Slashdot Mirror


Neither Rain, Nor Snow, Nor Dark of Night...

Digital_Quartz writes "This week's I, Cringely discusses possible plans for ensuring your data survives Hurricane Frances. I've always though remote backups would be the best solution to a problem like this. Maybe even something as simple as hiding a DVD-R under your desk at work, with all your worldly data on it. How do you secure your precious data against earthquakes, hurricanes, and swarms of locusts?" Reader pillageplunder writes "CNN is reporting: 'Scientists say more storms like Frances -- both very intense and very large -- are likely.' They theorize that warming oceans natural cycles are setting the stage. Some interesting facts throughout the article... Forecasting has gotten better, with a 3 day forecast now having a margin of error or 'only' 200 miles." And an anonymous reader writes "For those peer-2-peer geeks stuck in hurricane Frances, you can now listen to Central Florida Indymedia's coverage of the hurricane. In addition to giving updates about the hurricane, they are playing music, interviews, and relaying other radio stations. Possibly more interesting than the content to Slashdot readers will be the fact that it is being done via peer-2-peer. The java program p2p-radio from p2p-radio.sourceforge.net is being used in conjunction with shoutcast to deliver the content. Details on how to connect are available here on Tampa Indymedia's Website."

278 comments

  1. Acts of God by loid_void · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Keep a nitro sniffn' DeLorean parked in the garage with a terabyte of storage on board, then, with any amount of Warning, 1,2,3 days, hell, one hour, you best hall ass!!!!!!! of course, in the proper direction. If you have other valuable computers you do not want to leave behind, you will need a trailer and a hitch.

    --
    Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    1. Re:Acts of God by Randy+Wang · · Score: 1

      Screw the DeLorean! Get yourself one o' them Warthogs?

      --
      --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    2. Re:Acts of God by loid_void · · Score: 1

      Thanks, just picked up two of 'dem warthogs, and ready for anything!

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
  2. Gmail by panxerox · · Score: 0

    At a gig an account you could store all sorts of stuff there.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  3. nuke it! by Slashbot+Hive-Mind · · Score: 5, Funny

    lets just nuke it!

    --

    --
    We are the collective Slashbot HiveMind
    1. Re:nuke it! by AlexMidn1ght · · Score: 4, Funny

      From the aforementioned article : "If we think about mechanical energy, the energy at humanity's disposal is closer to the storm's, but the task of focusing even half of the energy on a spot in the middle of a remote ocean would still be formidable. Brute force interference with hurricanes doesn't seem promising.

      So you mean I've been blowing at it for nothing?

    2. Re:nuke it! by Veridium · · Score: 4, Informative

      Somebody mod parent funny. From the article:
      Apart from the fact that this might not even alter the storm, this approach neglects the problem that the released radioactive fallout would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating environmental problems. Needless to say, this is not a good idea.

      I guess I shouldn't be laughing so hard that this answer is under the frequently asked questions section on the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory website, but I really can't help myself.

      --
      Think for yourself, destroy your television.
    3. Re:nuke it! by aled · · Score: 1

      Eh guys, you can't blow up everything that you don't like. Especially not me, ok?

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    4. Re:nuke it! by mooredav · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nukes won't work because they don't have the power to counter the hurricane. A better approach is to build a giant plexiglass shield off the coast. This is also a solid defense against shark attacks.

    5. Re:nuke it! by LiSrt · · Score: 2, Funny

      That site also considered the possibility of coating the ocean in a substance capable of preventing evaporation -- wonder if crude oil would work for that?...

    6. Re:nuke it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its the only way to be sure."

    7. Re:nuke it! by Eric604 · · Score: 0

      don't forget to install some holes with wind turbines

    8. Re:nuke it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you mean I've been blowing at it for nothing?

      Yes. Now wipe off your chin.

    9. Re:nuke it! by kelzer · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has got to be one of the stupidest ideas I've ever heard. I live in Orlando, and have known a lot of Sea World employees, and those who have worked the "Shark Encounter" exhibit tell me they have to replace the plexiglass every year because the sharks are relentless at gnawing through it.

      What we really need is a shield made of transparent aluminum.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    10. Re:nuke it! by kelzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I didn't realize the President read Slashdot! That's almost as good an idea as the one you had about clear-cutting, er, I mean, thinning forrests to prevent wildfires.

      Yet another example of your common-sense approach to the environment. Keep up the good work!

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    11. Re:nuke it! by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      A better approach is to build a giant plexiglass shield off the coast. This is also a solid defense against shark attacks.

      Even against sharks with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads?

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    12. Re:nuke it! by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2, Informative

      H-bombs the scale of Bravo (1954 test on Bikini - 1000 times the power of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima) do have the power to create nuclear hurricanes. Nuclear hurricanes are capable of killing with the radiation alone a hundred miles from Ground Zero, making them far worse than normal hurricanes. Generating a nuclear hurricane is not going to help you much.

      Hurricanes are a force of nature with the fury of an angry god. There are only three things we humans can presently do about them:

      1) Secure your stuff as best you can
      2) Flee to shelter
      3) Pray

      "Our people.. stricken with disease.
      You.. you played with the fires of the gods.
      And you dare to come here and ask us for help!
      You betrayed us! You expect us to trust you after what you have done?"
      Infant Island Chief, "Godzilla vs. Mothra" (US Version), 1964
      (For the 10th anniversary of Bravo.)

    13. Re:nuke it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the Europeans:
      With the added benefit of keeping all you Americans in!! :D
      For the Americans:
      With the added benefit of keeping all you Europeans in!! :D

    14. Re:nuke it! by Lobsang · · Score: 1

      No!

      It would never stop the sharks with the fricking "LASER" on their heads...

  4. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true. I, Cringe when reading I, Cringly.

  5. While we're on the subject, by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't forget the guy from UCLA that is predicting a 6.5ish earthquake in southern california within the next few days.

    1. Re:While we're on the subject, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um 6.5 is nothing for CA.

    2. Re:While we're on the subject, by evilviper · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, he isn't "predicting a 6.5ish earthquake in southern california within the next few days". He predicted there would be a big earthquake in the next 9 months, and that time period is almost over.

      I know, doesn't make it sound as menacing as the way you put it, but exaggeration does that.

      Personally, I'm rather surprised his prediction didn't work out. A prediction that there won't be any major quakes in a large section of California for the next 9 months, would be just as unlikely to come true.

      That pretty much explains how he got the first two right... and I'm personally rather happy to see that he got this one wrong.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:While we're on the subject, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we'll bail their asses out to.
      Build your homes on flood plains, earthquake fault lines, and the south eastern seaboard that get's demolished by hurricanes every few years, then let the rest of the country bail you out by rebuilding it for you has got to stop.
      Ain't it funny how the American heartland is constantly getting screwed by it's coastal citizens.
      Your tax dollars at work funding idiocy.

    4. Re:While we're on the subject, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      then... doesn't that make you an even bigger idiot for remaining in the "heartland" and paying taxes? seeing as how you're supporting the entire east and west coasts and eveything? maybe it's time for a little tough love. maybe you should just move out of the country and take your vote with you. that'll teach us to build houses in places where we want them! damn pesky freedom! seriously, learn english. ok?

    5. Re:While we're on the subject, by justins · · Score: 1
      Um 6.5 is nothing for CA.

      6.5 isn't "nothing" anywhere. And there are still parts of the SF Bay Bridge that will probably fall off if you look at them funny...
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  6. Safe as can be by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yup...Wisconsin...no hurricanes here, too far north for the fault zone in southern Indiana to reach us, sure it's Tornado Alley but I don't live near a trailer park. I guess the worst that could happen is accidentally saying something positive about the Minnesota Vikings.

    1. Re:Safe as can be by bluGill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true, there are hurricanes in Wisconson and Minnesota. Of course by the time they make it even the worst of them are minor storms, less powerful than a normal summer thunderstorm. If it wasn't for the weathermen looking for trivia like hurricanes to try to make things interesting we would never know.

      There are worse things than saying something positive about the Vikings, you slip in something positive about the packers for instance.

    2. Re:Safe as can be by kfg · · Score: 1

      Not true, there are hurricanes in Wisconson and Minnesota. Of course by the time they make it even the worst of them are minor storms, less powerful than a normal summer thunderstorm.

      At which point they are things that used to be hurricanes, which is something rather different than a hurricane.

      Anything that hits you has to go through me first. I'm only 200 miles from landfall and I've never seen a true hurricane here in my lifetime, although the Great Hurricane of '38 made it this far before being downgraded to a tropical storm on its way toward you.

      My mother lived in New Bedford at that time. New Bedford went 8 feet underwater. She was one of the lucky ones and got rescued from a second story before the full force of the storm hit.

      Now that is a hurricane.

      KFG

    3. Re:Safe as can be by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Hurricanes, by definition, are storms with winds above 74MPH. How many storms of that strength have you seen in Minnesota recently?

      Hurricane Rating Scale

  7. Simple... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bury it on the moon. If several underground lunar data repositories are set up, then the data will be safe from anything that can happen on Earth. By using multiple repositories, we are protected in case a meteor strikes the moon as well. Maybe the economic impetus that drives future space exploration will be the need to maintain intellectual property in perpetuity rather than mineral resources.

    -or-

    As Linus suggested, put it on an FTP site and let the world mirror it.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Simple... by MoralHazard · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer the time-honored method of exploiting the guilibility and horniness of the human species (may the supply never run short!):

      1) Tar your data up in a nice, big file--pad it with BS to get it up to at least a couple dozen megs;

      2) Encrypt it with something strong--AES-256 should do it--and keep the key safe;

      3) Rename the ciphertext file to "XXX Brittany Spears Double Penetration ATM moneyshot!!!.mpg" or something similar;

      4) Share it with your favorite KaZaA client, rate it high, and watch the mirroring happen.

    2. Re:Simple... by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what if the moon falls from the sky and collides with Earth?

    3. Re:Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you're the reason why half the porno movies on Kazaa won't play in WMP!

    4. Re:Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pad it with ... at least a couple dozen megs ... Encrypt it with something strong

      Seeing it that pretty much my most important data is about 20 gigs of pr0n the world is already doing all the work for me without me lifing a hand off my... uh mouse.

    5. Re:Simple... by typhoonius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can someone write a bot that posts the Linus FTP quote and then the Kazaa fake file joke every time a Slashdot story about backups is posted?

    6. Re:Simple... by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      Some people would argue that this has already happened..

      Q.

    7. Re:Simple... by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      How do you know I'm not a bot, huh? I don't remember getting no Turing test, man!

      -MoralHazard's Eliza-over-HTTP backend

  8. Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "his week's I, Cringely discusses possible plans for ensuring your data survives Hurricane Frances."

    Your harddrives. In a nice, heavy, watertight safe. It's not going anywhere.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Unless it collides with a tree at 200mph+...

      Now, if it were bolted down onto a slap of concrete and the drives were mounted directly into the safe itself...

    2. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by CatGrep · · Score: 1

      Your harddrives. In a nice, heavy, watertight safe. It's not going anywhere.

      Saltwater can do some pretty crazy damage and given that they're predicting up to a 15ft storm surge, there are probably a lot of houses in Florida that are lower than that.

      125MPH winds can do a lot of damage too...

    3. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's easier than that: Live somewhere else. (Or leave a copy of your data with somebody who does.)

      Now, I may have to worry about earthquakes and fire, but those disasters don't often get to such a large scale in a given place. Fire I should probably prepare for, but I'd be lucky to survive an earthquake so large that my data does not.

    4. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      What part of "safe" didnt you read?
      Watertight safes arent going to melt away like cotton in h2so4 just because there is salt water, end even the ceiling falling on a normal sized safe should produce more shock to the drive than placing it down on the desk.
      Of course you should prevent it from bouncing around, e.g. by putting it into a padded drawer,ect, but that shoulnd be a problem

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Blastrogath · · Score: 2, Informative

      No hurracane is going to propell a SAFE at 200 mph. A safe has thick metal walls and a huge weight to surface area ratio. Even if the building it's in collapses, the safe would be in more danger from a fall than from the wind.

      Also, If you had bolted the safe to a concrete slab (such as a foundation) why mount the drives to the safe? It's not like they're going to be blown around by the wind inside the closed safe.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    6. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by waynelorentz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your harddrives. In a nice, heavy, watertight safe. It's not going anywhere.

      You'd be surprised what a hurricane can throw around. Or even just a tropical storm.

      Look at a map of eastern Texas from a few years ago and you'll see Highway 87 running along the coast. Most of that highway doesn't exist anymore. Traveling north from Galveston for about 15 miles you run into a blockade in the middle of the road re-routing you to the north. If you park there and walk along the highway, it disappears after a few hundred yards. This is what Tropcial Storm Francis did in the late 90's. When I first went there, there were huge slabs of freeway sticking out of the beach at odd angles. You could look at the layers of asphalt and concrete that had been laid on it over the years. Some were sticking almost straight up like giant monoliths. THIS USED TO BE A FREEWAY, and you think your little safe isn't going to move? At some parts you could look out into the Gulf at low tide and see more chunks of highway. Even if your safe didn't move, if you lived near the coast it might get buried under 30 feet of sand. Good luck finding it.

      To summarize:
      Tropical storm Francis blew apart a freeway.
      Hurricane Frances is much stronger.
      You can't escape nature.

      Oh, and that stretch of beach is now mercifully free of tourists, so it's great for shell collecting.

    7. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      ...because there wouldn't be much point in posting if the GP didn't have anything *different* to say.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    8. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      No hurracane is going to propell a SAFE at 200 mph. A safe has thick metal walls and a huge weight to surface area ratio. Even if the building it's in collapses, the safe would be in more danger from a fall than from the wind.

      Maybe not the wind, but flooding will carry that puppy downstream just fine. (Hint to the poster talking about the freeway... it wasn't the wind or rain that did that, it was the tidal surge and flooding.)

      So maybe the trick is to mount that safe above flood level...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    9. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      way to ignore physics. the surface area to weight ratio is much smaller for a safe than it is for a freeway. the wind will simply not affect a heavy safe in the same way.

      put a cardboard box partway filled with sand next to half a brick on the ground in a heavy wind. the box is much larger and heavier than the brick, but it will be blown away first every time.

      to summarize:
      your post is meaningless.

    10. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      I like to use the time tested Hole(TM) technology of keeping things safe. The oldest data in existance is a well preserved beastiality pornography collection stored on the wall of a cave.

      The government has been using it for years to store information for both security and safety reasons. In fact, I bet your dog uses the very same technology for storing his snacks.

      Also see the "Don't put all your eggs in one basket" technology.

      Anyone read any news lately?

      --
      Karma Clown
    11. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by ttsalo · · Score: 1
      Watertight safes

      Watertight means that the water that goes in doesn't come out. Every engineer that has built anything "waterproof" knows this.

      But to be serious, I'm pretty sure that real immersion-proof safes with tight enough tolerances for real o-ring seals are insanely expensive. And you'll have to inspect the seals every time you close the safe, even a tiny bit of crud can let the water in.

      --

      --
      If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, where does the road paved with evil intentions lead to?
    12. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Just put your drives into some spare static bags, stick those into ziplock bags, stick those into individual tupperware containers, and finally place those into your safe. That should keep the drives protected for a reasonable amount of time.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    13. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Look dude, if a hurricane can propel a multiton car a few miles from it's original resting spot, reallocate farm aminals into different pastures, impale sticks of straw in solid concrete and perform major house renovation on an epic scale, I think it can give a good roller coaster ride to a measly couple of hundred pound safe.

    14. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      It's a function of weight to area, not weight. I'm sure the goodyear blimp weighs more than me, but I'm probably safer in a heavy wind. A safe is denser than a car. Besides, I didn't say a safe couldn't be moved by a hurricane. It can. But it's not going to move it at 200mph, or even anywhere close to that.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    15. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Blastrogath · · Score: 1
      Maybe not the wind, but flooding will carry that puppy downstream just fine. (Hint to the poster talking about the freeway... it wasn't the wind or rain that did that, it was the tidal surge and flooding.)

      So maybe the trick is to mount that safe above flood level...
      Yeah, a hurricane can certainly move the safe. I was contending that the idea of getting a safe moving at 200mph was just plain silly. Safes don't easily move that fast in any direction but down.
      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    16. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Then it's the tree that impales itself on the piece of straw, then?

    17. Re: Simply unplug those HDDs, and... by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      A straw has less weight to area than a tree, so a wind will move it faster than it'll move a tree. It also has an vastly higher weight to surface area. If straw has enough relitive velocity it'll punch into things. For a straw to have enough relitive velocity to punch into a tree the tree has to be still, or at least much slower.

      So, the fact that a straw can be driven into a tree proves that straws and trees move at much different speeds in a hurracane. My money is on the light, high surface area stuff going faster.

      Besides, most trees and straw are less dense than safes.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  9. Re:You misspelled "incompetent" by loid_void · · Score: 0

    Mispelling one word is a grate form of marketing, if it's only one line.

    --
    Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
  10. Wanna save your data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plug it up your butt and give it a swirly.

    1. Re:Wanna save your data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA!

      I just spilled my drink all over my keyboard!

  11. Indymedia is Insane. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://tampaindymedia.org/bin/site/templates/defau lt.asp?area_2=imc/open%20newswire/2004/Aug/41755.7 7734375.dat

    Frankovich says the children of survivors of Hurricane Andrew were recently asked to bring in their baby teeth when they fell out, for what was called the "Tooth Fairy Study." It was found that these children had radiation levels seven times higher than what is considered safe.
    Frankovich lived directly behind the Metrozoo. While the zoo reported that only a few animals died, in reality 95% of them died in the storm. Rhesus monkeys and big apes wandered around the rubble with Frankovich and her fellow survivors. Only later did she learn that the animals were infected with the AIDS virus. It turns out that the University of Miami ran a research center on the back property of Metrozoo that no one was supposed to know about.

    The Coast Guard Station was next door to the complex where Frankovich lived. A woman whose husband worked for the Coast Guard told Frankovich that the Coast Guard pulled 1,500 bodies out of the water. She said that everyone who worked on the body pick-up had to take an oath of secrecy not to discuss what they saw or did in the first ten days. When Frankovich spoke to a group in Clearwater about Hurricane Andrew, a man from the audience stood up and said that he was called up to active duty for nine weeks to help with the clean up. "The death figures the media is giving are totally inaccurate," he said. "The information I received is that 5,280 bodies were disposed of in incinerators."

    http://tampaindymedia.org/bin/site/templates/defau lt.asp?area_2=imc/open%20newswire/2004/Jul/50414.9 6484375.dat

    Posted: 7/11/2004 2:00:14 PM
    Author: NCA

    Bring Down the Israeli Apartheid Wall ...
    Solidarity Fast
    Sat. & Sun. July 24 & 25

    As the Palestinian Arab people continue the struggle against this and all of Israel's colonial policies, the National Council of Arab Americans (NCA) joins in support of the Hunger Strike currently taking place in Palestine at the initiation of Dr. Azmi Bishara. We salute all participants of this bold act in protest of the Apartheid Wall.

    info@arab-american.net

    1. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by bobwoodard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come on... with articles like "The Invisible U.S. Military Offensives in Weather Weaponry":

      http://tampaindymedia.org/bin/site/templates/def au lt.asp?area_2=imc/open%20newswire/2004/Aug/66619.8 671875.dat

      How can you say that? :-)

    2. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by DirtMcGirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insane? It's only as insane as the people who post there, which is a group with a fairly broad range of political views.

      The neat thing about indymedia is that generally (there are some minor checks and balances), anyone can post anything. You get nutty posts like the first one, and everything else in between.

      From reading your other posts, I get the feeling you're the sort of person who equates criticism of the Israeli government with anti-semetism, so I won't even address the second link you posted.

    3. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first link is really hilarious - claims that hurricane Andrew had 350+ mph winds, killed 5,000 people, and that the "National Hurricane Bureau" (which doesn't exist) is to blame for not providing adequate warning.

      This does raise a serious question, though - what is the happy medium between the inept, frequently biased (one way or another) corporate media, and the kind of free-for-all lies and delusions as news crap that one finds on Indymedia?

    4. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem with indymedia is that there's no real editorial control - anyone who wants to publish an article can do so. Here's proof :)

    5. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I do not equate criticism of the Israli goverment with anti-semetism. Bitch about them all you want to, just don't claim that killing a 3 year old on a bus is a legimitate military target.

      The leaders of the PA have to keep their population upset with Israli because they do not want their people to know how much money they have taken from them. With as much aid as the PA gets from the EU, USA and the UN it should be a much better place to live.

      And, don't you think that Israel would stop counter attacking if the PA would put a stop to the suicide bomb attacks against Israel?

    6. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Just post a conservative rant and watch it be yanked down within 24 hours.

    7. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by DirtMcGirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just don't claim that killing a 3 year old on a bus is a legimitate military target.

      I certainly won't, and I hope you won't either. What do you think happened when an Israeli F16 shoots missiles into an apartment building in one of the most densely populated places on Earth? Innocents get turned into "legitimate military targets." Is the inevitable civilian carnage and misery, and the bus-bombers it creates, worth a couple dead possible Hamas supporters?

      The leaders of the PA have to keep their population upset with Israli because they do not want their people to know how much money they have taken from them. With as much aid as the PA gets from the EU, USA and the UN it should be a much better place to live.

      Dude, Yasser Arafat doesn't need to make the Palestinian people hate Israel. The Israeli bulldozers, tanks, and snipers probably do a good enough job of that.

      I'm certainly no supporter of the current Palestinian government. But really, they're pretty irrelevant. For me, the real issue is the immense suffering visited on an occupied people by an occupying army - that's made possible by my tax dollars. (30 or 40 billion a year!)

      And, don't you think that Israel would stop counter attacking if the PA would put a stop to the suicide bomb attacks against Israel?

      No, I really don't. Aggressive settlement (in any other situation, we'd call it colonization) of the occupied lands has been a stated aim of the Israeli givernment for decades. Why would Israel stop building settlements if the occupied population suddenly became complacent? It would just make things easier. The settlements are just one example, but my argument applies more generally.

      On the other hand, if the occupation was less brutal, if people's houses stopped being demolished, if soldiers stopped humiliating and murdering people for sport**, I think Hamas wouldn't be able to find a single recruit, and the violence would stop.

      **I went to college with a guy who just finished a tour in Gaza. He told some pretty gruesome stories.

    8. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by DJCF · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else notice

      Hi Slashdot :-) WE NEED LOCAL LINUX GURUS. Please come to our meetings

      in the of the page?

      (Actually it was all in caps but wouldnt sneak past the lameness filter)

    9. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Hell, try posting something conservative to Freerepublic and see how quick you are called Moby and your account is zotted.

    10. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      go ahead and post it. we won't pull it down (i'm one of their tech guys). we encourage rants of all stripes ;-) but seriously, posts may only be removed according to the following rules...
      Why a post may be hidden:
      The Tampa IMC editorial collective, in order to maintain the integrity of the newswire and the media commons it creates for our community of participants, may "hide" posts to the Newswire when the content disregards the guidelines that have been put in place (see below). All hidden posts (exceptions noted below) must be notified to the collective mailing list so that all members of the collective have the chance to agree or disagree with the hiding of the post. If members of the editorial collective have a disagreement over a newswire post, or a feature selection, it will be dealt with via discussion towards consensus. If consensus is not reached within 48 hours a vote will be called within the editorial collective, requiring a 66% majority vote.

      Articles that may be hidden, as long as the editorial collective is notified:
      • Posts the author has requested hidden.
      • Posts which are obviously incorrect or misleading. This includes attempts to spread dis-information or to impersonate another individual.
      • Posts that incite violence against members of the community.
      • Posts which publish identifying information without the individual's knowledge or consent.
      • Posts which use language, imagery, or other forms of communication whose sole purpose is to promote racism, fascism, xenophobia, homophobia, sexism, able-ism, ageism or any other form of discrimination.
      • Persistent nuisance posts to the newswire or comments sections.
      • Posts that are deemed to be devoid of content or analysis and appear to be published with the sole purpose of disruption.
      Articles that may be hidden without notifying the rest of the editorial collective:
      • Verbatim posts of other media without added content
      • Unreadable formats (ie. photos posted as text).
      • Posts titled "test."
      • Duplicate posts.
      • Advertising of products or for-profit services.
      • Pornography, excepting sexually explicit satire.
      We remind IMC participants that hidden articles are not deleted from the site. All content posted to the newswire can be accessed through the administrative interface, where hidden posts can be viewed.
      by the way if you're in the tampa area and have linux skills and would like to help those of us at tampaindymedia who need and want linux skills please email feedback@tampaindmedia.org or join our phpbb board for meeting info. we'd love to meet you!
    11. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by forii · · Score: 1

      Just post a conservative rant and watch it be yanked down within 24 hours.
      Yeah, this is one of the major problems with Indymedia. They claim to be "independent", but in reality they only promote a particular political point of view. Of course it's their site, they can do whatever they want with it, but they shouldn't try to claim that they are a democratic source of "truth".
      If you criticize Indymedia, you invariably get a response of "look at free republic!", but Free Republic admits that they are promoting a particular world-view. Indymedia tries to have it both ways, claiming to be un-biased, while only presenting a particular way of thinking, and burying any dissent. In a way, it's a reminder of the scary Soviet-style propaganda, claiming to represent "the people", while working hard to ensure that "the people" were not allowed to disagree.

    12. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Our editorial policy says you can't "impersonate another individual".

      bye bye post!

      nice thought experiment though ;)

      btw, the a.c. post that i just hid said the following:
      I've got a small dick
      Posted: 9/4/2004 12:51:52 AM
      Author: Rob 'Small Dick' Malda

      It's been reported in teh news that I have a small penis. For many years, I thought this was mere tomfoolery on the part of slashdot 'trolls'. But now, after last night with Cmdr. Taco, I find that they are right. This is why I've booked passage to China, so that the famous Dr. Long can perform penile plastic surgery to improve my ... condition.

      That is all.
    13. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean that my insightful reportage is safe?

    14. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously posted before you RTFD...

      so...nope...

    15. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, it was worth a try. Thanks for reposting it here, though :)

    16. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i did. but that's probably 'cause i put it there when i made "slashcache.html" ;) we'd like to get our site moved to a foss solution :) rather than the mostly closed-source cms we use now :(

    17. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      n.p. it was pretty funny.

      but i hope you'll reconsider your point about indymedia's problem being that it doesn't have any editorial policy ;)

      i like to think of indymedia as being an almost wiki-like current events and local news resource. it's also fun if your into news and/or reporting.

    18. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if the occupation was less brutal, if people's houses stopped being demolished, if soldiers stopped humiliating and murdering people for sport**, I think Hamas wouldn't be able to find a single recruit, and the violence would stop.

      Of course, Arafat said he'd put 5 bullets in the chest of anyone who stops the PA from making Jerusalem its capital, and he refused to go through with Oslo because it required giving up the 'Palestinian right of return' to Israeli territory. Fufilling such a request would make it impossible for Israel to defend itself in a war.

      There are extremists in both political camps. And Arafat isn't even the most agressive among the Palestianian leaders.

      Hamas would still be able to find recruits if the violence stopped since they still consider the land that is Israel to be theirs and want to fight for it. Just as some Israeli radicals consider broad swatches of now-arab territory to be part of Israel's herritage and want to fight for it.

      What you do with your tax dollars is your business, of course. But the only thing keeping the various terrorst groups from mounting more agressive attacks against Israel is their physial inabillity to get better weapons.

      Aggressive settlement (in any other situation, we'd call it colonization)

      Colonization is like what Brittan did to India - i.e. destroy the industry and use the people to produce raw materials to feed the colonizer's industrial economy. I don't think that this is Israel's primary objective, though it does use a lot of Palestinian labor. Settlement, on the other hand (or resettlement depending on your view of history) is an attempt to actually live on the land and kick out the people who are there.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    19. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You've shown that there is an editorial policy on indymedia, so that's a start :)

      I do see your point, though. I used to volunteer at a campus radio station in the news department, and what I liked most about it was that I - and everyone else - was allowed to do what they wanted to do, within reason. The 5 o'clock news stories were still decided by the news director, but if you booked a time slot, you were able to report on anything you wanted to. The basic restrictions were quite similar to yours - nothing discriminatory, no verbatim copying of other news programs, etc. It bred a very open atmosphere that was really fun to work in. Most importantly, it exposed you to issues and points-of-view you'd never thought of.

      Anyway, good luck with the IMC, and the hurricane!

    20. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in the Israeli/Palestianian conflict it seems like you like to define whether something is "terrorism" or not is by what kind of weapon is used, not who gets killed by it - C 4 under a bus = terrorism, F-16 with a "made in the USA" missile = clean, "fair and balanced" warfare. WTF? Either way the grapes of wrath are ripened on boths sides, when it's your friends and neighbors and countrymen blown to bits you won't be wringing your hands splitting hairs over what model of explosive blew them up.

      And you are right, the model of colonization matches the South African model much better than the Indian model - small enclaves of masters have large numbers of slaves come and work in the heavily fortified enclaves and after working the slaves retreat out of the enclaves back to the slums - periodocally random slums are razed by the powers that be just to made sure everyone is clear about who is in charge. Seems exactly the same to me, except the Palestianians haven't internalized it as much as the black South Africans had, so they fight back a little more - South Africa had the third (?) largest army in the world for a reason - to hold back the day of reckoning.

      With the middle east situation, the world loses (whereas South Africa people didn't care as much), If the US wanted to really solve the problem, they could use half of the 40 billion to create a decent (or geez why not wonderful) place of the Palestianians to live and release them from slavery and then maybe they wouldn't give a damn as much about what the Israelis were doing, sure they might bitch about it at the corner opium smoking, but they wouldn't be seething with hatred the way you do when you are oppressed, hungry without basic necessities for survival, humiliated, treated like a criminal. Heirarchy of needs, you can't expect people who aren't surviving physically to engage in a philisophical discussion and resolution of property rights.

    21. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      So in the Israeli/Palestianian conflict it seems like you like to define whether something is "terrorism" or not is by what kind of weapon is used, not who gets killed by it - C 4 under a bus = terrorism, F-16 with a "made in the USA" missile = clean, "fair and balanced" warfare. WTF?
      Are you sure you didn't get that from another discussion? I didn't define terrorism. For the record, I think it's based on the type of target. i.e. a missle fired at a Hammas member that takes out one of his nearby supporters is not terrorism. A missle fired directly at an innocent civilian would be.

      The comparison between S. Africa and Israel is obnoxious at best. Jews have lived in Israel for over 2000 years. They're not 'colonizing' the area any more than the arab states 'colonized' the middle east when the British left. The saudis still have, straight out black slavery, for example. But people never talk about the things arabs do to their own citizens. Do arabs only have civil rights when they live in the West Bank?

      Many of the palastinian paramilitary/terrorist groups are puppets for other nations. As long as Iran wants Israel gone, for example, doing things for Palestinains, by itself, isn't going to fix anything.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    22. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comparison between S. Africa and Israel is obnoxious at best. Jews have lived in Israel for over 2000 years.

      Really? I am talking about now, not 2000 years ago. Where did all the current people in Israel come from? They weren't there already they came (and you will notice that all the signs in the pictures say "[boat to/passage to] Palestine") from Europe (like the white South Africans did) and Russia [you know the story of how Israel come to be this time] and now they employ most of the Arab Palestinians as slave labor. I am talking about how things are, I don't have a vested interest in either side - but look at the pictures, the daily ebb and flow of people, the economic situation they are all parallel to South Africa as I pointed out. Were there a bunch of Jewish settlers prior to WW II (say 1700-1932) who employed a much larger number of Arabs as menial laborers?

      What the Saudis do to there own people isn't going to precipitate WW III so right now I don't give a damn about them or the 9 yr old camel racers in UAE, etc it sucks but...

      Palestinians would be much harder to recruit as puppets, I would guess near impossible to recruit, if their houses weren't being razed and they had a high standard of living (what if we gave them a higher standard of living than the average Israeli, it seems obvious that in general people with high standards of living are not individually interested in going to fight people with a lower standard of living unless conscripted by the military or if the other people come over and rip the gameboy out of their hands). Installing moderates at the top won't do a damn thing if people can't survive at a decent level and live with dignity and a modicum of freedom.

      I have to congratulate Israel for that tactic [bulldozing neighborhoods with rockproof bulldozers] it is the best way to demoralize and distract people - preoccupy them with reacquiring the basic needs for physical survival and the constant threat that it will keep happening again and again and they don't have as much time/energy/resources/will to organize a resistance, yet it has the outward appearance (to the world press) of not looking that bad (except for the film of the British TV cameraman getting shot and killed). Of course, the down side is that it creates a population of people with perpetual post traumatic stress - desperate and unstable with nothing better to do than fight the oppressors.

    23. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a missile fired at a Hammas member that takes out one of his nearby supporters is not terrorism.

      As someone pointed out close physical proximity does not equal support when you are in a densely populated area, but as you demonstrate it is an excuse that makes people feel OK about the collateral damage. Which proves my point you are saying that the type of weapon and the intent of the weapon makes a difference when civilians die - I say after a few years of it happening all the time people who live there don't care how/why/what kind of explosives outside interests do care because they can assign different levels of moral outrage to each incident.

      I am sure if the Palestinians had F-16s they would be happy to kill Israeli leaders rather than bomb buses, but they don't so they don't. Does that make them morally inferior or militarily inferior? If Israeli citizens died during a Palestinian F-16 missile attack on an Israeli leader, is that because they were supporters of that leader? Do we shrug and say "Oh, well they shouldn't have been there at that time" Do we assign a different value to an Israeli vs a Palestinian life, in the US we seem to.

    24. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you didn't get that from another discussion? I didn't define terrorism. For the record, I think it's based on the type of target.

      Yes, sorry that was DAldredge who was discussing "legitimate military targets" normally the basis people use to try to define whether an incident was a terrorist attack or not. But you do seem to agree that it is based on intended target, which I think might have applied better when war was hand to hand combat, but now with large weapons and mixing of civilians and combatants the usefulness of intended target to draw moral superiority seems questionable. Especially, now where wars are not between equal powers, but where one side clearly has overwhelming firepower and to affect any resistance the other side can only resort to guerilla (or "terrorist") tactics.

    25. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Were there a bunch of Jewish settlers prior to WW II (say 1700-1932)

      There were Jews there in that time period. Call them 'settlers' if you like. They lived with the transjordanian settelers and generally got along pretty well with them, though they were still treated as visitors in a foreign land by either the British occupiers or the other arab settlers. But yes, there were many immigrants to Israel then, and 100 years before then and 200 years before then. Even in the time of the crusades, there were Jews near Jerusalem, though they had to pay special taxes for not being Muslims. Of course, for the time this was pretty lenient treatment for people living in a nation that they didn't control. Some Russians, decendants of the Khazars, might never have lived in Israel. And the tide of immigration due to Zionism began a fair bit before WWII.

      who employed a much larger number of Arabs as menial laborers?

      Explain this to me, because I truly don't understand it. What's keeping Palestinians from working in, say, Jordan. Does Israel prevent it?

      The notion that jobs are exploitation is one that I've always had a little trouble buying into, especially in Israel. Israel has a labor surplus as it is.

      what if we gave them a higher standard of living than the average Israeli, it seems obvious that in general people with high standards of living are not individually interested in going to fight people with a lower standard of living unless conscripted by the military or if the other people come over and rip the gameboy out of their hands)

      Which is why the US has one of the largest militaries in the world and has nearly always been in a war somewhere in the world?

      If the palestinians had more money, it would not be evenly distributed. The PA is corrupt. There are plenty of gangs that demand protection money. If there was greater wealth in the West Bank, it would flow towards this hierarchy, and quite a bit would be spent on weapons. I don't buy the notion that more wealth would end the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Maybe it would stem the tide of the recruits, but wealth is a force multiplier. Besides, it's suicidal to try and fight a war to a standstill, like the US tried in vietnam. You either fight to win or you get ready to lose. What nation is going to respond to an attack by giving people money? That sends a very bad message.

      The PLO was formed to take back the territory that is Israel, and was active before Israel was even in the West Bank. There's little to demonstrate that the palestinians have changed their compact.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    26. Re:Indymedia is Insane. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      you are saying that the type of weapon and the intent of the weapon makes a difference when civilians die

      I don't care about the type. But the intent? Yes. Intent is a matter of law. Law is a matter of interest to outside nations. I'm sure you're right that people on the ground don't give a damn.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  12. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sie haben recht, Herr Gauleiter.

  13. HAARP? by TrollBurger · · Score: 0

    Whats the chances that this is being caused either intentionally or indirectly from the US governments usage of the HAARP system? http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/ http://www.viewzone.com/haarp00.html Just curious. HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes". Communicating with submarines is only one of those purposes.

    1. Re:HAARP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chances are much greater that the cause is the extra energy released into the atmosphere by the profligate use of fossil fuel energy.

      As for HAARP communicating with subs, there are existing antenna arrays which are used for this. One is in Annapolis,
      MD. ; I used to see it out my office window every day.

      The notion that hurricanes are being intentionally caused is more than slightly paranoid. You might want to tune your tinfoil hat to a different frequency.

      There are some things which are beyond the powers of man, and
      controlling the global climate is one of those things. Like Billy Bob said in "Sling Blade" :

      "it's too big"...

    2. Re:HAARP? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's a fairly safe bet that responsibility can be laid at the feet of something the military calls by the code name "The Sun."

      KFG

  14. ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Funny

    The snake's head is rising from the ocean. All the energy we've pumped into the ocean/atmosphere over the past 300 years of industry, accelerating the past 100 years in the gathering Greenhouse, is coming howling back down our throats. Undersea ocean currents have gotten twistier, as extra energy has moved them kilometers out of their old tracks. The energy in a 1Km-wide, thousand-Km-long current, twisted twice as loopy through the viscous sea, is enough to send hundreds of force-5 hurricanes, made of fluffy air and nebulous raindrops. By the time the beats in these cycles are noticeable, they're undeniable. And unstoppable. At least humans have some species experience, from past Ice Ages, in surviving these catastrophic climate changes. But only genetically - the Earth washes irritating civilizations from its surface like an eyelash floating in tears.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:ourobouros rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like it !

      Just one question ...

      How do we get rid of Bush ?

    2. Re:ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Send him back to coastal Houston, and tell him to bail. Or get someone to whisper under his bedroom door some night about building an ark.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:ourobouros rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a quick reply !

      Let's just hope that the election process can send him packing,
      THIS time.

    4. Re:ourobouros rising by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've always known you were a nut. Now you've posted something to link back to as proof when you rant again.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What, like your flownover squawking? Or just this meaningless, whining denial? Why bother posting, when you just look like an obnoxious fool? Halfbaked plan...

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:ourobouros rising by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Why do you waste your +1 posting ability on crap like this? Many people read at +2 (I do) to avoid drivel. When you're gonna squabble and 'defend your cred' here (hah!) click on the 'No Karma Bonus' checkbox.

      (won't hurt your feelings by suggesting you check it all the time.)

      --
      resigned
    7. Re:ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Why are you wasting our time by posting how *I* should use my karma? I don't need to "defend" myself from your drivel, I'm just amused by how you squawk in public. Now, since we're getting so much attention, at such a high price, why don't you get someone to coach you on posting some Greenhouse denial worth reading, with facts, logic, or references?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:ourobouros rising by kahei · · Score: 1


      Dude, stop replying to the crank... I tend to compulsively read posts by cranks and it's annoying when they build up...

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    9. Re:ourobouros rising by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 1

      Miller's Tale reference? Are you some kind of crypto-intellectual?

    10. Re:ourobouros rising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool! So, if we kill it, do we get his summon, or just a ninja sword (can't remember if it was Murasame or Masamune all of a sudden--Edge would know... :)

    11. Re:ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Sure, just cast a "cloudkill" at 169th level into a bag of holding, then drop in a sphere of annihiliation. "Great trick, but I can only do it once." - Daffy Duck

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:ourobouros rising by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. In this harum-scarum world, the chauce is yours.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  15. Simple. by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    Make a nice USB keychain drive suppository or two. If something happens to the data there, then your data will be the least of your concerns.

    Remember, it isn't that the wind is blowing, it's what the wind is blowing.

    1. Re:Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you get with a Volvo, it doesn't really matter how many sit-ups you did that morning!

    2. Re:Simple. by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Of course, the problem is that if the wind does blow, you've lost your data.

      And I don't want the job of recovering it.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  16. Nice Software! by tunabomber · · Score: 1

    Thanks to a JNLP distribution, It took me all of 1 minute to get p2p-radio working. Too bad the station election sucks, but hopefully that'll change if this thing gets a good userbase.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Nice Software! by lambent · · Score: 1

      Yes ... apparently, someone right now is doing a psychedelic remix of some guy reading an eggplant recipe.

      I can see how this will be useful for the hurricane.

  17. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Thank you for proving my point that most, if not all, indymedia supports are insane.

  18. Ya should'a thought of this yesterday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Buy spare hard drive
    2. Copy your hard drive onto spare
    3. Fed-Ex spare to friend in Cleaveland
    4. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    And those of you with a dozen computers around the house already have a buncha spare hard drives, right?

  19. mail it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mail a dvd backup to seattle prior to the storm. address it to a non existant address. it will be returned shortly after the storm.

    1. Re:mail it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You need to mail it to an address with no mailbox instead. If you mail it to a nonexistent address they'll probably discover that it doesn't exist when it's scanned for destination and you'll get it back right before the storm hits. Not very useful.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. In my room... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my room, Girl::Frances blows me!

  21. Re:more information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell goes around registering all these .info domains just to redirect them to that goatse-poop-browser-hijack site? Must be the work of teh GNAA.

  22. The sky is falling! by dvnelson72 · · Score: 1

    It's hotter. It's colder. It's wetter. It's drier. Oh. wait. I keep moving.

  23. DVD-R by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why hide your DVD-R backup under the desk? Carry it with you. That way you will always have access to your data, no matter where you are.

    Also, if something happens that is severe enough to destroy the disk, it will probably also kill you, so you won't be needing that data backup anymore.

    --
    Ideology is for ideots.
    1. Re:DVD-R by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Why hide your DVD-R backup under the desk? Carry it with you. That way you will always have access to your data, no matter where you are.

      You can access data from a DVD-R wherever you are? What, do you have a drive in your butt?

      I assume it's slot-loading. Because discs would fall out of the mechanical tray, right?

      I can just see you over at tech support one day:
      "Hey, guys. I've got a coasterized CD stuck in my drive. Can one of you strap on some gloves and get it out?"

  24. Trade Space by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I set my father and my sister up with linux boxes to act as web server, mail server and storage.

    Now, I send 20G to my sister's system (arizona), my sister sends up to my father's system (stuart fl), and my father's system will be sending it to me (Colorad) (Unfortunately, it was not a high priority, but it will be that way once he gets home and cleans up).

    Simply trade space with friends.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Trade Space by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

      Except for most people don't trust their friends with their information, even if it was encrypted.

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
    2. Re:Trade Space by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      in fact, we do encrypt the private stuff. But this is actually photos.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Trade Space by emin · · Score: 1

      I agree; trading space is the way to go. You might also like the Distributed Internet Backup System (DIBS) project. It provides a way to trade space with strangers and protects your data with cryptography, and error correction coding.

    4. Re:Trade Space by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Thanx. I was thinking of doing something similar only over nfs (I have been thinking that a distributed nfs might be interesting).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  25. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you ever stop to consider that while indymedia might well be insane, and that bizzare reply to you might be insane(or only mocking you, one of the two), that you look really insane posting this the way you are on this thread?

  26. hosting facility == hurricaine shelter by G27+Radio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like Jacksonville Beach is going to be spared the worst of this storm, but as usual, you really don't know where the storm is going to land until the last minute.

    If the storm turns towards us at a bad time a lot of people are going to be heading to shelters. I'm heading to our hosting facility. Diesel backup power, redundant Internet connections, built like a bunker, away from the ocean.

    My servers are in the safest place I can think to go.

    1. Re:hosting facility == hurricaine shelter by DJCF · · Score: 1

      And as Florida tries to recover and rebuild their infrastructure in the face of the greatest hurricane in US history... I HAVE A REDUNDANT INTERNET CONNECTION!

  27. Righteous use of P2P file sharing by News+for+nerds · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Make a rar archive of your data, complete with password encryption and recovery data
    2. Rename it to something like "Star Wars Trilogy DVD Complete Rip.avi"
    3. Share it on P2P network!

    1. Re:Righteous use of P2P file sharing by Sigurd_Fafnersbane · · Score: 1

      cute :-)

      I have often thought about writing an RFC for around April 1st for a method for backing up data by cross-posting it encrypted on news-groups.

      The idea would be something like making an archive of your data and then splitting it up in a large number of smaller packages using data interleaving between the packages and the use of error correcting codes like Reed-Solomon to overcome loss of individual packages. The system should then cross-post the data to a wide selection of news-groups and re-post messages as news-groups die or moderators remove posts.

      A way of making the messages live longer and not be banned from posting so fast would be to use steganography to hide the data inside other data.

      Wait!. It might be that my idea is not new at all. This is the real explanation behind all the Viagra spam on news-net ;-)

  28. Move to California, of course! by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Duh, that was too easy. Never mind those earthquakes and fires and mudslides and power failures and RIAA/MPAA lawyers, at least we don't get hurricanes out here. (Or if you don't like living here in civilization, you could move to Phoenix, like lots of banks and other companies that want low-risk locations for their data centers have done over the last decade or so. Eventually the telecom boom of the late 90s built enough fiber out there to actually support them, and unlike the dotcom/software business crash that made cool stuff vanish, when a telecom fiber company goes bankrupt, somebody else buys up its fiber for pennies on the dollar and keeps operating it. You'll need a bit bigger UPS to handle your air conditioning, but it's no big deal.)

    Seriously, though, there is a need to develop good backup software, and businesses need to make sure they're prepared for disasters. Here in California we had the 89 and 94 quakes to remind us, though too much of NYC's business didn't get serious about it until after 9/11.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Move to California, of course! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      at least we don't get hurricanes out here.

      I live in the California desert. I have also been through a hurricane (when traveling, in the mid-west).

      I can safely say that the wind gusts blowing through here on a weekly basis, are actually hurricane-force.

      Of course, we live through them with very little property damage, and it isn't raining hail at the same time, so we do get off a bit easier. But on the opposide end, in other parts of the country, you know the trees around you will be standing, on a day-to-day basis, and only when a hurricane hits is there a chance they will fall. Here, a tree that looked perfectly healthy could fall on your car or house any day, for no particular reason.

      You've said we get earthquakes, fires, mudslides, and power failures, but that's not all... It wasn't long ago a tornado touched-down here in Southern California, even though it dissipated almost immediately. The point is, although we are at much less risk, percentage-wise, a major tornado could suddenly form here, and cause massive damage, due to not having the early warning they get in the midwest.

      And let's not forget flooding. What happens here isn't exactly the same extent as when the Mississippi overflows it's banks, but there have been several instances of major floods over the past decade.

      I think you can live anywhere in the country, you just need to have a home built to withstand the local weather. Unfortunately, building regs don't require any such thing, and contractors aren't going to spend an extra cent to make a house safer.

      Live in Florida? Have a nice big cement dome built, with bullet-proof plexiglass windows/skylights.

      Live in flood territory? Have your home built on 6 foot-tall columns, anchored in cement. Then, when the area floods, your deck and stairs may be washed away, but your house will remain in good shape.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Move to California, of course! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have also been through a hurricane (when traveling, in the mid-west).

      No, I'm afraid you haven't. A thunderstorm maybe, which can be really nasty in the midwest, but they aren't hurricanes and lack the most destructive part of the hurricane. The ocean.

      Live in Florida? Have a nice big cement dome built, with bullet-proof plexiglass windows/skylights.

      This works until it gets hit by a ship or the ground underneath it simply ceases to exist. Florida's bedrock is saturated limestone and not to be trusted either. The plexiglass better be cannon proof. There are places where it's vaguely possible to build a "hurricane proof" (for sufficiently low values of "proof") house. Florida's coastal areas aren't one of them.

      Live in flood territory? Have your home built on 6 foot-tall columns, anchored in cement. Then, when the area floods, your deck and stairs may be washed away, but your house will remain in good shape.

      In my area our trout streams that you can wade across in 30 seconds without getting more than your ankles wet in July wash away major steel highway bridges in March. One good four ton chunk of ice traveling downstream at 60 mph will clean away your house, six foot tall concrete columns and all.

      We are small and puny and can be squashed like bugs on a windshield, as can the sturdiest of our structures under the right conditions.

      It's best to run away if you have the chance.

      KFG

    3. Re:Move to California, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are small and puny and can be squashed like bugs on a windshield, as can the sturdiest of our structures under the right conditions.

      It's best to run away if you have the chance.


      All you need to remember is:
      1) Duck
      2) and Cover

      Simple.

    4. Re:Move to California, of course! by tylernt · · Score: 1

      You forgot the catchy tune. And the ????? step. In Japan.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    5. Re:Move to California, of course! by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Live in flood territory? Have your home built on 6 foot-tall columns, anchored in cement.

      Six feet? You obviously have never lived long-term in places where it seriously floods. In Houston in 2003, there was 18 feet of water in my building.

      In Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky it can flood 30 or 40 feet.

      I'm sure there are other parts of the country that get it worse.

      Are you suggesting people build their homes on top of five-story pilings?

    6. Re:Move to California, of course! by confused+one · · Score: 1
      In the mid-west you never saw a hurricane. You saw the tropical storm/tropical depression remnants of what was left over from a hurricane after it dumped most of it's energy on the coast. Unless you lived on or very near the coast, you haven't experienced a hurricane.

    7. Re:Move to California, of course! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      This is a hilarious post.

      First you say 6 feet isn't enough, that you'd have to built your house 20-40 feet up...

      Then you act like I'm crazy for saying people should build their houses 20-40 feet up!

      No, I will stick with my original 6 feet. Yes, your house may get water damage in the larger floods, but it's FAR less likely to get washed away, far less likely to get it's foundation washed out from under it, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Move to California, of course! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      they aren't hurricanes and lack the most destructive part of the hurricane. The ocean.

      *Ahem*. It was officially a hurricane. I'm not saying this because it was windy... I'm saying this because of THE HURRICANE WARNING ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE.

      I suppose they're a bunch of idiots, and don't know what a hurricane is?

      There are places where it's vaguely possible to build a "hurricane proof" (for sufficiently low values of "proof") house. Florida's coastal areas aren't one of them.

      Good to hear you have all the answers. Why don't you go visit NASA sometime, and tell them that their practically hurricane-proof building is just a figment of their imagination.

      Your argument is absolutely ridiculous.

      The plexiglass better be cannon proof.

      A large object, even going 300MPH, has less force, per-inch, than a bullet. So, bullet-proof plexiglass will work fine. However, that was really besides the point... The fact is, even with the windows broken-out, you should have no trouble surviving any tornato/hurricane. Even if we change the odds to a worse-case senario, tons of material entering through all the broken windows would still leave plenty of places where you could go, and be out of the path of any debris that enters through the windows.

      One good four ton chunk of ice traveling downstream at 60 mph will clean away your house, six foot tall concrete columns and all.

      Good straw man there... Hey, guess what? An atomic bomb will also wipe out your house, 6-foot tall concrete columns and all... But that isn't the fucking issue we are talking about at all. If I thought it was ice-berg proof, I would have said so. No, it's only to help when there is flooding, not where there's an avalance, not when there's a hurricane, not when you have ice sheets, etc.

      It's best to run away if you have the chance.

      Yes, you are right, it certainly is best. HOWEVER, I don't know of anyone who has a house that has the slightest chance of being able to run away, so it's not an option. You have no choice but to try and make your home sturdy enough that it will survive the majority of disasters in your area.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Move to California, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Ahem*. It was officially a hurricane. I'm not saying this because it was windy... I'm saying this because of THE HURRICANE WARNING ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE.

      Hint: see that word NATIONAL in there?
      Yep, that means they use new-fangled radio waves to broadcast their weather reports ALL OVER the country. Isn't that neat?

      Of course, people who are 500 miles away from where the storm hits land are usually aware that they are, erm... 500 miles away.

    10. Re:Move to California, of course! by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      at least we don't get hurricanes out here.

      Hate to burst your bubble, but there's a Category 5 hurricane (Javier) coming towards us.

      Well, it was a Cat 5 last night anyways. It's slowing down now. Still will probably be VERY wet and somewhat windy if/when it gets here.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  29. gmail invites by MaDsKiLLz0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hey uhh i have ten gmail invites up at http://www.madskillz.cc get them while you can

  30. 3 articles? by rlmassie · · Score: 1

    I don't have time for this, I just tied branches down that haven't yet been picked up from charley.

    Answer 1: Maybe i'll just put a stack of DVD-Rs on my roof. I'm sure I'd break some sort of bandwidth record.

    Answer 2: Bonnie, Charley, Frances,... $@*%

    Answer 3: I'll tell you what, if someone buys me a generator, I'll run a node. Until then I'm sticking to batteries and FM.

  31. Forecasting... by ktakki · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 1938, before NOAA and the National Weather Service, before satellites and the Weather Channel, a Category 3 hurricane hit Long Island and New England. A junior forecaster at the U.S. Weather Bureau had predicted its track, but he was overruled by the senior staff.

    Hurricanes tend to lose energy over land, but a few days of stormy weather had created a warm, wet carpet beneath its path. Long Island was temporarily cut in half (and a new inlet -- Shinnecock -- was created and exists to this day). Wind speeds exceeded 120 MPH. Fifty foot waves hit Gloucester, MA. The Connecticut River rose 35 feet above its banks. Falmouth, MA (on Cape Cod) was under 8 feet of water. According to historian William Manchester, people in Vermont, 300 miles inland, could smell the ocean.

    When it was over, 700 people were dead, 63,000 homeless. Nine thousand buildings were destroyed, along with over 3,000 boats. Wreckage from this hurricane could be seen well into the 1970s. The cost of the damage was $6.2 million in 1938 (Depression) dollars, adjusted to over $15,000,000,000 today.

    Two billion trees were blown to the ground. And this was "just" a Cat 3.

    So, yeah, the OP bitches about 200 miles give-or-take. Hell, we can see these forming off the coast of West Africa now. When was the last hurricane that killed 700 people here in the US? (Yes, I know about cyclones killing thousands in Bangladesh, and evacuating everyone is nigh unto impossible.)

    There's always going to be property damage. But property can be rebuilt. Even a +- 400 mile forecast saves hundreds, even thousands of lives.

    Oh, and about that data thing? Just ftp your stuff somewhere and let everyone else mirror it. Worked for Linus, right?

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Forecasting... by IceFoot · · Score: 1
      The cost of the damage was $6.2 million in 1938 (Depression) dollars, adjusted to over $15,000,000,000 today.


      Fifteen BILLION? No way. More like $82 MILLION. A lot of money, but let's keep our decimal point in the right place.


      Free cost-of-living calculator here [American Institute for Economic Research]

  32. Re:In the fourth reich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever someone resorts to expletives you know that there are no facts left to debunk and that they are grasping at straws to win the argument.

  33. Websites: The Forgotten Backup Problem by RonBurk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You can actually read (elsewhere) in realtime panicky messages being posted by website operators who just discovered their hosting service is located in Florida and is going to be going down for at least a few days. People think they've got their bases covered when they have a backup copy of the data files comprising their website, but they often get a nasty surprise like this.

    It doesn't take a hurricane to teach website operators about backup problems, though. Worms that infect and destroy hosting service servers, or router attacks that effectively shut a hosting service down for days produce the same kind of collection of panicked webmasters.

    Just backing up website data files is only a part of a website backup plan. You really want at least two independent (that means both geographically independent, and not run by the same company -- don't forget the "FBI shuts down hosting company" scenario) DNS servers listed as authoritative for your domain. Very few websites meet even that lone requirement.

    You don't have good data backup if you can't demonstrate that you can recover from disaster, and the same is pretty much true for website backup. If you can't show that you can, within at least a matter of hours, have your website running on a machine it's never lived on before and serving "real" requests from the outside world, then you shouldn't really bother reading the fine print about whether your hosting company claims it offers 99.9% uptime or 99.99% uptime.

    1. Re:Websites: The Forgotten Backup Problem by thogard · · Score: 1

      You make several good points but there still seems to be some massive confusion about why we "backup" data.

      The main reasons are:
      1) recover short term data loss (i.e. does rm move it to the trash?)
      2) recovery of bad hardware (disk, power supply dies and kills the box)
      3) disaster recovery (tornado, earth quake, building fires)
      Each of the three have different requirements and one solution doesn't fit all unless its real expensive.

      For example for #1, a big hard disk with a slow mirror of the main file server works great.
      For #2 its very handy to have your backup on site or at least accessible
      For #3, a different county or state or country can make sense but its impractical for other backups for nearly any but the largest of businesses.

      Most companies I know of can't manage to get their off site backups out the door less than once a month, getting them to plan for their business to be off line for a few weeks seems to be a problem thats just to hard so they just will ride out the storm if it happens which is sad since its easy to fix some of these problems with a cheap server somewhere and rsync.

    2. Re:Websites: The Forgotten Backup Problem by DJCF · · Score: 1

      On a related subject, did anyone else notice that www.ksc.nasa.gov was down?

    3. Re:Websites: The Forgotten Backup Problem by arkanes · · Score: 1

      A guy I know who lives in Florida and hosts out of his house was down for a week during the last hurricane. This time, he arranged for backups at 2 remote locations (one in Europe, one in Canada), archived everything to DVD-R, and got a generator to provide the time to do everything once the power goes out. Think everything is going to be just fine this time ;)

  34. DisneyWorld by Sydney+Weidman · · Score: 1

    I happen to be visiting DisneyWorld right now from Winnipeg, Canada. I would recommend using DisneyWorld as a location for your data centre. They have their own back up generators, and no above ground power lines. That said their pursuit of endless copyright term extensions is totally lame.

  35. Duh, put it on the network? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Gmail, Yahoo Briefcase, blah blah there are a dozen ways to upload all of the "you life depends on it" data to disaster-proof service.

    If you are in business you should be using something like DataSafe, who will take your backup tapes and put them in very safe keeping should you need them.

  36. Have a nice trip? See you next fall. by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Informative
    Also, if something happens that is severe enough to destroy the disk, it will probably also kill you, so you won't be needing that data backup anymore.

    Great, until you trip over something on the floor in the dark at the shelter because the power's out, trip, and fall flat on your face, with the disk in your jacket pocket.

    DVD-R's and CD-Rs are remarkably fragile.

  37. After listening by ifwm · · Score: 1

    to 28 years of hurricane forecasting, I can say it most certainly has not gotten better, at least not for many years. I could do a better job throwing chicken bones and reading the stars. The weather forecasters here are rarely right, and when they are, it can be atributed to chance.

    Unless they meant better at fear mongering, in that case they're top-notch.

  38. ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're about to enter the peak of the hurricane season. Any day now,
    you're going to turn on the TV and see a weather person pointing to some
    radar blob out in the Atlantic Ocean and making two basic meteorological
    points.

    (1) There is no need to panic.

    (2) We could all be killed.

    Yes, hurricane season is an exciting time to be in Florida. If you're
    new to the area, you're probably wondering what you need to do to prepare
    for the possibility that we'll get hit by "the big one." Based on our
    insurance industry experiences, we recommend that you follow this simple
    three-step hurricane preparedness plan:

    STEP 1: Buy enough food and bottled water to last your family for at
    least three days.

    STEP 2: Put these supplies into your car.

    STEP 3: Drive to Nebraska and remain there until Halloween.
    Unfortunately, statistics show that most people will not follow this
    sensible plan. Most people will foolishly stay here in Florida.

    We'll start with one of the most important hurricane preparedness items:

    HOMEOWNERS' INSURANCE: If you own a home, you must have hurricane
    insurance. Fortunately, this insurance is cheap and easy to get, as long as
    your home meets two basic requirements:

    (1) It is reasonably well-built, and
    (2) It is located in Wisconsin
    Unfortunately, if your home is located in Florida, or any other area
    that might actually be hit by a hurricane, most insurance companies would
    prefer not to sell you hurricane insurance, because then they might be
    required to pay YOU money, and that is certainly not why they got into the
    insurance business in the first place. So you'll have to scrounge around for
    an insurance company, which will charge you an annual premium roughly equal
    to the replacement value of your house. At any moment, this company can drop
    you like used dental floss.

    SHUTTERS: Your house should have hurricane shutters on all the windows,
    all the doors, There are several types of shutters, with advantages and
    disadvantages:

    Plywood shutters: The advantage is that, because you make them yourself,
    they're cheap.

    Sheet-metal shutters: The advantage is that these work well, once you
    get them all up. The disadvantage is that once you get them all up, your
    hands will be useless bleeding stumps, and it will be December.

    Roll-down shutters: The advantages are that they're very easy to use,
    and will definitely protect your house. The disadvantage is that you will
    have to sell your house to pay for them.
    Hurricane-proof windows: These are the newest wrinkle in hurricane
    protection: They look like ordinary windows, but they can withstand
    hurricane winds! You can be sure of this, because the salesman says so. He
    lives in Nebraska.
    Hurricane Proofing your property: As the hurricane approaches, check
    your yard for movable objects like barbecue grills, planters, patio
    furniture, visiting relatives, etc... You should, as a precaution, throw
    these items into your swimming pool (if you don't have a swimming pool, you
    should have one built immediately). Otherwise, the hurricane winds will turn
    these objects into deadly missiles.

    EVACUATION ROUTE:
    If you live in a low-lying area, you should have an evacuation route
    planned out. (To determine whether you live in a low-lying area, look at
    your driver's license; if it says "Florida," you live in a low-lying area.)
    The purpose of having an evacuation route is to avoid being trapped in your
    home when a major storm hits. Instead, you will be trapped in a gigantic
    traffic jam several miles from your home, along with two hundred thousand
    other evacuees. So, as a bonus, you will not be lonely.
    HURRICANE SUPPLIES:

    If you don't evacuate, you will need a mess of supplies. Do not buy them
    now! Florida tradition requires that you wait unti

    1. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by flafish · · Score: 1

      " Bleach. (No, I don't know what the bleach is for. NOBODY knows what the
      bleach is for, but it's traditional, so GET some!)" It is for sterilizing water for drinking, and cleaning up after the storm damage to kill mold and mildew.

      Backup is multiple computers wrapped in garbage bags inside a concrete block and concrete column house with a concrete ( 12" thick ) second floor. House is equipted with 2 generators and storm panels or sliding shutters on all windows.
      The house survide Andrew so the structure is sound.

    2. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleach, unless used in huge quantities (worse than swimming pool water), then let sit for a few hours, then boiled for 10 minutes, will not be effective.

      Just boil the water for 10 minutes or buy bottled water. Or buy a camping filter, or iodine tablets from the camping store.

      Otherwise you'll just make yourself sick or risk getting something from the water anyway.

    3. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Informative
      Bleach, unless used in huge quantities (worse than swimming pool water), then let sit for a few hours, then boiled for 10 minutes, will not be effective.

      Really? I realize that the resultant liquid might not be good to drink, but won't it at least be sterile? I had the impression that bleach was pretty good at killing anything that got immersed in it, even after being diluted quite a bit.

    4. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by CobaltTiger · · Score: 5, Informative

      Credit to Dave Barry might be in order, no?

      Hurricane season can make a storm shudder

    5. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks. The source I got it from made no mention of who wrote it.

    6. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why didn't you link or credit the source that you *did* get it from?

    7. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Bleach can be used to disinfect water though it's not my favorite method. http://www.i4at.org/surv/bleach.htm gives the specs. Boiling works without all the nasty chemicals BTW most city water contains bleach to keep the bateria down thats what gives it that fresh nasty city water taste. Bleach and a Brita is a good combo if it's hot as the brita is good at taking the bleach out.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    8. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least now we know that Dave Barry is worthy of a +$ funny on slashdot.

    9. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      So why didn't you link or credit the source that you *did* get it from?

      I didn't provide a link, as there is no (to my knowledge) consistent way of linking to Usenet and having it work across different browsers. The person who posted it was clearly not the original author.

    10. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS by flafish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Bleach, unless used in huge quantities (worse than swimming pool water), then let sit for a few hours, then boiled for 10 minutes, will not be effective."

      It does not take as much as you think if the water is fairly safe to start with. 2 tbs per gallon and left sit for 30 minutes after shaking is a safe way to sterilize the water. Almost all city water supplies use chlorine is some form to treat the drinking water. Boiling may not be possible as you would not have electricity and open flames in a closed up home is dangerous.

      Where I am, the rock filters the water well enough that 100 ft from a septic tank and drain field the bacteria count is in the safe level. Even after Andrew, our water was safe to drink without any treatment.

  39. redundant whatever it is by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I've been working with CDs and DVDs a lot lately. (My day job is writing backup software) A large portion of the media I have fails within just a few months. Not everything, but just one unreadable sector is enough to cause problems.

    Therefore I have to reccomend that you make several backups of everything important. Note however that important doesn't mean everything. You can download linux from anywhere, save the pictures. (though family and friends can get you copies of many of them too) IF you have any open source software, just post the patch, with a note that it isn't complete but just in case you die in the hurricane.

    1. Re:redundant whatever it is by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Aren't you putting some sort of ECC into your software? Especially you seem to be using it with dvd/cd media.

  40. The California logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    In California we get a very very bad earthquake around once every 60 years.

    Florida gets hurricanes of some sort every year, a bad one once a decade.

    Buffalo NY is assured of getting at least one month of hellish winter. California is assured of getting one month of cloudy weather.

    You have floods. We have fires. Except after a fire we have some assurance another fire won't come through that particular area for some time.

    All in all the risk v reward in California is quite decent.

  41. My crdit Union is Shut Down by thejuggler · · Score: 1

    My credit union, which is in Minneapolis, MN, has its processing center for it's online banking located in Florida. The processing center evacuated and shut down all of its servers. I am with out access to my accounts because they didn't have a backup center somewhere where these acts of god are less likely to happen, like here in MN! Hell it only gets cold here. That good for computers!

    1. Re:My crdit Union is Shut Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do your business with a real bank. Credit Unions are generally bare bones operations to begin with

  42. Funny? Mods on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm mod this +1 Scares the shit out of me.

    1. Re:Funny? Mods on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "I'm mod this +1 Scares the shit out of me."

      Well, I thought it was funny ! But...

      heh heh... if that post scares you, you should read "The Hot Zone" by Richard Preston. There is a sentence, near the end of the book, which postulates ( I am paraphrasing here ) that the "Earth may be interested in getting rid of the excess of meat"
      ( humans ).

      Now THAT is scary, but it could also be true.

      But if you haven't read the above book, by all means do so. It will
      give you a nice warm feeling for USAAMRID and Ft. Detrick, MD,
      as well as the possible consequences of various government experiments gone wrong.

      While you're at it, rent the film "The 12 Monkeys" ( surely this film must be in the Slashdot pantheon of awesome films ? )

      Happy nightmares...

    2. Re:Funny? Mods on crack? by kfg · · Score: 1

      "Earth may be interested in getting rid of the excess of meat"

      Earth isn't any more interested in getting rid of "the excess of meat" of humans than the cage is interested in getting rid of the "excess of meat" of rats.

      Doesn't mean it sucks any less to be one of the rats though.

      surely this film must be in the Slashdot pantheon of awesome films ?

      Surely.

      KFG

    3. Re:Funny? Mods on crack? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      three words;
      calissavirus in Australia. :)

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    4. Re:Funny? Mods on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But "the cage" and the earth are just easy terms for the ethereal "thing that binds us" (no, not a ring [not a ring of metal at least] but maybe a ring more like the one Ponahontas sang about).

      What is it about an overcrowded cage that makes rats turn gay? How does the message "turn gay, too many babies" get communicated and what is the trigger, could various macro environmental things be happening to the humans in the overcrowded cage now? - gosh no, because we are too scientific to believe that, blah, blah.

      Could it really be that there is a higher percentage of gays now then any time in history - the gay community has a vested interest in saying no.

      Could it be that homosexuality isn't a choice, it is a macro environmental response to overpopulation that randomly picks members of the species to be non-reproductive - the "christian right" and to a lesser extent the gay community have a vested interest in saying no.
      Personally, I think this would be hilarious if shown to be true, the gay community, rather than being the abomination that the right says they are, would turn out to be the individuals chosen by "the hand of god/nature" as it was trying to save the human race from distroying itself and the environment.

      The problem with global warming if it is due to fossil fuel burning and other chemical pollutants, is the same problem as with GMO's - there is no satisfaction in the liberals being able to say "We told you so" because by the time we are sure, it is too late and we are all fucked.

      I can't believe the Earth can support 6 billion people without some major chaotic events being precipitated, so I guess we'll know sooner than later - unlike the rest of history. Maybe gen Y will see the population curve change direction for some reason.

      http://dieoff.org/page5.htm
      Both Packard and Buffet are concerned enough to donate billions to try to force changes:
      http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/mankiw/c olumns/sept98.html

    5. Re:Funny? Mods on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calicivirus and I never understood why the dingoes don't eat those babies...

      Mad Cow might be RCD for humans, how would you fight a loose protein?

  43. Seriously, come on now by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    CNN is reporting: 'Scientists say more storms like Frances -- both very intense and very large -- are likely.

    So what CNN is basically saying is that we'll continue to have seasonal storms just like we have for all of human history.

    They really needed "scientists" to tell them that?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Seriously, come on now by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It's an offhand way of saying that Bush's policies concerning global warming, has caused this.

  44. you won't think its funny later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    many scientists have given the same argument - in particular that new freshwater entering the oceanic currents from global warming is causing global currents to be altered (as fresh water is more dense, it sinks below saltwater currents and alters their courses).

    its amazing - we need freshwater to live, but we need a vast majority of it to stay frozen or we'll die.

    1. Re:you won't think its funny later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freshwater is less dense than saltwater.

  45. Frances is dying fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's wobling now, slowing down, barely a force 2.

    Not exepected to hit FLA until late Saturday.

    FLA might see a little rain, that's about it. Nothing to worry about, people, it's nothing and it's over.

  46. Uh, move Inland. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

    There are tornados to worry about, etc., but it seems like living in a coastal region is just begging for trouble.

    Maybe I should throw a server online somewhere in the basement, here in 'flyover country' for people 'living on the edge' to back their data onto.

    Naw, this house has been here since 1900 but it could go any time...

    --
    resigned
  47. Hi-res Florida webcams by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    High resolution surveillance cameras in Florida are still up and online. Not much to see at night, but check back tomorrow.

    The best camera is the Miami Beach ultra high resolution panoramic webcam. 8000 x 2320 pixels.

    1. Re:Hi-res Florida webcams by lordkuri · · Score: 1

      Coralized link of "the best camera", before everyone kills it.

      -lk

  48. RAIS by 10000000000000000000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    thinking of keeping data intact, do you think it's possible to store data in the internet.

    if you had enough hosts constantly passing packets between each other it should be theoretically possible to store some information exclusively within the packets during the routing transfer.

    Meaning, as soon as the data was passed to a router the node running the host sofware could free the memory space it previously occupied.

    imagine RAIS (Redundant Array of Independant Systems). A p2p network on which you dedicate 10mb of disk space.

    5mb for your files, and 5mb for encrypted parity files for the other users. (storage amounts here are merely speculation).

    If your computer is hit by a comet or a sperm whale falls on it then the documents you saved on this network remain. Just log in with your username and retrieve your documents.

    This wouldn't be practical for storage of very large things; say media files.

    But it should be well suited for small important files: documents and such.

    Now, in this network there would be a good deal of latency while packets are passed between hosts (replication, storage swapping).

    During these precious milliseconds these packets carry information. since the data is being routed we can strike it from the host.

    There would need to be some serious acknowledgement mechanisms for guaranteeing the integrity of this data as is lives in it's spectre form - and I don't currently see how that would be accomplished.

    Nonetheless, it's an intriguing idea.

    both the encrypted p2p storage network and the spectred storage.

    1. Re:RAIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thikn there is something called DIBS that does pretty much what you describe.

  49. Certain Slashdot posters are MORE dense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "its amazing - we need freshwater to live, but we need a vast majority of it to stay frozen or we'll die."

    I have some news for you, Mister AC :

    1) you need an apostrophe inserted in "its", above.

    2) we are all going to die, no matter what the global climate does.

    2) a) the coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave man dies but once.

    3) What I think is funny NOW, is the shortsighted and selfish behavior of so many people who call themselves intelligent.
    Now THAT is hilarious ( and disgusting ).

    4) Life is a tragedy for those who feel, and a comedy for those
    who think.

    I'm still laughing, and I will be laughing until I die, at the way technology has advanced, but human foresight is still as bad as
    it was ten thousand years ago.

    And by the way, fresh water is LESS dense than salt water. Fresh water of an equal temperature will "float" above a layer of salt water.

    ( I got a minor in oceanography in undergrad school, where did you get your knowledge ? Cereal boxes ? )

    Once again, I find myself wondering WHY I even bother reading this website...

  50. a p2p network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THAT's what CAUSED this hurricane!!!! Dismantle it at ONCE!!!

    Love,
    RIAA/MPAA

  51. Before you store data at work... by CatGrep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe even something as simple as hiding a DVD-R under your desk at work, with all your worldly data on it.

    Better check your employment agreement before you do that. If you develop code 'on the side' it could be difficult to prove that you didn't do any work on it at work. Maybe the company could claim ownership simply because it was on their premises. Definately could muddy the legal waters - tread carefully.

    1. Re:Before you store data at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have my own box at the workplace for such things. Since our workplace isn't like the security seciton of a national laboratory or such, the PTB are pretty lax about this kind of thing.

      Whereas my employer might argue that I used their network and electricity and maybe, *just* maybe, I spent some undocumentable amount of "their time" doing "my stuff" while otherwise being a productive worker, I will refuse to turn over to that the stuff that is mine, my ideas.

      If I were forced to turn it over to them, I would also release it to the internet also.

  52. Re:Halfbaked Plan sinking... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No, he's a nut. The kind of nut who dressed up and went out sidewalk ranting in NYC last week.

    Now, if he'd picked a name like 'Duck Ruby' it would all be in fun. But sometimes it seems like he actually believes the stuff he spews. Which is regrettable.

    --
    resigned
  53. In canada too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no way dude, my bosses credit union is down also. and i'm in vancouver canada!

  54. I have the PERFECT solution by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
    step 1: encrypt your important data.

    step 2: apply ASCII armoring to the encryption and put a space after every ten characters.

    step 3: post to /.

    %S%#H6sne3 6js46yhbr s5YD$S%YS $Eg45tys3 4tGV#$tfg se4TGs43T HBs4eTHBS $EThs4$ES tSEyhS#$g bySh67S%$ Eyge5tYE% $h67YS%$t gsvE$hse4 %TGve$Ths eYBS$%Ybe szTYSETV$S E$%y7NiR^& 0o)*(j[-0[-KM0789;0y9p*YForn[5s4ysp[OT$AW{EVto4a3[ 65#$P{TO%^O*n^D&PN^PS$%PO6yn5S$POynS$%OynuoNS$%POy $SPOy$%SNPYOAPO45tAP#O4t

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  55. Well by tuxter · · Score: 0

    You could always email it to your 1Gb google mail account. Or here http://www.iomega.com/istorage/ or here http://www.xdrive.com/ Sure there are some free versions available too, try here http://www.google.com/. Or sign up for a free trial, and hope it's all over in a couple of weeks ;)

  56. Why don't they start building better houses? by CatGrep · · Score: 1

    Whenever I hear about these hurricanes doing all this damage, I wonder why they don't start building their houses differently down there. What if instead of wooden or brick boxes (not very aerodynamic) they started building concrete domes - something that wouldn't catch the wind nearly as much. I suppose it wouldn't help with flood damage (though they might be able to do something waterproof, I suppose), but it would certainly help minimize the damage from wind. And they shouldn't allow trailers/mobile homes at all in places like Florida, but maybe the idea is that they're so cheap that they're essentially disposable dwellings.

    Of course the kind of house you build and the materials you choose would vary from region to region (building out of concrete in California isn't such a good idea).

    1. Re:Why don't they start building better houses? by blaberski · · Score: 1

      I remember someone who lived in South Carolina, on the beach doing exactly that. He built a concrete dome, that had the actualy dwelling above the storm surge. On top of that he had steele reinforced concrete going to some ungodly depth, and at the touch of a button steele shutters could be deployed over every window in the house.

      The problem is that his neighbors had a cow, and were complaining that his place should be torn down since it looked odd on the beach, and they claimed it was lowering everybodies property value.

    2. Re:Why don't they start building better houses? by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How to make homes more hurricane resistant: :

      1. Let the insurance companies raise the homeowners premiums to astronomical amounts or flat out deny coverage
      2. Deny _any_ federal disaster assistance

      to property/homeowners that own/build in high risk areas and don't build/upgrade to withstand a major storm with only minimal damage.

      The idea of living on the beach is nice and all, but those who fail to remember that Mother Nature is in charge should get what they deserve. If you want to build your $2,000,000 house on a beach, three feet above sea level in an area known to be overrun by storm surge, go ahead, if you have the money to repair/replace everything you lose time and time again... You can't afford to fix it? Tough luck buster, YOU made the choice.

      Why should those who live in safer areas (by choice or necessity) have to subsidize the rebuilding of property in areas that should never have been developed in the first place? For that matter, why should Joe Taxpayer have to subsidize the clueless/greedy?

      IANASE, but concrete building California is done all the time, just have to double/triple the amount of rebar used...

      --
      -- Mace only makes me hornier.
    3. Re:Why don't they start building better houses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the worst thing for the neighbours was that the concrete house was a concrete reminder of how idiotic they were to own flimsy houses on a frequent hurricane path.

    4. Re:Why don't they start building better houses? by wooley-one · · Score: 1

      I'm writing this from a boarded up house just south of Miami. I went through Andrew in this same house where we experienced gusts of up to 210 mph or more.

      Natural disasters occur virtually everywhere. I would much rather deal with a hurricane than a tornado or an earthquake. You can prepare for a hurricane days in advance, with a tornado you get a few minutes at the very best.

      The reason we don't build concrete domes is because, frankly, living in a dome would suck. A dome would be a huge waste of land area for the amount of useable space, which becomes a real consideration with property values as high as they are.

      We fared pretty well in Andrew. We had no sheeting left on the roof and the interior of house was soaked, but the structure remained sound. The main reason we did well is that this house was built in 1958. The new construction was utter crap due to a quarter century of developers having their way with the building codes.

      As the result of Andrew, the building codes have improved. Most houses down here are cinder-block, not brick or wood, prior to Andrew some houses were using stucco or chip board for exterior walls. In the Florida Keys, the most common type of house is cinder-block with a poured concrete roof on concrete stilts that form the first floor.

      I agree with you about the trailer homes. Those things are friggin death traps in a storm.

    5. Re:Why don't they start building better houses? by danharan · · Score: 1

      Boingboing covered the topic. Perhaps not quite resistant enough yet, but definitely a step in the right direction.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  57. Babies are born with Strontium-90 in their teeth by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Actually that's not insane. There have been studies done on baby teeth. Strontium-90 was found in the teeth of those living relalitively close to nuclear power plants. Baby Teeth offer radioactive clues

  58. simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't live in an area that has ever had a serious earthquake, hurricane, tornado or flood. Anything extremely important is uploaded to a directory on my colo'd server about 30 miles away (in case my apartment burns down, I guess).

  59. ATTENTION FLORIDIANS-Mother in flaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hurricane Proofing your property: As the hurricane approaches, check your yard for movable objects like barbecue grills, planters, patio furniture, visiting relatives, etc... You should, as a precaution, throw these items into your swimming pool (if you don't have a swimming pool, you
    should have one built immediately). Otherwise, the hurricane winds will turn these objects into deadly missiles."

    I'm sorry! The mother in law already is a "deadly missile". What do I do now?

    1. Re:ATTENTION FLORIDIANS-Mother in flaw. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put her in the swimming pool as well. If she tries to get out, drown her!

  60. Duh... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    The answer is redundancy. Every day, thousands of cells in your body are screwed up due to interference from background radiation. Your body contains numerous mechanisms to detect cells with screwed up DNA and termminate them.

    Your IT technology must do the same. Here's what I use in keeping data safe for a hosted application:

    1) The primary server is configured with RAID1 - either hard drive fails, I can pull the bad one and continue working while I replace the primary drive. It has 3 independant redundant network feeds.

    2) There's a hot backup server, mirrored nightly that I can switch to in about 4 hours. It's on a diffferent network, in a different city, several hundred miles away from the primary.

    3) There's a 3rd backup site containing full backups (incremental backups that emulate full backups a la rsync) going back a full month, at any time. Again, different city, different network.

    4) The database is dumped to disk every hour, on the hour. Thus, I not only have a current copy of the databae, but in the event of a programming failure, I can roll the database back to any point on the hour going back 4 days.

    5) The application in mind is client-based, with periodic updates to the server. Most of the relevant data could be deleted from the server at any time, and most users wouldn't even notice, since their client applications would update the server with the relevant data periodically!

    With this setup, to lose data you must:

    1) Not allow the client to "talk" to the server, and

    2) the client must suffer a catastrophic failure (EG: HDD failure)

    3) The server must have both HDD and all 3 network feeds die, and

    4) The hot backup server must be dead, and

    5) the 3rd location server/HDD must be dead and

    6) the client software must be installed on only one machine (it seldom is!)

    Pretty dammn unlikely set of circumstances. If you build your network-capable software right, it is damn near impossible to suffer catastrophic losses.

    Does it matter? Hell yeah! I may soon be adding yet *another* layer of redundancy since Postgres replication is now *finally* a real option! But, my business could suffer several catastrophes in a row and we'd *still* continue operating smoothly!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  61. GmailFS by lancew · · Score: 1

    GmailFS provides a mountable Linux filesystem which uses your Gmail account as its storage medium.

    http://richard.jones.name/google-hacks/gmail-files ystem/gmail-filesystem.html

  62. Re:Babies are born with Strontium-90 in their teet by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    "Baby teeth from counties near two nuclear plants in Florida and plants in California, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania were compared with baby teeth from other counties in the same states."

    The article I linked said the Hurricane cased a covered up nuclear leak at the plant.

  63. Re:Have a nice trip? See you next fall. by toddestan · · Score: 1

    DVD-R's and CD-Rs are remarkably fragile.

    They are also cheap. Burn a few - carry one with you, put one under your desk, put on in the car. Heck, put one in the refridgerator if you feel like it. Chances are atleast one will survive.

  64. Seriously, come on now-Underwelmed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NEWSFLASH! Scientists say that large rocks from space are likely to crash into the Earth, and erradicate most of the life there.

    In reaction to this news, a slashdotter was heard to say, "Humpff!"

  65. In-House Security by consoneo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Concrete Nail Gun, 4 Nails, 4 Lenghts of Chain, one Personal Safe with an attachment point.

    Place 250 Gig hard drive inside, packed in bubble wrap and newspaper one foot thick.

    1. Re:In-House Security by karnal · · Score: 1

      Man, you must have a hell of a local town paper to be printing on pages a foot thick!

      --
      Karnal
  66. heh. *A* dvd-r? by solios · · Score: 1

    Man, my shit hasn't fit into four gigs since 1998. By which I mean my shit. Not mp3s, or divx, or warez, or operating system CDs or any of the other STUFF that accumulates over the course of seven years of hardcore machine immersion.

    Hell, I've generated something like sixteen gigs of data in the last ten weeks. Which is slightly above average, but not by much. As a digital (and video!) artist, I eat hard drives, and backups are something of an annoyance- more for the tedium of the burn or tape time than anything else.

    The biggest problem with backups (imo) is keeping them organized and clearly detailed. Mild annoyance to, say, try to find something on a CDR from 1997.

  67. That's "Gloom of Night" by Steve+Hartwell · · Score: 1

    I know how we like to get things right on Slashdot, so here's the actual [unofficial] USPS motto

    Actually, given the topic, "gloom" seems a better match, anyway...

  68. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rotflmao!

    yeah and this guy's posted another anti-indymedia rant today.

    he's obviously never been to an indymedia meeting. they're quite interesting grassroots experiments. i've been to many of them. he should stop getting all worked up and take his ass to one :)

  69. The happy median is critical thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The happy median is critical thinking, which mainstream media coverage does little to encourage.

    Indymedia certainly forces that issue doesn't it ;)

  70. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is is that the supporters of indymedia have to hide to make their points?

  71. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well if it isn't the a.c. pot calling the kettle black!

    actually i don't have a slashdot account and i don't want one because i don't give a crap about slash-karma. that's why i always post a.c. regardless of the topic.

    so NEENER NEENER!

  72. Re:Ever see Cringlys attempt at building an airpla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he can make a fucking wifi signal bounce off of Alpha Centauri and back down thousands of miles away. But how he does it is a secret, sshhhhh!

    But I do have to give him some props for his rapping, I love that line in his song with Snoopy that goes:

    Pulled up, stop parked, rims still spinning
    Valet look like he in the game and must be winning

  73. Rsync by Alioth · · Score: 1

    I remote backup with rsync to a machine that's over 4,000 miles away. I guess that means I should have a reasonable expectation my data will survive :-)

  74. Stop, you're both right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm not sure if it was my age, or the time it was in, but when I first became aware of Israel/Palestine (early to mid 1990s), it seemed like most people would avoid taking sides, and point out that both sides in the conflict were guilty of equally reprehensable crimes. Blowing up 3-year-olds on busses, kids going to the beach for the summer, or a neighborhood cafe on one side; firing tank shells and anti-tank missils into crowded streets and shooting live bullets at nonviolent (rock-throwing at the worst) protesters on the other. The game of moral superiority cannot be won in a war, especially one like this. Keep in mind that this very game is the excuse that the _both_ sides use to justify further violence (seriously: Whenever the IDF raids a refugee camp, or uses an Apache to missile a car during rush-hour, it is in response to a terrorist attack; whenever Hamas blows up a bus, it's in response to an IDF raid or missile attack, ad infinitum), and only servers to prolong the suffering on both sides.

    The problem, as I see it, is twofold:
    - The occupation. Palestinians are never going to accept Israeli control, and will fight against it until it ends. The Occupied Territories are millstones around Israel's neck, and the sooner they are given back to the Palestinians, the sooner the war will end.
    - The culture of vionlence on both sides. Just like Northern Ireland (thank god they've started to move forward!), there is a generation of people - young men especailly - on both sides who only know war, and whose only real skill is in how to fight. They are the extremists, and they see it as in their interest for the conflict to continue.

  75. XOR groups by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
    Many years ago, I was writing backup software for tapes. Tapes are prone to bad spots but apart from the ECC in hardware, we would record backups in groups of blocks with each group protected by an XOR of the preceding data blocks. Bad spots on tape may be big enough to defeat ECC, but single block recovery was possible using the XOR block. As long as only one error occurred per redundancy group, it could be recovered.

    Is there anything public domain that will do this? I tried Google and found nothing.

  76. Re:Babies are born with Strontium-90 in their teet by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Sorry I didn't see that part. It's possible that it could be true. It's bordering on a conspiracy theory, though. One of the down sides of independent media is that there's no real regulation on what's being reported.

  77. I don't get it... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

    ...why (damn kitten is chasing my hands as i type!) do you need to hide a DVD-R under your desk? why can't you just carry it around wherever youre going?! I'm lost....

  78. Something like PAR2? by WoTG · · Score: 1

    It's not quite what you are asking for, but parity files are great. PAR's have become a mandatory part of USENET binary groups. Plus, the crazy-magic math that is involved in PARs to recreate missing chunks of files can do wonders with damaged media - particularly the newer PAR2 algorithms. I run my little home data backups through it, and I feel pretty comfortable with it.

    Somewhere there is webpage and graphics of someone testing PAR2 data recovery by using a felt pen to blot out chunks of a CD, and then recovering it with some sort of ISO maker plus the PAR software. I can't find the link, unfortunately.
    the PAR site

    1. Re:Something like PAR2? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      I have discussed the idea of using PAR2 files for backups at work.
      The situation is this: we have some 200 workstations. These have way too much diskspace, as you cannot buy small disks these days anymore. 4GB would be plenty for a business-use workstation (just the OS and some applications are stored there), but the workstations have 40 or 80 GB disks.
      This means there is about 8TB of unused diskspace.

      The servers have much less diskspace than that, in total. It would be possible to store several backups on the workstation disks.
      The idea is to make backups as a set of files, distributed over a number of workstations, and protected by PAR2 files (in case a workstation fails or is re-installed). The backup data would of course be encrypted, and not accessible to the workstation user because of access rights.

      This could serve as a quickly accessible backup, in addition to the normal tape backups we use. It could also be more reliable (tape backup units are not the most reliable parts in computers).

      What is missing, or at least as far as we know, is a tool that allows to store a directory tree, access rights included, into a a number of parts with added PAR2 files, where the destination of each file can be specified separately (e.g. via a control file). We would not want to first copy all server data to a local set of files and then move each of these files to a workstation in a second step, but the files would have to be directly written to the workstations over the network.

      Anyone seen something like that?

    2. Re:Something like PAR2? by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
      A long time ago, I had some dealings with enterprise-level backup systems. The system backed up to exchangeable volumes such as tapes or to special files. It could handle evrything from individual files throgh to whole volumes. The same program could also handle disk duplication (and optionally resizing or cleaning). With such overloaded functionality, it was a monster.

      The worst part though was if you took a backup from one system with access control lists to another. Normalising the identifiers was *hard*. If you were always restoring on the same system (or something with the same rights identifiers), you had a perfect backup (except when backing up a file open for write).

    3. Re:Something like PAR2? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Fortunately we have only a single domain. Access control lists should not be a problem, but they should be included (they often aren't in programs intended for file transfer rather than backup).

      If I remember correctly, RAR can do almost what we need except for the requirement to store the different parts on different machines (= in different destination directories). And except it does not do on-the-fly PAR2 generation but leaves that to a separate utility that again reads all the files.

      And of course, to use it in real life there would need to be some database to store what backup on what date was stored on which workstations and under what filename. Plus a mechanism to purge old files to make room for new ones.

      Indeed, this can be expanded and extended almost indefinately, but we are really looking at a simple solution for a small company (with more creative employees than money).

    4. Re:Something like PAR2? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      4GB would be plenty for a business-use workstation

      My advice to you is whatever you are running, don't switch to XP.

      Just a base, patched install of Windows XP runs just over 2 Gig, then when you try to put SP2 on it (dont bother) it'll need just under 4 for the install process.

      But like I said, after fooling around with it, I have found no reason to bother with SP2.

    5. Re:Something like PAR2? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      We run Windows 2000 SP4 with all fixes, and about 10 applications (Mozilla, OpenOffice, ICA Client, SAP GUI, Acrobat Reader, JAVA runtime, etc plus MS Office on a few systems).
      There are even some old systems with 3.2 GB disks and they have room to spare.

      But it does not matter, replace the 4 GB with 8 GB if you like and you still see a lot of free space on a business workstation with the smallest disk available today. All data is of course stored on servers.

  79. Joke?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really do this...I do have to check for my data every few weeks and re-download it to make sure it's still safe.

  80. 1957? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    What about ARPNET, from what the Internet spawned from?

    The beginnings of the internet go back at least as far as 1957, which marks the founding of the Defence Department's Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) in response to the Soviet Union launching Sputnik.
    In 1963, ARPA asked the Rand Corporation to ponder how to form a command-and control network capable of surviving attack by atomic bombs.

    The Rand Corporation's response (made public in 1964) was that the network would "have no central authority" and would be "designed from the beginning to operate while in tatters".
    These two basic concepts became the defining characteristics of what would eventually become the Internet.

    The Internet was conceptualized from the beginning as having no central authority, while operating in a condition of assumed unreliability (bombed-out cities, downed telephone lines) or, in other words, having maximum redundancy.
    All nodes would be coequal in status, each with authority to originate, relay, and receive messages.

  81. And the inevitable reference to Global Warming... by ScienceThinker · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...begins by people who have no idea what they're talking about.

    Hurricanes are a natural part of the weather system, folks. The only unnatural thing about the path of Hurricane Frances is the large number of mobile homes, wooden framed building, expensive condos and idiots who refuse to evacuate from all of the above.

    The number of Atlantic hurricanes has DECLINED over the last 50 years. Put that in your climate model and smoke it.

    And for those fascinated by climate models, here's a kicker from the IPCC 2001:

    "In sum, a strategy must recognize what is possible. In climate research and modeling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear system, and therefore that the prediction of a specific future climate is not possible."

    I shall use my patented slashdot idiot model to predict that the next few posters will claim that:

    - the majority of scientists believe human induced global warming to be a fact (not true, and since when has science ever been decided by popular vote?)

    - that "ScienceThinker" is not a scientist (guess what?)

    - that there are "ominous signs" of climate change (when weren't there?)

    - that the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is unprecedented (no it isn't) ...and so on.

    GO!

  82. wtf... by bkeating · · Score: 1

    W T F, the summary of this news post has massive A.D.D. Screw it, im going to bed.

  83. you could buy a gun safe by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Larger, roomier, and probably more readily available than a proper heavy floor safe (I think they sell them at Walmart). Plus, you can bolt most of them down, and many come with fire-resistant liners.

    Add a waterproof container and lock your safe, and you can probably evacuate with impunity.

    Side note: a friend of mine was researching buying just such an item a few years back, and had literature from a bunch of companies. The funniest brochure had a series of pictures of safes involved in various disasters... they were all the same: big pile of ashes/rubble/timbers, with the scorched-but-otherwise-intact safe sticking up out of the rubble.

    IIRC, the same phenomenon was noted in Nagasaki after the atomic bomb was dropped... the four Mosler vaults of the Teikoku bank were found still standing in the middle of the ruins, contents intact.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  84. Out source to West Virginia by evilnissan · · Score: 1

    Nothing ever happens here that would endanger your data centers.

    Besides I need a new job... please.

    --
    This Sig for rent.
  85. The ancient solution by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

    We all know they did not build pyramids to put dead bodies in. All the knowledge of the past is hidden in monuments. They've gone through more years and more floodings than most 'scientist' tell you.

  86. about 450 gigs by EaterOfDog · · Score: 1

    I am systems admin for a medium central florida newspaper. I have spent the last day making an additional offsite backup of everything. Databases, file servers, archives, software, serial numbers, etc. The trusty Carbon Copy Cloner (for OS X) and several firewire drives have made things much easier. The servers are already duplicated to our print facilty 2 miles away, so that will give me three copies. I have a final meeting in two hours. What a giant pain in the ass.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
  87. the US gives about $2.6bn a year to Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's grants and loans, too. that $40bn figure has no bearing in reality.
    overview
    details

    1. Re:the US gives about $2.6bn a year to Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter and we know that the outright giving of money to Israel is in the many billions per year and some of it is hidden in creative govt accounting esp to hide the true levels of spending on weapons systems and the value of shared intelligence, so my point holds. If you want to stop the conflict that is ruining the world - raise people up, when they are that desperate they have nothing to lose. Get them focused on making something of themselves, but to do that they have to be above the physical survival level. Who do people resent more Warren Buffet or their boss, both make more money than they do and Warren makes way more but your boss oppresses you, so you hate them for that and start to blame them for the condition of your life - get them to stop depending on Israel for their survival and they won't resent them so damn much, it seems obvious to me and I could care less about either group, if they weren't the trigger for the apocalypse.

      But that won't happen because we don't decide how to spend our money on what is best for the future of the planet with or without a secret conspiracy of rich people controlling things. If we did, we might have a program (for intance) for every car, truck and bus to go in and get a free upgrade to a catalyst coated radiator so that everyone who drives could start cleaning the air right away, etc.

    2. Re:the US gives about $2.6bn a year to Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, come on now. It does matter, because you were more than an order of magnitude wrong on a point of fact. I (clearly) agree that peace in the middle east is tremendously important, and have my own ideas about solutions to the problem (end of the occupation; bring extremists out of power and put moderates in power). But if you're not even accurate on (important) points of fact, you're not going to get very far whatever your method towards peace is.

  88. Locusts? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    How do you secure your precious data against earthquakes, hurricanes, and swarms of locusts?

    Don't worry. Locusts eat plants, not data.

  89. A little late, isn't it? by barzok · · Score: 1

    With the storm about to pummel the Bahamas, I'd say if you're in Florida it's past time to be doing your backups. By now if you & your data are/were in any danger, the backup media should be in the car and you should be getting the F outta Dodge.

  90. Plans from 28.08N 80.65W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Which is definitely going to get hot with some hurricane-force winds, although the current predicted track is about 35 mi south.

    This is the main file server at work, which includes a lot of software development.

    One set of backups are off-site. Another set (and all the historicals) are in the on-site safe. But the server is currently up. We were going to power it down and trust RAID to keep the data safe, but when it dropped a category, we decided to just see if it'll kep running. It's on a hell of a UPS.

    All non-essential equipment is off and unplugged.

    Right now, the big worry is flooding. It's big and extremely slow-moving, so it'll dump for a very long time on the land it's passing. Everything's at least a foot off the floor, so here's hoping it doesn't get much worse than that.

    It's going to be a boring wait. It's started already (Saturday morning), and it'll be well into Sunday before it's passed. Here's hoping my net access stays up!

  91. I took my critical data with me by JohnVH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was going to pack my PC in the trunk and take it with me (full tower packed with hard drives) but changed my mind.

    I backed up all my critical personal data to DVD and took it with me to our data center near Ft. Lauderdale, Florida where I spent the night on an air mattress in an empty office.

    The data center is rated to take a high category 3 strike on the outside of the building (140 mph reinforced glass windows) and up to a category 5 strike on the reinforced concrete data center core. We also have 2 X 1500kw generators and enough fuel to last over a week.

    I was actually looking out the window a few minutes ago and you would hardly think there was a hurricane coming. It looked a bit wet but only a light breeze.

    We have about 40 people here (the disaster recovery team and their families) and a lot of them brought their pets as well (I can hear a dog barking from an office down the hall).

    I should have a great view of the hurricane as it comes through due to the large reinforced glass windows (wish I had brought a video camera) and am not as concerned now that it has been downgraded to a category 2.

    The only thing that would suck is if my home floods as I have a LOT of computer and home theater equipment on or near the floor. I have shutters up to protect the windows but there is nothing I can do to stop flooding.

    Well I am just rambling on now. There is nothing else to do except wait at this point and at the speed Francis is moving I could easily be in here for another 24 to 36 hours.

  92. Brother in New York by NickisGod.com · · Score: 1

    At the print shop where I work in South Florida, our customer order database files totalled 190 MegaBytes zipped. We have no offsite backup unfourtanetly. My solution was to fire up Apache on a workstation and email my little brother in New York the link. I figured his Hard Drive's should be pretty safe from this crap. With his DSL and our full T1, it took 30 minutes,

    The 100 GB of customer files will just have to survive these pathetic feeder bands.

    BTW: Like I was telling him, it could be worse...it could be snowing--that would really suck. :)

  93. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Not true, there are hurricanes in Wisconson and Minnesota. Of course by the time they make it even the worst of them are minor storms, less powerful than a normal summer thunderstorm.
    In which case they're no longer "hurricanes," moron.
  94. Taking it home with you by Augie+De+Blieck+Jr. · · Score: 1

    I used to work in the copy room of a law firm almost ten years ago. The bookkeepers made daily backups of all the records on tape. At the end of the day, one tape was locked up in a fireproof safe. The other went in the bookkeeper's purse and went home with her.

    The bosses there must have REALLY trusted her.

    They also didn't upgrade their systems until about two or three years ago, and their employees just got e-mail addresses two years ago. Progress marches on...

  95. How about.. don't live in Florida? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    Okay, I know it's not really a practical suggestion, but hear me out. If someone offered you a place to live on a volcano that was definitely going to erupt and destroy your home within the next ten years, would you buy the deeds? Or would you buy a house that was guaranteed to flood out every year? Well, yes, people do, and I really don't know why.

    1. Re:How about.. don't live in Florida? by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Natural disasters are universal. Earthquakes in California, tornadoes in the midwest, forest fires, floods...Hurricanes aren't so bad. Property damage might be expensive, but usually, the population is warned several days in advance. The smart ones board up and evacuate. Death tolls are fairly low, especially when one considers the population density and area impacted by one of these storms.

      I personally have survived five major tropical storms (category 4 or higher.) In all that, I never had so much as a window go out. I wasn't stupid enough to live on the beach, but I was sometimes as close as three miles to the ocean. Partly luck, mostly preparation.

  96. Hurricane? by myg · · Score: 1

    I'm reading Slashdot instead right from not-so-sunny South Florida. With my worldly data backed up on several servers and burned to CD/DVD just to be sure.... You insensitive clods. Oh wait, the Hurricane made some Slashdot news. I guess you guys aren't so insensitive.

  97. Re:Hi-res Florida webcams (Surf's Up!) by praedictus · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link, I'm laughing my ass off at the number of surfers out there in the water. Some baddass waves going on there, mind you if I was there I might be tempted, but I find anything over 3 m a bit scary, not to mention too exhausting paddling out past the rebentation er break zone

    --
    Watashi wa chikyubutsurigakusha desu.
  98. Re:Halfbaked Plan sinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you really this much of an idiot, Halfbaked, or are you
    just trolling ?

    And if you are a supporter of Bush, I truly hope you don't have children - there are enough idiots in the world already.

  99. Bury it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a DVD-R, place all that you want onto it to be backed up. Next, get a thick plastic, waterproof container that is just large enough for the DVD, and place the DVD-R inside it. Go out into your backyard, and dig 3 feet down into the dirt, and bury it. I gurentee, this puppy will survive *ANYTHING* nature can throw at it.

  100. Hi neighbor! by flafish · · Score: 1

    Our house is a two story one built of concrete and reinforced concrete. The footing go down into solid rock and the walls have reinforced concrete columns ever 10 ft with all corners of the house being poured concrete too. The second floor is 8" spandeck slabs with reinforced concrete poured to a minimum of 4" on top of that. Spandeck slabs are normally hollow but due to the contractor working the concrete rather hard, it filled the voids and made it 12" of solid concrete. Only weakness is the roof but it went thru Andrew with only a few spots where it got down to the tar paper. If it was to be built again, it would have a concrete roof too. New one being built about 2 blocks from us is all poured concrete. Storm panels and sliding shutters on windows and main door. Garage doors are reinforced with either steel beams or 2X4's on edge. One of them is still from when the house was built in 1979.
    House was dead center of the eye.

  101. What we need... by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

    Is a big fan. Stick with me here. We'll build a gigantic fan, black out the entire country for a few hours, and blow the hurricane over to Africa.

    Hey, I wonder if a hydrogen bomb would work better than a nuke? In any case, we could use the fan to blow the radioactive waste away too.

    --
    Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
  102. Re:Hi-res Florida webcams (Surf's Up!) by Animats · · Score: 1
    As of 1314EDT 4 SEP, the surfers are gone, and the beach is full of police cars.

    At 1333, the cops have the beaches cleared, and there's just one emergency vehicle. A few good waves, but not much happening.

  103. Re:Hi-res Florida webcams (Surf's Up!) by Animats · · Score: 1
    The Cocoa Beach pier webcam went out at 1415 EDT, after some images of the camera being banged around.

    Miami looks OK; the storm is hitting further north.

    NASA KSC appears to be offline.

  104. Somehwat OT, but. by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
    The NOAA has some decent photos and images of the storm.

    CG image from space

    False color shot

    Another CG from space

    I'd hate to be in Florida right now.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  105. YES. by solios · · Score: 1

    I mean, the latency for dumping a few gigs of pr0n or restoring a backup from an asteroid full of storage is gonna suck, but hell- you don't have to worry about weather. You don't have to worry about atmospheric contamination. This shit's still going to BE THERE in a few thousand years, in some capacity.

    We'll see satellites tailored to do this first, though. :|

  106. Save the voting machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the storm is targeting Palm Beach, let's be sure those touch-screen voting machines are safe. First, gather them all up and load them into mobile homes. The put all the mobile homes in a nice open area, say on the beach of a barrier island. Don't close the doors and windows, you need to let the wind pressure equalize and give the storm surge water a place to drain out. And just to be sure, put all the software sources and design documents int he same safe place. Hurry, there's not much time before the eye wall arrives!

  107. Re:Halfbaked Plan sinking... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Look at some polling numbers, dude.

    There are people all over the place, having children and supporting the relection of Dubya.

    Not sure what about my participation in this discussion makes me an 'idiot' though.

    Duck Rubby is the one who is forever parroting out the propaganda somebody fed him.

    --
    resigned
  108. Department of Homeland Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    better approach is to build a giant plexiglass shield off the coast.

    Not a bad idea. Perhaps we could convince Tom Ridge that it would make the US more safe against terrorism, and DHS would fund it. When they're at it, they would continue to build it all around the US borders. It would not only keep terrorist out, but the cold winds from the Canada during winter time! Talk about a win-win situation!

  109. Aluminum foil by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Just create a 3D 'barcode' on aluminum foil of your data.

    http://www.adams1.com/pub/russadam/stack.html

    This is a sample of some 2D codes and one pointer to a 'bumpy' barcode. I'm pretty sure a dot matrix printer will do just fine on aluminum foil with a sheet feeder and some fuss.

    Since some barcodes will do very high density per square inch an 8.5x11.5 sheet can store a meg or more depending on barcode and the resolution of the reader.

    If anyone would happen to know of a printer/reader combination for aluminum foil I'd be interested if it gets to the 100 megabyte per sheet range or better.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  110. Re:And the inevitable reference to Global Warming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Of course the CNN article didn't bother to talk to Dr. Bill Gray, the dean of seasonal hurricane forecasting who not only successfully predicted this busy hurricane season, but also believes any link to possible global warming is bunk.

    Hurricanes come in 40 year cycles. We are part way into the up swing of the high part of the cycle.

  111. more at 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in other news.. real estate prices drop in Florida.

  112. Last Post! by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 1

    harharhar

  113. I left Orlando 2 days ago... by sootman · · Score: 1

    ...with 7 hard drives in a cardboard box wrapped in plastic. Greetings from Savannah!

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  114. Re:Next on Indymedia Radio! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a supporter of indymedia, but I have to point out that who someone is does not discredit or validate what they say. In that regard, if a point is made anonymously, it is made, regardless of whether you know the identity or not.
    That being said, that was some nutty stuff reported.

  115. lockss by an_mo · · Score: 1

    LOCKSS That is, Lots Of Copies Keeps Stuff Safe may be a solution.

    See the project ath lockss.stanford.edu