Slashdot Mirror


A Background of a 'Background Checker'

pamri writes "The Times of India profiles Jay Patel, of Abika, a firm that specializes in background checks, personality profiles, satellite or aerial Photos of any location besides other services in the US. It is now venturing into other countries including Canada and India. Abika is already facing protests from Canadian Privacy groups for breaching the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act"

58 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Personality profile? by REBloomfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hell, Google will do a damn good job of that. Hundreds of USENET posts and forum posts and website things, you can find most of my life out there on big ol' web.....

    1. Re:Personality profile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So.. How're your tropical fish doing..? :)

    2. Re:Personality profile? by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And that's exactly what companies do when they interview you. I have personally had three interviews and found that typically *after* you have the interview a Google referrer shows up in your logs from the interviewing company.

      I know one guy on IRC that interviewed with a company and they spent a good amount of time passing around the link to his gallery (mostly pertaining to the pictures of the large gauges in his ears).

      One interviewer checked my site before I came in (and I knew it) and he said that they didn't hire pot smokers. He assumed I was a pot smoker because I was a Grateful Dead fan.

      Just remember that you may or may not be hired due to interpretations of your "web presence" regardless of whether or not it's actually how you live your life.

    3. Re:Personality profile? by Lonesome+Squash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hell, Google will do a damn good job of that. Hundreds of USENET posts and forum posts and website things, you can find most of my life out there on big ol' web.....

      Actual conversation:
      "Dad, did you write something about masturbation on the web a long time ago?"

      "What? No! Waitaminute, yes. Not on the web, on a newsgroup. But it was just a metaphor! It was about intellectual masturbation."

      "My friends think you're so cool!"

      Who knew when we were writing that stuff 15 years ago that it would be around FOREVER?

      P.S. How did I know what she was talking about so fast? A former student of mine tracked me down one day. The first thing he said was, "Hey, I read that thing of yours about masturbation." I had no recollection of it so I went and looked it up.

      --
      Behold the riant ape! Beware, his crooked thumbs!
    4. Re:Personality profile? by g0at · · Score: 3, Funny

      One interviewer checked my site before I came in (and I knew it) and he said that they didn't hire pot smokers. He assumed I was a pot smoker because I was a Grateful Dead fan.

      Did you respond that it was fine since you never work for people who beat their wives anyway?

      -ben

    5. Re:Personality profile? by abysmilliard · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is one incident where being named Jones makes me happy.

      I can never find myself on Google, even with my full name. Sometimes not even with the city I'm in.

      All those years bemoaning the mundanity of my name, and it turns out it may someday become my greatest defense against the All-Seeing Eye of Google

    6. Re:Personality profile? by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Funny

      dunno... are you hitting on me?

    7. Re:Personality profile? by Inda · · Score: 4, Funny

      RE: R. E. Bloomfield Personality Profile

      Hi! Remember me? Remember when we robbed the local 24hr garage? I still think about the blood pouring from that blind old aged pensioner in the wheelchair. I thought her head was going to pop when you stamped on it for the third time!

      Did you ever get away with the drug smuggling operation you were running? I told the police that you were the lowest on the ladder - I think they bought it. I didn't read any newspaper stories so I'm guessing you're OK..?

      Who would have thought that, after all these years, I'd find you through Google.

      How's the job hunting going?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:Personality profile? by THESuperShawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "One interviewer checked my site before I came in (and I knew it) and he said that they didn't hire pot smokers. He assumed I was a pot smoker because I was a Grateful Dead fan"

      Sounds like a case of slander and/or deflamation of character to me. There are very strict rules about what can be said/asked in an interview (or on the job, or when firing, etc), and they are enforced pretty seriously. I know of one person who actually got in a little bit of trouble for giving a negative reference for an old employee.

      Always remember, you are interviewing the company at the same time they are interviewing you. If this was a person of authority, and I would assume they would be if they were interviewing you, would you really want to work for someone who made such accusations without backing it up?

      Just thin, whenever he found the toilet seat still up, the coffee pot empty, the TP roll finished off, spoiled food in the fridge, etc, he would be looking to blame someone.

      Even though it sucked he labeled you like that, it doesn't sound like a company you would want to work for anyway...

      --
      Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    9. Re:Personality profile? by REBloomfield · · Score: 3, Funny

      dammit.... busted......

    10. Re:Personality profile? by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I come top when you search google for my name.

      My website has images of my tattoos, graphic mentions of my body piercings, and a lot of free software.

      I'm happy if people rule me out on the ground of piercings/tattoos whatever. At the end of the day the kind of environment where those things are unaceptable (no matter how discriminatory they are) I'm not going to want to work.

      I think that my achievements stand on their own technical merits.

      Hopefully somebody who's looking for a Debian Administrator would get in touch despite my piercings/tattoos/etc. If not no loss.

      We've just saved me and them some time on each side.

    11. Re:Personality profile? by SlartibartfastJunior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My sister got a major internship this past summer. After a few days, her new boss mentioned something about "What's this about how you can balance a stack of twelve books on your head and gargle entire scenes from "The Phantom of the Opera?""

      Of course these had never been mentioned, but her boss had googled her name and found her college dorm website with a picture of her balancing a textbook, pizza box, bottle of laundry detergent, a bottle of soda, and a board game on her head all at the same time, along with the program from a dorm open mic night (where she did, indeed, gargle a scene from "The Phantom of the Opera." Luckily, her boss thought this was cool, instead of scary - but it could have gone the other way.

  2. My Fortress of Solitude by 10101001011 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of Ice, Snow and the Eskimo (Inuit) is finally succumbing to being invaded by Americans (for flu vaccine, for our natural resources, and now for our privacy). Oh great, we get to become the 52nd State!

    (Iraq is 51st ;) )

    1. Re:My Fortress of Solitude by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh great, we get to become the 52nd State!

      Imagine another blue state with the population of California. I doubt that the present administration would want that.

  3. Recourse by Savant-Ben · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People may be shouting about it, but what international laws prevent this? Espionage? Isn't that for state bodies though.

    1. Re:Recourse by 10101001011 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It isn't necessarily INTERNATIONAL laws that prevent this, rather it is national laws that keep tabs on it. In Canada in any case we have the Privacy Act which basically means people cannot keep your personal information without your consent. Granted, I am doubtful there is a clause that says:

      All font point sizes must exceed size -1...

  4. Outsourcing Privacy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It is now venturing into other countries including Canada and India. Abika is already facing protests from Canadian Privacy groups for breaching the Canadian Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act"

    So in other words. Privacy (getting around) is being outsourced.

    Welcome to the Brave New World. Hope everyone brought an antacid?

    1. Re:Outsourcing Privacy. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who cares. Our credit card companies have more information about us than you can imagine.

    2. Re:Outsourcing Privacy. by 10101001011 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have no:
      Driver's License
      Credit Card
      Valid Bank Account

      The ONLY two sources that have any sizable information on me are the government due to birth records and social insurance number (which I might add cannot be easily linked to my current address).

      Face it, I have no need to worry about my privacy; my life on the other hand, could use some serious pyschiatric evaluation.

    3. Re:Outsourcing Privacy. by dotwaffle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh how I love our Data Protection Act in the UK ;) It is illegal for any personal information to be shared between companies (and even divisions of government) without a good reason, that has been ok'd by the subject first - that's right, the Police are not allowed to get your Health records unless it's either a criminal investigation or they have your permission - they can't look "just in case", and neither can anyone else...

  5. This was bound to happen by Large+Bogon+Collider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since they are not a Canadian enitiy, they are not bound by Canadian laws. As such, they are not accountable to any but likely much less strict Indian laws. So how does one deal with this? Either 1) Make whomever uses the service (in Canada) be liable, 2) enact international laws via UN or such, or 3) stick head in ground and hope problems go away. This is another problem that comes with being a global community.

    1. Re:This was bound to happen by 10101001011 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am not sure I understand what you are saying; the Canadian Privacy Act forces ALL corporate entities to destroy any personal data, regardless of where your main office is. If they intend to merely profile Canadians for their business venture, then they would be liable to any laws that are imposed on people conducting business in Canada that are from outside the country.

    2. Re:This was bound to happen by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      yes, but how would canada enforce this law if they never set foot in Canada. extridition? I don't think that would sit well with other governments.

    3. Re:This was bound to happen by normandr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This person does not have privileged access to information about me. He is just collecting what is out there. This is just a snow storm in a teapot. You can sue if you are being defamed.

    4. Re:This was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you a a lawyer? I'm not. But I am a Canadian law student. So I probably know more about the law, particularly Canadian law, than 99% of the posters on this board. Which isn't saying much, I admit.

      That said, with respect, you're very wrong.

      As a matter of law, you can always bring a claim against a foreign defendant in your own jurisdiction. The threshold issue will be whether your jurisdiction is the appropriate venue to pursue the claim.

      Incidentally, I don't think the problem is so much PIPEDA as defamation. If someone publishes inaccurate and defamatory information about me, I can sue their pants off, whether I'm in Canada or the US. But I'd probably want to do it in Canada, since US libel laws are pretty defendant-friendly.

      If you succeed, however, you'd have to enforce the judgment in the defendant's jurisdiction, which could be problematic.

      Incidentally, although the Times of India is profiling this fellow, the company is based in Wyoming (or so claims their WHOIS record). One would go after the corporate person, I would think, so at the very least, people can sue the corp under Wyoming/US law.

      If, for any reason, you think I'm full of it, then note that Americans regularly sue Canadians in American courts. Right now there's a great case about a junkyard owner in Virginia suing CIBC (one of Canada's largest banks) in negligence for mistakenly sending faxes containing the bank's customers' information to his business.

      However, IANAL. None of the foregoing is legal advice.

    5. Re:This was bound to happen by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The issue isn't principle - it is practicality.

      Suppose somebody from Sealand travels to Canada and kills somebody. Then they fly back to Sealand before the crime is discovered.

      Clearly the broke Canadian law. However, the fact is that the Canadians can't do anything about it except invade Sealand, impose sanctions of some sort on the entire country, or hope the guy flys back to Canada so that they can arrest him at Immigration.

      The company in question gets lots of money from Canadians, but probably never steps foot in Canada, or has assets of any kind there. If they aren't violating Indian laws then the Indian govermnent will probably not extradite them. That is, unless the rest of the civilized world imposes sanctions until they adopt privacy laws. Probably won't happen - too much money to be made there...

      Many people break foreign laws all the time - perhaps by not praying daily to the local dictator, or whatever. As long as you never set foot in those countries, there isn't much they can do about it. This is usually a good thing, but sometimes a bad thing. Then again, the average Indian probably could care less about Canadian privacy laws - they're just happy for the extra jobs...

    6. Re:This was bound to happen by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the principle is that unless there is a good reason not to allow it, everybody should be able to petition their courts when they are treated unjustly. After all, their local courts are the ones which they would tend to trust to judge their case fairly (since they comply with local views of right and wrong and civil rights).

      When a sensitive issue of diplomacy is involved, the local state department or equivalent may file briefs with the court to address these issues as well. Once a judgement is made, the foreign government can choose whether or not to obey it, and the local executive branch can decide whether or not to seek to force the foreign goverment to obey it.

      For countries with similar principles of justice and civil rights this probably works out fine most of the time. It tends to work out less well when one country is a democracy and the other is a dictatorship, or something like that. Unless the democracy wants to go to war or impose heavy sanctions (which only work so well, and may lead to war), things are pretty much in the hands of the dictator.

      Note that one of the big areas of controversy surounding the International Criminal Court is the concept that individual countries would give up their power to veto a judgement of this court. In the USA, for instance, supreme court justices are appointed by a US-elected president and confirmed by a US-elected senate. An ICC justice would have a much more murky selection process, and the US would certainly have fairly little influence over their selection. To a US sentator asked to ratify the necessary treaties, the question is "why appoint somebody we have no control over to have power over US citizens, when the international court gives us no benefit we don't already have?" (The ICC doesn't benefit the US much, since if Osama Bin Laden were found the US wouldn't be calling for a warrant by the ICC, they would simply transport him to America to stand justice there. It isn't like anybody is going to refuse to extradite him.)

    7. Re:This was bound to happen by tonyr60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Clearly the broke Canadian law. However, the fact is that the Canadians can't do anything about it except invade Sealand, impose sanctions of some sort on the entire country, or hope the guy flys back to Canada so that they can arrest him at Immigration."

      You forgot extradition. So Canada does not have an extradition treaty with Sealand, then just wait until the alledged criminal travels to a country with an extradition treaty with Canada.

      Extradition does work fairly well for capital crimes, as long as solid evidence is involved. Privacy cases, which may involve civil law, may be another matter though.

  6. Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually remember that the CBC did a piece on this topic. Here's the video.

  7. he just doesn't get it by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Patel though sees it differently. The root cause of insecurity and intolerance in this world, he argues, is that we know so little about each other. If everyone knew everything about everyone else, or at least had access to such information, there would be less problems. Besides, why try and hide things, when it is becoming harder and harder to do so?

    Perhaps the reason why we know so little about each other is that people feel the need to sneak around and dig up dirt on others and then use that information against them? If you truly wanted to know more about someone, then open your mouth and ask that someone.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:he just doesn't get it by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you truly wanted to know more about someone, then open your mouth and ask that someone.
      Heheh. I speak as an Indian of course, but I believe this is more a cultural thing than anything else; somehow, as the Brit-born Indian author Ruskin Bond puts it, being nosey is a sign of friendship among Indians. You can immediately notice it if you, say, enter an intra-city bus in India; you get scanned from head to toe by everyone around. Most international travellers get spooked by that, but really, curiousity is, apparently, a sign of friendship.

      Of course, intra-bus cultural nuances get complicated once you extrapolate them to the Internet and get professional about all this snooping.

  8. how much longer by wcitechnologies · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How much longer will it be until we have a worldwide "people" database? How long until it has 6.x billion entries?

    I hate to be the one running around with a tin foil hat here, but I don't like this idea one bit. Although some see huge privacy implications in this, my personal reasons are more religious.

    How long until each entry has an X, Y, and Z associated with it?

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
  9. not bound by laws? eh? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Other comments have said basically that anyone whose company's not based in country X doesn't have to abide by the laws of country X when acting within the borders of country X. Granted, aerial photos is a bit of a grey area, but within the concept that in order to take a picture of Canada to that resolution, you'd pretty much be intentionally invading Canadian airspace, at least in principle, then it's pretty much like jaywalking in Germany but saying that since you're American, you don't have to abide by German laws.

    --
    stuff |
  10. This guy hates privacy by Ironsides · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If everyone knew everything about everyone else, or at least had access to such information, there would be less problems.

    Name one that would be solved this way.

    Besides, why try and hide things, when it is becoming harder and harder to do so?

    Because I don't wan't everyone knowing a lot about me. I like people not knowing stuff about me. Particularly things like my income (why should anyone care buy me and the IRS), ex-wives, speeding tickets, where I live when I don't know them, who I talk to and a whole host of other things. If I choose to tell someone or post something on the internet that is fine by me. But I don't want them finding out info any other way.

    At least when I submit to a government background check I have to give them permision first.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:This guy hates privacy by dema · · Score: 2, Funny

      Name one that would be solved this way.

      Females.

  11. Different Juristictions by Jumbo+Jimbo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A lot of the discussion, yet again, centres around which country's laws apply.

    Lawson believes Canadian privacy law should apply to Abika since it is selling Canadians' information about themselves, but there are hurdles because the firm is based in the United States.

    In the UK we have strong data protection laws as well. However, many companies that take our data make us waive the right by saying that we are aware that the data may be moved outside the UK (Bank call centres in India?) and our rights do not apply.

    I guess that these may not have been tested yet and may be like click-through EULA that may not always stand up, but our privacy is being gradualy eroded away to whichever country has the weakest privacy laws.

  12. Expectation of Privacy, Revisited the 1000th Time by Onimaru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay, so let me get this straight. A company is searching through and compiling publicly available information, and then making some TheSpark-style random conjectures based on these data?

    Where is the expectation of privacy here? Do I have a (reasonable) expectation that data about me on the internet are private? Even my grandmother can tell you that that's ridiculous. This is the cyberspace equivalent of looking through my garbage, not breaking into my house. I hope this action falls on its face, because people providing information aggregation of all kinds are a very valuable, growing part of the coolness the internet has to offer and I want to encourage them in any way possible, even if it does mean that someone might know I bought a USB Christmas tree off ThinkGeek.

    Two qualifications, though:

    1. I hope this site also logs visits to...this site. It would be neat to know if my prospective employer is vetting prospective employees without telling them. That would speak to their trustworthiness, I would think.
    2. I also hope that the fact that their "psychological profiles" are basically for-fun-only personality tests is stated plainly. This is one place where legal weasel-words would make me very happy. This goes under the generic heading of "You can be as stupid as you want, but please don't make other people stupid, too."
    --
    adam b.
  13. will it be run on mysql? by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    select * from people where id=666;

  14. you don't get it by tuxette · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The problem is putting this bit and that bit of information about you in a profile and making an assumption about your personality and behavior based on this profile. Keep in mind that these bits of information are more often than not collected non-contextually. And more often than not, using this information against you.

    For example, borrowing a good example used here earlier, if you are a big Grateful Dead fan who goes to all their concerts and runs a website dedicated to them, you are a pot smoker.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:you don't get it by bloodredsun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But would you want to work for a company that was this stupid. Or a manager that relies on crude psychological evaluation from an unreliable and non-contextual source to excuse the fact that he can't find his arse with both hands and a map.

  15. Wow by Jakhel · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Comprehensive Background Checks, typically return Subject's Name, Aliases, AKA's Age Month & year of birth Date and Location where SSN issued. Others associated with SSN 22 year address/phone history B&W Satellite Photo of current location Nationwide Bankruptcy Search - Nationwide Judgments, Liens Search Nationwide Real Property Search Property Assessments Others listed at subjects address Possible Associates Relatives summary, names & phone numbers Voter Registrations Records Current Neighbors, Names, addresses, phones Court cases involving subject FAA registrations Drug Enforcement Agency Search FAA Airmen, FAA Aircraft Social Security Death Index Professional Licenses Internet Domain Ownership Corporate affiliations UCC filings (Business Loans) Aircraft Ownership Vessels Ownership Motor Vehicles, Motorcycles, Boats Ownership (FL, ME, MN, MS, MP, NE, NC, OH, TX, WI) Drivers License Info (FL, ID, MN, MO, OH, TX, WI) Concealed Weapons Permit (AR, FL, IN, LA, ME, ND, VA) Hunting & Fishing Permits (AK, AL, AR, CT, DE, FL, GA, IL, MA, MS, MO, MT, ND, NV, NJ, NC, OH, OK, UT, VA, WI)


    It looks like IT hasn't been the only victim of offshoring. Who would have thought that BIG BROTHER would be outsourced to India too..and you can have all that information AND a psychological profile based on past actions for $140. It's like a credit report of your ENTIRE LIFE. I'm almost tempted to get one just to see why I get hired/turned down for the jobs I apply to.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. During a television interview... by DougDew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that was aired recently, the founder of Abika claimed that privacy is stupid and that he doesn't believe in it. In short, he declared his hostility to the very notion of privacy.

    Perhaps it would be possible to publish some of his family's private information on the web to test his conviction that privacy is stupid. Perhaps this could be done in the same way that folks published some facts from Poindexter's private life as a response to the Total Information Awareness initiative.

    Also, Abika's business model depends upon privacy. In other words, in the upper right hand side of http://www.abika.com, there is a "private, confidential, guaranteed" logo, which makes sense as Abika's services would be far less attractive to customers without such a guarantee. If Jay Patel really believes that privacy is stupid, then I challenge him to publish on his website the results of all background checks. More importantly, I challenge Jay Patel to inform the targets of background checks when checks are being performed and also of the identity of the requesters of the checks. After all, the major credit reporting agencies such as TRW are now being forced to report such information to the targets of credit checks, so why should Abika be permitted to operate any differently?

  18. Some of their other services include.. by Jakhel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Basic Background Search (Public Records) (USA) $9.98

    General Background Check (USA) $49.98

    Comprehensive Background Check (USA) $69.98

    Background Check including Psychological Profile (Includes Behavior History and more) (USA) $139.98

    Background Search with Nationwide Criminal Record Search $99.98

    Background Search with Statewide Criminal Record Search $79.98

    Find / Locate this Person (Public records search only) $29.98

    Verify Employment (each) $24.98

    Verify Income $39.95

    Property Search $24.98

    Civil Court Records Search (each Court) $29.98

    State Criminal Records Search (First Name, Last Name, DOB required) $39.98

    County Criminal Records Search (each County) $29.98

    Copies of Court Documents for criminal and civil court records $39.98

    Police Reports, Accident Reports Search by County, City or License Plate Number $69.98

    Search History of Employment (Public Records) (Searches Public Records and Work Databases) $49.98

    Current Employment Search $149.98

    Search / Verify Education & College Degrees $59.98

    Find email or IM from physical address $49.95

    Find Cell Phone Number, Address & Name from SSN $169.98

    Search Date of Birth of this person $14.98

    Search Possible Girlfriends/Boyfriends/Spouses/Roommates $99.95

    Search Social Security Number $139.98

    Search Utility Records (Trace person by searching Electric or Gas utility accounts) $79.98

    Find Relatives (Through Public Records) $49.98

    Search Family Tree Returns info on Ancestors $139.98

    Physical Address from P.O.Box & Name $89.98

    USA Nationwide Criminal Records Search (First Name, Last Name, DOB required) $59.98

    Unconventional Behavior Search $89.98

    Background Check for Canada (Please click on above link for info on this search) $119.98

    Sex Offender Search (each state) $17.98

    International Background Check (Each Country, Please click on above link for info on this search) $139.98

    Medical Records $89.98

    Statewide Marriage Records Search (CA, CO, KY, TX, ME, NV, FL) $24.98

    Statewide Divorce Records Search $179.98

    Statewide Marriage Records Search (Any other state except CA, CO, KY, TX, ME, NV, FL) $179.96

    Find Person by their First Name & Age $39.98

    Find Person by their Maiden Name $49.98

    Sexual Orientation Search (Name, Address, DOB required) $49.98

    Cheating Search (Relationships) (Name, Address, DOB required) $89.98

    Verify Name, DOB from Picture (Checks if Name & DOB belongs to the person in the picture) $89.98

    28 Hour Rush Delivery $39.95

  19. and another thing... by tuxette · · Score: 4, Insightful
    He noted her name tag, came home, and using his knowledge of databases and search techniques, riffled through the Internet looking up information on her. He went back a few days later and surprised Angela with details about her life. He also told her how he had found out. Three weeks later, in a story that could make a script for a date-movie, they were married.

    What was it he dug up on her that made her marry a sneaky bastard like him in three short weeks? And how desperately did he need his Green Card? Or is that "none of our business?"

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  20. Globalization and communications by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More and more the technology for communications are breaking down barriers both physical and national. And it's precisely a "national game" that I see service providers like this playing more and more effectively. Previously it was just a megacorp that could set up operations in a foreign country, but with services become virtualized and products becoming not much more than information, even small fries can use their national benefits to provide what can't be gotten locally.

    What'll come next? Probably nations realizing that they're losing control that they thought they once had, and finally coming together. To globalize and equalize citizenship? Goodness, no ... to control all this potential with WIPO-like legislation and freedom-sapping rules.

  21. Permanent record by Jakhel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Forget google, what about all those times in elementary, middle, and high school when teachers told us that "this will go on your permanent record"? I guess they really WEREN'T bullshitting us after all. :(

    1. Re:Permanent record by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a student in a school. 'Permanent' means 'Until the network goes down again', or about 32 minutes ;-)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  22. Data Rape by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just data rape, pure and simple. This company is gathering vasts amounts of your personal, public and private dealings over several years and then peddling that information to souless private companies.

    This is wrong pure and simple.

    I don't question someone's right to have access to "specific" data about me. i.e my GP needs to know my blood type, the taxman needs to know my income, the pizza delivery boys needs to know my address. But the wholesale collection and amalgamation of every possible facet of my life by people who have no business knowing anything about me, disgusts me to my very core. No doubt Mr Patel wets himself over the prospect of getting access to embedded RFID telemetry as well.

    Stalking is a crime. When stalkers are caught with pictures, diaries and details of people's whereabouts and dealings, this is usually used against them in a court case. why shouldn't the same apply to Mt Patel and his kind?

    This behaviour is inexcusable. Noone needs to know this much about anyone else and those that do should be prosecuted. Persons and Companies should have the minimum amount of data possible on any one person. Data is on a need to know basis, and they don't need to know.

    Of course, these dirty data raping fiends will argue on grounds of civil liberty(which they threaten), free speech(which they help to chill) and of course they play the happy smiley, "Our motives are purely innocent, you have nothing to fear" PR card, that will fool so many people.(That whole three week marraige story is probobly just a PR stunt) .They'll also bitch about how we have no right to privacy(while keeping their own records out of the public eye).

    Well guess what. I have a right to dignity. And if some private company starts selling off every minutes detail about me, every action I have ever done, every rumour, everything I've said or been remotely involved in, be it happy, sad, embarrassing, glad, hopeful, disparing or just plain private, to every slobbering data hungry slimeball that comes looking for it, I consider that a pretty big dent in my personal dignity pal! See you in court!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  23. This is only the warm up act by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Consolidating all this information off shore facilities is going to be a real boon to the Chinese and Indian governments. All that juicy data on those fat and stupid Americans. And it won't cost them a penny. They'll simply help themselves to copies. No one in the companies would dare complain or refuse.

    This guy is doing it here, but as the off shore trend increases the information is going to become more available to potentially hostile foreign governments.

    Manage it now or pay the price later. We're already paying the price with companies like this one cropping up. This is nothing less than domestic spying.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  24. Re:not bound by laws? eh? - satellites by bored_lurker · · Score: 2, Informative

    to take a picture of Canada to that resolution, you'd pretty much be intentionally invading Canadian airspace

    Sorry, not right. Since we are talking about satellites here "airspace" does not apply. This from a US Navy law page:

    The upper limit of airspace subject to national jurisdiction has not been authoritatively defined by international law. International practice has established that airspace terminates at some point below the point at which artificial satellites can be placed in orbit without free-falling to earth. Outer space begins at that undefined point. All nations enjoy a freedom of equal access to outer space and none may appropriate it to its national airspace or exclusive use.

    --
    --- Tolerance is the axiomatic "virtue" of those without convictions ---
  25. Identity theft made easy... by Zro+Point+Two · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I havn't seen anyone mention this yet, but this was the first thing I thought of.

    Pay a couple bucks to this company, get complete background on someone, and then take over their life....you now know everything about them and their past, you don't even have to create things. This means that anything you say about your past can be verified as true.

    The other thing that really got me going was this comment...
    "Patel questions the need for restrictions on personal information, saying lack of data about people is what breeds fear and ignorance. "Most people don't care about privacy. It's the media that makes it a big hype.""

    I'm sure that there are LOTS of people that care about privacy...why do you think we have curtains on our windows?

    --
    Zro . two

    "I come from Canada...they say I'm slow....eh?"
  26. that data is available because we sent it there! by wotevah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe they can do this in India because we are sending all our information there for processing in the first place. Once it's there, it doesn't take too much to bribe someone to get those records.

    There should be laws that prevent any company from sending US citizen's private information overseas (with a very broad definition of "private", to prevent abuse). This not only will stop this leak, it will also keep some jobs here (medical transcriptions, marketing and all "data mining" business as it relates to person's activity or credit).

  27. This wouldnt happen if you had a decent DPA... by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Countries that dont have a Data Protection Act like *cough* the USA need to get one, and countries that do need to add a clause to stop any stupid loop-holes. Oh and also kick people like Blunkett out who want to shit all over the DPA for no reason.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:This wouldnt happen if you had a decent DPA... by back_pages · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Countries that dont have a Data Protection Act like *cough* the USA need to get one, and countries that do need to add a clause to stop any stupid loop-holes. Oh and also kick people like Blunkett out who want to shit all over the DPA for no reason.

      WTF are you talking about? It sounds pretty clear to me that there is money in this - industrial/commercial money. It's a service business that could relocate to any location where the laws permit it - taking its tax dollars along for the trip. A democracy should reflect the will of its people.

      Like it or not, the American people spoke loud and clear last election day and told our government that we don't mind be face-fucked as long as somebody else is getting rich. The USA doesn't have a "Data Protection Act" because the people clearly don't want it - just as they don't want their soldiers at home, they don't like the Constitution anymore, and they really don't like fags.

      So seriously, wtf are you talking about? You must be talking about some OTHER country that needs a Data Protection Act - a country that has -citizens-, not -consumers- as voters; A country that lives up to a higher standard of libery and justice. Wake up - these are the Red States of America. You don't want to be a terrorist, do you? Why do you need to protect that data, hm? What library books have you been reading?




      Wish I could say this was tongue in cheek, unfortunately it's far more cynical/realistic than comedic.

  28. Patel sounds like a Class-A citizen. by lysium · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The article mentions that Jay Patel saw his wife-to-be at the mall, went home and researched her on the Internet, and then returned to the mall to recite her personal life back to her. They married three weeks later.

    The guy sounds like a real creep, and now he offers services like "Sexual Orientation Check." Truly disgusting.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  29. A Good Reminder by Saige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In many ways, the article and various /. comments made here are a great reminder of exactly how much personal data some of us even WILLINGLY put out there on the web. It's not that way for everyone, but I'm sure plenty of /. users, for example, have done enough stuff on the net that someone could put together a pretty good profile of the person from a Google search and some simple digging into what's found there, without having to go into anything fancy.

    Heck, I'm just thinking about what I've done, and wonder how much someone could pull up about me from everything I've made available. It's a little strange to think about.

    --
    "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  30. The inside scoop on "Jay Patel" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    (Posting as AC for privacy reasons.)

    1) Jay Patel is an alias for Sanjay Amin. (More on this in a bit)
    2) Sanjay Amin started out a company called Entropy Systems, which offered a perpetual motion machine to paying customers. This was after he defaulted from school loans at the University of Minnesota. (He left the university and the state due to some disagreements with the university about his engine)
    3) Using the millions of dollars he bilked out of various people and organizations primarily in the Youngstown area, Entropy Systems disappeared and became www.abika.com, a site that offered free eBooks. See the Wired article for details about the transition.
    4) After deciding that free eBooks weren't very profitable, Abika.com went through various transformations until it made it to its current state of being a background investigation website.
    5) To avoid connections with his questionable past, Mr. Amin now goes by the name Jay Patel.
    6) Abika.com sells a combination of reports from an astrology CD-ROM that Mr. Amin has, plus actual reports from private investigators that he re-sells (without a license).

    So how about that, Sanjay? How do you like your privacy now?