Slashdot Mirror


Do Honeybees Defy Dinosaur Extinction Theories?

neutron_p writes "The humble tropical honeybee may challenge the idea that a post-asteroid impact "nuclear winter" was a big player in the decimation of dinosaurs 65 million years ago. Somehow the tropical honeybee, Cretotrigona prisca, survived the end-Cretaceous extinction event, despite what many researchers believe was a years-long period of darkness and frigid temperatures caused by sunlight-blocking dust and smoke from the asteroid impact at Chicxulub."

106 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. Anyone else besides me? by tekiegreg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Read that as "from the asteroid impact at Chix Club?" For a second I thought a hot nightclub got wiped off the planet and my chances of procreating in this world went down a notch or something...*phew*

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Anyone else besides me? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > the asteroid impact at Chicxulub

      Sorry, Scrabble players...it's a proper noun.

    2. Re:Anyone else besides me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your chances of procreating went down a notch when you put "slashdot.org" into your browser.

    3. Re:Anyone else besides me? by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sex != procreation. I don't think too many guys go to clubs with the goal of getting a woman pregnant :-)

    4. Re:Anyone else besides me? by Sebadude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot readers might, it could be their only chance.

      --
      Eh.
    5. Re:Anyone else besides me? by Sique · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But it's a geographic term, so I reject it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    6. Re:Anyone else besides me? by Maow · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sex != procreation.

      I don't think too many guys go to clubs with the goal of getting a woman pregnant :-)

      Your point may be valid, but I'm afraid it's wasted, since it was posted on slashdot where knowledge of the subject is purely theoretical.

      [ducks [and runs] ]

      rb
    7. Re:Anyone else besides me? by cfuse · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sex != procreation. I don't think too many guys go to clubs with the goal of getting a woman pregnant :-)

      And that, is of course why beer evolved. Natural selection causes drunk men to get together with drunk women and make offspring that are predisposed to do the same thing as soon as they can get fake id. The beer has a symbotic relationship with the human species (specifically, the drunk humper sub-species) and is perfectly adapted to it's environmental niche.

  2. Optimal temperature range by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This new finding is based on the optimal temperature range for honeybees and their food source - nectar-rich flowering plants (which share the same optimal temperature range), to survive.

    However if your living environment has just been destroyed by a meteor, wouldn't these creatures just "make-do" with less-ideal conditions, maybe in a smaller population?

    Honeybees are so much smaller than dinosaurs, I don't think we can really compare their adapting speed, ability and mobility.

    --
    Play iCLOD Virtual City Explorer and win Half-Life 2

    1. Re:Optimal temperature range by darweidu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do honeybees live in far northern climates? Say, in the Arctic? Because if they can hibernate for 6 months without a colony dying off, why not a year?

    2. Re:Optimal temperature range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they lived on honey for a few years. Perhaps they had really giant honeycombs where they lived in like a nuclear fallout shelter kind of way until the bad air went away.

      It was just a thought

    3. Re:Optimal temperature range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The asteroid impact model is perhaps too simple, too. The anomaly of this Honeybee finding may indicate a need for improvement in the asteroid hypothesis.

      Namely, would the temperature truly drop globally after the collision of an asteroid? Or is there an anomalous spot on earth that the temperature remains habitable (via some fluid exchange of heat or thinning of obscuring dust cloud)?

      In short, don't just jump to conclusion because there are some anomalies in a model. After all, that is why it is called "model".

      -b

    4. Re:Optimal temperature range by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, they were on Noah'a ark. End of story. ;)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    5. Re:Optimal temperature range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bees are much smaller than me, but I imagine I'm much more adaptable and mobile.

    6. Re:Optimal temperature range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Honeycomb's big? Yeah yeah yeah
      It's not small? No no no

    7. Re:Optimal temperature range by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

      as I said in my other post, I've kept bees.

      They don't need to forage. They stockpile vast amounts of honey just in case there's no food next year. On the order of 100s of times more than they need to survive a winter. A large hive untouched could probably survive 30 or 40 years with no new food source.

      They've also been known to fly 20 miles from the hive to find a food source. It doesn't take much. If it's flowering, the bees will find it. Most of the bees got their nectar, where I was, from dandelions and other weeds, which don't have very strict climactic conditions to grow.

      I'm not shocked in the least to find that they survived and dinosaurs didnt.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:Optimal temperature range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never found you living in my eaves.

    9. Re:Optimal temperature range by rjelks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I admit that I didn't RTFA, but I thought insects were a lot bigger back then. With a difference in size, wouldn't that skew an experiment today?

    10. Re:Optimal temperature range by pilgrim23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did not the cockroach predate the dinosaur? And, from what I recall, some nuclear reactors have a cockroach infestation issue INSIDE THE REACTION VESSEL! Some insects will be here long after the family mammalia has run their course...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    11. Re:Optimal temperature range by Sai+Babu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bees are capable of extended dormancy.
      Unlike dinosaurs, they store food so when 'awake' they don't 'need' forage.
      Under adverse conditions, if a lot of bees in a colony die, there is just that much food for the others. Kind of like the Donner party (not to be confused with dinner party).

    12. Re:Optimal temperature range by Holi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could it be possible that fertilized eggs do not hatch until conditions are survivable. Thus even though the previous colony had been wiped out the next generation hatched when the sky cleared and continued the line.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    13. Re:Optimal temperature range by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Still, though... 65 Mya isn't that far from Sphecomyrma freyi (the "ur-ant" - the ancestor of both bees and ants). How can he possibly claim that this animal is going to be subject to the same sort of climatic restrictions that modern honeybees are?

      Heck, even many modern bees can take cold weather. This place lists 22 species of arctic bees:

      http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/bombus/arctic.ht ml

      Are we supposed to believe with that long for evolutionary divergence, just because it "looks similar" to modern honeybees, that it had to have had the same sort of physiological characteristics? And are we supposed to make that assumption with such confidence that we just toss all of the evidence in the entire K-T layer for a meteor impact?

      --
      That's it, Mr. Giraffe, get all the marmalade.
    14. Re:Optimal temperature range by YetAnotherAnonymousC · · Score: 5, Funny

      European or tropical?

      But more important, what is their unladen airspeed velocity. And do you think tropical bees could carry a coconut to England? Or European bees?

    15. Re:Optimal temperature range by Rei · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Without knowing anything about the bee physiology vs. dinosaur physiology, it's completely speculation. The author is claiming to know about the ancient bee physiology based on modern honeybees; that argument is nonsensical, since these bees were quite divergent, genetically, from modern bees.

      Seing as 22 modern species of bees do just great in arctic conditions. Stick an ostrich there (birds being the closest relative of dinosaurs), and it will be dead in no time. There's no way to know that these particular bees can't handle a climate change better than dinosaurs.

      --
      That's it, Mr. Giraffe, get all the marmalade.
    16. Re:Optimal temperature range by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, Jesus has already been appointed to that position. However, Pat Robinson will fill-in until he arrives. :)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    17. Re:Optimal temperature range by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Actually, the article said nothing of the sort.

      "...amber-preserved specimens of the oldest tropical honey bee, Cretotrigona prisca, are almost indistinguishable from - and are probably the ancestors of - some modern tropical honeybees like Dactylurina, according to other studies cited by Kozisek"

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    18. Re:Optimal temperature range by timjdot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long can you freeze a bee before it cannot be revived? I remember reading about a 100 year old bug called a bearbug or something like that which was revived... my theory is that bugs have non-linear evolution... a bug thawed today could have been frozen very long ago.

      --
      Expect Freedom.
    19. Re:Optimal temperature range by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Stick an ostrich there (birds being the closest relative of dinosaurs), and it will be dead in no time

      One of the South American varieties lives as high up as 5000m way in the mountain tundra belt. So I would not bet on this. Same for the dinosaurs. They were sufficiently diverse to cover the entire Earth including the polar regions and at least some were covered with feathers. While the arctic 65 million years ago was not as cold as now, it were definitely not tropical.

      Actually, the heavy methals thrown into the atmosphere are likely to have contributed much more to the demise of the dinosaurs compared to any nuclear winter effect. The bigger the animal and the slower its methabolism, the higher is the effect from heavy methal intoxication.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  3. ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    here in america, we pronounce it "nuculer", you insensitive clod.

    1. Re:ahem by back_pages · · Score: 2, Funny
      I heard an anecdote from some retired military officer (cannot possibly recall who) and he said, "Yeah, I know the difference. When I'm talking about power plants and research, I say nuclear. When I'm talking about weapons, I say nukuler. I figure, when you actually have nukuler weapons at your disposal, you can pronounce it however you damn well please."

      Can anybody put a name to that paraphrased quote?

  4. Confusion... by Pi_0's+don't+shower · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought it was pretty well-established that the dinosaurs were already in decline by the end of the Cretaceous period, about 65 million years ago.

    It's known that many species were already extinct by then, and there was a large asteroid impact around that time, causing some sort of a climate change that finished them off.

    Based on the fact that many many smaller animals (rodents, birds, reptiles, amphibians) survived the event, I don't understand why it's confusing that insects (even tropical insects) survived as well. Can someone explain this, please?

    (One of the great things about /. is there's no shortage of people who'll try to explain this...)

    1. Re:Confusion... by darweidu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RTFA - tropical honeybees DON'T survive extended darkness. That's why it's odd. They aren't questioning the fact that ANY life survived, it's the fact that this fragile type of honeybees, specifically, survived.

    2. Re:Confusion... by downward+dog · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the article:

      Late Cretaceous tropical honeybees preserved in amber are almost identical to their modern relatives, she says. If no modern tropical honeybee could have survived years in the dark and cold without the flowering plants they lived off of, Kozisek reasoned, something must be amiss with the nuclear winter theory.

      The argument is not necessarily that the event directly killed honeybees (although the article also talks about honeybees' limited tolerance for cold temperatures). Basically, the idea is that flowering plants could not have survived through the event. Without flowering plants, bees would no longer have a purpose to their existence and would be plunged into a state of desperate ennui. No, wait, I mean they would starve. Yeah, starve.

    3. Re:Confusion... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Far from the impact crater a *lot* of vegetation survived - this is what destroyed earlier theories about a worldwide fire (it was actually quite localized).

      The nuclear winter theory has been challenged more than once, but the alternatives aren't so convincing (the two-asteroid theory for example).

    4. Re:Confusion... by ebuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ummm... Total darkness isn't kind to birds, plants, or other animals or insects. The darkness may not have been 100%, mabye it's just a 20% dip in available light. That's enough to drastically change plant life (and everything else).

      We've let too many Hollywood producers "visualize" the meteor impact, I'm sure it was fantastic, but it's really hard to know exactly what happened such a long time ago. Surely it didn't flip cars like flapjacks on the streets of NY, and it definately didn't enflame the entire world like Armageddon's opening screen.

      It could be that honey bees "went south for the winter" except in this case they used to live in the north, and moved south as the temperatures changed. It could be that honeybees have become genetically acclimated to our current temperatures, and can no longer accomodate temperature changes. It could be that some flowering plants could sustain them in the relative darkness. Mabye they can use alternative food sources in conditions of extreme hunger.

      A lot of my guesses are certain to be wrong, and you may come up with much better possibilities than these, but from the quality of the information in this article, nobody can support a reason. It's a shame that so much science asks the populace to take it's findings on faith, instead of showing the evidence and how they came to the conclusion. Mabye it's the lack of good scientific journalisim, or mabye journalists don't trust the population to understand, just to accept. Remember there's not even a reference to the estimated sunlight blockage or temperature drop.

  5. Science schmience... by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Funny

    The honeybees only survived because the aliens took them off the planet during the extinction, then brought them back about the time they built the pyramids.

    1. Re:Science schmience... by Xshare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Was this before or after the stargate was buried?

    2. Re:Science schmience... by wdavies · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well it finally explains the Honey Bees in the X-Files...

  6. Simple explanation by MoxCamel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Honey bees are do-bees. Dinosaurs are don't-bees.

  7. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many species of bees hibernate during the winter. All you'd need is a few queens to survive in hibernation, and they could easily repopulate the bee world afterwards.

    1. Re:hmm by The+FooMiester · · Score: 4, Informative

      IAAB(I am a beekeeper)

      All bees that live north of the carolinas need to "winter over" as it's called. They don't really hibernate perse, because bees don't sleep at all.
      They form in a cluster, and actually shiver to keep warm. The queen stays at the center of the cluster, the rest of the bees rotate around. They make flights out to relieve themselves on nice days.

      In Northeastern Pennsylvania, it takes about 70 pounds of honey to survive an average winter. Average honey production is somewhere around 150 pounds. Winter is considered to last from the first week of November to the first blossoms of the year(usually red bud maple, sometime in March)

      I don't find it odd at all that the honeybee survived a year without sunshine, especially if in the warmer months it got above 40, so the bees could fly about to collect water.

      --
      The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
    2. Re:hmm by Alsee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All you need for a species to survive is for a single colony to survive and repopulate. Of all of the bee colonies all across the entire planet, it seems quite possible that one or more of those colonies may have been in the vicinity of a volcano or other geothermal source. Such geothermal zones would create an "oasis" of warmth in a global winter. I'd wager many species survived in such oases.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:hmm by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      That is quite a leap, but as I said in my other reply to you, we don't know the methodology so criticism of that leap is rather premature. There simply isn't enough detail in that report to dismiss the research. You'll also note that many the posts do not point out that leap, but instead seem to assume that all bees are the same.

      As an aside, more and more science articles on Slashdot seem to be dominated by posters dismissing research based on perceived problems in reports of the research, rather than the research itself. It's not all that helpful to do that, especially when there are already 50 posts stating the same thing (personally I'll be handing out a few redundant moderations next time I notice this trend and have mod points). It's almost like Slashdot is becoming more cynical and more scientifically conservative.

  8. I love bees by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love bees.. Not only do they survive nuclear winter, but unlike cockroaches they wear cool rugby shirts. Sting on, my buzzy cousins! Sting on!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I Love Bees by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now I just going to sneak up on this lil rippa, and jam me thumb up his butthole!

      Oi crikey! That's really pissing him off!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:I Love Bees by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd think a bigger mystery is why crocodiles and sharks have survived virtually unchanged. What's a croc got that T-Rex didnt?

      A T-Rex is functionally warm-blooded. It may not be able to regulate its temperature, but between its mass and activity level, the core body temperature of a T-Rex will remain fairly constant. It's quite likely that the dinosaurs evolved to take advantage of this. Reduce the environmental temperature by a few degrees, though, and a T-Rex will need to increase its activity level to maintain body temperature. If there isn't enough food for the increased activity, it'll either starve to death or freeze to death.

      A croc is functionally cold-blooded. Global cooling just means it'll slow down for a while.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  9. Of course species survived it. by CedgeS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was a mass extinction, not a total extinction. If nothing had survived, we would have started over again 65 million years ago at a few species near ocean bottom vents. Many, many, many land plants and creatures survived. A much more interesting question would be, "How did Cretotrigona prisca or their close ancestors survive the mass extinction event about 65 million years ago"?

  10. Honeybees, huh... by demonbug · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay already, I'll go buy Halo 2...

    Uh, this is about Halo, right?

  11. Not only that by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite bees are the ones's from Margaret's Honey in Napa, CA. I bought a case of them last month and they keep transmitting me secret messages from space, I think. I tried to decode their message, and I think it's:
    PURC HASEHA LOTWOFO RT HEXBO X
    I think the language is Sumerian, possibly. No idea, help me out here.
    I'll get to the bottom of this somehow...

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  12. That is how smart presidents say it. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Informative

    "here in america, we pronounce it "nuculer" Jimmy Carter, who is the only president who was an actual nuclear engineer earlier in his career, pronounced it this way.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  13. Its pretty obvious then by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    The bees at some point turned into swarms of ravenous dinosaur eating killers and wiped the poor innocent helpless dinos out. There can be no other explanation.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Its pretty obvious then by rworne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The bees just ate the Grendels (and everything else that wasn't blue) when the environment changed.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re:Its pretty obvious then by RsG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm... where's my +1 obscure Niven/Pournelle reference mod when I need it? Bravo, that was easily to most obscure thing I've seen on /. or at least the wierdest that I actually recognized.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  14. Decimation?!?! by borcharc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Decimation is the Roman Army practice of executing every tenth man in a unit to ensure discipline. This is usually done to deal with rebellion or crowdedness. I was unaware they every tenth dinosaur was executed. I get annoyed when this word is used incorrectly, I would use obliteration or some other word instead.

    1. Re:Decimation?!?! by great+om · · Score: 2, Insightful

      guess what: languages evolve and the exact meaning of words can change.

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    2. Re:Decimation?!?! by lightknight · · Score: 5, Informative

      One entry found for decimate.

      Main Entry: decimate
      Pronunciation: 'de-s&-"mAt
      Function: transitive verb
      Inflected Form(s): -mated; -mating
      Etymology: Latin decimatus, past participle of decimare, from decimus tenth, from decem ten
      1 : to select by lot and kill every tenth man of
      2 : to exact a tax of 10 percent from
      3 a : to reduce drastically especially in number b : to destroy a large part of
      - decimation /"de-s&-'mA-sh&n/ noun

      See 3a.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Decimation?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Decimation is the Roman Army practice of executing every tenth man in a unit to ensure discipline. This is usually done to deal with rebellion or crowdedness.

      Actually, they usually selected the most pedantic 10% of the group.

    4. Re:Decimation?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I get annoyed when this word is used incorrectly"

      Funny, I get annoyed when prissy word-police can't handle the changing use of a word.

    5. Re:Decimation?!?! by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I get annoyed when this word is used incorrectly

      And I get annoyed by seeming pedants who themselves use malaprops. Do you really mean "crowdedness", as if they needed to eliminate every tenth man just so they could get more elbow room?

      Or maybe you meant "cowardice", which is more accurate historical motivation for the practice.

      Please, before you pick grammatical nits, make sure you know how to spell every word you use yourself. Otherwise you just look ridiculous.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  15. Beescile. by Kenja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last I checked you could pop a bee into the freezer for a few days and it will recover after you thaw it. Could this not explain how insects and other simple life forms survived the climet change caused by such an impact?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Beescile. by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Two major flaws in theory:

      1) AC electricity hadn't been discovered then.
      2) The refrigerator wasn't invented until the 1800s.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Beescile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Last you checked!? You monster!

  16. They don't really care by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do Honey Bees Defy Dinasour Extinction Theories?

    Honey bees mostly don't care. Dinasour extinction theories are not getting a lot of buzz with them.

  17. Different Mating Habits. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bees Have one Queen per hive who is always well fed even if the other drones get killed off. But the Queen always gets priority so she can have more offspring. Dinos If they are like modern reptiles and mammals tend to live for themeless And they will try to allocate the recourses for them to survive even if it means not mating or letting a pregnant female starve, so the male could live an other day. These different methods have different advantages and flaws it is can be that the Bees lifestyle seems to have given them an advantage in times of food scarcity where the queen was still reproducing while the Reptiles were off fending for themselves.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  18. Exactly by CedgeS · · Score: 4, Informative

    This tells us more about what we don't know about honeybees than it tells us about the cataclysmic event of 65 million years ago. And its not much of a mystery anyway - many types of bees hibernate, and can be kept for years in a freezer for pollinating orchards.

    1. Re:Exactly by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was the first thought that came to my mind. I'm sure they had movies, like "Encino Bee", about cavebees unthawed into modern time. And much hilarity ensued.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  19. Re:What I want to know is... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's hard to tell from your post - is it possible that you are actually a flower?

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  20. Honey Bee Behavior by dunsel · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can see how a colony of honeybees could survuve a few years of absolute darkness. We all should know how they store a lot of honey, but they have many other behaviors that help them last through adverse conditions. Apart from the queen, any bee will give its life to protect the hive. No help stoping years of darkness here, though.

    Bees eat more than nectar, they also eat polen and when both are scarce bees have been known to eat many, many other things to include other insects and assorted decaying plant matter.

    Also, a colony of bees has an intellect that is much more than the sum of the bee minds it contains. Like ants, science isn't quite sure how the bees communicate (pheremones of some sorts) but the end effect is that they can guide many others to far away flowers, organize a defense of the hive, keep the hive core temperature habitable from 40 below (F) to 120+ (F), neglecting un-needed bees to death in times of drought, and a lot more.

    So, I can see a large hive with a lot of stored food seeing the sun go away and not come back doing some things like killing/not feeding the majority of the hive, the surviviors eating what they can find, and the queen surviving years of hell to create a new colony when the conditions allow for it.

    1. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, the dance theory has to do with how a forager bee tells the rest of the workers precicely where the food is that he found. The legend goes that he first spins one way X times to denote the direction, then the other way X times to denote the distance.

      Plenty of people are sceptical of this, and alternate theories include the one that the other bees just follow the forager by his scent - like a line of ants in the sky.

      I have seen bees spin around and do this dance while they flap their wings. Every time I'd smoke them they'd all start doing it (to fan the smoke from the hive). That's how smoke "pacifies" bees, they go into "holy shit forget that guy whos tryin to take our honey, this place is on fire!" mode.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by fimbulvetr · · Score: 3, Informative

      hive intelligence.
      use google.

    3. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, the dance theory has to do with how a forager bee tells the rest of the workers precicely where the food is that he found. The legend goes that he first spins one way X times to denote the direction, then the other way X times to denote the distance.

      The descriptions of the "waggle dance" I've seen don't match the one you give. They're more like this:

      The dancing forager bee does a figure-8 path around a slashed-circle - like the capital leter theta. The straight run is what's significant.

      The angle of the striaght run with the vertical is the same as the angle between the sun and the path to the food. The bee waggles its butt while on the straight path, and the number of waggles is proportional to the flight effort to get to the food under prevailing wind conditions.

      The surrounding bees observe the dance, pick up the scent of the food source off the dancing bee, then take off BEFORE it goes out for another load.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    4. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      the distance is not related to flight effort, it's related to the quantity of visual stimulus accumulated during flight. thus a low flight of 50m is equivalent to a high altitude flight of 200m, since the visual integral is the same.

      the experiments done (with bees low down, on high buildings, through carefully patterned tunnels etc) are all really rather beatiful. Gould and Gould describe many of them, but many have been done since. (start with von Frisch, read up to Srinivasan and Zhang)

      bees are amazing, and they do it all with a brain smaller than a pinhead.

    5. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      hive intelligence.
      use google.


      Why? We're already using Slashdot, that should tell us everything we need to know about hive intelligence.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:Honey Bee Behavior by Fancia · · Score: 2, Informative

      But scientists have been able to direct bees to locations using a scentless drone imitating waggle dances, once they decoded a likely pattern; furthermore, as another poster pointed out, the dance doesn't follow quite the pattern you describe.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  21. Freezer by spoonist · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously these so-called "scientists" have never caught bees in a jar then stuck them in the freezer.

    Man are they pissed when they thaw.

    Ice age. Big deal.

  22. what??? no they aren't by mikethebends · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dinosaurs aren't extinct...they terrorized an island back in 1993 or so, and a few years later made it to the mainland (San Diego, if memory serves.)
    It was in all the papers.
    Why can't we ever seem to live in peace with these noble, flightless birds? Sigh...

  23. Did you know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Penguins have vestigial stingers.

    I think we know what happened to the bees.

  24. Not again by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    > despite what many researchers believe was a years-long period of darkness and frigid temperatures

    Please don't make me relive my teenage years...

  25. I Love Bees by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a former hobbyist apiculturalist (ie; I had my own bee hive as a kid), I can comment a little here.

    A beehive can survive for an extended period of time of bad weather. They survive pretty rough canadian winters, for one. A bee can be frozen solid and thaw out and still be alive.

    Cool weather pisses bees off. That is, they get nasty and stingy when it starts to chill. This is to protect the hive from invaders. If an invader comes into the hive as it cools off, they'll ball around it, and sting it to death. I once opened a hive in the spring and found the remains of a raccoon who decided it would be a neat home.

    The drones get kicked out about this time. They exist only to breed, and it's not worth the hives time to feed them over the winter. A couple weeks of extended cold, and you'll find a few dozen dead drones scattered about in front of the hive. They literally freeze to death on the doorstep like the little match girl.

    As it gets colder, the workers "ball up" around the queen, insulating her and the caretakers closest to her. This is usually in the center of the lowest portion of the hive, because thats usually the warmest spot. They all then go into a sort of hibernation so they need little food or energy.

    They make 100s of times more honey than they need, which is good for us. Harvesting all that honey doesn't hurt the hive during a normal season.

    I don't know how many years this volcanic winter was supposed to have lasted, but I could easily see a big hive with a lot of honey surviving a decade of less-than-optimal weather.

    They don't need to forage, like I said, they store a lot of food. Barring some asshole like me coming to steal all their honey, they could last decades. It just needs to get warm enough for the queen to carry on laying eggs and for the other activities of the hive to take place for about 2 months a year. "Warm enough" is only a few degrees above freezing.

    This would be especially true if the hive is underground, which isn't completely uncommon in the wild for honeybees to take over an abandoned gopher hole.

    In short, its really fucking hard to kill a beehive. They're designed to withstand a black bear smashing them apart and gobble down a bunch of honeycomb. I'd put my money on bees outliving a bunch of gigantic reptiles any day.

    I'd think a bigger mystery is why crocodiles and sharks have survived virtually unchanged. What's a croc got that T-Rex didnt?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  26. What a croc got? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "What's a croc got that T-Rex didnt?"

    Some crazy aussie in shorts wrestling them on TV, what? Crikey!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. Re:Maybe not by Draveed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Humans weren't even close to existing 65 million years ago. Ancient humans wouldn't have created a legend about an event that old because no human could have known it happened.

    --
    Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
  28. Re:Maybe not by legirons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Well, I know I will get hit hard for this but have to bring it up....
    What about the flood written about in the bible, in ancient writings of India, written about by the ancient peoples of middle america and in many other old cultures? Could this have been it? Could they have all drown?
    "

    How recent do you think this was?

  29. Amateur Theories... by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    of which this is one, but several people have posted things like, "bees can survive a winter," and "you can toss 'em in the freezer and they'll be okay in a few days."

    The woman's an EXPERT in the field. You think she hasn't considered this? If you read the article, it discusses, specifically a range that this TROPICAL honey bee survives in. Tropical honey bees probably don't need to adapt to survive to very cold temperatures, as it DOESN'T TEND TO GET COLD IN THE TROPICS!!!! If you're comparing them to your common honey bee that lives in the U.S., Canada, or Europe, it's quite possible they've adapted to cold weather since it DOES GET COLD THERE.

    Sorry, I don't mean to scream, but it's kind of like having a paleontologist try to tell you why your code isn't running? Thanks, but I don't need the help of a paleontologist.

    Unless you have at least a hobbyist background in paleontology, you're probably not qualified to even speculate. I'm pretty sure I'm not qualified to question her findings.

    Also, keep in mind, we're not talking about a winter that lasted a few months. We're talking about a winter that lasted a few THOUSAND years. It's a lot to ask of any creature to live outside of its normal survival temperature for a few months, let alone a few THOUSAND years. So, sticking a bee in your freezer for a few days is hardly a valid comparison.

    1. Re:Amateur Theories... by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh my god a scientists said so so it must be true!

      An expert in the field of apiculture? No. She knows fossils, not bees. She's a PhD palentologist. Oh wait, no she's not, she's a graduate student. We're talking about a graduate students thesis.

      One that's based on the fact that amber-fossilized bees aesthetically look like modern bees, and are "probably" (the articles word) the ancestors of modern bees, so therefore they must have identical biological needs.

      I've spent more years tending beehives than she did studying dinosaur bones. They really don't have "strict survival requirements" as she says in TFA. I've opened hives that should have been dead, but aren't.

      The only things I know of that'll kill a hive is a disease called foulbrood, and a condition called a "laying worker", where the queen dies, and before a new queen is reared, one of the worker bees fills in and starts laying eggs. Since eggs are being layed, the workers wont worry about rearing a new queen. Since the worker is unfertilized, the eggs will all hatch male (drones), and thats no good. The only solution is to watch very closely for a bee thats going into cells backwards, and pinch it.

      But I digress.

      Also, we aren't talking about a winter that lasted a few thousand years, we're talking about a decade tops.

      Some graduate student spouts some theory and you shout down anyone who dares criticize it. No wonder we're so overwhelmed with junk science these days.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  30. what I teach my biology students by spongebobsquarepants · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just because an animal is ectothermic, does not mean that it's body temperature is the same as air temperature. For instance in South America, certain lizards are active at extremely high altitude, where temperatures often don't climb above 15 degrees C, yet their body temperatures are nearly 10 degrees C above the ambient air temperature. It all simple heat balance. And smaller organisms can heat up more quickly due to radiative heat sources or other sources of heat due to their small body size (=low thermal inertia). So any heat source in the environment might provide refuge for these bees. and it wouldn't take much sun poking through the clouds to be just enough!

  31. the truth is out there by mcmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    The honeybees survived because they'd been breed to introduce a genetically altered strain of smallpox meant to help spread the alien virus.

  32. Self-centered scientists. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... paleontology graduate student Jacqueline M. Kozisek ...

    Did it occur to her to ask an entomologist? From Wikipedia In the autumn, young queens mate with male drone bees and hibernate over the winter in a warm area. Oftentimes, a queen will burrow into the ground to keep herself from freezing. In the spring, a queen awakens and finds a suitable place to create her hive, and then builds wax pots in which to lay her fertilized eggs from the previous winter. The eggs that hatch are female workers, and in time they populate the hive.

    I am not an entomologist, but even I can postulate a) they are triggered out of hibernation by temperature, so they just stayed until the earth heated up. Winters around here (Western Penn) can spend quite some time around and below freezing, but the ground stays near freezing. All it would have taken would have been a relative hardy handful to survive; if they haven't changed much since then it's not like they were cross breeding like crazy. Heck, for all we know there were thousands of bee types beforehand and these are the only ones that could survive being frozen as queens.

    It's almost as if this paleontologist didn't know queen bees hibernate, even for tropical bees. (See here. I will give her credit for an original approach, but even if I'm way off base (which I'll admit) it took me 2 minutes to find 'hibernate in winter' in reference to bumblebees. It may just be the article left out her accounting for this fact, but if she found out about it hopefully she can address whether or not they could have hibernated long enough.

    Ok, I know I'm rambling so I'll make my point: while the temperatures were shown to kill off flying bees, I'm curious whether she was aware of the hibernation possibility and accounted for whether the temperatures were low enough, long enough to kill them as well.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    1. Re:Self-centered scientists. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would be a young queen whos born into an established hive, and gets the boot from the previous queen.

      The situation of a single queen bee starting a new hive is fairly rare, usually when a young queen leaves, half the workers leave with her. This happens when a hive is overpopulated, otherwise there would be no young queen.

      That's what they call a swarm, and they all go looking for a new place to settle down. Now and then you might see a giant mass of bees on a post or tree limb, thats a swarm waiting for some foragers to come back and say "doods I found this awesome hollow log!"

      Usually the bees will ball around the queen for the winter, they'll vibrate to create a little heat do to friction. It's not really hibernation either, it's more of a suspended animation. They basically stop all body functions.

      I've had beehives survive canadian ice storms, with the entire hive encased in six inches of solid ice all the way around. Suffocation apparently isn't a problem for them either.

      Bees wont fly when it's cold. They'll hang around the hive all pissed off waiting for someone to sting.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  33. As Winnie-the-Pooh once said... by sulli · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can never tell with bees.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  34. Honey Bees are pretty temerature resiliant by mgbaron · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is what I know about Bees from a friend of mine who works on them in a laboratory. Bees are pretty resilient to temperature change. I one time asked him how he did his research and he told me that the "freeze" the Bees down to a certain point so that they can pick them up with tweezers and tag them and do whatever else Bee researchers do. The bees slow down enough eventually that they can be handled quite readily, but they don't actually die. Perhaps this adds more weight to the "winter" theory?

  35. Re:Maybe not by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative
    It has been estimated that if all the ice melted and the rain all come down that there would be quite a distance of water over the highest peak of the planet.

    Don't be ridiculous. And just how much is "all the rain?"
    Look. If it rained for 40 days that's 960 hours. If it reached the highest peak that's 20,000 feet of water. That's over 20 feet of rainfall per hour. In a tropical rainstorm the rain is so dense you can't see anything but water, and yet that's only a few inches of rainfall per hour. Twenty feet per hour, every hour, for 40 days, would demolish any vessel, let alone a home built wooden one. It didn't happen. Get over it.

  36. But they weren't frozen by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to the theory of the Ka-BLAM event, temperatures didn't drop more than about 22 degrees. Do the math:

    ~91 degrees (optimal temp)

    - 22 (max temp drop)

    = 69 degrees. That's far above freezing, but far below what the bees--AND the flowers--need to survive. So, according to the theory, the flowers DIED for lack of sunlight, and the bees DIED from (to them) cold temperatures. Since they weren't frozen, chemical reactions did not stop; therefore, they starved to death because they couldn't keep (from TA) vital metabolic activities running. And since they weren't frozen, their carcasses should have Rotted Away. But...

    they're Still Here. That means there's something Wrong with the theory.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:But they weren't frozen by vsprintf · · Score: 3, Funny

      they're Still Here. That means there's something Wrong with the theory.

      And it's not hard to figure out. There was no asteroid impact. Dick Cheney wiped out the dinosaurs and started the rumors of asteroids of mass destruction for obvious oil-related reasons. It's a darned good thing for the bees that you can't run an SUV on honey. (Just kidding - it's post-election humor. :)

    2. Re:But they weren't frozen by juhaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's 6 degrees celsius outside as I'm writing this (that's 42.8 F for you weird Americans).

      There are no flowers outside. Nor any bees. It's way under the optimal, colder than after ka-blam, somewhat above freezing, though... By your reasoning, that should mean that when summer comes next year, bees have starved and died.

      But... they'll be here. They are, every spring. That means there's something Wrong, eh? Maybe I'm just hallucinating and actually living in tropics. Or maybe it's teh matrix. Or maybe the bees are just more hardy than the people writing this article think.

      Pick one, occam's razor will help.

  37. Location, Location, Location by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, and both of them had a 'southern bumpkin' accent. Carter was from the south, and Jr. was just dumb there.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  38. Mystery solved. by Java+Ape · · Score: 2, Funny

    Based on what is known about the Cretaceous climate and modern tropical honeybees, Kozisek estimates that any post-impact winter event could not have dropped temperatures more than 4 to 13 degrees F (2-7C) without wiping out the bees. Current nuclear winter theories from the Chicxulub impact estimate drops of 13 to 22 degrees F (7-12C) - too cold for tropical honeybees. obviously, the temperature dropped by EXACTLY 13 F (7 C), the upper range of the bee's tolerance and the lower limit of current models. Where's the conflict? Do I win a nobel prize?

    1. Re:Mystery solved. by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's worse is, if I recall correctly, temperature changes are now understood to affect the poles more than the equator (ie, the tropics).

  39. Jeebus! by DogDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, as most people in the US obviously know (51%, actually), dinosaurs never existed, and the planet was created only about 3000 years ago, and took 7 days. So, all of this is a moot point. Your "science" is no match for the Bible, which is REAL "science" (which somebody actually told me previously, with a straight face).

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  40. A little more wood for the fire. by ebuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's the link which presents the abstract to her thesis. Having read and written a few of these, it sounded good until the latent logical fallacies became obvious.

    http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2004AM/finalprogram/ab st ract_80171.htm

    Note that she talks about optimum temperature range of the bees, and then contrasts that with projected estimates of ambient temperature drop. Then her projected temperature drop OVERLAPPS the previously projected temperature drop. Also she does not provide evidence that these bees cannot survive in a temperate climate, but again directs us back to it's optimum living range.

    Finally, she never attempts to resolve the first leap of faith in her hypothesis. That modern day relatives are metabolically identical to thier ancient ancestors.

    Maybe the actual presentation fills in these missing gaps, but I believe that if she had something really earthshaking to say, she would present just enough hints of her evidence in the abstract to make people's eyes pop.

  41. Re:As Far As I Know by Inthewire · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I like how Neal Stephenson described the destruction of the great library in Alexandria:
    It's inherently difficult to get reliable information about an event that consisted of the destruction of all recorded information .
    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  42. Aha! by njord · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this means that dinosaurs didn't really exist after all and that GOD created them!



    God 1, Science 1,000,000

  43. European or tropical? Ooh, I don't know. by leonbrooks · · Score: 2

    Heyaaaaaaagh! [gets flung into crevasse]

    Sorry, had a brief Python seizure there.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  44. And then they die... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...'coz in case it's escaped your attention, the grubs which hatch require outside care and feeding until they encyst for metamorphosis.

    The conditions TFA says that the bees die under is "much to cold to live, much to hot to suspend animation". If the eggs didn't die before hatching, the larvae which hatched would be dead within a day, probably much sooner.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  45. That's easy - by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Funny
    Honeybees were on the ark!

    [This is intended to be "funny" or "food for thought". It is not at all clear, to say the least, that the Flood and the Extinction were the same event - even if you believe in the Flood as I do.]

  46. Re:You didn't RTFA, did you? by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * these bees don't store honey, so they depend on flowers
    * the temperature drop wasn't enough to trigger hibernation
    * [not from TFA] the queen can't survive alone, nor can larvae
    * the flowers in the region don't survive asteroid winters at all
    * ergo, neither did the bees


    This is all postulated from the modern behaviour of a probably-related but definitely distinct species and wild guesswork. There is no presented evidence that the ancient species that pre-existed the event behaved in even a remotely similar way.

  47. Re:Biggest flaw by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey - has anyone thought of asking the bees whether the light stays on?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO