Slashdot Mirror


It's Just the 'internet' Now?

This morning Wired News announced that 'web', 'net', and 'internet' will no longer be capitalized in their stories. Is this the next logical step after ditching 'e-mail' in favor of 'email' , or should the global computer network still be treated with a proper name? For more discussion, see Wikipedia, The Chicago Manual, and an article profiling Joseph Turow's de-capitalization efforts.

75 of 710 comments (clear)

  1. Next move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    ... we should decapitalize "Google".

    1. Re:Next move... by abb3w · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, that only happens if the SEC get antsy enough about the Playboy interview during the IPO quiet period.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Next move... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
      The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

      ...hwah? Ever heard of proper nouns? Is "Thomas MacKenzie Darby" a brand name? If so, where do you most frequently buy me?

      Next, you're gonna tell us that you can verb a noun so long as it's a registered trademark.

      Which would be seriously McDonald's'ed up.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    3. Re:Next move... by wamatt · · Score: 3, Funny

      So who writes pron with a '0' now anymore??

    4. Re:Next move... by slamb · · Score: 4, Informative
      The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

      Wow, you've been thoroughly commercialized. Brand names aren't the only things capitalized in English.

      Proper nouns (also called proper names) are names and denote unique entities. [...] Proper nouns are capitalized in English and most or all other languages that use the Latin alphabet; this is one easy way to recognize them.

      (from Wikipedia)

      We refer to it as the Internet. Corporations have intranets. The capitalization conveys meaning. Wired's usage is wrong.

    5. Re:Next move... by iksowrak · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Internet was never a brand name but the capital I Internet is used to differentiate between the global Internet and other internetworks or internets. There's more than one internet but only one Internet.

    6. Re:Next move... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Funny
      How about decapitalizing 'God' ?

      *gets struck by lightning*

    7. Re:Next move... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Funny
      It worked for "digital". But then again, they couldn't afford the capital letter.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    8. Re:Next move... by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 4, Funny

      i'm running low on thomas mackenzie darby. i couldn't find any at the dollar store. i checked everything's a dollar. radio shack was also out. wolf camera said they'd never heard of it. i may have to order some Online on the Web and have it fedexed.

      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    9. Re:Next move... by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thus the fairly interesting tracking of usage. For instance, some works refer to the south (as in the American south), while others refer to the South, which gives it a stronger identity. The same thing can occasionally be seen for the west/the West. It certainly gives the voice of the author or publication a stance on how they view the region.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    10. Re:Next move... by TechnoPops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is exactly right. Because, really, if someone says "internet," is there going to be any other one that you're going to confuse it with?

      --
      "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
    11. Re:Next move... by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next, you're gonna tell us that you can verb a noun so long as it's a registered trademark.

      Well, you just verbed the noun "verb."

      --
      bp
    12. Re:Next move... by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now look at what you've done. You made Uncle Bill mad again. ;-)

      That's uncle bill now.

    13. Re:Next move... by trentblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, the proper title is Friggin' Moron.

    14. Re:Next move... by Hobbex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The Internet" is the NAME of a single computer network. There are other networks with names, like Fidonet, Bitnet, Arpanet, etc, but most of them are not around anymore. Saying that it is no more a proper noun than car, refrigerator, or restaurant is simply wrong.

      If you had named your fridge "Old Whiny", your car "Betty", and your restaurant was named "The E-Coli Farm" it WOULD be correct to say:

      "Old Whiny is broken and the food is bad, so let's jump in Betty and go to The E-Coli Farm." (I skipped the food because few people name individual items of food.)

      That the The Internet happens to be a name in definite form does not make it any less of a name, just like The Netherlands is still the name of a country, and The Rocky Mountains is still the name of a mountain chain. (Note that "a rocky mountain" is something entirely different - just like "an internet.")

    15. Re:Next move... by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

      An internet is any connected series of networks. The Internet is the globally connnected system that we are currently using.

    16. Re:Next move... by optikSmoke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahhh, I'm glad at least one other person in this world has reasoning abilities. Slashdot needs a +50 Right, No More Replies Necessary moderation.

    17. Re:Next move... by trentfoley · · Score: 5, Interesting

      An interesting point that I have considered many times.

      Those that want to keep "God" in the U.S. pledge, etc., claim that "God" is a generic term for a spiritual, not religious concept; and, therefore, does not endorse any specific religion. Bill O'Reilly holds this belief, as do many conservatives.

      Those that want to remove "God" from the U.S. pledge, etc., claim that "God" is the proper name for the Judeo-Christian supreme being and represents an endorsement by the U.S. government of a specific religion. Which is, of course, unconstitutional.

      My suggestion to mend this dilema has always been to uncapitalize "God" thereby removing the association with the Judeo-Christian supreme being. Hell, I'd even be for making it plural... One nation, under gods, indivisible...

      My unrealistic suggestion is to change "God" to "the laws of physics".

    18. Re:Next move... by legojenn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, I guess when the aide to our (then) Prime Minister called Mr Bush a moron, she was just addressing him by his title....

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  2. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And this is News? err sorry. news

  3. What about website? by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can we please make that one word, like most of those who actually build them do?

    1. Re:What about website? by barzok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and stop calling them "sights" unless they're tourist attractions to be looked at and photographed.

  4. Re:finally... really... by Nos. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been really annoyed by things like MS-Word that would always automatically capitalize the "i" in "internet". I never found a reason to capitalize works like internet, web, etc. unless grammar demanded it (like starting a sentence). The question now is, how long is it going to take the rest of the world to catch on.

  5. im of the opinion that by GillBates0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    should the global computer network still be treated with a proper name?

    the intarweb should still be treated with teh proper name

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  6. hey, i started this trend by BillLeeLee · · Score: 5, Funny

    wired is stealing my thunder. i started this trend when my shift key broke. curse you wired.

    damn shift key, i can't use the exclamation point to emphasize my rage.

    --
    www.google.com
    1. Re:hey, i started this trend by telstar · · Score: 4, Funny

      psst! Look over on the other side... There's two of them!

    2. Re:hey, i started this trend by Rellik66 · · Score: 3, Funny

      tHATS NOTHING. mY CAPSLOCK IS STUCK ON, BUT AT LEAST TYPING "iNTERNET AND wEB, ETC." WON'T LOOK FUNNY ANYMORE.

      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

  7. not quite the same as 'television' yet by jdallien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It doesn't bother me either way, captialized or not, but I think the comparision to television and phonograph isn't quite correct at this point. As of right now, we only have one Internet, hence referring to it as "the Internet", whereas there are many televisions, etc. To me the captialization comes more from using it like a proper name more than like a brand name. Somewhere down the road maybe there will be many networks called internets and it would make more sense to use it just as a normal noun.

    Or we could just not worry about it and get to work on the more pressing problems... should Microsoft be spelled with a $?

  8. No more /.? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hopefully we can drop /. now and instead hold down the SHIFT and all surf over to ?>

    John.

    1. Re:No more /.? by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      ?> is pronounced "what's greater". Surely appropriate for the new name for /.

      John.

  9. Re:The internet by ack154 · · Score: 4, Funny

    eh hem...

    "The internet is a communications tool used the world over where people can come together to bitch about movies and share pornography with one another."

    Great movie.

  10. The Internet is my God. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why? The simple answer is because there is no earthly reason to capitalize any of these words. Actually, there never was.

    Well there was never any reason to capitalize "net" for the simple fact that it is really 'net which is a shortened version of "Internet". I consider the Internet a specific place and thus deserving of capitalization.

    If It's Capitalized, It Must Be Important.

    There are a lot of things that are important that aren't capitalized. Take for example "air" and "water". Most people don't capitalize either one of those. I suppose there may be some groups out there like "wateries" or "airheads" that may refute my claims but they can write their own damn non-sense. I'd prefer they save it for 4/1/2005 though.

    That it transformed human communication is beyond dispute. But no more so than moveable type did in its day. Or the radio. Or television.

    Small nitpick here... If you are talking about "the radio" instead of radio there is a slight difference. Radio is talking about the medium where "the radio" is talking about the big box over in the corner of the living room that talks.

    I will continue to refer to it as "Internet" as it is my all knowing God. Maybe that's why Google is capitalized? :)

  11. it's no problem by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    lowercase makes one handed typing easier

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  12. it could be worse.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    at least the names are staying the same. there are places in the world... well ok france,..where they have renamed words in an attempt to stop encroachment of english into their language. like referring to email as 'courrier electronique'. my own lack of capitalization today is a tribute to ee cummings however.

  13. I'll just be happy if... by barzok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people stop writing WEB when it's not an acronym or abbreviation.

    1. Re:I'll just be happy if... by mbbac · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll be happy when people quit talking about MAC users.

      --

      mbbac

  14. Re:in other developments by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose people using "/." have been doing this all along, else it would be "?."

    =Smidge=

  15. The reason by Order · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There never was a reason to capitalize "Internet"?!
    Or perhaps Wired News simply don't know what they're talking about?
    The "internet" is any set of networks connected with routers. The "Internet" is the largest such network, that uses TCP/IP.

    From FOLDOC:

    Internet
    internet

    --

    I am a genius; therefore, you suck.
  16. A wise move with much precedent by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Based on observed trends, it seems to be a good move. As a manager, I rely on my team to give me direction on technological improvements. Decapitalization of key words is consistent with the observed behaviors 'in the wild'. For example, I recently received the following emails that suggest Wired's decision is accurate:

    'im working on something alredy, so go stuff yourself and get back to browsing the internet'

    'Hey ass, next time you can't get to your stupid Sims board, check whether your network cable is even plugged in before telling everyone that "the internet is down"'

    'Jeesus, Ben, stop sending me that gd Bonzai Buddy trash! I don't care if it's cute, that little bastard screwed up my internet settings! I lost a weeks worth of work!'

    If my team uses that type of capitalization, then I know it's just a matter of time before it catches on.

    Regards,

    PHB

  17. who cares by nuggz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it really matter?
    Does the capitalization improve or impede understanding in any way?

    English is a fluid language, constantly changing and slightly different everywhere.
    It has different spelling pronounciation and accents everywhere. Despite the best hopes of the wannabe language police, english has and will continue to change.

  18. Name of place by Barryke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see the Internet as a place, like Amsterdam or Mars.
    A proper name of place is capitalized, hence i capitalize the Internet accordingly.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
    1. Re:Name of place by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmm... isn't Amsterdam in 'The Netherlands'. For that matter, isn't Mars in 'The Solar System'. I may buy pants at Target; but I might find a pair I like at The Gap. Having or lacking an article is a very poor indicator of whether something is a proper noun.

  19. Unfortunately... by nlawalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    The internet will continue to be a victim of capitalism.

  20. Tanenbaum by Gumshoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason we capitalise 'Internet' is so that we can distinguish between it and mere 'internets'. 'Internet', with a lower case 'i', refers to any set of interconnected networks. Whereas 'Internet', with a capital 'i' refers to "the specific, worldwide internet that is widely used to connect universities, government offices, companies and [...] private individuals". That quotation incidentally comes from Tanenbaum's textbook, "Computer Networks" (3rd edition, page 16) where he made the exact same distinction that I have just made.

    It's always been capitalised and always will be AFIAC.

  21. maybe you're just kidding, but by IshanCaspian · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people joke around about this, but the truth of the matter is that he never claimed that he "invented it," only that he secured funding for it. This funding was instrumental in its creation. Really, this whole joke is just another example of a witty Republican smear that has no basis in fact.

    http://dir.salon.com/tech/col/rose/2000/10/05/go re _internet/index.html

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:maybe you're just kidding, but by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Al Gore's exact quote is this:

      "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."

      OK. He didn't say "invented", but he didn't say anything about securing funding for the internet either. Gore used the word created, which is defined by the Merriam-Webster online dictionary as:

      Main Entry: 1create
      Pronunciation: krE-'At, 'krE-"
      Function: verb
      Inflected Form(s): created; creating
      Etymology: Middle English, from Latin creatus, past participle of creare; akin to Latin crescere to grow -- more at CRESCENT
      transitive senses
      1 : to bring into existence
      2 a : to invest with a new form, office, or rank b : to produce or bring about by a course of action or behavior
      3 : CAUSE, OCCASION
      4 a : to produce through imaginative skill b : DESIGN
      intransitive senses : to make or bring into existence something new.

      The bottom line - Gore was claimed that the internet was created as the result of his initiative. While he may have contributed on a political level to its creation, that's not what he said, and his statement can readily be interpreted as him attempting to take more credit than he was properly entitled to. The "smear" has a basis in fact, if only because Gore didn't say what he later said he had meant to say.

      And it was funny. It's the same sort of thing as Dan Quayle mispelling "potatoe". The statement was a mistake that made Gore look stupid and egotistical. The right capitalized on it in the same manner that the left capitalizes on Bush's mistatements and malapropisms.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  22. AP Stylebook by Cycline3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The AP Stylebook says that Internet should be capitalized and it's still e-mail instead of email and they still make use of 3 character state codes instead of the newer 2 character postal ones. That book is the gold standard and anyone publishing should be following it.

  23. Wikipedia comment by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Speaking as a Wikipedia admin) - god, oh god, why did you link to the *TALK* page and not the article? Sigh...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  24. Worldwide Web by techstar25 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Another one that always bothered me..."worldwide" is one word. So it should be Worldwide Web...as in ww.slashdot.org and not www.

  25. Re:You know... by Bearpaw · · Score: 3, Informative
    Al Gore invented the "Internet" so shouldn't we ask his permission before we change any names?

    I'll never understand why this pathetic lameness is still considered funny for so long after the Republicans started exaggerating what Gore actually said. Is it some sort of self-mocking humor by the people dumb enough to repeat it?

  26. Oh my god, the internet's been kleenexed by Black+Perl · · Score: 4, Funny
    e e

    cummings

    would
    be

    proud

    --
    bp
  27. Some cap changes by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I almost NEVER proper-case microsoft (lower-casing/deprecation intentional). Sometimes, to get around honoring uppercasing for ms, I just use the initial msie, ms excel, NT4.0, win XP or W2K SP#... This way, it looks like a minor omission.

    Hmm, I guess ms will try to use meta tags and other technology to "clean up" documents, especially those that have "microsoft" (lower-casing/deprecation intentional) in them. Or, didn't they try that, only to be blasted for over-reaching into peoples' documents?

    When will we get people to correctly use:

    -"log on" as a verb and "logon" as the noun?

    -"insecure" for emotional states of mind

    -"non-secure" regarding the nature of the Internet. The Internet cannot be "insecure", since it is not a sentient/organic/thinking thing.

    When I was aboardship/aboard ship, and was Petty Officer of the Watch, I/we answered the landline/land line as "Quarterdeck, USS Flint. Petty Officer Syes Speaking. This is a non-secure line; how may I help you sir, or ma'am?"

    Phone lines are never insecure, so why the Internet? I think it was because a bunch of marketers took over the security message aspect of the Internet. Or, some engineers who are FANTASTIC programmers just happened to select the wrong word from the dictionary and it "stuck".

    Even "unsecure" might seem better that "insecure".

    =========
    Hmmm... I just ran a "dictionary.com" search on "insecure" and got these:

    1. Not sure or certain; doubtful: unemployed and facing an insecure future.
    2. Inadequately guarded or protected; unsafe: A shortage of military police made the air base insecure.
    3. Not firm or fixed; unsteady: an insecure foothold.
    4. Lacking stability; troubled: an insecure relationship.
    5. Lacking self-confidence; plagued by anxiety: had always felt insecure at parties.

    ========

    Well, to me, number 2 sounds stupid, as if someone POST-COLDWAR got caught up in the "insecure Internet" description thing.

    I guess I'll have to go to pre-Internet boom dictionaries to find out if "insecure" back then was described as in item #2 above...

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  28. Internet vs. internet by p0rnking · · Score: 4, Informative

    With most of the words in question, I don't see the point in having the first letter capitalized, such as email, web, net (wich is slang for Internet), but with Internet vs. internet, I thought there was a difference between the 2, where internet refers an "inter-network (a link between networks which has not been tied to The Internet), and Internet refers to the "net".

  29. The Internet vs. private internets. by argent · · Score: 3, Informative

    Correctimundo, my friend. I was wondering why nobody made this point: any routed network using the Internet Protocol is an internet. The first private or restricted internets like MILnet were around long before the publicly-facing portion of the ARPAnet expanded into the Internet.

  30. Excellent info. on WIkipedia... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wikipedia has a good write-up at the top of its entry for Internet:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet

    and I appreciate the manner in which it addresses the "popular parlance" for "internet" in terms of the commonly used services on the Internet, e.g. "A system running internet services." (my example, based on Wikipedia's narrative).

    There is also a good discussion of Capitonyms:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitonym

    I think Wikipedia got it right.

  31. Stupid Wired by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (a) Nobody cares. Nobody, most of all Wired (which tries to coin terms and screw with the language unsuccessfully on a very frequent basis) has the ability to just decree that everyone is going to change capitalization or spelling of a word. The includes dictionaries -- they just codify common usage.

    (b) Insofar as there is a correct way of doing things, "Internet" should be capitalized. We use "the Internet". It is a proper noun (which, surprise surprise, should be capitalized) that refers to something quite different from "an internet" -- I can build "an internet" running IPX attaching a couple of networks, but "the Internet" runs IP and is a rather large entity that currently spans the world.

    (c) I hate journalists that try to leave their mark on the world by affecting the language.

    (d) Tell you what. I think that there's "no reason to capitalize 'Wired'" -- after all, there's another term, "wired", which exists, and surely we should just merge the two. So from now on, "Wired" can be referred to as "wired". Of course, the newly-redubbed "wired" people will probably take issue with this, as it's confusing and doesn't gain anything, and violates English rules, but I want to get my name out there on etymologies for mucking with a word. It's "wired" now. Oh, and "Tony Long", the editor pushing this? He can be "tony long", or just "long" for short.

  32. Language authorities by Rich+Klein · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why would you look to Wired for questions about language? That's what dictionaries are for! If you want to know if a word should be capitalized or not, look to a dictionary like OED or Merriam-Webster. Incidentally, Merriam-Webster lists internet with a capital "I."

    --
    -Rich
  33. Pacific Ocean or "pacific ocean"? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Informative

    The internet was never a brand name, thus, there was no need to capitalize it.

    Capitalization is determined by whether or not something is a proper noun, not by whether it is a brand name. The Internet is a proper noun, as opposed to "the internet", which would refer to, say, one's private corporate internet.

    If you'd like other examples: nobody owns the "Pacific Ocean", but because there is only one "Pacific Ocean" (despite being many oceans that could be called pacific) we capitalize it. There are many moons, but only one Moon. There are many presidents, but President as a title is capitalized, because it is used as a proper noun.

    The proper way to refer to Google is "Google" when using the term as a noun -- it is a proper noun that refers to a company. The *verb* "google", meaning "to search for on Google", is not capitalized.

  34. More importantly... by cafebabe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can we now ban apostrophes in "CPU's", "MP3's", etc.? It just kills me that even The New York Times (which is normally a stickler for grammar) has adopted that bastardized punctuation as their standard.

    --
    When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
  35. Capitals... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's funny that in the development of the roman alphabet, originally there were only capitals. Lowercase letters were developed to make text more legible. So what do we actually still use capitals for? I mean, capitalizing names or words in a title or nouns etc. is just a convention. Just like spelling. In Europe, languages occasionally undergo a spelling change. What bugs me is why they never change the spelling to be consistent, let alone phonetic (e.g. corresponding 1 to 1 with the sound).

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  36. Re:Internet by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your conclusion is valid but your reasoning is backwards.

    The Internet is a proper noun referring to the worldwide public internet managed by the IETF. It is to distinguish this specific internet named the Internet from the private and restricted access internets that it should remain capitalised.

  37. It's a proper name by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We still capitalize the Earth, Atlantic Ocean, and McDonalds. Just because something's world-known and basically ubiquitous doesn't keep it from being a proper noun.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  38. Wired and their "next moves" by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, if you're just trying to be Wired (which means being relentlessly hip to try to avoid losing their self-assumed position as authority on Internet culture), there's a fair number of predictable "next moves":

    Internet becomes "iNet". This is to fit with Apple's product naming scheme, which is cool, and therefore something that Wired is terribly concerned about associating itself with.

    "I see" becomes "i c". Wired constantly promotes the claim that the Internet (oops, sorry -- "internet") is going to completely drive our lives and our culture, and currently most authorship is done via chat. What better way to argue their point than to let themselves be completely swayed by typos and shortcuts from chat?

    Micropayments are "hip", so Wired stops selling "subscriptions" and starts selling "micropayments in twelve chunk block minimums".

    "Internet time", or "beats" (a desperate attempt by Swatch, who has put every useful gadget and more onto a watch, to produce new required features to drive watch sales) will be adopted by Wired. I'm not sure that "beats" are hip or not, but they're certainly stupid and Internet culture-oriented, so Wired should love them. They can say "It took me @45 to write this article".

    Wired will no longer refer to themselves as a "magazine". "Magazines" are pre-Internet culture, and "'zine" is only marginally more "hip". No, tablet computers are "hip", and so Wired will sell "paper tablets".

    Speaking of "'zine", almost any word can be made more hip by chopping some prefix off and replacing the prefix with an apostrophe. We know this because a couple of sci fi authors have done this. Therefore, I won't "Download and read Wired on the Internet by 4:00 PM". Instead, I'll "'nload 'n rez wired on the internet by @3452". Where would we be without Wired for entertainment?

    1. Re:Wired and their "next moves" by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "(a desperate attempt by Swatch, who has put every useful gadget and more onto a watch, to produce new required features to drive watch sales)"

      I swear, the whole .beat system has got to be the stupidest thing I have ever come across (and Sega was even stupider for implementing it in PSO!).

      We already have a very nice time standard for the internet. It's called "Coordinated Universal Time" or UTC for short (because the acronym UTC confuses speakers of all languages equally). The internet even has its own protocol for distributing UTC to various machines. The only problem one might have with UTC is the possibility of leap seconds cropping up every now and then, but all you need to do is poll your favorite NTP server and your clock will be back on track.

      But Swatch has to go and break things for the sole purpose of trying to be "cool."

      First off, they're stupid enough to use the length of a mean solar day as their standard, which means they inherit the problems of UTC. They could have tried some different standard, something that made their "beat" system an actual alternative to UTC instead of simply dressing it up in a new set of clothes, but that might have resembled innovation too much. The only difference now is that we talk about leap beats instead of leap seconds.

      Then they go off and break the Prime Meridian. Ever since Harrison started to build his little trinkets (now he could build a watch!) over two centuries ago just about everybody has been using the line of longitude passing through Greenwich, England. But no, God forbid they conform to anything vaguely resembling a standard, they have to pick their own meridian. Continuing with their theme of "just dress up UTC," they don't actually pick the meridian going through Swatch headquarters, they pick the nearest multiple of 15 degrees from the Greenwich Meridian.

      But the real flaw in the system, the one that drives the final nail in the coffin of this God-awful idea that can serve as a symbol of the dot-com bubble all too well, was the idea of dividing the day into an even 1000 "beats." Yay. 1000. A nice round number. It's just like SI. Except we already have SI!!!. And the SI unit of time is not the mean solar day, it is the second! Everything is seconds! 60 seconds in a minute! 3600 seconds in an hour! 86,400 seconds in an SI day! And now we have 86.4 seconds in a beat? Yay! We now have the first man-made unit of time that isn't an integer number of seconds! At a time when people such as myself catch hell from self-styled "metric" zealots for measuring things in units of 0.3048 m and 0.45359237 kg, Swatch has now developed a system of measuring time that everybody can agree is fucked up!

      Swatch could have done something neat. They could have been constructively different instead of just being different in an effort to be "cool" (which they apparently also failed miserably at). How about a system of time that does nothing but count off integer seconds? No minutes, hours, days or years, just seconds. They pick some arbitrary time to start counting from (say, 2000 January 1 00:00:00 UTC or 1999 December 31 12:00:00 UTC, since "Y2K" was so freakin' trendy at the time) and have a watch that tells you how many hectoseconds it's been since then (they could even call them "beats" instead). It'd be simple, it'd be different, and it'd have absolutely nothing to do with "time in the real world" (since so few people are able to divide any given integer by 864 in their heads). And it'd have an advantage over all the other time standards widely used today in that it is purely SI (UTC has that leap-second fudge factor to add into TAI, and even the TAI put out by BIPM ticks off an MJD every 86,400 s). The only problem I'd have with it then is the fact that the WWVB signal doesn't carry information on the current offset between UTC and TAI (and NTP does even less), which would mean having to put the TAI offset into my radio-controlled watch by hand, but I'd put up with it for the niftiness factor alone.

      Does Swatch even offer a radio-controlled watch, or is keeping accurate time not important enough a feature to put into one of their watches?

  39. URL - url? by otisg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are we also going to start lower-casing acronyms?
    It seems that everything that requires a bit more thinking or complexity, even if it's trivial, gets simplified. That is why we no longer have beautiful architecture, furniture, et cetera with ornaments, but rather super-simple, utilitarian everything.
    Lame.

    --
    Simpy
  40. While we're complaining... by EvanED · · Score: 4, Informative

    The abbreviation 'i.e.' does NOT mean 'for example.' If you want 'for example', use 'e.g.'

    The former is an abbreviation for the latin 'id est', which means 'that is'. It's a rephrasing of what came before.

    Your use is probably not strictly wrong, as reading it with 'that is' works, just 'e.g.' ('exempli grati') would work better.

  41. Learn your Latin roots! by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought the point was that my 192.168.1.0/24 behind my linksys access point is "an internet". The 66.35.250.0/24 slashdot is on is "an internet" (unlike mine, a publicly routeable one). An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol".

    What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet. The Internet is the connection of multiple networks to each other. It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping. A corporate network, Slashdot's server farms, and your person home network are intranets because they are a network of machines within one logical organization.

    This is why there can be only one Internet unless you make a completely separate other network between networks that doesn't talk to the first one at all. That's very unlikely to happen until we start building colonies on other worlds, and we'll probably have slow, laggy connections between them even then. I see no reason to decapitalize the Internet since there can be only one. (No Highlander jokes, please.)

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I thought the point was that my 192.168.1.0/24 behind my linksys access point is "an internet". The 66.35.250.0/24 slashdot is on is "an internet" (unlike mine, a publicly routeable one). An internet is any network that uses, surprise surprise, the "internet protocol".
      What you are talking about is an intranet, not an internet. The Internet is the connection of multiple networks to each other. It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping. A corporate network, Slashdot's server farms, and your person home network are intranets because they are a network of machines within one logical organization.

      A collection of machines that can talk directly to each other over a common link layer (like ethernet) is a network. A network may use IP for convenience, but if everyone's using the same subnet, its just a simple network. (Calling it an intranet may be correct, but it's not very informative (unless you're talking about administrative domains), since an intranet could be a network or an internetwork.)

      A collection of interconnected networks that communicate using a common link-layer independant internetworking protocol (like IP) is an internet (regardless of whether it is connected to the Internet).

      The Internet is the largest connected internet.

      -jim

    2. Re:Learn your Latin roots! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is a network of networks, thus it sits between other networks and earns the inter- prefix. Intra- means within one's own logical grouping.

      You are attempting to pick words apart to prove what they actually mean. It'd be nice if languages were logical and that approach actually worked, but it doesn't.

      "Anti-semitic", for example, doesn't mean "against semites", but "hating Jews", since that's what it was first coined for. "Homophobia" is not "fear of similarity" but of "homosexuals".

      First there were networks. Then there was "internet protocol", which could be used to connect networks. Then there was "internet", any set of 2 or more hosts using internet protocol. Only 15 years later was "intranet" coined, to mean a LAN using application protocols popularized on the Internet.

  42. Actually, the NYT has a point. by panurge · · Score: 3, Informative
    One use of apostrophes between a noun and the plural s has been to indicate that the noun is not a normal English word. (There is more about this in Eats, shoots and leaves by Lynne Truss.)
    MP3s is a good example. "MP3" is not a word. It is not even an acronym, since it has no discernible vowels and the "3" is clearly not a pronounceable letter. Furthermore, it does not have a meaningful plural form: MP3s would presumably be pronounced "em pee three ess", but the actual pronunciation "em pee threes" seems to suggest that there are a set of threes of the MP variety.

    A really stuffy way of indicating what is intended would be to write "MP3"s, to indicate that the thing in quotes is actually a quotation of informal speech. So it is quite reasonable to put a less ostentatious punctuation mark to say "Hey, this is a complete bastardisation of English, but this is what people are using."

    Personally, I think that "MP3 files" is clearer and less offensive to us grammar Nazis, but newspapers have to reflect real world usage.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  43. Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are scores of unique things which don't have their names capitalized. The earth. The sun. The internet is now one of those things. Initially, it was named the Internet because it wasn't unique. "Internet" was only capitalized in order to differentiate it from other large internetworks of computers back in the early days.
    Your very argument is flawed. The Earth should be capitalized, but "earth" may not be. Likewise with the Sun. If you refer to it as the name of the specific object (I live on Earth), it gets capitalized. Otherwise, (I enjoy having fresh earth between my fingers) it may not be.

    Capitalization of proper nouns exists to increase comprehension. The Internet was named that way because it was unique. There were, agreed, many inter-networks, but the Internet was the "mother of all internets" as it aimed to connect them all into one global inter-network.

    Corporations have intranets, but they may also have inter-networks with various vendors and customers -- these may not always be part of the Internet. So, as long as it is possible to have an internet that is not the Internet, the proper version should be capitalized.

    Wired is merely hoping to be ahead of the curve in suggesting that it won't be long before all internets are part of the Internet -- and then it won't matter if the term is capitalized at all.
    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Proper Nouns and such (was Re:Next move...) by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny

      Otherwise, (I enjoy having fresh earth between my fingers) it may not be

      Unless you're Atlas, and are actually holding Earth between your fingers.

      Um, you insensitive clod.

  44. How's that for by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Capital Punishment?

  45. Re:Those are i(I?)ntranets........genius.. by cheese_wallet · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Intranet" is meaningless marketspeak which usually applies to a Web site.

    The technical term "internet" applies to a collection of "networked networks".

    Genius.


    Apparently you haven't made it into the real world yet. Intra means within. Inter means between. You have interstate roads (crossing boundaries) and intrastate roads (stay within the state). A corporations network that is not open to the public is an intranet. It is used only within (intra) the company.

    intranet is most certainly not meaningless marketspeak.

  46. microsoft by kaleco · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were going to decapitalise 'Microsoft', but in the end capitalism was just too much a part of their image.

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge