Slashdot Mirror


UK High Court Orders ISPs to Identify File-sharers

securitas writes "The BBC reports that the British High Court has ordered Internet service providers (ISPs) to divulge the identities of 28 customers accused of music file-sharing to the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), the UK equivalent of the RIAA. The court order issued by Mr Justice Blackburne is a big victory for the BPI and its umbrella oranization, International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), especially after recent setbacks in Canada (CRIA) and the USA. Blackburne is quoted as saying, 'On the face of it this appears to be a powerful case of copyright infringement.' The ISPs have 14 days to comply with the court order. More coverage at the Guardian/Reuters and the Register."

58 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Different here? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Insightful

    when push comes to shove, will it turn out this way here too? This really changes things if ISPs are going to have to police their users. This should cause ISP rates to go up as well, which is bad for everyone.

    CB$#@*(

    1. Re:Different here? by eln · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know when I worked at an ISP (admittedly several years ago), the policy was basically to give the authorities anything they wanted, with or without an actual court order. I think most ISPs work on such slim margins that they can't really afford to try and fight a legal battle over their users' right to privacy when faced with subpoenas like this.

      Having a court give sanction to the violation of privacy involved like this when it actually is challenged just makes ISPs far more likely everywhere else to keep handing over records whenever anyone asks for them.

    2. Re:Different here? by erick99 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think so, though it won't happen until the RIAA can convince a judge with incontravertible evidence of copyright infringement.

      I think the US judges are, for the most part, loathe to give the okay to what ends up being a fishing expedition. What a fine line this is.

      The RIAA is tenancious and they are not going to give up until they can get to the people that they believe are stealing (their words) copyrighted material. They seem to be on a three-pronged campaign of going through the courts, the legislature, and probably the executive brance (at least for lobbying). I don't see them losing this battle.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    3. Re:Different here? by rushmobius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Read the article....

      The ISP's are not being asked to police their users, they are being ordered to release information about subpoenaed users to the proper authorities. This is information ISP's usually maintain anyways.

      As much as I hate the RIAA and other major media conglomerates, I find no fault in a company trying to enforce the standing laws.

      If you think a 65mph speed limit law is unjust, are you going to complain to the ticketing officer or try to get the law changed?

    4. Re:Different here? by julesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know when I worked at an ISP (admittedly several years ago), the policy was basically to give the authorities anything they wanted, with or without an actual court order.

      Authorities, sure. An industry association of record labels? I would hope they wouldn't.

    5. Re:Different here? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that one. There was a story where someone had written threatening court action and the ISP had sent them name, address, telephone number, etc. completely without even involving a lawyer.

      That couldn't actually happen in the UK - such action would be completely illegal and would involve heavy fines for the ISP involved.

    6. Re:Different here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An industry association of record labels = Authorities

    7. Re:Different here? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mine does...all bands and laser, forwards and backwards. Valentine One However, I must admit, I've yet to live anywhere where they really have laser. Not many places in the south have it...and NOLA, heck, the cops here still predominately use X band...really old stuff, can pick them up a couple miles away...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Different here? by MinotaurUK · · Score: 2, Informative

      The parent makes a good point. In the UK the Data Protection Act governs fairly tightly exactly what information could be released by an ISP and exactly to which authorities. To the best of my knowledge, the BPI is not specified under that Act.

    9. Re:Different here? by uhlume · · Score: 2

      Bullshit. An industry association of record labels doesn't constitute 'authority' under any accepted colloqial or legal definition of the word. It's an interest group, nothing more.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    10. Re:Different here? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the cops here still predominately use X band

      If that's the case you can use one of those old active jammers. I think I still have one around somewhere. You may be able to get a great deal on a used one.

      There's nothing like the rush of shooting past a cop at 90 mph without getting chased. Not that I would recommend doing so intentionally. The more common scenario is jamming on your brakes when you see them and not getting a ticket even though you were doing 90 when he shot you (and you had obviously jammed on your breaks).

      Up here in the northeast, they use Ka and laser a lot. I guess they used all that ticket revenue to buy new equipment. I hate when I see them using lasers. I think "what if they aim that thing in my eye?".

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    11. Re:Different here? by simoncrute · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What the article doesn't make clear is this.

      Has the BPI got to go to seek the courts' approval each time they want the name and address, or have they somehow automatically gained the right to see confidential records of ISPs just by saying they suspect someone of sharing illegal files ?

      I hope it's the former, but I fear it's the latter.

  2. British Pornographic Industry by spikiermonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    For a moment i thought it was the British Pornographic Industry. If the porn industry starts suing people internet would be obselete for me. :(

    --
    "Where all men think alike, no one thinks very much." -Walter Lippmann
    1. Re:British Pornographic Industry by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For those of us that don't surf porn on the internet (me and this other guy over there), it would probally half or less our ping times and 5x our download rates....

  3. Hopefully by stecoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    These 28 customers accused of music file-sharing are from North Korea. Then what are you going to do?

    1. Re:Hopefully by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

      Easy: send them the boys to hunt for weapons of mass filesharing and arrest Kim Jung Il and his government for threatening big record corporations.

      How do I know Kim Jung Il and his cronies are the ones doing the file sharing? well, ask yourself: who else has internet access in NK?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Hopefully by coconutstudio · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean send Team America?

  4. Damn! by holzp · · Score: 4, Funny

    There go all the Benny Hill rips from Emule!

  5. Go Canada! by euxneks · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm glad we're allowed to improve our cultural knowledge base here in Canada. ;) Time to go download some more songs.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  6. Here they come... by BaCkBuRn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is the new age of file-swapping enforcement a lottery now? Not long until file-traders must obtain draft cards".

    --
    PRINT "Signature line broken."
    GOTO 1
  7. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know what, you can spare all of your music should be free hippy bullshit, if these were the 14 biggest file sharers out of a population of fifty million plus British internet users, then so be it. It's not like anybody can say that they didn't know it was illegal, that they didn't know they were violating international copyright laws.

  8. /dev/null by ylikone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why don't the ISP's just dump all their usage logs to /dev/null ? For the sake of customer privacy. Can't really expect the ISP's to come up with data that they don't have, can you!?

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:/dev/null by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      That would make it rather difficult to nail crackers & spammers on their network. What would happen in the case of a billing dispute?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:/dev/null by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because of the law discussed in this article.

    3. Re:/dev/null by mustangsal66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only logs my ISP keeps are mail, and intrusion. Instrusion logs get cycled weekly (If you don't catch an intrusion in a week, you probably won't). Mail logs are kept for 3 days to track issues.

      This is already several Gigs worth of data.

      We'd need a SAN to keep all of the traffic logs. We have modem customers that flow upto 10 Mb/s... I couldn't imagine trying to log it all.

      Ok Say we spend $$$$$$ to keep all the logs... then to have to filter through it to find specific data... nightmare. Our leases are only 24 hours... a lot of people can have an IP address within a months time...

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
    4. Re:/dev/null by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because there are data warehousing laws. Depending upon where you live, not tracking your customers can be just as illegal as anything those customers might do.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:/dev/null by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least in the United States (I can't speak for elsewhere) ISPs are on the side of their customers because it is in their best interests to be. Verizon, for example, stuck up for a bunch of file-sharers not because it was the ethical or "right" thing to do, or because they really cared one way or the other about what happened to those accused infringers, but because they didn't want a legal precedent to be set. Furthermore, communications companies that are avowed squealers tend to have problems keeping customers, especially in this age of RIAA litigiousness.

      Telecom providers which have achieved common carrier status are immune to prosecution for any illegal activities on their equipment by their customers. Common carriers are also more tightly regulated. However, ISPs absolutely do not want to be forced into the role of Internet cop: the costs and potential liabilities would be enormous. Users, for their part, don't want their providers to function as organs of the government (or the RIAA) either. Of course, as usual for such politically-motivated extensions of government power, legitimate corporations and private citizens gain little. Also as usual, real criminals are hardly affected either way.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  9. ISPs here assured me file sharing is fine! by PtrToNull · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I signed up for my 512 kb/s ADSL in Kuwait, I asked the ISP salesman specifically if I might have any problems with file sharing.

    He said it's perfectly fine with the compnay policies, and even suggested a few P2P clients that he liked!

    1. Re:ISPs here assured me file sharing is fine! by Johnny+Doughnuts · · Score: 3, Funny

      I really doubt the **AA would have a problem with that, unless bushykins decides to go after Kuwait.

      Laugh, 'tis a joke.

  10. Why KEEP records? by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me that keeping detailed logs of your users is just a big legal headache.

    One of my clients was once interested in installing detailed internet monitoring and logging (so as to see who is wasting time on the web). They lost interest rapidly when I pointed out that they could be compelled to provide it in court should someone sue.

    SurfControl and the other Big Brother ware makers never include that in the copy.

    Here's what I'd do: You need to keep certain logs so you can know if there is an intrusion, DoS, etc, but program your logs to automatically erase every week. That means that there will never be more than THE CURRENT WEEK's worth of data that could be subpoened.

    Of course, I'm sure if ISP's start doing THAT the RIAA will just get Congress to pass laws that make us all retain ALL logs for all time...

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Why KEEP records? by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe British ISPs are now legally required to keep this information, which is a serious PITA for them. The ISPA complained and complained about the terabytes of storage they would need... but I don't recall the government ever relenting.

    2. Re:Why KEEP records? by jonwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And there are probobly good reasons for wanting ISPs to keep this information.
      For example, things like child porn.
      Or like scumbags or perverts in chat rooms.
      I think a good answer is to have the law such that you need a court order to get the logs.
      That would mean that the BPI can still get the logs to sue people but only after they have gone to court to prove that was in fact sharing illegal files.

  11. Pay those starving artists to front the campaigns! by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "They are uploading music on a massive scale, effectively stealing the livelihoods of thousands of artists and the people who invest in them."

    Yet they chose Brittany Spears to be the front-person for the anti-pirating campaign. How about paying some of those starving artists to play frontman instead?

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Its time to just open up your wireless router by L7_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you have an open WAN for anonymous people to connect to the internet over, can the owner of the router (and ISP connection) be held responsible for sharing files over said connection?

    1. Re:Its time to just open up your wireless router by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have an open WAN for anonymous people to connect to the internet over, can the owner of the router (and ISP connection) be held responsible for sharing files over said connection?

      What if it isn't open and someone hacks you can you be held liable? We have too many people out there that have open WAPs are we going to expect all those people to become knowledgable about WLANs and close it up?

      I mean there are 4 open WAPs in the immediate vicinity around my house (and when I say open, I mean default passwords and SSIDs as well). Several more are in the neighborhood. I can only imagine what it is like everywhere else.

    2. Re:Its time to just open up your wireless router by julesh · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a case in the UK recently where somebody got off charges of downloading child porn because he had a trojan on his system that he claimed somebody else had been using to download the stuff in order to frame him.

    3. Re:Its time to just open up your wireless router by yomommaDOTorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just start using secure, anonymous protocols? Freenet comes to mind. They can't prosecute if everything is anonymous and encrypted!

      --
      I didn't just do this post, I also did Yomomma!
  14. This isn't scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Compared to the next step, I mean. How do you identify filesharers when they do it secretly and not via some dumbass gnutella/fasttrack/etc that lets everyone in the world know exactly what you're doing?

    Well, you don't. You just suspect everyone whose traffic stats look abnormal. Sure, the hell will freeze before ISPs are going to provide this data for free. So what happens? A new law...

    1. Re:This isn't scary. by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "You just suspect everyone whose traffic stats look abnormal."

      Open Office = (roughly) 50 Mb.
      Red Hat, Gentoo, BSD, etc. = 2 or 3 CDs worth each.
      20 perfectly legal to download DivX format shorts from Atom Films = 200 Mb.

      So the RIAA looks at #1, and assumes I've just pirated the new Metallica CD.
      The MPAA looks at #2 and assumes I just pirated Shrek 2 or Teminator 3.
      And I'm sure the Software anti-piracy association can find something that is the right size to fit #3.
      So if I stay away from big files...
      Alice sends me a .jpg of baby Bob - Ooops! it's the same size as Harry_Potter_and_the_Muggle_Porn_Ring.txt

      Every single person paying for broadband access looks 'abnormal'. All of us. A nation of high speed criminals.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  15. Deadlines by dema · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ISPs have 14 days to comply with the court order.

    Apparently the courts in Europe know how to set deadlines, unlike the US Courts.

  16. sad by compro01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    seems that Cananda is the only country to have the sense to tell the music industry to shove it...

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    1. Re:sad by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      seems that Cananda is the only country to have the sense to tell the music industry to shove it

      Are you talking about the same Canada that charges a tax (oops, levy) on all blank media (including data CD-Rs) that is paid out to the record industry?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  17. For a momen there ... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I read:

    "...the British Pornographic Industry (BPI), the UK equivalent of the RIAA."

    Dyslexia can be funny.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  18. Depressing by locarecords.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still of the opinion that criminalising your audience is a very dangerous game for the record labels to be getting involved in. And also extremely sad and backwards. I think Steve Job's comment that he treats downloading tracks as his biggest competitor to iTunes Music Store.

    In any case, it will further push the record labels one step further away from any claim to believe in the importance of music for music's sake and hopefully open up the eyes of fans to the sheer amount of manipulation these guys now have in terms of creating pre-planned acts, factory stamped songs and shallow, empty and talentless indivduals who want fame more than anything else.

    It will be extremely interesting to see how the music press in the UK react - most of them are in the pay of the music business anyway except a few genuine exceptions, Void Magazine for one...

    Also I really hope that this will provide more impetus to people experimenting with the copyleft music scene...

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    1. Re:Depressing by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Criminalising criminals is a dangerous game?

      Absolutely, especially when you live in countries where people elect the representatives who define what is criminal. It's much too early to predict how this will all shake out in the end but it's probably safe to say that the percentage of people who want to share files today is roughly in the same neighborhood of those who wanted to drink during prohibition.

      The *AAs and their government cronies, instead of trying to find ways to meet these wants while still protecting their interests, are doing everything in their power to just stop it completely.

      One smart thing to do would be to go back to requiring registration of copyrights and provide a searchable database so people can determine just what is and what is not in the public domain.

      Another would be yearly renewals, much the same as car registrations, for a nominal or even no fee. Most people probably wouldn't care if copyright owners kept their rights for eternity as long as they actively showed an interest in doing so.

      And finally, two more. Clarify and set in stone the meanings of deravitive works and fair use. Is it seven notes? Six? Obviously if it is one nobody would be able to create another song again. Oh, that brings up another thing...just what is the minimum length of a copyrighted work? There are people out there who claim exclusive rights to one second recordings of doorbell chimes and door creaks. Really now, how much more ridiculous can you get?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  19. Re:Pay those starving artists to front the campaig by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First they need to find one of those 'starving artists' who are happy that they have signed over their rights to the songs they have written or performed over to the local equivalent of the RIAA. Or at least happy enough about the deal that they will play the front man for the local anti-pirating campaign.

    Nope, I don't think they will find many either.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  20. Anyone Know the IPs ? by anat0010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone have the full disposition ? What IP addresses are the BPI asking to divulge the identity of ?
    Not that I'm worried or anything.

  21. How to Outwit the BPI by turgid · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, the American RIAA seems to be doing a very poor job of identifying suspects. How many false positives does their brain-dead software flag up?

    Why doesn't everyone put up files named Madonna_Like_a_Virgin.mp3 or Britney_Spears_Takes_it_Reel_Good.mp3 filled with random data? A few hundred thousand of those on the peers should give the BPI a headache.

    You could plead you innocence quite legitimately.

    They would then have to copyright file names....

  22. USA situation is better, thankfully. by deacon · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Supreme Court handed Internet services providers and privacy advocates a crucial victory yesterday when it decided to pass on an important Internet piracy case. . . .

    "The recording industry may not agree, but the U.S. Supreme Court thinks personal privacy is far more important that music piracy," Red Herring reported. "On Tuesday, the high court refused to entertain an appeal of a unanimous 2003 decision by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals that held that copyright holders cannot force Internet providers to identify file sharers using a mere subpoena.

    Industry watchers see this as yet another blow that the recording industry has taken in its fight against online file sharing -- a fight it is slowly losing. The lawsuits in question were between New York's Verizon Internet Services and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), headquartered in Washington, D.C."

    From instapundit.com 5 minutes ago, of course. :)

  23. In the US by d3ity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the US, the ACLU would be screaming bloddy murder, and lawyers would be flocking over this like vultures over a rotting elephant.

  24. That's his title by WillerZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Judges in Britain are called Mr Justice $surname. Just like Dukes are His Grace $fullname etc.

    Phil

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
  25. It's all in a name, apparently by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh, has anyone caught that the filing was done by a Mr Justice Blackbourne?

    So, if he is a judge, then justice is being sought by Justice Justice?

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    1. Re:It's all in a name, apparently by Mindwarp · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's his TITLE, not his first name! It's how you address judges in the U.K. "Mr. Justice insert family name here"

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
  26. copyright abuse example email by jlebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    here is the kind of email you can receive from a copyright holder. > Re: Unauthorized Use of Twentieth Century FOX Film Corporation Property - ALIEN VS. PREDATOR > > > Notice ID:###### > Notice Date:# Oct 2004 ##:##:## GMT > Case ID: ####### > > > Dear Sir or Madam: > > TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION and its affiliated companies (collectively, "FOX") are the exclusive owners of copyrights in motion pictures, including ALIEN VS. PREDATOR. > > It has come to our attention that ADSL is the service provider for the IP address listed below, from which unauthorized copying and distribution (downloading, uploading, file serving, file "swapping" or other similar activities) of FOX'S property is taking place. The documentation included at the end of this notice specifies the location of the infringement. We believe that the Internet access of the user engaging in this infringement is provided by ADSL or a downstream service provider who purchases this connectivity from ADSL. > > This unauthorized copying and distribution constitutes copyright infringement under applicable national laws and international treaties. Although various legal and equitable remedies may be available to FOX as a result of such infringement, FOX believes that the entire Internet community benefits when these matters are resolved cooperatively. We urge you to take immediate action to effect removal of the detected infringement listed in the attached report, including: > > (1) Notify the account holder of this infringement > (2) Request the account holder remove the infringing material > (3) Disable access to the infringing material > (4) Take appropriate action against the account holder under your Abuse Policy/Terms of Service > > We appreciate your efforts toward this common goal. Please send us a prompt response indicating the actions you have taken to resolve this matter. Please reference the above noted Notice ID and Case ID in the subject line of all email correspondence. > > The undersigned has a good faith belief that use of FOX's property in the manner described herein is not authorized by FOX, its agents or the law. Also, we hereby state, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California and under the laws of the United States, that the information in this notification is accurate and that the undersigned is authorized to act on behalf of FOX with respect to this matter. > > Please be advised that this letter is not and is not intended to be a complete statement of the facts or law as they may pertain to this matter or of FOX's positions, rights or remedies, legal or equitable, all of which are specifically reserved. > > Please contact us at the above listed address or by replying to this email should you have any questions. Also note that this infringement notice contains an XML tag that can be used to automate the processing of this data. If you would like more information on how to use this tag, please do not hesitate to contact BayTSP. > > > Very truly yours, > > Sarah Bergman > Compliance Manager > BayTSP, Inc. > PO Box 1314 > Los Gatos, CA 95031 > > v: 408-341-2300 > f: 408-341-2399 notice that the real crime is to watch alien vs predator :D

    1. Re:copyright abuse example email by jlebrech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And to think ive just bought a cd that wont even rip onto my mp3 player thats sick. I'll probably have to download the same cd in mp3 format and get sued for something i have bought.

  27. Have you noticed... by David+Horn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you noticed how all judges in the UK seem to have the first name Justice? Must be some sort of ordained-from-birth thing.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  28. How to beat all this crap: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Interesting
    start having informal FIREWIRE parties.

    I've done this several times. I go over a friends house, with two other interested people. We all have Macintosh computers. We all have Firewire Drives. At around 1 in the afternoon we start drinkin' ourselves stupid and plugging our drives into each other's laptops or desktop (depending). Then we go through the drive, copying files over to our own drive as we see fit.

    Net result?

    I have 85 gigs of music on my 120 gig drive.

    Now, it's much more "site specific" - I'm not "open to the public" but I know my friends have remarkable taste in music and we get to recommend music to each other.

    If I like something, I go to the record store AND I BUY THE CD. (sometimes I buy it used, sometimes new, depending on how I feel and the depth of my pocket and the obscurity of the music)

    Why? It's not because I'm feeling guilty - I just know that the CD will likely outlast the hard drive, and it's just good sound back up policy.

    Of course, to rip all my CDs over would take a few months of dedicated part time effort, but that's fine. It's still good to have the back up, JIC.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.