Slashdot Mirror


Ireland Cracks Down on Online Scammers

bizpile writes "Ireland has decided to take some extreme measures to crack down on one type of online scam. They have decided to suspend direct dialing to 13 countries (mostly South Pacific Islands) in order to halt the use of auto-dialers. The measure, announced by Ireland's Commission for Communications Regulation, came in response to hundreds of consumer complaints about the scams. ComReg acknowledges that its move is extreme but says that previous efforts to raise awareness of the problem failed to significantly diminish complaints. ComReg will keep the block in place for six months, after which it will be reviewed. All direct-dial calls will initially be blocked, although the regulator is also compiling a "white list" of legitimate numbers that consumers have requested to call."

183 comments

  1. What's the scam ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean I can see that if it's just to make people pay when there's no need, it'd be a real pain where it hurts, but if it's to try and collect on that money (by setting up a high-cost line then using a virus/trojan to change the settings to dial it), there must be someone making money out of it. Surely it ought to be possible to track down by the payments ?

    I suppose the line owner could claim innocence, but they'd have to be damn convincing about it if lots of people suddenly start dialling this high-cost line.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:What's the scam ? by aug24 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Tariffs are paid between phone networks, then call revenues are paid on in the receiving country to the person/entity who owns the line. That person is 'somewhere else', obviously. Chuck a few paper companies in awkward places in the chain and you're stuffed.

      The telcos can't ask their opposite numbers for details, and can't refuse to pay for certain numbers either. So blocking them at root is (a) their only option and (b) a jolly good idea because all the poor buggers like my brother (who got caught for 125gbp just the other day - bloody MS insecure ^&*&^%$) would find their net connection refused and realise that they're being done.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:What's the scam ? by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm still waiting for a valid criticism of my idea which is to delay payment from the people who supply a phone service (British Telecom in the UK, AT&T etc in the States) to the people who run premium rate numbers for 2 or 3 months, so that there is plenty of time for people to dispute their bills. So if I find I have a 1000 UKP bill to some dodgy little company on some obscure island, and I complain, and there are many other people in the same position, then payment is withheld until the dodgy company can account for itself.

      A runner, or fraught with difficulty?

    3. Re:What's the scam ? by jobsagoodun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They already do delay it. There was a brilliant scam done to BT 10 years ago when premium lines first came out. The scammers got two offices, and put 20 phone lines into one, and 20 premium lines into the other. The bills for the premium lines got paid out (to the scammers) every 30 days, but the phone bills on the out going lines were payable every 90. So the scammers phoned up the premium lines from their outgoing lines & too two months money off BT.

      At that point I think BT made the billing cycles the same!

    4. Re:What's the scam ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You can't *prove* you didn't make the call legitimately.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:What's the scam ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would have to have a clue about telco billing and specifically interconnect billing to understand the issues at hand, the previous poster's point is correct.

    6. Re:What's the scam ? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      a jolly good idea because all the poor buggers like my brother (who got caught for 125gbp just the other day - bloody MS insecure ^&*&^%$) would find their net connection refused and realise that they're being done

      That's the other good thing about ADSL - I don't have to worry about shit like this. No (traditional) modem, no way it can dial out. Good job too, as in the past I've had to clean a handful of the little buggers off my girlfriend's PC.

      Sucks to be caught out by this sort of thing though - hope your brother gets/got the money back.

    7. Re:What's the scam ? by julesh · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's terrible at supporting Gnutella standards. IIRC, it cannot be an Ultrapeer

      No, the billing cycles are still as you described them. I believe they will, however, block a line that is being used to make too many premium rate calls and require an advance payment to reenable it.

    8. Re:What's the scam ? by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      What if you were in a coma, hmmm?

      --
      stuff
    9. Re:What's the scam ? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > They already do delay it.

      Clearly the system I described isn't in place, otherwise there wouldn't be a problem!

    10. Re:What's the scam ? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Pasted the wrong quote there.

      I'm sure I pressed Ctrl+C; maybe Firefox doesn't like me.

    11. Re:What's the scam ? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > You can't *prove* you didn't make the call legitimately.

      I'm sure you could get an expert witness to demonstrate that dialler software was installed on the ripped-off persons PC without their knowledge, or that the person wasn't in when the calls were made, or that the person who supposedly made the call never said anything.

      If you were not the first person to notice the dodgy calls perhaps you'd have a case against your phone company for not blocking calls to the dodgy company in question?

    12. Re:What's the scam ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Physicians, Judges and Laywers across the world hear this :

      Even if I am lying in a coma, I don't want my cronjobs stopped!

      Yours of sound mind and body,

      Dr, T. Skwid Esq.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    13. Re:What's the scam ? by aug24 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      hope your brother gets/got the money back.

      Not looking likely... but tell your MS-using UK friends: BT will password protect premium numbers so they can't be used by a dialler.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    14. Re:What's the scam ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly password protect, but you can ring 150 and ask for "premium rate number barring". From then on, you just can't ring 09xxxxxxxx numbers until you phone up 150 to remove the bar.

      Save yourself a fortune

    15. Re:What's the scam ? by igb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the more dramatic scam involved `midnight lines'. Once upon a time, BT (or probably British Telecom, or even the GPO) would sell you a phone line with which you could make unlimited calls between midnight and six in the morning. Combined with a premium rate number you could get very rich. ian

    16. Re:What's the scam ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      The correct answer is : "but you can demonstrate reasonable doubt".

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    17. Re:What's the scam ? by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      a jolly good idea because all the poor buggers like my brother (who got caught for 125gbp just the other day - bloody MS insecure ^&*&^%$) would find their net connection refused and realise that they're being done

      Wow, my brother had the same exact thing happen too. When he called the phone company the 1st tier of customer service played dumb until he went up a tier and they had heard the story many times before. In short he didn't pay a dime. I wonder how many other people this happens to...

      --
      I'm a minister!
    18. Re:What's the scam ? by woodhouse · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're not susceptible to auto-diallers maybe, but with an always on connection, you're a lot more susceptible to viruses generally. Using a router with DSL or cable is a good idea, if only for the hardware firewall.

    19. Re:What's the scam ? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Not looking likely... but tell your MS-using UK friends: BT will password protect premium numbers so they can't be used by a dialler.

      But for international call baring they would have to pay.

    20. Re:What's the scam ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't phone companies BAN so-called premium numbers? Oh that's right, they're there to make money. Ethics means NOTHING nowadays.

  2. How to deal with Spam/Scam by CdBee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lesson One. Be a European regulatory authority!

    BT, here in the UK, have been doing some similar actions recently although on a less extreme scale.(One of which is maximum cost control, they refuse to route any call where the cost is higher than the maximum cost for an inland premium-rate call in the UK).

    Its good to see regulators and firms acting to protect the more clueless users from themselves, as long as it doesn't prevent people requesting a line be opened.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:How to deal with Spam/Scam by alanxyzzy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here is The Register's article on BT blocking specific numbers used by premium rate dialler scammers, and here's BT's web page on the subject.

      The UK has a body called ICSTIS which deals with premium rate (but not expensive overseas) tarrifs.

      Some other links:
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/01/icstis_ann ual_report/
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/28/mps_icstis /

    2. Re:How to deal with Spam/Scam by stry_cat · · Score: 1
      Its good to see regulators and firms acting to protect the more clueless users from themselves, as long as it doesn't prevent people requesting a line be opened.

      I think it is terrible that these regulators and firms are interfering with the communication system. These idiots who are calling theses lines will stop once they have to pay the bill. That's the only way to educate some of these people.
    3. Re:How to deal with Spam/Scam by CdBee · · Score: 1

      That school of thought hasn't worked so far, has it? Look at the size of current networks of compromised PCs for evidence...

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:How to deal with Spam/Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is there a need for so-called premium lines? They are a very easy resource for commiting fraud. Hell, 1-800 numbers in the U.S. are no longer necessary toll free. 1-800 operators can add charges to the bills of incoming callers. Supposedly they can only do that if they have the consent of the caller (yeah right!).

      I think phone companies are the problem. In fact, phone companies are cooperating with the mafia because crime is profitable.

  3. power of boycott by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about all those legitimate businesses that are dependent solely on Ireland for their existance? Seriously though, If more countries were like this, it would probably force the governments to crack down on scammers (or at least try to).

    1. Re:power of boycott by Ravadill · · Score: 1

      How many legitimate companies with overpriced premium only phone lines would be on small south pacific islands? Incase for some reason there is, customers can get the number whitelisted anyway.

    2. Re:power of boycott by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      that's the idea, to make it too expensive for these countries that harbour these scammers to harbour them(at the moment some of them are even getting bribes from these scammers.. so they don't care if they're not legit even under their legislation).

      if you want to act like an asshole you risk that nobody will call you up and invite you anywhere...

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:power of boycott by mpe · · Score: 1

      How many legitimate companies with overpriced premium only phone lines would be on small south pacific islands?

      Assuming the phone call actually makes it to anywhere near the South Pacific.

  4. More awareness would help too. by mind21_98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't simply ensuring you have adequate virus/spyware protection help? This falls under awareness since people download things that do things totally differently than what they wanted. In extreme cases, you could remove the dialup modem and leave an Ethernet card for Internet access. In any case, blocking direct-dialing does seem too extreme.

    1. Re:More awareness would help too. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Fortunately many banks have now finally moved to Internet banking. Many broadband users left their modem installed "because it is required to use telebanking". When a modem is an utterly useless piece of equipment, it should be easier to persuade the user to disconnect or remove it.

      So, in parallel with informing the users, it should help to recommend businesses to discontinue all modem dialin services that can be (or have been) moved to Internet.

    2. Re:More awareness would help too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps removing the modem would help, but in ireland broadband internet access is not available to everyone, leaving dialup as the only option. Im waiting for my phone bill at the moment as we got a dialer somehow, despite having up-to-date virus protection. It seems as though older versions of virus protection dont protect against this.

    3. Re:More awareness would help too. by Mant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't simply ensuring you have adequate virus/spyware protection help? This falls under awareness since people download things that do things totally differently than what they wanted.

      I know it is traditional not to read the article, but you could at least read the summary.

      previous efforts to raise awareness of the problem failed to significantly diminish complaints

      They tried rasing awareness. It didn't work. Many, many uses don't have adequate virus/spyware protection, and don't understand about it.

      In extreme cases, you could remove the dialup modem and leave an Ethernet card for Internet access.

      Unless you the dial up modem is what you use to connect to the internet. The Ethernet card is only going to be any use if you connect through a network, or to a cable/ADSL mode, that uses an Ethernet connection.

    4. Re:More awareness would help too. by random_culchie · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with comreg.
      The vast majority of these phone calls are intended to rip the customer off.
      As an interesting thought, now with direct dialling gone, will you have to use the operator to get all those seedy 3.50 / minute sex lines in the Sunday World newspaper :). Cause that would be interesting to explain to the operator!

    5. Re:More awareness would help too. by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      my cable modem doesn't send/recieve faxes

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:More awareness would help too. by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of online Irish people use 56k modems. Some of the new adware stuff actually actively attacks protection programs, and/or stops the user from downloading the tools required to repair their machine.

      So I don't think it is all that extreme. If you read the article you will see that a lot of the countries listed don't even have a real population there.

    7. Re:More awareness would help too. by Ralconte · · Score: 1

      so use a web based service to send and recieve faxes. You can view them, print them, recieve them as emails, either as graphics or OCR'ed for you already. Plus, your phone line is tied up, answering voice calls with the matining call of the modem.

    8. Re:More awareness would help too. by cL0h · · Score: 1

      I''ve already rebuilt my mothers machine once after being hit by diallers. It now has bang up to date antivirus, AdAware and Spybot latest versions and it's still got a feckin dialler on it. Luckily the phones are on a loop and you have to dial 9 for an outside line which the dialler doesn't do!!
      Still very annoying though cos it tries to connect every 60 seconds and the dialup connection dialogue pops up each time.

      --
      cL0h
    9. Re:More awareness would help too. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      so use a web based service to send and recieve faxes. You can view them, print them, recieve them as emails, either as graphics or OCR'ed for you already. Plus, your phone line is tied up, answering voice calls with the matining call of the modem.

      Yes, but you have to pay several dollars a month for such a service, or possibly some limited services are free but require you to accept spam in return. I use one of these and it's a bit of a drag but occasionally necessary. Also many services are limited as to where the dial-up numbers they provide are; you don't want to force people to make international calls to fax you if they're in the same city. If I used faxes more than once a month I'd install fax software and use my modem.

    10. Re:More awareness would help too. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Faxes? Do they still exist?

  5. White lists by hackerm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    the regulator is also compiling a "white list" of legitimate numbers that consumers have requested to call


    So what's going to stop owners of those numbers in foreign countries to send an email requesting that their number is whitelisted?

    1. Re:White lists by RungeKutta · · Score: 0
      So what's going to stop owners of those numbers in foreign countries to send an email requesting that their number is whitelisted?

      Nothing, but I'm guessing those will be reviewed by a human and if found to be for fraudulent use, will not be added.

      --
      You are free to do as we tell you.
      We want your soul.
      www.wewantyoursoul.com
    2. Re:White lists by eoinmadden · · Score: 0

      I imagine ComReg intend to verify the number is legit before adding it to the whitelist.

    3. Re:White lists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the regulator is also compiling a "white list" of legitimate numbers that consumers have requested to call

      HTH!

    4. Re:White lists by eoinmadden · · Score: 0

      From their website[0]: ComReg will "permit direct dial access to specific telephone numbers located within the destinations referred to in the attached Appendix B only at the request of a subscriber and following the network operator having verified that the requested telephone number is a voice only service." 0. http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/ComR eg0499.pdf

    5. Re:White lists by gowen · · Score: 1
      So what's going to stop owners of those numbers in foreign countries to send an email requesting that their number is whitelisted?
      The fact they're unlikely to subscribers to an Irish telephone company...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    6. Re:White lists by rpjs · · Score: 1

      And I should imagine the potential scam market in Ireland (pop what 3 million or so?) is so small that it wouldn't be worth the scammers' time to bother. Now if a country the size of the US did it, or even the size of the UK, then they might try to subvert it.

    7. Re:White lists by johnjuanny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Population is up to just about 4 million now, according to the last census. Which is of course still tiny (small enough that I'm pleasantly surprised that we're talking about Ireland) - but you'd be surprised how much is worth the scammers' time. With about 1 - 1.5 million people on the 'net here (IIRC from an article I read recently), it's still a healthy target market - especially as the vast majority of those are still on dialup since broadband is only now taking off here. Also I wonder just how well policed and updated this white list will be. It's easy to see it being quietly forgotten about. Still, seems to me to be an encouraging move.

    8. Re:White lists by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      The fact they're unlikely to subscribers to an Irish telephone company...

      And the telco could make it a rule only to open outgoing calls if the subscriber calls them from the line he wants enabled. Caller-id or a call back from the telco to the subscriber would verify ownership. Some extra effort for the telco, but how many non-business subscribers are likely to want to dial direct to Nigeria??

      MBolongo: Hello, this is Michael at Cork 555-1234. Please to be allowing dis list of numbers to be calling to my brothers in Nigeria and China.
      Operator: Pull the other one, Bwana. Caller-id shows you're in West Africa.
      MBolongo: May the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits!!!

    9. Re:White lists by mpe · · Score: 1

      So what's going to stop owners of those numbers in foreign countries to send an email requesting that their number is whitelisted?

      The easiest way would be for the regulator to accept requests only be telephone via a number which does not accept calls from outside the Irish Republic.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Re:Will this ever work by REBloomfield · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try reading the article. This isn't a spam issue, it's a premium rate dialler issue. If they move operations in a big way, then Ireland can react in the same way. To be honest, I can't imagine the loss of Ireland will make them want to move...

  8. Is this the proper way? by p0 · · Score: 1


    I doubt that this will have any impact on those dialers. What was the research done to determine that most of these dialers are infact dialing to South Pacific islands? What about the cases of dialing else where and the cases in which the users have not raised an official complaint to the ISPs? What are the statistics?

    The best way, as a starter, would be to educate Joe average how harmful these dialers can be, and instead of going on blocking direct dialing to specific zones, wouldn't it also help much better if the user knew how to recognize, avoid, detect and eliminate such scams?

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Is this the proper way? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is zero legitimate usage to the South Seas islands. They have the distinction of being the most expensive places to call on the planet, with the single exception of calling a ship at sea. I used to work with fraud control of a major carrier, and nobody had ever ONCE seen a legitimate call to one of these places (Vanuatu, Niue Island, etc). It's all scams and phone sex.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Is this the proper way? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 0, Redundant
      educate Joe average how harmful these dialers can be

      Joe average would never even know that there is a dialer involved. He clicks on [close this popup]. He has no way of knowing that instead of closing the popup, its activated a dialler.

      especially after a couple of Guinesses.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Is this the proper way? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      I have relatives in Fiji, and have rung them. I am sure there are people who have relatives in Tahiti or the Cook Islands.

      I wonder if diallers "humanise" the modem dialling or it it can be detected by looking at the spacing of the digits... not really worth it I suppose.

      IIRC at one stage Mercury 121 (mobile) phones banned the two rather large countries of Pakistan and Nigeria from being called, presumably since that's where all the stolen mobile phones were calling.

    4. Re:Is this the proper way? by Billy69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was O2 (and perhaps others as well) who blocked this as there was a fault in the firmware of the most common Philips pay-as-you-go mobile (the one that was handed out free with a student Barclaycard) which meant you could call out for free. So while they fixed the problem by instituting a system at their end, they profiled all their pay-as-you-go calls, and barred calling to the countries bing called for the longest duration.

      --
      #include "disclaimer.h"
    5. Re:Is this the proper way? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Impact on the dialers? Hardly. Cutting into the flow of money to the scammers? Maybe a little bit. Preventing a lot of unfortunate, computer-illiterate irishmen from raking up giant telephone bills? Sure thing.


      And as far as I can understand the article, thats what it's all about - not to stop the scammers per se, but to prevent people from falling itno their trap. And as such, this is a Good Thing (tm) as far as I'm concerned.


      You could try to educate Joe Avrage (or Ola Dunk, as we call him), but even if you should manage that - and it ain't gonna be easy - it's all in wain when their spouse, stipid kid or geratic grandmother just 'borrows' the PC for a bit and clicks on something they shouldn't have clicked on... back to square one. Blocking whole nations like this may seem extrem, but it works. If you have a legitimate reason to call there, simply call the telco and ask them to put that number on the whitelist.


      A simular sceme - allthought user-initiated - are in place in Norway. You can ask that your phone shouldn't be allowed to call abroad, except to numbers you spesifificly designates. Or you can tell TeleNor (the biggest telco in Norway) that your phone isn 't supposed to call abroad, unless you dieal a spesific code first. I had to have a collegue set that one up, since his wife was (still is, despite countless attempts at teaching her) in the habit of clicking 'yes' to everything on screen...

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    6. Re:Is this the proper way? by jmmcd · · Score: 1
      actually, they have been trying to educate people about this (i got a mail about it the other day from an isp) but someone's grandmother isn't going to read, understand, or put into effect the advice they give.

      and btw: ireland is becoming very totalitarian, partly because the government just doesn't know how else to control us.

    7. Re:Is this the proper way? by random_culchie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt that this will have any impact on those dialers. What was the research done to determine that most of these dialers are infact dialing to South Pacific islands?

      Of course it will. If the dialers can't dial these numbers the custoemr can't get ripped off.

      Numerous complaints about these charges to Eircom (Our countries defacto telecomunications monopoly) have been ignored. Many customers have been left out of pocket. Thats why the usually toothless ComReg has taken action.

      The best way, as a starter, would be to educate Joe average how harmful these dialers can be, and instead of going on blocking direct dialing to specific zones, wouldn't it also help much better if the user knew how to recognize, avoid, detect and eliminate such scams?

      The people tha have been ripped off are generally not the tech savvy kind. They are not going to listen to this "education" anymore than they listen to traffic laws. Generally people will only care about it after they have been done over. These trojan dialers go to great lengths to conceal their presence.

      See also Ireland offline for more info.

    8. Re:Is this the proper way? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Yeah, New Zealand excepted, of course. But from the rest of the world?

      Besides, if you had legit usage it would show up on your bill in previous months, and the computer would score it low.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Is this the proper way? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing up that! It had been puzzling me for a while, and the "stolen mobile" theory was only based on reading the contract and anecdotal evidence. Why is it not surprising that it was Philips? :-)

    10. Re:Is this the proper way? by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Joe Avrage [sic] (or Ola Dunk, as we call him)
      In Ireland, they call him Ima Drunk.

      (+1 Funny)
      (+1 Irish Joke)
      (-4 Not Really Funny)

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    11. Re:Is this the proper way? by Billy69 · · Score: 1

      Just in case you were wondering about the technical details, basically the hack was a code that could be typed into the phone which would stop its realtime clock. The phone actually stored the PAYG credit internally, and used the internal clock to decrease your credit. Basically stopping the RTC would make the phone stop decresing your credit. The eventual solution was to duplicate the storage of credit in the phone companies system, so if you made more calls than you had credit for, they would just disable your phone.

      --
      #include "disclaimer.h"
    12. Re:Is this the proper way? by kiatoa · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my Mom lives in the Cooks - I'll have to ask her about getting wierd calls. I still don't understand how someone external to the phone company can make a buck off of this. BTW I grew up (in Raro) with the old crank telephones with party lines. No way to do a scam with that level of technology!

      --
      90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
    13. Re:Is this the proper way? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Or as Billy T James said; the government had put in slot machines for the public to use. Put 20 cents into the slot and press button B to see if you get a jackpot!

  9. Easier Method by illuminata · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've got a method that'd take care of the offline scammers in Ireland, too.

    Declare war on the leprechauns.

    You know those little fuckers are the ones up to this. God damn dirty leprechaun tricks...

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Easier Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just mad because I haxored their port of gold.

  10. Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by zaxios · · Score: 1

    I think it's sad that to stop scammers Ireland has to deliberately stunt its telecommunications infrastructure. This will help stop the scams themselves and their profitability, but scamming will continue to hurt Ireland.

    So what's going to stop owners of those numbers in foreign countries to send an email requesting that their number is whitelisted?

    Remember that there's a step between request and approval. Ireland is clearly serious about this.

    1. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Yes because Ireland's economy is closely coupled with that of the South Pacific Islands.

      Rather a lot of these "make random uninformed comments" karma whores today.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    2. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by https · · Score: 2, Insightful

      99.9% of calls to these numbers are fraud. Ireland isn't stunting its telephone infrastructure in any meaningful way.

      Think of this as cutting off an entire netblock for spamming. Either the guys on the other side do something about it, or their phones just stop ringing.

    3. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by Unipuma · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I hate to be the devil's advocate in this, but this also raises some privacy issues.

      If (for a legitimate reason) you need to call someone on one of those islands, how are you going to whitelist this number? Do you have to register with name and address? Additional information?

      You wouldn't be able to make an anonymous call anymore, because even public phones would have to be unblocked.

      Of course, there's always the question 'Why would you want to make an anonymous call', but I feel that falls in the same category as 'If you have nothing to hide....'

    4. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by zaxios · · Score: 1

      Yes because Ireland's economy is closely coupled with that of the South Pacific Islands.

      Did I say that Ireland's economy would be hurt? No. I said that they were restricting the functionality of their phone network, which they are. I can't say that there are a lot of "make random uninformed replies" to actual comments idiots around because, in fact, your somewhat alone in your stupidity.

      karma whores
      My karma is already maxed out, moron.

    5. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by random_culchie · · Score: 1

      Oh dear....

      If you make a call the details are recorded by the phone company anyway!

      You wouldn't be able to make an anonymous call anymore, because even public phones would have to be unblocked.

      Wrong and irrelevent. Its the numbers that are whitelisted to everyone. You could request the number to be unblocked for a genuine reason. and ,one hopes, comreg will make an intellegent decision to unblock it. It not being a premium 4 /min number would probably be their first criteria. You can then go about your shady activities on a public phone with your handfulls of euro coins.

      Of course, there's always the question 'Why would you want to make an anonymous call'

      (figures are only for demonstration purposes)

      Population of ireland around 4 million.

      Amount of phone calls to these tiny islands [fuck all]

      amount of genuine calls to these islands [fuck all] /80

      amount of genuine calls to these islands that need to be made anonymously [fuck all] /80 /80

      So in summary there is not going to be many people affected by this.

      Mods: parent doesn't have a clue what he is talking about b4 u mod me flamebait

    6. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Think of this as cutting off an entire netblock for spamming.

      I can hear it now:

      "They made a mistake. My phone number is blocked and I'm not a scammer!", "What they should have done was just block the phone number of the scammer.", "There was no reason to include entire countries of innocent people as collateral damage!", "Frea speach!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Crime costs even when it doesn't pay by novakreo · · Score: 1

      I think it's sad that to stop scammers Ireland has to deliberately stunt its telecommunications infrastructure. This will help stop the scams themselves and their profitability, but scamming will continue to hurt Ireland.

      They're not the only ones. Optus in Australia made direct dialing to Sao Tome-Principe, Guinea-Bissau, and Diego Garcia available only on an opt-in basis earlier this year. I don't know if it's the same in Ireland, but everyone I know who makes international calls uses calling cards anyway, since the standard telco rates, even to 'cheap' destinations like NZ, UK, and USA are ridiculously expensive.

      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
  11. Lets loose premium rate dialup. by pklong · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not just ban all premium rate dial up sites. They are just breeding grounds for porn sites and scams. I've yet to see a legitimate use for them. We could do without them.

    If you want to charge for a service get the customer to enter their credit card details / set up an account. If you think they would be unwilling, then that speaks volumes about your business.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny


      They are just breeding grounds for porn sites

      and you call that illegitmate ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by pklong · · Score: 1

      Well yes considering these are used to hide your tracks. Its got to be a lot less embarrassing to have 0989 012345678 Premium rate number on your phone bill than Big Tits Adult Entertainment on your bank statement. Specially if your significant other gets to see your bills.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    3. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by julesh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not just ban all premium rate dial up sites. They are just breeding grounds for porn sites and scams. I've yet to see a legitimate use for them. We could do without them.

      If you want to charge for a service get the customer to enter their credit card details / set up an account. If you think they would be unwilling, then that speaks volumes about your business.


      A telco I use the services of operates a premium-rate dialup in order to change the terminating line of their non-geographic numbers.

      Typical charges for using this service are in the range of 30-50 pence, of which the telco probably gets 20-40.

      If they wanted to charge 50 pence on a credit card, they would lose over half of that in transaction processing fees. And if somebody tried to pay with a debit card, they'd lose nearly all of it.

      For some services, particularly very cheap ones that the purchaser will want to use infrequently, a premium rate phone line is the most effective way of charging.

    4. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telcos make way to much money on premium rate services. These services are not going to disappear any time soon.

    5. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by pklong · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I was not to clear on this one. I mean premium dial up data service. I don't have a problem with voice calls to premium numbers, which as you state have legitimate uses (e.g. travel information) though it would be nice to have a mandatory welcome to xyz, calls charged at xyz at the start of the call.

      Many are a complete rip off of course and there is plenty of adult content, which is pretty nasty and anyone (child) can call. (As an aside, I don't see parents monitoring childrens phone calls, when they could be calling some really nasty, personalised, stuff)

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    6. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      By "loose premium rate dialup", do you mean total deregulation? I say we lose them instead!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by pklong · · Score: 1

      Well yes, but you knew what I meant.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    8. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by julesh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I wasn't clear -- the service I was talking about _was_ a data service. You dial in on their number and only then are you permitted to talk to their web server.

      Many are a complete rip off of course and there is plenty of adult content, which is pretty nasty and anyone (child) can call. (As an aside, I don't see parents monitoring childrens phone calls, when they could be calling some really nasty, personalised, stuff)

      BT offers a free premium rate call blocking service. I believe it is quite popular with parents.

    9. Re:Lets loose premium rate dialup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how companies imbrace unethical cash just because there happens to be a loophole in the laws. It's illegal to install dialers, but it's not illegal to receive money on behalf of the phone dialers? Funny money if you ask me.

      Crime = money. Money = big profits.

  12. Per usual by Celt · · Score: 1

    Per usual you can bet that Eircom (Irelands monopolistic telco) had no plans on doing this untill Comreg (Irelands Telco regulator) killed them alittle.

    Dam this country sucks so much some times :(

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:Per usual by breandandalton · · Score: 0

      Well, in this instance, it sucks less than every other country that's doing nothing about the problem.

    2. Re:Per usual by csgarvey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Even worse, eircom (the inucmbent, and almost, but not quite monopolistic), created a new tariff band specifically for these destinations, back in 2002.

      Band 13 includes those mentioned in the ComReg directive, and cost a whopping Eur 3.60 per minute (at all times). As a comparison, one reseller charges Eur 1.00 to the same desitnation, and the highest premium rate here is Eur 2.90.

      So its reasonably clear that Band 13 was created to generate more profit for eircom, rather than protect their customer's interests. There are unsubstantiated rumours from "insiders" that eircom were making Eur 1m - Eur 1.5m profit a month.

      .cg

    3. Re:Per usual by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Not a monopoly - there are other suppliers. The former state monopoly, true, but not any more.

    4. Re:Per usual by Celt · · Score: 1

      Don't be so sure, after all who do you currently pay your line rental to :)
      Yes it'll change but it hasn't yet..

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  13. Re:Will this ever work by Celt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If America did the same* then they properly would.. :)

    *NEVER gona happen

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  14. Pin codes on international/premium rate by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Maybe Windows should make it a little more difficult to go altering dial-up settings. How many users would mind a warning message saying "a program is trying to change your dial-up".

    Does any spyware/anti-virus software check this (and I don't mean check for a piece of particular spyware, but check the behaviour).

    1. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the spyware would start displaying the following:

      "If windows asks about changing dialup settings, remember to click Yes or you won't see [Insert_Celeb_Name] tits."

      Its just like the websites for activeX controls, or more recently for Driver downloads.

      Never underestimate the gullibility of your userbase.

      All of these problems are caused by operating under Admin anyway, because if I remember rightly, you can't change things like this as a normal user.

      Fix that issue and the problems will subside.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      How many users would mind a warning message saying "a program is trying to change your dial-up".

      About 3 less than will just click "OK" without reading the text, which is in turn 90% more than would have any hope of understanding the text even if they did read it.

      Personally I'm in Ireland and opposed to this blocking. This is a case of "The Savvy" preying on "The Clueless-Who-Should-Not-Be-Permitted-Online-Withou t-a-License-Proving-Trained-Ability", and more power to them I say.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    3. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      Actually as far as I know, the dialers out there don't modify existing dial up settings, but rather sit and wait for when a user's modem connection is not being used, and call these numbers and rack up the bills via a virus running in the background.

      It sucks, talk to my brother :/

      --
      I'm a minister!
    4. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

      The program most often recommended for preventing modem hijacking appears to be StopItNow. It's shareware.

      Both Adware and SpyBot will detect some but not all hijackers.

    5. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

      Maybe the spyware would start displaying the following:

      "If windows asks about changing dialup settings, remember to click Yes or you won't see [Insert_Celeb_Name] tits."

      All of these problems are caused by operating under Admin anyway, because if I remember rightly, you can't change things like this as a normal user.


      The problems mnight stop if users on windows did not run as admin by default. Or that message might start reading :
      "If windows asks for your admin password, enter it or you won't see [Insert_Celeb_Name] tits."

      As you said: Never underestimate the gullibility of your userbase.

      --
      "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
    6. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      who said anything about giving them the password in the first place ;)

      I can truly see M$s conunderum with admin account, especially regarding home users, and your right, they will just change that.

      At least giving users the appropriate rights protects the machines under my control.

      Perhaps home machine installation should include a random test. Pass the test and you get admin priviledges, fail it and you stay as guest.

      Things like "A website is asking to install something automatically, should you let it?"

      "Your 90 year old Grandmother sends you a whiz bang screen saver, do you open the attachment?"

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:Pin codes on international/premium rate by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      'The term is "Could NOT care less"! Saying you "Could care less" implies that you do indeed care.'

      Hmm... isn't that supposed to be a sarcastic remark? You'd say "As if I could care less," which makes the sarcasm obvious, except at some point everyone dropped the "as if".

      At least, that's how I always understood it.

  15. Re:Will this ever work by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Insightful ? . Note to Mod: RTFA it's not even about spamming, nor is the scam based in Ireland.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  16. Good Idea by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a fairly good idea, all in all... It's kinda similar in certain respects to the way most firewalls are (or should be) configured; block all, allow selectively.

    Clearly no company wants to cut into their profits, so I'm sure they very carefully analysed calls to the blocked areas over the last while, to see how many calls were made out to them. If they were used all the time by customers, they wouldn't consider it feasible to ban the entire selection.

    It could be considered to be extreme, but it's certainly not any sort of censorship. They have said that they will compile a "white-list" of numbers in those territories, so if you have a legitimate reason to be calling those places, they are more than happy for you to do so. Again, just like configuring a firewall for the first time, it is a bit of a pain to allow all the things you need to, but you end up with a much more secure system.

    1. Re:Good Idea by bfree · · Score: 1

      As someone else has pointed out this decision has not come from a company, it has come from the Communications Regulator. Eircom (the incumbent monopoly, formerly state-owned, then semi-state, then public limited and now privately owned) would have had no interest in addressing this problem as they were making a fortune on it too! Now I personally think this decision is fine also, most people who actually want to call these numbers will be happy to tell their phone service provider to just open up the couple of numbers they need, though I do hope for the odd fringe case they will be able to open the line completely and face the consequences themselves (they may not have a computer and hence might not care in the slightest about all this, but do care about rining mum, sister, granny, school friends etc.) Also I'm glad they showed the reasonable approach of putting renewal dates on the plan, an acknowledgment that this is not the way it should be, just the way it must be for now.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  17. Mod parent down: this is not a spam issue by https · · Score: 1

    It's a phone dialler problem.

  18. Extreme but a step in the right direction by CheesyPeteza · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Atleast its finally showing a government willing to do something about it. You can't just educate people overnight to become IT experts and never get fooled again by some auto dialer. There will always be people who don't understand the system they are using. Education isn't a complete solution, the telephone regulators have to step in and do something. I would actually like to see a ban on the extreme premium rate calls completely (the ones that charge about 1000% the price of the call), but still allow the double the cost ones for TV programmes to make money in their competitions/polls like who wants to be a millionaire etc.

    1. Re:Extreme but a step in the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. The fact is that the Internet is populated by an awful lot of people who are completely uneducated regarding the pitfalls. I know at least one person who was a victim of one of these dialers, and Eircom were only too happy to charge her the 60 euros for the price of a single call to Papa New Guinea. Frankly, innocent people were getting scammed out of a lot of money, and it had to stop. Predictably, Eircom, or Eircon as they're commonly known here, seemed happy to let it carry on, and make money out of it themselves.

      Alas, the south pacific isn't a particularly well-regulated place. Its not as easy as saying "just send the law enforcement around to whatever business is doing this". I think the ComReg plan is the only practical solution available under the circumstances.

  19. make such scam billing illegal by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So why not pass a law against any "automatic" payments on a telephone bill going outside the country? The end user shouldn't be responsible for this type of fraud at all, and if the telcos had to resolve any such charges themselves rather than making their cut when the end user was hijacked and scammed, you can bet they would be more motivated to clean up the system as well.

    Of course, you might still need to block some popular scam countries, if only to protect the citizens from running up not insignificant long distance time charges (and you certainly can't stop the telcos from charging from long distance time, but you can stop them from charging the extra fees that motivate this problem in the first place). If enough countries got around to saying flat out that we know this is a scam and we are going to legally protect our citizens from the "fees" they are being scammed out of, then eventually the problem would go away and there would be no need to block numbers. But as long as the government sides with the crooks and their telco accomplices and allows the telcos to go after the victim in this scam, the problem will not only continue but will grow; this article is the proof of that.

    What little, if any, valid charges one incurrs while calling another party by long distance could certainly be covered by other and better means than allowing it to be directly billed to a telephone number (credit card, for example). Enforcing this would be far better than exposing all of your citizens to a scam based on a flawed telco business model and blocking whole countries from your long distance system.

    Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing this type of billing go away completely, even for calls within a country. But at least there is a good argument that any scammers operating this way inside a country can be caught and taken to court; which is often not the case when they are on the other side of the globe. A few simple changes to the law, such as forcing the telcos to hold any payments for several innitial months to be sure victims have time to complain about scam sites and block those payments, should be adequate to stop hit and run scammers from seting up shop in the country they plan to run their scam in. And, of course, a law should block incoming international long distance telco "special fees", not just outgoing ones.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  20. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No I didnt RTFA, but it says they are banning direct dial calls, so if you want to ring someone in one of those countries, ring the International Operator first and ask to be connected. Duh!

    1. Re:Duh! by julesh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I were implementing this, I'd have a (short) message describing why the call has been blocked, followed by "If you really want to be connected, please dial now."

    2. Re:Duh! by julesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      D'oh!

      That should read:

      "..., please dial [random 3 digit code] now."

    3. Re:Duh! by mpe · · Score: 1

      but it says they are banning direct dial calls, so if you want to ring someone in one of those countries, ring the International Operator first and ask to be connected.

      Maybe these numbers (if any) will subsequently be added to the IDD whitelist.

    4. Re:Duh! by myov · · Score: 1

      I thought Telus (dominant landline carrier in Western Canada) implemented this recently as well.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  21. I also live in Ireland, Eircom not to be praised by zoney_ie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those bunch of muppets Eircom deliberately grouped the specific countries in question as "Pacific Islands" (even including one or two west African countries) in a certain tariff band. They then racked up the prices for this band. As it was merely international rate, not a premium rate (we have 15xx regulated premium nos.) people could not have it blocked.

    My guess is the business that lost 12,000 and others complained to ComReg (the regulatory authority).

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  22. Re:Will this ever work by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

    If they quit annoying us Irish people, then I'll be perfectly happy for them to jump ship elsewhere :-P

    --
    This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
  23. Re:Will this ever work by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 2, Funny

    But thats impossible. Everybody knows there's no way not to annoy the Irish.


    Not flamebait or a troll, I'm part Irish and just admitting the truth. Got a problem with that? You're just saying that to annoy me!!!

    --

    --
    What would Bill Clinton do?
  24. It all comes down to education. by sofakingon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It all comes down to education. If the people in general were more suspicious and critical of people, especially online, and new about basic security measures, this kind of thing would happen more rarely.

    However, people will not "wake up" to a fact until it (A) impacts a large enough segment for the media to report on it or (B) impacts business enough to have them protect their infrastructure better and/or buy air/press time (see A above)

    Government regulation is not the answer. It creates more red tape and toothless laws and raises taxes. Businesses (to include telcos, whether a state or private) should be innovative, not lobby the government to protect a broken system.

  25. Not all education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    People keep saying that people need to educated, which is true, but even the educated can fall over by this one.
    It is very easy for you setting to be modified without knowing. Apparently most of these autodiallers disconnect a current session and reconnect without you realising, unless you have you modem sound turned on (and you might have you modem set up to auto re-dial if you get disconnected, which can be frequent with a crap service like Eircom).
    I have seen this actually happen to a friends computer recently, before I heard about this, which I spent ages try to get rid of all the spyware etc off. His dial-up settings had been changed, which fortunately he noticed!
    However his problem was that he kept getting virus/spyware alerts (as Norton warns you about TOO much), and a (stupid) friend of his told him to turn off the virus protection. He system was fried with crap as a result.
    I agree with a previous statement that windows should alert that setting have been changed. OS X something similar by warning youthe very first time any application is launched.

    Anyway, it is very easy for this to happen to you without you realising. Hopefully if you know about these things you will cop on very quickly, but not before you get a nasty phone bill.

    1. Re:Not all education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reconnect without you realising, unless you have you modem sound turned on

      My memory may be deceiving me, but I'm sure I remmber that one of the old Hayes modem AT control codes was for turning off the modem sound; when dialler malware changes the dialup settings, I'd imgine the first thing it does is to turn off the speaker ...

    2. Re:Not all education by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Education to keep checking the dialout numbers isn't the point.

      Education to not use software that's so vulnerable to spyware drive-by installations, to switch off scripting and html rendering in email clients etc. however would cut down the problem.

    3. Re:Not all education by Superjhemp · · Score: 0, Troll
      People keep saying that people need to educated, which is true, but even the educated can fall over by this one.

      Hmm, no. This is only possible if you run the insecure Windows(tm) OS. And no educated person would ever do that.

  26. Some of these islands don't even have a population by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are not talking of blocking Fiji here, many of the blocked islands effectively don't even have a population - e.g. Diego Garcia, where the British threw out the entire indigenous population (a few thousand) to make way for a US military base.

  27. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been blocking phone calls to probably more countries from easten canada now for months. Sucks to be you if you have relatives there.

    1. Re:This is news? by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Sucks to be you if you have relatives there.

      They're only blocking direct dial calls. If you've got relatives in those countries, then you'll probably be using a calling card, as these countries are damn expensive to call through the standard phone companies. Otherwise you can always go via the operator, like in the old days.

  28. Re:This is Ireland, and I live here ... by Sanity · · Score: 2
    And no one who uses a computer in this country is intelligent enough to actually know what a Dialer is.
    Indeed, whereas everyone who uses a computer in other countries has a PhD in computer science.
  29. License Raj... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > It could be considered to be extreme, but it's certainly not any sort of censorship.

    Ever heard about the License Raj ?. You don't need an outright ban to achieve a certain amount of censorship. You just need enough corrupt administrators to ensure that the system is available only to the equally corrupt (like what happened in India). Depends on how hard it is to get a number whitelisted (soon, we'll have "200 whitelisted numbers for just 20 Grand" ...)

    But yeah, this one's probably a good idea ... (and I don't want to waste my moderation on the comments).

  30. Germany & Switzerland by CaptainZapp · · Score: 3, Informative
    In Germany dialers must be registered with the respective authorities otherwise it's illegal and the scammers are not entitled to collect anything.

    If premium charges are racked up the user must physically type OK into a box before the dialer gets operative. That doesn't help too much if in addition to the dialer a troyan is sneaked into the computer that OK's it in a for the user transparent fashion.

    In this case the number was shut down and the scamee mustn't pay.

    In Switzerland dialers to premium numbers are outright verboten, since this year. Period.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Germany & Switzerland by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      In Switzerland dialers to premium numbers are outright verboten, since this year. Period.
      So, if one is found on your system, you get shiped of to jail? Good solution I must say.
  31. Diego Garcia by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Since Diego Garcia is a US military base, is the phone scam there run by a certain Sargeant Bilko?

  32. Duh! and Duh, Doh! for you by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    NO! It's the scammers that are taking over your computers that are really doing the dialing. Don't you think they would quickly add a pause and this extra dialing in? There may be ways to beat them (but don't bet on it - many modems do voice and a good hack might even voice-id a challange of numbers to be dialed back), but the far better solution would be to flatly outlaw this flawed telco business model of charginging special premium fees for some numbers, particularly for International calls (where the scammer is much harder to track down).

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Duh! and Duh, Doh! for you by julesh · · Score: 1

      Don't you think they would quickly add a pause and this extra dialing in?

      Well, thats why it would be a random number, not something predictable.

      There may be ways to beat them (but don't bet on it - many modems do voice and a good hack might even voice-id a challange of numbers to be dialed back)

      Voice analysis is hard. If only a few countries implement blocks of this nature, they wouldn't bother doing anything about it.

    2. Re:Duh! and Duh, Doh! for you by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      Voice analysis is hard.

      Voice analysis gets a lot easier when you're trying to analyze a source designed to be clear and distinct, and you only have to pick out the informstion from a very iimited subset of words, in this case the tem posiable digits.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  33. Re:I also live in Ireland, Eircom not to be praise by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 3, Informative

    I fixed a few machines with dialers on them for friends and family (I am also in Ireland). Some of them had phone bills of over 600 euros to these countries. I am happy they are doing this. It is a long time coming. I also heard about eircom collecting money to pay fraudsters. I am surprised they were allowed do this. The actual document by the way is here.. http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/ComR eg0499.pdf Here are submissions from the various telcos. http://www.comreg.ie/_fileupload/publications/ComR eg0499a.zip

  34. Password stealing, anyone? by rosbif73 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    OK, so the current set of scammers are probably just interested in getting money out of the premium phone line. But I assume there's a dialup server on the other end that actually provides internet access, so that people don't notice the scam too quickly.

    This means they could also sniff packets to their heart's content, stealing passwords as they go...

  35. A small question of freedom... by MrKane · · Score: 0

    Isn't it primarily the responsibility of the end user to monitor their own internet activity/security of their connection? If so, there can be no justification in infinging the rights of millions of others because of a few hundred people who have invested in technology they don't understand/can't manage.

    Maybe *I'm* being harsh/simple?

    1. Re:A small question of freedom... by easter1916 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Freedom, jesus, Americans bandy that word around at the drop of a hat. Calls to those nations are now placed through an operator. Where's the loss of freedom? Minor loss of convenience is all.

    2. Re:A small question of freedom... by MrKane · · Score: 0

      ...fair point, but wouldn't you agree that the effect of inconveniencing millions due to the lack of ability of a comparative handful of users to use their computers properly is somewhat anti-rational? It's like saying you have to have a representative of the marketing watchdogs come round and help you use your microwave oven because their is an increase in the number of reports of people putting tinfoil containers in them, no? ..oh and I'm not American, sorry ;)

    3. Re:A small question of freedom... by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Population of the Republic of Ireland is just over 4 million. Number of phone lines, let's say 2 million for the sake of argument. Number of people wanting to call those destinations per week? Probably in the low tens... just tens.

  36. Re:I also live in Ireland, Eircom not to be praise by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1
    Argh! I hate replying to myself. Stupid submit button. :/ Here it is formatted.

    I fixed a few machines with dialers on them for friends and family (I am also in Ireland). Some of them had phone bills of over 600 euros to these countries. I am happy they are doing this. It is a long time coming.

    I also heard about eircom collecting money to pay fraudsters. I am surprised they were allowed do this.

    The actual document by the way is here (PDF). Here are submissions from the various telcos.

  37. Eircom was making more out of it than the scammers by blorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Eircom (Ireland's effective telecom monopoly) had picked the dialler countries out specifically and put them in a special 'Band 13' that was more expensive than anywhere else on the planet - 360.58c per minute, *three times* the next most expensive region. However these same countries could be dialled from for example Germany for as little as 37c/minute.

    So likely Eircom were paying the foreign telco a relatively small amount for completing the call, and the foreign telco would pass on a percentage of that to the dialler operator, while Eircom itself was getting the lions share of the actual call costs. If you complained, they would basically say 'you shouldn't have been visiting porn sites then'.

    It was in no way in Eircom's interest to see these scams ended, and that's why it was the government regulator that stepped in to force them to block the number.

    See here for some more background information. (This guy's site is a parody of the ComReg site but the information he presents is true.)

  38. The same story again ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it reminds me another funny story :

    http://www.carrefourtechno.com/carrefour/sites/fo/ redir.php?c=1&g=1&m=1&u=219&l=fr_FR&k=1rY1hD5hH7sx aMHYrKYgEtHw9ULgka

    Anyway, you can't say that music isn't a big part of it's success...

  39. Re:Will this ever work by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If America did the same* then they properly would.. :)

    *NEVER gona happen

    On the other hand, if America (and maybe the E.U. too) passed a simple law stating that customers would not be responsiable for international long distance premium charges and that the government would no longer side with the telcos in giving them the weight of law to enforce these fees coming from a flawed business model against it's own citizens, then the problem would go away fast.

    It might even go away faster if the government recognized that this was a well know fraud based on a flawed concept that the telcos set up and that the telcos take a cut from each time the scam gets a victim, and charged them with rackettering for letting the problem continue.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  40. Re:Will this ever work by Finuvir · · Score: 1

    But thats impossible. Everybody knows there's no way not to annoy the Irish.

    Hey! I find that offensive.

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  41. Re:This is Ireland, and I live here ... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

    I would contend that the majority of the population of this country (or any other) is intelligent enough to know what a dialer is. The problem is that they are not knowledgeable enough to know what it is, nor should they be required to be.

    --
    Why is anything anything?
  42. Re:This is Ireland, and I live here ... by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1
    And no one who uses a computer in this country is intelligent enough to actually know what a Dialer is.

    That is wrong, think of all the PC users out there that will click on every dialog box that pops up.
    This website is trying to install code in order to view it, would you like to proceed?

    [OK] [Cancel]
    >User: Yes I would like to see more porn!

    Happens all the time...
    --
    I'm a minister!
  43. Re:This is Ireland, and I live here ... by frisket · · Score: 1
    no one who uses a computer in this country is intelligent enough to actually know what a Dialer is.

    There is an element of truth in this: obviously enough people who got caught by pr0n dialers to complain to Telecom. But this reaction is merely a case of protecting people from themselves -- it won't hurt the pr0n merchants, who will always find another way.

    There are some people who would prefer the Internet to auto-cull itself. Those users who were careless or unknowledgeable enough to get scammed will panic and stop using it.

    And then of course there are those people who actually see pr0n dialers as a valuable service resource :-)

    The best cure for seasickness is to go and sit under a tree. [Spike Milligan]

  44. Unless you are in NL and they activate SWITCHPOINT by P1ON33R · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's the other good thing about ADSL - I don't have to worry about shit like this. No (traditional) modem, no way it can dial out.

    Unless you live in the Netherlands and you have an evil big telco (KPN) that changes your DSL line into an electronic payment facility, with a risk of EUR 3.000 per incident. The technology they used is called 'Klipping' to link the IP number to the phone number of the DSL connection being used. No matter who has access to your machine (could be a remote connection with a stealth web proxy) payments can be made and will be automatically subscribed from your bank account.

    This 'service' has been activated for all customers, without any notification at all, and with lies and cheats from KPN about the actual risks. For instance they clame that someone would have to literally dig up your phone line cable to abuse this system, which is a plain lie (wireless LANs, remote connections, etc.).

    Sorry I am still a bit upset about all this. ;) For more information search on google for 'Klipping' and 'Switchpoint'.

  45. In Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The phone companies also blocked a number of countries. You can call a toll free number and
    have the block lifted for free. It esentially stopped all the sacamming in one go. Those that need to do buisness with those countries presumably opened their lines shortly after (I presume that this is a very limited number of people), so the commercial impact was minimal, and the benefits maximal.

  46. Can't they just block *modem* calls? by clive_p · · Score: 1

    Telephone companies try hard to save bandwidth on overseas calls and compress them more than inland calls, but they have to detect calls to fax machines and modems, as the compression messes them up completely. So: can't they just block modem calls to these countries? It would still stop people sending faxes, but would not affect the vast majority of legitimate calls, which I suspect are plain voice calls. Or is this, for some reason, not technically feasible?

    1. Re: Can't they just block *modem* calls? by kbmccarty · · Score: 1

      So: can't they just block modem calls to these countries? It would still stop people sending faxes, but would not affect the vast majority of legitimate calls...

      That's why your suggestion won't fly; a hell of a lot of businesses and other organizations still rely on international faxes. E.g., my research experiment is based in Italy. The ability to fax signed paperwork from here (the US) to there, and back, is crucial.

      --
      - Kevin B. McCarty
    2. Re: Can't they just block *modem* calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and right now those people are still blocked

      thats the point, his suggestion was to limit further the blocks.

      the faxing companies still would have to do the exact same thing they are doing right now, get the number whitelisted.

    3. Re:Can't they just block *modem* calls? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Some long time ago I had a Gateway 28k8 modem that came with a callcenter application. You'd plug a regular telephone handset into the modem as well as the cord to the wall. From the callcenter app you could set up multiple voice mailboxes, with an outgoing message that said: "Press 1 for X; press 2 for Y; press 3 for Z, etc". Voicemail was stored on the PC and could be played back through the handset, just like a regular answering machine. It could also send and receive faxes. I think I got a similar app with a 56K PCI modem a couple of years back.

      My point?? The app was "talking" down the phone line to the caller by copying to the phone line an audio file it recorded from the handset... No modem or fax tones, unless you used the builtin terminal or fax machine. The dialler doesn't have to be making a modem connection. It could simply say "yadayadayada" to its friend overseas. Your telco is charged by the remote telco based on length of call and the cost of the routing, not on the call content...

  47. Doesn't this require the use of MSIE? by Secrity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe that people who use any browser other than MSIE are either much less likely or incapable of having these dialers seripticiously loaded on their computers. The article said "previous efforts to raise awareness of the problem failed to significantly diminish complaints." Wouldn't it be more effective for Ireland to simply advertise the dangers of using MSIE?

    1. Re:Doesn't this require the use of MSIE? by discord5 · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be more effective for Ireland to simply advertise the dangers of using MSIE?

      The task sounds easy, but it isn't. Users are notoriously persistent in ignoring all but the most extreme measures.

      "You shouldn't click YES on anything, you should read it" is usually interpreted as "click yes on anything without reading it". I'm not kidding, I have to do some end-user support from time to time, and it's horrific. I've told some people 10 times not to use their administrator account for day to day use, and they will still go right in or complain when you change the password.

      So, as a matter of effectiveness, this is probably a good temporary solution.

  48. Re:Will this ever work by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    It's related to spam. The scammers send out spam for their "free pr0n site". Then the site will twist your arm to download/install their malware. (They might call it an "Internet accelerator" or some other lie.)

    I don't have any statistics handy, but I thought most of the dialer spammers were in Eastern Europe. They probably outsourced the telephone end of their operations to remote counties that have a no-questions-asked policy.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  49. Official Apology by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Informative

    The following was an email sent to all eircom customers(or at least everyone with a @eircom.net address


    From: service.announcements@eircom.net

    Dear Customer,

    As part of our ongoing commitment to customer service we would like to
    provide you with the following important information on Modem
    Hi-Jacking.

    Modem Hi-Jacking occurs when a web site you visit purposely disconnects
    you from your Internet Service Provider and reconnects you to the
    Internet through an international or premium rate number, which may
    result in increased call charges.

    Everyone using the Internet should be aware of this risk. It is a
    global issue and is not confined to Ireland. eircom net provides a safe
    surfing guide, which may help you reduce the risk of Modem Hi-Jacking.

    Please be aware that there are also software and hardware solutions
    available, which may reduce the risk of Modem Hi-Jacking. Our safe
    surfing guide provides some examples of these solutions. These are
    purely examples and do not represent an exhaustive list. eircom net is
    not in a position to recommend a particular solution. Customers will
    need to determine which one best suits their particular needs.

    For further advice please visit our safe surfing guide at
    http://www.eircom.net/safesurfing

    Kind Regards,

    Fintan Lawler

    Managing Director, eircom net



    This mail sounds a lot like eircom covering their own asses to me. They've regularly overcharged the numbers that dialers are calling, at over 3 a minute. I was almost caught by one of these dialer programs myself a few years back.
    I logged off, left the PC to get something to eat, and then a very wierd sound started coming out of the modem. A big dialing +475 5746353735373 or something appeared on the status connection. Got freaked out at the time. Virus scanner couldn't find the dialer, so I had to desperatly altavista for an answer(didn't know about google yet). I fixed the issue but low and behold, the next bill had a big IR£3 charge for the number that the dialer connected to for about 20 seconds.

    This scam has been know for a long time, radio stations are always on about it every few months. Maybe the guy on the inside got caught, because there HAD to be one unless eircom just enjoyed grossly overcharging customers. Oh well. Monopoly is as monopoly does. Still they're giving a free broadband trial now... Hmmm I wonder if I should NO CARRIER

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  50. Ha ... by elronxenu · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's the telco version of the USENET Death Penalty applied to a whole country :-)

    And they called us vigilantes ...!

  51. Re:Unless you are in NL and they activate SWITCHPO by Superjhemp · · Score: 1
    For more information search on google for 'Klipping' and 'Switchpoint'.

    I tried looking those up, but it's all double dutch for me...

  52. eProvisia by troon · · Score: 1

    How am I going to contact my personal human spam filter now?

    Oh, wait - I don't live in Ireland.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  53. Re:Will this ever work by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

    So in this case, jump ship means that the scammers will target another country to get their calls from...

  54. god forbid by patrick.whitlock · · Score: 1

    people actually listen to warnings issued by IT professionals. i personally tell prople about this all the time, but they don't listen either. I've said it in a post before and here it is again.. pay attention to what you put into your computer and this will stop. a little thought on behalf of the consumer can go a long way. ireland just decided that they had to stop the bitching somehow, so they removed the problem... way to go

  55. Re:I also live in Ireland, Eircom not to be praise by bfree · · Score: 1

    You could place a block on all international numbers (quite extreme) or you could pick up a simple phone router with a white or black list of prefixes (a company I used to work for did this for a chain of customers shops to limit the staff to just the calls they needed to make for work).

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  56. Dumb by kieran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the regulator is also compiling a "white list" of legitimate numbers that consumers have requested to call.

    "Hello, is that Paddy? I'll give you 20 euros to try and call this number so that it gets added to the whitelist."

    1. Re:Dumb by vhold · · Score: 1

      There aren't enough details here to determine if the white list idea is flawed or not. The article says they are working with representatives from the blocked countries to help compile the list. That seems to suggest some level of testing at least, and that just blindly adding numbers that are requested isn't likely to be the case.

    2. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hello, is that Paddy? I'll give you 20 euros to try and call this number so that it gets added to the whitelist."

      Just hope that "Paddy" has no connections with the IRA.

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Re:good for Ireland folks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are good people. Individuals who refuse to be socially-engineered. Lied to. Bullied. Preyed upon. Repeatedly. These companies were asked..to alleviate the problem. Finally, a sovereign nation which represents its citizens, a culture...a proud heritage...stepped in.

    The Telecommunications Conglomerate. The local I.S.P.'s. The Dial-Up Redirection Gang. The Middle-Men ? Innocent to the last individual. Their rapacious tentacles spread throughout unsuspecting communities. Throughout entire countries.

    Now. You disparage an entire nation. Treat them as if they're errant school children...forgetful of a lesson. Get this message. Learn this lesson. There are those who do not want to be a member of your club. IT( Information Technology )my left foot.

    Ireland. The common folk. I am proud of my heritage.

  59. Diallers made in Ireland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    My sister in South Africa was caught with a whopping bill due to this scam. I wrote a long letter to Telkom, who eventually reimbursed part of her bill (but admitted no guilt on their part)

    Interestingly, during my research I came across these links that indicated the diallers are actually developed in Dublin itself.

    Seems like things are going full-circle here - Ireland is cutting lines to countries dialled by software developed in Ireland...
    Shouldn't they start investigating the root cause?

    http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,36055,00.ht ml:
    "...the company that makes and sells the dialers, in this case Dublin-based Nocreditcard.com, gets a good chunk of the profits..."

    http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,35627,00.ht ml:
    "...The company behind Adultbuffet's dialer appears to be the No Credit Card Network, owned by Celtline Holdings based in Dublin, Ireland..."

    1. Re:Diallers made in Ireland? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister in South Africa was caught with a whopping bill due to this scam. I wrote a long letter to Telkom, who eventually reimbursed part of her bill (but admitted no guilt on their part)

      Telcos profit big time on these scams. There's no way they will ever reimburse all of the phoney charges. :)

  60. Hello.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    Hello, is that ComReg? I would like my aunties number to added to ther white list. The number is +475 5746353735373..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  61. It's really an order not to bill for dialer calls by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    What ComReg is really doing is telling eircom that they can't charge for dialer calls. But they can't order eircom to provide free service. So they told eircom to either block or not bill. Here's the actual directive:
    • The Commission for Communications Regulation directs that Providers of Publicly Available Telephone Services shall no later 04 October 2004:
    • a) Suspend direct dial access to destinations listed in the attached Appendix B. The Appendix will be reviewed on a regular basis by ComReg and the network operators and amended appropriately in response to any significant changes to problem destinations; and
    • b) permit direct dial access to specific telephone numbers located within the destinations referred to in the attached Appendix B only at the request of a subscriber and following the network operator having verified that the requested telephone number is a legitimate service only or
    • c) As an alternative to only permitting direct dial access in accordance with paragraph b), above, providers of publicly available telephone services can choose to no longer charge any consumers for unauthorised call charges arising from Autodiallers.

    It's only for six months, until they figure out something better.

  62. Automated authenticathion: by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Forward the call to an IVR system which says:
    To complete your call dial XXX
    Where XXX is a random three-digit number.

    Humans will be able to respond to this. Modem autodialers will not (at least not without a huge amount of added intelligence).

    BTW: I'm patenting the process :-)

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  63. Troll! But wtf... by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1
    So, if one is found on your system, you get shiped of to jail? Good solution I must say.

    You are free to install as many dialers as you want. The service provider however will not be able to collect when charges are racked up due to a dialer.

    You know. Switzerland is a fairly civilized country, not like for example the US where they might put you for four years into the slammer for posessing 15 XTC tabletts or half an ounce of weed.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk