Slashdot Mirror


Detailed Review of the Archos AV420 PVR

ilovealpacas writes "The Globe and Mail has posted a step by step look at the Archos AV420. For about $1000 Canadian (I think that's $800 US), you get an 80GB portable video player and recorder that also plays MP3's and has a CF slot for pictures. Hmmm.....laptop?"

157 comments

  1. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but does it run linux?

    1. Re:but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This model does not run Linux yet. (The 500 one apparently will, out of the box.)

      However, do not forget that the model before the 400, the 300, has similar specs (although not as slim), and there is a Linux version running on it:

      http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS4929282643.html

      linav home page:

      http://linav.sf.net/

  2. Convergence by erixtark · · Score: 1

    Yepp, everything will become a PC.

    1. Re:Convergence by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Everything will become a "personal computer"? Somehow I doubt that, unless you put a really weird meaning to the PC acronym.

  3. Laptop? by BeerCat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aren't laptops cheaper than that, though?
    I mean, even an iBook works out less.

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
    1. Re:Laptop? by pronobozo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yeah but you don't get a cheap laptop with an 80 gig drive. It's for people that don't want a laptop. That don't want to spend hours installing software to get it running. To have a bunch of crap they don't want. Ease of use.

      --
      ------
      insert sig here,here, and here
    2. Re:Laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't get a cheap laptop with an 80 gig drive

      But a cheap laptop and 144.50 will.

    3. Re:Laptop? by james72 · · Score: 1

      Read the article! It's damn inconvienent to wait 2 minutes for a laptop to boot, plus laptops are much bigger than this unit.

      It's your choice - if you think you need a cheap laptop more than this device then get one. But I already have a $3000 laptop, and can easily see where a pocket sized, instant-on alternative would be better.

      -James.

    4. Re:Laptop? by Speare · · Score: 1

      A laptop cannot fit into my camera bag when I go on vacations. Most laptops can't plug into the big-screen TV for all the relatives to get a sneak-peak at the photos I've taken during the week. I've been lusting after an Archos previously, but the requirement of a dongle for CompactFlash reading was a limiting factor.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    5. Re:Laptop? by arodland · · Score: 1

      Certainly these days most laptops do plug into the TV.

    6. Re:Laptop? by baudilus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and their batteries die after about 2-3 hours (unless you get a battery upgrade). This device has an estimated 12 hours of battery life.

    7. Re:Laptop? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      yeah but you don't get a cheap laptop with an 80 gig drive. It's for people that don't want a laptop. That don't want to spend hours installing software to get it running. To have a bunch of crap they don't want. Ease of use.

      I agree with BeerCat. It still sounds like an iBook, especially given your description.

    8. Re:Laptop? by dspyder · · Score: 1

      I want to know where you're getting $800 iBooks with a warranty, cuz AppleStore says they start at $1099. I didn't think the education discount was that good.

      Oh, you mean you're including the other functionality of the laptop in your cost calculation.... got it.... ok, so then I gotta ask you where are you getting those iBooks that fit in your pocket?

      I thought so...

      --D

    9. Re:Laptop? by EvanTaylor · · Score: 1

      Apparently you never owned an iBook. Mine got about 5 hrs under normal conditions.

      --
      Sleep is for the weak.
    10. Re:Laptop? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I still feel like someone with the disposabal income to drop $800 on a portable media player is in need of some kind of moneyectomy. It just seems really extravagent to me.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    11. Re:Laptop? by Radar|TGS · · Score: 1

      They had a refurb G4 800 iBook for $800 with a 1 year warranty. They haven't had any for a month or so. Just an FYI.

    12. Re:Laptop? by garote · · Score: 1
      A laptop cannot fit into my camera bag when I go on vacations.

      Of course not, silly, that's where the camera goes! ;)

      Most laptops can't plug into the big-screen TV for all the relatives to get a sneak-peak at the photos I've taken during the week.

      A 12-inch iBook can (and an ibook's not exactly high-end for a laptop these days.) You can also use a laptop to retouch those photos, and upload them so folks 10,000 miles away can see the pictures, along with your typed or dictated commentary.
      It will also hold a pile of maps and accept a GPS dongle, speak driving directions out loud to you, enable voip access, play thousands upon thousands of games (with the magic of emulators), and be FAR easier to use for all these things since you can do them with a KEYBOARD, the trackpad, and/or a USB or wireless mouse, instead of what is essentially a glorified ATARI LYNX FOR ADULTS.
      What's more, if you get an Apple machine, you gain the "instant on" appeal of PVRs. OS X suspends to RAM, and wakes up from it, in less than four seconds. (I haven't actually SHUT DOWN my powerbook since I bought it two years ago!)

      The big thing I don't understand is, when people see this item, why don't they notice the big tether-cord that comes with it? Tying them to an actual computer - the device they HAVE TO USE to get all their crap on and off of these things? Honestly, it's just a big external hard drive with a window stuck on it. Why would anyone choose to create such a management overhead, for no reason?

      I've been lusting after an Archos previously,

      Ahhh, there's the reason: lust!

      but the requirement of a dongle for CompactFlash reading was a limiting factor.

      Alas, to avoid a dongle, you'd need something other than the 12" ibook, which lacks a PCMCIA slot.

    13. Re:Laptop? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Mine got about 5 hrs under normal conditions.

      So, less than half what this device can do, eh?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Laptop? by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      It still sounds like an iBook, especially given your description

      Doesn't sound like the one sitting right next to me (well, Powerbook, really). My Powerbook came with a bunch of crap I don't use, has taken weeks to find and install software to get it to do what I want, and if for no other reason than the fact that Apple STILL doesn't grasp the fact that a one-button mouse is useless, ESPECIALLY if I have to hold down a key on the keyboard or two in order to do a lot of thing, is not easy to use.

      On the other hand, it does look nice. It better, though, after spending $2600 to get the same functionality a $900 Windows laptop would have gotten me.

      Before you ask, I was giving Apple another try after a decade or so of avoiding them. Don't get me wrong, I've actually grown quite fond of it, it just ain't worth all the hype.

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    15. Re:Laptop? by really? · · Score: 1

      Mmm ... don't know ... get bigger pockets??? :-)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    16. Re:Laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used one of these fucking Archos things, and in terms of EVERY SINGLE FEATURE (excepting HD size) an iBook beats it in versatility and ease of use.

      Honestly, it's a hunk of shit. DO NOT waste your hard-earned.

    17. Re:Laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with a screen about 8 times bigger.

  4. PC? by erotic_pie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    when will they stop making all this specialized crap and just make better software and hardware based on laptops or PDA's to do the same thing why reverse engineer things

    1. Re:PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when will they stop making all this specialized crap and just make better software and hardware based on laptops or PDA's to do the same thing why reverse engineer things

      Not only did you omit all punctuation and capitalization, but you incorrectly used 'reverse engineer'. Well done.

    2. Re:PC? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to reverse engineer your sentence. Ever heard of question marks?

    3. Re:PC? by erotic_pie · · Score: 0

      my bad, I always forget the HTML tags. :-(

      note to self: *preview button*

    4. Re:PC? by babyrat · · Score: 1

      when will they stop making all this specialized crap and just make better software and hardware based on laptops or PDA's to do the same thing why reverse engineer things

      When people stop buying them and/or it's no longer profitable????

  5. Overkill? by Benw5483 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This definitely brings up the question of what overkill is. I think I may enjoy something like this, but at the same time, how much would I really use it for anything other than audio and maybe a little video.

    For me it would probably end up as little more than an 80 GB mp3 player with a lot of extra hard drive storage space.

    Does anybody out there think this would be better than a laptop? The only place I can see using this for movies or pictures would be on vacation or business trips where a laptop would be more practical.

    --
    what?
    1. Re:Overkill? by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      Everyone has different needs, I am buying the Gmini400 which is smaller and cheaper, but plays video, for my brother who lives in Japan and has a 2 hour commute daily to/from school. This would be great for that. The Gmini 400 even plays simple pixelart games.

    2. Re:Overkill? by cwills · · Score: 1

      I have the AV320 (earlier generation). It has a 20gig harddrive, does the video playback/record and mp3/wav playback/record. It has an external card reader. In addition you can get a camera attachement for it.

      So.. basically it's the same type of unit as this new one, just not as much memory, different control layout and mine doesn't have batteries that I can replace (well, not without breaking the warranty seal).

      Now why did I buy the AV320?

      Well I don't have a laptop...

      I had just gotten a digital camera and was going on a trip. I was originally looking at just a digital wallet so that I could store extra photos. I was having difficulty in locating one. I did come across the Archos AV320 (it had just came out). When I looked at what it could do I saw that not only could I use it as a digital wallet, but I could also replace my portable Sony Minidisk recorder (the trip I was going on was to a folk music festival). I liked the fact that I could record more then 75 minutes at a time. Last time I had attended I came back with a huge stack of minidisks.

      Now why not just get a laptop. -- Well.. when you are carrying a large musical instrument, folding chair, etc, and are going to be setting up in the middle of a jam tent where space is tight, a laptop really is out of the question. With the AV320 I can just set the thing under my chair, hit record and be done with it. It has about a 10 hour battery life.

      When I get back, I just hook the AV320 up to a USB port and it shows up under linux as just a disk drive. I can copy to/from the AV320 to linux, edit the recordings etc.

      And it's great for going on long road trips. I just load a bunch of MP3's onto the thing, hook up a little FM transmitter and just play through the car radio. I haven't been on a airplane flight since I've gotten it, but the thing would be great having along for the flight. Just hook up the DVR attachment record what I want beforehand and I can have my inflight movie(s).

  6. Read the durn book instead by lottameez · · Score: 3, Funny

    [curmudgeonly sneer] You bums need to read books instead of wasting yer money on these fancy schmantzy doo-dads. What? Too afraid to talk to the guy sitting next to you on the airplane?

    Why, when I was a youngster...cough cough KACCCCCHHH...phtt.


    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    1. Re:Read the durn book instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...when I was a youngster...


      You mean, like, 5 years ago, when you were 10?

      That was so last century!

    2. Re:Read the durn book instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG I .... ccan't ssstop laaaughing. &'-P

    3. Re:Read the durn book instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on more or less reproducing the coughing-up and spitting noises in print correctly. I haven't laughed that hard in a while. :-P

    4. Re:Read the durn book instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too afraid to talk to the guy sitting next to you on the airplane?

      Way off topic here but anyway.
      I worked in IT for an airline and flew to airports and back home roughly 4 times a week for 3 years. I am also a white knuckle flyer, bascially paranoid and nervous almost the whole time the plane was in the air. My method of remaining calm was to talk to the person next to me. Some people will talk the entire flight, others will not. It is obvious after a short sentence or a little interaction wether the person wants bothered or not. I met many different and interesting people. A large city symphony conductor, several CEO/CFOs of probably now gone dot-bombs, quite a few pilots, a Senators son, and various other road warriors. Each a different story to tell and all very interesting. Most of our conversation were about what we did, things in our respective lines of work and what we enjoyed and did not enjoy about what we did. An example was the conductor describing what type of music he listened to in his free time and how picky he was about the actual quality different recordings. I also asked him how often he viewed other performances, who he looked up to, and listened to him describe what his goals were in that career. Very interesting indeed. I know a little about a lot and it is easy for me to grasp many of the different things that people do and ask what i thought were logical qustions for the respective line of work that each person did. My method must have worked well as many of my conversations did not end until we were in the terminal.

  7. How's the construction? by signe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Personally, I will never buy another piece of equipment made by Archos. I had to take apart one of their Jukebox Recorders to try and get it to function at all. I discovered that the 4 circuit boards inside (which pretty much make up the entirety of the interior, and what the outer casing attaches to) are all held together with solder joints. As in they have attached the circuit boards to each other using solder. In addition, the battery contacts are on circuit boards at either end of the main boards. So when you put the batteries in, the pressure of the springs puts stress on the solder joints that hold the thing together.

    Needless to say, I was not able to revive this piece of crap.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    1. Re:How's the construction? by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is it that comments negatively portraying a company are always modded up around here? There's two sides to every coin.

      I've had an Archos Jukebox Recorder 10 for well over 5 years now, and haven't had any problems with it. I still get +/- 5 hours of continuous play out of the original NiMH rechargable batteries that came with the unit. I've taken it apart a few times (mostly to use it as an external USB enclosure to try salvaging files from a dead laptop drives), and never had any problems with shoddy solder joints or breaking anything putting the batteries back in. It's been a very solid unit, and survived many falls and trips around town in my backpack, all with the original IBM travelstar hard drive.

      I'm tired of seeing all the "my thing broke so this company sucks" comments here, and felt like chipping in my positive experience with this particular product.

    2. Re:How's the construction? by jest3r · · Score: 1

      The problem with Archos is their advertised battery life is usually double real world results. Furthermore their technical support is slow and impersonal ..

      On the plus they do seem to be improving the look and feel of their portable players.

    3. Re:How's the construction? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I've had the 20 GB model for about 3 months now and it makes me feel a lot more safe than when I used my laptop in public to watch movies. I can't really comment on the constuction except to say that it has survived 100's of rural bus rides so far this semester.

    4. Re:How's the construction? by signe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the interior construction of the thing isn't a matter of a subjective experience. Using solder joints to secure one circuit board to another is bad construction.

      I'm glad your jukebox works. Given what I know of the interior of these things, I would consider you lucky.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
    5. Re:How's the construction? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. They're pieces of junk with no quality control. I have an AV140 (it was bout $400 at the time) and the battery barely gets me to work in the morning. Sometimes it'll last less than 30 minutes, sometimes I can get a hour. As I understand it, it's kind of a crap shoot as to whether your unit will be like this or not. It also gets into a funky state where it'll play two songs at the same time. Sometimes it crashes for no reason and sometimes it becomes totally unresponsive (even the off button won't work) until the batteries run down. I hardly ever use it anymore because it's such a pain. It's the worst piece of electronics I've ever purchased.

    6. Re:How's the construction? by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      Archos has changed their products a _LOT_ since you purchased yours. I have had almost every generation player they have released up to the Gmini 120 and they make very solid stuff -they all still work!

      My old Jukebox recorder (like yours) was dropped (by a friend using it) into the ocean (read: completely submerged). We fished it out, and on a whim dried it out thoroughly at a low heat, and it WORKED AGAIN!

      Not to mention Archos value, and support for advanced users. Such a community has grown up around the old Jukebox recorders that there is a website available to fix nearly any issue. Especially bad cracked solder joints.

      The Jukeboxes (20GB) were available on Amazon.com and other places for 90 dollars for a time. And yes they were cheaply made, but hats off to Archos for bring HD players to the masses, and now Portable Media Players..

    7. Re:How's the construction? by rdewalt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Same here. I've got the same model (AJR-10) that I aquired from a friend when the drive died.

      Tore it apart, bought an off-the-shelf 40gb drive, did the magic hand wave incantation (i.e. formatted it FAT-32) dumped my MP3's to it, replaced the 1500mAh's with COTS 2300mAh's, and re-assembled. Cable went the way of all those Special Cables, so I grafted two USB-A Male ends together and made my own. Installed the RockBox rom, and BOOM replaced the standard archos rom with one that has the functionality I needed.

      For $125 in parts cost, and an hour's work. I got a 40gb mp3 player that does about 12 hours on a single charge. I pop the plastic battery plates, and I can swap in any regular AA size batteries. Doesn't hook to the USB port on my big FreeBSD machine. No big deal. five minutes with the screwdriver, and the drive is free again, I stick it right on the IDE chain. Who the hell would xfer gigs of data over USB, when you've got IDE.

      I've got four people who want me to make them one, all I need is the parts. Okay, so the construction is not Most Ideal. But I can fix a solder weild if it goes bad. Hell, Archos haven't gone forth and shut down the "How to mod your Archos" people, nor the 'open source rom' people. Isn't that something that slashdotters like?

    8. Re:How's the construction? by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it that comments negatively portraying a company are always modded up around here? There's two sides to every coin.

      Look, comments being modded 'up' or 'down' are not a valid indication of their 'worth' to the subject matter. Stop thinking so linearly! Break the dialectic noose!

      Slashdot comments work to 'categorize', not 'valuate' a posts' validity to the thread. "Negative" feedback on a company/product is typically not moderated because of its negativity, but because it is feedback.. just as many "glowing reports" will filter through the Mod system to "Interesting" or "Informative" as "negative slants" ..

      In short, its feedback, stupid!!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:How's the construction? by DrEldarion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I agree. The Archos Jukebox has always been solid for me as well. The fact that you could replace the batteries with higher-capacity ones was great, and the rubber corners made it survive quite a few falls (although they ARE really ugly).

      Had it a while, and only replaced it today because I found a killer deal on a Dell DJ - I wanted something a bit more elegant.

    10. Re:How's the construction? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I still get +/- 5 hours of continuous play out of the original NiMH rechargable batteries that came with the unit.

      Wow. It must really suck when you get -5 hours out of them, huh?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:How's the construction? by EvilNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm of a mixed mindset about it.

      I bought the original Archos model 6000 with the 6GB disk. It ran without problems for about a year, and then the charging port and power ports both died. No big deal, the batteries charge more efficiently in an external unit anyway, and swapping them out takes about five seconds, so I can live with that. I only ran it on AC in my car, but given the battery life I can live without that as well. About a year and a half after purchase, the USB port starts getting flaky, throwing data errors any time I use it.

      Again, no big deal really. It takes five minutes to reduce it to a bare hard disk and plug it in directly with IDE, and I don't change music mixes that often, though I do miss the ability to drop files on it and use it as a cheap, portable USB drive. Two years in, the hard disk takes a dive (never dropped once, only runs in my car). Easy to replace it with a 60GB laptop hard disk I had laying around. While I'm at it, I upgrade to the Rockbox firmware because it kicks the shit out of the original. Just last month (what, 3 years since purhcase now? I lost track) I noticed my charge wasn't holding as long as it used to. Popped in four 2300ma batteries to replace the stock 1500ma(?) batteries and it's now running for 20 hours solid on a single charge.

      The lesson to take home here is that the Archos does well because it uses a relatively open hardware architecture. I am still using it precisely because I could replace the hard disk, firmware, and batteries. I will never touch any portable device that uses proprietary, unreplaceable batteries (hence why I hate the iPod and most Palm devices). In retrospect, given Archos's shitty 90-day warranty, I think it would have been better to buy it from Best Buy and get a 3-year warranty slapped onto it on the cheap. That at least is good to cover hard disk failures.

      I'll be using this one until it literally burns out, however long that takes. It's a damn good chunk of hardware, despite a few manufacturing problems (as others have noted). If I were to buy another MP3/Video player device, I would be looking at Archos as my first pick, at least as long as the hardware remains that easy to hack and replace. I don't think I would ever drop $800 on a portable video/audio device, though. Maybe when it is $400 in a few years I'll think about it.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
  8. No DVD! by darth_MALL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It couldn't have been that much of a stretch to add a DVD player could it? I'm sure all the other features are great, but when I think of mobile entertainment, DVD is 1st on the list. Ahh well I can't afford it anyway, so it's back to work.

    1. Re:No DVD! by samhart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, these things are smaller than a DVD ;-)

      Besides, this is more in the uber-iPod arena than the portable DVD arena. I have a AV320 myself and I take it to the gym for MP3 listenning. I wouldnt want a full DVD player there ;-)

    2. Re:No DVD! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      It couldn't have been that much of a stretch to add a DVD player could it?

      Uh, yeah, it would have been a stretch... at least 2 inches since the device is only 3" x 5" to start with. Then you'd have to double the thickness to accomdate the drive, and there goes one of the greatest features, the pocketability.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  9. AV320 by samhart · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have an AV320 that I got from some consulting I did a while back (because he couldn't pay me in cash, har har har) and I absolutely love mine.

    It's powered by embedded Linux (which I love) and it works like a dream. There have been many an airplane ride that was made easier because of my AV320 ;-)

    My biggest problem with mine (could not apply to this version) was that the screen wasn't well protected. A simple $8 camera carrying case and a pack of Palm screen protectors and this problem was solved.

    1. Re:AV320 by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Got any support for your claim that the Archos AV320 (and presumably other models in the Archos product line) are powered by embedded Linux? I have a Gmini 400 and there's nary a copy of the GPL to be found...

    2. Re:AV320 by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Uh... Google helps. The very first link shown is from a PC Magazine review stating it uses Linux.

      Less anger, less laziness.

  10. Hmmm.... by exhilaration · · Score: 3, Informative

    If one can get a 2.4 Ghz laptop for $889, then is this thing overpriced?

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you don't SAVE anything if this unit is sufficient for your needs (800 - 889 = $89 more expensive). While you do get more features from the laptop, if you don't need those features, then you are WASTING money getting the laptop. In addition, they have the AV420 for $450 at amazon (which is actually the unit that I have considered in the past, but I have not yet bitten). For example, I have been looking at these as a way to extend the amount of memory that I have while traveling with my digital camera. I have considered a laptop, but the weight, size, and cost DOES actually make these things look attractive. I can get 20GB of storage, something that plays movies and MP3s, and something to backup digital pictures to all in something that is small, light, and reasonably inexpensive. Compare that to a small, light laptop (which will cost you over $1000) and suddenly these start to look good. In addition, my desktop at home and at work make a laptop un-needed. Just my $0.02, spending more money for features you may not need from a laptop doesn't make sense. I just wish the Archos thing had an internet connection and browser.

  11. The remote sucks..... by ARRRLovin · · Score: 1

    ... and you can't timeshift live TV. Hardly a PVR. This thing needs some serious refinement for it to be the primary device in my home theater (or "theatre" in Cannuckistan ;-) ).

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:The remote sucks..... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      I think it is not meant to replace a real PVR. More of a personal PORTABLE accessary. They really should make it able to INTERFACE with a PVR like replay or tivo, rather than BE a PVR.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    2. Re:The remote sucks..... by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1
      ...to be the primary device in my home theater (or "theatre" in Cannuckistan ;-) ).

      Where is Cannuckistan and what the hell is that "theatre" you speak of?

    3. Re:The remote sucks..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cannuckistan is in the Great White North eh!

      The theatre is the place where we go to drink beer out of paper cups in the dark.

    4. Re:The remote sucks..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a theatre is where you go to watch plays.

      A CINEMA is where you go to watch films, not that this piece of shit has any place in either. It's bad at every single thing it tries to do.

  12. Embedded linux boots in seconds on new laptops by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    FTFA: And unlike most laptops, it boots up in a few seconds making it easy to use at any time.

    But didnt I just read a story on Slashdot a while back about a laptop with an embedded linux distro which would boot the laptop in seconds for multimedia use? Imagine one of these in the 12" slim form factor with a tablet display and you've got an only slightly larger PVR which doubles as a laptop and looks oh so nifty you just know they'll all be using them in the 24th century.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  13. neat ... but not too practical in my book by Khaotix · · Score: 1
    1. Re:neat ... but not too practical in my book by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1


      Three THOUSAND fucking dollars!!!!!!!!!!!

      what does it do that the second user and dirt cheap dell c840 I'm typing this on (and just about to watch man on fire on) doesn't do??/

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
    2. Re:neat ... but not too practical in my book by Khaotix · · Score: 1

      It weighs just over a pound. It's thinner than an issue of Wired.

    3. Re:neat ... but not too practical in my book by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

      so?

      does anyone have to lift it into low earth orbit?

      --
      http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  14. What? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't get the point of these portable DVD players... most of the time, they're the price (or cost more!) than a laptop that you could use to do MORE than listen to video... Anyway, I don't even see a purpose for them. To listen to videos... in your car? Maybe? Someone care to explain?

    1. Re:What? by El_Smack · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't use them to listen to videos, you use them to see music.

      --


      There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    2. Re:What? by scleary1 · · Score: 1

      If all you are interested in is watching DVD(s) then this is probably not the device for you. I own a portable DVD player (a couple of years now). The battery lasts for about 2 ½ movies...vs ½ a movie on my laptop. Boot time on my portable is close to instant. Plus connecting to TV's on the road is sweet. Airports, waiting at the dentist...these tasks go by faster with a good flick.

    3. Re:What? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I don't get the point of these portable DVD players... most of the time, they're the price (or cost more!) than a laptop that you could use to do MORE than listen to video

      If you've ever taken a laptop on a plane just so the kids could watch a Disney(tm) flick you'd understand that 2 hours on a modern laptop is pretty good, 4 hours is you happen to have a pair. This device claims 12hrs of battery life. If you were on an extended flight and trying to keep the kids amused which would you rather have?

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  15. Just some information about the model numbers... by Swift+Kick · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article description might be a little deceptive.
    The Archos AV420 is only 20GB and it retails for about $470 on Amazon.com.
    The AV480 is 80GB and is about $715 also from Amazon.com
    Check out more information on the devices on Archo's own page located here.

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  16. A word please by revery · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm.....laptop?

    Maybe you're not familiar with how this works. You submit the story, we make the jokes.

    You owe someone a +5 Funny.

    --

    it's all part of the new Slashdot Comment subsidy program.

    1. Re:A word please by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Maybe you're not familiar with how this works. You submit the story, we make the jokes."

      hehe. The stupid thing is that this is a niche product, and actually its size makes it more useful for this particular purpose than a laptop.

      If I were still at my previous company where I had to travel frequently, I'd probably invest in one of these. Laptops on a plane, no matter how small, are not fun.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:A word please by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe you're not familiar with how this works. You submit the story, we make the jokes.

      Yeah, kids these days. What's next, a story about Soviet Russia which ends with the words "First post!"?

    3. Re:A word please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I noticed that no one asked if this thing plays oggs yet. Allow me.

      Does this thing play oggs?

    4. Re:A word please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, post types "First You!"

  17. Why??? by Skraut · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I guess if you have nothing else to do with your money, this may be something interesting, but it just doesn't seem to fit.

    I have an iRiver IHP-120 which I love, and have with me virtually everywhere, and beat the hell out of just by daily use. The cost of this Archos would make me leave it inside rather that drop it in my pocket and hop on the tractor (yes there are some of us rural type geeks :) I'd be too afraid to crack the screen, or otherwise break it.

    So you're left with a movie player. An $800 portable movie player. WHY? As others have said you can grab a decent laptop for less than that, or even a $200, 3 year old laptop off of ebay will do everything device does. Sure it's not as cute or pretty, but seriously...

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:Why??? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Also, portable DVD players seem to be going for $250-$400. Why an Archos video jukebox? Sure, you can store more videos on it but I can deal with saving nearly $500 instead.

      Right now, I have a 1.5 year old (with 1.5 yrs left on the warranty, 14" SXGA+, 5lb laptop for $650 that I bought on eBay. And no, the Archos can't compare, doing less at a higher cost. It is smaller, but it looks larger than what would fit in a normal pocket (cargo pants don't count, IMO), so I'd still need to drag around a pouch or a bag.

  18. I don't get it... by Infinityis · · Score: 0

    So far as I can tell, this device is like a miniature TiVo with a screen + iPod + portable hard drive.

    I mean, yeah, the features are nice and all, but who needs a portable device to record TV programs? It would seem more useful if perhaps it also played DVDs or something like that.

    Maybe it's just me, but it feels like a lot of these devices are simply trying to repackage existing technology just because it can be done, not because it makes sense. I can think of plenty of things I'd rather do with my $1000...

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Miphnik · · Score: 1

      The iPod's already usable as a portable hard disk drive -- you just have to configure it.

      --
      "My order takes pride in knowing all that can be known, and most of all the rest..." --Galen
    2. Re:I don't get it... by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      It has a little screen on it's tiny body that lets you *play* the video that it records. So that you can view last night's shows on the train to work the next day, for example.
      Can't do that with a tivo. Or with a pod thingy.
      And no DRM (at least not on the older Archos gadgets).

  19. 8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by Em+Ellel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have to carry a notebook anyway with sufficient battery life, by all means - take that instead, but given a choice, i'd rather carry a 10oz device that works vs a 8 lbs device that runs microsoft.

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  20. At least they made Sync'ing easy by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lastly, the folks at Archos saw it fit to just let the AV420 be recognized as a hard drive. As in all other functions, files can be moved, renamed or deleted right on the device. Just plug it in via USB 2.0 and just drag and drop any files to your heart's content. If you prefer to synchronize your tunes, you can always use the included Musicmatch software.

    This is where they got it right, whether a PVR is in the stars for you or not everyone should adopt this practice (that means you apple!). There is nothing more upsetting than getting a device that only wants to talk to its software for importing files. My old iPaq PocketPC would annoy the hell out of me because I couldn't just plug it in to any USB port on any computer and get files to/from it. At least the iPod lets you get at the "other" files stored on the HDD without iTunes or other synch software.

    Or am I just crazy? Should we all just install Music Match and Real One so we can get files off our USB flashpenthumb drives with stickers on them?

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:At least they made Sync'ing easy by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      I have a Gmini 120 and I purchased a 40gb CREATIVE Jukebox for my brother, and within hours we took it back. It REQUIRED a driver install, and an 11MB 'Jukebox Explorer' add on to move files to it, and it could not store files larger than 500mb without errors. Also, it only read ID3 tage and maintained a database you would sort through. So if your albums didnt have ID3 tags you were screwed, on top of that you couldn't have dupee database entries, so any albums with general ID3 tags wouldn't transfer to it.. BLAH!

      The Archos players are auto recognized as ext USB drives. they work with ID3 or /artist/album/track heirarchies.. I love them.

    2. Re:At least they made Sync'ing easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Archos players are auto recognized as ext USB drives. they work with ID3 or /artist/album/track heirarchies.. I love them.

      I just wish there were a firmware update to make the iPod work in the same manner. ID3 tags are great and all, just not for organizing files.

  21. asd by manitee · · Score: 1

    I had one of the 20 gb Jukeboxes and it was very reliable. An associate has one of their video players and enjoys it.

    --
    Four-digit slashdot ID. Recognize.
  22. OT: Aargh! Spreading stupidity on the web by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 1

    "does not allow for it to stand up on it's own"

    Now, major publications are letting mistakes like this slide into their text. I mourn.

    Bob's Quick Guide to Its and It's, You Idiots

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
  23. What it's for / geek factor by SilentChris · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I bought a gMini400 from Archos to primarily watch movies/shows on long commutes. I'm on a train/bus/plane. I'm not the one driving. Why not enjoy myself?

    As for the pure "geek" factor: you can get a 20 GB iPod for $300. For $60 more (if you shop around) you can get the same hard drive space with the ability to play DivX movies, read from compact flash and get roughly the same battery life (the gMini is rated for 10 hours playing MP3s). Why *wouldn't* a geek get one over an iPod? The only reason I can see for iPod left is UI (I transferred all my iTunes music to MP3).

    1. Re:What it's for / geek factor by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      UI and size, iPod wins.

      iTunes *is* nice software for doing library management, at least for me. A combination of iTunes (to do management/transfer to the iPod), CDEX to do tagging on extraction, and Tag 'n' Rename to do retagging of poorly tagged files is what I use.

      But basically, UI and size.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:What it's for / geek factor by Hitmen · · Score: 1

      Actually, the gmini400 he's talking about is 4.17" x 2.37" x 0.69", comming in at 5.6 ounces. The ipod is 4.1" by 2.4" by 0.57", also 5.6 ounces. So... just UI?

    3. Re:What it's for / geek factor by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      The gMini400 is identical size. I'm actually using an iPod case for it.

      As for software, again: UI. That's about the only thing Apple has left. (Personally, I write my own software. iTunes inability to store ratings within ID3 tags drove me nuts).

    4. Re:What it's for / geek factor by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Whoops. I didn't realize Archos made anything small; the only Archos things I've seen were quite sizable, and the UI drove me nuts on them. I recently got to play with a clickwheel iPod (mine is a 3G model) and was very impressed; they got rid of the few irritations I had, like the fact that buttons activate either way too easy or not at all on occasion, and replaced it with nice positive feedback for button activation.

      I don't really use the ratings thing, as I have a pretty good idea of how much I like any given song (and yes, I do have a lot of them, by anyone's measure).

      Note one more thing: the gMini 400 has a 20 GB hard drive for a retail of $400. The iPod 20GB retails at $299, so it has price over the Archos as well as UI.

      4.2 x 2.4 x 0.7 (gMini)
      4.1 x 2.4 x 0.57 (iPod 20 GB; the 40GB is 0.7 thick)

      The iPod remains slightly smaller and thinner at the same hard drive size, though it is NOT a big difference by any means.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  24. if you wait a bit longer, your laptop will be a tv by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    Today's Daily Wireless has piece about a chip that can be added to a lop top to give it decent video [I am assuming playback not capture] capability.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  25. Re:Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowolf cluster of these?!

    That would be like Elvis, watching a lot of televisions.

  26. Warning!` by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    I had -- yes had -- an Archos FM Recorder.

    A decent use of off the shelf components, but the actual unit quality was abysmal -- I and many others found that the unit broke down quickly with merely normal use.

    And the software -- the device's OS sucked. For the recorder, a much better alternative existed in the Rockbox replacement software, but not only did Archos never support this volunteer effort that probably saved their product line, their new revenue model includes selling "keys" to activate various closed-source extentions of their software. In other words, proprietary lock-in where you get to pay again and again, to use features that should have been included when you bought the device. And so no open source replacemnt.

    So my advice is to stay away from this, and get yourself a mini-laptop.

    While there's damned little software for them, I'd recommend Sharp's products: my Zaurus I've dropped on bare wooden floors dozens of times, and the worst that's happened is the keyboard shield came off -- and it took me two minutes to hook that back on. When I've dropped it, the running software kept running without a hitch -- even when I was using xmms to play mp3s.

  27. Would you show Apple such disrespect? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not a laptop any more than an iPod is a PDA.

    It's all about the UI. You turn it on and it plays movies. You don't log in or wait for stuff to boot, etc.

    Also, most laptops don't have 80 gig drives, and are quite frankly not designed to watch movies or listen to music. The speakers and displays suck for such tasks. I have a little portable DVD player, and it's 7 inch screen is easier to see from a distance or angle than my laptop's.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Would you show Apple such disrespect? by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      Seriously, it's a portable media player - who is going to use the speakers? This is for plugging in and spacing out of the daily commute. Oh, and it'll make you pray that the leery, deep breathing guy doesn't stand beside you on the over-crowded bus/train/metro and pretend to look at it whilst engage you in frottage http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=frottage/

    2. Re:Would you show Apple such disrespect? by CatOne · · Score: 1

      Well, my PowerBook takes about 2 seconds to "boot" because it just sleeps when I close it. So that argument is out. A PowerBook is a great DVD watcher, and it's just about as fast as this thing, and it can do 4000 other things the Archos cannot.

      I have no need for the Archos. Others may, but the "boots a lot faster than a laptop" just means you're using a laptop with crappy power management.

    3. Re:Would you show Apple such disrespect? by outcast36 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever lived in Pittsburgh?

  28. No, but the AV500 will. . . by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Informative

    It will run Qtopia to be exact. . . They say it will be out before christmas and will have all PDA functions in addition to a hard drive and audio/video functions. It should be a nifty gadget if it doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

  29. we need the 22surboard--the linux handheld by RangerWest · · Score: 1

    From http://22surf.org/zurich.html & http://22surfboard.com

    Surf's up and the LAMP developer community is ready to rock out--they just need a surfboard to surf Moore's Law, Metcalfe's Law, and Constitutional Law on home. As soon as somebody manufactures handhelds and media-servers that can readily run common Linux and LAMP (Linux/Apache/MYSQL/PHP) applications like postnuke and phpnuke, the floodgates of innovation will open. The technology is there. Move over iPodTM, TiVoTM, iPaqTM, and MicrosoftTM. Open-source CMS and DRM will power tomorrow's content marketplaces, handhelds, computers, and media-servers, as artist-hackers create the open-source hardware, software, and standards for all-in-one media devices, record labels, media marketplaces, and modeling agencies. In fact, if your company is building a 22surfboard or some other open-source-based device, send it along and perhaps we can hack a free marketing campaign for it. Any company who's building open-source devices is doing us all a big favor, so we'd be glad to help out!

    The technology for ventures centered upon open-source CMS & DRM is all there as outlined at authena.org--RDF/RSS for rights definitions; http and REST web services for content transfer, rights negotiation, and syndication; SSL, PGP, Media-S, and OPENIPMP for encryption and security; bit torrent for accelerated downloads, and LAMP applications such as postnuke, phpnuke, xoops, oscommerce, and netjuke for media browsing, buying, serving, and viewing. Surf's up, but there's nothing to surf it with.

    A 22surfboard will be an all-in-one handheld device that holds books, movies, and more. It will readily run standard Linux distros, including RedHat, Suse, and Gentoo. Designed with the Linux-Apache-MYSQL-PHP (LAMP) developer community in mind, it will inherit the vast power of the sourceforge LAMP community who are hungry for a true Linux handheld/media-device to hack.

    At 22surfer we think it'd rock for hardware and software businesses, lawyers, MBAs, to think like artist-hackers. We need designers to design the 22surfboard. We need lawyers to pen the open-source patents and claims. We need MBAs to come up with cool marketing campaigns. And the hacker-community will make it the most powerful device on the market. Become a 22surfer! There's room for artist-hackers, lawyers, MBAs, programming gods, UI designers, drummers, and more! Heck, we could even use some architects to design the 22surfshacks.

    The 22surfboard vs. The Prior Art: The Problems with Proprietary CMS & DRM Illustrated: The iPod(TM) & TiVo(TM) & HP & Zaurus & How to Do It Better--Manufacture Handhelds for the LAMP Developer Community.

    To date there exists no personal media player nor home media server that runs on truly open standards. As soon as an open device comes to market, its adoption by the hacker community will be rapid, giving it vast power and functionality. As Moore's law marches on, personal and home media players, computers and cell phones, are destined tobecome one and the same. A hardware company manufacturing an open-source device such as the 22surfboard stands to beat Microsoft and Apple in both price and functionality. The off-the-shelf components will be inexpensive, and the vast power of the Sourceforge hackers will give the device unparalleled functionality, without costing the device manufacturer.

    The prior-art shows countless examples of devices which were never truly open and thus ultimately failed to gain the essential widespead use throughout the hacker community. All too often we have seen companies brand themselves "open source" for some hype on slashdot, only to require NDAs and travel on down the proprietary route. Very few, if any, of these companies have succeeded.

    HP & ZAURUS(TM): "Last month, I touched a little bit on HP's screwed up Linux PDA initiative, but perhaps I was a bit too harsh. Sure, they have a research arm that's completely underutilized and they have absolutely no clue as how to turn those efforts

  30. I mean the 22surfboard--the linux handheld by RangerWest · · Score: 1

    It's the 22surfboard! Sorry abou that! I need to proof read subjectlines more often. Best, Ranger

  31. Digital Cameras by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 1

    Something like this will probably really appeal to the high-end digital photographers, with the CF slot in it. Shame there's only a 320x240 screen though, PDAs are slowly making their way out of that resolution (although I do understand that pushing any more pixels than that will require substantial processor power)

    Can any photography buffs out there see themselves using something like this? A step up from the storage bricks I could imagine.

    1. Re:Digital Cameras by Chimney · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you define as 'storage bricks', Mike. I'm very happy with my 20GB iPod/Belkin cardreader combo. I stored 3 weeks worth of Amazon trek, HiRes, on it and could have gone on for another 3 weeks. I use it for portable mass storage. I don't WANT a videoscreen on that! Because I wouldn't dream of showing my photos to anybody on a 320x240 screen! Horror! My photos deserve a LARGE monitor! At least!

  32. Re:8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by boredMDer · · Score: 1

    ' i'd rather carry a 10oz device that works vs a 8 lbs device that runs microsoft. '

    And who says that it has to 'run microsoft'?

    One can just as easily install another operating system on that as any other laptop, you're not locked in to Microsoft...

  33. Gmini 400 out and about... by Anubis333 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Their Gmini 400 is only 30 dollars more than a 20gb iPod, and has a lot of the same functions listed int he article (no PVR, smaller screen, 20GB). I have been an Archos customer for a long time, the Gmini 120 is one of the best devices I have ever owned! And I am actually buying a Gmini 400 today for my brother.

    Anyone who is considering a high 200's priced MP3 player (iRiver, iPod, etc..) should take a look at the Gmini 400. And on the cheap, the Gmini 120 (~$150) is a great product!

  34. What what, WHAT??? by daddymac · · Score: 1
    Maybe you don't get the point of this Portable DVD player because it's not a DVD player. It's a portable "media" player. There is no DVD drive. Or CDrom drive. Or floppy drive. It's the size of a deck of cards. Think "iPod that can also play video, if you want it for that."

    You're probably thinking about one of these. They cost 200 dollars. You think you can get a halfway decent laptop for 200 bucks? Please tell me where.

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    1. Re:What what, WHAT??? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 1

      Tell me when you'll consider a 5 inches screen worthwile to watch, because at 200$, I'm not!

    2. Re:What what, WHAT??? by corsican · · Score: 1
      Ooo! Tag line stealer!

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    3. Re:What what, WHAT??? by corsican · · Score: 1
      Although I must admit yours was more accurately lifted from THE RULES FOR MEN whereas mine was more of a paraphrase...

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    4. Re:What what, WHAT??? by daddymac · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. the Rules for men, THAT's where I stole that from. Heh. I had forgotten.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    5. Re:What what, WHAT??? by daddymac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a 5 inch screen is pretty lame, unless, you know, you are looking at it from less than 2 feet away, then it's fine. Of course, bigger screens mean less battery life, less portable, higher price.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  35. Re:if you wait a bit longer, your laptop will be a by museumpeace · · Score: 1
    I checked the article...it actually looks like ViXs is selling a full-up MPEG core. I hope some enterprising manufacturer that is talking up convergence [are you listening GateWay?] puts this thing in a laptop with a good built in camera. I could have my video's edited by the time I got back to the office. The capabilities include:
    1. High quality dual encoding at low bit rates
    2. High-speed transrating and transcoding
    3. 3D comb filtering and analog noise filtering
    4. Mini-PCI or PCI interface
    5. Multistream MPEG reprocessing, format conversion and bit rate reduction at 8x-to-24x real time
    6. Support for multiple analog and digital (including HDTV) video streams
    7. Programmable Audio encoding into MP3, MPEG2 L2, AC3, AAC formats
    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  36. Re:8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    And I would rather have something that takes up the same amount of space (or only slightly more) and can do a little more than merely play MP3s and video. I can't understand who would spend close to a grand for something that only really does a couple mundane tasks.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  37. 420 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well no one else said it but

    canadians + 420 = nice and baked

    haha well i saw the synnergy of multiple paradigms.

  38. Walkman 2004 by fireteller2 · · Score: 1

    I thought this was an over the top toy at first, but it's turned out to be invaluable. It's about the size of the original Sony cassette Walkman. I.e. smaller then a CD. It's thick and a little heavy, and doesn't come with a belt carrier or other protection. I can lay hours of tivo recording (from my 300 hours modified tivo) and whenever I'm board or waiting in line or traveling, I can just watch a show. Or if I prefer listen to anyone of the songs from my entire album collection. And it's fantastic for capturing video stuff to transfer to the computer, or from the computer to video cassette, or to watch on a T.V.

    Also, you got a copy of the Sopranos last night and your friend missed it. No problem just bring it on the archos, you can view it on a normal tv, on the archos, or transfer the file to his computer for him to watch it later.

    After the archos itself turned out to be so helpful I decided to get the camera attachment, and I'm very happy with that as well. You can record ~hundred hours on the 80gb drive at slightly better then DV quality (for the file, the single ship CCD is a little week in low light). And it doubles as a 3.3 mega pixel still camera with an amazing amount of storage space. Also the camera comes with a carrying case which is more or less necessary because the lack of protection of the viewing surface.

    The three cons for me are price, battery life (given it can't be replaced in transit), and lack of protection. Also the time it takes for the camera to take a still picture is a little sluggish, but manageable.

    fire

  39. Re:Can you imagine... by Royoken · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Warning: your comment falls into the following category

    [X]Beowulf cluster nonsence

    please punish your self with 4 tech help sessions with inept wintel using soccer moms and a thrashing by the goatse.cx guy

  40. We need mod points yesterday ! by elpapacito · · Score: 1

    -1 : STUF-NOW detected

    Seems Technical Frontpage Userpost (but is ) Noncomparative Obvious "Wow"vertisement

  41. Cool. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    I can watch Half-Baked on my 420.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  42. One fine use for this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually one niche it fills pretty nicely is for those of us who like to hack and tinker with video crap.

    With this tiny thing, you can record video/audio from any video source in a portable and tetherless fashion. Got a camera in your kite, rocket, helmet, robot, or whatever? Instead of recording to a luggable VCR, or a luggable PC/laptop, or a camcorder with video input - this small thing records it digitally direct.

    It's awfully convenient and not to be sniffed at for those of us familiar with the limitations and hassles of tinkering with this sort of thing.

  43. I have one and LOVE IT by curran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I travel alot and just bought the av480 for $650 at Compuplus.com - I now have my entire MP3 collection (30 Gig) All my photos (20 Gig) with 3 gig left over for recording TV and copying pron. Add the FM receiver and you can now "Tivo" FM radio (30 second buffer) as well as record what you're listening too.

    They seem to update the OS on a regular basis, my only compliant at this point is that the Direct TV receiver model D-10 is not in the av480 list but I spoke to Archos yesterday.

    To set up the Tivo-like features - I have to go to Yahoo TV and save my weekly schedule to my harddrive - transfer it to the archos whre it is auto recognized! Not too bad.

    So far - GREAT unit.

  44. Plusses and minuses by jangobongo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plusses:

    - Use it to time-shift your TV shows
    - Can edit out commercials
    - Can alter the screen ratio to normal, full, 4:3, or 16:9 (letterboxing)
    - Boots up in seconds (as opposed to laptops)
    - Shows recorded on the unit can be played on your PC (or is that a minus?)
    - Can import TV listings from Yahoo! for programming
    - Create playlists on the fly with s split screen and allows you to sort music files by artist, album, title, genre, year or playlist
    - Built in microphone for live recording in addition to in-line recording

    Minuses:

    - For the best video playback at 2,500 Kbps (near television quality), using about 2GB per hour of recording; so 20GB model holds about 10 hours (80 GB model holds about 40 hours)
    - Device will record files up to 2GB in size before closing that file and starting another
    - By default, external speakers stay on, even when you plug in the headphones (potentially embarassing and annoying)
    - Freezes on last image when fast-forwarding or rewinding so that you can't observe your progress
    - Can't program for repeat events (such as weekly episodes), each episode has to be programmed seperately
    - Gapless playback of songs is not supported
    - Navigation buttons are not backlit, making use in very low-light situations difficult
    - Records in WAV format only

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  45. Re:money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, funny boy, the US dollar is falling and the Canadian dollar is getting stronger everyday. 4 more years of Bush and I'll be able to buy a state or two with lunch money. Keep it up!

  46. Re:8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

    And who says that it has to 'run microsoft'?

    One can just as easily install another operating system on that as any other laptop, you're not locked in to Microsoft...


    Although I would disagree with you on your choice of word "easily" - it is not the point. I did not say it HAS to run Microsoft, I said it DOES. Take a poll of a random 100 people you run into with laptops in an airport, and I would be surprised if you find more than one running Linux. But that again is not the point.

    The point is that Linux will not make it any lighter, at least not in physical sense, and will add as much (if not more) complexity (relative term here) than Windows to get it to work. All this vs. a 10 Oz device that just works when you turn it on.

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  47. Re:8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by DrEldarion · · Score: 0, Troll

    Slightly more space? Did you even LOOK to see how big the Archos is? You can shove it in your pants pocket.

    That's like saying, "Who would want to buy an iPod when you could get an old pentium 133 laptop for the same price and use it to do more than play MP3s!"

  48. RCA RD2780; Same featuers, half the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picked up an RCA RD2780 a while back for $400 USD, and lately have seen them retail for $350. IT does all the same functions; plays movies, MP3 player, CF slot, picture viewer, and act as a portable 20G HD. Even more stunning is that there are hacking forums that show the simplicity of upgrading it to 80G! Once the warranty runs out, that will be my next to-do on the unit.

    As for video, the RD2780 suffers through the ".asf" format. However, I have found out recently that it is capable of playing mpeg files, although the episodes I've tried suffer from sync problems between the audio and video. If you use the built-in encoder with the video, there are two annoying features: Macrovision protection, and the inability to display dark scenes correctly. The Macrovision protection is a wash, as the encoding downsamples the video to be compact on the hard-drive (a 2hr movie compresses to about 1G), so I can't really see the point of file-trading. There is a way around the Macrovision, easily found on handheld forums. The compression of dark scenes is the worst, as it includes the black bars for 16:9 formats. Dark areas become blotchy black squares, so Alien vs. Predator fans might want to find another way to encode their movies. RCA allows the firmware on the unit to be easily upgraded, so I'm confident the firmware will unlock the full potential of the hardware eventually.

    This leads into a minor gripe with the unit. On first pass, many of the features appear as "not available yet", such as slideshow on the photo-viewer and equalizer for the MP3 player. One has to downlaod the firmware upgrade to enable these features. Once that's done, it really lives up to the hype.

    As for music, I've had no issues with playback of MP3s. The screen cuts backlit power during MP3 play, to conserve battery life (I get 8hrs of MP3 play easily). Since the unit acts as a HD, drag and drop of your favourite MP3s is simple to do. The RD2780 also comes with MusicMatch Jukebox, which not only encodes the MP3s, but also includes the album cover in the encoding, so the cover is displayed in the LCD. I haven't bothered much with playlists, but the ability to create and play lists of MP3s exists, too.

    The slideshow is simple to use, and RCA released a thumbnail viewer for pics, for those like me who are too lazy to rename the titles. You can also set a soundtrack to the viewer, for those who want to use it as a new-age method to show vacation photos on the cruise ship (a pox to thee!).

    As for interfacing with the PC, the computer sees it as a standard 20G HD connected to the USB port. Transfers are fast, and the navigation is simple, with directories set up for Video, Audio, Pictures, and Files (for transfer of your important data). One caveat- don't put a period in your filenames. The firmware sees the string after the period as a file extension, and doesn't display the file if it doesn't match the folder's media format. I lost access to several "Firefly" episodes when I used a "Disc.Title.asf" naming scheme (the files are still there, but I have to connect to a PC to rename them).

    As for a comparison, the Archos AV-series do have more add-on options, such as a camera (that allows still and video capture) and a few more high-end goodies. As for a basic media player, then I believe the RCA unit is the best value. If Archos drops their price to compete, then I might have picked up one of their units. As it stands, I've survived many long flights with the RD2780 in my hands, with the warm glow of my favourite Sci-fi shows keeping me company.

    1. Re:RCA RD2780; Same featuers, half the price by Stymie · · Score: 1

      This was a good review of the RD2780's features.

      I can confirm that the current firmware allows excellent playback of MPEG1 files, I haven't yet tried MPEG2 (but reports suggest that they should work).

      I was pleased with all the stuff that came with the unit -- headphones, car power adaptor, cassette adaptor, leather-style carrying case, etc.

      There's some talk about a camera attachment from RCA for this unit. Three megapixel, if I'm not mistaken.

      Good tip regarding periods in video filenames. :)

      An interesting side note -- available as a free download from RCA is a Windows-only tool called Lyra-DJ. It scans your MP3s on supported Lyras (the RD2780 is one of the supported products) and does a mathematical analysis of your music and creates playlists based on the results. Geeky!

      For Linux users, it's important to note that like the Archos product reviewed above, the RD2780 simply appears as a USB drive. Proprietary software not required -- are you listening, Apple?

      The comment about the Firmware issue is dead on -- many early adopters of the RD2780 were infuriated by the "Coming Soon" messages for unsupported functions under the initial firmware. This was not cool. RCA should hang their heads in shame.... :) To the Anonymous poster of the immediate parent of this post -- have you updated to the latest firmware? The dark-area pixelization issue seems much better.

      I'd like to see an unbiased showdown of features between the RD2780 and the Archive AV420.

      - Battery life
      - Image playback quality, image recording quality
      - UI experience
      - MP3 playback experience
      - Onboard extras (games, eggs, etc)
      - Supported expansion devices
      - Updatability -- frequency of firmware updates, ease of firmware updates
      - Included stuff
      - Usable disk space
      - Durability / ruggedness etc.

      just my thoughts...

  49. Re:8+ lbs vs 10oz - you decide by Em+Ellel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, I want to see someone going jogging while playing MP3's on their laptop. (Sales pitch - It is a music player AND a piece of excercise equipment!!!)

    On the flip side, the device is about the size of a PocketPC - wouldn't it be nice to have a PocketPC (running MS, or Linux, or PalmOS, or anything programmable and extendable) in the same form factor with a Hard Drive. When will those come out??? Now THAT would be something!

    -Em

    --
    RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  50. Here's where they will succeed or fail: by dspyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Loading the content!

    I have the older Archos JBMM20, and it's a wonderful machine despite its quirks and lousy firmware and small screen. However, the biggest pain in the ass is converting my downloaded video clips into the resolution and codec that it needs to play. It's a slow and tedious process.

    Now, my brother has a DirecTivo set to dump to his NetApp drive array. My UltimateTV can't do that, and even if it could... I'd have to convert those videos to put them on my Archos anyway.

    Same goes for DVDs. To rip a DVD I legally own, to use on my own portable hardware, I have to pay for some [possibly illegal] software and deal with the frustrations of getting those to work right.

    What is needed is a play-any-content, tightly integrated to video-on-demand services and all of the other video-related hardware in my house. Of course, Disney (Michael Eisner is the devil) is fundamentally opposed to that view of the world. While you're at it, why not allow me to stream the videos on my device (no hard drive) from my central server over Wifi or ?

    --D

  51. Quality of Archos products by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 1

    The Archos jukebox (recorder) was probably the worst piece of machinery I ever owned. The only thing worse was Archos' customer service.

    I bought that 2 years ago. Does anyone agree or otherwise think that that the quality of the jukebox was not indicative of the quality of their other products including current ones?

    --

    can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    1. Re:Quality of Archos products by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Mine AV320 was bad, real bad. It is the quality of the soldering that lets them down. If only they fixed that it would be an amazing product.

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  52. Windows MCE by Leadmagnet · · Score: 1

    If this ran Widows Media Center then I would buy it.

    --
    http://www.leadmagnet.50megs.com
  53. No Linux on the AV320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can definitely say that the AV320 does not use Linux.

    The AV300, AV400 and Gmini products are all based on AVOS, an OS written from scratch by Archos.
    It has evolved over several generations of hardware.

    Last spring, Archos announced to be working on the AV500, which will be based on Linux.

    1. Re:No Linux on the AV320 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just to make things clear, archos original firmware is really different from linux. But there is a project of running linux on this device see
      http://linav.sf.net for more details or http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS4929282643.html

      And for the name avos, I think they stole it from another project that was working on the av3xx device.

  54. It's all about battery life by Great_Jehovah · · Score: 1

    A laptop can't play a whole movie without running out of batteries whereas a special purpose device such as this can play several in a row.

  55. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wrong again, dicknose.

  56. You're crazy by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    The iPod is a firewire mass storage device. Points for Apple.

    iTunes is required to construct the index of all the songs on the device. It's required to acheive the 12 hour battery life. It means that the index is loaded into memory and that the index is searched, browsed, and read, instead of spinning up the hard drive willy nilly whenever ID3 data is required. The ONLY reason the hard drive is ever touched outside of bootup is to load up music data into the buffers.

    You could argue, "Let the device generate the index!" but I argue, "Give me more battery!"

    1. Re:You're crazy by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      But I argue, you would only need to regenerate the index once every time you change the music on it, in which case its plugged into a computer and charged off USB or Firewire, this nulling your arguement.

      iTunes Schmietunes. I cant for the life of my get used to using that software, and no, the plugin for Winamp 5 isnt much better. I guess I'm just a file tree / Winamp 2.8x kinda guy.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    2. Re:You're crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must either be an educationally subnormal human or some kind of super-chimp. iTunes has a GOOD interface. A crap MP3 encoder, yes, but a GOOD interface.

    3. Re:You're crazy by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      You're arguing then for making the iPod more complex, then. Take the work the computer is doing indexing, normalizing, rating, and organizing, and instead reassign it as follows:
      Organizing and rating, you
      Indexing and normalizing, iPod

      I dunno, it seems to me most people like having the computer do the hard work of organizing and rating, indexing, and normalizing because they then get the results on iTunes as WELL as the iPod. But to each their own.

      I mean, the iPod interface is the same as the iTunes interface. I dunno why one is okay, but the other is not.

    4. Re:You're crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started my MP3 listening and collecting habbits with Winamp 1.x and IRC. I've used iTunes for all of 5 minutes. I never upgraded from winamp 2.8x, I'm stuck in my ways. I organize my collection by /artist/album/title.mp3. before that it was a huge directory of artist - title.mp3 but after leeching a friends 5 gig collection i picked up the habbit. i guess im an old dog, damn whippersnappers

  57. See music? by Proteus · · Score: 1
    You don't use them to listen to videos, you use them to see music.
    Huh. I thought that's what LSD was for...
    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:See music? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. I thought that's what LSD was for...

      I thought LSDs were for cars.

  58. No, sorry. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    Can any photography buffs out there see themselves using something like this? A step up from the storage bricks I could imagine.

    Not really. There are a lot of reasons, perhaps most importantly, there's not likely to be a RAW converter built into it, which means that I can only see the JPG's I shoot. If I want to look a the images, I have to either dump it to a laptop or use my camera. So that fancy screen doesn't do me a whole heck of a lot of good. Why not just save a step (and some cash?)

    As for the cost savings over CF cards -- well, I can get two or three two-gig cards for that much money. How many shots would I take for an assignment? Maybe 2000-3000 max. So I don't really need the off-storage capacity unless it's all RAW files (which take up more space), but then we're back to problem #1.

    The last big issue is transfer speed. Most photo-banks like this have terrible write speeds -- 10 minutes for a 512 meg card is not unusual. There are dedicated image "tank" solutions designed for photographers that have 10 MB/s transfer speeds already -- and cost half the price.

    Just about the only reason a photographer would use one is to listen to MP3's while shooting, but again, there are better solutions already out there for this.

    This would be a nice little unit for travel -- though most long airplane rides already offer your own little screen with a choice of movies. Basically your target audience is someone who rides the bus a lot -- unfortunately, not the sort of demographic that has $800 of discretionary income to spend on a gadget.

    1. Re:No, sorry. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I would have to agree with you. Actually read this thread with just that in mind. Would be kinda neat to be able to preview the pics on sort of a screen.

      But the inability to view RAW files and the slow USB based CF to hard disk transfer speeds make it less than useful.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  59. MOD PaRent UP !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PaRent UP !!!!!

    No,no, DOWN, DOWN !!! MOD ParenT Down !!

  60. dude get a dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  61. How funny, I received my AV480 today... by Remik · · Score: 1

    I bought one last week, and it arrived this morning. Sadly, the one thing I was dreading (after reading pretty much everything there is to read about the AV series) came true and it had shipped with a defunct hard disk. After fully charging the battery I would power on the player only to get 1 second of hard disk activity followed by an auto-shutdown. I got an RMA and shipped it back. Here's to hoping the second time's the charm.

    I've had other Archos products, and the only real problem is getting one that works. Once you get one that isn't D.O.A. they are amazing. I have a JukeBox Recorder 20GB that's running Rockbox (actually looking to sell, if anyone is interested) that hasn't given me a single problem over that past year.

    Oh, and when was the last time a laptop fit in your shirt pocket? Soon, I will be the uber-geek...every Simpsons episode at my disposal, whenever/wherever.

    -R

  62. Archos.... meh. by shawnywany · · Score: 1

    Be careful with Archos. Every product I've ever bought from them has developed a messed up display within two to three months and has had to be sent back. Their tech support is awful and it took them over a month to send me a new Gmini 120 MP3 player when both the display and the battery went. Has Archos kicked up their support at all lately, or am I just alone?

  63. Cost like a laptop? by grantsellis · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    If you can afford the $700 Cdn. (20GB) or $1,000 (80GB) price tag, the AV420 is at the top of its class.

    It's $1000 Canadian, which at the current conversion factor is roughly $0.50.

    Bet you can't get a laptop for that.

    Seriously though, assuming it costs the same in the US, it's $792.29 USD (according to www.xe.com).

    Admittedly, you still can get a cheaper laptop, but it won't have recording and it sure won't have a 4 hour battery life.

    And forget about an ibook :)
  64. software to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To rip a DVD I legally own, to use on my own portable hardware, I have to pay for some [possibly illegal] software and deal with the frustrations of getting those to work right.
    DVDDecryptor and DVDShrink are both free and work pretty flawlessy and have pretty good UIs. Using these products, you can rip your DVDs to unencrypted VOBs. Granted that you must then do a further conversion to your final destination, but such conversion is also available for free (see dvdrhelp.com). No need to pay for any phase of the conversion.

  65. For $800 i can... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

    1. Buy a brand-new/used Mac.
    2. Pay RIAA taxes and buy 53 audio CDs
    3. Buy 3 iPODs and wait for a crack that will play video on ipods.
    4. Contribute to ihatebush campaign.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  66. screen size by technopinion · · Score: 1

    What I don't get is, why do none of these media player units have bigger screens? I was thinking of getting a portable DVD player for the kids in the car, and they all come with at least 7" screens. I'd much rather get something like this that I can also use for playing my MP3s and taking on non-car trips, but the screen is way too small for anything other than hold-it-in-your-hands-in-front-of-your-face.