Slashdot Mirror


Open Letter to Doom Fans from Script Writer

HomeLAN has a reprint of a letter written by Doom movie script writer Dave Callaham. In it he (wittily) attempts to explain why the Doom movie is going to be so unlike the game, and what his role in the creation of the film has been. From his letter: "The screenplay I wrote DOES differ in a number of ways from the games. I want to be very honest and forthcoming in saying that, and I know that I won't make any friends amongst the fans of the game in doing so. But it should be mentioned that it was never the goal of anyone involved in this film, from myself and the producers to the studio to the guys at id, to make a direct film adaptation of the game(s)."

120 comments

  1. All he needs to do is make sure there are by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2

    Demons... and space marines. Tada! We're all happy.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    1. Re:All he needs to do is make sure there are by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They can't make the movie the same, quite frankly Doom III the game already ripped off Aliens the movie directed by James Cameron.

    2. Re:All he needs to do is make sure there are by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      > Demons... and space marines.
      >
      And, if I recall, this film will have neither.

      (Yeah, I should of just modded you as funny, but I don't have any points today. I can send you a free toaster however...)

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  2. Bad? by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    I always thought the plot of the games was supposed to be laughably bad. Shouldn't any real fans not have too much a problem with this?

    --
    Photos.
    1. Re:Bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The plot of doom is basically "marine guy on planet that is taken over by demons fights those demons, wins". Pretty simple. What is there to deviate from? You have a pretty wide field to play with there.

    2. Re:Bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What is there to deviate from, indeed. Let's see.

      marine guy

      Changed to "SWAT team."

      on planet

      Changed to "facility on Earth."

      that is taken over by demons

      Changed to "overrun by zombies."

      fights those demons

      Again, changed to "fights zombies."

      wins.

      Well, this being Hollywood, at least the good guy will probably win. So overall, they've got about 1 out of 4 or 5, depending on how you count. Yes sir, only Hollywood could start with the simplest of plots for Doom and wind up with Resident Evil.

    3. Re:Bad? by nes11 · · Score: 1

      somebody didn't read the whole post.

      & you got modded up for it. nice to know the mods are awake.

    4. Re:Bad? by escher · · Score: 1

      This has just been an off day for me.

    5. Re:Bad? by nes11 · · Score: 1

      lol, we all have those once in awhile.

    6. Re:Bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mercury is in retrograde.

    7. Re:Bad? by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      Change wins to loses and it'd be Resident Evil.

      But since it's wins at the end, it's not! Even though it's full of zombies and SWAT in a sekret facility. Christ, I wish I had some of what Hollywood execs were smoking.

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  3. Summary: by Schezar · · Score: 4, Informative

    He basically says: "Hollywood wouldn't let me make the good Doom movie you want, and forced me to make a crappy movie that they think will sell well enough to make a profit. I'm trying real hard not to sound bitter."

    The movie is called "Doom" solely to raise press awareness of what otherwise would be a non-event. Like "Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest," which had nothing at all to do with "Final Fantasy," but used the name as market leverage.

    (Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest was the second worst game ever, aside from ET)

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:Summary: by Hard_Rock_2 · · Score: 1

      I never though mystic quest was that bad of a game, having owend it and beat it. It was just a simple rpg, nothing horible about it. Waynes World on the other hand........

    2. Re:Summary: by Otter · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm in the minority here but I love Doom for its unrelenting fast-twitch shooting -- not for its preposterous "plot", the only positive aspect of which is that it barely has the slightest impact on the game itself. If I were capable of agonizing over the fine points of Hell on Mars (Hell is now on Mars why?), I'd be a Trekkie instead.

      On the other hand, as long as the movie involves lots of shooting revenants and the fat fireball guys with the double-barrel shotgun I'll consider it.

    3. Re:Summary: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither is E.T. the worst game ever - not by a long shot. There were scores of worse games on the 2600 alone. Most people who parrot that have never actually played the fscking game in the first place.

    4. Re:Summary: by syynnapse · · Score: 1

      you see, they accidentally opened a gate to hell on mars.

      --

      System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

    5. Re:Summary: by mausmalone · · Score: 1
      Well, a more complete summary of the letter is that (a) the remarks quoted in other articles are not his and are provably falsified, (b) he respects Doom fans and has a sense of humor (in his own opinion), (c) the Doom movie will be a thematic match for the Doom series, containing the "themes" and "elements" we know and love.

      Still, though, this does nothing to rebuke the statement that the following items will be missing from Doom, the movie:
      • Mars
      • Space Marines
      • Demons
      • Rift to Hell
      • Gory Violence
      So, basically, he said it will contain "some" elements from Doom, but apparently, not the most essential ones to the series. Maybe we'll get to watch the main character run around in poor lighting picking up PDA's/looking for the blue key for 90 minutes.
      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    6. Re:Summary: by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      (Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest was the second worst game ever, aside from ET)

      You sound like a man who's never played Chubby Cherub.

    7. Re:Summary: by mccoma · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chubby Cherub and Doom in the same thread, only on slashdot.

    8. Re:Summary: by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      I actually liked FF MQ, probably a lot more then I enjoyed 7. Personal differences I suppose:) I loved all the FF pre 7, man those imports ruled.

    9. Re:Summary: by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      About the only other things it could contain are shotguns, chainsaws, and BFG's. Except that it doesn't contain gore so it doesn't have those things.

      So yeah, it'll be some guy running around in the dark looking for the yellow key cinematic scenes of lava pits.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  4. To put it another way... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

    "This movies going to suck and depress the shit out of all Doom fans. Sorry."

  5. Direct Adaptations by HAKdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think fans of the Doom games (myself included) are looking for a "direct adaptation" of the games. However, when you take out Hell, Demons, Mars, and Space Marines, it isn't even Doom anymore.

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    1. Re:Direct Adaptations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG How did you know that? You are like SO SMART

  6. Oblig. Penny-Arcade by RaboKrabekian · · Score: 4, Funny

    As usual, they've commented on it already:

    Penny-Arcade on Doom Movie

    --
    "Moderate drinking can help prevent amputated limbs" -- Abigail Zuger, NYTimes, 12/31/02
  7. Franchise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it should be mentioned that it was never the goal of anyone involved in this film, from myself and the producers to the studio to the guys at id, to make a direct film adaptation of the game(s).

    So...basically it was your plan to mooch off the franchise?

    Nice going, skippy.

    1. Re:Franchise... by GearType2 · · Score: 1

      read the article.

    2. Re:Franchise... by S.+Traaken · · Score: 1

      So...basically it was your plan to mooch off the franchise?

      It seems the popular way to go - SciFi did it with Legend of Earthsea...

  8. Ok.... by GearType2 · · Score: 0

    So I no longer hate the writer at least.... now all I need are letters from the other hundred or so people destroying the Doom name.

  9. Say huh? by sc0ttyb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without all the things that makes DOOM what it is then all you really have is Resident Evil. Think about it:

    - virally-altered humans (i.e. zombies)
    - not on Mars or its moons
    - no hell demons
    - SWAT team

    If that's not a Resident Evil flick, I don't know what is.

    --
    "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
    1. Re:Say huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet that was their intent, it sounds like they wanted to rip-off RE's story, and just loosely connect it to the Doom series in order to give it more publicity. I highly doubt that they would get anywhere if they called it anything else.

      I guess the original title of "Evil Resident" was too obvious, and "Yet Another Crappy Unoriginal Hollywood Rip-Off Trying To Cash In On Another Movie's Success" was too long.

  10. Assume this is a real letter... by PoderOmega · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...that the themes and elements that you love about Doom are ALL represented strongly in the film...just with some new twists

    Hmmm what themes are we looking at here:
    Monsters
    Violence
    Weapons ...uh... I'm drawing a blank for any original or non-overkilled movie themes here. Just in the last year we've had Dawn of the Dead, AvP, Resident Evil 2....

  11. Worse than Starship Troopers by kherr · · Score: 1

    Starship Troopers is one of the worst adaptations of a movie I can think of. They eliminated the powered armor, a centerpiece of the setting for the book. While the movie managed to not be horrible, it certainly is not related to Heinlein's book in any significant way. The Doom movie sounds like it will be worse.

    1. Re:Worse than Starship Troopers by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers was so bad that scientists are trying to harness the power of Heinlein still spinning in his grave.

      No, satirizing the book doesn't count as a good adaptation. In fact, despite a few action scenes, it was a lousy movie, and it's sad to think it might turn people away from the book, which was one of my all-time favorie reads.

  12. My open letter to the scriptwriter by kc78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank you for letting us know exactly how you plan to bastardize this great game by making it have nothing to do with the game at all. You have told us that we all had expectations of how the film should be made, and even though you've removed them and now it's nothing at all like Doom it will still be a great game. To that, I say thank you. However, do allow me to let you know that I understand your expectations of how I will watch said film by paying 10 dollars at the local theatre. I had orinally planned on doing this, but as my involvement in said movie came along things slowly changed. Allow me to comfort you that even though I shall not be watching this movie the way you planned, you will still love it when I download it for free. Yours truly.

    1. Re:My open letter to the scriptwriter by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      I might have added somewhere:

      Enjoy your movie after it is finished, by yourself, in your room, and have your mother charge you $10 to enter for the viewing, because that will probably be the gross at the box office.

  13. Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Doom is doom. It is marines at a research base on mars being overrun by the legions from hell. This story could be found in the readme.txt in the original Doom. If you bothered.

    Doom 3 expands a bit on it by adding such nicesties as in game story to the mix. It adds a "bad guy" or something.

    Now after years of talk someone is trying to turn the Doom game into a movie. We get a list of staff that belong neither on the A-list or the cult list. It screams direct-to-video.

    Then all we hear is about things they are going to change. I could understand if this guy was a Steven Spielberg but surely he can't be that deluded? You are a nothing given a ready made universe. USE IT. MILK IT. We hear things like cost being bandied about but how expensive is a mars base anyway? Geez this is the age of CGI. Hell you got the sets in Doom3. Rerender and keep the shots very short. This guy is only showing how crap he is by complaing about budget. Exactly how much did the shot in Star Wars cost that firmly set luke on an alien planet? I am not a photographer but what is the cost of a double exposure nowadays? All you need for a mars exterior is a sand desert with a red filter. The BBC can do it for a docu/drama.

    Now he is complaining that the fans are upset because he is taking all the doom out of doom. Note that he doesn't actually refute any of the changes that are rumored.

    Learn something from better movie makers. learn something from every goddamn suckass bad game license movie that came before. You got a very simple frame work in wich you can make one hell of an action movie. All you need to do is have the hero be a marine, set it on mars and the bad guys are demons or possesed humans. The rest of the story is up to you. You can make it an alien or an aliens. You can make it pure horror or comedy. You can add a love interest JUST AS LONG AS IT IS ON MARS, HAS MARINES AND DEMONS.

    What the fuck is this guy problem. I would very much like to know what the people at ID are thinking. Are they paid a huge amount for the license or have they never watched any of the other game license movies. I don't think a new Doom is planned so are they planning to really sink the license once and for all?

    The guy seems to have a George Lucas attitude that the fans will just have to swallow what ever he makes. One problem George Lucas got big before his ego swelled. The current George Lucas has with the new star wars movies not repeated the success. The first three movies are a part of culture. The new ones are not. Just make a proper Doom movie then use your fame to make your virus swat team movie.

    Oh well maybe Half-life will get a proper movie. Oh, they wanted a love interest for Freeman? Never mind.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by nes11 · · Score: 1

      hmmm, there seems to be a common problem here.

      do you know the meaning of the word scriptwriter?

      he's not making the movie, he's not directing it, he's not producing it, he wrote it. period. you're write, he's not Speilberg & he's not Lucas. say it with me slowly, he's a w-r-i-t-e-r.

      geesh, all he's saying is that you're right, the producers and directors are screwing it up, but he had little say in it. he's washing his hands of the matter if you will.

      i remember back in the day when a little thing like vocabulary was taught in school.

    2. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by twosmokes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you read the letter?

      "I am pretty much solely responsible for that, since it was my pitch and my screenplay that got made."

      He never wanted to make a Doom movie. He wanted to make a movie in the Doom universe.

      It's like making a movie called "Marvel Universe" about a housewife's illicit love affair with her pool boy.

      He's keeping the theme of the games minus the demons and minus Mars. So we'll get a Will Smith movie with a BFG thrown in. Good thing they're using the Doom license.

    3. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the same letter that I did?
      From the letter: Instead, we have toyed with some elements of the game, and yes, I am pretty much solely responsible for that, since it was my pitch and my screenplay that got made
      Sounds like he's saying he is responsible for at least some of the changes people are whining about. Sure, maybe not all of them, but he never said it's all the director's fault.

      you're write, he's not Spielberg & he's not Lucas.
      i remember back in the day when a little thing like vocabulary was taught in school.

      Hilarity. I believe they also taught capitalization in school, but apparently you forgot that too.

    4. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by nes11 · · Score: 1

      "you're write, he's not Spielberg & he's not Lucas.
      i remember back in the day when a little thing like vocabulary was taught in school.
      Hilarity. I believe they also taught capitalization in school, but apparently you forgot that too."

      lol, capitalization. spellling is such a minor inconvenience.

    5. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to sympathize with this guy. I believe he is a fan of the games and more so than anyone in Hollywood wanted to see Doom re-envisioned in film format. But I think the guy may have hit a wall. He's a writer, not a director, not a producer, not a studio. I believe that the Doom movie is very low budget because; no one in Hollywood gets the game. No one understands it. So they will not put any real money into the picture. Frankly I don't want to see any sci-fi horror based film with crappy effects, cheap sets and lousy dialogue, unless they are going for Sam Raimi "Evil Dead" style camp. Doom isn't much of a talker so I would expect to be wowed with its visuals. So the guy has this grand vision for Doom the movie, probably at the level of Cameron's Aliens. But the budget is too huge and the studios shoot it down or at least the producers start demanding things get changed in the script and the lone Hollywood screenwriter and his faithful homage to Doom gets changed and the guy is forced to make concessions.

      Frankly, if Star Wars circa 1977 had to be made again today, it would cost 5 times as much to produce. Lucas' early team of artists, modelers, costume designers and special effects wizards probably were a lot cheaper in the days before the Blockbuster movie concept. That is why everyone is using CGI because it is fundamentally cheaper to produce than molding and sculpting real-life models.

      Hollywood also likes to "test" the waters before adding real money to a picture/franchise. If the first film does really well then they will make a sequel with more or less the same plot as the first film, but with a lot more money.

      I think the blame goes to id software, not the screenwriter. It is their IP. If the screenwriter is given the budget he wants to make Doom, what can he do? Quit? Resign? Have you ever heard of a screenwriter walking away from a motion picture because the film's budget isn't big enough for the material? If I were a screenwriter, my first priority is to get work, be damned the film's budget. It is really up to id software to determine if the film is serving their IP properly. They might not even care. I don't expect id software to know how to make movies or even deal with Hollywood executives. Most Game to film adaptations are failures anyways, id might be thinking, let's just take the money and run.

    6. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id will release the expansion which will pave the way for the movie, save the day and the movie? be the heroes again? this whole deal a huge pr/brainstorming for free move?

    7. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I could understand if this guy was a Steven Spielberg but surely he can't be that deluded?

      Ya but if Stephen Spielberg directed, he'd probably keep replacing the guns with a flashlight and distort id's original vision. Oh wait...

      Really though, if I remember correctly, a significant part of Doom 2 took place on Earth. Considering that the budget might not allow for a Mars base without looking rediculously cheesy, a movie set on Earth would still be true to the original source even if it's not as cool. I haven't been following this movie though and it's not clear where it's being set, so whatever, I'm probably wrong.

      Anyways, I think it's obvious what happened here. Resident Evil: Apocalypse just made a decent amount of money on a tiny budget and now some studio execs are trying to me-too themselves into the same situation. Consequentially, they're trying to reduce their investment risk by making it as close to RE as possible since that property has already shown success. You see it all the time in movies, like when they release a bunch of natural disaster movies within months of eachother. To these people, the Doom property isn't a story or a setting, it's a brand. They're hoping to make a quick buck on name recognition as Doom is a pretty famous gaming franchise. I'm guessing that any interest in actually keeping the Doom universe intact is peripheral at best and only exists to keep from alienating casual gamers.

      Similarly, biological weapons and desease are in the news right now whereas demons erupting from Hell are not. If you're funding a movie that seems pretty shitty to begin with, it would probably be in your best interest to choose an antagonist that most represents your audience's fears even if that manifestation is pretty rediculous.
    8. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by Sebadude · · Score: 1

      I would just like to point out that George Lucas already had a giant ego before he got big. In fact, it most definately played a very large part in how he got "big".

      Let's not confuse "having balls" and "being a dick". Dave Callaham has balls. He had an idea, and he sold it. If the studios are being dicks for tearing it appart and disappointing you in the process, it's not his problem.

      He still has the balls to stand up for himself and tell you what's what. But obviously, you and many others still feel compelled to be dicks about it...

      --
      Eh.
    9. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      He's not washing his hands of the matter. If he was washing his hands of the whole project, his name would not be attached to it. He wouldn't be pulling a paycheck from the bastardization of the Doom franchise, and worse than that, his original script.

      He's still attached to it, though, so he's just as responsible. By accepting that paycheck, he's basically going 'yeah, it's horrible they are doing this, but they are paying me a shitload of money. Oh well, how horrible of those evil hollywood.. oo, my check is here!'

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
    10. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      "We hear things like cost being bandied about but how expensive is a mars base anyway? Geez this is the age of CGI."

      Seriously. Why don't they use a simple blue/green screen? 5-6 weeks into my (one day a week) TV Production I class we learned how to do blue screen effects, and it's nothing new in Hollywood.
      All they need to do is build a nice interior of the Mars base set, which I assume they're doing with the Earth base, and just put a blue sheet around all of the windows. In post-production you can add a cheap GIF, JPG or even PNG of "Mars Landscape" all you want. Or why not use the Mars rover images? There is virtually no budget difference, this guy's just trying to find some excuse for why the studio won't let him. Heck, it's probably even cheaper, because virtually all of the shots could be done on the same set, with maybe a few all bluescreen effects if they decide to venture outside!

      If everyone chipped in $.01, they'd have enough for 40 bluescreens, and 50 teams of CGI artists. C'mon...Get your act together.

    11. Re:Oh boy. This guy is a scriptwriter? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Ya but if Stephen Spielberg directed, he'd probably keep replacing the guns with a flashlight

      I, for one, was looking forward to the seeing the Big Fine Walkie-Talkie 9000 in action.

      Not to mention the double-antenna walkie-talkie and the walkie-talkie launcher.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  14. pfffff... by powerloop · · Score: 1

    so why make a movie with this name then? Why not some generic name. Doom and Movie constitutes a specific expectation attitude. It builds upon the knowledge of what the game is like. No more words. My left shoe is similar to my right shoe, but its not the same, doesnt matter how many letters I write to my feet, it will not change. Everything else is just a means of trying to "sell" it now the way it is or put on the perceived audience a manipulative view of the subject matter. have a nice day

  15. Nothing new from Hollywood here... by jo42 · · Score: 2

    The "I, Robot" movie had very little to do with the book either. Yet more proof that Hollywood is creatively stagnant. Blade Trinity is a stinker as is Oceans 12. Bleh.

    1. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Hero was quite good (although foreign), and I really enjoyed The Incredibles. I liked De-Lovely, and will try to catch the Aviator this weekend. I've heard good things about both Ray and Finding Neverland.
      The point is there has been a ton of crap this year (as every year) but there have also been plenty of excellent movies released this year if you look beyond the some of the popcorn flicks. I'd hope that anyone who cares a whit about creativity would not hold a sequel to a remake of what was originally just a movie for some cool cats to hang together and make a little coin in the process.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      They actually admit that "I, Robot" the movie had little to do with the movie. Usually, movies will say "based upon," but "I, Robot" is "suggested" by the short story collection of Asimov. What the hell does suggested mean? Is it like an inspiration, but just not as good an idea?

      I'll agree with you on Blade Trinity. I mean come on. A vampire Pomeranian and Triple H gets beaten up by Van Wilder. Whatever.

    3. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Geez, I missed Ocean's 1 to 11?

    4. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      "I, Robot" did take a lot of liberties. But, it kept the core idea that the original books were trying to get across. The three laws can work perfectly and still produce an undesired effect. Morality cannot be simplified to such a degree.

    5. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      I think the problem is that this "adaptation" is particularly egregious, even by Hollywood standards. Sure, maybe "I, Robot" had little to do with the book.

      But at least it had robots.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    6. Re:Nothing new from Hollywood here... by jlapier · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree - I, Robot wasn't like the short stories exactly, but the filmmakers proved to me that they got the "point" of the three laws - they just modernized things and action-ed up the plot a bit, cuz that's what hollywood does.

      As far as doom goes, why even make a movie? it's a ridculous plot that only serves to set up a game where you can use all kinds of cool weapons against hellish beings from a different dimension.

      If they don't have Hell, or demons, or Mars, I at least hope they have exploding barrels. Even on a budget you can make exploding barrels!

  16. Question then... by tandr · · Score: 1

    Then why the heck did you name it Doom ??? Or Holiwood ran out names for the movies ?

    1. Re:Question then... by DeckerEgo · · Score: 1

      DooM was used as the moniker because, like was aforementioned, the title "Resident Evil" was already taken. C'mon, kids love zombies! Sexy zombies! Oh, and instead of Mars it's at the beach! Kids love the beach! And they eat Doritos! And drink Dewars! The Pepsi folks had a few changes, that's all.

      My favorite quote:
      "Finally, to the fan that suggested I get an enema (ostensibly to clean out my head, I think): That was awesome."

  17. Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    it was never the goal of anyone involved in this film... to make a direct film adaptation of the game(s).

    ... because you can't make a film WITHOUT ANY FREAKING LIGHTING!

    1. Re:Obviously... by powerloop · · Score: 1

      "[...| direct film adaptation of the game(s)." as in first person perspectitive?

      No problems with this, but without all the elements that make up the narrative or are part of it like hell and demons and the subjective quality of what Doom used to release emotionally or otherwise, there really is nothing left of the original but the name.

      In your quote he speaks about "game(S)". Doom x3 do not share lighting issue.

      One could at least have tried to write an adequate representation of this game that defined so many other games.

  18. Boohoo by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Have you read the same letter as me? He claims that hollywood wouldn't allow him to make his "original" "unapologetic and hyper-violent" doom movie that we were all supposed to be love as a true doom movie.

    Ehm? Wha?

    So what is so "risky" about mars or marines? I can see demons upsetting some right wingers but they would be upset by anything. Hasn't stopped hollywood dealing with demons before.

    So who exactly is stopping him. Who is funding the movie and why? I don't believe the hollywood wouldn't accept it. It has accepted riskier stuff and what is stopping them from making it outside of hollywood? They are hardly trying to court A-list crew members.

    No I see this as a badly writter rant by a crap writer who thinks he has some skills and trying to defend his ego trip in changing every single story element. As has been pointed out time and time again Doom is very simple.

    As for the violence. I see more death in an epside of CSi and more graphic. Hell they have insde shots of exploding skulls. AND THAT IS ON TV.

    Awh shit. We all knew this was gonna suck. They managed to ruin tomb raider. Even simpler story. Big tits, jiggle.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Boohoo by nes11 · · Score: 1

      you just really have no clue do you?

      he wrote the script. period. he's not funding it, he's not directing it, he's not producing it, he wrote it. that's it. he's not going to go "make it outside of hollywood" cause he's not trying to make it inside. in case you still don't get it....HE'S NOT MAKING IT. he's just a writer.

      he never said that he wanted to make a movie that "were all supposed to be love as a true doom movie." he said he the script he wrote was the true doom movie in his mind. he even repeatedly said that each of our ideas probably differed greately from his, and the facts are that the visions of the people in charge differed even more.

      did you even read the whole thing? I know there were alot of big words.

      next time, before you annoy the rest of us with your illogical ranting, try getting a clue.

    2. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that his vision of a Doom movie has almost nothing to do with Doom. So why is he writing a Doom movie? Did he even play the games? Could it be that he is just a third rate hack writer with delusions of grandeur? Probably.

    3. Re:Boohoo by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      At least in the tomb raider movie they included the essential elements: big boobs, dual weilding pistols, raiding tombs. I dare say it may be a much better movie.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    4. Re:Boohoo by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      He really wanted to write the Resident Evil movie, but they wouldn't take his script because the good guys win at the end...

      1. Write Shitty Resident Evil Script

      2. Change all 'Resident Evil' refs to 'Doom' refs.

      3. Sell to Hollywood

      4. Hide from pissed off fanbase

      5. ???

      6. Profit!!!

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  19. Not plot, SETTING. Big difference by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    If you don't know the doom setting I must express my sympaties with your relatives for you are braindead. Just in case you are one of the living dead however it is this. Marines on a mars research base overrun by demons from hell and humans possesed.

    So there is indeed no plot to ruin. Doom3 has a plot but not the original 2 games. Basically it is shooting and at the end you shoot an awfull lot and close the gate.

    So plenty of freedom to make almost any movie you want. Just as long as you set it on mars, add some marines and some tasty demons.

    It is like making a movie called titanic and setting it in tibet. A movie called D-day and setting in an office in houston.

    People have made plenty of movies around d-day from action to war drama to love story. None of them replaced the allies with aliens battling herds of albino cows.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Not plot, SETTING. Big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The original Doom does not take place on Mars.

    2. Re:Not plot, SETTING. Big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up

    3. Re:Not plot, SETTING. Big difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rounding error.

    4. Re:Not plot, SETTING. Big difference by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      Regardless, the setting of Doom is as shitty as the plot. This isn't Shakespeare come on. Who gives a shit.

      --
      Photos.
  20. Doom: The Movie: The Game by EddieBurkett · · Score: 2, Funny

    I look forward to when the game based on Doom: The Movie comes out. It should be fun to play a generic fps where you run around shooting zombies.

    Then again, an fps wouldn't show off the lead actor, so it will probably be a straight platformer.

    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
    1. Re:Doom: The Movie: The Game by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Well, since Doom: The Movie is being made more like Resident Evil. Maybe Doom: The Movie: The Game will be a generic FPS with a Resident Evil control scheme.

    2. Re:Doom: The Movie: The Game by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Then again, an fps wouldn't show off the lead actor, so it will probably be a straight platformer.

      What do you mean? There's probably a picture of the player character (with all of that acting-ability glory!) in the status bar...

  21. Why call it doom then? by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Why call it doom then? From what I've heard about the plot, it just sounds like a sequel to "28 Days Later" maybe they should just call it "Another 28 Days later"??

    When is Hollywood going to give us what we want?? Instead, we once again get a resounding "Fuck you".

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:Why call it doom then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true, and they wonder how we feel so morally sound in downloading, and "pirating" their hard work when they are busy bastardizing our lore and legends. I'm not sure whether to thank them for looking, or smack them for regurgitating their vomit-versions of our geek heritage.

    2. Re:Why call it doom then? by tenaciousj · · Score: 2, Insightful
      When is Hollywood going to give us what we want?? Instead, we once again get a resounding "Fuck you".

      Answer: Never. Because they say "Fuck you" and people still happily go and pay for it.

      Until there is a universial "Fuck you" right back at them, why should they give us what we want?

  22. Thanks for the honesty... and for saving me $12 by FozzieCDN · · Score: 1

    I wish to thank the writer, director and the studio for being so forthcoming regarding what a load of crap this "Doom" franchise movie will be. They have saved me the price of a movie admission (and of course snack food) and the horror of seeing another poorly done Game to Movie release. Congratulations on destroying your product before it ever got off the ground guys, you could write a good "what not to do with a valuable IP" book. Anyone who might have cared or wanted to see this film have written it off.

    1. Re:Thanks for the honesty... and for saving me $12 by Gilesx · · Score: 1

      >> saved me the price of a movie admission (and of course snack food)

      5 x nacho tubs, 3 family size sodas, 5 foot long hotdogs and 2 tubs of mega-sized popcorn swimming in butter?

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    2. Re:Thanks for the honesty... and for saving me $12 by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Seriously. C'mon, if you don't have Mars, demons, marines and a research experiment gone bad opening a gateway to Hell, IT'S NOT DOOM. That they want to change the plot so bad it's retarded - we've already seen movies with similar (and much worse) plots than the original Doom.

      I wanted to see a Doom movie, but i'm getting an average action movie with the Doom name plastered on it. No thanks.

      PS, from the article...

      "(someone out there on doomworld.com sure loved the idea of Howie Long as Doomguy -- which is perfect aesthetically, but let's face it, totally absurd if you want this movie to come out in theatres)"

      Why not? Granted, the guy is not Robert DeNiro, but he could pull an action movie just fine; just check Firestorm, in which he was actually pretty good as an action hero. Bullshit like that shows that they couldn't care less about making it a good movie; they just want a forgetable blockbuster to make some easy money.

  23. Letter to parent by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    Dear euxneks: Fuck you. Love, Hollywood. (sorry I couldnt resist)

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
    1. Re:Letter to parent by sudog · · Score: 1

      Dear AzraelKans,
      Eat shit and die, knobgobbler.
      (sorry I couldn't resist.)

  24. Sure just continue with yout script plan... by AzraelKans · · Score: 1

    Sure, no problem Mr. Callahan just keep up with your plan and do the movie with your little script, and I will keep up with my plan and I wont go to the teather to watch it. I also will warn all my friends and coworkers about your movie being a complete transvesty with no relation but the name to the game and no other intention but to take their money for being gamers. Im pretty sure they will be delighted not to go.

    By the way Mr Callahan, obviously you dont care about fan complaints about your RE 28 days cheap clone. So if no fans are going to be interested in your movie, whos going to pay to see it then? for some reason I cant picture my grandpa and my in laws, standing in line for a movie called "doom" I hope your relatives and friends are up to the task.

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
  25. Be careful what you wish for by Mumpsman · · Score: 0, Troll

    The problem with making a DooM movie is that a real DooM movie could never be made....

    Imagine this: Opening shot, a lone Space Marine steps off his landing craft and makes his way into an abandoned research outpost on Mars.

    Suddenly, from around the corner a flaming, screaming skull flies towards him desperately trying to take bites out of his face. He quickly levels his shotgun and shatters the skull in mid-scream. Distracted, he fails to notice the shambling, rotting corpse slowly advancing on him. At the last second he spins around and tears the clearly human corpse apart with a chainsaw...

    See what I'm getting at here? A DooM movie would be 90 minutes of:

    a) Demons from hell
    b) Zombie headshots
    c) Ultra-violence
    d) Satanism/satanic symbolism
    e) Absolutely no redeeming moral value


    As much as I would love to see a movie like this, there isn't a major studio in the world that would back a project like this, at this time. Did any of you see what happened on November 2nd? Jesusland would be up in arms over a real DooM movie. What you'd see would be like the opposite of The Passion of the Christ - a grass roots movement to not only ban the movie, but all violent video games.

    Personally I want the movie to suck. I hope it tanks, and DooM and the legion of games it has influenced survive this strange fundamentalist movement in America.

    Be careful what you wish for. A real DooM movie which stayed true to game, would ultimately create a backlash which would destroy the very thing we are all so passionate about.

    --
    No battles to the death are recalled. Mumpsman can hit to attack and cause brainsmashing.
    1. Re:Be careful what you wish for by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      See what Im getting at here? A DooM movie would be 90 minutes of:

      a) Demons from hell
      b) Zombie headshots
      c) Ultra-violence
      d) Satanism/satanic symbolism
      e) Absolutely no redeeming moral value


      My god. Where is it showing? Tell me, for the love of god, TELL ME!!!! I need to see it!

    2. Re:Be careful what you wish for by powerloop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with most of your arguments.

      But nobody would really expect a one person movie.
      Maybe a group of scientists who need rescuing? Or how about some H. P. Lovecraftian myth. Maybe the eternal fight between good and evil? Many old concepts and cliches you could incorporate and maybe also some new things.

      Take a look at Soldier, Pitchblack, Predator, Rambo, Octalus, Braindead, Screamers, Tremors, Ghosts Of Mars, The Thing, Bodysnatchers and so on.
      They share common ground in which Doom would fit in.
      Most of them (if not all) are trashy, but this is really only because of the profit calculation made by studios and the resulting stress on budget, plot, cast, set and crew.

      I am thoroughly surprised as how people still seem to react against violence, sex and religion in movies (Exorcist).
      May I ask if the majority thinks that movies need to be controlled/censored?

      I would have paid to see Doom as an interpretation of Dante's Inferno or even a social- and/or political critical movie (Mars Base, Megacorps, Two or more fractions on Mars, maybe even artifacts and an alien civilization a la 2001 and so on). Maybe even a movie completely about religion (Dogma).
      Or an interpretative dialogue (A Boy and His Dog) that (in between the slaughter) "explores the depths" of Mr. Grunt's personality (really). A talented writer could pull that of, maybe.
      Avantgarde? Experimental?

      But yes something like that will never happen (maybe for the best).

      So what remains is to make a movie that will serve as some sort of propaganda? A gadget of political and social manipulation in which Romeros zombies get resurrected to personify the "satanic" nonconformists and nonbelievers, the one, big, evil enemy of society?

      Or will it have an aspect of reflection and be open enough?
      Because Doom is world wide and not everybody thinks or sees things the same.

      The worst case? If it would understand itself as serious work.

      Have a nice day

    3. Re:Be careful what you wish for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But nobody would really expect a one person movie. Maybe a group of scientists who need rescuing?

      Yeah there could be some scientists. They could say something all intelligent and scientist like such as "No! Don't open that cabinet door Doctor Gunderson!" then scream a little and possibly emit a gurgle or death rattle after they are ripped apart by zombies or some sort of huge demonic beast.

    4. Re:Be careful what you wish for by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1
      See what Im getting at here? A DooM movie would be 90 minutes of:

      a) Demons from hell
      b) Zombie headshots
      c) Ultra-violence
      d) Satanism/satanic symbolism
      e) Absolutely no redeeming moral value

      That sounds like it could make for a pretty wicked suspense film to me. Something like Alien but with different visuals and imagery.

      Doom is all about the atmosphere, most of the levels in the older games focused more on approaching enemies than actually fighting them. For example, you'd always hear enemies in other rooms before facing them, most ambushes were obvious from the layout of the room they were set in, and there was almost always something you could do to avoid or knock out a room that was overcrowded with enemies.

      In that vein, I think Doom64, with it's freaky non-musical ambient soundtrack and improved lighting engine, was the best of the sprite-based games. One of the early levels even has a section that mimics the lighting from the carnival scene in Apocalypse Now.
    5. Re:Be careful what you wish for by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Nahh, that's easy to structure. Setup and character development, 15-20 minutes. Action sequence: 10 minutes. Regrouping and character interaction: 15-20 minutes. Massive Action sequence: 45 minutes. Finale and coda: 10 minutes. Hey presto, 95-105 minutes worth of movie. Plenty of time for other characters, teamwork, etc. and lots of time for fragging demons on a run through hell.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    6. Re:Be careful what you wish for by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      with that in mind....


      at least they could put it on Mars, with space marines, uac, and demons from Hell! The only "redeeming" value of a "Doom" movie is that it at least have those things.


      then again, Doom 3 has a great engine...why don't we just devote a section of /. to pounding out a script...we obviously can't do any worse! we can have some map modders create the sets and farm the reners out to the really geeky people with dual opterons and dual SLI'd 6800's... it would at least be "Doom on Doom"

  26. I'll say it again! by Gilesx · · Score: 1

    Just watch John Carpenter's Ghosts of Mars - it was uncannily like Doom.... from the deserted space bases, to the look of the 'possessed' - hell, it was even on Mars!

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:I'll say it again! by space_jake · · Score: 0

      I dont wish that hell upon anyone. Ghosts of Mars was absolutely horrible, but with the way things are going it looks like Doom might take the cake. This Callahan guy is ridiculous he attitude is solely Hollywood liked my script and is paying me tons of money so.....I'm sorry but fans don't pay me to make this movie....

    2. Re:I'll say it again! by ostermei · · Score: 1
      hell, it was even on Mars!
      Exactly!
      --
      "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
  27. It better not be rated PG-13! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this movie comes out rated PG-13 than there is no doubt that it's pure shit! I want massive explsions, massive B00Bies, and massive amounts of bl00d.

    1. Re:It better not be rated PG-13! by __aatgod8309 · · Score: 1

      Massive 'B00Bies'? No, what you want is 'Duke Nukem Whenever: The Movie'

  28. BFG by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    A Doom movie?

    Bio-Force Deal.

    (Hint: this is a reference to the renaming of the BFG...)

  29. Movie isn't Doom, but Doom 1, 2, Final, and 3 are by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 0

    Instead of killing myself or seeing the movie, I think I will just play the Doom games instead, and skip the Holloywood Bull.

  30. uhm? by Pwned · · Score: 0

    Is anyone besides Doom fans going to want to see this movie anyway? With all the "Doom Kills Children" stuff from soccer moms and such I don't think it's going to go through to all that wide of an audience, I mean, most of the people I, uh, "knew" in high schools wouldn't want to see a movie based off of a computer game because it was dorky. The only people who are going to want to see this movie, as far as I can tell is Doom fans, Hollywood should know this, why dissapoint?

    1. Re:uhm? by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      It's a damn good thing I'm not the one writing the script. The urge to put in a line for the space marine like "To think I was always the geek in high school" would be just too hard to resist.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  31. I'm having childhood nightmares.... by zarthrag · · Score: 1

    about the Super Mario Bros Movie, and how it scared me into hating the game.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  32. Elvis by Lepruhkawn · · Score: 1

    I would rather have some sort of tongue-in-cheek movie. Put Bruce Campbell's Elvis from Bubba Ho-Tep in it or something. ("Come and get it, you undead sack of shit.")

    Call me a strange Doom fan, but my taste for giblets and hellspawn does not translate to the silver screen for me.

    --
    Jesus saves....And takes 1/2 damage.
  33. Doom 2's storyline by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Roughly 1/2 to 2/3 of Doom 2 took place on Earth, but Doom 2 makes absolutely no sense without Doom 1. In Doom 1, you find the root of the problem and enter it (episode 1.) Episode 2, you find the experiment gone wrong, you kill the guard at the portal (the cyberdemon) and enter the portal into hell (cue episode 3). You fight through Hell, you kill the 'General/Commander' of the forces of Hell and go through the same portal being used to invade Earth in order to get home. You get home, but find Earth overrun. Cue Doom 2.

    Without all that Doom 2 makes almost no sense. A movie goer with no Doom 1 info would end up asking himself this :

    1. Who is this guy? (Hes a marine who got shipped to Mars for striking his superior officer.)
    2. Where/how did demons get to Earth? (see Doom 1.)
    3. Why is he so badass and everyone else fell to the demons? (Because he's been through hell and back, hes prepared, he has the element of surprise, hes skilled and hes nothing less of a 'veteran' against demons at this point.)
    4. If hes so good, why aren't the other Marines so good (see Doom 1, originally he got left behind so he was more 'shoot now, figure out when they're all dead' and not 'lets figure this thing out peacefully before filling it full of holes.'

    1. Re:Doom 2's storyline by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't D1 being on Mars and D2 being on Earth set things up nicely for a movie and its sequal?

      Doom, the Movie: Bad-ass marine gets in a just dispute with a superior officer, and is exiled on a moon of Mars, where a corporation is performing experiments for the military in (what is rumored) teleportation.

      Of course, bad things happen, and people end up dying, leaving only our hero left. (All of the above happens in the first ten or fifteen minutes of movie length.) Our hero then spends the next half hour to an hour killing the strange aliens that start to appear (heading to the other moon somewhere in the middle of this) until (mid-movie surprise twist) the hero and the audience comes to the revelation that these aren't aliens, they are demonic beings and there is some big demon somewhere in the base controlling all of this.

      Rest of the movie is slaughtering more creatures until the big boss at the end. Roll credits. After the credits, we cut to a scene with our hero, voicing his relief at being able to head back to good ol' earth. Cut to the earth, showing a cute little bunny in a green field. Pan to the site, showing a burning city in the background, burnt forest, bigger and stranger demons, and a rabbit's decapited head on a spike. Fade to black. Text: Doom II: Hell on Earth, in theatres July 2nd, 2006.

      No new monsters, no new creatures. Doom I has plenty of scary creatures to build on.

      Then, the next year, we could have the sequal, Doom II. Our hero, arriving on earth, finds bad things, including the Doom II monsters and the odd elder sign. First part of the movie is brief backstory. Middle of the movie is our hero hunting down and killing the monsters on earth. The mid-movie twist is our hero finding that he has to enter hell itself to end the demonic plague. In the end, cue giant demonic head on wall generating demons, with a big finish. The end.

      DVD Extras: (1) Our hero fighting nazis and pink demons. (2) The last scene from a different angle, showing John Romero controlling the end boss.

      Now that's how you make a few good Doom movies.

    2. Re:Doom 2's storyline by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1

      I think the order that they go in is mostly irrelevant if you twist the plot slightly.

      Make the first one on Earth with a main character that has a slightly different back-story and if it's successful, have him go to Deimos and Phobos with a bigger budget and face real monsters. All you need to know on Earth is that a portal from hell opened, they can slowly unravel that it started on Mars and set up what was Doom 1. If a third one gets made, then send him into hell for the final showdown. Then he can get into his homemade interstellar spaceship and defeat the vorticons.

      By getting closer to hell each time, they can end them with him going into a portal where the audience can assume he died a tragic death if the money isn't there for a sequel.

      Also, there are lots of ways to have a badass main character on Earth without having him go through Hell first, give him some super armour, or genetically enhance him, or have him get broken out of badass marine prison by a demon attack or something. Not only that, but for film, you'd probably want a group of characters anyways so that you can kill off a few and provide potato-head dialogue to explain what's going on. Otherwise, the movie would be pretty confusing.

    3. Re:Doom 2's storyline by MMaestro · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that you leave yourself with a stupid, undeveloped main character like every other marine. If its done the way you set it up (Doom 2 > Doom 1 > Doom 3) then still end up asking yourself questions 1, 3 and 4. On top of that, if a second movie ISN'T made then it turns out just the way people are complaining about here : a no-backstory horror/zombie/monster flick with weak characters and a horrible plot.

  34. Direct Quote by durtbag · · Score: 1
    "This is Hollywood. We wanted to take a viable franchise, bastardize it, and make a fourtune off of the tie-in. At no point were we going to be true to the game or the fans. So fuck you, and give us your money"

    Thats all I hear when I read this.

    --
    itadakimasu
  35. Such A Shame. A Darn Shame. by Two+Scoops · · Score: 2, Funny

    They try to make a movie about Doom, and they completely miss the point. They look at a game for inspiration and there's a perfectly good book. A TRILOGY. Forgotten. Prize-winning literature, forgotten.

    And don't get me started on the comic.

    1. Re:Such A Shame. A Darn Shame. by Pwned · · Score: 0

      I'd pay a Hundred Dollars to watch a big screen adaptation of that comic.

    2. Re:Such A Shame. A Darn Shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... Prize winning liturature? I think you misspelled 'LOTR'.

  36. Read between the lines by edo-01 · · Score: 1
    Your post is great and I agree with you, but you're targeting the wrong person. The writer wrote a screenplay set on Mars, with space marines and demons - but there are people on the production - and he can't name them because he will get in Deep Shit - who are steering the thing towards their "vision" which in most cases with these fuckers is a pastiche of the last ten dumb films they have seen.

    Remember, Giaman and Pratchett's Good Omens screenplay was sunk by insane story notes from an executive producer that essentially changed everything from the book except the title. It happens every time with these adaptation films unless you have someone who gives a shit in a position of power to protect the property, for example Peter Jackson. (LOTR purists take note, I know he changed some things but at least he didn't set the story on a different bloody planet.

    Trust me. Blame the producers/the studio meatwhistles/hell, maybe the director as well - but for this guy to state publicly that he's "disappointed" that his true-to-the-game screenplay has been drastically altered, then behind the scenes he's almost certainly so monstrously fucked off at these pricks he's having trouble seeing straight.

    1. Re:Read between the lines by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      I still think the worst hack wasn't Good Omens, but the horror that I have heard was done to Sandman.

      "Puny Mortal! Bullets cannot hurt me. I am the SANDMAN!"

      Nephilium

  37. Question for John Carmack by edo-01 · · Score: 1
    Obviously we can't expect you to comment on your feelings about these developments, but I'm curious if you guys retained any control or input over the film?

    [I guess there's little chance of an answer, but I thought I'd throw it out there]

  38. What's the problem? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    The movie is supposed to be Doom, right? Well, shouldn't it be spelling Doom then? I can't see it being any more Doomed than this.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  39. Mystic Quest was a very important game by Leninix · · Score: 1

    Mystic Quest was a very important game, and was not THAT bad. Even more important, it was the first game on a very popular series, Sword of mana.

    1. Re:Mystic Quest was a very important game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... No. Mystic Quest was a bad game. Period.

      The first game of the popular series "Sword of Mana" was released on the Game Boy and was called "Seiken Densetsu." For some not-so-obscure reason it was renamed "Final Fantasy Adventure" for the NA market.

      Seiken Densetsu 2 for the SFC was renamed "Secre of Mana" for the SNES and Seiken Densetsu 3 was never realeased outside of Japan (western players were only left with the sorry imitation that is "Secret of Evermore")

    2. Re:Mystic Quest was a very important game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secret of Evermore isnt even remotely like Seiken Densetsu 3.
      At best SOE wants to be like Seiken Densetsu 2.

  40. Open Letter to Whisky Fans from Glenholwood by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Open letter from DoomedWhisky Product Manager Glenholwood distillery:
    Sometime in the last week or so there was quite an uproar over the announcement of our latest DoomedWhisky product.

    The DoomedWhisky produced does differ in a number of ways from our other very popular whiskies. I want to be very honest and forthcoming in saying that, and I know I won't make any friends amongst the fans of whisky in doing so.

    But it should be mentioned that it was never the goal of anyone involved in DoomedWhisky to make it exactly like whisky. Because let's be honest, we were never going to top the other whiskies anyway. Instead we have toyed with some ingredients of the product and yes, I am pretty much solely responsible for that, since it was my idea and my whisky that got made. Let me assure you, though, that the themes and elements that you love about Whisky are ALL represented strongly in DooomedWhisky...just with some new twists - like _real_ lemon juice (twist of lemon included!), and lots of pure spring water (so that we can meet regulations and sell it to kids ). We did away with the casks/barrels and we are using rice instead of barley.

    I don't enjoy watching a bunch of strangers bastardize my whisky any more than you do, but really none of us can do anything about it at this point, so I hope that at least some of you will fret, with me, in the direction of optimism. We all have high expectations, and a lot of them won't be met, but the bottom line is the Whisky is going to be pretty cool.

    --
  41. How it went down at ID: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey guys, you know this weird guy we thought was some telemarketer? Well, he actually called to license Doom 3. But he wasn't calling for the engine. No, this idiot is offering us heaps of money for- get this- the story of Doom 3!"
    "Let's agree, I want something to laugh about!"

  42. They already have a Doom movie... by wickedj · · Score: 1

    And it's called "Ghosts of Mars". A group of Martian archaeologists dig up some alien ruins and set free evil Martian "ghosts" which take over the bodies of humans, even when dead. A group of military commandos/criminals face a enormous numbers of possessed zombie-like creatures and attempt to escape. The only thing lacking is some green armor and big over-the-top plasma based weapons. Oh and demons.