Slashdot Mirror


Detailed Changes In Star Wars DVD Release w/Pics

JSDopefish writes "DVD news site dvdanswers.com has written a pretty cool article on the changes in Star Wars: Episode IV. A list of changes is nothing new, but this version has detailed screenshots and comparisons between the 1977 original, the 1997 reissue, and the 2004 DVD version. He plans one for Empire Strikes Back & Return of the Jedi, but they're not out yet."

96 of 449 comments (clear)

  1. We understand by GreenCrackBaby · · Score: 5, Funny
    He plans one for Empire Strikes Back & Return of the Jedi, but they're not out yet.


    I bet his busy sex life is keeping him from having the other two finished for us.

    --

    "The market alone cannot provide sufficient constraints on corporation's penchant to cause harm." -- Joel Bakan
    1. Re:We understand by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Funny

      He plans one for Empire Strikes Back & Return of the Jedi, but they're not out yet.

      I think he just misunderstood the confusing numbering system since they started with Episode IV.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:We understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One trick pony. I'm so bored with Lucas. For one thing, I've never understood Star Wars. It's a fun movie. Once. But it's not any better than about 50% of the movies out there. It must be great to be a guy who only has one storyline in his pocket and you can just keep milking the idiots who will buy THE SAME FUCKING MOVIE every 36 months just because you added an animated monster or changed the lighting in one scene or another.

      Pathetic!

    3. Re:We understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      I bet his busy sex life is keeping him from having the other two finished for us.

      Yeah you try balancing two ewoks and a wookie!

    4. Re:We understand by Whalou · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy, it all depends on where you the fulcrum underneath the seesaw.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
  2. Cost Benefit by erick99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These changes seem like they would be time consuming and quite expensive. Does the studio recover these costs in new sales of the updated DVD? Or, does Lucas do this partly for the art?

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:Cost Benefit by anonymous+cowherd+(m · · Score: 5, Informative

      George Lucas talks about this on the extras DVD. He says it was primarily to make them the movies they were supposed to be. So, I suppose you could say, it's for the art.

      --
      http://neokosmos.blogsome.com
    2. Re:Cost Benefit by Reducer2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pray I don't alter it any further.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    3. Re:Cost Benefit by nadamsieee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not for the art. George Lucas is all about the money and his ego. I submit two choice quotes from an AP/Yahoo! article mentioned previously on Slashdot:

      Money:

      AP: Why did you change your mind and decide to put the original three movies out on DVD now? Lucas: Just because the market has shifted so dramatically. A lot of people are getting very worried about piracy. That has really eaten dramatically into the sales. It really just came down to, there may not be a market when I wanted to bring it out, which was like, three years from now. So rather than just sit by and watch the whole thing fall apart, better to bring it out early and get it over with.

      Ego:

      AP: Do you pay much attention to fan reactions to your choices? Lucas: Not really. The movies are what the movies are. ... The thing about science-fiction fans and "Star Wars" fans is they're very independent-thinking people. They all think outside the box, but they all have very strong ideas about what should happen, and they think it should be their way. Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way.

      Episodes IV through VI were great because either somebody else directed them or George wasn't fat headed enough at that time to always get his way. Watch the behind-the-scenes making of the special editions and you will see a whole lot George-ass-kissing-yes-men.

    4. Re:Cost Benefit by fireduck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see that these quotes strongly support the idea that its about money and ego. While, yes the money quote does list piracy as a readson to release sooner; to combat that all Lucas would have to do is a quick transfer to DVD and put it out. Rather than do that, he went back and did a lot of work cleaning up the quality (color, scratches, noise, etc.) of the film as well as adding/adjusting various special effects. That wasn't free, and likely was done because he wanted to best quality movie available.

      As for ego, well, sure, it's his movie so he should have his way. If he couldn't so the effects he wanted in the 70s and 80s and can do them now and insert them, how is that just ego, and not an artist finally fulfilling his vision?

      Yes, he may be greedy and very ego driven, but the amount of work that he's put into these movies over the years (even if many fans don't agree with it) indicates his degree of passion.

    5. Re:Cost Benefit by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Do you disagree that these are Lucas' movies and that he has the right to present them however he wants? I'm not exactly defending him, but if he is as money-grubbing as you say he is, wouldn't it have made more economic sense to give the fans exactly what they wanted? And if he had done that, wouldn't you then have to call him a sellout?

      For the record, I would have loved for Lucas to release the original theatrical versions with a few visual cleanups (matte lines around the TIE fighters, for instance). Just playing devil's advocate here, no flames.

    6. Re:Cost Benefit by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Which is fine, except I'm making the movies, so I should have it my way."

      So it is about the art.

      The whole point of being an artist/creator is to shape something the way you want it to be made. If that's "ego", it's simply the sort of ego that leads one to create stuff in the first place.

      Whether other people also like it, or whether it's commercially successful is entirely separate questions.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:Cost Benefit by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes and no. There are a number of changes which aren't neccessary and could have easily been shot in the original films they just weren't.

      The most egregious in my opinion is Greedo shooting first. That could have easily been done in 1977, however, that wasn't the story as presented then. If it really is about the rating of the movie, I wish he'd just say that from the horse's mouth. I'd at least accept that, and then be angry with silly movie ratings board (along with the fact that I know Lucas would know how to schmooze his way past that if he tried).

      The musical number and dance sequence in ROTJ could have easily been added then. No problem. It wasn't, probably for two reasons, one time was probably running out, and two nobody really likes it except for George.

      You have to remember several things. First off, Lucas is famous for changing his tune on Star Wars movies. He's changed how many movies their were supposed to be. I've seen interviews where he claims it's supposed to be 6, and I've seen interviews where it's supposed to be 9. Both of them with Lucas being the one describing the original history. I trust George about as far as I think George can throw himself.

      Second, this is the George Lucas who when DivX was still a viable option, said the original Star Wars trilogy would never ever be released to a standard DVD. It would only be released on the "pay per play" DivX system that was still around in 1995 and 1996 primarily supported by Circuit City. I decided on the day I found that out, I'd never ever pay for a Star Wars movie. I'd never pirate a copy. I'm still looking for a LaserDisc or VHS widescreen copy that I can use to create a new DVD from even if it's a home brew setup that uses a TV Tuner card. George Lucas uses Star Wars fans to make money, there's no other reason to decide to relase it on DivX and only on DivX. That ain't about art. It's my understanding that the movies we're pretty close to being released back then, but DivX collapsed as a collosal failure. Now he's bringing out the movies. The timing I'm not so sure why now. He's dumb as rocks if he things the DVD market is going to dry up.

      I'd really like a widescreen copy of the original movies, as shown in the theatres. It was one of the greatest movies every made, and now it'll be lost to the sands of times. The movies that are out, aren't the movies that made it famous. This is what people lament about copyright. Lucas will probably successfully destroy all the known copies of the original movie. That's like losing the original manuscripts to Shakespear. They are part of the culture of a generation of people. I'd like to see them released if only to preserve them. It's not like we destroyed the original "King Kong" movies just because they look horrible. They are what they are. They should be preserved if only for historical purposes.

      It's one thing to clean up the frames, and make the images look sharper. It's a whole different thing to add and remove scenes. To change scenes that defined charaters. I really don't care about the stuff that involves linking the original trilogy with the new episodes. I suppose if Lucas wants to act like they are all one big original coherent story that's his business. However, they weren't and aren't. For the most part, that stuff is in portions of the movie I really don't care about.

      Kirby

    8. Re:Cost Benefit by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most egregious [changes] in my opinion is Greedo shooting first.... If it really is about the rating of the movie, I wish he'd just say that from the horse's mouth.

      MPAA ratings may have also been a factor in the shooting of imperials and why some show the impact flash and others don't. The site claims there's inconsistency. I think there is consistency: the impacts are only removed for the characters who weren't wearing body armor.

      So it's as if they were told they can show armor evaporating in a flash of light, but not flesh. So you get left with the implied searing flesh and not the (FX-simulated) sight of it.

      Granted, I haven't watched my box set yet to see if my theory is correct.

      Still, even if it is the MPAA restricting him in theaters, he could have restored it for an unrated DVD "director's cut" release. (Although that release might be kept out of Wal*Mart.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  3. This time... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    .. the Mos Eisley cantina bartender shoots first, killing Greedo instantly and rendering Solo a parapalegic. Watch for the CGI wheelchair!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:This time... by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny
      .. the Mos Eisley cantina bartender shoots first, killing Greedo instantly and rendering Solo a parapalegic. Watch for the CGI wheelchair!
      And then he buys a shrimping boat in Alabama, and the local retard (Jar-Jar) hires on and calls him Lieutenant Han.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:This time... by khendron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meesa mama say life isa like box of chocolates. Meesa no know whata comes next!

      --
      Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    3. Re:This time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Enough with the Greedo (or anything) shoots first jokes!

      Greedo shoots his load onto your mom's face. First.

      Begun this gang bang has.

    4. Re:This time... by SamBaughman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meesa mama say life isa like box of chocolates. Meesa no know whata comes next!

      If I'm lucky, it's the cyanide chocolate...

  4. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is this "Star Wars" you speak of? This article is so 1st and 2nd world centric. What about us 3rd world countries with no TV and internet access? Before you ask, the answer is "carrier pidgeons."

    1. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow! How did you know that I was going to ask you about your sex life?

  5. I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Force wasn't with him, or his server.

  6. Can't see the link... by jmcmunn · · Score: 5, Informative

    The link in the story seems to be dead for me already...but here is another one that I was reading a few weeks ago, similar content.

    http://www.thedigitalbits.com/reviews3/starwarscha nges.html

    1. Re:Can't see the link... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

      I knew Lucas had edited these movies a lot, but putting Frodo Baggins in there is just simply to much! :)

      (Personal mirror.. original site is gone)

  7. Re:Oh well... by BitwiseX · · Score: 2, Funny

    wow. I even said to myself "No comments! Maybe I can check it out before it's /.ed!"

    The server has turned to the dark side of the Force..

  8. w/Pics by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot posts with title containing "w/Pics" scare the bejesus out of me.

    1. Re:w/Pics by FurryFeet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you a web server?

  9. Re:seems like it's slashdoted already... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

    In this version, slashdot shoots first.
    Then nobody can see the rest of the movie.

  10. site not found by SQLz · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You've never heard of the DVD news site dvdanswers.com, its the site that got Slashdotted in under 12 parsects."

    1. Re:site not found by bobwoodard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pretty much right, since you have to account for motion out there, nothing's static.

      GL goes over this in the DVD extras and his point was that you couldn't simply go from point A to point B since you'd have to miss all the planets/stars/junk in the middle or run headlong into something at an enormous rate of speed.

      So... his point was that the route between point A and point B might actually be a longer distance than the straightline distance. Han's pride was in having a navigational computer that could come up with a route that only covered 12 parsecs.

    2. Re:site not found by flosofl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      a parsec is 3.26 lightyears, and thus a measurement of distance...

      Over the years I have thought long and hard about the Kessel Run statement in the movie (it always bugged me). The only semi-satisfactory explanation I could come up with was this:

      Since the Millenium Falcon mostly travels in Hyperspace, the only real space it travels in would be too and from jump points and planets. I am making a HUGE assumption that in the SW universe you can't make arbitrary jumps from point A to Z. You could argue that he discovered a highly efficient jump pattern that required only 12 parsecs of travel in real space. Therefore, this is more a testament to his skill as a Navigator than how fast the ship is.

      It would make sense... but, if I remember correctly, the statement is made reagrding how fast the ship is. While the trip would obviously be faster (because its covering less real space), the comment is not about the efficient navigational plotting but the inherent speed of the Falcon.

      Damn! Now its back to bugging me again.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    3. Re:site not found by Laivincolmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was under the impression that perhaps it was a case of the shorter the route, the more difficult it was. Perhaps taking shortcuts through more dangerous areas would require more skill, but could be done faster and in a lesser distance. Therefore a larger distance traveled would imply a lack of skill for taking an easier route.

    4. Re:site not found by Babbster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, one of the books (supposedly canon) explains that the Kessel Run is a smuggling route which skirts close to "The Maw," a cluster of black holes. The closer one navigates to the black holes the greater the distortion of normal space, and the shorter the route turns out to be. I'm not a astrophysicist, and thus can't judge the story's plausibility, but it sure seemed like an entertaining explanation for what was originally just a mistake. :)

    5. Re:site not found by glorf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well if you also make an assumption that hyperspace involves bending space then the falcon's ability to bend space to the point where a 12 parsec jump route is available would be impressive compared to other ships that can't bend space as efficiently.

  11. He forgot this change... by xTK-421x · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  12. Further changes. by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the new version, Alderaan shoots first.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  13. Top three changes by Anixamander · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Greedo now strangles a baby, sodomizes an Ewok, and then shoots at Han. First.

    2. Several black stormtroopers added for racial balance.

    3. Millineum Falcon is now totally riced

    I'm sure there are others...

    --
    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
    1. Re:Top three changes by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      3. Millineum Falcon is now totally riced

      Admiral, did you remove the Type-R stickers from the Millenium Falcon?

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Top three changes by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2. Several black stormtroopers added for racial balance.

      Additionally, when the stormtroopers open the door to the control room where C-3PO and R2-D2 should be and find it empty, one is heard to exclaim "We ain't found shit"

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  14. I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sorry for a long rant... It will probably be modded down in no time, just because it is not a trendy thing to say here, but what the hell: I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release -- for an entire week.

    Why? What's to boycott? Isn't "Star Wars" good old fashioned sci-fi? Harmless fun? Some people call it "eye candy" -- a chance to drop back into childhood and punt your adult cares away for two hours, dwelling in a lavish universe where good and evil are vividly drawn, without all the inconvenient counterpoint distinctions that clutter daily life.

    Got a problem? Cleave it with a light saber! Wouldn't you love -- just once in your life -- to dive a fast little ship into your worst enemy's stronghold and set off a chain reaction, blowing up the whole megillah from within its rotten core while you streak away to safety at the speed of light? (It's such a nifty notion that it happens in three out of four "Star Wars" flicks.)

    One of the problems with so-called light entertainment today is that somehow, amid all the gaudy special effects, people tend to lose track of simple things, like story and meaning. They stop noticing the moral lessons the director is trying to push. Yet these things matter.

    By now it's grown clear that George Lucas has an agenda, one that he takes very seriously. After four "Star Wars" films, alarm bells should have gone off, even among those who don't look for morals in movies. When the chief feature distinguishing "good" from "evil" is how pretty the characters are, it's a clue that maybe the whole saga deserves a second look.

    Just what bill of goods are we being sold, between the frames?

    - Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow.
    - "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability.
    - Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough.
    - True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited.
    - Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.

    That is just the beginning of a long list of "moral" lessons relentlessly pushed by "Star Wars." Lessons that starkly differentiate this saga from others that seem superficially similar, like "Star Trek." (We'll take a much closer look at some stark divergences between these two sci-fi universes below.)

    Above all, I never cared for the whole Nietzschian Übermensch thing: the notion -- pervading a great many myths and legends -- that a good yarn has to be about demigods who are bigger, badder and better than normal folk by several orders of magnitude. It's an ancient storytelling tradition based on abiding contempt for the masses -- one that I find odious in the works of A.E. Van Vogt, E.E. Smith, L. Ron Hubbard and wherever you witness slanlike super-beings deciding the fate of billions without ever pausing to consider their wishes.

    Wow, you say. If I feel that strongly about this, why just a week-long boycott? Why see the latest "Star Wars" film at all?

    Because I am forced to admit that demigod tales resonate deeply in the human heart.

    In "The Hero With a Thousand Faces," Joseph Campbell showed how a particular, rhythmic storytelling technique was used in almost every ancient and pre-modern culture, depicting protagonists and antagonists with certain consistent motives and character traits, a pattern that transcended boundaries of language and culture. In these classic tales, the hero begins reluctant, yet signs and portents foretell his pre-ordained greatness. He receives dire warnings and sage wisdom from a mentor, acquires quirky-but-faithful companions, faces a series of steepening crises, explores the pit of his own fears and emerges triumphant to bring some boon/talisman/victory home to his admiring tribe/people/nation.

    By offering valuable insights into this revered storytelling tradition, Joseph Campbell did indeed shed light on common spiritual traits that seem shared by all human bein

    1. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

    2. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was with this up until this point:

      But then, in "Return of the Jedi," Lucas takes this basic wisdom and perverts it, saying -- "If you get angry -- even at injustice and murder -- it will automatically and immediately transform you into an unalloyedly evil person! All of your opinions and political beliefs will suddenly and magically reverse. Every loyalty will be forsaken and your friends won't be able to draw you back. You will instantly join your sworn enemy as his close pal or apprentice. All because you let yourself get angry at his crimes."

      Not WILL- MIGHT. Examples abound- The Bolshevik revolution is my favorite expample. Human rebels have a tendency to imitate the worst in what they are fighting against- WWII is another example. A primary feature of facism was the joining together of governmental and corporate power to oppress the citizenry- and here in the United States we created the Military-Industrial Complex to fight the Nazis, which eventually grew up to oppress the citizenry.

      In other words, getting angry at Adolf Hitler will cause you to rush right out and join the Nazi Party? Excuse me, George. Could you come up with a single example of that happening? Ever?

      Not quite right- more that getting angry at Adolf Hitler will cause you to rush out, create a military industrial complex, and then eventually create the House Unamerican Activities Comittee to silence the voices that are complaining by labeling them "communists". It happened. Right here in the United States. George W. Bush himself is the inheritor of Adolf Hitler's fascism- through a lot of twists and turns.

      I agree with everything else you had to say- but like your book The Postman you irk me with the stuff you did not know. (The Postman irked me because I was going to school in Klamath Falls at the time- and I knew you got the order of towns on Hwy 58 completely fouled up). Oakridge is EAST of Springfield, damnit).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Note to readers: MIGHT is important here. If we know the danger of the dark side- like David Brin pointed out- then our future isn't set in stone. We don't have to choose either branch of the flawed family- we can strike out on our own and build something new.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by moorcito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But then, in "Return of the Jedi," Lucas takes this basic wisdom and perverts it, saying -- "If you get angry -- even at injustice and murder -- it will automatically and immediately transform you into an unalloyedly evil person! All of your opinions and political beliefs will suddenly and magically reverse. Every loyalty will be forsaken and your friends won't be able to draw you back. You will instantly join your sworn enemy as his close pal or apprentice. All because you let yourself get angry at his crimes."

      Sounds about right except for the fact that you used the word angry when you should have used hate. I belive it was hate that Yoda warned against, and Luke was trying to not let his hatred get the best of him. There is a big difference between anger and hate, for instance I may get angry at my children because of something they did wrong, but that doesn't mean that I hate them.

    5. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by cafelatte · · Score: 2, Informative

      This guy just pasted this from here.

    6. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the pacific highways leads to Sydney, Canberra and eventually to Melbourne (ech), but I manage to stop at Coffs Harbour.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:I boycotted Star Wars DVD Release by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But then, in "Return of the Jedi," Lucas takes this basic wisdom and perverts it, saying -- "If you get angry -- even at injustice and murder -- it will automatically and immediately transform you into an unalloyedly evil person! All of your opinions and political beliefs will suddenly and magically reverse. Every loyalty will be forsaken and your friends won't be able to draw you back. You will instantly join your sworn enemy as his close pal or apprentice. All because you let yourself get angry at his crimes."

      I disagree with David's interpretation here fairly strongly. It's been some time since I've last seen the movies, but my recollection was not that anger and hatred simply switched you over to the dark side, but that acting through it hurt you as well as the ones that you strike down. The emperor was pleased that he could feel hatred inside Luke, but did that instantly make Luke evil? No.. the emperor was constantly urging him to follow that hatred, to be spurned to violence because of it. Essentially to let that fear and hatred become dominant in him. That might not instantly turn him into the next Vader, as Anakin's off-screen killing spree didn't suddenly switch all his allegiances either.. but the idea is that such actions from those motivations damage the spirit, making it the next time even easier. A slippery slope arguement.

      There are a number of ideas that David scoffs at that are fundamentally Christian too.. the idea that a good action for the wrong reasons is still damaging, the idea that even the worst of people can find complete redemption if he truly wishes to change, to come to the light. These are hardly "evil" ideas, and David goes a little overboard in his desire to paint Lucas as a villain for the ideas of Star Wars.

  15. I don't know how... by Zaranne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He managed to get screenshots of the 1977 release, since the one that ended up on video all those years ago wasn't the same as what I saw 50 times in the theatre. I know C3P0 had a tendency to babble, but he did have some great lines that got nixed. Unlike AOTC.

    Unless of course, this was something recorded on Beta off of OnTV...go figure...oh, or Laserdisc.

    --
    So when is the Hawkeye movie coming out?
    1. Re:I don't know how... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's like saying:

      I have no idea how the addition of two numbers could equal 5.

      Unless of course, they were 4 and 1.
      Or, if they were 3 and 2.
      Or 5 and 0.

      There are Beta copies floating around, and there are many LD copies floating around. LD would be pretty easy to get screen shots from.

  16. Oops... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 4, Funny

    He found a few more things he missed...after he finishes updating the page, he's going to make another page detailing the differences between the first page he released and the second.

  17. My greatest fear by lunatik42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Honestly, I think that somewhere in George Lucas' fragmented mind, motivation is building to remake Episodes IV-VI. Notwithstanding that this is the worst thing that could happen to the series, I think we could expect some "great" innovations, like Jerry Springer making a cameo to help out with the Skywalker family issues.

  18. Palpatine's Voice, Lines in 'Empire' by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They changed the voice of the Emperor (when communicating with Vader) to be consistent with the actor who played him in ROTJ. They also changed the lines so that the less-observant could understand the story more easily. It was a bit disappointing.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Palpatine's Voice, Lines in 'Empire' by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Transript. It is indeed revealing for people who might not have been paying attention:

      Vader: What is thy bidding, my master?

      Palpatine:There is a great disturbance in the Force. We have a new enemy: Luke Skywalker.

      V: Of course. As you know, he is my son, and I am now in disguise after that incident on the lava planet.

      P: Yes, of course. And as I'm sure you remember, my friend, I became Emperor after using a clone army to initiate a faux civil war built on beurocratic pretences, which allowed me to rise in power without the Jedi becoming aware. I'm sure you remember Darth Tyranus, whom you destroyed.

      V: I remember, my master. And while we're on this subject, it was that series of events that allowed me to also crush the Jedi, which I was bound to do after the death of my mother.

      P: Enough of the recap. Back to young Skywalker. If he could be turned, he could be a great asset ...

      And it goes on. Lucas's writing is definitely going downhill as he revises these films.

  19. To be honest by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought I was a star wars fan till I found slashdot, now I realise I just thought they were entertaining movies. Its been so long since I have see the originals I doubt I would actually notice the changes or even be aware of them if I had not been forewarned.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:To be honest by Morrigu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I realized this myself 8 years ago.

      Second year at college, first day back, and I was setting up my room in the honors dorm. I got a tiny little single-bed room, but it was all mine. Threw up an Star Wars Episode IV and an Indiana Jones poster on the wall, sat down, hooked up my PC, and was happily downloading crap off the 'Net or wasting time on IRC or something.

      Two new freshmen guys come down the hall, chattering back and forth, all excited. They set up shop four doors down on the right, and then one of them sticks their head in my room: "Hey! You're a Star Wars fan too?!"

      I grunt or nod or something, a little taken aback by his excitement. At that point I had nearly forgotten the Star Wars poster hanging on my wall. His roomie comes by at that point and sticks his head in too, all smiling and happy.

      "Who's your favorite character from the movies?" the first one asks. I think for a second, not quite sure since it had been a little bit since I sat down and watched all of 'em on VHS (maybe the previous Christmas or something), and come up with "Han Solo, I think."

      The first one looks kind of disappointed - what a pedestrian choice! - but the other guy chimes in, "Oh, I like Greedo. And Muftak!" Greedo I recognized, but Muftak? Who the hell is Muftak? He kept grinning at me like some sort of deranged hyena, waiting for a response.

      Realizing that I was talking to people who had spent more time involved with the movies than I spent on, say, my senior-year Computer Science class in high school, I nodded, said something polite, and smiled. They moved on, and I knew deep down that I wouldn't be winning the award for Biggest Star Wars Fan in Thomas Hall that year, despite the cardboard stand-up Yoda I still hadn't unpacked.

      --
      "We can categorically state that we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - Major Mike Shearer, UK
  20. It worked! by orangeguru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The '77 Star Wars just did it for me. I can't stand artist who can't let go of their work ... imagine Picasso rushing into the museeum to add little bits here and there just because ...

    Make new a better movies Mr. Lucas! You have the money and technology now.

    1. Re:It worked! by orangeguru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, Lucas main argument for all the changes was that he didn't have the money and technology to make 'proper' movies.

      He seems to suffer from the same strange syndrome like many movie makers: the more money they get, their flicks get worse. Look at John Carpenter, his first low budget movies were great - and like Lucas he got fame and money ... and he only produced bad stuff in his later years.

      Lucas is a great producer, ok director and a lousy scriptwriter (especially his dialogues suck). But he is also a control fetishist ... in some strange way all his new movies suffer from too much 'Lucas' ...

  21. One more added scene... by dew4au · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the upcoming Blu-Ray release of the trilogy I hear Lucas is planning a shower scene with Obi-wan and a bantha. "Ol' Ben gets lonely, then desperate" Pre-order now!

  22. Not just screenshots... by freeze128 · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the funniest changes couldn't really be seen in a screenshot. At the end of Return of the Jedi, the second death star is destroyed, and all the worlds rejoice in their freedom from the evil empire. We see scenes from Corusant, Endor, and a new shot of Naboo. With subtitles turned on, all the people of Naboo are in the streets partying, and the subtitles say "Weesa free!"

    I laughed my assa offa!

    1. Re:Not just screenshots... by jea6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, quote The Critic, "It Stinks".

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  23. Re:Oh well... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do expect? Everyone reads the articles before posting, right? Ahhh, who am I kidding.

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  24. Re:awsome by DaHat · · Score: 2, Funny

    i am currently downloading the DVD versions of this classic

    I so enjoy when a person admits to committing a crime without prompting.

    The MPAA and FBI will be knocking at your door shortly.

  25. Re:Cost Benefit: HUGE ONE... Epsiode IV is PG now by fireduck · · Score: 4, Informative

    But in 1977, there was no movie ratings, but now we do have them.

    ummm... the ratings system was introduced in November 1, 1968. That's 9 years before Star Wars came out. At the time of Star Wars, however, there was no PG-13. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.

  26. The ability to destroy a planet... by Spencerian · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is insignificant next to the power of a Slashdotting.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  27. Google to the Rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like google has cached the page for us.

  28. Re:seems like it's slashdoted already... by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    their server definitely didn't make the kessel run in 30 parsects...

  29. Auto-Coralize links!!! by hacker · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been thinking.. and this is the 5th instance of this.. why can't Slashdot auto-Coralize the links that they use in the articles?

    If $ARTICLE_SUMMARY has a URL in it, split the domain off, append .nyud.net:8090 to it, and then post it publically. Thats exactly what the NYU Distribution Network was designed for.

    In this case, this would be:

    http://www.dvdanswers.com.nyud.net:8090/index.php? r=0&s=8&c=28

    1. Re:Auto-Coralize links!!! by pnatural · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been thinking.. and this is the 5th instance of this..

      Don't worry, thinking gets easier! Some people have thunk 10, maybe even 20 times in their lives.

    2. Re:Auto-Coralize links!!! by Minwee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would be lovely if it weren't for the fact that your "coralized" page is still trying to load all the images from the original site.

      Ten pages of "Look at this scene: {Broken Image} It was changed to this: (Broken Image) You can clearly see Natalie Portman's nipple in the background here: (Broken Image) But the biggest change is right here: (Broken Image)" really isn't doing it for me.

  30. Re:Oh well... by somethinghollow · · Score: 4, Informative
  31. H2G2? by fracai · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are apparently not a fan of Douglas Adams.

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  32. google cache [mirrpr by gustgr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe most nerds have already googled for the cache but here it is.

  33. Re:Who cares? by corsican · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And yet, here you are in the discussion.

    --
    --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
  34. Re:Oh well... by Disposable+Rob · · Score: 5, Informative
    If it's /.'ed, try these instead:

    Episode IV

    Episode V

    Episode VI

  35. An apology to the readers by AvantLegion · · Score: 5, Funny
    Look everyone, I'm sorry. I'm this man's psychiatrist. I told him he could go back on the Internet because I thought we were making real progress.

    Davey, repeat afer me, "Star Wars is not real. Darth Vader is not Hitler."

  36. Explosion by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The one thing that bugs me the most about the digital enhancements to Episode IV is the Alderaan and Death Star explosions. That damn ring effect bugs me to no end. If they wanted to show a more realisitic effect, they should have shown both the planet and Death Star fracturing along natural weak points in the structure and whole chunks of them being blown away from the exploding mass.

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    1. Re:Explosion by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one thing that bugs me the most about the digital enhancements to Episode IV is the Alderaan and Death Star explosions. That damn ring effect bugs me to no end.

      You're not the only one... the ring effect would've been really cool *if* it was aligned with the equator of the deathstar. Then, at least, it would've looked like it was energy escaping along the "weak point" due to that indentation running around the equator. Instead, it looks like it was just randomly tacked onto the film just because it looked cool.

      But Lucas is a hack and can't leave well enough alone... that, or every time he reviews something for approval he's stoned out of his mind.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  37. Re:awsome by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not experienced on this topic at all. But, I believe you are allowed to excerpt certain portions of copyrighted works for the purposes of reviewing them. IE, you can quote books, but you can not take a whole chapter and claim it as your own. IE, you can show a couple 5 second clips of a movie while you criticize the movie. I think this comparison could easily fall under this category.

  38. Re:A plea from the youth of the era by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you talking about Lucas or Bush ?

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  39. Stars Wars, hasn't it been beaten to death enough? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's like the whole Star Wars issue won't stay down even though everyone tells it to stay down after a good beating!

    My question is after all this, do the DVD box sets come with Version numbers written in fine print? Like Version 0.1, V 0.25, V 0.31 etc etc... Will they ever come out with Version 1.0? Full version!?!?!

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  40. There was more than one audio mix sent to theaters by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2, Informative
    [I don't know how] He managed to get screenshots of the 1977 release, since the one that ended up on video all those years ago wasn't the same as what I saw 50 times in the theatre. I know C3P0 had a tendency to babble, but he did have some great lines that got nixed.

    According to one of the DVD extra features, there were multiple remixes of the audio for the original feature. They tried to get theaters to upgrade to THX Audio, but weren't entirely successful - some theaters were in plain stereo, and many were just plain monaural.

    Thus, they had to redo the audio track several times, and some small things were changed a bit from one version to the next. So it's quite possible that you couldn't hear a line or a sound effect as well in the version that went to laser disk as in the version that played at whatever theater you went to 50 times.

    On the other hand, maybe you just imagined it. Can you give an example of a specific C3PO line you think was dropped?

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  41. You think that's funny? by c4miles · · Score: 3, Informative

    A couple of years ago I was in Morocco. Not quite Third World, yet i was with a large group of 17-22 year olds and none had heard of Star Wars.

    The looks we got whilst trying to demonstrate light sabres were priceless.

    1. Re:You think that's funny? by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The looks we got whilst trying to demonstrate light sabres were priceless."

      Ummm... I can think of maybe 3 ways this could have gone:
      1) You (and whoever else was with you to make it "we") always carry your lightsaber replicas around with you, in which case their "looks" are understandable.

      2) You have actually created and were using real lightsabers, in which case their "looks" are understandable.

      3) You were using breadsticks and kept saying, 'now imagine a glowing blade of light coming out of the end here', and making the whooshing, humming, and crackling sounds, in which case their "looks" are nderstandable.

      Ghyslain got a whole hell of a lot of attention for his lightsaber demonstration. I can only imagine you looked at least half as amusing as he did...

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
  42. Missed Change in Episode V: ESB by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I preordered the DVDs, and while I did go straight home and watch them all I haven't scrutinized them for every change. However I did notice that one of the big "errors" from the originals still remains in Empire Strike Back.

    In the fight scene between Vader and Luke in the Carbonite Chamber, after Luke turns of his saber and jumps off the platform to follow Vader he lands on a trampoline (since the set platform was ~10 ft high) and when he rebounds his head reappears in the shot. Surprisingly Lucas missed editing out Luke's head as he bounces back into frame.

    I find it hard to believe Lucas didn't have a check list of fixes for the re-remastering; both personal, and culled from the endless fan forums that at this point have probably documented every mistake there is.
    Oversight? Or perhaps a little piece of nostalgia left in there on purpose?

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:Missed Change in Episode V: ESB by ctishman · · Score: 2, Informative

      They also left the "Luke! Carrie!" bit from the celebration in ANH in there. I think lots of stuff was left like that for nostalgia's sake.

  43. Re:There was more than one audio mix sent to theat by oni · · Score: 4, Informative

    C3PO line you think was dropped?

    On the regular VHS version that I have, when R2 pulls up the directions that obiwan will take to the tractor beam thing and the camera zooms to the video screen, C3PO explains what obiwan has to do. "the beam is powered by these three things, and if you take out one the beam will be disabled." But in the widescreen VHS version, that line isn't present.

    Not a C3PO line, but in the scene where Adm Tark is told that there is a security alert in the detention area, Darth Vader is there and he says a couple of lines, but then stops talking and continues shaking his finger. It's clear there was more dialog there. This is easily explained though by the fact that all of vader's lines were dubbed.

  44. Two things about these new versions by gphinch · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. On the DVD when the storm troopers come rushing into the control room that C-3P0 and R2-D2 are hiding in, one hits his head on the door as its rising and falls down. This was always a little blooper that made it in. Now there is a lound *thunk* sound, which had me rolling.

    2. No one ever seems to complain about it, but i think the worst change made to the trilogy is in RotJ, Jabba's Palace, the singing and dancing scene. It was fine as it was, but the new song and dance routine with the cgi-creatures and backup singers makes me want to retch.
    "They're butchering the classics. John Williams must be rolling over in his grave!"

    --
    in bed.
  45. Re:Jabba the whiny bitch.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I want to know is why Jabba didn't turn Han into a grease spot when he stepped on him. Well, actually, I know the answer: Because Lucas is what, in my teenage years, I would have referred to as a "fucktard". If you stepped on scarface's shoes, you'd have an extra hole in your head in less time than it takes to say "Is that a gun?" Jabba has been known to laugh when his guards are eaten by the Rancor. You think you'd live long if you stepped on him?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Screw 'em by ucblockhead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, normally I pay for my movies. I spent good money on the movies I like..."The Big Lebowski". The entire B5 series. "Bladerunner". A number of others. I've probablygt 40-50 DVDs all told. I also bought the original series on VHS way back when.

    I wanted "Star Wars" on DVD. But I don't want the "fixed" crap. I want the "Star Wars" I fell in love with. I'd pay good money for it even though I've already paid Lucas once for the original version on tape and once (to my regret) for the "Special Edition" on DVD.

    But Lucas won't sell it to him. So screw 'em. I pulled it off of bittorrent and made my own DVDs of the first three films. I'm not going to pay the bastard for further fucked up versions.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  47. Such a detailed review by Trogre · · Score: 3, Informative

    And I can't believe he didn't mention the changes to the musical score.

    In some of the most dramatic moments (such as the Death Star run), the music is ramped down so it's barely audiable, in favour of the sound effects. This is due to the sound effect guy doing the final mix.

    Also, all the music in ANH has the rear channels swapped. It's fine in ESB and ROTJ, but it's definitely wrong in ANH. Not a problem unless you're listening to it on your 5/7.1 system with some sense of where the instruments are on the sound stage. Then it just gives you a headache. There's no point in just swapping your rear channels over, since then all your sound effects are the wrong way round.

    The worst thing is that although the channels are clearly wrong, Lucasfilm have stated this is a "deliberate creative decision".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  48. star wars gangsta rap SE! by Imazalil · · Score: 2, Funny

    hot damn! even the SW gangsta rap has a special edition out!

    http://atomfilms.shockwave.com/af/content/gangst a_ rap_se

  49. Re:TO MODERATORS: by AJWM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's no good defending yourself, Brin ;-)

    Crap is crap no matter who writes it -- and Sturgeon's Law probably applies to an individual author's output too. Moderators go by content, not authorship.

    (BTW, liked the first three "Uplift War" books, but everything's been downhill from there. The Postman seemed pretty derivative of Lucifer's Hammer's "Harry the mailman".)

    --
    -- Alastair
  50. Re:Stop, young Jedi. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    :-). Oppression is oppression- and death is death. Sure, Bush hasn't found his scapegoat yet- or has he? He's certainly been working hard to herd the middle class into lower levels of housing (ghettos) and the poor towards homelessness. Even Hitler took a few years before the death camps started.

    But you're very right as far as it goes- my point is more that the military industrial complex and the House UnAmerican Activities Committee was like Hitler. W is several generations down the path from there.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  51. Re:Stop, young Jedi. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd also point out that I was comparing the FASCISM of Hitler with the FASCISM of Bush, not the evil or the stupidity.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  52. according to starwars.com ... by jjk3 · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://www.starwars.com/community/askjc/jocasta/as kjc20020221.html

    While Captain Solo is known to make boastful claims that seem to defy the basic laws of space-time physics, in this particular case, an understanding of the mechanics of the Kessel Run illuminates this statistic.

    The Kessel Run is a contest of speed and endurance for smugglers. Those who undertake it must deliver specified cargos (usually illicit in nature) to a series of divergently moving transport vessels. The smuggler must deliver the cargo before the transports wander out of the free trade lanes into restricted Imperial space.

    Solo's record is impressive, since the transport vessels covered less than 12 parsecs of distance during his hurried run between them, a testament to his piloting and the speed of the Millennium Falcon.

    There is more than one way to smuggle spice out of Kessel. According to one tale, Solo left out the middleman and ferried the stolen goods himself, skirting dangerously close to the Maw Cluster, a baffling congregation of black holes. In doing so, he shortened the distance for the run, achieving an impressive record of under 12 parsecs.

    Using either methodology allows Solo's claim to stand, but there are many, including the Jedi Obi-Wan Kenobi, who felt that the Corellian captain was just blowing hot air.

  53. Awful by xYoni69x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Screw the re-re-re-re-re-re-release. I want the original.
    Why did they touch it? Do they think we don't know the film was aired in 1977?
    I, personally, know. And I want to see that, nothing more.

    Watching A New Hope with 2004 fancy special effects would be like watching Clerks with color and good acting. I mean, seriously, some things shouldn't be changed.

    /Save Films From Their Own Directors Club, Spokesman

    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();