Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

FBI Ordered to Turn Over Lennon Files

Posted by CowboyNeal on from the helter-skelter dept.

CatDogLordOfTheRoot writes "CNN is reporting that a U.S. District Judge rejected the governments arguements to keep the secret records of John Lennon sealed. The FBI argued that releasing the last ten pages would pose a risk to national security as a foreign government (not identified) secretly gave information to the US Government. Looks like another big step in the Freedom of Information Act."

62 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Good news by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There should be a law making all records public after a certain period of time (like copyright expiration). (fp?)

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
    1. Re:Good news by BlackEyedSceva · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most of the time information becomes public anyway. There is no need for a LAW to do this.

    2. Re:Good news by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "after a certain period of time (like copyright expiration"

      From the way copyright law is going, that's going to be about 435 years.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:Good news by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not true. Piles of secret information is buried constantly. Of course, there is public info, but there is very little civil war, mexican-american war or wwi info that is available.

      --
      Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
    4. Re:Good news by NakedGoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are in fact declassification procedures for all U.S. classified documents that state specific declassification timeframes. The declassification time is specified for the specific document or information. 50 years is very common.
      The government often has very legitimate reasons for keeping documents under wraps. For instance if Yoko Ono were passing information from North Korea with the knowledge of the local government China may not look favorably upon it and it could cause more than a little tension.

      --
      Four plus four equals 2,137.
    5. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      So what? 435 years is NOT unreasonable.

      What is my incentive to create if my great-great-great-great-great grand children can't sit on their asses living off my royalties? That's the new lazy american dream!

    6. Re:Good news by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Clinton's Executive Order 12958 reduced that to 25 years in most cases. (The more recent version is Bush's Executive Order 13292).

      But there are many ways to get around that in the latest EO. It won't be released if it will (to quote the EO):

      (1) reveal the identity of a confidential human source, or a human intelligence source, or reveal information about the application of an intelligence source or method;

      (2) reveal information that would assist in the development or use of weapons of mass destruction;

      (3) reveal information that would impair U.S. cryptologic systems or activities;

      (4) reveal information that would impair the application of state of the art technology within a U.S. weapon system;

      (5) reveal actual U.S. military war plans that remain in effect;

      (6) reveal information, including foreign government information, that would seriously and demonstrably impair relations between the United States and a foreign government, or seriously and demonstrably undermine ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States;

      (7) reveal information that would clearly and demonstrably impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of the national security, are authorized;

      (8) reveal information that would seriously and demonstrably impair current national security emergency preparedness plans or reveal current vulnerabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, or projects relating to the national security; or

      (9) violate a statute, treaty, or international agreement.

      That determination is made by the agency head (e.g. CIA, NSA), not by an outside panel, and there's no appeal. So it's automatically declassified unless they care enough to stop it.

    7. Re:Good news by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily. For example, would you like to have the original documents from the Manhattan project (weapon designs) made public simply because they are over 60 years old? No, it is better that certain records remain classified, even at the expense of the right of the public to know and especially when the documents in question are important to the national security of the United States.

    8. Re:Good news by bob+beta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I posted some strong opinions once on a Slashdot account where I had my email address exposed.

      That email account is pretty much worthless now. Nothing of the kind has EVER happened due to all the USENET posts I have made with a public email address.

      There are some some really nasty and hostile elements involved in the threads on this site. It's a serious mistake to reveal an email address if you have any strongly held opinions.

      --
      "What's the frequency Kenneth?"
    9. Re:Good news by slashjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Manhattan Project is not a very good example. Given the information currently available on the internet, it's relatively easy to design a 1st generation nuclear bomb (such as Fat Man or Little Boy). Even the information on how to refine Uranium and Plutonium isn't hard to find. The difficulty for anyone wanting to make a nuke is in getting ahold of the Uranium or Plutonium in the first place. After that, in under a year they'll have a bomb ready for use.

  2. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like another big step in the Freedom of Information Act

    Imagine!

  3. I, for one, am intrigued by the information by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I look forward to reading the released documents. I believe a 'Sargeant Pepper' may be the foreign national in question, and I think it's high time he produce answers.

    1. Re:I, for one, am intrigued by the information by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      ObSimpsons reference:

      Well we all know that the Beatles were subliminally recruiting for the U.S. military.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  4. One of many revelations in the FBI files.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the walrus was Paul.

  5. Beatles? by BenSpinSpace · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey Judge Don't let me down Take a security threat And make it better Remember, for all the harm that you do Screw the FBI, and be a trendsetter

    1. Re:Beatles? by robbyjo · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's more like "Let It Be"

      When I find myself in times of trouble
      The FBI comes to me
      Speaking terrorism, let it be...

      --

      --
      Error 500: Internal sig error
  6. Finally... by Lu+Xun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...we'll learn what that last song on the White Album means.

    --
    That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
  7. I can see it now. by Artie_Effim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yoko, instead of being a super-royal-bitch who is single handedly responsiable for breaking up the greatest band of that era, was in fact a defected spy master, living in annomity amounget the illuminati.

  8. Say What? by AsnFkr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one that was unaware there was any sort of scandal or cover up or anything fishy about his death? I thought it was a pretty straightforward murder. This is indeed curious information.

    --


    adventure-today.com
    1. Re:Say What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This had nothing to do with his death. The FBI followed John Lennon because he had his own opinion of the war in Vietnam. So President Nixon had the FBI treat him like a national security risk.

      Sounds just like the current Administration.

    2. Re:Say What? by ggvaidya · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not about his death (which was pretty straightforward, yeah). In the early 1970s, the FBI were investigating Lennon and other rock-n-rollers with political interests. You can get more information here and here.

    3. Re:Say What? by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

      The files in question are the files the FBI kept on Lennon while he was alive. He was watched by the FBI because of his antiwar stance and he was not a U.S. citizen. There is no controversy about his death.

    4. Re: Say What? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > I never got into them more then listening to thier music a couple of times.

      I presume that disclaimer was for the FBI's benefit...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Say What? by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, there IS some controversy, including a weird conspiracy theory, about Lennon's death, but for once, the standard weird conspiracy theory doesn't involve the FBI, or the U.S. Government in general.
      This one runs approximately as follows.

      1 Charles Manson based his Helter-Skelter massacree scheme on the Beatles song from the White album

      2. Sharon Tate gets killed by the Manson family as part of that scheme.

      3. Sharon Tate was married to director Roman Polanski.

      4. Polanski directed the film 'Rosemary's Baby'.

      5. Rosemary's Baby was filmed (in part) in the Dakota Building (The rest was shot in the studio).

      6. Lennon lived in the Dakota Building, and was shot just outside it.

      7. Supposedly, the first report of Lennon's being shot came from the then current occupants of the appartment where Rosmary's Baby was filmed. (This last claim is the only one in the chain that looks iffy).

      It all adds up to a chain of strange coincidences, that don't even point to a particular bunch of conspiritors, or suggest a motive. People have looked to see if the little weasel who killed John Lennon could be tied to the Mansonites, to organized Satanism, or to anything else, and found basically nothing, but that doesn't keep people from trying to put it together into a controversy. It's a fair bet that the FBI files will have nothing that sheds any light on this, and that people will keep looking anyway.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  9. Re:crap by just_von · · Score: 3, Insightful

    restate that: Now we'll know where he got all those good drugs from!!

  10. Won't Be Long by geomon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And you will have to fight for the information that US security and intelligence agencies have accumulated on you.

    The problem with the USA Patriot Act is that it has an unintended consequence: While working under the guise of gathering information on terrorists (a good thing) a great deal more information is gathered on innocent individuals (a bad thing).

    Now before people start waving their arms around with "You've got nothing to worry about unless you've got something to hide", keep in mind that information can always be used for purposes other than stopping terrorism. Information can be used for political reasons as well.

    That is the problem with the USA Patriot Act. You will never know what information has been gathered on you, and you will never know if some *legal* activity, such as belonging to a political organization, will become a problem for you or your family in the future.

    Lennon may not have been right, he may have created political problems for the Nixon Administration, but he did everything in the open and legally.

    Look where it got him.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Won't Be Long by tm2b · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The problem with the USA Patriot Act is that it has an unintended consequence: While working under the guise of gathering information on terrorists (a good thing) a great deal more information is gathered on innocent individuals (a bad thing).
      Jim Pinkerton, a FOX News (bear with me, he's one of the ones who does more than repeat the RNC talking points) commentator, makes an excellent point against the Patriot Act that conservatives would be wise to attend.

      When they read the Patriot Act, they imagine it being used against people that this administration deems as enemies. They are comfortable with this: they see it as to be used against terrorists, illegal immigrants and other potential dangers.

      Pinkerton makes the point that they must now picture the same powers in the hand of an administration that they would not be some comfortable with: for example, in the hands of a liberal President, let's say for the sake of argument a President Hillary Clinton.

      Most neocons should think long and hard about that kind of mix, and why the United States has the strong tradition of limiting the power of the executive and subjecting everything to the possibility of judicial review. They're not there to protect the terrorists, they're there to protect us against an administration with whom we do not agree.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    2. Re: Won't Be Long by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Interesting


      > and why the United States has the strong tradition of limiting the power of the executive and subjecting everything to the possibility of judicial review.

      And unfortunately, we also have a strong tradition of spying on people who don't do what the powers that be want them to do. A few years back news came out that that the FBI had a 70 page file on a former president of the University of California, simply because he wouldn't fire a couple of professors that certain people thought were too liberal.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re: Won't Be Long by tm2b · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And unfortunately, we also have a strong tradition of spying on people who don't do what the powers that be want them to do. A few years back news came out that that the FBI had a 70 page file on a former president of the University of California, simply because he wouldn't fire a couple of professors that certain people thought were too liberal.
      Indeed. And you can find much stronger examples, in the student, civil rights, and religious groups that J. Edgar Hoover's FBI spied on, and further back to the efforts that Senators Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon made to support spying upon suspected communists and the later President Richard Nixon's "enemies list" that helped direct Hoover's excesses.

      There's nothing that bothers me more about neocons than their contempt for checks and balances on the executive and legislative branches. I miss the days in the 80s when neocons were commonly referred to as "cryptofascists." I'd like to see that term return.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    4. Re:Won't Be Long by xs650 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The problem with the USA Patriot Act is that it has an unintended consequence: While working under the guise of gathering information on terrorists (a good thing) a great deal more information is gathered on innocent individuals (a bad thing)."

      If you believe that was a fully unintended consequence, I own a long suspension bridge north of San Francisco to sell you.

    5. Re:Won't Be Long by nightfire-unique · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Now before people start waving their arms around with "You've got nothing to worry about unless you've got something to hide", keep in mind that information can always be used for purposes other than stopping terrorism. Information can be used for political reasons as well.

      Forget political reasons. What if you do have something to hide?

      No, I'm serious. You're a criminal. I'm a criminal. We're all criminals. You've downloaded copyrighted movies/mp3s, he's smoked some drugs, she sat at the front of the bus, and I've driven 19mph over the speed limit.

      There are so many laws in America, it's simply a matter of whether someone gets caught.

      I for one am not interested in giving the "powers that be" any more control/surveillance capacity than they already have.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  11. Confidential: by Sophrosyne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yoko Ono is really an alien... do not look her directly in the eyes.

    1. Re:Confidential: by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw that! Do NOT under any circumstance listen to the Audio Weapon she calls 'singings'.

      Death, or worse a love of techno, may result.

  12. Exemptions by acceber · · Score: 5, Informative
    The FOI Act applies explicitly to government agencies, such as the FBI. The FBI challenged the act because they felt that the information was a threat to national security. There are nine exemptions to the FOI Act in which an agency can refuse to disclose information.

    Here are the exemptionsexemptions.

    1. Re:Exemptions by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 3, Funny

      "There are nine exemptions to the FOI Act in which an agency can refuse to disclose information."

      Are any 'embarrassment'?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  13. You're right, by empaler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reading up on the FBI files on the JFK assassination atm... oh, wait.

  14. Are you now by empaler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?

  15. What I wanna know is... by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why oh WHY are records sealed regarding, in essense, a celebrity civilian who's been dead for almost 24 years now?

    I mean I had my own conspiracy theory that it was due to the Reagan administration taking office, or a Manchurian Candidate situation, but hasn't the FBI figured out that hiding documents on cold cases long out of date only adds to the suspicion?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:What I wanna know is... by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      hasn't the FBI figured out that hiding documents on cold cases long out of date only adds to the suspicion?

      The FBI knows what it's doing. If you only fight when you have something to hide, everyone will know you have something to hide when you're fighting. Every time there's a controversy made about it and it turns out to be nothing, people get less suspicious.

      That, and they just don't like to have we mortals looking over their shoulders. It's a penis thing.

  16. Wrong. by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are not unintended consequences, they are deliberate. It will make it easier for those in power to stay in power and help keep 'undesirables' out of power.

  17. someone post a link to the files and receive by Savatte · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instant Karma

  18. Re:Good news? Bad news by wHartHog(69) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You've got to be kidding. The whole reason we have these problems is because of secrecy. We must hold our government accountable for its actions. The only way to ensure that is to know what, when, where, why, and how it takes action. There is no "them" and "us". The government is an extention of "the people", and should act on our behalf. We must ensure that it does. Freedom requires dilegence. And action

  19. Lots of Data Collected by BisonHoof · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is certainly true that the FBI were *very* interested in Lennon, especially during his "Marxist" phase, circa "Some Time in New York City". According to John Wiener ("Lennon vs the FBI" in Thomson and Gutman's "Lennon Companion") there is a 288 page file on Lennon in the FBIs "domestic security" section, of which 199 pages are still classfied "in the interests of defence of foregin policy", and thousands of pages in the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

  20. Here's the top secret... by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Walrus Was Paul.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  21. Re:Good news? Bad news by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, I can't believe people are so selfish that they'd risk the U.S.'s relations with another country just so they, and _possibly_ others, can see what happened. If the FBI wants documents classified, the FBI has a good reason. I don't want another 9/11 in the U.S. or a foreign country just because people want to see some documents.

    Right, and by that logic, let's just suspend Habeus because it might make us safer too....

    No, judicial and legal principles, and the framework of liberty is more important than any single action that the government does purportedly in the interest of the people. Otherwise we lose *all* our liberty.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  22. I've already seen them... by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Saw them already, Greedo shot first.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  23. Is that stuff still around? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No, I didn't RTFA, but it has been almost 25 years since he was killed. Why would anyone keep stuff that long - doesn't the FBI have a shread-on date?

    Maybe that is what is driving it - release it or lose it? I dunno.

    Then again, folks are still obsessed with Elvis and Marilyn Monroe. Go figure.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  24. Well... by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny
    a U.S. District Judge rejected the governments arguements to keep the secret records of John Lennon sealed.
    Well, I for one, am looking forward to hearing a new John Lennon album because honestly, Imagine and the Wedding Album are getting a little stale. Still though, I understand the FBI wanting to keep it sealed, I mean, imagine the resale value of something like that, it has to be like 5 times a butcher cover of Yesterday and Today.
  25. Found it by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny
    Turns out FBI was using an old version of wu-ftp server. I got in and found what this is all about. It is indeed a threat to national security. Here's an exerpt:
    Imagine there's no countries,
    It isn't hard to do
    If there are no countries, there's no USA. There is also some evidence of a communist plot that Lennon was involved with, which would have us all with no possessions, "sharing" all the world. Defeating the Soviets came at a prodigious price. We can't afford to let this plot reactivate or we'll have to fight it all over again.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  26. Maybe, just maybe.... STASI by Siriaan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The US government may be nervous about these documents due to the early Beatles stint in Germany. Could it be possible that the East German secret police, who almost certainly had informers throughout West Germany, may have passed on information at the request of the United States? Just imagine how embarrassing it would be for people to know that the US government were in cahoots at one time with possibly the most notorious policing force ever created.

  27. Conintelpro? by hotspotbloc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Could there really be anything worse? I mean this is a couple of surveillance reports so it is likely they only deal with Lennon's movements and how he was tracked. It's the "how" part that makes the FBI nervous, especially now with the PATRIOT Act up for permanent renewal. The last thing the DOJ wants is the public being reminded of Hoover's lack of respect to the individual man and the FBI's checkered past.

    This is why the FOIA is such a good thing. While it's easier to forget about our mistakes, analyzing them helps us avoid repeating them. Its so we can see what the Govt has said about us.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  28. Re:Good news? Bad news by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What slashdotters don't get is that the government isn't out to get us.

    It's not that the government is out to get "us" per se, especially if by us you mean everyone in the U.S. The government is out to get anyone who interferes with its nefarious fucking schemes to grow into this cthulhuesque horror which consumes the whole nation. The federal government is the ultimate bureaucracy because you're not even allowed to sue it without permission! The government is not a single entity either but it is united in certain pursuits.

    What are those pursuits? For one, the poverty industry. Different parts of the government are more or less involved in different parts of the stratification of society for the purpose of employing more people in the government - which costs us all money. First there's the welfare system, which penalizes success by taking away help from the people who need it most - if you can't make the jump from poor to not poor in one step, the government will cut back your aid so that you stay poor. Next there's the War on Drugs - it employs thousands in law enforcement, corrections, and the judicial system, but ultimately it's harming the populace. It's modern-day prohibition, but the masses are happy enough with their alcohol and cigarettes that they won't (for the most part) do anything about it, so the system continues in its lovely little circles, helped along by our own Cocaine Import Agency.

    If you're one of the people who does anything the goverment doesn't like you to do, then it's not unreasonable to be paranoid.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  29. Re:Gee, I wonder WHICH country...? by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    maybe FUCKING ENGLAND? You losers... if there's one country besides the U.S. that had any information on John Lennon it's god damned brits. How sensitive is that really?

    Or possibly Canada. John Lennon spent a good deal of time in Canada doing things he wouldn't so in the US, like his and Yoko's North American bed-in (in Montreal), John and Yoko's "Live Peace in Toronto" concert, and the fact that he stayed with Ronnie Hawkins (IIRC) at a farm here in Ontario for some time.

    During those days the RCMP and Canadian police forces were keeping their eyes on rock stars (or at least so it seems to me). In 1977 Keith Richards (Rolling Stones) was arrested for Heroin possession.

    I wouldn't be too suprised if the RCMP collected some data on Lennon during his time here. What would suprise me is if the FBI would think that anyone here would care if such information were to be made public 24 years later.

    (To be honest though, England does seem to be the more probable source).

    Yaz.

  30. I quote thus by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.

    Commissioner Pravin Lal
    "U.N. Declaration of Rights"

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  31. Lost Lennon/Cat Stevens collaboration by ic0wb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is linked to the recent Cat Stevens deportation. What nobody picked up on is that he came to the US to meet with an RIAA attorney. According to insiders, FBI agents stole the Cat Stevens-John Lennon tapes in 1980 from Lennons apartment. When the unsuspecting Lennon showed up, he had to be distracted by drugged stoolie Mark Chapman as evasive action. Chapman went 'roidal and agents left out the back door with the material. If these secret documents are released, the RIAA will sue the FBI for millions for illegally obtaining and withholding copyrighted material and easily win. I can see why the Government is being this protective.

  32. Delaying tactic by M.+Silver · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're just stalling while they reprint them without the proportional font and superscripts.

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  33. I got the files! by benjonson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good news folks: the files were released under the Freedom of Information Act. I just got them. Here they are:

    The ambassador from [blacked out] assured [blacked out] that Mr. Lennon gave [blacked out] to [blacked out].
    Thank God that's all out in the open now.
    --
    =-+
  34. Transparent Government by Tony · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea that our government can operate in secret is a scary one. The whole idea of keeping this information around is that, after 25 years, information can and should be released to the public. This is a great step in helping keep our government relatively honest.

    Granted, it is scary to learn 40 years after the fact that the Cuban Missile Crisis almost led to nuclear war. A Russian submarine officer disobeyed a direct order: he did not launch nuclear warhead tipped torpedos at the US fleet.

    This came out via the freedom of information act. Yes, it's a little late to learn about it so long after the fact, but it's great to know we should all thank Vasili Arkhipov for stopping the destruction of the world as we know it.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Transparent Government by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 4, Informative

      "A Russian submarine officer disobeyed a direct order: he did not launch nuclear warhead tipped torpedos at the US fleet."

      Actually he pointed out that the conditions for the SOP change to fire on other combatants were not met to another officer on the submarine. There were no direct orders to fire from the Supreme Soviet, but they do have discretion under certain circumstances, such as hull damage.

      Valentin Grigoroevich was the officer that ordered the assembly under stressful circumstances (low air, high temperatures, no communications and constant depth charging from American destroyers enforcing the blockade).

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  35. Re:the reason? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 4, Funny
    John Lennon had some potential political influence and that made him a target, especially because he was a scumbag hippie type.

    That's not why he has a file, it was because John Lennon was a seceret agent for MI6, feeding very unhelpful/false information to American Intellegence departments. This was part of an attempt to stem US world domination by keeping it locked in the cold war and keeping econimy suppressed....

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Nothing to see here... by cliveholloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    These "secret records" were kept hidden to protect the public. Apparently they were titled, "Yoko Ono - unplugged (Vo1. 1 to 10)".

    Imagine the Aural pain that would ensue if these were ever "released".

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism