Slashdot Mirror


Human-Powered Spam Filtering

arturs writes "A company called eProvisia started an unusal business: they filter out spam not by using complicated algorithms, but human beings... It costs around $20/year - is the war against spam over?" It's an interesting idea - the privacy concerns are big of course, but how would this stack up to, say SpamAssassin or a suite like Barracuda's Spam firewall. We tested the Barracuda device - great integration of OSS software, with a nice interface. Update: 09/20 15:12 GMT by J : Corrected price of Spam Eradicator.

84 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Buzzword Bingo by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the company's "About Our Company" page:
    Privately funded in 1993, now with customers in 40 countries* and over $67 million** in cash reserves, the company experienced a phenomenal growth and continues to aggressively pursue new frontiers in order to meet or exceed the needs of most demanding customers by providing a scalable, seamless, comprehensive offering.

    Leveraging our paradigm-shifting product line with state of the art technology developed by a dedicated team of professionals, we offer a significant competitive advantage on the diversified but fragmented market of best of breed anti-spam solutions.

    These people score a 9.8 out of 10 in the Buzzword Bingo game. That second paragraph, in particular, would keep me as far away from them as possible.
    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Buzzword Bingo by JaffaKREE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Modded funny, but I agree 100%. Who writes these things ?? Do they start with a list of 20 words (Paradigm, leverage, diversify) and have their managers tell them those words MUST be included ?? Yeesh !

    2. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Nos. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No kidding, that second paragraph (well, actually sentence) has high buzz word content yet actually only says, we do anti-spam. I have a feeling marketing and technical don't agree on much at this company.

    3. Re:Buzzword Bingo by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah man, I just needed "synchronicity" or "win-win situation" to fill my card!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Buzzword Bingo by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That second paragraph, in particular, would keep me as far away from them as possible.

      And yet those are exactly the words that HR departments are looking for on resumes. As long as you can use stupid words that really don't work in any other situation you can get your foot in the door.

    5. Re:Buzzword Bingo by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn it, I almost had a double diagonal if they had said "enterprise" and "legacy" --- drat!.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    6. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Funny

      . ** - Palmyra Atoll dollars.

    7. Re:Buzzword Bingo by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah and would like a bunch of buzzword bozos to READ EVERY DAMN MAIL YOU GET??????????????????

      personally i just think though that they use some filters to help..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Buzzword Bingo by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Funny
      I hereby propose a new mathematical function. It is called BSD (no relation to the OS), short for BullShit-Detector.

      The calculation of BSD is simple. Its domain is the set of all strings. The range is all real numbers from 0.0 - 1.0. To calculate BSD(s) for string s, simply take the length of s (call this l). Then, divide the number of of characters that contribute to the actual, non-bullshit content of the string by l. This is the value of BSD(s).

      To give a pertinent example, it is plainly apparent that BSD('Leveraging our paradigm-shifting product line with state of the art technology developed by a dedicated team of professionals, we offer a significant competitive advantage on the diversified but fragmented market of best of breed anti-spam solutions.') = 0.0.

      It is my hope that this will leverage the ever-expanding work of linguistics researchers around the world in utilizing paradigm-shifting methods for significantly empowering their abilities to detect bullshit.

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    9. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Clay+Mitchell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if they are reading everybody's spam, they are going to be damn good at spitting out buzzwords.

    10. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Aggrazel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worse than that, click on the signup:

      The minute your mail starts flowing, a dedicated team of over a hundred trained Screening and Preselection Specialists, working 24 hours a day**


      ** - Timezone differences may apply.
      ....

    11. Re:Buzzword Bingo by alakon · · Score: 2, Informative

      but you missed the asterisks- * - Not all currently recognized by UN. ** - Palmyra Atoll dollars. ...from http://eprovisia.dione.cc/about.html As far as I can see, the Palmyra Atoll doesn't have it's own currency... and anyone in the world can make up their own countries.

    12. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Chris_Jefferson · · Score: 5, Informative
      What is more impressive is:

      Conveniently located in the heart of Palmyra Atoll, eProvisia LLC is the leading provider of reliable, robust, powerful and cost-efficient spam filtering solutions for world-class corporations and individual users.

      Privately funded in 1993, now with customers in 40 countries* and over $67 million** in cash reserves, ....

      * - Not all currently recognized by UN. ** - Palmyra Atoll dollars.

      Palmyra Atoll is uninhabited, and doesn't have a currency. The phone number is invalid (nowhere has a +78 extension), and what kind of place lists in its address "Islet 7, 5 52 N 162 06 W"?

      I wouldn't have bothered posting this except it seems like both slashdot and most of the people reading this seem to be taking it seriously. It's not.

      --
      Combination - fun iPhone puzzling
    13. Re:Buzzword Bingo by myc_lykaon · · Score: 2, Funny
      It also sent the Wankometer bananas.

      See the result here

    14. Re:Buzzword Bingo by sh0rtie · · Score: 5, Informative


      Funny i know, but actually such an app actually exists
      Deloitte & Touche's Bullfighter

      BullfighterTM is software that runs in Microsoft Word and PowerPoint, within Microsoft Windows 2000 or XP. It works a lot like the spelling and grammar checker in those applications, but focuses on jargon and readability.

    15. Re:Buzzword Bingo by jrumney · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Its amazing how many people, even here on Slashdot, can't spot such an obvious scam. There was another company called "Edge Corporation" that used to sell a service where for $14.95/month they would let you know if your credit card number showed up on the lists being traded by fraudsters. Of course, you had to give them your credit card details so they could check on your card. The reason I found out, is a mysterious 39.95GBP showed up on my girlfriend's credit card bill, which I traced back to the same organization, and she hadn't even been stupid enough to sign up for their service.

      I expect the same is going on here. Sign up for their service, and not only do you lose your $20, but you end up on a load more spammer's lists as well.

    16. Re:Buzzword Bingo by DoctorHoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found more information on this Island. You can checkout this for more information.

    17. Re:Buzzword Bingo by lofoforabr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just look at the Terms of Service in their page. This must have been put under the wrong slashdot section. It's more suited for the "It's funny. Laugh".

      Terms of Service and Legal Disclaimer

      By viewing pages or using products and services of eProvisia LCC, you acknowledge and consent to the following terms and conditions:

      (1) Warranties and waivers. You understand that there are no guarantees, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, confidentiality or availability of the service. eProvisia LCC may choose to share any information acquired in the course of providing its services with other entities, and may, at its sole discretion and based on this information, take whichever actions the company, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or representatives, consider to be appropriate. You henceforth void your reasonable expectation of privacy, and your constitutional rights to a fair and speedy trial.

      (2) Indemnification. You agree to hold harmless and indemnify eProvisia LCC and its affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, from and against any legal claims, including liability for the company not adhering to the terms and conditions of this agreement.

      (3) Choice of Law and Jurisdiction. These Terms of Use will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Uninhabited Sovereign Territory of Palmyra Atoll, without giving effect to its conflict of laws and provisions of your actual state or country of residence. Any claims, legal proceedings, or litigations regarding eProvisia LCC and its affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, will be brought solely in and you consent to the jurisdiction of Palmyra Atoll courts.

    18. Re:Buzzword Bingo by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if a state had the advancement of art as first goal in its constitution, it could rightfully considered a state of the art, couldn't it?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    19. Re:Buzzword Bingo by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      State of the art is a perfectly legitimate tool which is nonetheless nearly never used appropriately. People are always trying to claim that their tool that puts together a couple old concepts in a new way is state of the art. Unless you're doing something that's never been done before, that is nonetheless widely recognized as probably being the best way to do it (or will soon come to be recognized as such) you're not state of the anything.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Buzzword Bingo by drakaan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Somebody kill him. Kill him now.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    21. Re:Buzzword Bingo by Andrewkov · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You *are* aware that this site is a hoax, aren't you?

      I just wonder if Hemos knew that when he posted it...

    22. Re:Buzzword Bingo by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      These people score a 9.8 out of 10 in the Buzzword Bingo game. That second paragraph, in particular, would keep me as far away from them as possible.

      It was obviously designed to do that; it's a joke. And if you look up the location of their company, it's basically Gilligan's Island: an uninhabited (except for 20 Fish and Wildlife Service staff) atoll 1000 miles south of Hawaii.

  2. How about wiki spam by stecoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    privacy concerns are big of course

    I thoroughly enjoy wikpedia and I have always thought of new ways of using the wiki concept - here is one solution to spam without privacy concerns.

    Your email interface would look at a list on the wiki page and filter out any known spam. One spam slips through and you can make a new entry at wik (like database or text page whatever). The entry could be the whole email or an algorithm but either way an algorithm would eventually be made based on a pattern to reduce the entry size (who knows the community is in control of it). Fixed the privacy concerns unless you did it to yourself.

    The next great thing about the wiki is you could take that 20 bucks a month and make a donation to the wiki. Not only would you be helping thwart spam but also supporting a great dictionary, encyclopedia and all things great with the open concept.

    1. Re:How about wiki spam by troon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Already baked: it's called Vipul's Razor.

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    2. Re:How about wiki spam by savagedome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One spam slips through and you can make a new entry at wik

      And what's stopping a spam ring from going back to it and deleting it?

      Don't forget that *authoritative* is still a grey area for wiki concepts.

  3. With a personal touch by mod_critical · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they ever verify their decisions with you:

    Mark,
    This is Eric, your spam d00d. You got a message about fisting, you into that? Let me know, thanks!
    -- Eric

    1. Re:With a personal touch by PhotoBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah I was thinking that, how well does this solution work for non-graduate drug addicts who have erectile disfunction problems and need a loan?

  4. Now here's a job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That I would not mind outsourcing to the indians and chinese!

  5. Party like its... by ericspinder · · Score: 4, Informative
    Our company, eProvisia LLC,
    I always worry about companies which use "LLC" as soon as the name is mentioned - 'Limited Liability Corporation'. It screams 'we are not responsable!'
    [the address] ...Palmyra Atoll (Uninhabited Sovereign Territory)
    Sounds like the 21th century equilivant of 'Florida Swamp land'.

    Four pages, home, the product, terms of service, and about the company. The only thing they are missing is bios of the 'management team'. Even better the $67 million dollars in cash reserves are in Palmyra Atoll dollars; I wonder what the exchange rate is?

    Overall, it looks like someone stole a 'dot com' idea from 1999. Anyone have a little red Corvette?

    I'll stick with Spamassassin, Thunderbird.

    --
    The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    1. Re:Party like its... by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      [the address]...Palmyra Atoll (Uninhabited Sovereign Territory)

      This is thge odd part. How can an uninhabited territory be sovereign. According to the CIA Factbook it is a National Wildlife Refuge managed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Also, it says it has no economic activity. What the heck would back Palmyra Atoll's dollar?

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:Party like its... by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just like a coporation, the "LLC" is part of the entity's legal name. They're not advertising that they're an LLC, they're just stating their name.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:Party like its... by ericspinder · · Score: 2, Informative
      As someone else pointed out, you are thinking about a LLP - "Limited Liability Partnership" An LLC is what corporations use when they engage with other corporations to conduct business. An LLC with a single Corporate owner (functionally) is either a liability firewall for a risky business (or division), or just another part of complicated deception (kinda like Enron).

      The LLC complaint was a minor issue, mostly based on personal observations, it's amazing how many people are willing to jump on me about *the meaning* of an LLC

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
  6. Won't work by seanyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. The only way that they'll be able to do this at a good cost is to use some kind of third world labour with a first language that isn't english. 2. Given that my baysian spam solution seems to be better at sorting spam than me (I've accidently deleted items which were not spam before), then I'm not entirely sure that a stranger could do better. They offer a 100% guarantee. I doubt they'll be able to offer a 100% service.

    --
    Training monkeys for world domination since 1439
    1. Re:Won't work by Punknubbins · · Score: 2, Informative

      The cost can be brought down using automated prefiltering both with currently available commercial/oss packages and by injecting the manually verified spam data back into the prefiltering system. However, I personaly would not trust anyone to do this sort of manual filtering unless they where actually located in a country with very good intellectually property protection and privacy protection laws, and kept a very big insurence policy for data theft or they where bonded using some other method which was easily verifiable. And still I would only suggest this for personal email accounts which don't contain anything that they need to keep secret, such as my grandparents personal email account as baby photos and weather reports need not be to secure.

  7. RE: Barracuda by numbski · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://sourceforge.net/projects/sa-milt-quar

    I'm working on mimicking the barracuda's functionality, and have the spam quarantine working.

    I apologize that sourceforge is showing no releases, the files ARE in cvs, and are stable after much testing. I'll try to get in and do a release later today.

    My hope is to build a full spam firewall suite that is easy to set up and still have much scalability and control.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  8. It's yearly, not monthly by brucmack · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The $20/month figure sounded a little high until I read that it is $19.95/year, not per month.

    That being said, I don't know if I see the benefit of paying someone else to read my email. They even offer more expensive packages to have them categorize and summarize your mail for you, as well as discard non-spam mails that you don't want anyway. I suppose it could be useful for really busy executive types, but then can't they afford secretaries anyway?

  9. You've been beaten to it! by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MailWasher Pro from Firetrust has an option similar to that known as FirstAlert, you sign up for a year membership and use their app to submit spam type messages to them, later, a human verifies that the e-mail is indeed spam and adds it to their database. Once added, any MWP users using FirstAlert will hit the database, see that the message is there and act accordingly (often times deleting without even showing it to the user). It works... ok, about 30% of my spam is nuked this way, the built in Bayesian filtering catches another 40% or so, and the DNS blacklists catch most of the rest. Of the last two groups I verify manually, but have come to trust FirstAlert... it's just a shame it's not getting the high %'s it used to.

  10. Spam won't be gone until... by GoMMiX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People stop trying to profit so much to help reduce or stop it...

    I'm not sure who's worse anymore, the companies out there who sell services to 'help' you reduce/eliminate spam, or the spammers. (Maybe one in the same, in some instances)..

    The only resolution I see to spam is good, solid legislation THAT IS ENFORCED. Country harbors spammers, cut them off from the US internet. Spammers AND the companies that hire them BOTH held equally liable. If it's a criminal act to spam, it's a criminal act to hire someone to spam.

    People can write programs all day to try and stop spam, it won't matter. If someone can write a program to filter x out, someone else will find a way to get y through. It's an endless cycle.

    Spam is like a virus in so many ways...

    1. Re:Spam won't be gone until... by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The only resolution I see to spam is good, solid legislation THAT IS ENFORCED....Spam is like a virus in so many ways...

      Maybe spam is also like drugs in a couple ways. They both cause a bunch of problems, and the gross majority would like to limit/get rid of them, but there's also I section of the population that's hooked. So the question becomes, how do you get rid of something so popular?

      We've seen what's happened with drugs. You outlaw the sale, and people sell it illegally. You outlaw the import of drugs, and people smuggle them.

      Yeah, we enforce the laws, but a good rule of thumb is, if an activity is profitable enough, people will do it. You can make laws against them and enforce those laws, but as long as it's profitable enough, people will do it anyway, and clever people will figure a way around law enforcement.

      As long as there are people who want drugs, and as long as there are people who buy from spam, these will be profitable businesses. How do you decrease the demand for illegal drugs? If we could do that, we wouldn't need them to be illegal anymore, and we wouldn't need the "war on drugs".

      How do you get morons to quit buying junk from spam advertisements? If we could do that, spam would just dry up, and we wouldn't need laws, and we wouldn't even really need filters. But it still comes back to that question of "how?"

  11. Having RTFA... by troon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that site *must* be a spoof. All the disclaimers and address in Palmyra Atoll is so dodgy.

    Besides, I used to live out that way (Kiribati, in the early 1970s, then called the Gilbert Islands), and I don't recall hearing about these guys! Oh, wait, 1993...

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:Having RTFA... by crowdozer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yah I bet a small nature reserve island in the middle of the Pacific has a sweet broadband connection and population to facilitate such a business. Perhaps they are training monkeys to sort your spam. That would explain the price.

  12. Business model? by Empiric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "24 hours a day" * 30 days/month = 720 hours

    $20 per month / 720 hours = about 3 cents an hour.

    Since they say they begin "manually reviewing, hand-picking and approving important correspondence", how does this work? To pay someone $6/hour, they'd need to be reviewing at least 200 mailboxes simultaneously. My confidence level of their accuracy under these circumstances would be considerably -lower- than a software solution.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:Business model? by Brento · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "24 hours a day" * 30 days/month = 720 hours

      $20 per month / 720 hours = about 3 cents an hour.


      No, because remember they have more than one customer, and it's not a ratio of one employee to one customer. One employee can probably service dozens and dozens of users, especially if you're prescreening email with SpamAssassin. When I start work in the morning, I can clear out the night's junk mail (after SpamAssassin's leftovers) in a matter of seconds.

      I'd be more interesting in seeing the lag time between a mail going in, and it being "cleared" by their spam system.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
  13. hilarious by alatesystems · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look at this about page.

    Im going to include their footnotes on that pge in parentheses and bold.

    Privately funded in 1993, now with customers in 40 countries(Not all currently recognized by UN) and over $67 million(Palmyra Atoll dollars) in cash reserves, the company experienced a phenomenal growth

    1. Re:hilarious by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coincidentally, $67 million Palmyra Atoll dollars is the estimated value of that Free Dell Desktop PC that's just waiting for those who click on your .sig.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    2. Re:hilarious by Umbro2 · · Score: 2, Funny
      With all your attention focused on annoying us with your free ads for a DellPC (who wants one?) or an IPod (who doesn't already have one?); you missed the best one:

      These people are "working 24 hours a day (Timezone differences may apply)"

  14. Spamassassin works great by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if its setup properly and bayes is enabled. Since Aug. 1st i've recieved 1800 emails flagged as spam... A few false positives but I have my threshold set pretty low. About 140 emails have gotten through and soon i'll take that folder and process it. Before I started processing spam that wasn't caught by spamassassin about 4-5 were getting through a day.. Now its once every few days.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  15. It is by spam alone I set my mind in motion by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the article doesn't mention is that this "human-powered spam filtering" consists of Mentats who have been specially trained to use the latest Bayesian filters, and who bear the Imperial conditioning against deleting important messages.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  16. Its a joke ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (3) Choice of Law and Jurisdiction. These Terms of Use will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Uninhabited Sovereign Territory of Palmyra Atoll, without giving effect to its conflict of laws and provisions of your actual state or country of residence. Any claims, legal proceedings, or litigations regarding eProvisia LCC and its affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, will be brought solely in and you consent to the jurisdiction of Palmyra Atoll courts.

    1. Re:Its a joke ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has to be a joke or a scam...http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factboo k/geos/lq.html Read the CIA's description of that island and decide for yourself. Seems pretty unlikely this is legit. I would guess the only thing you would receive by contacting this "company" is more spam.

  17. isn't this similar to what gmail does? by laard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from my understanding, all gmail users that click the little "report spam" button are essentially helping build the database and increase the effectiveness of its filters... though I guess they must be careful because this could potentially generate a lot of false positives.

    --
    --- If we knew half the things we shouldn't we'd stop wishing we knew it all
  18. Re:Yay by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There can be a huge advantage of looking over data manually.

    My job is focused around looking at data to find problems. Many companies by high cost and very fancy data verification tools, address cassing software etc... Then they run these things on automatic on all of there data. What happens is that there data slowly becomes unreliable over time because they are paying their data entry a pittiance or are simply outsourceing it to a foreign nation who has people who do not speak the language, as much as spell it.

    So, having someone like me who can clean the data (even sensitive data) to quickly check for errors, find common errors, and write novel solutions for them is a pretty big business. I deal with crap sent from data entry day after day and turn it into data that can be used, and is highly accurate.

    So, I can definately see someone using a human as an intermediary between spam.

    I could see this working this way. If the email comes from someone "trusted" in the company, it gets passed along without a human filter. Any email addresses that are not trusted would come by a physical person.

    This way, if "Bob, your investment advisor" emails you, then that data would be sent directly to the company without human interference.

    but, if a mail comes to sales@mycompany.com, then you would have a person scan that e-mail and verify its spammyness. This way, any spam that would get through would have to be from someone trusted. If someone is trusted, then they are not likely to be spam.

    It could be a very good system, but I doubt companies would want to allow email to be looked at this way. Consumer responce data, address data, etc.. I can see, but not really e-mails unless there was a pressing need to stop it.

    --
    If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
  19. LLC Companies by jeffs72 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, LLC's are the smart way to do a partnership. In a partnership, all principles enjoy equal responsibility for mishaps. In LLC's, all principles enjoy shared responsibility.

    I guess the best way to sum it up would be to quote my Business Legal Environment professor: "...and I hope that now you all have a clear understanding of partnerships. Now let me give you a word of advice, never form one."


    --
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    1. Re:LLC Companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are valid reasons to form an LP. And lumping LPs together with GPs is overgeneralization.

      My employer's company runs about twenty LPs. They invest in other business entities that carry the actual risk, so the "equal responsibilities for mishaps" is quite limited.

      At least I think that's how it works. But I guarantee you that the lawyers & execs running this boat understand it better than you & me, & maybe even your BLE professor too.

      Boy, I hope this "Post Anonymously" works right.

  20. this has to be a joke by unformed · · Score: 4, Informative


    Palmyra Atoll is a thousand miles south of Hawaii, an untold distance from civilization. Uninhabited by humans and wild to the core, it is the last intact marine wilderness in the U.S. tropics.

  21. GMail outcry by TVC15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And people were upset when it was 'discovered' that GMail was going to programatically 'read' your email to provide contextual advertising (and spam filtering) as an invasion of privacy? Here we will have actual _people_ reading your private correspondences. No thanks.

  22. Some juicy tidbits on eProvisia by looney9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So the first line on their front page reads:

    "For the first time ever: 100% reliability in combating spam. Guaranteed."

    But the first two bullet points of their TOS also read:

    "You understand that there are no guarantees, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, confidentiality or availability of the service."

    AND

    "You agree to hold harmless and indemnify eProvisia LCC and its affiliates, subsidiaries, and representatives, from and against any legal claims, including liability for the company not adhering to the terms and conditions of this agreement. "

    So they guarantee to stop 100% of spam...but if they don't, that's too bad as they never claimed to anyway and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

    Some juicy info on the Palmyra Atoll:

    "Palmyra Atoll Palmyra is an equatorial atoll, a circular string of 54 small, heavily vegetated islets formed by the growth of coral on the rim of an ancient submerged volcano. The Palmyra Atoll is a thousand miles south of Hawaii, an untold distance from civilization. Uninhabited by humans and wild to the core, it is the last intact marine wilderness in the U.S. tropics."

    So they are claiming human spam filtering from a place which is uninhabited by humans. I guess it is true that if you have a million monkeys banging on the keyboard they could actually turn out a real product.

  23. synergy! by H8X55 · · Score: 4, Funny

    synergy!

    I was waiting for synergy to pop up there somewhere...

    What's a mission statement, About Us page, or memo from management without synergy?!?

    1. Re:synergy! by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "What do you do?"
      "I produce synergy. And books on how to cheat at Bridge."

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    2. Re:synergy! by Glog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah the good old times - the last company I worked for was called "Synergize Solutions". It was during the "boom" times so we had "free donuts Friday".

  24. I'd be a bit suspicious by J+Mack+Daddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A piece of software that is filtering your spam is not being paid to do it. Yes it's creators were perhaps paid, but at least they are one step removed. A paid human-based service doing spam-filtering, however, would have a direct motive to want as much spam flying around as possible, so as to have as many potential customers as possible. I wouldn't be surprised if this company was created by and is being funded by the spammers themselves as just one more way to make money from spam! .

    --

    Jiggity

  25. Palmyra Atoll dollars by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even better the $67 million dollars in cash reserves are in Palmyra Atoll dollars; I wonder what the exchange rate is?

    One Palmyra Atoll dollar = 17 pieces of mithril, or approximately twenty kilograms of fairy dust.

    There's no such thing, people. This is a joke.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    1. Re:Palmyra Atoll dollars by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > One Palmyra Atoll dollar = 17 pieces of mithril, or approximately twenty
      > kilograms of fairy dust. There's no such thing, people. This is a joke.

      Actually, mithril does exist. It's also known as titanium ore or titanium
      steel (depending on whether it's being mined or whether a worked object is
      being described).

      It's Adamantium that hasn't been invented yet. Unlike mithril, adamantium is
      not vulnerable to the liquid nitrogen freeze-and-shatter attack. It is
      speculated to contain plastic polymer in addition to metal alloy, but we don't
      know how to actually make it.

      HTH.HAND.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  26. Hmmmm. by modifried · · Score: 2, Funny

    "... working 24 hours a day**..."

    "** - Timezone differences may apply."

    Damn. I was all excited about the fact that they worked 24 hours a day, but I live on the west coast.

  27. Filtering using spelling checker... by baywulf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why can't we use spelling checkers to filter spam? It seems all the spam now uses mispelled words and numbers in words to trip other filtering methods. So measure percent words mispelled or with numbers in them and above a particular threshold consider it spam.

    1. Re:Filtering using spelling checker... by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately that would block email from most of my friends...

    2. Re:Filtering using spelling checker... by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 3, Funny

      I take it you've never seen how my 12-year-old sister and her friends type.

      OMG tht is sooo cool!!!1 rlly? no way!! ... you get the idea. It's enough to make a spell-checker turn in its dictionary.

  28. I had an epiphany yesterday by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was out with my girlfriend yesterday morning, we went to breakfast and left the restaurant. When we arrived back at her place, she noticed that I had a flier attached to my car window. Something I had never even noticed when driving. It was for some silly event that I can't remember but it made me start thinking. You know, this is just spam..and yet I'm not all that upset about it. In fact, you see spam everywhere in life, but people rarely get as upset or harbor such a strong emotional feeling toward it. For example:

    Billboards - Spam. I didn't ask to see all that while driving

    Homeless people begging for money - Spam. Like the Nigerian guys trying who promise you 1 gazillion dollars once you donate 5k

    Fliers - Spam. (eventhough I'm always interested in what what is going on my city, but please don't put it on my car window without asking)

    People who wear clothes that have the clothing logo in 20 inch font plastered on the chest - Spam. I'm not going to buy clothes just because they say Von Dutch so stop trying to get me to buy them

    Cell phone company trademarked ring tones - Spam. It's like they're trying to get me to buy a nokia phone by playing it's themesong over and over.

    Bumperstickers - Spam.

    Racing Decals - Spam.

    Racing Decals on Jackets - Spam.

    Can you think of any more? Feel free to jump in

    Sorry if this is off topic..I just wanted to share. Why? Because sharing is caring.

  29. Guaranteed? by bluntmanspam · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the home page (in BIG H1 font):
    For the first time ever: 100% reliability in combating spam. Guaranteed.
    But from the first point on the TOS page:
    (1) Warranties and waivers. You understand that there are no guarantees, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, confidentiality or availability of the service.
    Hmmm...
  30. That beats the Nigerian scam. by Fantasio · · Score: 2

    The most dismaying is the number of suckers who'll fall in it.

  31. It gets better... by alakon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Screams IP theft.
    (1) Warranties and waivers. You understand that there are no guarantees, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, confidentiality or availability of the service. eProvisia LCC may choose to share any information acquired in the course of providing its services with other entities, and may, at its sole discretion and based on this information, take whichever actions the company, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or representatives, consider to be appropriate. You henceforth void your reasonable expectation of privacy, and your constitutional rights to a fair and speedy trial.

    Not only that, but the contract is "governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Uninhabited Sovereign Territory of Palmyra Atoll, ..."

  32. Re:ideas? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought this up long ago when address munging was in its infancy on Usenet. I referred to it as hiring a secretary.

    They'd better not be applying for a patent.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  33. Many Solutions Already (indirectly) Human-Powered by tabdelgawad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many popular anti-spam systems, e.g. those implemented by webmail services, are already indirectly human-powered. Users classify their own spam emails and the everyone benefits system-wide without privacy concerns.

    I'd say the system works pretty well. My Yahoo account, which was unusable after being harvested from my Usenet postings, is usable again. I just checked, and I have 426 messages in my bulk (spam) folder and 9 in my inbox. Of the nine, half (ok, 4!) are auto-responses from mail daemons to messages I never sent, while the other half are spam that escaped the filters. Not bad at all for a few days' worth of mail.

    I think a sensible business model is for the webmail services to leverage their huge, continually updated, spam database and license them to ISPs, who can then filter spam at the server level before users download anything. I think that's much more elegant than software+community based solutions implemented at the user level.

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  34. It's a joke. by Rabin+Vincent · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why?
    1. The site is hosted at eprovisia.dione.cc, and dione.cc is something of a Polish linux group's website, of which our friend arturs is a member.
    2. The "company" is "incorporated" at "Palmyra Atoll, a small nature preserve somewhere near Hawai'i. There's nothing there but nature.
    3. The geographical co-ordinates are in the postal address: Islet 7, 5 52 N 162 06 W.
    4. There's no +78 dialling code.

      This is a great joke, and once more Slashdot's been had.

      -Rabin

  35. There's a dupe site by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Informative

    at eprovisia.coredump.cx.

    This site is a joke, and no more represents an actual business than that other famous site with a .cx domain.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  36. Slashdot has been trolled, kthanxbye by brickbat · · Score: 4, Informative

    This company can't possibly be real.

    Anybody read their terms of service? You understand that there are no guarantees, either expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy, confidentiality or availability of the service. eProvisia LCC may choose to share any information acquired in the course of providing its services with other entities, and may, at its sole discretion and based on this information, take whichever actions the company, its affiliates, subsidiaries, or representatives, consider to be appropriate. You henceforth void your reasonable expectation of privacy, and your constitutional rights to a fair and speedy trial.

    And their contact information. Um, Palmyra Atoll is an uninhabited pile of sand in the Pacific Ocean. "Palmyra Atoll dollars?" BWAHAHAHA.

    Leveraging our paradigm-shifting product line with state of the art technology developed by a dedicated team of professionals, we offer a significant competitive advantage on the diversified but fragmented market of best of breed anti-spam solutions. That line sounds like it was generated with the Web Economy Bullshit Generator.

    Thanks for the laugh, Hemos. No, I'm laughing at you, not with you.

  37. Palmyra Atoll Facts by omahajim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the CIA World Factbook on Palmyra Atoll:

    Location: Oceania, atoll in the North Pacific Ocean, about half way between Hawaii and American Samoa ( 5 52 N, 162 06 W)

    Area: about 50 islets covered with dense vegetation, coconut trees, and balsa-like trees up to 30 meters tall
    total: 11.9 sq km
    land: 11.9 sq km

    Population: no indigenous inhabitants; 4 to 20 Nature Conservancy staff, US Fish and Wildlife staff (July 2004 est.)

    Dependency status: incorporated territory of the US; privately owned, but administered from Washington, DC, by the Fish and Wildlife Service of the US Department of the Interior; the Office of Insular Affairs of the US Department of the Interior continues to administer nine excluded areas comprising certain tidal and submerged lands within the 12 nm territorial sea or within the lagoon

    Legal system: the laws of the US, where applicable, apply

    Flag description: the flag of the US is used

    Economy - overview: no economic activity

    This page was last updated on 14 September, 2004

    Translation of eProvisia's four-page web site : We're from the Government, and we're here to help you.

  38. Re:Carl Sagan beat you to it... by OneOver137 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although he called it the 'Bologna Detection Kit' and applied it to pseudo-science. It actually works quite well here on /.

  39. Yahoo's spam filtering by PW2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Yahoo's spam filtering is also human powered. It seems to be contantly getting better. I signed up for webspace with them ($20 per month) and get a lot of POP3 2G email accounts; their spam filter gets most of the spam and then I mark spam that is remaining in the inbox. Lastly I check for false positives and occasionally download the highly spam free email messages once a month or so using POP3 (I usually just use the web front-end for daily email access).

    1. Re:Yahoo's spam filtering by shotgunefx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yahoo's spam filtering sucks. I trained it with 15,000 messages (over 99% spam) and it hasn't got one yet. Only 2 false positives. (I get around 100 spam a day on this account)

      After much nagging, the answer I got was basically that if you forward mail to your Y! account, it doesn't filter it AT ALL. So anything that has a different to gets by. I wonder how this works if you pay yahoo to be someone@somwhere.com.

      I wish I knew this before I spent all that time classifying. And I know your not supposed to bitch about free stuff and I'm not. Been a MailPlus customer for years.

      At the very least they should have a swear filter you could use to catch the obvious shit such as "Tight Anal Teens get fucked in the ASS!"

      You only have 50 or so filters and it's just not practical to try and catch even a small portion of blue language.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
  40. What currency? by PaybackCS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As seen here the Palmyra Atoll is nothing more then an inhabited ring of island a thousand miles south of Hawaii. There is no population, no government, no money, and very likely no eProvisia. The site is a complete farce, and is probably run by spammers collecting email addresses and names.

  41. Clever Ad for Barracuda by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article is not a troll. This is a very cleverly written ad for Barracuda.

  42. I considered starting such a business... by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...for a brief moment.

    I immediately realised such a business would never thrive, because:

    • Businesses would never allow an outside firm to scan potentially sensitive emails.
    • Even for humans it is sometimes very difficult to distinguish spam from real mail, especially if you are not an insider to the business.
    • It could not be supported by an automated mechanism, because you could be sued if you would filter out real mail as spam, even if it happens rarely.
    • If it takes about 10 seconds to scan a piece of mail, any human could scan a maximum of about 300 mails an hour. Since this is the amount of spam I receive in a single day, I have to pay at least an hour's fee per day to scan my mail, or probably something like $3000 a month. Nobody will pay this.

    Yes, it's a hoax. Which could be immediately deduced from the fact that it is not viable business (especially with the price they quote).