Slashdot Mirror


One-Watt Wireless Radio Modem Reaches 40 Miles

maxstreampr wrote in to plug their radio modem. It's the size of a credit card, one watt, and can transmit 40 miles line of sight or 3000 feet indoors. Something about using the AT command set to fire off a command 40 miles through the air amuses me.

63 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. what about when you go under a bridge? by LazyPhoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    makes me think of riding around in the AM radio days and going silent when going under an overpass.

    1. Re:what about when you go under a bridge? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...for those of us lucky enough to live close to Chicago (I'm just over 100 miles away), we can continue to experience the wonderful long-range AM radio while we listen to Pat Hughes and Ron Santo cover the Cubs game on radio 720.

      It comes in great on my car, but hardly at all on any of my other radios. Of course, there are a few spots I avoid because they kill the reception. I'll even drive five miles out of the way just to avoid that patch.

  2. Denial of service attack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    +++ATH0 on a cloudy day. With a repeater.

    1. Re:Denial of service attack! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck yeah...I still participate on a Worldgroup BBS.

      And my favorite joke on computer campers?

      "ga has just given you 2000 credits. Type =x to accept."

      ("ga" is the Teleconference equivalent of IRC's "/me")

  3. Why do we even need the Internet? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

    If everyone bought one of these and ran them in peer-to-peer mode, we could all dump our ISPs!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Why do we even need the Internet? by drewbradford · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather keep mine. The article says that the max speed is 230kbps, and the max sustainable is 115.2 kbps. It won't be too long that you can get that with a cellular modem.

    2. Re:Why do we even need the Internet? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn, I knew I should have actually read the article!!!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Why do we even need the Internet? by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you could live with a shared media with a peak throughput of 115 kbits, sure.

      I do not want to rain on anyones parade, but ISM band FHSS FSK modems are kinda cool-for-1997 ...

      That being said, if maxstream had a reasonable price for onesey twoseys, (Their web site has a promotion for what appears to be this series at USD 90 for qty ten) there could be some cool hack value for moderately low speed stuff in portable projects.

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
    4. Re:Why do we even need the Internet? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      You find me a 9600 baud acoustic coupler and I'll give you a gmail invite. :)

  4. Re: One-Watt Wireless Radio Modem Reaches 40 Miles by Scoria · · Score: 5, Funny

    Additionally, rumor has it that this device will burn a hole in your pocket. (Thank you, I'm here all week.)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  5. Okay, I'll do it by koreth · · Score: 5, Funny
    Someone's going to, so it may as well be me...

    "Site" - a location.

    "Sight" - something visual.

    "Line of sight" - a line along which you can see (i.e., an unobstructed line.)

    "Line of site" - evidence that what you've written matters so little to you that it's not worth the effort to proofread. You don't care; why should we?

    1. Re:Okay, I'll do it by joranbelar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't look now, the Slashdot editors actually EDITED something! And they got it right!

    2. Re:Okay, I'll do it by Requiem · · Score: 3, Funny

      You beat me to it. Keep the flame of the English language burning, my friend.

  6. Calling Long Distance by grunt107 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is used with a 256-bit key, the highest encryption standard available.

    The real question is, did they use Lexar programming techniques?

  7. Wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My Grandma loves all this talk of 'Wireless' again..

  8. Did anyone else read this... by Ignignot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Using the AT command to set a fire 40 miles off? Or has it just been too long a day at work? My office has been regularly swept for mines.

    --
    I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    1. Re:Did anyone else read this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My office has been regularly swept for mines.

      Translated: all we do at the office is play minesweeper

  9. What kind of antenna?? by ARRRLovin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What kind of antenna did they use? "High gain" isn't all that descriptive.

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:What kind of antenna?? by chill · · Score: 5, Funny

      What kind of antenna did they use? "High gain" isn't all that descriptive.

      A thin, copper one, 40-miles long. :-)

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:What kind of antenna?? by ARRRLovin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice.......UUUULF. :-)

      --
      -Randy
    3. Re:What kind of antenna?? by YankeeInExile · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do the math ...

      Po = +30 dBm
      path loss over 64km at 915 MHz: -130
      Pr = -100 dBm ... let's see ... at 9600 bps it requires -103 so that gives you 3 dB of fade margin even with isotropic radiators.

      Put a +6dBi yagi (I think that is the maximum allowed on ISM under Part 47 anyway) at each end and you've got 15dB of fade margin, which should give you a couple of orders of magnitude of BER performance (the datasheet was notably lacking a BER / EbNo chart ).

      --
      How does the Slashdot Effect happen given that no slashdotters ever RTFA?
  10. Credit Card Sized? by icekillis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you mean PCMCIA-sized?

  11. Speed by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The speeds indicated look too slow to be useful except for remote low overhead / slow data acquisition stuff.

    9600 baud is pretty darn slow, even with compresion.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Speed by wg0350 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is ideal for certain applications. Environmental monitoring and remote metering are two technologies where dial-up modems are still used at speeds similar to this. These are prime candidates for upgrading to wireless. Despite their lack of publicity there are still thousands of low data rate products in use today. You could have 10s - 100s of these devices reporting to one local substation with a broadband connection to a main monitoring station somewhere else in the world.

      Not everything has bandwidth requirements comparable to todays average internet connection.

      It seems like the selling point of this product is its power consumption. Remote monitoring stations will have very limited power sources. Low power / Long range and high reliability are often more of a concern than high data rate.

  12. Friends of SCO by MikeMacK · · Score: 2, Funny
    MaxStream, Inc., 355 South 520 West Suite 180, Lindon, Utah 84042

    Lindon, Utah is sure a happening place.

    1. Re:Friends of SCO by weston · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Canopy Group has a set of office buildings in Lindon that has great connectivity. SCO occupies one of them, and some Canopy companies occupy others, but the rest are rented out to other companies, one of which I work for, which have nothing to do with SCO, and are happy about that.

  13. MaxStream RF modem by mknewman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone notice the 9600 baud bit rate? Marc

  14. Quick follow-up by joranbelar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently, the editors are hedging their bets on this one: I keep hitting reload, and the submission text alternates between "line of sight" to "line of site".

    1. Re:Quick follow-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      By not RTFA, I'm trying to maintain both spellings in a quantum state.

    2. Re:Quick follow-up by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

      By replying to this anonymous post, I am aiming along the "line of cite".

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  15. Testimonial by TheVampire · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our company uses the MaxStream RS485 modems, and I can attest that they do work very well.

  16. Not very impressive by jandrese · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, that's some marketing. The "40 miles" claim is when you're in deep space and using high gain antennas. Actual performance will be less than a mile. Also, in case people want to compare this with 802.11 (which is difficult because they are in different bands), a typical 802.11b card radiates 30mW, instead of the 1W these guys are apparently claiming. The data rate is nothing exceptional either, 115.2kbps (and these are 1000 bits/kb sized), which pales in comparison to 802.11g at ~55000kbps. This technology would have a much higher "wow" factor 5 years ago, but nowadays that kind of range for that kind of throughput just isn't all that new or special.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Not very impressive by javaxman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      From TFM :
      * Up to 3000 feet range (Indoor/Urban environments, @9600 RF data rate)

      We're talking about this thing for what reason?

      CmdrTaco, please, drink some Jolt and wake up. That's twice in one day you've made me want to smack you around for wasting my time. 9600 baud? Really, why would we want to use this?

      To compare this to 802.11b, they have what looks like a version that operates in the 2.4GHz band, guess what? 1500ft range, at 9600 baud.

      While I'll admit this thing might have some very specific uses, like remote data collection where you don't have a lot of data, but you want it delivered at regular intervals over a distance where it'd be hard to put in relays or run a real link... but the damn thing costs more than $400, so if you *can* use 802.11g instead, you'll probably want to!

    2. Re:Not very impressive by Sleuth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like it would be easier to go pick up a couple used Richochet modems on ebay. 128kbps and 1 mile line of sight out of the box. USB interface and all. Linux has the network drivers already.

  17. wow, I learn something new everyday by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd never heard of this, but after some reading: Wireless over modems it's out there, and well supported. I can see it being a less touchy solution in that it's old school analog, but 40 miles? THat's hard to believe.

    CBSD

    1. Re:wow, I learn something new everyday by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can see it being a less touchy solution in that it's old school analog, but 40 miles? THat's hard to believe.

      Thats where the external directional antennas come in. Works for bluetooth and wifi.

  18. RF distance can be surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For what it's worth, I once used a 5 watt HF radio to contact the Canary Islands from Atlanta, GA. The signal was not strong, but we had no trouble carrying on a brief conversation. RF is pretty amazing stuff when the conditions are right.

  19. 9600 baud 'em by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Funny
    Mordac: I am Mordac, preventer of information services! I deny your request for specifications! In retribution for disturbing me, I sentence you to one month without email!

    Dilbert: okay.

    Mordac: What?! No engineer gives up email so easily. Assume the position!

    Dilbert (at home, to Dogbert): So, he found the modem strapped to my ankle, but he missed my wireless pen modem.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  20. Nothing amazing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Amateur radio operators have been doing this for years. The higher the antenna, the better. Put up a tower, say 50-60ft, put the antenna on top using good feedline and fittings, and you will get out to good distances. Better yet, take your laptop up to a mountain location, and you will be able to tx and rx for easily many times that distance. Hams do this routinely.

    1. Re:Nothing amazing here by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      But only with a license.
      Yes, but it's not hard to get one.
      I'm assuming they're unlicensed.
      Well, they're likely FCC certified, but the spectrum they use is unlicensed, so ...
      Obviously there are, but what are those limits?
      For most of the unlicensed bands, under 1 watt. The WiFi `shootouts' and the like typically do not use amplifiers at all (microwave amplifiers are expensive), just high gain antennas, though I don't think the Part 15 rules (which is what things like this and WiFi are allowed under) allow the use of high gain antennas for transmitting. (If correct, this is very often violated, though obviously the FCC doesn't care that much.)

      As for encryption, it's only the ham rules (part 97) that prohibit encryption. They also require that you ID yourself at the end of each message (and at least every 10 minutes) and that the usage be non-commercial. The FCC itself doesn't frown upon encryption, at least not publically.

      I guess I need to read up on my FCC rules
      Yup. This link might be an interesting place to start.
  21. Wow! by Guano_Jim · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm using one of these right now and it's gr345l;@!@*!bbg

    NO CARRIER

  22. In the army (in Finland) by Aggrajag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our radiolinks (which are like wi-fi) were sending line-of-sight transmissions, 9600 baud, with about 3 milliwatts. I cannot remember the frequencies we used but they were in the microwave range so I'm not sure it's comparable with the radiomodems mentioned in the article using 900 MHz band. Cool stuff anyway!

  23. no time penalty by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    No time penalty is incurred during AES encryption or decryption.

    That's pretty interesting. Perhaps they meant to say that there is no additional processing overhead beyond that which is introduced by performing the full number of rounds for a 256 bit key in hardware.

    It seems you still need a shared secret. I assume it isn't doing any authenticated Diffie-Hellman to establish a session key.

    Sorry, it's just kind of irritating when you hear things like "security through encryption." Great. You get integrity protection and data confidentialy while the data is in trasit. There are many other opportunities for an attacker to get your data besides when it's flying around in mid-air.

    --
    I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
  24. it's 900MHz by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 3, Informative

    40 miles alone is not impressive, HAMs talk all over the world on less than a watt (QRP) routinely, on HF bands off-course

    But than I read this modem works on 900MHz, so that's quite a feat, worthy of a "Pringles can award"

  25. /.ed by TarlCabbot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like their web server went under a bridge.

  26. Re:Speed: defense of 9600 baud by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although 9600 could never handle today's internet and web activities, it is amazingly fast for TTY and CLI type applications. Having started with 110 baud mechanical TTY and 300 baud acoustical coupler modem on a green screen, I well remember my first experience with a 9600 baud hardwired Lear Siegler terminals -- WOW very fast.

    9600 baud is good enough for modem-to-modem chat, e-mail via pine, text processing with vi or emacs, or almost any *nix command. Thinking about this reminds me of how terribly bloated everything has become with verbose formatting and styling of pages. Pictures may be worth a 1000 words, but they require 10 to 100 times the bandwidth of those words.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  27. Re:Ad Dot by funkdid · · Score: 3, Funny
    I was just thinking that I like slashdot and it's ok if they put a well placed ad here or there if it keeps up the high quality of this site. Maybe they'll be able to make it even better. Maybe they'll start to patent some of the features of slashdot, and trademark some of the slashdot esque things about it. Maybe they'll pick up some closed source companies that make a nice product and then open source them. Maybe they'll become a portal for all types of news, not just "news for nerds". Then perhaps they'll start to consider spinning Slashdot off of OSDN, take it public. Then they'll sell stock in some odd dutch auction, and offer 1 Terabyte of storage in the new "slashmail" beta free e-mail service.....

    Seriously all companies (and governments) turn out the same eventually. Just like with google, we'll be sitting around one day commenting "Remember when slashdot was that indie little "news for nerds" site?

    --

    I boycott signatures

  28. How can you tell if someone is a complete geek? by Omega1045 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Q: How can you tell if someone is a complete geek?

    A: If they say, "Something about using the AT command set to fire off a command 40 miles through the air amuses me."

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  29. umm, line of site at 40 miles? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is the world flat?

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  30. 1000 Miles per watt award by leighklotz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In ham radio, there's a 1000 miles per watt award that's not particularly hard to get....I made 1842 miles per watt (Palo Alto, California to Sakhalin Island in Russia) using a data modulation called PSK-31 and a wire antenna on my roof, and just over 1000 miles per watt from San Luis Obispo, CA to Estonia using CW: 5700 miles with 4.5 watts to a 28 foot wire thrown from a second-story window into a small tree, running on a pack of AA batteries.

    1. Re:1000 Miles per watt award by smnolde · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's a nice link that might explain it:

      packetradio.com

      By comparing the small bandwidth of PSK31 and measuring its gain against a CW filter of 500 Hz; 10 * log (500/31) dB = 12 dB, quickly reveals that a CW transmitter must put out 15 to 18 times more power than a PSK31 transmitter, just to achieve the same signal to noise ratio at the receiving station. This is the reason the PSK31 operating mode has gained so much popularity in such a very short period.

      I work PSK31 occasionally and have worked Europe easily with 50W or less. It's not magic, and the band conditions are horrid as we're in a soloar minimum. If i get up early enough I bet i could work Asia. Not bad for being in southeast Arkansas.

      I can't wait in a few years when the sunspot cycle is on the way up again and we're able to work across the world on 5W or less easily.

      PSK31 is a fantastic mode to work and it's easy to pick up DX contacts.

      KD5ZEF

  31. Well, at least... by ph43thon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...they didn't use "line of cite"

  32. Re:problems by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mr. Anonymous Coward... Let me take this opportunity to introduce you to Mr. Inverse-square Law.

  33. Re:Distant Horizon. by pclminion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, what planet is this 40-mile line of sight transmission designed for?

    Don't be cynical. I can look out my office window and see a mountain which is 65 miles away from here. The world is not a "totally flat plain or ocean."

    Do you live in the Midwest or something? The entire world isn't all like that, you know!

  34. Re:Ad Dot by funkdid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Geekdom is becoming more and more mainstream every day. Ask a 16 year old about *Insert what used to be something only us computer geeks knew about*. Look about the number of registered /.'ers. It keep growing and fast. You know how many people I've turned on to /., many of them arent' even tech savy. They still check it everyday, and each month a higher percentage of the articles peak their interest, slowly but surely they start learning and the articles mean more to them. Before you know it they ask me "Hey did you see that article on arstechinca last week?"!

    --

    I boycott signatures

  35. Re:Distant Horizon. by Zakabog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually it's 40 miles in deep space, but if you've ever visited New York City? We have quite a number of buildings above 100ft. The top of my house is 100 feet from the ground, and I'm on a hill so that helps too.

  36. Re:How much does this cost? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are there 999 other slashdottters who'd like to make an order with me?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  37. Cool Stuff by soapee01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm faimiliar with MaxStream, good company, good products. They even gave us a little student discount. Used their 9xStream in my senior design project. Great for low bandwidth/low power embedded applications and extremely easy to integrate (simple UART IIRC). Just pick your own protocol and let the radio do its magic (ie nothing but basic RF knowledge required). This makes me think about picking up that project again and seeing what the extra distance might do.

  38. It's not an 11b replacement! by don.g · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not really sure why this was worthy of a slashdot article -- judging by most of the posts, people are just complaining that it's slower than 802.11*.

    But that's not what it's aimed at. Look at the interface it has on the non-RF side: multidrop serial. It's designed for telemetry applications. And when you're doing telemetry, lower power usage is good (as you may be running off solar-charged batteries) and bandwidth needs are minimal - you're not going to need more than a few bytes for a current water level or similar :-)

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  39. Re:And I'm getting 14,400 bps on my HSCSD mobile by chris234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GPRS here in the States starts at around $20 a month for unmetered service. And people say we're behind the times here.....

  40. Re:And I'm getting 14,400 bps on my HSCSD mobile by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last I checked, Sprint was the only cheap unmetered. BTW, it's 2.5G - it's under 300k rated.

    Also, I think you're wrong on what plans there are. Here's what they've got:

    Sprint PCS Vision Pictures Pack
    Perfect for people who have a PCS VisionSM Picture Phone.Take, upload and send an unlimited number of pictures with Sprint PCS Picture MailSM. Includes 100 SMS Text Messages and Web access.

    Obviously, you need a camera phone. It's $15, and comes with $5 free downloads/month.

    Sprint PCS Vision Premium Pack
    Perfect for people who want to download Ringers, Games, Screen Savers and other Sprint PCS Vision Services. Includes 100 SMS Messages and Web access.

    $15, $10 free dl/mo.

    Sprint PCS Vision Professional Pack
    Read and send personal or company email with Sprint PCS Business ConnectionSM Personal Edition. Includes Messaging, Web access and Sprint PCS Picture Mail. ( Additional $15/month for Sprint PCS Vision Smart Devices that use the Microsoft® Pocket PC Operating System.)

    It's really a waste if you've got ReqWireless WebViewer ($10, but Sprint doesn't offer it, so it's not free) and webmail, but there's a reason NOT to get a Pocket PC from them - $30/mo internet (because it's got Pocket IE), and no free downloads... It's $15/mo if you've got a regular phone.

    They've also got picture and video mail packages ($5/ea, video needs picture) that can be standalone (1 cent/kb w/o Vision).

    It appears that if you've got $100 or more per month in regular charges, you get free Vision (I thought it was the 2000 minute plan or greater, but...) I don't know what service level, but I BELIEVE it's Pro.

    Get Free & Clear America, for the love of $DEITY, if you want to roam without getting raped ($5).

    Now, I just need a way to get something like the Vi660, even with an early contract renewal (I've heard enough bad reviews about the Vi600, and I know the 660 works fairly well (except signal is weaker than my 3588i)) - I HATE THIS PIECE OF NOKIA CRAP THAT ISN'T VISION COMPATIBLE (and is a piece of Nokia crap). The Sprint salesdroid (OK, so there actually was GOOD customer service IN THE STORE - senior salesdroid) said the Nokia had FCC maximum power, and didn't say the same about the Vi660.

    One thing I noticed - the thing has a wireless modem and CDMA2000 1x support. The thing is a fscking 2.5G phone, and doesn't even have internet access. At least the Vi660 is free online...

  41. Re:Ribbit! by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    I shudder to think of the size of the handset needed to hold the processing power required for the insanely complex smart routing this concept would take to realize. Not to mention the batteries!

    I agree that it's a neat concept, but early experiments with WiFi meshes seem to indicate that it will have problems scaling without a lot of horsepower behind it. And that's with fixed "pads" as it were.

    --
    No relation to Happy Monkey
  42. Some substance, more hype, a few uses..... by tiger99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    At 9600 baud? I think not......

    I do wish they would standardise on frequency allocations worldwide, as I live in the UK and might have a use for one of these, as it might be cheaper than what we have, the 458MHz band where things like this have been around for a long time, similar power, same baud rate, similar range with a directional antenna. I note that this one seems to be specified with a 4dB external antenna gain. Now that would be about a 4 element yagi, or a helix or dish, but maybe more as you would have a lot of attenuation in the coax unless it was very short, so the whole package is actually not so small as it seems.

    But we have seen better than this on Slashdot, not so many weeks ago someone had fitted up dish antennae to a standard WiFi card IIRC, and were getting better range on less power (100mW?), and very much greater bandwidth, but of course very directional. That too ought to be allowed worldwide but probably is not.

    This thing is not by any means a technical breakthrough, except possibly in terms of power efficiency, and even there I think the improvement is marginal.