Slashdot Mirror


D-Link's USB-Powered Access Point

Roger Ryder writes "D-Link announced the AirPlus G DWL-G730AP Wireless Pocket Router/AP, a pocket Access Point for travelers. It can be powered by a USB cable and works as an 802.11g access point, client or router. A 3-way configuration switch on the bottom of the unit changes the mode of operation. In AP mode, the DWL-G730AP can be used to create a wireless network in a room where a single Ethernet port is provided. In Router mode, it can be used to share a single broadband Internet connection. The internal DHCP server automatically assigns IP addresses to ensure everyone in the room can connect to the Internet. It supports VPN Pass-through and firewall features including Network Address Translation (NAT) and MAC filtering to protect your wireless network from malicious attacks. When set in Wireless Client mode, the device allows connection to an existing wireless network, without having to install complicated drivers or additional software. For added mobility, the DWL-G730AP can be powered over USB if power outlets are not available. Similar devices are available from ASUS, SMC, Apple's AirPort Express and Netgear."

206 comments

  1. Is that a router in your pocket by Try+to+think+about+i · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or are you happy to see me?

  2. Again? by thejoelpatrol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This looks like another ad/press release. First the Nokia phone, now a wifi product. Why are these getting approved?

    1. Re:Again? by geoffybiggins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it was an ad then there wouldn't be mention of competing products in the same post would there? I think you're looking at this the wrong way, it's more a pointer towards emerging consumer-level tech that pretty much everyone here would be interested in rather than a shameless plug.

    2. Re:Again? by Alcimedes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because new technology is interesting to geeks? This is the first (to my knowledge) USB powered access point. That's news, at least to people who travel a lot.

      Every day I get people walking into my office asking me advice about technology I personally haven't had a chance to play around with. An article like this gives me a shot to read about a cool new product that I probably wouldn't have thought to look up until a day or so before I was leaving for a trip. Dunno, I don't mind having articles posted that give out info on new tech. that has unique features.

    3. Re:Again? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      but then again just by mentioning those similar products that THIS IS HARDLY NEWS.

      if it were a review for a new type of product or had something truly unique and was fresh then it would be newsworthy.

      or would you like to see cheapo nic's reviews on slashdot as well?(well, actually some that really did test performance would be quite useful..)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Again? by thejoelpatrol · · Score: 1

      With the proper software, any number of products like this can be USB-powered access points: http://www.macsense.com/product/broadband/WUA400.h tml

    5. Re:Again? by randyest · · Score: 0

      Your post confuses me. I read your (broken) link (HTML isn't hard -- try it!) and it seems that "any number" is, well, one.

      Maybe it's just me, but given the wording of your post, I expected more than one. I suppose "one" is "any number," but I think that's phrase is usually reserved for cases where there are several.

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Again? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Slashdot ate half my post, 503 errors suck, here's the full post

      Your post confuses me. I read your (broken) link (HTML isn't hard -- try it!) and it seems that "any number" is, well, one. And, unless you mean drivers (which the Airpad requires, but the new D-Link device does not,) I don't understand what software has to do with it.

      Most importantly, the product you linked to requires a computer to be connected to the ethernet port, upon which drivers muct be installed, and into which the Airpad connects to allow other computers to share said connection.

      In contrast, the new D-Link device plugs directly into the ethernet port and seems to allow any number of (and I do mean more than one!) devices to connect to it -- none of which need be PC or Mac computers, and so no drivers are required. Examples of such devices include Audrey, ReplayTV, TiVO, Xbox with network connector, or playstation2 with network connector just to name (and link) a few.

      Maybe it's just me, but given the wording of your post, I expected more than one. I suppose "one" is "any number," but I think that's phrase is usually reserved for cases where there are several. I also expected an equivalent device (hint: USB-power isn't the main feature) which the device you mentioned is not.

      And, since the Airpad costs $92 and requires a computer (PC or Mac only,) and the D-link device is $99 with no computer required I can think of (and link to) any number of possible devices for which this new product may have applications where the Airpad can't work.

      --
      everything in moderation
    7. Re:Again? by howlatthemoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I need to hook it to the the USB port on my computer and then plugin the ethernet cable into wall? IS THIS WIRELESS? Or, I need to carry this device and YAB (yet another brick). The Apple product's design is much more user friendly for travel. They should do something like that. It is easier for me to plug the ethernet into my laptop and make it into an access point.

      What is the big deal about USB power? It doesn't free you from being attached to the wall. And, if I want to share my wired connection, my internal wireless card is a lot easier to carry.

    8. Re:Again? by randyest · · Score: 1

      The big deal is not that it's USB power, to the discredit of the story title author, rather that this device can work without a computer (no drivers) and thus can be used with the many other sorts of wireless devices out there. Without a computer.

      --
      everything in moderation
    9. Re:Again? by jhoffoss · · Score: 4, Informative
      The Asus WL330 is USB-powered. These have been out for a few months, and in fact a revised edition is available now. You can find it on Asus' website, which I will leave it to the reader to figure out.

      No one is complaining about the product posting; everyone is complaining about the lack of a story. We could all go find five hundred products that might be worth a glance, and post it to Slashdot. But "stories" like this increase the noise-to-info ratio greatly. Instead, the submitter (or michael himself) could have searched a bit for a review on the product. If none were available, perhaps the poster could have bought one, reviewed it, and posted a story to the review. At least it would provide independent and useful information about the product, rather than PR/marketing info from DLink.

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    10. Re:Again? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      BFD!! I did this years ago with a USB wireless NIC and AnalogX's Proxy

  3. Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by waynelorentz · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, when I'm on the road in a hotel I can plug this into my USB port, then plug an Ethernet cable into it and surf wirelessly? Oh... except for the Ethernet cable plugged into my USB port.

    1. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative
      no, if you are holding an impromptu meeting within a hotel room, that has one ethernet jack, you can have everyone in the room, online through your connection..

      also, if you have adjoing rooms with someone travelling with you on a business trip, you can share a connection if they 1-charge for a connection per day or 2-one or the other jack is out of service.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no when I do that I just click on the airport icon and say "Create network" then say "hey everybody, I've set up my powerbook with wifi, just connect to 'My Computer' and if you're using a Mac, the collaboration wiki should show up in your rendezvous bookmarks".

    3. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I can do this with my laptop however......

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    4. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by Scutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The way I read this is that you can connect it to your computer *or* to the wall ethernet jack. That's why it supports USB power but also includes a separate power supply. It looks like it does not have to be connected to your computer to act as as access point or router. Seems like a nice tool, if you ask me. I'm frequently working in server rooms, etc. that do not have a handy ethernet jack near my workspace. I carry a bulky access point around to assist, but a device that can switch from one mode to another, is small, and comes in a rugged carrying case (preferrably with the words "Don't Panic" written in large, friendly letters on the cover) would be nice.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    5. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you already do this using an ad-hoc wireless connection + internet connection sharing?

    6. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by martijn-s · · Score: 1

      When I go to a meeting there's at most one person using a laptop, writing the minutes.

      What is this? An impromptu meeting to surf porn or something? That sounds like a CSI plotline to me!

    7. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      It totally depends on the company or organization culture. Even within Fortune 500 companies, there's a huge variation in how things like laptops are used. I've consulted in large companies where, if you showed up for a meeting and there wasn't a projector and anything less than 80% laptop usage, there was something wrong with the meeting. I've also worked with companies where, if you showed up with a laptop, it's like you just drove up in a Bentley and you can go months without seeing a projector in any meeting.

    8. Re:Wireless Internet - Just add a wire! by BladeRider · · Score: 1

      So, how does the device handle the initial configuration most hotels requre for in-room internet access? Usually, you have to bring up their web page in a browser and agree to their billing terms before you get connectivity outside the hotel.

      --
      j.
  4. New way to war drive? by jarich · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Cruise into an internet cafe, turn your access point, then innocent bystanders will use your access point instead the cafes.

    Hang out for an hour, record the packets, go home and extract email passwords, etc...

    This would probably work in an apartment complex, etc as well

    1. Re:New way to war drive? by damiam · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't have to be the AP to sniff wireless packets, it's quite easy to do so as a client.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:New way to war drive? by einer · · Score: 1

      Just put your card into promisc and run some sniff soft... ? Why bother with the ap? Or is there something an ap can do that my wifi laptop can't?

    3. Re:New way to war drive? by bozojoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You forgot step 4

      PROFIT!!!

      --
      lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
    4. Re:New way to war drive? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Or is there something an ap can do that my wifi laptop can't?

      Yeah. Man-in-the-middle attacks, DNS spoofing, probably a few others.... Well, your laptop could do DNS spoofing by spoofing the source address... but not reliably. With an AP, it no longer requires taking advantage of a race condition. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:New way to war drive? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      But a laptop can be an access point too. In fact my home "access point" is none other than a pc with a dlink card and hostap driver. Works great!

      Now I'm not supposing most people would want to set up linux with the hostap driver, and configure their routing, etc. But with some slick Windows-based software, you could do the same thing in a more user-friendly way. Hey, they could even charge double the normal price for the pcmcia WIFI card, and call it a "special access point" card or something.

    6. Re:New way to war drive? by zaffir · · Score: 1

      This would make a man-in-the-middle attack easier MAYBE, but it's nothing you can't do with arp poisoning.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    7. Re:New way to war drive? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Soeaking of man-in-the-middle attacks, this thing looks like a lot of fun.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    8. Re:New way to war drive? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      True, but you can't do round-trip on the same wireless card, so that would require an actual wired connection. With this, you could use this as the AP, and use your laptop as the network, and route back out to the real base station. If you set it up right (i.e. lock your laptop to a single BSID and name the network the same as the main network), you'll have other people's laptops choosing yours over the main one based on signal strength, and can then do man-in-the-middle attacks.

      Admittedly, of course, you could do the same thing if you could somehow cram two wireless cards in your laptop (maybe built-in airport on a 15" or 17" PowerBook and an external card in the PC card slot or something). You could also do it with any other USB wi-fi adapter. But still....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:New way to war drive? by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      One thing I'm worried about: Someone doing this at, yes, for example an Internet cafe, but changing the routing and/or DNS so that sites the user normally trusts, such as his bank is replaced by the attackers site. The attacker then says on the "bank's" site "you need to update your browser", which most would do without a blink. That browser is trojanned with a backdoor and some new root certificates. That way, the attacker can control the information flow between the user and the bank also when he's elsewhere, with no warning displayed.

      I've outlined this attack to my bank, but they just scoff at it. Tell me, am I as totally clueless as my bank thinks, or is it them?

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    10. Re:New way to war drive? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I happen to have a T40 *without* the internal (mini-pci) WIFI adapter, but my D-Link 802.11b and Netgear 802.11G fit side-by side in the PCMCIA slots just fine.

  5. Please Enlighten Me by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me how this would be useful? Honestly, I don't know.

    It seems to me that if you were traveling and you were at a place that had broadband, then you most likely brought along a laptop. Wouldn't it be easier to just buy an ethernet cable rather than paying for this?

    1. Re:Please Enlighten Me by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There are three ways to connect from a hotel: a modem, an Ethernet jack, and a 802.11b network. If you have the #1 or #3 then the device does not apply at all. If you have #2 then you can surf while in the bed, for example.

      Even the bed example is not a best fit; business travelers are usually tired enough, and they spend more time in restaurants (between 6pm and midnight) than in bed.

      Even more detached from reality is the claim that you can share the connection. Sure you can, but with who? When you travel you have your room to yourself. I don't see any scenario when a bunch of people suddenly needs to share some Internet connection. I travel with other people sometimes, and we have notebooks... but sneakernet with USB flash disks is the media of choice; besides, we all have Internet access in our rooms, often included into the bill which we don't pay ourselves anyway, along with newspapers which we don't have time or desire to read.

      This device may be useful to someone - anything is useful to someone, somewhere. But when I travel I need an Access Point much less than a spare battery, for example, or a stack of CDs. I do not need this AP on the road, and I don't know anyone who would need it.

      Besides, most of business travelers are sales people, not very familiar with computers and rightfully afraid to mess with them. These guys know how to turn the thing on and how to start their PowerPoint presentation, and that's pretty much all they know. The good part is that they don't even need to know more.

    2. Re:Please Enlighten Me by penteren · · Score: 1

      We often would have tech salesmen come in to give us demos of their products. They often would want to set up a small local network, and would either have to bring a router and string cables everywhere or else bring their own wireless hub, which would often be fairly large and clunky, and would require searching for an open electrical outlet. I see this as being quite useful for those type of salesmen. It would save a huge amount of setup time for them when coming in to do demos.

    3. Re:Please Enlighten Me by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, let me give a real-world application that I have used...

      At E3 this year, four of us were sharing two rooms, but we were doing all of our work in one room. Three of us had laptops, and we all would be doing work that would have required wireless internet. We knew our room would have internet access via ethernet, so I had brought along a full-size D-Link access point/router so that all three of us could use the internet access via wireless at the same time. Having one of these devices (or preferably an AirPort Express, had they been out at the time) would have saved me some room in my laptop bag.

      Just my $.02...

    4. Re:Please Enlighten Me by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      If you have #2 then you can surf while in the bed, for example.

      I was thinking more like a small office situation where you could have one computer dealing with your ISP's broken PPPOE implementation, with a USB AP providing a network for everybody else. That said, there's not much advantage to that over buying a stand-alone AP....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:Please Enlighten Me by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      This would be of use in option 3 as well, as one of it's modes of operation is as a usb-wifi adapter. Since it runs off the power the laptop pumps into the USB port, you would not need to carry a second cable around to power the adapter.

      Whether it is a 'good' use I don't know. Most laptops come with an ethernet interface these days. That eliminates the need to use a device like this as an ethernet adapter. Add a PCMCIA Wifi card that can act as an AP, and some software in the background to do nat/ipmasq, dhcp services, etc. and you already have just about everything you get out of this device.

      The only thing I see this device providing over a laptop with a built in ethernet and a wifi pcmcia interface (or embeded wifi card) is ease of converting from one mode to the other. Whether that is of importance to you, I can't say.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    6. Re:Please Enlighten Me by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I do not need this AP on the road, and I don't know anyone who would need it.

      OK, here's a good situation. It's a meeting with staff at XYZ organization. Our clients almost universally have a DSL network. A few are set up with wireless, usually it's Cat5.

      So, there we are... in the meeting room. Frequently, nobody bothered to wire the conference room, or there's only one !@#!@ plug, while there are 3-5 of us all standing around with our fancy schmancy laptops, dealing with Internet-based software.

      We're taking turns, sitting around... it's awkward.

      Something like this - plug in small cigarrete-pack sized box, and sit down... everybody's online at once!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    7. Re:Please Enlighten Me by tftp · · Score: 1
      One of my favorite travel notebooks - IBM Thinkpad 240 - has PCMCIA 802.11b card that I bought for $8 or so. All other notebooks have 802.11 built in. And at the hotel they have their access points mounted in each room.

      In option 3 I see no need for this device whatsoever, with USB or without... Even if you are stuck with an older notebook without 802.11, get a PCMCIA card, it is tiny and light, and does not need cables.

    8. Re:Please Enlighten Me by tftp · · Score: 1
      As I said, anything is useful to someone, somewhere. Myself, I haven't been at a presentation or a meeting that depends on Internet connection, but I guess there is always a possibility...

      But for most sales people it is easier to bring a roll of Ethernet cable as opposed to setting up a completely new wireless network.

      In addition, many companies do not permit unauthorized APs on their network, for obvious reasons :-)

    9. Re:Please Enlighten Me by woobieman29 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well then, allow me to enlighten you... :-)

      I work as a Sales Engineer for an enterprise software company, and I can think of a number of uses for this type of product. Just to clarify, a 'Sales Engineer' is generally someone who is in charge of all pre-sales engineering duties, such as requirements gathering, proof of concept, etc.

      First of all, I do a lot of work in hotel rooms, and I like to take advantage of the mobility of my laptop. I hate working at the cramped desk that most hotels give you, so I usually end up working on the bed, and wireless would be very helpful. Second, I feel that using a hardware NAT router in a hotel room is a 'Good Thing'. Yes, some of the software firewalls are nice, and will keep you protected - I feel however that the additional security layer is nice judging by the sort of activity that I see on the LANs of most hotels. Third, business travelers often have need for impromptu meetings while on the road. With this unit everyone can share a single ethernet jack to get some work done. Finally, the reason that might be most relevant only to other SE's like me....for a lot of proof-of-concept or demo environments it is imperative that you carry a router and other gear to emulate real world network conditions for your presentation/demonstration. This sure beats carrying a full-sized Linksys.

      Consider yourself enlightened.

      --
      \/\/oobie
    10. Re:Please Enlighten Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the salesman is selling what exactly? It has been my experience that salesmen are just above the food chain from lawyers. All salesmen care about is making a sale they don't care about the stuff that happens after the sale. e.g. the tech support required to run their greatest thing since sliced bread all they care about is getting some sucker to buy into their bullsh** and collect their commision.

      Salesmen are just a bunch of bottom feeders just one rung up from a lawyer (who doesn't really care if he wins or loses a case just that he gets his cash for trying.)

      Weathermen are another pet peeve of mine gawd I wish I could say to my boss we have a X% chance of getting this contract and when we don't get it we can say that X% out of a million square miles will get rain/hurricane/tornado so our predictition is "accurate". Give me a job where I can be "right" less than half of the time and still be employed. I used to have an old weather predictor hanging on a tree outside my window

      It was a rope .... when the rope was wet it was raining.... you know the old joke.

      I guess I choose the wrong profession to be in when being successful 60% of the time lets you keep your job.

      Only job I know of is if you are successful more than 30-35% of the time is professional baseball but that is another story.

    11. Re:Please Enlighten Me by russint · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it have been much easier, cheaper and/or safer to just bring a small hub/switch?

      --
      ^^
    12. Re:Please Enlighten Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Powerbook that I would like to use NetBSD. However, since no Airport Extreme drivers exist, I can't use it's built in wireless. Further, since NetBSD is a slow with driver support, there does not appear to be any USB wireless adapters available. So, this could be my only option for wireless access without having to haul an additional power cord.

    13. Re:Please Enlighten Me by EtherMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't see any scenario when a bunch of people suddenly needs to share some Internet connection.

      How about a team of CPA's in for a large company's audit and certification of financials? Or sales tax investigators doing a large audit? A team of programmers in for a database migration? I bet the insurance company response teams in Florida could even have benefitted from such a device. Once you start thinking along these lines, the list starts growing and growing.

      Just a few weeks ago my family and I, along with two other families spent a week vacationing in some cabins at a camping resort. I brought 4 notebooks and a LinkSys WAP along with some multiplayer games. It rained two nights in a row, but the kids had a blast playing games. We had quite a crowd of family, friends and even passers-by hooting and hollering on our front porch.

      This got me to thinking how nice it would be if I could find a tiny AP to carry in my daily bag for similar purposes. Granted, most cheap AP's aren't that big, but this D-Link device looks small enough to fit in one of the unused diskette pockets in my bag, and since its USB-powered, I can leave the power-supply at home.

      --
      --- A man with a briefcase can steal more money, than any man with a gun. [Don Henley]
    14. Re:Please Enlighten Me by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      I almost bought one two weeks ago for a trade show. You pay through the nose for an IP line in a convention hall, and they give you a DHCP line. If you're taking in a couple machines they want to charge you for multiple drops, usually several hundred a line (no lie).

      So, I thought this would be an easy way to get all the machines on line (about 3 or 4) with paying for a single line. As pointed out by others, you could just use the IP line, then use your wireless card in AP mode if you set up the software, but this seemed like a simple plug in approach for about $90. Plus, would give us some firewall protection against others in the hall sniffing the machines we brought in.

      In the end, I bought the $40 Belkin "internet sharing device" (a router/firewall with 1 CAT5 in and 4 CAT5 out) which was $10 after $30 in rebates. I was worried about RF contention with all those IT vendors in close proximity, and 10$ and a couple cables was simple enough since we really didn't need to be mobile.

      While you're correct that a business traveler usually has an ethernet jack for the wall, it actually isn't that uncommon to have more than one machine these days and only access to a single IP. There's some logic to a portable NAT solution. But, I don't think they'll sell tons of these things, given other ways to share and dealing with potential interference with all that 2.4 GHz traffic.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    15. Re:Please Enlighten Me by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Could someone tell me how this would be useful? Honestly, I don't know.

      I don't know either. Since I can't find any currently selling wireless cards that work with Linux or FreeBSD, the idea of any sort of wireless access point is as useless to me as teats on a boar. I've got drivers for several hundred popular cards, but none of them can be found at Fry's, MicroCenter, BestBuy, etc. (no, NDIS is not an option).

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    16. Re:Please Enlighten Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fagot

  6. wow by kayen_telva · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    not even attempting to hide blatant infomercials now. but i guess they do it for all things apple so I shouldnt bitch.

    1. Re:wow by jhoffoss · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Sad thing is, this isn't even Apple. Apple is just mentioned. Apparently that's enough though. That must be why some of the interesting/relevant stories I've submitted were denied! Because it didn't mention Apple! How moronic of me!

      /me goes off somewhere else...

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    2. Re:wow by kayen_telva · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Proof that mentioning apple in a negative light gets you modded down.
      I present 3 other comments rated UP for saying almost the same thing:

      1, 2, 3.


      you MAC fanboys are pathetic.

      uh oh..those are sliding down too.

    3. Re:wow by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      perhaps I needed a comma in there somewhere. I did not mean that this article was about apple, just that if its ok for apple to have a story on every product release, I guess its ok for any company to be blatantly advertised for.

    4. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but who's pathetic - posting the same thing on slashdot and trying? get a life dude.

    5. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The reason almost every new Apple product gets a story is because almost every new Apple product is innovative.

      Thats kind of like complaining about all the stories about Tiger Woods winning this tournament and that tournament. There were 30 other golfers there but Tiger always gets his picture in the paper. What gives?

  7. D-Link catching up by MerryGoByeBye · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Looks like D-Link's been doing its homework.

    I recently bought a D-Link 802.11g+ card. The loaf at Best Buy expressed doubts about whether D-Link's 108Mbps "protocol" (compression, etc on regular g) would work with Netgear's 108Mbps protocol and he suggested I buy the same company's brand for the entire network.

    Naturally, I ignored him. It works fine.

    If D-Link can keep making devices that perform reliably and interact correctly with those of other manufacturers, I say "Great!"

    1. Re:D-Link catching up by Team_Peppy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not only are they making reliable devices, but think about this: The smaller they are and less power these things require, the faster we will get to the World Wide Mesh!! Everywhere you go, everywhere you look, millions of packets flying around us. It has to be the precursor to Wonkavision!! Keep that technology advancing D-Link!!

    2. Re:D-Link catching up by Jardine · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recently bought a D-Link 802.11g+ card. The loaf at Best Buy expressed doubts about whether D-Link's 108Mbps "protocol" (compression, etc on regular g) would work with Netgear's 108Mbps protocol and he suggested I buy the same company's brand for the entire network.

      It's my understanding that they achieve (in theory) 108 Mbps by taking up two channels that don't interfere with each other and running 54Mbps over each channel.

    3. Re:D-Link catching up by randyest · · Score: 1
      Your post pleases me in two ways:

      Thanks for the laugh!
      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:D-Link catching up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently bought a D-Link 802.11g+ card. The loaf at Best Buy expressed doubts about whether D-Link's 108Mbps "protocol" (compression, etc on regular g) would work with Netgear's 108Mbps protocol and he suggested I buy the same company's brand for the entire network.

      It's my understanding that they achieve (in theory) 108 Mbps by taking up two channels that don't interfere with each other and running 54Mbps over each channel.
      I wonder if the fuck-up all the neighbors' WIFI-compliant 802.11g networks, just like the 802.11b+ devices did.
    5. Re:D-Link catching up by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of ways to do it, hence the BB tech was probably being safe about the brand recommendation. Linksys for example, uses a different tech that doesn't use channel bonding, whereas Super-G products do. At this point it doesn't matter though, we'll have 802.11n products by this time next year.

    6. Re:D-Link catching up by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      You're lucky it works. There's two or three companies that make the wireless chipsets. Products from different companies using the same chipsets (like Apple and Buffalo) usually interoperate; products using different chipsets might not interoperate for things that aren't standard ("turbo" modes) or aren't common (wireless bridging).

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    7. Re:D-Link catching up by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      As a wise man once said, "Don't get too cocky kid."

      For instance, I have a set of D-Link 2100 access points. They were bought for the point-to-multipoint mode that we use for our MAN.

      Trouble is, the access points fall asleep if they're idle for more than a minute, and it can take several minutes for them to wake up.

      This is commonly reported on messageboards, but there's no fix from D-Link. The tech support says they can't help with the issue. The only solution is to leave a machine on the far end of the network pinging a device on the near end. Forever.

      Similarly, I have another pair of D-Link 900+ access points. The factory firmware doesn't have SNMP, you have to flash it to get SNMP. Fine. But the SNMP-capable firmware has a broken point-to-point mode. This on radios advertised as having both capabilities.

      I've also lost the LAN port on two out of 5 of these units.

      I remember buying similar access points for $1200 a few years ago. They were rock-solid if relatively featureless. You don't get the same thing for $99. But you'd hope you at least get something that works as advertised.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  8. Awesome by mboverload · · Score: 0

    Now THAT is awesome, just what I have been looking for when I fix computers and laptops. Just stick it in there and not having to worry about hubs and ethernet cables.

  9. Been there, done that. by naitro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I fail to see how this is any different (from a linux geek's point of view) from using any prism2-based WLAN card with the Host AP drivers.

    Might appeal to PHBs without the necessary 'mad skillz', though, but these are hardly Slashdot's target audience.

    1. Re:Been there, done that. by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 3, Informative
      I fail to see how this is any different (from a linux geek's point of view) from using any prism2-based WLAN card with the Host AP drivers.

      Well, you can use 802.11g instead of just b, you don't have to tie up a computer as a dedicated access point, you don't have to have kernel source lying around to install it, and it probably uses less power and generates less noise than a computer.

      I like hostAP, but its not the easiest or best solution in all circumstsances.

      -jim

    2. Re:Been there, done that. by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      I like hostAP, but its not the easiest or best solution in all circumstsances.

      In fact, for small LAN requirements, I just use a 802.11b ad hoc configuration: I just need to give the win/linux clients a static IP/mask/DNS and let my laptop be the NAT router/firewall with a DSL connection to the net. All you need is the wireless tools packages that you have already installed to try out wifi.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  10. Not as neat a package as the AirPort Express by nickovs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This seems to serve the same purpose as the AirPort Express for the business traveller except that it has a separate power supply (unless you want to tether yourself to it with a USB cable). The fact that the power supply is not built in seems to me to limit its utility quite a lot. Given it costs 80% as much as the AirPort and also lacks the printer sharing (and non-sequitur music streaming) I have a hard time seeing this being a commercial success.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:Not as neat a package as the AirPort Express by stienman · · Score: 1

      The fact that the airport express cost $30 more ($129 vs $99) and cannot be powered by the computer seems to limit its usefulness.

      It's going to be tethered to something - either your internet connection (next to a plug) or to your computer (next to a usb port).

      It's not for everybody, for every use. But it is likely to be a commercial success.

      -Adam

    2. Re:Not as neat a package as the AirPort Express by randyest · · Score: 1

      I think it's closer to the Airpad since that uses USB power, except that this new device doesn't require a computer so it plugs directly into the ethernet port and allows any number of devices to connect to it -- none of which need be PC or Mac computers, and so no drivers are required.

      Examples of such devices include Audrey [audreyhacking.com], ReplayTV [digitalnetworksna.com], TiVO [tivo.com], Xbox with network connector [xbox.com], or playstation2 with network connector [playstation2.com] just to list a few.

      --
      everything in moderation
  11. You can't link to the Apple Store like that. by Xenex · · Score: 3, Informative
  12. Aircraft LAN parties! by RWaye · · Score: 5, Funny

    The only use I see for this is LAN parties on Planes/Busses/Trains. I am sure the person in the seat next to me would enjoy it when my buddy from the back of the plane storms up and throws a glass of coke at me screaming "STOP AWPING NOOB!".
    The fact that this could also screw up plane communications and positioning equipment is irrevelant. No one ever uses that stuff anyway... ;)

    1. Re:Aircraft LAN parties! by AlphaPB · · Score: 1

      Play all the mile-high CS that you want. Just don't be a terrorist on cs_747 or you're in for a mob beating!

    2. Re:Aircraft LAN parties! by tftp · · Score: 1
      The fact that this could also screw up plane communications and positioning equipment is irrevelant.

      Most people know how to turn their cell phones off when asked by the crew, but does anyone really know how to shut down that built-in wireless card? On many computers it is difficult to even see that it is on (Thinkpad G40) and it is enabled by default. To disable you have to go deep into Device Manager, or to play with Wireless settings.

      So chances are when you are flying, lots of passengers have 802.11 up and running, transmitting away at full power... and they don't know about it.

    3. Re:Aircraft LAN parties! by CaptainPuff · · Score: 1

      Actually you can set up an Ad-Hoc wireless network with your regular wireless cards already.
      Similar to having a direct ethernet card to ethernet card (via a cross-over cable of course).

  13. It's not that bad people by ian+rogers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not that bad. I'm sure this will be useful for people who don't want to carry a router with them if they have more than one laptop or something in a hotel room, or if they go somewhere without a network yet want to use more than one computer at a time. What's so bad about a new versitile product, even if it does have a brand name on it?

  14. Re:Okay... by gkuz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At least this one doesn't have the same horrid "IT" color scheme as the Nokia press release did.

  15. Laptop Battery by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Congrats..Your laptop battery life has just gone down from 2hrs45min to 20 minutes(10 if you're trying to achieve FP!).

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
    1. Re:Laptop Battery by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought as well...

      Except that in my case it would go down from 35 minutes to about 3 1/2...
      Time to upgrade my laptop I guess...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  16. free alternative- use your existing wifi adapter by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative

    PCTel's Segue Soft Access Point Module (SAM) is a clever piece of software that turns any LAN-connected PC into a Wi-Fi wireless access point. Given the low price of Wi-Fi APs (typically $60 or less), SAM might not appear to make economic sense. But SAM's price is even lower: Several motherboard and wireless chipset makers have purchased licenses to include SAM with their products, making SAM effectively free to end users. And for setting up a temporary AP in a hotel room, meeting room, or the like, it's a darn clever solution.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  17. Simple solution by dj245 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    For these stories that are nothing but ads in disguise, I encourage everyone to not post comments in these stories and not moderate anything up nor down. If nobody is modded up, people with thresholds won't find anything to read in the comments and will move on. Maybe we can get the message across that we are not interested in these types of adverstoryments.

    Feel free not to moderate me at all.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Simple solution by freeweed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Feel free not to moderate me at all.

      Starting Score: 1 point
      Karma-Bonus Modifier +1 (Edit)
      Total Score: 2

      Looks like it's working so far. Betcha I get a Funny + or two tho :P

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Simple solution by randyest · · Score: 1

      FYI that +1 is not the result of moderation. It's the default in your user preferences. Look for "Karma Bonus (modifier assigned to posts where the user has good karma)" and note that it's set to "+1".

      If you didn't know that, maybe the "(Edit)" link next to the "Karma-Bonus Modifier +1 (Edit)" you quoted could have been a hint. Or do you normally get the option to immediately change a moderation? (Boy I wish I did.)

      Change it to 0 and re-check his post. Like magic, it's back to 1. Change it to -5 and mod him down if you like! Look! Unlimited mod points for you (except that no one else sees the results of your shennanigans.)

      Oh, and I'll take that bet -- no +1 funny for you!

      (Says the mod nazi ;)

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right after you I will!

    4. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      redundant? redundant to what, exactly?

    5. Re:Simple solution by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Um... thanks for lovely explanation, and entirely missing the point.

      The grandparent asked mods to "feel free not to mod me", I pointed out that no one had modded him/her, and said "hey, looks like it's working".

      What part of "don't mod me" "hey, you didn't get modded" did you miss?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  18. built in Airport by mbaudis · · Score: 4, Informative

    two notes:

    1. the mobile hub feature can be useful. traveling with two powerbooks, my wife and i frequently use a single network access (dialup, ethernet) in hotels, sharing it from one machine over ad hoc wlan

    2. well, with a powerbook (or stationary mac with airport card), you get this option built in, without any hassle with a separate device or dlls from hell...

    (please insert your apple rant here:... thanks.)

    1. Re:built in Airport by adelayde · · Score: 1

      no rant. was just about to write the same. the internet connexion sharing over the airport is great and i've used it many times for just this purpose, the ibook works the same.

      i also have a thing about d-link equipment, namely that it's pretty pants normally.

    2. Re:built in Airport by dave420 · · Score: 1

      But how is that different from any other manufacturer's equipment? I do that all the time with my PC notebooks (and they were cheaper ;))

    3. Re:built in Airport by shawn99452 · · Score: 1

      Apple's implementation of Internet Sharing over AirPort actually makes the card look like an AP to other devices, so they can automatically connect to it. It will distribute IP addresses (10.0.2.x I think) and otherwise be indistiguishable from an ordinary AP/Router. This is useful for impromptu Quake 3 matches with other WiFi users, and possibly for more serious work.

    4. Re:built in Airport by mbaudis · · Score: 1

      well, again two points:

      1. it just works
      2. it already did work in 2000, under os 9. and if you compare the current price of my son's 4 year old powerbook to something "similar" in the x86 world (not to talk about the driver pain and probable problems getting linux to run a card on an older machine). and 1070 (education) for a new ibook with dvd and airport card is not so bad either.
    5. Re:built in Airport by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      it's pretty pants normally.
      Is that good or bad?
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  19. a more useful idea by boots@work · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would be an ethernet-powered access-point: just one plug for an Ethernet port, and it bridges and/or NATs onto that connection.

    I don't know how much power you can safely draw over Ethernet. Maybe it's not enough. But it would be cool if it worked.

    1. Re:a more useful idea by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

      http://www.edoceo.com/networking/ethernet.php

      The pinout for ethernet connection has grounds, and transmits and receive lines, lacking a Vcc supply. USB, PS/2 and serial have GND and +5v to supply some juice the the device.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    2. Re:a more useful idea by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. I don't know how much power you can safely draw over Ethernet. Maybe it's not enough. But it would be cool if it worked.

      POE -- power over ethernet -- is used in quite a few wireless routers/aps/... . There's even a spec for it. I think 12 volts works well, though that's from memory. In most cases, that's enough to run most devices that use a power brick. The typical use for POE is to power remote APs without having to run a power cord.

      The upper limit? I don't know...though if you give your 5v device 12v you deserve what you get!

      On the other hand, power loss over the length of the cable can be substantial. Be sure to check out the power loss calculators on line if you intend to have long runs of it (close to or over ~100ft).

      8 wires on a typical ethernet cable, 4 are in use for data, 4 aren't -- though the other 4 can be used for phone lines or a second ethernet connection. Quite handy.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    3. Re:a more useful idea by boots@work · · Score: 1

      I realize that standard ethernet doesn't have a VCC line. But you can be more creative: since data is transmitted by a modulated signal, you can use a DC potential between the two pairs to transmit power, or you can use the two spare pairs that are unused by most installations.

      See this diagram.

      802.3af requires upgraded equipment which is currently rare. Therefore my question: how much load can you put on the rx pair without degrading the signal or hurting the other machine? Probably not very much, but more than zero. Not enough, I suppose, to run a Wifi emitter.

    4. Re:a more useful idea by randyest · · Score: 1

      But you can be more creative: since data is transmitted by a modulated signal, you can use a DC potential between the two pairs to transmit power

      No you can't. Read your own link:

      Since Ethernet pairs are transformer coupled at each end, it is possible to apply DC power to the center tap of the isolation transformer without upsetting the data transfer. In this mode of operation the pair on pins 3 and 6 and the pair on pins 1 and 2 can be of either polarity.

      You'd need an ethernet jack that puts power on the spare lines, which a device like this can't possibly provide.

      Power over ethernet requires changes to the ethernet ports on everything -- you can just modify a client and make it draw power from the hub/switch/jack.

      --
      everything in moderation
    5. Re:a more useful idea by burns210 · · Score: 1

      what if your laptop is the box that you want to bridge connections on... so you have this AP plugged into your rj-45, providing NAT and bridges connections from your... where, bluetooth?

      This being USB powered means I can route my ehternet connection to my USB AP, and share a connection.

    6. Re:a more useful idea by boots@work · · Score: 1

      My previous post said that PoE (in one mode) creates a DC potential between the rx and tx lines. This is done by applying DC to the isolation transformers. The two statements are entirely consistent.

      you can just modify a client and make it draw power from the hub/switch/jack.

      Can you? That's what I was originally asking. I don't think you can get much power that way. But anyhow, that's not how PoE works; it requries a modified hub/switch, or at least a separate unit to supply the DC voltage.

    7. Re:a more useful idea by ICA · · Score: 1
    8. Re:a more useful idea by randyest · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no, I meant to say "can't" both times, not just the first :)

      --
      everything in moderation
  20. Are you happy to see me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nobody seemed to mention that there is a lot of stuff to carry here. Compare this to the very, very compact size of Airport Express. How is this thing from D-Link convenient?

    1. Re:Are you happy to see me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it includes the case case!

  21. A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative


    Probably the best way to connect securely when traveling cheaply is to boot a cyber cafe computer from a Knoppix CD. That way you can be certain there are no keystroke recorders installed by some previous user. Basically, you will want to check your bank accounts and get your email from a web-based client. So Knoppix gives you everything you need: an OS and a browser.

    There might still be a problem with a hardware-based keystroke recorder, but that level of expertise is unlikely, I think. A thief who could do that could get a good job, and wouldn't need to be a thief.

    1. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by La+Fortezza · · Score: 1
      There might still be a problem with a hardware-based keystroke recorder, but that level of expertise is unlikely, I think.

      It's not quite as hard as you think.

    2. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      2600 had an article on hardware keystroke recorders. Basically just something you stick between the keyboard & the pc, usually small enough to not be noticed unless you know exactly what you're looking for. No expertise required. Simple check to see whether your keyboard plugs into the computer or if there's an intermediary...

      --
      [o]_O
    3. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by freeweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      There might still be a problem with a hardware-based keystroke recorder, but that level of expertise is unlikely, I think. A thief who could do that could get a good job, and wouldn't need to be a thief.

      Hire me, please!

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by ilctoh · · Score: 2, Informative

      There might still be a problem with a hardware-based keystroke recorder, but that level of expertise is unlikely, I think. A thief who could do that could get a good job, and wouldn't need to be a thief.

      I don't think it takes much skill to use a hardware based like this one. For those of you too lazy to look at the page, it has nice step-by-step install instructions: unplug keyboard, plug recorder into keyboard port, plug keyboard into recorder. Yeah, lots of skill and expertise needed there.

      --
      How many slashes would a slashdot dot, if a slashdot could dot slashes?
    5. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      It actually requires less expertise to leave and retrieve a hardware keystroke logger than it does to try to circumvent unknown protection to install your own logging software. Sure, the hardware costs more, and you have to come back for the pickup, but you don't have to care what OS the public system is running or how it's locked down.

    6. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I've seen keyboards with built in keystroke loggers. Google up a link for me. I'm to busy checking over my AFB.

    7. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I don't know what sort of cyber cafes you use, but I've *never* been in one that would let you reboot one of their computers from a CD, anymore than they would let you install your own software.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:A Knoppix CD provides a secure OS and browser. by sita · · Score: 1

      Probably the best way to connect securely when traveling cheaply is to boot a cyber cafe computer from a Knoppix CD.

      That's of course also a good way to annoy the guy who runs the cyber cafe, since you will disable his metering software.

      Do people actually regularly use Knoppix CD:s this way? Do you get in trouble often over it? Do you ask first? Are cyber cafe managers happy to let you?

  22. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best part is that most of us already read about this a day or two ago on other blogs. /. has jumped the shark

  23. Still think Airport Express has this thing beat by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Airport express is more compact (no extra crap to carry around). It also has airtunes (hopefully someone will get a driver for mac/windows/linux so it can do more than just music).

    That extra couple dollars is worth the design.

    1. Re:Still think Airport Express has this thing beat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the MAJOR exception of "Powered by USB". You can by any wireless router with a power cord and get that functionality.

      The Dlink device would also allow you to create your own wireless network among others in the same area without additional wires or an existing network (only an ethernet jack on the host PC). You could create a quick network for others with wireless to join. Plus is doubles as a wireless card for a single host PC again without additional wires or power.

      Geezzz. It does not have to be an Apple product to be useful. I wish Apple made toliet paper so you zealots could have something to wipe your ass with.

  24. OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by menscher · · Score: 1

    Kinda off-topic, but I was considering buying a DLink 514 wireless router since it's so much cheaper than the linksys equivalent. I've seen a lot of scathing reviews online, but those are mostly from the non-technical crowd (firmware update? wazzat?). I'd love to know if any /.ers have tried this out, and were successful.

    1. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by saned · · Score: 1

      I don't remember exactly the model number, but the D-link wireless access point/router I got didn't work for me. 3 feet was all the reach I got, using a different power source though (15V). It could have been that, but the Linksys I bought after that worked out of the box.
      YMMV

      -P@

      --
      signal_connect(0, "test_top.dut.my_sig", "clk");
    2. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. The complaints about that router steered me to the Linksys WRT54G. It's generally considered to be reliable, and there are IIRC three separate 3rd-party firmware projects.

      Kind of a sucky time to buy networking gear due to universities starting back up, but the WRT54G is $61 at amazon before 10 MIR.

    3. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by bradasch · · Score: 1

      I have one in my room and it works ok, but I don't stretch it too much: I use it for my main desktop and a notebook I share with my wife, and it reaches the whole apartment (not that big). Never had any problems with it.

    4. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by perotbot · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the 614+, at the time it was 200, but I've seen it as low as $49, have had it for going on 2yrs now and it's been a good appliance, you need to be running windows to upgrade the firmware. Range has been over 150' using both an Orinoco Gold card and the DWL-650+ D-link card

      --
      ~corporate tool, but employed~
    5. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WRT54G firmware is updated via a web browser. Windows not required.

    6. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by stevenvi · · Score: 1

      I bought one cause it was cheap, just like me... don't expect anything too excellent with it or anything. I've had trouble receiving a signal from it being maybe 50 feet away (through the floor and across the other side of the house,) which to me is poor quality, but I like to move around a lot, I don't know what distances "good" range is with a WiFi router.

      Updating the firmware was a no-brainer. Took less than a minute to do. I did actually have problems with it when I changed the admin username, which rendered it unusable. I had to reset the memory on it and start over configuring everthing, which was pretty frustrating. But I was able to change the password okay after learning of this horrible bug in it. (Almost returned it after that happened, though, sheesh!)

    7. Re:OT: D-Link 514 experiences? by mikeage · · Score: 1

      The only problem I've had with my DI-614+ is that it used to lock up a lot when running eMule. It didn't like opening so many ports over NAT in such a short time. Then again, that's probably just the router side... as an AP it ought to be fine.

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  25. Re:Okay... by jrockway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not a fucking ad. It's slightly interesting. How else would have you found out about this AND gotten to hear comments about it, anyway.

    Even if it is an ad, what right do you have to complain. You're not paying for slashdot. Go elsewhere if you don't like it. I'm a subscriber (read: I pay money to see slashdot) and I love articles like this. Okay!?

    This is becoming the new cliché on slashdot... "this is an ad... slashdot sucks... whine whine"

    It's been said so many times that it's not interesting, insightful, or funny. That makes it -1 Redundant.

    --
    My other car is first.
  26. Re:Welcome! by jrockway · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Gee you copy other people's posts and then you get modded down? We heard the idea once, and that was enough. Think of something else to say.

    --
    My other car is first.
  27. Airplane approved? by StDave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could see this being useful in an airplane if you wanted to game with friends or collaborate with coworkers on the same flight. Of course, it would also probably screw up the avionics and redirect the flight to Tibet. But at least you would be able to get some work or enjoyment for the long flight...

    Or it would be useful for simple impromptu networking for a quick and dirty network situations where power is at a premium (like a natural disaster). Granted, that wouldn't involve Internet access, but a small easily powered AP is somewhat useful.

    1. Re:Airplane approved? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      I got the chance to view a presentation about shielding aircraft from travellers electronics that send out signals (cellular phones, laptops, whatever).

      They proposed installing waveguides around the cabin of the airplane. It would be too complex to surround only airplane equipment that would be affected.

      You all have waveguides in your house in your microwave. Go to your microwave and look in the door, see the metal grate with a pattern of holes? That's a waveguide specifically made to protect your face from melting like your nacho cheese you're cooking when the magentron fires up.

      I think the presenters figured out the proper design of a waveguide (material, thickness, diameter of holes, distance apart, et al) and from that could estimate the rough financial and weight cost of fitting a plane with a protective basket.

      I don't know about you but the last plane I was on, I was in an upright fetal position for 2 hours. It's not easy being tall in an Embraer RJ-145.

  28. You know.. by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been reading slashdot since 1998. These two stories from michael today have got to be the lamest entries I've ever seen on here. I'm very disappointed. At least this one isn't as bad as the Nokia one.

    1. Re:You know.. by Nethead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Large Green Mallard (31462): " I've been reading slashdot since 1998."

      When did they start letting the newbies post?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  29. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    translation: "waah, girls don't like me"

  30. News for nerds? Not today :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot - Ads for Nerds, Stuff that make OSDN Money. Or something stupid like that.

  31. Only if you call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...plugging things in expertise:

    ssdfsdfasdfasdfsadf

  32. Reviews ??? Re:Okay... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't exactly call them reviews, but I always look forward to getting my next article on SCO / The Caldera Group ! :-)

  33. Re:Welcome! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    All but one were posted within a minute of each other...you call that copying?

  34. MOD PARENT UP! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, had to. :P

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  35. how much does it cost for a /. ad? by LodCrappo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would like to plug some of my company's products too.

    --
    -Lod
  36. Power over ethernet exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so do APs that work with it. The PoE is 802.3af

  37. Umm peer to peer? by s88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has no one in this thread ever heard of peer to peer?
    All the examples of "I could have used this when..." could easily have been solved by simply setting your wireless cards into peer mode and making an ad hoc wireless network. This is quick and easy with every network client app I have seen; does no one use this feature or what?

    Why is this device any better than just bridging your ethernet to your wireless peer network?

    1. Re:Umm peer to peer? by randyest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why is this device any better than just bridging your ethernet to your wireless peer network?

      It doesn't require a PC or Mac, needs no drivers, and so can provide connectivity to devices such as Audrey, ReplayTV, TiVO, Xbox with network connector, or playstation2 with network connector.

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Umm peer to peer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where does the USB power come from??

      I'll stick with my powerbook's software access point, thanks.

    3. Re:Umm peer to peer? by randyest · · Score: 1

      It could come from an Audrey or any of the other many non-PC/Mac devices with USB (which means it ultimately comes from some device's power supply, of course.) Or it could come from the (included) DC power supply.

      Again, despite the article title (which seems to have thrown everyone off,) USB-power isn't the primary feature of this device. Apple's airpad has it. But what Apple's airpad and the other devices mentioned don't have is the driverless, computerless option.

      Stick with whateve you want. But if you want to hook up a few Xboxes to one ethernet port, you need something like this. Which is why it's interesting.

      If you're always on a powerbook and not interested in networking other devices ever, this isn't for you. That doesn't mean it has no applications, or that some other device can do everything this can (nothing on the market can, AFAIK.)

      --
      everything in moderation
  38. Wrong - You Become an ISP by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Here's a biz model:

    1. Get a USB wireless hub
    2. Pay for WLAN access at Starbucks
    3. Get a seat at Starbucks and resell cheap WLAN access to other guests
    4. And the /.-mandatory: Profit

  39. Re:Okay... by MacJedi · · Score: 1
    I'm happy that you love "slightly interesting" articles like this. However, not all of us do. What would make the most sense would be for Slashdot to add a "PR" category so that those who do not like it filter drivel like this away.

    P.S. There is always a right to complain.

    --
    2^5
  40. Is it a bad product like the other DLINK ones? by freitasm · · Score: 1

    I bought two DLINK AP a month ago and they'd freeze every 20 minutes. Only way was power down and up every 20 minutes. Not fun. DLINK said it was my network. Interesting enough I got a El Cheapo one for half price while waiting for a Belkin AP + router. Both the El Cheapo and Belkin work fine. Both DLINK were RMAed.

  41. Not an add by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

    Sure it sounds like an ad... it talks quite extensivly about a single product.... However it then links you to similar products from competitors... Haven't seen any adds do that before...

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  42. Re:Welcome! by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

    There were zero responses when I typed it out, the other posters apparently hit send 1/10th of a second faster then I did. :-)

  43. Re:free alternative- use your existing wifi adapte by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Also worth pointing out that OS X can do this out of the box. (And if XP can't, I'm surprised...)

  44. Re:Okay... by Gunark · · Score: 1

    By the same logic.... what right do you have to complain about someone else complaining that this post is an ad? You're not paying for slashdot. Go elsewhere if you don't like it.

    This is becoming the new cliché on slashdot... "this is someone complaining about slashdot... go somewhere else if you don't like it... whine whine"

    The moral here: you're free to complain about other people's complaints, but that makes your complaints kind of ironic :)

  45. Re:Welcome! by zieroh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    To slashad! Where you can read ad copy sooner then anyone else

    Well, except that this announcement is, like, many days old. I've come to realize recently that slashdot is not really very timely on these types of things.

    See Gizmodo's Report from last Friday.

    --
    People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  46. Airport Express link by catwh0re · · Score: 1

    http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/ The link in the title article copy is a link to the apple store (to a timed out session)

  47. Re:Welcome! by thedillybar · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Are you physically capable of reading the headline D-Link's USB-Powered Access Point and just skipping over it? Don't read the comments, don't post a comment, don't click on the link.

    We don't need to hear about it everytime you don't like an article.

  48. And this post by Karma+Star · · Score: 0

    isn't fucking insightful. Really, who the hell modded this up (hint: starts with a Cmdr, ends with a Taco)? It's an ad. You'd have to be a goddamned moron not to pick up on it (or working for slashdot).

    --
    Me email iz skyewalkerluke at microsoft's free email service.
  49. Can it be used as a router with a wireless bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so it can communicate with a wireless router connected to wired WAN.

    p.s. Why are bridges so overpriced?

  50. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who the hell are you to complain about someone complaining about someone complaining that this post is an ad? Are you paying for slashdot?

    This kind of meta-complaining about complaints seems oh-so-noble but is really just petty.

    In short, if you're going to complain about people complaining about complaints, expect complaints!

  51. Re:Okay... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "I'm a subscriber (read: I pay money to see slashdot)"

    Why?

    To see ads?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  52. Re:Welcome! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Ah, then any time the system detects that five responses have come in from five different people within, say, two seconds, they should ALL get the

    "SLOW DOWN, COWBOY!"

    response!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Maybe that will keep the servers up long enough to be able to send in a response, too.

    How about this? Nobody should be allowed to send more than one response within a twenty-four period?

    See - we can make the Net look like snail mail if we try!

    Now if we can just figure out a way to put AI into the moderators (since they don't seem to have any "real" intelligence), we could make /. into somethin' cookin'!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  53. so that explains it by ubiquitin · · Score: 1

    The online shops have been dumping the D-LINK model DWL-122 which is a USB dongle wireless adapter (that happens to work with Linux.) I picked up one for $29 from TigerDirect or somesuchplace. Pretty good bang for the buck: it worked plug and play without the need for additional drivers in a WinXP box I tried it with. Definitely a handy little device to have hanging around, but it doesn't do access point stuff like the current generation does. Any word on Linux-workability for the newer model mentioned in this story??

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  54. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    On my PowerBook as well as my iMac, I go to the preferences panel "Sharing" and click one button and now my PB is an access point, with a DHCP server, which can be used to share the ethernet or modem connection. I've never tried it but I bet with a second 802.11 card in the PC card slot it can even share one wireless network with the other.

    For about a year, the iMac was my only access point. I didn't think of writing slashdot about it!

    Or I can just go up to the airport icon on the menu bar and "create network" which does the ad-hoc thing.

    Yeah yeah, another mac fanboy, but come on, what's the point of a wireless access point with.. a USB wire??

    1. Re:huh? by salimma · · Score: 1

      Is that in real infrastructure mode (can support multiple client) or can you only share your connection with one other computer (ad-hoc) though?

      Sounds interesting.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
  55. Re:free alternative- use your existing wifi adapte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Windows people have to do something extra to make their computers work as access points??? Wow. I bet some Windows PCs don't even come with wireless cards.

    *cradles powerbook*

  56. Re:free alternative- use your existing wifi adapte by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    actually, since reading that article in PC magazine, I've thought so as well..

    in ad-hoc mode, and with ICS (internet connection sharing) enabled, you should be able to bridge the adapters easily..

    At one of my job sites, we have a cable modem that goes into a dell low end server- this has a second ethernet card connected to a hub, which shares a lan with two other PC's..

    I have had them previously set up as bridged connections and ICS sharing enabled, and all three pc's had web access (the owner has since instructed it be turned off to the two client pc's-- too much distraction)
    but the second ethernet card should be substitutable with a wifi adapter, and set in adhoc- it should 'just work'

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  57. Re:Okay...more info by jhoffoss · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Okay, first off, this is a link to the product description page, nothing else. At least with the previous story (re: nokia phone) one of the early posters posted a link to a very good review from the Register, which was written over a month ago. THAT would have been worth posting to the front page of Slashdot.

    Second, I would know about this product because I read slashdot and have seen Airport Express postings, which have had comments referring to these. I also recently purchased the aforementioned Asus WL330 access point. (Which has been revised; see a review of older model here.) This is a very good product that I've been very happy with.

    In my opionion, a PR page on a small access point, which follows the same from Apple, ( here, here, and here) is not newsworthy.

    Frankly, if I _were_ a subscriber, which I have considered doing at length, I would be pissed that stories like this show up. I want insightful reviews and bleeding edge stuff I won't see other places for weeks. Not product pages to DLink products. I can go to dlink.com for that.

    THIS is why I said what I said.

    It's been said so many times that it's not interesting, insightful, or funny. That makes it -1 Redundant.
    As opposed to your post?
    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  58. How about a modem? by chris234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the issues I have with all these "travel" APs that I've seen is that none of them have a modem in them. Most of the places I've had to set up a temporary wireless net when travelling don't have any existing network access aside from a phone line. I wish Apple had left out the USB port and dropped in a modem instead.

    Guess the graphite Airport keeps travelling!

  59. dLink makes shoddy products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    bad engineering, bad drivers, bad tech support. don't be fooled by the 'feature list'. stay far away from dlink. they're a bad company. i've had to replace everything that i've bought from them.

  60. Airport Express is what you need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am in the same boat and have found the Airport Express to be a life saver! With that D-Link router you need to carry an external power supply. With the Airport Express the whole unit is only as large as the power supply. Most of us already carry way to many devices in our laptop bags.

    I am probably going to buy another one for my living room stereo. Its that great!

  61. junkkkk...!!! by troutsoup · · Score: 1

    yeah, but its still d-link junk. i've in a fit of cheapness bought dlink garbage and as always been totally ready to throw it out. if it lasts....

    pcmcia wireless card. DOA after firmware update. wireless G base useless because it can't handle any sort of real traffic and has bugs that don't allow me to enable PKA encryption. usb wireless B adaptor that gives really awful throughput. i mean ass awful..... thanks but no thanks, i wont take their stuff for free any more.

    --
    -- troutsoup.com
  62. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find your comments intriguing and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  63. Nifty... by nitrocloud · · Score: 0

    This networking device would seem to be paving the way to a simple lightweight computing architure where wearable computers actually may become a reality.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  64. its worth by ctime · · Score: 1

    Theses things are going to be the bain of secure corporate networking. Anyone can EASILY popup a AP leasing out IP's on your companies network. Not to say it's hard to do already, but this just makes it WAY to easy.

    time to fire up the old ipaq with wififofum and start bashing some heads.

    1. Re:its worth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bane

  65. I do this now with the built-in wifi by bmidgley · · Score: 1

    I have a debian setup that is very handy for wifi networking. If I 'ifup ath0' (ath0 refers to the internal madwifi card) when I already have a default route (through eth0 or ppp/tmobile) then my startup script puts the madwifi card in master mode, tweaks WEP/SSID settings, starts up dhcp on the adapter, and runs debian's ipmasq util. My access point is up and flying at that point.

    Maybe this is the kind of thing the windows drivers won't let you do with typical wifi cards but inside Linux I have enough control to pull it off.

    Brad

  66. 2.5W by XanC · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the max amperage on USB is 500mA. Over 5V, that means the device burns at most 2.5W. Doesn't seem like the change in battery life would be too drastic.

  67. Keyloggers by XanC · · Score: 1
    Remember the keylogger that was installed via Javascript through holes in IIS and IE?

    I'll be dollars to doughnuts that there are thousands and thousands of public access computers that will be running this program for many years.

    A Knoppix CD is a great idea.

  68. Re:free alternative- use your existing wifi adapte by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

    If you're using a Prism-type chipset, you can either use hostap (for 802.11b) or the Prism54 drivers (for 802.11g) to run your card in "Master" (AP) mode. Instant linux-based AP.

    I play with this off and on with my laptop and the high-powered SMC-2532W-B card, which can take an external antenna. Crank up Apache, set up BIND to return the laptop's wifi IP address to every query, and away I go (hey, wifi isn't JUST for The Internet(tm) after all). Or if I feel the need I can bridge to a wired connection, but that's boring - ANYONE can do that...

    Anybody know if any of the 802.11g Prism-chipset-based PCMCIA/Cardbus cards exist that can take and external antenna?

  69. Re:Okay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, he claims to be a subscriber, so he probably is paying for it, you illiterate cunt. But I think you should both keep bitching at each other just to exercise our universal right to complain about absolutely anything on slashdot (so long as the complaint doesn't include the text of scientology's OT III, which the editors deleted because they can't handle a bullshit lawsuit).

  70. If there is a problem, it isn't KeyGhost. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    From the KeyGhost installation instructions: "To install the KeyGhost, all you need to do is plug it in between your keyboard cable and your computer."

    Obviously, these require no expertise to install. Obviously, also, you would look for these on any computer you used.

    It might be good to carry one of those laptop-size USB keyboards, and use it instead of the cyber cafe keyboard. That would guard against keystroke loggers inside the keyboard. USB keyboards install automatically; there is no need to detach the normal keyboard.

    1. Re:If there is a problem, it isn't KeyGhost. by phearlez · · Score: 1

      Maybe a better idea would be to fit your tinfoil hat a little snugger. I never fail to be amazed how many slashdotters are the geeky version of those kids with wallets on chains to keep people from stealing their bus pass.

      --
      Bad management trumps ideology - Show the world you want better leadership. http://www.timefornewmanagement.com
  71. Will it work in an XboX slot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That might be a cool way to get internet in your living room without running cables everywhere.

  72. virus attack by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    I bought a d-link switch/router/firewall nearly two years ago. A year ago, it stopped working. At least, I could not find the 'embedded homepage', where you set ip-adresses etc., any longer. Also, it worked for one attached computer but not for two or more. I mailed the kit to d-link which could not find a problem and returned it to me.

    Then a friend said the kit may have suffered from some sort of 'virus attack' which kills the kit's memory or something similar and that d-link is very well aware of this 'issue', but, that they would never admit it and that I was without luck here.

    Has any other slashdotter experienced 'half-dead' d-links?

    1. Re:virus attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that thing was working just as a switch. That is why it was only working with a single client (the IP address was given directly by the modem).

      Try something called a CrashRecoveryReset: with the power off start pressing on the reset button (back of the unit), connect the power and keep pressing the reset button for at least 12 seconds then release. After a minute unplug the power for 10 seconds and plug again.

      After this change the IP of your computer to something static as the following: 192.168.0.55, sub mask: 255.255.255.0, gateway: 192.168.0.1. You will be able to access again the router's web page (192.168.0.1) but be aware that it will be asking immediately for a new firmware (since yours is corrupted).

      If this does not do it then call tech support to get your RMA.

      Oh yeah, don't forget to put your settings back to DHCP IP address or set the DNS also as 192.168.0.1.

  73. But is it really USB powered? by Gldm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find alot of things that are "USB powered" aren't. They usually need two ports and even then depend on out of spec power levels. For example, my Lacie 4x slimline DVD writer can't draw enough power from the two USB ports on my Toshiba M200. I tried a d-link USB2 card that was supposedly rated at 500ma per port (The spec maximum) but either that's not enough power or the Toshiba doesn't deliver enough power to the card. There's just no way to get it to work. On my desktop, plug it into 2 USB ports and it works fine.

    I'm debating either getting a small lightweight UPS around 300VA or if I'm better off cutting up some USB device or cable and wiring in a 4AA holder to put batteries in.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:But is it really USB powered? by nmos · · Score: 1

      Most USB powered devices that require a lot of power also have a plug for a wall wart. If yours doesn't and really needs that much power I'd return it and get something else. You could also get a USB hub with a wall wart adapter. It would be fairly easy to splice in a battery back if you really need mobile operation.

  74. WRT54G by Schlaegel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought myself a WRT54G Router (about $60) for a similar purpose. After uploaded 3rd party firmware It has a similar functionality (no USB).

    They both can be an access point, client or router.

    The WRT54G is bigger, needs power, but hooks up to your computer via Ethernet and requires no driver.

    I wanted a wireless client that did not use my CPU for a controller and did not taint the kernel. The WRT54G does a great job.

  75. oh no, here we go by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    so anyone who has one of these can sit down and start acting as a dhcp server? that's going to be *marvellous* in public wifi hotspots, isn't it?

  76. EverythingUSB.com by otisg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This site will interest most(all?) of Slashdot readers:
    http://www.everythingusb.com/
    .

    --
    Simpy
  77. authenticating with the hotel network? by dipakpatel · · Score: 1

    Most hotel rooms that I have come across with net access usually require you authenticate your MAC address before you get online.

    After hooking up the ethernet cable you're required to fire up a web-browser and log on. This binds the laptop ethernet MAC address to that session.

    But if you connect up a wireless basestation such as this device (or the Airport Express) - how do you get around this problem?

    1. Re:authenticating with the hotel network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it depends on where you live.

      because i can surf from the parking lots / freeway in my area (freeway if i am REALLY QUICK ;)

      this is in the midwest. (wisconsin

  78. Why do people post junk like this? by matdodgson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why do people post junk like this? Nobody wants to read crap like this!

  79. Why a hardware switch??? by erpbridge · · Score: 1

    Why did they make this a hardware switch? Don't people learn through product testing that the more movable parts the consumer has access to, the chances of any movable part being broken from being moved back and forth rises exponentially?

    Shoulda been a software selection on an internal webpage, or maybe (heaven forbid, as this is another point of failure), a membrane pushbutton.

  80. dLink is a bad company. by Magnetic_Monopole · · Score: 1

    I will never buy from them again. Don't be fooled. Always a lot of bugs, and they don't support their products. They like to claim that 'it's Windows fault' that they didn't debug their drivers. Go with NetGear or LinkSys when they have the same thing shortly.

  81. The real use for this by DarthBobo · · Score: 1

    There is actually a real need for this sort of product. Many hotels and conference locations rent internet access at outlandish rates - thousands of dollars a day for a single connected computer at a trade show is not uncommon. The last (small) conference I attended had a single ethernet jack enabled in each symposium room. The hotel had wireless, but wanted thousands of dollars a day to enable it for the conference particiapnts.

    There are _lots_ of places in the real world where there is a single ethernet jack but multiple people who need access. Most conference rooms at any non tech oriented company, if they have a connection, it will be a single jack. Universities have only recently gotton to the point that wired access is universal - a half dozen students trying to study in a library study room might have a single jack -- etc etc.

    --
    +--------------------- You idiot! I told you we were facing the wrong way!
  82. Can this be an Ethernet to Wireless Bridge? by TheSync · · Score: 1

    For "security reasons", I can't change any of the network properties on my work laptop, including wireless settings (such as SSID)...you may be able to guess which OS I am running from the need to do this.

    I can, however, run Virtual PC on my laptop, and have full control over my Ethernet NIC settings from a virtual machine...

    So I'd like to use something like the D-Link DWL-810+ (Ethernet to Wireless Bridge) for mobile wireless usage, but I would like it to be USB powered so I don't need to plug it in.

    Will this new D-Link device serve the same purpose?

  83. Re:free alternative- use your existing wifi adapte by peekitty · · Score: 1

    The only external antenna-ready Prism54 card that I'm aware of is the Compex WL54G. It has an MC connector, just like Orinoco cards.

  84. Wi-Fi Bedouin by nandhp · · Score: 1

    This would be perfect for running a Wi-Fi Bedouin.

  85. Maybe you don't have enough experience. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    I've traveled to 33 countries, and been in a lot of low-rent cyber cafes. Would they steal info? Yes, and it has happened to me.