Slashdot Mirror


New Video Game Recreates Kennedy Assassination

theodp writes "Lee Harvey Oswald-wannabes will be able to simulate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy when Traffic Games releases the $9.99 JFK Reloaded on Monday to coincide with the 41st anniversary of Kennedy's murder in Dallas. 'It is despicable,' said a spokesman for Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy, the late president's brother."

79 of 832 comments (clear)

  1. Sequel ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one am looking forward to "Chappaquiddick II: The Game"

    1. Re:Sequel ideas? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      To be followed by the JFK Junior Flight Simulator game.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    2. Re:Sequel ideas? by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about a Grover Cleveland related game in which you try to see how many activities you can do twice on non-consecutive occasions?

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    3. Re:Sequel ideas? by roseblood · · Score: 3, Funny

      To be followed by the JFK Junior Flight Simulator game

      Or perhaps a Senator Kennedy Driving game. Extra points awarded the further you can distance yourself from the body of the woman you just killed [politicaly as well as physicaly.]

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  2. Whats wrong? by ericdano · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is wrong with it? I see re-creations all the time on the History Channel, Discovery, etc, etc, etc. Why not create a game that lets you do it? It is something that happened. Where is the upcry when you have WWII games happening??

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Whats wrong? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's see... It's:

      1) disrespectful to the family of the victim.
      2) morbid
      3) a cheap ploy to get attention for a mediocre effort.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Whats wrong? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where is the upcry when you have WWII games happening??

      Games about WWII: OK.

      Games about shoveling the dead naked bodies of Jews into ovens: Not OK.

      I guess the point is that some things just go beyond what most people think is appropriate/acceptable/good taste.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Whats wrong? by Erwos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Shooting Nazis is generally considered good form, because they're universally regarded as evil personified and with damn good reason. You'll notice that this is the objective of 99.9% of FPS WWII games. Not too many games where you start off as an SS soldier out to kill FDR, some famous Jewish rabbi, etc.

      More to the point, you get _points_ for drilling JFK just so with your rifle. That's pretty tasteless, and for a president who was liked pretty well (so I'm told) by most of the world, you'd think they could stay away from that...

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    4. Re:Whats wrong? by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good point.

      I notice that games like Battlefield 1942 never include scenarios like being one of the Soviet troops who murdered the Polish officers in the Katyn forest massacre, or playing one of the SS thugs at Treblinka.

      They all seem to be based on scenarios where the people you're trying to shoot can shoot back.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Whats wrong? by Boronx · · Score: 5, Funny

      And yet a large minority of the players devote their time to knifing hapless newbs.

    6. Re:Whats wrong? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't play enough video games to know what it is called but I recall a WWII video game where at least part of the time you were an assassin, and you had to kill specific people. You still got shot at by guards and so forth so it wasn't just a massacre, but there were rooms where everyone was unarmed and you could just pick them off.

      I agree that a game portraying Jews thrown in graves would be more offensive but it's also not that far removed from a visit to the Holocaust Museum or the Museum of Tolerance, where the conditions of Jews are recreated in rather direct ways. The difference there of course is that in the museum you play the role of the victim.

      It's an interesting question and I'm not sure where I fall on it but I can't say I'm too offended by this, especially given the explanation someone else posted that the videogamemakers want to prove that the Warren Commission hypothesis is not possible. If that's the case, then there is little question that this is a form of political speech and even historical research, poor taste or no.

    7. Re:Whats wrong? by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Shooting Nazis is generally considered good form
      The people who got drafted to go fight in Russia or France aren't people I'd be proud of killing. We're not talking about Himmler's Totenkopfeinheiten here; these are humans, many of whom would probably much rather be safe at home than in some foreign country getting shot at.

      I would be more inclined to draw the moral line at the shooting of defenseless people, if I were going to draw one.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  3. I'm suprised to be agreeing.. by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

    with Teddy Kennedy on *anything*, but this is in very poor taste.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  4. Oh my god! They killed JFK! by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those bastards! AGAIN!

    Seriously, tho, WTF?! Is this a way to commemorate what is reportedly (I wasn't born at the time, so I can't speak for it) a very sad day in US history?

    Or is this just a thinly vieled cover for the "Shrubya" skin that will be showing up on 0-day sites shortly after release?

    1. Re:Oh my god! They killed JFK! by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Read about the 10,000 - 100,000 USD contest they are running, it appears that they think that no one will be able to make the shots match the Warren Commission Report.

      That may be why they are doing it.

  5. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully it isn't this company and a Kennedy impersonator.

  6. Awww.... by empee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was hoping for a game that would let me recreate the beers that were thrown at Ron Artest on Friday night.

  7. Warren Commision. by krymsin01 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was look around on their site earlier. Seems to me that the point of this game is to get people to question the findings of the Warren commision by showing how impossible it is to pull off.

    If you can, they offer a $100,000 reward. Sounds like it's bot time to me...

    --
    stuff
    1. Re:Warren Commision. by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a new show, either on Discovery Channel or the History Channel, where they recreated the shot. The bullet pretty much did what the "magic bullet" did. Check it out.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  8. Re:If it were a different president by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Informative

    While I might or might not agree with your assessment of the Slashdot editors' political opinions, we would all do well to be careful when making remarks regarding violence towards current or former presidents, as well as presidential candidates and other high-level federal officials(elected or appointed). There are laws regarding this sort of thing. If I recall, some late-night talkshow host got into some serious trouble years ago by showing a picture of W at a podium with the words "Snipers Wanted" underneath. Or, something like that. Quite a stir arose from the incident.

  9. Oswald. by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Funny

    Campers. Bastards. The lot of them.

  10. My question is... by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can this possibly be $10 worth of entertainment? How can this be worth anything?

    I get to shoot one guy, four times? If that costs $10 bucks, I owe Bungie about 180 billion dollars.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  11. 'It is despicable,' by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, as so was your boses behavior when he, while driving drunk, killed a woman.

    But thats in the past and doesn't matter.

  12. weeeee by kaje103 · · Score: 5, Funny

    oh boy oh boy.. I can't wait until they make a simulation of Clinton in the Oval Office. Mission: Hit the mouth Fire torpedo one! The dress was hit, I repeat the dress was hit! Game Over

  13. Nintendo Power Classified Information by Gary+Yogurt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Press "back and to the left, back and to the left" on the controller after the Traffic Games logo for an extra shooter!

  14. see if you too have the skills to beat the rap! by taxman_10m · · Score: 5, Funny

    or drive Mary Jo home... which is less fun.

  15. Turnabout is fair play... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just my two cents, of course, but with videogames like this, maybe the outrage at the lack of decency should be directed a little more broadly...

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  16. seems boring. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *When the simulation starts, you are viewing Dealey Plaza through Lee Harvey Oswald's eyes: from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository. A cross-hair marks the position of your rifle sight. Controls available to you are left-click to shoot, and right-click to zoom in/out, and mouse-movements to adjust your aim.*

    so, you only get to aim and shoot. sounds quite boring, and doesn't really offer anything for the conspiracy heads either, as the conspiracy and plot is already played out with oswald as the shooter. now if you would be able to reconstruct the happenings in different ways, like placing the shooter at different locations or using multiple shooters.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  17. Too Soon? by Stubtify · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I personally don't agree with the product, I certainly hope this doesn't turn into another campaign against video game violence. It may however, since that this comes out during a time when people still lived through the event in question, yet the audience is clearly a newer generation. Shameless, yes. Outlaw it? nope.

  18. Couple thoughts. by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One, You realize that at least we have the freedom to create this recreation. Many countries could ban this, or even worse put you in jail.

    Second, Could this be to prove that the 3 bullets didnt come from the same gun? No matter what you do, you can't recreate the assignation since the bullets come from different directions?

    I thought it was proved when the home movie was finally released showing the driver getting hit, that there was a 2nd gunman.

    Or is that damn Magic bullet bullshit true? Bounces around like ping pong ball. Hey, even snopes.com doesnt explain that urban legend.

    1. Re:Couple thoughts. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or is that damn Magic bullet bullshit true?

      The History Channel (IIRC) just ran a special about that last week. A team set out to prove or disprove the single bullet theory. They constructed two very realistic torsos, placed them the way Kennedy and Connally were seated and oriented in the car, and fired a bullet exactly like Oswald used from a rifle just like Oswald's from Oswald's relative position to the limo.

      The result? They almost got a single bullet to produce all the wounds. The only difference was they broke an extra rib in "Connally's" torso-- that deformed the bullet more than apparently happened in the real assassination, and took away the energy it needed to penetrate a block of gel meant to represent Connally's thigh-- it just bounced off, instead. I thought the single bullet theory was a bunch of shit, but after seeing their recreation it certainly seems plausible.

      The show was fascinating, and I'm sure it will see another airing or two this week for anybody who's interested. I think it was "Investigating History," and if so then it's on tonight (Monday night 11/22) at 10PM ET.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:Couple thoughts. by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But just between you and me, if you were dictator, you would ban it, wouldn't you?

      (I wouldn't. In fact, I'm going to go burn a U.S. flag now, because the flag symbolizes the freedom to do just that. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  19. other shooters by syynnapse · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I suppose its somewhat in poor taste, but im all about free speech.

    I don't like that it only allows you to be oswald though. It would be much more intresting if you could also try it in the multiple shooter scenario. if this were an option, the game would be much more likely to "undermine the theory there was some shadowy plot behind the assassination" as the developer claims its purpose is.

    --

    System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

  20. Re:The last I checked... by Atzanteol · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have freedom of speech and expression the last I heard.

    Those freedoms apply to the brothers of assassinated presidents too, yes?

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  21. Change history... by MrDyrden · · Score: 5, Funny

    Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Start JFK now has 30 lives!

  22. Re:Let's see...It's not: by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are reenactments of historical events disrespectful to those involved?

    They certainly can be, and this game is one such example.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  23. Re:Let's see...It's not: by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're missing the point.

    While this is recreation of a historical detail for points, it's also recreation of a murder.

    I imagine you would be extremely upset if someone created a videogame reenacting the murder of your sister or brother, asking players to try and mimic as perfectly as possible the trajectory of the bullets that exited your loved one's skull.

    This isn't a history role-playing game, this is recreation of an actual murder.

    There's definately more wrong than right in this. You should be able to see that.

  24. Multiplayer Sequel by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Funny

    The hear the multiplayer sequel lets your friends play as the shooters on the grassy knoll!

  25. For a more tasteful take, try XIII by majid · · Score: 3, Informative

    XIII is a FPS based on a hit French illustrated series of the same name, and loosely inspired by the JFK assassination. You play the role of an amnesiac who finds out he is somehow implicated in the assassination of a US President, and must clear your name and recover your past. The twist at the end is stunning. Interestingly, the 3D is rendered to resemble cel animation, very cool.

  26. that's not really responsive by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The parent comment asked why it was any different from a WWII reenactment game. All three conditions would certainly apply. And there are hordes of WWII games, and there is no uproar.

    This is a historical event, and while all three things are probably true for many recountings of such historical events, I'm not convinced that video games should be treated differently from any other historical account. Certainly the game is there for entertainment, which makes it different from a documentary (for example), but not so different that it isn't still (at least implicitly) a narrative about an important historical event.

    1. Re:that's not really responsive by k98sven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my opinion there *is* a significant difference.

      1) Tens of millions of people were killed in WWII. The sheer number of deaths depersonalizes the victims. (Unfair as that may be) So you can't compare it. AFAIK most WWII games do not center on specific named individuals either.

      2) Time, WWII was two generations ago, the Kennedy murder was one.

      3) Morality. All but the strongest pacificts would agree that killing another armed man in war is one thing and murdering an unarmed civilian is another. WWII reenactment games usually center on warfare, not the Holocaust, for example.

      I don't see that being a 'historical event' is much of a mitigating factor. So was 9/11, and I think most people would be quite offended if someone were to make a 'hit the twin towers flight simulator'-type game out of it.

      And that would be because of the reasons stated above.

    2. Re:that's not really responsive by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've got mixed feelings about all this but let me play devil's advocate for a sec:

      1) Tens of millions of people were killed in WWII. The sheer number of deaths depersonalizes the victims. (Unfair as that may be)

      Arguably, a game that desensitizes participants to the slaughter of thousands of faceless combatants is worse from a moral perspective than one that targets a particular individual. In any case, I have seen games that focus on individuals -- Hitler, for example. And again, the Kennedy assassination is an important piece of history -- I think it would be different with say a game that focused on the murder of Joe Blow from Indiana or whatever.

      Time, WWII was two generations ago, the Kennedy murder was one.

      I see the point, but who decides when enough time has passed? There are WWII vets alive today who are probably offended by WWII games. Besides, what about games that depict (and even celebrate) the slaughter of vaguely defined swarthy terrorist-types from the middle east? We have wars going on right now that some games portray (with varying degrees of specificity). I think the real difference is that American culture recognizes one as an "enemy" and it's ok to slaughter enemies.

      3) Morality. All but the strongest pacificts would agree that killing another armed man in war is one thing and murdering an unarmed civilian is another.

      Political assassination, however, is a third case. I think you're right that we shouldn't see games reenacting the gas chambers or Columbine or whatever, but I'm not so sure about an event that involves heads of state (especially when the past 40 years of popular culture have been obsessed with the details of this particular head of state's assassination).

      I don't see that being a 'historical event' is much of a mitigating factor.

      The problem is actually that you do see being a "video game" as a mitigating factor in the other direction. The fact that this is a historical event is important for the same reason that it is OK to write a biography exposing the sexual escapades of a President while it is not OK to write one exposing those of your next door neighbor. As a public official, his death is a matter of public interest and insofar as there has been intense public speculation about the circumstances of it, well, this is just another form of expression for that speculation. I agree with many that this is in poor taste, but I don't think it's beyond the pale, at least no more so than a documentary about the Kennedy assassination.

      So was 9/11, and I think most people would be quite offended if someone were to make a 'hit the twin towers flight simulator'-type game out of it.

      They already did -- some company called Microsoft made it - in 2000. As far as a post-911 game like that being offensive -- I think the bigger problem for many people would be the game's use as a training tool. There is no way this game could be used to train for assassination unless you're planning something in Dealy Plaza. But I don't think there would be as much objection to a post-911 game that simulated the collapse of the WTC or the Pentagon in order to cast doubt on the official story -- some sort of physics simulation of the buildings coming down or the Pentagon collapsing that implies that there is no plane or whatever. That's a more apt analogy.

      Such a simulation would be too "serious" though; I think the real problem people have with this is that it is billed as "entertainment" rather than "education" or "advocacy," but we've got to recognize that many things are both.

  27. Coming soon from the same developer... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 5, Funny
    Die, Liberal, Die!

    You'll throw the switch on an electric chair holding a convicted baby-butchering doctor in this educational look at both sides of the abortion debate. Learn all about electric current, too.

    Take Dat, Bitch!

    Use a crowbar on a conniving hooker before the jury rejects her opportunistic criminal complaint against you. The game has been designed to debunk phony assault charges; after all, she's a hooker.

    Voterator

    Install and, with the help of a bottle of Windex and a micro-fiber cloth, debug the latest U.S. touchscreen polling machines. Can a vote here or there go awry? Find out when your candidate enjoys late surges in the opposition's key districts!

  28. Firefox RSS feed Live Bookmark misleading by robotoverflow · · Score: 5, Funny

    "New Video Game Recreates Kennedy Ass..."

    --
    % mkdir :
    % ls -dF :
    :/
  29. The latest Flash ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kill JFK and win a FREEEE iPod!

  30. Re:Doesn't Sound Fun to Me by ceeam · · Score: 4, Funny

    Huh! Imagine when on higher levels there are HUNDREDS! of limos with Kennedies rushing at you! Like in old arcades.

  31. UP UP DOWN DOWN LEFT RIGHT A B SECLECT START by roseblood · · Score: 5, Funny

    incase you want to get an extra shooter on the grassy knoll.

    --
    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    1. Re:UP UP DOWN DOWN LEFT RIGHT A B SECLECT START by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wrong game. For this, the code is:

      back, and to the left.

  32. Question by ceeam · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the GWB mod is due out?

  33. Re:"They Hate Us For Our Freedom!" by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um, Dude.
    When does freedom of speech = freedom to threaten another human life? Do you think someone has the right to make a video game about killing you personally? What about someone you love?

    Would you suggest that a society where threats on life are accepted and protected, would in fact be more free? That sort of system of intimidation would only sacrafice our freedom to those who have the greatest ability to end our lives.

    Lets say some very rich and powerful person were to threaten the life of the president, and for the sake of argument, there is nothing illegal about making that threat. What you would be left with is a weakened presidency, perhaps more likely to act along the idealogical lines of the man who has threatened to take his life.

    The intimidation that comes with a threat makes it just as serious as the actual act of murder. It is control based on whoever is strongest. A society free to threaten its leaders is not free, but merely bound to the will of the entity best equipped to make good on its word.

  34. Re:So, what about... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thats a great idea. Concentration Camp Tycoon, from the makers of rollercoaster tycoon and railroad tycoon. I can see it selling just about as well as lemonade tycoon...

    No, silly. It's called Sim-Camp. Getting started is easy- just follow the steps below and you'll have your concentration camp up and running in no time.

    Step 1 -- Build an Incinerator
    Every camp needs an incinerator to dispose of the bodies of its victims. To build an incinerator, click on the Incinerator tool, then click on an empty area of the map. (Note: If the smoke from your incinerator is not animating, the game is probably paused. Choose a game speed to start the smoke animating.)

    Step 2 -- Add Zones
    Zones are areas that you designate for different kinds of buildings in your compound. The people who will be enslaved in your camp need to live in Residential Zones, work in Industrial Zones, and die in Disposal Zones. Place each zone type on the city map near the incinerator.

    Step 3 -- Build Railways
    The residents will need some way to arrive in your camp from the rest of the Reich. Place some Railways along the sides of your zones. Now that the zones in your camp have transportation, you should see your death camp slowly come to life. Congratulations! You've created your first concentration camp -- you may now call yourself "Kamp Kommandant!"

  35. If you RTFWS by Shihar · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you bothered to read the fucking web site you would quickly realize that this game is hardly distasteful. It isn't a shooter where you try and whack hordes of secret service guards to kill JFK. It sounds like a project to try and show that the shot was impossible. It is a simulation. Just spend thirty seconds reading the website and it becomes pretty clear that the motive for the game is pretty pure. Hell, just skim the FAQ and you should get an idea what these people are about. If it was some KKK website letting you shoot that liberal panzy, I would agree, but it sounds more like a historian with too much time on his hands.

  36. Why stop there? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many years until we have "September 11th, the video game"?

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  37. This is a shocking game. by ttroutma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The replays and ballistics through bodies stuff is creepy. First time it showed the replay of JFK losing a chunk of brain I was actually horrified. This is different than blasting monsters a bazillion times with unrealistic weapons. It actually friggin makes you see, hear, BE the killer. On the other hand it answers a lot of questions I'd always had about the distance and angle of the shots. The sim idicates that JFK was in an exposed position, much more so than I'd ever noticed before. Randomly blasting into the car seems to take out JFK more often than the other characters.

  38. Enjoy by Anenga · · Score: 4, Funny

    The SS at your door.

  39. Guys, read the site before you jump to conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The game is intended as an "interactive reconstruction." The idea is to see how plausible the findings of the Warren Commission are. There's even a contest with a $100,000 prize if you can pull off the shots that Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to have taken. The simulation is an attempt to be so accurate that you must miss with your first shot in accordance with the assumptions they have made in recreating the events. Read all about it on the FAQ page.

    Historians are always reconstructing the assassination. The Discovery Channel once ran a special where they ran a dummy by in a car and had an expert marksmen sharpshoot at its head as it drove by. It wasn't horrifying; it was supposed to be educational. This game is clearly an attempt to show just how implausible the official explanation for the JFK assassination is. I would love to see if any player actually achieves a high passing score.

    Personal, I find the idea of this fascinating. The angle of "play as assassin and shoot JFK!" was given by Slashdot; that's not the intent. It's more of an academic exercise, and it will be very interesting to take part in this and see if the government's explanation for what happened actually plays out when you try it yourself. There's a reason they have the assassin's floor blocked off in the Assassination Museum--as Bill Hicks said, they didn't want thousands of American tourists going up there each year, pointing out the window, and realizing "There's no fucking way!"

    Of course, all of this publicity is probably more than they could have hoped for. I doubt many people would have known about this sim otherwise.

  40. Unsolved History: JFK - Beyond the Magic Bullet by calc · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was on the Discovery Channel and was called "Unsolved History: JFK - Beyond the Magic Bullet" It doesn't show to be airing again anytime soon. However, they do have the DVD for sale on their site - here

  41. Cartoon Physics sure helps get it accurate by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm quite skeptical of the games "re-enactment shows it's possible" contention. Sure, you can make a computer simulation where it's easy for the FPS player to shoot the President, but it's unlikely that they're doing the physics well enough to let anybody prove or disprove the Magic Bullet theory, and the news article and web site don't sound like they're giving you the choice of shooting from the Grassy Knoll either - just that you get to watch the bullet flying in Neo-like slow motion. It ain't science. (Also, of course, even if Oswald was the only gunman, that doesn't prove he was a lone assassin vs. getting support and funding from the Mafia or the Cubans or the Pentagon or whomever your favorite conspiracy theory likes to pin it on.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Cartoon Physics sure helps get it accurate by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Informative
      Hardly sounds like "cartoon physics":

      The ballistics in JFK Reloaded are significantly more advanced than those present in traditional "shooter" video games. This is in keeping with JFK Reloaded's status as a true simulation of the events in Dealey Plaza in 1963. For example:
      The bullets travel through the air at the correct speed - they don't instantly reach their target. Therefore you have to shoot in front of moving targets ("aim off") in order to hit them.

      As the bullets travel they are subject to gravity, and thus travel in a curved path - the further away the target is, the higher you have to aim. For example, if you shoot at the bridge, you will see the point of bullet impact quite far below the cross-hair point; shoot at the (closer) Stemmons Freeway sign, and you'll see the impact point has dropped less.

      When bullets hit objects, they react according to the material they hit. For instance, they will pass through glass and upholstery unhindered; pass through flesh with some deflection; and either glance off or pass through bone, depending on the angle of impact.

      Angles of ricochet and internal body deflection are highly accurate simulations, based on the laws of physics.
      The bullets have a certain amount of energy. As they penetrate and/or ricochet, they lose this energy as appropriate. So for instance a bullet that has already gone through a human head has very little energy left, and will tend to lodge in the next thing it hits.

      Bullets can travel complicated paths, bouncing around from object to object (within the limitations of their energy, see above). It is even possible to take 'bank shots', by intentionally ricocheting bullets off buildings.
  42. Re:Doesn't Sound Fun to Me by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

    And finally, a gigantic limo drives up, with a humongous Kennedy.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  43. MS Flight Sim by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many years until we have "September 11th, the video game"?

    It's called "Microsoft Flight Simulator" and it's been around since the 1980s...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  44. Damn Conspiracy theorists... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... keep trying to make this a multi-player game.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  45. But that's all irrelivant/invalid by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is that when people try to recreate something like this, they want to assume that what happened was precisely as was intended, and thus you have to recreate everything just as happened for it to be possible. Well, not so much.

    Assuming that the WC's report is true and Oswald was the lone shooter he had one objective: Kill president Kennedy. So, to that end he was firing at the prsident until he was convinced he was dead. Most likely by a visual clue indicating a headshot. The first two shots were misses, as least as far as he was concerned. He wasn't trying to miss, he was trying to hit, however he failed to do so.

    It's not hard ot take two shots and miss and hit with a third one, even at a moving target if you are an experienced marksman. That doesn't mean you can recreate the happenings perfectly. It will happen one way one time, another the next.

    Also, no game can accurately model the physics of what will happen. Realtime physics engines in games are pretty primitive. They can deal with the basics like ragdoll simulation on bodies, falling objects, and simple destructable objects, but any real simulation is FAR beyond what we have.

    Well, to accurately simulate a bullet impact, it takes some serious power. Bullets do NOT act intuitively, espically high power ones. Lots of people forget that the bullets fired were high powered rounds form a Carcano military rifle. Thos act quite differently from a 9mm JHP round. Their penetration is extreme, and you can easily shoot through 3 or more unarmoured people with one. TRying to say that a game can simulate the trajectory of a bullet through a complex structure like the body is just stupid.

    Sounds to me like these people are really doing one of two things:

    1) Trying to play up the consparicy nut angle saying "See, lots of gamers couldn't do it in our (highly invalid) simulation, how could it possibly have happened in rea life?" and thus "prove" their theory.

    2) Make money off said consparicy nuts.

    I see nothing here approaching valid or interesting.

    1. Re:But that's all irrelivant/invalid by ObitMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I see nothing here approaching valid or interesting.

      you sure were long-winded in replying for it to be not valid or not interesting.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:But that's all irrelivant/invalid by bryanp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oswald was such a notoriously bad shot that his coworkers (when he worked at a factory in Russia) would shoot something for him on hunts, so he wouldn't look bad to his girlfriend.

      This is a commonly repeated falsehood. Oswald was rated "Sharpshooter" in the Marines. He was able to place repeated shots in a small target at 200 yards, rather more than the 60 yards beteween him and Kennedy.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    3. Re:But that's all irrelivant/invalid by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I think it was the History Channel which just proved that that was exactly what happened.

      Using lots of new technological goodies unavailable to the Warren Commission, they were able to show that with Kennedy sitting higher than Connally, and Connally sitting slightly to the left, the bullet would have passed through Kennedys throat and into Connallys arm then wrist then leg. Exactly as the Warren Commission said.

      They even used someone who was approximately the same height and weight as Kennedy and by putting small pieces of metal on a shirt, and then doing an x-ray, the bullet wounds were exactly as were done in real life. They even had this model sit in a position just like Kennedy had been and did the x-rays with the same result.

      They even used a nearly identical rifle and fired a round into specially made recreation of the human body. A firm in Australia does it I believe. The bullet, when examined, came out almost intact. Just like in real life.

      In the past I always poo-pooed the single bullet theory. However, after looking at the Zapruder film and comparing it to the model and the computer generated recreation, I have my doubts. It does look plausible that a single bullet could have done what was done.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  46. The most despicable thing by Magickcat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that the most despicable thing is the fact that the American people have never had the people who killed former Pres. Kennedy brought to justice, not had the whole facts of the assasination revealed publically and officially. Of course, such a revelation would probably reveal things still relevant today, so it stays secret.

    If I was Sen. Edward Kennedy, I'd find this game less tasteless compared to a lack of answers and justice.

    Of course, if I saw the game sold in a store, I'd reconsider ever purchasing from them again. Thourougly tasteless and disrepectful, regardless of whatever you might happen to think of JFK.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  47. Dont give this trash publicity by cliffski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This game wouldnt sell a single copy if the media didnt splash it everywhere as some kind of scandal. Its just like the game 'manhunt' which the media got pulled from UK stores recently.
    Seriously, there are some fantastic games out at the moment, Half Life 2, Rollercoaster Tycoon 3, maybe Pirates will be good even *cough plug* my own Starship Tycoon ;)
    Its always pretty depressing to see that you can get a million dollars worth of advertising just by ensuring your game is sick and tasteless.
    Lets treat trash like this the way it deserves, and ignore it completely. there are plenty more worthy pieces of entertainmemnt out there that could be covered instead.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  48. Re:Guys, read the site before you jump to conclusi by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Informative
    The game is intended as an "interactive reconstruction." The idea is to see how plausible the findings of the Warren Commission are. There's even a contest with a $100,000 prize if you can pull off the shots that Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to have taken

    Except it's already been done. It was covered on either the History Channel or the Discovery Channel a while ago. They made models out of ballistics gel with pig bones inside, and had a shooter on a crane to get the same angle and distance Oswald had, using the same model gun from the same year, firing the same model bullets. He made the shot, the "wounds" on the ballistics gel model matched the wounds on Kennedy and Connely, and the damage on the bullet was almost identical to that of the so-called "magic bullet".

  49. Re:Doesn't Sound Fun to Me by rleibman · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's already a humongous Kennedy. He senates for Massachussets.

  50. Re:Guys, read the site before you jump to conclusi by Phil+Karn · · Score: 4, Informative
    This game is clearly an attempt to show just how implausible the official explanation for the JFK assassination is.

    Actually, the authors are trying to show exactly the opposite, that the Warren Commission made perfectly reasonable conclusions. Perhaps you should actually read what the game's authors said before you spout off your tired old conspiracy theories.

    ...they didn't want thousands of American tourists going up there each year, pointing out the window, and realizing "There's no fucking way!"

    Funny, when I visited Dealey Plaza, it seemed so... small. Then I visited the Sixth Floor museum and stood next to that window. That shot was easy! The only mystery is how he actually managed to miss one shot out of three.

    By the way, I've actually read the Warren Commission report. Have you?

  51. New theories for JFK tinfoilers by tod_miller · · Score: 3, Funny

    By analysing the information gained from the release of the game, we now believe that:

    "The killer grenade jumped the parade, and bunny hopped across to a grassy knoll where it spray pained a clan logo before shouting 'j1h4d l0l rotflmao gg' and then using an aimbot to assassinate JFK.... the final words of the killer before police emptied the munitions budget of a small state into him was: k1ll4h dropped - connection reset by peer"

    Games.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  52. Killing USA:s president is trivial, but... by JollyFinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Getting away with it these days is nearly impossible...
    [Trivial, with money and manpower inside united states, and with some time for preparitions.]
    Quicklist:
    Someone inside does it with poison or something: blackmail, bribe, personal hate towards president etc...
    Longrange rifles and explosive bullets 2 kilometers away from target...
    Mortars 8 kilometers away from target... Best would be if you could get enough firepower to take down a building, if not then in the street right in front of it.
    Bazooka trough a wall...
    Burry explosives before hand to a location you know president will be at sometime future....
    Best location would be a large bridge. Feed the sharks below the bridge before hand just to make sure...
    Navy/airforce insiders... Well get missile, zero it to a building where president is. Hit the fire button. Or better yet. Use insiders to get it from armory, deliver it withing its range to the president and then fire it at the target...

    Now none of the tricks are something you could get AWAY with actually, so there has to be something more important than persons own life for a motive to do it. Doing it isn't going to make anything better, you just get another dumb polition that does same mistakes, perhaps few additional mistakes os it won't solve a thing.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  53. Dubya character?! by b374 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where can I download a Dubya mod/character?

  54. Re:Doesn't Sound Fun to Me by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Informative
    He senates for Massachussets.

    Verbing weirds language....

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  55. Re:Guys, read the site before you jump to conclusi by Fade_to_Blah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually there was some damage. The bullet head was flattened out some and lead was starting to come out the back of the bullet. The discovery channel show's bullet matched the photos from the magic bullet with unbelievable accuracy.

  56. Re:Guys, read the site before you jump to conclusi by CreatureComfort · · Score: 4, Informative



    As someone who lives in Dallas and has been to the six floor museum several times I can definitively say you are full of B.S.

    The entire six floor is dedicated to a museum covering the event. Until a couple years ago, you could actually crouch down at the window, in the exact position Oswald was in. They had to block that area off (about a 10'x12' area) with glass walls because idiots kept trying to "rearrange" things or "leave momentos" that they had been there. I believe that you can actually still get into the area, you just have to pre-arrange it with the curating staff.

    The six floor museum is actually the best museum on a political subject I have ever seen. I really expected it to be highly biased, one way or another, however, it turns out to be an incredibly unbiased and thorough review of all the credible work that has been done on the assasination, as well as a good, unbiased review of Kennedy's life and presidency. I was overwhelmed the first time I went through with all of the information presented. I've been back 3 times, by myself, just so that I could spend timing examining some of the displays and presentations, rather than rushing through with visiting family and friends from out of town.

    Even if you aren't really interested in museums or the assasination, I would still definate recommend a stop at Dealy Plaza and the museum if you pass through Dallas.

    --
    "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
    Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  57. Re:Doesn't Sound Fun to Me by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think it's supposed to be fun. It's supposed to be educational. BTW, I wrote a JE a while back with this very idea: Prior Art.

    That's nothing. Back in the 80's a buddy and me wrote a game based on the Kennedy assassination for the Commodore 64.

    It was kinda cool. It played a cheesy version of "Hail to the Chief" while you shot at the president. If you remember the kind of sounds that came out of a Commodore, you know what I mean.

    Naturaly, not everybody thought it was as funny as we did. My girlfriend came home from work, took a look at our game and the collection of beer bottles around the apartment, and made a face like she'd bit into a lemon. She asked us, "Don't you two shingle-heads have anything better to do?"

    I gave a copy of it to friend to take to work with him at the water department. He showed it to some old man who worked there. I understand the old geezer flipped out, and threatened to call the FBI on us.

    We uploaded it up to some bulletin board, and promptly got banned after some of the other customers complained.

    I guess we should have stuck with it, since it looks like there's a buck to made.

    But we didn't exactly get a lot of encouragement at the time. Didn't look very promising. I wonder if there's still a copy of our version floating around on the net some where?

  58. Who are "the people"? by TFGeditor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyday citizens comprised militias. They were not "armies," but ordinary people who could be called up wen needed. They supplied their own weapons. Hence the phrase "the right of the people." To say the second amendment does not apply to individuals is to say likewise of the first and fourth, which contain the same language--"right of the people."

    --
    Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.