Slashdot Mirror


New Lubricant Leads To Faster Hard Drives

azav writes "We all know about Moore's Law as it applies to chip speed but little attention is publicly made to the challenges of increasing speed in hard drives. A recent discovery in polyester (yes, polyester, you disco baby) lubricants will allow for faster and longer lasting hard drives."

100 of 365 comments (clear)

  1. FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    nyah

    1. Re:FIRST ANAL "HARD DRIVE" LUBRICANT POST! by chrono325 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, so I use the RSS reader in Firefox, and it cuts off the headlines a bit, so all I saw was "New Lubricant Leads to Faster..." Its a sad sign of the times...

  2. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

    Sounds like some of the spam I get every day... cue all the bad jokes.

    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex. Once someone uses the word lubricants, everyone gets giddy...

    2. Re:Wow... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Check, and check. Yup that's everyone.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Wow... by DrGonzo1138 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can't even say titmouse without giggling like a school girl"
      -Homer Simpson

    4. Re:Wow... by Spudley · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've got to admit that the innuendo in that headline is... um... somewhat unsubtle.

      To be honest, I always suspected the term "hard drive" was invented as a sick inside joke by computer geeks, (along with a few other very suspect phrases).

      But what really convinced me was when I went to South Africa and discovered that a 3.5" floppy disk is known over there as a "stiffy disk". Ostensibly, the original idea was to differentiate them from the older 5.25" floppies, but you've got to admit that whoever came up with that one must have known what he was doing.

      I'm not usually one to laugh at blatant innuendo, but the first few times I heard that phrase being used, it absolutely cracked me up - not just for the phrase itself, but for the fact that no-one else seemed to get the joke. To them the phrase is completely natural: A South African computer geek can get away with telling people that he's got a stiffy in his pocket, and it won't even raise a smirk.

      (having said that, it's been a while since I've used a stif... uh, a 3.5" floppy, so I can't be sure the phrase is still current - SA readers, feel free to correct me)

      --
      (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    5. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My father's 48, and he finds it amusing as well.

      He's probably never had sex then.
    6. Re:Wow... by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

      And always remember to use protection. You wouldn't want to catch a nasty virus.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    7. Re:Wow... by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm not usually one to laugh at blatant innuendo, but the first few times I heard that phrase being used, it absolutely cracked me up - not just for the phrase itself, but for the fact that no-one else seemed to get the joke


      I'm told that Australians have a similar reaction when they hear people talking about getting "root access"...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Wow... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex. Once someone uses the word lubricants, everyone gets giddy... "

      Giddy? Nah. I see a bunch of people trying to be a comedian, though.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Wow... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      *But what really convinced me was when I went to South Africa and discovered that a 3.5" floppy disk is known over there as a "stiffy disk". Ostensibly, the original idea was to differentiate them from the older 5.25" floppies, but you've got to admit that whoever came up with that one must have known what he was doing.*

      in finland, a 5.25" floppy is called 'lerppu'(roughly translates to 'floppy'). 3.5" being called 'korppu'(translates to a hard biscuit like thingy).

      too bad korppu doesn't sound so fun as stiffy..

      well.. "uptime"...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Wow... by 10000000000000000000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be honest, I always suspected the term "hard drive" was invented as a sick inside joke by computer geeks Yeah, I've long suspected the same about pilots and the "cockpit" :P

    11. Re:Wow... by azav · · Score: 3, Funny

      And in South Africa, White Out is NOT called White Out.

      Forget exactly what it is called though.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    12. Re:Wow... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lubricants and "Faster, Longer Lasting hard drives."

      Seeing as how a lot of them will be stuffed full of porn, it seems somehow appropriate.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:Wow... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Funny

      And in South Africa, White Out is NOT called White Out.
      Forget exactly what it is called though.

      Correction fluid?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    14. Re:Wow... by nofx_3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats some kinda Pair of Ducks. Either that or we have a futurama type situation on our hands.
      "I did do the nasty in the pasty."
      -Philip J. Fry

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    15. Re:Wow... by Cynikal · · Score: 2

      well im far beyond 15, but the words "faster", "longer", "hard", and "lubricants" in the same sentence does make me laugh a bit.

    16. Re:Wow... by Kumkwat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here (NZ) its called *twink* :)

    17. Re:Wow... by falzer · · Score: 5, Funny

      The mailman, on the other hand, didn't find it funny at all.

    18. Re:Wow... by dcam · · Score: 3, Informative

      Australians also laugh when Europeans come over and start talking about routers, pronounced as rooters. For the same reason.

      --
      meh
    19. Re:Wow... by inflex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having also lived in ZA for a few years, the other thing that cracked me up was the way they pronounce 'router'. In ZA, they pronounce it as 'r-oo-ter', as if you were pronouncing 'hooters'. In Australia, 'root' is another term for sex. I personally preferred to pronounce it as 'r-out-er'.

      PLD.

    20. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      root = 'fuck' in Australia, so when an Aussie happens to mention the words 'mad rooter', they're not referring to a buggered up packet forwarder.

    21. Re:Wow... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      We Aussies also have a very different meaning for the word "fanny" than you do in the US.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Wow... by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my friends ask me how to set up a LAN, pronouning router as root-ah at least gets their attention ;)

      I thought root == fuck everywhere in the world.
      Maybe Linux system aministration is just one big fucking joke then?

  3. Big deal... by Junta · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am constantly bombarded about emails promising 'longer lasting hard drives' something about pills or herbs, this is nothing new.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  4. Hmm by bigberk · · Score: 2, Funny
    "lubricants will allow for faster and longer lasting ..."
    Funny, my girlfriend agrees!
  5. Maybe they just need some... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    of this?

  6. My hard drive speed... by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 5, Funny

    With this, my hard drive speed increased a lot, if you know what I mean, and I think you do!

    However, I don't know about "longer lasting". I guess it depends on the person. Mine becomes a floppy after 2 minutes.

  7. Hmm? by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are you selling? Hard drives or sex jelly?

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Hmm? by drdink · · Score: 3, Informative

      It comes from the Family Guy Y2K episode. There is a guy in a chicken suit handing out coupons, and the chicken tells Peter about Y2K. Peter replies with "What are you selling? Chicken or sex jelly?"

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  8. More importantly by dmayle · · Score: 2, Funny

    New lubricant leads to faster pr0n on hard drives...

    </ducks>

  9. Faster Hard Drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hard Drive Speed doesn't seem to be the problem... S-ATA suits me just fine.

    What I really worry about is hard drives not getting any bigger. It seems progress has stopped at about 350 - 400gig and no prospect of going anywhere.

    1. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by damiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
      SATA is the speed of the bus from the hard drive, not the actual drive. You'd currently need a RAID cluster of drives to fill the SATA bus.

      And hard drive speed does matter, a huge amount. Unless you have a crapload of RAM and everything you use is cached, 90% of the time you spend waiting for programs to start up or large files to be read is waiting for the HD to read the data. A faster HD can make a computer feel much snappier than a slow one.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      User data needs will always increase.
      I remember spending a boatload of cash on a 4GB drive about 6 or 7 years ago thinking that would be more than enough storage for at least the next decade.
      I've now got a 160GB boot drive and 1/2 TB array for storing media files (DV video, music, photos, etc).

      I don't think it will be too much longer before people stop keeping physical files in the home, and instead scan all of their receipts, bills and statements as scanned images on their computers.

      If you think video takes up a lot of space now, wait until all consumer electronics use HD video and storage needs increase by 4x.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by Tesko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, no, the biggest one out (the 400gb one) has 5 80GB platters. But another major manufacturer is using 100GB platters in one if it's hard drives. I can't remember the manufacturers/hard drive models for the life of me. I can't wait for 20,000 RPM S-ATA Drives to hit the streets.

    4. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "What I really worry about is hard drives not getting any bigger."

      The women keep telling us 'size doesn't matter'.

    5. Re:Faster Hard Drives? by at_18 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hard drives are pathetically slow. A seek takes 10 milliseconds, that's a factor of almost a million slower than a random memory access. The biggest noticeable delays (boot up time, firefox load time, open office load time, etc.) are all caused by the slow hard disk. Transfer speeds, which are now approaching 50MB/sec, are good enough. And size is still going up: two years ago 120 GB, one year ago 250 GB, this year 400 GB. No sign of slowing.

  10. Drive Heat by Klar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My laptop runs cool, except for the left palm rest, where the hard drive is inside the case. After a few hours of gaming, it can be VERY hot. Would better lube allow for portable drives to run cooler?

    1. Re:Drive Heat by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      most likely your GPU or the end of the cpu heatpipe is there...
      No current 2.5" HD needs more than 5W during normal usage, which is WAY lower than many other components...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Drive Heat by Hooya · · Score: 2, Funny

      so, you're a left hander.

      i must have missed the memo to start calling it *gaming* ;)

    3. Re:Drive Heat by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The OP may be right, but so is the Grandparent. Hard drives don't consume a lot of energy, so in a second, they simply can't generate more than 5W of heat, due to the whole "conservation of energy" thing. However, since hard drives don't put out a lot of heat, there's not a lot of effort to cool them, and they can build up heat to be hotter than other components, making the OP correct too. Without more info though, it's hard to say who's right.

  11. Come on by Legion303 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hard". "Lubricant". "Faster". How the hell are the trolls supposed to twist this into a quick laugh? You guys are making it too difficult.

  12. Great, but... by PingKing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Far greater than faster drives, of course, would be drives with no moving parts.

    No wear, faster transfer (no seek time!) and silent. Should this be the way research should be going?

    --

    Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    1. Re:Great, but... by aspx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, no moving parts does not translate to no wear. Your Pentium IV CPU will eventually let you down, even if you use it under ideal conditions. Granted, well-designed electronic components tend to be more reliable than mechanical components.

    2. Re:Great, but... by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's plenty of research and progress in this direction: flash drives. They're still ridiculously small and expensive compared to normal hard drives but give them some more years. After all, flash, unlike hard drives, is affected by Moore's law.

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    3. Re:Great, but... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      good idea. then we just have to worry about the finite witeability of Flash memory.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Great, but... by Throtex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, back in the mid-80's, your memory size and disk size were fairly close, or a factor of 10 at most.

      You insensitive clod! Back in the mid-80s I had 64k of RAM (or 128k depending on what mode I started up in), and zero hard disk space. If you applied Moore's law to double the capacity, we'd still have no hard drive space!

      pfft! pfft I say! :)

    5. Re:Great, but... by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Research is already there, RAMdrive products just need volume to become economical.

      Curtis SSD http://www.curtisssd.com/products/drives/ make solid state hard drives that appear as a SCSI hard drive. They're phenomenally fast, and I imagine phenomenally expensive.

      However, they are of course volatile, so you need to stream your OS and data from a tape of HDD into cache before you boot the machine. And again, capacities are limited to ~15GB, so they're only of any real use as swap and/or database filesystems (possibly as root FS if you're looking for very snappy applications as well... hell, you could even RAID0 the bastards ;).

      As mentioned above, MRAM (non-volatile RAM with pretty much unlimited write, unlike flash based technologies) is an attempt to do away with the "load your OS before you boot" problem, but I don't think it'll appear in the consumer arena for awhile yet, and I imagine it'll be similarly priced to the Curtis drives today.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    6. Re:Great, but... by DarkMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not meaning to be (overly) pedantic, but that's not wear. Wear is caused by bits rubbing over each other.

      This is not just a semantic difference. The failure modes of silicon chips are mostly diffusion limited - that it, the metal conductors expand, the pn junctions become more diffuse, vacencies develop in the silicon, and so on. The failure mode of a part which wears is generally that the wear causes a mechanical weakness in a part till it breaks, bends, or is otherwise no longer functional.

      This difference is reflected in the time to failure of different devices. Electronics show a bathtub curve - essentially, manufacturing defects show up in young failures, then after a period (around 8 - 10 months), there is no intrinsitic source of failure other than the (slow) diffusion limited modes, so there number of devices failing drop very low, until that mode dominates, at sometime around 8-10 years after manufacture.

      Mechanical parts also show young failures, but, due to wearing, they do not last as long, and the rate of failures does not drop as low. The exact duration is determined by the type of use of the part. For example, this motor here *clunk* has bushes and brushes that have a design life of 1 months constant use, which translates to about 4 years with typical uses patterns. On the other hand, the motor in a washing machine is rated for something like 2 years constant use. The washing machine motor has bigger bushes and brushes, which are designed to last longer.

      I could go on, but a) it gets boring rapidly, and b) I'd have to did out some notes on it, and cba.

      In 10 years with computers, which gives experince with devices up to 20 years old, I have seen 1 case of failure in a componant over 3 months old that was not caused (directly or indirectly [0]) by mechanical wear.

      Having said all that, Flash memory is not as reliable as most electronics, as it has a particular structure that causes insulator breakdown after around 1000 writes. But that's not _really_ wear, although I'm told it has a similar failure profile.

      Not moving parts does not translate to no deterioration, but it _does_ mean no wear.

      [0] Couple of times, power supply fans died, power supply overheats, fails, and frys electronics.

  13. Attention slashdot management by bigberk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first twenty posts for this article should prove as valuable for marketing research of slashdot readership. You should be posting pornography, not links to tech articles. Yes, I'm kind of joking but kind of not.

  14. Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But will they make it to market before memory cards large enough and cheap enough to feasibly replace hard drives altogether do?

    1. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why are there slashdotters that believe memory chips will replace hard drives on a large scale any time soon?

      2TB is the addressing limit of that standard, not the amount of memory they will have. 2TB memory cards will take a loooong time to be released, esp. given that 8GB CF cards aren't available, 4GB CF cards are still pretty expensive, if available at all.

      Because flash memory cards follow RAM in costs, I doubt flash drives will replace hard drives any time soon unless you want your hard drive to be as small as your RAM space. Very similar processes are used, and I don't think the cost of making 32MB RAM chips are much different than 32MB solid state chips, because they are very similar in complexity.

    2. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, right now memory cards are wildly more expensive. But hard drives used to be wildly more expensive than they currently are, too.

      The first round of very fast and very efficient (if also very expensive) flash memory cards large enough to be considered viable hard-drive replacements are coming around now.

      Just as demand for hard-drives has pushed down hard-drive price, and demand for increasing amounts of RAM has pushed down RAM prices, so will increasing demand for solid-state memory hard-drive replacement cards increase.

      I, for one, am optimistic.

    3. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by droleary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, right now memory cards are wildly more expensive. But hard drives used to be wildly more expensive than they currently are, too.

      Internal market price changes are meaningless; you have to compare between the markets. Is flash memory decreasing in price at a faster rate than HDs? It doesn't look like it to me. And even if it is, the current per Gig price difference is about 100:1, which means flash has a lot of ground to make up.

    4. Re:Faster Hard Drives are nice... by VeryProfessional · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But will they make it to market before memory cards [slashdot.org] large enough and cheap enough to feasibly replace hard drives altogether do?

      Why the assumption that we have one or the other? The history of computing is one of a lengthening memory pyramid. It used to be just RAM and nonvolatile storage. Now we have three levels of cache on top of that. Now (excepting certain bits of bloatware *cough cough*) operating systems are not growing in size at the same rate as storage technology. I still have trouble filling more than a gigabyte or two on a basic Linux install. Why not have a situation where OS and core applications are stored on solid-state memory chips (say 10 G), while all the media that people are so fond of can end up on your mega hard-drive? That way you get the benefit of both: snappy load times for executable code, and near-unlimited, low-cost storage for all your media.

  15. Faster and longer lasting hard drives? by thephotoman · · Score: 2, Funny

    How long do you think it'll be before I start getting "natural Viagra" spam for this technology? And how much longer will it take for the spammers to realize that they're talking about an actual computer component and not anything phallic?

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  16. What's changed? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Granted, I've not kept up on the intricate details of hard disk manufacture, but I recall that the drive heads were suspended above the physical media by a thin layer of air. Has that changed? What's the point of lubricating the disk surfaces if the heads don't touch them.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:What's changed? by Tlosk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ignore the other people who replied, I don't think they bothered to read the article. The lubricant on the disc surface is just to help protect it from damage (platters are already have a protective layer, but this new one has better characteristics at high speed and is simpler to apply because it doesn't require seperate adhesives).

      The term lubricant probably wasn't the best choice, rather it's just a protective film.

      Supposedly at the high RPMs of top of the line drives, the film currently used can ripple or even spin off entirely after prolonged usage which leaves the disc more vulnerable to head contact or armature resting.

  17. But it's still mechanical. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While it's all very nice, the problem is easily ignored if one would just go for solid state HDs. Why is it so damn hard to come up with a simple system? I don't care if it's 5 1/4 device with 20gb at 200 euros. Think of the MASSIVE speed and reliability increases...

    1. Re:But it's still mechanical. by roadrunnerro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only MASSIVE increase would be in access time, but dunno about bandwith (SD, CF and friends aren't that fast - maybe with some kind of internal redundant arrangement, a la RAID, if it's not already used) or reliability (they have a limited number of write cycles - the swap file on a machine low on RAM or on a file server would probably burn a hole through it...).

    2. Re:But it's still mechanical. by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I have been thinking about solid state drives for quite some time now. Here's what I came up with the last iteration :

      You are pretty much just as well off with a nice tight SATA RAID 5 array. Tom's ran a recent article on throughput for SATA RAID 5 arrays and found that at 6 drives (using those bad ass high end Raptors, I'm guessing) he could break through the 200 megabytes per second sustained transfer rates. About 4-5 times what you and I get on a daily basis from our regular ATA-100 hard drive (which was to be expected, given the number of drives in the array.) A single person on a single machine doing single (or simple multi) tasking isn't going to notice much difference in performance between that and a RAM drive. Some, yes, but almost negligible. The only way the additional performance gains from RAM make sense is multiple users doing radically different things - this would have the drive array thrashing around trying to do all those different things but RAM seek times are effectively zero.

      You really wouldn't get the incredible boost in performance you are imagining, simply because hard drives are already pretty fast and approaching the point where they are no longer the bottleneck.

      Look here for a review from a little over a year ago. He got all excited about the differences he saw, but in reality many applications didn't show a noticable difference.

      Don't get me wrong - I am going to keep trying, as this is a never ending quest ... but solid state drives aren't the holy grail of computing.

      If you want to experiment with solid state drives, check out Cenatek's Ramdisk. Cost you $69 (they may have a free timed demo, I'm not entirely sure) and you can use it to convert your system RAM to a Ramdrive = solid state disk. If you like what it does, just throw more memory in your computer and go for it. If you can find a way to really speed up your system, be sure to share it with the rest of us ($69 is dirt cheap if you can figure out a way to get a 20% boost in performance - but you would need a bunch of RAM to take advantage of it.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:But it's still mechanical. by karnal · · Score: 2, Informative

      "This is probably why the palm pilot does not have a replaceable battery."

      OK. Now I'm gonna swear. Where the fuck did you pull that from?

      Try running out of battery power on a palm VX (I know, older model - but you said "palm"). You lose all applications in memory.

      Why? 'cause it's not "flash memory". It's actually something closer to SDRAM, which requires refresh charges every so often. Hence, if you run out of battery, you lose the memory. As well, it's not "ROM" if you can write to it.

      --
      Karnal
  18. Stop making joke by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is not funny. We have very serious technology break-through, and you should not be laugh about "Hard drive", "lube-and-polyester, "etc."

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  19. Internal speed is the problem, not interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    S-ATA, P-ATA or one of the multiple SCSI interfaces, all are not maxed out until you put multiple disks (and in S-ATA that is impossible, by design, P-ATA just sucks at that and the only worth naming is SCSI, that was designed with that in mind). The issue is the mechanical speed. For a single disk, all interfaces are faster than the platters and heads can read or write sequentially. Think about heads that can move quicker from one place to another and disks that turn faster, thus allowing to have better peak speed and also better real speed (non continous reads or writes). Of course, that requires better mechanical parts to avoid problems like vibrations or head crashes. Maybe the new lubricant could help with that.

  20. Bearings by stimpleton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The oddest materials pop up for load bearing duties.
    "Felt bearings" have been used in the automotive industry for years.

    Especially in rack and pinion steering system where lateral forces are not so high.

    Lubricants for the felt material include oil and graphite powder, or run dry.

    While more durable bearings such as needle roller, bronze sleeve, and teflon bushings, may be the preference of performance applications, ease of fitment, damping ability, and cost, still ensures felt bearings are used today, both in automotive and other industrial machinery. It is very possible, you have owned a car with one or moore felt bearings somewhere in the steering system.

    The properties of synthetic material as a bearing surface have been used and far back as 1950's(and maybe beyond).

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:Bearings by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you mean rack and peanut steering. Pinion? What is this, make-up-words day?

      --
      Arbitrary sig
  21. sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those who failed chemistry . . .
    The polymer used in this application is a sterically hindered polyester. An ester is a carboxylic acid with some sort of organic group replacing the hydrogen (i.e., O=C-O-CH3 is the methyl ester moiety).

    Bulky groups sterically hinder a molecule, making part of the molecule inaccessible. One very common application is the sterically hindered base, like triethylamine. A normal amine is NH3, but a triethyl amine is N(CH3)3. The effect is that the compound raises a solution's pH, but cannot react with other functional groups easily. This helps prevent side reactions / biproducts.

    t-BOC is one type of a sterically hindered protective group. Generally, protecting groups are removed as one of the final steps in order to get the desired product. This polyester has steric hindrance that protects the ester bond. But the article didn't say how that was accomplished. Adamantanes are another type of bulky group used to sterically hinder a molecule.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:sterically hindered polymer by bodrell · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, I bet there are a lot of people who've never failed chemistry who didn't know what a sterically hindered polyester is. I'm also sure that there are a ton of smart chemistry students who, thanks to your pedantic "explanation" are no wiser.

      I hope that you don't plan to teach chemistry to anyone who doesn't already know it. Not everyone has studied organic chemistry.

      (I didn't write the above comment; just trying to keep the thread from getting too deep)
      Sorry, but anyone who studied (and passed) chemistry ought to know what steric hindrance is. If you're having trouble with my vocabulary, then I'll try to clarify.


      Steric: having to do with space. As in, "I was unable to fit my couch in the Honda Civic due to steric hindrance."
      Polymer: A molecule composed of three or more repeating units. This can be a heteropolymer (more than one type of repeating unit) or a homopolymer (only one type of repeating unit). The repeating unit is called a monomer, and often has an antiquated name. For example, ethylene is the antiquated name of ethene, a two-carbon hydrocarbon with a double bond between carbons. However, polyethylene has no double bonds (because the bonds opened during the polymerization).
      Moiety: A part of a molecule that has a particular functionality. For example, the amino acids each have three moieties: the amino part, the acid part, and the side-group. For proline the amino part is the side group also. Functional groups (amines, esters, acids, alcohols, etc.) are all moieties.

      Are we clear now? Or is that still too pedantic? BTW, I'm not a teacher and don't plan on being one in the near future. There are different levels of understanding of any subject. Just because some people don't know what a molecule is doesn't mean I should define every term when I mention them. To quote H. L. Mencken, "Those who can, do; those who can't, teach."

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    2. Re:sterically hindered polymer by 808140 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While the GP's post may have had a bit of a "look how much I know" feel to it, I suspect that your reaction to his use of "jargon" which with you are not familiar is an emotional rather than rational one. We always feel stupid when people speak to us about subjects we know little about (relative to them) as if "everyone understands it". Anyone who has ever been exposed to experts in a field other than their own has experienced this.

      But as a mathematician, I understand that to properly express a problem, one must develop a language to describe it. To put this in CS terms, someone once said that if you lay out your data structures correctly, algorithms just fall into place, and that your code practically writes itself. The catch is, designing good data structures is no small feat, and much thought goes into it, and understanding the motivation is not always easy if you aren't really familiar with the problem.

      In Math, we often joke (in a haha only serious kind of way) that our discipline is more linguistic than anything else. In a sense, math is simply "jargon", which as far as I can tell is the term used by laypeople threatened by big words for terminology with which they aren't familiar. There's really not much more to it than that; arrange your definitions properly, word them carefully, and the proofs just come.

      Chemistry, physics, biology, and even sciences such as sociology and psychology all do the same sorts of things. I took o-chem in school and we used the term steric hinderance a lot, but the term "moiety" I either never learned or didn't remember. So I looked it up.

      If the GP had been piling layer upon layer of complexity into his post, forcing the reader to master advanced organic chemistry concepts before being able to understand what he meant, I think he could rightly be accused of jargonism. But here, he used three or four terms with which you might be unfamiliar, all of which are trivial to look up.

      I would have expected that a culture (slashdot) so connected to RTFM and CS, which probably has more technical jargon than any other scientific discipline, would know how to look up a few terms outside of their field.

      Instead, you just bitch. Learning is a two way street, you know. You actually have to make an effort sometimes. Now you know what steric hinderance is. You've learned something, and if he hadn't used the term, you wouldn't know. This is not bad. You should thank him.

  22. Buy our "Boogie Grease!" by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yeah, baby! That's what I said, Boogie Grease!

    Boogie-Grease - made with bitchin' bad-ass polyester technology. Our Boogie-Grease will make your hard drive run longer and faster.

    So don't come up "short and slow" in the server department and be the laughing stock of the tech lab. Buy Boogie-Grease Today!

    P.S. Nerd chicks dig it!

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  23. Its funny. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That I am reading this right after I reinstalled a new harrdrive on my Notebook where after 2 1/2 years the IBM Travelstar died on me. So in in an other 2 1/2 years these drives will be available for my next replacement. Still I wish I had the option to at least raid 1 my laptop. Even it it does add weight and uses more battery.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  24. Faster, but maybe smellier? by postgrep · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Won't the heat of the hardrive heat the lube up? And if so, won't it smell bad?

    1. Re:Faster, but maybe smellier? by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny
      So tell me - when was the last time you were huffing hard-drive emissions?

      On second thought, please don't tell me.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  25. Insightful! by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, every girlfriend loves a speedy hard drive! After all, it allows her to perform everyday computing tasks, such as finding the MS Word document she's looking for or installing a new version of Quicken.

    This new lubricant will allow the the hard disk to go faster because it will form an interface between the moving parts and the part of the head that touches them. The smooth, slippery, evenly-coated moving parts will slide much more easily against the head, prolonging its life.
    Really, this is one magnificent technological achievement.

    And to think, all the comments I've read so far have been pornographic innuendos made by "+1, Funny"-hording neanderthals. But your post, on the other hand....

    I just re-read it. nevermind....

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  26. Polyester, eh? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm. I've been using polyester based oils in my engines for a long time. So am I going to have to change my HDD oil every 3000 gigabytes or something?

    1. Re:Polyester, eh? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
      You're measuring in gigabytes, and not rotations or miles?

      What's next? You're gonna start telling me that your hard drive can do the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs?

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  27. the 70's by mottie · · Score: 3, Funny

    A recent discovery in polyester (yes, polyester, you disco baby) lubricants
    THAT explains why people got so busy back in the 70s.

  28. vehicle oil? by chimpo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could this be used on engines? I know that oil carries away heat, as well as lubricates, in internal combustion engines.

    If they find a way of coating parts and use some kind of anti-freeze in vehicles, maybe internal combustion engines will last longer. Two strokes could make a come back.

  29. Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've often wondered about the rate of evaporation on fluid-bearing HDs. Running at high temperatures, even the lowest level of evaporation will mean a loss of lubricant over the years. Even inside the semi-sealed chamber of the drive, each on-off cycle will mean that the drive exhales the evaporated lubricant and the cooling pattern of a turned-off drive will mean condensation of lubricant on the inside shell of the case.

    Ball-bearings (well-designed ones at least) can last virtually forever. I wonder if the same can be said for fluid bearings?

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by ameoba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fortunately, this is computer hardware we're talking about - most of it becomes obsolete or suffers a catastrophic failure before it simply wears out.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:Vapor pressure of HD lubricants -- lifespan? by LDorman · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...suffers a catastrophic failure before it simply wears out."

      Whew... lucky me, I was able to experience a catstrophic failure before my hard drive wore out. Guess I won't have to replace it after all.

      Nothing personal, just couldn't resist...

      --
      Bush makes our troops prey...
  30. Operating Temps by EmperorKagato · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It makes me wonder what are the possible operating temperatures of this lubricant and how much of a viscosity difference we would see from the standards of today compared to this new lubricant that is added.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  31. With the Y2KY fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you can now get four digits into your date instead two.

  32. Longer lasting? by myov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With my hard drive luck, a year seems like a "longer lasting" drive. I've lost more hard drives in the last year than ever - Just being away on vacation (with the computers unplugged), I lost 2 hard drives! (not a complete loss, but the systems acted funny enough that I suspected total failure if I didn't replace the drives quickly)

    One week of being off, for a drive that is not used 24x7, should not kill a drive. I've had drives sitting on a shelf for a year that still work fine. I should not need to setup a 3-drive RAID array simply to get the level of reliability we had a few years ago.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  33. Improvements through the mundane by michael_cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is surprising how often improvements in our computer technology comes from relatively mundane sources. For example, much of the reason that Moore's Law has continued to hold is the way that the mechanical engineers have been able to constantly improve our ability to position things accurately. Masks and wafers must be positioned with astonishing (at least to me) accuracy relative to each other in order to allow creation of 90 nm features.

    1. Re:Improvements through the mundane by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "...our ability to position things accurately."

      You've hit upon a deep philosophical point. All that information is, is the location of things. Computation is moving things around.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  34. Re: Wow ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 5, Funny
    I swear most slashdot readers must either be 15, or never have sex.

    We have a winner ...

  35. I for one... by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new lubricated polyester overlords.

  36. I am too by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But let's be realistic about time scales here. CF is not replacing harddrives next month or even next year. We are talking probably 5+ years until it is realisticly at the price level and capacity where it's a serious contender for most systems. In the interm, it would be nice to have better harddrives. It's a proven, widely used technology. Making it better is nothing but good.

    Just because there is potentially something better some years off doesn't mean you want to stop working on what you've got now. Quantum computers stand to make current computers looks like abacuses. However, they won't be around for many years, if at all, so it's not like we want to pack up and stop working on current chip technology.

    I too envision a future where one doesn't have RAM and disk, you have one permenant memory storage that holds everything, because it's more than fast enough. However I realise that such a ting is many years off. Even the next logical step, replacing mechanical drives with solid state ones, isn't happening for a few years at least.

  37. Get your H/\rd d|sk lubr|c4nt for ch3ep ch3ep!! by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 3, Funny

    your womans will love your fore it! H/\rd d|sk lubr|c4nt only 4.95 come on man you ow it to her! Spin faster last longer! many satisfied people can be happy!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  38. Crossword. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Funny

    One time, I was doing a crossword.

    DI_K

    12. Can be floppy or hard.

    Couldn't make this sort of thing up if I tried.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  39. Re:Where the fsck did you learn economics? by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The law of Supply & Demand work in the short term. Over longer terms, the means of economic production can grow, shift around, or, in the case of fossil fuels for example, shrink. The history of electonics in the last few decades has been one of growing markets suppporting ever larger capital investment, and accumulating technical know-how, bringing us declining per-byte costs for memory and storage.

    In the absence of growing markets (if tarrif wars were to isolate national economies from foreign trade for example) nobody could afford to build those billion dollar fabs, but we would still have advancing technology. So the OP got it half-right.

    And of course the yet-undiscovered low-cost future technology has to exist. Fields outside electronics have had growing markets drive technological and capital investment, but they haven't advanced as fast.

  40. Re:Where the fsck did you learn economics? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But the laws of supply and demand only kick in when the supply is constrained. In the case of a non-constrained supply, then what happens is the manufacturer will set the price so that the (sell price - manufacturing cost) * units sold equals is maximized (maximum total profit). Then the manufacture will make as many as will sell at that price.

    Now, in this case, there is another economic force at play. It is the laws of economy of scale. So, as demand increases, more will be manufactured, allowing cheaper production costs, which will allow the sell price to drop, assuming that a lower sell price will increase the "quantity demanded" at that demand level enought to cause enough more units to sell to create a higher profit.

  41. Getcher fix, getcher fix... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Funny

    Poor man. Here, have some amateur lesbian porn. (No joke. Stuff's impossible to find, but there it is.)

    Clearly not work-safe, of course.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  42. The challanger... by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Funny
    Heh, a while ago I read a guide on HardOCP about how to install a blowhole in the top of your computer case. It had one sentence that went like so:
    "I know I am anal enough that if my blowhole were cocked to one side, it would drive me nuts. (Show me another non-sexual sentence that uses "anal, cocked, blowhole, and nuts" and you will have my props.)
    This story title doesn't use those exact words, but surely getting four sexual innuendos in any sort of casual sentence is a worthy accomplishment. :)
  43. Re:glass coated platters on IBM drives? by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is the actual platters that are made from a ceramic glass instead of metal. The glass has better thermal tolerance and is lighter and stronger than the previous metals used.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  44. Good, but too late. Solid state is the future. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Informative

    Check out these solid state HD's.

    I'm sure there'll come the time when spinning disks (either floppy or HD) will come to an end and become just pieces of junk in a museum - like vacuum tubes in electronics.

  45. in another case of "the blind leading the blind" by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 4, Informative
    If a HDD is using micro-magnets to read/write from the platter, wouldn't the presence of a (relatively) giant magnet in the middle of the platter, bounce other magnetic bits around to such a degree that you'd either require a larger, unusable inner section of the platter, or lose the ability to use magnetic methods of storing data on the platter?

    I can imagine a magnetically floating CD-ROM drive though, since optical systems aren't (measurably) affected by magnetism.

    --
    click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.
  46. oh polyester how i loathe thee by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Polyester is made from petrochemicals, this synthetic is also non-biodegradable, so it is inherently unsustainable on two counts. Making polyester uses large amounts of water for cooling, along with lubricants which can become a source of contamination. The processes is also very energy-hungry.

    IM willing to live with a little less speed, and a little more ecology in my future computer thank-you.