Slashdot Mirror


Thunderbird 0.9 Released

Simon (S2) writes "Thunderbird 0.9 is now available for download! New features include Saved Search Folders (aka Virtual Folders) which allow you to display messages based on previously set search criteria across multiple folders. Message Grouping allows you to organize e-mail in a folder by grouping them based on various attributes like Date, Sender, Label, etc. Thunderbird 0.9 also includes numerous bug fixes and other improvements. For more information, see the release notes. Builds can be found on the mozilla.org FTP server or in the release notes above."

85 of 373 comments (clear)

  1. Fantastic job! by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Mozilla Foundation has been really doing a fantastic job with thinks like Mozilla, Firefox (and Camino!), Thunderbird, and the new multiplatform Sunbird calendaring client.

    Kudos to the team both at the Foundation and in the open source community for turning out this first rate software!

    1. Re:Fantastic job! by gordgekko · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does it integrate with Thunderbird?

      I can't speak for others but I have never gotten Thunderbird to work properly with Sunbird. I have tried with the past few versions and the avialable extensions and it never goes. Pity.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    2. Re:Fantastic job! by DAtkins · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sunbird works as a standalone and as an extension for Thunderbird and FireFox...

      Still, it needs a few more revisions before it's really ready.

  2. Tiger Features? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of the new features sound like they are implementations of those described in the version of Apple's Mail.app that is due to ship with Tiger. I wonder if this kind of thing will dissuade companies like Apple from announcing new features so far before they are ready for release.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Tiger Features? by simcop2387 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This has existed already in Evolution, and i wouldn't be surprised if in other mail clients also.

    2. Re:Tiger Features? by samael · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're also available in other products. The Bat! has had Saved Searches for a while.

    3. Re:Tiger Features? by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microsoft Outlook 2003 offers them as well.

    4. Re:Tiger Features? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no you silly person. If Apple has it, Apple was first. It's just the way it is, and the sooner we can all accept that, the happier we all will be. It's like Microsoft being evil, Linux being secure, and the government trying to exploit the masses. Other possible explanations are really just a waste of time once you acknowledge the truth.

  3. So, have the devs been listening? by Dragoon412 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the most requested features I see is the ability to minimize to the system tray. Have the devs even mentioned this being a consideration?

    I use Thunderbird, and I like it, but it drives me nuts having one more thing cluttering my taskbar when all I want it open for is to let me know when mail arrives.

    1. Re:So, have the devs been listening? by Capt.+Zapp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed! In the mean-time, I've been using Thundertray to launch and minimize Thunderbird from the Windows system tray. http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/1063659252/1

    2. Re:So, have the devs been listening? by Refrag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't you really want the Taskbar to be fixed? Why don't you complain to Microsoft instead of Mozilla? Something like Apple's Dock is way better than the Windows Taskbar.

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    3. Re:So, have the devs been listening? by ajr_trm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am/was waiting for ability to encrypt stored passwords with master password.

      Is this feature present in 0.9?

  4. Torrents? by Gentoo+Fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd hate to assist in the clobbering of an FTP server -- I'm suprised such a popular software project (particularly one with not-so-small files) isn't using Bittorrent yet.

    1. Re:Torrents? by mikefe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they want to be able to track how many downloads there are of the software.

      These numbers are tracked very closely by the Mozilla community to measure penetration.

      Yes, I (and they) know it's not a perfect source of information, but it is a source.

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
  5. Saved Searches sounds good but... by samael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to be able to tag messages with meta-data (like "To Do" or "Mum's Birthday" or "Project 257") and then be able to produce searches based on that.

    1. Re:Saved Searches sounds good but... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 4, Informative

      You already can, they call that labels.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Saved Searches sounds good but... by shawb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think what the graandparent wants is the ability to put multiple tags on an individual email. Oftentimes emails can cross over to many different topics.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Saved Searches sounds good but... by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe labels are simply coloring a message one color or another. The problem with this is that there's a limited amount of labels to choose from, and last I checked you couldn't create more (you can only change the presets).

  6. Don't worry by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Mozilla's servers can handle it just fine (they always have).

    1. Re:Don't worry by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bugzilla requests requires alot more processing than simple ftp. Doing db queries and generating a webpage compared to pushing a memory mapped file through the network card.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    2. Re:Don't worry by Kingpin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because Bugzilla is a clunky piece of Perl turd and the FTP/HTTP servers are not? :-)

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
  7. What about performance and memory usage? by kbahey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not to disparage Thunderbird or anything. Thunderbird is one of two mail user agents (MUA) I use regularly, the other being plain old mutt when I am connected to the home server using ssh.

    The issue with Thunderbird is not functionality, but rather bloat. It takes up a lot of memory and is slow. Compared to for example, FireFox, on the same machine.

    1. Re:What about performance and memory usage? by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I don't think it's necessarily fair to compare Thunderbird to a web browser. TB has a lot more data to juggle than Firefox, in general. FF just has to deal with a couple of webpages at a time, while TB has to keep giant lists of messages at the ready. Also, just in terms of raw amounts of data, your average mbox has a lot more data than your average HTML page.

      I've found TB to compare favorably, performance-wise, to other clients I've tried, such as Outlook, Outlook Express, Evolution. (Although it's been a long time since I've tried Evolution.)

    2. Re:What about performance and memory usage? by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've been wondering the same thing but haven't had the time to debug it at all. Here's a line from top:
      PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
      31929 rufus 16 0 668m 359m 169m S 0.0 36.0 3:08.69 mozilla-thunder
      Yes, that is 350mb of ram it is using. True I have ~100 imap folders in my default view, a few of which have >100,000 messages, but I don't see the need to have the entire structure of each folder loaded persistently in ram.
    3. Re:What about performance and memory usage? by labratuk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I take it you're getting that by running top on linux. If so, that's a horrible way to measure memory usage. It includes in that number a LOT of things which are shared or just caches.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  8. Bayesian Folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want a folder that can learn what sort of thing I want in it. Like the spam filtering, but not just junk. So I could drag credit card notices to my Bills folder a couple times and then have it just happen. When somebody smarter than me implements this, then I'll be a Thunderbird supporter.

    1. Re:Bayesian Folders by Man+of+E · · Score: 2, Informative

      Popfile does this, I believe. Haven't used it myself (because it only works with POP3), but some people swear by it.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig
    2. Re:Bayesian Folders by mikeboone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, this is what's keeping me off Thunderbird. I am still using Outlook, but with the cool extension Outclass which is an Outlook front-end for POPFile. It works really well. I know I could use POPFile's web interface, but it's so much nicer when it's integrated into the mail app. If Thunderbird can use Bayes for spam, open it up for other uses!

    3. Re:Bayesian Folders by SizL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Popfile indead does this, and very well in my case. And I don't know when you last checked, but it speaks IMAP and NNTP too now. I use it on my own mailserver and get 95% accuracy in classifying my mail into some 20+ categories. I tried Thunderbird, but I don't like the way it handles IMAP accounts.

    4. Re:Bayesian Folders by dabraham · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's actually an enhancement request for that with a bounty. There's even a patch submitted (check out bugzilla bug # 181866 (no link, bugzilla rejects links from /.)).

      It seems to be stalled at the moment, but there is motivation, money, and work there. Voting for the bug raises the odds that it will get attention. Not by a whole lot, but some.

  9. buggy? by jstave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm always a little uneasy about software that is in the pre-1.0 state. Can anyone speak to its reliablility?

    1. Re:buggy? by mkoenecke · · Score: 4, Informative

      No worries; I've been using it for a couple of years now (I'm an attorney who uses it for both business and personal e-mail). I have not had even one problem with reliability or stability.

      Remember, it's a fork off of the Mozilla project, which has been past 1.0 for quite some time.

      --
      TANSTAAFL
    2. Re:buggy? by jrumney · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm always a little uneasy about software that is in the pre-1.0 state. If it makes you feel better, it is released under the Mozilla Public License, which is up to 1.1 already. 1.1 + 0.9 = 2.0, so I think it averages out.

    3. Re:buggy? by flint · · Score: 2, Informative

      I try every release... but I have experienced lock ups every time thus far within an hour of normal pop use. Outlook 2000 still does a better job for me unfortunately.

      I also need to trigger the play of a sound file when a message is filtered to a specific folder and haven't seen an extension do this yet (and I'm too lazy to learn xul etc to do it myself). It has been requested as a feature already.

  10. I wonder. by Moby+Cock · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does anybody know of any 'big-scale' implementation of T-Bird? I use it at home sparingly since I find I use more and more web based email and a real decent email client is just not needed. I know Outlook (and others) has countless corporate implementations, and I am wondering if T-Bird has been used similarly. If so, how does it hold up? Anybody?

    1. Re:I wonder. by Aliencow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We use it on approximately 100 PCs (that's not big-scale but still)

      Right now, the network is a mess (started working here about 6months ago) - but I'm currently working on making MSIs for Thunderbird so I can keep it up to date easily. Someone did the same thing with Firefox and it's great!

  11. Question for the Outlook "switchers" by holden+caufield · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not a troll.

    I use Outlook for my personal email, and I'm strongly considering changing my mail client. Other than the security benefits of not automatically running scripts when viewing messages, can anyone who has switched to Thunderbird tell me what other features make this client a preferred choice to Outlook?

    I'll politely add that open-source isn't enough to compel me to change, nor is bayesian filtering (I already use SpamBayes).

    Thanks for your help, and really, I'm not trying to fan any flames!

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    1. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use Thunderbird because..
      I like the interface.
      It supports IMAP well, it allows me to have my newsgroups in the same app.
      It supports RSS too, which is a feature I love!

    2. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by gclef · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are a few reasons I use it for my home email:

      1) Mouse gestures. I'm on a lot of mailing lists, and being able to specify common actions as a gesture (right-click & drag right to select the next unread message, for example) saves me a lot of time digging through lists like Full-Disclosure.

      2) Message threading. It's not perfect, but it helps a lot to be able to group messages by thread (I think new versions of Outlook can do this, but my 2000 version can not).

      3) The Baysean filtering is nice, but as you've mentioned, you already have that.

      4) Themes. Yeah, it's trivial, but still...they're fun.

    3. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by Nevenmrgan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      - It's faster than Outlook (though slower than Firefox). In the latest Outlook, message rendering can take up to a few seconds - the UI is just not very responsive.

      - Leaner UI overall. I like Outlook's corporate functions, but I just don't use them that often at work, and never at home. Also, Outlook suffers from having 15 different ways to get to your folders - they keep adding new panels and icons. I don't consider this a good thing at all, since it rarely - if ever - increases my productivity or improves my user experience. It just makes me click around idly.

      - Significantly faster (and better) quicksearch (there are even rumors of search-as-you-type in the future!)

      - As with any other Mozilla product, they listen to the users' comments. If a reasonable, much-requested feature doesn't make it to the release, I'll bet my hat there's an extension that does it.

      - Shockingly, it's a better client for Ma and Pa User. Fewer buttons, leaner out of the box, no office environment mumbo jumbo. (I'm not even going to take seriously suggestions to use Outlook Express in that case.)

    4. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by nvivo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My reasons to switch:

      1. Profile, preferences, rules, contacts, etc are easy to backup. You can have all your files in one place and you choose where.

      2. IMAP support in Outlook really sucks... in a way i can`t even describe it. Thunderbird is perfect with IMAP, and no need to purge messages manually...

      3. Saved Search folders in 0.9 are great. They are like views in databases, but for your messages.

      4. RSS support to keep you up with the news.

      5. Great extensions makes Thunderbird even better.

      6. It looks much better than Outlook Express.

    5. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In addition to what other posters have listed,

      - Administration - One simple screen for e-mail accounts and another simple screen for other configuration options. I find the Outlook barrage of configuration windows and tabs VERY annoying. It's also difficult to see exactly how POP/IMAP e-mail accounts are configured in Outlook. If you see the options in Thunderbird you'll see what I mean.

      - These new Virtual Folders (mail's not really moved into them, but it's a view over all your mail based on criteria you specify). I use Outlook 2002 (XP) at work and I don't see any way to do the same without creating rules to copy mail to folders.

      - Message threads. I see no way to do this in Outlook 2002.

      - Less features. Outlook has more features, but I don't have any use for most of them. So Thunderbird is less cluttered for me.

    6. Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers" by Ark42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have trouble getting many people to switch to TB even though they quickly took up FF. The things keeping back these people I know that are now using FF + Outlook are:

      1) Buttons work differently, such as the delete button doesn't also close the message if you opened the message in a new Window (These type of problems are solvable with the Buttons! extension)

      2) The context menu for Copy To and Move To is very annoying for them to use since they typically have 100s of folders nested across their accounts, and they can't seem to find the folder they want fast enough, where as Outlook will just pop up a little window with a folder tree for Copy/Move operations.

      3) The address book contacts editor has most of the useful information on the first tab, but the Company Title and Notes section are on the 2nd and 3rd tab, and users find it annoying to have to use these extra tabs for such common pieces of information, when all the other stuff on the 2nd and 3rd tab is unused. Somehow, they wan't those two fields duplicated onto the main tab for the contacts editor.

      4) Having to open the address book in a new window, and the contacts sidebar tab really doesn't help anybody I suggested it to here. Users really seem to wait a contacts folder in their folder list to see the list of contacts.

      5) The contacts list is not easily sortable like Outlook and blank fields seem to sort above A forcing them to sort Z-A and scroll down to find the stuff in the middle. I guess they just want A-Z sorting to put blanks after Z.

  12. Here you go by Nevenmrgan · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is, of course, an extension that adds this functionality: http://minimizetotray.mozdev.org/ Happy extending.

    1. Re:Here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Happy extending.

      That's the second time today someone has said that to me! This morning, I got this email ...

    2. Re:Here you go by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use an app called Thundertray. Its pretty much a tray launcher and minimizer for tbird. The tray extension on the mozdev site never worked for me for some reason.

  13. I want a "Export to mysql" option by LoboRojo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For all of use archiving our email for years, wouldn't it be nice to be able to file messages in a real database? YES!!!!

    --

    ---
    All my submissions to Slashdot rejected... and proud of it!
  14. Label threads by elykyllek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to be able to label threads, and for it to automatically label any messages added to the thread. That way I can view my unread and be able to tell if I previously labelled the thread as important.

    Any idea if this is possible or planned?

  15. Re:MSI package... by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to be too curmudgeonly towards your kind offer, but I would much rather that the Thunderbird team themselves provided an "official" MSI package for download from their site along with md5 sums and a signature to check it against.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  16. 0.8 to 0.9 Upgrade Freezes by elysian1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    People have been reporting problems with upgrading from 0.8 to 0.9. It seems like there may be a compatibility problem with older profiles that causes 0.9 to freeze. I think I may wait a while before upgrading since 0.8 works fine for me.

    1. Re:0.8 to 0.9 Upgrade Freezes by PeteDotNu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, go on, live dangerously. Back up your profile first, and see what happens.

      --
      My other processor is big-endian.
  17. Re:Minimize to tray by ning · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use PowerMenu. It adds a few items to every window's title bar menu - minimize to tray, set transparency, set task priority and 'always on top'. I find it incredibly useful. hth ning

  18. how does it comapre to gmail by yohan1701 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a gmail account and its great. But I still would love have a mail client with gmail like features.

    Instead of folders, categorizing messages, so that a message can have multiply categories. I always hated using folders anyways and everything just ended up in my inbox.

    The search is best part of gmail. How does searching in Thunderbird compare ?

  19. PIM features? by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the next important step for Thunderbird would be to allow it to be installed (via extensions and such) as a full PIM suite. Calendar, address book, etc. are features people look for, and if these were available, Thunderbird would start converting Outlook users at the same rate Firefox is converting IE users.

    Adding in the existing Calendar extension would be a good start. Adding in connectivity to an standards-based open source groupware server would create the end-to-end solution we've been looking for all these years.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  20. Related Story by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Reuters has a story about Firefox gaining on IE this morning:

    Story here.

    The story says Firefax now enjoys a 6% market share!

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  21. Link to homepage. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the obvious, but missing link to the Thunderbird homepage.

  22. mozilla.org have great servers. by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They heave great servers at mozilla.org. THay can handle a /. But if you really want to share the file to a /. crowd make a .torrent file and share it using bittorent.

  23. also Lotus Notes by dominux · · Score: 4, Informative

    the way Notes stores mail is a little different in concept to most other things, folders don't "contain" messages, messages exist in their own right in the database irrespective of what folders they might be in. It is perfectly valid for a message to exist without any folders including the message. Folders in Notes can have documents dragged into them which stores that association and you can get to the message through the folder. A saved search is what would be called a view in Notes, that is a folder which is based on a selection formula rather than manual fileing. It is perfectly valid also for one message to be shown in many many folders and views, but delete it from one it is deleted from all. Deleting a message is very different from removing it from a folder. Views and folders can also be categorised, this is basically the same thing as the group by feature. Notes views are indexed rather than calculated on the fly so I suspect they would be quicker for large mail files.

    Notes of course isn't open source and you can only do limited view customisation without the design client, I do like the user interface for creating these saved searches, it is better than creating a private view in Notes.

  24. PopTray by tabdelgawad · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is a great open source mail notifier that will monitor as many Pop accounts as you like, at any interval you like, with preview and delete functionality while the email is still on the server. One button click will launch your favorite email client, so it's almost indistinguishable from having Thunderbird minimized to tray, and it uses less memory.

    --
    Imposing Libertarian views on everyone online since 1992.
  25. I've just discovered a new killer feature by afd8856 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new View > Sort > Group By Sort (G)

    You'll have to download it to see what it does :)

    --
    I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
  26. Hmmm... by sn0wflake · · Score: 2, Informative

    After installing Thunderbird 0.9 I get a lot of timeout errors :(

  27. Re:GREAT! by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh, they served over 1 million copies of the Firefox preview in under 100 hours, I don't think Slashdot is really that big of a worry for them.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  28. Credit where credit is due by jrumney · · Score: 5, Informative

    The inspiration for this feature came from Usenet legend Kibo, who in the early 90's was grepping the Usenet spool so he could find and reply to every post that ever mentioned his name. Gnus (the Emacs newsreader) got this feature in 1995 under the name "nnkiboze" (other backends being nntp, nnmail, nnrss, nnslashdot etc).

  29. Re:Archive?! by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Outlook Express lets you drag messages out to the filesystem; the raw RFC822 (headers, attachments, and all) gets saved as a file with an .eml extension. When you double-click the .eml file, OE displays it in a message window.

    Thunderbird lets you save by pressing Ctrl+S on a particular message, but it doesn't work when you have more than one message selected, and you can't use drag-and-drop either. And I haven't been able to figure out how to display the message in TB again (there's a File | Open Saved Message..., but it doesn't seem to do anything).

  30. And filtering still doesn't work by Mastoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least, filtering based on Body content.

    I'm on a mailing list that, due to its nature, must accept submissions from non-members and has a public address. Naturally, it gets swamped with spam. SpamAssassin catches most of it, but doesn't add headers or change the subject; instead, it politely sends a warning message (I believe report_safe is set to 1) and attaches the original message.

    Since I have no headers to work from, I have to create filters based on body content. Simple enough, right? If it contains words foo bar baz, delete the message.

    Except it doesn't work. Didn't work in .8, doesn't work in .9. In fact, when I go back and try to edit the filter to figure out why it's failing, Thunderbird has changed the Body check back to Subject and lost the condition check. This is highly annoying.

    --
    I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
  31. Forward Wrap by jeffehobbs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the major annoyances my company is finding during our internal Thunderbird testing is this freakish behavior:

    1) user gets email.

    2) user replies to email, text wraps correctly.

    3) user forwards email and the text does not wrap at all, but instead runs off the screen horizontally causing annoying readability issues.

    Does anyone know why this is? It still appears to be in Thunderbird 0.9. I'm confused as to if it is a bug or by design. If it's a bug, it's kind of a big one. If it's by design, it's kind of a poor design and there should be an option or preference to have "reply" and "forward" act consistently.

    Otherwise, Thunderbird ROCKS -- nice work Thunderbird developers. It's fast, free and just getting better and better with each release.

    ~jeff

    p.s. Inline spell check would be nice

    1. Re:Forward Wrap by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I've seen that happen before, both with replies (only from one friend -- seems their Exchange server's sending in a wierd format) and forwards. It drove me nuts for a while, until I noticed the following:
      (reply or forward first) Go to Edit, Rewrap. This should reflow the text :)

      It is somewhat annoying, though.

  32. Outlook Address Books by JimPooley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So is it better at importing Outlook address books? I'm trying to make it the standard mail app at work, but our support staff won't budge from Outlook unless we can succesfully import 500+ contacts into the Thunderbird address book - including all notes held in Outlook's address book.
    (Mind you, even then it'll be an uphill task, despite the company having 14 Linux servers handling all our mission critical stuff, our tech. support guys are diehard Microsoft fans who are afraid of anything not by Microsoft!)

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
    1. Re:Outlook Address Books by dara · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, the address book in Thunderbird is still very primitive compared to Outlook, Evolution, or Kmail. You can't use pictures, Geo locations, there is no place for Birthday, Children, etc. - only the four custom fields and Notes. There are only two email addresses that can be stored. How in the world could it import information from Outlook without losing it?

      In response to another poster, I'm sorry, but .csv is not good enough for an address book anymore. There are too many fields (many of which won't be used for all entries) so viewing your book as a spreadsheet becomes tedious. Plus, there is no way to store picture information in a .csv file.

      I'd prefer to use Thunderbird (or Mozilla) over Evolution or Kmail since I use both Windows and Linux, but I wish the three would get together and hammer at a way to have a really powerful address book standard, leaving no vCard info behind and storing any other info not included in vCard (e.g. Last Sort View State). And of course leaving no useful Outlook info behind either.

      Dara

  33. It might have been great... by hustille · · Score: 2, Interesting
    but they still emulate braindead MS software.
    What connection is there between receiving accounts and identities? At least sending servers are separated out, but if identities have a connection at all, it's as a folder preference: I might be subscribed to different mailing lists with different email addresses.

    OK, it's definitely an improvement if you're switching from Outlook, but as linux user I have kmail...

  34. Gmail ? by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it just me, or is gmail inspiring some of the new features ?

    Looks like GMail is not so unique anymore.

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:Gmail ? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Saved search folders are part of Outlook 2003, which was probably the original inspiration.

  35. Love TB and FF, but I will not upgrade by beforewisdom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love TB ( and FF ) but I will not upgrade until features are added that I absolutely must have.

    It used to be that upgrading either of these wouldn't effect my plugins, but these days I have to redo all of my plugins after each install.

    A major pain,... I will wait until a "must have" new feature comes out.

    Steve

  36. Re:Lean and mean? by DarkSarin · · Score: 4, Informative

    just checked, thunderbird is taking 41,192K and firefox is taking 58,936K.

    Of course I do have 5 inboxes, one of which has 413 messages and the other 327 (the other three all have less than 100 (72, 15, 0)). I have two separate windows open, and two tabs in one and 3 in the other.

    What can I say, that doesn't seem too unreasonable. Note that explorer.exe is taking 16,368, and IEXPLORE.EXE with just slashdot takes 17,800 alone.

    Is firefox lean? Maybe not as much as it could be, but it is pretty good. THe fact that it opens as fast or faster than IE without the same OS hooks? Bloody ingenious if you ask me.

    --
    "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
  37. Add an interface to Gmail... by b00m3rang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and they'd be unstoppable. Seriously, the main problem I have with Gmail is the inability to sort by subject. I'm subscribed to about 50 mailing lists, and I don't want to search for each of them individually to find the latest posts for a particular group. It's silly.

  38. Re:Lean and mean? by l0b0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uh, my TB has maxed out at 60572K today, and I'm just using it for one newsgroup and twenty-something RSS feeds. And why has the parent been modded troll? This is clearly an issue...

  39. can we assign a unique SMTP server per personna? by Locutus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The last time I checked, Thunderbird did not allow me to use a different outgoing SMTP server based on the personna(reply-to) used.

    This is a big problem these days because SPAM filters at the ISP block email where the reply-to address is not within the same domain as the sending SMTP server.

    It's a must-have feature me to move to it.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  40. format=flowed? by boomgopher · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think what you're seeing is related to "format=flowed" in the content-type header of sent messages:

    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

    Though this shouldn't force scrolling AFAIK, at least when I view it in T-Bird.


    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  41. Why is it... by jeif1k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Guys, this is the Mozilla section. I already deleted the Apple section from my frontpage because I'm tired of the ceaseless Apple marketing and rewriting of history by Apple fans. Making incorrect claims that open source projects are copying features from Apple, when the opposite is the case, are insulting and just make Apple look bad.

  42. But what about local mailboxes? by Yiliar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about letting me read my local mailbox?? and Wouldn't it be GREAT to read root's mail in ThunderBird? For those of us who manage lots and lots of servers, it would be awsome to be able to read root mailboxes with a decent email program.

  43. calendar extention not yet ready by SteelRat · · Score: 2, Informative

    It should be noted that, if like me, you are a user of the mozilla calendar extention, you are hosed if you upgrade right now. Wait for the extention to catch up with the release build or be sorry.. like me. :(

  44. Re:can we assign a unique SMTP server per personna by dartboard · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can, and have been able to for quite some time AFAIK. Under the server settings for the account in question, click the "Advanced" button and choose your SMTP server. Of course you need to have created the SMTP server at the SMTP server creation screen first.

  45. Local Folders by Saiyine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is possible in this new version to remove the "Local folders" ???

    I just dont use it so DON'T want to have it on my screen.

    --
    Hosting 20G hd, 1Tb bw! ssh $7.95
  46. Needs faster searching by DJ-Dodger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd really like to switch to Thunderbird...but I just can't give up the instantaneous searching capabilities that the LookOut add-in gives Outlook. I've gotten so used to being able to search my entire Gigabyte-sized Outlook archive in less than a second that I just can't bring myself to give it up, despite the cool features I'm seeing added to Thunderbird.

    Anyone know of speedier search capabilities coming to Thunderbird anytime soon?

  47. gmail... by torrents · · Score: 2, Interesting

    now if i could read my gmail and my email at the same time i'd be praising mozilla (even more [get firefox])

    --
    Get your torrents...