Slashdot Mirror
MGM Purchase Gives Sony An Edge In Disc Format War
Grump writes "The New York Times reports: 'The purchase of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer by a group led by Sony will not only give the company an enormous film library but also considerable power in its fight to set the format for the next generation of digital video discs.' The article goes on to suggest that Sony is gearing up for another Betamax-style failure."
I do not like the way all of these studios suddenly get aggregated by huge multinational companies...
If they decide to prevent a movie from reaching the theaters, it begins easier and easier...
Would "Clerks" still make a success in 2004 ?
In 10 years, will Fahrenheit 911 sequels ever reach the public ?
Trolling using another account since 2005.
it seems like these format wars between companies will end up making the cu lose out, haveing to buy more players, does anyone else think that dvds are just fine? HD content would be nice, but i dont think that its fair to the cu for all of us to have to buy two players, mabye they will make dual format players, and then no one will win or finalize anything, grr
cause if they don't, there won't be businesses like: Transfer your Betamax Videos to DVD. this way, when we don't have any more IT jobs, we can convert one DVD types to another DVD types...
CB$#@#$@
free ipod and free gmail!
With Microsoft supporting the NEC and Toshiba blue ray format. And Sony, with its huge movie, and technology back up, who is more likely to win the war of the formats?
Hopefully, the consumers.
Geeks everywhere want to know!
"It further tips scales that were already tipped toward Blu-ray," said Ross Rubin, a consumer electronics analyst at the NPD Group.
I don't know about all of you, but I certainly don't favor expensive new technology to proven successes. DVD may skip a frame now and then, and yes, there's still the chance that the disc may scratch, but for the most part, it's more than value-priced technology. That is, the price is fair given the failure rate.
Oh Sony, first betamax, and your memory stick (ok it is cute).
:-0
:-) :-) :-)
I wrote you a haiku to make you feel better
lets buy MGM
why not it'll be fun, come on
hail our new disc format
ok it isn't that good but whatever.
I can imagine a new Blu-ray player with memory stick input and built in ps3!
In fact, will PS3 use the new disc format? or PS4?
I say good luck to em. As long as I can write my XVid movies to 'em
*come on that is the real need here!*
#hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
I guess this merger also means we'll see more films than just Columbia Tristar Home Video's limited selection on the UMD format used in Sony's PlayStation Portable handheld system.
DVD officially stands for nothing.
From wikipedia
"DVD" was originally an acronym for "digital versatile disc"; some members of the DVD Forum believe that it should stand for "digital video disc", due to the fact that most members of the public believe that DVD does stand for that. Toshiba, which maintains the official DVD Forum site, adheres to the interpretation of "digital versatile disc." The DVD Forum never reached a consensus on the matter, however, and so today the official name of the format is simply "DVD"; the letters do not 'officially' stand for anything.
So now we know...
Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
I don't see any reason why this format would be a betamax failure. It seems pretty solid. But yeah, given Sony's record of unsuccessful and barely successful formats, this is probably right.
Betamax, minidisk, memory stick, atrac3. Arguably SACD as well.
Seriously, people just bought DVD's. Heck, most of my collection is in DVD format. Which is as good as I need and probably as good as it gets for the next 20 years. From DVD there is no real compelling reason for the consumer to upgrade. It is already high digtial, the market already enjoys the Value Added features. Making a release in another format would be like Sony Max all over again.
MGM bought UA in the 80's. Time bought Warner Brothers a while back too. Nothing sudden about media consolidation.
Best Slashdot Co
Comment removed based on user account deletion
What killed the Betamax format was that they were not willing to share to technology with other manufacturers, and that paved the way for the VHS format to dominate the market...shame, I would have rather watched vids on Beta all these years - picture quality far superior than VHS.
The article goes on to suggest that Sony is gearing up for another Betamax-style failure.
Betamax was far from a failure. it was better than VHS, a overall better design from the beginning and is still pretty much near the standard today in broadcast (betacam is very much like betamax.)
They failed because of two tiny points.
Tape size - not fricking long enough.. they fixed that with a larger format but by that time the damage was done.
Adoption - VHS was far cheaper to license, so the porn industry latched onto it and ran, thus solidifying the VHS format as the defacto standard.
Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
DVD officially stands for nothing.
It officially stands for DVD. It really does stand for digital versatile disc. I'm sure the members of the DVD Forum that wanted Video were those only concerned with Video. Therefore, their opinions do not matter.
From wikipedia
Wikipedia is not authoritative.
"WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY."
"Therefore, please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by professionals who are knowledgeable in the particular areas of expertise necessary to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information about any subject in Wikipedia"
So now we (don't) know...
End of line.
I've just signed legislation that'll outlaw Russia forever. We'll begin bombing in five minutes.
... the first one used to distribute porn! The adult industry has a much greater influence on technology than the industry cares to admit.
Betamax
Mini Disc
Memory Stick
Blu-ray?
SPAM
Both formats will probably have a ton of DRM in it anyways. It's all just a money making ploy to get us to buy new "special edition" disc sets... "Now with 15 seconds of additional footage and some interview with one of the extras!" That and new players of course.
And isn't DVD already in 480p?
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
I don't know of any other company that has tried and failed more times to set its own monopoly in some form of media. Any discerning nerd avoids Sony products like the plague because they undoubtedly go against any set standard.
The ones I know about:
- betamax
- mini-disc (though it eventually opened up to other manufacturers after it was old technology)
- Playstation/Playstation 2 (ya, most video game systems aren't compatible with other manufacturers.. but this is still an example)
- Memory-stick (wtf.. we have compact flash, smart media, secure digital.. but Sony somehow thinks they'll be the standard)
I'm sure there's a few I'm forgetting. Sony is a damn frustrating company. If they just adopted and backed a new standard instead of always trying to monopolize, we would have standards adopted significantly faster. Sony is a huge company.
--- We need more Ron Paul!
Sony is in a much better position now than they were during the beta/VHS wars. They lost that one because they were much smaller and alone. They now have allies, the playstation is around and Sony owns more music and movies than they did. People are now are used to multiformat players and recorders. I think the trend will continue. Remember beta was a different size and shape, we are dealing with basically the same media with a different format. That being said, I agree that some of these monopolistic trends are bad for the industry. I wonder what format Microsoft will choose for the Xbox 2.
Not to question the great Wikipedia in the sky, but I was under the impression that DVD originally stood for Digital Video Disc, but then everyone was like "no, its more than just video, cuz it will work really nice in computers and stuff" (unlike the hack used to put data on CDs)...and so they want with Digial Versital Disc...
If it was "Versital" from the start, they should have gone with the gramatically more sensible "Versital Digial Disc"...VDD. Not to be confused with the compeating "Venerial Disease Disc" format.
SPAM
What does this mean to the Disney MGM park? Is Mickey Mouse going to have to carry a walkman now?
I assume they are going to keep the MGM branding, but has anyone heard anything else about this?
I don't think this will explode into a Betamax fiasco, but more rather a DVD-R and +R situation. At least from my standpoint, both suck, but I don't really have to worry about them because they've done a good job of making things compatible.
No one ever believed it was possible untill the Apple superdrive, so maybe they don't think they can make a combined player untill some other high priced company puts one in for "simplicity."
Or maybe this is just me hoping that the nice new Progressive scan DVD player I just bought isn't worthless
--clarus
PlayStation. PlayStation 2. Compact Disc itself, co-developed with Philips.
True, Betamax the format is dead, but Betacam the format and Betamax the copyright precedent live on for now.
.. is that no one wants them to become the standard in any format war.
Sony would like to set themselves up to be the microsoft of the entertainment world. They consistantly ignore market demands and instead produce devices they want people to have instead of devices that people want to have.
Honestly, how many people would want a portable music player that plays some format other than mp3? and takes a higher priced, sony only memory card?
This is what its really about, the control ..
Remember this is sony we are talking about..
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Does it have to be a Betamax-style failure? What about a Minidisk-style failure? Or a Memory-Stick-style failure? Or an Attrac3-style failure?
Sony spent the last 20 years creating redundant formats that nobody wants.
I think there really should only be one 'format':
The file. We should be moving to a future where all our music and films live on media with a filesystem.
So many DVD players today read CD/DVD-ROMs with MP3 files and there are even some now that can read DivX files.
Of course it won't happen because the big companies want us to keep buying our films and music again and again in new formats. But a file created today can be with us forever. I actually think that's the main reason behind DRM. Not to prevent illegal copying but to wring revenue far into the future by licencing the decoder to hardware manufacturers.
Because the ps3 will have blue-ray.
Assuming the ps3 follows the popularity of the ps1 and the ps2, a high percentage of households will already have a blue-ray player. (over 50 million ps2s have been sold)
Frankly, I dont see much advantage of these disks over DVDs, and Ive _got_ an hdtv.
no
"Sony also announced yesterday that it had reached an agreement with Comcast to offer Sony and MGM movies over Comcast's video-on-demand systems and on new cable channels that it would form with the Sony group."
From an article here.
I don't know about you, but i hardly ever go to the movie store anymore (unless i want to own a DVD). I rent most of my titles from Time Warner's video-on-demand. This agreement opens up that whole distribution channel (no pun intended) for all of those classic MGM titles.
There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
And to clarify further, in either case scenario, MS will win because both Next-gen DVD formats will most likely use MS codec.
At this point, I think HD DVD (by NEC/Toshiba) is a history. And I wouldn't be surprised even if Sony has a second thought on the codec they will use for distribution. I want to see Sony leaving MS or coming up with something other than MS codec.
The fact that this means more consolidation of media in the hands of fewer and fewer companies, however, is very, very distressing. http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/mediaconsol.html
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
I would estimate DVD quality to be about 3x VHS (about 2x more pixels, and a much better color space).
HDTV has 6x as many pixels as DVD, at 2 Mega pixels.
From my experience with a 10-foot wide projection system (NEC LX135 QXGA) I have at home, anything below DVD is almost unwatchable. DVD looks glorious until you pump a true HDTV signal into the system and then what you have is in many ways better than going to the theater (at least the crappy cineplexes in this town).
Now you might carp who the hell has 10' wide projection systems to really enjoy this kind of experience. The percentage is small today, but I predict that DLP will cause hi-res projection prices to plummet in the next 2-3 years. Mostly because DLP will experience the same kind of Moore's law improvement as any other type of chip type process, while other methods rely more on bulk size improvements.
In fact while it has been long to make it out of the Labs, Hi-Res displays will probably be common and affordable in Ultra-HD resolutions in 5 to 10 years time. (over 8 mega pixels) in large sizes.
I suspect U-HD will be overkill for home, and in most ways exceeds 35mm film quality when you factor in film speed (grainer for faster) and editing and reprocessing (loosing quality at each step). Sure, theoretically 35mm film has 16 Meg pixel, but in practice it is more like 3-6 (not much more than HD). And that's only if you can find a theater that knows how to keep a critical focus, and whose machines don't jitter uncontrollably because they are trying to squeeze the last penny out the damn things before going digital, which they desperately want to avoid as long a possible because first generation equipment is expensive and will suck compared to equipment available in 2-3 years time.
Even without 10' screens, in 2 or 3 years, WUXGA screens (1920-1200) will be common and affordable in laptops with Blu-Ray and/or HD-DVD built in. The near photographic look will motivate people to upgrade their home viewing experience. One of the biggest reasons for HDTV slow acceptance has been the failure of early systems to actually display the full quality that the standard supports (most systems today advertised as HDTV still don't). That and of course the lack of actual HDTV content to be viewed.
I suspect I will be one of the ones to say HD is good enough once we really get there. My father has trouble seeing the detail of DVD. So many people don't have the visually acuity to really appreciate the difference. Beyond HD I suspect the majority of people won't really be able to see much of a difference. I'm speaking of REAL HD. 1080p at 60 frames a second is really sweet, but over the air stops just short of this with p at only 24 and 30 fps. My prediction is that eventually 1080p at 60fps will become a standard, one that holds for a couple of decades or more, but we could get stuck at 1080i or 720p, which is a shame because the difference is quite noticeable up to this. Digital photography might still motivate people to buy U-HD projection systems for displaying stills.
As for me -- GIVE ME BLU-RAY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!!!
(while the CRTs hold out on my current system)
Letter To Iran
Hmmmm...
The major issue I had with a lot of this is "marketing". They are generally the problem. Marketing is entirely the reason behind the VHS vs Beta war, and to this day, are behind much of the current day issues of products. Quality of an item or service anymore means absolutely nothing. It's all in how you market, and how hard you do it. You can be selling crap-on-a-stick, and people will buy the heck out of it all day long if you market it in the right way.
The current bit with Sony buying all this is much ado about nothing. Fact is that when DVD's started becoming favor over VHS for rentals and purchase, many companies licensed the material and migrated a good percentage of it to the "current" format(s), such as DVD. We even saw this with Laserdisc's.
This stuff will more or less be around for quite some time. Maybe not in a format you'd particularly want, but it'll be here.
Cheers
All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
The DVD FAQ agrees with you, Digital Video Disc was the original meaning.
FWIW, I remember Sony's site being one of the first I visited when I got online in 1996, specifically becauseI wanted to see info on the new, upcoming DVD format. At that time, according to them, DVD meant Digital Video Disc. I didn't hear "versatile" until much later.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
Blu-ray is HD. HD-DVD is HD. Blu-ray holds more data, which translates into lower compression rates, assuming the same extras on the disc.
IF Sony can get blu-ray out the door in a cost-competitive way, there will be no real fight like there was with Betamax/VHS. Sony just needs to get over themselves, and with so many parteners, they pretty much have to. There will be a marginal ($1) difference in production price at production volumes for the new laser wavelength. They're the same size disc, use the same codecs, will likely end up with the same DRM.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
Sony is developing OLEDs. But Sony is also trying to infest the market with DRM technologies. So I bring back an ad hoc poll from a few years ago:
Today, Sony is
a) Good
b) Bad
c) CowboyNeal
I choose CowboyNeal.