Slashdot Mirror


Apple Launches iTunes Affiliate Program

An anonymous user writes, "Apple has launched an affiliate program for their iTunes music store that earns participants 5% commission. Affiliates can link directly to songs, albums, and artists, as well as apply to the Apple Store affiliate program to sell hardware. It costs nothing to join and people that sign up prior to September 15 can win one of five free iPod minis. Apple has also assembled a handy FAQ."

67 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. So... by odano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is basically a 5% discount on all iTunes music?

    1. Re:So... by vijayiyer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Note that they don't pay you until you've accumulated $25 in commission, meaning you don't get anything until there are 506 purchases made.

    2. Re:So... by suckmysav · · Score: 5, Informative

      " This is basically a 5% discount on all iTunes music?"

      Well, if you purchased the music for yourself and you bought over a thousand songs each month then I guess it would be, yes.

      FIn most cases though, I expect it would represent a 5% kickback to any site owner who could generate 1000 clickthrus that culminate in a purchase, which is quite a bit different.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    3. Re:So... by Neko-kun · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, It means that you, the re-seller, gets a five percent cut out of every song you sell.

      In other words, Apple is allowing webmasters to have links on their websites that when a visitor clicks on it, iTunes will open up to the album page ready for the visitor to buy it.

      Say for example,

      "Hey peeps, I was listening to this one album the other day, and it was really nice. if you want to buy it so you can share my amazement, click here"

      All an affiliate would be doing would be reffering more would-be customers to the iTMS.

    4. Re:So... by MedHead · · Score: 2, Interesting
      2.2. Affiliate agrees not to make any representations, warranties or other statements concerning Apple, Apple's site, any of Apple's products or services, or Apple's site policies, except as expressly authorized by the Engagement.

      http://www.apple.com/itunes/affiliates/terms.html

      Would anyone mind explaining this to me? I'm not a lawyer, so I can't be sure... but from what I can see, doesn't this mean that as an affiliate, we are not allowed to say we like or dislike a song to which is being linked?

    5. Re:So... by aka-ed · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, it means that an affiliate cannot (for instance) make statements that might be construed as Apple policy statements, unless so authorized; the songs sold on Itunes do not belong to Apple (they're licensed), so are not covered by this.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    6. Re:So... by ColdGrits · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, that is incorrect.

      The $ DO accumulate over the months. Check the FAQ. It was linked from the original article.

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    7. Re:So... by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The slick thing to do would be to create some sort of automated system where the visitor could provide the artist and title of a song to a form on the affiliate's website. The form would spawn a CGI that would query the ITMS website for the specific song and then provide the affiliate-enabled link to the visitor as output. That way the affiliate wouldn't be limited to just the songs they took the time to link to and wouldn't have to field email from visitors that ask for song links. It would all be automated. That would be really slick.

  2. Recursive marketing sucks. A lot. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought I had just finished with everyone under the sun trying to ram gmail tokens down my throat, and now I have to start over with the damn iTunes thing? Argh!

    People are going to be suckers for recursive marketing until the market gets saturated.

  3. Fight the Enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems the folks at DownhillBattle.org could use this to raise revenue and pay the artist 5 cents on each song sold...

  4. FAQ? by LihTox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love Apple, but there are two things that struck me:
    1) "Frequently Asked Questions"? How long has this been around that there are questions asked frequently? :)
    2) In the FAQ, there is the sentence "You can only use approved creative provided by iTunes." When did "creative" become a noun?

    1. Re:FAQ? by MedHead · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I too was confused with the FAQ, but for a different reason: there are no banner measurements given. I don't want to have to sign an agreement that gives me certain responsibilities without knowing all my tools at my disposal beforehand. Does "creative" mean text-based ads similar to Google's? Does "banner" mean 88x31 pixels, or 500x150 pixels? If I'm going to have to follow all sorts of rules just to see what I can promote on my website, forget it. I don't want to take the risk of Apple emailing me about my lack of participation. Maybe I'm being too paranoid?

    2. Re:FAQ? by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have you ever been in an affiliate program? As a general rule you can sign up and never participate, no one cares. Why should they?

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:FAQ? by AdamTheBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "logo's and banners." What'll it be michaelswilder.com ? Are you going to put an apostrophe when you pluralise or not?

      I know I wont pay for marketing from someone who can't make up their mind on something as simple as that.

    4. Re:FAQ? by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Given current practices, "creative" means a web bug linked to 2o7. As much as I like apple, they seem way into the tracking of users as they move around the internet. I would think this would a prime opportunity for them to collect more marketing data.

      Just because you are parniod does not mean people are not actully out to get you.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  5. Terms of service word count: 22,760 by aka-ed · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think this must be some kind of record. Anybody else willing to read it and tell me what parts might be objectionable?

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    1. Re:Terms of service word count: 22,760 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You read contracts?

    2. Re:Terms of service word count: 22,760 by nmoog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know, I only got up to the bit that said "..a legal resident of the United States.."

  6. Incentive for smaller labels? by photonagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like this might be an additional incentive for smaller labels to join up with iTunes store, or perhaps even independant artists to start doing so.

    I'm not exactly sure how Apple signs labels (or individuals) even after a bit of browsing on their site.

  7. SSN + No encryption = ??? by muel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I too paranoid to feel completely iffy about submitting my social security number over a non-encrypted website? I don't think it's very naive to expect a little lock icon to pop up when I visit Apple's "tell us everything about you, but we'll keep it private, fer sure, promise!!!11" zone.

    1. Re:SSN + No encryption = ??? by MedHead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, security? That'll be installed on Tuesday!

    2. Re:SSN + No encryption = ??? by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Funny
      commodoresloat=Mrs. Hilda Schrader Whitcher?

      You owe me money, biatch!

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:SSN + No encryption = ??? by mosch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      <form name="form1" action="https://ssl.linksynergy.com/php-bin/reg/s<nobr>r<wbr></wbr></nobr> egister.shtml?mid=13508&no_r=1" method="post">

  8. Win one of five free iPod minis? by 89cents · · Score: 5, Funny

    Geez with everyone doing it now, I had to check to see if there were referrer links to freeipods.com in the article summary.

  9. Here comes the spam! by crucini · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Affiliate programs seem to bring out the slimiest in people, whether it's email spam or spammy slashdot comments. Won't it be wonderful to search for some obscure song on google and get a vast wasteland of affiliate link-spam pages all pointing to Apple?

    I thought Apple had more class.

    (Please, Apple fanboys, don't mod this down out of reflexive groupthink. Because that's lame.)

  10. so in other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's an iFfiliate program.

    *runs for cover*

  11. Canada still too cold for AAC quality music by Matt+Clare · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple also annouced that Canada is too cold for iTunes quality soundwaves to work and plans to never let the canucks into the iTunes store.

    --
    .\.\att Clare
  12. Must be done in IE by enjoilax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using FF .9.3 and will not register, did it with IE, sorry all.

  13. FAQ #402 by LuxFX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: Is it really possiblr to win an iPod mini?
    A: You're not very good at math, are you?

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    1. Re:FAQ #402 by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny
      1: If you join, there is a non-zero chance that you do.
      2: If you don't join, there is zero chance that you do.
      3. If you convince others not to join, your chance gets bigger.

      See, math is easy.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:FAQ #402 by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 5, Funny
      Q: Is it really possiblr to win an iPod mini?
      A: You're not very good at math, are you?

      Or spelling, it would appear. :-)

  14. I love signing checks for 82 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sell 16,000 songs per month and finance your new BMW!

  15. Re:subject by theKinkyRabbit · · Score: 5, Informative

    You put a banner on your site, pointing to the iTMS. When someone clicks it and then buys something within the next 24 hours, you get a percentage of the transaction.
    This has been working for a long time with the Apple Store, the fact that it now works with the iTMS too is the news bit.

    --
    Life isn't a bitch. Life is a virgin. A bitch is easy.
  16. Looking forward to it by tobes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There seem to be a lot of complaints about this so far, but I for one am really looking forward to it. I've been linking to the itms extensively for about a year now (just cause it's very useful for my users). It's going to be great to start getting some revenue!

    Personally, I think the iTunes Music Store is a great platform for finding new music. Anyone can make links to it and they've got tons of sample streams. Hopefully this move indicates that Apple wants third parties to provide the navigation innovation while they continue to act as a platform and catalog.

    1. Re:Looking forward to it by savetz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blatant self-promotion: If you like MusicMobs, you may also like TunesTracker. Tell it your favorite artists, and it will send you an e-mail alert whenever the iTunes Music Store has new songs by that artist.

      And yeah, I'll be using the iTMS affiliate program for TunesTracker.

  17. I don't quite understand... by huchida · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the FAQ I couldn't figure out how this works. If a visitor clicks the banner on your site, does that open their copy of iTunes and take them to the store? After all there is no iTunes store site to be directed to...

    If that's the case, this sounds more like a way to get PC users to install iTunes than to actually sell songs. A bit on the sleazy side, isn't it Apple?

    I do see a benefit for independant artists, assuming they can get their music in the iTunes music store in the first place (how does that work, anyway? Is anyone rejected?) Previously the best they could hope for is to direct you to Amazon, or, worse, tell you how to mail-order their music.

    1. Re:I don't quite understand... by bitrott · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If that's the case, this sounds more like a way to get PC users to install iTunes than to actually sell songs. A bit on the sleazy side, isn't it Apple?


      How is that sleazy? The end user was clicking to buy the song and would have to use the client necessary to play that song. It's not exactly spyware here folks. It's money in exchange for goods and services. To take advantage of that service, you have to download a really excellent media player.

  18. Beginning of a Revolution? by Fraser+Cain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if this is the beginning of the end for the traditional music companies. From what I understand, the key benefit they bring to the music business is marketing. They use their marketing and distribution channels to make a band popular or not.

    If iTunes is starting to offer an affiliate program, then it will encourage websites to develop song lists and various tools that analyze your current listening tastes and then recommend songs that you can buy from iTunes. Obviously there'll be a flurry of crap and SPAM, but eventually some pretty cool services are going to emerge.

    Services which can avoid the traditional music labels entirely. Artists can produce a song, a vast network of freelance marketers can promote it (instead of 5 big media conglomerates), and music buyers can pay for it.

    --
    Publisher, Universe Today - http://www.universetoday.com
    1. Re:Beginning of a Revolution? by tobes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm already doing pretty much this exact thing on Musicmobs.

    2. Re:Beginning of a Revolution? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      revolution???
      wtf? and those 'tools' aren't going to be a new thing.

      what you will see however for certain is google-spam. because it's not 'really' spam to have spam google. it just needs ten people to do linkfarms of all pop songs going between them or so and you'll be completely fucked for finding a site with real content about these songs.

      apple would probably be able to weed out spyware 'recommenders' and nasty stuff like that but they can't really weed out those zombie websites with generated content that's just links to other sites of theirs with generated content(and adverts)..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Beginning of a Revolution? by smclean · · Score: 2, Informative
      See also:

      AudioScrobbler

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    4. Re:Beginning of a Revolution? by cowscows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think the best part about all this will be big sites dedicated to providing links to lots of music. Sites like that already exist, and the good ones have made names for themselves.

      What I find more interesting about this is that it can provide an easy way for people to provide useful music links on their personal websites. For example, I read a lot of different blogs every day, some written by people I know, some written by people I've never met. But most of those people think and write intelligently enough that I feel their opinions are worthwhile. And so if they recommend some music, I might just go check it out, because it might be something cool, something besides the normal radio play, and because doing it through itunes will be very easy.

      I'll get a nice quick preview of the particular song, it'll be easy to find other songs by the artist if I like it, and if I choose to buy it, I can get it right then and there, and toss a little money back to the blog author as thanks.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  19. Re:Recursive marketing sucks. A lot. by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I guess I can't interest you in a free iPod...?

  20. Also positive possibilities by spectrokid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I guess it wouldn't be too hard for OS projects to use this as a source of revenue. By your music through Mozilla and support your favourite browser while you are at it!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  21. Slashdot by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot should apply, they could make a bundle off of the commissions with all the iTunes related articles they post. All they'd have to do is find a covert way to post links so that people wouldn't realize that it's a money making proposition for them ;)

  22. Re:Recursive marketing sucks. A lot. by Hi_2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recursive marketing is a breath of fresh air compared to the old style. I flip through the channels on my TV and see ads that I classify into three categories: Useless, stupid, and funny. Useless is things like Tampons, or Dishwashing detergent, neither of which I would buy even with their assurances of "Grease fighting crystals". Stupid is any sort of medication, which should be pitched and perscribed only by a liscenced doctor with your best interests at heart. Funny ads are almost exculsivley a fairly standard joke with a single logo or name tacked on.

    Even worse are things like "Targeted" advertisements on the internet. Google's getting better, but internet ads still fall into the basic categories.

    None of these catergories comes close to informing me or making good use of my time. My friends, on the other hand, have a pretty good idea of what I like and have a pretty vested interest in giving me honest opinions. Music is meant to be a question of "Hey, Bob, come listen to this song, it's got a really catchy tune.", not of "LOOKIT THIS GIRLS BOOBS! AND SHE SINGS!". It will happen, and this is it.

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
  23. It's like the old joke about lotteries... by rlowe69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... they're just a tax on people who are bad at math.

    The odds are still terrible you'll win an iPod Mini, but it looks like the only thing signing up for this will cost you is your time.

    --
    ----- rL
  24. But Context is everything... by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine that I run a site which talks about music in general or just hip-hop, jazz or whatever. Those kinds of people can slip little ads into their site which make sense. It's a lot easier than just telling people to venture to their local [INSERT ANTIQUE FORMAT] store and grabbing one off the shelf.

    I, for example, have a political website. Right now there are lots of good political books that relate exactly to the content of my site. It makes sense to have a "click here to buy this" after book quotes. What doesn't make sense is putting them on every page even where they don't belong. (Not that I take advantage of this because I can't find a good affiliate program that does this, amazon IIRC doesn't offer this anymore).

    Sure, you'll get google-bombed pages which have nothing but "buy this song" links but out there someone can turn his or her hobbie into a cash cow. It may not be much money - but to the site's readers it means the site may be up next year come domain/hosting renewal time.

    Although, can you imagine the possibility with iTunes affiliate programs? Music has a much broader appeal. I can put my favorite song's name and artist name in my Slashdot sig, just to get people turned on to their music. It would be annoying for everyone to link to Britney Spears or some other pop-star, but obscure music could be marketed for almost nothing.

    The cool thing is that you can help support your favorite artist and get a kickback while doing it. The reason that Britney and company are so popular is because people vote with their dollars. If there is suddenly a huge surge in Jaco Pastorius songs sold on iTunes maybe radio stations will get a clue and stop following the RIAA's lead.

    btw... get a freeipod already! ;-) he he he.... couldn't resist.

    1. Re:But Context is everything... by g3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Talk about context, if you're a band and you push people to iTunes to buy your album*, I suppose you benefit from your album selling, but you are also an affiliate! Fairly obvious use, but still interesting.

      *As The Cure does (and they push not just to iTunes, but other services).

    2. Re:But Context is everything... by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What this really makes me think of is LiveJournal and other blogs. Lots of people seem to like sticking in their mood and whatever music they're listening to at the top of every blog entry. Now imagine them making their "Current Song:" line in every entry an iTMS link to the song. Any money they make off it is theirs to keep on a free blog site, since they don't have to pay for hosting, and people can earn money just by keeping a journal of the inane details of their everyday life, as long as someone actually reads it. People could even make money off each other, buying songs through each other's referrals and getting the money kicked back to their friend.

  25. My Very own IPOD compatable Music Store. by tonywestonuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Link directly from your website to any song, album or artist on iTunes. iTunes offers the largest and most diverse legal music download catalogue -- over 1 million tracks from all five major labels and over 600 leading independents. So... Lets say I copied all the available tunes titles from the itunes store, and launched a kickass amazing sites that was more friendly than iTunes , easier to navigate through. (If this is indeed possible, is not the issue here). So, My site becomes a instant Google like hit, Consumers are happy (iPod compatable song downloads), I'm getting 5% of each tune that is sold... (5% of millions, is, well Loadsass!), so I'm happy also. So, what would be the difference (not technically, but Visibly to the consumer) between this setup, and Apple [doing what everyone's screaming at them to do, but they won't] licensing the AAC technology to a third party to allow them to set up their own store?.....

    in the latter case, To get the protected AAC files to your iPod, you still need iTunes (to handle the drm keys), So Apples presence will still be there.
    How much differences will there realy be?

    1. Re:My Very own IPOD compatable Music Store. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Lets say I copied all the available tunes titles from the itunes store"

      But why copy, when there's already phptunes?

    2. Re:My Very own IPOD compatable Music Store. by tonywestonuk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, why not!.... It could be possible to dynamically update your website using phptunes, so (in theory) your online music site will not need any maintenance!

  26. Re:*WARNING* not a secure form! by Accipiter · · Score: 4, Informative

    The form action itself is on an https connection. It's encrypted. Stop worrying.

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  27. Re:*WARNING* not a secure form! by incog8723 · · Score: 2, Informative

    they expect people to enter their social security number....

    Don't enter it. If the script demands it, put in all zeroes. If it still rejects it, put in all nines. If it still then rejects it, browse to epitonic.com, emusic.com, or mp3.com, or many other thousands of free mp3 music collections. Browse by area even. I live in Nashville. Go to a fucking live show, for godssakes. There are literally thousands of them here. I would bet there are at least two or three in your locale.

    The point is, your Social Security Number is YOUR PRIVATE information. You don't have to give it to ANYONE, *unless* you are dealing with social security benefits. Goodbye.

  28. How to *really* win an iPod Mini by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The odds are still terrible you'll win an iPod Mini, but it looks like the only thing signing up for this will cost you is your time.

    Yup. So it consumes some chunk of your time for an incredibly small chance to win an iPod Mini.

    You really want an iPod Mini, with a 100% chance to win (and help out the other folks in the Open Source world)?

    Do a GNOME Bug Bounty, and just *buy* an iPod Mini.

    Apple wins, you win, the Open Source world wins, and the musicians win.

  29. Re:*WARNING* not a secure form! by marauder404 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Don't enter it. ... If it still then rejects it, browse to epitonic.com, emusic.com, or mp3.com, or many other thousands of free mp3 music collections ... Go to a fucking live show, for godssakes ... The point is, your Social Security Number is YOUR PRIVATE information. You don't have to give it to ANYONE, *unless* you are dealing with social security benefits. Goodbye.
    Apple doesn't use the SSN. It's submitted to LinkShare, who holds onto it. They want it so that when they pay you a commission, the information about payments made to you or your company are properly submitted to the IRS. This has absolutely nothing to do with buying music. If you want to be paid as an affiliate, they need to report your earnings to the IRS. As you probably know, anything you submit to the IRS is tagged with your name and SSN.
  30. Bloggers by xombo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This will be great for bloggers, I'm already scoring a few bucks a month from Amazon for this sort of thing, but a live list of what I'm listening to could be absolutely devine for affiliate commissions.

  31. Already been linking to songs on my site ... by adzoox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really great. I have been linking to songs as part of all my stories on my website - since I started it in January. My site stats show that 3 out of every 10 visitors are at least clicking on the iTunes Music Store Link. I'll now be able to see how many people are actually buying songs. I've had a few reader emails telling me that they have.

    [Note that one thing the parent is not mentioning ... not everyone that "signs up" is going to be able to participate - there is a case by case approval process]

    I realize that 5% isn't much, but it's actually a huge percentage considering what Apple makes. [I take it that their estimated 3 profit per song has gone up]

    This could be a great way for websites such as mine - who are also Apple oriented to get a tiny bit of operation revenue.

    I hate banner ads - so it 's neat that I can now have a story element as part of my revenue.

    Some examples:

    Is It A Sin To Buy A Mac Devil Inside ~ INXS

    How To Avoid An Auction Scam Without Really Trying eBay ~ Weird Al Yankovic

    What Kon Man!Confunkshunizeya ~ Con Funk Shun

    I really appreciate that Apple has now made me a part of the not only the downloading process but the true sharing process. Because sharing does involve some form of compensation or benefit. :)

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  32. Re:NO SSL by finkployd · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's not how it works my friend.
    Your data was secure, let me explain.

    Your browser downloaded the website with the form on it over a clear channel, and displayed it in your browser. So far no problem.

    Then you entered your personal data into the form on the website, which so far only exists in your computer's memory, none of that data was ever sent over the network until you pressed submit.

    Once you pressed submit, your browser opened a secure connection to the url you posted and sent the data from the form to it. Never in this transaction was your data sent over the network in the clear.

    Granted this is still a confusing move on Apple's part. The convention is usually to encrypt both the url with the form AND the url it is being submitted to. The first step is totally unnecessary from a security perspective, but it reassures people who think it is only safe to enter data if they see "https" on the form url.

  33. iTunes Idea I'd rather see by NYTrojan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's what I'd really like to see out of iTunes. How about an internet radio client. It would be a small program you install... you could tune in to several different stations (maybe some indie stuff too, to give individuals who let itunes sell their music some play). On the face of this program would be a 'buy this song now' button. Ever hear something you like but don't know who's singing it or forget later? Not a problem now. You can purchase it instantly.

    Think about it, you could finally have individuals getting play and selling their music without the big record lables. iTunes is the one system that is already big enough to pull this off I think.

  34. Re:*WARNING* not a secure form! by 94229a · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the SSN is anything like a SIN, then I think you do need to provide it.

    I have to give my SIN out for anything that pays me money. My employer gives me paychecks, the bank pays me interest and the affiliate program gives me commission cheques. That institution is responsible for telling Revenue Canada I've made money -- and Revenue Canada doesn't want my name, it needs my SIN as well.

    So the institution is required by law to have my SIN. There are supposed to be severe restrictions on how they use that number though.

  35. Re:Recursive marketing sucks. A lot. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean it's compatible with Rhapsody ?!?

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  36. Re:Affiliate vs. Artist Share by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess part of the idea here is that the artist can now get 15-19% (I heard more like a quarter per song, btw...I don't trust downhillbattle's numbers) by pushing people to iTunes through their websites.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  37. What I do by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I like to do is secure the page with the form on it, and then send the important data over an insecure channel.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  38. Not for individuals in the UK by carou · · Score: 2, Informative
    It would have been nice for Apple to make this clearer, but - at least as far as UK residents are concerned - individuals are not allowed to join this scheme, because of LinkShare Terms and Conditions: (their capitals, not mine)

    Member Qualifications

    In order to join or use any Network as a Network Affiliate, you must be a corporation, limited partnership, limited liability company or other form of business organization that has an independent legal existence or, solely in the case of any Network other than the UK Network, an individual who is at least of the age required in order to be competent to enter into contracts under the laws of the jurisdiction in which you reside (and, in any event, at least eighteen years old). INDIVIDUALS MAY NOT JOIN OR USE THE UK NETWORK.

    IN ADDITION, YOU MAY USE ANY LINKSHARE NETWORK ONLY FOR A BUSINESS PURPOSE AND NOT FOR Any PERSONAL, HOUSEHHOLD OR FAMILY PURPOSE; THE BUSINESS THAT YOU CONDUCT THROUGH ANY LINKSHARE NETWORK MUST BE YOUR PRIMARY BUSINESS OR AN INTEGRAL PART OF YOUR PRIMARY BUSINESS; AND YOUR USE OF ANY LINKSHARE NETWORK MUST BE INTEGRALLY RELATED TO SUCH BUSINESS.


    So no "5% off iTunes" purchases for me...
  39. Referrer program on hardware and software? by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about Apple setting up a referral program from their hardware and software? It could be like a customer loyalty referral program on complete systems like what your Dodge dealer might do for people that refer new customers to the dealership (mine kicks back $50/referral). Apple could send me $50 or 5% of the purchase price of whatever my referral bought. That would be nice. The same goes from lesser hardware. If I refer people to the iPod Mini via my website and they buy one, I'd like a kickback. I think a referral program like this would be a very good thing. I'm all for it.