Slashdot Mirror


Toyota Demos 'Partner Robots'

angryflute writes "Toyota has created a walker robot that the driver sits in and controls. It's meant for handicapped people to get around with, but you can easily see the potential for this technology to become the basis for a real-world version of an AT-ST Scout Walker or mobile suit Gundam -- just add guns!" Gizmodo has some more pictures.

224 comments

  1. Only in Japan by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Robots this cool and bizarre could only come from Japan. Normally, I am a fan of form following function, but am reminded in these robots of everything cool about design from a Japanese ethic. Their principal application of providing the handicapped with greater mobility is one that we are familiar with in our lab. One of our fellows is in a wheelchair (polio) and sometimes accessibility is still a problem for him, particularly obtaining things that are above his reach. Certainly the Segway folks have worked in this area before, but their form absolutely followed function and had very little of the design sensibility of Toyotas products. I also can find almost nothing on their site about products for the handicapped anymore. What happened? Has Segway abandoned all their accessibility products in favor of the HT?

    Also, I imagine that since the US Army has an overriding interest in enhancing personal mobility, that they too will be paying Toyota a visit.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Only in Japan by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I just got done with TFA and while I think these are crazy, I also can't help but think paintball meets mechassault. I really would like to try a few of these out ;) ;)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Only in Japan by jdray · · Score: 1

      Did you read the specs on the thing? Almost 500 pounds (200kg = approx 440#), and moves at about one mile per hour.

      That's great if you can't otherwise walk at all, I suppose, but I don't see soldiers getting all jazzed about strolling into combat in one, guns or not.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    3. Re:Only in Japan by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 2, Informative

      To answer your question about accessibility products:
      "When and where can I purchase an IBOT(TM) Mobility System?
      Although the IBOT(TM) was invented and developed at DEKA, Independence Technology, a division of Johnson & Johnson, will be marketing and selling the IBOT(TM). Please consult their website, www.indetech.com for questions regarding price and availability"

      --
      (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    4. Re:Only in Japan by krymsin01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When automobile (think: tanks) were introduced during world war I to the battle field, they were highly impractical and were considered an imparement rather that as a tacticle avantage.

      --
      stuff
    5. Re:Only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... polio? How in the world does someone have polio these days?

    6. Re:Only in Japan by uradu · · Score: 1

      > am reminded in these robots of everything cool
      > about design from a Japanese ethic

      Well, one of the "robots" looks like she's sitting in a huge wheeled vagina. So much for ethics of any particular sort ;-)

    7. Re:Only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polio leaves one crippled for life.

    8. Re:Only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, one of the "robots" looks like she's sitting in a huge wheeled vagina.

      What the fuck is wrong with you?

    9. Re:Only in Japan by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      How in the world does someone have polio these days?
      Some people are old enough that they contracted polio before the vaccine was generally available (around 1955-1960 for the Salk vaccine, and the early 1960s for the Sabin vaccine).
      Note that according to this site, "In 1955 there were 28,985 cases of polio; in 1956, 14,647; in 1957, 5,894".
      I am 49 years old (50 next week), and am still working, so I could very well have been one of those unfortunate persons (though, thankfully, I wasn't).

      The site referenced above also reports that there are about a quarter million cases of polio per year worldwide even today, and occasionally even in the U.S. (usually due to problems with the Sabin vaccine itself, which is a live, but weakened, polio virus).
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    10. Re:Only in Japan by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, one of the "robots" looks like she's sitting in a huge wheeled vagina.


      You say that like it's a bad thing...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Only in Japan by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      But tanks introduced an element that was beneficial in battle that was not yet the case prior to that point: they provided a mobile, powerful, and armored vehicle which could withstand conventional firearms and even minor explosions (grenades, etc.) without breaking. They were the 900 pound gorilla of battle - granted, one that needed a lot of bannanas and attention.

      What would one of these mobile suits provide? They're too slow to be practical, too big to be maneuverable, and too heavy to go many places.

      Now, something that strapped to your body frame, ala Starship Troopers (the book, not the bloody movie - more like a Mechwarrior Elemental suit) would indeed be the "new tank".

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    12. Re:Only in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're too slow to be practical, too big to be maneuverable, and too heavy to go many places.

      Umm yeah, the point is that tanks used to be that way during WWI. And then they improved.

      Now, using your brain, extend this improvement idea to Toyota's new robots. There, you got it!

    13. Re:Only in Japan by danila · · Score: 1

      Segway sold all rights to medical use of self-balancing technology to P&G. P&G (supposedly) markets the IBOT wheelchair, but there is no mention of it on their site as well...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    14. Re:Only in Japan by uradu · · Score: 1

      > You say that like it's a bad thing...

      Absolutely not, I just wouldn't necessarily consider it an expression of sophisticated styling, that's all.

    15. Re:Only in Japan by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Idiot. You're forgetting the -intended application- of these devices.

      These robotics are completely inadequate for their intended application of assisted mobility for those that can't get about on their own.

      Tanks, however, are what made Germany's army able to completely walk over the other armies of Europe. While they might have been slow, big, etc. - whatever - compared to what was to come, they were a drastic improvement over the horse-drawn artillery of the competition. Furthermore, before Germany's tanks, there was no mobile armor. There was simply entrenched battlements and other such stationary armor. While relatively immoble, etc. they were still a hell of a lot better than the alternative and gave the Germans a significant advantage over their combatants until the Americans joined with their Shermans.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  2. Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What the hell. Seriously, when is Japan going to stop bogarting the good acid?

    Aside from that, the assisted mobility thing is going to be a big, big market in the next couple of decades as the baby boomers start hitting the wall (assuming they aren't actually staring down an extra 900 years of life by then). While I seriously hope it won't look much like this given my natural fear of old people in silver spandex, I think we will see a lot of advancement in this field as the money shifts in that direction.

    It's not just limited to mobility, either -- picture a recorder that is always working and allows you to privately review what just happened in your spare moments to aid memory? Heh, maybe you could even mark off when you've told a particular story to spare your loved ones the constant retelling...

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they left out the passing out of LSD during the show.

    2. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      is going to be a big, big market in the next couple of decades as the baby boomers start hitting the wall (assuming they aren't actually staring down an extra 900 years of life by then).

      If they do line another 900 years they are going to be pretty sick cookies at the end of that time. Maybe they will need things like this for the last 900 years of their life

    3. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1, Informative
      Blame the french:

      3. Producer/Show Director

      Yves Pépin Profile

      Born in France in 1943, Pépin is known for his fantastic, grand-scale productions. Head of the Paris-based production company eca2, he has successfully executed numerous multimedia and large-scale programs at various global events, expositions and theme parks.

      Pépin's representative works include the opening and closing ceremonies of the 1998 World Cup in France and the 1999-2000 Millennium Celebration spectacle at the Eiffel Tower.
    4. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      ...and it's only a matter of time before Apple jumps on this and we get...

      The all new iPod Walker, as promoted by Stephen Hawking

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    5. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      picture a recorder that is always working and allows you to privately review what just happened in your spare moments to aid memory

      Like a skrode?

    6. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      Like a skrode?

      Exactly, except we'd have to come up with a version that works here in the slow zone.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    7. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by utuk99 · · Score: 1

      So its the French who have all the good acid? The wheeled ones are probably going to be more practical for a long time. Although if you could get that thing doing a decent speed it would be cool. I only hope they get autopilot on cars of anykind soon, as I am sick of driving in traffic. I think that is where the real money is. Fear the Geek

    8. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by FreakyGeeky · · Score: 1

      It's not acid. I belive that psilocybin (magic mushroom) is legal in Japan. I think it explains a lot.

    9. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      They patched that loophole a while back.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by XmineR · · Score: 0

      Dood, they should just take that ifbot and turn it into a kind of KIT/Gundam mobile suit for old and handicapped folks... a robot you ride in and have a conversation with... and I am sure the ifbot would love to remind old people what they just did... it already has a built in camera...

    11. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by thargor66 · · Score: 1

      It was made illegal in June 2002. But before that there was a legal loophole that basically had people selling them in shops..

    12. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Queer+Boy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The Japanese cultural phenomenon of "cute" is the same cultural phenomenon of "tough" that America has. We put blood and gore and screaming and machismo into everything, and they put bright colours and funny songs and talking animals in everything.

      I find it a refreshing alternative. Frankly I find the "Grand Theft Auto" mindset dull and primitive.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    13. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on your mastery of the broad generalization! There's plenty of Japanese entertainment featuring gore and screaming (Takashi Miike, anyone?) just as there's plenty of American entertainment that recognizes, exaggerates, or mocks the national obsession with same. Japan's artistic history is full of representations of sex, violence, and combinations thereof that are just plain weird for most Westerners, and I'm willing to postulate that the "talking animals" derive from a variety of nature-based or animist religions -- Japanese folklore (like that of many other regions) is full of intelligent animals, spirits in animal form, or animal spirits in human form. American folklore was cobbled together from European (and probably occasionally Native American) sources or developed ad hoc as the new nation -- achieved through violent revolution, natch -- set about manufacturing a national identity. Add to all this the influence of American culture on the Japanese post-WWII, not to mention the omnidirectional influence of everything on everything else in this age of information and the whole thing gets pretty convoluted. Far too convoluted to make statements like the above, IMO.

      In conclusion, none of this really matters because robots are cool.

    14. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Japanese cultural phenomenon of "cute" is the same cultural phenomenon of "tough" that America has. We put blood and gore and screaming and machismo into everything, and they put bright colours and funny songs and talking animals in everything.

      I find it a refreshing alternative. Frankly I find the "Grand Theft Auto" mindset dull and primitive.


      Oh, that's rich. It must have been the Aztecs who came up with bushido, seppuku, and Sword of Doom. Hmm, perhaps I'll go do a "test cut" on some random peasant I find on the road. Or better yet, watch some lighthearted Japanese anime. Tentacle sex, anyone?

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    15. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      Of course you're only familiar with the subculture that's violent. You've proven my point most exquisitely. No, really, you don't keep having to tell me I'm right.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    16. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by instarx · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you are both right. It is just that the Japanese culture ALLOWS beauty (read "cute") and violence to coexist with little stigma for either. This appreciation for the utility of both is simply not possible in US cutlure at this time.

      Historically, the samurai were as interested in beauty as in the martial arts; while in the US beauty (and the appreciation of it) has traditionally been associated almost entirely with feminity, and violence almost entirely with masculinity - a stupid and culturally limiting viewpoint in my opinion.

    17. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by pyrote · · Score: 1

      ...and it's only a matter of time before Apple jumps on this and we get...The all new iPod Walker, as promoted by Stephen Hawking

      Cant wait for it's new Text-to-speech E-book reader.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    18. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tentacle sex, anyone?

      Are you implying that tentacle sex is't cute, then?
    19. Re:Soon to be a lot of money in this... by Triskele · · Score: 1
      Oh, that's rich. It must have been the Aztecs who came up with bushido, seppuku, and Sword of Doom. Hmm, perhaps I'll go do a "test cut" on some random peasant I find on the road.

      No. That's rich. That's like saying that US culture is still focussed on genocide and wiping out native Americans or pistol duels at high noon on mainstreet.

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

  3. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throw in a few weapons and have a real life Battletech match!

  4. Or... by metlin · · Score: 1

    ...or just use it to drive in the HOV lane =)

    The cop won't even suspect it's a doll if it can move its arms around.

  5. Cool, but... by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    DO you have to wear the quasi-futuristic suits to make it work? Handicapped people still have dignity you know.

    1. Re:Cool, but... by INetEngineer · · Score: 1

      Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"? I assume they are considering a seat belt complete with voice activation and possibly safety padding?

      Just playing devil's advocate and imagining a worst case scenario here...

      --
      --I smoked my sig.
    2. Re:Cool, but... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"?

      Well, what's sopping people from overturning their wheelchairs today? Or kicking away the crutch or walker? Or injuring their guide dog?

      If you can't count on other people's basic decency, no safety mechanism is going to help, for any of us.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Cool, but... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"?

      That's what the laser cannons are for.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Cool, but... by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I'm still wondering about the condoms on their knees.
      Whats scary... is that knowing the japanese, there is probably a REASON they have condoms on their knees.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    5. Re:Cool, but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      HAH HAH!

    6. Re:Cool, but... by Triskele · · Score: 1
      Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"? I assume they are considering a seat belt complete with voice activation and possibly safety padding

      Do you regularly sweep handicapped people's crutches away or overturn their wheelchairs? If so please hand yourself in to your nearest police station.

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

  6. Please reply with to link with video. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

  7. Coming next, the Shover Robot by mekkab · · Score: 4, Funny

    In order to push bread down their throats.

    Do you have stairs in your house?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Coming next, the Shover Robot by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Yes, they will protects us from The Terrible Secret of Space.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:Coming next, the Shover Robot by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      I am the walker robot. Driving is the answer. Driving will protect you from the terrible secret of space.

      Grandma has gone down the stairs. I will drive Grandma out into the snow...

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    3. Re:Coming next, the Shover Robot by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      That link reminds me of the "feeding robot" (lunchtime robot) in Chaplin's "Modern Times" from 1936: it basically forces him to eat at a speed that optimizes company profit. It was pretty scary when I was a kid, now it is just disturbing.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  8. Is it me... by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

    ...or do those prototype units look fake? I'm all for robots, but two of them look like modified Sinclair C5s, and the bipedal robot looks too shiny. Give me something drenched in oil and looking bashed to hell any day of the week.

    --
    Baka Drew
    1. Re:Is it me... by pewterfish · · Score: 1

      You're not wrong, doesn't look durable somehow, does it? Appearance and its relationship to perceived function is important, more so than most people think.

      I remember, in my product-design classes, hearing about a digital camera being designed by a far-eastern company (can't remember who off the top of my head). Initial tests suggested the public felt it was 'cheap', 'tacky', 'toylike'. The exact same unit later shipped with a series of lead weights glued into its casing, to none of the above complaints.

      The units on display are just that: display models. They're probably hardly past prototype, and still have that 'sketchy' quality to them. With any luck a more real-world, everyday looking version will arrive later.

      Alternatively, go nuts with a sledgehammer, whatever floats your boat ;)

      --
      :D > £/$
    2. Re:Is it me... by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

      I'll just stick to having white shiny Apple computers and nice white-ish HP Projectors (like the MP3222).

      I can appreciate design, but they really do look like concept drawings given form, and certainly nothing that should be spoilt by real world elements like rain, mud, exhaust fumes, or mother of all stains, red wine... ;)

      --
      Baka Drew
  9. Just add guns by zackeller · · Score: 5, Funny

    That phrase has never caused anything bad to happen.

    1. Re:Just add guns by miketang16 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for peace and very much against unnecessary wars ::cough::, but I'm sorry... Gundam's are awesome.... and I want one... =D

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
  10. Trendy by fembots · · Score: 1

    Considering the "popularity" of Segways, I wonder if this thing will attract many interests.

    These may be suitable for youngter disabled because the conventional granny scooter may be a bit of put-off.

    Another concern is the recovery process. Let's look at the i-foot, which is designed to help the disabled to get around and to climb up stairs. But can it recover from a fall should accident happens?

    1. Re:Trendy by d474 · · Score: 1

      OMG! From your question I just pictured this massive 500lb walking robot in mid-stride at the top of some stairs and the battery loses power. Can you imagine the look on the disabled persons face as the thing just s-l-o-w-l-y leans and begins to fall over down the stairs....LOL can you imagine what a NOISE that would make in the office building! I shouldn't laugh - I'm going to hell now...
      But seriously, the guy in the photo is already like 4 feet off the ground - look out for banana peels...

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  11. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi!!! How are you? I'd like to find a friend for corresponding. Would you like to communicate with me? My name is Yuliya. I'm from Russia. I'm 33. I have been devorced for a long time and I'm single woman now. I would be glad very much to correspond with you. I know English well, so I don't use any translators. If you write to me on: yyuuliiya@newmail.ru Then I'll send you my photo and tell you more about me.

    Yuliya

  12. Old People/Walker Robots by tonsofpcs · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Japan, only old people use walker robots.

    1. Re:Old People/Walker Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you.

  13. Wow by cuteseal · · Score: 1

    Mein gott! It's the PowerLoader from Aliens!

    1. Re:Wow by sloanster · · Score: 1

      tja!

  14. Taking away jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hundreds of dogs are rescued each year from pounds to provide assistance for the blind members of our society.

    Otherwise these dogs must be euthanized to make room for the next batch of strays coming from the street.

    Won't you think of the dogs?

    1. Re:Taking away jobs! by BitwiseX · · Score: 0

      Since blind people are probably not going to be allowed to drive this things, there will be plenty of jobs training dogs to drive this things for them! Making jobs!

    2. Re:Taking away jobs! by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      they took our dogs!
      dey tuk ur dogs!
      derk er durr!

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  15. Escaflowne by TWX · · Score: 1

    I hope that any large scale mechs don't give their occupant the same problem that Escaflowne did when they needed to repair it...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Escaflowne by Crimsane · · Score: 1

      unless the robot needs its ball-bearings buffed and oiled, if you know what i mean

  16. Game over, man.. by Koil · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sigourney Weaver may be able to get her old job back!

  17. ex-Military project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like a military project that flopped. =D

  18. Yes!!! by dj_cel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Gundam style robots and AT-AT's can't be far away right? Take of every zi..er toyota walker thingy!

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  19. Those Suits by ettlz · · Score: 1

    I'll have one iff it comes with one of those fancy silver Futurama-like suits.

  20. This made me think of Ripley. by punkin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get away from her, you bitch!

  21. What everybody's thinking... by isugimpy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, who's in favor of starting a paypal account for people to donate to so the geeks can get one, mount very large guns on it, and then mount a very small nuclear reactor? Destruction of cities is fun for the whole family!

  22. Very impressed with Japan! by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    I mean, really. Their engineers have this unique way of looking at problems and their solutions to those problems always leave me in awe. Not only does their population have access to the latest and greatest technology, but they are also very receptive to products that may be interpreted by the rest of the world as, "what the f***?" Keep up the great work, Japan! Only with your help will our future be realized.

    1. Re:Very impressed with Japan! by renjipanicker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> Not only does their population have access to the latest and greatest technology That's because they make their tecnology for the benefit of their population. I find it ironic that while one slashdot article spoke of Japan making robots to help their elderly, another article a short while later spoke of the USA creating robots with guns to make the killing process more effecient. How do you know the US does not currently have a better class of robots than these already? Maybe there are, except maybe they are not being used for uncool things like helping elderly folks cross the road...

    2. Re:Very impressed with Japan! by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1
      Their engineers have this unique way of looking at problems and their solutions to those problems always leave me in awe.
      ...because their assisted living walker wouldn't fit through a single door I've ever walked through?

      I do suppose busting through the door to your office (and talking a nice chunk of the wall with it) would be a good way for the handicapped to scare the living crap out of their co-workers, but that'd be about it. Come to think of it, that does leave me in awe. I want one.
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  23. In America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Driving robots are only for old people.

  24. I-foot in, Segway out. by javaxman · · Score: 1
    I mean, really. Either one of those things is cooler than the Segway.

    The U.S. has no hope of ever being as cool as Japan, no matter how much they love to copy aspects of our, um, pop 'culture'...

    Insert I-unit joke here...

  25. who are the adwizards who came up with this one by viva_fourier · · Score: 5, Funny

    First couple things I thought of when I saw the conceptual ad:

    1. wtf?
    2. Seriously, wtf?
    3. A new Power Rangers design?
    4. Cheap Peyote hits Tokyo?
    5. Does it come in "Confederate Flag" with a gunrack?

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  26. Why not by bryan986 · · Score: 1

    Focus development on robotic cars instead, then no one will need to drive, and a robot wont take up space in the drivers seat

    --
    There is no sig
    1. Re:Why not by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Why focus on any one thing? This is the problem with the thinking of those in the U.S.

      Focusing on one problem leaves many other possibilities without a chance of ever reaching fruition. The Japanese look at problems from every point of view, even if they may appear to be impractical. Compare the state of robotics in the U.S. with that of Japan. Outside of a few top universities, mainly MIT, such coolness is only taking place in Japan.

    2. Re:Why not by bryan986 · · Score: 1

      Coolness in Japan is worthless junk that no right minded person would buy outside of the Japanese

      --
      There is no sig
    3. Re:Why not by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Which just goes to show that the rest of the world isn't advanced enough to realize progress when it sees it. You're missing the point of technology offshoots, derivative products, and the acclimation of such futuristic products to the population. This is why the rest of the world is lacking in technology.

  27. They would surely look cool as a sci/fi movie prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are so shiny and future-ish.

  28. two words... by nusratt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    bigger doors.

    Didn't RTFA, just looked at the pix.
    But, if these things are to be practical for "handicapped" people, buildings will need MUCH bigger doors, wider aisles between office cubicles, wider hallways in homes, and higher ceilings in many places -- not to mention bigger cargo doors in personal vans, etc.

    1. Re:two words... by Stripsurge · · Score: 1

      If that hook didn't stick out a foot above the walker guy's head it might be close to fitting in a regular sized room.... but I guess thats for protection when the machine inevitably topples.

      You're assuming though that standard Japanese architecture is the same as in North America. Maybe somebody could give some insight into typical ceiling heights in Japan?

    2. Re:two words... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you add high enough caliber guns, doors won't really be a problem anymore, nor will walls, traffic, or anything else that you can make go away by repeatedly shooting.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:two words... by really? · · Score: 1

      I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your newsletter. :-)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:two words... by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      I can't speak to that in detail, but I do know that in Japan, my 4'11" ex can reach the overhead handholds on the subway, so I would be willing to bet that ceilings are considerably lower.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:two words... by vivian · · Score: 1

      I can't speak to that in detail, but I do know that in Japan, my 4'11" ex can reach the overhead handholds on the subway, so I would be willing to bet that ceilings are considerably lower.

      Those trains often have posters hanging down from the ceiling, which, being 6"4, I'd brush through as I walked down the carriage. Unfortunately in some trains they'd have a steel rail going accross the carriage between the hand rails running the length of the car. These were usually located just behind hanging posters that neatly hid them, and I have sent a carriage ringing like a bell on more than one occasion because of this.

      Standard door height in Japan seems to be about 6 ft. I have the scars to prove it.
      In either environment, I don't think the walker bot's going to fit.

  29. Re:Oh great by pchan- · · Score: 1

    X-Bender: but i don't want people thinking we're robosexuals. if anyone asks, say you're my debugger.

  30. Too tall, too wide, too long by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Am I the only one that notice just how tall, wide, and long these things are? They would be impractical to use for any day-to-day operation. The standing robot looks to be 8' tall and its feet looks to be 1'x2'. It would hardly be able to climb stairs with ease. Doorways, staircases, and almost all archways in Japan are smaller and more cramped than their US counter-part. I just don't see this thing fitting into a Japanese-sized apartment or office.

    The other robotic device would need to run on the street because it looks 50% larger than our current electric wheelchairs and is about as long as motorcycle. I mean sure they look cool and sound great. But when you consider its practical applications, especially in Japan, it's just rediculous.

    And WTF is up with that chick dressed up in the white latex suit?!? I mean really...WTF?!?

    1. Re:Too tall, too wide, too long by Zeal17 · · Score: 1

      ...and I hope it doesn't violate the weight limit of most elevators...

      --

      "If it sucks without butter, it still sucks with butter, only creamier." - AC
    2. Re:Too tall, too wide, too long by nativespeaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one that notice just how tall, wide, and long these things are?

      Well...I'm guessing that the initial conversation went something like this:

      Japanese Engineer: Hey, boss - - would it be ok if I took a couple years off the Prius team and started making Mecha?
      Japanese Boss: I'm sorry...that sounds like a terrible waste of time and company resources.
      Japanese Engineer: Ah...yes. You're right. On an unrelated note, have you seen these designs for...uh...Assisted Mobility Vehicles that I've been working on?
      Japanese Boss: Very impressiv...wait...what's this, an EMP gun??
      Japanese Engineer: Personal protection. Old people are weak, and...old.
      Japanese Boss: Well, I'm sold. Whip up a psychedelic butterfly show while you're at it.

    3. Re:Too tall, too wide, too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one that notice just how tall, wide, and long these things are? [...] It would hardly be able to climb stairs with ease.

      Much like the ED-209 from "Robocop".
  31. O.K., fess up . . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 1, Funny

    . . . how many of y'all saw the headline "Partner Robot" and assumed that you were going to read about the debut of a ErotoBot?

    Stefan

    1. Re:O.K., fess up . . . . by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      Main Features of i-Unit:
      #5 "My-unit"
      A personalized recognition system can provide information and music, and body color can be customized, according to the individual's preferences and emotions.


      I've always wanted to color customize My-Unit based upon emotion.

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
    2. Re:O.K., fess up . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what I thought ....

  32. It's the wrong trousers, Gromit! by yroJJory · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and they've gone wrong!

    --
    Jory
  33. My prediction. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the diabled will be the last to get these things. It will be the same people who went out and got 2 or 3 Segways that end up with these first, rich-kid toys. Sad, I think, but that's my prediction.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  34. Something's Missing by Solstice · · Score: 2, Funny

    So when do the robots start fighting? Do all three models join together to form a larger robot?

  35. I must have one! by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

    My life cannot be complete until I own a walker robot.

    That is all.

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  36. Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A friend of mine, who ironically is a tanker in the military fully believes that robotech battlemechs will one day be a reality. Surprisingly, he does not realize that one of the advantages that a tank has is a low profile. Granted, it does not have legs to walk around with, so it a little less mobile. However, if you are dealing with insurgents who have RPG's, or even other tanks, having a high profile is BAD. Even if you had armor that was strong enough to withstand multiple hits, the sheer force of a hit would cause a mech to topple, or at the very least lose balance.

    While large mechs would be cool, they would be all to prone to getting blown up. Just giant walking targets. Now, smaller mechs, about the size of an Abrams would be mobile, and act as armor for troops would be more practical than building size robots - but Giant Mechs? Not likely. (All the above is assuming you over come all the other physical limits such as structural stress etc...)

    Mech wheelchairs are a good idea however.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, try to hack my 31337 firewall!

      That was waaaaaaaaaay too easy. You used the same root password that I use on my machine. You really should think about changing it...

    2. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by MixmastaKooz · · Score: 1

      I agree, something closer to Tribes' mechs with their jump jets would be more practical than the huge marauders of Battletech...

      Everyone is talking about putting guns on the biped robot...jump jets would be better and you could have another escape route! Up!!! (Or speedily skidding the surface...)

    3. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      This may all be true... but think of this...

      Just picture the enemy as they see our bipedal 2 story transformable planes walking down the country side.

      I'm not sure you'll be able to fire off an rpg while you're shitting your pants in amazement ;)

      Of coures the effect will wear off and what you say is true. Its why helicopters fly "nape of the earth" low and slow.. missles are a bitch when you pop up over the hills.

    4. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's entirely possible large mechanical walkers might get made, if only for show. The USSR used to constantly have military parades with tanks and rockets. A few medium Mechs would look good walking alongside your tanks if you are trying to impress your own population.

      The other big advantage, of course is mobility. If large mechs ever do get built, I'd suppose they are likely to be civilian construction vehicles, and the like, where mobility is more interesting than survivability under RPG fire.

      Quick, somebody post the userfriendly strip. You know the one.

    5. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mr Flibble writes:
      A friend of mine, who ironically is a tanker in the military fully believes that robotech battlemechs will one day be a reality. Surprisingly, he does not realize that one of the advantages that a tank has is a low profile. Granted, it does not have legs to walk around with, so it a little less mobile. However, if you are dealing with insurgents who have RPG's, or even other tanks, having a high profile is BAD. Even if you had armor that was strong enough to withstand multiple hits, the sheer force of a hit would cause a mech to topple, or at the very least lose balance. While large mechs would be cool, they would be all to prone to getting blown up. Just giant walking targets. Now, smaller mechs, about the size of an Abrams would be mobile, and act as armor for troops would be more practical than building size robots - but Giant Mechs? Not likely. (All the above is assuming you over come all the other physical limits such as structural stress etc...)

      I think this view is a bit narrow. Battle mech-style exosuits would be more of a "bridging the gap between infantry mobility and heavy armor's offensive ability" thing.

      Suppose you had a mech that only allowed for a 2x profile of a human but could increase their firepower by 2x, increase their ability to take fire by 6x and let them travel 3x faster.

      These things are always compromises. It may very well be that a modern Abrams is more-or-less the pinnacle of current "heavy armor," but that doesn't mean there isn't a middle ground that can be covered.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    6. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by kureido · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly from my btech MUSE days, the 'mechs relied on pretty massive gyros to keep their balance, like a Segway.

    7. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      I could see small lightweight mech suits being very useful for:

      + Hostile NBC (Nuclear/Bio/Chem) environments, protect the infantryman inside
      + Space or underwater combat
      + Bio-amplification, allowing wearer to leap tall buildings in a single bound, with electronically enhanced vision, sound, strength and (maybe) smell. Imagine a superhero costume that gives you most of the abilities of Wolverine, the Hulk, Invisible Man and Superman. Soldiers could pack massive amounts of gear, wield and fire heavy assault weapons impossible for an unaided infantryman to carry
      + Adaptive camoflage that automatically adjusts to whatever terrain you are standing in front of. Think of predator's suit.
      + Built in autodoc to automatically release anti-coagulant over any detected gunshot wound, and coolant/soothing cream over any burn.
      + Built in adaptive noise cancellation. You are dead silent, even while raining fire on the target.
      + Voice controlled heads up display, with encrypted communications, GPS, battlefield maps, live video to/from other members of your squad and headquarters.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    8. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by bedurndurn · · Score: 3, Funny

      + Built in autodoc to automatically release anti-coagulant over any detected gunshot wound, and coolant/soothing cream over any burn.

      That makes the whole NASA fubar of switching metric/imperial units seem minor by comparison. ;)

    9. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      True, but scale it down to barely larger than human size. Powered armor, a la Starship Troopers (the book).

      TOW/Hellfire missile launcher coaxial with your arm (or over your shoulder), reloads on the backpack.

      Small, fast, harder to kill. Dies easier if you do hit it, but harder to hit.

      'Mech' size (tank size) things are only that big because they shoot larger gun rounds, and to handle the recoil, many reloads, the armor, and the engine.

      If we take a Humvee, add capacity for 50 reloads, a 125mm gun...then we need to add armor to take a hit, weight to stabilize it when we shoot, a larger engine to haul it all, tracks to spread out the load...we end up with a tank.

    10. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...having a high profile is BAD. Even if you had armor that was strong enough to withstand multiple hits, the sheer force of a hit would cause a mech to topple, or at the very least lose balance."

      STRIIIDER!!!

    11. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, he does not realize that one of the advantages that a tank has is a low profile.

      The same profile is had by dogs and horses. And yet humans still survive.

      "Giant" walking robots could exist, but they would fit the same niche as WMDs, not tanks -- strategic displays of strength as psychological warfare, not open-field gun platforms.

      OTOH, railgun equipped slow-moving mechs might replace the super-artillery role once played by battleships. Having a big gun you can fire from the sea is good and all, but one that you can move inland is even better. (Why the legs? To make it easier to set and brace the weapon. The thing would probably still have tracks for long-term movement.)

    12. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by makohund · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go in between.

      Something capable of 2 legged upright motion.

      But also capable of dropping horizontal to the surface. (Just like a real soldier)

      Like an ant. Give it 6 limbs. Bottom two work as legs when upright, top two as arms. (Perhaps middle pair fold to sides.) Make the back most heavily armoured. Drop to ground to scurry around quickly like an ant, with a low profile. Stand up for longer range vision, more humanoid mobility, etc.

    13. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      That was kind of my idea at the end of my paragraph. Having a medium sized mech would be viable - either as an exoskeleton or some other variant. As other ppl have mentioned, as soon as you start to scale the vehicle above a certain size, the mass of the mech begins to put too much weight on the ground beneath it. The Abrams is a specific size because that size is the most efficient for the platform. Start scaling it up larger, and it becomes heavier, likely slower, and requires more energy. I picked the Abrams as a platform for size/mass of a Mech because scaling beyond that point is likely inefficent from a power to weight ratio.

      Your idea of the 2X a human profile is quite correct - this would likely weigh much less than an Abrams, and thus consume less energy to operate, and would be more effective than an unarmored (or lightly armored) human trooper.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    14. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Actually the i-foot design reminds me more of the Zentradi battle pods, they were big as the Veritechs only because Zentradis were giants. But if the design was adopted for Micronians (humans), then it would be of similar size.

      This is the ultimate mobile patrol tower / post. It would offer protection for the occupants and provide ability to enter more cramped streets that tanks would not be able to enter.

    15. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by hernick · · Score: 1

      The giant robots of the future will probably not be bipedal... In a combat situation, they will surely be able to adopt a low profile. I can imagine a spider-like giant robot being somewhat practical.. Multiple redundant legs, and perhaps the ability to stand taller on part of them if a high profile or climbing is required.

    16. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I imagine that, provided a sufficiently dense energy form is found to power such a device, structural body armor would quickly become common. Think along the lines of Starship Troopers (the book, not hte movie) or a Mechwarrior Elemental suit. Something that's armored, with jump jets (no more getting cornered or surrounded -just fly over the fuckers and drop a grenade) and a servo-powered exoskeleton.

      It would also make combat significantly more difficult for the insurgents. No longer can they take out men with bullets. Bullets just slow them down - marginally, at best. Instead, the bullets glance off their armor (titanium, maybe? I don't know. something strong and lightweight, at least.) Instead, an RPG is required to take out a single man, maybe more - because the suits have built in protections for body hits with explosive devices (as tanks do). A blast wouldn't even harm the soldier, as the suit would be sturdy enough to prevent such harm (provided it wasn't long-term, like a flame thrower or such.) That'd get difficult, and expensive, for any 'insurgents' quickly. Particularly when any given soldier can jumpjet to a roof, then simply jump down on them from a height of 3 stories and shoot methodically without breaking a sweat.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    17. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by MROD · · Score: 1

      I think you've been playing Half-Life too long ;-)

      --

      Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
    18. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by danila · · Score: 1

      We don't know until we have the technology in place. Giant mechas have many advantages. For example, the high-profile can be an advantage if you have automatic AI-assisted monitoring, FoF systems in place and 360 degree coverage by automatic guns. A 15 meter high mecha would keep every enemy several square kilometers around it in check. A mecha is also better than a tank for fighting in heavily reinforced urban setting. You can't use a tank to get over a 3 meter think/high wall with some smart mines and stuff. There is no reason to think that mechas' legs and joints would be constrained by our present technology, they are likely to be as mobile as monkeys and as sturdy as elefants. :) Needless to say that when you are in a giant mecha, you can dodge rockets, something a tank can't. :) So there are many potential advantages to that design and it might be practical in the future.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    19. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by danila · · Score: 1

      I dunno about userfriendly, but Caterpillar loader from Aliens is a great example.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    20. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by danila · · Score: 1

      1) They don't need RPGs to kill your grandma, just a "truck of fertilizer". Bingo - yesterday's insurgents become tomorrow's terrorists.
      2) They can change tactics quickly and without multi-billion investments into ten-year R&D projects.
      3) The USA fights only with enemies whose military budget is hundreds or thousands times smaller. It is possible (though at present it looks unlikely) that in several decades it would have to face an enemy that has comparable technology and military power.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    21. Re:Physics is against Robotech Creations... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      While Giant Mechas would have points in the Cool factor.. They lose points due to physics. Strength to weight ratio is one. The reason that a pit bull is the most efficent fighting dog is that it is strong for its weight. You can breed a larger dog, but the ratio of muscle to mass becomes skewed, and the dog is actually a less effective fighter even though it is larger. There are diminishing returns.

      Also, a large mech would have a large mass. With a large mass it would deform the ground it stood upon to a great degree - it would sink in moderately normal terrain. Also, because of the high profile even if it had AI capable of monitoring a large area, all that would be required to cause signifigant damage to the mech would be a single insurgent with a rocket launcher. Or, better still, a smart missile. Believe me, the smart missile would be signifigantly cheaper to produce. And there lies another problem. Cost.

      The return on investment of battle effectiveness to money spent would be skewed in a bad way with a large mech. Imagine a billion dollar mech that gets taken down by a 1 million or less dollar missile? In a war of economics, the cheaper combatant wins. (Notice how the insurgents in Iraq have far less funding, but are still causing havoc.)

      And, again, being large and visible violates a simple battlefield principle. DONT GET HIT. If you dont get hit, you dont get hurt. The easier you are to see, the more likely you are to get hit. A 15 M Mecha would be very easy to see.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  37. Very Logan's Run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And do I have to wear a funny suit to ride around in one of those...?

  38. Look out! by wcitechnologies · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mod me down, but I'd be on the lookout for californians to start lobbying to allow robot-human mariiages in a few years. Its a sign of the times!

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    1. Re:Look out! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      You say that as if it's a bad thing. :(

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  39. Great, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is its OS embedded gentoo?

  40. obligatory but painfully bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *winces in pain*
    I, for one, welcome our senile overlords

  41. Great Show! by lawpoop · · Score: 1

    Apparently, they will be distributing free LSD.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  42. how about those construction exoskeletons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    from aliens?

    the one which sigourney weaver uses to battle the queen?

    seems if you want to connect scifi with this robotic suit, something in construction seems most appropriate: robotic exoskeleton assisted construction workers could assemble houses like we play with legos

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  43. Of course without a compact power supply... by mshaslam · · Score: 1
    ...it's all just jerking off. If you can't run a personal vehicle for more then four hours it is useless. If you can't get it to run for a day our two, it is at best inconvenient.

    On the other hand if you do have a compact high density power source then the sky is the limit. I've said it before and I'll say it again, the only thing standing between us an a fully functional battle suit is the power supply.

    MSH

    1. Re:Of course without a compact power supply... by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      if you do have a compact high density power source then the sky is the limit.

      They have one already, energon cubes silly!

  44. the next time stephen hawking loses a bet by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    he might not have to pay up

    don't mess with a genius in a mechasuit

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the next time stephen hawking loses a bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Obligatory Simpsons quote... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In either case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today remember always your duty is clear: To build and maintain those robots. Thank you.
    -- Military school Commandant's graduation address, "The Secret War of Lisa Simpson"

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  46. Two more words by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Rocket Launcher

    Then it can make its own doors. That and have extra jumping power.

    1. Re:Two more words by SunPin · · Score: 1

      :) I laughed out loud. Thanks.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
  47. Oooh. by merdaccia · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is wonderful news for all those handicapped people that can climb four feet.

    --

    *blinking cursor*

    1. Re:Oooh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tool, if you bothered to actually check the link in the article.

      http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/news/04/1203_1d.html

    2. Re:Oooh. by merdaccia · · Score: 1

      It was a joke, jackass.

      --

      *blinking cursor*

  48. Ill take 4000 please by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    And would you please include chrome sneakers and oh, that lovely optional Death Ray!!!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  49. Personal Vehicles by dokebi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Toyota released a similar vehicle called PM at the Tokyo Auto show while back. I think Toyota is interested in these Personal Vehicles because in emerging markets like China or India, where population is very dense and poor, even small compact cars will be too large and too expensive. And considering how well the small SMART vehicles have done in Europe, I think they believe there is a market for a nimble vehicle sized between a motorcycle and a normal car. I would love to see them try!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  50. Do they also make... by mrnutz · · Score: 1

    Shover or Pusher robots?

  51. Not surprising by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    As I've always said, imagine anything from the future, add "In Japan" to the end of it, and it does not sound implausible.

    For example,

    "Old people have robot walking companions... in Japan."
    "They've got television in their Brita containers... in Japan."
    "The Xbox 2 will be a terrible failure... in Japan."
    "You can rent space shuttles for families to sleep in... in Japan."
    "You can buy gas masks with X-ray vision on street corners... in Japan."

    Now, in Korea, it's only old people that have robot friends. Which seems to put them even further ahead in the future. Perhaps "in Korea" is the new "in Japan" -- not that either were ever really anything.

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  52. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hobo: Gus old chum, let's give a friendly welcome to this new robo.

    [Bender rolls up his sleeves.]

    Bender: What did you call me?

    Gus: A robo. You know? A robot-hobo.

    Bender: Oh OK I thought you said "romo."

  53. Engineering is against it too . . . by Bagheera · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mech vs Tank discussion is one that I've been into too many times to count. Bottom line is Mecha are cool to look at, but inherently too complex to be especially useful on the battlefield. Those knees are going to be inherently more fragile than a tank's suspension, and the point loading on the feet will be higher than with tracks.

    Now, Toyota's application of "walker" technology for aiding the handicapped is exceptionally cool. They've still got to beat the complexity issue (a more or less conventional powered chair is cheaper and less complex) but it IS a clever way to get around the fact that most buildings are designed around people with legs, rather than people with wheels. Power chairs still mostly have trouble with stairs.

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    1. Re:Engineering is against it too . . . by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can't get a tank to a lot of places a walker-style mech would be able to get to easily, carrying a lot of cargo, and still be much lower profile than something airborne. It's basically the difference between a hammer and a screwdriver. Both can be used on both nails and screws, but only one of the two is ideal for each situation.
      But this is all theory until the AT-AT's climb up the mountains to get me ;)

    2. Re:Engineering is against it too . . . by isolation · · Score: 0

      Did you ever see the Tanks that converted to Mechs in Robotect Southern Cross. You get the best of both worlds if we ever develop something like that.

      --
      Free Unix? Free Windows. http://www.reactos.com
    3. Re:Engineering is against it too . . . by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      I think the mechs' guardian mode (where it has functional resemblance to battle pods) was its most powerful mode. I always thought the battaloid mode was the vanity more for the mechs. There is no true functional advantage yet giving higher profile for a larger more vulnerable target. It can be argued that vehicle mode has functional advantage in transport. But the battaloid mode is only useful for show

    4. Re:Engineering is against it too . . . by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Yes, the knees are a weakpoint. The Macross saga's RDF used this specific tactic against the Zentradi's battlepods.

      However, the same can be said for any form of bodysuits. Same reason why you hit tanks in the treads. All mobility points are a weakness because it is a moving part.

      Knees and Legs can be shielded, much like how tank tracks are shielded. The advantage of walker design is that it can traverse more varied terrain than tracked / wheeled weapons

  54. wait'n for the GRITS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not going to be satisfied until the NatalieBot keeps me in as many lapdances and other, um, jobs, as I can pay the electric bill for. Plus, she needs to be able to convince my mom that she's only a phase I'm going through.

    1. Re:wait'n for the GRITS! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Plus, she needs to be able to convince my mom that she's only a phase I'm going through."

      Heh. That put an image of an auto-sexual rights parade in my mind...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  55. Re:I WANT TO PUT MY PEE PEE IN YOUR POO POO HOLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not gonna happen buster.

    (Unless you have a lot of money you want to give me.)

  56. Frell guns... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

    Can you mount rockets in the hands so you can launch them at your enemies?

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    1. Re:Frell guns... by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      ...and I'd like to order one Boomstick Edition with chainsaw hands, please.

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
  57. IBOT by excyl · · Score: 1
    I also can find almost nothing on their site about products for the handicapped anymore. What happened? Has Segway abandoned all their accessibility products in favor of the HT?

    I believe you might be thinking of the IBOT wheelchair engineered by the same people behind the HT. Dean Kamen was the primary inventor behind both and created the IBOT with his company DEKA. I suppose one could augment the control of the wheelchair (IBOT) to be more like the Toyota product or add in some basic AI helper functionality into its control.

    --
    --Excyl
  58. PAK CHOOIE by mekkab · · Score: 1

    UNF.

    He cannot use icq right now he has gone down the stairs.

    pak. chooie. unf.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  59. Wow! by sleighb0y · · Score: 1

    So how long before this is the future?

    "It is post-World War III. War is outlawed."

    War is outlawed, that statement is priceless.

  60. Spoon! by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    Anyone think of Arthur from "The Tick" (the cool animated series, not the lame live-action sitcom) in his moth suit when looking at the leg mech device?

    All it needs is operational moth wings.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Spoon! by RatBastard · · Score: 1
      the cool animated series, not the lame live-action sitcom


      I love you.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  61. Tentacle rape by SunPin · · Score: 1
    DO you have to wear the quasi-futuristic suits to make it work?


    You don't have to wear the suits but you might not like the _other_ requirement.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Tentacle rape by pyrote · · Score: 1

      requirement... heck I thought it was a feature!

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  62. do them transform by lashi · · Score: 1
    Are the two units on the right just differnt modes? Does that mean they TRANSFORM???

    Imagine how useful that would be.

    Say you sit in your motorcycle, the traffic slows down due to an accident. You transform the bike into your walking suits and go on the sidewalk instead. That would be so useful.

    Hello, Robotech!

  63. For show only by jangobongo · · Score: 1


    From the press release: "...richly entertaining show, based on the theme "The Dream, Joy and Inspiration of Mobility in the 21st Century... performance content will feature Toyota's efforts toward achieving "optimal mobility," "harmony with society" and "meeting the needs of individuals," and the future technologies and vehicle possibilities that form part of the company's vision for the society of tomorrow."

    In other words, these are not meant to be practical. They are just toys for a stage show for the 2005 World Expo. Expos are well known as a platform for showcasing visions of the future, dangling futuristic toys in front of the world. But how often do these concepts make it into the real world use? 50% of the time? 25%? Less?

    Cool ideas, though. Toyota should be commended for its creativity and ingenuity.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    1. Re:For show only by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I thought. These things remind me of concept cars from GM - they look fabulous, but they never actually get to the showroom.

  64. Doubt it by SunPin · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is there a way for handicap people to defend against people pushing them over in their new "i-foot"?

    500 lbs. Good luck trying. I hope the handicapped don't crush you for your insolence.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Doubt it by ScaldedTauntaun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, will welcome our new handicapped overlords!

      -ST

    2. Re:Doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i-foot?? That thing looks more like an i-pod than, well, an i-pod

  65. Forget "i-Foot and i-Unit" by NIK282000 · · Score: 1

    How about i-sore, those things are ugly. For all the technology in Japan they dont have an asthetic sence.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:Forget "i-Foot and i-Unit" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first thought as well. It's a cool idea, but that egg-shaped design (for the walking unit) is just terrible. I love the "Design Concept" that they describe: "The egg-shaped design of the "i-foot" that wraps around the passenger is meant to express the dream of future three-dimensional mobility and the feelings of safety and reliability upon which that dream is built."

      I can only hope that this statement is just poorly translated from Japanese; in English its vagueness borders on sheer incoherence.

  66. Masamune Shirow said it best... by payndz · · Score: 1
    KSHANG! KSHANG! KSHANG!

    All right! Landmates coming soon from your friendly local Toyota dealer! Sign me up for a Guges-D, I'm sure the government will have no problems with that...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  67. Send the Handicap to war! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    This is why i love Japan. (uh not the sending handicap to war) but their interest in all things f'n cool :)

    And they do it in the spirit of fun.

    We have a lot to learn from our Japanese friends.

    1. Re:Send the Handicap to war! by nizo · · Score: 1

      Japan spends $42 billion (1% of their GDP) on their military, while we spend $370 billion (3.3% of our GDP). Just imagine all the cool stuff we could make with over 200 billion dollars per year.

    2. Re:Send the Handicap to war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine all the cool stuff we HAVE made that you don't even know about! :)

    3. Re:Send the Handicap to war! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope - miltech aint cool.

  68. No more excuses for paraplegics... by luckytroll · · Score: 1

    Add some plating and a weapon mount and even the disabled will be unable to resist the Empires call to battle in Iraq....

  69. RTFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The walker robot has a mounting/dismounting mode: http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/news/04/1203_1d.html/

  70. You don't HAVE to but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Randy: Well, yeah, but I have one question about the way it works.

    Mr. Garrison: Sure.

    Randy: Well, it seems all the buttons on these front and rear flexigrips are also found on the side of the vehicle.

    Mr. Garrison: Yeup.

    Randy: Well... so... they don't really... do anything.

    Mr. Garrison: Right.

    Randy: So then, couldn't I just order one that works without going in and out of my ass and mouth?

    Mr. Garrison: [thinks about this a moment] Well, I... guess you could.

  71. HUD? by tattoi.nobori · · Score: 1
    I love Japan... The only people in the world driven enough (or wierd enough) to build something like this!

    I wonder what that curved glass face-shield is for? It would be pretty easy to build a heads-up display projector into that column running up behind the driver's head, and display speed, heading, GPS map, etc. for the driver! (I suddenly want one, very badly! ^_^)

  72. Technotrousers! by Wumpus · · Score: 1

    At last!

  73. Interesting fact! by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

    They were at first going to call it a 'spouse robot', but Japan passed a constitutional amendment banning robosexual marriage. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.

    1. Re:Interesting fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, old people are nagged by spouse robots!

  74. In Japan... by 12+inch+pianist · · Score: 0

    Only old people think PartersBots can do the nasty.

  75. Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Scott+Francis[Mecham · · Score: 1

    Say you sit in your motorcycle, the traffic slows down due to an accident. You transform the bike into your walking suits and go on the sidewalk instead. That would be so useful.

    ..but I believe present-day motorcycles already have the capability to use the sidewalk, without the need for transformation.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the law allows it, since they are motorized and travel faster than the allowed speed.

  76. Partner Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in "domestic partners"? 10 states already outlawed gay marriage. I'm not sure that they're going to let this slide.

  77. The Toy Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn it! When is this going to make it to the toy market. I want my Super Toy!

  78. DARPA has been looking at exoskeletons.... by kaladorn · · Score: 1

    Exoskeletons a la DARPA The military has been interested in combat exoskeletons for some time. DARPA has been poking its nose around this idea for years.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:DARPA has been looking at exoskeletons.... by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my opinion I think the Darpa mechanized suit idea seems more well suited for most people. You wear it, thus it's not very big compared to the japanese machine you sit it. It looks like it's pretty big, too much for your average japanese home. It could be more suited for industrial purposes though. again, too big for walking around town imo. I'm sure they can make it smaller, very cool stuff.

    2. Re:DARPA has been looking at exoskeletons.... by anagama · · Score: 1

      • again, too big for walking around town imo.

      Yeah - but just imagine how cool it would be walking down the sidewalk, towering over everyone, getting the looks from all the cute babes ....
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:DARPA has been looking at exoskeletons.... by bernywork · · Score: 1

      Would that be angry looks as you run over their toes?

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
  79. Why 2 Legs? by fussili · · Score: 1

    If you're going for something that's going to be sturdy when taking fire surely you ought to follow nature - add a couple more legs.

    Sure it won't be the cool 'Battlemech' everyone wants to see with the stars and stripes flying from it ("Hahahah! Look how much money we have, this baby cost as much as your whole defence budget!!!one1one!") but it'll probably be nearly impossible to knock over.

  80. This thing does stairs by np_bernstein · · Score: 1
    A very good friend of mine has to use a wheelchair, and one of the most annoying things he has to deal with is an inability to go up and down stairs. Who fucking cares what it looks like, who cares if it seems crazy - I'm sure as hell it's less embarassing than having to say "excuse me, can you help pull me up this flight of stairs?"

    This is HUGE for people with disabilites.

    Quote:

    This 2-legged, mountable robot was developed for three-dimensional mobility, with the ability to navigate staircases. The passenger climbs on and drives with a joystick.


    If this works the way it supposed to, if it really works.... it's going to change the lives of thousands and thousands of people in an extremely profound way. This just made my day.
    --
    RandomAndInteresting.comdefending the world from stupidity since 1979
  81. Am I the only one even slightly disgusted .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. by the obvious glee the submitter has for the idea of making giant killing machines real?

    Newsflash, army and sci-fi geeks: in the real world, it's not cool when people get killed. Please let us try to remember that weapons are for killing, despite the fact that they look cool and have neat shiny features.

    ok, /soapbox.

  82. Not much time left... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until I have my exosuit...

    Combining scientific commercial leaps in technology with the advances made by the military, it is not long until a full-fledged exosuit becomes a reality.

    This will literally revolutionise everything, civilian and military.

    My friends, look at the scientific advances we are making. It is not long before life as you know it undergoes a drastic change.

    I, for one, will enjoy introducing myself as one of your new overlords.

  83. And here I am... by martinze · · Score: 1

    using my own legs like a sucker! Homer Simpson

    --
    If you live long enough eventually you get to see everything.
  84. Segway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the "main show" image, the four wheeled vehicles look a bit Segway-esque. Does anyone else agree?

  85. lost in translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term "partner robot" has connotations that the Japanese probably didn't intend.

  86. Appleseed by Macgruder · · Score: 1

    Landmates, baby! All we're missing is the hot chick with gun and the massive cyborg with even bigger guns.

    --
    I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
  87. Check out the 'conceptual image' on main link... by GreenPenInc · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of Logan's Run.

    "Renew! Renew! Renew!"

  88. 'Partner Robots' by wubboy · · Score: 1

    With the tagline 'Partner Robots' from Japan I was kinda thinking they would have more tentacles.

    --
    Sit... Speak.... Shake.... Good Dog!
  89. :GB2GBS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTH HAND

  90. Re:FPFPFPF by drivinghighway61 · · Score: 1

    If it's willing, it isn't slavery, moron...

  91. I agree with the tank analogy better than the mech by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    It appears to me the one that got the grace and speed armor thing right was Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex, when it showed the Tachkomas (sp?), little one man spider tanks with wheels on the bottoms of the legs. They can hop and dodge, lean, spin out, and hit the highways like a car if they need to.

    It's like Tony Hawk was driving the thing.

    I would however, like to add that the one thing that people are missing with the abilities of an armored "waldo" suit would be the way that a man could change battle tactics entirely. A regular infantry squad with one armored man alone could wreck havok, considering he could make breaches where there was no door, rescue the wounded, and run point in dangerous situations.

    Ask yourself this... how useful would a tank be that could walk up stairs to clean out an apartment building, or throw heavy ammo on top of a roof to a quick gun emplacement?

    I agree with most here, the smaller the better. The real reasons our tanks are so large is to fit the large guns. That is all.

  92. Gayest Graphic of the week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I give that image the gay graphic of the week by a major corp award.

  93. Fem Bots by microbrewer · · Score: 1

    next invention in the works is the realistic fem bot for all the lonley /.ers who are sick of patching up thier blow up doll.

  94. Get away from her! You bitch!!! by sbergman2 · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all. Please don't mod this down just because you don't understand the reference.

  95. Battlefield environment vs. mechs by chiph · · Score: 1

    Automated armor is almost certainly on it's way. Only it won't be giant mechs, it will be improvments in current designs.

    Once you remove the need to house & protect the humans in a tank, you can significantly change it's size & shape, making it lower (with an elevating mount for the main gun), narrower (the better to go through forests), and lighter (only put the heaviest armor on the important parts). You'd still want to use tracks because of how they distribute weight, but you could put helper arms on the front for climbing over obstacles (much like what's on the tracker bot recconaisance units).

    Removing the humans from the chassis also leaves room for more computing power. Once the DARPA Grand Challenge results in self-navigation software, you can add on additional software for the vehicles to act in self-organizing swarms, as well as position themselves in formations that maximize their lethality.

    Instead of the "A" in UAV standing for "aerial", it would stand for "armored".

    Chip H.

  96. Sure.... you say that NOW... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    But when the Angels return, and your precious little tanks smash themselves in a pathetic show of futility against their AT fields; THEN you'll be thanking the Japanese for getting a head start on the development of mecha necessary to actually fight, and kill, an Angel.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  97. Re:On/off switch... by sail4evr · · Score: 1

    The very same computer controlled actuators that keep it balanced when walking would keep it balanced when someone tried to push it over.

    Try pushing over something powerful enough to move around 500 lbs that doesn't want to be pushed over.

    Wait till it pushes back!

  98. Re:Check out the 'conceptual image' on main link.. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I bet your crystal's red too.

    --
  99. Stair-climbing wheelchair already exists. by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    Here's a story about it, from well over a year ago.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  100. I want one like Sigourney Weaver's by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    I want one like Sigourney Weaver uses in Aliens (2) as a dock-loader, then later to battle the Alien.