Slashdot Mirror


NOAA Adopts New Net Policy

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has adopted a new policy which applies to provision of all National Weather Service environmental information, including forecasts, warnings, and observations. In June, /. reported that NOAA was taking comments on the proposed policy. Hundreds of Slashdotters responded. And it made a difference: NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate. Congrats to the Slash community for making a difference and helping to set US Govt policy.

204 comments

  1. free weatherbug? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does this mean someone could write a free version of weatherbug that doesn't include the annoying spyware and registration? That'd be nice.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just get yourself the WeatherFox extension for Mozilla Firefox to use instead. That way not only is the code of it free (as in beer and freedom), but also the updates come from the Weather Channel and not the Weather Channel rejects that end up working for WeatherBug.

    2. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, I'll write one but it'll use Clippy. "You seem to be getting hit by a PYA hurricane."

    3. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.singerscreations.com/AboutWeatherWatche r.asp Weather Watcher is far better. Try it - it's fantastic. No ads, no nagging. The author accepts donations.

    4. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It needs a background MIDI of Debussy's The Snowflakes Are Dancing, covered by Tomita.

    5. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is where the hell is this free beer people keep talking about? Because I'm totally there.

    6. Re:free weatherbug? by bconway · · Score: 1

      What do you mean could? wm[w|W]eather has been around in various incarnations for 5 years.

      --
      Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
    7. Re:free weatherbug? by Curtman · · Score: 1

      You mean like gweather, which has been part of GNOME for what 5 years now?

    8. Re:free weatherbug? by mrgreenfur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's already several. Here's one for firefox:

      http://forecastfox.mozdev.org/

    9. Re:free weatherbug? by goon+america · · Score: 2, Interesting

      #!/usr/bin/expect

      spawn telnet rainmaker.wunderground.com
      expect "Press Return to continue:"
      send "\n"
      send "bdr\n" # replace with your own 3-letter city code
      expect "Press Return to continue"
      send_user "\n"
      exit

    10. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Would you like me to format a S.O.S letter for you?"

      Yes|No|Cancel

    11. Re:free weatherbug? by gmuslera · · Score: 1
      I solve my weather needs in another way. Pick a webpage with the N-day forecast for my city (not living in USA, so must support international weather), with a script download it once a hour or so, trim the downloaded page to have just the weather report (with very simple regex) and include the resulting html snippet in my browser homepage (where also have the most current visited sites, interfaces with search engines and so on).

      Is very browser/os independant, works even if im not at home/my computer and shortens a bit my web navigation.

      But if that is not enough, as i still have space in the KDE kicker, i have there the kweather applet that at least show the current weather.

    12. Re:free weatherbug? by dcigary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude! That's awesome! Just another reason why I love The Weather Underground! I looked high and low for a simple weather page with a radar image that I could display on my Treo 600, and I found it.

      --
      ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
    13. Re:free weatherbug? by hab136 · · Score: 1
      Just get yourself the WeatherFox extension for Mozilla Firefox to use instead. That way not only is the code of it free (as in beer and freedom), but also the updates come from the Weather Channel and not the Weather Channel rejects that end up working for WeatherBug.

      Here's a link: http://forecastfox.mozdev.org/

    14. Re:free weatherbug? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Dude - I've written something like that already.

      I was approached a while ago about building a small module for a website to pull in temperature and humidity (factors which affect concrete drying times, apparently). My geek nature kicked in and I hunted down a means for obtaining all the weather info without having to rip off a weather.com or similar site.

      I was able to FTP to NOAA servers for free/anonymous, download the most recent file (once an hour is all I bothered with), and parse it into a database. Part of the difficulty was lining up the ICAO codes with the location, but since I have place names (city, state, country) it wasn't that bad. I ended up integrating it into a project of my own. The concrete site project never solidified.

      So yeah - you could do that yourself. You'd want a server to handle the load, though - not relying on the NOAA servers for each client connection/update. So it would be free to the clients but it would cost you something. That's probably why it hasn't been done without spyware/registration/crapware.

    15. Re:free weatherbug? by UFNinja · · Score: 1

      It's actually called ForecastFox now and can be found at http://forecastfox.mozdev.org :)

    16. Re:free weatherbug? by gmknobl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now THAT'S funny. Regardless of any political comments I feel like posting these days about the neo... uh, I promised I wouldn't go there.

      Where's that free Guiness Draught (in a can)? Love those little sherical gassy pods, man!

    17. Re:free weatherbug? by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Tab 1 + Tab 2

      There's my weatherbug. Honestly, what does weatherbug have to offer that a simple bookmark in mozilla doesn't, besides another potential problem for your computer?

    18. Re:free weatherbug? by wworf · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're using windows, I'd suggest using Weather Corner Alert. It's unobtrusive and accesses METAR data from NOAA. Why would you want something that accesses a commercial (though free) source if the whole purpose of this story was to gain more free access to public data?

    19. Re:free weatherbug? by lotsofgadgets · · Score: 1

      Another choice would be Weatherpulse from Tropic Designs. No ads and it also gets it's updates from the Weather Channel http://www.tropicdesigns.net/weatherpulse/weatherp ulse-setup.exe

    20. Re:free weatherbug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter who you get it from, all weather data on the internet (except for the BBC) for anywhere in the world ultimately comes from one of two sources: the NOAA NWP output and the NWS.

    21. Re:free weatherbug? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      How about this one? You can use the "public API" URL template:

      http://www.wx.com/radar_servlet.cfm?zip=<ZIP>&si ze =0

      or the URL rewritten by the server to include local city names at image coordinates:

      http://www.wx.com:9030/javaimg/servlet/Radar?hou r= <GMT>&cell=<MAP-CELL>&dir=1&size=0&citycount=3&cit y3=New%20Haven&x3=220&y3=117&city2=Hartford&x2=237 &y2=38&city1=Bridgeport&x1=202&y1= 129

      The smallest image is 300x400pxls, but that squeezes legibly. You might make a personal webpage with a column of images for the hours, and just scroll down. Damn, this Treo is great when Sprint isn't screwed up!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:free weatherbug? by randyjparker · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just corresponded with Jon, the developer of ForecastFox. I work as a contractor at The Weather Channel, and was surprised that they had objected to the name 'WeatherFox'. Jon explained that it was the owner of the domain name weatherfox.com that objected, not TWC.

      TWC is actually a huge supporter of open source software, to the point of providing full time employment for a FreeBSD kernel developer. We've directly funded some other open source projects too, and try to give back in lots of ways.

    23. Re:free weatherbug? by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      Really? I just can't stand nitrogen in my beer. It's got to be carbonation. I know plenty that don't mind it, but I just can't stand the taste/sensation.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    24. Re:free weatherbug? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      "You seem to be getting hit by a PYA hurricane."

      "Would you like to buy some MSPlywood to protect your Windows installations?"

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    25. Re:free weatherbug? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1
      Excellent news. This means that it is very unlikely that 'The Weather Channel' would attempt to control access to the data that forecastfox uses.

      Of course, there is no guarantee that it won't happen in the future.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    26. Re:free weatherbug? by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Just browsing the pictures of Weatherpulse, it seems like its overkill for your average user.

    27. Re:free weatherbug? by wsanders · · Score: 1

      http://weather.gov/radar/images/DS.p19r0/SI.kmux/l atest.gif

      For KMUX radar. Replace "kmux" your own local radar code.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  2. Good stuff! by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's good to see a Government agency actually doing something proactive with technology! Props all round.

    1. Re:Good stuff! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is scary stuff. If the terrorists got their hands on weather reports in the USA there is no telling what trouble they could stir up. I imagine this kind of thing should remain secret and proprietary.

    2. Re:Good stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Ashcroft! You had your four years.

    3. Re:Good stuff! by dubdays · · Score: 1

      No kidding...hell must have frozen over. It seems rare anymore that the government actually does something cool AND does not have it cater entirely to Big Business (with Dubya in office, no less) for use to their own ends. It seems as though the weather industry must not have a whole lot of money to "donate" to (*cough*buyout*cough) our polititians. Does anyone know if this is true or not?

    4. Re:Good stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you are right. just look what they have done in Slovakia recently...

    5. Re:Good stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, Everyone! Be ready. It's not over yet. I'm a former Accuweather employee and I can tell you that Barry Myers is only going to goto the next level now. So get ready to write letters to your congressmen!

      --Ray Allen.

  3. Pies by Zilverfire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Pies and cookies all around Congrats ya'll --------- "I just want you to know, rocks arn't people" - Tucker

    --
    "Could you put that in a memo entitled, SHIT I ALREADY KNOW!" - Sarge
  4. Hmmm... by floridagators1 · · Score: 0

    Just try not to yell at the weather man! Remember, he can't predict nature...

  5. The system works!!! by plover · · Score: 5, Informative
    Slashdot even got an honorable mention in the NOAA writeup (third paragraph)!

    I'm happy because my concerns were addressed. I was afraid that the proposed policy was going to give commercial interests the ability to reqeust the NOAA discontinue a service without review, meaning that if weather.com didn't like the ability of the NWS to issue point forecasts they could behind-the-scenes ask for it to be ended. The modified policy now states they will "Establish... orderly processes for seeking input and suggestions to create, modify, or discontinue products and services".

    It's a cool feeling to be a part of a process that actually seems to have worked to our advantage for a change.

    --
    John
    1. Re:The system works!!! by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Slashdot even got an honorable mention in the NOAA writeup (third paragraph)!

      Even if they did get the URL wrong :(

    2. Re:The system works!!! by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Good thing it redirects.

    3. Re:The system works!!! by Forbman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At least wxunderground.com will let you see the fleshed-out NWS scientist commentaries on the weather forecasts, along the lines of "two of the models predict X, but Model A predicts not X, and it seems to be more accurate this time of year, so I'm going with the Model A.", etc.

      The NWS/Accu-Trak/TWC reports are what the weather puppets on TV/Radio read anyways. Not too many actually bother trying to interpret things on their own anymore. Tom Skilling @ WGN comes to mind.

      If you remember wx.purdue.edu in the old days, this was probably the most awesome weather information site available (also had wx.washington.edu, etc.). Well, the atmospheric sciences people I think got tired of hosting these public wx sites ($$$), and they went non-public in the DotCom days, but now it's in a commercial form of wxunderground.com.

      Weather.com's stuff just sucks.

    4. Re:The system works!!! by idiotnot · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can find this stuff pretty easily from NOAA if you take a look around. I'm a broadcaster, and I look at these every day when I'm preparing my forecasts. We get prepared weather from a commercial provider, but I find it to be severely lacking, because the community my station serves has weather that can be quite different, depending upon where you are. During the winter, you can go from just rain to a foot of snow within 40 miles.

      Here's the site I visit every day. Take a look at things like the "Area Forecast Discussions." While they're a bit cryptic to read, they give you a better picture than the limited local forecast.

    5. Re:The system works!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot even got an honorable mention in the NOAA writeup (third paragraph)!

      What the hell is slashdot.com?!

    6. Re:The system works!!! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well I guess in markets without remarkable weather you might have airheads reading reports, but in "lake effect" Cleveland almost all of the channels (except FOX) have a couple actual meteorologists on staff for the weather department. Weather here is fleeting but often brutal, as the saying goes "if you don't like the weather, wait around it's sure to change". Personally I've used weatherunderground.com for about a decade. Recently they added a cool feature which got me to pay for daytime radar, they now added the storm prediction vectors to severe weather systems on their animated radar maps. They also have the predicted precip, cloud height, hail size (if applicable), etc for each front. The subscription paid for itself when I could see a major hail storm was heading right for my area last spring, I moved the car under the carport just 10 minutes before 3+ inch hail caused major damage to my neighbors vehicles (it stripped half the trees by my apartment since it was driven by 60+ mph winds). But having freer access to the info we are already paying for with our taxes will be nice =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:The system works!!! by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1
    8. Re:The system works!!! by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yup, I can vouch for that. While I am not a broadcaster, I am a hardcore weather nerd. I visit the local forecast discussion daily. It offers the details that you simply cannot get anywhere else. During the spring/early summer months, the forecast discussion pages offer a *gold mine* of information on where the severe weather will be. Depending on how closely the models agree with eachother, I can usually get enough advance notice to make an eight hour drive to see some action.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    9. Re:The system works!!! by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Are you in Buffalo, by chance? :)

      NOAA data is excellent, I'll agree with that... Only having pulled tons of it for nationwide map display, and of course I'd love to just have a nice GIS layer of every piece, but what's there is sweet enough.

    10. Re:The system works!!! by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Yep - the discussions are great - I also check the Forcast Systems Labs Mesonet data (I also run a station that submits to the mesonet). Run a station, get your skywarn training, and you might be surprised (well YOU won't be, but some reading this will be) you may even get to know the forcasters at your local NWS office. Then when things get strange, you might even get a phone call, or call them. I've had them call me and ask for some local conditions

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    11. Re:The system works!!! by bobsalt · · Score: 1

      yep, I been using them for last couple of years...

      http://www.crh.noaa.gov/

      sure beats all the crap you get at the other sites...


    12. Re:The system works!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity they didn't spell my name right...

      Sincerely,
      slashdot.org

    13. Re:The system works!!! by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Haha....no, Eastern Virginia, but the principle is the same -- proximity to the water. No rain at the beach, all snow inland.

    14. Re:The system works!!! by Cumstien · · Score: 1

      No question that weather.com is poor. Weather.com sensationalizes their forecasts, if the NWS says 40% chance of rain, then weather.com says 50%. If weather.com had their way, we'd experience constant blizzards, heat waves, down pours, hurricanes, and tornados. Nice average days don't sell advertising.

      Personally I find http://weather.unisys.com/ to work quite well.

    15. Re:The system works!!! by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Come on now, I'm down here in Springfield now... we don't get SNOW here!!

      Well, not any that really counts anyway. :)

    16. Re:The system works!!! by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I'll guess that the scientific discussion on weatherunderground.com is the decoded/parsed NWS stuff that is part of their data stream...

      But where I live, I really like the local weather stations. In the summer I can go north on Hwy 99W about 3 miles into Amity and go from sunny and dry at my house to pouring rain. Not t-storm rain, because the rain track is right over the Eola hills, and then watch later on the PDX news how bad Hillsboro or downtown PDX got soaked, while wishing I had irrigation rights...

  6. Government not a lost cause yet by TimmyDee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This just goes to show that not all hope is lost in participatory government. I know I get frustrated at times with how much clout corporations have in government operations, but every now and again I get a little glimmer of hope.

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
    1. Re:Government not a lost cause yet by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ironically, the bureaucracy apparently listens better than actual elected officials!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Government not a lost cause yet by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      This should also remind people that there is a helluva lot more to participatory government than voting once every four years. Democracy should be about people participating in the decision making process, not simply rubber stamping decisions made by the elites.

      In a lot of ways, Democracy is what we all make of it. Which, when you look at the state of it in much of the West, is actually pretty sad.

    3. Re:Government not a lost cause yet by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Which only makes sense. Elected officials are looking where the real money is coming from. And it sure as heck is not from us the taxpayers. Well not direct anyways.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Government not a lost cause yet by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Thats common many places. The bureaucracy tends to have strict rules about how to handle consultations and how to handle questions and comments exactly because they are not elected and so their only way of ensuring there are no questions about the legitimacy of their actions is to hide it, follow orders from elected officials, or keep everything scrupulously to established procedures and document every step. Elected officials on the other hand can usually play the "I was elected, so I represent the will of the people" get out of jail free card, whether or not they actually give a shit about their constituents without being expected to back up their views with anything.

    5. Re:Government not a lost cause yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but only if we could get the Bureau of Standards (or whatever it is now called) to publish standards for streaming video protocols and such and use its purchasing power in the market place in favor of such things so we could get out from under Real*Media and Windows Media Player.

  7. A good result of the "Slashdot Effect" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Showing people that there are a lot of us out there to consider, those who know what they are talking about and can show others how to support everybody at once... not just the majority (and proprietary) slice of the market. Kudos!

  8. Well... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Least they listen every once in a while. Still, it's good to see that at least ONE agency remembers that the people are supposed to run the government, not the other way around.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    1. Re:Well... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      Er, it's also the other way around. Also.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:Well... by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      at least ONE agency remembers that the people are supposed to run the government

      Agreed. Or, at the very least, they realize that when it comes to the weather, information literally saves lives. Remember, the guys at NOAA are largely scientists out for one cause: protecting life and property. It's no accident that NOAA is part of the Department of Commerce...

      In any case, this is a prety major victory worthy of celebration!

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    3. Re:Well... by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      It's still government that holds the keys. The people may influence government, but by the very definition of government (*), the people and the government are two very distinct groups.

      (*) Government is the organization which holds the unique right to initiate force as a means to an end; anyone else who does so is a criminal. That is the only absolute, universal way to define government.

      So no, the people cannot logically "run" the government. At best, they can influence government's decisions on where, when, and how to apply the unique right to initiate force.

    4. Re:Well... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      The Founding Fathers, by the definition of the laws at the time, were criminals. Breaking the law does not necessarily mean that what you are doing is ethically wrong, especially if the law is oppressive. What most governments who decide that they can ignore the people find is that the people, once sufficiently pissed off, can quite well apply force right back, whether it's legal or not.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    5. Re:Well... by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      Breaking the law does not necessarily mean that what you are doing is ethically wrong, especially if the law is oppressive

      I'd be the first to agree with that. Morality and law are completely seperate and distinct concepts which rarely intersect. The only unambiguous, consistent, and universal way to define morality is in terms of human interaction between two or more parties, by the principle of non-aggression.

  9. Hundreds by glass_window · · Score: 2, Interesting

    'Hundreds' is right! I searched their "comment" pdf for slashdot and had to tell it to stop at around 500 and I'm sure it would have kept going for quite some time.

    1. Re:Hundreds by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      According to that PDF file, the total comments as a direct referral from slashdot numbered 483. That doesn't count the /.ers that clicked on the nws.noaa.gov/fairweather link first. The response was overwhelming, and I'm smiling very widely knowing that yes, the system does -- sometimes -- work.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    2. Re:Hundreds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the page "new policy" hosted on noaa.gov mentions "slashdot.com". I guess that's a start.

  10. Government not a lost cause yet-Poster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe all the "But I'm helpless..." posters should print this story out, and put it on their wall.

  11. NOAA's electronic survival by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, since "Hundreds of Slashdotters responded..." and NOAA both kept functioning and was able listen to the comments, would it be safe to say that they weathered the storm?

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:NOAA's electronic survival by Betelgeuse · · Score: 1

      It's times like these that I wish there were a "+1, Groan" moderation option. . .

      --
      I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  12. yay for superkaramba! by 54v4g3 · · Score: 0

    so does this mean that all those nifty superkaramba weather checking apps will be better?

    anyway, congrats slashdotters! this just goes to show that people, en masse, can make a difference.

  13. Just think, if we had disposable millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We might be able to lobby for something useful. The joys of capitalism.

    1. Re:Just think, if we had disposable millions by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      The joys of capitalism.
      You misspelt "democracy"

  14. Thank you all for your contributions! by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm posting this for my brother who works out at the NOAA as an advanced research analyst.

    --- Begin ---

    Hi there Slashdot, yes, I'm a total weather freak and as such I was really glad to help serve you guys and field your comments, questions, and complaints.

    What really hit home for me was how passionate many of you are for our services and that they be delivered in an open, fair medium. As technology advances, some of us tend to go for the first choice, and Microsoft, Oracle, and other closed-source large companies were trying to influence our decisions.

    It was thanks to you the people of Slashdot that our eyes were opened and we have begun to embrace cheaper (which my manager likes) and more open (open-source) tools.

    Thank you and it's my pleasure to help serve you and continue research our weather systems here on Earth.

    Sincerely,
    David M. ******* (name withheld for privacy)

    --- End ---

    Enjoy guys hope that was interesting as a first-hand perspective.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Thank you all for your contributions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad you've gone the right route. Using proprietary software in the days before GNU/Linux would have been understandable, and some useful work was done even under those limitations. But with alternatives there is really no excuse to be using it. Besides, all real research equipment is migrating to Linux these days anyway, so compatability is definitely an issue.

    2. Re:Thank you all for your contributions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that's really cool! I wish you the best of luck in all your open sores endeavors.

  15. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [ OT: your math skills need updating. Slashdotters have a much higher combined IQ than a flea (750,000 users will get there by sheer quantity if nothing else.) What you probably meant to say was the average Slashdotter has the IQ of a flea. ]

  16. term 'slashdotting' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's whole new meaning for ./ -effect. I hope we could ./ the world, starting from software patents.

  17. Ok, now what about by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    all the hot air in DC?
    Can we get some action on that?

    1. Re:Ok, now what about by burns210 · · Score: 1

      light a match?

  18. Re:Fight Club. by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like Chuck Palahniuk as much as the next burnt-out twenty-something office worker, but like Nietzsche, not everything he writes is an endorsement of what comes out of his pen, or for that matter, the gospel truth.

    YLFI,
    a beautiful and unique snowflake
    --
    One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  19. If only... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


    > NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate.

    Now if only we could get the Feds to make their porn available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form, and use other dissemination technologies such as satellite, radio, and wireless.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Now if only we could get the Feds to make their porn available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form, and use other dissemination technologies such as satellite, radio, and wireless.

      You can find some naked chicks right here.

    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot damn, those are some fine ass chicks!

  20. Listening to geeks??? by hcsteve · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Korea, only old people take recommendations from slashdotters.

    --
    If you were a hot dog, and you were starving, would you eat yourself?
    1. Re:Listening to geeks??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just give it up. It's okay to let go.

    2. Re:Listening to geeks??? by marvy666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hahahahahha you fail it!

  21. Slashdot.com is real! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can access it on the internets

  22. See? by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not every *AA is evil!

    1. Re:See? by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      But they're NOAA, you see...

      --
    2. Re:See? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Not every *AA is evil!

      Just wait until NOAA has weather control figured out.

  23. We'll see how long... by Forbman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this lasts.

    All it will take is someone from TWC or some of the other commercial repackagers of NWS information who happens to have been a good RNC/TeamW contributor to put a whisper in Karl Rove's ear that NOAA is out of line here, that those commie freeniks should have to pay for the information, and it will then fall under some blanket of the US PATRIOT Act, National Security, DMCA, etc., so that their handle on the data from NOAA/NWS is impenetrable for the untermenschen (ie., the rest of us).

    1. Re:We'll see how long... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Exactly so.

      Someone here at /. should start a pool on
      just how long NOAA will hold this position.
      In today's political climate, it is not
      very difficult to imagine that all that
      taxpayer-funded weather forcasting (and
      research) will wind up being commercialized,
      and "public" data being held hostage to
      secrecy and the DMCA (under the guise of
      "national security"). As if anyone with
      a barometer, a wet bulb, and a window
      wouldn't eventually figure out the weather.

    2. Re:We'll see how long... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it TWC that paid for the DRI Radeon8500 drivers? I think your tinfoil hat is too tight.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:We'll see how long... by St.+Alfonso · · Score: 1
      Oh, come on .. you can do better that that ... how about the part where evil genius Rove, at the bequest of the dark Wizard of Redmond and Larry the Impaler, rounds up masses of hippie-freak Linux and mySQL users for internment into Windows/Oracle re-education camps.

      Oh, and don't forget to work in the Illuminati somehow.

      Crikey, it must be tough going through life so paranoid.

    4. Re:We'll see how long... by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Hmm... useful information like cell phone system outage briefs get cloaked away because "terrorists" could use the data. Like anyone with a couple of thousand dollars of hardware and software, a GPS receiver, a camera phone (!) and some good local maps couldn't go around and discreetly, casually map out the local cell phone infrastructure over a period of a few weeks?

      Then, map out the cell coverage areas, and map out which ones need to be knocked out to render an area or few (need to do a few dummy areas with some bogus dummy action first) before going for the big one.

  24. NOAA & EAS by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Informative

    It can never be emphasized enough how utterly valuable a SAME equipped weather radio can be. They do not just allow you to get up to the minute weather reports, but they also act as your first warning of any kind of serious emergency in your area.

    Warning sirens are only intended to notify people outdoors, and TVs and radios are only useful if you are awake, the unit is on and you are within earshot and paying attention at the time.

    When NOAA or an emergency management agency (NOAA allows them to utilize the system without running the transmissions by them first) sends out a warning message, it is proceeded by what sounds like intermittent static. In fact, the system is sending out a burst of number sequences that are decoded by SAME equipped radios that compare the number sequence to that which the user has previously entered. If they do not match, the radio ignores the message, if they do match however, a generally ear-piercing alarm sounds while the radio interprets the alert code and displays the corresponding text message before the computer voice announcement (or real person if the situation warrants it) from the NOAA station begins to broadcast. The process takes about 10 seconds (this is to give you a chance to get closer to the radio before the voice warning begins).

    Here is a complete list of all of the emergency codes

    They are not as cheap as a clock radio, but they are worth every penny. I'm still astonished when I come across people who live in tornado-prone areas who don't buy them despite their financial ability to do so and their fear of dangerous weather.

    1. Re:NOAA & EAS by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Fear of dangerous weather OR the lack thereof.

      My parents have one and I can still vivdly recall a few years ago when a tornado touched down nearby. We knew about it, and by golly, we were standing outside watching it and my mom was recording it with the video camera.

      So yeah, except for the annoying tests those radios run once a week, they're pretty useful to have.

    2. Re:NOAA & EAS by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Even if you don't live in a tornado-prone area, tornadoes can strike with little or no warning. In fact, I was a small child when the somewhat-famous Manitou Springs tornado hit. Manitou is a MOUNTAIN resort town, so naturally tornadoes are rare, so say the least...

      Luckily noone died in that tornado, but imagine my fright as a small child running inside not knowing what that thing roaring up the road was... On the plus side, I have become a hardcore weather nerd as a result, even a skywarn-trained spotter. And I can tell you that my weather radio has been invaluable!

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    3. Re:NOAA & EAS by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      I live in a tornado-prone area, but the trailer park a block away from where I live already has been wiped off the map. No more trailer park, no more tornadoes...

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    4. Re:NOAA & EAS by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      I can still vivdly recall a few years ago when a tornado touched down nearby. We knew about it, and by golly, we were standing outside watching it and my mom was recording it with the video camera.

      You're the guy without a shirt I keep seeing on Cops, right?

    5. Re:NOAA & EAS by JoelWNelson · · Score: 1

      They have been talking about privatizing the NWS for a few years (off and on) so it's good to hear that it will stay public -- at least for a while longer. I remember at one time it was even suggested making the NOAA Weather Radio audio an encrypted, subscriber-only service.

      This site is a good resource for "weather radio geeks" -- http://www.weatherradio.info/ -- they have all sorts of news including future stations and talk/discussion boards.

    6. Re:NOAA & EAS by JoelWNelson · · Score: 1
    7. Re:NOAA & EAS by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1

      Another good thing to have is a scanner. In times where there is really severy weather, the NOAA activates SkyWarn, which is basically a network of HAM operators who observe and call in important information. This was really helpful a few months ago here when we had ~20 tornados touching down all over our area. We were able to hear exactly where they were, and when they ended. Fascinating.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
  25. Voobah, voobah, voobah, ping! by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

    NOAA!

    You talkin' to me?

    It's Slashdot, NOAA.

    Riiiiiiiiiiiight! Who is this. . .really?

    KFG

    1. Re:Voobah, voobah, voobah, ping! by plover · · Score: 2, Funny
      NOAA! I want you to make a first post that includes Natalie Portman!

      Riiiight . . . What's a first post?

      Never mind, NOAA. I want you to go out into the world and collect a cluster of beowulfs, and load them up two by two.

      Riiiight . . . am I on JenniCam? How come you want me to do all these weird things?

      I'm going to destroy the world.

      Riiiight . . . how you gonna do it?

      I'm going to post the URL on the front page of Slashdot, and crap-flood 'em all right out.

      Riiiight . . .

      --
      John
    2. Re:Voobah, voobah, voobah, ping! by killpog · · Score: 1

      C'mon, you're dating yourself... That's a really old album... I liked it, too.

    3. Re:Voobah, voobah, voobah, ping! by JackHolloway · · Score: 1

      and me without mod points. Ya'll get a +1 funny from *me* /cleans coffee off monitor

      --
      "It may just be that there is something fundamentally unworkable about government itself" -H. Beam Piper
    4. Re:Voobah, voobah, voobah, ping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *laugh* thanks, needed that...

      How long can you tread water?

  26. slash eh? by Anubis350 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    congrats to the slash community eh? what do explicit homosexual sex stories have to do with noaa? :-P

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:slash eh? by Anubis350 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      just because they both usually blow doesnt mean they're related my friend.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  27. We can't stop now... by Infinityis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Let's see if we can milk all the way.... Seeing as how the FCC can way overstep it's bounds, maybe the NOAA can too. What are the odds that we can petition them to create a policy that voids the DMCA, declares SCO corrupt and bankrupt, and actively tracks down and imprisons scammers?

    We've found something that works, so now it's our civil responsibility to use it to the fullest.

  28. Now.... by doormat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we could only get that kind of voice on the issues of copyright and patents!!

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Now.... by servoled · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried?

      --
      "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
  29. To paraphrase George Carlin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tonight, a little bit of darkness, followed tomorrow morning with some scattered light."

  30. No way! by Mullen · · Score: 0

    There can not be any /. comments in that document because I did not see "First Post!", "In Soviet Russia...", anything relating to hot grits or Natalie Portman.

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:No way! by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      Nor did we see:
      1. NOAA
      2. Proposed Policy Comments
      3. ????
      4. Profit!

  31. The system works!!!-Elections. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's a cool feeling to be a part of a process that actually seems to have worked to our advantage for a change. "

    And come 2008, you can repeat the experiment.

    1. Re:The system works!!!-Elections. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop. Now you're just making me cry.

  32. great, but how about distribution? by Fess_Longhair · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The big problem with NOAA is getting the data out the door. Even their NWS field offices only get a small piece of what's available, and they have very tight bandwidth limitations. For example, it would be great to get all of the GFS ensemble member grids in real time, but they're largely unavailable; and it's really a small ensemble compared to what the future (should) hold.

    1. Re:great, but how about distribution? by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      YUP! I would take this opportunity encourage everyone to sign up with your local NWS office as a spotter. All it takes is usually a rain gauge, a phone, and a few training classes. And let me assure you, your calls are invaluable to the people at the field offices!

      Every time I call in, no matter how minor the event, they are always appreciative. The greater the density of people who call in, the more accurate the forecast, and the more warning time in a severe weather event.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    2. Re:great, but how about distribution? by MrFreshly · · Score: 1

      Perhaps .torrent would be the way to go. Then we're all sharing in the bandwidth burden.

  33. next up for slashdot input ... by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1
    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
  34. What an achievement. by KZigurs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Silly, silly slashdoters, we. Some stupid agency compiled a list of our worthless comments, made some changes they were planning to the original policy and now we all KNOW THEY LISTEN.

    1. Re:What an achievement. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You'd better hope the "stupid agency" is doing its job the next time you board an aircraft, or have a hurricane/tornado/major snowstorm hit your area.

    2. Re:What an achievement. by KZigurs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't care - I live in eastern europe, and you know - we have regular major snowstorms here. Know what? Nobody cares. It's a FUCKING WEATHER. You can't change it and there is no big point to know it in advance in anyway. Except, of course, you are one of those people who needs to pack just to visit the other end of the town.

      And, yes, btw - just how exactly, apart from telling people what we should be afraid from today, this agency is changing anything.

      (and as for those 'be vevvy vevvy afvaid!' shit - shit it.)

    3. Re:What an achievement. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      yes we all witnessed the amazing weather prediction technology that much of Europre employs with the amazing deaths of 10s of thousands of old people (not from Korea or Japan) in "englightened" France last year.

      When was the last time that happened here in the stupid US?

      Good job guys! Keep up the good work!

    4. Re:What an achievement. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You are amazingly naive. Yes, the NOAA can't change the weather, but if there's a big hurricane headed my way, I'd like to know about it so I can board up my house and either prepare to weather the storm, or if its severe enough, leave for safer ground. If I'm a fisherman or own a sailboat, I'd like to know when a storm is going to hit in the evening, so I don't sail out to sea in the morning. If I'm a pilot I'd like to know if my destination is going to get 2 feet of snow and make it impossible for me to land.

      A category 4 storm is definitely something to be very afraid of. I blizzard is also something to be very afraid of if you're going to be outside and unprotected. Maybe they don't value human life very much in Latvia (assuming that is where you are from), but here in the US we don't take too kindly to avoidable deaths. (Unless, of course such avoidance would come in the way of corporate profits, but that's a whole different story)

  35. Hundreds, eh... by flamechocobo · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised we didn't /. the weather service. That would have been great. "Now let's look at the weather... Wait... Where is it? Crap, it seems that geeky news site is at it again."

    1. Re:Hundreds, eh... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      The weather service (or at least the satellite services division) still gets effectively /.ed every time there's a hurricane about to make land fall. Learned that the hard way this year in Florida.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
  36. GREAT!! Who do we THANK?! by tweedlebait · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We should write them some nice 'thank you' letters!

    I missed this story and acting on it, but if someone with some political savvy could direct myself and others to the people who listened (and those who didn't) to ./'ers input and made decisions with our ideas in mind it would be great!

    --
    Firefox & /. ? Use this often:
  37. *AA by tangent3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    First thing that came to my mind seeing the NOAA acronym....

    Say "NO!" to *AA!

    1. Re:*AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for ( i=0 ; i MAX_BASE ; i++ ) if ( belongsTo[base[i]] == YOU ) belongsTo[base[i]] = US ;

      foreach (base in your.bases):
      base.belongsTo(us);

  38. Already been happening by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

    "NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate"
    Has been internet accessible for years http://www.noaa.gov/, and if you crawl around enough you can find where they put the raw data feeds and make an app that reads them (seem to be the same ones that go to the automated 'voices' that broadcast NOAA Weather Radio, yes, the Weather Radio network that has been around for a long time, heck, I have scanners and CB sets that have Weather Radio switches). The only one I don't understand directly by this is 'wireless', as the weather radio and satellite networks are wireless, and wireless internet and cellular telephone access is publicly available.

  39. Well in touch with latest technology... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In addition to having written a weather warning widget with the information they provide, I've noticed that their system usually takes beatings nicely whenever widespread severe weather occurs. Based on the interactions I've had with the website in creating the widget, their backend consists of the PHP/MySQL duo... they also run Apache 2 and Red Hat according to Netcraft. Their warnings are in both RSS and XML feeds. So it's been nice working with what they've been willing to provide, especially when you consider the large audience they serve.

    1. Re:Well in touch with latest technology... by aseidl · · Score: 1

      They also provide the current conditions in XML feeds and you can get the forecast using SOAP.

  40. actually... by Grandmaster+Mort · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's called ForecastFox now because of trademark issues with The Weather Channel. You may download it at http://forecastfox.mozdev.org/

    --
    si vis pacem, para bellum..."if you wish peace, prepare for war"
    1. Re:actually... by Buran · · Score: 1

      I don't know how you can trademark "weather". The combination of "weather" + "firefox" is brain dead obvious. The scum sucking lawyers should have been told to piss off -- I doubt they'd have a case.

    2. Re:actually... by sepluv · · Score: 1
      One word for those guys: generic.
      • AFAIK the weatherfox developers aren't doing any trading so no one can have a trademark dispute with them.
      • There are no trademarks for `weatherfox' in the US or EU.
      • `Weather' is only registered in the field of "Cosmetics; hair care preparations; non-medicated skin care preparations" which last time I checked didn't cover software.
      • Even if it was registered `weather' might just be a generic term in the field of weather forecasting.
      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    3. Re:actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh, "Fox" is a pretty significant media network.

      Perhaps they should have called it "weatherfire" or "weatherphoenix"

  41. Yes they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are an unconstitutional parasitic entity that must be abolished. Of course, everything in the government unless it's constitutional "Which of course, nothing is" should be abolished. Fuck, we don't need no government owned military, the second amendment states that a well armed militia has the right to bear arms. The people is the fucking militia, not the God Damned government. NO fucking safety nets, known as social services/welfare. if you must use them, then you need to be taken out of the gene pool. He who is willing to give up essential freedoms for temporary safety deserves neither. So in 2006 on, vote Libertarian, the ones that don't are the fucktards that are too stupid to stand on their own two fucking feet.

  42. Relevance of Slashdot by eean · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is true that a lot of power in Democracy (and probably other forms as well) is given to those that show up. It looks like Slashdot did. But before we pat ourselves on the back, I found an interesting comment when I was scanning the FairweartherComments3.pdf, page 332, it was from the Director of Sales-Media of Accuweather Inc who was also in support of rejecting the changes, citing that it would break a 60 year understanding on the line between what work was done by the private and publich sector.

    1. Re:Relevance of Slashdot by Alsee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      an interesting comment when I was scanning the FairweartherComments3.pdf, page 332, it was from the Director of Sales-Media of Accuweather Inc

      Actually that comment is almost difficult to miss, considering that it appears no less than SIXTY FOUR TIMES! Accuweather engaged in a spam campaign.

      They apparently gave their employees a form letter to send in. The form letter appears to have been minorly revised from the initial comment to the final round of submissions, but the letter remains essentially intact. Virtually all sumbmitted the form letter intact, I think only one or two submitters bothered to add on a personal note. A number of them even comically wound up copy/pasting it with ">" at the beginning of each line, as email commonly does when quoting. Chuckle.

      It first appears in comment 227. It then appears as comments: 1120 1211 1213 1215 1217 1219 1220 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1229 1230 1231 1232 1235 1236 1237 1286 1307 1322 1334 1336 1339 1340 1341 1344 1346 1347 1348 1349 1352 1353 1355 1361 1367 1368 1369 1371 1372 1373 1390 1399 1401 1403 1409 1411 1411 1412 1414 1417 1420 1422 1428 1451 1454 1455 1458 1459 1464 1565 1469.

      Most of them are officially signes with an "AccuWeather employee" tag, but undoubtedly every single one derives for AccuWeather.

      As far as I can see their only arguments are
      (1) they want the old policy to remain
      (which isn't really a reason to retain the old policy)
      (2) The new policy will "disadvantage the American public" because "It can negatively impact job growth and corporate stability".

      I would say "job growth" is a bad thing and harmful to the economy when it is accomplished through supression of information and duplication of work.

      Nor is "corporate stability" itself a valid goal. Business live and die on actually satisying unmet the needs of the public. You do not artifically create or maintain an "unmet need" restricting existing publicly funded information. If Accuweather wants the government out of the "weather business", then fine, they should be denied any government funded, government created, or gorventment gathered information as well. Let AccuWeather launch their own satallites and operate countless ground stations themselves.

      The increased availablility of information information increases the opportunities for new businesses to crop up and utilize that information and to add value to that information. Corporate instability is a good thing, survival of the fittest constantly struggling to actually fulfill NEEDED work, rather than surpression to artificially create a need.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  43. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by shufler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    RTF is a proprietary format.

    It's open, sure, but you can say the same about PDF.

  44. As long as you're searching... by Atario · · Score: 1

    Try looking for "sucks". It's in there -- twice. Yay for governmental immortalization of public comment!

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  45. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by waferhead · · Score: 1

    IIRC, RTF came from a fellow in the NAVY, and is quite public domain.

    The spec on MS site is for MSs IMPLEMENTATION.

    Sorta like PDF, only completely different.

    I lamely googled for a link, but RTF is sort of a common search result...

  46. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by shufler · · Score: 1

    The original format may be public domain (I have yet to find such evidence), however the current RTF specifications are written by Microsoft.

  47. slashdot.com? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Heh, it says slashdot.com even though it takes you to the same site as .org.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  48. In other news.. by Bruce+Perens+(3872) · · Score: 1
    NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate.
    In other news, the Bush Administration has announced that a 43 billion dollar contract to determine the best vendor-neutral format to use has been awarded to a joint consortium of Microsoft, Sun, and The SCO Group.
    --
    Want a more mature forum than Slashdot? Try Technocrat.net
  49. As a weather nerd... by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... I would like to say.. YES! This is not only a victory for us weather nerds but for the entire population of the U.S. After all, it's all about the warning time! Imagine, all the media outlets having to pay a licensing fee to Accuweather for issuing a tornado warning... OK, I know that's pushing it but the basic point remains the same. It's our information and it should stay that way!

    Also, as a trained weather spotter, I have been in contact with my local weather service office (KPUB) about this issue and they completely agree that the information be as accessible as possible.

    Chalk one up for us!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:As a weather nerd... by grumling · · Score: 1

      Don't laugh... Joel Meyers (CEO of Accuweather) has proposed this many times. He wanted NOAA to collect the data (the hard part) while he would take care of the forcasts and dessimination (the easy part).

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  50. Amerstam Vallon is a troll... read for more. by swiftstream · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before anybody accepts this immediately as true, I'd just like to point out that this guy has posted lots of things about his personal achievements and his accomplishments, so much that you have to be a bit skeptical. Besides being the brother of an NOAA analyst, he claims all of the following... (taken from http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=131294&cid=109 59811)

    Ken Jennings was my roommate freshman year at Brigham Young University

    I worked for NASA for 8 years straight out of MIT undergrad.

    I'm an editor for Tom's Hardware Guide

    I worked for a particular company that denied another company a lucrative contract just because that company's CTO had bullied my company's CEO when he was in high school

    I have TWO friends who work at Bungie

    I work on LAMP software and deploy to customer's websites.

    I obtained a preview release [of GIMP 2.0]


    Forgive me for being skeptical, but I have trouble believing all that. A child of the post pointed to above says that the parent poster is a known troll, and a check of his recent comments shows many rated troll.

    So perhaps this shouldn't be 5, Interesting?

    --
    Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    1. Re:Amerstam Vallon is a troll... read for more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since I lost my network admin job (stupid economy!) I now work at a country club as a facilities guy... That's a fancy way of saying maintenance man. Anyway, I worked with a guy not too long ago who said he was worth 3 million dollars, invented an internal combustion engine that was 99.8% effecient, has a patent on a roof coating that will reduce energy bills by 80%, once jumped from one plane to another, IN FLIGHT, and welded a wing back together, but yet he was a short order cook that made 7 bucks an hour... Do we see a parellel here?

    2. Re:Amerstam Vallon is a troll... read for more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they need to pay him more, yo!!

    3. Re:Amerstam Vallon is a troll... read for more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I obtained a preview release [of GIMP 2.0]

      This is virtually meaningless.
      The GIMP is a Free Software project and is available from the GNOME CVS repository.
      Anyone can download it anonymously at any time and build their own copy. Access to a preview release is about as valuable as sand in a desert.

  51. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    so what if they are written by Microsoft, so long as the format is available to everyone and is not patent encumbered it is open enough.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  52. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by shufler · · Score: 1

    From the great-grandparent:

    RTF is a proprietary format.

    It's open, sure, but you can say the same about PDF


    This thread has nothing to do with the openess of RTF, but correcting the claims that RTF isn't proprietary (since it is).

  53. Re:w00t by kazoosandinstruments · · Score: 1
    How, praytell, is this offtopic? Perhaps a little inarticulate and therefore lacking in insight, interest or information, however it accurately responds to the last bit of the synopsis:
    And it made a difference: NOAA will make its data and products available in internet-accessible, vendor-neutral form and will use other dissemination technologies, e.g. satellite broadcast, NOAA Weather Radio, and wireless, as appropriate. Congrats to the Slash community for making a difference and helping to set US Govt policy.
    I think we can all agree, a positive impact is indeed something to "w00t!" about, and the poster didn't even brag about fp/gnaa/the death of *bsd/etc, which would have been offtopic ...
  54. Thank you NOAA by ttys00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm an Aussie who uses the free NOAA weather data services extensively in my travels around the globe. I don't pay for this service, nor fund it with my tax dollars, but I can still access it for free and without restriction.

    Thank you NOAA, for making the right decision for everyone on the internet, not just those that fund you.

  55. -1, sneaky but fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  56. Credit should go... by rdean400 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To whomever identified this point, whether it was a commenter or NOAA staff member:

    "Mission connection: NOAA's information services will support the NOAA mission. As a government agency, NOAA recognizes its core responsibility to protect life and property."

    The responsibility to protect life and property trumps all other concerns. Providing for the security of citizens is the primary responsibility of government. Supplying the data only to commercial entities would be improper delegation of that responsibility.

  57. 33% of response were from Slashdot by Ingolfke · · Score: 5, Funny
    There were a total of 1473 comments, of those 490 were submitted by Slashdoters, according to the linked-from URL. This is 33.26%, which on the surface seems like a significant impact, but when you look a little closer you'll see that the #s are not quite as impressive as they seem. Here's the breakdown

    63 - In Soviet Russia the weather updates you.
    19 - Notices that this service is already provided by Goatse.cx
    3 - Requests to add a feature that notifies you anytime Natalie Portman comes within 50 meters of hot grits.
    16 - Pondering what a beowulf cluster of these might be like.
    48 - Blasting the NOAA because Microsoft is secretly behind bad weather.
    27 - Claimed the request was a dupe and cited existing services provided by the NOAA.
    16 - Only old Koreans use the weather.
    19 - Claims that "1 0wnz d4 w34th3r cuz 1m s0 133t"
    193 - Users suggesting the NOAA needs to rely on perl, python, BSD, Linux, MySQL, PHP, emacs, vi, haskell, or ruby for all future development efforts.
    1 - Comment suggesting the weather should be properly called GNU/Weather (thanks RMS!)
    11 - Requested a change for notices about clear sunny days. The new notice will read, "Nothing to see here. Move along."
    13 - Requesting that the raw weather data and weather forcasting software be sent as part of an ebuild that they could emerge and compile the report anytime they wanted, because they've got their Gentoo system totally tweaked out for this type of application.
    27 - Asked for help getting WeatherBug to work correctly on Linux w/ Wine.
    9 - Posts about how Netcraft had confirmed it, weather is dead.
    1 - Comment with made up statistics about how important changing was.
    1 - Comment with made up statistics about how important not changing was.
    32 - EA employees asked for pictures, b/c they've never seen the light of day, a blue sky or snow lit by daylight.
    1 - Comment that read...


    To Whom It May Concern:

    Thanks, this is a great idea. Go for it. You guys rock. I've only been here a few days now, but I'm glad I could give my 2 cents, check out my blog (excluded). Also, I was thinking about going into programming because I took a class on C++, and I wrote a program that would randomly guess the weather, but since you're going to do this maybe I need to consider not studying IT in college... any suggestions?

    Josh Milsken
    Sophmore, Wuleska High School
    Topeka, KS

    P.S. - My birthday is next week... gonna be 15... gonna get my learners permit. Woohoo!


    Quite an impact.

  58. His real name is Eric Krout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and he's a sad, lonely shell of a man.

  59. congrats /.ers for your next assignment.... by museumpeace · · Score: 4, Informative

    Be sure to attend The FTC workshop on P2P networks If you read the adgenda, you would think FTC is trying to convince people that P2P is a threat to consumers. It would make sense to use a spurious issue that pushes congressional hot buttons if you wanted to slap restrictive laws on P2P since protecting copyrights doesn't get out the votes.
    Oh, yeah the weather. I bike to work in new england: a very detailed forcast is critical to my saftey so this little victory is a serious win from my perspective. I already paid taxes for this data...be damned if I'll pay twice for it.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  60. Forget Weather Roach by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    Get, Weather Watcher.

    No ads, no spyware, just works, and works well.

    --

    Question everything

  61. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by k98sven · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the heck does proprietary matter?

    There are plenty of ISO and ANSI standards which are patent-encumbered. And you usually have to pay money to get access to the standards documents.

    Non-proprietary doesn't mean open.
    And proprietary doesn't mean non-open.

    So what's the point in distinguishing them, then? Not many people care about who created the standard. People do care about if they can implement it for free, and freely.

  62. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The people is the fucking militia"

    I genuflect when I see the results of a public education.

    1. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, abolish public education. Public education is unconstitutional. Let the parents teach their children if they can't afford private education. If they can do neither, then they need to be taken out of the gene pool anyways, so, like the grandparent post said, vote libertarian in the next election, and every election after that. Someone that doesn't vote straight Libertarian is asking for trouble.

      Back onto subject, we don't need The National Weather Service/NOAA, private organizations "The Weather Channel; ABC, NBC, and CBS affiliates; Fox news, CNN, MSNBC" and online services "weather.com, weatherbug, etc" are doing the job and doing it better than the government. So there is no reason for NOAA to exist, so it needs to be abolished so we can get this country one step closer to abolishing the income tax.

  63. Half of Slashdotters to grind their teeth by mi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    At any positive mention of our pro-Business, pro-War, anti-Healthcare government...

    What? The services are available to foreigners too?..

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  64. But they've been doing this already for years by constantlyamazed · · Score: 1

    It's been possible for years now to get all of these services directly from the NOAA ftp site. Everything, including real-time NEXRAD radar has been available.

    Now if they make it available as XML web services, that would be fabulous.
    -brian

  65. The Weather Machine by SunPin · · Score: 1
    This is scary stuff. If the terrorists got their hands on weather reports in the USA there is no telling what trouble they could stir up. I imagine this kind of thing should remain secret and proprietary.

    Does anyone else remember Cobra's Weather Machine? I blame the resurgence of Cobra for the four hurricanes that smacked Florida this summer. Crazy environmentalists are paying him and he's using our new culture of fear to make a name for himself again.

    ... unless Cobra is actually a woman.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  66. will NOAA survive an all-Republican government? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For a couple decades now NOAA has been on the conservative's hit list for abolition. One reason is because much of its research is into the environement. Another reason is that some small governement people believe that the government should outsource most, if not all research to universities, think tanks and companies.
    I live near the the Boulder UCAR/NCAR/NOAA centers. Every year in recent years their proposed fudning gets whacked 25-50%, only to be restored last minute. But the restoration may not continue much longer.

  67. No mention of "free" by ZedNaught · · Score: 1
    IANAL but,
    Notice that this policy does not use the term "free" but rather "at the lowest possible cost to users."

    This leaves the door open to a fee in the future.

  68. Re:GREAT!! Who do we THANK?! by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 1

    http://weather.gov/feedback.php

    Please everyone, take the time to write out a nice sincere thank you note. Try to stay away from such negativites as "Thanks for not being an just another government agency" and steer more towards "We appreciate your willingness to disseminate this information."

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  69. They do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://weather.gov/xml/ At least a good chunk of it. My project, openWeather aims to fill some gaps that the NWS has in their services. Come and help out.

  70. NOAA Weather Radio IS Thee BEST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's great that a little NOAA radio from Radio Shack can always tell you the latest forcasts, warnings and advisory conditions.

    NOAA Radio has come in handy when traveling, hiking, boating, flying, diving and driving.

    NOAA is One of the things the government does right... Thank you USA !

  71. Rare event - land grab fails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The commerical weather industry attempted to gain exclusive access to NOAA weather data. Specifically, they wanted to shut down the NOAA NextRad looping radar images that are updated every 7 to 10 minutes or so.

    The CAII members already had a glossy GUI + ads interface which offered NO MORE than what NOAA's looping NextRad site offered, but they wanted $30/year for access 'rights' and they only covered 75 cities, a limitation probably established because rural areas like mine in Eastern Nebraska don't have a population large enough to generate ad income, even if we would be forced to pay for access rights. Also, the commercial NextRad windows were only guaranteeing 15 minute updates, instead of NOAA's 7 to 10 minute average.

    Now, if we can break the hold other land grabbers have or are attempting to get on the Public Commons, like software patents on mythical Intellectual Property "rights" (i.e, like 200 year old math algorithms, common code snippets,etc.) we well go a long way toward restoring the freedoms which corrupt corporations have stolen. How can we do it? Work to get corrupt, money-grubbing politicians voted out of office. They are the ones who took the 'campaign donations', formerly known as bribes, to sponsor the changes in laws so favorable to the Gates of this country, but detrimental to you and I.

  72. Sure ways to tell by sjames · · Score: 1

    It's often fairly easy to distinguish the airheads from meteorologists on the news.

    On a day when severe weather is expected, watch closely. If the weatherperson is clearly excited but trying not to sound too excited (since people hit by the storms might take offense), you're watching a meteorologist or at least a genuine weather geek. Otherwise, they'e likely just reading a report without understanding what it really means.

    Bonus points if they use appropriate modes of the nexrad to point out storm features that actually matter. If they ever put it in doppler mode and try to explain the indicators of potential or actual tornado formation, you'll know for sure.

  73. Use your mod points for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parent Up

  74. Re:It frightens me, sometimes by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    How does the fact that Microsoft writes the standard make it proprietary?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  75. Tom Skilling @ WGN by MattHaffner · · Score: 1

    Holy cow, Skilling was (is?) awesome. Back in our college days we'd try to catch the evening forecast every night. They gave (still give?) him like 15 minutes to talk about the weather in detail. I learned way more from him in a few nights about weather than listening to the useless talking heads on any other station for years.

    We were (are?) such geeks.

    1. Re:Tom Skilling @ WGN by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Yes, he still gets about 15 minutes to do the weather, explain a little bit, and offer up some "weather trivia" to the other news marionettes.

      If you get WGN via cable or satellite, he does the 9pm weather during the week.

  76. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

    Obviously you are making up those statistics because you state in your overview that 490 of 1473 the comments made were made by slashdotters and yet the sum of the "breakdown" is 500. Nice try troll.

  77. Good heavens! An *AA that is not evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I'd never seen the day. Who'd thought NOAA would offer such services instead of throwing lawyers to people?

  78. Canadian equivalent by leoc · · Score: 1

    In Canada, this site appears to be the equivalent to the NOAA site. I browsed around a bit and it says the data is available, but the site is not responding right now so I am unable to see what kind of format it is provided in.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  79. Like WeatherGopher? by MasterMnd · · Score: 1

    You mean like WeatherGopher? Free as in beer, and free from spyware.

  80. Graphics freezing my computers by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else had problems with NOAA's graphics causing their computer to lock up? It does this on several of mine. I don't get a BSD, or anything that will give me a clue what the problem is. It just locks up.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  81. Thanks NOAA by fbg111 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Congrats to the Slash community for making a difference and helping to set US Govt policy.

    And thanks to NOAA for being receptive to non-corporate opinions.

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  82. Amerstam can cover storms like Jim Cantore for /. by leftie · · Score: 1

    Let Amerstam go out there and send us back updates from natural disasters as they happen. He can stand right next to Jim Cantore and take do live updates for slashdot via webcam.

    Amerstam... ooops.... he really needs to hold on better than that... he could could use all that technical skill he claims and help us learn about the impacts of natural disasters... oooo...he should be quicker on his feet in those trailer parks. They generate a lot of debris during landfall... but with huge weather disaters expected to increase with global warming, we'll need... ooof... good thing palm trees aren't very dense, walk it off Amerstam... we'll need better data and a wider variety of data about... ouch... I didn't realize the Epcot Center dome would get airborne and still hug the ground like that... wider variety of data from the these storms as they happen so that we learn how to plan evacuations better... look out for the... eeewwwwww.... Tugboat.

  83. WeatherBug by weatherbugjay · · Score: 1

    fyi- 7000 LIVE, local stations at schools, universities, businesses in your neighborhood with live conditions vs. once an hour updates from airport stations. you decide which is better if weather is important for your business.

  84. WeatherBug is not spyware & we support NOAA 10 by weatherbugjay · · Score: 1

    hate to rain on LordEnder's parade, but WeatherBug, which he incorrectly calls spyware (more on that in a sec) actually helps supply weather from our 7000 LIVE weather stations (as opposed to the NWS stations that are mostly at aiports and do NOT update live) to the NWS as announced in the Nov. 19th press release from the DOC- NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE, AWS CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN NEW PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TO EXPAND USE OF WEATHERBUG DATA so, the very data that is helping the NWS give better forecasts may in some instances be helped by the data from local WeatherBug stations. The Dept. of Homeland Security through the Homeland Security Initiative already relies on WeatherBug data in times of national crisis since our stations update wind conditions live- getting 1 hour old wind direction isn't going to help us too much if God forbid there is a dispersal of something in the air. Now, if you don't like our program, hey, it's a free country. There are great weather programs out there that I've seen listed in these posts. Use them if you don't like ours. The more folks interested in live weather the better for all of us in the weather market. As for the spyware concerns- WeatherBug is not spyware. In fact, we are passionately committed to fighting the spread of these technologies because they damage the environment in which we do business. If you define adware like most as "software that serves ads based on user surfing habits" then we are NOT adware either- you actually choose a sponsor if you have the free program. If you define adware simply as "anything with ads" then, yes, like The Weather Channel's desktop program, AIM, yahoo mail etc., by that broad swatch since we serve ads, we'd be adware. Our formal spyware policy can be found at: http://www.weatherbug.com/aws/support/faq_spyware. htm where you can view our certification from TRUST and free downloads to what we believe are some of the most effective anti-spyware detection programs, as part of our commitment to end spyware. We are also a member of COAST (Coalition Against Spyware Technology- www.coast-info.org). For the record, spyware tracks websurfing activity and sometimes reads what is on the user's hard drive. WeatherBug is not capable of tracking your overall web use or deciphering anything on your hard drive. I am aware that occasionally some spyware detectors may list, incorrectly, certain programs. WeatherBug has been victim to this- many of you probably are thinking that Spybot or Adaware used to list us and they did- Spybot stopped about 9 months ago and Adware in early 2003 but I know that the reputation sometimes sticks, incorrect though it may be. If you have other questions, please feel free to email me directly at jay@weatherbug.com

  85. offtopic eh? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    for the unelightened/humorless (including the mod who modded my posts offtopic, yes you) slash is a kind of sexual fiction (very often fan fiction) written about homosexual encounters. I was making a play on words, maybe its not funny to some but it wasnt any more offtopic than any other joke made here

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  86. Re:free weatherbug its called Weather Watcher by instarx · · Score: 1

    Try Weather Watcher, found at www.SingersCreations.com

    no spyware, no popups, no ads, no cost. Just desktop weather.

  87. The Terrorists! by Fromeo · · Score: 1


    But couldn't terrorists get hold of this information and use it to execute their agendas of fear on the American (and World) public? We should definitely not allow the terrorists to do this! All information should be taken off the Internet immediately!
    </tounge-in-cheek>