentic it probably should have been distributed. Sure, it was extrordinary news, but is the correct solution for the radio stations to broadcast absolutely nothing while all the switchboards at NORAD are tied up confirming an attack which will kill anybody not underground in 15 minutes?

    4. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by fwc · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In a "previous life" I did some work for a radio station, including some stuff in relation to the old EBS system.

      The previous poster is correct. There were actually two tones (853 and 960 Hz) which were broadcast at the same time for 22.5 seconds. By using two tones it prevented false detection. Usually. I built more than one EBS detector during that period with a couple of Tone detectors (NE567 if I remember correctly) and an and gate and a 555 timer to not alert unless the tone was on for more than 10 seconds or so. This was primarily used in later years for local emergencies such as tornadoes. However, for nationwide emergencies another system was used.

      Each station had a "big red envelope". The station I worked for had it at the operator position in the main control room. Digging around the internet I found this site which has a picture of an envelope from 73. I remember the newer ones (about 1991) being better printed, but about the same. The envelopes were sealed and were not to be opened unless the station received an EBS message via teletype which needed to be authenticated. This envelope was replaced on a regular basis.

      At some point during the period I was around the station I asked the owner about the envelope, and he related the story about the February 1971 activation. Evidentally he was on duty when the message came in. (Looks like there's a copy of the message up on this site). He opened the envelope and checked the authenticators. Now you have to realize that everyone pretty much knew that the only likely reason for the nationwide system to be activated was nuclear war. Saying that he was rather worried by this message is an understatement. I can't remember if he complied with the warning or if it was called off fast enough that he didn't have to, but I do remember he was either ready to shut down or did.

      If you google for "1971 EBS Activation", You will find some other stories about this event.

    5. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by fwc · · Score: 1

      Hate to follow-up my own post, but 1971 EBS Norad yields even better results at google.

    6. Re:Emergency Broadcast System problems by wfberg · · Score: 1

      here is an account of the EAN activation from 1971; scroll down to 'Nuclear Alert' Proves False.

      It must have been the most chilling false alert ever..

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  26. The great search by JackpotMonkey · · Score: 1

    Damnit this means I'm going to have to dig through my spare parts for my old dialup modem, and I swore it would never see the light of day again.

    --
    ______ Eagles may fly but monkeys don't get sucked into jet engines.
  27. This is only a test... by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    ...of the Emergency Broadcast System. Had this been an actual emergency, you would all be dead now. This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System

  28. omg! i can change everyone's preferences! by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i think there must have been a mistake, mr. taco.

    i seem to be able to modify everyone's preferences. it's right there, in the left hand corner!!!!!

  29. It isn't as bad as it sounds. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, its based on low-speed modem transmissions over public airwaves. What wasn't mentioned is:

    The low-speed transmissions are done by 'primary' stations, who have big transmitters. 'Secondary' stations choose primary stations to monitor, and retransmit the alerts the primary stations transmit.

    The low-speed transmissions are done on their broadcast frequency.

    So, you know what you need to exploit this? Locally, you need to know which local station(s) is/are primary, and a transmitter big enough to override the monitored signal, or a group of transmitters big enough to override the monitored signal at each of the monitoring antennas.

    Nationally, you would need to do this for EVERY primary station.

    It isn't perfect, but its actually pretty reasonable security. A far bigger threat would be someone who could inject a believable warning into the primary systems, and even there, I'm not so certain its really a worry (see: 1970s NORAD mistake that no one broadcast).

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
    1. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Stop it with the reality. This is slashdot, and we're trying to get upset and figure out just how to blame Bush for it. (nothing personal just that hes the sitting president and most of us arent old enough to vote)

      Anyways..

      People don't realize that this system isn't a completely computerized network written by geeks. There are humans in the loop. Dispite the mistakes they make, many of them have some things computers dont, common sense and skepticism.

      So long as enough of them have enough common sense, or skepticism, they'd recognize a hoax or mistake up the chain. Exactly like the NORAD incident. Most sensible people would wait for some confirmation before panicking the community.

      Anyways.. Back to my own little world where I imagine that its simple (hell even possible) to broadcast whatever I want on every TV in the nation with my C64 and 1200 baud modem.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Well, I spent 4 years DJing at a radio station, as well as doing some engineering.

      We had a hard enough time getting our DJs to remember to trigger the *required* EAS tests, and the incoming alerts (weather, Amber, etc.), much less getting them to remember to approve a made up one with weird info.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by SagSaw · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, you know what you need to exploit this? Locally, you need to know which local station(s) is/are primary, and a transmitter big enough to override the monitored signal, or a group of transmitters big enough to override the monitored signal at each of the monitoring antennas.

      It's quite a bit simpler than that. Let's assume I want to get a message out to a large (local) audience via EAS. In most areas, the cable TV system will broadcase EAS alerts on all channels (or at least sound an alert tone and advise viewers to switch to a particular channel, which then carries the alert message). This means that all I have to do is inject the message into the system of the local cable provider.

      "Over-riding" the signal of whatever station they monitor is not that difficult. All you have to do is be physically close to their receiver and have a reasonable amount of power. I imagine that, at most, 5W-50W is all that would be needed in most cases. 5W is easily provided by a hand-held radio and 50W or more can be found in off-the-shelf mobile transceivers.

      If you don't know what station the cable company monitors, or where the receiver is physically located, it might get a bit more difficult, but not much. In this case, simply try every station/location in order of likelyhood.

      All this assumes, of course, that the cable provider uses an automated system. If their system involves a real-live human reading the message prior to broadcase, your message would have to be believable enough to pass a cursory sanity check.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    4. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      a) The cable provider is probably a primary and not a secondary. Primaries are chosen based on two things: audience and transmitter power. Obviously, transmitter power only applies to broadcast stations. Cable systems are probably (not having worked in TV, I wouldn't know) primaries, based on their viewer numbers and the fact that it'd be easy to use them as a good distribution to a large geographic area with more regularity than a broadcast primary. Thus, you'd need to inject the message into the message-passing front end, which means it would need to be perceived as coming from an authoritative source for whatever you were trying to send.

      b) Sure, you can override that 50 kilowatt clear channel (as opposed to Clear Channel) AM station with a 5W transmitter if you can get 5 feet from the antenna. Where's the antenna? Odds are its on property you have no access to. Its probably not easily accessible, and the antenna for the receiver isn't a huge, easy to spot thing, either. Maybe if you had inside info as to its location, but even there, the secondary is going to human-check (unless its an automated station). Every location is a much bigger proposal than you're passing it off as.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      Cable companies aren't usually primaries. They pick big broadcast stations because they are broadcast stations. A secondary station wouldn't be able to get the message from a cable company.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    6. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      Cable systems are probably (not having worked in TV, I wouldn't know) primaries, based on their viewer numbers and the fact that it'd be easy to use them as a good distribution to a large geographic area with more regularity than a broadcast primary.

      It doesn't make much sense for the cable system to be a primary given that no secondary stations can receive their signal. Most radio stations have a much longer range than the franchise of a typical cable system. Both of these factors make a cable operator useless from the standpoint of distributing messages to other broadcasters.

      Sure, you can override that 50 kilowatt clear channel (as opposed to Clear Channel) AM station with a 5W transmitter if you can get 5 feet from the antenna. Where's the antenna?

      Well, my local cable operator is located in a mixed residential commercial area. Right at the edge of their parking lot, they have a small tower with a number of antennas on it. Most appear to be television receiving antenna to pick up the local channels. There are a couple of dishes and antennas that appear to be for microwave frequencies as well. It is probably a good bet that their EAS receiver is nearby.

      I don't mean to make it sound like any idiot with a walkie-talkie can inject a signal. However, with a little work and a little luck (such as discovering the location of the reciever and finding a secondary station that won't do a human check on the message before retransmitting it), it most probably is doable.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    7. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, you know what you need to exploit this? Locally, you need to know which local station(s) is/are primary, and a transmitter big enough to override the monitored signal

      Which isn't difficult at all...

      Once you're a few miles away from the multi-megawatt signal, a transmitter of a few watts can over-power the signal locally.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...what about call-in radio? Seems like an obvious exploit....Couldn't someone just call in to a live talk show, say they will be speaking on government insecurity, and promptly play the tones?

    9. Re:It isn't as bad as it sounds. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No, of course not. Talk radio is not live, it is all on a delay. The host would hit the big yellow button, and your modem tones would never be broadcast.

      Same thing as trying to curse, or anything else inappropriate on talk radio.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  30. EAS MESSAGE by mboverload · · Score: 0, Funny
    __This is for immediate release to all EAS channels of distribution__

    This Emergency Alert System message would like to inform you that hakz0rz pWn j00 aLL. All j00R Em3Rg3ncy Al3rt sY5teM 4RE BeLoNG t0 Slashdot!

  31. Emergency Alert System Insecure -- a phase by jeephistorian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its just a phase. I was insecure too when I was tht young.

    ________________________

    --
    Huh?
  32. That's just not true...it has a password! by Spoing · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows that the secret EMS pass code is 00000000! What posers!

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  33. Re:omg! i can change everyone's preferences! by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

    someone respond to my comment please, this is the first comment i ever made on /. after three years of lurking.

  34. Marconi said it best the first time by shubert1966 · · Score: 1


    Most people thought the EBS looked kinda stupid when the blackout happened a while back.

    Had it been an actual terrorist attack - we'd have been toast. Maybe they should switch to Vonage.

    This shit was great back in 1950, but equal rights and democracy were great in the 60's and we don't seem to have them anymore either.

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  35. Been following EAS/EBS for a while... by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Informative


    It truly was designed for a different era, but has its uses even today. Virtually all weather emergency bulletins are sent out via the EAS protocols today, which doesn't normally affect people in, say, Silicon Valley, but makes a big difference in Tornado Alley and in Florida right now.

    A few miles from here there was a fire at a chemical factory in La Mesa, CA... I was sitting there watching something on a high-cable channel when I hear a tone and see scrolling text at the top of the screen advising me to evacuate the area. Thank you EAS, and thank you Cox Cable.

    When San Diego had its Cedar Fire in 2003 (largest fire in the history of CA, which altered everyone here's life) the EAS was used by the NWS, FD, and PD to provide information on evacuation across all channels on the cable systems (not sure about the radio, they might have been covering that themselves).

    The California Office of Emergency Services has a Emerg. Digital Info Service that uses some of the same technology and protocols as well (includes the much-reknowned AMBER alerts).

    Don't think that this is some relic, this is used and tested on at least a weekly basis nationwide (SD Info).

    That being said, efforts to modernize and update things are great. I'd like to see some sort of emergency protocol for data packets, similar to the emergency phone service that allows infrastructure workers' phone calls to have priority in the midst of an emergency. There should be a EAS sitatuion website that is update out-of-bounds and is replicated (through some fancy AS routing) to servers all across the country, so it's always accessible. Think of a FEMA-run Akamai.

    The company I work for was even considering some way to allow people to have EDIS/EAS alerts pop up (via Messenger service or some other client) whenever they were released for the area they're in (won't work because of all the RFC1918 space they use :\).

    Emergency Alert Systems, and Civil Defense systems in general ARE still around, and ARE working within their original intent, but more public attention needs to be brought to them, so that all know about them. It's not so much security, but having more eyes on them will undoubtedly help suggest further improvements.

    And I agree with the earlier poster... ANYONE who hacks a system like this deserves the 20 years of time they'll get. That's just dumb. It's on a par with DOSing a 911 call center. Don't do it. You WILL cause loss of life and NO ONE will have any sympathy when you go to prison for a very, very long time. In fact, I'd love to help catch you.

    1. Re:Been following EAS/EBS for a while... by splines · · Score: 1

      In the Netherlands the government has just begun setting up a alert system that broadcasts SMS messages from single SMS cells. So if there's an gas leak in an area (not many tornado's here) they can send an alert to the cell that covers it and everyone mobile phone connected to the cell will receive a SMS with instructions. Normally in these cases the turn on sirens in the neighbourhood and there are emergency broadcasts on radio and tv, but the sirens don't have 100% coverage. Mobile phone coverage *is* 100% and there are enough of them to get everyone informed quickly. They also plan to use this system for commercial applications, like instructions to avoid traffic jams etc. I think this is going to work a lot better than the siren/emergency broadcast system, because some people would think the sirens are just a test, won't hear them or won't turn on their radios (before choking in the chlorine cloud). When you have 3/4 of the people receiving instructions to their phones, virtually everyone knows within a few minutes what's going on.

  36. Tell us something new? by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice to know terrorism is really being taken care of seriously, so between this, voting and letting anything onto a plane that the tabaco companies deem ok, what else isnt working? the next terrorism incident will strike terror into everyone not because of fire and death but because they will suddenly realise their worst fear - that the people incharge are all idiots!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  37. Accenture will fix this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $40 Billion dollars.

  38. Yawn by uofitorn · · Score: 1, Informative

    Another article covered earlier in the day by The Register...

    --
    "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
    "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
  39. Blatant lie - check snopes.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.snopes.com/science/poolpiss.htm

    Read the last paragraph

  40. That site...wow. It's very explaining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explains everything!
    http://generisite.net/

  41. Do you pay attention to "Emergency Broadcasts"? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I don't.

    A) I live in California, they don't pre-announce earthquakes.

    B) for a few years, I lived in Nebraska, where they did broadcast, with some regularity, warnings of tornados and flooding. Flooding NEVER applied to ME (since I didn't buy a house in a low area), and after a while, I began to treat tornado warnings as special invitations to go outside and see the cool angry-green lightning. My house was well built and held up well to 100 mph+ winds. No trailer for me.

    C) Al Quesodilla just nuked LA. Well, shit, I guess I won't go there anymore.

    Seriously, not to discount the system totally, but what percentage of you actually use/get benefit from it?

    I suspect you don't need an emergency broadcast to tell you that Huricane XYZ is bearning right down on you now (sorry Tampa, hope you come out ok).

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Do you pay attention to "Emergency Broadcasts"? by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      I too live in California, and I've gotten use out of it exactly once, and that's when a railroad car overturned and it vented gas which, at the time, they thought was toxic, so a shelter-in-place order went out. You think they could've waited five minutes, though ... Dave was just about to do the Top Ten.

    2. Re:Do you pay attention to "Emergency Broadcasts"? by dave420 · · Score: 1
      "Something bad's happening. If you don't know about it already, it doesn't affect you. If it does affect you, you know already."

      basically :)

  42. hi lurking lamer luser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u suck

  43. Re:omg! i can change everyone's preferences! by Palidine · · Score: 1

    respond :)

  44. This was in 2600 a long time ago! by bostonguy · · Score: 1

    I don't have the exact issue handy, but someone wrote an article in the past few years explaining exactly how the system works, and how to possibly gain access/control.

  45. Perhaps this is all a set up by cpu_fusion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Not that I'd be surprised about the emergency broadcast system having security problems, but consider one way the government could make this work to their advantage.

    They could have already set up monitors that could very quickly traingulate the source of an interference, while in parallel secretly laying down a secure system. Then by encouraging press coverage of the security holes, they would raise the possibility of a terrorist trying to use said security holes, and in doing so, give up their location.

    /shrug

    Puting on my meta-tin-foil-hat.

    1. Re:Perhaps this is all a set up by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      And exactly how many do you think would do it from a static location instead of the back of a van or similar ?

      Even with a system like you suggest it's probably going to take the best part of 1 hour or more for law enforcement to show up. Then if they are lucky they will catch 1 or 2 flunkies operating the equipment. If they are unlucky they will find a van with some automated equipment that was activated via a delay loop as the guy parked and walked away.

      If they wanted to get more secure why not use a cell phone as a modem into a computer controlling your equipment. Then you've got remote data feed into your equipment

    2. Re:Perhaps this is all a set up by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that would only let you find the device - not necessarily the criminal. What if someone builds an EAS transmitter that also receives a start signal on a different frequency or has a few-hour delay built in, and drops in the median of a major highway; is there any real way to determine who put it there? Or places it in a back corner/restroom of a public library or bank building, or....

      Besides, it'd be a royal waste of time to use such a system if a script-kiddie sent the signal "local origination" - "required weekly test" - "this county only" - "valid for 00:00" followed by the Badgers flash clip as the emergency broadcast.

  46. pls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dear torrirst pls no attack pls thx

  47. It's real by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    Oh trust me, it's for real. And yes, they do use it. And let me tell you, this article worries me. On a day like today, a script kiddy could inflict some really serious chaos.

    Taylor B. Palm Bay, FL

  48. at least there trying to make things better by Liskl · · Score: 0

    based on my own view of the situation i think that an over hual is needed in a large scale national georgraphic

    --
    --- Website: http://spinhex.sytes.net/
  49. Broadcasting is insecure by billsf · · Score: 1

    What does it take to hijack a cable TV head-end or an STL? (studio transmitter link) If your TV tells you to "put your head between your legs and ...." wouldn't it be prudent to verify the information? While most pranksters would rather play an "XXX" film or get some political message accross a more devious action is certainly more thinkable than the unthinkable.

    If you are not directly in an emergency, atleast take an effort to verify it. On 11 september 2001 my inital reaction was that it may be a 'super hack' and someone (some group) had managed to take control of all the news media from the US to Europe. In the tech company I was working, this was seen as a real possibility. Only after a couple calls actually confirmed it, did the shock and horror of it really set in.

    While one should never trust one type of media, verification from multiple sources is very secure. EBS has served its purpose and EAS is certainly obsolete. It is however just one more source of information, little as it may actually represent.

  50. It's the Stingy and Battery show! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Kids...Itchy and Scratchy can't be here today. But instead,
    we've got the next best thing! It's the Stingy and Battery
    show! They bite. And light. And bite and light and...yatta,
    yatta, you know what I'm talking about.

  51. The title of this article should have read: by d474 · · Score: 1


    Emergency Alert System is Pretty Much Fucked

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  52. Hoax - true story by danharan · · Score: 1

    About 13 years ago, St-Pierre (et Miquelon) was warned of an impending tsunami from some official New York source.

    At least it looked official... and it could be a huge disaster for the whole island and its 6,000 or so inhabitants. Local learneds debated about it on radio and TV.

    No confirmation with said authorities could be obtained, and Canadian media weren't reporting the story either. What to do? There had been a devastating tsunami in Newfoundland in 1929. Heck, a third of the old women in St-Pierre were refugees from that even; they came to work on the island, only to get married there. (Ok, the Prohibition meant they were also flush with cash, so they could hire maids and take them out to drink...)

    But I digress. It seemed like a hoax, but it was plausible. Hundreds of people decided not to take risks, and go to the highest "mountain" (read hill) they could go to and wait.

    No wave came. Parents preferred being safe than sorry, and kids played during this grand improvised mass picnic, a festival of sorts.

    This was even though the mass of evidence was that this was just a hoax, not even cleverly executed. Based on this, I reckon an exageration about a real event could empty an entire city or village, perhaps even more. No doubt people living close to the hurricane in Florida right now that thought they were sufficiently far away from the "eye" might be convinced to evacuate.

    What does a malicious hacker, criminal or terrorist do once people evacuate? Or is fucking with their minds the whole point?

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    1. Re:Hoax - true story by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      " What does a malicious hacker, criminal or terrorist do once people evacuate? Or is fucking with their minds the whole point?"

      The better thing to do from a terrorist point of view would be to inform the public that everything is fine and that the real alart after a real terror alert was a fake, meaning that people stay in the area and higher casualties ensue.

    2. Re:Hoax - true story by danharan · · Score: 1

      The terrorists aren't really interested in casualties. They go after symbols to get you to respond with irrational actions - which so far, they are succeeding at.

      If 9/11 had been intended to kill massive amounts of people, they would have waited mid-day, and/or prevented people from leaving the building.

      I'm sure if you asked most people in the US what the terrorists wanted, they would claim the destruction of our civilization. In that kind of environment, it's not surprising people would hold absurd ideas about the intentions of terrorists.

      With such counter-factual beliefs, you folks unfortunately do not stand a chance.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  53. I've been hearing about this for years by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    While it is a huge concern, it's neither new nor surprising information.

  54. Re:omg! i can change everyone's preferences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "someone respond to my comment please, this is the first comment i ever made on /. after three years of lurking."

    Hi, dude!

  55. It was broken from the gitgo by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a broadcast engineer, this system was IMO, broken from the gitgo.

    However, let me also point out that the huge majority of the system, if it all worked, which is rare, is secure in that the average stations gear can only accept input from the designated primary station in the area, and the NWS services which are also a part of the "network".

    The rest of the secondary sites in a given area are proscribed from the generation of any spurious information by the FCC, with the penalties being both uncontestable, and damned expensive for the offender who originated the false message.

    The rest of the problem is its dependability. The local system here has to jump the NRAO Quiet Zone, and is I believe now a satellite link, itself a huge problem in the event of an emp from an atomic device on the same side of the planet, or solar flares also can potentially render the link useless.

    Once you get the alert up here from star city, then you have the problem of poorly designed gear foisted off on us broadcasters by the relatively short timetable mandated by the last methodology change about 15 years ago. That gear is now failing, and the maker, who was probably incorporated just to peddle the things, has since found it impossible to survive on the expendables the system requires, like its printers unique thermal paper etc. No schematics were furnished without a lot of yelling and screaming on our part, and sending it back for expert service? Fugetaboudit. Expert service does not exist in many cases.

    And then the commission wants to fine us 27,000 per malfunction to boot. Most of the failures are beyond our control as the testing frequency is not sufficient to locate a malfunction before its a real malfunction.

    Yes, its broken, hopelessly so. It needs to be replaced with something that actually works AND is secure from outside attacks.

    And it needs to be stated up front that anyone with an idea of sueing the users for using an unknown submarine patent they ran to the patent office and got a patent on after the system was developed, will do jail time until such time as the system is declared unusable as this one s/b now. We went thru that already with this system, some jerk, smelling an easy dollar, ran and got a patent on it from our slumbering USTPO and sent all of us letters demanding $1500 a year for a license to use the system that was developed and mandated by the government. I think all of us were in close harmony during the chorus that told the commission and the equipment makers to pay it, we weren't about to pay annually for something that was mandated by them once we had purchased the original gear and installed it.

    They faded away into the slime from whence they came eventually, and the patent was eventually set aside, or so we are being told.

    Yah, we need a new system, one considerably more well thought out than this one ever was.

    --
    Cheers, Gene

  56. New use for my Atari? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean it's possible to gain control with an Atari 2600? W00t! And here all along I thought it was just for playing games. I can't wait to see this technology incorporated in my Colecovision too!

  57. Makes You wonder by d3ity · · Score: 1

    It sorta makes you wonder what would happen in the event of another terrorist attack on america. A terrorist sets a bomb off in washington DC, and our alert system is shutdown by a simple attack on the system. There was no real reason to question the systems security. The logical response would be the system is heavily encrypted and secure. Hats off to the government. After 9/11 they couldnt figure out that a SECURE system was required? Sigh. How many people would die before they changed the system? I doubt it would cost a terrible ammount to make the system secure. Thankfully someone brought attention to it before it was exploited.

    1. Re:Makes You wonder by Medevo · · Score: 1

      How many schoolchildren had to die in school shootings before the government realized that problems in schools and parenting need to be fixed?

      Not enough yet

      Medevo

    2. Re:Makes You wonder by dave420 · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure what good emergency broadcasts would have done on 9/11... No-one knew what was going on before the first plane hit, then everyone in the towers figured something bad was happening and tried to get out. Same goes for the Pentagon (conspiracy theories aside). No magic-message-on-the-TV would have saved any lives at all, just provided a good way to scare the country senseless.

  58. Hackers: only a modest change is necessary by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

    "... this was a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. Had this been a real emergency, the tone you just heard would have been followed by panicked shouting and terrified screams. This concludes our test of The Emergency Broadcast System."

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
  59. My experience by FakePlasticDubya · · Score: 1

    When I worked at a radio station, I was responsible for scheduling and issuing the required weekly and monthly tests of the EAS.

    I always thought that the system wasn't exactly that secure, as it was a relayed system and if a primary station issued a false EAS message, it would be relayed to all of those stations designated to listen to the primary...

    One time when configuring a new EAS machine, I was tempted to issue a Tsunami warning (for the Chicagoland area), but decided I'd rather not go to jail or pay some huge fine.

    --

    "We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
  60. Secure? by Cow007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let us remember there is no such thing as "secure" there is only more secure. Don't rate this "100% funny" its not funny at all.

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  61. Ouch! by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    Im sure every hacker right now is thinking "damn I wish I had thought of that! However even if the incoming server used authentication as basic as caller ID it would help alot. (but with VOIP spoofing who knows)

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  62. Simple solution by andrewjj20 · · Score: 1

    add a digital signature of some sort with a public key, that would prevent any unauthorized use of the system, and still keep it open for any body. the only problem is how do you distribute the public key, not everyone has internet, and broadcasting it every now and then opens up the possiblity for abuse.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole point of public key cryptography is you DON'T need to have a shared secret. It doesn't matter who gets hold of the public key so long as everyone keeps their private keys secure. Broadcasting public keys is fine.

    2. Re:Simple solution by slamb · · Score: 1
      The whole point of public key cryptography is you DON'T need to have a shared secret. It doesn't matter who gets hold of the public key so long as everyone keeps their private keys secure. Broadcasting public keys is fine.

      It's not fine. It doesn't matter if an attacker gets your public key, but it does matter if your people get an attacker's key and think it's yours. They could only accept keys that have been signed by another key...but then how they get that key and know it is valid? You need to have a secure distribution channel.

    3. Re:Simple solution by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why?

      All you need is a central signing authority a la SSL websites. Everyone has a copy of the CA's key hardcoded into their emergency receiver equipment. You just have to make bloody sure the CA is never compromised (and there are ways to do that - the current SSL CAs seem to be remaining secure).

      The bit that you distribute - the CA root cert in your box - can be sent out publically. It doesn't need a secure distribution channel.

      This would be an entirely appropriate level of security for an emergency broadcast system.

    4. Re:Simple solution by slamb · · Score: 1
      All you need is a central signing authority a la SSL websites. Everyone has a copy of the CA's key hardcoded into their emergency receiver equipment.

      See, that's a secure distribution channel. My point is that you simply can't have gotten all the keys through broadcast. And if you include one with the hardware, you're not.

  63. You are a Moore-on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to criticize stuff, you should learn to spell.

  64. How about a virus? by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember Terminator 3 where Skynet had created a virus that scrambled global communication? I would think that a virus could be used to broadcast bogus or misleading signals. And it could spread quickly enough, especially over cable to have a major impact.

  65. The airwaves are secure.... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EAS is trigged by unencrypted slow-modem-like broadcasts over the broadcast airwaves. That is, station A has a machine that listens to station B, and when station B broadcasts an alert that needs to be heard on station A, a magic box interrupts programming to broadcast the alert.

    Sure, there's no tech security in the EAS system itself, but there is plenty of physical security at any TV or radio station under the jurisdiction of the FCC. To put it bluntly, if their broadcast signal is overtaken by a hacker by any means, that station is at risk of having its ability to do business taking away from them forever by losing their license.

    To create a false EAS message, an attacker would need to know what stations monitors what other stations in the EAS network, and also be able to overtake on of those statioons to get their own broadcast on the air. This just plain isn't likely... not to mention whatever public panic might be created would be mitigated by the real EAS system quickly publishing a "Ignore last message, we've lost control of our system!" message.

  66. Bush is Osama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No differerence, dude. They are mutually employed by each other, and the best of friends.

  67. Stupid question by nuggetman · · Score: 1

    But why are these problems being brought to light NOW instead of the ~7 years ago when the EAS replaced the EBS?

    In the age of terrorism suddenly every fucking thing is exploitable, yet none of this was brought to light when whatever legacy app was implemented 10 years ago.

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  68. It was Secure UNTIL posted on /.!!! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    it was at least secure thru obscurity untill you told the people on slashdot!!!! now it will be hacked next week!!!!

  69. (Off-topic) Re:tornado sirens too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good books those. Especially the last one.

  70. 4th EAS Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • AYB: ALl Your Base Are Belong To Us. Make Your Time.
  71. Captain Midnight by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the bugs Captain Midnight found in the satellite TV system. Did they ever fix it, other than encrypting the signal?

  72. Semen. On your face. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we speak, I am unloading tablespoon after tablespoon of my gelatinous haploid DNA all over your face. It is being rhythmically pumped from my vas deferens and prostate, straight through the quivering shaft of my penis and impacting at approximately 15mph.

    Jesus Christ, this feels incredible.

    Shut up, you stupid fuck. Osama Bin Laden is assuredly not Bush's "best friend." Just because one oil company's family is tight with the house of Saud does not mean George W. Bush SPECIFICALLY is butt-buddies with Osama.

    Get a life. And wipe my cum off your face, already.

  73. Post-Apocalyptic Perspectives (was Re:Yup) by sevej · · Score: 1

    A realistic description of such a society may be found in Walter M. Miller Jr's science fiction classic A Canticle for Leibowitz . Some excellent reviews of this book may be found here, and, on our own Slashdot, here.

    If I remember correctly, the first part of the book concerns a garden variety electronic schematic entitled "Transistorized Control System for Unit Six-B". A monastic religious order has devoted itself to the preservation of this and other "memorabilia". In an attempt to preserve it, one of the younger monks has reproduced it by hand. The reproduction is not an exact copy though; it has been "illuminated" with gold lettering, ivy climbing around the margins, and cherubs. One of my favorite scenes is when the "illuminated" copy is mistaken for the original.

    I imagine that the residents of such a world would marvel at the amazing artifacts left by "the Ancients". They might wonder about things like Road , as the inhabitants of John Crowley's book Engine Summer refer to our freeway system. I can hear questions like "What was it used for?" and "I wonder how they lived." (See David Macaulay's Motel of the Mysteries for a scholarly discussion of what our descendents might think a toilet seat was used for.)

    Of course, perspectives like these are not unfamiliar to us; think about how we view the Egyptians and the Mayans. Makes one wonder...

  74. EAS and Severe Weather Warnings are Recent by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I'm in my late 40s, so I grew up with the US/Russian Cold War terrorist threat of nuclear war and I remember people building bomb shelters in their back yards when I was a kid. The first time I heard the Emergency Broadcasting System announce that this was a real warning, not a test, was probably around the late 80s, and I really freaked for a few seconds before realizing that they were using the thing for flood warnings. It's a perfectly sensible thing to do with it (:-), but for my whole life it had meant "If it's not a test, then Nuclear War Starts Now"

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  75. "Testament" - non-gory , post-nuke, frightening by billstewart · · Score: 1
    "The Day After" was mostly a made-for-TV disaster movie; I didn't get much emotional effect from it. "Testament" was far more frightening and gripping, by avoiding all the destruction-pr0n and focusing on the people, and it still hurts to remember it 20 years later.

    It's set in a quiet northern California town, nice family place, Dad's commuted to work in San Francisco the day the bomb hits, so after the TV goes out and enough communications gets restored to know there's been a nuclear attack, they know he's not coming back, and everybody starts dieing of radation from the fallout over the next few months, kids and old people first. None of the black twisted cities, it's still a nice sunny day out, and there's nothing they can do to stop it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  76. Nevada _does_ get floods by billstewart · · Score: 1

    OK, not _all_ of Nevada, but lots of desert areas are susceptible to flash floods when it rains - that's why they teach you stuff about "never go down in the arroyo unless you can climb to safety if there's a flash flood". And there are lots of mountain areas in Nevada that do actually have water in the rivers, and you'll find cities usually get built where there's water. Reno in particular is at some risk of floods, though Las Vegas is much less so.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks