Slashdot Mirror


Interview of Danger (Sidekick II) CEO Hank Nothhaft

r-blo writes "Know that new T-Mobile Sidekick II that Paris Hilton and Derek Jeter have been totin' around town? Yeah, that one. Well, Engadget has an interview with Danger's (the company that makes the Sidekick) CEO, Hank Nothhaft, talking about all manner of things regarding the mobile-internet device, including its closed development environment. They even ask him what phone he'd buy if it wasn't a Sidekick II, gotta love that!"

103 comments

  1. I wonder if it does video.... by BalorTFL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is Paris Hilton really the best spokesperson for this product?

    1. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is marketed towards the same people that watch "The Simple Life" and think MTV is fresh and original. Cool gadget and all, but think about their demographic.

    2. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, there's a reason why the company is called Danger - they like to take chances.

    3. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by igrp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Certainly not if you're targeting this towards geeks or your average business customer. That's not the target audience they have in mind though - they're after the teen and twen markets.

      You have better, more integrated and less fancy and shiny solutions available if you're looking for a mobile business solution (e.g. the Blackberries).

      Paris Hilton probably won't win a Nobel prize and a lot of people tend to make fun of her but she does represent that glamerous, in-your-face party girl thing that their target audience (secretly) admires. And it is indeed catching on - it's not just that you see the Sidekick II featured in rap videos (that could be clever product placement, even though I doubt it -- remember the iPod/music video trend 50 Cent started). You also see them in all the places where people go to show off and be seen (ie. the hip bars and clubs, etc).

    4. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by Saxton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll want to keep in mind that what you're talking about is T-Mobile's doing, and has little to do with Danger. The celebrity party they talked about in the article, only 4 Danger employees were present (iirc they had a drawing for one or two of them!). T-Mobile also gives away Sidekicks to rap artists, and they eventually show up in videos - from what I understand there is no formal product placement by T-Mobile other than placing them into celebrities hands. Danger does not do too much in terms of directly marketing the product to end users, it's the providers that do the marketing.

      -Aaron

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    5. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by soyuz_2 · · Score: 1

      I can just see it... In the hood, some gangbanger is texting away on his sideKix Schwei--- right... The real target audience is the rich california twenty-thrity somethings who own companies and think they are pimps on the side. Nothing wrong with that though.

    6. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      To quote Joe Martin's "Mr. Boffo", "Perfect for Idiot".

    7. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      Is Paris Hilton really the best spokesperson for this product?

      Is Paris Hilton really the best spokesperson for ANY product? (Other than porn of course...)

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    8. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know what's glamourous about being a mindless skank.

      Not a troll, honest. I'd just like to know.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    9. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they named it that after Hank ran XO (nee Concentric Networks) into the ground.

    10. Re:I wonder if it does video.... by igrp · · Score: 1

      Well, check this out. Apparently you can still sell a poster she made for ~$400.

  2. Form factor by keiferb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What, if any, plans are there to reduce the size of the device? An iPod is about the biggest thing I can stand to carry around in my pocket. I'd like to get one of the hiptops, but I'd rather not need a fanny-pack to carry it.

    1. Re:Form factor by igrp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's an interesting question. I was wondering if they could introduce a Sidekick Mini (like the iPod Mini) when I first saw them in a club around here.

      I think that's just not going to happen anytime soon though (at least not without huge technological advances in terms of battery life or power consumption). What makes these things so desirable, aside from the cool factor, is that they're truly mobile devices. Mobile in the way that the 'mobile office' ads in the mid-90's promised.

      Sure, my cell phone has WAP, an email client, Bluetooh (PDA interface) and God knows what not. But it's pretty much useless since the keypad makes typing a chore and the screen's just unuseable for real any work.

      The Sidekick, on the other hand, just works. It's pretty easy to use, the screen has decent resolution and using the keyboard is at least not worse than using a PDA's stylus to input data.

      The other major selling point is battery life. Being truly mobile isn't worth jack, if the thing's dead. That's why you need decent battery life and people have just come to expect their cell phones to last at least a couple of days on a single charge. And that's the expectation you basically have to meet when you introduce any cell phone-like device.

      Now, if you made the Sidekick smaller, you'd evidently have three problems: reduced usability, less battery life and more heat. Especially the latter is a huge design problem if you plan to implement WLAN capabilities in the future (as the article hints).

      Hence I don't think we're going to see drastically smaller Sidekick-like devices.

    2. Re:Form factor by lytlebill · · Score: 1

      Really, the new Sidekicks and the latest(4g) iPods are not that far apart in size. I think they both really fit into the same category of neet devices which are just large enough to do all the amazing things they do.

    3. Re:Form factor by timts · · Score: 1

      actually you should abondon the ipod and carry the smaller creative Muvo2 4G mp3 player, which is smaller, same capacity as ipod mini but a lot cheaper, also with better sound quality.

  3. Problem with All-in-one by GaussianInteger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem with these all-in-one devices is that the ALWAYs, ALWAYs end up doing everything horribly. Since most people use handheld devices to do one or two major things, an all-in-one device doesn't make sense at all. For example, if I were into playing Mp3s, an generic all-in-one device might support this, but say, with only 32MB and mp3 only support, when for the price of the entire device, i might be able to buy an iRiver. In the end, this product won't really sell because it has no singular attractive feature. If a user falls in love with the part of the device that does function X, s/he'll likely get a device decicated and much better at X.

    1. Re:Problem with All-in-one by nate1138 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I had the color sidekick for about a year or so, and it was pretty good at everything. It especially excelled at data. IM, SMS, email, web, all worked really well. The worst part about the sidekick is the control aspect. But that's more to blame on t-mobile (who, by the way, suck ass). Why the hell they won't just let me upload my own apps has always bugged me. Same with ringtones. I understand they want me to buy them from them, but if I want to make my own and play them, who the hell are they to tell me otherwise?

      --
      Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
    2. Re:Problem with All-in-one by Saxton · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem with these all-in-one devices is that the ALWAYs, ALWAYs end up doing everything horribly.

      That's not the case with the hiptop. Danger has picked and chosen what features to have and what features are out of scope for the device. As many people request features such as bluetooth, mp3 players, javascript in the browser, video recording, etc., Danger has stuck to what works well for the device and kept out most of the stuff that wouldn't work out. The AIM client is the best portable AIM client I've ever used, and I can say the same thing about the e-mail client. For what it is, the web browser is great, and the PIM functionailty suits my needs perfectly. If you want something that also plays MP3s, get an iPod. If you want an awesome phone with MMS, look at Nokia. For what I use most, the hiptop delivers. I formally disagree with you when you say they all-in-one devices always end up doing everything horribly.

      -Aaron

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    3. Re:Problem with All-in-one by JanusFury · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just to add my voice to Saxton's, the Hiptop is probably one of the best all-in-one devices I've ever used. When it worked, it worked extremely well. The web browser was very well designed and made it a pleasure to browse most websites, as long as you had signal, and the AIM and Email functionality was more than adequate for conversations with friends and checking your inbox while you're on the go. The SMS was a bit weak, but honestly with AIM and Email I never needed to use it. The keyboard, in particular, made it a pleasure to type in notes or messages. I wrote entire short stories on the Hiptop's keyboard, and it was a pleasure. For someone who likes to write in particular, the Hiptop is excellent, because it allows you to have an efficient way to jot down an idea or note the moment you get an idea, and just slip the phone back in your pocket. No need to carry around a big notebook, and no forgetting great ideas.

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
    4. Re:Problem with All-in-one by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Then get a device that allows you to connect to it instead of having to go thru T-Mobile. I have a T-Mobile T610 and I have a lot of ringtones and crap that I sent to the phone via the IR port. No one paid nothing.

    5. Re:Problem with All-in-one by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I just bought my sidekick (version 1) about ... 3 hours ago. I went into the "Catalog" program and downloaded the 10 dollar SSH client. Woot! 48 characters wide. Haven't figured out how to toggle around in screen yet. Anyways, as a (barely) netadmin, this is like, the coolest thing in the world. I can telnet into the ciscos from the movie theater or while I'm out at a nice italian place with a beautiful gal. Yep. My life just got so much better. Yeeeeeeeep. uh huh. (facetious aside, the program is very usable, with a 3 second latency)

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    6. Re:Problem with All-in-one by Jikel_Morten · · Score: 1

      I disagree as well. I've owned my Colour SK for about a year and a half now and love it. The browser is great, imho. Email is slick...the worst thing on the device is the phone by most accounts, although I don't mind it that much. The ui is one of the best I've seen on any device. One major annoyance, however, is latency.

    7. Re:Problem with All-in-one by dmanny · · Score: 1

      Meta-modded your comment. Your sig made me laugh. Thanks.

      --
      All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
  4. What other phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm aiming for a device like the Motorola MPx. Wireless, BT, excellent form factor but will be better when they can reduce the size a tad more.

  5. advertorial alert by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting



    The submitter of this story, r-blo, has never posted any messages, but has submitted two stories-- both of which were accepted. My guess is that the sidekick PR dept. bought this story placement from Slashdot and this account has been created for the supposed submission of the placed advertorial...

    The other story r-blo submitted was probably paid for by Tivo's pr department.

    1. Re:advertorial alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12th post! yippeeeeee

    2. Re:advertorial alert by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd say it's far more likely to be an engadget shill.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    3. Re:advertorial alert by victor_the_cleaner · · Score: 1

      that or r-blo is extremely lucky, perhaps he/she could pick some lottery numbers for me?

    4. Re:advertorial alert by slashrogue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or maybe the guy just doesn't have much to say? Engadget seems to be a pretty good source of news and slashdot's linked to more than just 2 of their articles.

    5. Re:advertorial alert by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The other story r-blo submitted was probably paid for by Tivo's pr department."

      So?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:advertorial alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what are you doing here, you shit? Stop being so PIA and get a girlfriend or boyfriend.

      I hate you. You are the lowest human being on earth.

    7. Re:advertorial alert by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      You must be pretty thin skinned. "He typed some stuff on slashdot and aaaaargggghhh I hate him!!!"

      Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:advertorial alert by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

      Good conspiracy theory. But what does r-blo stand for? Hmmmm...could be: Read (our story) - Believe (in our product), Love (our product), Order (our product).

    9. Re:advertorial alert by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps, r-blo has several nicknames and only submits stories with one so his submission won't be judged on the content of his messages. Or maybe he doesn't like posting messages but has been reading slashdot for years. Or maybe he has been on Slashdot for a short time and has a propensity for submitting newsworthy stories.
      Although we shouldn't rule out your point, if we start judging the value of a user on how much time he/she has spent on slashdot, then this community will be driven by the "grandfathers" (valuable members of the community) and we will never get different points of view from other less active members (valuable members of the community).

      --

      can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
  6. Marketing by ARRRLovin · · Score: 0

    They've done a great job at marketing this new product. I guess they held a party and had a few dozen celebs pose for photos with the device. Everyone from Jesse James (Monster Garage) to Tony Hawk swears by their Sidekick. Which says a lot because they can pretty much afford anything. I had the first version with the drab gray screen and found it was an awesome PDA/Internet device, but really lacked in the cell phone department. I'll be eyeballing one of the SK2's in the coming months.

    --
    -Randy
  7. What they needed to ask him about by techsoldaten · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What they needed to ask him about is the durability of the Sidekick 2. I have issues with how well it is constructed, and I am not the only person who feels this way.

    I bought a Sidekick back in April and have been vigilant about it's upkeep. Never dropped it, never sat anything down on it. One day, the action wheel just stops working - literally, I am sending an email and it just doesn't work anymore.

    One of the things mentioned in this article is that the Sidekick crowd tends to be 30-ish, which means people are going to have active lifestyles where things can happen to a phone. What is the sense of investing in such a snazzy device if it is not going to keep up with you?

    M

    1. Re:What they needed to ask him about by Saxton · · Score: 2, Informative

      To answer your concern, Danger has decided to switch who's building their hardware and they've chosen Sharp.

      Here's a Press Release about it.

      -Aaron

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    2. Re:What they needed to ask him about by JanusFury · · Score: 1

      I remember them switching manufacturers before, but it's good to hear that they've found a reputable company to manufacture their phones. If Sharp can't manufacture a solid cell-phone, I can't think of many other companies that could.

      Good to see that you're still around, by the way. I remember you from the Hiptop boards. The hiptop Community was always one of the best parts of owning a Hiptop, and it's good to see that it's still going strong.

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
    3. Re:What they needed to ask him about by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.. I'm on my 6th CSK, and its broken too... The back button is barely working. I'm holding out until the SK2 comes out hoping that when I RMA it TMobile will give in and ship me the SK2 instead of the CSK (although its not very likely because I won't be signing another 1 year contract to do so.)

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    4. Re:What they needed to ask him about by russellh · · Score: 1

      Mine has held up very well, except for reception which seems to have steadily degraded since Dec 2002 when I got it. It is covered in scratches, the corners are polished smooth, I drop it all the time. All I want to know about SK2 is if reception is better, as it has always stunk. My wife has a sprint treo 600 and gets reception everywhere, while I can't get any in our house, at the grocery store, etc. etc. but I'm waiting for either sk2 or the treo 650.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    5. Re:What they needed to ask him about by nesthigh · · Score: 1

      Sprint and T-Mobile each use a different underlying technology. Sprint's is CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access), while T-Mo's is TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access). Guess which one needs towers placed more closely to the user.

      The T (time) part of TDMA means that as you get far enough away from the tower your roundtrip times will exceed the time interval the tower expects to find your signal.
      next

    6. Re:What they needed to ask him about by darkfrog · · Score: 1

      I have had horrible luck/time with sidekick dependability. I am also on my 6th!! Sidekick. Most everyone that I know that has one is AT LEAST on their 4th!
      First one... lasted the longest about 2 months... Backlight on the screen stopped working properly(every time I opened it, it would turn off)
      Second one... Broke the day after I bought it(the scroll wheel button stopped responding).
      Third one... Scroll wheel again.
      Fourth one... The screen started inverting when I had it open, while inverted key entry wasn't being recieved.
      Fith one... Plastic casing on the screen broke the day after I received it (just from opening it!!!).
      Sixth one... NO PROBLEMS!!! So far....

      Be carefully shoddy craftmanship can make the BEST products worth shit. I personally still think SUPER highly of the software involved, but whats it worth if the hardware doesn't work!

      P.S. - I've only had this phone 8 months too.

      --
      --DarkFrog
      If the dead rise again, we're going to have some serious population control issues.
  8. THIS IS NOT A SLASHDOT INTERVIEW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ask questions here; they won't get answered.

  9. The perfect all-in-one would be modular. by rubberbando · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They should make a system of components that each have a function (MP3 player, Cell Phone, etc). These could stand alone on their own that can be assembled together "Voltron Style" to combine their abilities, processing power, memory, etc to form an all-in-one super device.

    This could different options for components/functionality and perhaps leave plenty of room for upgradability.

    Just a thought.. :-)

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    1. Re:The perfect all-in-one would be modular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modularity works against small devices. First off it increases the size of the device because of the extra packaging and connectors needed to modularize the parts. Second, it increases the price of the device, for both those who want the extra features and those who don't. Third, it decreases the utility of the device compared to one designed for a specific set of features. All in all, by trying to please all the market segments simultaneously, it ends up being the worst option for each.

      For example, look at the Handspring Visor, which attempted this approach. It was a fine PDA (I still use it), but the expansion slot made it fatter than necisarry for those that didn't use it, and much taller than needed to be when modules were added. Using it with the phone module was very clunky compared to other phone/PDAs on the market. Same for the GPS option. The base device was less expensive than the Palm Pilot at the time, but that was due to other factors, and IIRC, the phone and cell modules by themselves were as expensive as an entire integrated device.

      I know where you are comming from, but modularity is a really bad compromise when it comes to handhelds. A better compromise is to simply offer different models with different features, instead of expecting everyone to want the super-duper-has-everything-but-the-kitchen-sink model.

      -jackson

    2. Re:The perfect all-in-one would be modular. by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      I had something more aesthetically pleasing in mind than a PDA with an expansion slot. As I mentioned before, each piece would be able to function on its own. I would design each piece to be flat like a small calculator. They would be stacked like a deck of cards to connect to each other in any configuration the user sees fit. They would also auto-detect each other, network together and share resources.

      Unlike the HandSpring Visor, you wouldn't have to juggle around modules, being able to use only one at a time. You could use any or all of them at once and as I mentioned before, each could stand alone, unlike the Visor which needed a core unit.

      Anyways, thats my design idea. Maybe I should patent it or something. :-P

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  10. Segway hook?! by Eric+Lai · · Score: 1

    Of even greater interest is the Segway Hook that is featured on the main engadget page.

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/6213312554476399/

    Wow. Just...wow.

    1. Re:Segway hook?! by Eric+Lai · · Score: 1

      One would think I'd know how to format a URL by now:

      http://www.engadget.com/entry/6213312554476399/

  11. Licks lips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Sidekick crowd tends to be 30-ish, which means people are going to have active lifestyles where things can happen to a phone.

    You've peaked my curiousity! Tell me more about these ominous-sounding "things that can happen to a phone" - they're not anything like "things that can happen to a hamster", are they?

  12. Before you think about buying this... by LnxAddct · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Read this, the beginning tells you how cool the device it, but the ending is rather startling Here.
    Regards,
    Steve

  13. I'd like to be a fan of Danger, but... by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Informative

    A while back when the first Sidekick came out, I bought one. Signed up for the one year contract with the $40/mo plan, with T-Mobile. Got the whole little kit - phone, camera, headset, etc. All was well. For a while.

    You see, the manufacturers that Danger contracted to build the first sidekick sucked. They sucked bad. My first Sidekick's keyboard began to bail on me within months: a few keys became almost impossible to press and the E key stopped working entirely. Then the scroll wheel and Back button (yes, the BACK button) started to go out. So, I called up on the phone and spent a few days negotiating with T-Mobile's people to get a replacement. They were originally going to charge me $70 (gee, what a cheap price to replace a faulty product), but I convinced them to give me the replacement for free, since I wasn't the only person having problems.

    So, anyway, fast forward a few weeks. I've got my replacement sidekick (by a new manufacturer), and all is well.

    Not. The new one has dust inside the screen casing, and the Menu button has absolutely no resistance so it's possible to press it just by breathing on it.

    I don't have any experience with the Color sidekick or the Sidekick 2, obviously, so I hope that the manufacturing problems have been solved. But manufacturing problems were just the beginning for me...

    See, one of the major reasons I decided to get a Sidekick was for the devkit. I wanted to be able to write little apps to use on the phone, so I could carry some notes and info around with me. I also wanted to be able to keep my address book on the phone in sync with the one on my desktop. That's not too much to ask, right? You can do that with most J2ME phones nowadays.

    Well, apparently it is too much to ask. Practically from the day the original Sidekick was released, Danger promised that there would be sync software so you could keep your phone's data in sync with your desktop. From the day I got my phone to the day I cancelled the service on my second one, Danger never released any sync software, and the only way to get your data off your phone was to use their flimsy, slow, buggy web interface, and manually copy-and-paste information from the textboxes on the webpage - one address book entry at a time.

    And the devkit, of course. I signed the NDA, etc. Installed the dev tools, read the docs, messed around. Even wrote a small program just to get the hang of things.

    Then I discovered that the API was horrible. Vague/incorrect documentation, slow performance, and an obscene lack of basic features. It was well below the standard set by J2ME 1.0 (and that's saying a lot, considering that J2ME 1.0 is one of the worst APIs I've ever had the misfortune of using). The dev tools were flimsy as well. For example, the Hiptop and its development tools would crash when fed PNGs that didn't match its exact format specifications. Apparently Danger has never heard of libpng, because you had to make sure to feed every PNG file you created through pngcrush with a specific set of options before Danger's software would even touch it.
    Resources were also a pain. In J2ME, your app's resources are stored in a JAR file (basically a ZIP plus a manifest). You can store files of any type you wish in there, and easily load them up at runtime and read them. Not so with the Hiptop. All data, whether it be a string, an image, or an arbitrary block of bytes, had to have a unique integer identifier, and be compiled into a proprietary resource format by their horrible resource editor. Once it was compiled, you had to copy those identifier constants into your application somewhere, and use a switch statement or something to load up that data at runtime. Not only did this make hiptop development a pain, but it meant that it was extremely difficult to port J2ME applications to the Hiptop or develop an application for both platforms at once.

    And of course, once you had your application written, the fun truly began. First you had to download a buggy, unsupported USB driver for

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:I'd like to be a fan of Danger, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Errr.. I could only surmize you are a troll, or you just didn't really spend much time with the platform, because I couldn't disagree more.

      First let's get rid of the plain old wrong assertions you make:

      1) You can't save apps you made to the phone. Duh, type % loader save. Boom, things are saved over reboots. Been that way forever, guess you didn't dig very deep.

      2) Resources. Oh what a crybaby, admitedly the drc system they use isn't the most streamline in the world, but if you can't handle defining a variable in one place and referencing it in another you shouldn't be programming. You also realize the entire point of their system is to allow for internationalization right from the front instead of as an afterthought?

      3) Syncing. If you really were a developer, you would have seen that Danger offerend syncing to developers over a year ago and it works like a charm. Unfortunately t-mobile didn't allow it on their main servers for whatever reason, but word is that will change for SKII.

      3) API. Their API rules. Yes, they only support certain PNG formats, that's hardly a big deal to work around. What you get in return is a really easy to use and awesome looking API for a phone with always on internet. Writing apps for this thing is a joy, it's amazing what kind of stuff you can crank out with very little code.

      I've developed a Jabber client, a FICS chess client, and a scraping application like AvantGo on it and I've found it really powerful and extremely easy to develop on.

      What I will agree on is that the build quality for the SK and CSK was below par. Rumors are the new device solves these problems.

      But your rant is off base on most of those points.

  14. CONSUME by smaksly · · Score: 0, Troll

    Consume destroy pale hiptop flesh eater esctasy valid and exciting need power growing weaker sidekick pain of death overmaster obeys the growth nationwide parrallax energy waning slithers slowly to the 18-34 year old pod feeder tenticles writhing paris hilton fragile spores marketing strategy HARDER FASTER DEREK JETER BETTER COVER SHEETS ON THE TPS REPORTS thank you

  15. you might be right by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Informative



    I looked a bit closer at r-blo's other submission that was accepted. It's the MS-vs-TIVO article on Engadget. The curious thing is that it's written by a Thomas Hawk. That name sounded familiar to me.... So I looked at his user record on Slashdot.

    Turns out Thomas Hawk submitted two stories last Thursday. Both accepted. One is a review of the Windows Media Player and the other is the article that originally got me suspicious about Advertorial Content on Slashdot. It's the Mark Cuban fluff piece that looks like paid placement to boost Cuban's image as a tech guru. Thomas Hawk writes in his introduction to that slashdot posting--

    Mark Cuban, owner of the Mavericks, HDNET, blogger extraordinaire and all around tech visionary really, really gets it.

    And when I wrote this post questioning Mark Cuban's predictions, it was modded down as 'flamebait'... oh, well. I guess slashdot has to pay the bills somehow.

    1. Re:you might be right by r-blo · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Looks like you didn't research hard enough, nor did you add 2 and 2, SethJohnson and Tyler Eaves.

      So I'll do the math for you.
      1. Both articles are Engadget pieces.

      2. Both articles have nothing to do with each other, and share no common threads or companies.

      3. The Senior Editor for Engadget is Ryan Block. (You may need to take a moment to think about that part.)

      That said, perhaps you should take note of what Engadget is: a subscription free news source. Emphasis on the word free (beer). I don't really know how one can shill something that costs nothing, but thanks for the complete lack of confidence and community-building. Without readership, Engadget (and /., and every other site you really like that has ads) would cease to exist, remember?

      Get it now? Good. Now I suggest you get off your high horse before you get any more dangerously paranoid. And feel free to never read Engadget or any r-blo submitted pieces again.
  16. Cracked or boycotted by slashdot ? by lfourrier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all we don't like : no tweaking, no property of the hard, pay per use...

    Can customers upload their own ringtones?

    No. There’s an effort by the industry to make people pay for the content on these devices. ...

    Even though we’re 1 percent of T-Mobile’s installed base right now, we generate 10 percent of their data revenue. ...

    What about allowing developers to create user-installable applications for the Sidekick?

    Not user-installable. We’re a gatekeeper in that sense. they use our developer kit, they reach an agreement with us, and then through us they can have access to our user base.

    1. Re:Cracked or boycotted by slashdot ? by smclean · · Score: 1
      This is one of the reasons I haven't thought of buying a cellphone yet. It is still an industry with very little consumer empowerment. It's just a microcosm of the PC revolution. All the tech companies figured they could start over with the proprietary bullshit again on a different architecture with the excuse that "It's smaller" satiating the average Joe-dont-know-shit consumer.

      Eventually, that will change, just like it always does with things like this. The first product to break out of the proprietary lock-in mindset wins. Just like VHS, just like PC clones. One company can't fulfill all the potential uses of what is basically a portable computer which happens to have access to a wireless data service otherwise known as cellular phone service, just like Microsoft knew they couldn't, just like Apple knew they couldn't.

      Just history repeating itself.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    2. Re:Cracked or boycotted by slashdot ? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Worst part of this is, it'd be pathetically easy to program for this thing; it runs Java apps... from what he says in this interview, they intend to be a software/OS company and make money through licensing with developers and such?? I guess that's the reason for the 'gatekeeper' role?

      And how exactly are their developers supposed to make money?

      Why would I want to write a program for the Sidekick, exactly, given that Danger could cut off my access to it, or decide to not give me access at all?

      I'd love to know the answers to those questions... if there was a way to make money in the space, I'm sure there are some apps I could throw together for this thing, especially if the best non-obvious example app he can think of is the "World Clock"!!

      Then there's that 'new' lucrative Java Games area... which I guess is lucrative if you can get someone to buy your startup ;-)

  17. Fuck, I'm behind the times.. by b3h · · Score: 1

    I just upgraded my old-ass Nokia phone to a Sony Ericsson and I was wowed at how many functions it had. Three days later and it get put to shameIby what I think this is a hint of the future in handheld/telephone/PDA technological evolution. Of course (gotta say it), I wish it was a little more open. The Sidekicks look a little feature-locked which I always hate to see. Gotta hate the feeling you get when you can't use your new toy the way YOU want it to.

    1. Re:Fuck, I'm behind the times.. by b3h · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, the typos were a test of the amazing science of word recognition. ;)

  18. what a sidestep! by inmate · · Score: 1
    Q: Can customers upload their own ringtones?
    A: No. There's an effort by the industry to make people pay for the content on these devices.

    It's not us! It's the "INDUSTRY"!
    We would *love* for our customers to upload their own ringtones...but the "INDUSTRY" won't let us!

    What bullshit!

    --
    --- blackironprison, where ignorance is bliss....
    1. Re:what a sidestep! by Saxton · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not us! It's the "INDUSTRY"!

      We would *love* for our customers to upload their own ringtones...but the "INDUSTRY" won't let us!

      What bullshit!


      It's not bullshit. Danger's hiptop in some markets allow for the creation and importing of your own ringtones. T-Mobile wanted this feature removed from the OS so they could charge people for ringtones. I agree, that it's "bullshit" in that sense, but don't blame Danger for it. This is T-Mobile milking the cow. What he means by "industry" is the phone service provider industry, not the phone manufacturer industry.

      -Aaron

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
  19. Still a drug dealer sales model... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The bottom line is still "lock the customer in and bleed them for everything you can get".

    Can customers upload their own ringtones?

    No. There's an effort by the industry to make people pay for the content on these devices.


    And people wonder why I just want a dumb cell phone and a separate handheld for *my* stuff that I can control.

    1. Re:Still a drug dealer sales model... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine, but why would you want ringtones on your non-cell phone handheld?

  20. Terminal Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didja know they have an SSH client called Terminal Monkey? That and only that feature is the reason I'm considering one. I'd appreciate any input from people about other portable gsm/gprs devices that would allow me to ssh home while on the move.

    1. Re:Terminal Monkey by chris234 · · Score: 1

      The Treo 600 has some PalmOS ssh clients available for it, and I recall there are some PocketPC ssh clients that I assume, but can't verify, would run on the Pocket PC phones.

    2. Re:Terminal Monkey by w0ss · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't need to access a cisco router the ssh client is ok. The ssh client does not implement des just blowfish thats why it can't connect to a cisco.

  21. well look at.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look at http://www.cnchq.de to get more informations about this!

  22. Preach on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    But a lot of things have changed. The API still sucks, but J2ME is supposedly one of the things we'll be seeing in the new OS load. Sync is also implemented in the new environment (and it's about damned time!). You didn't need to flash the DevOS on your phone after the last Over-the-Air update; now you just get a IMEI-based key that puts your phone in developer mode. You can access the regular data environment while using custom apps now, so the data you spent so much time entering is still accessible. (You could always permanently burn an app to the phone through the CLI, by the way.)

    I'm about 75% satisfied with the device. When it works, it's a fantastic device, period. But its horrid development environment, severe physical flaws (I'm on replacement device #3) and connection with the absolutely miserable T-Mobile service (a ringing argument against government monopolies if ever I saw one) means that I'm far from satisfied with it. There will have to be significant and major improvements and additions to the device for me to purchase the Rev II.

  23. Derek and Paris? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Know that new T-Mobile Sidekick II that Paris Hilton and Derek Jeter have been totin' around town?

    No, I don't. Paris Hilton is a basketcase attention whore who redefines the term "spoiled rich brat", and Derek Jeter is an asshole on and off the field; he beat the shit out of a Special Ed teacher moonlighting as a Fenway groundskeeper, and had some rather unsympathetic things to say about the Devil Rays when they chose to stay in Florida until their families were out of the path of the hurricane.

    Furthermore, I'm not stupid enough to fall for celebrity endorsements, because I actually have a brain. This is also why I want a cell phone that doesn't have a camera. Just bluetooth, good signal, good address book, quality construction, and a simple, easy to use interface.

    Before you mod me off-topic or flamebait, consider that the article was one giant piece of astroturf- as another poster noted, the story submitter has never made a single comment on slashdot.

    1. Re:Derek and Paris? by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

      Derek Jeter is an asshole on and off the field; he beat the shit out of a Special Ed teacher moonlighting as a Fenway groundskeeper ...

      Well, I don't know if he's an asshole, but I do know that Jeter wasn't anywhere near the brawl in the bullpen.

      'jfb

      --
      To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
    2. Re:Derek and Paris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI-Jeff Nelson and Karim Garcia were the two Yankees who beat up the groundskeeper, not Jeter.

      Jeter sucks, and is a miserable human being due to the team he plays for, but let's be fair here. He may beat up Special Ed kids in his spare time, but his filthy Yankee man-pleasers are clean on this one.

    3. Re:Derek and Paris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems kind of silly to be against celebrity endorsements because 'you actually have a brain', but believe in the inherent evilness of a few celebrities because of some news anecdotes you catch on tv or the internet.

      You reach a conclusion on the heavily biast entertainment and sports media? That's pretty fucking stupid.

    4. Re:Derek and Paris? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, spot on with regards to Paris, but Derek Jeter was NOT involved in last years beating of the Fenway groundskeeper during Game 3 of the ALCS. That was Karim Garcia and Jeff Nelson, neither of whom are on the Yankees anymore.

      I'm no Yankees fan, not in the slightest, but to hear someone slander Derek Jeter just ain't right. The guy has heart. On and off the field.

      This is from a born and raised Red Sox fan.

  24. Sidekick is still kicking? by wardk · · Score: 1

    shit, I though Borland dumped this DOS relic. good to see useful old applications being dusted off. wonder if they'll open source it?

    I bet Philippe Kahn is behind this

  25. that's that new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...triple throw down 4 cams turbo DVD like plastic disk "ultra rich" holographic media read/write/yodel format thingamabob we were just talking about the other day. All the industry is going to it doncha know... I mean, I know I read about it here.....

  26. Re:Terminal Monkey - Where does encryption begin? by tburt11 · · Score: 1
    I tried the sidekick I a couple of months ago, until it quit working after 10 days. I purchased the $10 SSH client, and it worked good...

    My question is, where is the encrytion done?
    Does the SideKick encrypt?
    Or does it communicate with a server that does the encryption?

    Terribly misleading if it is the latter! How would we know?

  27. Ringing in the decline of civilization by SilentScream · · Score: 1

    You can download about 300 different ringtones for $1.99 or less. It's painless, you don't have to whip out your credit card. With a one-click buy it bills your T-Mobile account. Can customers upload their own ringtones? No. There's an effort by the industry to make people pay for the content on these devices.

    Am I the only one who gets depressed thinking about all the money currently being spent on ring tones in the world? For crying out loud, $1.99 is what we should be paying for a top 40 CD, not a %$^%$#@! ring tone. Talk about a stupidity tax.

    1. Re:Ringing in the decline of civilization by thryllkill · · Score: 1
      For crying out loud, $1.99 is what we should be paying for a top 40 CD

      That's funny. I wouldn't even pay that much for a top 40 CD.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

  28. OK by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    GOTCHA!

  29. Boycott this thing! by eric777 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not that I really expect any of you to go along, but I know I won't be buying one of these things.

    Why?

    Because that 'celebrity party' he talks about in the article took place at the Grove in Los Angeles, right next to my apartment building. This 'party' consisted of earth-shaking 'music' that kept my one- and two-year old children up till after 1:00 in the morning on a week night, listening to an amplified rapper yelling Mother-F**er again and again. This was audible a full city block away, with all of the windows closed up tight. I'm telling you, my building was shaking. I'm just lucky the kids didn't learn that word - it was repeated hundreds of times.

    The police were called multiple times, by me and other neighbors, and eventually shut them down.

    These kinds of irresponsible corporate citizens don't deserve our support.

    OK, I'm done with my rant.

    1. Re:Boycott this thing! by galtish · · Score: 1

      ...listening to an amplified rapper yelling Mother-F**er again and again.

      It sounds like they managed to translate the essence of the Hiptop.com Forums into a real life experience...

  30. SonyEricsson P800/900 does it better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with the (reportedly) crappy Sidekick? The SonyEricsson P800, P900 (very nice device), and now the new P910 (with redundant thumb-board imho) do everything the Sidekick claims to do, isn't vendor specific, lets anyone write apps (C++, freely available SDK, or J2ME), and absolutly rocks.

    And if pda like phones arn't for you, try the nearly equally awesome Nokia 6600, which has the same underlying OS as the P800/900 (Symbian) but with a different interface.

    Sounds like the SideKick is an also-ran really.

  31. no. no, i don't. by flacco · · Score: 1
    "Know that new T-Mobile Sidekick II that Paris Hilton and Derek Jeter have been totin' around town? Yeah, that one."

    no, i don't. and why should i care what those douchebags are "totin' around town"?

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  32. Read the above article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been a T-Mobile customer, and before that a Voicestream customer, and before that an Omnipoint customer. I'm considering dropping them because of that article.

  33. I stopped reading... by bhsx · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading when I read the word "synergistic," like I always do.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  34. Re:Terminal Monkey - Where does encryption begin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The encryption for Terminal Monkey is end to end, hiptop to host. "How would we know" is by reading the source code, which is available in the SDK examples under a BSD license.

  35. be straight with the community you're building by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful



    Hey Ryan, the story here isn't my paranoia, it's your lack of full disclosure. For starters, you're hyping up your website with posts using a pseudonym that you do not use on said website. The slashdot community typically frowns on such disingenuous self-promotions. Had you instead been open and said, "Hey slashdotters, here's an article I wrote on my website about XYZ" then it certainly wouldn't have come across as some sort of deception.

    ...what Engadget is: a subscription free news source.

    Is your site really a news source or a distributor of press releases? I know that sounds like a flame, but I don't mean it that way. I think your site is probably a lot of fun to produce. At the same time, when a site's content is so product-heavy, I get suspicious about the possibility of paid placement, etc. Especially when you gush about a product like this-- "Know that new T-Mobile Sidekick II that Paris Hilton and Derek Jeter have been totin' around town?" The only reason Paris Hilton would have any tech gadget is if she's paid to endorse it. By commenting on Paris Hilton owning a Sidekick II, you've taken on the role of a mouthpiece for the Danger PR department. Does your community really care what consumer products Paris Hilton owns? Actually, it would have been a hundred times more interesting had your contacts at Danger's PR department arranged for you to interview Paris about what she does with her Sidekick rather than the CEO.

    If you want to call Engadget a news source, you need to brush up on your journalism ethics. Real journalists don't accept gifts or freebies of any kind from people / companies they might write about. For example, Roger Ebert pays to see the movies he reviews. Quality journalists don't present advertisements as news. Does Engadget qualify?

    Please check the Society of Professional Journalist's website on the issue:

    Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.

    Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.

    Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid bidding for news.

    1. Re:be straight with the community you're building by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

      Pff submitting story from his own blog without a little disclaimer (even without the disclaimer word) but at least a clear link on who you are - well that is lame.

      Thank you for pointing it out.

      --
      Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  36. The interview was Not Haf Bad... by mikeage · · Score: 1

    *groan*

    (+1 Insulting someones time)
    (-5 Poor job of the above)

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  37. Re:6 gmail invites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks a lot! :-)

  38. 10 questions to use email ? by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

    from the ITW :
    You answer less than 10 questions to set up your email account

    ok let's guess :
    1. incoming server
    2. login
    3. pass
    (At this point, it should work)
    4. email
    (Now there's no reason not to send email)
    5. name
    6. delay between checks/alerts
    7. dowload body ?
    8. security protocol

    I can't get to 10 or even 9. Ideas ?

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  39. Why are you an anonymous coward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an astroturfer?

  40. umm shouldn't cingular also have the sidekick 2? by Mika24 · · Score: 1

    "Why is T-Mobile the only wireless provider that carries the Sidekick? T-Mobile uses the network built by Cingular Wireless, which is in the process of merging with AT&T Wireless, and they provide nationwide coverage, and we also have agreements with some regional players. And we continue to go after the other large GSM carriers here in the U.S. Clearly, we would like to have broader distribution, but we also have a strong presence in Canada and pipeline of potential carriers in Europe."

    --
    http://www.npcgaming.com Dedicated Gaming Servers