Slashdot Mirror


Apple Releases Logic 7, New Jam Packs

RadRafe writes "Apple today introduced Logic Pro 7 and Logic Express 7. Logic Pro now features Distributed Audio, a clustering tool (Xgrid-based?) to exploit the DSP power of multiple Macs, and Sculpture, the long-awaited component-modeling synthesizer. Also out today are two new Jam Packs for GarageBand - though they work in Logic too, now that Logic supports Apple Loops."

187 comments

  1. "Scale out" by ARRRLovin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With "grid-everything" becoming the latest buzz, hardware manufacturers must be salivating every time a new distributed processing program is released.

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:"Scale out" by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This actually is a *BIG* thing. Built in distributed computing infrastructure that is easy to enable without a ton of scripting and custom coding has been a holy grail of distributed computing for a while. Programs like Pooch from Dean Dauger have helped considerably, but distributed computing built into applications that take advantage of an OS supported computing "grid" are another level entirely. Certainly folks that use film rendering and such can benefit, but so can users of Photoshop, not to mention a whole cadre of folks in scientific computing (like myself) for image analysis and clustering analysis (of images) and molecular simulations, particle based modeling etc...etc...etc...

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:"Scale out" by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Latest buzz? Bah, I remember reading about 3D artists stuffing Quadra 950s full of Radius Rockets 10 years ago.

    3. Re:"Scale out" by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon we'll grid locks... like in slapstick shows... But, the backdoor intrusion will be to knock out the hinges...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:"Scale out" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grid lox and bagels?

  2. Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    is what the cool kids are running thesedays, that full VST experience (gotta love vst plugins), from Steiberg of course
    Clicky

    1. Re:Cubase SX 3 by nijk · · Score: 0

      The even cooler kids are running Reason 2.5

      It's swedish so it's cool okay.

    2. Re:Cubase SX 3 by jsoffron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just wondering (honestly, because I don't know) - does slahdot usually post about music software updates? It seems an odd thing to show up on the front page, because I didn't see anything (which, again, might have been something I missed rather than something that didn't happen) about the new Cubase on here, which I think is as/more popular than Logic, or anything about adobe audition when it came out, or anything about the other myriad music programs on the market. Why is this slashdot news-worthy?

    3. Re:Cubase SX 3 by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have used Cubase, Nuendo, Protools, Logic and Reason. They all suck as sequencers when compared to Digital Performer. VST on the mac is now pointless, since all the *cool* kids are using Audio Units. Look up the synth packages. MachFive, Kompakt and Intakt are all AU plugs.

      Steinberg originally developed for Windows (actually IRIX, but that's a long story), and has not done a good job porting things to the mac.

      But if you are comfortable with Cubase, go for it, after all, only the end product matters.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    4. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Brackney · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use Logic Pro and have no trouble w/ VST plugins using FXPansion's VST/AU converter. Works like a charm.

    5. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      IRIX? What the fuck? Cubase was originally an Atari ST program.

    6. Re:Cubase SX 3 by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      Those must be cool time traveling kids, considering version 3 isn't available yet.

      . I use version 2 on Windows and the Mac and they're both great. Its an expensive program, but with a nice soundcard you can do some serious work with the Steinberg Stuff.

      I tried logic once and I couldn't figure it out without looking things up. With Cubase its pretty straightforward.

      By the way, Audacity supports VST's as well, although they don't display like they do in Steinberg's software.

    7. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The cool kids are using Ableton Live 4. Very cool elastic audio, VSTi support, and a highly elegant next generation user interface.

      Logic = Super clunky
      SX = Not as Clunky
      Ableton Live v 4 = Creamy Smooth

    8. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jah, but it is not a DAW in the DP4, SX, Logic etc. way

    9. Re:Cubase SX 3 by trollus_and_cressida · · Score: 1, Informative

      IRIX? yeah, exactly. wtf? Cubase evolved on the Atari ST from Steinberg's Pro24 - alson on the Atari ST (built in midiport -woohoo!). I believe Steinberg moved to the mac from the Atari and only after that moved to the PC. Music developers tended to heavily favor the mac over the pc. Logic was also originally developed by C-Lab (which changed its name to Emagic) on the Atari ST (8 mhz processor - woohoo!) when it was known as Notator. It then became Notator Logic. Then Logic. Then moved to the Mac. Emagic than developed a PC version - which was good but more buggy than the mac version and always a little behind featurewise. Not surprisingly when Emagic was bought by Mac they gave up the PC version of Logic.

    10. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cubase blows. Try Live 4 if your really serious.

    11. Re:Cubase SX 3 by bobbagum · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's the beowolf cluster of those that makes it newsworthy

    12. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Briareos · · Score: 1
      Those must be cool time traveling kids, considering version 3 isn't available yet.

      Strange - I could've sworn that that's exactly what was in the upgrade box I got 2 weeks ago...

      If you still don't believe me: the online help was missing from the DVD, so you have to download it...

      np: Autechre - Arch Carrier (LP5)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    13. Re:Cubase SX 3 by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I'm new to the mac world...just recently got a used G3 800Mhz iBook that I've dual booted with Gentoo Linux. I'm also starting to play guitar and mess around with drums. I've looked at GarageBand...and alas, my iBook is just too weak to run it.

      I've started looking into open source analogs of things like GarageBand and Logic. I've found Ardour, Hydrogen, and Audacity. Are there any others that I should look at with similar functionality as the Apple 'store bought' versions have?

      Eventually, I'll try to get a dual G5...but, can't quite get one now,but, would like to play with these tools, and learn how record and mix tracks, etc....

      Also, anyone know of good tutorials for Ardour? I've found simple ones for Hydrogen and Audacity...would like more on these too...

      One last thing...out of the Apple selections, GarageBand, Logic, and Soundtrack, how do ya'll rate them for professional use...pros/cons of each...etc?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Cubase SX 3 by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      Cubase was an Atari program, I was refering to Nuendo. Nuendo was developed for a quad proccessor IRIX system. Steinberg did all the development and some of the beta on Octanes, only to later port it to Windows, which pissed off many Mac users. Since then, Steinberg has always been a Windows first, Mac second developer.

      Cubase has Atari roots, yes, I admit it, i was wrong...

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    15. Re:Cubase SX 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...and before Cubase (on the Atari ST) it was Steinberg Pro24. I can still remember the night and day difference in MIDI timing going from Pro24 to Cubase. Cubase Audio was also a first on the Atarti - for this you needed the Atarti with the built in Motorola DSP (cant remember the model at the moment. I used a regular old ST.)

    16. Re:Cubase SX 3 by waynelorentz · · Score: 0

      just recently got a used G3 800Mhz iBook that I've dual booted with Gentoo Linux. I'm also starting to play guitar and mess around with drums. I've looked at GarageBand...and alas, my iBook is just too weak to run it.

      Eventually, I'll try to get a dual G5...but, can't quite get one now,but, would like to play with these tools, and learn how record and mix tracks, etc....


      I picked up a used TRS-80 Model II off eBay that I've dual booted with TRSDOS and CP/M. 48k of RAM and a monochrome display. Imagine my dismay when I found out it's too weak to run professional-level 3D rendering programs.

      Eventually I'd like to get a Commodore 64... but, can't quite get one now,but would like to play with Advanced OCP Art Studio and learn how to use Koala Painter, etc....

    17. Re:Cubase SX 3 by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      Logic is definitely more popular than Cubase, especially when Logic had a PC version. Cubase SX always looked pretty, but the interface was a confusing mess of symbols, and it's infamous for being an unstable piece of software. I tried it on my laptop, and it crashed my system.

      On the PC side, Cakewalk Sonar is definitely gaining ground, particularly with the release of Sonar 4 (track folders, track layering, and the Overview mode are a godsend). But the best reason of all? No godawful USB dongle copy protection! Simple serial number, less hassle for us legitimate users.

    18. Re:Cubase SX 3 by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Informative
      For what it's worth, I run Logic Express on my 800MHz eMac and do just fine: I haven't really tested the limits, but in one song I have 8 audio tracks with a few (simple) effects and about half a dozen software synths, a couple of individual buses with global effects (reverb, delay), and the main ouput with a multiband compressor on it ... with about 80% or so of CPU power. Logic also allows you to "freeze" tracks, which means running off an audio copy with all the effects already processed, so you can squeeze more tracks/effects in. In comparison, Garage Band isn't very well optimized. I've been very happy with Logic Express, especially since I got it for $150 with an educational discount. And the new Logic Express 7 looks even better, at the same price.

      There's a recent thread on compiling JACK and Ardour for OSX on OS X Audio, which has lots of great info on recording on the Mac: many posters own/run studios, but the place is still newbie-friendly.

      HTH

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    19. Re:Cubase SX 3 by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      Before i moved to doing audio on my dual g5, i was doing it on a dual 500 mhz g4 (and for quite a while i was doing it before the second processor did anything at all) using Mark of the Unicorn Digital Performer, which lets you record, edit, and do midi sequencing. I haven't used logic heavily, but its commercial grade. garage band is great for noodling around, but i find it limiting for the sort of stuff i do.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    20. Re:Cubase SX 3 by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " For what it's worth, I run Logic Express on my 800MHz eMac and do just fine: "

      Thanks for the reply...just curious, which version of Logic Express were you running that worked this well on the 800Mhz eMac? Maybe I could pick up a used copy on eBay or something...

      Thanks in advance...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:Cubase SX 3 by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Version 6. I'd be a little dubious about eBay because of Logic's hardware copy-protection scheme, a USB "key." If that's corrupted, you might not be able to get a new one.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  3. Not a lot of new features.... by ericdano · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Not a ton of new features. The distributed DSP is interesting though.....

    It will be interesting to see how MOTU is going to respond with DP5 ;-)

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by alset_tech · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not a ton of new features. The distributed DSP is interesting though.....

      I guess that means you didn't read the pages of online documentation of download the PDF, because I see many new features. Add to the list:

      A new drum synth, an FM synth, a component modeling synth, an amp modeling plugin, match EQ, linear EQ, new ring modulation, pitch correction, vocal modulation, multi-meter, spectrum analyzer, phase correction, AAC support, ID3 support, global tracks for tempo and key adjustments, automatic cross-fade, QWERTY MIDI control, DSP templates, external instrument tracks, Apple Loops support, etc etc etc.

      RTGDFA

      --
      Standing on the shoulders of giants.
    2. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by ericdano · · Score: 0, Troll

      Like I said, not a ton of new features. Cross Fade and Tempo/Key Adjustments are about the only things I'd use......

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by alset_tech · · Score: 2, Informative
      Like I said, not a ton of new features. Cross Fade and Tempo/Key Adjustments are about the only things I'd use......

      What you would use has nothing to do with what was added. You're trolling when you intentionally omit or skew information to make a point. Last count: 38 new features.

      --
      Standing on the shoulders of giants.
    4. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down Kool-aid man. A lot of these "features" I'd say are fluff. Where are the bug fixes? Things that make Logic more stable?

    5. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see many new features. Add to the list:

      A new drum synth, an FM synth, a component modeling synth,

      Stuff you can get free or almost free in VST form just about anywhere...

      an amp modeling plugin, match EQ, linear EQ, new ring modulation, pitch correction, vocal modulation, multi-meter, spectrum analyzer, phase correction,

      ...A bunch of pedestrian plugins...

      AAC support,

      ...some Apple-specific thing nobody gives a crap about...

      ...ID3 support, global tracks for tempo and key adjustments, automatic cross-fade,

      These are considered features?

      QWERTY MIDI control,

      You could always map keys to events.

      DSP templates, external instrument tracks, Apple Loops support, etc etc etc.

      Uh, yeah, nice. Where do I send my $1000?

    6. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      ... and a guitar amp simulator.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    7. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Whereas I would never use either of the features you want, but could definitely use a component modeling synth, a new ring modulator, and some of the other more effect/processing functions.

      Each to their own; fluff is as the user sees it.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:Not a lot of new features.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motu responded by releasing DP 4.5 yesterday...

  4. What's *actually* new in the new Logic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it's got a bunch of new gee-whiz filters, movie software integration features, and a much-needed ripoff of the "distributed use" feature Cubase has had for years. Anything else? Anything useful?

    1. Re:What's *actually* new in the new Logic? by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 1

      Cubase does NOT have this kind of distributed processing. If you're referring to VStack, you still need audio cards on your 'other' machines; this doesnt appear to; all routing is via ethernet.

      The nearest competing technology is FXTeleport, which is host-independent (its a VST plugin)

      --
      free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
    2. Re:What's *actually* new in the new Logic? by nlago · · Score: 1
      The nearest competing technology is FXTeleport, which is host-independent (its a VST plugin)

      And DLADSPA, as in "distributed ladspa" (written by yours truly): http://gsd.ime.usp.br/~lago/masters.

  5. Re:Macs are expensive by DavidLeblond · · Score: 2, Informative

    its Macs not MACs. And I know my old school (NCSU) is doing stuff with Xgrid. I heard they were trying to get a cluster of all the Macs on campus.

  6. Re:Macs are expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And yet schools still have MACs.

    Everyone with an Ethernet card has a MAC.
    Perhaps you were thinking of "Macintosh", commonly abbreviated "Mac"?

  7. Re:Macs are expensive by ericdano · · Score: 1

    Troll. Midi labs, which Macs are used in, are never free. I see at my local community college the labs are constantly packed. When would they have time to do SETI or Folding???

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  8. Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Is this kind of like Fruity-Loops by FL Studio?

    And also...

    "It supports audio at 16- and 24-bit resolution and sample rates of up to 192kHz for both audio recording and playback of internal software instruments."

    Only 192kHz? I'm not terribly sure that's worth the $999 price tag they're asking.

    1. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 192kHz, not 192Kbps... big difference.

      CD quality is 44kHz, if I'm not mistaken (which I may be...)

    2. Re:Kind of like... by ennerseed · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Only 192kHz?"
      This is not mp3 bit rates here. This is Pro Audio level sound quality.

      An Audio CD has a sample rate of 44.1kHz.

      --
      "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Kind of like... by RiotXIX · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, 192Khz seems to be the most professional audio cards seem to be able to cope with. M-audio, who make professional audio cards and instruments, are just about to release there latest model [http://www.samash.com/catalog/showitem.asp?ItemID =32398] in the next few days/weeks, and that's (only?) 192khz . Apparently that's quite high in terms of hardware parts for professional recording. And you may like to know, it is reported at several locations even though manufacturers like creative claim their parts are 192 khz, the music is resampled at a lower rate least once before output so it's just advertising garbage. I only know this because I've been searching for the best soundcard to get for audio playback [exclusively], and this seems to be the best option..if any one knows any more on this, then please do correct me.

      Thanks a lot by the way..now I probably can't keep moderating this quite interesting thread ;-)

      --
      "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
    4. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 192kHz?

      ...moron.

    5. Re:Kind of like... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      96kHz makes sense because instead of having an HF filter that starts rolling off within the human hearing range (in order to be near zero by the nyquist point of... say 22.05kHz) you can start filtering way outside the human hearing range and do digital downsampling in a way that avoids aliasing instead, thus preserving the higher audible frequencies more accurately.

      192kHz, though... seems a bit... nay, completely out to lunch. Oh, wait. With 192kHz, you should be able to record the (60kHz) WWVB radio signal along with your audio, so you don't need to time stamp your files. I'm sure everybody can appreciate the benefits there.... ;-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    6. Re:Kind of like... by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Only slightly mistaken; it's 44.1 kHz. The difference is often overlooked. Overall, though, you're exactly correct, in that the difference is a matter of kHz sampling as opposed to kbps bitrate.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    7. Re:Kind of like... by rco3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And, of course, there are the experiments done by (IIRC) Pioneer with a cobbled-up double speed DAT machine in which samples of Harmon-muted trumpet, which has significant harmonic content past 20-30 kHz, were played by for test listeners. EEG's indicated that the brain activity differed between recordings bandlimited to 20 kHz and recordings which contained the higher frequency content. None of the listeners could hear the difference, but they appeared to respond to it nonetheless.

      What the underlying cause and effect were, I don't know.

      Personally, I'd feel pretty confident that a 24/96 medium, with relatively sharp Nyquist filters, would qualify as being completely transparent compared to the rest of the signal chain. There certainly aren't going to be many mike/preamp combinations exceeding 120 dB s/n!

      I suspect that the use of a 192 kHz sample rate allows for both extended bandwidth past the conventionally accepted limits of human hearing, and for shallower, gentler Nyquist filtering. The sampling's certainly cheap enough now, unlike 1983 when most CD players used 14-bit D/A converters!

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    8. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      192 kHz sample rate * 24 bits per sample = a bit rate of 4,608 kbits per second. That's about 35 times the amount of data per second of a 128 kbit/s mp3.

    9. Re:Kind of like... by 33degrees · · Score: 3, Informative
      Is this kind of like Fruity-Loops by FL Studio?
      Comparing FruityLoops and Logic is really comparing apples and oranges. Fruityloops is a great program in that it does certain things very well, but it's quite limited in many regards (doing any kind of heavy duty audio editing is pretty much impossible). Logic can be complicated for doing simple things, but it can do very complex things quite simply too.
      Only 192kHz? I'm not terribly sure that's worth the $999 price tag they're asking.
      You're confusing kHz with kbps. kbps is a measure of bits per second, whereas kHz is a measure of samples per second, with the size of the sample being the bit depth. 16bit stereo audio takes 32 bits per sample, so 1kHz = 32kbps, and in the case of 24bit/192kHz audio, it's 12 288 kbps. Does that make the $999 price tag more appealing?
    10. Re:Kind of like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are only interested in playback, check out the Benchmark DAC 1. Everyone raves that the sound quality is incredible. The benefit of the DAC 1 is that you can plug any digital input into it since it is essentially a portable pair of stereo DACs, so you are not just limited to digital outputs from your computer which may add value for you. If you are doing recording also, you will need something else, maybe a Lynx two, something from Apogee, or RME... These are all relatively pricey solutions, but if you really want good quality it's worth the money.

    11. Re:Kind of like... by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

      Is this kind of like Fruity-Loops by FL Studio?

      Not at all. FruityLoops is a click-the-dots looping sequencer program. Its professional counterparts are Project 5, Reason, Digital Performer, etc.

      Logic competes with Pro Tools, Cubase, Sonar, SawStudio, etc.

  9. As a Logic Platinum user by mcc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm honestly kind of pissed about the bug fixes thing. I bought the top-of-the-line version of Logic when 6 came out. Shortly afterward suddenly they redid the pricing structures so there's no longer a Platinum, just a Pro and an Express. A year later I find that they're issuing updates to Pro 6 that they aren't issuing to Platinum 6, even though on would expect these to be the same product. Meanwhile despite them being introduced not long after Logic 6 I still can't use Cocoa-view AudioUnits, a basic feature which you'd think Apple would support in their own software and a feature which I need. Now that 7 is out I can pretty much be guaranteed that Cocoa-view audiounits are not coming to Platinum 6, no?

    1. Re:As a Logic Platinum user by ckuhtz · · Score: 1

      And the response from Apple's customer support to this was what? Seems this is an issue you need to take up with Apple directly.

      --

      Poof.
    2. Re:As a Logic Platinum user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back to k5 you apple whore.

    3. Re:As a Logic Platinum user by stinkfoot · · Score: 1

      I bought the top-of-the-line version of Logic when 6 came out. Shortly afterward suddenly they redid the pricing structures...

      just be thankful you didn't buy 2.5, 3, 4, and 5 platinum...

      ...for windows.

    4. Re:As a Logic Platinum user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going back to the time of the Apple ][ GS, at least. I've been hearing things like this. Apple seems to like to change directions and not offer solutions to a small group of people who just spent a ton of money. The Apple platform is really enticing, but the company just scares me with some of their decisions. I certianly would be pissed... Well, the last version of Logic I used was 5 on WinXP... I guess what I mean is it seems Apple has no problem shafting a small group of its users, and I hesitate to use it as a platform for that very reason. Of course the PC absolutely sucks, but at least you have options. Of course if you're just sequencing you may as well stick to the Atari ST with Cubase or Logic...

    5. Re:As a Logic Platinum user by natd · · Score: 1
      Well, hang on - have you actually raised this with Apple / eMagic?

      I have Logic 5 out of the Big Box - yes, that cheap bundle from 3 or 4 years ago.

      It came with lots of cool options, including EXSP24.

      It came with an XSKey (the licence key) and codes for everything on both Windows and Mac OS 9. I used it on Windows until recently I got a new PowerBook.

      So I have a look online. There is an OSX vesion of 5.5.1 which had come out well after I bought my BigBox. FREE to download. But wait - EXSP24 doesn't work - it is OS9 only.

      So I email eMagic. 4 days later a package arrives..free of charge from Europe to Australia. A new OSX version of EXSP24 and everything all upto date.

      That's incredible customer service to somone who bought the el-cheapo version years ago. I can't really imagine they will really dump on a recent V6 purchaser given what they are still doing for V5.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
  10. Bundling Soft Synths by Black-Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a MOTU user myself, but the idea of bundling the soft synth's with the DAW software is intriging.

    I can see the value added with the bundling, but you would think customers would want to pick and choose their soft synths. I mean, does everyone want a B3 or a PPG or whatever emulator?

    1. Re:Bundling Soft Synths by 33degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can see the value added with the bundling, but you would think customers would want to pick and choose their soft synths. I mean, does everyone want a B3 or a PPG or whatever emulator?
      That's the way it used to be with emagic, but apple decided to simplify the product line, and now you get everything for the price the software alone used to cost. I personally aplaud them for doing so, as the software is easily worth $999 without the synths, and probably 3 times that with them all, not to mention that they're very high quality.
    2. Re:Bundling Soft Synths by Black-Man · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I noticed on the MOTU-MAC forum yesterday users were moaning about MOTU not bundling. Maybe it's time for a switch!

  11. Very busy user interface by caseih · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The UI looks quite complicated. I imagine that means there is a lot flexibility at your fingertips. I wonder, though, at the wisdom of making computer user interfaces attempt to mimick the traditional analog interfaces. Knobs that you turn, for example, are pretty stupid, yet the screenshots for Logic Pro show loads of such controls. With a wheel mouse i suppose turning the knobs is easy, but apple has only one button from the factory. Will this UI make it in the User Interface Hall of Shame?

    1. Re:Very busy user interface by andrewjhall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to use Logic on Windows (when that was available). It's a grade A nightmare to use. Even the musicians I know struggle with it. It can do nearly everything you could possibly imagine, but it'll make you pay for it every step of the way. I never got very far without my head in the manual, which was a serious blow to my geek credibility (in front of pretty musician I was setting it up for I might add)....

    2. Re:Very busy user interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      considering the basic processes involved in recording and mixing are essentially the same whether you do it using analog equipment or digital, it would be quite silly to reinvent to the wheel. note, however, that this statement does not say anything about the extra editing functionality you get with digital systems - it's about tracking and mixing...

    3. Re:Very busy user interface by acomj · · Score: 1

      I agree. The interfaces are usefull for those that are already familiar with the device. The digital version should also have a more intuitive computer interface to go allong with the traditional one.

    4. Re:Very busy user interface by trollus_and_cressida · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The looks quite complicated because it is quite complicated. Logic is probably the most user unfriendly sequencing/audio program out there. It's also the most powerful. Because of this its the favorite of music technology geeks - think of it as the OpenBSD of music software.

      Very very steep learning curve. If you've never used a sequencing program before I'd give you a small chance of getting some sound out of the program within a few days. If you're familiar with another program (MOTU or Cubase) you can probably get sound out of it in a day but certainly won't be able to get it fully up and running in a day. The features and flexibility of it are pretty much unmatched by anything else. Like everything, there's a tradeoff between simplicity and ease of use versus power and features. If you want the former, Logic is definitely not for you. If you're a geek, you'll love logic. Just don't plan on installing it and immediately, or even a in couple of weeks, getting to making music. Drum and Base, techno people tend to be logic guys.

      More user-friendly is Mark of the Unicorn's (MOTU) Digital Performer. Nice looking and not as feature packed - it tends to be the choice of those scoring films and tv. Having worked as MOTU tech support I can tell you that MOTU tech support is the absolute worst! Oh god, they're laughably horrible. However, there are some good user MOTU forums which will help you out should you encounter any trouble.

      As for the knobs that you turn issue, it does look a bit silly if you're trying to control a bunch of knobs with one mouse. But most serious users of Logic or any digital workstation will buy a hardware controller with a number of knobs. Logic has something called the "Environment" which pretty much allows you to control anything with anything else. Powerful, flexible, and, again, will take time to learn.

      Personally I like Logic the best, been using it for a while, and would say am still only using 5-10% of what its capable of. You will not outgrow Logic.

    5. Re:Very busy user interface by 33degrees · · Score: 1
      Knobs that you turn, for example, are pretty stupid, yet the screenshots for Logic Pro show loads of such controls.
      You've obviously never used any pro audio software, as these types of knobs are found everywhere. The thing is, the knobs aren't manipulated with a circular motion, but a simple up down motion, and it's actually very intuitive, as well as taking up less space than a virtual fader.

      As for the wisdom of making interfaces that emulate hardware, that's an ongoing discussion in the audio software world that will never be resolved. To me, it's similar to the issue of speed & RPM gauges on cars; a physical (or virtual) dial is much easier to understand at a glance than a simple number, especially when you're dealing with a large number of parameters. The succesfull formula for audio software seems be to combine the use knobs and faders where appropriate with other types of controls for more complex or obscure functionality.
    6. Re:Very busy user interface by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that you can get a variety of outboard controllers that have actual knobs on them, which, when twiddled, control whichever parameters on such UIs you choose.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    7. Re:Very busy user interface by caseih · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm. Say anything remotely anti-apple and the moderators jump all over you! Wow. That comment is most certainly not a troll.

      Thanks for those who talked about how the knob controls work (which, they are right in pointing out, is not immediately intuitive; there is a slight learning curve), rather than just blindly modding down.

    8. Re:Very busy user interface by danigiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " With a wheel mouse i suppose turning the knobs is easy, but apple has only one button from the factory."

      Oh, come on!

      You mean you are an experienced audio pro, making solid cash and cannot spend like $50 on a multibutton scroll wheel mouse?

      Moreover, since when are you using factory-supplied mice on a PC? They are crap! First thing anyone should do is trash them!

      On the other hand, when telling my mum over the phone to mail me some stuff, one-button mice would be a blessing.

      Of course, I have a trusty Logitech gizmo-enabled mouse to bring up all my favorite Eclipse contextual menus *and* bring up Expose with the central scroll-wheel click.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. User-unfriendly Logic by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does anybody know why Logic has to be this complicated to use? From the top of my head:
    - A second menu bar? Why? It is unintuitive, defeats Fitt's Law and is just plain awkward.
    - Init files: to have a standard way of organizing, you have to save a project in a certain way with a certain name to a certain folder which I always forget. Apple's GUI guide simply states "after an app starts up, make it appear like when you left it"
    - Often times, Logic doesn't redraw correctly.
    - Icons vary widely in quality: Some are Aqua-esque, other's are 8bit-like, and even others are pure b/w... ?!
    - Hundreds of icons that do not line up, or overlap each other... looks sloppy
    - Sometimes bouncing works, sometimes it does nothing
    - Timestreching crashes Logic from time to time

    These errors are all present in the (until now) most recent version of Logic. Emagic is aware of these problems: They have a buglist feature that all registered users get access to (I wonder why others don't... let me guess: because it might hold them off from buying it?).

    Anyway, my point is: Now Apple owns Logic, and this app still does not behave in the way Apple asks apps to behave... it's just silly...

    Anybody know why after all these years, Logic is still extremely unlogical (don't let me go into details about *these* things), yet they don't care?

    1. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by piecewise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You say Logic is this, this, this, and that.

      Are you referring to previous experiences with Logic - or do you say you've used the product that came out today and it's improved on none of these problems?

      --
      The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    2. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Sometimes bouncing works, sometimes it does nothing

      So I am not the only person experiencing this problem, then?

    3. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm refering to the 1 year old product, which has been constantly "improved" by Emagic for more than 10 years since its inception.

    4. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've used every point release for the past 10 years? Thus, you know that there have never been any other issues that needed to be resolved? They've just been sitting around and making harder and harder for people to use, right?

      ps - Fitt's Law is a fucking joke.

    5. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by trollus_and_cressida · · Score: 0

      These errors are all present in the (until now) most recent version of Logic. Emagic is aware of these problems: They have a buglist feature that all registered users get access to (I wonder why others don't... let me guess: because it might hold them off from buying it?). More likely because Logic only wants to offer support to those who've registered their product. The PC version of Logic was warezed like crazy.

    6. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by Brackney · · Score: 1

      I agree that Logic's UI needs work, but I think that's just its roots showing. It'll continue to improve with time - especially now that Apple's taking a more direct role in developing and distributing it. As for timestretch and bounce issues - I've experienced neither on my G5.

    7. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1
      Have you looked at the screenshots on the site? Apple has clearly rewritten the interface from the ground up for Logic 7. It doesn't look like a bad PC port from the late 80's anymore, and it wouldn't surprise me if it shared some of the UI framework and back end with GarageBand.

      Big improvements take time. Emagic didn't care about UI. Apple does. Note also that Logic 7 is no longer branded Emagic; it is now a fully Apple-branded and -supported product.

    8. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      Are there any full-size screenshots on the site anywhere? I've looked and can't find anything but tiny images (other than of the plugins.)

      From those tiny images it looks like the interface is only marginally updated from 6, which was (IMHO) only marginally updated from 5. It seems like, for the most part, it's the same old Logic 5 with some Photoshop layer effects thrown onto all the UI elements.

      I'm going to buy Logic 7 regardless, I'm just curious. The Logic UI never really bothered me that much anyway, once I got used to it.

      But, I've just dropped a good chunk of cash on a new G5 & 2 new 19" monitors, so it's gonna be a few weeks before I have the cash for Logic and I'm interested to see more before then!

    9. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      There is one big screenshot in the Apple PR-department: http://www.apple.com/pr/products/logic/logic.html.

      It shows that none of the serious interface problems have been gone: The second menubar now looks a bit different, but it's still there. Bummer :-(

      By the way: has anybody else noticed that Apple has created oversized screenshots with twice the resolution for Apps like Logic and GarageBand? Either some graphic artist has painstakingly recreated every UI interface element with the double resolution or these apps are already resolution-independent and Apple has just not yet made it official... ? :-)

    10. Re:User-unfriendly Logic by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link!

      Yeah, the UI looks like the same old Logic with some bevels and highlights thrown on. :)

      I've read that the underlying code for resolution independence is present in the 10.4 Developer Previews, so Apple could be using it for the screenshots.

  14. Not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can *do* drums in it but it's clumsy and a lot of work. Even though FruityLoops is such a built-for-dummies program, there unfortunately isn't anything for the macintosh that's really comparable to FruityLoops. :(

    1. Re:Not really. by myster0n · · Score: 1

      If you want to do drums, there's "drumkit from hell" (1, 2 and "superior").
      I've got "drumkit from hell superior", and it really rocks. It's 3 VSTs (and rewire support) : one for drums, one for percussion and one for cocktail. And about 35 GIG(!!!) of drum samples.

      The system requirements are a bit steep, though.

      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    2. Re:Not really. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Aren't drum kits (real live physical drums as well as software drums) for dummies by definition? =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  15. Heh heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor MOTU. Like many computer nerd musicians, I've now "accidentally" browsed too many pr0n sites to not think of something totally different when I see DP written...

  16. Re:Also new: .Mac increased to 250MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until they turn on the CAPTCHA's and bring your gclusterfs(ck) to a crashing halt...

  17. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by mkarpinski · · Score: 3, Informative

    GarageBand isn't bundled with OS X.

    It's bundled with the iLife suite of applications...

    --
    As below, so above and beyond, I imagine drawn beyond the lines of reason. Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
  18. Apple Loops ?? by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer Froot Loops. They also taste lemon, grape, orange, etc. instead of just apple.

    1. Re:Apple Loops ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you can't even spell Fruit.....*tsk tsk*

    2. Re:Apple Loops ?? by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "A" is for Abble,
      "J" is for jacks,
      Cinnamony, toastee Appppple Jax
      You need a good brekfust --
      That's a fakt,
      Stahhrrt it out wit Abble Jacs

      Abbo jaks...
      Abboh Jax...

      ===========

      So are they combining Apple Jacks and Floot Roops to get Fruit Jacks?

      Mayb Toni the Tiger of Flosted Frakes got crossed with the Sugar Bear after s/he heard "Come to the hunnah-khomb "Hahhd Out".

      That Toucan showed up with those sweet-asse cheerios and we the rest was the birds and the bees... After the Trix-chasin' rabbit arrived...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:Apple Loops ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you can't even spell Fruit.....*tsk tsk*

      Don't blame him, blame Kellogg's; it's their trademark.

    4. Re:Apple Loops ?? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      According to googlism (4th definition), this cereal is properly called "shithead." More information here.

    5. Re:Apple Loops ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you've got to try Apple Loops! They're sweet and crunchy and they're DRM-fortified!

  19. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is bunded with OSX.

  20. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by Knobby · · Score: 3, Informative

    GarageBand is not included in Mac OS X.. GarageBand is included in the iLife package, and if you buy both Mac OS X and iLife at the same time you it will cost $50 less than if you buy them separately.

  21. Re:Macs are expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of...

    Shields face from repeated floggings with large trout.

  22. the Logic learning curve... by ez_TAB · · Score: 0

    isn't as bad as everyone makes out. Its just not an app that instantly gratifies when u jump in and play. Sit down and RTFM for a few days (especially the UI and Environment chapters) and it becomes clearer. Use it for 2-3 months and the worst part of the learning curve is over imo...

    --
    Quote from ???: "There are lies; there are damn lies; and there are benchmarks."
  23. Wow distributed audio? That's so 1999! by nsanders · · Score: 0

    That's pretty neat that Apple has added this into Logic, it will be killer with G5 systems. I just can't help but laugh that it took someone else this long. Sonic Studio HD has had distributed processing for over 5 years. Time to play catch up boys!

  24. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    ... for now. You can buy them both at the same time and get a $50 rebate, but iLife 04 is not PART of OSX.

  25. Latency? by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
    For real time effects how is latency addressed on this? Logic does latency compensation for tracks during playback, but not on busses. What additional latency is caused by the network and syncing the nodes? Is this technology going to be just as painful for a large mix session as UAD-1 and Powercore?

    I do like that the nodes are unlimited license wise. However I am concerned about the actual use in a real production environment.

  26. Is this a replacement? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    Apple already has a product out called Soundtrack which was meant to be their professional music creation/editing software package. Are they discontinuing it and replacing it with Logic?

    1. Re:Is this a replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, Soundtrack is essentially just a looping program. Logic and GarageBand work with loops, but also allow for audio tracking, too.

    2. Re:Is this a replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a replacement. Soundtrack is a loop based program, like Acid Pro. Logic is for MIDI and audio production. While both might overlap each other, they are targetted at different markets.

    3. Re:Is this a replacement? by 33degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not at all. Although you could do most of what you can do in soundtrack with logic, they're really aimed at different markets; Logic is very powerfull but has a steep learning curve, whereas soundtrack is ideal for people who aren't neccesarily musicians, but who need pro-level software for background music to their projects.

  27. Infinite Loops! by Wingie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Notice how they advertised infinite loops as a feature. Seems like they're copying Microsoft advert strategies now...

    1. Re:Infinite Loops! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple Computer
      1 Infinite Loop
      Cupertino, CA

      it's not a feature

      it's their address

    2. Re:Infinite Loops! by MasonMcD · · Score: 4, Informative

      Notice how they advertised infinite loops as a feature. Seems like they're copying Microsoft advert strategies now...

      Or likely playing off of Apple's Cupertino address, 1 Infinite Loop.

  28. this is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    196khz is the sampling rate of the digital audio. compare to 44khz 16bit for an uncompressed audio cd. very different than a 196khz mp3.

    the whole Grid thing is not new. Steinberg has had System Link for some time which is very comparable but not truly grid distributed.

    www.fxteleport.com has also been around for more than a year and does everything the new logic toy does.

    and SX3 is not the jam. Ableton Live4 is. www.ableton.com

  29. Re:Macs are expensive by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    But you're thinking of apples, while he's thinking of apples. Better get on the same page. I could go for a macintosh right about now, no worms please!

  30. Is this possible? by bhima · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    For quite sometime I have had this idea running about in my head...

    I am a huge Sherlock Holmes & Dr. Who fan and I really have enjoyed the audio files I've listened to. My issue is this most of the non-BBC audio are abridged and are mono.

    I would love to create a 5.1 Audio file of the original text of the books I own.

    .

    And I do love the voices in the Sherlock Holmes series

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Is this possible? by norkakn · · Score: 1

      its _possible_ but you don't want to do it. (it'll sound crappy. Its of similar dificulty to automatically taking 2d images and making 3 models from them..)

  31. Re:Review. by E-Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mod this down.

    There is no such thing as a "Altivextreme" card. Dual 2.5Ghz G5s even with 4GB of ram do not cost $12,000. Someone who does use Logic doesn't refer to their stuff as a "music file". There is no DMA enable/disable in MacOS, and it is enabled by default. And running Logic on a G3 iMac... what did you expect??

    This is just a AC posting negative drivel out his bum for whatever reason. /dale

  32. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing is complete and total bullshit, whoever had modded this up is a fricken idiot.

  33. Re:Review. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's about time you upgraded from your 8600/300

  34. Re:Review. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting? Sadly I don't think many realize this is a joke...

  35. Re:Review. by th4tGuy() · · Score: 1

    wtf are you talking about. This is total FUD.
    ->G5 2.5GHz x 2 w/ 4GB RAM != $12,000
    ->no such thing as Altivextreme PCI-X card
    ->MagicMaestro for DOS does not exist
    ->You say your G5 is slow, then compare to the G3 iMac and say it was slow, so therefore it must be slow! your G3 iMac is slow at everything - hello?

    I smell TROLL BS...

    --
    -- As soon as I have an interesting sig, you'll be among the first to know!
  36. The Cool Kidz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:The Cool Kidz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max/MSP?

      Yeah, cue louis armstrong singing "we have all the time in the world"

    2. Re:The Cool Kidz by wavedeform · · Score: 1
      Max/MSP?

      See, that just proves how cool it is. :-)

      Max/MSP is a very cool graphic data flow programming language for... well, anything really, but focused on MIDI and DSP. There is also an add-on program called Jitter that specializes in video manipulation.
      Max originally came from IRCAM in the 1990s. It is currently shepherded by Cycling74

  37. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Garageband comes bundled with any new Mac, as well as the rest of iLife '04.

  38. As a 3month Logic Pro 6 owner... by tarkin · · Score: 1

    I wish I waited another couple of months before splashing for the Gold > Pro upgrade. Now I have to pay up the same amount if I want the spiffy new Guitar Amp.
    But hey, that's the name of the game I suppose. I hope there's some cheapo upgrade for suckers like me ;-)

    After recording a cd this week on an an ancient 5 year old mac running pro-tools under Mac OS 9 I can say this much : Logic really is a bargain at the price it's selling at (full AND upgrades) if you see what it offers (features and performance) on the latest PowerBooks and PowerMacs.

    But kudos for mac os 9 and pro-tools because the engineer really squeezed every little drop out of his investement (mac + protools + digidesign hardware)

    --
    blaah !
    1. Re:As a 3month Logic Pro 6 owner... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      A question about that MacOS/ProTools setup...

      What kind of Digi hardware did it have, and does that hardware work properly with MacOS X/Logic?

    2. Re:As a 3month Logic Pro 6 owner... by tarkin · · Score: 1

      He used a Mackie D8B digital mixer desk for all the input/output duties, along with some other quality AD/DA convertors and Focusrite pre-amps/compressors. This went from the Mackie into 2 Digidesign ADAT bridges into the computer and back out.
      The only hardware that has to work with Mac OS X/ProTools are the ADAT bridges. I guess Digidesign should have some updated hardware that does the same thing.

      I found it to be really nice setup because it leaves the mixer desk in control. Since the Mackie is essentially a mixing-computer with it's own operating system it handles all the processing and automation stuff, and all setups could be saved etc...
      I guess that's one reason his pro-tools software is not that important. Pro-tools is just hist tape-deck and editing station.
      Not his main mixing and processing tool. I guess the Mackie D8B costs boatloads more than a new Protools hardware setup.

      I wish someone put something like that in a compact 8 or 16 channel mixer that works independantly also. I guess a Digi002 comes close in 'mindset'.

      --
      blaah !
    3. Re:As a 3month Logic Pro 6 owner... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Thanks for replying.

      I was just wondering because my dad has a couple of 888 I/O's and wants to try Logic and OS X.

  39. Re:Also new: .Mac increased to 250MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool beans. I was just about to renew, but wondering if I should hold out for more. Woohoo.

  40. Original parent not a troll. Is right! by bach37 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm a music professional and I must say it's crazy to include a program like GarageBand (or even to call it 'GarageBand') with iLife/a new mac purchase (iLife came free with my new iBook). iDvd, iPhoto and the like I can understand. My grandmother can use those programs. But a midi sequencer? You may think the main parent is a troll, but he's got a point.

    1. Re:Original parent not a troll. Is right! by wulfhound · · Score: 1

      GarageBand is not really a midi sequencer. More of an audio arranger, looper and basic multitracker.

    2. Re:Original parent not a troll. Is right! by bach37 · · Score: 1

      Right and that's called a sequencer.

    3. Re:Original parent not a troll. Is right! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah, and you conveniently dropped four little letters this time around.

      Does every single program need to be useful to every single user to be included? How does it hurt your poor sainted grandmother if Apple has included an application she'll never use?

      On the other hand, this would be a lot of fun for the kids on a family computer, and would be at least a little bit of compensation for the Mac not being the greatest game machine. And it's probably "healthier" (whatever that means) for kids to slap together loops and call it music than to attack hookers with chainsaws and steal automobiles.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Original parent not a troll. Is right! by bach37 · · Score: 1

      It IS a midi sequencer. I give up. I hate trying to talk to non-musicians.

  41. MAC = most overused CS acronym by LanMan04 · · Score: 1
    MAC can mean:
    1. Macintosh
    2. Media Access Control
    3. Media Access Controler
    4. Mandatory Access Control
    5. Multiplexed Analogue Components
    6. Message Authentication Code
    7. Message Authenticity Check
    8. Multiplier Accumulator Chip
    Get's confusing after a while, especially those of us in Info Assurance.
    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
    1. Re:MAC = most overused CS acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9. The truck driver that delivers the computers from the factory

      And, heck, for that matter:

      10. The truck itself!

    2. Re:MAC = most overused CS acronym by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Umm..."Mac" (the computer platform sold by Apple) is not an acronym. Which is exactly the point: MAC can have any of several meanings, but "Macintosh" is not one of them.

  42. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by javaxman · · Score: 2, Insightful
    99.99999% of OSX users have no interest in creating digital music. Maybe a small percentage fire it up a couple of times to make some fun noise but thats it. Apple should unbundle this and slash the price of OSX.

    While I doubt your market research, and your ability to recognize that OS X sells separately from iLife, I understand the source of your confusion.

    iLife is bundled with new Apple hardware, so you get a copy when you buy a new iBook, iMac, PowerMac, etc.

    Now, maybe you won't use GarageBand, but I'm going to guess that 99.999999% of OS users have some interest in one of iPhoto, iMovie, or iDVD. Ok, mainly iPhoto. But do you really think Apple would be able to drop the price of their machines by much if they excluded a single program that costs less than $50 ?? Why am I answering this troll?

    Really, GarageBand is there for semiserious users of iMovie and iDVD- so you can put together a little tune for your home movie project. It's totally useful and doesn't affect the price of the overall package much at all.

  43. Re:Review. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly I don't think many realize this is a joke...

    That's because it's not funny. It's stupid. There's no punchline. No indication that the poster (you?) is making a wisecrack. No context. Nada. Nothing. Not witty. Won't get you a date. Won't get you anything but flamed (me?). Doesn't rhyme. Lacks all the basic components of even a simple "why'd the chicken cross the road" joke.

    It's just....dumb.

  44. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    Apple's marketing research showed that 50% of households had at least one amateur musician in them. Someone who practiced with at least one instrument.

    Considering that it is a minimal cost to bundle it with the computer (which is all that they do, not with the OS), why not throw it in as an added nicety for those who might use it?

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  45. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by sammy+baby · · Score: 1
    Which is bunded with OSX.


    No it's not. iLife is bundled with new Macs.

    So, for example: when I bought my Aluminum Powerbook, it came with the then-current iLife and Mac OS 10.2 (Jaguar). When I purchased the upgrade to 10.3 (Panther), iLife wasn't included.
  46. bit rates versus sample rates by Thumpnugget · · Score: 3, Informative

    To expand on this for people who are missing the distinction: mp3 rates are bit rates, meaning that the audio stream is reduced to a certain number of bits per second. The sample rates for digital pro audio equipment refer to how many samples (of varying width, usually 16 or 24) are taken represent the analog audio stream.

    So, one can see intuitively that a stereo 24-bit 192Khz audio file will be 24 times larger than a stereo mp3 file that is 192kpbs. The difference in clarity will be almost as striking as the size difference. ;)

    --
    Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
    1. Re:bit rates versus sample rates by Smurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, one can see intuitively that a stereo 24-bit 192Khz audio file will be 24 times larger than a stereo mp3 file that is 192kpbs.

      No, as far as I understand it's 24 bits per sample per channel. So if it's in stereo, the file would be 48 times larger than the MP3.

  47. Apple's loops just aren't good enough by Greenisus · · Score: 1

    I recorded an album on my iBook with a TASCAM US-122, and found that Apple's loops just aren't good enough. They sound clear, but they're just not that interesting. So, I got M-Audio's These Drums Are Loud, and it really added a lot to my drum section (I don't have the space for a drum kit). Anyway, that's just a tip. I'd avoid the new Jam Packs without a lot of reviews and maybe some sample clips. Of course, if you want more than drums, that's another story.

  48. Re:Review. by Thumpnugget · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, but how long does it take you to make a copy of a 22MB Photoshop file? That's what I really want to know. I bet it takes forever.

    :-P

    --
    Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
  49. They should make a software package TheHounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that way we can have headlines like Apple Releases TheHounds.

    It could be a search engine, perhaps.

  50. Re:Well, then it's exactly the same as Cubase SX 3 by thrash242 · · Score: 1

    I was a Logic fan before they abandoned PC users and VST. Now I'm very happy with Cubase SL 2.X. I in fact like the way Cubase works better than I ever liked Logic. For instance, it has such amazingly fancy things as *gasp* right click context menus.

  51. Goodbye Emagic by wheatwilliams · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Logic 7 is referred to as Apple Logic 7.

    All previous versions were referred to as Emagic Logic.

    Today the existing Emagic web site essentially went away (although there is some new information there).

    Emagic is a German company and Apple bought it two years ago and stopped its development of Windows products.

    So this release of Logic 7 represents the culmination of a huge realignment of music and audio software on the Mac platform, with profound implications for the market and third-party companies that make competing and complimentary products.

  52. I am impressed. by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Logic Pro 7 includes a ton of the stuff I've been waiting for, and when you consider all the bundled synths and effects it's actually a pretty damn good value.

    I've been using Logic since version 2, and I have watched it evolve from a do-everything MIDI sequencer to a full-fledged DAW suite.

    I'm frustrated to read so many negative comments from people who have obviously never used serious music software before, so I'm going to address a few things:

    First, this is very relevant to apple.slashdot.org because Apple owns Logic, and a lot of us have been very eager to see just what Apple was going to do with Logic for version 7.

    Is it anything like Fruity Loops or Garage Band? No, not really. You could probably pick up any of the above to create a piece of dance music, but Logic is the only one of the three that is wide open - if there's something a computer can do with audio, Logic Pro can probably do it.

    I doubt Cubase is more popular than Logic in the studio. Once you get used to working in Logic, Cubase feels like a toy. I'll admit I haven't used it in a few years so maybe it has improved.

    Somebody posted that Logic is unstable and doesn't draw right a lot of the time, but this has not been my experience - in fact version 6 has been rock-solid for me. I know that cracked copies of Logic tend to not work very well.

    A few people have said that there aren't a lot of new featured, but I downloaded the Logic Overview PDF from the Apple site, and I see TONS of stuff:

    • Distributed Audio Processing. Yes this is cool stuff, maybe other software does it too, but how scalable is it? Apple is claiming they can stuff 512 mono streams over a gigabit backbone. That's cool stuff, and makes a pretty neat case for a few XServe cluster nodes. (By the way, this appears to not be XGrid-based, as the nodes don't seem to share a single distributed task - instead you choose which node you want to work on which track from the Arrange window.)
    • Sculpture. Sorry but I don't know of any DAW app that includes a professional component modelling synth at any price. Emagic's synths have always sounded great to me, and I'm anxious to hear this.
    • Ultrabeat. A drum machine. Well here's some Fruity Loops functionality - as a matter of fact this looks like a kick-ass drum machine, something I've been anxious to see in Logic. It's got virtual analog, FM, component modelling and sample playback. The only drum machine I know of that's as versatile on paper is the $1100 USD MachineDrum, if ya wanna order one from Sweden.
    • EFM-1 - another synth - this one looks like a simple FM synth. I reserve judgement, but it's probably nice for metallic and buzzy sounds.
    • Inclusion of Garage Band Instruments is awesome, and was much-anticipated by Logic composers. Garage Band has a kick-ass sample set, and I'm sure they will find their way into my bread-and-butter work (commercials).
    • Apple Loops first appeared in SoundTrack, then in Garage Band. It looks as though it is actually possible to create Apple Loops, which means that Logic now has Ableton Live! / Acid - like functionality at last. Live is a lot cheaper at around $400, and Acid is Windows only, but they both lack the flexibility and plug-in set that Logic has.
    • Guitar Amp Pro is also pretty damn cool. People's jaws drop when they hear the amp simulation in Garage Band, so its inclusion (with the addition of a few extra parameters) in Logic is a no-brainer - it had to happen. Still, it's here, and I will be using it.
    • Other Effects like Ring Shifter, Vocal Transformer, Pitch Correction are fun effects to play with, and offer lots of opportunities for creative use.
    • New Mastering Plug-ins: Linear Phase EQ (I haven't heard it, but Logic's EQ's are already pretty good, and from its description this is a bona fide mastering EQ), and Match EQ (
    1. Re:I am impressed. by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      People's jaws drop when they hear the amp simulation in Garage Band

      How do the simulations in Garage Band compare to things like Amplitube and the Line 6 and Vox modelling boxes? Is the Garage Band stuff related to some older product that a non Mac user (so far) would recognize under another name?

    2. Re:I am impressed. by TibbonZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like Logic in alot of ways, but I really hope that they have fixed the unholy combination of the G5s, OS X, Logic, and Digidesign (TDM) hardware. From what I have seen this is nothing but crash crash boom! If that indeed does work well, with this new distributed audio, I might have to switch from Protools to Logic. My only other reservation with logic, is that it's still not 100% easy to swap drives with Protools users. I simply love protools for the fact that I can next day (or Digitransfer... which is a overpriced secure FTP box) a hard drive to any studio in the world, and assume that they have a Protools rig that can open it, and I can drag my iLok key with me, and have all my plugins on a CD or USB key, and have all my plugins legally on any system i touch. Not bad. It reminds me of some time ago when I could send a 2" tape theoritically to just about any studio, or a few years ago ADATs anywhere. My next big project is all in Protools and on 2" synced together, and the session is going to be done some at my place, some in LA, and mixed god knows where, and mastered god knows where. It needs to easily be transportable. But if they can get some way to save as a basic protools file from logic, i'd love it!

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
  53. All those plugins. by torpor · · Score: 1

    The Mega-Plugin packs are pretty interesting, but if nothing else (I hate using computers for music) it demonstrates just how fun it is to write software to do specific things, when things are set up for you, and you need only focus on finite things.

    Synth plugin developers are starting to become a dime a dozen, just like PHP monkeys and C junkies in the 90's and 80's .. so I'm not *so* nervy about all the Logic features.

    Be interesting to see where Apple take the hardware side of this 'synthesizer' train they're on, and somehow own, now ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  54. Competitive upgrades? by FromageTheDog · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is, whatever happened to competitive upgrades? Apple seems to have killed this offering, which otherwise may have encouraged me to try the pro version. No way I'm even going to glance at it for $1000, given my investment in Cubase... - Fromage

  55. How relevant is this article? by rd_syringe · · Score: 1

    Usually, we never ever get DAW release news on Slashdot. Why now? Is it because this is Apple?

    In that case, you also need to report that Steinberg Cubase SX 3 and Cakewalk Sonar 4 were both release this month.

    1. Re:How relevant is this article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially since Cubase, at least, supports more than one OS.

  56. Bad form; eMapple. Very bad form! by lucaschan.com · · Score: 1

    Logic Pro 6 has only been out for about 6 months (in Australia). Now they're hitting us with a whole new version already.

    I have seriously been living in poverty from buying Logic Pro 6. The upgrade to version 7 is another AU$500.

    Grr!

  57. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by litac · · Score: 1

    You are not completely correct. GB is part of iLife which is sold as a standalone product for $49. It is also bundled with new Apple computers - every model. So, technically, if Apple didn't bundle iLife with a new computer, the price could drop by $49.

    Big f***ing whoop-de-doo.

    I'd rather have my iLife than my $49.

    The original poster is a troll.

  58. Re:Broadcast Wave by flimflam · · Score: 3, Informative

    Broadcast Wave is actually becoming the standard audio file format for the film industry. It is used in most of the new digital field recorders (Aaton Cantar, HHB PortaDrive, Zaxcom Deva and the various Fostex field recorders.

    The support of this format in Logic is significant as it's the first Apple software to support it. Hopefully this means will see it soon in Final Cut soon.

    --
    -- It only takes 20 minutes for a liberal to become a conservative thanks to our new outpatient surgical procedure!
  59. No Dongles in Express by joel8x · · Score: 1

    Check out the system requirements for Logic Express:

    Macintosh computer with a PowerPC G4 or faster processor (G5 or dual G4
    processors recommended)
    512MB of RAM
    Mac OS X v10.3 or later
    4GB of available hard disk space
    DVD drive for software installation
    Low-latency multi-I/O audio hardware and MIDI interface recommended
    Separate hard drive recommended for high-resolution audio tracks

    Notice anything missing? No more XSKey dongles!! Woohoo for Apple respecting the limited available ports on powerbooks! Unfortunately, Pro still requires one. Still, that and the ability to import Garageband projects are enought to warrant a purchase - I can't stand software that punishes paying users.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  60. Competitors? by Thinkit4 · · Score: 1

    I dabbled around a bit and only found CuBase to be a real all-in-one. Is sonar by cakewalk on the same level?

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  61. What were you doing in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you were in the bathroom when Apple asked, "Did everyone who wanted one get a competitive upgrade? Yes? OK, then, we can drop that."

  62. Re:Review. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the old trolls are the best trolls.

  63. Re:Unbundle GarageBand and reduce OSX price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people either play music or have played music. I suck, but I use a keyboard once in a blue moon, and can plunk away at a guitar. At a place I worked at, around a third of the people played music, and a couple had professionally.

    So, there might not be much of a market for sequencer software for the general public, but it makes buying a Mac a lot more appealing.

    Just like iPhoto is in there. Most people just take snapshots, and would never buy photo editing software.... but if you give it away with the computer, it adds a little value to the computer.

    There are a zillion other things that Apple could add. They could add a recipe database for cooks. They could add an HTML editor. They could make a proprietary email client that would specialize in sending homework answers to the teacher's inbox, for grading.

    There are all little things people do with their computer, that could benefit from the "web services" or specialized client-server application.

  64. /.ness by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Loads of comments here.
    Mostly trolls or flamebait... a few people who suggest sx3, reason or Live are better...
    I am surprised to be the only one asking about:
    • when will the update be available ?
    • is the Gb-ethernet mandatory in order to use the xgrid functionality or will it run but not as quickly ?
    • were there main engines updates besides the xgrid stuff ?
    • does the update take mLan further into account or is this supposed to be 100% handled by the system ?
    • will the update dvd also contain new Apple Loops and EXS24mkII samples ?
    • If I visit Apple's CHF/FR Logic pages, the specs only appear in English, isn't Logic 7 already localized ?
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  65. Re:Bad form; eMapple. Very bad form! by Moofie · · Score: 1

    So don't buy it. What's the problem?

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  66. 192k == tape by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    192k is about equivalent to 2" analog tape, IIRC. As in, really really good. I want this.

    I haven't used this, but I feel pretty confident in saying it kicks Fruity Loops's ass.

    Still, $999 for just software when you can get Pro Tools + the mBox interface for 3 or 4 hundred? Not worth it, IMO. Targeted towards the pros, I guess.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  67. I'm a little confused about this Distributed Audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I could either use costly dedicated audio cards, costly dedicated audio hardware or costly G5s?
    This is not meant as a troll, I'm genuinely curious as to the advantage here of having more G5s hooked up via ethernet as opposed to using dedicated hardware?

    Is there a cost benefit? I think you can get pretty decent hardware/audio cards for the cost of a G5.
    Also, what about lag?

    I suppose as this product has just been released, not much anecdotal evidence will be available (if any).
    Oh well, any theories?

  68. Free Software has this too (in beta) by nlago · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, my masters was about developing such a system for LADSPA: http://gsd.ime.usp.br/~lago/masters. The research and the beta-level, proof-of-concept implementation were concluded in April.

  69. Re:your ignorance is painful by Fluidic+Binary · · Score: 1

    I wasn't belittling anything. Some people here are just oversensitive and too worried about their own preferences and agenda's.

    I made light of it because the notion is amusing to me, that doesn't mean I don't realize that it is a quality product.

    I would honestly probably use it in the games I am working on to avoid having to get an entire crew of people together to play each instrument etc.

    But at the time the irony of machines making art was more prominent in my mind.

    I guess we all don't realize that a name like 'Apple Loops' was probably intended to be amusing...

    Just calm down and grow up folks

  70. Guitar Amp by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

    Word on the street is that the guitar amp was developed by Emagic after they were acquired by Apple.