Slashdot Mirror
Mozilla Releases Firefox 1.0 RC1
islandroots writes "Mozilla has finally posted the first Firefox 1.0 release candidate on their FTP servers. This could very well be the last official release of Firefox before the big 1.0 launch date on November 9th. Mozilla FTP Servers"
After reading comments that indicate that your installed extensions will show up as incompatible with RC1, I think I'll wait. Apparently the browser has to automatically consider extensions as incompatible until authors check them or something along those lines.
http://www.busyweather.com/
Be aware, there's some sort of Java bug with the application update mechanism. There is a bit of a thread here.
Annoying pop-up bug?
I had an issue with two Firefox windows opening at the click of a link in an email. (very annoying when responding to phpbb forum mail)
Easily fixed using google and a registry patch.
The (rough) changelog is here:/ changel og-rc1.html
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/qa
From MozillaZine:
Asa Dotzler writes: "Today we have our first Firefox 1.0 candidate builds available for testing. You can get these test builds from FTP. If you've already downloaded 1.0 PR (the "feature complete" preview) and you're not really interested in testing and bug reporting, then you should probably stick with 1.0 PR for a couple more weeks and upgrade when we release the official Firefox 1.0.
“Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041026 "
..(search the web is one, opening an url you highlighted in a new tab is another...)
and you are right, some extensions don't work anymore (I had "browsertime" not working), but all the others I use seem fine (download manager tweak, translation panel, user agent switcher, dictionnary search)
On the other hand, so many things that were working only so and so are now working again
So if you are not THAT dependant on ALL your extensions give it a try... also that way you can mail your extension wrtiter and get them/help them to fix that compatibility problem...
It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
It's really annoying I know. A workaround is to do ctrl++ then ctrl+-. So control and the plus key followed by control and the minus key.
./ or FF fault. Anyone know?
I never gotta the bottom of whether it's
----
It was quite disturbing: When I had a site open in one window, which would open new windows through java script, everything worked until I had a second window open (with a couple of tabs). When clicking on a java script link to open a picture, for example, firefox would segfault. This is on Linux, and I couldn't remedy this with a new profile.
I have been using 0.9.3 since then.
I feel so sig.
This "release candidate" is really just an interim release between 1.0PR and 1.0 final. The Firefox team knows that there are still significant bugs that must be addressed before 1.0-final. See The Burning Edge for a small taste of what's been fixed since 1.0PR, and what is still left to do.
;)
A word of caution: there will be significant bugfixes between now and the final release, but there may or may not be automatic update notifications. If you decide to install this on the computers of your friends and family, make sure to upgrade them again later
Here is a short javascript bookmarklet that fixes table rendering. To prevent Slashcode from mangling it, I've inserted some linebreaks. Condense it back into one line and then use it as a bookmarked URL; whenever you select it, it will fix all of the incremental-display bugs on the current page.
( )
javascript:(function(){
var s=document.body.style;
var x=s.display;
s.display='none';
s.display=x;
})
Its a bug release - ala no new features.
Keep those bug reports coming!
"This is a rough changelog for the RC-1 release. It's probably got a few bugs on it that aren't actually fixed and it's certainly missing a few bugs that were fixed, but it should give you a pretty good idea about most of the 250 or so bugs we've fixed since the Preview Release."
Actually, the slashdot.org site tentatively validates as compliant with both HTML 3.2 and 4.01 transitional standards using the W3C HTML validator. This means that it is not designed just to support IE but rather, the broader 3.2 and 4.01 HTML standards. And actually, if the DOCTYPE declaration for "HTML 4.01 Transitional" had been inserted at the top, the code would pass!
Here is the changelog with around 250 bugs which were fixed
fifteen jugglers, five believers
The bug is fixed in trunk. But unfortunately the fix won't make it for Firefox 1.0 as the merge of the two source trees will only be made after release (due to need of excessive regression testing).i d=21752 7#c108
Bug about the issue is here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?
Correct url without space and clicky for lazy people is here
Firefox until 1.0 (after that version it will change) is based on a spinoff of the 1.7 branch. In this branch (called aviary branch) they ported in some fixes from the trunk and also some from 1.7 branch.
this dodgy website [slashdot.org]. I am using 1.0 RC1 at the moment and it often renders this site very badly, hiding the text in negative-X land.
Fixed in the trunk builds, and will therefore be in all Firefox versions after Firefox 1.0 Final.
This is Bugzilla bug #217527.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
It now seems to implement everything that the Mozilla Browser does, and I don't really find it any faster than the Mozilla Suite, and I like the integrated mail client (which has great search, spam filtering and other facilities).
Some people object to using the suite if they don't use the mail client, but really, come on, it's taking up only a few MB on your hard disk. Get over it!
If you do use the associated Thunderbird mail client then you're actually using more memory as the GRE (Gecko Runtime Environment) is not yet sharable between different processes.
Plans like putting a full page ad in the New York Times for FireFox seem a bit crazy to me. What about the mail client, IRC client and forthcoming calendar? Advertise once there's a whole suite, and even then not in newspapers!
Clever signature text goes here.
How different is this from my Preview Release? Should I download it? Or just wait until Nov 9th?
Among the largest changes are:
- Tabbed browsing preferences, see "Advanced" panel in Options.
- Several bug fixes to the new find toolbar.
- Browser migration improvements.
- Security fixes, such as an important fix to the problem with inactive tabs able to grab input focus.
- Maybe a dozen crash fixes, some being among the most commonly reported crashes.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Informative?
/. has gone through the effort of preventing users from sending their site to the W3C validator (unless some mirror is used)....
I think the poster is making a joke here. Slashdot's HTML is neither valid 3.2 or 4.01 even with the DOCTYPE declarations. Not.by.a.long.shot. In fact,
Right off of the spreadfirefox.com website:
a note to SFX community: This is a testing release. This is not a product release. We're not pushing this release on our PR users. The majority of PR users should stick with PR until 1.0 ships. This is a testing release and we don't need everyone downloading it, just the folks that want to be involved with testing and bug reporting. Please don't evangelize this release or start pushing all your friends and family to upgrade. Most of them should wait until 1.0 in about two weeks.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Because someone trolls the web all night waiting for Mozilla to release another version of Firefox, they get rewarded with their in lights on the front page of slashdot. Did you wonder why it's only on the FTP server and not advertised on the web site?
geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
They are still uploading more local versions.
Check populicio.us
I thought this was super neat. I went to Dodge's website - www.4adodge.com and started to price/build a new car. I got a popup saying "Your browser is not officially supported." Before I started cussing like a sailor I continued reading and it say "If you would like to continue, press OK. Otherwise, press cancel." I couldn't believe. Someone had the state of mind to let me keep going at my own risk. It was unbelievable.
Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
Alternatively, I just hold ctrl and scroll the mouse up, then down really quick.
Otherwise, you get this: click
There was this little thing called "resistence" that the French had. You know, they were actively fighting against the armies occupying their soil and helping UK and allied troops with intelligence on how to hurt the Germans. They also forced the Germans to have a very large military presence in France in order to keep the peace....
Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
remember "IE Shines on broken html" article the other week? Test these:http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/mangleme/gallery/ on firefox rc1: they're already fixed
Actually the whole release may just be fixing bugs( and changed the icon on live bookmarks:p )
gtkaml.org
Yes they seem to be fixed.a /changel og-rc1.html
c gi?id=26495 6
i d=12475 0
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/q
This is the relevant entry in bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.
Also focus stealing has been fixed
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?
TechSutra
I think you're confused. The 9/11 which upsets people is the 9th of September. Americans write dates the wrong way around.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Works perfectly here - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041027 Firefox/0.10.1
I am using the plugin from Gnome's librsvg-2.8.1 (/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libmozsvgdec.so)
I see you can start a new instance of the Mozilla window without the profile window popping up in linux. Finally!
If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
When did you last try FireFox?
Both features are there in 0.10.1.
2) search for browser.startup.page
3) set it to 0
4) done.
The "New Tab" button is there in firefox, it just doesn't show on the default installation. If you right click on the button toolbar and click "Customize" you should see the New Tab button in there. Drag it into the toolbar and voila :)
arcane for life
For me, it has been rock solid for the past 7 months. I have been using it exclusively as my Mail Client at work, with an IMAP email store.
I have upwards of 100-500 emails a day that I go through with it.
--
Scott Carr * Documentation Co-Lead * OpenOffice.org
Scott Carr
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21752 7
Not linked, because bugzilla disallows slashdot as a referrer. If you read the comments, they had a fix, but the fix broke a bunch of other sites. This blog post sums things up pretty well too.
217527.
It's fixed in the trunk, but will not be fixed in the FF 1.0 branch because the current patch caused too many regressions and would require a serious QA effort to track them all down.
Feel free to vote for it, but it's way too late to make it into FF 1.0. Besides, it's already recognized as a high-priority bug. If you really want to help move this into Firefox as quickly as possible, download a trunk build and isolate test cases for regressions.
I don't really want to change over to a pre-1.0 release unless someone can convince me that it is prety darn stable and feature-complete
You do realize that these are two separate questions and have two completely different answers.
Stability: objective measurement of how many crashes and lockups you typically have. From what I hear, Thunderbird is pretty solid
Feature complete: subjective, does it fit my model of what a mail client should look like and do. You can't ask anyone this, you have to try for yourself. If you have an IMAP mail account, you can test it without disrupting your current mail workflow too much
I just installed Firefox without any special consideration and I am able to see svg images just fine.
The Moox builds are compiled for many specific processors, including Athlon64.
Definately improved performance on my P3 laptop!
The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
Well, shortly, yes.
The long answer is: the bug is marked "blocking-aviary1.0", which means 1.0 cannot be released until this bug is not fixed. The bug depends on these unfixed bugs, which means the bug cannot be called "fixed" until all of these bugs are not fixed. UNfixed bugs atm in the dependency: 265027 265067 265736 265846 265867 265899 265902 265973 265999 266015.
Although all this info could be determined from the original bugreport.
It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
Be yourself no matter what they say
Some sites are now doing something different with the popups, that fools every pop up blocker out there.
Try http://astalavista.box.sk/ for a sample
Open Source Java Web Forum with LDAP authentication
Not to mention helping the U.S. win the American Revolution.
Does on mine, but i noticed the popup is made in flash, which you may not have installed, or maybe are using the click flash to view extension or something like that.
Popups in flash... The future
Open Source Java Web Forum with LDAP authentication
Read your history schmuck. Louis XVI was King of France during the American Revolution. He started helping in 1775 (that's right, before 1776). So the French had everything to do with it. Since it put such a financial strain on France, helping the Americans with the American Revolution may ultimately have been a contributing factor in the French Revolution and Louis XVI's death.
At the time of the American Revolution Napoleon was just starting military school. He didn't start fighting any battles till the late 1790's.
As well, since it seems you probably didn't hear about it, Napoleon was French. In fact, he was the Emperor of France, but that wasn't until 1804. He was kicked out in 1814 and tried for a come-back in 1815, and failed at Waterloo. He died (suspected poisoning) in his prison on St. Helena in 1821.
France has won many wars. That is why there are so many French or former French territories around the world. Get your hillbilly ass off the moonshine or meth or whatever you are smoking, and actually learn what you are talking about.
You are probably a troll, but I had to say it anyway.
-- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
So I take it you are the same Anonymous Troll that posted this a few days ago. My (late) reply still applies.
In short, claiming that Firefox has had more vulnerabilities is misleading at best, and a lie at worst. Any way you slice it, Firefox's security track record is vastly better than IE's.
When you have Opera set to "Block all Pop-ups" nothing comes up from that site.
Overruled. Don't be a dope. Those situations are politically entirely different.
Overrulled yourself. "Politics" (whatever you mean by that) has nothing to do with it. Control over territory is the only issue here.
If the U.S. hadn't helped France in WWII, then Germany might currently control France.
If France hadn't helped the U.S. during the U.S. Revolutionary War, then England might currently control the U.S.
Those are the same dang thing.
France has won many wars. That is why there are so many French or former French territories around the world. Get your hillbilly ass off the moonshine or meth or whatever you are smoking, and actually learn what you are talking about.
Examples for those who don't know:
Remember the Louisiana purchase? The U.S. bought that territory from France. France originally conquered this area (and lost it, and regained it, but that's a whole other story).
Many parts of Asia were at one time French colonies. Vietnam famously so, but also other Asian countries such as Laos.
Likewise, France had African colonies, e.g. Algeria and Djibouti.
In all cases, France originally got those colonies by _winning wars_. These colonies have since tended to become independent, as with pretty much all other colonies around the world (e.g. The Philippines), so losing colonies is not unique to France.
Of course, as many people have stated, France has won (and lost) plenty of wars in Europe. Napoleon is recent and was more successful than any French ruler since Charlemagne, so people tend to remember him, but France had its other victories (Brittany used to be part of Britian, you know!)
Microsoft doesn't like people knowing about ther exploits. Every single one of firefox's is released to the public. So there could be more for IE, only microsoft knows...