Slashdot Mirror


20,000 Zombie PCs -- $3000

Saint Aardvark writes "From F-Secure blog comes these links to two USA Today articles on spamming. The first gives an example of how a grandmother ended up becoming a security expert after Comcast cut her connection for spamming. The second quotes spammers advertising networks of Zombie PCs for sale. The price? $3000 for 20,000 machines."

46 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. So, for 3 Grand... by GTRacer · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...Can I get folding@home running on those 20 thousand boxes?

    GTRacer
    - Things to do

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    1. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 5, Funny
      No - but you can spam a lot of people and ask them if they would like to run folding@home.

      Probably a lot of them would, after all look how many people clicked on something to become a zombie in the first place...

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by xmas2003 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I bet I get modd'ed down into oblivion, but rather than send Email to 20,000 people about my folding@home team, would it be OK if I posted it here for 20,000 Slashdotters to consider joining?!? ;-)

      BTW, I'm really surprised that the 20,000 PC's are "only" $3,000 - seems like you could have 'em do clicks on Google Ads or other affliiate type stuff and make a lot more than that ... assuming you don't get caught.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    3. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by Duncan3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      *laughs*

      Um, no, we really wouldn't appreciate you doing that with our software. And it is against our terms of use. http://vsp27.stanford.edu/license.txt

      But back in my d.net days, we estimated that about 1/3 to 1/2 of all installs were zombies or forgotten. The original 5 proxies (hardcoded IP's, including my old dorm IP) probably still get pounded on after all these years.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    4. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by MightyPez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I had no clue that in a time when a majority of middle aged and elderly people using PC's with just enough knowledge to turn them on, an elitist asshole could belittle someone who took time out of their life to learn nuances of security on the internet.

    5. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by Chazmati · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She's probably an expert within her peer group. It's all relative, isn't it? :)

    6. Re:So, for 3 Grand... by abirdman · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But don't you see? It doesn't require a "security expert" to keep a Windows machine clean and virus-free. All it requires is a little software and a clue. People don't purposely install software that will turn their computers into zombies. They do it because they don't understand that opening an email with that "free screensaver" or "hot picture" will infect their machine (and they're right, it shouldn't be that way!). They don't realize that random popups offering Viagra aren't built into the OS and normal, and that they're different from the random popups that Microsoft Update sends. I know and have observed several people (not stupid!) who just routinely close any popup window, don't read any of them, and assume everything is normal.

      If grandma figures that all out, and especially if she tells all her friends, then I have no problem with her calling herself an expert. Don't worry, no prospective employer is going to hire her over someone who knows something, unless maybe she's hired to train end-users in the humdrum tasks of everyday workstation security. Imagine, if you will, a Beowulf Cluster of "grannies-who-get-it" showing everyone they know the nuts and bolts of how not to infect their computers! How to manage Microsoft update, how to d/l, install and run SpyBot S&D, a virus scanner, a spam filter program like POPFile, and maybe even a more secure browser (read, one that doesn't automatically install and run whatever random piece of code it finds on the net). They would do more for overall Internet security than a batallion of security experts preaching arcane router strategies to tired and jaded Network Admins. There would still be occasional viruses, worms, and exploits, but those could be left to the experts. I see no reason to be cynical about this.

      /END OF RANT

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  2. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new security grandmother overlord. All bow to thee.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Rubberpants.net · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Now you listen here young man! The next time I catch you spoofing e-mail headers I'm not bringing you down milk and cookies!" *whack!*

  3. Will this give WETA a run for their money? by jaxdahl · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how the processing power would compare to WETA's supercomputer cluster and their pricing. It would be slower to coummunicate data among the computers and ensure data quality, but I wonder how it compares.

  4. Whose fault? by RollingThunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Heather Hall can trace the start of her online banking nightmare to the day she received what she thought was a legitimate e-mail request from Bank of America asking her to click a link to a bank Web page. The 27-year-old health services worker typed in her login, password and account number. ...
    Bank of America agreed to reimburse the money stolen from Hall's account, but only after she badgered them. "They wanted me to believe it was my fault," says Hall.

    Yes, it's her fault. She did something foolish.

    1. Re:Whose fault? by Renraku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Scams are criminal acts. Thus, the money was removed from the bank due to a criminal act. A bank that loses money to a criminal act that refuses to reimburse its customers might well lose its status as a bank. They took from her, without her permission, money from her bank account. Which is stealing, fraud, etc, etc. Maybe it was her fault it got stolen, but the money was stolen, from the bank.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Whose fault? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Foolish, yes, but from a non-nerd point of view, not so obvious. It looks like it comes from the company. Why not provide their login, password and account number?

      Since I haven't sensed that a widespread educational movement is in place to tell users otherwise (besides the occasional article in the newspaper, and I personally believe that doesn't count), can someone else step up to the plate? It sucks to have to repeat the "who's responsibility is it"? thing ad infinitum.

      So here's a story... I have two Macs hooked up at home. Comcast gives you the cable modem and basically just tells you to plug it in. Not surprisingly, if I were to have an old WinXP system that was stuck on dial-up (I can't download 400 MB service packs or security updates), I would be virus infected. Fortunately, I had OS X with a firewall... except they told me to disable the firewall and virus software since I was having problems. If that works, ordinary user thinks, "Wow, well if I can't use a high-speed internet connection with a firewall/virus software, what's the point"? That seems like a setup for disaster.

      Remember, most users come up with questions like this. I don't think they're at all aware of what can happen, or what the effects of identity theft are, or how much it sucks. All they know is that geeks like us tend to berate them, companies like Comcast give them a mile of rope to hang themselves, and companies like Microsoft push insecure solutions that have enough security holes to cause companies like Comcast to shut off their internet access.

      Come on, we can do better, all around.

    3. Re:Whose fault? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe technically, but that's not how the law works (thankfully).

      Or do you think every time you hand a credit/debit card to a cashier at K-mart, that gives them the right to start charging things to your account?

      Hell, your account number and routing info is on a cheque. So everyone you write a cheque to gets unlimited access to your chequing account?

      Thinking bigger, all I need is your SSN (easily obtained) to steal your identity and take out a few hundred thou in mortages.

      And it's all your fault! You gave it to me when you came to work for me! Hahahaha.

      If BoA allows any unauthorized person to remove money from my account, it is their fault.

      It doesn't matter how they came across my PIN or account number.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Whose fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the problem is far worse than this.

      With the ability to register unicode domain names, you may indeed see www.citibank.com and have no idea that the "a" is from the russian alphabet and therefore points to a different server and IP, even though visually, right down to the pixel, they are identical.

      All browsers should show warnings for any domain containing characters from multiple languages, or not permit them at all. I can think of no legitimate use for them.

    5. Re:Whose fault? by bfields · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If I walk up to you on the street and say "Hey, I'm from Bank of America, I need your bank account information." and then you proceed to give it to me, then it is indeed your fault.

      The closer analogy would be you walking up to me, saying "Hey, the Bank of America is over there", and giving me directions to an address where you have, overnight, erected an identical replica of a bank of america branch. (OK, perhaps the font on the logo is just slightly wrong if I think to look really closely.)

      In retrospect, I shouldn't have trusted directions from a random stranger, but by the time I'm standing there with the bank branch in front of me and the original referral already forgotten, it may not really cross my mind to doubt its legitimacy.

      The real idiocy here is all the banks setting up "secure" websites where you authenticate by sending them one secret (or maybe one of a few secrets), with the result that all it takes is for that secret to be compromised once, and your identity is compromised forever.

      Perhaps this will finally them that they need something better. (Surely some kind of USB dongle/smartcard-like thingy would be cheap enough now?)

      --Bruce Fields

    6. Re:Whose fault? by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Similar scams have been played in real life with fake ATMs...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:Whose fault? by jpkunst · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do you have any links to examples or javascript that can actually do this?

      Firefox spoof demonstration. No padlock spoof, though, I believe.

      JP

  5. From the article by Rubberpants.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    "When I pay my water bill, I expect my water to be drinkable out of the tap. Today, when you pay your Internet bill, the data you get is not consumable."

    Not without some kind of sauce or dressing. Plain 1's and 0's taste like cardboard.

  6. Security Expert? by rvw14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Zombie victim Carty took matters into her own hands: She did research on how to clean up and protect her PC and diligently updates programs that scan her computer for various types of malicious code. Her PC now runs clean. "I had no clue at Christmas that I would become a security expert," she says.

    It is quite sad that a person who just updates their computer and runs a virus scanner is now considered a "security expert."

    1. Re:Security Expert? by bokmann · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's funny, because Grandma laughs at people who buy frozen pizza and pre-fab cookie dough who think they are 'cooking'.

  7. Re:No wonder... by bludstone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy crap. That makes me a secuirty expert! Time to update the resume!

    --

    no .sig
  8. Voodoo Legend by MikeMacK · · Score: 5, Funny
    And, much like zombies of voodoo legend, they mindlessly do the bidding of their masters and help commit crimes online.

    I didn't realize the zombies of voodoo legend were online.

  9. Odd. by nathan+s · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have to say, I don't understand how people get into so much trouble.

    Maybe I've been lucky, but I've ran a Windows XP system for about a year now (and a Windows 98SE system for about 2 years prior under the same conditions), doing the occasional patches from Windows Update, without a virus scanner or firewall. If I do something stupid that makes me suspect that I've contracted something, I'll drop over to http://housecall.antivirus.com/ and do a quick scan. This generally only happens when I'm trying to find a crack for something on a P2P network and the bastards have embedded a keystroke logger or some other little nasty in a trojan crack package.

    Otherwise, I do an occasional glance-over at the list of processes running, and if my modem is lighting up like a Christmas tree I might fire up Sygate Personal Firewall or something just to see what's happening with the traffic, but I've never seen it give me real cause for concern. I still get some port traffic for the old Code Red worms and what not, but nothing that seems to have been really problematic.

    As I said, maybe I'm just lucky. Then again, maybe I don't use Internet Explorer or Outlook Express, and maybe that helps a lot. Who knows.:-)

  10. The price? $3000 for 20,000 machines... by Onimaru · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the ability to DoS SCO for the rest of the century...priceless.

    There are some things money can't buy. For the rest, there's my Zombie Army of Evil.

    --
    adam b.
  11. Funny by suwain_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's funny you should mention computer problems.

    Whenever I view this it.slashdot.org site, everything on my screen is all washed-out.

    Is this a symptom of being a zombie PC?

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  12. Re:No wonder... by jazman_777 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So that's all it takes to be a security expert these days?

    A one-eyed man in the land of the blind is King.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  13. Pay the $3k and clean house by jamezilla · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This sounds like a good deal for the authorities. For 3 grand you get:
    1. a list of machines that need to be cleaned up
    2. a bank account or other information that can be used to track down the spammers/crackers
    I guarantee $3k is cheaper than what it would actually cost tax payers if the authorities did their job with normal investigative work.
    1. Re:Pay the $3k and clean house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In an economics class I took, we were presented with a case where a bunch of missionaries got together for a project where they would collect alot of money, then go to a third world nation and buy some underage prostitutes, then bring them to the states to give them help, treatment, and a caring foster home to be raised up in.

      It all sounds good on paper until you look at the fact that the people that kidnapped the kids got paid, so they have incentive to repeat the process. The argument was that the better (albeit longer and harder) fight was to make child prostitution not profitable or try to arrest or contain the kidnappers somehow.

      Somehow I think the the spammers would figure out a way to get their money, cover their tracks, and sneak away. I don't think they really care what happens to the 20k zombies. They got their money, weather the zombieNet was used to clean house or actually send spam.

  14. Re:Article attaches no blame to Microsoft by NatasRevol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Money? Lots and lots of money?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  15. ISPs could do *so* much here. by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just start monitoring for bursts of spam from their clients, and simply *pick up the phone* and *call them.* "Sir, we've detected mass spam coming from your connection. Please clean up your computer. You have one week."

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  16. Re:Article attaches no blame to Microsoft by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And one wonders why users do not recieve some of they blame they rightly deserve, either.

    First lady in the story - obviously had zero protection beforehand, and it took a major problem w/her connection being disconnected before she got some. If nothing else, at least it sounds like she has the concept of basic security down a little better now.

    Second lady mentioned - a single call to her bank for verification would have likely saved her any trouble. I have gotten several "phishing" mails myself, and they are incredibly easy to recognize - often from a bank I have no accounts with or that never sends mail otherwise, they contain grammatical/spelling errors that would never appear in a real mail, and ask for information that the real bank would have absolutely no reason to need verified.

    Third lady mentioned - more Microsoft's fault than the others, due to the security holes. Still, it sounds like she either didn't patch things, opened a nasty attachment, or otherwise brought the software on through her own action. Hard to tell since they don't mention anything by name.

    So yes, Microsoft is evil. But don't fool yourself into thinking that users aren't contributing their share of problems either.

  17. So where are the cops? by Jaywalk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Breaking into someone else's computer without permission is illegal. A zombie network of 20,000 PCs means that someone has compromised 20,000 computers and, apparently, advertising that fact for personal gain. How hard would it be for a cop to shell out the $2000, then arrest spammer? Of course anyone who has read Sterling's The Hacker Crackdown realizes just how clueless law enforcement can be with technical issues, but this one looks like a no brainer:
    • The perpetrator (a spammer) is almost universally hated.
    • Spammers do real damage.
    • They are doing this damage for a pure profit motive.
    • They are operating out in the open, making for an easy arrest.
    So why are these bozos still in business?
    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:So where are the cops? by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Breaking into someone else's computer without permission is illegal. A zombie network of 20,000 PCs means that someone has compromised 20,000 computers and, apparently, advertising that fact for personal gain. How hard would it be for a cop to shell out the $2000, then arrest spammer? Of course anyone who has read Sterling's The Hacker Crackdown realizes just how clueless law enforcement can be with technical issues, but this one looks like a no brainer:

      How embarrassing would it be for the police to discover their own machines in the zombie network ...

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  18. Not so much actually by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    We get Linux boxes in labs we don't manage hacked all the time. They usually aren't used for SPAM, they are instead used for warez, eggdrops or shells, but they get hacked all the same. Reason is the same too: someone fails to patch their system, and it gets exploited.

    Linux needs patching as well because OSS is not immune to security holes. SSH, BIND and even PNG are three off the top of my head that have had security problems in the past. If you run a Linux box that has an SSH server, and you don't patch it when an SSH venurability comes out, someone WILL hack it.

  19. Re:Rhetorical question: by pyros · · Score: 4, Informative
    You might think that Linux and Macs are more secure by default, but these are users who will open email with attachments, open the zip attachment, type in the password to open the executable in the zip attachment, run the executable. More warnings and barriers won't help.

    But unless they're running with root privileges (which most distributions don't do by default) you can't overwrite system binaries or executables, or run daemons on priviledged ports (like open smtp relays on port 25), etc. I know that the attacker could do things like use nonstandard ports or privilege escalation hacks like buffer overflows, but it's extra work the attacker needs to do, making it a less attractive target (and thus, more secure by default).

  20. Re:Rhetorical question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was going to root my GF's box last night..but she gets made when I refer to it as linux.

  21. caveat emptor by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If spammers are scammers, can you really expect good value for your money?

    I fully expect follow-up news stories on how someone who wanted to open a business online fell for a mass marketing scam, paying spammers thousands of dollars only to see the spammers vanish in thin air with their money.

  22. Re:End Users are Stupid by hey! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stupid? Well, people look at their home computers like their TV or their toaster. Is there any other consumer product that requires so much awareness to run?

    Probably only the the automobile. We make people take written and practical tests before they're allowed to drive unsupervised, and then in most places they are expected to get insurance to cover any damage their operation of the car may cause.

    Is that where you want to go?

    Using a computer on the Internet will never be as simple and relatively safe as using a TV, but it could be moved down the scale of complexity in that direction, by better engineering of Internet software and making ISP managed reverse firewalls part of the standard broadband service.

    Granny should be able to just turn on her computer to order to sell her crocheting on ebay or get email with pictures of her grandkids without having to research computer administration. And, when she's done, I think she should be able to flick a massive off switch (like on the old PC/XTs) and watch the CRT raster turn into a little dot, without having to worry that somebody is using her computer when she thinks it is idle. I for one would think that was cool.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  23. Re:End Users are Stupid by gorbachev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many who drive cars know how to fix it? I certainly don't, nor do I have any desire to learn to fix my car.

    It's not the end users' fault the majority of home computers are by default magnets for virii, trojans, worms and spyware.

    Certain OS manufacturer is at fault here, as well as the Dells and Gateways of the world, who insist on selling zombie networks when solutions to prevent them from occurring have been in place for quite a while.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  24. Re:Rhetorical question: by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the world of common users, Linux boxes are about as common as snowcones in hell, too. Macs are almost as common as snowcones in Florida...not quite.

    Insightful??? No. Funny??? Yes.....

    Funny thing is that the author seems to say that Macs are close to ubiquitous (snowcones seem to be likely to be common in Florida because they are a form of hot-weather refreshment) but Linux machines are nowhere.

    Worldwide, Linux machines probably marginally beat Macs in the desktop space. Domestically, Macs are a bit ahead, for now....

    In China, OTOH, legal copies of windows are much more rare than FreeBSD desktops in the US!!!

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  25. Re:Rhetorical question: by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the spams outgoing, you dont NEED to run anything on a privileged port, and standard user access will do. So long as the rooted system accepts mail in, even on a non standard port that you can configure your master host to connect to, then it can happily spam everyone else. The mailserver doesnt need to talk FROM port 25.

  26. Tired of inflated stats by shogarth · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In July, spam made up 94.5% of e-mail traffic, nearly double from a year before, says e-mail management firm MessageLabs.

    Does anyone else wonder where MessageLabs gets their statistics? I can't help but wonder at their methodology (though I suspect rectal extraction). I get daily reports on SpamAssassin and my configured DNS block lists for the servers I manage. Their spam traffic doesn't start to approach 95% of inbound messages. After eliminating all internal email from the statistics, SpamAssassin flags about 20% of incoming email as suspicious and SpamHaus blocks another 10% or so. These are not confidential, hard-to-find addresses. These are university servers where staff and faculty are required to have valid email addresses posted on the department web pages. Any spider worth a damn should have harvested them long ago. I find it very hard to believe that this environment is getting 60% less spam than systems that don't provide a directory of valid addresses.

    Spam is a problem, but it's time journalists (online and otherwise) start taking stats with a grain of salt. Too many organizations are willing to publish questionable numbers in an attempt to sound like they have thoroughly researched the issue.

    Or in the MessageLabs case, to sell a product that will 'solve' the problem.

  27. SpecialHam.com? by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the USA Today article...

    One indication of the going rate for zombie PCs comes from a June 11 posting on SpecialHam.com, an electronic forum for spammers.

    And you guys didn't put that link in the main Slashdot article?!?!?! Oh come on! If there's a site that deserves to be slashdotted, that one must be it.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  28. Disagree with the "utility" analogy. by mwillems · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Consumers should demand what they do of other utilities," says Kip McClanahan, CEO of security firm Tipping Point. "When I pay my water bill, I expect my water to be drinkable out of the tap. Today, when you pay your Internet bill, the data you get is not consumable."

    Seems to me this is off the mark, and it typifies what is wrong with our telecom-oriented providers, as they too believe this all too often.

    The provider provides a connection. He does not provide content. ISDN was a gigantic failure because telco's thought they had to provide content, rather than just a reliable connection.

    If I want content, I will buy an AOL subscription. Otherwise, what I expect is not clean water but a reliable liquid movement mechanism. You don't call it a pipe for nothing. The liquid that comes out will be determined by me, not by the provider of pipes!

    MW

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
  29. MOD PARENT UP by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh if I had mod points, my friend, you would be more karma-ful than you are right now. I couldn't agree more. At least she did something about it, instead of sitting ignoring it, hoping it gets better, unlike the other 20,000 plus people mentioned.