Slashdot Mirror


iRiver Ships Linux Media Players

prostoalex writes "The Register talks about new Linux-based portable media players available from iRiver. PMP-120 and PMP-140 feature 3.5'' color screen and 20 and 40 GB drives. The price tag is $500 and $600 respectively. The players support MP3, WMA, WAV and ASF music formats as well as MPEG, ASF, AVI and DivX video formats."

156 comments

  1. Yes but... by sparcnut · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux? ... Oh wait...

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    1. Re:Yes but... by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No Ogg? No Way!

    2. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Yes but... by shufler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This seems strange, since iRiver does make players which support ogg.

      You would think this "linux versions" would support it by default or something.

  2. Great!!! by KennyP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another /. toy I can't afford :-(

    Kenny P.
    Visualize Whirled P.'s

    1. Re:Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A shame it doesn't use a Windows CE version of WMCE. Then I would buy it.

    2. Re:Great!!! by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Dude, you can afford it. Get one for FREE. Check out my sig, this is another site like freeipods.com, except for it is video players instead.

      It's legit, and it just started a week or so ago, it's easy to get referrals. Just trying to help you out man...

    3. Re:Great!!! by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "It's legit"

      If by legit you really mean pyramid scheme.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    4. Re:Great!!! by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Possibly, depending on your definition of pyramid scheme. I have heard it called a "viral advertising" scheme as well. The important thing is to get in early, and then you have a good shot. That's why pyramid schemes are good for the top 3% and bad for the rest.

      I feel I am in early enough for it to benefit me. But in 2 weeks, I agree it may be a waste for those who have not joined.

      Your call obviously.

    5. Re:Great!!! by russint · · Score: 1

      It's legit
      Sorry, but that made me NOT trust you

      --
      ^^
  3. Ogg Vorbis by gspr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aaargh! Although it is nice and well, this isn't what the average free software Joe is crying out for. We want Ogg Vorbis capable players!

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmmm, most iRiver players (such as the iHP series) support ogg. I would be very surprised if this didn't, I imagine it's an error that it is not listed.

    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis by mocm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aren't all the iRiver HD players Ogg Vorbis capable?
      The H100 and H300 series are and the PMPs are too.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iRiver DOES offer Ogg Vorbis players too.
      http://www.iriveramerica.com/products/H320.a spx

    4. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Staos · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, you're right. I found it very unlikely, given that all their other players have OGG support, but NOOOOO. They had to ship a linux-based player without native OGG support.

      Ijust wanted to finally tell someone to RTFA....

      --
      In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
    5. Re:Ogg Vorbis by mocm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok the official specs say no ogg, but maybe that is a misprint. But here they say it has ogg.
      Was Ogg support the cause for the long delay?

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    6. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Donny+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > this isn't what the average free software Joe is crying out for.

      Yeah, it isn't and the probable reason is that there's only about 50,000 of average free software Joes compared to 2 billion of all average Joes.

      Not to mention that this tiny market segment isn't exactly known for their generosity and lavish spending habits.

    7. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Fweeky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Required for me: FLAC, MusePack, Vorbis. In that order.

      Nice to have: APE, WavPack, OptimFrog, MP3+APEv2 tags, and every other audio format I've seen in use (I mean, isn't that the entire point of a portable media player, that it plays all your media? Duh)

      No, I'm not holding my breath either.

    8. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not to mention that this tiny market segment isn't exactly known for their generosity and lavish spending habits.

      That's an over-generalization, it's like me saying that everybody else is a clueless fucking moron who's paying way over the odds for sub-standard product.

      You see I do actually want a portable player but I'm only intrested in open, unencumbered standards. Guess I wait a couple more years for one that handles vorbis, flac, theora and dirac without the other crap! Frankly I don't care if it does cost more than an average Joe-consumer box; nobody's ever said freedom comes cheaply!

    9. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you shitting me?!?!?

      JPEG and BMP picture formats are supported, as are text files, alongside the H320's MP3, Ogg Vorbis and WMA audio formats.

    10. Re:Ogg Vorbis by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that this tiny market segment isn't exactly known for their generosity and lavish spending habits.

      Just a guess, but maybe this is because the market hasn't really done its job at providing gadgets of the required quality?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    11. Re:Ogg Vorbis by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      I would expect DivX support to be harder than ogg support. I can see why ogg would hold up a flash or CD player, or even a hard-drive audio player. But when we're already supporting video, I can't expect ogg to be so problematic.

      But then, the only reason I've seen hardware manufacturers encounter difficulty with ogg was due to the floating point math required to decode, which was solved quite a while ago. We have a decoder that doesn't require floating point math now.

  4. $500 and $600? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $500 and $600? Lucky they're using Linux to keep the price down.

    1. Re:$500 and $600? by legirons · · Score: 4, Funny

      "$500 and $600? Lucky they're using Linux to keep the price down."

      That's $600-as-in-beer, not $600-as-in-freedom...

    2. Re:$500 and $600? by jimicus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but the hardware only costs $5. The rest is licensing - SCO offered them a special deal.

    3. Re:$500 and $600? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a fair amount of beer... ;-)

  5. No OGG VORBIS???? by redtape · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Oh, the shame, the shame! ;)

    1. Re:No OGG VORBIS???? by Gubbe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yet, at the bottom, there's the following:

      About iRiver
      iRiver is the leading innovator in delivering portable digital media devices. iRiver provides consumers with the viewing, listening and recording flexibility to accommodate their active lifestyles by manufacturing award-winning hybrid products supporting existing and emerging formats, including MP3, OGG, ASF, WMA and WMA-DRM. Milpitas-based iRiver America, Inc. can be found on the Web at www.iRiverAmerica.com.

      (emphasis of 'OGG' mine)

    2. Re:No OGG VORBIS???? by Skraut · · Score: 1
      would this be called RTFFPATB?

      Read The F Fine Print At The Bottom

      Hmmm maybe it won't catch on.

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    3. Re:No OGG VORBIS???? by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

      Go and look at the specifications at the bottom of the page for the PMP-120. It does *NOT* list Ogg Vorbis as a supported format. Seriously how did this get +5 informative?

      --
      -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
    4. Re:No OGG VORBIS???? by Gubbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I never meant to insinuate that the product supports OGG Vorbis. I posted that excerpt to point out the discrepancy between their company policy and their actual product.

      Nevertheless, omitting OGG Vorbis from the specifications does not necessarily mean that Vorbis isn't supported on the product now or in the future, especially considering how it apparently is important enough to include in their 'About' blurb.

      I suggest we either ask iRiver directly or wait and see what the final product can actually do before performing anything knee-jerk related.

  6. abbreviation by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Funny

    clearly the pmp stands for pimp

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:abbreviation by utopyr · · Score: 1

      Pmp my drive?

  7. Oggly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    All my tunes are in *ogg format. You'd expect a Linux player to handle oggs :S

    1. Re:Oggly by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder how easy this thing is to hack.

      I mean, it's based on Linux, so at the very least, their kernel is available. If they're anything like Linksys (don't get your hopes up, though), they might distribute the source code for practically everything.

      Although you might find that "practically everything" means "everything but the media player."

      At that point you'd have to wonder how much effort it would be to rewrite its software around MPlayer.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  8. FLAC support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it not have FLAC support?

  9. REAL question is.. by Manip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question is, did IRiver release the source code for their new Linux players?

    If they did, have they made it easy for people to change the software on the player?

    Do they support open-source software for their player?

    1. Re:REAL question is.. by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Well you can buy one and ask them to give you the OS and GPL part of the code... If they don't, ask for refund :-)

      I'm curious what would happen in such situation but I don't really need a portable player right now so I'm not in a position to try.

    2. Re:REAL question is.. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      The refund doesn't help -- I still want the source.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:REAL question is.. by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

      At that point, instead of a refund, point the FSF in their direction ;-)

    4. Re:REAL question is.. by rixdaffy · · Score: 5, Insightful


      I don't see why they would need to release the source for their player.
      They probably should release any modifications they did to the kernel, but AFAIK they don't have to release any apps they make run on Linux. It's not like every company who makes commercial software which runs on Linux is obliged to release the source (would be great if they did though)

      Ricardo.

    5. Re:REAL question is.. by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      It's not like every company who makes commercial software which runs on Linux is obliged to release the source (would be great if they did though)
      That couldn't possibly happen, because you can produce software which runs on Linux without agreeing to any licence. An easy example is Java programs, but C programs could be compiled for Linux on another platform.
    6. Re:REAL question is.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      If they still don't get it, get EFF to start throwing cluesticks at them.

    7. Re:REAL question is.. by bfields · · Score: 1
      That couldn't possibly happen, because you can produce software which runs on Linux without agreeing to any licence. An easy example is Java programs, but C programs could be compiled for Linux on another platform.

      The language and the platform its compiled on have nothing to do with it. Even if you do accept the screwed-up interpretation of copyright law that says mere use of a program requires a license (since it copies the code into memory in order to use it!), the GPL explicitly gives unconditional permission for use of GPL'd software. (It's only when you start distributing the GPL'd software that it places conditions on you.) You can distribute proprietary software compiled with gcc on Linux, and lots of people do so.

      --Bruce Fields

    8. Re:REAL question is.. by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The hypothesis I was addressing was a scenario in which Linux was distributed under a licence which required anyone producing software which ran on it to distribute source code with that software.

    9. Re:REAL question is.. by bfields · · Score: 1
      The hypothesis I was addressing was a scenario in which Linux was distributed under a licence which required anyone producing software which ran on it to distribute source code with that software.

      That's a weird hypothesis, since no distribution I've ever heard of uses such a license. I'm not sure it would even be possible to distribute Linux under stuch a license.

      (Well, OK, maybe it could, if you, for example, produced a distribution that used a Linux kernel but replaced gcc by your own proprietary compiler and placed a license on that compiler that made such a requirement. I don't know whether anyone would call the resulting distribution "Linux"....)

    10. Re:REAL question is.. by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      I believe that his hypothesis was a theoretical one in which run-time linking (ie running a program under linux) required adpotion of the linux license.

      For example, vmware runs on linux, linux is GPLX, hence vmware is GPLX.

      If this were the situation, Linux would not be anywhere near as popular today.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    11. Re:REAL question is.. by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      That's a weird hypothesis, since no distribution I've ever heard of uses such a license. I'm not sure it would even be possible to distribute Linux under stuch a license.
      Thank you for agreeing with my original point.
  10. So.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We have companies that make cool stuff that look like props from a very bad b_class scifi movie/series.

    And we have apple.

    I'll Switch to another player when it can make me a proper espresso, walk my dog and do the dishes !.

    retep.

  11. What about the software? by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have an i-river player. It's great except you need special software to access (as opposed to other players that are seen as removable storage). It's (the software that is) also not very good and I don't think there's a linux version.

    1. Re:What about the software? by Norgus · · Score: 1

      The meda player itself is linux, yet the interfacing software is limited to windows?
      confirm/deny?

    2. Re:What about the software? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I don't know about the previous versions, but I own a H340 which is similar to this PiMP player and they just appear as a HD - no software or drivers required.

      Actually, I seriously looked at one these players around a month ago and I'm positive they were selling in the UK then, because online merchants (including Amazon) were saying they had stock. But in the end, I went for the smaller H340 music only player as these looked a little too big. Plus I'd spend all my life converting .avi's into the 320x160 (I think) format required for optimal viewing...

    3. Re:What about the software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check for a firmware update. Seriously. I had the same problem with an iRiver, and the update fixed it.

    4. Re:What about the software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      What the hell are you smoking?

      They work with any OS (and I have tried mine with OSX, Linux and Windows), and need no configuration. They do show up as removable storage.

      There is a program called "iripdb" which you can use in place of the iriver's database ripper. It's open source so you can theoretically compile it for any platform.

    5. Re:What about the software? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you smoking? They work with any OS (and I have tried mine with OSX, Linux and Windows), and need no configuration. They do show up as removable storage. There is a program called "iripdb" which you can use in place of the iriver's database ripper. It's open source so you can theoretically compile it for any platform.

      Just to back this guy up....
      Everything this AC says is right. I have an ihp-120 which I use with Linux. It works great.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  12. Audio quality by Norgus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Frequency range at 20Hz~20kHz
    Isn't this a little low? or am I getting confused by the fact all my audio files are at 44Khz?

    1. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      44 is the sampling rate, not the freq range

    2. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.
      that's the freq range of the amplifier and the earphone.

      anyway human ear can only hear in this range, so it's sufficient.

    3. Re:Audio quality by Norgus · · Score: 2

      Thanks for clearing that up.Now if only if I could, I'd mod myself down now.

    4. Re:Audio quality by TheReckoning · · Score: 5, Informative

      The human ear can only detect sounds between 20Hz and about 20kHz (some people can hear higer, some cannot hear frequencies that high).

      Audio is typically sampled at 44kHz to eliminate aliasing distortion. Google for "Nyquist" and "aliasing distortion" for more than you could ever possibly want to know.

    5. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! Everyone knows that kHz means Kill Hearts. Yes those tiny nano bots die everytime that people like YOU want extra kHz, just think for a moment. By listening to your music at only 20kHz you've saved 24 nano bots and their children and their childrens children. Won't somebody think of the kHz!!??

    6. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average human can hear frequencies between 20Hz and 20KHz. The reason for the 44KHz sampling rate is explained here.

    7. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20Hz-20KHz refers to the frequency range that can be outputted by the device, while 44.1Khz is a common sampling rate used for digital audio (44.1KHz = 44100 samples per second).

    8. Re:Audio quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should, because that comment was shocking in its ignorance.

    9. Re:Audio quality by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've often wondered: was the rather unusual sampling frequency of 44.1kHz chosen to be an exact multiple of concert pitch, where A is 441Hz?

    10. Re:Audio quality by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Audio is typically sampled at 44kHz to eliminate aliasing distortion. Google for "Nyquist" and "aliasing distortion" for more than you could ever possibly want to know.

      Pretty much correct, but no one so far has bothered to mention that audio must be filtered before it is sampled. It is this filtering that prevents aliasing.

      Sampling by itself can't do anything to prevent aliasing becuase it just samples everything that's there whether or not it would cause aliasing. (Ex: A distorted electric guitar with a direct box and no filtering would probably alias pretty bad.)

      I believe this is worth pointing out because more astute /. readers may have noticed that 2*20KHz=40KHz, yet the sampling rate is 44.1KHz.
      This is also worth knowing about because the filtering is the reason for the move to high sampling rates such as 96KHz, not the frequency range. It is impossible to build a filter with and perfect cutoff, so the more space between your maximum frequency of interest and your nyquist cutoff, the better off you are.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    11. Re:Audio quality by loonicks · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, Nyquist theory says that you must sample a signal at twice its frequency to accuractely reproduce it.

    12. Re:Audio quality by damiam · · Score: 1

      IIRC, A4 is 440Hz, not 441. I don't believe it's related to 44.1kHz sampling

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    13. Re:Audio quality by Teach · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered: was the rather unusual sampling frequency of 44.1kHz chosen to be an exact multiple of concert pitch, where A is 441Hz?

      Not at all. It was chosen because it needed to be able to be at least 40 kHz (twice 20 kHz by the Nyquist Theorem), and because during digital audio development in the late 1960s, companies were typically storing the digital signal on high-grade video tape. 44.1 kHz was a compromise reached between Sony and Philips in 1979. This was over 40 kHz, and also matched up with 60 fps of interlaced digital video (3 samples per field of 490/2 lines; 3 x 245 x 60 Hz = 44100 Hz).

      Note that as pointed out by another poster, concert A is 440 Hz, not 441. Also note that pitches typically increase by factors of two, not factors of ten: concert A is 440 Hz; the A one octave above that is 880 Hz.

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
  13. That's pricey by Lispy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Although it looks really neat it is way too expensive. I mean, the iPod is pretty overpriced and I thought Archos players to be on the upper edge but this beats them both. I mean isn't the whole purpose of using Linux on such a device to bring the costs down? I hope they are very successful with this device so it might get affordable in the near future but right now this is way out of reach for the average geek.

    Slightly offtopic: In case you are looking for a feature laden, flashbased player you might find the VaioX miniXen interesting. It is pretty cheap and can do everything you might ever want from such a small device. It plays nice with your Linux OS too, of course. I was comparing prices and features of these players for half a year now and finally settled on the Vaiox. I am very happy with it, although I am not sure where to get it in the US! ;-)

    1. Re:That's pricey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although it looks really neat it is way too expensive. I mean, the iPod is pretty overpriced and I thought Archos players to be on the upper edge but this beats them both."

      Yeah... I was playing VIDEOS on the COLOUR LCD SCREEN of my ipod the other day and just laughing at all those suckers who bought more expensive players. I mean why go more expensive, when you can have all those features at the lower price point of the ipod?

    2. Re:That's pricey by rjhall · · Score: 1

      did you spot the bit in the article about the fact it plays video?
      I don't see the ipod or miniXen playing video - and the archos are more expensive!

  14. Missed a format by fire-eyes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now i've heard some manufacturers say that they don't try support for certain formats because the cpu power on the units is too low.

    Being a new unit, and the price, I really think that's BS now.

    Of course, the format is ogg. I would consider one (though NOT at that price!) if it had it... Sigh.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    1. Re:Missed a format by chendo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Common sense is required here.

      If it could play DivX... how could it not have the CPU power to play OGG? It's probably a mistake on iRiver's part to not have included it in the supported formats list.

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    2. Re:Missed a format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. My ihp120 supports ogg just fine, as do many of their flash memory devices. It's got to be a mistake, afterall this thing does appear to do a shitload of formats, it would be easy to miss one.

    3. Re:Missed a format by linuxguy · · Score: 1

      It is very likely that the DivX (MPEG-4) and other video decoding is being done by a dedicated hardware decoder.

    4. Re:Missed a format by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Not a mistake, they probable decided against implementing it because not enough people would use it. Maybe 10% of the slashdot community would be interested, but how about elsewhere?

    5. Re:Missed a format by donovangn · · Score: 1

      From iRiver's website (I suspect they're a reputable source):

      # Plays over 600 hours of digital music*
      # Up to 16 hours of battery life
      # Supports MP3, WMA, ASF, WAV and OGG music files
      # Ultra-fast USB 2.0 transfers (up to 40 times faster than USB 1.0)
      # Integrated FM tuner
      # Backlit remote control with 4-line display
      # Built-in voice recorder
      # Intuitive music navigation
      # Real-time MP3 encoding (no PC required)
      # 20GB of internal storage
      # Store or transfer files of any type
      # Extra-large, 8-line, backlit LCD
      # Rechargeable Lithium Polymer battery
      # Optical input and output
      # Upgradeable to future formats and features

    6. Re:Missed a format by damiam · · Score: 1

      That list is for the H120, not the PMP.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:Missed a format by pchan- · · Score: 1

      whine whine ogg

      possibilities:
      1. the video decoding is done on a dsp on which an ogg implementation is not available. the audio/control cpu does not have enough cpu power to decode ogg files.
      2. they ran out of room in the flash memory
      3. they had a schedule to meet, and did not get the feature done in time.
      4. they did not have the resources to put another codec through their q.a. process.
      5. if it had ogg, you'd be whining about lack of a different feature.

  15. iriver and OGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an iriver. I have the iHP-120 specifically for the ogg and longer battery life (16 hour) Plus you don't need software to connect to a PC (just a usb port).

  16. Is it only in gold?? by mishmash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go here for UK availability on the PMP-140 .... and prices... and a photo it looks a bit like a pre-gameboy era electronic game gadget... and it's gold are they all gold I wonder/
    The pmp120 looks more like it belongs in with the "now"...

    1. Re:Is it only in gold?? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      £414?!!!

      Bugger that. I can get an SFF PC and populate it for that.

  17. CPU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know what processor they're using?

  18. It's called Ogg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod!

  19. My portable music player by _aa_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now it can't compete on storage space, I admit, but my palmone treo 600 has been my exclusive portable music player for about 6 months now. Combined with the pocket-tunes software and a sd memory card, the treo 600 becomes a rather fancy mp3, wma, wav, and ogg player. In addition to that, it's also a cell phone, plays games, browses webs, etc. You can buy a 1gb sd card for about $80, and the pocket-tunes software is $30. The phone itself is only $350 with a contract from the evil phone company of your choice. If you get their unlimited data plans, then you can stream your favorite shoutcast streams straight to your phone.

    Ever since I bought this phone, my archos jukebox 6000 has been sitting on the shelf collecting dust.

    If you don't want the phone you could always get the tungsten t5. Also be sure to check out the yet unreleased treo 650.

    1. Re:My portable music player by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      Your iPod plays wma files?

    2. Re:My portable music player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody uses WMA. It's a proprietary format that uses icky DRM.

      That's why I only use high-quality MP3 and AAC.

  20. not just pricey by poptones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's very close to being enough to get me to buy one save for the lack of software adaptability (Can I hack it and add features?) and lack of wireless connectivity.

    I mean, it'll play ASF... right? So ASF will accept mms: and other sorts of streaming filenames as well. Give this damn thing wireless connectivity and you've got a portable "internet tuner" - a device capable of playing all your favorite streams anywhere you're near a wap.

    With all the features this thing has (and the price!) I wouldn't expect such a glaring oversight. Gimme this thing with wireless (get rid of the useless FM tuner if you have to - and provide at least a modicum of user-customizationability) and I'm there.

  21. FLAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just curious, but what's the big draw for FLAC? Isn't compression in the 2:1 range? I don't think I would bother compressing for the small gain.

    1. Re:FLAC by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uncompressed audio is so big that even a 40% reduction in size can make a difference. Especially if you're hauling 3 hour Dead shows around on your portable. Or downloading them for free at archive.org

      There's also the embedded checksums and the support for vorbiscomments that make it real nice to use. If I weren't a poor grad student I'd definately buy one of these.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:FLAC by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      50% on files that are ~10MB per minute is quite significant. It costs a few seconds per track, provides integrity checking, metadata support, and it's cheap to decode, so..

  22. Re:No .ogg :-( by nwbvt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They do support ogg. It just didn't register with the submitter of the story (or the editor who approved it) that .ogg was a music format popular in geek crowds.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  23. Reviews and games by ldm · · Score: 1

    Is anybody aware of any reviews _of the final product_ that are available? I can't wait to see what The Reg will say when they get their hands on one.

    I am reasonably sure that Ogg Vorbis support is included (most all other iRiver products support it) ... as a large chunk of my music collection is in this format, I bloody hope it's in there...

    On some other sites, I have read that the devices support 8 bit games, however I can't find out any details, or an SDK for developing them, does anybody know anything about this?

    1. Re:Reviews and games by pchan- · · Score: 1

      the pmp-120 is already out at retail stores, go try it out. i looked at one at best buy the other day. the browsing interface is a big clunky, but it is the best portable media player i have seen thus far. compared to the rca lyra, the sony hmp (which i tried first-hand in japan), the achos jukebox, and few other junky players, it seems like the one with the best interface, and the widest supported format range. it is also pretty good about showing metadata.

      it doesn't choke when you try to fast-forward like most of the others, but it does not show anything while fast-forwarding (which could be a nuisance when you're trying to watch *ahem* a certain class of movies).

  24. Then use Neuros by HelloKitty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's awsome. Neuros, plays mp3, ogg, it can record with onboard mic, broadcast FM to your car stereo, and much much more. :)

    it's grrrreeeeaaaat!

    1. Re:Then use Neuros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so does my iRiver ihp120 (except the FM broadcast, which is a non-issue as I've simply wired in a plug), and it can do much much more (useful stuff) than your Neuros.

    2. Re:Then use Neuros by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      But doesn't the Neuros have open-source firmware? Does the ihp120 offer that as well?

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  25. the neuros doesn't have that problem - is OGG too. by HelloKitty · · Score: 2, Informative

    the neuros plays oggs, and connects as a standard USB hard drive. I didn't need any software to plug it into Win2k or WinXP

  26. My $30 CD player can do something these can't... by nwbvt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Namely play entire albums. Most MP3 players cannot do this simply because they lack the ability to play songs without sticking gaps in between them, which ruin many albums.

    I've heard rumors that the iRiver was planning to support gapless playback, but their latest update doesn't work at all. Until they do, I'll just stick with my CDs when I want to listen to music on the go.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  27. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not join your mp3s using your PC ?

  28. I got to play with one... by solive1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a display model at a Best Buy near me (I think, it was one of those stores). I found it difficult to navigate through the menus and such and it took me about 5 minutes before I could get a song to play. There were no video files on the device so I couldn't test the video quality. All I know is that at the price they wanted, this player was too much of a hassle to use. And now that I'm reading about the lack of OGG support, that almost defeats the purpose of buying an iRiver.

  29. Seconded - These people are seriously challenged. by Onimaru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously! Oh, look at us we managed to make a player that runs Linux and still isn't Linux-friendly. How stupid can you get?

    It's like some marketing guy came in and said "You know what's hot? Li-nux!" and then no one ever bothered to figure out why or how or with who.

    --
    adam b.
  30. Re:No .ogg :-( by Morgahastu · · Score: 0

    This is a misconception made by many slashdot readers.

    Ogg: It's not popular with most geeks either. It's a minority within a minority. I don't know a single person, in real life or online, who uses OGG.

  31. Must Be Gapless by nathanh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Until these players are gapless I am simply not interested. Too many of my albums are continuous movements. There's nothing more frustrating than a two-second moment of silence during the music.

    The other thing these players seem to be missing is a simple text reader. My #1 use for my PDA is an e-book reader. It would be really sweet if the PMP could double-up as an e-book reader.

    1. Re:Must Be Gapless by Shinglor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's nothing more frustrating than a two-second moment of silence during the music.

      If that's the worst thing that's ever happened to you, you should consider yourself lucky.

    2. Re:Must Be Gapless by Performaman · · Score: 0

      Get a Palm Zire 71/72 and a 1gb SD card.

      --

      I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
    3. Re:Must Be Gapless by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      On my iRiver H320 you can define the length of the pause between tracks and you can read text files (never tried to though, I do that on my Pilot).
      It never is "gapless" though. But the pause never is as long as two seconds either.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Must Be Gapless by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      You may want to check out some of Creative's players. I own a 60GB Zen Xtra, and never noticed any gaps. Just now I listened to Deep Purple's Made in Japan (2 CD remastered), and have to admit there is a gap between songs, however it's very short, I'd say less than 0.5 seconds.

  32. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No FireWire, no sale.

    And someone has to provide Mac support.

    And AAC. At least unprotected. I'll never use the iTunes Music Store.

    1. Re:No by rco3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "No FireWire, no sale.

      And someone has to provide Mac support.

      And AAC. At least unprotected. I'll never use the iTunes Music Store."

      Yes, SIR! We'll get right on it. Firewire, OGG support, and AAC support. No copy protection, and no need for iTunes - we'll simply put all of your favorite music on it from the factory.

      Oh, and for YOU - it will be free, of course. And a blowjob, with our compliments.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmmmmmm blowjobs

  33. Re:My $1500 computer can do something these can't by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    The obvious problem with hardware MP3 players is that they're all but unusable without plugging into a computer. Its actually quite easy to encode mp3s and other formats to support gapless playback, but you do need to play around with software on the PC (or Mac) I'd be nice to just plug into any stereo receiver and get MP3s (or Ogg or whatever)

  34. As always... by 3nuff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    iRiver delivers another great product. The features on this thing are awsome. The design, quite futuristic. The price, well...but it does do video.

    I've always felt that iRiver really knew how to make a great product. I've got one of their SlimX CD players and was troughly impressed with the ability to upgrade the firmware and the number of options that I had when it came to keeping the device powered (rechargable, alkalines, and good old wall socket.)

    The only drawback to their products is the amount of plastic. The iPod is a good example of case design. They are almost completely closed. iRiver products just don't seem as hardy.

    Anyone else feel the same or am I just being a Troll?

    --
    "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
    1. Re:As always... by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      I dropped my IMP-450 on the ground and got a scratch or two but it still works fine and is in one piece. I'm just pissed that the 450's (much delayed) firmware upgrade doesn't support ogg. Buyers remorse, right?

  35. That's a Pimpin' Playa to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /had to be said

  36. Opposite problem by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

    At least using it under Linux, my Neuros needed some special software to upload stuff into the neuros 'database'. My iriver just shows up as a standard usb device I can drag/drop to, without any extra software needed.

  37. I like the name alot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IRiver PIMP ... Awesome.

  38. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new ihp120 firmware does support gapless playback. I was sad that it wasn't included at first, but customer demand drove them to make it happen.

    It's not true gapless, mind you, but it's like iTunes' deal where they mix the songs together at the gap. It's barely noticible on techno stuff, and on Pink Floyd albums, for example, it's not noticible at all.

  39. I won one of these - input appreciated by Pastis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won one of these beasts PMP 120 and I have not yet received it. I may have the option to exchange it against something of similar value.

    I was wondering if anyone had feedback. In particular, I would like to know:

    - if they think I can switch hard disk easily. I have had so many hard disk failures that I don't trust them anymore. I also have a 60Go spare disk, and I could use it there :)

    - if they think that there is a better alternative, such as an Archos player

    - if it will be hacker friendly. The fact that it is using Linux proves nothing. I would love to have an open firmware, but I don't see this coming from iRiver.

    Any other input appreciated.

  40. $600!? by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $600!? That more than I paid to build this computer. Wow.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:$600!? by iyliki · · Score: 1
      600!? That more than I paid to build this computer. Wow.
      But can you stick your computer in your pocket?
    2. Re:$600!? by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      I paid $500 for a Nomad Jukebox (6 GB, USB 1.1, MP3 and WAV only, and heavy) back in 2000. While I could have waited for prices to come down, I really wanted something capable of storing all my music for a cross-country drive.

      Considering that since purchasing the Nomad, I use it on almost every drive, and sometimes during the day (either with headphones or hooked to my stereo), it's made up for its price.

      The moral of the story: $600 is a lot for a toy that doesn't get used. $600 is not a lot of money for something that'll be used 10+ hours a week -- especially if it replaces other equipment (CD changer, etc)

  41. Rio Karma does Gapless. by genixia · · Score: 2, Informative
    Real Gapless, not the rip-as-one-track fake gapless hack that iPod owners have to use. Not the 0.5s nearly-gapless-so-not-really-gapless 'gapless' that the Creative Zen does either.


    The Karma has the HonestToGoodnessZeroSecondOneTrackPlaysIntoTheNext version.

  42. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    From what I've heard that is noticably different from true gapless playback. If you have had personal experience suggesting otherwise, maybe I'll try one out.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  43. Re:No .ogg :-( by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well gee, if you don't know anyone who uses a certain technology it must not be in existence.

    In case the frequency of "What about ogg" posts on this story didn't clue you in, the format is indeed popular within the geek crowd.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  44. Am I the only one.. by kiljoy001 · · Score: 1

    that read the model # as "pimp" - so and so ??

    1. Re:Am I the only one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that read the model # as "pimp" - so and so ??

      No...

  45. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't play two arbitrary MP3s "back to back" without the potential for silent gaps. It doesn't mean anything to ask for this, and so when you do, what you get is a cross fade.

    MPEG audio layer 3 was not intended for ripping your CDs onto a flash memory device and walking around listening to the music. It was conceived as the high performance variant in a family of algorithms for use in streaming media. When you change TV channels or radio channels it isn't "seamless" so this wasn't a requirement. As a result the last block of audio in an MP3 must be a fullsize block, so the encoder fills the remaining fraction of a second with silence or something equally uninteresting. During playback there is no reliable mechanism to determine where in the last block this filler material begins.

    (You may see a similar phenomenon if you try to skip to a particular track in a "seamless" CD album. CDs are also stored as individuals blocks, and a track can only begin and end with a whole block, so tracks actually don't start and stop exactly where you'd like them to. In fact with Red Book Audio as written there has to be a short silent gap between tracks. Customers don't much like this, so the CDs you buy in the shops don't always obey this restriction, they simply put the track start/ stop markers as close to the real start and end of the track as is possible)

    Ogg Vorbis includes the necessary tweaks to make gapless playback possible in theory. So a CD track can be stored as an Ogg without tagging any silence on the end as filler. Of course the player still has to do the necessary buffering to smoothly transition from one track to the next without a pause of any kind. But it's at least possible to really do gapless playback instead of silly cross-fading tricks.

  46. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by nwbvt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    " You can't play two arbitrary MP3s "back to back" without the potential for silent gaps."

    Who said anything about MP3s? I know the MP3 format does not support gapless playback. Thats one reason I have my music collection ripped into ogg vorbis files (this is slashdot you know, people here are familiar with the format). Thus I can listen to them with no gaps. What I'm looking for is a portable player which can also do this. I've heard the Karma supports it, though it has its own problems.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  47. Imagine by passthecrackpipe · · Score: 1

    A Beowolf cluster of these.....

    (sorry - couldn't resist)

    --
    People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.
    1. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine a Beowulf cluster of redundant /.ers who keep making beowulf jokes.

      In other news, Richard Simmons is gay.

  48. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This drives me crazy with SOFTWARE MP3 players. Winamp claims to support gapless but I just can't get it to work. I might have some kind of hardware problem, but can anyone recommend a good software player that is verified to do it right? Windows or Linux preferably both.

  49. Video by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does it seem that most of the posters here have completely missed that this thing plays videos?

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Video by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Video is just fluff on these things... you can't watch video when it's in your pocket. You can't watch video walking down the street, you can't watch video while driving, you can't watch video on the bus (well in theory you could but you'd look like a complete dork doing so). Who needs video?

  50. Re:My $30 CD player can do something these can't.. by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    XMMS has it bundled with the crossfade plugin. I also seem to remember it working with winamp2 (though not with later versions). Also you will probably need to use ogg vorbis files as I think mp3s have gaps stuck at the ends of the file.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  51. I'd be surprised if they couldn't by Nailer · · Score: 1

    In 1998 I like dance music - most of my albums were continuous mixes. I remember distinctly when WinAmp got the ability to play back albums continuously.

    If WinAmp could do this in 98, then it surprises me an embedded player couldn't do the same six years later.

    If the iRiver doesn't do it, I bet another can.

  52. I think they missed a letter. by Goosey · · Score: 1

    PMP? Come on, take a gander at that thing. Surely they missed an 'I' in there somewhere!!

    --
    --- "End Of Line" - MCP
  53. One look at the photo of the PMP-120 by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    and the first thing that came to mind was portable pr0n. I can think of no other useful reason for a 20gb portable device that can play movies.

    --

    Question everything

  54. So the market isn't a river/Getting what we want. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    So, I guess this puts the lie to how we can all relax and the market will provide? Now it seems we're being told that even when what we want is available at low cost (last I recall, Ogg Vorbis support was royalty-free and non-copylefted free software is available), it's still too much to actually ask for what we want and hold out buying until we get it.

    On a more technical note, perhaps it would be better to make a small portable more generic computer and load it with software that will do what we want. We might not get the stylized interface, but it could give gapless playback of all the free software/open source codecs we like.

  55. iPod feedback. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then tell them.

    I know for a fact that Apple reads this feedback, and bases new features around it.

    1. Re:iPod feedback. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then tell them.

      I already have, you gormless know-it-all.

  56. iPod feedback. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then tell them.

    I know for a fact that Apple reads this feedback, and bases new features around it.

  57. Re:No .ogg :-( by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

    The same 20 people who use it ask for it's support every time.

  58. Re:No .ogg :-( by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

    You are guilty like me. Just because there are people on slashdot who like OGG it doesn't mean it's popular. Just like I don't know a single person who likes OGG it doesn't necessarily mean it's not popular.

    I didn't say popularity for it was non-existant, it's just very small and people don't seem to recognize that.

    My theory is also that the portion of these people who always demand OGG support that actually buy these products are even slimmer. I probably wouldn't decide to include OGG support in my products either. Look at the products that support OGG, they haven't been shot into popularity because of its OGG support.

  59. Re:No .ogg :-( by nwbvt · · Score: 1
    First of all, that is why I limited its popularity to a specific group, namely the geek crowd.

    Second, we are not talking about whether or not iRiver should support ogg vorbis, they already do. We are talking about whether or not the omission of ogg vorbis in the list of supported formats in the /. article summary should have occurred. Thus the only group that should be considered are /. readers, for whom I feel there is sufficient evidence that ogg vorbis is popular (again, read the comments for this very story).

    Third, I am not basing this merely on the opinions of /.ers. I know people in the real world as well who use .oggs. In fact I even first heard of .ogg somewhere other than /.

    Fourth, yes products that support ogg vorbis are popular. Check out amazon.com's top selling portable music players in the 11-20 GB range, 3 out of 8 support .oggs (the karma and the iRivers).

    Anything else?

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.